310237_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20221025

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number D_7 T7 - R 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: �outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ///I Region:
Farm Name:Tt A J I I Owner Email:
Owner Name: Chrii C , ?,kndRS Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
�i;2
/ t / l 0- -,
Certified Operator:
C✓Irt-f
G
t ?,6cLj
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
to Finish
to Feeder
rto Finish
v to Wean
v to Feedej
v to Finish
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: td lo��
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer _—
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity POD.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poutts
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify D WR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [—]No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑///No)
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
j'I Ncy
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
.Li=(NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: Date of Inspection: in
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E3'5o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes UXO ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes JPVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental reat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) v /
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZT ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes QAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [� ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes 0,N'9� ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes EXo /❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [ZIo
❑ Yes ET'No
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[—]Yes Q'N/o
❑ Yes I 11V0
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continuer!

Facility Number: , Date of Inspection: to
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? _]Yes �0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
fer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any addi
of facilitv to better explain situations (use additional naaes as
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes E2-TTF ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No J2-NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Bj- o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑J 6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes tL� 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [DXo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ro
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
ons or any other comments.
Phone: q(d , i _ 7 & T/7",
Date: ) O lu`/--01
511212020