310153_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20221004

Facility Number jDivision of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
p Other Agency
for Visit:
Operation Review p Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Co `Y- Q h/a,,,— Owner Email:
Owner Name: �� t D�Ci P Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: Gc sj =tie, 6/ L(P
Certified Operator: Qai-( .61I gn
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Vn teeder
er too FFinish
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Other
Title:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region: W&
Certification Number: 00&6a_
Certification Number: r+
Latitude: 3I�t ,_8A760 Longitude:--V,d7dyl`l
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. j Wet Poultry Capacity
—acittyy —Popes.
Layer I_
Non -Layer
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[-]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: IDate of Inspection: U
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E9. �00 NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �L
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes OZ p ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes � ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes L ]o❑ NA ❑ NE
ff
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q110 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ZLX6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes [Go
NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes [ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes t No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes EZ .Ro
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes L_I 1Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP []Checklists []Design ❑Maps ❑LeaseAgreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes [L—] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes [[J>o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes 1;i4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: 31 -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
E!r<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
p-No-
❑ NA/
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
IZJ>
❑ NE
❑ Yes
EDo o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
EJ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
EPxc
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
EKO
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 940
❑ Yes �14❑ YesNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
CL� -�Uj on 161 &�o r, AL.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: q /U _ oZL Y
Date: lU/
511212020