20160981 Ver 2_Uzzle Monitoring Report_MY4_20160981_V1_DWR_10312022_20221031

ID#* 20160981
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/31/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/31/2022
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
ID#:* 20160981
Existing ID#
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Uzzle - Buffer
County: Johnston
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Uzzle Monitoring 6.52MB
Report _MY4_20160981 _V 1 _D W R_10312022. pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name: * Jamey McEachran
Signature: *
a'Y"

3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
10/31/2022
CREDIT RELEASE REQUEST FORM
To:NCDEQ-DWR Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
From:Jamey McEachran ([e-mail] & 919-623-9889)
Through:Environmental Banc and Exchange-Neuse I, LLC (EBX-Neuse I, LLC)
We formally request a credit release for the Uzzle Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (DWR Project
#20160981 V2)for completion of Task #8: Monitoring Report #4 and financial assurances per the
approved credit release schedule, which is included in the Attachments with this request. The
following documents have been submitted to DWR for Task #8: Monitoring Report #4 and are
pending review:
1)Year 4 Monitoring Report, 2) Credit Release Schedule(PDF fromFinal BPDP), and 3)
Approved Credit Tablefrom As-Built 4) Financial Assurance Continuation Certificate
(#K15480609)
Credits requested for release are detailed below:
Credit Type% Credit Amount Notes/Comments
Release(IncludeUnits)
Buffer Restoration
Buffer Preservation
Buffer Enhancement5%13,441.700
Generated Nitrogen Nutrient Offset
Generated Nitrogen Nutrient Offset
Signature:
Attachments: 1) Approved Project Credit Table 2)Approved Credit Release Schedule 3) Bond
Continuation Certificate (#K15480609); I will send a hard copyand electric copyof the renewal
when received.
Can DWR please include approval within the Credit Release Letter to reduce performance bond
(#K15480609) from $60,000 to $40,000 for the bond renewal for January17,2022 to January17,
2023?

201920192020202020202021201920222024
-
--------
Nitrogen

- - - - - - - - -
Buffer Preservation
54,879.000 54,879.000 26,883.400 26,883.400 13,719.750 13,441.700 26,883.400
Buffer Enhancement
- - - - - - - - -
Buffer Restoration
%
5%5%
20%20%10%10%10%10%10%
Original Credits
Credit Release #

Riparian Buffer Credit
Credit
RiparianCredit Existing Used Per % Full
Mitigation TypeRatioMitigation Assets
ZoneTypeAcreageAcreageAcre Credit
2
(ft)
Riparian
20-30’Enhancement.09.0943,5602:175%1,407.750 ft² (0.03ac)
Buffer
Riparian
0-50'Enhancement12.0812.0843,5602:1100%255,773.500ft² (5.87ac)
Buffer
Riparian
151-200'Enhancement1.581.5843,5602:133%11,652.795ft² (0.27ac)
Buffer
268,834.036ft² (6.172ac)
Total Enhancements13.45
includes ratios & reductions
1.4Riparian EnhancementApproach
Preparation of the Parcel involvedspraying exotic invasive species, contoured ripping, seeding, and
planting. Livestock werecompletely removed from Parcel, in perpetuity by way of conservation easement
and installation of fencing.After construction activities, the subsoil wasscarified,and any compaction was
deep tilled before the topsoil wasplaced back over the site. Any topsoil that wasremoved during
construction wasstockpiled and placed over the site during final soil preparation. This process provides
favorable soil conditions for plant growth. Bare root plantings and live stakes wereplanted according to the
planting plan.
Enhancement occurredin areas of grazingadjacent to the stream in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). Where livestock waspresent, RES installedcattle
exclusion fencing to prohibitaccess to riparian areas and their associated streams. All fencingwasinstalled
to NRCS specifications.
Riparian enhancement adjacent to streams was approved by the DWR in their Buffer Viability letter dated
January 13, 2017.All enhancement activities beganfrom the tops of the stream banks and extended outward
a maximum of 200 feet perpendicular to the stream channel where possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (effective November 1, 2015). It is important to note that areas along all reaches, between the 50-
150-footbuffer width zone, within the project wasused to generate additional stream credit for the Uzzle
Stream Mitigation Bank. Thisarea is solely being used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and
is notbe used for the generation of any other credit.Buffer crediting is generated from the 0-50foot and
151-200-footbuffer width zones, with a small area of credit being generated within the 20-30-footbuffer
zone due to project limitation with a gas lineeasement. Buffer enhancement can only generate buffer
mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.
All riparian enhancement activities commencedin concurrence with the stream mitigation activities and
not before. Restoration activities based on the design approach includedmeandering the proposed channel
within the natural valley, backfilling the existing stream channel, and reconnecting a new channel to its
floodplain. Diffuse flow istobe maintained throughout the mitigated riparian areas.
Uzzle Buffer3Baseline MonitoringReport
MitigationSiteOctober2019

Bank Parcel Development Plan Year 4 Monitoring Report
Uzzle Buffer Mitigation Site
DWR Project # 2016-0981v2
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201

Prepared By:

Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC,
An entity of Resource Environmental Solutions
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-829-9909

October 2022

Table of Contents

1.0 Project Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location and Description ..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Success Criteria ................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Project Components ......................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Riparian Enhancement Approach .................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Construction and As-Built Conditions ............................................................................................. 4
1.6 Year 4 Monitoring Performance ...................................................................................................... 4
2.0 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 4
3.0 Reference ................................................................................................................................................ 5
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species

Appendix C: Visual Assessment Data
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
i

1.0 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
EBX–Neuse I, LLC, an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide this Bank
Parcel Development Monitoring Report for the Uzzle Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank (Parcel). This Parcel
was built to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to development within
the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC –
03020201) (Figure 1). This Parcel is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 and the RES Poplar Creek Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI), made and
entered into by EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality-Division of Water Resources (DWR). The BPDP has also been
constructed in concurrence with Uzzle Stream Mitigation Site in the Neu-Con Stream and Wetland
Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2016-01973). The mitigation plan for the Uzzle Stream Mitigation Bank
was approved by Interagency Review Team (IRT) in February 2019.
The Uzzle Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately six miles southeast of Clayton, North
Carolina. The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03020201100040, a
Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR Subbasin Number 03-04-02. To access the Parcel head West on NC
70 from the Town of Wilson Mills and turn left onto Meta Drive. The Parcel is accessible from the end of
Meta Drive. The coordinates of the site are 35.585186 N, -78.393553 W.

The easement is separated by an agricultural crossing, dividing the site into an upper and lower portion.
The upper portion of the project includes reaches LP1, LP2, LP3, LP4, and LP5. The lower portion of the
project includes reaches LP5, LP6, and LP7. The overall drainage area of the Parcel is approximately 2.05
miles squared. Little Poplar Creek (LP1, LP2, LP4, LP5, and LP7) is a perennial stream channel and the
two unnamed tributaries (LP3 and LP6) have been classified as intermittent and confirmed by DWR staff
Furthermore, it was confirmed, by DWR staff, that all riparian areas adjacent to streams associated with
this proposed bank have active cattle grazing. Stream identifications and buffer viability assessments were
performed by the DWR at the January 13, 2017 site visit.

For purposes of the Uzzle Riparian Buffer Bank, the Parcel involved enhancing riparian buffers and other
riparian areas adjacent to mitigated streams onsite. Of the 27.27 acres protected in the conservation
easement, 13.45 acres are enhanced by the removal of cattle from the streams and riparian areas for Neuse
riparian buffer credit only. The BPDP generates credit within the 20-30 foot range, 0-50 foot and 151-200
foot buffer from the proposed top of bank. Majority of the project streams have a riparian buffer of at least
50 feet, excluding crossings and a portion of LP5 and LP6 due to the parallel gas-line easement. Credit
within the 51-150 foot buffer zone was claimed for additional stream credit in the Uzzle Stream Mitigation
Bank. There is no overlap in the buffer bank credit areas and the buffer for stream credit areas. The stream
credit area is solely used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and is not used for the generation
of any other credit. Also, riparian buffer enhancement credits generated on this Bank Parcel are allowed
pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) but are not used to generate nutrient offset credits.

Uzzle Buffer 1 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2022

1.2 Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring is to occur each year for a minimum of five (5) years and is to be conducted
during the fall season with the first year occurring at least 5 months from initial planting. As part of the
stream mitigation plan 3.6 acres were planted and four monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100
2
min size. These plots cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area for the Stream Mitigation
Bank. All four plots are within the riparian buffer that are measuring success of both the stream mitigation
and the buffer riparian area. Data for the plots is to be provided in the Monitoring reports, as a courtesy to
the DWR. The following data is to be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or
volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots are to be flagged with flagging tape. Photos are to be taken
from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. Visual inspections and
photos are to be taken to ensure that enhancement areas are being maintained and compliant. The measures
of vegetative success for the parcel are based on the Uzzle Stream Mitigation Plan (Action ID #SAW-2016-
01973). Invasive and noxious species are to be monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or
alter the desired community structure of the site.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion areas within the conservation easement is to be performed each
year with all observations provided in the annual monitoring reports, to confirm:
Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
no cattle access within the conservation easement area;
no encroachment has occurred;
diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area; and
there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.

RES is to monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, all plots will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Uzzle Stream
Mitigation Plan.

1.3 Project Components
2
This Bank generates approximately 6.17 acres (268,834.036 ft) of buffer enhancement credits. The
approximately 0.21 acre decrease in creditable area following the as-built was due to the removal of buffer
areas less than 20 feet from the top of bank. The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated service Neuse
buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin, excluding the Fall Lake
Watershed. The Sponsor is to maintain one credit ledger. The one ledger shall account for buffer
enhancement credits. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on this credit ledger. The total potential
mitigation credits that the Uzzle Bank generates are summarized below.

Uzzle Buffer 2 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2022

Table 1. Riparian Buffer Credit
Riparian Buffer Credit
Credit
Riparian Credit Existing Used Per % Full
Mitigation Type Ratio Mitigation Assets
Zone Type Acreage Acreage Acre Credit
2
(ft)
Riparian
20-29’ Enhancement .09 .09 43,560 2:1 75% 1,407.750 ft² (0.03 ac)
Buffer
Riparian
0-50' Enhancement 12.08 12.08 43,560 2:1 100% 255,773.500 ft² (5.87 ac)
Buffer
Riparian
151-200' Enhancement1.58 1.58 43,560 2:1 33% 11,652.795 ft² (0.27 ac)
Buffer
268,834.036 ft² (6.172 ac)
Total Enhancements 13.45
includes ratios & reductions
1.4 Riparian Enhancement Approach
Preparation of the Parcel involved spraying exotic invasive species, contoured ripping, seeding, and
planting. Livestock were completely removed from Parcel, in perpetuity by way of conservation easement
and installation of fencing. After construction activities, the subsoil was scarified, and any compaction was
deep tilled before the topsoil was placed back over the site. Any topsoil that was removed during
construction was stockpiled and placed over the site during final soil preparation. This process provides
favorable soil conditions for plant growth. Bare root plantings and live stakes were planted according to the
planting plan.

Enhancement occurred in areas of grazing adjacent to the stream in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). Where livestock was present, RES installed cattle
exclusion fencing to prohibit access to riparian areas and their associated streams. All fencing was installed
to NRCS specifications.

Riparian enhancement adjacent to streams was approved by the DWR in their Buffer Viability letter dated
January 13, 2017. All enhancement activities began from the tops of the stream banks and extended outward
a maximum of 200 feet perpendicular to the stream channel where possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (effective November 1, 2015). It is important to note that areas along all reaches, between the 50-
150-foot buffer width zone, within the project was used to generate additional stream credit for the Uzzle
Stream Mitigation Bank. This area is solely being used for the generation of stream mitigation credits and
is not be used for the generation of any other credit. Buffer crediting is generated from the 0-50 foot and
151-200-foot buffer width zones, with a small area of credit being generated within the 20-30-foot buffer
zone due to project limitation with a gas line easement. Buffer enhancement can only generate buffer
mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.
All riparian enhancement activities commenced in concurrence with the stream mitigation activities and
not before. Stream restoration activities based on the design approach included meandering the proposed
channel within the natural valley, backfilling the existing stream channel, and reconnecting a new channel
to its floodplain. Diffuse flow is to be maintained throughout the mitigated riparian areas.

Uzzle Buffer 3 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2022

1.5 Construction and As-Built Conditions
Revegetation of the site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees in
areas where stream restoration occurred. Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping
that section of the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp is the target community type and was used
for all areas within the project. The community is defined by Schafale (2012). The planting of bare root
trees occurred in May 2019. Deviations from the initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A
list of the planted species can be found in Table 2.
Stream construction activities were completed in May 2019. RES submitted a Stream As-Built Report in
July 2019 to USACE and conducted a site visit in July 2019 with no comments. The site was constructed
in accordance with the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2016-
01973), 401 (DWR # 2016-0981), and NPDES Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (JC# 19-012-P) Permits.
The conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation
signs attached to either fences or t-posts. A fence was installed around the entire easement as livestock were
present throughout.
1.6 Year 4 Monitoring Performance
The Uzzle Year 4 Monitoring (MY4) activities were completed in February and September 2022. All MY4
data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meet vegetation and stream interim
success criteria.
Monitoring of the four permanent vegetation plots was completed during September 2022. Vegetation
tables and data are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MY4 monitoring data
indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of planted stems per acre. Planted stem
densities ranged from 405 to 647 planted stems per acre with a mean of 516 planted stems per acre across
all plots. A total of 11 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were noted in three
plots, with an average of 132 stems per acre. The average tree height observed was 7.3 feet. A few willow
livestakes were added to Vegetation Plot 1 in the wet area in March 2020.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project. RES performed supplemental planting in 2021 of about
40 bareroot trees, the species included willow oak (Quercus phellos), water oak (Quercus nigra), overcup
oak (Quercus lyrata), American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and river birch (Betula nigra).
A boundary sit walk was performed in February 2022 and ensured that the fencing was in good condition
and there was no evidence of cattle in the easement. There was no encroachment observed or similar
activities that would negatively affect the functioning of the buffer. Diffuse flow was also maintained
throughout the conservation easement area. Highway 70 expansion is currently occurring along the
easement boundaries. RES is monitoring the easement on a regular basis to ensure that no encroachment
or issues are impacting our easement as construction is occurring. A few small areas of re-sprouted
Chinese privet observed in 2019 in the lower section of the easement were treated in early 2020 and May
of 2021 and will continue to be treated as needed throughout the monitoring period.
2.0 Methods
Vegetation success is being monitored at four permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry
tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal
conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Uzzle Buffer 4 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2022

3.0 Reference
Environmental Banc & Exchange – Neuse I, LLC (2018). Uzzle Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site – Bank Parcel
Development Plan

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

NCDENR. 2009. “Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.” Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).

NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.

Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Uzzle Buffer 5 Year 4 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2022

Appendix A
Maps

Legend
Conservation Easement
Date: 10/12/2020
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Drawn by: RTM
Uzzle Buffer/Nutrient Site
©
Checked by: BPB
05001,000
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Feet

seicepS evisavnI
dxm.fdp.VPCC RWD 4YM elzzU 2 erugiF\\potkseD\\iadagh\\sresU\\:C :htaP tnemucoD

Appendix

Table 2. Planted Species Summary
CommonNameScientificNameTotalStemsPlanted
WaterOak Quercusnigra 1,800
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 1,100
Sycamore Platanusoccidentalis 900
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 800
WillowOak Quercusphellos 700
Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica 700
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 600
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 600
River Birch Betula nigra 500
OvercupOak Quercus lyrata 400
Tuliptree Liriodendron tulipifera 400
Flowering Dogwood Cornus florida 400
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 300
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 300
American Hazelnut Corylus americana 300
Total
9,800
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Wetland/Stream Vegetation Totals
(per acre)
Success Avergae
Planted Volunteer Total
Plot #Criteria Stem Height
Stems/AcreStems/AcreStems/Acre
Met?(ft)
1 405405809Yes4.8
2 5260526Yes10.4
3 48681567Yes5.7
4 64740688Yes7.7
Project Avg516132647Yes7.3

Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species

Uzzle MY4Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1 (09/20/2022) Vegetation Plot 2 (09/20/2022)

Vegetation Plot 3 (09/20/2022) Vegetation Plot 4 (09/20/2022)

Appendix
VegetationMonitoringPlot Data Sheets

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) DatasheetPlease fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Party:Role:Date last planted:
Plot05302019-01-0001
/
New planting date m/yy?
5
Date:-
VMD Year (1-5):
/ / / /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
sampled, specify reason below
Notes:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
35.590498NAD27
Latitude or UTM-N:Datum:
(dec.deg. or m)
-78.3956417N
UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
0.5195
Coordinate Accuracy (m):X-Axis bearing (deg):
1010
Plot Dimensions: X: Y:
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Notes*
Sep 2022 DataTHIS YEAR'S DATA
Map XYHeightDBHHeightDBHRe-
Source*Vigor*Damage*Notes
IDSpecies Name
char0.1m0.1m1cm*1 cm1cm*1 cmsprout
31.42.451.0Fraxinus pennsylvanicaR

a
128.53.1145.00.1Taxodium distichumR

j
146.04.1210.00.4Taxodium distichumR

g
154.94.6240.00.7Taxodium distichumR

e
163.94.9130.0Cornus amomumR DBH?

d
278.26.0152.00.1Salix nigraR

i
308.08.5119.0Salix nigraR DBH?

h
343.29.8190.00.3Platanus occidentalisR

c
351.89.9130.0Fraxinus pennsylvanicaR DBH?

b
5425.09.1110.0Betula nigraR DBH?

f
# stems:10
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
XYHeightDBH
Source*Vigor*Damage*Notes
Species Name
(m)(m)1 cm*1 cm

Explanation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): 10cm 50cm 100cm 137cm
S EEDLINGS Ï H EIGHT C LASSES S APLINGS Ï DBH T REES Ï DBH
10 cm- 50 cm-100 cm-
=10
Sub- Sub-
Species Name
0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5-
Seed Sapl (write DBH)
50 cm 100 cm 137 cm
c
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
**Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
p. 1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing.Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.

# stems:10
°
195
X-axis:
Map of stems on plot05302019-01-0001
map size:

small

N

bc
f
h
i
Y:5m
d
e
g
j
a
(0,0)X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
p. 2
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing.Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) DatasheetPlease fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Party:Role:Date last planted:
Plot05302019-01-0002
/
New planting date m/yy?
5
Date:-
VMD Year (1-5):
/ / / /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
sampled, specify reason below
Notes:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
35.590355NAD27
Latitude or UTM-N:Datum:
(dec.deg. or m)
-78.3952317N
UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
0.5324
Coordinate Accuracy (m):X-Axis bearing (deg):
1010
Plot Dimensions: X: Y:
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Notes*
Sep 2022 DataTHIS YEAR'S DATA
Map XYHeightDBHHeightDBHRe-
Source*Vigor*Damage*Notes
IDSpecies Name
char0.1m0.1m1cm*1 cm1cm*1 cmsprout
380.70.4450.02.4Platanus occidentalisR

b
440.58.8450.02.9Platanus occidentalisR

a
482.65.8350.02.5Betula nigraR

c
544.22.3120.0Cornus amomumR DBH?

d
617.98.4240.02.7Betula nigraR

i
627.67.1340.03.0Betula nigraR

h
637.06.2420.04.0Betula nigraR

g
666.72.2310.03.2Taxodium distichumR

f
676.71.1290.02.7Taxodium distichumR

e
708.32.9400.03.7Taxodium distichumR

j
718.53.8105.0Cornus amomumR DBH?

k
728.65.0290.02.8Taxodium distichumR

l
738.75.9Nyssa sylvaticaR

m
Missing
749.06.9360.03.0Taxodium distichumR

n
# stems:
14
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
XYHeightDBH
Source*Vigor*Damage*Notes
Species Name
(m)(m)1 cm*1 cm

*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
p. 3
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing.Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.

Notes*
Sep 2022 DataTHIS YEAR'S DATA
Plot (continued):05302019-01-0002
map sourceXYddhHeightDBHddhHeightDBHRe-
Vigor*Damage*Notes
IDSpecies
char(m)(m)(mm)(cm)(cm)(mm)(cm)(cm)sprout
Explanation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): 10cm 50cm 100cm 137cm
S EEDLINGS Ï H EIGHT C LASSES S APLINGS Ï DBH T REES Ï DBH
10 cm- 50 cm-100 cm-
=10
Sub- Sub-
Species Name
0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5-
Seed Sapl (write DBH)
50 cm 100 cm 137 cm
c
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
**Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
# stems:14
°
324
X-axis:
Map of stems on plot05302019-01-0002
map size:

small

N

a
i
h
n
g
cm
l
Y:5m
k
j
df
e
b
(0,0)X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
p. 4
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing.Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) DatasheetPlease fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Party:Role:Date last planted:
Plot05302019-01-0003
/
New planting date m/yy?
5
Date:-
VMD Year (1-5):
/ / / /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
sampled, specify reason below
Notes:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
35.589926NAD27
Latitude or UTM-N:Datum:
(dec.deg. or m)
-78.3954517N
UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
0.5210
Coordinate Accuracy (m):X-Axis bearing (deg):
1010
Plot Dimensions: X: Y:
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Notes*
Sep 2022 DataTHIS YEAR'S DATA
Map XYHeightDBHHeightDBHRe-
Source*Vigor*Damage*Notes
IDSpecies Name
char0.1m0.1m1cm*1 cm1cm*1 cmsprout
763.92.1Cephalanthus occidentalisR

e
Missing
775.22.350.0Diospyros virginianaR

h
818.74.5210.00.6Taxodium distichumR

m
836.05.3100.0Cornus amomumR

j
844.75.3240.02.0Taxodium distichumR

g
862.45.0350.03.0Taxodium distichumR

d
921.68.2120.0Fraxinus pennsylvanicaR DBH?

b
955.37.965.0Fraxinus pennsylvanicaR

i
977.77.5190.00.4Diospyros virginianaR

l
999.29.5210.00.3Platanus occidentalisR

n
1017.09.890.0Cornus amomumR

k
1020.29.9300.01.7Platanus occidentalisR

a
2631.69.9Quercus michauxiiR

c
Missing
4813.99.9170.00.3Platanus occidentalisU

f
# stems:
14
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
XYHeightDBH
Source*Vigor*Damage*Notes
Species Name
(m)(m)1 cm*1 cm

*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
p. 5
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing.Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.

Notes*
Sep 2022 DataTHIS YEAR'S DATA
Plot (continued):05302019-01-0003
map sourceXYddhHeightDBHddhHeightDBHRe-
Vigor*Damage*Notes
IDSpecies
char(m)(m)(mm)(cm)(cm)(mm)(cm)(cm)sprout
Explanation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): 10cm 50cm 100cm 137cm
S EEDLINGS Ï H EIGHT C LASSES S APLINGS Ï DBH T REES Ï DBH
10 cm- 50 cm-100 cm-
=10
Sub- Sub-
Species Name
0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5-
Seed Sapl (write DBH)
50 cm 100 cm 137 cm
c
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
**Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
# stems:14
°
210
X-axis:
Map of stems on plot05302019-01-0003
map size:

small

N

akcf
n
b
i
l
gj
d
Y:5m
m
h
e
(0,0)X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
p. 6
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing.Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) DatasheetPlease fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Party:Role:Date last planted:
Plot05302019-01-0004
/
New planting date m/yy?
5
Date:-
VMD Year (1-5):
/ / / /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard:
sampled, specify reason below
Notes:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
35.589301NAD27
Latitude or UTM-N:Datum:
(dec.deg. or m)
-78.3956017N
UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
0.5250
Coordinate Accuracy (m):X-Axis bearing (deg):
1010
Plot Dimensions: X: Y:
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Notes*
Sep 2022 DataTHIS YEAR'S DATA
Map XYHeightDBHHeightDBHRe-
Source*Vigor*Damage*Notes
IDSpecies Name
char0.1m0.1m1cm*1 cm1cm*1 cmsprout
1044.20.3120.0Quercus michauxiiR DBH?

i
1117.25.3450.02.0Platanus occidentalisR

m
1143.63.2180.00.3Nyssa sylvaticaR

f
1152.52.1550.03.1Platanus occidentalisR

c
1180.53.6100.0Quercus michauxiiR

a
1191.54.4320.00.9Quercus michauxiiR

b
1202.65.2260.01.2Taxodium distichumR

d
1213.75.9165.00.1Fraxinus pennsylvanicaR

g
1225.06.5450.02.0Platanus occidentalisR

j
1236.37.4155.00.1Taxodium distichumR

k
1247.38.4160.00.1Platanus occidentalisR

n
1258.48.5160.00.1Taxodium distichumR

p
1266.39.8230.00.7Fraxinus pennsylvanicaR

l
1284.18.6100.0Fraxinus pennsylvanicaR

h
1292.98.0100.0Fraxinus pennsylvanicaR

e
5468.44.9270.01.0Liriodendron tulipiferaR

o
# stems:16
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
XYHeightDBH
Source*Vigor*Damage*Notes
Species Name
(m)(m)1 cm*1 cm

*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
p. 7
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing.Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.

Notes*
Sep 2022 DataTHIS YEAR'S DATA
Plot (continued):05302019-01-0004
map sourceXYddhHeightDBHddhHeightDBHRe-
Vigor*Damage*Notes
IDSpecies
char(m)(m)(mm)(cm)(cm)(mm)(cm)(cm)sprout
Explanation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): 10cm 50cm 100cm 137cm
S EEDLINGS Ï H EIGHT C LASSES S APLINGS Ï DBH T REES Ï DBH
10 cm- 50 cm-100 cm-
=10
Sub- Sub-
Species Name
0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5-
Seed Sapl (write DBH)
50 cm 100 cm 137 cm
c
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
**Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
# stems:16
°
250
X-axis:
Map of stems on plot05302019-01-0004
map size:

small

N
l
h
np
e
k
j
g
dm
Y:5m
o
b
a
f
c
i
(0,0)X:5m
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown
p. 8
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing.Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.