The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20141271 Ver 1_Application_20141211Page 1 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4January 2009 Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. _____________ DWQ project no. _______________ Form Version 1.4January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. Yes No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. Yes No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: 2b. County: 2c. Nearest municipality / town: 2d. Subdivision name: 2e.NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: DeritaRoad-U-4910 Cabarrus Concord NA U-4910 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 14 Page 2 of 10 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5.Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: SueHyde CityofConcord P.O.Box308 Concord,NorthCarolina28026-0308 704-920-5401 704-786-4521 hydes@concordnc.gov KevinVanMetre AECOM 701CorporateCenterDrive,Suite475 Raleigh,NC27607 919-854-6214 919-854-6259 kevin.vanmetre@aecom.com DirectorofEngineering Page 3 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4January 2009 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: Longitude: 1c. Property size: acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: 2c. River basin: 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. N/A NA -80.718011 RockyRiver C(RockyRiver) Yadkin/PeeDee ThecorridoralongDeritaRd.includesmediumtolowdensityresidential,commercial,mixed-use,villageandplannedunitdevelopment,andindustrial landuses.DeritaRd.isprimarilyatwo-laneundividedhighwaythatparallelsI-85andconnectsConcordMillsBoulevardandPoplarTentRoad.The existing2011AverageDailyTraffic(ADT)forDeritaRoadbetweentheseroadsis10,570vehiclesperdayandisexpecttoincreaseto13,020in2035. 0.33 SeeAttached SeeAttached AECOM AnApprovedJurisdictionalDeterminationwasissuedbySarahHaironDecember20,2011(ActionID2011-01493).ANCDWQon-sitedetermination forapplicabilitytothemitigationruleswasissuedbyPollyLespinasseonOctober3,2011. PhaseI(U-4910B)beginsatPoplarTentRoadandextendsto,andincludes,theintersectionofAviationBoulevardpriortotaperingbacktothe existingtwo-lanesection.PhaseII(U-4910A)willextendfromtheendofPhaseItoConcordMillsBoulevard.Currently,onlyU-4910Bhasfunding. 35.393581 915 KevinLapp Page 4 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams – tributariesBuffersOpen Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction Corps (404,10) or DWQ (401, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 2g.Total Wetland Impacts: 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Type of jurisdiction 3f. Average stream width (feet) 3g. Impact length (linear feet) S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 3i. Comments: Chooseone ChooseoneYes/No- Yes/No- Yes/No- Yes/No- Yes/No- Yes/No- 0.28 seeattachedtable Totalpermanentfillinwetlands:0.18acre Totalpermanentmechanizedclearinginwetlands:0.09acre Totalpermanentexcavationofwetlands:0.01acre Chooseone-- 561 seeattachedtable Totalpermanentimpacts(460lf) Totaltemporaryimpacts(101lf) - - - - - - Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone - - - - - - Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone - - - - - - - - - - Page 5 of 10 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) O1 O2 O3 O4 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond FloodedFilledExcavated FloodedFilledExcavated P1 P2 5f.Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a.Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Catawba Randleman Other: 6b. Buffer Impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 6h.Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: ChooseoneChoose 0 Chooseone Yes/No 00 Projectisnotinaprotectedwatershed. - - - - Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone Choose Choose Choose Chooseone - - - - - - Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No ) Page 6 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4January 2009 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Type: Type: Quantity: Quantity: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. DeritaRoadisanexistingroadwayanddesignconsiderationstoavoidorminimizeimpactstothestreamsandwetlandswerelimitedbythenatureof thewideningproject.However,2:1sideslopeshavebeenutilizedtoreduceprojectimpactstotheadjacentstream. StormwaterBestManagementPracticeswillbeutilizedaccordingtomethodsoutlinedintheStormwaterBestManagementPracticesToolbox (Version1,March2008)toreduceimpactstothestreamduringtheconstructionprocessandpost-constructionprocess. 460 warm 0 0.5 SeeAttached Chooseone Chooseone Chooseone 0 0 Page 7 of 10 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f.Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4January 2009 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the projectinclude or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Yes No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d.If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply Watershed Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply (check all that apply): Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? Yes No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No 25.7 U-4910in Cabarrus Countyinvolvesthewideningof existingDeritaRdbetween ConcordMillsBlvdandPoplarTentRd.Theprojectincludesone culvertreplacementatanunnamedtributaryandonebridgereplacementovertheRockyRiver(PhaseII).Nodeckdrainswillbeplaceddirectlyover water,eliminatingdirectroadwayrunoffintosurfacewaters.2:1sideslopeshavebeenutilized,reducingprojectimpactstosurroundingwetlandand jurisdictionalareas. NCDOTundertheirNPDESpermit CityofConcord Page 9 of 10 PCN Form – Version 1.4January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No 1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Yes No 1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: Yes No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? Yes No 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No 2c.If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No 3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. A CumulativeImpactAnalysisisprovidedintheOctober2012CategoricalExclusion. N/A Figure 1 Vicinity Map §¨¦ 85 Phase I Begins ÆÆ 24 Concord ÆÆ 73 Derita RoadWidening Project TIP U-4910 Cabarrus County, North Carolina C a b a r r u s M e c k l e n b u r g §¨¦85 ÆÆ 49 tu29 ÆÆ 3 tu601 §¨¦85 C A B A R R U S C O . M E C K L E N B U R G C O . Concord Mills Blvd. (SR 2894) Christenbury Rd (S R 1 4 4 7 ) P o pla r T e n t R d (SR 1394) Phase II Ends B r o w n R d ( S R 1 3 0 5 ) C o x M il l R d ( S R 1448) Altacrest Dr(SR 2811) Goodman Cir (SR 1441) O d e l l S c h o o l R d (SR 2464) Derita Rd (SR 1445) ¯ Concord Date 06/2014 02,0004,0001,000 Feet Concord Regional Airport Concord Mills Mall Aviation Blvd NW §¨¦485 FUTURE Existing Bridge City of Concord Phase I Ends/ Phase II Begins S t r e a m 3 DERITA RD ALTACREST DRASPEN W A Y NORTHWINDS DR NW Stream 1 We t l a n d 1 DERITA RD C H R I S T E N B U R Y P K W Y Legend 015030075 FeetStudy Area Streams Wetlands¯ConcordConcord §¨¦85DeritaPoplar Tent Concord Mills Odell School !C!C !C We t l a n d 3 We t l a n d 2 St r e a m 2 D E R I T A R D T H U N D E R R D N W C H R I S T E N B U R Y R D !C!C Rocky River We t l a n d 4 We t l a n d 5 We t l a n d 6 Ph a s e I E n d s / Ph a s e I I B e g i n s DERITA RD JETSTREAM BLVD NW Jurisdictional Features Derita Road Widening Project TIP Project U-4910 Cabarrus County, North Carolina Figure 2Date08/2014ABCD A B C D I II Derita Road Widening (U-4910) Additional Information A Categorical Exclusion for this project was approved and signed by FHWA on October 31, 2012 and is available upon request. B. Project Information and Prior Project History 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project NCDOT STIP Project U-4910 consists of widening approximately 2.6 miles of Derita Road (SR 1445) between Concord Mills Boulevard (SR 2894) and Poplar Tent Road (SR 1394). The purpose of the proposed project is to improve traffic flow and levels of service on Derita Road in the project study area. Further, the project will enhance access to the Concord Regional Airport and facilitate the development of industrial land use nodes in the study area. Derita Road is a major corridor that connects Concord Regional Airport, Concord Mills, Charlotte Motor Speedway and other regional land uses between the Charlotte Metropolitan area and the City of Concord. Derita Road is currently a two-lane undivided highway for a majority of the project’s limits and parallels I-85, providing a north / south connection between Concord Mills Boulevard and Poplar Tent Road. Derita Road is four-lanes between Concord Mills Boulevard and just north of the Lowes Driveway. Approximately 500 feet north of the Lowes Driveway, Derita Road transitions to a two-lane roadway and widens to three or more lanes (including turn lanes) at the major cross streets (including Thunder Road, Aviation Boulevard / Westwinds Boulevard, Northwinds Drive, Westmoreland Drive, and Poplar Tent Road). The existing 2011 average daily traffic (ADT) volumes for Derita Road along the proposed project is 10,570 vehicles per day (vpd) and ranges from a low of 9,400 vpd on the south leg of Derita Road and Concord Mills Boulevard intersection to a high of 11,000 vpd on the north leg of the Derita Road and Concord Mills Boulevard intersection (located in Phase II). Derita Road intersects with numerous roads that facilitate notable traffic volumes, including Poplar Tent Road (16,900 to 22,000 vpd), Westwind Boulevard (1,100 vpd), Aviation Boulevard (1,700 vpd), Thunder Road (4,900 vpd), Lowes Driveway (2,200 vpd), Christenbury Parkway (17,900 vpd), and Concord Mills Boulevard (23,100 vpd). The future No-Build 2035 ADT for Derita Road along the proposed project shows traffic increasing to 13,020 vpd and ranges from a low of 11,500 vpd between Aviation Boulevard and Jetstream Boulevard to a high of 16,100 vpd on the north leg of the Derita Road and Poplar Tent Road intersection. Intersections with numerous roads that facilitate notable traffic volumes also show increases in traffic volumes in 2035: Poplar Tent Road (35,600 to 45,400 vpd), Westwind Boulevard (6,000 vpd), Aviation Boulevard (4,300 vpd), Thunder Road (10,000 vpd), Lowes Driveway (3,200 vpd), Christenbury Parkway (23,200 vpd), and Concord Mills Boulevard (31,600 vpd). The future Build 2035 ADT for Derita Road along the proposed project shows traffic increasing to a low of 24,500 vpd between Aviation Boulevard and Jetstream Boulevard to a high of 29,100 vpd between the Lowes Driveway and Concord Mills Boulevard. Crashes along the proposed project are slightly higher than the statewide three-year crash rate (2008-2010) for urban primary routes. Crash data was collected and analyzed for Derita Road from Poplar Tent Road to Concord Mills Boulevard for a three-year period from March 1, 2009 to February 29, 2012. The data included crash rates, crash types, and other related crash information. Crash rates are determined by the length of roadway, average daily traffic, and the number of reported accidents along a route for a specific time frame. A total of 70 crashes were reported along the 2.6-mile section of Derita Road from Poplar Tent Road to Concord Mills Boulevard in Cabarrus County during the period from March 1, 2009 to February 29, 2012. The total crash rate for Derita Road was 266.56 per 100-million vehicle miles. This is slightly higher than the statewide three-year crash rate (2008-2010) for urban primary routes, which was 217.18 per 100-million vehicle miles. Four prominent collision types made up 68.57 percent of the total crashes along Derita Road. Of the 70 reported crashes, 13 were angle collisions; 7 were animal collisions; 7 were left turn on same roadway collisions; and 21 were rear-end slow or stop collisions. Rear-end slow or stop crash types are an indicator of congested conditions and/or turning movements along existing Derita Road and represent the effect such conditions can have on driver behavior. One fatal crash occurred along Derita Road during the three-year period. Construction of the project will be completed in two phases. Phase I will begin at Poplar Tent Road and extend to, and include, the intersection of Aviation Boulevard prior to tapering back to the existing two-lane section. Phase II will extend from the end of Phase I to Concord Mills Boulevard. Currently only Phase I of this project is funded and will be constructed under this permit. The construction date of Phase II is yet to be determined. 3e. Describe the project in detail, including type of equipment to be used. The proposed widening of Derita Road is consistent with the classification as a major thoroughfare. Along the project corridor, the two-lane road will be widened to four lanes with a 23-foot wide raised grass median. The typical section includes 14-foot outside lanes for shared use with bicyclists. Curb and gutter will be added, along with sidewalks, to both sides of the roadway. The speed limit of the proposed facility will be 45 miles per hour. There will be no access control implemented. Medians may be provided for channelization of traffic on Derita Road and the intersecting roadways. Full movement intersections are anticipated to be provided at the Derita Road and Concord Mills Boulevard intersection, the Derita Road and Aviation Boulevard NW / Westwinds Boulevard NW intersection, and the Derita Road and Thunder Rd intersection. At the Derita Road and Poplar Tent intersection, all movement will be permitted except left turns (as designed for TIP I-3803B). Leftovers will be provided for other side streets as possible. Other minor roads and driveways may be converted to right-in and right-out intersections. Full access at these intersections is anticipated to mitigate any access issues. U-turn traffic is being considered when designing the full access intersections. During construction, two-way traffic will be maintained on existing streets in the project study vicinity. Coordination will occur with local resident and business owners to maintain access to properties during construction. The roadway will be constructed using standard roadway construction equipment such as bulldozers, road graders, and dump trucks. 4. Jurisdictional Determination The wetlands were delineated by AECOM in 2011. The wetland boundary was surveyed by CH Engineering and a jurisdictional package was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). A Jurisdictional Determination was issued by the USACE on December 20, 2011 (2011-01493) and a North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Now NCDWR) on-site determination was issued on October 3, 2011. 6. Future Project Plans The project is currently divided into two sections that will be constructed in two phases. U-4910A (Phase II) will extend from the end of Phase I to Concord Mills Boulevard. U-4910B (Phase I) of the project begins at Poplar Tent Road, extends to, and includes, the intersection of Aviation Boulevard prior to tapering back to the existing two-lane section. Currently, only Phase I has funding (due to the high cost of the bridge structure in Phase II) and is anticipated to be let in June 2015 with construction beginning in September 2015. Construction of Phase I is anticipated to take 30 months and the let date for Phase II will hopefully be known before the letting of Phase I. Phase II (U-4910A) is not funded at this time. Impacts associated with Phase I only include Stream 3: 295 linear feet (lf) of permanent impacts (culvert or stabilization), and 15 lf of temporary clearing. Impacts associated with Phase II include 0.28 acre of permanent wetland impacts (0.18 acre of fill, 0.09 acre of mechanized clearing, and 0.01 acre of excavation) and 251 linear feet of stream impacts: 165 lf of permanent impacts and 86 lf of temporary impacts. Mitigation will be acquired through the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program for both phases of the project simultaneously. Though the construction phases may differ, mitigation acquisition will not be a two phase process. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 2. Wetland Impacts Wetland Impact Number Type of Impact Type of Wetland Forested Type of Jurisdiction Area of impact (acres) Site 1 Mechanized Clearing (Wetland 3) Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.08 Site 1 Fill (Wetland 3) Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.02 Site 2 Fill (Wetland 2) Scrub-shrub No Corps 0.02 Site 2 Excavation (Wetland 2) Scrub-shrub No Corps 0.01 Site 4 Fill (Wetland 4) Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps 0.05 Site 5 Fill (Wetland 5) Small Basin Wetland Yes Corps 0.08 Site 5 Mechanized Clearing (Wetland 5) Small Basin Wetland Yes Corps 0.01 Site 6 Fill (Wetland 6) Small Basin Wetland Yes Corps 0.01 Total 0.28 acres 2h. Comments There are no wetland impacts associated with Phase I of this project. Five wetlands will be impacted in association with Phase II of this project. Wetland 1 will sustain no impacts as a result of either phase of the project. Wetland 2 will sustain 0.02 acre of permanent fill and 0.01 acre of permanent excavation as a result of Phase II construction. Wetland 3 will sustain 0.08 of permanent mechanized clearing of the forested wetland and 0.02 acre of permanent fill as a result of Phase II construction. Wetland 4 will sustain 0.05 acre of permanent fill as a result of Phase II construction. Wetland 5 will sustain 0.08 acre of fill and 0.01 acre of mechanized clearing as a result of Phase II construction. Wetland 6 will sustain 0.01 acre of permanent fill as a result of Phase II construction. 3. Stream Impacts Stream Impact Type of Impact Stream Name Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT) Type of jurisdiction Average stream width (feet) Impact length (linear feet) Site 2 P Culvert UT Rocky River (S2) PER Corps 15 95 Site 2 T Mechanized Clearing UT Rocky River (S2) PER Corps 15 52 (0.02 ac) Site 3 T Stabilization UT Rocky River (S2) PER Corps 15 50 Site 5 T Temporary Work Pad Rocky River PER Corps 50 34 (0.01 ac) Site 7 P Stabilization Rocky River PER Corps 50 20 Site 8 P Culvert UT Rocky River (S3) PER Corps 7 275 Site 8 P Stabilization UT Rocky River (S3) PER Corps 7 20 Site 8 T Mechanized clearing UT Rocky River (S3) PER Corps 7 15 (0.01 ac) Total 561 linear feet (460 lf permanent) 3i. Comments Only one stream will be impacted by Phase I of this project: Stream 3. 295 linear feet (lf) of stream will be permanently impacted. 275 lf will be placed in culvert and 20 lf will be stabilized. 15 lf will be temporarily cleared. Two additional streams will be impacted as a result of Phase II. Stream 2 will sustain 145 lf of permanent impacts (95 lf of culvert and 50 lf of stabilization). Stream 2 will also sustain 52 lf of temporary clearing. The Rocky River will sustain 20 lf of permanent stabilization and 34 lf of temporary impacts from a work pad placed in the river only during construction. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 4h. Comments Of the 460 linear feet of permanent stream impacts, USACE requires 370’ of mitigation and NCDWR requires 295’ of mitigation. (USACE does not require mitigation for bank stabilization, and NCDWR does not require mitigation for streams impacted less than 150’ total). F. Supplementary Information 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat Federally Listed Species Potentially Occurring in Cabarrus County Common Name Scientific NameStatus Carolina heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata Endangered Schweinitz’s sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Threatened There is no designated Critical Habitat for any Endangered or Threatened species located in the project area. A U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposal for listing the Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) as an endangered species was published in the Federal Register in October 2013. The listing will become effective on or before April, 2015. Furthermore, this species is included in USFWS’s current list of protected species for Cabarrus County. City of Concord is working closely with the USFWS to understand how this proposed listing may impact City of Concord projects. City of Concord will continue to coordinate appropriately with USFWS to determine if this project will incur potential effects to the Northern long-eared bat, and how to address these potential effects, if necessary.” (V e r s i o n 1 . 2 ; R e l e a s e d S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 1 ) U- 4 9 1 0 Co u n t y ( i e s ) : Ca b a r r u s Page 1of 1 Pr o j e c t T y p e : D a t e : Ph o n e : Ph o n e : Em a i l : Em a i l : Co u n t y ( i e s ) : CA M A C o u n t y ? De s i g n / F u t u r e : Ex i s t i n g : Su p p l e m e n t a l : No n e Pr i m a r y : Ro c k y R i v e r Ya d k i n - P e e D e e 13 - 1 7 be l a m @ s u n g a t e d e s i g n . c o m On e 1 2 - f o o t i n s i d e a n d o n e 1 4 - f o o t o u t s i d e l a n e w i t h a 2 ' - 5 " c u r b a n d g u t t e r i n e a c h di r e c t i o n w i t h a 2 3 - f o o t r a i s e d m e d i a n . ( 2 '- 9 " m o u n t a b l e c u r b s w / 1 7 . 5 ' o f g r a s s ) Tw o 1 0 - f o o t l a n e s w i t h r o a d w a y d i t c h e s N/ A NC D W Q S t r e a m I n d e x N o . : Pr o j e c t / T I P N o . : NC D O T C o n t a c t : Pr o j e c t N o . : U- 4 9 1 0 Co n t r a c t o r / D e s i g n e r : rh e n e g a r @ n c d o t . g o v Ra l e i g h , N C 2 7 6 9 9 Ge n e r a l P r o j e c t I n f o r m a t i o n Ad d r e s s : 4/22/2014 Su n g a t e D e s i g n G r o u p 15 9 0 M a i l S e r v i c e C e n t e r 91 5 J o n e s F r a n k l i n R o a d Ra l e i g h , N C 2 7 6 0 6 No r t h C a r o l i n a D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Hi g h w a y S t o r m w a t e r P r o g r a m S T O R M W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T P L A N FO R L I N E A R R O A D W A Y P R O J E C T S Ra n d y H e n e g a r , P E Ro a d w a y W i d e n i n g ac. Ge n e r a l P r o j e c t N a r r a t i v e : U- 4 9 1 0 i n C a b a r r u s C o u n t y i n v o l v e s t h e w i d e n i n g o f e x i s t i n g D e r i t a Rd b e t w e e n C o n c o r d M i l l s B l v d a n d P o p l a r T e n t R d . T h e p r o j e c t includes one culvert replacment at an un n a m e d t r i b u t a r y a n d o n e b r i d g e r e p l a c e m e n t o v e r t h e R o c k y R i v e r . Br i d g e d e c k d r a i n s w i l l n o t b e p l a c e d d i r e c t l y o v e r R o c k y R i ver, eliminating direct roadway runoff into su r f a c e w a t e r s . A l s o , 2 : 1 s i d e s l o p e s h a v e b e e n u t i l i z e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e p r o j e c t , r e d u c i n g p r o j e c t i m p a c t s t o s u r r o u n d i n g w e t l a n d a n d j u r i s d i c t i o n a l a r e a s . Ty p i c a l C r o s s S e c t i o n D e s c r i p t i o n : Re f e r e n c e s ADT 2011 is 11,000 30 . 2 0 Av e r a g e D a i l y T r a f f i c ( v e h / h r / d a y ) : ac . Ot h e r S t r e a m C l a s s i f i c a t i o n : Br i a n E l a m , P E Ci t y / T o w n : 91 9 - 8 5 9 - 2 2 4 3 NC D O T H y r d r a u l i c s U n i t Ad d r e s s : Co n c o r d 91 9 - 7 0 7 - 6 7 2 6 Ca b a r r u s No No n e NC D W Q S u r f a c e W a t e r C l a s s i f i c a t i o n f o r P r i m a r y R e c e i v i n g W a t e r 30 3 ( d ) I m p a i r m e n t s : Ri v e r B a s i n ( s ) : Pr i m a r y R e c e i v i n g W a t e r : Cl a s s C Bu f f e r R u l e s i n E f f e c t Pr o j e c t D e s c r i p t i o n tu r b i d i t y Su r r o u n d i n g L a n d U s e : Ru r a l / I n d u s t r i a l / R e s i d e n t i a l 2. 3 6 M i l e s AD T 2 0 3 5 i s 2 8 , 3 0 0 12 . 6 0 Pr o j e c t B u i l t - U p o n A r e a ( a c . ) Pr o p o s e d P r o j e c t E x i s t i n g S i t e Pr o j e c t L e n g t h ( l i n . M i l e s o r f e e t ) : Ha n d Existing Existing Pe r m a n e n t T e m p . E x c a v a t i o n M e c h a n i z e d C l e a r i n g P e r m a n e n t T e m p . C h a n n e l C h a n n e l N a t u r a l Si t e S t a t i o n S t r u c t u r e F i l l I n F i l l I n i n C l e a r i n g i n S W S W I m p a c t s I m p a c t s S t r e a m No . ( F r o m / T o ) S i z e / T y p e W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s i n W e t l a n d s W e t l a n d s i m p a c t s i m p a c t s P e r m a n e n t T e m p . D e s i g n ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( a c ) ( f t ) ( f t ) ( f t ) U - 4 9 1 0 A 1 1 2 1 + 7 0 - 1 2 2 + 9 5 - L - R T R O A D F I L L ( W 3 ) 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 8 2 1 2 3 + 4 0 - 1 2 3 + 7 6 - L - L T R O A D F I L L / D I T C H ( W 2 ) 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 1 0 3 1 2 4 - 1 1 - L - CU L V E R T 3 @ 1 0 ' X 8 ' R C B C ( S 2 ) 0 . 0 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 9 5 5 2 ST R E A M B A N K S T A B I L I Z A T I O N ( S 2 ) 0 . 0 2 0 5 0 4 1 4 4 + 5 0 - 1 4 5 + 0 5 - L - L T R O A D F I L L ( W 4 ) 0 . 0 5 5 1 4 5 + 8 2 - 1 4 6 + 6 0 - L - L T R O A D F I L L ( W 5 ) 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 1 6 1 4 8 + 1 5 - 1 4 8 + 4 0 - L - L T T O T A L T A K E ( W 6 ) 0 . 0 1 7 1 4 7 + 5 5 - 1 4 7 + 6 5 - L - R T TE M P W O R K P A D ( R O C K Y R I V E R ) 0 . 0 1 0 3 4 1 4 7 + 6 5 - 1 4 8 + 1 1 - L - R T RI P R A P A T E B K M N T ( R O C K Y R I V E R ) 0 . 0 0 3 2 0 U - 4 9 1 0 B 8 1 8 6 + 5 8 - 1 8 8 + 7 2 - L - L T R O A D F I L L 4 8 " R C P ( S 3 ) 0 . 0 3 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 7 5 1 5 ST R E A M B A N K S T A B I L I Z A T I O N ( S 3 ) 0 . 0 0 2 2 0 SU B T O T A L S * : 0 . 1 8 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 9 5 0 . 0 3 1 4 6 0 1 0 1 *R o u n d e d t o t a l s a r e s u m o f a c t u a l i m p a c t s NO T E S : AT N R e v i s e d 3 / 1 2 / 1 3 SH E E T 19OF 19 W E T L A N D P E R M I T I M P A C T S U M M A R Y WE T L A N D I M P A C T S S U R F A C E W A T E R I M P A C T S U-4910 CABARRUS COUNTY NO R T H O F S R 2 8 9 4 C O N C O R D M I L L S B L V D TO S R 1 3 9 4 P O P L A R T E N T R O A D NC D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 4-21-2014