20220770 Ver 1_More Info Received_20220816 (8)

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. <mailto:[e-mail]>

Good afternoon Colleen,

In regards to your previous request for additional information. Please see our responses below:

1. Please provide a copy of the overlay of the cleared areas on top of the PJD as requested by the USACE on June 10, 2022. I see it referenced several times (including
the email between James Lastinger and Zak Shipman dated July 21, 2022, that you attached to your Additional Information Response dated July 25, 2022) , but I do not see a copy of the
overlay map. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)] Please see attached overlay map (C-02) depicting the cleared areas.

2. Impact amounts for Wetland Impacts C & D appear to be rounded down instead of up. For instance, Sheet WI-09 shows 0.0019 acres of permanent wetlands impacts . The
revised PCN dated 7/20/22 says 0.001 ac, when this should be 0.002 ac. Please provide an updated wetlands impact table. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)]. These have been updated, please see attached
revised PCN

3. I want to make sure I’m understanding the dashed line that I’ve highlighted in yellow in the below snip from Sheet WI-06. Is this a parcel boundary? [15A NCAC 02H
.0502(a)(9)] Per the project engineer, The dashed line is the legal recorded maintenance easement for the offsite septic lot Lot 48A as shown on the attached (C-03). Lot 48A is offsite
septic lot for Lot 48, which is located immediately adjacent to the north west. We are required to have legal deeded access for the offsite lot to the public right-of-way for the offsite
septic lot, however in this case all maintenance traffic for Lot 48A can access the offsite lot from the back of Lot 48 via a small easement across the bottom of Lot 49. Therefore we
do not anticipate any maintenance traffic using the legal maintenance easement to access Lot 48A.

4. Please confirm that there are no wetlands impacts in the area that I’ve highlighted yellow from Sheet WI-01. It looks like there is something very close to the wetlands,
and I can’t tell that it is outside the wetlands area on my screen. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(a)(9)] Per the project engineer, there are no proposed wetland impacts for the highlighted area.

Please let me know if this information will suffice.

Thank you,

CAMDEN BRUNICK

Environmental Consultant

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA

North Quarter Office Park

8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104

Raleigh, NC 27615

[phone](cell)

From: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 6:17 PM
To: Camden Brunick <[e-mail]>; Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Gains Property/Corbett Landing subdivision/Pittsboro/Chatham County/SAW-2021-00686/Incomplete Notice

Hi Camden,

I’m just starting my review of this one. Please provide the following:

1. Please provide a copy of the overlay of the cleared areas on top of the PJD as requested by the USACE on June 10, 2022. I see it referenced several times (including the email between
James Lastinger and Zak Shipman dated July 21, 2022, that you attached to your Additional Information Response dated July 25, 2022) , but I do not see a copy of the overlay map. [15A
NCAC 02H .0502(c)]
2. Impact amounts for Wetland Impacts C & D appear to be rounded down instead of up. For instance, Sheet WI-09 shows 0.0019 acres of permanent wetlands impacts . The revised PCN dated
7/20/22 says 0.001 ac, when this should be 0.002 ac. Please provide an updated wetlands impact table. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(c)]
3. I want to make sure I’m understanding the dashed line that I’ve highlighted in yellow in the below snip from Sheet WI-06. Is this a parcel boundary? [15A NCAC 02H .0502(a)(9)]
4. Please confirm that there are no wetlands impacts in the area that I’ve highlighted yellow from Sheet WI-01. It looks like there is something very close to the wetlands, and I can’t
tell that it is outside the wetlands area on my screen. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(a)(9)]

Thanks,

Colleen Cohn

Environmental Specialist II

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality

Division of Water Resources

Raleigh Regional Office

3800 Barrett Drive

Raleigh, NC 27609

Office: 919-791-4258

E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the

North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

From: Camden Brunick <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 1:08 PM
To: Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: [External] RE: Gains Property/Corbett Landing subdivision/Pittsboro/Chatham County/SAW-2021-00686/Incomplete Notice

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. <mailto:[e-mail]>

Good afternoon James,

I hope you had a good weekend. In regards to your previous email requesting additional information, please see our responses below:

1. Impact area C has been minimized further with a shift of roadway design, please see attached revised impact maps as well as updated PCN above.
2. I believe Zak Shipman has taken care of this issue and provided you with a response. I have attached email correspondence above.

Please let me know if this information will suffice.

Thank you,

CAMDEN BRUNICK

Environmental Consultant

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA

North Quarter Office Park

8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104

Raleigh, NC 27615

[phone](cell)

From: Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 2:09 PM
To: Camden Brunick <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: Gains Property/Corbett Landing subdivision/Pittsboro/Chatham County/SAW-2021-00686/Incomplete Notice

Camden,

After review of the above referenced PCN received on 6-3-22, it has been considered incomplete. Please address the below items so that we may be able to continue our review of the proposed
activity/PCN:

1. Under general condition 23a. Mitigation, the activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United
States to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e., on site). After review of the proposed plans it appears that further avoidance of waters of the US could occur, specifically
at impact area C (Streams F and F2) by located the proposed road/cul-de-sac further east. Please provide further justification for this proposed impacts in this location or revised

plans demonstrating further avoidance and minimization.

2. On May 27, 2022 it came to our attention through an NOV from the town of Pittsboro that unauthorized activities may have occurred on the site through mechanized land clearing within
jurisdictional areas without a permit verification. (number 4 on the attached NOV). To date this has been unresolved. Please verify that no unauthorized activities have occurred within
potential waters of the US. Until an appropriate resolution occurs either through voluntary restoration or ATF permitting or it has been verified that no unauthorized activities have
occurred, your PCN will not be processed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding any of the above.

James Lastinger

Regulatory PM

Raleigh Regulatory Field Office

US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District

ADDRESS: 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587

Phone: [phone]

Please note that I am teleworking almost exclusively. Email is the best way to reach me.