20221502 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20221027

DW R
mrlsloa of ware. Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
4/29/2022
BIMS # Assigned"
20221502
Is a payment required for this project?
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Central Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
International Drive Extension
1 a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
1 b. Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
10/27/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Crabtree Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
Longitude:
35.841986
-78.825076
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
Yes No
Version# *
1
What amout is owed?
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
u

1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?"`
Yes
No
1 b. What types) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
14 - Linear transportation
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Town of Morrisville
2b. Deed book and page no.:
N/A
2c. Contact Person:
Martha Paige, Town Manager
2d.Address
Street Address
100 Town Hall Drive
Address Line 2
City
State/ Province Region
Morrisville
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27560
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
4b. Business Name:
Kimley-Horn
4c.Address
Street Address
421 Fayetteville Street
Address Line 2
Suite 600
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Proiect Information and Prior Proiect History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
N/A
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Morrisville
2. Project Identification
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number
2a. Property Identification Number:
See attached Figure 5: Property Parcels Map 2b. Property size:
and Property Parcels Table 1.9
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Postal / Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Crabtree Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:
QNSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010801
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The International Drive Extension project is located at the northern terminus of the existing International Drive, west of McCrimmon Parkway and east of Airport Boulevard in Morrisville,
Wake County, North Carolina. Land use within the project study area consists of the existing International Drive roadway corridor and the associated right-of-way and undeveloped forested
area in Morrisville, Wake County, NC. Land use in the vicinity of the project is generally developed for industrial and commercial uses, with pockets of undeveloped forested area, riparian
corridors, and pockets of residential development.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
440
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:'
The purpose of the International Drive Extension project is to extend the existing International Drive north to connect to Stephen's Park Drive, a planned roadway associated with the
adjacent SPARK development (SAW-2021-01709; DWR# 201220773) (permitted by others). The extension of International Drive to connect to Stephen's Park Drive will provide a
connection from Aviation Parkway to McCrimmon Parkway as part of the Town of Morrisville's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The extension of International Drive will facilitate traffic
flow and provide a public thoroughfare and connectivity between three major active roadways (Aviation Parkway, Airport Boulevard, and McCrimmon Parkway), contributing to an
improved, safer, and more efficient roadway network for the Town of Morrisville.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
The International Drive Extension project is proposing to extend the existing International Drive roadway, which also includes extending curb and gutter, utilities, and sidewalk, north
approximately 640 feet to connect to Stephen's Park Drive. The extension of International Drive is proposing to cross two streams; therefore, the project also includes the installation of two
culverts as a result of the roadway extension. Headwalls are proposed as part of the design for the inlet and outlet of both culverts to minimize stream impacts to the extent practicable.
Typical site development and structural construction equipment will be utilized including dump trucks, graders, bulldozers, asphalt pavers, excavators, and concrete trucks.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
Kimley-Horn environmental staff delineated the project study area on July 14-15, 2021 and February
24, 2022 and identified two jurisdictional streams (S4 and S5) in or within 50 feet of the project study
area. A Town of Morrisville Stream Origin and Buffer Determination (TOM#: DETER-2-0025) was
issued by Ben Mills of the Town of Morrisville on September 9, 2021 for the larger SPARK
development. Documentation is attached as part of this permit application. Additionally, a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination Request for the project is included as part of this permit application for
review by the USACE.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Emma Radford, WPIT, CA and Mackenzie Richards, PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
The proposed project is a single and complete undertaking, and no additional permits are anticipated as part of this roadway extension at this time.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
U
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
3f. Type of
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
11
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Site 1-Perpendicular
Permanent
Culvert
Stream S4
Perennial
Both
10
165
Roadway Crossing
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S2
Site 1-Perpendicular
Permanent
Culvert
Stream S5
Intermittent
Both
73
Roadway Crossing
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S3
Site 1-Temporary Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream S4
Perennial
Both
10
40
and Construction Access
Average (feet)
pinear feet)

S4 Site 1-Temporary Dewatering Temporary Dewatering Stream SS Intermittent Both 60
and Construction Access average (feet) (linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
238
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
338
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
100
3j. Comments:
Unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional streams will result from the proposed roadway extension and associated stream crossings. At Impact Site 1, a total
of 238 LF (0.045 acres) of permanent impacts to streams S4 and S5 will result from the installation of culverts to carry the streams beneath the proposed
International Drive roadway extension corridor. Culverts will be installed as to not impede normal baseflow and will allow for the movement of aquatic
species within the streams. Temporary stream impacts will result from construction access and temporary dewatering of the streams via pump around to
complete the roadway extension and culvert installation. Temporary impacts will be restored to pre -construction contours.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
Neuse Tar -Pamlico
Catawba Randleman
Goose Creek Jordan Lake
Other
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Site 1-Perpendicular Roadway Crossing
P
Stream S4 and Stream SS
Yes
16,361
7,704
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 16,361.00
7,704.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 16,361.00
7,704.00
6i. Comments:
Unavoidable permanent impacts to the Neuse River Basin Buffer Zones 1 and 2 of streams S4 and S5 within the project study area will result from the
proposed International Drive roadway extension and associated grading. Due to the proximity of S4 and S5 to one another, the buffers are co -mingled
and splitting impacts between S4 and S5 specifically is challenging. Impacts have been summarized together since mitigation is required. According to
NCDWR's Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffers Table of Uses, perpendicular roadway crossings impacting greater than one-third of an acre of riparian
buffer are "allowable with mitigation upon authorization". Therefore, since the project is proposing 24,065 sq. ft. (0.55 ac.) of permanent riparian buffer
impacts as a result of the roadway extension, compensatory buffer mitigation will be required for the proposed impacts.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to jurisdictional streams, wetlands, and riparian buffer zones have been avoided and minimized to the extent practical. Crossings of
environmental features have been designed to be near perpendicular to reduce impact lengths. Fill slopes within the jurisdictional features have been
tightened to 2:1 where practicable and extensive headwalls are proposed as part of the design on the inlet and outlet of both culverts to further reduce
impacts. Additionally, the extension of International Drive is utilizing the existing section of International Drive as much as practicable and ties to the
roadway network within the adjacent SPARK development (SAW-2021-01709; DWR# 201220773) rather than continuing on new -location to Airport
Boulevard or McCrimmon Parkway, greatly reducing additional stream, wetland, and riparian buffer impacts associated with alternative alignments for
International Drive.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Impacts to streams, wetlands, and riparian buffer zones within the project corridor will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the construction
process by avoiding these features with equipment, materials, and access corridors where possible. Where feasible, equipment staging and construction
access will be located in upland areas throughout the corridor, and silt fencing will be installed around the permitted limits of disturbance to ensure all
equipment is only located within areas to be impacted. Additionally, temporary sediment control measures will be used throughout the project corridor
reduce construction stormwater impacts to receiving waters and minimize runoff from the construction sites.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State

2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Town of Morrisville - Morrisville Community Park Stream and Neuse Riparian Buffer Restoration
Project
3b. Credits Purchased/Requested (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Quantity:
Stream 440 stream credits
3c. Comments
Kimley-Horn staff conducted NC Stream Assessment Method (NCSAM) evaluations in the field and found stream S4 to have a NCSAM rating of "High"
and S5 to have a NCSAM rating of "Medium". Therefore, the project proposes to provide compensatory mitigation stream credits at a 2:1 ratio for the
165 LF of unavoidable permanent stream impacts to stream S4 and at a 1.5:1 ratio for the 73 LF of unavoidable permanent stream impacts to stream
S5. To offset these losses, 440 stream credits have been secured through the Town of Morrisville - Morrisville Community Park Stream and Neuse
Riparian Buffer Restoration Project. The Stream Credit Ledger for the Morrisville Community Park Stream and Neuse Riparian Buffer Restoration Project
has been attached as part of this application.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
60,639
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
The project proposes to purchase compensatory mitigation buffer credits at a 3:1 ratio for unavoidable impacts to Neuse River Basin Buffer Zone 1 and a
1.5:1 ratio of unavoidable impacts to Neuse River Basin Buffer Zone 2 of streams S4 and S5. To offset these losses, a total of 60,639 riparian buffer
credits have been reserved through the NCDMS In -Lieu Free Program. The DIMS Acceptance Letter has been included as part of this application.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact.
6c. Reason for impact
6d. Total impact (square
feet)
Multiplier
6e. Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
Perpendicular Road Crossing
16,361
3 11
49,083
Zone 2 Perpendicular Road Crossing 7,704 1.5 11,556
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
60639
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
Yes No
6j. Comments:
According to NCDWR's Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffers Table of Uses, perpendicular roadway crossings impacting greater than one-third of an acre
of riparian buffer are "allowable with mitigation upon authorization". Therefore, since the project is proposing 24,065 sq. ft. (0.55 ac.) of permanent
riparian buffer impacts as a result of the roadway extension, compensatory buffer mitigation will be required for the proposed impacts. The project
proposes to purchase compensatory mitigation buffer credits at a 3:1 ratio for unavoidable impacts to Neuse River Basin Buffer Zone 1 and a 1.5:1 ratio
of unavoidable impacts to Neuse River Basin Buffer Zone 2 of streams S4 and S5. To offset these losses, a total of 60,639 of riparian buffer credits have
been reserved through the NCDMS In -Lieu Free Program. The DMS Acceptance Letter has been included as part of this application.

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes No
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Town of Morrisville
Comments:
The project includes the addition of curb and gutter along the proposed roadway. Stormwater captured from the proposed roadway will be routed into and treated by SCMs along the
roadside. The proposed SCMs have been sized to treat the stormwater generated from the proposed project prior to being discharged into downstream waters and will comply with the
Town of Morrisville's stormwater program.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstatellocal) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
Yes No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments: *
The proposed project does not require preparation of an environmental document.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed roadway extension is a single and complete undertaking intended to serve the current and projected growth in this area of Wake County
and is consistent with the Town of Morrisville's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. No cumulative impacts or additional development is anticipated as a
result of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
u

5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
As of October 24, 2022, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consulting (IPaC) tool lists six protected species with
potential to occur within the project vicinity. The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) also has potential to occur in the project vicinity and is protected
under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA). Kimley-Horn reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) element occurrence
database (updated July 2022) to determine if there are any known occurrences of federally protected species in the project study area or its vicinity. The
NCNHP database records indicate that there are no known occurrences of any federally threatened or endangered species in or within 1.0 mile of the
project study area.
Suitable habitat for the red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) is not present within the project study area. Forested areas within the study area, mostly
comprised of immature pines with dense understories, are disturbed and have been previously harvested throughout the project study area. In addition,
a review of the NCNHP database records (updated July 2022) indicates there are no known occurrences of RCW in or within 1.0 mile of the project
study area. Due to lack of suitable habitat and the lack of known occurrences, it has been determined that the proposed project would have "No Effect"
on RCW.
Suitable habitat for the dwarf wedgemussel, Atlantic pigtoe, Carolina madtom, and Neuse River waterdog is not present within the project study area due
to the lack of well -oxygenated streams with stable banks. Streams in the project corridor have been impacted by sediment discharge and the banks are
incised with frequent failures and sloughing along the evaluated reaches. A review of the NCNHP database records (updated July 2022) indicates there
are no known occurrences of these aquatic species in or within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Due to the lack of suitable habitat and the lack of
known occurrences, it has been determined that the proposed project will have "No Effect" on these aquatic species.
Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is not present within the project area. Roadsides and forest edges within the project area were found to be too
frequently maintained through mowing and herbicide application to provide suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac. In addition, a review of the NCNHP
database records (updated July 2022) indicates there are no known occurrences of Michaux's sumac in or within 1.0 mile of the project corridor. Due to
the lack of suitable habitat and the lack of known occurrences, it has been determined that the proposed project will have "No Effect" on Michaux's
sumac.
The bald eagle is protected under the BGPA, enforced by the USFWS. Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large
bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water. A desktop -Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) assessment of the project area, as well as the area within a 1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project study area,
was performed using 2021 color aerials. One water body (Lake Crabtree) large enough or sufficiently open to be considered a potential feeding source
was identified. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database records (updated July 2022) indicates there are no known occurrences of bald eagle in or
within 1.0 mile of the project study area. The project study area and the area with 660 feet have primarily been developed and cleared and are
discontinuous with the forest surrounding Lake Crabtree. The majority of trees within the project study area are immature pines and therefore unsuitable
for nesting habitat. Due to the lack of suitable nesting habitat, the lack of known occurrences, and the minimal impact anticipated from the proposed
project, it has been determined that the proposed project will have "No Effect" on the bald eagle.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?"`
The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper was reviewed on October 24, 2022. No essential fish habitat was identified within the project site or within the
vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
A review of the State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service database performed on October 24, 2022 identified no National
Register, Study List, or Determined Eligible sites or districts in or within 1.0 mile of the project study area.
Due to the lack of known historic and cultural resources in or within 1.0 of the project study area, as indicated by the NCSHPO HPOWEB, it is
anticipated that the proposed project will not impact any known cultural or historical resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No

8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
The FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) panels 3720075600J (effective 5/2/2006) indicates the project study area is not located within a
FEMA-regulated floodway or flood hazard area.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or dreg and drop files here to attach document
01_InternationalDrive_PCN_14_Cover _Letter.pdf
534.86KB
03_TOM_InternationalDrive_Agent_Authorization.pdf
49.13KB
04_IntnlDrive_Figures.pdf
3.73MB
05_Fig5.0_McCrimmonParkway_PermitDrawings.pdf
664.29KB
06_InternationalDrive_Mitigation.pdf
291.28KB
07_Spark _TOM_Stream Determination Letter.pdf
9.28MB
08_InternationalDrive_PJD_Request.pdf
3.48MB
09_International Drive Plan and Profile.pdf
File must be PDF or KMZ
428.02KB
Comments
Please see attachments to aid in the review of this permit application.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the INC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the INC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jason Hartshorn, PWS
Signature
�T.rge• �u<c�ct.r, o��:S 5�
Date
10/27/2022