WQ0031725_Annual Report_20110221

S0P
I. Annual Land Application Certification Form
• Was a certification form submitted? �1�.5
• Was land application conducted during the reported year? YES
• How many dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied? v.32
• Were the applications within the permitted amount? yeS.
• Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre .
• Did it indicate compliance? e5
• Was it signed by the appropriate people? �.eS
2. ItiIonitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency?1,�,5
• Were the metals analyses reported,on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? �,e s
• Were the results reported in mg/kg?, e.s
• . Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?*7.0-f
• If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested)i,,-s
• Was TCLP analysis conducted?%/ -e-S' --5 /Cents / 12----4.
3. Field Summary
• Were the land application. events recorded on the Field Summary Forms? yes
• Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field? VA J'
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?q(&5"
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources? y Es
• Were the field Ioading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)? y2 y f-,•0a 71 S, 4e Tr
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated? yeS PAW Wa-s f-o kl%�,
• Were the calculations correct? bwi- dui
• Were the PAN loading rates.within permit limits?yes 14N3_14 value ;N Pilo
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits? c.4\c t T;oni . i re-cA1cwW`d
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?Ye-S PA N — ; c +,tt= w ks tower!°,
• Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season?�es cz,�d �; t(,t'/% r -e I
• Were the Field Summary Forms complete?yO-.s }ki ,.�-�, , SQ I ¢Ype
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of the Pathen and Vector Attraction Reduction Form submit ed? y'-e_x
• Did the form indicate the period of coverage, the residual class, and the pathogen reduction alternative and the
vector attraction reduction option used'?
•. Was the appropriate documentation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report?
• Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503?
L-5�- Y-C,5 tz—,L, see ila 44s
5. Soil 'Pests
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field? Y es
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field? No 6 l _ .S.Of TZ S 7 1 ', ,��
1t • Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field? 6 #4,
C�t1Zr%� ik.^ tnoti554r,5,-o So-19 /ln�S'
als49�Cen,ber.20I0.
6. General
• Was the report in the proper format? V,9
• Were. any parts of the annual report missing? N 0
• Was the report submitted on time?y.e5
� Q�o�•u,e,5�r. tr. A�l�,�,Jt^ol �✓��%• �,e,��r,aS .
* Any violations of ceiling concentrations shouldtie reported toTretreatmentfor....municipalities. only.
Res�orne ��•� SSt1 ;��u��i1 —Tip,-sue {��2:�w..u.�•,en.S'.. w.c..� �c-k- ��lh•Z� c4-�,-f�S;�•� �.n C,o:c.

Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1 - Fecal Coliform Density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? PrO,
• Were seven samples taken?favy y' S
• Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly?`2s
• Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids) I-e,5
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (one of five)
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Aerobic Digestion
• Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Waste time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68°F) and 60 days at 15°C (59°F)?
Air Drying
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was theambient. temperature above 0°C (32T) for two months?
• Were the residuals partially, digested?
• Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (not snow covered)?
Anaerobic Digestion
• Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 15 days at 35°C (95T) to 55°C (131T) and 60 days at 200C
(680F)?
Composting
• Was it a. composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the temperature. raised to 40°C (104T) or higher and remained at 40°C (104T) for five days?
• Did the temperature exceed 55°C (131T) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
• Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)?

Vector Attraction Reduction Review'
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction bJ„ac
• Was there 38% reduction? 4&5 (6e"
�
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report? i��— �I�
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not -total solids)? Its btk4 zp- V_45
• Was the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)? ckeck (a n spe_c-l',o m
• Were calculations correct? ye
40-Day Bench Scale Test _
• Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
• Was the test run for 40 days?
• `Was the test done between 30°C (86°F) and 37°C (99°F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the reduction less than 17%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Were calculations correct?'
30-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
• Was the test run for 30 days?
• Was the test done at 201C (68°F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids- (not total solids)?
• Was the reduction less than 15%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Were calculations correct?
o V5 do 4o—
f
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR)
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?
• Was the test done between 10.1C (50°F) and 30°C (86°F)?
• Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (68°F)?
• Was the -SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)?
• Was the sample holding time under two hours?
• Was the test started withinl5 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained?

14-Day Aerobic Process
• , Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were the residuals treated for 14 days?
• Was the residuals temperature higher than 400C (104°F) for the 14-day period?
• Was the average residuals temperature higher than 450C (1130F)?
Alkaline Stabilization
• Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by the addition of alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition
of more alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty-two
hours without the addition of more alkali?
• , Was the pH corrected to 250C (770F)?
Drying of Stabilized Residuals
• Does the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?
• Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 75% total solids?
J .
Drying of Unstabilized Residuals
Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids?
Injection
• Was there any significant. amount of residuals on land surface one hour after
injection (Inspection)?
• Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
• Was injection done at time that crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals inj ected within eight hours
after discharge from pathogen treatment?
Incorporation
• Were the residuals incorporated into the soil within six hours after application?
• Was incorporation done on pasture or hay field?
• Was incorporation done at time that crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals incorporated within eight

February 21, 2011
NCDENR - DWQ
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: 2010 Annual Land Application Report
Permit No. WQ0031725
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
McDowell County
Enclosed is the annual land application report for the calendar year 2010.
FEB 2 8 2611
Asheville Regional Office
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Anita Jensen at 828.756.6734 or Stephen
Taylor at 828.756.6618.
Sincerely
est Shephard
EHS Manager
Baxter Healthcare
PO Box 1390
65 Pitts Station Rd. & Hwy 221 N
Marion, NC 28752
T 828.756.4151
F 828.756.4821
Cc: NC Division of Water Quality (3 copies with enclosures)
WWTP File Copy
EHS File Copy
rbr"'arro �011
n Pr
0�,Q/,& 88"6V Veit
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
PO Box 1390, Marion, NC 28752
T 828.756.4151

Baxter Healthcare Corporation
2010 Annual Report
Land Application Program
NC Permit No. WQ0031725

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
` ir',Q Permit#: WQ0031725 County; McDowell Year: 2010
Facility Name (as shown on permit): Baxter Healthcare
Land Application Operator: Southern Soil Builders, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Land application of residuals -as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
0 Yes ❑ No - If No, slap Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Application Summary:
Total number of'a plication fields in thepermit:
4
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year:
4
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
87.82
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
80.8
Part B - Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2010 with all couditions 'of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division ,of Water Quality. Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual. soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of 11boratory results are attached.
4) Anrival TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 4.0 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1111 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." f
EXAJEN�-Ve 1&ad
Permittee N.We and Title (type or print)
-/(-/I
�f Se.
Sign a of Permittee Date
1011■
Signature of Preparer /' Date gignature ofEand Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
WQ Permit Number: WQ0031725 Laboratory: 1)
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare Corporation 2)
Residual Source WQ # or NC0006564 3)
NPDES #: 4)
WWTP Name: 5)
Residual Analvsis Data
A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
Parameter
Limit
• _ _
1 1
F
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant
penalties fo . mittin�lse information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Preparer ,*,
--e'11 —//
Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26) DENR FORM RSSF (12/2006) -

- , ' 14 ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding- Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name:
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
Baxter Healthcare Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
WQ0031725 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Derek Teague Owner: Trilby Setzer Predominant Soil Series:
18.43 '
CmB2
19.8 Acres Permitted: 19.8 Site #: 5-01 Field #: S-01
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
Com-
posite
Date
ism
Total
Phos-
phorus
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
1
2
3
4
5
_8j
8
9
101
Ill I
12
DT/Ac./
APP•
14
Event
0.93
Arsenic
1 0.022
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1,0.000
'0.000
0.000
1 0.022
Cadmium
0.009
0.000
0.000
0.000
woe 000
0.000
0.000
0.000 '
0,000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.009
Copper
0.596
0.000
0.006
0.000
0.000
"6.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.596
Chromium
0.285
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000'-
0.000:
0.060
0.000
, 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.285
Lead
0.063
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
.0.000
-0.000-
0,000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.063
Mercury
0.001
0.000
0.060
0.000
0.600
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001,
Molyb-
0.017
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
., 0.000
0.000
. 0.000
='0.000
0.000
0.0'00
0.017
denum
Nickel
0.097
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.097
Selenium
1 0.002
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
Zinc
0.857
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.060
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
.0.000
.'0.000
0.000
0.857
Total
is
Phos-
31.095
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000.:
,`6.000'
0,000,
0.000.
0.000
'0.000'
0.000
0.000-
31.095
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Si ature of Land Applier
Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
T acility Name: Baxter Healthcare Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): : 36.50
'ermit #: WQ0031725 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
3perator: Derek Teague Owner: Trilby Setzer Predominant Soil Series: HsB2
kcres Used: 25 Acres Permitted: 25 Site #: S-02 Field #: S-02
tesidual
Analysis Data
(Heavy
Metals and Total Phosphorus
use mg/kg,
% Solids
use
Raw Percent #):
'ample or
Com-
posite
Date
1J
4/27/10
2
s
4{
5
6
7
8
9
.101
11 J
12
Yo Solids
11.27
Arsenic
12
�admium
5
Copper
320
'hromium
153
Lead
34
Mercury
0.8
Molyb-
denum
9
Nickel
52
Selenium
•- 1
Zinc
, 460
Total
Phos-
horus
1
16700
knnual
Heavy Metal Field Loadings
(Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
DT/Ac./
App.
Event
_ 1 1
1.46
AJ
_4J
5 J
6
7J
8
9
10J
11 l
12
y
m
W
Arsenic
0.035
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
1 ' 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.035
Cadmium
0.015
0.000
1 0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.060
' 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.015
Copper
0.934
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.934
�hromium
0.447
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.447
Lead
0.099
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.099
Mercury
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
Molyb-
denum
0.026
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0'.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.026
Nickel
0.152
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.152
Selenium
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
Zinc
1.343
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.343
Total
Phos-
horus
48.764
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
48.764
ITT ..o.-t;f r nnrlar
nanalty "flaw that thk nc�ument was nrenared under my
direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
i
.� . l� T t • f • T ' �
Ur-I'M rvnivi iwrwr k'itu/_uuo) •

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare Total' Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
Permit #: WQ0031725 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): -
Operator: Derek Teague Owner: Larry Teague Predominant Soil Series: HsB2
Acres Used: 26 Acres Permitted: 26 Site #: T1 Field #: TI
Residual Analvsis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
7 8 - I
-TMW
Com-
posite
Date
How
MEMO
no
0
Total
Phos-
Annual Heavv Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
1 1
21
3
4j
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DT/Ac./
App.
in
Event
0.76✓
Arsenic
0.018
0.000
`0.000`0.000''
"`0000 "
; 0,000'
'°-A.000'
0:000-
'0.000.
0.000
0.018
Cadmium
0.008
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0:000.'
. 0.000 .
.'0.000
0:000>'
0.000
0:000 `
0.008
Copper
0.484
0.000
0.000
0.000'
• 0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
. 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
. 0.484:
Chromium
0.232
0.000
0.000
0,000
-0.000
.0.000
.0.000
0.000
.0.000:
0:000
0.000'.0.000
0'.232
Lead
0.051
0.000
0.000
0.000 .
;:'0.000 ;
' A.
0.0.00 `.
0.000
0.900 �
0,0.00
0;000
0,000
0.051 :
Mercury
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 '
; 0.000
0.000Molyb-
0.0.00....
0.000
' 0.000
0.000
0,000
0.001
0.014
0.000
0.000
0 000
0.00.0
..Q.000
0.000:
0.000
0.000
0.'000'
0.000
0.000
0.014
deInum um
1
.
Nickel
0,079
0.000
0.000
'0.000.
:0.000
-0.000..
, 0.000
0.000 .
- 0.000.
0.000 ::.
0.000 f
0.000 • •
'0.079
Selenium
0.002
0.000
0.000'-
0.000:•
:-.0,000
0:000..
0.000
.0.000.
0.000'-.:0.000
0:0.00
0.000.
0.002
Zinc
0.69.6
0.000
0.000
0.060
,�"0.000
-.0.000 .
0.000: ,
.0.000 .
. 0.000
0.000'
0.000
0.000.
0.696
Total
Phos-
25.284
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
'0.000
0.000
0.000
25.284
horus
"1 cernly, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
V
Signtore of Land Applier Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
Permit #: WQ0031725 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Dperator: Derek Teague Owner: Larry Teague Predominant Soil Series:
kcres Used: 10 Acres Permitted: 10 Site #: T2 Field #:
MgC2
T2
Residual
Analysis Data
(Heavy
Metals and Total Phosphorus
use
mg/kg, % Solids
use
Raw Percent #);
'ample or
Com-
posite
Date
1
4/27/10
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
% Solids
11.27
Arsenic
12
Cadmium
5
Copper
320
Mromium
153
Lead
34
Mercury
0.8
Molyb-
denum
9
Nickel
52
Selenium
._ 1
Zinc
, 460
Total
Phos-
horus
i.
16700
Annual
Heavy Metal Field Loadings
(Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
DT/Ac./
App.
Event
1
1.32✓
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LIJ
12
H
Arsenic
0.032
0.000
0.000
`0.0,00:
0.000'
-;0:000'
.-0.000
0,000.
0:000.
..0;000
`0.0.00.•
' 0.00.0
'0.032'
Cadmium
0.013
'0.000
.:0 000:..
0.000.
0:000
9.
0:000;'
' O.000
0.000
` 0.0.00:
0,000'
0:000
0.013
Copper
0.846
0.000
0.000
0.000
'0.000.
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0.00
0.000:.
' 0.000
0.846
Chromium
0.405
0.000
0.000.
0.000'
-0.000 1
: 0,000
:0.000
0,000
0,000.
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.405
Lead
0.090
0.000
0.000'
0.000
..0.000.
. 0.000
A.000 .
0.000 '
0.000
'0.000
0.000
0.000
0.090
Mercury
0.002
0.000
:0.000
0.000
0.000:
.0.000•
"0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
Molyb-
denum
0.024
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.024
Nickel
0.137
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.137
Selenium
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
'0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
Zinc
1.216
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.216
Total
Phos-
horus
44.155
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
44.155
III now4 w nndar
nPnalty of law_ that thiic daeument was nrenared under my
direction or suAervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are.significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
I
Signature of Land Applier
Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (1212006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare WQ Permit #: WQ0031725 Field #: S-01 Acres Utilized: 19.8
Land Owner: Trilby Setzer Annual Dry Tons Applied: 18.4283 " Site #: S-01 Acres Permitted: 19.8
Operator: Derek Teague
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
Predominant Soil Series: CmB2
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 216 Crop 2 Name:
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
C) =
y
O
C1
Volume applied
enter one Solids/
( )
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
/o
Solids
Volume
Applied per
pp p
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
D
(Dry,
Wei
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
a
K
a _,
"
9
o� w
* c
o
ay w
w ,_
CD
# «
>
Z
CD
w -+
c,
*
>
TKN
mg/kg _
Z El Y
4
a°o o
g �•
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
1
(bs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
4-2010
70.84
11.27
: - `-- -'0.340
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
-.46 54:6
`=' _NA
Fescue
5-2010
21.84
11.27
:<Y- O.TOS =::
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
:.S.1OI=>
-sNA'
Fescue
6-2010
52.39
11.27
° `::° 0.251::: :-=
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
12.237
== NA
Fescue
7-2010
49.09
11.27
;='_ ;0.235 -
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
-11A4 6%
' -NA
Fescue
`.0:000 ' `
0:000.`:
'0.000. .
0.000...,"
0.000. =
. '.0.-000
0:000 =` :
:0:000 ="
' :0:000
='% •0.000 -.'.°:
.0:000.:
:�- 0:000
.. .
-..., ,z._•,-
=-...__-
._ . . =
ons totals on FORM FSF sup ( attach FORM
Residuals Applications
FSF supp to this form):
-
L=:
TOTALS:
;?:194:16't:"'
0
AS
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
H
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
:453'50:.::0:000.
Lime A lied
Annual lbs/acre
=10'0:022 -q -
`0.009
0.596'
-A.285n:
'0.063
0:001�
0.017 :
:0:097
0.002
0185T'
`31.005' ==
=
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.12
0.053
9.378
0.718
1.493
0.044
0.188
0.499
0.081
12.651
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
=• 0.142'1:.
' 0.062
9.974
1:003
. 1.556 `
0.045
0.205
0.596 '
'.0:083
13:508
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34
138
NA
267
15
NA
374
89
1 2498
Permit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting, false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
of Land Applier
M&
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2008

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare WQ Permit #: WQ0031725 Field #: S-02 Acres Utilized: 25
Land Owner: Trilby Setzer Annual Dry Tons Applied: 36.5177 Site #: S-02 Acres Permitted: 25
Operator: Derek Teague Predominant Soil Series: HsB2 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 1 Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 216 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
o c
*�
a) �
Q0
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES # WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
Dry,
W
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
Y
3 -0
T'
�•
o o
�
o
w w
*
7�
?; -+
�, w
*
0
TKN
mg/kg
Z a
a
o a
ao o
g �•
mglkg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
( Ibs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
8-2010
77.8
11.27
•:. •:0.295'•..: ;
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
14.392.
NA
Fescue
9-2010
93.5
11.27
"0:355 =; .-
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
17.296
;'; NA
Fescue
10-2010
110.37
11.27
:: 0.419
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
20.417
°I ,NA
Fescue
11-2010
76.4
11.27
:: ,: 0.290 "
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
14.133
- NA
Fescue
12-20101
26.68
1 11.27
::.: 0:101• `:
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
4.936:..•
; .:NA
Fescue
::- 0:000:_s_01-
0.000:
`:0:000 •:
:.. --0.000%-._--.
0.000 "
`=fl:000 .
:0.000:
:0.000
0:000:`
:0:000
0:000
0:000 c°:
0:000
0:000
0.000 --�,
.0.000 -•
".0.000
=
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp (attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
=;3s4:7s:
vol
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
71.175
= o:oo0
Lime Applied
Annual lbs/acre
0.035'I/
' 0.015
A.934
'0.447�
0.099
''0:002J
0:026
=0.152
0.003
'1:343
48:764
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0
0
0.794
0.282
0
0.007
0
0.117
0
0.891
Current Cumulative Ibs/ac
0.035 -
0.015
1.728
0.729
.-,0.099 =.
--0.009 �
.. 0.026."
".:.0.269
',-:'0.003 >
. "2.234 ...
Permitted C. P. L. R:****
36
34
138
NA
267
15
NA
374
89
2498
Permit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
216`
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
.information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Land Applier
t—A
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant LoadinE Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
#• Acres Utilized• 26
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare WQ Permit #: WQ0031725 Fleld
Land Owner: Larry Teague Annual Dry Tons Applied:'- .9.6754' ;,-: Site #: TI Acres Permitted: 26
Operator: Derek Teague Predominant Soil Series: HsB2 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Cron 1 Name! Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 216 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
Volume applied
Volume
Residual Sources
Soil
Precip.
c
Nitrate
PAN Applied
Name of Crop Type
o
(enter one) Solids/
o
/o
Applied per
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Cond.
past 24
5 'R
w _w,
r.
?: a
TKN
ao o
and
Ibs/acre
( )
Receiving Residual
a3 0
Liquid
Solids
Acre
Fert., Animal
(Dry,
o
�,
* �•
w.
Nitrite
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1 I
Crop 2
Q
Cu. Yds Gallons
(Dry TonslAc)
Waste, etc)
Wet,
Moist)
inches
]
o
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
1-2010
48.5
11.27
`_- ° ;0:177 _ .:
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
3640
115
8.627"=
=NA ;r:
Fescue
11.27
"M O.S80'= :.
W00031725
dry -
0
s
0.5
0.3
78400
640
115
35:84
=>>
Fescue
3-2010
158.8
{7]](A��
000:
kw
0:000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp (attach FORM FSF supp to this form):
=-•
:
As Cd Cu Cr Pb Hg Mo Ni Se Zn P
44.470 = 0 000 <
Lime Applied,
TOTALS . �_: 207 3 =� w o •
{: = 0.0086 484 '"0.232 °; 0:05:1:: 0 001 :` : 0:0.14 ..: 0 �79 °' ` , .OA02 ° : 0:696 25284
3 �, ��
Date lbs/ac
12-2010
1,000
Annual lbs/acre
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
,,0.018 .0
0.148 0.023 2.834 0.353 0.254 0.011 0.0172 0.259 0.023 2.776
V
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0;166:-:J-*3180'-;0.585" `--0;305�: 0.012' ':'Q.031, :,0:338 0;025_ `3: 72
-
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36 34 138 NA 267 15 NA 374 89 2498
216
Permit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepares unaer my uirecuvu .,. au.pul V RDIUM ,u a-- _ - - -- ••---- - ____ ___�___ __ ____-
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
v7-1 **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost-0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
Signature of Land Applier aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare WQ Permit #: WQ0031725 Fie #: T2 Acres Utilized: 10
Land Owner: Larry Teague Annual Dry Tons Applied: 13.2195 Site #: T2 Acres Permitted: 10
Operator: Derek Teague Predominant Soil Series: MgC2 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Cron 1 Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 162 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
1.Cond.
Volume applied
Volume
Residual Sources
soil
Precip.
X b
R.
Z
Nitrate
PAN Applied
Name of Crop Type
(enter one) Solids/
%
Applied per
(NPDES #, W #,
Q
Past 24
.b
c�
w
�, u
w
,
T1CN
as o
and
(Ibs/acre)
Receiving Residual
g
o
Li uid
q
Solids
Acre
Fert Animal
(Dry'
Hrs.
o m
«
*
w•
Nitrite
Application
Q
Cu Yds Gallons
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Waste, etc)
Wet,
Moist)
inches
o
o
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
1-2010 1
139.28
11.27
=:': 1.322
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.5 1
0.3
78400
3640
115
64.413
NA
Fescue
0:000
0.000
-0;000
0.000
=i 0.000
=A:000
0.000
.=,0.000 .
`0.090 :
0.000
<` 0.000 ..
.0.000 .
0.000
0 060
0.000
- `0.000
:-:0:000
0.000
::0.000
0.000
:0:000
--0.000
0.000
•0.000
'•.0:000
0.000
..
.:.; ...;
•: • <: _
Residuals Applications totals
on FORM FSF supp (attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
_ '.
TOTALS:
•-='-13928.
:.+ 'M 0
AS
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
H
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
64.413
0.000
Lime A lied
Annual Ibs/acre
0:032 ,j
0.013 ;.
0.846
:0.405.'.
' 0:090
0.002 :
".. 0.024
0137 :
.•'0.003v
1r216-`
.44:155
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.044
0.015
1.438
0.518
0.107
0.007
0.029
0.21
0.008
1.591
- -
12-2010
1000
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
;''0:076 ,i
. 0.028
2.284
: 0.923
'0.197
.0.009 °
-0.053..
- ; 0:347• `
0.011 `
' 2:807a _
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34
138
1 NA
267
15
1 NA
374
89
2498
Permit -PAN Limit "l st/2nd Crop
_ - -••4 r �' 162-
;..
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accoruance wiau at by5LUM ucbigucu LV aDOUA cr wwk
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)
J

PAN
Mineralization
as decimal
ITotal.dry
tons/year
lAcres
Applied on
1 80.8
Rate
0.3
TKN
78400
NH3
1 3 440
NO3
115
NO2
0
% Solids
0.1127
1 87.82
PAN Surface
24363 1 mg/kgmg/kg 48.726 Ibs/d ton
4279.1171 Ibs total PAN
52.95937 Ibs PAN/acre
PAN In ection
26183 m /k 52.366 Ibs/d . ton
4598.7821bs total PAN
56.91562 lbs PAN/acre
Dry Tons11000. al.
0.469959
1st year PAN
Ibs./acre
Surface Ibs.
Surface
4279.11732
52.95937277
1st year PAN
Ibs./acre
Injected lbs.
Injected
4598.78212
56.9156203
MR(TKN-NH3)+ + .5(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
MR(TKN-NH3) + l(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
1000 X 8.34 X %solids X sp. gravity .'!---dry tons/1000gal."
2000

SAR
Sodium Absorption Ratio NafMg/L)
Ca M /L
Mg(Mg/L)
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23 353.88
2625.91
21.41
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12 Na ME
115.3860871
Ca (ME)
M ME
1
131.2955
1.7841667
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
The amount of exchangeable sodium ions versus the
amount of exchangeable calcium & magnesium ions in a given material.
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 require ESP in permit.
SAR = 1.8861982 . (From Mg/L entered above)
SAR= 1.8855205 (From ME entered below)
Na ME Ca ME M ME
1
15.38 13129 1.78

Page: 1 of 2
Report Number: 10-118-0205
Account Number: 46381
Submitted By: ZACH KEY
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER, NC 28669
Lab Number: 76196
Sample Id: BAXTER
A01C-1- Eastem Laboratories, Inc.
7621 Whiteone Road Richmond. Virginia 23237 (804) 743-W1 Fax [phone]
www.al-labs-eastem.com
Project: BAXTER
NC CERT #257
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Date Sampled: 4/27/2010 10:30:00
Date Received: 04/28/2010 00:00
Date Reported: 05/04/2010
Total Solids'
11.27 ✓
112700
100.0
.BB
04/28/201015:29
SM-254OG
Moisture
88.73
100.0
BB
04128/201015:29
SM-254OG
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
7.84
78400
10.0
JM
04/30/2010 08:39
SM-4500-NH3C-TKN
Total Phosphorus
1.67
16700
100
KM
04/29/2010 08.50
SW-6010B
Total Potassium
0.36
3570
100
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW=601013
Total Sulfur
1.68
16800
100
KM.
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-6010B
Total Calcium
2.33
23300
100
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-601013
Total Magnesium
0.43
4250
100
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-6010B
Total Sodium
0.31
3140
100
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-6010B
Total Iron
12200
1
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-6010B
Total Aluminum
3000
10
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-6010B
Total Manganese
190
1
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-6010B-
Total Copper
320
1
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-6010B
Total Zinc
460
1
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-60106
Ammonia Nitrogen
0.36
3640
10.0
JM
04/29/2010 09:49
SM-4500-NH3C
Organic N
7.48
74760
10.0
04/29/2010 09:49
CALCULATION
Nitrate+Nitrite-N
115
1.00
JM
04/29/2010 09:50
SM-450ONO3F
Total Cadmium
5.0
1.0
KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-6010B
All -values are on a dry weight basis
except as noted by asterisk.
Detection limit on all N series is on a wet basis.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use or our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or part. nor may any
reference be made
�I,,,�L
1 C
to the work. the results. or the company in any advertising. news release. or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization
Q4W
o
Pauric McGroary

Page: 2 of 2
Report Number: 10-118-0205
Account Number: 46381
Submitted By: ZACH KEY
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER, NC 28669
L A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
7621 Whitepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone] Fax [phone]
www.al4abs-eastem.com
Project : BAXTER
NC CERT #257
REPORT OF ANALYSIS Date Sampled: 4/27/2010'10:30:00
Lab Number: 76196 Date Received: 04/28/2010 00:00
Sample Id : BAXTER Date Reported: 05/04/2010
Total Chromium
153 5 KM
04rZ9rzu1u WMU
5w-bulub
Total Nickel
52 5 KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-60106
Total Lead
34 5 KM
04/29/2010 08..50
SW-6010B
Total Arsenic
12.0 1.0 KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-6010B
Total Mercury
0.8 0.4 KM
04/29/201010:00
SW 7471A
Total Selenium
1.0 1.0 KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW-60106
pH (as received)6.77
0.01 JM
04/29/2010 09:50
SW-9045D
Total Molybdenum
9 5 KM
04/29/2010 08:50
SW=601013
Comments:
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted by asterisk.
Detection limit on all N series is on a wet basis.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use or our clients. and may not be reproduced in whole or part. nor may any reference be made
O fir,
W r'
?Of
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising. news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization
Pauric McGroary

Volatile Solids Reduction Calculation
VS in- VS out =
Vs in -(VS in X VS out)
0.9 - 0.31
0.9 - (0.9 X 0.31)
0.9 — ° aJct
= 0.59 = 0.95
0.621
Or 95% Volatile Solids Reduction

Analytical Results
Southern Soil Builders For: Baxter
958 Hoots Road
Roaring River NC 28669
Entered 8/25/2010
Reported: 8/30/2010
Sample Remark
;ample ID
Parameter
Cust ID
Result
Units
Method
Date Analyzed
Analyst
100825-5.1
% Volatile Solids
A
0.9
%
SM254OG
8/26/10
MD
100825-5.2
% Volatile Solids
B
0.83
%
SM254OG
8/26/10
MD
100825-5.3
% Volatile Solids
C
0.31
%
SM254OG
8/26/10
MD
100825-5.4"
% Volatile Solids
D
0.75
%
SM2540G
8/26/10
MD
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
P.O. Box 228 Statesville, North Carolina 28687. 704/872/4697

Analytical Results
Southern Soil Builders For Baxter
958 Hoots Road
Roaring River NC 28669
Entered 5/5/2010
Reported: 6/1/2010
Sample Remark
Sample ID
Parameter
Cust ID
Result Units
Method
Date Analyzed.
Analyst
10055-18.1
% Solids
1
3.32
%
SM2540B
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.1
Fecal Coliform MTF
1
<60
MPN/g
SM92210E
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.1
Geometric Mean
1
166
MPN/g
dry wt. basis
5/7/10
CL
10055-18.10"
Corrosivity
TCLP
See Attached
SW-846
5/12/10
PACE
10055-18.10
Ignitability
TCLP
See Attached
1010M
5/12/10
PACE
10055-18.10
Reactivity
TCLP
See Attached
SW-846
5/12/10
PACE
10055-18.10
TCLP
TCLP
See Attached
1311
5/12/10
PACE
10055-18.2
% Solids
2
2.35
%
SM2540B
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.2
Fecal Coliform MTF
2
170
MPN/g
SM92210E
5/6/10
MD
10.055-18.3
% Solid's
3
3.10
%
SM2540B
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.3
Fecal Coliform MTF
3
968
MPN/g
SM92210E
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.4
% Solids
4
1.88
%
SM2540B
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.4
Fecal Coliform MTF
4
<106
MPN/g
SM92210E
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.5
% Solids
5
3.26
%
SM2540B
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.5
Fecal Coliform MTF
5
123
MPN/g
SM9221 CE
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.6
% Solids
6
2.26
%
SM2540B
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.6
Fecal Coliform MTF
6
<88
MPN/g
SM92210E
5/6/'f0
MD
10055-18.7
% Solids
7
2.68
%
SM2540B
5/6/10
MD
10055-18.7
Fecal Coliform MTF
7
299
MPN/g
SM92210E
516/10
MD
10055-18.8
Total Solids
A
18,204
mg/L
SM2540B
5/7110
MD
10055-18.8
Volatile Solids
A
11,736
mg/L
SM2540
5/8/10
MD
10055-18.9
Total Solids
B
3258
mg/L
SM2540B
5/7/10
MD
10055-18.9
Volatile Solids
B
2180
mg/L
SM2540
5/8/10
MD
P.O. Box 228 9 Statesville, North Carolina 28687. 704/872/4697

Southern Soil Builders
958 Hoots Road
Roaring -River
Entered 5/5/2010
Reported: 6/1 /2010
Sample Remark
NC 28669
Sample ID Parameter Cust ID
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NC00909
For
Result Units Method Date
P.O. Box 228 . Statesville, North Carolina 28687 a 704/872/4697

Date:
19-May-10
Analytical Environmental Services, Inc
Client: Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Client Sample ID: 10055-18.10
Collection Date: 5/5/2010
12:15:00 PM
Project: 9268841
Lab ID: 1005781-003
Matrix: Solid
Result
Reporting
Dilution
Qual Units BatcblD
Date Analyzed
Analyst
Analyses
Limit
Factor
PESTICIDES, TCLP SW1311/8081B
(SW3510B)
BRL
0.0050
ing/L 129233 ' 1
05/141201012:44
KD
Chlordane
BRL
0.0010
mg/L 129233 1
05/14/2010 12:44
KD
Endrin
BRL
0.00050
mg/L 129233 1
05/14/201012:44
KD
gamma-BHC
BRL
0.00050
mg/I. 129233 1
05/141201012:44
KD
Heptachlor
BRL
0.00050
mg/L 129233 1
05/14/2010 12:44
KD
Heptachlor epoxide
BRL
0.0050
mg/L 129233 1
05/14/2010 12:44
KD
Methoxychlor
BRL
0.050
mg/L 129233 1
05/14/2010 12:44
KD
Toxaphene
62.4
35.5-128
%REC 129233 1
05/14/2010 12:44
KD
Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl
71.]
26.5-120
%REC 129233 1
05/14l2010 12:44
KD
Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Ignitability SW 1010
180
0
> T R171711 1
05/14/201011:00
AS
Ignitability
HERBICIDES; TCLP SW1311/8151A
(SW351OB)
BRL
0.20
mglL 128920 1
05/14/2010 07:10
AK
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
BRL
0.20
mg/L 128920 1
05/14/2010 07:10
AK
2,4-D
110
53.1-142
%REC 128920 1
05/14/2010 07:10
AK
SuDCAA
Qualirm": • Value exceeds maximum contaminant level
BRL Below reporting limit
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
N Analyte not NELAC certified
B Analyte detected in the associated method blank
> Greater than Result value
E Estimated (value above quantitation range)
S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix
Narr See case narrative
NC Not confirmed
< ' less than Result value
6of11

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
ceAnalytical a
2225 Riverside Dr.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28$04
Huntersville, NC 28078
wrrwpacalebr om+
[phone]
[phone] .
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: 10055
Pace Project No.: 9268841
Lab ID: 9268841001 Collected: 05/05/10 08:30
Received: 05/06/10 12:50 Matrix: Solid
Sample: 10055-16
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit DF
Prepared
Analyzed CAS No. Qua]
6010 MET ICP, TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/11/10 16:35
ND mg/L 0.026 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:02 7440-38-2
Arsenic
0.20 mg/L 0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:02 7440-39-3
Barium
ND mg/L 0.0050 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:02 7440-43-9
Cadmium
ND mg/L 0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:02 7440-47-3
Chromium
ND mg/L 0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:02 7439-92-1
Lead
ND mg/L 0.050 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:02 7782-49-2
Selenium
ND mg/L 0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:02 7440-22-4
Silver
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
7470 Mercury, TCLP
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/11/10 16:35
ND ug/L 0.20 1
05/13/10 09:35
05/13/10 13:41 7439-97-6
Mercury
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/10/10 14:00
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11110 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 10646-7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 121-14-2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L 60.0 1
05111/1011:00
05/12/10 16:39 87-68-3
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 67-72-1
Hexachlorobenze
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 95-48-7
2-MethylphethaneCresol)
250 5
05/11110 11:00
05113/10 14:3
3&4-Methylphenol(m8,p Cresol)
3610 ug/L �j (wr�1 t—
50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 98 95-3
Nitrobenzene
ND ug/L
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/1211016:39 87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 110-86-1
Pyridine
ND u /L 50.0 1
9chlorophenol
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 95-95-4
2,4,5-T
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 88-06-2
2,4,6-Tdchlorophenol
12-102 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 4165-60-0
N4robenzene-d5 (S)
27 %
% 13-107 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 321-60-8
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
40
% 21-132 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 1718-51-0
Terphe nyl d14 (S)
51
21 % 10-110 1
05/11/1011:00
05/12/10 16:39 13127-88-3
Phenolnyl (S)
22 % 10-110 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 367-12-4
2-Fluorophenol (S)
70 % 27-108 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 16:39 118-79-0
2,4,6-Tdbromophenol (S)
8260 MSV TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L 100 20
05/12/10 07:34 71-43-2
Benzene
ND ug/L 200 20
05/12/10 07:34 78-93-3
2-Butanone (MEK)
100 20
05/12/10 07:34 56-23-5
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
100 20
05/12/10 07:34 108 90-7
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
100 20
05/12/10 07:34 67-66-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
100 20
05/12/10 07:34 106-46-7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
100 20
.
05/12/10 07:34 107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
100 20
05/12/10 07:34 75-35-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
100 20
05/12/10 07:34 127-1.8�
Tetra chloroethene
ND ug/L
100 20
05/12/10 07:34 79-01-6
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 4 of 23
Date: 05/28/2010 04:03 PM
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

® Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
G+eAwlytj +ar 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kin ey Ave. Suite 100
J `"' Asheville, NC 2880.4 Huntersville, NC 28078
www.Pecelebr•cam
[phone] (704)875-909.2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: 10055
Pace Project No.: 9268841
Sample: 10055-16 Lab ID: 9268841001 Collected: 05/05/10 08:30 Received: 05/06/10 12:50 Matrix: Solid
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
100
20
05/12/10 07:34
75-01-4
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
103 %
79-120
20
05/12/10 07:34
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
103 %
70-120
20
05/12/10 07:34
2037-26-5
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
97 %
87-109
20
05/12/10 07:34
460-00-4'
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
100 %
85-115
20
05/12/10 07:34
1868-53-7
9045 pH Soil
Analytical Method: EPA9045
pH at 25 Degrees C
6.9 Sid. Units
0.10
1
05/14/10 19:08
733C Reactive Cyanide
Analytical Method: SW-846 7.3.3.2 Modified
Cyanide, Reactive
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
05/11/10 14:39
734S Reac ive Sulfide
Analytical Method: SW-846 7.3.4.2
Sulfide, Reactive
ND mg/L
1.0
1
05/11/10 15:03
Sample: 10065-17 Lab ID: 9268841002
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters Results Units
Collected: 05/05/10 09:00
Report Limit DF
Received: 05/06/10 12:50 Matrix: Solid
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua]
6010 MET ICP, TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Leachate Method/Date: EPA
1311; 05/11/10 16:35
Arsenic
ND mg/L
0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:05
7440-38-2
Barium
0.86 mg/L
0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:05
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND mg/L
0.0050 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:05
7440-43-9
Chromium
0.27 mg/L
0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:05
7440-47-3
Lead
ND mg/L
0,025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:05
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND mg/L
0.050 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:05
7782.49-2
Silver
ND mg/L
0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:05
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury, TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/11/10 16:35
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 1
05/13/10 09:35
05/13/10 13:43
7439-97-6
8270 MSSV'TCLP Sep Funnel
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/10/10 14:00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/1111011:00
05/12/10 17:06
106-46-7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
121-14-2
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
87-68-3
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
118-74-1
Hexachloroethane
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
67-72-1
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
95-48-7
3&4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
ND ug/L 50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
Date: 05/28/2010 04:03 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 5 of 23
This report shall not be reproduced; except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

e Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
C@ ^ ,,,,'ikiln,� j 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
i U kl l Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
www.p�com
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: 10055
Pace Project No.: 9268841
Collected: 05/05/10 09:00 Received: 05/06/10 12:50 Matrix: Solid
Sample: 10055-17 Lab ID: 9268841002
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/10/10 14:00
ND ug/L
50.0
1
05/1111011:00
05/12/10 17:06
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
87486-5
Pentachlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
05/11/10 11:00
06/12/10 17:06
110-86-1
Pyridine
ND ug/L
50.0
1
05/11/1011:00
05/12/10 17:06
95-95-4
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
05111/1011:00
05112/1017:06
88-06-2
2,4,6-Tdchlorophenol
52 %
12-102
1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
4165-60-0
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
63 %
13-107
1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
321-60-8
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
90 %
21-132
1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
1718-51-0
Terphenyl-ll4 (S)
28 %
10-110
1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
13127-88-3
Phenol-d6 (S)
39 %
10-110
1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12110 17:06
367-12-4
2-Fluorophenol (S)
85 %
27-108
1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:06
118-79-6
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
F
8260 MSV TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
100
20
05/12/10 07:12
71-43-2
Benzene
ND ug/L
200
20
05/12/10 07:12
78-93-3
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
100
20
06/12/10 07:12
56-23-5
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
100
20
05/12/10 07:12
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
100
20
05/12/10 07:12
67-66-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
100
20
05/12/10 07:12
106-46-7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
100
20
05/12/10 07:12
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND u L
100
20
05/12/10 07:12
75-35-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
10.0
20
05/12/10 07:12
127 18 4
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
100
20
05/12/10 07:12
79-01-6
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
100
20
05/12/10 07:12
75-01-4
Vinyl chloride
99 %
79-120
20
05/12/10 07:12
17060-07-0
1,2-Dichioroethane-d4 (S)
%
70-120
20
05/12/10 07:12
2037-26-5
Toluene-d8 (S)
100
98 %
87-109
20
05/12/10 07:12
460-00-4
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
a
98 /o
85-115
20
05/12/10 07:12
1868-53-7
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
9045 pH Soil
Analytical Method: EPA 9045
pH at 25 Degrees C
6.9 Std. Units
0.10
1
05/26/10 14:54
733C Reactive Cyanide
Analytical Method: SW-846 7.3.3.2 Modified
Cyanide, Reactive
ND mg/L
0.0050
1
05/11/10 14:39
734S Reactive Sulfide
Analytical Method: SW-846 7.3.4.2
ND mg/L
1.0
1
05/11/1015:03
Sulfide, Reactive
Date: 05/28/2010 04:03 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
IN
Page 6 of 23

ceAnalytical
www.pacabbs.com
Project: 10055
Pace Project No.: 9268841
Pace Ana"cal Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 1(incey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: 10055-18.10 Lab ID: 9268841003 Collected: 05/05/10 12:15 Received: 05/06/10 12:50 Matrix: Solid
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
6010 MET ICP, TCLP Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/11/10 16:36
ND mg/L
0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:09
7440-38-2
Arsenic
0.060 mg/L
0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:09
7440-39-3
Barium
ND mg/L
0.0050 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:09
7440-43-9
Cadmium
ND mg/L
0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:09
7440-47-3
Chromium
ND mg/L
0.025 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:09
7439-92-1
Lead
ND mg/L
0.050 1
05/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:09
7782-49-2
Selenium
ND mg/L
0.025 1
06/12/10 12:20
05/12/10 23:09
7440-22-4
Silver
7470 Mercury, TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/11/10 16:35
ND ug/L
0.20 1
05/13/10 09:35
05/13/10 13:46
7439-97-6
Mercury
1
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/10/10 14:00
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05111/1011:00
05/12/10 17:33
10646-7
2,4-Dinftrotoluene
ND ug/L
50.0 1
06/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
121-14-2
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
50.0 1
06/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
87-68-3
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
67-72-1
Hexachloroethane
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
95-48-7
2-Methyl phenol (o-Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
3&4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05/11/1011:00
05112/1017:33
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
110-86-1
Pyridine
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
95 95 4
2,4,5-Tdchlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0 1
05/11/1011:00
05/12/10 17:33
88-06-2
2,4,6-Tdchlorophenol
61 %
12-102 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
4165-6D-0
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
78 %
13-107 1
05/11110 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
321-60-8
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
85 %
21-132 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
1718-51-0
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
33 %
10-110 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
13127-88-3
Phenol-d6 (S)
45 %
10-110 1
05/11 /10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
367-12-4
2-Fluorophenol (S)
95 %
27-108 1
05/11/10 11:00
05/12/10 17:33
118-79-6
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
8260 MSV TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
165 33
05/10/10 20:41
71-43-2
Benzene
ND ug/L
330 33
05/10/10 20:41
7&93-3
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
165 33
05/10/10 20:41
56-23-5
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
165 33
05/10/10 20:41
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
165 33
05/10/10 20:41
67 66-3
Chloroform
ND ug/L
165 33
05/10/10 20:41
106-46-7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
165 33
05/10/10 20:41
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
165 33
05/10/10 20:41
75-35-4
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
165 33
05/10/10 20:41
127-18-4
Tetra chloroethene
ND ug/L
165 33
05/10/10 20:41
79-01-6
Tdchloroethene
Date: 05/28/2010 04:03 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Page 7 of 23
This report shall
not be reproduced, except
in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,
I nc..-

1
aceAnalytical
. www.pawlabsx=
Project: 10055
Pace Project No.: 9268841
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersvilie, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: 10055-18.10
Lab ID: 9268841003 Collected:
05/05/10 12:15
Received: 05/06/10 12:50 Matrix: Solid
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit
DF
Prepared Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
165
33
05/10/10 20:41
75-01-4
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
99 %
79-120
33
05/10/10 20:41
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
33
05/10/10 20:41
2037-26-5
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
100 %
87-109
33
05/10/10 20:41
460-00-3
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
85-115
33
05/10/10 20:41
1868-53-7
9045 pH Soil
Analytical Method: EPA 9045
pH at 25 Degrees C
7.2 Std. Units
0.10
1
05/14/10 19:08
733C S Reactive Cyanide
Analytical Method: SW-846 7.3.3.2
Cyanide, Reactive
ND mg/kg
1.0
1
05/12/10 14:50
735S Reactive Sulfide
Analytical Method: SW-846 7.3.4.2
is
Sulfide, Reactive
• ND mg/kg
10
1
05/12/10 11:67
Date: 05/28/2010 04:03 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc:.
y(1..1Qa>s.lc
Page 8 of 23

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (02T Rules)
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare
WWTP Name: Baxter Healthcare
Monitoring Period: From
WQ Permit Number: WQ0031725
NPDES Number: NC0006564
l /l /2010 To 12/31 /2010
Pathoeen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and, alternative performed:
Class A:
Alt. A (time/temp) ❑
Alt B (Alk Treatineiit) ❑ TO.
C (Prior Testing) Q
Alt.D (No Prior Test) ❑ I
Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs ❑
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thetmophilic
Beta Ray 01
Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
Class B:
JAII. (1) Fecal Density R1
Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens ❑
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class
B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ❑
Air Drying ❑
Composting ❑ jAerobic
Digestion ❑
Anaerobic Digestion C7
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following
monitoring data:
Allowable Level Pathogen Density Number ot
Excee-
Frequency Sample na y ica
Tech-
Parameter in Sludge Minim Geo. Mean axim Units
of Analysis -type niaue
2 x 10 to the
MPN
60
166
968
MPN/g
0
7
grab
sm9221 e
6th power
per gram of
Fecal Coliform
total solids
CFU
1000 mpn per gram
J
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
3 MPN per 4 grams
(in lieu of fecal
total solid (dry
colifomm)
weight)
Vantnr e+rraotinn Rediietinn (1 SA NCAC 02T .11071 - Please malcate alternative performed:
Alt.1 (VS reduction) 0
Alt. 2 (40-day bench) G]
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑
Alt. 4 (Spec. 02 uptake) ❑
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic) ❑
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization ❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) El
Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable) 0-
Alt. 9 (Injection) [_ 1
Alt. 10 (Incorporation) ❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed ❑
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
Ll "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
.wl "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note
if you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Prep arer e and Title (type or print)
Dennis Key Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
Signature of Prepa * Date Signature of nd Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

Page 1 of 1
Report Number: 10-349-0567� A&L Eastem Laboratories, Inc.
Account Number: 46381
7621 Whitepine Road RlchmondeVirglnia 23237 (804) 7435401 Fax [phone]
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS wuvwaleastern.com Grower: Submitted By: ZACH KEY
DENNIS KEY BAXTER Farm ID:
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER NC 28669
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT Analytical Method(s):
Mehlich 3
Date Received: 12/15/2010 Date Of Analvsis: 12/16/2010 / Date Of Renort: 12/17/2010 / e
" :Organic'Metter"'""
-Phosphorus
.�otassium '
':`.Magnesium
.:Calcium.:
"
"Sodium
pH
::'.".
"-Acidity :":
Sample ID
Lab
.-'ENR
% Rate.'=:,Ili§!A
"Mehlich 3 :.
Reserve
:::., K
:Mg
Ca
Na
Soil
Buffet"
H "
Field ID
Number
m ..:
pp Rate"
ppm :Rate
ppm -Rate
ppm Rate.
ppm
Rate'
'ppm..:.
Rate_
PH.
;index .
. meq/t00g
megM00g-.
S 1
00737
3.6 M 110
48
M
73 L
324 H
874
M
16
VL
6.0
6.80
1.3
8.7
NC = 40
NC = 37
S2
00738
2.6 M 92
47
M
53 VL
281 H
841
M
VL
NC=39
NC=27
113
6.6
6.89
0.4
7.2
T1
00739
8.1 M 104
165
H
39 VL
143 H
647
M
III
VL
5.9
6.84
0.9
5:5
NC=54
NC=20
T2
00740
3.1 M 103 133
M
41 VL
138 H
674
M
117
VL
5.7
6.80
i.3
6.0
NC=27
NC=21
Percent
Base Saturation
Nitrate
Sulfur
Mangane's'e
Iron:'
Solubleattsc'
::Chloride
`a4ltiminiim
Sample ID
Field ID
K' �.
Mg
Ca
%.
:.Na
":;°Y°
;
H ::
- NO
S :
Zn t
=; Mn
Fe:.".
CI
:'%...
•"%
:%
PPm" Rate-:ppm•
: • Ra
ppm Ra
t PPm a
ppm'
Ra
pp'm R
i
Ppm Rate
ms/cm
'Rate
:pP
m ..Rate
PPm
S1
2.2
31.0
50.2
0.8
15.3
0.12
VL
S2
1.9
32.5
58.4
0.8F5_9
0.09
VL
T1
1.8
21.7
58.8
0.9T17.2
0.08
VL
T2
1.8
19.2
56.2
1.2
1 20.9
0.07
VL
va uee on ims report represent the plant available nutrients in the Explanation of symbols: % (percent), ppm (parts per million), Ibs/A
soil. Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), (pounds per acre), ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meq/100g
H (High), VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. (milli-equivatent.per 100 grams). Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A,
C.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity. Soluble Sags ms/cm x 640 = ppm.
This report applies to sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
maximum of thirty days after testing.
Analysis prepared br. A&L Eastern laboratories, Inc.
by: PWZ,. OF G �
Pauric McGroary -