WQ0031725_Annual Report_20100218

S
S
B
Southern
Soil
Builders, Inc.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Beverly Price
NCDENR-DWQ
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Baxter Healthcare WQ0031725
958 Hoots Road Roaring River, NC 28669
[phone] 9 Fax [phone]
RECENED
N 2 2 2510
.Si1 viiie Regional OfficS
Enclosed you will find the undated PAN and SAR calculations as requested. The three
field summary forms have been corrected where the mineralization rates and the
volatilization rates got reversed.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please contact me at
[e-mail] or at 336-957-7871.
P"�.
Zach Key
Southern Soil Builders, Inc.
RECEIVED
JUN 17 2010
Information Processing knit
DWQ/BOG

SAR & ESP
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg.: Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
Na M /L Ca M /L Mg M /L
407.4 1 1955.52 1 512.16
Na ME
17.71304
Ca ME
97.776
M ME
42.68
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
SAR = 2.113674 (From Mg/L entered above)
SAR= 2.11313 (From ME entered below)
Na (ME)
Ca (ME)
MEl17.71
12.68
97.8
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the
Na ME CEC
0.869565 7.1
ESP = 112.24739
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq.

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare
Land Owner: Trilby Setzer
WQ Permit #: WQ0031725 Field #: S-01
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 7.8227 Site #: S-01
Operator: Derek Teague Predominant Soil Series: CmB2
Crop I Name: Fescue Crop I Max. PAN: 216 Crop 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 19.8
Acres Permitted: 19.8
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
`' s
.�
0
Q
Volume applied
pp
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(Dry'
MisWett)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
Y
3 2
co b
o raw,
'
<
o
w °'
N
>
� coo
p7 CD w
�,'
>
TKN
mg/kg
_z Y
-; �
o
00 o
w
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
Ibs/acre
( )
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
8-09
j 79.8
11.64
0.395
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
20.545
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
79.8
- 0
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
20.545
1 0.000
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0.010
0.003
0.232
0.084
0.023
0.001
0.006
0.034
0.002
0.255
15.600 1
Date
I lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.11
0.05
9.146
0.634
1.47
0.043
0.182
0.465
0.079
12.396
8-09
1000
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.120
0.053
.9.378
0.718
1.493
0.044
0.188
0.499
0.081
12.651
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34
1338
NA
267
15
1 NA
1 374
89
2498
Permit PAN Limit Ist/2nd Crop
216
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure tnat
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signatffre of Land Applier
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface -0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare
Land Owner: Larry Teague
Operator: Derek Teague
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
WQ Permit #: WQ0031725 Field #: T-02
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 18.4000 Site #: T-02
Predominant Soil Series: MgC2
Crop I Max. PAN: 162 Crop 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 10
Acres Permitted: 10
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
`- t
°
�? o
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES # WQ#
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
SOil
Cond.
(Dry,
WetCu.
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
a
K
co �'-
r o'
o0 w
o
w R
co _
*
K
X c1
w
°'
w
* a
TKN
mg/kg
z 3
�
o 3
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
pp
(Ibs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop I
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
8-09
1 24
11.64
0.235
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
12.234
NA
Fescue
9-09
44.7
11.64
0.438
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
22.787
NA
Fescue
10-09
45.3
11.64
0.444
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
23.093
NA
Fescue
11-09
73.7
11.64
0.722
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
37.570
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
187.71
0
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
95.684
1 0.000
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0.044
0.015
1.067
0.386
0.107
0.004
0.029
0.155
0.008
1.174
71.760
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0
0
0.371
0.132
0
0.003
0
0.055
0
0.417
8-09
1000
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.044
0.015
1.438
0.518
0.107
0.007
0.029
0.210
0.008
1.591
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
1 34
1 1338
1 NA
1 267
1 15
1 NA
1 374
1 89
1 2498
Permit PAN Limit Ist/2nd Crop
162
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of rand Applier
Date
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare
Land Owner: Larry Teague
Operator: Derek Teague
CrOD 1 Name: Fescue
WQ Permit #• WQ0031725 Field #: T-01 Acres Utilized: 26
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 43.7690 Site #: T-01 Acres Permitted: 26
Predominant Soil Series: HsB2 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 216 Crop 2 Name:
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
Volume applied
Volume
Residual Sources
Soil
Cond.
precip.
>
F
o
w CD
z
Nitrate
PAN Applied
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
o -
(enter one) Solids/
%
Applied per
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Past 24
-
m
? -
�, w
TKN
o 3
00 0
and
( Ibs/acre)
ca o
Liquid
Solids
Acre
Fert., Animal
D
( ry'
Hrs.
E' F
0 w
0
*
* N'
0
0 w
Nitrite
Application
Q
Cu. Yds Gallons
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Waste, etc)
Wet,
Moist)
Inches
n 0.
o
*
* �,
0
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
2-09
107.29
11.64
0.405
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
21.036
NA
Fescue
3-09
108.8
11.64
0.410
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
21.332
NA
Fescue
4-09
108.
11.64
0.407
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
21.175 1
NA
Fescue
5-09
72.6
11.64
0.274
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
14.234
NA
Fescue
6-09
49.8
11.64
0.188
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.5
0.3
81200
8200
1
9.764
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
446.491
0
' :
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
H
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
87.541
0.000
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0.040
0.013
0.974
0.353
0.097
0.004
0.027
0.141
0.007
1.072
65.520
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.108
0.01
1.86
0
0.157
0.0066
0.145
0.1178
0.0158
1.704
8-09
1000
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.148
1 0.023
2.834
0.353
0.254
0.011
0.172
0.259
0.023
2.776
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34
1.338
1 NA
1 267
1 15
NA
374
89
2498
Permit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
216
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signatre of Land Applier
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

kph
� Annual Report Review SOP Class B Land Application
1. Annual Land Application Certification Form
.• Was a certification form submitted? Y65.
• Was land application conducted during the reported year?
® How many dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied?
• Were the applications within the permitted amount? y,es
• Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre .
• Did it indicate compliance? Yes
• Was it signed by the appropriate people?
2. Monitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency? y.P—s
• Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? y z s
• Were the results reported in mg/kg? YES
• Were the metals within ceiling concentration permit limits? Ines
• If no, were the lab. analyses attached? [„�o . respti
o • Were all the required parameters tested? y e. s s p �'— ca l ewla Rc�d
• Was TCLP analysis conducted? y ej. Co,-ros 5�' Y
• Were the TCLP contaminants within regulatory l�M,
its? ye�y 6os�d 4L
3. Field Summary Ga �� c ©�€ �1= �'� be P
o Were the land application events recorded on the Field Summary Forms? ye _5
® Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field applied on? )re-,5
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land? YES
O Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources? yS5
• Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)? yes
:KO Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated?yams F2 too pQl0 R ci,},,+ ��v ve 4
,E • Were. the'ealculations correct? PA m. --> Na 3 R'cvd , in Ate- k. o , response. Pb MG) se.
• Were the. PAN loading rates within permit limits? y-e-S
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits? y-I- 14e
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop? IDS A -Sic 7"ji
• Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season? .y e,S
® Were the Field Summary Forms complete? e.5
• Was lime application on Field Summary Form? T I 3/0q i000 16s .
Ae
T?_ 7 9r3 Y►e Urt o,
4: Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
s Was a signed copy of. the Pathn and Vector Attraction eduction Form submitted? kpS l,tn Wln G�
• Did the forwndicate the period of coverage, the residual class, and the pathogen reduction alternative and the mil.
vector attraction reduction' option used? �n�—�
A • Was the appropriate documen�- -ion to show patho�en s and vector attractin�reduction included in the report?
a e Was pathogen and vector,6' action reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503 or 2T?
Don t �zsd ro ��« /}el �j J -S �"�
5. Soil Tests
p
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each field applied on?
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field? N9 a .
® Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for eaLh application field (state soils lab)? w�S
6. General a o
• Was the report in the proper format? YtS �• �� Q u�' ��
• Were any parts of the annual report missing?
e Was the report submitted on time? Y �S V�r4 SK
�j f �Icwla � Shk
PAN�t-
�C
S" pJc-1.,t.cl� Va„ dQ T+5 no+ 55

Class B Pathoizen Review
Alternative 1 - Fecal Coliform Density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
• Were seven samples taken? bN� %k' LEA be-
w P
• Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly? .4-00
• Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids) y,k5
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (one of five)
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Aerobic Digestion
® Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature betweeri 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 15°C (59T)?
Air Drying
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was the ambient temperature above 0°C (32T) for two months?
o Were the residuals partially digested?
• Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (riot snow covered)?
Anaerobic Di e� stion
a 'Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
® Was the time and temperature.between 15 days at 35°C (95T) to 55°C (131T) and 60 days at 20°C
(68-F)?
Composting
• Was it a. composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
© Was the temperature raised to 40°C (104°F) or higher and remained at 40°C (104T) for five days?
• Did the temperature exceed 55°C (13IT) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
• Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77T)?

Vector Attraction Reduction Review '• r; ''''�~
® Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction
• Was there 3 8 % reduction? 10,
® Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
® Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)? �S
® Was the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application y�e y
(Inspection)?
Were calculations correct? 01
40-Day Bench Scale Test
® Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
o Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
® Was the test run for 4.0 days?
Was the test done between 30°C (86T) and 37°C (99°F)?
® Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
® Was the reduction less than 17%?
® Were lab sheets/calculations in report?.
® Were calculations correct?
30-Day Bench Scale Test
® Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
® Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
® Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
® Was the test run for 30 days?
® Was the test done at 200C (680F)?
® Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
® Was the reduction less than 15%?
Q Were lab'sheets/calculations in report?
® Were calculations correct?
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOURR)
Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
® Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?
® Was the test done between 10°C (50°F) and 300C (860F)?
® Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (68°F)?
® Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)?
Was the sample holding time under two hours?
Was the test started within15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained?

14-Dav Aerobic Process
Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
® Were the residuals treated for 14 days?
® Was the residuals temperature higher than 400C (104T) for the 14-day period?
® Was the average residuals temperature higher than.45°C (113T)?
Alkaline Stabilization
Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by the addition of alkali?
® Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition
of more alkali?
® Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty-two
hours without the addition of more alkali?
a Was the pH corrected to 250C (770F)?
Dr�jng of Stabilized Residuals
• Does the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?
® Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
Were the residuals dried to 75% total solids?
Drying of Unstabilized Residuals
Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
® Were the residuals dried to, 90% total solids? .
Infection
® Was there any significant. amount of residuals on land surface one hour after
injection (Inspection)?
® Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
® Was injection.done at time that crop was growing?
® If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals inj ected within eight hours
after discharge from pathogen treatment?
Incorporation
® Were the residuals incorporated into the soil within six hours after application?
Q Was incorporation done on pasture or hay field?
® Was incorporation done at time that crop was growing?
® If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals incorporated within eight
_................. _.. _. _.. -_hours- after- discharge- from- pathogen. treatment?.._...___....... _....__.........._ ....._ ... _.__. __._

7
233.�
CLIENT'S COPY

r i .
F`B 22 2t;:�
Asheville Regional Office
BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
2009 ANNUAL REPORT
LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
NC PERMIT NO. WQ0031725
E CEV'J .0
FEa s zolo

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
WQ Fermit4: WQ0031725 County: McDowell r; Year: 2.009
Facility Name (as shown on permit): Baxter Healthcare
Land Application Operator:
Southern Soil Builders, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
R Yes ❑ No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also; If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Application Summary:
Total number of application fields in the permst:
4
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year;
3
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sitW
69.9
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
55.8
Part B - Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2009 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. 0 Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring -was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the. Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1 I I I were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
1 1) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters`a v oc�urrec
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residdy s., 2010
Part C - Certification: ttttSS ,LL�,�
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge aad,belief'tr,ue;°ae�'u4'�,�e,
V.and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information;` ncluding the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
�S-Kl E-N 61, 6-C 1P Mk-zzgy �v�Ss r•
Permittee Name and Title (type or print)
7 JJ 110
Signature of Permittee Date
I`A-
Signature of Preparer*
(if different from Permittee)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and
Date
ture of
Applier Date
(if different from Permittee and Preparer)
15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
WQ Permit Number: WQ0031725
Facility Name:
Residual Source WQ # or
NPDES #:
WWTP Name:
Residual Analvsis Data
Baxter Healthcare
NC0006564
Laboratory:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
A&L Eastern Laboratories. Inc.
Parameter
.Limit
Conc.
Chromium
Nitrate and Nitrite
ror surrace uisposai racemes me ceiling concentration limits listed in this torm are not applicable. Reference the individual permit for metals limits.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant
p?"Ities for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations:"
Signaturelof Preparer'
_7jIsl16
Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1 102 (26)
DEN'R FORM RSSF (12/2006)

SAR r
PAN= 26,001 Mg/Kg vl'
cc-o,
�7—
g00
o,
s

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
'Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 43.68
Permit #: WQ0031725 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Derek Teague Owner: Larry Teague Predominant Soil Series: 9 HSB2
Acres Used: 26 Acres Permitted: 26 Site #: T-01 Field #: T-01
Residual Analvsis Data (Heavv Metals and Total Phosphorus use m2/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
Com-
posite
Date
-
Total
Phos
phorusMENEENEENEEN
Annual Heavv Metal l+ield LoadmLirs (Calculated in Ws/acre):
I
Total
1
2
3j
5j
6
7
8j
9
10
ill
12
DT/Ac./
°
App.
Event
1.68
Arsenic
0.040
1 0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
•0.000
1 0.040
Cadmium
0.013
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.013
Copper
0.974
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.974
Chromium
0.353
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.00Q
�.0.000
0.353
Lead
0.097
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 '
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.097
Mercury
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
.0.000
1 0.004
Molyb-
0.027
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.027
denum
Nickel
0.141
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.141
Selenium
0.007
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
'0.000
0.007
Zinc
1.072
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
"0.000
1.072
Total
Phos-
65.520
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
65.520
horus
"I certify, under .penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of Land Applier
Date
J
N5% 12 n .002 -,ul` lalbl A 1.6%> : o,ou \SAG
DENR FORM MFLSI= (12/2006)

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual I !Port
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 18.39
Permit #: WQ0031725 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Derek Teague Owner: Larry Teague Predominant Soil Series: MgC2
Acres Used: 10 Acres Permitted: 10 Site #: T-02 Field #: T-02
Residual Analvsis Data (Heavv Metals and Total Phosphorus use me/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent
Com-
posite
Date.
�.
Total
P
..
��
Annual Henw Metal Field Loadings it:alculatea In ins/acre):
Total
1
121
3
4 v
_5j
6 1
7
8
9
10
"1
12
y
DT/Ac./
0
App.
r
Event
1.84
Arsenic
0.044
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.044
Cadmium
0.015
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.01
Copper
1.067
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.067
Chromium
0.386
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.386
Lead
0.107
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.600
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
.0.000
0.107
Mercury
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.'000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.004
Molyb-
0.029
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.029
denum
Nickel
0.154
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.154
Selenium
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.008
Zinc
1.173
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0;000
1.173
Total
Phos-
71.721
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
71.721
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my airection or supervision In accoruance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)
o/
Signature of Land Applier

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 7.82 ,
Permit #: WQ0031725 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Derek Teague Owner: Trilby Setzer Predominant Soil Series: CmB2`
Acres Used: 19.8 Acres Permitted: 19.8 Site #: S-01 Field #: S-01
Residual Analysis Data (Heave Metals and Total Phosphorus use nfe/k2. % Solids use Raw Percent #1:
Com-
posite
Date.
�.
Total
•
.•
Annual Heavv Metal Meld Loadines (Calculated in Ibs/acre):
Total
1
2
4 1
jj
6
7
9 J
i2i
11
12
DT/Ac./
_3j
_Bj
o
App.
y
Event
0.40
"
Arsenic
0.009
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.009
Cadmium
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
Copper
0.229
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.229
Chromium
0.083
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.083
Lead
0.023
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.023
Mercury
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
Molyb-
0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.006
denum
Nickel
0.033
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.033
Selenium
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
Zinc
0.252
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.252
Total
Phos-
15.405
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
15.405
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations".
Signature of Land Applier Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

`---\_ I--
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare WQ Permit #: WQ0031725 Field #: T-01 Acres Utilized: 26
Land Owner: Larry Teague Annual Dry Tons Applied: 43.7690 Site #: T-01 Acres Permitted: 26
Operator: Derek Teague Predominant Soil Series: HsB2 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop I Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: 216 Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN:
` t
o
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
SOLI
Cond.
(Dry,
t.
vest)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
D
a
3 �•
o w
a
* '
o
w °=,
-
N'
* w
0
a
N
c
3
TKN
mg/kg
z D
�' E3
c
oo c
g a
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
( Ibs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Cro 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
2-09
107.29
1'•5 PT
11.64
0.405
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.3
0.5
81200
8200
1
,31.521
NA
Fescue
3-09
108.8
io,W 0-r
11.64
0A10
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.3
0.5
81200
8200
1
31.965
NA
Fescue
4-09
108
11.64
0.407 ✓
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.3
0.5
81200
8200
1
31.730
NA
Fescue
5-09
72.6
11 p"(
11.64
0.274 /
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.3
0.5
81200
8200
1
21.329
NA
Fescue
6-09
49.8
y,
11.64
0.188 ✓
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.3
0.5
81200
8200
1
14.631
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0 ,
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
446.49
o
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
H g
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
131.176
0.000
Lime Applied ,
Annuallbs/acre
0.040
0.013
0.974
0.353
0.097
0.004
0.027
0.141
0.007
1.072
65.520
Date
I lbs/act
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.108
0.01
1.86
0
0.157
0.0066
0.145
0.1178
0.0158
1.704
- Oq
lOoO
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.148 ✓
0.021
2.834
0.353
0.254
0.011
0.172 V,
0.259
0.023
2.776
Permitted C. P. L. R.***'*
36
34
1338
NA
267
15
NA
374
89
2498
Permit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
F 216
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false -
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
(.2.4- **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested, -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
a• ****C.P:L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
F5�
DENR FORM FSF (1212006)

nn
00 0
7 AN,
A (49

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare
Land Owner: Larry Teague
Operator: Derek Teague
Crop I Name:
Fescue
WQ Permit #: WQ0031725 Field #: T-02
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 18.4000 Site #: T-02
Predominant Soil Series: MgC2
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 162 Crop 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 10
Acres Permitted: 10
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
° Y
°
M °
Volume applied
enter one Solids/
( )
Liquid
9
Cu. Yds Gallons
o
/o
Solids
Volume
Applied per
PP P
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, \N Q#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(Dry,
Wet
Moist)
Preci P
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
D
�
0 o
<
X a
a _
=
N
# w'
0
TKN
mg/kg
z ➢
0
o o
g �'-•
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
PP
(Ibs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop I
Crop 2
8-19
24
11.64
0.235
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.3
1 0.5
81200
8200
1
18.333
NA
Fescue
9-09
44.7
11.64
0.438
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.3
0.5
81200
8200
1
34.145
NA
Fescue
10-09
45.3
11.64
0.444
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.3
0.5
81200
8200
1
34.603
NA
Fescue
11-09
73.7
11.64
0.722
WQ0031725
dry
0
s
0.3
0.5
81200
8200
1
56.297
NA
Fescue
0.000
1
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
1877F
0
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
143.371
0.000
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0.044
0
0.044
36
0.015
0
0.015
34
1.067
0.371
1.438
1338 -'.
0.386
0.132
0.518
NA
0.107
0
0.107
267
0.004
0.003
0.007
15
0.029
0
0.029G
NA
0.154
0.055
0.209v
37.4
0.008
0
0.0081,
89
1.173
0.417
1.590
1 2498
71.721
6
Date-
-114&4ap
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
Permit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
I 1 162
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment -for knowing violations."
'7 *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost-0.1,'anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare WQ Permit #: WQ0031725 Field #: S-01 Acres Utilized:
Land Owner: Trilby Setzer Annual Dry Tons Applied: 7.8227 Site #: S-01 Acres Permitted:
Operator: Derek Teague
Crop I Name: Fescue
Predominant Soil Series: CmB2
Crop 1 Max. PAN: 216 Crop 2 Name:
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
19.8
19.8
a s
C
p
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#.
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(Dry,
(D
Wet,
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
>
K
a
c a
-•
o
; _
N'
. w
a
" w
TKN
mg/kg
z >
c 9
°; c
g w
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
( Ibs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop I
Crop 2
1-2009
79.8
11.64
0.395
W00031725
dry
0
s
0.3
0.5
81200
8200
1
30.786
NA
Fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
79.81
0
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P (
30.186
) 0.000
Lime Applied
Annual lbs/acre
0.009
0.003
0.229
0.083
0.023
0.001
0.006
0.033
0.002
0.252
15.405
�
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative Ibs/ac
0.11
0.119 -
36
0.05
0.053„
34
9.146
9.375,,
1 1338
0.634
0.717v
NA
1.47
IA93
267
0.043
0.044v
15
0.182
0.188 J
NA
0.465
0.498
374
0.079
0.081
89
12.396
12.648v
2498
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
Permit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
F 216
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
�j *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
/G **Volatilization Rate: Surface -0.5, Injection/incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
Signature of Land Applier Date
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate.
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

Report Number:
R09126-8005
Account Number:
46381
To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER, NC 28669
ATTN: DENNIS KEY
LAB NUMBER: 42762
SAMPLE ID: BAXTER
A&L EASTERN LABORATORIES, INC.
7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237
[phone] • Fax No. [phone]
FOR: BAXTER
li•L�Z�I�:i�I3�k'f/
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
copy: ZACH KEY
DATE SAMPLED: 5/4/2009 1245
DATE RECEIVED: 5/6/2009 1230
DATE REPORTED: 5/1 1/2009 PAGE: 1
Solids, Total (As is)
11.64
116400
100
JM
05/06/09
16:00
SM 2540G
Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl
8.12
81200
10
JM
05/07/09
16:00
SM 4500 (NorgB+NH3C)
Phosphorus
1.95
19500
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Potassium
0.55
5500
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Sulfur
1.58
15800
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Calcium
1.68
16800 �q% 1L
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Magnesium
0.44
4400 512•Z
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
.Sodium
0.35
35004olN-5P-
100
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Iron
11800
1
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Aluminum
2350
10
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Manganese
153
1
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Copper
- 290
1
KM
Q5/07/09
15:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Zinc
319
1
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Nitrogen, Ammonia (as N)
0.82
8200
10
JM
05/07/09
14:00
SM 4500(NH3B+NH3C)
Nitrogen, Organic (N)
7.30
73000
100
DCH
CALCULATION
Nitrogen, NO3+NO2
< 1
1
KS
05/07/09
1.5:00
SM 4500-NO3F
Cadmium
4.0
1
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
Chromium
105
5
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/6010B
All values are on a dry weight basis except
as noted. Detection Limit on all N series is on a wet basis. BDL' - Below
Detection Limit
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients.
and ma.r.not be reproduced in whole or
,n part, nor may any reference be made
to the work, the results.. or the company ,n any
advernsinq.,news release or
other public announcements
without obtaining
our prior written authorization
--li'CI
`n
�
PAUL C. H. CHU
•

Report Number:
R09126-8005 A&L EASTERN LABORATORIES, INC. y
Account Number: 7621 Whitepine Road •Richmond, Virginia 23237
AFL
46381 [phone] • Fax No. [phone]
TO: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER, NC 28669
ATTN: DENNIS KEY
LAB NUMBER: 42762
SAMPLE ID: BAXTER
FOR: BAXTER
NC CERT #257
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
copy: ZACH KEY
DATE SAMPLED: 5/4/2009 1245
DATE RECEIVED: 5/6/2009 1230
DATE REPORTED: 5/11/2009 PAGE: 2
Nickel
42
5
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Lead
29
5
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
Arsenic
12.0
1.0
KM
05/07/09
15:00
SW 846-601 OB
Mercury
1.2
0.4
KM
05/08/09
15:00
SW 846-7471A
Selenium
2.1
1.0
KM
05/07/09
15:00
SW 846-601OB
pH (Std. Unit, As is)
7.29
0.01
RD
05/07/09
12:30
SW 846-9045D
Molybdenum
8
5
KM
05/07/09
16:00
SW 846-3051/601OB
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted. Detection Limit on all N series is on a wet basis. BDL' - Below Detection Limit
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made -
to the work. the results, or the company in any advertising, news release. or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization �y•
PAUL C. H. CHU

•;S
Analytical Results
Southern Soil Builders For: Baxter
958 Hoots Road
Roaring River NC 28669
Entered 5/4/2009
Reported: 7/8/2009
Sample Remark
Sample ID
Parameter
Cust ID
Result Units
Method 'Date Analyzed
Analyst
09054-9.1
% Solids
1
1.7
%
SM2540B
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.1
Fecal Coliform MTF
1
7,647
MPN/g
SM92210E
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.10
Corrosivity
TCLP
See Attached
SW-846
5/21/09
PACE
09054-9.10
Ignitability
TCLP
See Attached
1010M
5/21/09
PACE
09054-9.10
Reactivity
TCLP
See Attached
SW-846 :
5/21/09
CL
09054-9.10
TCLP
TCLP
See Attached
1311 t
5/21/09
PACE
09054-9.2
% Solids
2
1.76
%
SM2540B
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.2
Fecal Coliform MTF
2
7,955
MPN/g
SM92210E.
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.3
% Solids
3
1.75
%
SM2540B
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.3
Fecal Coliform MTF
3
9,714.
MPN/g
SM92210E
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.4
%.Solids
4
1.67
%
SM2540B
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.4
Fecal Coliform MTF
4
29,940
MPN/g
SM92210E
5/5/09,
CL
09054-9.5
% Solids
5
1.67
%
SM2540B
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.5
Fecal Coliform MTF
5
6,587-
MPN/g
SM92210E
5/5/Q9
CL
09054-9.6
% Solids
6
1.64
%
SM2540B
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.6
Fecal Coliform MTF
6
4,878
MPN/g
SM9221 CE '
5/5/09
CL.
09054-9.7
% Solids
7
1.7
%
SM2540B
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.7
Fecal Coliform MTF
7
10,000
MPN/g
SM92210E'
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.7
Geometric Mean
7
9,225 ✓
MPN/g
dry wt. basis
5/5/09
CL
09054-9.8
VSS
Baxter A,
11,900
mg/L
SM2540G
5/6/09
CL
09054-9.9
VSS
Baxter B
350
mg/L
SM2540G
5/6/09
CL
W.
T VS
--3 P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 704/872/4697

Southern Soil Builders
958 Hoots Road
Roaring River NC 28669
Entered 5/4/2009
Reported: 7/8/2009
Sample Remark
Sample ID Parameter Cust ID
Respectfully submitted,
1
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NCO0909
For:
Result Units Method Date
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687. 704/872/4697

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc
Date: 15-May-09
Client:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Client Sample ID:
09054-9.10
Project:
9243664
Collection Date:
.5/4/2009 12:50:00 PM
Lab ID:
0905561-001
Matrix:
Aqueous
Analyses Reporting Dilution ,
Y Result Limit Qual Units BatchID 4 Factor Date Analyzed Analyst
HERBICIDES, TCLP SW1311/8151A
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) BRL 0.20
2,4-D BRL 0.20
Surr: DCAA 100 36.6-149
Qualifien: Value exceeds maximum contaminant level
BRL Below reporting limit
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
N Amlyte not NELAC certified
B Analyte detected in the associated method blank
> Greater than Result value
(SW3510B)
m8/L i'13188 1 05/13/2009 13:36' El ,
m8/L 113188 1 05/13/2009 13:36 El
%REC 113188' 1 05/13/200913:36 El
E Estimated (value above quantization range)
S Spike Recovery outside limos due to matrix
Narr See case narrative
NC Not confirmed
< Less than Result value
Page 3 of 5

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc.
CLIENT: Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Work Order: 0905561
Project: 9243664
Sample ID: MB-113188
Client ID:
Analyte
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
2.4-D
Surr: DCAA
Sample ID: LCS-113188
Client ID:
Analyte
2,4.5-TP (Silvex)
2,4-D
Surr: DCAA
Date: 15-May-09
ANALYTICAL QC SUMMARY REPORT
TestCode: HERBICIDES, TCLP SW1311/8151A
camp i ype: MBLK
Batch ID: 113188
Units: mg/L
TestCode: HERBICIDES,
TCLP
SW131118151A
Result
RPT Limit
SPK value
SPK Ref Val
BRL
0.20
0
0
BRL
0.20
0
0
0.4379
0
0.5
0
SampType: LCS
Batch ID:113188
Units: mg/L
TestCode: HERBICIDES, TCLP
SW131118161A
Result
RPT Limit
SPK value SPK Ref Val
0.4525
0.20
0.5
0
0.4238
0.20
0.5
0
0.5144
0
0.5
0
Sample ID: 0905428-001AMS
SampType: MS
Batch ID:113188
Units: mg/L
Client ID:
TestCode: HERBICIDES, TCLP
SW1311181SIA
Analyte
Result
RPT Limit
SPK value
SPK Ref Val
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
0.3733
0.20
0.5
0
2,4-D
0.3462
0.20
0.5
0
Surr: DCAA
0.4369
0
0.5
0
Prep Date:
6/12/2009
Analysis Date:
6/1312009
%REC
Lowl-imit Highlimit
RPD Ref Val
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
87.6
36.6
149 0
Prep Date:
5/12/2009
Analysis Date:
5/13/2009
%REC
Lowl-imit Highlimit RPD Ref Val
90.5
73.3
120 0
84.8
57.9
120 0
103
36.6
149 0
Prep Date:
5/12/2009
Analysis Date:
5/13/2009
%REC
Lowl-imit Highlimit RPD Ref Vat
74.7
63.4
133 0
69.2
44.5
128 0
87.4
36.6
149 0
RunNo:
147867
SegNo:
3037980
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
0
0
0
RunNo:
147867
SegNo:
3037981
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
0
0
0
RunNo: 147867
SegNo: 3037983
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
0
0
0
.'
Qualifiers: < Less than Result value > Greater than Result value ' B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank `
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Estimated value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
1 Estimated value detected below Reporting Limit N Analyte, not NELAC certified . R. . •
RPD outside limits due.to.matrix �.•
Rpt Lim Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside limits due to matrix `
Page I of l
Page 5 of 5

7 a/� ,, ^ a' Pace analytical Services, Ina Pace Analytical Services, Inc. G
ceA alytic.al . 2225 Riverside Dr. 98W KncryAve. Suite 1pp
wwwPacerabsr= Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: 09054-9
Pace Project No.: 9243664
Sample: 09054-9.10 lab ID: 9243664001 Collected: 05/04/09 12:50 Received: 05/07/09 10:25 Matrix: Other
Re& is reported on a "dry -weight' basis
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8081 GCS Pesticides, TCLP SPE
Analytical Method: EPA 8081 Preparation Method: EPA 3535
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/15/09 00:00
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane (Technical)
NO ug/L
0.50 1
05/20/09 17:45
05/21/09 11:22 58-89-9
Endrin
NO ug/L
3,0 1
05/20/09 17:45
05/21/09 11:22 57-74-9
Heptachlor epoxide
ND ug/L
NO ug/L
0.50 1
05/20/09 17:45
05/21/09 11:22 72-20-8 '
Methoxychlor
NO ug/L
0.50 1
05/20/09 17:45
05/21/09 11:22 1024-57-3
Toxaphene
NO ug/L
1,000 1
05/20/09 17:45
05/21/09 11:22 72-43-5
Decachlorobiphenyl (S)
66 %
3.0 1
0520169 17:45
05/21/09 11:22 8001-35-2
Tetrachloro-m-xy(ene (S)
31 %
10-138 1
0520/09 17:45
0521/09 11:22 2051-24-3
10-110 1
0520/09 17:45
0521109 11:22 87.7-09-8
9010 MET ICP, TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Leachate Me#wWDate: EPA 1311; 0520/09 17:30
Arsenic
Barium
NO mg/L
0.025 1
0521/09 12:30
0521/09 17:09 7440-W2
Cadmium
0.043 mg/L
0.025 1
05/21/09 12:30
0521/09 17:09 7440-39-3
Chromium
NO mg/L
0.0050 1
0521/0912:30
0521/09 17:09 7440-43-9
Lead
NO mg/L
0.025 1
0521/09 12:30
0521/09 17:09 7440- 47-3
Selenium
NO mg/L
0.025 1
0521/09 12:30
05/21/09 17:0 ' 7439-92-1
NO mg/L
0.050 1
0521/09 12:30
0521/09 17:09 7782-49-2
Silver
NO mg/L
0.025 1
0521/09 12:30
0521/09 17:09 7440-22-4
7470 Mercury, TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05/20/09 17:30
Mercury
NO uWL
020 1
0521109 12:30
0521109 15:57 7439-97-6 ,
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
t•
Leachate Method/Date: EPA 1311; 05115/09 00:00
,1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
NO ug/L
50.0 1
05/21/09 10:00
0522109 02:46 106-46-7
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
50.0 1
0521/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46` 12-1-14-2
Hexachlorobenzene
NO ug/L
50.0 1
05/21/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46 '87.68-3
Hexachloroethane
NO ug/L
50.0 1
05/21/09 10:00
05122/09 02:46 118-74-1
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
NO ug/L
50.0 1
0521/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46 67-72-1
3&4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
NO ug/L
50.0 1
50.0
0521/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46 95-48-7
Nitrobenzene
NO ug/L
1
0521/09 10:00
051WO9 02:46
Pentachlorophenol
NO ug/L
50.0 1
50.0
0521/09 10:00
0522109 02:46 98-95-3
Pyridine
1
0521/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46 87-86-5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
NO ug/L
NO ug/L
50.0 1
0521/09 10:00
0522109 02:46 110-86-1
2,4,6-Tdchlorophenol
NO ug/L
50.0 1
0521/09 10:00
05rM09 02:46 95-la5-4
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
56 %
50.0 1
0521/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46 88-06-2
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
62 %
30-150 1
05/21/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46. •4165-60-0
TerphenyW 14 (S)
30-150 1
05/21/09 10:00
05/22/09 02:46 321-60-8
Phenol-d6 (S)
64 %
30-150 1
05/21/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46 1718-01-0 ' -
2-Fluorophenol (S)
34 %
46 %
25-150 1
0521/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46 13127-88.3
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
42 %
25-150 1
05/21/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46 367-124
25-150 1
0521/09 10:00
0522/09 02:46 118-79-6
Date: 06/092009 03:31 PM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 4 of 11
This report shell not be reproduced, except in full,
without fhe written consent of Pace Ana"ml Services, Inc..

PiceAnalytical
wwwyacelabscw
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical t
W00 iGrw;Ave:
H-lie�.
Project: 09054-9 •.
Pace Project No.: 9243664
Sample: 09054-9.10 Lab ID: 9243664001 Collected: 05/04/09 12:50 Received: 06/07/09 10:25 Matrix: Other
Resuks reported on a "d7-weight, bases
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8260 MSV TCLP
Benzene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
12-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
W45 pH Soil
PH at 25 Degrees C
733C Reactive Cyanide
Cyanide, Reactive
734S Reactive Sulfide
Sulfide, Reactive
Date: 06/09/2009 03:31 PM
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
_
NO ug/L
NO
125
25
s
Ci°
05/20/09 01:4 71-43-2
ug/L
250
2t5
05/20/09 01:43, 78-93-3
ND ug/L
125
25
OSR0109 01:43 56-23-5
ND ug/L
125_
25
`/
05/20/09 01:43 108-90-7 -
NO ug/L
125
25
Lot
OW" 01:43 67-6&3
ND ug/L
125
25
YNA-)
05/20/09 01:43. 106-46-7
NO ug/L
125
25
05/20/09 01:43 1074)6-2 '
NO ug/L
125
25
��5ixk
0520/09 01:43 75-35-4
ND ug/L
125
25
0520/09 01:43 127-18-4
NO ug/L
125
25
tipcD '
05/20/09 01:43' 79-01-6
NO ug/L
125
25
4-1-
0520/09 01:43. 75-01-4
114 %
79-120
25
05/20/0905/20/09 01:43 17060-07-0
122 %
70-120
25
/,',"!`�-
0520/09 01:43 2037-26-5
94 %
87-109
25
1
0520/09 01:43 460-00-4
117 %
85-115
25
//l G/�`
0520/09 01.43 1868,53-7
Analytical Method: EPA 9045
5.4 Std.. Units 0.10 1
Analytical Method: SW-846 7.3.3.2 Modified
NO mg/L 0.0050 1
Analytical Method: SW-846 7.3.4.2
NO mg/L
1.0 1
0511210911:2;.
Vo t&( f 05/11/09 14:32 .
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduoed, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 5 of 11

Analytical Results
Southern Soil Builders
958 Hoots Road
Roaring River NC 28669
Entered 7/31/2009
Reported: 8/14/2009
Sample Remark
Sample ID Parameter Cust ID
For
Result Units
Method Date Analyzed Analyst
090731-5 Ignitability Baxter <0.8 1010M 8/11/09
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NCO0909
PACE
P.O. Box 228 9 Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 704/872/4697

• ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FOR14 (02T Rules)
Facility Name: Baxter Healthcare
WWTP Name: Baxter Healthcare
WQ Permit Number: WQ0031725
NPDES Number: NC0006564
Monitoring Period: From 1/1/2009 To 12/31/2009
Pathogen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alt. A (time/temp) ❑
Alt B (Alk Treatment) ❑
Alt. C (Prior Testing)❑
AILD (No Prior Test)
I Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs ❑
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
I Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
1 -
Class B:
JAIt. (1) Fecal Density
Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens ❑
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class
B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ❑
Air Drying ❑
1 Composting ❑
jAerobic Digestion 0
Anaerobic Digestion ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following
monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
Pathogen Density
Number ot
Excee-
dene
Frequency
of Analysis
Sample
Type
Analytical
Tech -
woue
Minimu
Geo. Mean
Maximum
Units
Fecal Coliform
2 x 10 to the
6th power
per gram of
total solids
MPN
4878
9225
29940
MPN/g
0
7
grab
sm9221 e
CFU
•
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 MPN per 4 grams
total solid (dry
weight)
•
Vector Attraction Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1107) - Please indicate alternative performed:
Alt.I (VS reduction)
Alt. 2 (40-day bench) ❑
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑
Alt. 4 (Spec. OZ uptake) ❑
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic) ❑
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization ❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable)
jAlt. 8 (Drying - Unstable) ❑
Alt. 9 (Injection) ❑
Alt. 10 (Incorporation) ❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed ❑
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
+❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106 and the
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1107 have not been met." (Please note
if you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the
requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance,with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
S-(uuCN r�t,•�E �,J S7EUG1-C�K Y Dennis Key President Southern Soil Huilders, Inc.
Preparer Name and Title (type or print) Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
Signatu e of Preparer* tlDate Signature of and Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

Page 1 of 5
A &L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
Report Number: 09-351-0538
®�
L
Account Number: 46381
r77621 wh¢epine Road Richmond. Virginia
23277 [phone] Fax (804) 27t-gaa6
www.allabscomJ
Submitted By:
ZACH
KEY
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
Grower:
SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS Farm ID:
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER NC 28669
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
Analytical Method(s):
Date Received: 12/17/2009 Date Of Analysis: 12/18/2009 Date Of Report: 12/21/2009
MEHLICH 3
Organic Matter
Phosphorus Potassium Magnesium Calcium Sodium
pH
Acidity C.E.0
Sample ID Lab ENR Mehlich 3 Reserve K Mg
Field ID Number % Rate
Ca Na
Rate m Rate
Soil
pH
Buffer H
Index meq/100g meq/1009
lbs/A ppm Rate ppm Rate ppm. Rate ppm
Rate ppm pp
BT9-1
125 VH 37 VL 151
M 1745 H 19 VL
6.9
6.92
0.1 10.3
17851 2.9 M 93
NC=104 NC=19
BT6-1
72 H 31 VL 158
H 1287 H 72 L
6.7
6.89
0.4 8.5
17852 2.8 M 94
NC=60 NC=16
77 H 30 VL 11B
M 1515 H 21 VL
71
0.0 8.7
BT6-3 17853 3.0 M 98
NC=64 NC=15
50 VL 221
H 607 M 12 VL
6.3
6.87
0.6 5.7
54 2.1 L 84
NC=19 NC=26
F��lL
21 L 43 VL 132
H 744 M 11 VL
6.80
1.3 6.3
T1
F1755 2.5 L 91
= NC = 22
NC 17
Percent
Base
Saturation
Nitrate
Sulfur
Zinc
Manganese
Iron
Copper
Boron
Soluble
Salts
Chloride
Aluminum
Sample ID
K
Mg
Ca
Na
H
NO3N
S
Zn
Mn
Fe
Cu
B
Ss
CI
AI
Field ID
/a
/o o
%
%
%
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ms/cm
Rate
ppm Rate
ppm
9 VL
23.7 VH
82 VH
77 VH
7.4 VH
0.7 M
0.16 VL
BT9 1
0.9
12.2
84.7
0.8
1.4
NC=23
NC=592.5
NC=513
NC=370.0
9 VL
10.6 VH
28 H
77 VH
5.6 VH
0.5 L
0.16 VL
BT6-1
0.9
15.5
75.7
3 7
4.5
NC = 23
NC = 265.0
NC = 175
NC = 280.0
7 VL
14.5 VH
92 VH
65 VH
5.3 .VH
0.5 L
0.13 r VL
BT6-3
0.9
11.3 j
87.1
1.0
0.0
.,
NC =•18•
NC = 362.5•
Nr- = 57.5
NC = 265.0.
10 L
1.7 L
18 M
60 VH
1 A M
0 1 VL
0.1 1
VL
I S1
2.2
32.3
53.2
0 9
10.5
NC = 25
NC = 42.5
NC = 113
NC = 70.0
7 VL
5.7 H
B L
137 VH
1.9 H
01 VL
0.12 VL
T1
TT81:775HE
E211
NC=18
NC=1425
NC=50
NC=950
,
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients ,n
the Explanation of symbols % (percent). ppm tparts per million) Ibs/A
tms,enon appd.es to samoteisi testeo Samples
�n�m d th-rty (lays attw tesnnq
afe ,eta,neo
a
soil. Rating alter each value VL (Very Low). L (Low) M (Medium).
(pounds per acre). ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter) meq/ t00g
ma.
t7 y
H (High) VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release
(mill-e(1uivalent per 100 grams) Convers,ons ppm x 2 = Ibs/A
Anatvs.s n,eparen oy Axt Eastw^ i ono, ato, es
i^,:
'
C E C - Canon Exchange Capacity
Soluble Salts ms/cm x 640 = ppm
Oscar Rwz

Page 2 of 5
Report Number: 09-351-0538
Account Number: 46381 r7Y�
Y
www allabs.com
Send To: SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS
DENNIS KEY
958 HOOTS ROAD
ROARING RIVER NC 28669
A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
7621 Whitepine Road Richmond Virginia 23237 [phone] Par (804) 271 b146
Grower: Submitted By: ZACH KEY
SOUTHERN SOIL BUILDERS Farm ID:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT Analytical Method(s):
n.to r)f Ronnnt- 19/71/?nnq MEHLICH 3
vp" `cyy yV
_
Organic Matter'
Phosphorus
Potassium
Magnesium
Calcium
Sodium
pH
Acidity
C.E.0
Sample ID
Lab
ENR
Mehlich 3
Reserve
K
Mg
Ca
Na
Soil
Buffer
H
Field ID
Number
% Rate
lbs/A
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm
Rate
ppm
Rate
ppm
Rate
PH
Index
meq/100g
megH00g
F1
159 VH
28 VL
109
M
800
M
17
VL
5.8
6.81
1.2
6.2
17856
3.2 M 105
NC = 132
NC = 14
T2
25 L
70 L
145
H
668
M
11
VL
6.82
1.1
5.9
17857
2.2 L 86
NC=21
NC=36
-]
1
-]
64 H
26 VL
124
H
649
M
17
VL
6.0
6.85
0.8
�71
FP-0
17858
2 2 L 87
I
NC=53
NC=13
-
-
NW11
VH
123 M
184
H
1216
M
16
VL
5.9
6.76
1.7
9.7
17859
3.2 M 100
I307
NC = 256
NC = 63
NW13
344 VH
197 H
225
H
1414
M
15
VL
5.9
6.73
2.0
11.5
17860
4.2 M 118
1
1
NC = 287
NC = 101
Percent Base Saturation
Nitrate
Sulfur
Zinc
Manganese
Iron
Copper
Boron
Soluble Salts
Chloride
Aluminum
Sample ID
K
Mg
Ca
Na
H
NOON
S
Zn
Mn
Fe
Cu
B
SS
CI
Al
Field ID
,
/a
%
o
/o
o
/o
%
PP m Rate
PP m Rate
PP m Rate
PP m Rate
PP m
Rate
PP m Rate
PP m
Rate
ms/cm
Rate
PP m Rate
PP m
F1
12 L
5.9 H
8 L
106
VH
9.7 VH
0.3
VL
0.13
VL
1.2
14.7
64.5
1.2
19.2
NC = 30
NC = 147.5
NC = 50
NC = 485.0
T2
8 VL
3.0 M
7 L
70
VH
2.0 H
0.1
VL
0.137VL
3.0
20.5
56.6
0.8
19.0
NC = 20
NC = 75 0
NC = 44
NC = 100.0
JP-01
7 VL
7.1 H
7 L
99
VH
4.9 VH
0.2
VL
0.11
VL
1.3
19.9 „
62.4 ,
1.4
F15 5
NC=18
NC=1775
NC=44
NC=245.0
NW11
9 VLrNC
VH
M
VH
6.0 VH
0.4
L
0.14
VL
3 3
15.8
62.7
0.7
17 1
NC = 23
= 342 S
�1ONC
= 63
1238
NC = 300.0
NW13
12 L
VH
M
VH
VH
0.6
M.
0 32
VL
44
163
61.5
06
171
1153
NC = 30
NC = 382 5
�12
NC = 75
1229
16.6
NC = 330.0
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the Explanation of symbols °i, (percent) ppm (parts per million) Ibs/A th's reoon to wslea sanWes are reranect a
sal Rating after each Value VL (Very Low) L (Low) M (Medium), (pounds per acre) msrcm (milli -mhos per centimeter) megr 100g tit ln"n, oars Atte, tesang
H IHigh) VH (Very Fligh) ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release (mill -equivalent per 100 grams) COnvers�ons pp^r + 2 = Ibs/A A­IVsis oqe.nare,i n.. 4Sl Faster^ ano, aiurs ❑n
C E C - Canon Exchange Capacity Soluble Salts ms/cm . 640 = poni
by
Oscar Rutz

Below are the calculations for Vector Attraction Reduction requirement
per 15A NCAC 02T.1107 (Alt 1).
Statesville Analytical shows a VSS on 5/6/09, Sample ID 09054-9.8 (also
identified as "Baxter A") of 11900 mg/L. This sample was pulled at the
beginning of the digestor process.
Statesville Analytical shows a VSS on 5/6/09, Sample ID 09054-9.9 (also
identified as "Baxter B") of 350 mg/L. This sample was pulled at the end
of the dewatering process.
((VSS In (mg/L) — VSS Out (mg/L)) _ VSS In (mg/L)) x 100 = % Solids Reduction
((11900 mg/L — 350 mg/L) _ 11900 mg/L) x 100 = 97.06 % Solids Reduction
d
This meets the 15A.NCAC 02T.1107 (Alt 1) requirement of minimum
38% Solids Reduction.
Stephen Gouge
Wastewater TreatrrYent Supervisor
Baxter Healthcare Corp.
11,9, oo i - 310
Il�6'J -(119(�,p7,
v, 6(5,
S-A