WQ0004298_Residuals Annual Report 2017_20180312

Town of Mars Hill NC
2017 Land Application Report
WQ0004298
Attached are the required forms for the Town of Mars Hills 2017 land application
program.
The town has land applied 0.00 dry tons of sludge over 0 acres in the calendar year 2017.
We have also maintained compliance with all terms and conditions. The Town of Mars
Hill has disposed 99.62 wet tons of the WWTP sludge at Advanced Disposal Eco-Safe
Landfill located in Blountville TN and di ply on WQ0004298 permitted site
in the calendar year 2017. (See Attached opy s
Contact Information:
Land Application ORC
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]
Permittee
Darhyl Boone
Town Manager
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]
ti.-
MAR 0.7 2w
21' r•_,�ti
!J:,iI
� : E�+�` D
bivision of 41'ater Resources
MAR 12 2018
Water Quality pegiona! Operations
Ashevi(ie -129 gal Office

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
WQ Permit#: WQ0004298 County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
Madison
Year: 2017
Town of Mars Hill
Land Application Operator: Robert M Sams Phone: [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
® Yes 21 No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Application Summary.
Total number of application fields in the pernut:
1 2
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year:
0
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
0
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
0
Part B - Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2017 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Rater Resources. 21 Yes ® No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1111 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C - Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Darhyl Boone- Town Manager
PermitteeW me and Title (type or print)
Signature of Permittee
Date
Signature of Preparer* / Date Signature of Land Applier
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
Date
* Preparer is defined m 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

AdVa19C11?C� ADVANCED DISPOSAL
ECOSAFE LANDFILL -YA
Disposal 385 HARR LANE \
BLOUNTVILLE TN 37617
V`
RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED
000011 000000025 �s
11111"11'III'III'lllll'llllll'llllllll�ll�l�lll'I'I'lllll'lllll' fi;�r
TOWN OF MARS HILL
• fPO BOX 368
MARS HILL NC 28754.0368
z
Account Information
Account Number YA001155
Site Number 0000
Invoice Date June 30, 2017
Invoice Number YA0000001780
Account Summary
Previous Balance $2,665.67
Payments/Adjustments-$2,665.67
Current Invoice Amount $1,842.48
Amount Due $1,842.48
Due Date Upon Receipt
Invoice Breakdown
Current $1,842.48
30 days - past due $0.00
60 days - past due $0.00
90 days - past due $0.00
Its easy being Green ... sign up
for ebill and auto pay at
http://Www.AdvancedDisposal.com/[Yillpay
Contact Us
[phone]
[e-mail]
Thank you for your business!
Pay By Phone: [phone] .
Phone PIN: 19 100 11550000
vanced Disposal is -a company bringing .fresh ideas and
lutions,to a clean.environment. How -can we further help
ur.bug1h6ss or home become greener and cled0er? Visit
°at www.AdvancadDlsnosal:com..
Id you'have questions about charges, please see the
of this invoice, .call your service representative or go .to
business!
Previous Balance $2,665.67
04/20/17 Lockbox Automated-$2,665.67
Payments and Adjustments-$2,665.67
Date
Description
Reference 0 Unit Price
Amount
00/12/17
ESPECIAL WASTE
T2115826 14.26TN
27.00
385.02
CONTRACT 17001 TOWN
OF MARS HILL
06/12/17
ESPECIAL WASTE
T2115877 14.40TN
27.00
386.80
CONTRACT 17001 TOWN
OF MARS HILL
06/13/17
ESPECIAL WASTE
T2115933 13.18TN
27.00
355.86
CONTRACT 17001 TOWN
OF MARS HILL
06/13/17
ESPECIAL WASTE
T2116003 15.43TN
27.00
416.61
CONTRACT 17001 TOWN
OF MARS HILL
06/14/17
ESPECIAL WASTE
T2116147 10.97TN
27.00
296.19
CONTRACT 17001 TOWN
OF MARS HILL
Material Summary
ESPECIAL WASTE 68.24 TN 1,842.48
Current Charges $1,842.48
Amount Due $19842.48
YA170703.101.bct-21-000000025
30. gloo. 5AI)
Coriiirtg soon: Advanced Disposat eServices1
f 7
Advanced Disposal is expanding our online: services. Customers: will have the
o ability to perform more transactions online and manage their accounts safely and
conveniently.. Please note: customers currently enrolled in online bill pay may be
required to change your. password in the near future because of these:
enhancements.,
_ya

1
Disposal
ADVANCED DISPOSAL
ECO-SAFE LANDFILL - YA
385 HARR LANE
BLOUNTVILLE TN 37617
RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED
000010 000000021 rX.-S
II�rlrlrlr�Illr�Il�rlulllymJll'II�II�II�IIIIJr�l�lll�lrr��l F�#�
M.
OF MARS HILL
4� PO BOX 368
' cA MARS HILL NC 28754-0368
2
Account Information
Account Number YA001155
Site Number 0000
Invoice Date December 31, 2017
Invoice Number YA0000002006
Account Summary
Previous Balance $1,842.48
Payments/Adjustments-$1,842.48
Current Invoice Amount $847.26
Amount Due $847.26
Due Date Upon Receipt
Invoice Breakdown
Current $847.26
30 days - past due $0.00
60 days - past due $0.00
90 days - past due $0.00
It's easy being Green ... sign up
for ebill and auto pay at
http://Www.AdvancedDisposal.com/billpay
Contact Us
[phone]
[e-mail]
Thank you for your businessl
YA180102JU1.td-19-UUUUUUUZ1
Online Bill Pay
Great for regular payments:
Visit vrww:advanceddfsposaLeomlbilfpay
to enroll In online bill pay methods.
With the Advanced Disposal online bill
payment system, you are able to:
• Make a one-time payment
• Setup.yout acoiiunt fat automatic
tecurring payments
If you would like asslstanee, please contact
us at 1-800.35541.08 and we will be happy
to assist. you. In getting set-up.
Pay By Phone: [phone]
Phone PIN:1910011550000
Advanced Disposal is a company bringing.fresh ideas and
solutions to a clean.environment. How -can we further help
your business or home become greener and cleaner? Visit
us -at v .ww.AdvancedDisposal:com.
Should you'have questions about charges, please see the
back of this invoice, call your service representative or go .to
www.AdvancedDis osal.com.
Thank.yqu for.your business!
Previous Balance $1,842.48
07i20/17 Lockbox Automated $1,842.48
Payments and Adjustments-$1,842.48
Date
Description
Reference Qty Unit Price
Amount
12107/17
ESPECIAL WASTE
T2131780 6.99TN '
27.00
188.73
CONTRACT 17001 TOWN
OF MARS HILL
12f07/17
ESPECIAL WASTE
T2131781 7.65TN
27.00
206.82
CONTRACT 17001 TOWN
OF MARS HILL
12/07/17
ESPECIAL WASTE
T2131849 7.94TN
27.00
214.38
CONTRACT 17001 TOWN
OF MARS HILL
12/07/17
ESPECIAL WASTE
T2131850 8.79TN
27.00
237.33
CONTRACT 17001 TOWN
OF MARS HILL
Material Summary
ESPECIAL WASTE 31.38 TN 847.26
Current Charges $847.26
Amount Due $847.26
144-4¢c.,� 5444-f
3 199100 = ys-co
How to Pay Your Bill
Pay by Mail
Best for sending a regular check -
Please snail, your check made. payable to
Advanced: Disposal to addles listed below. -
Please do not -send. correspondence. to this.
i assist us by including the
ance portion (the- perforated. bottom
n of your Invoice) along with your
or money order to ensure -your
mt.ls.posted quickly and accurately..
Pay by Phone
Good fora onetime payment -
Call 1-877-7204583. to -make your payment
by phone.
To. ensure fastest service, please have your
Phone PIN ready, -which can be found. at.
the top of your Invoice.
We accept MasterCard, Visa, American
Express and DiscoVer. An automated voice.
service. Will process your payment. This
option .is. ideal for making single payments.
PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WITH PAYMENT
Printed on recycled paper 0

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill LA
Land Owner: Matthew Cody
Operator: Robert Sams
Crop 1 Name:
WQ Permit #: WQ0004298 Field #: 1 Acres Utilized: 0
Annual Dry Tons Applied: #DIV/0! Site #: 1 Acres Permitted: 14.5
Predominant Soil Series: Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 1 Max. PAN:
Crop 2 Name:
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
0
°
o
A
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(Dry,
MOISt)
Precip.
Past 24
ems•
Inches
a
c� d
�.
°o.
* °p
o
� w
�, -
#
°p
c,
*
*
TKN
mg/kg
Z
a
o
o
c w•
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
( lbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
#DIV/0!
Did Not ADDIV
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0I
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
0
0
#VALUE!
Residuals Applications totals
on FORM
FSF supp ( attach
FORM FSF supp to this form):
#######
#######
TOTALS:
01
0
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
0.000
0.000
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
0.000
0.000
36
0.000
0.000
1 34
0.000
0.000
1 1338
0.000
0.000
1 NL
0.000
0.000
1 267
0.000
0.000
1 15
.0.000
0.000
1 NL
0.000
0.000
1 374
0.000
0.000
1 89
0.000
0.000
2498
0.000
M
. �
RV� ,
Date
lbs/ac
Permit PAN Limit l st/2nd Crop
h %
M , -z
d
+j3':'k
���-
�3'"f
'33t"%zafi ,f' ✓5^C
k , Y , t r ,x. Y
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualifie jpefsonnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
and imprisonment for
Signature of Land
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
*** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill LA
Land Owner: Matthew Cody
Operator: Robert Sams
Crop 1 Name:
WQ Permit #: WQ0004298 Field #: 2
Annual Dry Tons Applied: #DIV/0! Site #: 1
Predominant Soil Series:
Crop 1 Max. PAN: Crop 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 0
Acres Permitted: 3.8
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503):
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
A
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
wed'
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
Y
con
a
* p
o
~
*
* �'
*
TKN
mg/kg
Z
o
vc o
w•
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied (lbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
#DIV/0!
DiAnnlv
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0
0
#VALUE!
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
FSF supp to this form):
#######
#######
TOTALS:
0
0
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
H
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
0.000
0.000
Lime Applied
Annual lbs/acre
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34
1 1338
1 NL
267
15
NL
374
89
2498
Permit PAN Limit lst/2ndCrop
�3
...,.
.5?vzcfd,
✓".i?'",�S .w>,Y+Ju' „^d.�M v'S ��"�..�7.""
!4." h,
Sc„ ., r,.. ....
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
informatio , n uding the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN -Injection, INC -Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier
Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2•.D6)

r
4
Annual Report Review SDP Gass B Land-Apphcati6n
Reporting Period:
Permit Details:
'rOWQ._ oT Kcvs ujQVOOqA9S
Is 503N
Clas
s A oIe
-Maximum Dry, Tons Per Year: 7-
Number of acres' permitted.. j -?,:5.
Number of fields in permit:...
Counties that land ' is permitted for: A&A-141 Se� 14
Monitoring Frequeneybr TCLP: I Y 1pe-I-I4-
Monitoring Frequency for Residuals.Analysis: u-0-
Monit6ring Frequency for. Pathogen & Vector Attraction Reduction: 4,ill 14A A
Groundwater monitoring: N/A:
I. - Annual Laud Application Certification Form
-Was a certification form submitted?
Was land applicationc*ondu'ct'6'
dduring the reported -
How many dry tons and dry ions per acre were applied? - k'3A 2
Were the applications. within. the. pdrmitt6d amouiit?
Verify PAN if more than 'l 0 tons/ -;
acre
Did it indicate compliance? Y,
Was it signed. by the appropriate people?
.2, Monitoring.
Were.the analyses conducted atl.heyequired ftequpncy?,y
Was.an analyses taken for.each sourcethat wa
aly-s IdtidapilieM Y -
..Were the*m6tAls analysesr'pported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form?
Were the results reported -in mg/kg? yv�YC 0-a'A 9�A U - I,- V, Ce.
Were the pH's 6.0 or greater. for:each
-each residual sample? Me) 5AOW S,
.
1k,
a
Were the heavy metals: withi ' n%ceiling- concentration permit liniftpq V
4' Were the lab analysesattached?. - Nodk,A� �_41_w 19T5 WW ;5 VM'
At4
Were'all there required pgameters tested? y
'
Was T.W. anaIysi8:condu6te&`MC :-- R" -14'.
Were the TLCP contaminants within regulatory limits? � A
Was a corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity analysis conducted? m A
DOA wr b-v, olllk�.
3. Field Summary
-Were-the.land.application ev.ents.recorded.-..orj_the-F-ie.ld-S.uftimary-F--orms
-How many fields were applied on, this: year? —A
.Was a Field. Summary fbit a. submitted for each field?
Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?
from olcesl?
Were all the residuals applied permitteads y
Were the field. loading * rates for each metal ,and PAN calculated (year to date)?
Were the pumulativepolluta4t loading rates. calculated?
-Were the calculations correct?
-Were the PAN loading rates within permit limits? i"A-c Wfu- '101
61V(PI
Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates wWn permit limits?
Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?
010
sub XC.4-��
I

...Were the applications conducted during the prop' growing seaso ? CDu ld'
"©j 0- . M 04A �
Were the Field Summary Forms complete? Vo R ►d raic no a ven cu
Was linie application on Field Summary Form? No lime applied.► 3
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
oN II1Z3Ile,
It • Was a signed copy of th�thegen-an eetor Attraction Reduction Form submitted? , - f
ae-Did the form indicate the eriod of cover e; the residual class, and the pathogen reduction
alternative and the vector attrac ion re uetion option- used? e c tw�onshoc��,au`� be��_ A 1 }
d . (�.� ...'
Was the.Appropriate documentation to show path-aen and vector attraction reduction included
in the report?
Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503?° e;l l..
Yz
Class B Pathogen Review t
Alternative 1- Fecal Colif6nn Density
Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Were seven samples taken?
Was the geometriomean calculated and done correctly7Y
Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 WN/gram of total solids or
2,000,000 Colony Forming Units/gram: of toa1 solids)? : 5
..
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Signii:icantly Reduc6Pathogens (one of rive)
Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
L Aerobic Digestion .
Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
'Were logs submitted showing time. and'temperatute?
Were temperatures within range`for eoznplete tirrie:period?
Was the time and temperature-betw6en'40 days ai 20°C (680F)'and 60 days A 15°C f
:(590F)? - .
2. Air Drying
Were the residuals on sand'beds -or pave or unpaved basins for three months?'
Was the ambient temperature above 0°C (32°F) for two months?
Were the residuals partially digested?
Were.residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above O. T (not. snow .
covered)?
3. Anaerobic Digestion
-Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)? a
Were logs subinittedshowiing trine and temperature?
Were temp' within range for complete time period?
-Was the time and temperature between ] 5%daysA05PGOS.°F) to 550C (131°F) and 60 i.
days at 200C (680F)? 3 -
4. Composting (usually will lie..Class A'when composting is used)•
Was it a composting procedure (iiot'natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
Was the temperature raised to 40 -
5. Lime Stabilization

Was alkaline material •added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime
containing kiln dust. or fly ash)?.
Were logs submiiied showing time and temperature?
Was .the pHraised. to 12 after two hours of contact?
Were logssubmitted showing time and.pH�
Was temperature corrected'to•250C (TI°F)?
Alternative 3 Use of Processes- Equlyalent to:RSRP
(Not commonly use. See White House Nlannal page 100-103, tables l l-1 and 11-Z
Vector Attraction Reduction Review
Was the sampling conducted at'the.required frequency?
Option 1— 38% Volatile Solids Reduction
Was there 38%0 .reduction?
Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Were the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before'application
(Inspection)? „ ..
• Were 1 1 ti .' �
ea cu a ons correct.:
Option 2 40-Day Bench Scale. Test
Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals anaerobically digested -in1ab?..
Was the test run for 40 days .
Was the test done between 30°C (86°F) and 37°G (99°F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile solids (riot total solids)?
Was the reduction less than 17%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in: report? .
Were calculations correct?
Option 3 - 30-Day Bench, Scale Test
Wereresiduals from aerobically'dgestedtreatment (Inspection)? ,
Were residuals aerobically digested in lab? .
Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
If not 2% total solids, was.the test ran on a sample diluted to 2% with unchlorinated
effluent?
Was the test run for 30 days? ,
Was the test done.'at 20°C (68°F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Was the reduction less than 15%?
Were lab sheets/calculations in: report?
• Were calculations correct?
Option 4 — Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate(SOUR)
Were residuals form aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals 2% o or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?r�
Was the test done between 10°C (50°F) and 30°C (86°F)?�.
Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (680F)? y
Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total
residual solids (dry weight basis)? �)

lucAc D. a %, // D a
Was the sampling holding time two hours . j�
Was the test started within 15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained?
Option 5 —14-Day Aerobic Process
Were the residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Ware the residuals treated for 14 .days?
Was the residuals temperature higher than 400C (104T) for a 14-day period?
Was the average residuals.temperature higher than 450C (1'13T)?
Option 6 — Alkaline Stabilization
Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by.the addition of alkali?
Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours withoutihe addition of
more alkali?
Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additionaf twenty-two hours
without the addition of more alkali?
Was the pH corrected to.250C .(77°F)?
I
Option 7 _ Drying of Stabilized Residuals
Does.the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?
Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
Were the residuals dried up to 75% total solids?:
Option S —Drying of Unstabilized Residuals
Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
Were the residuals dried: to 90% total solids?
Option 9 — Injection
• Was there any significant amount of residuals on land surface one hour'after innjection
(Inspection)? N 3
Was injection done. on pasture or hay field? ;
Was injection done at time that crop Was growing?
If. Class A with respect to pathogen, -were residuals injected with eight hours after lO�g t
discharge from- pathogen treatment?:
5. Soil Tests . r
Was a, Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field? y bll + 5' 's
Were the •soil H's 6.0 or. eater for each a lication field? r
If no, was lime applied to hose fields? NA pp' WAq poi wt
Were the copper and zinc indexes in'the soil less than 2000 for each application.field?
*Was sodium less than 0.5 meq%100 cm^3? PUS,- su b� � �s ulaw� -1 1`�A rescc1 /00 CAS:'
*-.Was-the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) less than 15%?64
6Generalf�r�
• Was the report in the proper format? y :
-Was the annual report complete? 01D avi Au5s.rw
Was the report submitted on time? ab-53