The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWQ0004298_Residuals Annual Report 2013_20140211Town of Mars Hill NC 2013 Land Application Report WQ0004298 Attached are the required forms for the Town of Mars Hills 2013 land application program. The town has land applied 27.42353796 dry tons of sludge over 14.5 acres in the calendar year 2013. We have also maintained compliance. Contact Information: Preparer/ORC Robert Sams Public Works Director Town of Mars Hill PO Box 368 Mars Hill NC 28754 Phone # 828-206-2386 Permittee Darhyl Boone Town Manager Town of Mars Hill PO Box 368 Mars Hill NC 28754 Phone # 828-689-2301 RECEIVED Division of Water Resources F E B 1 1 2014 Water Quality Regional Operations Asheville Regional Office_ f AINA UAL LAAIJ A rJLAUA I IUA UER I IV IUA I WIN V UMV1 Permit#: WQ0004298 County: Madison Year: 2013 Facility Name (as shown on permit): Town of Mars Hill Land Application Operator: Robert M Sams Phone: 828-206-2386 Land application of residual solids as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year? Yes 0, No If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled. Part A: I Total number of application fields in permit: 2 Total number of fields land application occurred during the year: 1 Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: 27.42353796 Total number of acres land application occurred during the year: 14.5 Part B: Facility was compliant during calendar year 2013 with all conditions of the land application permit (including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. 10 Yes ED Na If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action taken. L'Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites. 2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit. 3. Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies of laboratory results are attached. 4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached. 5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3), copies of certified laboratory results are attached. 6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 503.13 or the Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13 (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities). 7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities). 8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality. 9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations. 10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were removed in accordance with the crop management plan. 11. No runoff 'of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred. 12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals. "I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." Darhyl Boone- Town Manager Permittame and Title (typ or print) SigiatureO Permittee Date //0 Signature of Preparer* Da a Signature of Land Applier Date DENR FORM ACF (5/2003) ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM Attach this form to the corresponding Annual Report Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed than those required to be summarized on this form. Permit Number: WQ0004298 Laboratory: Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill NPDES # or WQ#: NC0057151 WWTP Name: Town of Mars Hill Residual Analvsis Data 1) Earth Environmental Services 2) Environmental Testing Solutions Inc 3) 4) 5) 4mp or CompositeDate "I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are- signifiaqt penalties for sub ' "ng false information, including.the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." / 929 / Signature of Preparer ate 41 DENR FORM RSSF (5/2003) tarn tHroameatai services Michael Ladd 75 Bison Lane Murphy, NC 28906 Robbinsville Lab (828) 479-6428 Weaverville Lab (828) 645-8196 Residence (828) 837-9543 Vame and Address of Facility: Date: 10/14/2013 Town of Mars Hill WWTP Sample Collector. SR 3.0. BOX 368 Date and Time Sample Received: 4/9/2013 11:00 AM Mars Hill, NC 28754 Date and Time Sample Collected: 4/9/2013 10:23 AM M: Robert Sams Date and Time Sample Analyzed: < MHT .and Application Analyses - Note: All results in mg/Kg Dry Basis unless otherwise noted. rest Belt Press Sludge Soil Site #1 Soil Site #2 Report Limit Method Units WIDITY 0.0 meq/100g 0.o meq/100g SCA meq/100g rOTAL SUSPENDED RESIDUE .0 SM2540D mg/L :ATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY 15.2 meq/100g 10.4 meq/100g SCA meq/100g )H 7.2 7.2 6.8 0-14 SCA units 1MMONIA NITROGEN 11000 0.5. SCA mg/L 402 + NO3-n 130 1.0 SCA mg/L r OTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN 71000 SCA mg/L 'OTAL PHOSPHOROUS 17000 1 1400 470 SCA mg/L )ERCENT TOTAL RESIDUE 11.6% 74.1 % 76.3% SCA mg/L to ORGANIC MATTER 3.2% 3.2% SCA NTU fa BASE SATURATION - K 3.5% 6.0% SCA mg/L - H 0.0% 0.0% -Mg 22.1% 30.6% -Ca 73.66/6 62.6% -Na 0.6% 0.9% rLANT AVAILABLE (surface) 29630 PPM/dw NTROGEN- PPM DRY WT (subsurf) 35130 PPM/dw ;AR 1.416501 :SP 6.292906% 8.779264% IIANGANESE 150 450 SCA mg/L IIAGNESIUM 2800 3600 1500 SCA mg/L 'ODIUM 600 39 22 SCA mg/L :ADMIUM < 2.1 < 0.34 < 0.32 SCA mg/L :HROMIUM 21 34 32 SCA mg/L :OPPER 240 37 27 1 SCA mg/L .EAD 18 20 15. SCA mg/L IICKEL 21 16. 12._. SCA mg/L :INC 840 61 44 SCA mg/L :ALCIUM 8900 5500 1400 SCA mg/L 10TASSIUM 4900 1700 970 SCA mg/L iLUMINUM 5900 N/A N/A SCA mg/L iRSENIC 4.6 7.7 4.8 SCA mg/L IELENIUM 4.5 0.73 0.74 SCA mg/L AOLYBDENUM 6.2 1.1 0.66 SCA mg/L AERCURY 0.53 0.066 0.080 SCA mg/L I.C. Laboratory ID# 352 Analyzed By: S .ab Supervisor: Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville Certified By: Mars Hill Land Application Belt Press Sludge 4/9/13 PAN Mineralization as decimal _Total dN tons yea Acres Applied on Rate 0.4 TKN 71000 NH3 11000 NO3 130 NO2 0 %n Solids 0.116 PAN Surface 29630 m /k 59.26 lbs/dry ton 0 Ibs total PAN #DI1//01 lbs PAN/acre PAN Injection 35130 mg/k 70.26 lbs/dry ton 0 lbs total PAN #DIV/01 jibs PAN/acre Dry Tonsil 000, gal. 0.48372 1st year PAN Surface lbs. 0 1st year PAN Injected lbs. 0 lbs./acre Surface #DIV/0! lbs./acre Injected #DIV/0! MR(TKN-NH3)+ + .5(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton MR(TKN-NH3) + l(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton 1000 X 8.34 X %solids X sp. gravity "=dry tons/1000gal." 2000 �4, SAR . Mars Hill Land Application Belt Press Sludge 4/9/13 Sodium Absorption Ratio Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23 Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20 Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12 Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight Na(Mg/L) Ca M /L Mgf M /L 600 8900 1 2800 (ME) Ca ME M ME 1Na 26.086961 445 233. 3333 SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power SAR = 1.416501 (From Mg/L entered above) TSAR= 1.416501 (From ME entered below) Na (ME) ICa (ME) 1 445 I —Mg �ME� 26.08696 1233.3333 The amount of exchangeable sodium ions amount of exchangeable calcium & magne material. Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 re ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site #1 4/9/13 Exchangeable Sodium Percentage ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of soils Na (ME) CEC / 0.95652173892 15.2 ESP = 16.292906 % l/ Should be less than 15% (15-20%) Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq. ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site #2 4/9/13 Exchangeable Sodium Percentage ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of soils Na ME CEC 0.91304347806 10.4 ESP = 18.779264 % Should be less than 15% (15-20%) Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq. ""BBI (828) 47LABORATORY 6 28ATORY EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES WEAVERVILLE OFFICE (828) 645-8196 MICHAEL LADD-OWNER FAX: (828) 645-3706 RESIDENCE (828) 837-9543 FAX: (828) 835-8631 P.O. BOX 2733 75 BISON LANE WEAVERVILLE, NC 28787 MURPHY, NC 28906 Client: /yn/1 ►�C f I%� Gy'�P n I_ Report To: O YJ Q"' •� S a� S /� Address: 10,0 , 8a )� 3 Bill To: P.O. # / Billing Reference: Phone:g '�iSef_a�SL7Ce'(— �� `� �� FAX �-_R -Q99—� r� Sampled Bylpri t)p PRESERVATIVES ANALYSES, C REQUEST J Sampler Signature Date Z � z w > � m � O :vl/ 3 O LU CO w 2 + ITEM LL 0 0_ O Q 0 Oz Q z 2 = >> Z z = f . Pf"_- S ' 1164of, 2 q 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 03738 CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD Analytical Request Init Lab Temp:. Rec Lab Temp: *Reque,V,ad Due Q REMARKS r -') -- SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS CP-0771-B ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - (828) 479-6428 WEAVERVILLE OFFICE MICHAEL LADD-OWNER (828) 645-8196 FAX: (828) 645-3706 P.O. BOX 2733 75 BISON LANE RESIDENCE (828) 837-9543 WEAVERVILLE, NC 28787 MURPHY, NC 28906 FAX: (828) 835-8631 Client: �_rm_ fl 6QC- A &,/, G �T �'I ReportTo: Address: A � � � Q `l� 3 � � Bill To:- 9 7,� P.O. # / Billing Reference: Phone: Sp C.el�(� oLc��O` �J FAX #: 08739 CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD Analytical Request ki) v Init Lab Temp. Rec Lab Temb, �U *Reques Q Date: (`c! samV4 By (print): f R -or v •LL • • y ♦ 9 \ • + i / �► • d► 1 • �% �� ,�l \t * JMARKS ' • • • • • ITEM CL # SAMPLE DESCRIPTION RESID. TIME MATRIX EES. # MEN SHIPMENT OUT/DATE METHOD ITEM RETURNED/DATE # -IffiADDITIONAL RELINQUISED BY / AFFILIATION ACCEPTED BY /AFFILIATION DATE TIME COMMENTS: ■ r ■ MIN SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS CP-0771-B a�1 Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Project name: Earth Environmental Services Collection date: _ 9-Apr-13 �— ` G( Date received: 11-Apr-13 Sample identification: #041315 PO Box 7565 Asheville, NC 28802 Phone: ;(828) 350-9364 Fax::(828) 350-9368 Project number: :130411.509 Sample number: 104794 Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes Analyzed Percent Solids SM 2540 G 11.6 0.100 % 15-Apr-13 LTB 1 Mercury 7471B 0.53 0.17 mg/kg 15-Apr-13 LTB 1 Aluminum 6010C 5900 21 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Arsenic 6010C 4.6 2.1 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Cadmium 601OC <2.1 2.1 mg/kg �g 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 6010C 8900 85 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Chromium 6010C 21 2.1 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Copper 6010C 240 4.2 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Lead 6010C 18 2.1 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Magnesium 6010C 2800 21 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Molybdenum 6010C 6.2 4.2 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Nickel 6010C 21 8.5 mg/kg I7-Apr-13 BGM 1 Potassium 6010C 4900 110 m g/kg 17-Apr-13 .BGM 1 Selenium 6010C 4.5 4.2 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Sodium 6010C 600 110 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Zinc Nitrate + Nitrite 6010C 840 21 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 SM 4500 NO3 F 130 43 mg/kg 15-Apr-13 CLB 1 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P F 17000 430 mg/kg 18-Apr-13 CLB 1 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 351.2 71000 43000 mg/kg 23-Apr-13 CLB l Total Nitrogen Calculation 71000 43000 mg/kg 23-Apr-13 CLB 1 Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 D 11000 170 mg/kg 12-Apr-13 KEK Percent Solids SM 2540 G 12 % I I-Apr-13 KEK pH in Soil SW 846 9045D 7.2 S U I I Apr 13 KEK Footnotes: RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only. I. Analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc. Date reviewed: N14-13 NC Certification Number: 600 Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053 Signature: w NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786 This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions,: Inc.aA The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis. h tW Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Project name: Earth Environmental Services Collection date: 9-Apr-13 Date received: 11-Apr-13 Sample identification: #041316 PO Box 7565 Asheville, NC 28802 Phone: (828) 350-9364 Fax: (828) 350-9368 Project number: 130411.5.10 ASV f -'4 9t Sample number: .104795 Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes Analyzed Percent Solids SM 2540 G 74.1 0.100 % 15-Apr-13 LTB 1 Mercury 7471B 0.066 0.025 mg/kg 15-Apr-13 LTB 1 Arsenic 6010C 7.70 0.34 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Cadmium 6010C <0.34 0.34 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Calcium 6010C 5500 270 mg/kg 18-Apr-13 BGM 1 Chromium 6010C 34 0.34 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Copper 6010C 37 0.67 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Lead 6010C 20 0.34 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Magnesium 6010C 3600 67 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Mangenese 6010C 150 0.34 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Molybdenum 6010C 1.1 0.67 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Nickel 6010C 16 1.3 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Potassium 6010C 1700 17 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM l Selenium 6010C 0.73 0.67 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Silver 6010C <0.34 0.34 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Sodium 6010C 39 17 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Zinc 6010C 61 3.4 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P F 1400 67 mg/kg 22-Apr-13 CLB 1 pH in Soil SW 846 9045D 7.2 S.U. I I-Apr-13 KEK Acidity See Attached Sheets 16 Apr 13 A&L 2 This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis. IN 14f /fit �s�.' �..•. Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis Project name: Earth Environmental Services Collection date: 9-Apr-13� Date received: 11-Apr-13 Sri L Sample identification: #041317 PO Box 7565 Asheville, NC 28802 Phone: (828) 350=9364 Fax: (828)350-9368 Project number: 130411.510 Sample number: 104796 Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes Analyzed Percent Solids SM 2540 G 76.3 0.100 % 15-Apr-13 LTB I Mercury 7471B 0.080 0.028 mg/kg 15-Apr-13 LTB I Arsenic 6010C 4.8 0.32 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Cadmium 6010C <0.32 0.32. mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM I Calcium 6010C 1400 13 mg/kg Pig 17-Apr-13 BGM 1. 6010C 32 0.32 mg&g 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Copper 6010C 27 0.64 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Lead 6010C 15 0.32 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM I Magnesium 6010C 1500 3.2 m g/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Mangenese 6010C 450 6 mg/kg 18-Apr-13 BGM 1 Molybdenum 6010C 0.66 0.64 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Nickel 6010C 12 1.3 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Potassium 6010C 970 16 m g/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Selenium 6010C 0.74 0.64 m g/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Silver 6010C <0.32 0.32 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Sodium 6010C 22 16 mg/kg 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Zinc 601OC 44 3.2 m �g 17-Apr-13 BGM 1 Total Phosphorus P SM 4500 P F 470 66 mg/kg 18-Apr-13 CLB I pH in Soil SW 846 9045D 6.8 S.U. 11-Apr-13 KEK Acidity See Attached Sheets 16 Apt 13 A&L 2 Footnotes: RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only. 1. Analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc. 2. Analyzed by A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc. Date reviewed: -(UV1 NC Certification Number: 600 Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053 Signature: NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786 This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis. A &L Easte Laboratories 7821 Whitepine Road Richmond, VAirfinia 23237 (8%) 743-9401 Fax (804) 271-6446 11 - .-- i . vWlV AIlAL. 9 %09%0 Client: Grower: Report No: 13-105-0537 EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS EES Cust No:! 46220 75 BISON LN Date Printed: 04/17/2013 MURPHY NC 28906 Date Received: 04/15/2013 Date Analysis 04/16/2013 PO: Page: i I of 4 Lab Number : 17929 Field Id :041316 Sample Id: SOIL#! Test . . ..... ... Results SOIL TEST RATINGS' Calculated Cation 1��Fh a n qe.pa p a,�, ty Medium 'Soil pH' ' 7.5 15.2 meqliOOg Buffer.pH Phosph6r�us(F) 138 ppm Calculated Cation Saturation Potaisslimi*(1K). 208 ppm Calcium .(Ca) 2236 ppm %K 3.6 %Ca 73.6 %Mg 22.1 %H 0.0 Hmeq 0.0 %Na 0.6 MagnesIum'(Mg).:,.,.-. - 403 ppm Sulfur (S) t ,Boron (8) Copper (Cu) 3.4 ppm A ,Iron (Fe) Mangqnese'(Mh) 29 ppm :Zinc (Zn),. 8.4 ppm K t Mg Ratio Sodium (Na), 22 ppm 0.16 Ca Mg RatioSoluble*Salts 3.33 Organfic.Matf6r 3.2% ENR 92 Nitrate Nitrogen,... SOIL FERTILITY GUIDELINES Crop: Lawn Rec Units: LB/1 000 SF (Ibs). LIME 0-h4 'V -Pz S L 7-0: Fe 0 3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crop Rec Units: Comment: - Analysis prepared by: A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc. pod. Pauric McGroary t zA &L Eastern Laboratoles 21 VYhdepme Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 {B041743.9401 Fax {ss43271 644s YYVYVK31�dSt2R1 ci)m Client: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Grower: 4/17/2013 SOIL ANALYSIS 75 BISON LN EES Report No: Cust No, 13-105-0537 MURPHY NC 28906 Date Printed: 46220 04/17/2013 Date Received : 04/15/2013 Date Anysis al ; Lab Number PO: Page : 04 /16/2013 17929 Field Id :041316 I 2 of 4 e Sa mpl Id: SOIL #T I ':� FrrstlAppllcationK, : K, t 21-0-0 -- rerpuzer `#/1000}Sq Ft. Fertilizer: . 6 21-0-0 Commas: 6 21-0-0 Lawn Cation Exchange Capacity may be over -estimated due to high pH and free lime in the soil. The amount of fertilizer recommended in the first page is the total amount needed for the entire growing season. Split applications to keep the lawn green and prevent fertilizer loss. Custom blend is best to meet exactly the requirement impossible, the above specific fertilizer application is a general guideline, if the specified grades can not a uir found, pl t into 3-4 fertilizer having similar N:P:K ratio. The best time to apply fertilizer for cool season grass (bluegrass, fescue e r ' if this is when grass is growing. For Mid -Atlantic region the time is from late August to November. For Northeast region the replace with August to October. Fall application should start as soon as the day time high temperature is below 80-85F a ,g ass) is in the Fall one month. If you start application late in the Fall and do not finish all three applications, repeat the same applications en the is F mid next year. Spring application is recommended when exceptional fertilizer loss due to heavySpring rain (each p1with the interval of pale green. Spring application can start as soon as the grass starts to grow in April. In the case of exceptional war a Fall of application can be made earlier. ng,and the grasses look Apply 2.5 pounds of elemental sulfur per 1000 square feet to reduce pH. Repeat one application for eV m Spring, the For example soil with pH 7.5 will need 2 applications. Time between applications should be minimum of 3 months and moist soil are needed for sulfur to work. If application is in winter or in drought condition, more time is reryw�ed H unit above 7.3. applications to determine further application is needed. Warm temperature Use ammonium sulfate as all or portion of the N requirement to reduce pH. q Test soil after 3-4 For more in depth explanation, go to our website www.aleastern.com and select the "Lawn and Garden" tab at the page. At the bottom of the "Lawn and Garden" page, you find information explaining a soil test report and fertilizer recommendations. h'p://aleastern.cOm/forms/LawnGardenSoilTestExplained.pdf y top a home . mendations. Analysis prepared by: A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc. ! P " mr G i Pauric McGroary L�'A L Eastem Laberat®.� 7621 Wh(tepine Road Richmond, Yrginia 23237 (BD41743�401 fax {804) 271-6446 ; VIR71tr�a)Ok}S�9i'f1.601t1 I Client: 4/17/2013 SOIL =Anql��is: NALYSIS EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Grower: ; 13-105-0537 75 BISON LN EES 46220 MURPHY NC 28906 d: 04/17/2013 ed :04/151,:013 is : 04/16/2013 P03 of 4 Lab Number: 17930 Field Id :041317 Sample Id : SOIL #2 , Test. - Results . -, SOIL TEST RATING pS Soil H " °! z. Medium Calculated Cation 7.2 O t)mutn ' Exchange.Capacity __• Buffer.pH 10.4 Pho$phorus. (P) I meq/1009 Potassium (I() 23 PPme' 245 ppm Calculated. Cason Calciur.. (Ca)'. — — -- I , Saturation 1303 ppm :'. Magnesium'(Mg) %K 6.0 382 ppm ;��';.�*�-�,. Sul fur �" z %Ca �C 62.6 Boron %M9 30.6 coppe[:(Cu) I i %H 0.0 3.2 ppma w a . . Iron (Fe) �'�� hE� Hmeq 0.0 Manganese (Mn) . 71 ppm 4 %Na 0.9 Zinc (Zn) 3.3 ppm Sodium,(Naj + 21 ppm K: Mg.Ratio Soluble Salts 0.20 Organic'Matter Nitrate Plitroan. . o I - ca: Mg Ratio. 3.2 /o ENR 99 ' 2.05 e g SOIL FERTILITY GUIDELINES Crop: Lawn (lbs) LIME tons Rec Units,: LB/1000 SF ...: ` 3.5 2.5 Mn Zn Fe 0 Crop Rec Units: Comment: /4 Analysis prepared by: A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc. Paluric McGroary 'j A &L Eastern Laboratories 762i Whitepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 (604) 743-9401 Fax (604) 271 6446 WWW.21eaSteern.co m Client : EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Grower: 75 BISON LN EES MURPHY NC 28906 PO: Lab Number: 17930 Field Id :041317 - SUGGESTED FE 4/17/2013 Report Cust N Date Pi Date R( Date Ar Page Sample Id : SOIL SOIL ANALYS 13-105-0537 46220 'd: 04/17/2013 ived : 04/15/2013 ,sis : 04/16/2013 4of4 �ry Hppucat�on - Furth Appfication<, -; #/1.000 Sq: Ft: Fertilizer; #f:1000 Sq Ft Fertilizer #/1000. Sq Ft .._ Fert,hzer #/1000 10 10-20-15 10 Q Ft Fertilizer. . 10-20-15 6 21-0-0 I ; Comments - Lawn The amount of fertilizer recommended in the first page is the total amount needed for the entire growing s ason. Split into 3-4 applications to keep the lawn green and prevent fertilizer loss. Custom blend is best to meet exactly the requi etnent, if this is impossible, the above specific fertilizer application is a general guideline, if the specified grades can not be fo rid, replace with n grass (bluegrass, fertilizer having similar NRK ratio. The best time to apply fertilizer for cool seasog, fescue, egrass) is in the Fall when grass is growing. For Mid -Atlantic region the time is from late August to November. For Northeast regio the time is from mid August to October. Fall application should start as soon as the day time high temperature is below 80-85F, ap ly with the interval of one month. If you start application late in the Fall and do not finish all three applications, repeat the same app ications in the Fall of next year. Spring application is recommended when exceptional fertilizer loss due to heavy Spring rain leachi pale green. Spring application can start as soon as the grass starts to grow in April. In the case of exceptiona warm Sprn gSthe look application can be made earlier. Use ammonium sulfate as all or portion of the N requirement to reduce pH. For more in depth explanation, go to our website www.aleastern.com and select the "Lawn and Garden'to at the top of home page. At the bottom of the "Lawn and Garden" page, you find information explaining a soil test report and fertil zer recommendations. http://a leastem - co m/forms/Lawn Garden Soi lTestExplained. p df Analysis prepared by: A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc. McGroary Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 27.42354 Permit #: WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): 15.2 Operator: Robert M Sams Owner: LarryCody Acres Used: 14.5 Acres Permitted: 14.5 Site #: 1 Field #: 1 Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent ft Sample: or Com-: posite Date 4/9/13 4/9/13 4/9/13 ; 4/9/13 % Solids' 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 Arsenic` 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Cadmium 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Chromium 21 21 21 21 Copper] 240 240 240 240 Lead 18 18 18 18 Mercury 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53. 1Vlolyb- denum 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 Nickel :. 21 21 21 21 Selenium; 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Zinc 840 840 840 840 Total s Phos- horus ' 17000 17000 17000 ; 17000 ; Annual Heavy Metal Field.Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre): 9{ 7Ojf 11 i 12, o 0.702 ' 0.486 i 0.486 0.216 Arsenic 0.0065 0.0045. 0.0045 0.002: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0174 Cadmium 0.0029 0.002 : 0.002 0.0009 ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0079 hromiurt 0.0295 0.0204. 0.0204. 0.0091: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0794 . Copper 0.337 ; 0.2333 0.2333 0.1037 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.9072 Lead 0.0253 0.0175 : 0.0175 0.0078 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.068, Mercury 0.0007. 0.0005. 0.0005 , 0.0002 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.002 1Vlolyb- ;denum 0.0087 0.006 0.006 : 0.0027 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0234' Nickel 1 0.0295 ; 0.0204 0.0204 0.0091 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0794= Selenium. 0.0063: 0.0044: 0.0044 0.0019 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.017 Zinc 1.1794 0.8165: 0.8165:: 0.3629' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.1751 otal os- Lhorus 23.868. 16.524 16.524 ' 7.344 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64.26 "•1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document was :prepared :under my .direction ar:supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, includi h ossibUity of fines and ' prisonment for knowing violations" �4 - A99/4 -I- DENR FORM MFLSF (5/2003) LA J r1 ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD. PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE. Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Permit #: WQ0004298 Annual Dry Tons Applied: 27.42353796 Owner: Larry Cody Site #: 01 Operator: Field #: 01 Robert M Sams Acres Utilized: 14.5 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 15.2 Acres Permitted: 14.5 � 4 Specify Totals % Residual 1 e Cond. Inches Appli- Vola- Miner- Ammo- Ni- Must Select * Gal. o Yj Cu.Yd. Per Solid Dry Tons Per Precip. cation tili- ali- nia- trate Crop 1 p or Crop o A Report Acre Acre' Sources Summarize ( ) Past 24 Meth- zation zation TI�IV Ni- and PAN 1 PAN 2 2 101 inGal. s Wet, Moist Hrs. od* Rate** Rate trogen Nitrite Crop 1 Crop 2 4/24/13 1 21058 1452.3 11.6 0.70249488 Belt Press Sludge Dry 0 s 0.5 30% 11000 1100 130 30.418 ####### silage 1 4/2M 31 14578 1005.4 11.6 0.48632208 Belt Press Sludge Dry . 0 s 0.5 306/. 71000 1100 130 21.6577 ####### silage 2 10/10/1. 14578 1005.4 _ . 11.6 0.48632208 Belt Press Sludge e Dry Dry 0 s 0.5 30% 71000 1100 130 21.0577 ####### fescue 3 10/11/1. 6410 446.83 L6 0.21613944 . Belt Press Sludge .. D 0 s 0.5 30% 11060 1100 130 9.35884 ####### Fescue 4 0 0 5 0 0. . 6 _. _.......0 ....... _ _..... 0. 0 7 0. _. _ _ ... ........._..... _ ._. . _ __. .._.. 0 _.. 0.. .... _ 8 0 _ ._............. _ 0 0 9 _ 0 0 10 0 0. 11 0 0 2 TOTALS: 3910 As Cd Cr Cu Pb H Mo Ni $e _ Zn P PAN 1 PAN 2 Lime Applied 1 Annuallbs/acre 0.017388 0.00794 0.07938 0.9072 0.06804 0.002 0.02344 0.07938 6.01761 31752 64.26 81.8924 0 Date I lbs/ac Current Cumulative lbs/ac 0.920388 0.61694 2.01938 2.0572 5.4510�} i 0.132 .80744 2.60538 1.58401 6 576 3.401 0/2/201 6000 Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac 0.903 0.609 1.94 51.15 5.383 0.13 2.784 2.526 1.567 Permitted C. P. L R.*** 36 .. 34 nl 13H 267 15 nl 374 89 2498 Permit PAN Limit 1 st/2nd Crop .� OT !-al-fif" 11 1------I+- -T 1.1a1. +A..+ +1.� ,7......-.....�a ... j ' . . .1 .... . ... .. .. ... _ .. .. .. . .. ... - vva .aa,y, 1..lwv}- Fviawa}J UA :aT., R�.,a< .uim uVuuW. WUL was prcparru unuer my airecnon or supervision in accordance with asystem - designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant na ' s fol submitting a information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." /4 7 *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation Signature of Lan pplier ate **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5. Iniection/Incorporation -1.0 ***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative. Pollutant Loadina Rate * ** * The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1. DENR FORM FSF (5/2003) ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD. Facility Name: Owner: Site #: 01 Larry Cody PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE. Town of Mars Hill Field #: Operator: 02 Permit #: WQ0004298 Robert M Sams Acres Utilized: 0 Annual Dry Tons Applied: #DlV/0! Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): Acres Permitted: 3.8 10.4 o 1 o A � � S eci Totals Per Acre % Solid s Dry Tons Per Acre Residual Sources (Summarize) 1 e Cond. D Dry, Wet, Inches Precip. Past 24 Hrs. Appli- cation Meth- od* Vola- tili- zation Rate** Miner- ali- nation Rate N Ammo- nia- Ni- trogen Ni- trate and Nitrite PAN 1 PAN 2 Must Select Crop 1 or Crop 2 Gal. 6.Yd. Report Totals in Gal. Crop 1 - Crop 2 #DIV/0! #DN/0! Did NotPP1 Apply Y #DIV10! #DIV10! 1 #DIV/01 _ _....... #DIV/0! Did Not Apply _ _ #DIV/ 0! #DN/0! 2 #DIV/0. #DN/0! DidNotAPP Y 1 __..._ #.DN/0.. . ! .... .. #DIV/0 .. _ 3 4DN/01 #DN/0! Did Not Apply PP Y #DN/0! #DN/0! 4 #DN/0! #DN/0! Did Not Apply #DN/0! #DN/0! 1 g #DN/0! #DIV/0! Did Not Apply . ... . _ . #DN/0! #DN/0! #DN/0! #DN/0! Did Not Apply #DN/0! #DN/0 7! #DN/0! #DIV/0! Did NotA Apply Y #DIV/0! #DIV/0! g #DIV/0! #DIV/01 Did Not A P.Pl. Y 4DN/0! #DN/0! 9 4DIV/0! ... #DN/0! _. Did Not Apply._ #DIV/0! #DN/0! 10 #DN/0! #DN/0! Did Not Apply PP Y #DN%0! #DN/0! 11 4DIV/0! #DIV/0! Did Not Apply #DIV/0! #DIV/01 12 TOTALS: Annuallbs/acre . As _. Cd Cr Cu Pb H Mo Ni Se Zn P PAN 1 PAN 2 Lime Applied ate lb sac 04 Current Cumulative lbs/ac Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac Permitted C. P. L. R.** _. 0 _ 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �. Permit PAN Lvnit l st/2nd Crop ter. ' �� y tW certuy, unaer penairy of iaw, inai finis document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant ies for submitting4alse information, including the ossibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." — / - A,") w /2,,/ — �7 �// � *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation Signature of L pplier Date **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Iniection/Incorporation -1.0 ***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate **** The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1. DENR FORM FSF (5/2003) 11 ti!\lINUISU i tilrllllTU` 1\ 4i1\11 V U' 1.1 Vlt tXl Ilux% I1V1\ K v,mul-I1V1r r %JAIV1 Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Permit Number: WQ0004298 WWTP Name: NPDES Number: NCO057151 Monitoring Period: From To Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed: Class A: Alternative 10 Alternative 2 0 Alternative.3IN Alternative 4 5 Alternative 6 0' .Alternative r If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens": Compost 0 ' Heat Drymg0l, Heat Treatment E3 Thermophilic 0x Beta Ray 'Gamma RayO Pasteurization Class B: ..Alternative 1 Alternative 2 0 T Alternative .3 If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens": Lime Stabilization 0 Air Drying Composting 0 Aerobic Digestion Anaero bic.D:igestiorl If applicable to :alternative :performed :(Class A yr Class B) .complete':the following monitoring data: Parameter Allowable Level Pathogen Density g nm ero Excee- ' Frequency Sample Analytical; Minimim Geo. Mead axon Units in Sludge : of Analysis Type Tech-niqu e ces 2 x 1.0 to -the •6th power WN per 1500 8200 40000 col./gr 0 1/year : grab 9222d gram of total solids .or.2 x 10 .to Fecal Coliform the 6th power 'C]Fu per. of. 1.000.mpnper ' gram of.total solid (dry weight) Salmonella bacteria 3 ARN per 4 (in lieu of fecal grams total solid . coliform) dry weight) Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 503.33) - Please indicate option performed: Option 1 0 ' -Option 2 E3 I 0ption.3 0 •Option 4 Svc 11 Option 5 Option 6 _0 10ption 7 0 'O.ption 8 0 i Option 9 Option 1`0 h; t pq No vector attraction reduction options were performed g yy, E frkg CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement) "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met." E3 "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." (Please note if you check this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.) "This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment.". Robert M Sams -Public Works Director Pre r Name and Title ( or print Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print) o a9 i� 03)_ EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 75 Bison Lane Murphy, NC 28906 Residence — (828) 837-9543 Robbinsville Lab — (828) 479-6428 Weaverville Lab — (828) 645-8196 Fax — (828) 645-3706 E-Mail — earthenvser@webworkz.com\ October 14, 2013 NC ID #352 Mr. Robert Sams Town of Mars Hill P.O. Box 368 Mars Hill, NC 28754 Dear Mr. Sams: Following is a report of laboratory analyses for digester sludge samples received 6/17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27/2013. Colony Counts 0 1 M1 0-01 M1 tr 1 0-P.. ,. 6117/13 1,500 Colonies/Gram - --- - ----- 0.92 12 3 0 2 6118/13 20,000 Colonies/Gram 0.94 TNTC 19 6 3 6/19/13 10,000 Colonies/Gram 0.92 88 12 4 4 6/20/13 2,600 ColonieslGram 0.91 18 7 1 5 6/25/13 35,000 Colonies/Gram 1.01 88 35 2 6 6/26/13 40,000 Colonies/Gram 1.01 TNTC 40 7 7 6127/13 2,200Colonies/Gram 1.01 22 6 1 Geometric mean for all seven samples: 8,200 colonies/gram. Thank you for your business. If you have any question or need additional sample analyses performed, please call. Respectfully submitted, Michael J. Ladd Laboratory Director ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY (828) 479-6428 EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES WEAVERVILLE OFFICE (828) 645-8196 MICHAEL LADD-OWNER FAX: (828) 645-3706 P.O. BOX 2733 75 BISON LANE RESIDENCE SIDENCE (828) 837-9543 WEAVERVILLE, NO 28787 MURPHY, NO 28906 FAX: (828) 835-8631 Client: �QIJ Report To:-- &14 Address: Bill To: & V P.O. # / Billing Reference: Phone: —9 -�Ax #: -,fJ_R' —6 3 02,74-2 CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD Analytical Request Init Lab Temp: Rec Lab Temp: *Requested Due Date: Sampled By (print); Sampler Signature Date Sampled "4& 4,XJR,5 _'Ziawl LiuE MR11 I Ulm OLIN ■ 1 9 u N A, OEM Is cc ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: M-hMENI _1_6e IVA -7 114,Jo ae LFeb 08s14 08:13a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.1 Time (minutes) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Specific Oxygen L SOUR Facility Name Biosolids Permit Number, Date: Digester Temperature: Sampling Date/Time: Sampled By: Analysis Date/Time: Analyzed By: Sample Volume: Total Solids: Beginning Temperature: End Temperature:' Dissolved Oxygen Level Slope: 0.1 Intercept: 5.0 Correlation Coefficient: 1.0 Oxygen Uptake Rate: 5.72 Ambient Speck Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.74 Average Temperature: 15 Temperature Correction Factor: 1.402551731 Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and tate iters ry Solids: ees Celsius ees Celsius Celsius 16 mg Oxygen/g/hr spreadsheet execute automatically. I --F.ekb*03,1408:13a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.2 Time (minutes) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1.1 12 13 14 15 Specific Oxygen L SOUR Facility Na Biosolids Permit Num Digester Temperature: Sampling Date/Time: Sampled By: Analysis Date/Time: Analyzed By. Sample Volume: Total Solids:j Beginning Temperature:] End Temperature:' Dissolved Oxygen Level Slope: 0.1 Intercept 4.8 Correlation Coefficient: 1.0 Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.71 Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.62 Average Temperature: 14 Temperature Correction Factor: .1-500730352 Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:' Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and Rate Dry Solids: 'degrees Celsids deg]ees Celsius g 9xygen/hr! g Oxygen/g/hr agrees Celsiti S 0.931mg Oxygen/g/hr spreadshbet execute automatically. ;..E0 Oil 4 08:13a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.3 i i I Time (minutes) 0 2 3 4 I 5 # 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Specific Oxygen l SOUR Facility Biosolids Permit N Digester Temperature: Sampling Date/Time: Sampled By. Analysis Date/Time: Analyzed By:, Sample Volume: Total Solids: Beginning Temperature: End Temperature:. Dissolved Oxygen Level Slope: 0A Intercept: 4.4 Correlation Coefficient: 1.0 Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.80 Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.50 Average Temperature: 17 Temperature Correction Factor. 1.225043 Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and Rate i i. s illiliters Dry Solids! agrees Celsius Vees Celsius { i I i i i Oxygen/hr; Oxygen/g/hr rees Celsius Oxygen/g/hr Spreadsheet execute automatically. teb 0014 08:14a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.4 Time (minutes) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Specific Oxygen L SOUR Facility Na Blosolids Permit Num Digester Temperature: Sampling Date/Time: Sampled By: Analysis Date/Time: Analyzed By: Sample Volume: Total Solids:1 Beginning Temperature:1, End Temperature: Dissolved Oxygen Level Slope: Intercept: Correlation Coefficient: Oxygen Uptake Rate: Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: Average Temperature: Temperature Correction Factor CelsiL 0.1 3.3 ! i i 1.0 i 4.95 eng Oxygen,,*, 0.53 g Oxygen/g/hr 18 1.1449 egrees Celsius: i i Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and Oxygen/g/hr t execute automatically. - 4F*p %1 14 08:14a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.5 Facility Name Biosolids Permit Number. Date Digester Temperature Sampling Date/Time: Sampled, By: Analysis DateTme: Analyzed By:. Sample Volume:! Total Solids:l Beginning Temperature:i End Temperature: Time Dissolved Oxygen Level (minutes) (er9g/9p 3.88 •,— 2 3.73 3 3.67:' 4 3.6 3.52` 6 8 8 3.37 9 3.33 10 3.24 11 3.19� 12 3.14.". 13 3.1 14 3.03 15 - 9 QR. I Specific Oxygen Upt ke Rate SOUR IVlars Hill W0004298 20-Au 8/20/2013 10:1 Michael Ladd_ 8/20/201310:1 Ladd Slope: 0.1 Intercept: 3.8 Correlation Coefficient: 1.0 Oxygen Uptake Rate: 3.54 Ambient Specific. Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.42 Average Temperature: 18 Temperature Correction Factor. 1.1449 Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and Emg Oxygen/g/hr t execute automatically. .*510-.3v,14 08:14a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI j Specific Oxygen Upt 3ke Mate SOUR Facility Name. Biosolids Permit Number: Date: Digester Temperature: Sampling Date/Time: Sampled By: Analysis Date/Time: Analyzed By: Sample Volume: Total Solids: Beginning Temperature: End Temperature: Time Dissolved Oxygen Level (minutes) m /1 0 4.9'. 1 4.84 2 4.77 3 4.69 4.63 5 4.54 6 4.5 7 4.43 t 8 4.36 9 10 4.21' 11 4.16 12 4.08 13 3.98 14 3.91 15 ua Mars Hill WQ004298 11-Se 8. 9/11/201314:4 Michael Ladd 9/11/2013 14:4 Michael Ladd Slope: 0.1 Intercept: 4.9 Correlation Coefficient: Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.20 1 ng o Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.47 1 ig 0 Average Temperature: 18 wgrE Temperature Correction Factor 1.1449 Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and i he E i 828-835-8631 r Mmg Oxygen/g/hr et execute automatically. p.6 a%eb 1314 08:15a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.7 Time (minutes) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Specific Oxygen L SOUR Facility Name: Biosolids Permit Number. Date: Digester Temperature: Sampling Date/Time: Sampled By: Analysis Date/Timed Analyzed By: Sample Volume:. Total Solids: Beginning Temperature: End Temperature: Dissolved Oxygen Level Slope: 0.1 Intercept: 4.0 Correlation Coefficient: 1.0 Oxygen Uptake Rate: 3.76 Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.48 Average Temperature: 17 Temperature Correction Factor: 1.225043 Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and iters y Solids ses Celsius ses Celsius ,,L�mg Oxygen/g/hr eet execute automatically. WQ OC) Oqlc� oWin OM OV- -S w I I Annual Report Review SOP Class B Land Application Reporting Period: Z C) ` S Permit Details: • I 503? Class A or(@ Maximum Dry Tons Per Year: %Z ' • Number of acres permitted: i 3 } �'1► vt ► i a� Number of fields in permit: Counties that land is permitted for: ,W-.50, Monitoring Frequency for TCLP: ! / pee-"1 61GIe' • Monitoring Frequency for Residuals Analysis:w Monitoring Frequency for Pathogen & Vector Attraction Reduction: AM,,,,� Groundwater monitoring: N/A: 1. Annual Land Application Certification Form Was a certification form submitted? L), Was land application conducted during the reported year? t� How many dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied? Z--. c{ Were the applications within the permitted amount? `Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre? p A ` Did it indicate compliance? �er Was it signed by the appropriate people? 2. Monitoring Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency? YeS Was an analyses taken for each source that was land applied? kle-Y Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? Y e-f Were the results reported in mg/kg? Were the pH's 6.0 or greater for each residual sample? y S Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits? Y e,-r Were the lab analyses attached? Were all the required parameters tested? Was TCLP analysis conducted? k I e-�_ Were the TLCP contaminants within regulatory limits9 to k, Was a corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity analysis conducted? t+ 3. Field Summary Were the land application events recorded on the Field Summary Forms?y.e5 How many fields were applied on this year? 1 Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field?. ,trf' C- , COICS Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?,qP_5` Were all the residuals applied from permitted sou rces?y-r Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)? �f Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated? �S Were the calculations correct? �5 Were the PAN loading rates within permit limits? lfey Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits? Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?�� .Sew Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season? �/�� Were the Field Summary Forms complete?�,e Was lime application on Field Summary Form? No lime applied. Y"_o-/ �/! �• Jay„�' 4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction �" / 1 N( Was a signed co of the Pat en and Vect ettraction duction Form submitte ? fey : PY Did the form indicate the iod of covera ,the residua class, and the pathogen reducion alternative and the vector a rac ion re uction option used? • Was the appropriate documentation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report? • Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503? Class B Pathogen Review ternative 1— Fecal Coliform Density 17 W the sampling conducted at the required frequency? C_ re seven samples taken? s the geometric mean calculated and done correctly? id the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids)? Alternative 2 — Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (one of five) • Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? 1. Aerobic Digestion Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)? Were logs submitted showing time and temperature? Were temperatures within range for complete time period? Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 15°C (59°F)? 2. Air Drying Were the residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months? Was the ambient temperature above 0°C (327) for two months? Were the residuals partially digested? Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (not snow covered)? 3. Anaerobic Digestion • Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)? • Were logs submitted showing time and temperature? • Were temperatures within range for complete time period? Was the time and temperature between 15 days at 35°C (95T) to 55°C (13IT) and 60 days at 20°C (68T)? 4. Composting (usually will be Class A when composting is used) Was it a composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)? Were logs submitted showing time and temperature? Was the temperature raised to 40 5. Lime Stabilization • Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing kiln dust or fly ash)? Were logs submitted showing time and temperature? Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact? Were logs submitted showing time and pH? Was temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)? Alternative 3 — Use of Processes Equivalent to RSRP (Not commonly use. See White House Manual page 100-103, tables 11-1 and 11-2.) Vector Attraction Reduction Review • Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? Option 1 — 38% Volatile Solids Reduction Was there 38% reduction? Were lab sheets/calculations in report? Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)? Were the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application (Inspection)? Were calculations correct? Option 2 — 40-Day Bench Scale Test Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab? Was the test run for 40 days? Was the test done between 30°C (86°F) and 37°C (99°F)? Was the reduction of on volatile solids (not total solids)? Was the reduction less than 17%? Were lab sheets/calculations in report? Were calculations correct? Option 3 — 30-Day Bench Scale Test Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? Were residuals aerobically digested in lab? Were residuals 2% or less total solids? If not 2% total solids, was the test ran on a sample diluted to 2% with unchlorinated effluent? Was the test run for 30 days? Was the test done at 20°C (687)? Was, the reduction of on volatile solids (not total solids)? Was the reduction less than 15%? Were lab sheets/calculations in report? Were calculations correct? Option 4 — Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate(SOUR) . re residuals form aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)? s the test done between 10°C (50°F) and 30°C (86°F)? • W - the temperature corrected to 20°C (68°F)? as the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual solids (dry weight basis)? Was the sampling holding time two hours? Was the test started within 15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained? Option 5 — 14-Day Aerobic Process Were the residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? Were the residuals treated for 14 days? Was the residuals temperature higher than 40°C (104°F) for a 14-day period? Was the average residuals temperature higher than 45°C (113°F)? Option 6 — Alkaline Stabilization Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by the addition of alkali? Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition of more alkali? • Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty-two hours without the addition of more alkali? • Was the pH corrected to 25°C (77°F)? Option 7 — Drying of Stabilized Residuals Does the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals? Were the residuals mixed with any other materials? Were the residuals dried up to 75% total solids? Option 8 — Drying of Unstabilized Residuals Were the residuals mixed with any other materials? Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids? Option 9 —Injection • Was there any significant amount of residuals on land surface one hour after injection (Inspection)? Was injection done on pasture or hay field? Was injection done at time that crop was growing? If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals injected with eight hours after discharge from pathogen treatment? 5. Soil Tests ( ( X")J Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field? Yes, Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field? yej, If no, was lime applied to those fields? N/k Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 2000 for each application field? Yef Was sodium less than 0.5 meq/100 cm^3? *5, Was the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) less than 15%? Ye-5, 6.General Was the report in the proper format? y 5 Was the annual report complete? y� s Was the report submitted on time?�.0-5