WQ0004298_2012 Residuals Annual Report_20130206

Town of Mars Hill NC
2012 Land Application Report
WQ0004298
RECEIVED
FEB 06 cfl13
Asheville Regional Office
A uifer Protection
Attached are the required forms for the Town of Mars Hills 2012 land application
program.
The town has land applied 23.4574 dry tons of sludge over 14.5 acres in the calendar year
2012. We have also maintained compliance.
Contact Information:
Preparer/ORC
Robert Sams
Public Works Director
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]
Permittee
Darhyl Boone
Town Manager
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]
RECEIVEDIDENR/M
FEB 0 4 2013
Aquifer Protection Section

x"LL.-L.vruJ Irr1.1%-A11"11 k-k1(11t UA11" 4'"14"
MK674,0 Permit#: WQ0004298
County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
Land Application Operator:
Madison Year:
Town of Mars Hill
Kobert M Sams
Phone:
2012
828-206-2386
Lana application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year? RECEIVENDENOWQ
❑ Yes ❑ No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled. FES 0 4 2013
Total number of application fields in the permit
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year• 1
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites 23.4574
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year: 14.5
Part B - Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. 0 Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1111 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from.the Division of Water Quality.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C - Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Darhyl Boone -Town Manager 1
Permittee e and Tale (type or prim Signature Permittee Da e
Signature of Preparer* - Da a Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

P06
ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
WQ Permit Number: WQ0004298
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill
Residual Source WQ # or
NPDES #:
NCO057151
WWTP Name:
own ot Mars Hill
Residual Analvsis Data
Laboratory: 1) Earth Environmental
2) TA it,
3)
4)
5)
Parameter
(mg/kg)
Ceiling
Conc.
Limit
Sample or Com osite Date
4/ 17/ 12
Percent Solids (%)
NA
15.1
Arsenic
75
1.6
Cadmium
85
1.6
Copper
4,300
200
Chromium
NA
22
Lead
840
17
Mercury
57
1
Molybdenum
75
4.8
Nickel
420
16
Selenium
100
4.5
Zinc
7,500
590
Total Phosphorus
NA
29000
TKN
NA
53000
Ammonia -Nitrogen
NA
3000
Nitrate and Nitrite
8 Fnr mirfa(:A Manne.l -F-14—
NA
rho ..ea....
95
%,vuVGuuCaL1U11 mulls ustnu in this form are not applicable. Reference the individual permit for metals limits.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant
penalties f bmi g false informa ' , including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Si ature of Preparer * Da e
4�;
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM RSSF (12/2006)

a. A
Name and Address of Facility:
Town of Mars Hill WWTP
P.O. Box 368
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Aft: Robert Sams
Land Application Analyses - Note: All results in
Test
A71ON EXCHANGE CAPACITY
H
MMONIA NITROGEN
02 + NO3-n
JTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
:)TAL PHOSPHOROUS
=RCENT TOTAL RESIDUE
ORGANIC MATTER
BASE SATURATION - K
-H
-Mg
- Ca
Na
ANT AVAILABLE (surface
FROGEN- PPM DRY WT (subsu
MAGNESIUM
SODIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
NICKEL
ZINC
"ALCIUM
'OTASSIUM
\LUMINUM
\RSENIC
iELENIUM
AOLYBDENUM
IIERCURY
I.C. Laboratory ID# 352
Earth Enyironmanfal Sakes
Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
Weaverville Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
Date: 1/23/2013
Sample Collector. RS
Date and Time Sample Received: 4/18/2012 11:20 AM
Date and Time Sample Collected: 4/17/2012 2:05 - 3:00 PM
Date and Time Sample Analyzed: < MHT
Dry Basis unless otherwise noted.
Belt Press Sludge Soil Site #1
0.0 meq/100g
12.3 meq/100
6.2 7.8
3000
53000
29000 700
15.1% 81.9%
2.0%
19.3%
0.0%
58.8% 57.5%
1.5% 1.0%
21595
23095
1.478764
15.19972%
10.16375%
350
280
SCA
3100
4000
770
SCA
610
67
16
SCA
< 1.6
0.31K<029SCA
22
59SCA
200
69SCA
17
14SCA
16
19SCA
590
54SCA
7700
8600SCA
5300
3600
SCA
5300
N/A
N/A
SCA
< 1.6
< 0.30
< 0.29
SCA
4.5
< 0.60
< 0.57
SCA
4.8
< 0.60
< 0.57
SCA
1.0
0.068
0.054
SCA
Analyzed By:
SCA(i
ab Supervisor. Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville Certified By:
Soil Site #2
0.0 meq/100g
g 7.7 meq/100g
7.4
Report Limit
0
0-14
Method
SCA
SM2540D
SCA
SCA
Units
meq/100g
mg/L
m /100
eq 9
units
0.5
SCA
mg/L
1.0
SCA
mg/L
SCA
mg/L
290
SCA
mg/L
86.4%
SCA
mg/L
2.8%
SCA
NTU
9.2%
SCA
mg/L
0.0%
32.9%
PPM/dw
PPM/dw

t A
z
J 71
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Certificate of Analysis
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project name: Earth Environmental Services
Project numb
er. 120418.510
Collection date: 17-Apr-12 r �'(
Date received: 18-Apr-12 a_`n
Sample identification: #041232 -Si�3 All
Sample number:_ 92814
- Method Result RL Units Date ;
Pefce t Solids Analyzed Analys�Footnotes
W'/ ury SM 2540 G 15.1 0.100 % 2-_
7471 B Apr-12 JAB ]
N nicum 6010C 1.0 0113 rr'�g 26-Apr-12 NfEH ]
5300
6010C <16 mg/kg 26-Apr-12 BGM ]
rnium 1.6 mg/kg 26-Apr-12 BGM ] } m 6010C <1.6 1.6
�ium 6010C � 7700 66 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM (
P�r 6010C 22 mg/kg-5 Apra2 BGM 1
a ' 6010C 200 1.6 mpg 25-Apr-12 BGM ]
3.3 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM
�� �sium 6010C 17 ]
6010C 1.6 mg/kg 25_gp� 12 BGM
bdenum 3100 1
1 6010C 4.8 16 Mg/kg APr 12 BGM 1
3.3 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM ]
Fenium
lum 6010C 16 6.6 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM
6010C ]
6016C 54 00 82 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM
3.3 1n 1
ra
6010C 610 g/kg �-Apr-12 BGM6010C 510 82 mg/kg 25 Apr 12BGM+Nitrite SM 4500 NO3 F 95 16 mg/kg 25-Apr 12 BGM ]
t Phosphorus SM 4500 P F 33 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 CLB ] // I Kjeldahl Nitrogen 29000 330 mg/kg 24-Apr-12 CLB
I Nitrogen 351.2 53000 33000 m 1
g Calculationg 24-Apr-12 RSL ]
unonia Nitrogen 53000 33000 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 RSL
SM 4500 NH3 D 3000 ] in S Solids SM 2546 G 14 0 in Soil 36 mpg 20-Apr-12 ILK
SW 846 9045C /O 18-Apr-12 CDJ
6,2 S.U. 18-Apr-12 CDJ
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc.
Date reviewed: 0-30,11-
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan NC Certification Number: 600
Signature: SC Certification Number: 99053
NC Drinking Water Certification Number. 37786
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis ntal Testing Solutions, Inc.

Zile r\ C� .� t C 3��i . �G U
PAN V / f '% G L
Rate =,NH3
NO3
Np
0.4
00
95
0
0.3
PAN Surface
33.11
21595 m /k
43.19 Ibs/d ton 33
0
Ibs total PAN
#DIV/O!
Ibs PAN/acre
PAN Injection
23095 m /kg
46.19 Ibs/d ton
0
Ibs total PAN
#DIV/01
Ibs PAN/acre
D Tons/1000 al.
0.62967
1st year PAN
Surface Ibs.
0
Ibs./acre
Surface
#DIV/0!
1st year PAN Ibs./acre
In acted Ibs. Injected
0 #DIV/01
solids I tons/year I
0.151 Applied on
MR(TKN-NH3)+ + .5(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
MR(TKN-NH3) + 1(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
1000 X 8.34 X %solids X so gavity
2000
"=dry tons/1000gal."
M.

1-4
SAR Mars Hill Land Application Belt Press Sludge 4/17/12
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na M /L Ca M /L
M M /L
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
610 7700
3100
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Na ME
Ca ME
MQ (ME)
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
26.52174
385
258.3333
V
,/
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
7
SAR = 1.478764 (From Mg/L entered above) ✓
SAR= 1.478764 (From ME entered below)
Na ME Ca ME MgJME
26.52174 385 258.3333
The amount of exchangeable sodium ions
amount of exchangeable calcium & magne
material.
Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 re

ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site *1 4/17/12
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of soils
Na ME CEC
1.86956521739
ESP = 115.19972 % I Should be less than 15% (15-20%)
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq.
'45pDf-
r

0*
z ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site #2 4/17/12
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of soils
ESP = 110.16375 %
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq.
Na ME
0.78260869565 +/
z3.
CEC
7.7
Should be less than 15% (15-20%)
r�

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
WEAVERVILLE OFFICE
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone] W
_FAX: [phone]
Client: S �n ■ G' ifs Crb ��
Address: P< 0, ItS D-y- 3 � ■
■�,S ■ �� ■� ■7S`�
Phone: £S� 8�` �'�-���■ Cal �L �0�■3�17
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 2733
E NERVILLE, NC 28787
75 BISON LANE
MURPHY, NC 28906
08483
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD „
Analytical Request
Report To: K■py-f
Bill To: 7-0 m v- v [nit Lab Temp:
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
FAX #:■— ��F —.� s
Rec Lab Temp:
*Requested Due Date`
. -.: •
d ,
�_ •
•
•
Sa
ITEM I CL
# IAIVIPLE DESCRIPTION RESID. TIME MATRIX EES, #TA
■ ��� ��
an
son
a►�■■■■■■�■■
I
on
I■■■■■■■■■■�■
■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
IS
IS
0
0
1
son
0■■■■■
IN
1
0
son
I
son
■■■■■
IS
0
0
■■
■■■
loss
■■■■
IN
IN
0
onl■
■■o
NONE
s■■■
IMEMINEEM
on
on
son
0
onon
■■
SHIPMENT METHOD ITEM
OUT/ RETURNED/DATE #
RELINQUISED BY/
ACCEPTED BY/
DATE TIME
e • • •
■
Wo019-y, -�1
■
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS CP-0771-B

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
WEAVERVILLE OFFICE
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
`7 FLAX: [phone]
Client:yW�1 �T �c�/`S [-Ti1i W �_T ()
D
Address: 81 0 . A-OX 3 6&-
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 2733 75 BISON LANE
WEAVERVILLE, NC 28787 MURPHY, NC 28906
Report To: 7` Sc� ry�
Bill To:
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
Phone�0 ��`7 ��T � eQ.f l ` i-c�i --Q1b FAX #:
08484
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request
Init Lab Temp: X�
Rec Lab Te
ti
Requ a Date: b _
1�.
•
�
�� ' q ` ;
•
•
•
�.�'
-
ITEM ,CL �
# SAMPLE DESCRIPTION RESID. TIME MATRIX EES.
INon
-A
on
0
FOR
I
on
MEN
IMMIN
0
son
.SS
MEN
so
on
.,.......SS
M
NONE
IMMIN
sonM
MINE
NONE�son■���5�
0S0
�1on11111on
�5�
no
11011
M
SHIPMENT
OUT/DATE
METHOD ITEM
RETURNED/DATE #
RELINQUISED BY / AFFILIATION
ACCEPTED BY / AFFILIATION
DATE TIME
ADDITI.ONAL COMMENTS:
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS cP-0771-B

f
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services
Collection date: 17-Apr-12
Date received: 18-Apr-12
Sample identification: #041233
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 120418.511
Sample number: 92815
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed y
rxrucr3ollas SM 2540 G 81.9 0.100 % 23-Apr-12 JAB 1
�t1ry 7471 B 0.068 0.024 mg/kg 26-Apr-12 MEH 1
Uadmi' 6010C 0.31 0.30 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
C cal lU 6010C 8600 2400 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
Cher 6010C 59 0.30 m 2 Mg/kg s 4pr-1_ BGM 1
per 6010C 69 0.60 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
6010C 14 0.30 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
�gne:' 6010C 4000 600 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
M enese . 6010C 350 60.0 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
oN l�num 6010C <0.60 0.60 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
e 6010C 19 1.2 m 25-
Po �' m Pig Apr-AprBGM 1
6010C 3600 3000 mg/kg 2s-Ape 12 BGM 1
S n/m 6010C <0.66 0.60 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
J 6010C <0.30 0.30 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
6010C 67 15 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
" 6010C 54 3.0 mg/kg 25-Apr-12 BGM 1
I Phosphorus SM 4500 P F 700 61 mg/kg 24-Apr-12 CLB 1
in Soil SW 846 9045C 7.8 S.U. 18-Apr-12 CDJ
Acidity See Attached Sheets 2aApr-12 A&L 2
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services
Collection date: 17-Apr-12
Date received: 18-Apr-12 S` t
Sample identification: ##041234
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 120418.511
G l l aAA- 4�0 It C�'A C//(
S� Y1r7(c�
Sample number: 92816
PaF�meter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
// Analyzed
; c �., lit ovirus
SM 254U G
86.4-
0.100
%
23-Apr-12
JAB
1
cury
7471 B
0.054
0.024
mg/kg
26-Apr-12
MET-1
1
C ium
6010C
<0.29
0.29
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
cium
'mium
6010C
1000
11
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
C
6010C
39
0.29
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
er
6010C
22
0.57
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
6010C
12
0.29
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
esium
6010C
770
2.9
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
genese
6010C
280
57
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
lybdenum
6010C
<0.57
0.57
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
*el
assium
6010C
6010C
12
600
1.1
14
mg/kg
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
25-Apr-12
BGM
BGM
1
1
nium
6010C
<0.57
0.57
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
er
6010C
<0.29
0.29
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
c�ium
6010C
16
14
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
c
6010C
29
2.9
mg/kg
25-Apr-12
BGM
1
TXtal Phosphorus
SM 4500 P F
290
58
mg/kg
24-Apr-12
CLB
1
in Soil
SW 846 9045C
7.4
S.U.
18-Apr-12
CDJ
Acidity
See Attached Sheets
20-Apr 12
A&L
2
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc.
2. Analyzed by A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
Date reviewed: 05— 05-12
Data reviewed by: _ Kelley E. Keenan
Signature:
NC Certification Number: 600
SC Certification Number: 99053
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

40
Page 1 of 1
Report Number: 12-110-8708
Account Number. 46933
�17L1
Send To: ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
Wwra711abscom
SOLUTIONS INC
POB 7565
ASHEVILLE NC 28802
Date Received: 04/192012
Date Of Analysis: 04/202012
A&L Eastern Laboratories
76214Vhitepine Road Rtehm0nd,V1rylnia23227 (Ba4)7d3S4B1 Fax (BB4)271—
Grower:
#041233 & #041234
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
Date Of Report 05/03/2012
._.__. _-.-..., w.•r, 11—). M immum . Pounds per atte_ --. __......" �a Kt tnauun),'—A
H (High), VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. ), ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meg/loog
C.E.C_ - Cation Exchange Capacity_ (milB-equivatent per 100 grams). Conversions: Ppm x 2 = Ibsx&
Soluble Sails mscm x 640 = ppm.
Farm ID:
Analytical Method(.):
Mehlich 3
This report eppries to sam*fs) tested. Samples are retained a
trtawntrm of tnirry days after Iezdrlg. M
Analysts Prepared by: A&L Eastern Laboratories. In¢ by. P 1•� ���
Pauric McGroary

Page 1 of 1
Report Number: 12-116-0531 Y A &L Eastern Laboratories
Account Number: 46220 L
7621 White Ina o _ .. ., .... p Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone] Fax [phone]
Send To: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS www,allabs,com Grower:
75 BISON LN EES Farm ID:
MURPHY NC 28906 ,r I-L, I. / C -" '. A / C `� v 2 —
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT Analytical Method(s):
Date Received: 04/25/2012 Date Of Analvsis: 04/26/2012 Date Of Report: 04/27/9019 Mehlich 3
s
Orgtfnic Matter
Phosphorus
Potassium
Magnesium
Calcium
Sodium ,.
pH• , •
Acidity,
C.E.0
Sample ID
Field ID z
Lab
Number
e/, Rat®
Mehllch 3
Reserve ,
K
Mg
Ca
Na
'Soll
Buffer
H
•
Ppn? .. =Rate
,,ppm Rate
PPm ', :y Rate
Ppm Rate
.ppm Rate.
ppm ;.'`" Rat®„
PH
Index
me /100
Imn"0 2
16199
2.0 L 72
121 VH
492 VH
433 H
1447 M
43 VL
7 7
0.012.3
Sr�sSS $
NC =101
_ NC = 252
S#04 4�
(/rVY: GI
17
16200 2.8 M 95 L 276 VH 304 H 885 M 18 VL 7.2 0.0 7.7
_, _
Percent Base Saturation ", Nitrate Sulfur Zinc - : Mari anesta' , , -•Iron : Co er- Boro ` " Solulie salts
- 9 - PP .. n-;, Chloride °:Alumfnuin
:.
'';SamplelD,
Fie1dID';
K
Mg.
Ca;
Na,
H
903NMne
Cu.
B
SS
CI
AI
>z ,• . , :, ;
/01
/o ;'•".,.
. /O.
Ppm . Rate
:.... ..,,._ ..
ppm ,Rate
•a • u ., .,
;ppm , 'Rate
::..
p m`%..Rate.
P ... = -;
.,
m ::°-..Rate:
_pp ..., ...
m _ ::Rate
Rp. .... •
m Ra .
pp to
ms/c1Y1 Rate
ppm :.Rate
ppm
ESS#041233
10.3
29.3
58.8
1.5
0.0
6.2 H
63 VH
6.5 VH
NC = 155.0
NC = 394
NC = 325.0
ESS#041234
2.2
27 H
2.6 H
9.2
32.9
57.5
1.0
0.0
_-L
NC=55.0
NC=169
NC. =130.0
veiueaun uns report represent ine plant avauaoie nutrients in the t=xplanation of symbols: % (percent), ppm (parts per million), Ibs/A This report applles io sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
soil. Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), (pounds per acre), ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meq/100g maximum of thirty days after testing.
H (High), VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. (milli -equivalent per 100 grams). Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A, Soluble by: Paw'r" me G
C.E.C. - Cation Exchange -Capacity; ------. - ...-Salts ms/cm-x 640 = ppm. Analysis prepared by: A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
Pauric McGroary
0

Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 23.50
Permit #: WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): 12.3
Operator: Robert M Sams Owner: Larry Cody Predominant Soil Series:
Acres Used: 14.5 Acres Permitted: 14.5 Site #: 1 Field #:
Residual Analvsis Data (Heavy MPtalc and •P-+-i
Sample or
Com-
posite
Date
1
4/17/12
2
4/17/12
3
--
4
-
Af
--��V�
L6
uu uJ�
7
Inge,
8
io 301lus
9
use
Kaw rel
10
11
% Solids
15.1
15.1
Arsenic
1.6
1.6
Cadmium
1.6
1.6
Copper
200
200
Chromium
22
22
Lead
17
17
Mercury
1
1
Molyb-
denum
4.8
4.8
Nickel
16
16
Selenium
4.5
4.5
Zinc
5.9
5.9
Total
Phos-
horus
Annual
29000
NPaw Ma+"l
29000
1P.-j
l T
'cent
127
1
Total
DT/Ac./
App.
Event
1
0.99
---- - ----
2
0.64
-.••»•�-..5�
3
��.w■..uaawu
4
L51
111 1115/iLGi"Cl:
6
7 j8
L9
10
✓
✓
J
i/
✓
11
12
y
r4
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
�hrbmi
0.003
0.003
0:394
0.043
0.002
0.002
0.254
0.028
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0. 000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.0 00
0.000
0.000
0.648
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.071
Lead
Mercury
denumMolyb
enum
0.033
0.002
0.009
0.022
0.001
0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.055
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.016
Nickel
Selenium
0.032
0.009
0.020
0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.052
0.000
0.000
0.006
0.015'-
Zinc
Total
Phos-
nhnnis
0.012
57.130
0.008
36.888
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0.019
0.000
0.000
0.000
94.018
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
z=z a syst3 designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
`c £iC-nifieant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
°=r Y= n �t 0-knowing violation
Signature of Land A.pplier
DENR FORM. 6V:FlSF (12,2006)

0�
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION .FIELD SU1dIMARV FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill WQ Permit #: WQ0004298 field #: I Acres Utilized: 14.15
Land Owner: Larry Cody Annual Dry Tons Applied: 23.4574 Site #: 1 Acres Permitted: 14.5
Operator: Robert Sams Predominant Soil Series: Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 12,3
Crop I Name: Fescue Crop 1 Max. PAN: Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN: s �
0 Is"11
� �
m O
Q
Volume applied
enter one Solids/
( )
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
o
/o
Solids
Volume
Applied per
PP P
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond,
(Dry,
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
Y
b
E� o'
a w
p
o
�'
w _
r
R
� -t
as
0
TIN
rnglkg
z j
=.
o �
as o
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
( lbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop17
C:rop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
5/21/12
112.28
15.1
0.985
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
530,00
3000
95
32.633
NA
fescue
5/22/12
72.18
15,1
0.633
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
53000
3000
95
21,010
NA
fescue
0.000
0.000
0.000
--
0.000
--
0.000
0.000
-
-�
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
_
0.000
0.000
--
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
-
-
_-�
-`0.000
0.000
---
0.000
---
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM
_
FSF supp to this form):
®®
TOTALS:
184.461
0
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
53.693
0.000
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0.005
0.005
0.648
0.071
0,055
0.003
0.016
0.052
0.015
0.019
3.382
3.401
2498
_P
94.018
t z
Date
Ibs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.898
0.609
50.502
1.869
5.328
0.127
2.768.
2.474
1.552
Nov
5760
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.903 ✓
0.614
51,150
1.940V
5,383
0.130v
2,784
2,526 X
1.567
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34
1338
nl
267
15
nl
374
.89
Permit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
24 "'1„N
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to ,assure that
qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. lam aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
informa ' n inclu ing the possibility fines and i prisonment for knowing violations."
Application Method: S - Surface, IN - ]Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injectiion/Incorporation - 1.0
1*11 Mineralization Rates: 'Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -.0.2,
ignature of Land Applier 6ate aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loadine Rate
DENR FOFZM FSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill
Land Owner: Larry Cody
Operator: Robert m Sams
Crop 1 Name:
WQ Permit #: WQ0004298 Field #: 2 Acres Utilized: 0
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 4DIV/0! Site #: 1 Acres Permitted: 3.8
Predominant Soil Series: Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 7.7
Crop 1 Max. PAN:
Crop 2 Name:
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
c �
� a
+� o
�
Q
Volume applied
PP �
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
Residual Sources
(NPDBS #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Soil
Cond.
(D
(Dry,
Wet,
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.C'
inches
y
'y
ce b
F'r o
ao
-�
c
� �.,
--
*
°p
�
Q
� .,
=
* �•
*
p
TKN
mg/kg
Z
o
o
; i?.
w
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
(lbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
g
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop 1
Crop 2
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0I
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
I #DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
!.
Residuals Applications totals
on FORM FSF supp ( attach
FORM
FSF supp
to this form):
TOTALS:
o
o
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
H
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
0.000 T
0.000
LimeYApplied
Annual lbs/acre
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
xr
#######
.s.
Date
lbs/ac
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
#VALUE!
#######
#######
#######
#######
#######
#######
#######
#######
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
Permit PAN Limit lst/2nd Crop
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified pe onnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
informa ' n, i cludinjg the posspility off nes and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
o� **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

,a -�
got
ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (503 Rules)
.P
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill
WWTP Name: Town of Mars Hill WWTP
WQ Permit Number: WQ0004298
NPDES Number: NCO057151
Monitoring Period: From 11/5/2012 To 11/13/2012
Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) = Please indicate level achieved and alternative nerfarmi--d-
Class A:
Alternative 1 ❑
Alternative 2 ❑
Alternative 3 ❑
Alternative 4 ❑
Alternative 5 ❑I
Alternative 6 ❑
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further
Reduce'Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑4
Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
, :.
Class B:
Alternative 1 [0 '
Alternative 2 ❑
`
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ❑
Air Drying❑
Composting ❑
Aerobic Digestion
Anaerobic Digestion ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
Pathogen Density
Number o
Excee-
dence
Frequency
of Analysis
Sample
Type
yp
Analytical
Tech-
ni ue
Minimum
Geo. Mean
Maximurr,
Units
Fecal Coliform
2 x 10 to the
6th power
per gram of
total solids
MPN
7200
14000
26000
col./gra
0
1/year
grab
9222d
CFU
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 MPN per 4 grams
total solid (dry
weight)
vector Attraction Reduction (4u C FR 5u3.33) -Please indicate option performed:
Alt.l (VS reduction)
❑
Alt. 2 (40-day bench)
❑
Alt. 3 (30-day bench) ❑
Alt. 4 (Spec. 02 uptake)
2Alt.
5 (14-Day Aerobic)
[IAlt.
6 (Alk. Stabilization
❑
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) ❑
Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable)
[IAlt.
9 (Injection)
❑
Alt. 10 (Incorporation)
❑
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed
[I
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met."
® "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." (Please note if you check
this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Robert M Sams- Public Works Director
Prepar e and Title (type or print)
ignature of Preparer* Date
Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
Signature of Land Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 503 (12/2006)

EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Residence — [phone]
Robbinsville Lab — [phone]
Weaverville Lab — [phone]
Fax — [phone]
E-Mail — earthenvsergwebworkz.coml
December 31, 2012
NC ID #352
Mr. Robert Sams
Town of Mars Hill
P.O. Box 368
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Dear Mr. Sams:
Following is a report of laboratory analyses for digester sludge samples received 11/14/2012.
Colony Counts
# Samnle Date Cnlifnrm Densities (r.nlnniec/oram) %Tntal Sn1Mc 1 n ml 11 1 —1 n n1 —1
1
11/5/12
10,000 Colonies/Gram
0.79
74
9
2
2
11/6/12
26,0.00 Colonies/Gram
0.80
TNTC
21
6
3
1117/12
10,000 Colonies/Gram
0.86
89
9
2
4
11/8112
13,000 Colonies/Gram
0.84.
105
12
5
5
1119/12
28,000 Colonies/Gram
0.82
TNTC
23
5
6
11/12/12
12,000 Colonies/Gram
0.83
87
10
5
7
11/13/12
7,200 Colonies/Gram
0.79
57
6
2
Geometric mean for all seven samples: 14,000 colonies/gram. Thank you for your
business. If you have any question or need additional sample analyses performed, please
call.
Respectfully submitted,
�9"J�Y- C;'�&
Michael J. Ladd
Laboratory Director

�Fgb Q1 13 08:47a
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI
828-835-8631 p.1
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number: W0004298
Date: 12-AK
Digester Temperature: 14.
Sampling Date/Time: 4/12/2012 9:3
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Date/Time: 4/12/2012 9:3
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume: 100
Total Solids: 0.
Beginning Temperature: 14.
End Temperature: 14.
Dissolved Oxygen Level
i.311
5.13
5.08
4.99
4.91
4.88
4.81
191
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
grees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 5.4
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 5.07 mg Oxygenlhr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.63 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 15 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.402551731
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.89 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

13 08:47a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI
828-835-8631 p.2
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Bicsolids Permit Number: WQ004298
Date: 21-May
Digester Temperature: 1.4.8
Sampling Date/Time: 5/21/201214:00
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Daterrime: 5/21/2012 14:00
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume: 1 000milliliters
Total Solids: 0.88 % Dry Solids
Beginning Temperature: 14.8 degrees Celsius
End Temperature: 14. degrees Celsius
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.
4.31
4.2
4.09
4.01
3.92
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 5.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 6.15 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.70 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 15 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.402551731
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.98 mg Oxygenlg/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

13 08:47a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.3
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Dateffime:
Sampled By:
Analysis Datefi'ime:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
)Issolved Oxygen Level
4.161
3.751
15-1
0.91 %Dry Solids
16.6 degrees Celsius
16.6 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept 4.2
Correlation Coefficient 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.71 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate. 0.52 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 17 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.225043
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.63 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

13 08:47a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI '
828-835-8631 p.4
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Bicsolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling DatelTime:
Sampled By.
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature..
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
3.01
2.92
2.9
2.81
2
2.19
2.12
2. D8
2.D4
26-Jul
17.8
1210:15
add
1210.15
add
1000 milliliters
0.88 % Dry Solids
17.8 degrees Celsius
17.6 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 3.1
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.44 mg Oxygenlhr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.50 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.58 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

o 08:47a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI
828-835-8631 p.5
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number: W0004298
Date: 7-Augll
Digester Temperature: 18
Sampling Date/Time: 8/7/2012 10:40
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Date/Time. 8/7/201A
Analyzed By: Michael La
Sample Volume: milliliters
Total Solids: % Dry Solids
Beginning Temperature: degrees Celsius
End Temperature: degrees Celsius
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.33
4.22
4.16
3.
Slope: 0.1
Intercept 4.2
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 3.89 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.41 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.47 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions. Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

s:47a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.6
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Siosolids Permit Number.
Digester Temperature: 18.3
Sampling Date/Time: 9/20/2012 14:30
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Date/Time: 9/20/2012 14:30
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume: 1000 milliliters
Total Solids: 0.88 % Dry Solids
Beginning Temperature: 18.3 degrees Celsius
End Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4
Slope:
0.1
Intercept
5.1
Correlation Coefficient
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
5.50 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
0.62 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature:
18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor:
1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.72 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes.
The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

,:47a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.7
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5 .
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number -
Digester Temperature. 17
Sampling Date/Time: 10/29/2C12 13:I
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Date/Time: 10/29/2012 13:1
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume: 10(
Total Solids: 0.f
Beginning Temperature: 17
End Temperature: 17
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.15
3.811
M.
3.33
3.21
illiliters
Dry Solids
:grees Celsius
:grees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.4
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.44 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.52 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: O.f30 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

SOP
I. Annual Land Application Certification Form
• Was a certification form submitted? -0-5
• . Was lard application conducted during the reported year? Y•P-5
• How man, dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied? 23,g57-V
• Were the applications within the pe.�;itted amount?-Ye5
• Ver;-Fj P AIN if more than 10 tons/acre
• Did it indicate compliance?: Ye-5
• Was it signed by the appropriate peopte? .y--ly
2. iVIonitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency?,ye-5
• Were the metals analyses reported,on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? yeS
• Were the results reported in mg/kg?-p S
• . Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?•
• If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested? •-5
• Was TCLP analysis conducted? Rer�uir� 0ne-e-lp^rmiT cycle-
3. Field Summary
• Were the land application. events recorded on the Field Summary Forms?,,��s
• Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field? V es
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?��,,-5
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sourcesTya-S
• Were the field Ioading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)?yeJ
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated? ye-5
• Were the calculations correct?. VAS
• Were the PAN loading rates.within permit limits? YP-5
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?yet
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?,j-,--S
• Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season?•Y-e-3
• Were the Field Summary Forms complete?, ,r_T
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction _
• Was a signed copy of the Pathogen and Vector Attraction eduction Form subml,tted? y�S
• Did the form i dicatejhe period of coverage,'the residual class, and the pathogen reduction CIAI-Wative and the
vector attraction reduction option used'? V
•. Was the appropriatek'z documenta pn to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report?
• Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503?
5. Soil `fesrs'
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field? y-P-5
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field?pe,S `
• Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application fie!V' ,0-5'
6. General',
• Was the report in tJLe proper format? e5
• Were. any parts of the annual report T61saigg-7 �'�Q
• Was the report submitted on time? \' ! �p� /
,vc pg ri's08, 0 Gautmse, �,"arty � ;e,S�c �l�- �2?f,d, /I N.a d vti�Slb?�`'
* Any violations of ceiling concentrations should be i•eportd to. Pretreatment for municipalities. only.

Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1- Fecal Coliform Density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? � &S
Were seven samples taken? Y,&.S
• Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly? Y.e-S
• Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids) y�S
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (one of five)
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Aerobic Di e� stion
• Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?.
• Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 150C (590F)?
Air Dreg
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was theambient.temperature above O°C (32T) for two months?
• Were the residuals partially digested?
• Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above O°C '(riot snow covered)?
Anaerobic Di esg tion
• Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 15 days at 35°C (95T) to 55°C (13IT) and 60 days at 200C
(680F)?.
Composting
• Was it a. composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the temperature raised to 40°C (104°F) or higher and remained at 40°C (1O4T) for five days?
• Did the temperature exceed 55°C (13IT) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
• Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77T)?

Vector Attraction Reduction Review
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38%"Volatile Solids Reduction
• Was there 38% reduction?
• . Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not•total solids)?
• Was the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)?
• Were calculations correct?
40-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
• Was the test run for 40 days?
• Was the test done between 300C (86°F) and 370C (990F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the reduction less than 17%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Were calculations correct?
30-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
• Was the test run for 30 days?
• Was the test done at 200C (680F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the reduction less than 15%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations. in report?
• Were calculations correct?
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOURI
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? yeS
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)? 7e-5
• Was the test done between 100C (50°F) and 300C (860F)? �4$
• Was the temperature corrected to 200C (68°F)? y��
• Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)? y.,5
• Was the sample holding time under two hours? ye 5
• Was the test started withinl5 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained? .� S

14-Day Aerobic Process
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were the residuals treated for 14 days?
• Was the residuals temperature higher than 400C (104°F) for the 14-day period?
• Was the average residuals temperature higher than 45°C (113T)?
Alkaline Stabilization
• Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by the addition of alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition
of more alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty-two
hours without the addition of more alkali?
• Was the pH corrected to 250C (770F)?
Drying of Stabilized Residuals
• Does the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?
• Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 75% total solids?
Drying of Unstabilized Residuals
• Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids? .
N ection
• Was there any significant. amount of residuals on land surface one hour after
injection (Inspection)?
• Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
• Was injection done at time that crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals injected within eight hours
after discharge from pathogen treatment?
Incorporation
• Were the residuals incorporated into the soil within_ six hours after application?
• Was incorporation done on pasture or hay field?
• Was incorporation done at. time that crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals incorporated within eight
_.-. ___ ._. _---____--hours-after-discharge--fiom-pathogen-treatment?-------------