WQ0004298_2011 Residuals Annual Report_20120207

fi
Town of Mars Hill NC
2011 Land Application Report FET 0 7 20112
WQ0004298 I Asheville Regional Office
Attached are the required forms for the Town of Mars Hills 201A land applIcafi—o—n ------
.program. ( a P
alAolf ::. 0;)
The town has land applied 15.9292332 dry tons of sludge over 14.5 acres in the calendar
year 2011. We have also maintained compliance.
Contact Information:
Preparer/ORC
Robert Sams
Public Works Director
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]
Permittee
Darhyl Boone
Town Manager
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
Permit#: WQ0004298 County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
Land Application Operator:
Madison
Year: 2011
Town of Mars Hill Land Application Program
Robert M. Sams Phone: [phone]
Land application of residual solids as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
2 Yes ® No If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled. y
Part A: .�
Total number of application fields in permit: 2,� 1 r
Total number of fields land application occurred during the year: A
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: 15.9292332-: ,
Total number of acres land application occurred during the year: 14.5
Part B: N J,
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2011 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. 0 Yes ® No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain
corrective action taken.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites._
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at
least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three
(3) copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required
and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 503.13 or the
Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13 (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14 were
complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation,
prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of
violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were removed
in accordance with the crop management plan.
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Darhyl Boone- Town Manager
Permittee ame and Title (type or print)
S gnature of Preparer*
Date
Signature o Permittee
/—,Z7--/L
Date
Signature of Land Applier Date
DENR FORM ACF (5/2003)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Attach this form to the corresponding Annual Report
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed than those required to be summarized on this form.
Permit Number: WQ0004298 Laboratory: 1) Earth Environmental Services
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Land Application 2) Environmental Testing Solutions
NPDES # or 3) A&L Eastern Laboratories
WQ#: NC0057151
4)
WWTP Name: Town of Mars Hill WWTP 5)
Residual Analvsis Data
Sample or I
CompositeDate
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
signi nt penalties for submitti g false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
-7A
JAI "Zl� 4 AZ
Signature of Preparer D Ze
DENR.FORM RSSF (5/2003)

Earth Environmental Services
Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
Weaverville Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
Name and Address of Facility:
Date: 1111812011
Town of Mars Hill WWTP
Sample Collector.
RS
P.O. Box 368
Date and Time Sample Received:
6/8/2011 10:50 AM
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Date and Time Sample Collected:
6/7/2011 1:15 - 2:35 PM
Aft: Robert Sams
Date and Time Sample Analyzed:
< MHT
Land Application Analyses - Note: All results in
mq/Kq Dry Basis unless otherwise noted.
Test
Belt Press Sludge
Soil Site #1
Soil Site 92
Report Limit
Method
Units
ACIDITY
0.0 meq/100g
0.0 meq/100g
SCA
mg/L
TOTAL- SUSPENDED RESIDUE
1.0
SM2540D
mg/L
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY
15.5 meq/100g
11.8 meq/100g
SCA
per 100ml
PH
6.9
7.2
7.5
0-14
SCA
units
AMMONIA NITROGEN
7700
0.5
SCA
mg/L
NO2 + NO3-n
150
1.0
SCA
mg/L
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
4000
SCA
mg/L
TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS
18000
183
36
1 SCA
mg/L
PERCENT TOTAL RESIDUE
13.1%
80.7%
79.8%
SCA
mg/L
% ORGANIC MATTER
2.7%
3.1%
SCA
NTU
% BASE SATURATION - K
6.8%
9.2%
SCA
mg/L
- H
0.0%
0.0%
-Mg
30.2%
31.3%
-Ca
62.1 %
58.6%
-Na
0.7%
0.6%
PLANT AVAILABLE (surface)
2520
PPM/dw
NITROGEN- PPM DRY WT (subsurf)
6370
PPM/dw
SAR
0.086139
0.101034
ESP
0.93969%
7.737653%
MANGANESE
300
650
SCA
mg/L
MAGNESIUM
3100
6000
1000
SCA
mg/L
SODIUM
590
39
21
SCA
mg/L
CADMIUM
1.9
< 0.31
< 0.31
SCA
mg/L
CHROMIUM
24
45
75
SCA
mg/L
COPPER
250
33
64
SCA
mg/L
LEAD
19
15
12
SCA
mg/L
NICKEL
19
17
32
SCA
mg/L
ZJNC
840
110
57
SCA
mg/L
CALCIUM
7900
5500
1600
SCA
mg/L
POTASSIUM
4800
5000
450
SCA
mg/L
ALUMINUM
8100
NIA
N/A
SCA
mg/L
ARSENIC
< 3.8
< 0.31
< 0.31
SCA
mg/L
SELENIUM
6.7
1.4
1.6
SCA
mg/L
MOLYBDENUM
4.8
< 0.63
< 0.63
SCA
mg/L
MERCURY
1.3
0.054
0.081
SCA
mg/L
N.C. Laboratory ID# 352 Analyzed By:
Lab Supervisor. Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville Certified By:
T>-

PAN /S l l.t�Y" -e-- �r l �
� �I 'l2
Mineralization
as decimal
ITotal dry
tons/year
JAcres
AMlied on
Rate
0.4
[::ETKN
NH3
7700 4
NO3
150
NO2
0
% Solids
131 /
PAN Surface /
2520 mg/k 5.04 lbs/dry ton '
0 Ibs total PAN
#DIV/01 jibs PAN/acre
PAN Injection
6370 mg/kg 12.74 lbs/dry ton
0 1 lbs total PAN
#DIV/01 Jibs PAN/acre
Dry Tons/1000 gal.
#VALUE!
1st -year PAN
lbs./acre
Surface lbs.
Surface
Ol
I #DIV/0!
1st year PAN
lbs./acre
Injected lbs.
Injected
01
#DIV/0!
MR(TKN-NH3)+ + .5(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
MR(TKN-NH3) + l (NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
1000 X 8.34 X %solids X sp. gravity
2000
"=dry tons/1000gal."

�3.1 �(> spl;js
SAR & ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site #1 6/7/2011 I
5% IV54
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na(Mg/L)
Ca M /L
M M /L
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
39--
-5590-
1 woe -
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
77. X4
10,34,01
ok ?
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Na ME
Ca (ME)
Mg (ME)
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
1.695652
275
1 500
3, 346g3!�` 61.711E 33.9,q/�o7
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
❑i
Mg/L entered above)
SAR=-A A66a (From ME entered below)
Na (ME)
Ca (ME)
Mg (ME)
.1,695652
1 -27-5—
1 —6GG-
The amount of exchangeable sodium ions versus the
amount of exchangeable calcium & magnesium ions in a given
material. — - -
Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 require ESP in permit.
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of soils
( I; 32.oc-<elo.
ESP = 110.93969 %
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq.
Na ME CEC
1-69565 15.5
1,b43(1-7
( Sp= 1,043V?
Is k, 100
Should be less than 15% (15-20%)

SAR & ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site #2 6/7/2011
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
Na(Mg/L) Ca M /L Mg M /L
21 .1600 1 1000
Na ME
0.913043
Ca ME
80
Mg (ME)
83.33333
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
SAR = 0.101034 (From Mg/L entered above)
SAR= 0.101034 (From ME entered below)
Na . ME
Ca (ME)
M M
0.913043
80
83.33333
The amount of exchangeable sodium ions versus the
amount of exchangeable calcium & magnesium ions in a given
material.
Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 require ESP in permit.
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of soils
5.%9�q►s
ESP = 7.737653 %
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq.
f& �. i l
� � �-f
Na ME CEC—
O-GAA43 11.8
o -orscb
Should be less than 15% (15-20%)

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY I M-�
[phone] 1-1 EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY "11+411111!N1111 MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
,[phone]
FAX: [phone] P.O. BOX 1177 75 BISON LANE
RESIDENCE [phone] MARSHALL, NC 28753 MURPHY, NC 28906
FAX: [phone]
Client: v\ Of M- � Report To:
Address.�fl Bill To: im
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
Phone:
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request
[nit Lab Temp:
Rec Lab Temp:
*F)e quested Due_ $b:
LLIi��
0
z�'
LL
0
OZOZOZ
Pi
Pi W14
'p"Im, vau
ITEM CILf
SAMPLE -DESCRIPTION
# RESID. TIME MATRII
SHIPMENT
OUT/DATE
METHOD ITEM
RETUMED/DATE #
RELINOUISED SY /AFFILIATION
MOVIE
ACCEPTED BY/
AFFILIATION
KIM
DATE TIME
AQ1*IOKAL COMMENTS:,
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR JNSTRIJICTIONS, CP-0771-.B

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Address: (iy ��% t✓�
■ems ■����rG��?��.
Phone:
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177
MARSHALL, NC 28753
75 BISON LANE
MURPHY, NC 28906
Report To: Q�� ec�- Jc\,wLs
y�
Bill To: l ��►
P.O. # / Billing Reference: g-1 FAX #: -0 Ga ' 33 ry�
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request
Init Lab Terrlp:\�
Rec Lake. I-
_ ¢*�Rt6d Due Dai v�
• • •
4
tu
In
'
— r
s% •
0=5
'�' a"►��1� "REMARKS
MS 0
•
•
•a
co/ 2 0
VAIM, 0 -10
U10
;ITEMZA U_
CL •
e # SAMPLE DESCRIPTION RESID. TIME MATRIX ; EES. #
SHIPMENTMETHOD
OUT/DATE
ITEM
RETURNED/DATE #
RELINOUISEDBY/AFFILir1TION
005
ACCEPTED BY/
DATE TIME
ADDITIONAL
i
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS CP-0771-B

PO Box 7565
r
I K. Asheville, NC 28802
a. Phone: [phone]
�sl
Far: [phone]
J
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services Project number: 110608.505
Collection date: 7-Jun-11 S r d �" P Ac.,\ o i
� SC
—
Date received: 8-Jun-11 G -e — (lS/^(-7 ( C//
0�`�- ��-�,s.S E �. L
Sample identification: #061108 Sample number: 83204
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
;analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
13.1
0.100
%
13-Jun-I I
JAB 1
Mercury
7471B
1.3
0.15
mg/kg
1s-1nn-11
LTB I
Aluminum
6010C
8100
19
mg/kg
13_Jun-1 i
DWR 1
Arsenic
6010C
<3.8
3.8
mg/kg
I3-Jun-1I
DWR I
Cadmium
6010C
1.9
1.9
mg/kg
13-Jun-11
DWR I
Calcium
6010C
7900
1.9
mg/kg
13-Jun-1I
DWR I
Chromium
6010C
24
1.9
mg/kg
i3-Jun-i i
DWR I
Copper
6010C
250
3.8
mg/kg
13-Jun-ll
DWR 1
Lead
6010C
19
1.9
mg/kg
13-Jun-II
DWR I
Magnesium
6010C
3100
19
mg/kg
13-Jun-II
DWR I
Molybdenum
6010C
4.-8.
3.8
mg/kg
13-1un-11
DWR I
Nickel
6010C
19
7.6
mg/kg
13-Jun-1I
DWR I
Potassium
6010C
4800
95
mg/kg
13-Jun-II
DWR 1
Selenium
6010C
6.7
3.8 '
mg/kg
i3-Jun-1I
DWR i
Sodium
6010C
590
95
mg/kg
u-Jun-i i
DWR I
Zinc
6010C
8 0
19
mg/kg
i3-Jun-ii
DWR 1
Nitrate + Nitrite
SM 4500 NO3 F
150
38
mg/kg
14-1nn-I I
RSL I
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P F
18000
380
mg/kg
i4-Jun-I I
RSL I
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
351.2
4400
1900
mg/kg
13-Jun-I I
. RSL I
Total Nitrogen
Calculation
4200
1900
mg/kg
14-Jun-1 I
RSL I
Ammonia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 D
7700
77
mg/kg
10-jun-11
KEK
Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
13
%
8aun-ii
KEK
pH in Soil
SW 846 9045C
6.9
S U
&-Jun I I
KEK
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
I. Analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc.
Date reviewed: _ _ (Y0- 1-4-( 1 NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053
Signature: NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be reproduced, erept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

• PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services ( Project number: 110608.506
Collection date: 7-Jun-I1 �1�C 0, �� C 1 J A(1-�" A
Date. received: 8-Jun-11 � r �`�� ��
Sample identification: #1161109 J Sample number: 83205
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
r'CTUent 30110S
SM 2540 G
80.7
0.100
%
l3-Jung
JAB 1
Mercury
7471 B
0.054
0.024
mg/kg
15-Jim-n
LTB 1
Cadmium
6010C
<0.31
0.31
mg/kg
13-Jun-i1
DWR 1
Calcium
6010C
5500
63
mg/kg
13-Jun-11
DWR I
Chromium
6010C
45
0.31
mg/kg
13-Jun-lJ
DWR 1
Copper
6010C
33
0.63
mg/kg
13-Jun-ll
DWR 1
Lead
6010C
15
0.31
mg/kg
13-1un-11
DWR 1
Magnesium
6010C
6000
16
mg/kg
13-Fun-Ii
DWR i
Mangenese
6010C
300
1.6
mg/kg
13-Jun-11
DWR I
Molybdenum
6010C
<0.63
0.63
mg/kg
13aun-11
DWR 1
Nickel
6010C
17
1.3
mg/kg
13-Jun-u
DWR I
Potassium
6010C
5000
78
mg/kg
13-Jun-ii
DWR 1
Selenium
6010C
1.4
0.63
mg/kg
13-Jun-I
DWR I
Silver
6010C
<0.31
0.31
mg/kg
13-Jun-ri
DWR I
Sodium
6010C
39
16
mg/kg
13-Jun-ll
DWR 1
Zinc
6010C
110
3.1
mg/kg
13-.tun-11
DWR 1
Total Phosphorus
SM 4.�500 P F
440
62
mg/kg
14-Jun-1 l
RSL I
pH in Soil
SW 846 9045C
7.2
S.U.
8-Jun-n
KEK
Acidity
See Attached Sheets
2
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions. I_nc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services
Collection date: 7-Jun-11
Date received: 8-Jun-11
Sample identification: #061110
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Far: [phone]
Project number: 110608.506
s K
-7
Sample number: 83206
Parameter
Method
Result
R,
Units
Date
Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
79.8
0.100
%
13-Jun-I I
JAB 1
Mercury
7471 B
0.081
0.024
mg/kg
154un-1 I
LTB I
Cadmium
6010C
<0.31
0.31
mg/kg
i:w_-1,
DWR I
Calcium
6010C
1600
13
m g/kg
13-Jim-11
DWR 1
Chromium
6010C
75
0.31
mWkg
I--Jun-H
DWR I
Copper
6010C
64
0.63
mg/kg
13-Jun-It
DWR 1
Lead
6010C
12
0.31
mg/kg
13-Jun-II
DWR I
Magnesium
6010C
1000
3.1
mg/kg
13-Jun-1I
DWR 1
Mangenese
6010C
650
3.1
mg/kg
13-1un-11
DWR 1
Molybdenum
6010C
<0.63
0.63
mg/kg
13-1un-11
DWR I
Nickel
601OC
32
1.3
mg/kg
13-Jun-II
DWR I
Potassium
601OC
450
16
mg/kg
13-Jun-II
DWR I
Selenium
6010C
1.6
0.63
mg/kg
13-Jun-II
DWR I
Silver
6010C
<0.31
0.31
mg/kg
13-Jun-TI
DWR 1
Sodium
6010C
21
16
mg/kg
13-J.-H
DWR 1
Zinc
6010C
57
3.1
mg/kg
13-3un-11
DWR I
Total Phosphorus
SM 4500 P F
140
63
mg/kg
13-Jun-1 I
RSL 1
pH in Soil
SW 846 9045C
7.5
S.U.
KEK
Acidity.
See Attached Sheets
Footnotes:
RL =Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc.
2. Analyzed by A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
Date reviewed: 0(0- (3- U
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan
Signature:
NC Certification Number: 600
SC Certification Number: 99053
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without, the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

age 1 of 1
Report Number: 11-164-0518 AIL
Account Number: 46220
Send To: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS mmaleastern,com
75 BISON LN
MURPHY NC 28906
Date Received: 06/13/2011 Date Of Analvsis: 06/14/2011
A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
7621 Whitepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone] Fax [phone]
Grower:
EES#061109 & ESS#061110 Farm ID:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT Analytical Method(s):
Mehlich 3
Date Of Reoort: 06/15/2011
Organic Matter
Phosphorus
,
Potassium
Magnesium
Calcium
Sodium
pH
Acidity
C.E.0
Sample ID:.',,,
Lab'
ENR'
% Rate
Mehllch 3
Reserve
K
M,
Ca
Na
Soil
Buffer
H
Field ID
Number
IbslA
ppm Rate::
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
porn
Rate
ppm Rate
pH
Index
meq/100g
meclMoog
061109
(!5"1
S
�Q .
20036
2.7 M 82
153 VH
412 VH
562 H
1924
M
24 VL
7.2
- �-
NC
NC
0.0
15.5
0611110 -4 N�
i 8
3.1 M 95
36 M
425 VH
443 H
1384
M
16 VL
�
NC=30
NC=217
7,5
0.0
11.8
Percent
Bate Saturation :
Nitrate Sulfur.
Zinc .` Manganese
Iron
Copper
Boron
Soluble Salts
Chloride
Aluminum
le I�:<
SdiFie
d ID
K
Mg
Ca
Na
H
NO3N.
S; .,
Zn
Min
Fe
Cu
B
SS
Cl
Al
% ''
%
%
%
%
„Porn Rate-
,ppm Rate
ppm Rate::ppm
Rate
ppm
Rate
ppm Rate
ppm _ Rate
ms/cm - Rate-
-ppm Rate
ppm
061109
6.8
30.2
62.1
0.7
0.0
\
0611110
9.2
31.3
58.6
0.6
0.0
T,
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the Explanation of symbols: % (perce—ni[T-ppm (parts per million), Ibs/A This repots to sample(s) tested, Samples are retained a
soil. Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), (pounds per acre), ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meq/100g maximum of thirty days after testing.
H (High), VH (Very High); ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. (milli -equivalent per 100 grams). Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A, Soluble
Analysis prepared by: A8L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
C.E.C. -Cation Exchange Capacity. - Salts ms/cm x 640 =ppm.
by: ? Wic to &WV
Pauric McGroary

Report Number: 10-139.0651 tLi
Account Number: 46220
Send To: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS wwtvailaba.com
75 BISON LN
MURPHY NC 28906
Date Received: 05/19/2010 Date'Of Analvsis: os/2n/gain
A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
7621 Whittipine Road Rlohmond, Vlrpinla 23237 [phone] Fax (804) 271.Me
Gower:
EES#051035 & EES#051036
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT Analytical Method(s):
nafn hf RnnnrF• nnio-imn4n Mehiich 3
Farm ID:
s
Or anKc`IYlatter•
_
Ph s"„
p dr
_
to rteieliam
gw �
_ _
$�
b
�dl
pH
Acidity,
Field ll)
ENR
°'IehllchT3
Reserve
M g
Cad
z ��.
NA
-
hp
�pP• Mate
pent Rgte
R
,p m Rafe
� _ •:�, „
to Ra
pp Ip
ph" fate
"W
p
Index
``meq/1 QOa
ems.
meg110,�
061035
17066
7.6 H 150
350 VH
r
353 VH
"..p, ._
680 H
2936 M
a
NC = 292
NC = 181
7.1
0.0
21,3
051036
17067
4.4 M 119
47• M
383 VH
387 H
1780 M
NC=39
NC=19 6
6.9
6.91
0.2
113
Sample ll)..,
FercQnt Basesattlratlon
':,
Nitrate
sulfut
21nc
Manganese.,
lion
Copper,
Borah•
9ollrbl�seite
'
Chloride
AlumYrlrglrj
ield.ID:
K Mg Ca
Na ..:. H
NO.N
s
2h
,Mn
Fe
Cu
Bw
ss .-
clAID.
,,. °r6 ..: %
%
ppm Rate
Rate
'' hi .: `Ratd
p.'pm
PPm Rate
'Rate
,pprrl'
pp
..Rate
ppiii .Rate
m"slcm
•p'pm Rate
ppm
051035
4.2
26.6
68.9
0'0
051036
7.4
24.2
66.9
1.4
•-r-• •-r•--�• •• •• - r�• 4•a��•� �•�„a „ . ctiN,aI muVn yr symoois::ro tpercenq, ppm (pens per million), Ibs/A This report applies to sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
soil. Raling after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), (pounds per acre), ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meq/100g maximum of thirty days after testing, a
H (High), VH (Very High). ENR - Eatimated Nitrogen Release. (milli -equivalent per 100 grams). Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A, Soluble by: Pwia
C.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity. Salts ms/cm x 640 = ppm. Analysis prepared by: ASL Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
Pauric McGroary
�- � S c 0 � 5° •- S � T �

Report Number: 10-139.0551 LUL
Account Number: 46220
Send To: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS ww+wallebs,com
75 BISON LN
MURPHY NC 28906
Date Received: 05/10/2010 Date'OfAnalvsis:05/20/20in
,A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
7621 WhItapine Road Rlahinond,Virginia 23237 [phone] Pax(604)271.644e
Grower:
EES#051035 & EES#051036 Farm ID:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT Analytical Method(s):
Date Of Rannrt! nF191/!)nln Mehlich 3
S,am le=th :,..
"Twin
.9..,, ..
� ,.i�oaph.�!'
.gtaNla
n�.�a
rie�t:.r
9 um.Ca
Ictttm
S, odium
C;. .;
,R .... . • .
F,lerd-ID,:.,
:, ab....
h.....
"Nu ber.
.ENR ..
.: , ;,..
, iNehlfat
>
Reaevtve
:fie r
z. `,
K 4
M 9
Ca
.. s
N,a
3o�I
Buffer
H y,
s
_
_
•:-
�..,.:...., ,
x
�.
�pP., Rate
ppm � Rate
}i�ItQ��
pH
.,;.,Indek •
z ��
.N _,...
. .:.:... ....
_pP, - rt:.�� 7,
..._.::. .x
wppm
megl1009,
meX%s1Q�
051035
17066
7,6 H 150
350 VH
353 VH
680 H
2936 M
NC = 292
NC = 181
7.1
0.0
21.3
051036
17067
4.4 M 119
47 M
383 VH
387 H
1780 M
NC = 39
NC =196
6.9
6.91
0,2
13.3
3'ampit3:l�7`
Percent Base::Satui'aflon
,.-, ,
. Nitrate
ulfu[.
Z(c
4 Marr anese .
on
Coppers
!�o ro'n
8'
olrublet,Salts :
; Chloride
.n..•
All m,lrt ip;
'FieldlD' . •
K M Ca
o :..: ug
Na H
NOON
3
Zr1
:. M n
Fe
Gu
B
SS
Cl''
A�
o
:., ..
e
ppm F3ate
ppm Date
pqm T: Rat®
:ppm Rate
,ppm Rate
pptrl Rate
:ppm Efate
mslcm Rate
,ppm ' Rate
ppm
051035
4.2 26.6 66.9
0.0
051036
7,4
24.2
66.9
1.4
---• •- ••.- - • - ••-- - • -••• - ••- •• •• . v.a„a.rvn '! ay111w1- w wtatainy, ppm tparts per million), los/A This report applies to sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
soil. Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), (pounds per acre), ma/cm (milli -mhos per cenlimeter), meq/100g maximum of Ihlrty days after testing.
H (High), VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated,Nitrogen Release. (milli -equivalent per 100 grams). Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A, Soluble
C.E.C. - Callon Exchange Capacity. Salts ms/cm x 640 = ppm, Analysis prepared by; A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
s � � � ��'-I S ,,+
by: po 0wrgylic m tf
Pauric McGroary

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name:
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
Town of Mars Hill Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 15.9297
WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): 15.5
Robert M. Sams Owner: Larry Cody
14.5 Acres Permitted: 14.5 Site #:
Field #:
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent ft
OWN
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
K o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
�a�
o
p
y
o �F'
0.5493 1
0.5493
Arsenic
0.00421
0.0042
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0083
Cadmium
0.0021
0.0021
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0042
Chromiurr
0.0264
0.0264
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0527
Copper
0.2747
0.2747
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5493
Lead
0.0209
0.0209
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0417
Mercury
0.0014
0.0014
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0029
Molyb-
0.0053
0.0053
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0105
denum
Nickel
0.0209'
0.0209
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0417
Selenium
0.0074
0.0074
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0147
Zinc
0.9228
0.9228
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
1.8456
Total
Phos-
19.775
19.775
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
39.55
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the
information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
inclucliu the po ibility of fines d imprisonment for knowing violations"
i �7 /
DENR FORM MFLSF (5/2003)
V

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
Facility Name:
Owner:
Site #:
Larry Cody
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Town of Mars Hill
Field #:
Operator:
Permit #: WQ0004298
Robert M. Sams
Acres Utilized: 14.5
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 15,9292332
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 15.5
Acres Permitted: 14.5
o
o
(�
a S eci
Totals
per
Acre
%
Solid
s
D Tons Per
Acre
Residual
Sources
(Summarize)
)
1 e
Cond.
Dry,
Wet,Past
Inches
Precip.
24
Hrs.
Appli-
cation
Meth-
od*
Vola-
tili-
zation
Rate**
Miner-
ali-
zation
Rate
TKN
Ammo-
nia-
Ni-
trogen
Ni-
trate
and
Nitrite
PAN 1
PAN 2
Must Select
Crop 1 or Crop
2
*
Gal.
Cu.Yd.
Report
in Gal.Moist
Crop
Ticrop 2
5/26/11
14580
1005.51
13.1
0.549283903
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
4000
7700.
150
3.17486
#######
Fescue
1
6/8/11
.14580
1005.51,
13.1
0.549283903
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
4000
7700
150
3,17486
#######
Fescue
2
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
Ill
0
0
0
0
12
TOTALS:
2011
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
PAN 1
kAN 2
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0.00834936
0.00417
0.05273
0.5493
0.0417
0.00286
0.01055
0.04175
0.0,1472
1.84565
39,5496
6.3497
0
Date
lbs/ac
'
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.889609326
0,6047
1.81643
49.9528
5.28651
0.12452
2.75756
2.43247
1.53773
33.2391
31.3935
2498
10/5/11
5792
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.881259966
0.60053
1.7637
49.4035
5.24476
0.12166
2.74701
2.39072
1.52301
Permitted C. P. L. R.***
36
34
nl
1 1338
267
15
nl
374
89
Permit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
66r mr-rtiN .,ndPr nPnalty of law- that this document
was nrenared under my direction
or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
signific penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
AY" I l 02 7 /. *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
Signature o gd 1ptplier Date **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Iniection/Incorporation - 1.0
***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
* * * * The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into
the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1.
DENR FORM FSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill
)wner: Larry Cody Operator:
�ite #: 1 Field #: 2
Permit # WQ0004298
Robert M. Sams
Acres Utilized: 0
Annual Dry Tons Applied: #DIV/0!
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 11.8
Acres Permitted: 3.8
�+ c
1", Specify
Totals
per
Acre
#DIV/01
%
Solid
s
D Tons Per
�
Acre
#DIV/0!
Residual
Sources
(Summarize)
Did Not Apply
Site
Cond.
Dry,
Wet,
Moist
Inches
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
Appli-
cation
Meth-
od*
Vola-
tili-
zation
Rate**
Miner-
ali-
zation
Rate
TKN
Ammo-
nia-
Ni-
trogen
Ni-
trate
and
Nitrite
PAN 1
#DIV/01
PAN 2
#DIV/0!
Must Select
Crop 1 Cro
p or p
2
*
I
Gal.
Cu.Yd.
Report
Total's
in Gal.
Crop 1
Crop 2
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
2
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/01
3
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
4
#DIV/0!
4DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
15
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
6
#DIV/01
#DIV/01
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
7
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
8
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
9
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/01
I #DIV/0!
110
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
III
#DIV/01
FOTALS: #####
knnuallbs/acre
#DIV/0!
As
Did Not Apply
Cd Cr
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
#DIV/0!
PAN 1
10
#DIV/01
PAN 2
0
Lime Applied
Date
lbs/ac
12
"
.urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
?ermitted C. P. L. R. * * *
?ermrt PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
.r x'r
�.
�.
`I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
3esigned to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
dgnifica enalties for submi . g false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
7 *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
Signature of and Applier ate **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Iniection/Incorporation - 1.0
***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
*** The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into
the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1.
DENR FORM FSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM
Facility Name:
WWTP Name:
. Monitoring Period:
Town of Mars Hill
Town of Mars Hill WWTP
Permit Number:
NPDES Number:
WQ0004298
NCO057151
Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alternative 1 ❑
Alternative 2 ❑
Alternative 3 ❑
Alternative 4❑
Alternative 5 ❑
Alternative 6 El
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
Class B:
Alternative 12
Alternative 2 ❑
Alternative 3 ❑
% k
If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ❑
Air Drying ❑
Composting ❑
Aerobic Digestion 0
Anaerobic Digestion❑,��
,
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Allowable Level
Pathogen Density
Number o
Frequency
Sample
Analytical
Parameter
Sludge
in g
Excee-
dences
of Analysis
Type
Tech-niqu
Minimum
Geo. Mean
axim
Units
2 x 10 to the 6th
power NTN per
20000
32000
47000
col./gram
0
1/year
grab
9222d
gram of total
solids or 2 x 10 to
Fecal Coliform
the 6th power
CFU per gram of
1000 mpn per
gram of total solid
(dry weight)
Salmonella bacteria
3 MPN per 4
(in lieu of fecal
grams total solid
coliform)
(dry weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 503.33) - Please indicate option performed:
Option 1 ❑
Option 2 El
Option 3 ❑
Option 4
Option 5 El
Option 6 ❑
P
O tion 7 ❑
P
Option 8 ❑
P
Option 9
P
❑ Option 10 ❑
> x
No vector attraction reduction options were performed
❑
21, -s��:;
, .
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." (Please note if you check
this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the
system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for false: certification including fine and imprisonment."
Robert M. Sams -Public Works Director
Pre er Name and Title (type or print)
Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)

EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Residence — [phone]
Robbinsville Lab — [phone]
Weaverville Lab — [phone]
Fax — [phone]
E-Mail — [e-mail]\
November 11, 2011
NC ID 4352
Mr. Robert Sams
Town of Mars Hill
P.O. Box 368
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Dear Mr. Sams:
Following is a report of laboratory analyses for digester sludge samples receivedlW22,790VOW
Colony Counts
1 n .,,1 f) 1 M1 0.01 M1
8
1
z)am 1C Laic
6/6/11
20,000 Colonies/Gram
0.83
TNTC
17
3
2
6/7/11
27,000 Colonies/Gram
0.83
TNTC
23
6
3
6/8/11
47,000 Colonies/Gram
0.81
TNTC
38
11
4
6/9/11
36,000 Colonies/Gram
0.81
TNTC
29
3
5
6/10/11
37,000 Colonies/Gram
0.83
TNTC
31
6
6
6/13/11
30,000 Colonies/Gram
0.87
TNTC
26
2
7
6/14/11
25,000 Colonies/Gram
0.85
TNTC
21
3
Geometric mean for all seven samples: ' 32,000 colonies/gram. Thank you for your
business. If you have any question or need additional sample analyses performed, please
call.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael J. Ladd
Laboratory Director

ROBBINSVILLELABORATO�y EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
[phone] 7
WEAVERVILLE OFFICE ; MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
(828) 8) 5-8196 645-3737•06
FAX: (828) 645 P.O. BOX 2733 75 BISON LANE
RESIDENCE (828) 831,9543 WEAVERVILLE, NC 28787 MURPHY, NC 28906
FAX: (828) 835-%31 j
/,,��" l II f To:�
Client: ' h� ti" ��✓
����• Report '�
Address �Dr 6� Bill To: LJ �
�i%A Z
. # / Billing Reference:
i
Phone: g l�'ZS Z FAX #: 9—-3
Sampled pent): cn PRESERVATIVES ANALYSES
z o m REQUES
w
Sam p i at re ate Sampled r
z w °' C `
/ ° Lu a `�
(� O � O O Q O _ ~
O 1�
# SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , Oz 2 2 Z Z = \J
77l �.
2(
g
5 q _ cat a l b I
6 lCrl G I
8
9
10
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
08180 .
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request
Init Lab Temp:
Rec Lab Temp:
*Requested Due Date:
REMARKS
6 1I4 I
cP,oSit.B
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS

Jan 30 12 12:40p Earth Environmental Ser. 8288358631 p.5
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.81
4.74
4.64
11
0 milliliters
3 % Dry Solids
1 degrees Celsius ✓
2 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 5.1
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.94 mg Oxygenmr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.53 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 19 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.07 V
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.57 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Jan 30 12 12:40p Earth Environmental Ser.. 8288358631 p.4
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number.
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature.
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
2.93
2.85
2.8
2.73
2.66
2.59
2.62
2.41
2.36
1000 milliliters
1.08 0 Dry Solids
18.4 degrees Celsius
18.7 degrees Celsius
Slope:
0.1
Intercept:
3.0
Correlation Coefficient:
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
4.10 mg Oxygen/hr
0.38 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
19 degrees Celsius
1.07
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake
Rate: _ _ __. __0.41 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation
and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Jan 30 12 12:40p Earth Environmental Ser. 8288358631 p.3
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
.6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Mssolved Oxygen Level
4.32
4.25
4.141
3.891
3.31
17.2
011 13:10
Ladd /
011 13:10
Ladd
1000 milliliters
1 %Dry Solids
18.5 degrees Celsius ✓
18.4 degrees Celsius
Slope:
0,1
Intercept:
4.4
Correlation Coefficient:
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
4.63 mg Oxygen/hr
0.46 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature:
18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor:
1.1449 v'
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: _� 0.53_mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes.
The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Jan 30 12 12:39p Earth Environmental Ser. 8288358631 p.2
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Datefrime:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:;
Dissolved Oxygen Level
m /I
5.13
4.91
4.86
4.78
4.7
4.63
4.52
4.44
4.38
4.32
4.25
4.14
4.03
3.9
3.82
3.72
1 5/17/2011 11:151
1 11:15 ✓`
Dry Solids Y'�
grees Celsius r�
grees Celsius
Slope:
0.1
Intercept:
5.1
Correlation Coefficient:
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
5.22 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
0.57 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature:
16 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor:
1.31079601 V
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:_ 0.74 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes.
The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Jan 30 12 12:39p Earth Environmental Ser. 8288358631
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.71
407 4.07
3.
18-Apri
14.3
10.00 V/
Dry Solids ✓
grees Celsius,✓
grees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 5.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1,0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 6.49 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.78 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 15 d grees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.402551731
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: _~ 1.1,0, mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Jan 30 12 12:41p Earth Environmental Ser. 8288358631 p.7
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time-
Sampled By:
Analysis DatelTime:
Analyzed By:'
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.91
4.11
4
3.92
4:20
0.88 % Dry Solids ✓
19 degrees Celsius
18.6 degrees Celsius
Slope:
Q.1
Intercept:
5.0
Correlation Coefficient:
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
4.88 mg Oxygen/hr
0.55 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
19 degrees Celsius
1.07
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake
Rate:_0.59 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Slue Boxes. The Calculation
and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Jan 30 12 12:40p
Earth Environmental Ser. 8288358631 p.6
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number.
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Time
Dissolved Oxygen Level
(minutes)
(m /1)
0
4.62
1
4.57
2
4.49
3
4.41
4
4.35
5
4.29
6
4.18
7
4.14
8
4.06
9
4.01
10
3.93
11
3.85
12
3.77
13
37
14
3.63
15
'1 CA
21-Oct
18.4
112011 10:10
gel Ladd
1/2011 10:10 ✓
iel Ladd
1000 milliliters
0.87 % Dry Solids ✓
17.4 degrees Celsius
17.6 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.6
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.30 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.49 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate::. 057 mg Oxygen/g/hr✓
Instructions: Enter Data in the Slue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

PR-04-2012(WEO) 15:38 TORN OF MARS HILL
T•
ac.11-`tom _
Te]cpl:one:b-'T�� .... _
I:� Number. <42 " l i J
CC. .
)wJ "Al Ks; . f] Urgent
eB Q—V .'
Y.
TAWA�
,�j,ee+
T74 X
(FAX)8286893333
R ECEOVD
APR 04 2012
.Ashe,vB@je ,Regional Office
P. 001 /003
Number of Pages (including cover page)_
17.
- i' cLy-s
Telephone: ( D48) "—
Fax Number C D
14 Vor Your Review L7 Reply ASAP Q PTC:tse Comment
\(:!.A ne
TOWN OF MARS HILL
P. O. Box 368, 280 /V_ Main Street
Mars H111, North darolirsa 287S,d
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

APR-04-2012(WED) 15:38 TOWN OF MRRS HILL (FRX)8286893333 P.002I00"
ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: Town of Mars 1-Till Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
Permit #: WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Operator: Robert Sams Owner: Larzy Cody Predominant Soil Series;
Acres Used: 14.5 Acres Permitted: 14.5 Site #: 1 Field #:
15.92
15.5
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
Com-
posite
Date
-13
M
Annual 11eavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbslacre):
Total
7
2
3j
5
$
7
8
8
LOJ
IIJ
12
DT/AcJ
App.
Event
0.55
0.55
Arsenic
0.004
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
' 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000.
0,008.
Cadmium
0.002 1.0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000'
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.'000
0.000
1 0.004
Capper
0.275
0.275
0.000
0.000
0.0a0
o.00a .
0.000
0.000
0.000
.0.000
0.000
0.000 .
0,549
Chromi
0.'026
0.026
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000-
0.053-
Lead
0.021
0.02.1
.0.000
0.000
0.000
'0.000
0.000
•0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0�042
Mercury
•0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000'
0.000
0.000
.0.000
0.000
0.000
•0.000
0.000
0.003.
Molyb-
0.005
0.005
0.000:
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.011
den Lim
Nckel
0.021
0.021•
. 0.000
'0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.042.
Selenium
•0.007
0,007
0.000.
0.000
0.000•
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000-10.000
0.000
.0.000
0.015
Zinc
0.922
0.922
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.000
0.000
..0.000
0.000
0.000
1.845
Total
Phos-
.19.764
19.764
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
.0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
39.528
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordunce
with a systems designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties f resubmitting a se® format oa, including the possibility of fines and
imprison mfor knoling violplions". E Q �]
0421.11
o'f l.,and. Applier " e DENR FORM MFLSF (QA�
12/20015)
sh;uIter
Nille Regional ®Bice
protection

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SIJAIMARY FO%N1
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
Facility Name: ' OINM of Mars Bill
Land Owner: Larry Cody
Operator: Robert Sams
Crop 1 Name: Fescue
PLACE A "NIA" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
WQ Permit M. WQ0004298 Field 4: I
Annual Dry Tons Applied: i 15.9281 Site M 1
Predominant Soil Series:
Crop I Max. PAN: Crap 2 Name:
Acres Utilized: 14.5
Acres Permitted. 14.5
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 15.5
Crop 2 Max. PAN:
ga
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Lei. Yd, Gel lords
a/
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons+Ao)
Residual Sources
(NPDES 0, WQ4,
Fee, Animal
4' �' e�)
soilFraci
Cond.
(+�+lr
1�,
N{oist
p.
Past 24
Imes
r
p
c
M
�,
* &,
�'
*
*
TKN
m�kg
9
c
p
a 'w'
m9Ng
Iiitrate
and
iYltrite
mgkg
T
PAN Applied
lbsracre
{ )
I�antie aft -top Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop ]
Crap 2
V26111
72.1875
at
0.549
Belt Press Sludge
dry
O
s
0.5
30%
4000
7700
130
3.173
NA
fescue
3E2G+11
72.1875
13, l
1-. 0.549
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.3
30%
4000
7700
154
3.175
NA
fescue
0.000.
0.Wo
0.000
O.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
-0.000 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
©
0.000
0.000
0.6ce
- 0.000
0.000
O.Wo
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
:4.aa0
0.000
0.400
_;jr
TOPArS:
1 -37494
_ o
r
-1
As
Residuals Applications totals
Cd cu Cr
on FORM FSF sulip (attach
Pb H MG
FOR't FSF supp
Ni S$
to th is form).
Zn P
6.349'
4.000
Lime A lied
Annual lbs/acre
Prior Years CuFnu lative lbs/ac
_ 4,048 .
0.889609
0.004 D.i49
0.6047 49.9528
4.433
1.81643
0.04- 2 •
3.28651
0.003
0.12452
O.o i l
2.75756
. D.042.
2.43247
4.415
1.53773
1.845
1.53773
39.528
al 's ;_
r � - 3 _
=-': v _ ._
-
Date
lbsEac
1013111
5792
CurrentCumulative lbsJac
D.609 50.302
.869
5328
0.127
2.768
2.474
1.552
3.320.899
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
36
34 1338
nl
267
13
n1
374
89
2498
Permit PAIN Limit I ste2nd Up
11
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
quallQed personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, incl_ud n�the posgibility of Ws and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Land Applier
,�J } *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilisation Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/In corpora don -1.0
f Date *a* Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaeroblaRy digested -0.2,
R E C E �� E aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge-0.4
* * **C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
APR 04 20112
Asheville Regional office DENR FORM FSF (1212006)
i
0
a
i
ru
0
rn
0
Ln
w
LO
C'
ru
CD
co
1-0
UJ
UJ
w
LU
0
0
UJ
1
O
O
LU

RR-30-2012(FRI) 13:11 TOWN OF MARS HILL
FAX
T
Irax Number_`'
CC:
REMARKS: .Q 1Jrgent KI For Your Review
(FAX)8286893333 P.001/004
FRIECEmn
eville Regio � l � a��
Date: Vlp�j
r
Number of Pages Including cover page):
fn: -P�
Telephone: 1 drry�
F.x Number
Li' Reply ASAP
Q r[eRSC CQmmeut
TOWN OF MARS HILL
P_ D. Box 368,280 N. Maur Street
M,wrs Hill, North Garonna 287-14
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

r00
ru
o 'r
• SAR & ESP
Q
m
m
m
m .�
M Cq
CO
C
ru W
COCq
a
+o
a�
J
� C
n
L
Ln .+
C
CC G
W
o Jr-
z �
L
o ro
Ui
ru
M rJ
m
a
ti N
0
ru
o �
m
i L
Cr
Mars Hill Land Application Belt Press Sludge 6/7/2011
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na : Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Ca ; Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg ; Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent welght: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg1L 1 Equivalent weight
Ufann ft. caM ii MgLmgjfL �-,� bw- 5Ae
590 7g00 3100 $ +, `k
J+LI OrlI .I t:tr (Mi :) Wy (t-4 T 77)_
SAR- Na Milli Equivalent![0.5 K (Ca Milll Equivalent f Mg Milli equIvalent)J0.5 power
li : 7 1,h'I O)2 (lazy Fotit#. ❑utE:iv {I:�bu+rt;j 513697
;WT! 0.?l1{1033 {Irons mi; �antt�rcri rs,;lnl�r)
Na ME Ca ME YgAUE11
1.56217 1 89 32.26
The amount ofexchangaable sodium ions vaisus the
amount of exchangeable talcl;um & magnesium long in a gi "
materiaL
Permitting guidance Is if greatar than 10 require ESP in permit
5 o(L
� k
�,-. LA k© l IT

CD
0
m
o
a BAR & ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site fl 617P2ol i
a a_
Exchangeable Sod IUln Petcontag*
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) i CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions nocunAnn the cation excha l
m
m
m -4
Cn
CO
CO co Na. on NC sail test is expressed as meq.
CO m
CD
Cm CD
L
�a
G
a
J E
_I, C
o
L
Un •.+
Cr
LA
U-
o
s
m:+3
2e: L
Id
m p
W
U-
o
Cu
a
ti
o
m
� L
CC
E E
rage Gomp ex of soils
Na ME CEC
1.043478 1"s4$I'a 15.5
Should be less than 15% (16-20%)

0
0
SAIL & ESP
CL
Mars Hili-Land Application Sail Site #26i712011
Exchangeable Sodlum Percentage
ESP = No (Milli Equivarents)1 CEC X ti00
m
m ♦
m l �i tli I I i1.i�Ltili;3i3/ �f.4
m .r
rn �
M CD Na on NC soil tesi is expressed as meq.
ti in
m
cr CD
ce '
s.
Cn
ro
c
a
J E
J
= o
L
Ul -4
Cr
E
L3
LL
O
Z 41
L
CO ro
F- w
ru
m -4
CO
O
U-
ru �
0
ru O
o v)
m
C i L
Cr
The percentage, of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of sails
N ME ICE
0.69565217391
Should be less than 15% (15-20%)

`
------`-------------"='`----
�----'�--'---- 0�
/ '
."j ' ~ nc�
r'�� �� �°& 0
. ,
� | _____ _ -- - - - - ---'--- ------ -----' - ----'—'------------
-_-'_--- +--_ - ---'

1.. Annual Land Application Certification Form
• Was a certification form. submitted? Y e-y
• Was lard application conducted during the reported year? ye—T
• How many drytons and dry tons per acre were applied? 15,9 ©T
• Were the applications within the permitted amount? Y.&S
• Verify PAN i if more than 10 tons/acre
• Did it indicate compliance? ye-
• Was it signed by the appropriate people? k/�e—S
2. Monitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency? )1,5-
• Were the metals analyses reported:on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? t c s
• Were the results reported in mg/kg? Y O
• . Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?*,�-_
If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested? Y-e—y
• Was TCLP analysis conducted?
3. Field Summary
• Were the land application. events recorded on the Field Summary Forms? V,--X
• Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field?Ye—y
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?,/eJ
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources?q--
• Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)? YO-$
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated? ye,-'
'• Were the calculations correct? Yes -e5AP- 4 asp— ri® i r
• Were the PAN loading rates -within permit Iimits? Y.� ( p 2cvd 3l3 0 (Z
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?%i t'
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?,i-eS
• Were the applications conducted during the erop's growing season? Y-es
• Were the Field Summary Forms complete7�
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction ;Je 61JA/I6 O 0 t4 —r,--O-S-
• Was a signed copy of the Pat en a V ctnr Attra tion Reduction Form submitte
o� 't0/� yes v�
• Did the form irndic�the period of coYerage, he resid al class, and the pathog�h'reduction alternative and the
vector attraction reduction option used?
•. Was the appropriate docurnp"ion to show pathog and vector attraction reduction included in the report?
• Was pathogM and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503?
5. SoiI Tests
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field? -y e,3
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field? YeS
- Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field?
(�y�tlrti�w� ccc_ c�L Z-, n0+7 a.- d-f) � b�
6. General 4n,4tc ,sis- VjoZ btu S wC C,4, jozs 401-
• Was the report in the proper format?,,/,S M&ti I i-D.k.3 1�/1"Wcl so rode V'A-S n of
• Were any parts of the annual report missing? j o
• Was the report submitted on time?'t-a".
* Any violations of ceiling concentrations should be reported to."Pretreatmentfor•municipalities. only.
rilnr) < of

R e �cQ S 2 US 61—s-0— Na-
/q4 L
S�o�Ld bt done-
© �4s ► � u Q cs /04
�'- P"Cvj., da-l@
Aq l O(A nTMt
k* k- s° 1'1-% � �y�,':S - A� L 6, � 71, q A'�5 aiq&� e-s ?
P
ovt u l G Ur r 0, vi u�
�
ML 15 c��� � �- Cu, zn1 w'
N
Gad

Attachment I
North Carolina Wastewater/Groundwater Laboratory Certification
Certified Parameters Listing
Lab Name: Eastern Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Certificate Number: 257
Address: 7621 Whitepine Road Effective Date: 01/01/2012
Richmond, VA 23237-2296 Expiration Date: 12/31/2012
Date of Last Amendment:
The above named laboratory, having duly met the requirements of 15A NCAC 21-1.0800, is hereby certified for the measurement of the parameters listed below.
CERTIFIED PARAMETERS
MAGNESIUM
INORGANICS
SW846 Method 6010C
CHLORIDE
Mehlich 3 Extraction -Animal Waste only
Std Method 4500 Cl B
MANGANESE
AMMONIA NITROGEN
SW846 Method 6010C
Std Method 4500 NH3 C
Mehlich 3 Extraction - Animal Waste only
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
Std Method 4500 N Org B
MERCURY
SW846 Method 74T1 B
Sid Method 4500 NH3 C
MOLYBDENUM
NO2 + NO3 NITROGEN
SW846 Method 6010C
Std Method 4500 NO3 F
NICKEL
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
SW846 Method 6010C
EPA Method 6010C
POTASSIUMSW846
Mehlich 3 Extraction -Animal Waste only
Method 6010C
pH
Mehlich 3 Extraction - Animal Waste only
SW846 Method 9045D
SELENIUM
RESIDUE TOTAL
SW846 Method 6010C
Sid Method 2540E
SODIUM
TOTAL VOLATILE RESIDUE
SW846 Method 6010C
Std Method 2540G
Mehlich 3 Extraction - Animal Waste only
SULFATE
VANADIUM
Sid Method 426C 15th Ed
SW846 Method 6010C
METALS
ZINC
ALUMINUM
SW846 Method 6010C
SW846 Method 6010C
Mehlich 3 Extraction - Animal Waste only
ARSENIC
SW846 Method 6010C
BARIUM
SW846 Method 6010C
BERYLLIUM
SW846 Method 6010C
BORON
SW846 Method 6010C
CADMIUM
SW846 Method 6010C
CALCIUM
SW846 Method 6010C
Mehlich 3 Extraction - Animal Waste only
CHROMIUM TOTAL
SW846 Method 6010C
COBALT
SW846 Method 6010C
COPPER
SW846 Method 6010C
Mehlich 3 Extraction - Animal Waste only
IRON
SW846 Method 6010C
LEAD
SW846 Method 6010C
P,'V_ cla8'080- 0'37-%5 q3
This certification requires maintance of an acceptable quality assurance program, use of approved methodology, and satisfactory performance on'evaluation samples. Laboratories are
subject to civil penalties and/or decertification for infractions as set forth in 15A NCAC 21-1.0807.

Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1 - Fecal Coliform Density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? #97 7 a
• Were seven samples taken? f4wi19131
• Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly? y
• Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids) • O�F b vk rres,/
kio
• �n - se, LLosu,-e ' ®f to �-
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Patho eg ns (one of five)
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? l At `�r`l_ee'_ COUAf W-4-S'. Coc:-(J
Vave
Aerobic Digestion
• Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 15°C (591F)?
Air Drying
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was theambient. temperature above 0°C (32T) for two months?
• Were the residuals partially. digested?
• Were residuals exposed -to atmosphere during two months above 0°C'(riot snow covered)?
Anaerobic Di estion
s Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 15 days at 35°C (95T) to 55°C (131°F) and 60 days at 20°C
(68°F)?
Composting
• Was it a. composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the temperature. raised to 40°C (104T) or higher and remained at 40°C (104T) for five days?
• Did the temperature exceed 55°C (13IT) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
• Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)?

Vector Attraction Reduction Review
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction
• Was there 38% reduction?
• . Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not -total solids)?
• Was the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)?
• Were calculations correct?
40-DU Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
• Was the test run for 40 days? . -
• Was the test done between 30°C (86°F) and 37°C (99°F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the reduction less than 17%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Were calculations correct?
30-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
• Was the test run for 30 days?
• Was the test done at 20°C (681F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the reduction less than 15%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations. in report?
• Were calculations correct?
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR)
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?y&S
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?ye,S
• Was the test done between 10°C (50T) and 30°C (86°F)?ye4
• Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (68°F)? Y a
• Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)? ykeS
• Was the sample holding time under two hours?, e,S
• Was the test started within15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained? Yell'