WQ0004298_2009 Residuals Annual Report_20100210

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATICATION FORM
aPei mit#: WQ0004298 County: Madison Year: 2009
Facility Name -(as shown on permit): Town of Mars Hill Land Application Program
Land Application Operator: Robert M. Sams Phone: [phone]
Land application of residual solids as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
0 Yes ❑ No If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A:
Part B:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2009 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. S Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain
corrective action taken.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites. w co
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soilfpFTof at, Ut
least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit. ® ® �
3. Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year a�.nd tle
69
(3) copies of laboratory results are attached. 1:3 ® /
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year ks re uired
and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 503.13 or the
Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13 (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14 were
complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation,
prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of
violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were removed
in accordance with the crop management plan.
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Permitt6v Name and Title (type or p ' Signature of Permittee Date
Ila l6 _
Signature of Preparer* RECEI e/DENR ly tore of Land Applier
(if different from Permittee) Aquifer Protection Sfferent from Permittee and Preparer)
" Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) FEB 04 20
1
0
Date
DENR FORM ACF (5/2003)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Attach this form to the corresponding Annual Report
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed than those required to be summarized on this form.
Permit Number: WQ0004298 Laboratory:
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Land Application
NPDES # or NCO057151
WQ#:
WWTP Name: Town od Mars Hill WWTP
Residual Analysis Data
1) Earth Environmental Services
2) Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
3) A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
4)
5)
Sample or
CompositeDate
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
signific t penalties for sub 'tting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
A/7 PA? ellb
Signature of Preparer date
ti-
DENR FORM RSSF (5/2003)

5
farm tovironmenrai mvices
Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
Madison County Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
0" r0gz>-1 CP-rl
Name and Address of Facility:
Date: 6/8/2009
Town of Mars Hill WWTP
Sample Collector.
RS
P.O. Box 368
Date and Time Sample Received:
4/29/2009 11:30 AM
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Date and Time Sample Collected:
4/28/2009 1:05 -1:45 PM
Aft: Robert Sams
Date and Time Sample Analyzed:
< MHT
Land Application Analvses - Note: All results in ma/Ko Dry Basis unless otherwise noted.
Test
Belt Press Sludge
Soil Site #1
Soil Site #2
Report Limit
Method
Units
ACIDITY
7.0 meq/100g
7.3 meq/100g
SCA
mg/L
TOTAL SUSPENDED RESIDUE
1.0
SM2540D
mg/L
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY
10.7 meq/100g
11.0 meq/100g
SCA
per 100ml
pH
6.4
6.4
6.7
0-14
SCA
units
AMMONIA NITROGEN
17000
0.5
SCA
mg/L
NO2 + NO3-n
< 2.4
1.0
SCA
mg/L
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
59000
SCA
mg/L
TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS
17000
SCA
mg/L
PERCENT TOTAL RESIDUE
10.3%
85.0%
87.9%
SCA
mg/L
% ORGANIC MATTER
3.20/6
3.0%
SCA
NTU
% BASE SATURATION - K
4.6%
7.7%
SCA
mg/L
-H
- Mg
28.8%
21.8%
-Ca
66.1%
70.1%
- Na
0.6%
0.4%
PLANTAVAILABLE (surface)
21,100
PPM/dw
NITROGEN- PPM DRY WT (subsurf)
29,600
PPM/dw
TEMPERATURE
SM2550B
deg C
MANGANESE
810
350
SCA
mg/L
MAGNESIUM
3500
1500
1400
SCA
mg/L
SODIUM
920
< 5.3
< 150
SCA
mg/L
CADMIUM
< 7.1
< 0.88
< 2.5
SCA
mg/L
CHROMIUM
26
51
25
SCA
mg/L
COPPER
230
34
16
SCA
mg/L
LEAD
21
14
11
SCA
mg/L
NICKEL
19
13
10
SCA
mg/L
ZINC
710
79
38
SCA
mg/L
CALCIUM
9600
240
2400
SCA
mg/L
POTASSIUM
6600
980
930
SCA
mg/L
ALUMINUM
9100
WA
N/A
SCA
mg/L
ARSENIC
< 14
2.3
< 6.1
SCA
mg/L
SELENIUM
< 14
7.6
< 5.1
SCA
mg/L
MOLYBDENUM
< 14
< 1.8
< 5.1
SCA
mg/L
MERCURY
2.2
0.043
0.038
SCA
mg/L
N.C. Laboratory ID# 352 Analyzed By: � S
Lab Supervisor. Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville Certified By: 1J )1t- f'1 E -

Town of Mars Hill
2009 Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
Field # 1- 1.0% ESP Ce01
Field #2- 0.75% ESP
See attached calculation sheet for details

r""eO U1 lU UO:Tlr+ C.31,ull Cllvil awl nu c,la.ot Jc,— —— —— -———
..
T Aug 04 09 12.49P Dartt3ri Boons (828 ssss ji-1
rats -es= ley 1�• rrarcrs+�.Lrsvr eca-cy�-rues 1 t-use rw",rvmf. r-sar
�>�� solemn►
F.x bin: soda= pia (ESP) is as evaluation that car
pamVc excen sodium eoacemmm ion is ibe sail it5dE The ESP is
sW*s cation exchmv capacixy (CEQ "that is occapied by the si
dcum=anm can be node ftm a typical suR fi=U uy evahmui
follows:
tim x 100 cl
CEC
ESP - F-vdsevosbie Sodom Pwcentap
NA - Sad= Cunca Matbn
CEO - Cation E1a&"Co CapackV
,;.N7 " =
Emmmpb 1: (ESP)
o the CEC of a sod is 5.4 wWJOO cm? and the Na is 0.7 a
WhaR is the OwA mgeable soffit= pacca4w-
Nax IW
ESP=
CF-C
Q7 x 100
5.4
used to acommih e
: pacena ge of the
um Cations. This
amd calculated as
n
X100
cm:.
0.7 x 100
S.4 1
13-0
ly"e Y
6-30
Pi c EC

f
I
C- PUnt AvaUmbin Nitropu (PAR)ea►1cnlNtlonsand Imid 2PPUMIden am nquiregewntp
co
(.7fc)D
and as wdm am be "m ft amwe wumwmw
4M
2.
RM C*d*ku for die qp5medowmaMod Vmpowd
udludlaft Mcwhid =kWxdm as IL
PANm PAN fbr ftitba Appuealli;n
too'.
PAN,.
PAN
PFUDry wow
PAN for Sgb@urrm"
O'D
0) )+
PAN
3. Tival PAN an hP IMA ftwiftA
I

0
ROBBINSVILLE9-428 LABORATORY EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Client:
Address:
Phone:
P.O. BOX 1177 75 BISON LANE
MARSHALL, NC 28753 [ MURPHY, NC 28906
Report To: iQ L�, 6-er+ J s
Bill To: j ) IA
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
FAX #:- Ct�.�r ^�.��
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD "
Analytical Request
Init Lab Temp:
Rec Lab Temp:
*Rgu sted Due Date:
C
;in,
=102MMIUM-11
NIZE
FAA REMARKS
yM1M1MM11M1M1MM
ITEM
SOMEONE
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS cP-0771-6

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone] nn
Client:
Address:
i■ c,rS ■c ��, pJC-,��7 5 `/
Phone: (�
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177 75 BISON LANE
MARSHALL, NC 28753 MURPHY, NC 28906
Report To:
Bill To:
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
FAX #:
07013
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request
]nit Lab Tem
Rec Tevtp:
R9u Due Duets " �(
-.(prin
•
•
. ` t A •
REMARKS
w` 'r q• ''
'
.
•
•
•
•
•
C,q* e, Date Sampled
atUre
rJ9` /
ITEM _ L=F., ' ,, r CL * - ,_
# SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ' ' ` L RE SID TIME r MATRIX EES #
Mai
MEISSEN
MOD
ASIN
11
ON
mil
V"F
Sk
AAS
■■�®loll■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■
MEMMENES
1■
■■■loon
■■MM■■E■■ENONE
monsoon
SHIPMENT METHOD ITEM
OUT/DATE RETURNED/DATE #
RELINQUISED BY/ AFFILIATION
A�CCEPTEDBY/AF�FILIjATION�•
�.
DATE «;TIME
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:■
d
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTHUCTION5
CP-0771-8

r
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 090505.509
rrS
Collection date: 28-Apr-09Date received: received: 5-May-09 � G j.� �^� �. �-• � � ��� � t' /I �� f�7�
Sample identification: 9040962
Sample number: 60924
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
Arsenic
EPA 6010B
<14
14
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Cadmium
EPA 6010B
<7.1
7.1
mg/kg
15-Ni.y-09
Mcampbell 1
Copper
EPA 6010B
230
14
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell I
Chromium
EPA 6010B
26
7.1
mg/kg
is .may-o9
Mcampbell 1
Lead
EPA 6010E
21
7.1
mg/kg
1541ay-09
Mcampbell l
Molybdenum
EPA 6010B
<14
14
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Nickel
EPA 6010B
19
14
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Selenium
EPA 6010B
<14
14
mg/kg
15 iMay-09
Mcampbell I
Zinc
EPA 6010B
710
71
mg/kg
15-rvlay-09
Mcampbell 1
Aluminium
EPA 6010B
9100
71
mg/kg
15-May-09
Heasler I
Calcium
EPA 6010B
9600
140
mg/kg
15-Ntay-09
Heasler 1
Magnesium
EPA 6010B
3500
71
mg/kg
15-Niay-09
Mcampbell 1
Potassium
EPA 6010B
6600
71
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Sodium
EPA 6010B
920
420
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Mercury
EPA 7471 A
2.2
0.19
mg/kg
14-May-09
Dsullivan 1
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
EPA 351.2
59000
2400
mg/kg
13-May-09
Celfaki I
Nitrate + Nitrate
SM4500-NO3F
<24
24
mg/kg
11-May-09
Celfaki 1
Total Nitrogen Calculation
CALC
59000
9.5
mg/kg
1
Total Phosphorus
SM4500-P F
17000
480
mg/kg
13-May-09
Rlofitn 1
Percent Solids
SM2540 G
10.5
%
8-May-09
Kpowers 1
pH in Soil
SW 846 9045C
6.4
S.U.
6-May-09
Kkeenan
% Total Solid
SM 2540 G
10
%
5-N1ay-09
Lbonura
Ammonia Nitrogen
EPA 350.3
17000
500
mg/kg
8-May-09
Kkeenan
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

am
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Certificate of Analysis
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project name: Earth Environmental Services, Inc. Project number: 090505.509
Collection date: 28-A r-09 � i, C'n
Date received: 5-May-09�� ��.n� &
G
Sample identification: 9040963 Sample number: 60925
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
Arsenic
EPA 601 OB
2.3
1.8
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Cadmium
EPA 6010B
<0.88
0.88
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Copper
EPA 601 OB
34
1.8
mg/kg
15-ti1ay-09
Mcampbell 1
Chromium
EPA 601OB
51
0.88
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Lead
EPA 601 OB
14
0.88
mg/kg
15-11,lay-09
Mcampbell I
Molybdenum
EPA 6010B
<1.8
1.8
mg/kg
15-N•lay-09
Mcampbell 1
Nickel
EPA 601 OB
13
1.8
mg/kg
15 .May-09
Mcampbell 1
Selenium
EPA 601 OB
7.6
1.8
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell I
Zinc
EPA 601 OB
79
8.8
mg/kg
15 iMay-09
Mcampbell 1
Manganese
EPA 601 OB
810
29
mg/kg
15-May-09
Heasler 1
Calcium
EPA 601 OB
240
18
mg/kg
15-May-09
Heasler 1
Magnesium
EPA 601 OB
1500
8.8
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell I
Potassium
EPA 601 OB
980
8.8
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell I
Sodium
EPA 601 OB
<53-
53
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Mercury
EPA 7471A
0.043
0.024
mg/kg
14-May-09
Dsullivan I
Percent Solids
SM2540 G
85.0
%
8-May-09
Kpowers I
pH in Soil
SW 846 9045C
6.4
S.U.
6 Nlay-09
Kkeenan
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

' PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: (828) 350=9364
i �lfY Fax: [phone]
J r
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services, Inc.
Collection date: 28-Apr-09
Date received: 5-May-09
Sample identification: 9040964
Project number: 090505.509
Sample number. 60926
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
Arsenic
EPA 601OB
<5.1
5.1
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Cadmium
EPA 6010B
<2.5
2.5
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Copper
EPA 6010B
16
5.1
mg/kg
15-Nlay-0e
Mcampbell 1
Chromium
EPA 6010B
25
2.5
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell I
Lead
EPA 6010B
11
2.5
mg/kg
154May-09
Mcampbell 1
Molybdenum
EPA 6010B
<5.1
5.1
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Nickel
EPA 6010B
10
5.1
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Selenium
EPA 6010B
<5.1
5.1
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Zinc
EPA 6010B
38
25
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell 1
Manganese
EPA 601 OB
350
2.5
mg/kg
15-May-09
Heasler 1
Calcium
EPA 6010B
2400
51
mg/kg
I5-May-09
Heasler
Magnesium
EPA 6010B
1400
25
mg/kg
15-flay-09
Mcampbell 1
Potassium
EPA 6010B
930
25
mg/kg
15-Nlay-09
Mcampbell I
Sodium
EPA 6010B
<150
150
mg/kg
15-May-09
Mcampbell I
Mercury
EPA 7471 A
0.038
0.023
mg/kg
14-May-09
Dsullivan l
Percent Solids
SM2540 G
87.9
%
8-May-09
Kpowers 1
PH in Soil
SW 846 9045C 6.7
S.U.
6-Mav-09
Kkeenan
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Sample analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc.
Date reviewed: Z (),09 NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053
�C�� NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
Signature: ��`'
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

Report Number: EASTERN LABORATORIES, INC.
R09139-0063 A&L EAS
7621 Whitepine Road m Richmond, Virginia 23237-2214 )r 1
Account Number:
46220 Phone [phone] - Fax [phone] ,..
Website: www.al-labs-eastern.com o E-mail: [e-mail]
Send To: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS
Grower: EARTH ENV SVCS
75 BISON LN Submitted By: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS
MURPHY, NC 28906
Farm I D: Field I D:
SOIL ANALYSIS REP
ORT
Page: 1 Date Received; 5/19/2009 Date of Analysis: 5/20/2009 Date of Report: 5/21/2009 Analytical Method(s):
Mehlich III
Sample Lab Organic Matter Phosphorus Potassium Magnesium Calcium Sodium
Number Number % ENR Available Reserve pH Acidity C.E.C.
K MG CA NA Soil Buffer
Ibs/A Rate ppm Rate ppm Rate ppm Rate H
V
040963 6865 3.2 99 M 51 H ppm Rate ppm Rate ppm Rate pH Index meq/100g meq/100g
> � 192 H 370 VH 1416 M 1 VL 7.0 10 7 , 60
Rate
NC=98 la = w.g�
> 040964 6866 3.0 94 M 38 M z° = �3 -�b �. °1c ro x=
329 VH 28 H 1543 H 10 VL 7.3 11.0
NC=32 NC=168
Percent Base Saturation Nitrate Sulfur Zinc Manganese Iron Copper Boron
Sample
Number K Mg Ca Na H NO3-N SO4-S ZN MN pP Soluble Chloride Aluminum
/° /o % % % FIE CU B Salts CL
ppm Rate ppm Rate ppm Rate ppm Rate ppm Rate AL
040963 4.6 28.8 66.1 0,6 ppm Rate ppm Rate ms/cm Rate ppm Rate ppm Rate
Si 1 5.8 H 55 VH 3.3 VH
;e (f 040964 7.7 21.8 70.1 0.4 NC=145 NC=344 NC=165
}� e VH 81 VH 4.6 VH
14C.FiV
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the soil on a dry weight basis.
Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), H (High), VH (Very High).
ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. C,E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity.
This report applies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are reta:,
Explanation of symbols: % (percent), ppm (parts per million), Ibs/A (pounds per acre), maximum of thirty days after testing. Soil Analysis preparer ms/cm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meq/100g (milli -equivalent per 100 grams). A a L EASTERN AG LTURAL LABORATORIES
Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A, Soluble Salts ms/cm x 640 = ppm. by: u,
�aul Chu, Ph.
D.

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
'Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 28.5280542
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): 6.4
Robert M. Sams Owner: Larry Cody
14.5 Acres Permitted: 14.5 Site #: 1 Field #: 1
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent # ):
Sample
or Com-
posite
Date
111
4/28/09
21
4/28/09
3
4/28/09
4
4/28/09
5
4/28/09
714/128/09
7
4/28/09
8
9
10
11
12
% Solids
10.3
10.3
10.3
10.3
1 10.3
10.3
10.3
Arsenic
14
14
14
14
14'
14
14
✓
Cadmium
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
v
Chromium
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
Copper
230
230
230
230
230
230
230
✓
Lead
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
i
Mercury
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
Molyb-
denum I
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
✓
Nickel
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
✓
Selenium
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
Zinc
710
710
710
710
710
710
710
Total
Phos-
horus
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
17000
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
d o
III2
31
141L5J
6j
7
8
9
10
11
12
CD
o
0.4799
0.3839
0.048
0.096
0.144
0.3359
0.4799
Arsenic
0.0134
0.0107
0.0013
0.00274
0.004
0.0094'
0.0134
0
0
0
0
0
0.0551
Cadmium
0.0068
0.0055
0.0007
0.0014
0.002
0.0048
0.0068
0
0
0
0
0
0.0279
Chromiurn
0.025
0.02
0.0025
0.005
0.0075
0.0175
0.025
0
0
0
0
0
0.1023
Copper
0.2207
0.1766
0.0221
0.0441
0.0662
0.1545
0.2207
0
0
0
0
0
0.905
Lead
0.0202
0.0161
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.0141
0.0202
0
0
0
0
0
0.0826
Mercury
0.0021
0.0017
0.0002
0.0004
0.0006
0.0015
0.0021
0
0
0
0
0
0.0087
Molyb-
0.0134
0.0107
0.0013
0.0027
0.004
0.0094
0.0134
0
0 ,
0
0
0
0.0551
denum
Nickel
0.0182
0.0146
0.0018
0.0036
0.0055
0.0128
0.0182
0
0
0
0
0
0.0748
Selenium
0.0134
0.0107
0.0013
0.0027
0.004
0.0094
0.0134
0
0
0
0
0
0.0551
Zinc
0.6814
0.5451
0.0681
0.1363
0.2044
0.477
0.6814
0
0
0
0
0
2.7938
Total
Phos-
16.315
13.052
1.6313
3.263
4.8946
11.421
16.315
0
0
0
0
0
66.893
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the
information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
includ' the p sibility of es and imprisonment for knowing violations"
Signature of Land Applier 16ate
* See bottom of FSF Form for helpful instructions for this NVIFLSF Form and the mathematically linked FSF Form
Ll-
DENR FORM MFLSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Land Application Permit #: WQ0004298 Annual Dry Tons Applied: 28.5280542
Owner:
Site #:
Larry Cody Operator: Robert M. Sams Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 6.4
01 Field #: 01 Acres Utilized: 14.5 Acres Permitted: 14.5
o
�, 5
0 o
A
::J S eci
Totals
Per
Acre
%
Solid
s
Dry Tons Per
Acre
Residual
Sources
(Summarize)
1 e
Cond.
Dry,
Wet,
Moist
Inches
Precip.
Past 24
A li
pp
cation
Meth-
od*
Vola-
tili-
zation
Rate**
I
Miner-
ali-
zation
Rate
TKN
Ammo
nia-
Ni-
trogen
Ni-
trace
and
Nitrite
PAN 1
PAN 2
Must Select
Crop 1 or Crop
p p
2
Gal.
Cu.Yd.
Report
totalsHrs.
in Gal.
Crop 1
Crop 2
4/28/09
16200
1117.21
10.3
0.479866345
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
59000
17000
2.4
20.2527
#######
Fescue
1
4/29/09
12960
893.79
10.3
0.383893076
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
59000
17000
2.4
16.2021
#######
Fescue
2
6/02/09
1620
111.72
10.3
0.047986634
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
59000
17000
2.4
2.02527
#######
Fescue
3
9/8/09
3240
223.45
10.3
0.095973269
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
59000
17000
2.4
4.05053
#######
Fescue
4
9/15/09
4860
335.17
10.3
0.143959903
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
1 s
0.5
30%
59000
17000
2.4
1 6.0758
#######
Fescue
5
9/24/09
11340
782.07
10.3
0.335906441
Belt Press Sludge
moist
0
s
0.5
30%
59000
1 17000
2.4
114.1769
#######
Fescue
6
[0/26/05
16200
1117.2
10.3
0.479866345
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
59000
17000
2.4
20.2527
#######
Fescue
17
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
9
0
1
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
12
TOTALS:
4581
: >:: i : :
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Ha
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
PAN 1
PAN 2
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0.055088246
0.02794
0.10231
0.90502
0.08263
0.00866
0.05509
0.07476
0.05509
2.79376
66.8929
83.0359
0
Date
lbs/ac
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.871704046 0.59575 1.71158 48.947 5.20784 0.11862 2.73615 2.3538 1.50412 31.3955 :: ::::::::::::::::::::: if' ::::::::;::::::::;::::::
0.8166158 0.56781 1.60027 48.042 5.12521 0.10996 2.68106 2.27904 1.44903 28.5997
36 34 nl 1338 267 15 nl 374 89 2498 ::
0
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.***
t 1s 2nd Crop Permi
t PAN Lirru t/ P
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant alties or submittino
false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
yr (25/01 o �- � - /AZ ell 0
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
Signature of Land Applier Date **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Iniection/Incorvoration -1.0
***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
**** The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into
the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1.
DENR FORM FSF (512003)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Permit #: WQ0004298
Owner:
Site #:
Larry Cody Operator:
01 Field #: 02
Robert M.Sams
Acres Utilized: 0
Annual Dry Tons Applied: #DIV/0!
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 6.7
Acres Permitted: 3.8
oTotals
�, oPer
Acre
%
Solid
s
Dry Tons Per
Acre
Residual
Sources
(Summarize)
site
Cond.
Dry,
Wet,
Inches
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
Appl-
cation
Meth-
od*
Vola-
tili-
zation
Rate**
Miner-
ali-
zation
Rate
TKN
Ammo
nia-
Ni-
trogen
Ni-
trate
and
Nitrite
PAN 1
PAN 2
Must Select
Crop 1 or Crop
2
rReport
Crop 1
Crop 2
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
1
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
2
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
3
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
4
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
151
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
6
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
7
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
8
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
9
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
1101
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
#DIV/01
#DIV/0!
11
#DIV/0!
Did Not Apply
I
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
12
J#LDIV/01
TOTALS:
#####
::':::::::;:::
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
PAN 1
PAN 2
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0
o
Date
lbs/ac
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
0.268443864 0.30243 1.23249 28.943 3.34062 0.09631 1.55975 1.24497 0.67194 17.754 ::::
0.268443864 0.30243 1.23249 28.943 3.34062 0.09631 '1.55975 1.24497 0.67194 17.754 ::::
36 34 nl 1338 267 15 nl 374 89 2498 ............................
..:.:.:.:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...:.:.:.:...:.:...:.:.;.......;. ;.:.;.;;...;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;. ;.
0
...
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.***
Permit PAN Lunit Ist/2nd Crop
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant lties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
A��� Ili��16 *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
Signature of Land Applies Date **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Iniection/Incorporation -1.0
***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
* * * * The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into
the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1.
DENR FORM FSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Land Application Permit Number: WQ0004298
WWTP Name: Town of Mars Hill WWTP NPDES Number: NCO057151
Monitoring Period: From January 12009 To December 312009
Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alternative 1 ❑
Alternative 2 ❑
Alternative 3 ❑
Alternative 40
Alternative 5 ❑
Alternative 6 ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ❑
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray [IGamma
Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
Class B:
Alternative 1 ❑p
Alternative 2 ❑
Alternative 3 ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ❑
Air Drying ❑
1 Composting ❑
I Aerobic Digestion 9
Anaerobic Dig estion
.......................................................................................
........................................................................
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
g
Pathogen Density
Number of
Excee-
de c s
Frequency
of Analysis
y
Sample
Type
Analytical
Tech-ni ue
q
inim
Geo. Mean
axim
Units
Fecal Coliform
2 x 10 to the 6th
power MPN per
gram of total
solids or 2 x 10 to
the 6th power
CFU ver aram of
2600
6700
51000
col./gram
0
1/year
grab
9222d
1000 mpn per
gram of total solid
(dry weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 MPN per 4
grams total solid
(dry weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 503.33) - Please indicate option performed:
Option 1 ❑ Option 2 ❑ Option 3 ❑ Option 4 S Option 5 ❑
Option 6 ❑ Option 7 El Option 8 ❑ Option 9 ❑ Option 10 ❑
Novector attraction reduction options were performed ❑
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
0 "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." (Please note if you check
this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the
system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
lai Ler1 In,
M
d Title (typ or print)
�O,
Signature of Preparer ate
S/ �Lrl & W,5
Land p lier ame and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
ignature of Land Applier (if applicable) ate
DENR FORM RF (5/2003)

r i
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Residence — [phone]
Robbinsville Lab — [phone]
Marshall Lab — [phone]
Shelby Lab — [phone]'
E-Mail — earth [e-mail]\
June 8, 2009
NC ID#474, #352
Mr. Robert Sams
Town of Mars Hill
P.O. Box 368
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Dear Mr. Sams:
Following is a report of laboratory analyses for digester sludge samples received 5/6/2009.
Colony Counts
# Samnle Date Coliform Densities (colonies/gram) %Total Solids 1 0 ml 0 1 ml 0 M ml
1
4127/09
2,600 Colonies/Gram
0.92
19
6
2
2
4/28/09
3500 Colonies/Gram
0.97
34
13
1
3
4/29/09
5200 Colonies/Gram
0.95
49
8
1
4
4130/09
31000 Colonies/Gram
0.90
75
28
19
5
5/1109
51000 Colonies/Gram
0.97
86
35
20
6
5/4109
2800 Colonies/Gram
0.96
27
3
0
7
5/5/09
2800 Colonies/Gram
0.96
27
5
0
Geometric mean for all seven samples: 6,700 colonies/gram. Thank you for your
business. If you have any question or need additional sample analyses performed, please
call.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael J. Ladd
Laboratory Director

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Client:
Address: I Q V
'a
Phone:
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177 75 BISON LANE
MARSHALL, NC 28753 MURPHY, NC 28906
Report To:
Bill To: C,Drn
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
FAX #:
07015
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD -
Analytical Request
Init Lab Temp:
Rec Lab Temp:
*Requested Due Date:
Z
Samtlo, Signature Date Sampled
.,SAMPLE DESCRIPTION,
I'HIPMENT
METHOD
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS cP-Oni-B

r-�
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number: W0004298
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
HMichael Ladd H
1000 milliliters
0.97 % Dry Solids
14.3 degrees Celsius
14.7 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 5.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 623 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.64 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 15 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.402551731
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.90mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

6
5
4
a�
E
c
m
O 3
d
0
N
N
2
1
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.1039x + 5.1325
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

-_ --- -- -- - -- - - -- - - --- -- ----- - - - - - -
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number: WO004298
Date: 14-Ma
Digester Temperature: 16.3
Sampling Date/Time: 5/14/2009 10:10
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Date/Time: 5/14/2009 10:10
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume: 1000 milliliters
Total Solids: 0.89; % Dry Solids
Beginning Temperature: 16.3 degrees Celsius
End Temperature:11 15-9 degrees Celsius
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 5.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
. Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.87 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.55 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature.- 16 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.31079601
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.72 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart Y =-0.0812x + 5.0695
3 ! i
N
i
Q 2
f i
i
0 ! i
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

--.. __ _- ---- -- - - -- - - --- ------- - - - - --
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number tiWO004298
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Digester Temperature
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled %
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed %
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature
End Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen Level
0.93 %Dry Solids
17.2 degrees Celsius
17.2
6/23/2009 14:30�
1000 milliliters
17 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4-99 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.54 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 17 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.225043
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.66 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

4.5
4
3.5
3
0
E
2.5
a
x
O
CD 2
0
cl 1.5
1
0.5
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.0832x + 4.1098
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number: WQ004298
Date: 17-J
Digester Temperature: 17.
Sampling Date/Time:: 7/17/2009 10:1
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Date/Time: 7/17/2009
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
r_
Dissolved Oxygen Level
3.15
2.
2.
2.
1
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 3.6
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
arees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 5.59 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.59 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: O.G8; mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

0
4
3.5
3
2.5
1
0.5
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.0932x + 3.6503
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

----------
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number: WQ004298.
Date:' 11-/
Digester Temperature -
Sampling Date/Time 8/11/2009 14
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Datelfime: 8/11/2009 14
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume. -
Total Solids: 1
Beginning Temperature: 1
End Temperature: 1
Dissolved Oxygen Level
44.17:
4.07
3.88 i
3.75[1
.41 q
3.191.
illiliters
Dry Solids
:grees Celsius
:grees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.1
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 6.56 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.64 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:E: 0. 4 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

4.5
4
3.5
3
M
E
2.5
O
2
0
0
N
0 1.5
1
0.5
0
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.1093x + 4.2168
i 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

a oe. c.... .au �.�. ..0 Q— ��.. .... �.... �. �..... ...�. _ ----_-----
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number. WQ004298
Date: 11-Se
Digester Temperature: 18.6
Sampling Date/Time: 9/11/2009 9:00
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Date/Time: 9/11/2009 9:06
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume: 1000 milliliters
Total Solids. 0.87 6 Dry Solids
Beginning Temperature: 18.6 degrees Celsius
End Temperature:[-18.6 degrees Celsius
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
0.1
Intercept:
5.4
Correlation Coefficient:
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate:,
6.52 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
0.75 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature:
19 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor:
1.07
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.80 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes.
The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

6
5
^, 4
a�
E
C
Q1
O 3
a�
0
0
fN
G 2
1
0
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.1086x + 5.4815
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number W0004298
Digester Temperatur
Sampling Date/Tim
Sampled 0
Analysis Date/Tim
Analyzed 8
Sample Volum
Total Solid
Beginning Temperatur
End Temperatur
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
0.84 %Dry Solids
17 degrees Celsius
q 10/29/2009 13:3011
H10/29/09 13:30 pntl
1000 milliliters
17.2 degrees Celsius
0.1
5.0
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 6.61 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.79 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 17 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1-225043
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater 0.96 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

6
5
4
a�
E
c
a�
w
O 3
m
0
N
_N
2
1
0
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.1101x + 5,0653
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

rS (4; l
�z ooq
Annual Report Review SOP Class B Land Application
1. Annual Land Application Certification Form
• Was a certification form submitted? yes.
• Was land application conducted during the reported year? ye s
• How many dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied? :MS2 07
• Were the applications within the permitted amount? y.es
o Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre .
• Did it indicate compliance? y,, s
• . Was it signed by the appropriate people? ye_5
2. Monitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency?es
• Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? Y e.5
• Were the results reported in mg/kg? ye 5
• Were the metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?yam
• If no, were the labanalyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested? yes . �/vti�sing 591'
• Was TCLP analysis conducted? Aqu{
• Were the TCLP contaminants within regulatory limits? N1k
3. Field Summary
0 Were the land application events recorded on the Field Summary Forms? yes
e Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field applied on? e5
0 Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?afrj
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources?. a5
• Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)? yes
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated?l e,5
)• Were the calculations correct?. ESP- T46
• Were the PAN loading rates within permit limits?,,-.5
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?p '_5
s Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop? y:c-S
0 Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season? Y.e_S
© Were the Field Summary Forms complete?q q
v Was lime application on Field Summary Form? Yk to(c- (914 ay
5A2
�Y cadc.s,
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of -the Path en and Vector Attraction eduction Form subm, ' d?�
• Did the form indicate the period of coverage, the residual class, and the pathogen reduction alternative and the
vector attraction reduction option used?
• Was tbQ-ayp ate documentation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report?
e Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503 or 2T? .
5. Soil Tests
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each field applied on? �.L 7
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field?q �3
• Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field (state soils lab)?
6. General
• Was the report in the proper format? Z5
• Were any parts of the annual report mussing? aO
o Was the report submitted on time?` '&5
4- Add_

Class B PathoLyen Review
Alternative 1 - Fecal Coliform Density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? te,5
• Were seven samples taken?J-0
• Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly?
• Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids)IL5
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens one of five)
O Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Aerobic Digestion
• Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
o Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 15°C (59°F)?
Air Drying
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was the -ambient temperature above 0°C (32°F) for two months?
• Were the residuals partially digested?
• Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (riot snow covered)?
Anaerobic Digestion
• Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 15 days at 35°C (95T) to 55°C (131T) and 60 days at 20°C
(68-F)?
Composting
• Was it a composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
® Was the temperature raised to 40°C (104T) or higher and remained at 40°C (104T) for five days?
• Did the temperature exceed 55°C (131T) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH? .
Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)?

y
Vector Attraction Reduction Review
i Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction
o Was there 38% reduction?
® Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
o Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
® Was the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)?
O Were calculations correct?
40-Day Bench Scale Test
® Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
v Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
® Was the test run for 40 days?
® Was the test done between 30°C (86T) and 37°C (99°F)?
o Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Was the reduction less than 17%?
m Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
® Were calculations correct?
30-DU Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
® Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
® Was the test run for 30 days?
o Was the test done at 20°C (68T)?
e Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
o Was the reduction less than 15%?
b Were lab'sheets/calculations in report?
Were calculations correct?
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR.
o Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? es -
® Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted),, Ye,s
® Was the test done between 10°C (50°F) and 30°C (860F)? yes
m Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (68°F)? � Cg
® Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)? e6
Q Was the sample holding under two hours? ye,5.
o Was the test started withinl5 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained?Y,,6

I
rice, Bev
From: Michael Ladd [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:27 AM
To: Price, Bev
Subject: Mars Hill Land Application ESP And SAR Calculations
Attachments: Mars Hill 042809 SAR & ESP Soil Site #1.xls; Mars Hill 042809 SAR & ESP Soil Site #2.xls
Beverly
Attached are Mars Hill Land Application ESP and SAR Calculation for Soil Sites #1 & #2 on 4/28/09.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need further information.
Thank you
Michael Ladd
Earth Environmental Services
cell: 828-360-6401 or 360-6407

SAC 4 1
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
WWI-) Ca(Mg/L) M M /L
14 F 1416 370
Na (ME)
Ca (ME)
M ME
0.608696
70.8
1 30.83333
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
SAR = 0.085388 (From Mg/L entered above)
SAR= 0.085388 (From ME entered below)
Na ME
Ca (ME)
Mg (ME)
0.608696
70.8
1 30.8333
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the
Na ME CEC
0.608696 10.7
ESP = 15.688748
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq.

The amount of exchangeable sodium ions versus the
amount of exchangeable calcium & magnesium ions in a given material.
Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 require ESP in permit.
Cation exchange complex of soils
Should be less than 15% (15-20%)

Sife- 4Z
SAR & ESP
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
Na M /L Ca M /L M M /L
10 1 1543 1288
Na ME
0.434783
Ca (ME)
Mg (ME)
1 77.15
1 24
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
-7777
SAR = 0.061137 (From Mg/L entered above)
SAR= 0.061137 (From ME entered below)
Na ME
Ca (ME)
Mg (ME)
0.434783
77.15
1 24
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the
Na ME CEC
0.434783 11
ESP = 13.952573
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq.

The amount of exchangeable sodium ions versus the
amount of exchangeable calcium & magnesium ions in a given material.
Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 require ESP in permit.
cation exchange complex of soils
Should be less than 15% (15-20%)