WQ0004298_2008 Residuals Annual Report_20090212

AININUAL LA1V1) AYrl-.IUA11Vlr U K1111IUAl1Vlr VUK1V1
t#: WQ0004298 '`County: Madison Year: 2008
Facility Name (as shown on permit): Town of Mars Hill Land Application Program
Land Application Operator: Robert M. Sams Phone: [phone]
Land application of residual solids as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
FRI Yes ❑ No If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A:
Total number of application fields in permit: 2
Total number of fields land application occurred during the year: - 2
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: 18.0166518
Total number of acres land application occurred during the year: 18.3
Part B:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2008 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. 2 Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dategEi%l l0m-NR / DWQ
corrective action taken. I Aquifer Protection Section
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites. .FEB 1 2 .2009
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at
least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three
(3) copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required
and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 503:13 or the
Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13 (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14 were
complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation,
prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of
violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were removed
in accordance with the crop management plan.
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing 'violations."
Darhyl Boone- Town Manager zz� 2 91
Permittee Name and Title (type or print) Signature of Permittee Date
Signature of Preparer* ate Signature of Land Applies Date
DENR FORM ACF (5/2003)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Attach this form to the corresponding Annual Report
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed than those required to be summarized on this form.
Permit Number: WQ0004298
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Land Application
NPDES # or NCO057151
WQ#:
WWTP Name: Town of Mars Hill WWTP
Residual Analvsis Data
Laboratory: 1) Earth Environmental Services
2) Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
3) A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
4)
5)
Sample or
CompositeDate
EMEEMEEMEEME
Molybdenum
Mill
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
signific penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
.,x- 2 /)x
Signature of Preparer / 6ate
DENR FORM RSSF (5/2003)

Farm mironmentai seNices
Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
Madison County Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
Name and Address of Facility:
Date: 10/20/2008
Town of Mars Hill WWTP
Sample Collector: RS
P.O. BOX 368
Date and Time Sample Received: 10/1/2008 11:25 AM
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Date and Time Sample Collected: 9/30/2008
Aft:'Robert Sams
Date and Time Sample Analyzed: < MHT
Land Application Analyses - Note: All results in mg/Kg Dry Basis unless othervvise noted.
Test
Belt Press Sludge
Soil Site #1
Soil Site #2
Report Limit
Method
Units
ACIDITY
1.1 meq/100g
1.0 meq/1009
SCA
mg/L
TOTAL SUSPENDED RESIDUE
1.0
SM2540D
mg/L
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY
11.1 meq/100g
7.1 meq/100g
SCA
per 100mi
PH
5.9
7.5
7.1
0-14
SCA
units
AMMONIA NITROGEN
720
0.5
SCA
mg/L
NO2 + NO3-n
< 20
1.0
SCA
mg/L
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
48000
SCA
mg/L
TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS
1900d
SCA
mg/L
PERCENT TOTAL RESIDUE
12.7%
88.1%
93%
SCA
mg/L
• ORGANIC MATTER
2.9%
3.7%
SCA
NTU
• BASE SATURATION - K
4.6%
6.9%
SCA
mg/L
-H
-Mg
34.4%
32.4%
-Ca
60.1 %
59.4%
-Na
0.9%
1.2%
PLANT AVAILABLE (surface)
14,544
PPM/dw
NITROGEN- PPM DRY WT (subsurf)
14,904
PPM/dw
TEMPERATURE
SM255013
deg C
MANGANESE
320
260
SCA
mg/L
MAGNESIUM
4000
5300
1 600
SCA
mg/L
SODIUM
970
44
19
SCA
mg/L
CADMIUM
< 1.9
< 0.28
< 0.27
SCA
mg/L
CHROMIUM
26
34
32
SCA
mg/L
COPPER
300
44
21
SCA
mg/L
LEAD
25
12
10
SCA
mg/L
NICKEL
25
15
8
SCA
mg/L
ZINC
750
62
29
1 SCA
mg/L
CALCIUM
11000
1900
1200
SCA
mg/L
POTASSIUM
6100
5100
460
SCA
mg/L
ALUMINUM
8900
N/A
NIA
SCA
mg/L
ARSENIC
< 3.8
1.2
1.4
1
SCA
mg/L
SELENIUM
6.4
< 0.55
< 0.54
SCA
mg/L
MOLYBDENUM
4.7
< 0.55
< 0.54
SCA
mg/L
MERCURY
3.1
0.065
0.040
SCA
mg/L
N.C. Laboratory ID# 352 Analyzed By: S
Lab Supervisor: Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville Certified By:

Ip
dl:
ftut Available (PAN)aaf�IKdonsand Ift"d am
mx
L4
do
WWWA tj =SNOW* 39S
01" "fto 2"
lwmr�"
2. "WAY dmtXmgfle dwmddMQYAwj%4FqFwFJ
oft AID. W-kw oftdab" fa do . - I
8PPH=d
R.Old On me(bod Mond *%!z UbK dw blkwaft&B
followbi cdcwadm as a
PAN Aw stwom Appumtifo®
PAR
x C
PAR
"m Dry Wd&%
IPA" for sowuxg*m Appikedon
PAN mi�)] + ONO
-7
PMW
wwxk

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Client: I, ��1.,1n/\
Address: r f
Phone: � �-� — � 0(
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177
MARSHALL, NC 28753
75 BISON LANE CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
MURPHY, NC 28906 Analytical Request
Report To: /`c, J
Bill To: 'To ✓�
P.O. # / Billing Reference: _
FAX #: —rV, �3 ��— o j
Init Lab Temp: '� J
Rec Lab Tee
U
*Re es� Due Dat�p- (�c�
.1
e ®�
J1 •
0 Tv AMON
ILL
ITE
M#, . SAMPLE DESCRIPTION,:, R SID. T TIME, MATRIX'_,, +EES #- :.
•
•
•
•
_ • REMARKS
SMI mm
RON
IN
I
IN
mm
0
11111
F1
21
1
FAS
FA
11
FAS
04
04
110
■�--■.....
mossommosson
■�--■....
sommossommons
SHIPMENT
OUt/DATE
METHOD ITEM
RETURNED/DATE #
RELINOUISEDBY/AFFILIATION
ACCEPTED BY/
DATE TIME '
-■
r /_
RO/ fM�fiWr��
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:■
__
■
__
■
■
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS CP-0771-B

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Client: Ow Pj�-J'L
Address:
mom\ Ni
Phone:
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177 75 BISON LANE
MARSHALL, NC 28753f� 1 c MURPHY, NC 28906
Report To: (`��J�(�� JCS ►�/L
Bill To: I tYNl Et
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
FAX #: (, 0 CkO� cig-
06439,
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request
[nit Lab Temp:
Rec Lab Temp:
*R,�4eessted 'u? Date:
- luE I
-ITEM C-
Is IN IN is
1111
miles
IPMENT.'METHOD
ITEM
RELINQUISED BY/ AFFILIATION
VON
,L'_
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS CP-0771-B

I
Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services
Collection date: 30-Sep-08
Date received: 1-Oct-08
Sample identification: #100827
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 081001.510
VA <: a (-�f p It G�'a n 41
Gk tS Sty-\4 q0,
Sample number:
52819
Pa
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst
Footnotes
Analyzed
ercent Solids
SM 2540 G
12.7
%
6-Oct-08
IvIbatber
1
Mercury
EPA 7471 A
3.1
0.16
tng/kg
10-0ct-os
Heasler
1
Aluminum
EPA 6010 B
8900
19
mg/kg
-7-o.t-03
Mcampbell
1
Arsenic
EPA 6010 B
<3.8
3.8
mg/kg
7-Duos
Mcan,pi,ell
1
Cadmium
EPA 6010 B
<1.9
1.9
mg/kg
7-0c1-os
A4eantpbell
1
Calcium
EPA 6010 B
11000
38
mg/kg
7-0c1-os
Mcampbell
1
Chromium
EPA 601013
26
1.9
mg/kg
7-0.t-08
Mcainpbeu
1
Copper
EPA 6010 B
300
3.8
nig/kg
7-0ct-08
Mcampbell
1
Lead
EPA 6010 B
25
1.9
mg/kg
7-0ct-08
Mcampbell
1
Magnesium
EPA 6010 B
4000
19
mg/kg
7-Oct-OS
Mcampbell
1
Molybdenum
EPA 6010 B
4.7
3-8
mg/kg
7-0ct-08
Mcatpbell
]
Nickel
EPA 6010 B
25
3.8
mg/kg
7-0ct-08
Mcampbell
1
Potassium
EPA 6010 B
6100
19
mg/ clog
7-oct-os
Mcampbell
1
Selenium
EPA 6010 B
6.4
3.8
mg/kg
-i-oct-o8
mcantpbeii
]
Sodium
EPA 6010 B
970
120
n1g/kg
7-0ct-os
Meat» Abell
1
TEPA
6010 B
750
19
mg/kg
7-Cxt-08
Mcampbell
1
to + Nitrite
SIv14500 1\103 F
<20
20
mg/kg
9-oct-08
Heaslcr
1
T-6al Phosphorus
SM 4500 P F
19000
390
mg/kg
9-oa-oe
ltlotlin
1
• I Kjeldahl
EPA 351.2
48006
20000
mg/kg
lo-oct-os
Celibki
1
1 Nitrogen
Calculation
48000
7.9
mg/Icg
1
onia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 D
720
15
mg/kg
3-Oct-08
KEK
rcent Solids
SM 2540 G
13
0.1
S. U.
2-W-08
KEK
SM 9045 C
5.9
%
2-Oct-08.
KEK
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the sainples submitted for analysis.

Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services
Collection date: 30-Sep-08
Date received: 1-Oct-08
Sample identification: 9100828
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 081001.510
r;S 1 ly Lziti� A -,pp 1\ (3
c1--R o)a V
Sample number: 52820
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
88.1
%
6-oct-08
Mbarber
1
Mercury
EPA 7471 A
0.065
0.023
mg/kg
10-oca08
Hasler
1
Arsenic
EPA 6010 B
1.2
0.55
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Cadmium
EPA 6010 B
<0 28
0.28
mg/kg
7-act-o8
Mcampbell
1
Calcium
EPA 6010 B
1900
5.5
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Chronuum
EPA 6010 B
34
0.28
mg/kg
7-0c1-08
Mcampbell
1
Copper
EPA 6010 B
44
0.55
mg/kg
7-oct-o8
mcampbeu
1
Lead
EPA 6010 B
12
0.28
mg/kg
7-0ct-oe
A4aampbeu
1
Magnesium
EPA 6010 B
5300
280
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Manganese
EPA 6010 B
320
2.8
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Molybdenum
EPA 6010 B
<0.55
0.55
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Nickel
EPA 6010 B
15
0.55
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Potassium
EPA 6010 B
5100
280
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbelf
1
Selenium
EPA 6010 B
<0.55
0.55
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Sodium
EPA 6010 B
44
17
mg/kg
7-oct-o8
Mcampbell
1
Zinc
EPA 6010 B
62
2.8
mg/kg
7-0ct-08
Mcampbell
1
H
SM 9045 C
7.3
%
2-Oct-08
KEK
Jev
5 Ch
oVcCZ LVV-
Sample identification: #100829
Sample number:
52821
Parameter
Method
Result
RL
Units
Date
Analyst
Footnotes
Analyzed
Percent Solids
SM 2540 G
93.0
%
6-oct-08
Mbarbcr
1
Mercury
EPA 7471 A
0.040
. 0.022
mg/kg
10-oct-08
Haasler
1
Arsenic
EPA 6010 B
1.4
0.54
mg/kg
7-oct-o8
Mcampbell
I
Cadmium
EPA 6010 B
<0.27
0.27
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Calcium
EPA 6010 B
1200
5.4
mg/kg
7-0c1-08
Mcampbell
1
Chronvunl
EPA 6010 B
32
0.27
mg/kg
7-0ct-oe
Mcampbell
1
Copper
EPA 6010 B
21
0.54
mg/kg
7-0c1-08
Mcampbell
1
Lead
EPA 6010 B
10
0.27
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Magnesium
EPA 6010 B
600
2.7
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Manganese
EPA 6010 B
260
2.7
mg/kg
7-oct-os
Mcampbell
1
Molybdenum
EPA 6010 B
<0.54
0.54
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Nickel
EPA 6010 B
8.0
0.54
mg/kg
7-00-09
Mcampbell
1
Potassium
EPA 6010 B
460
2.7
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Selenium
EPA 6010 B
<0.54
0.54
mg/kg
7-0ct-08
Mcautpbeil
1
Sodium
EPA 6010 B
19
16
mg/kg
7-oct-08
Mcampbell
1
Zinc
EPA 6010 B
29
2.7
mg/kg
7-oct-08
McampbCu
1
PI -I
SM 9045 C
7.0
%
2-oct-08
KEK
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent ofEnvironmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Tile results in this report reLite only to the samples submitted for analysis.

Report Number: dfid�N
A&L EASTERN LABORATORIES, INC®
R08280-0120 7621 Whitepine Road a Richmond, Virginia 23237-2214raYUQ WEj�
Account Number: Phone [phone] o Fax [phone]
46220 Website: www.al-labs-eastern,com • E-mail: [e-mail]
R
Send To: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS Grower: EARTH ENV SVCS Submitted By: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS
75 BISON LN
MURPHY, NC 28906
Farm I D: Field I D:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
Analytical Method(s):
Page: 1 Date Received: 10/6/2008 Date of Analysis: 10/7/2008 Date of Report: 10/8/2008 Mehlich III
Sample
Lab
Organic Matter
Phosphorus
Potassium
Magnesium
Calcium
Sodium
pH
Acidity
C.E.C.
Number
Number
% ENR
Ibs/A Rate
Available
ppm Rate
Reserve
ppm Rate
K
ppm Rate
MG
ppm Rate
CA
ppm Rate
NA
ppm Rate
Soil
pH
Buffer
Index
H
meq/100g
meq/100g
100828
19180
2.9 92 M
109 VH
NC=91
201 H
NC=103
460 VH
1340 M
_ 23 VL
7.5
11.1
100829
19181
3.7 114 M
23 L
NC='19
191 H
NC=98
275 VH
840 M
20 VL
7.1
7.1
Sample
Numbed
Percent Base Saturation•
Nitrate
Sulfur
Zinc
Manganese
Iron
Copper
Boron
Soluble
as
Salts
Chloride
Aluminum
K
%°
M0,
%
Ca
%
Na., ;
d�°
. H -
%o ..
NO3-N
ppm Rate
SO4-S
pp m Rate
ZN
. ppm Rate
MN
ppm Rate
FE
ppm Rate
Cu
ppm Rate
B
ppm Rate
CL
ppm Rate
AL
ppm Rate
ms/cm Rate
100828
4.6
34.4
60.1
0.9
6.2 H
NC=155
29 H
NC=181
4.8 VH
NC=240
100829
6.9
32.4
59.4
1.2
3.8 H
NC=95
42 H
NC=263
4.0 VH
NC=200
This report applies to the sample(s) tested. Samples are retained a
Values on. this report represent the plant available nutrients in the soil on a dry weight basis. Explanation of symbols: % (percent), ppm (parts per million), Ibs/A (pounds per acre), maximum of thirty days after testing. Soil Analysis prepared by:
LTURAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium), H (High), VH (Very High). mslcm (milli -mhos per centimeter), meg1100g (milli -equivalent per 100 grams). � ,A & L EASTERN AGRICIJ
ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release. C.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity. Conversions: ppm x 2 = IWA, Soluble Salts mslcm x 640 = ppm, by e� —
aul Chu, Ph.D.

C11\1\VZVL 1V11JLtILIU 71'Aj' LVALLL\V "­­1L1L\1 1'Vl�l�l
Afttach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name:
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
Town of Mars Hill WWTP Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 12.86875
WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Robert M. Sams Owner:
14.5 Acres Permitted: 14.5 Site #:
Larry Cody
Field #:
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent ft
.W1.
posite
Date•
©
a
Q
��:
I
Total
Phos-
phorus
•���
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
c
1
21
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
4
�
y
o
0.8875
Arsenic 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0067
0
0
0.0067
Cadmiuml
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0034
0
0
0.0034
hromiuni
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0462
0
0
0.0462
Copper
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5325
0
0
0.5325
Lead
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0444
0
0
0.0444
Mercury
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0055
0
0
0.0055
Molyb-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
0.0083
0
0
0.0083
denum
Nickel
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0444
0
0
0.0444
Selenium
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
0.0114
0
0
0.0114
Zinc
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.3313
0
0
1.3313
Total
Phos-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33.725
0
0
33.725
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the
information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
includi the possibility of fi es and imprisonment for knowing violations"
a9a q_
L C'4 i1 r 'baAlpl DENR FORM MFLSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Permit #: WQ0004298 Annual Dry Tons Applied: 12.869037
)caner: Larry Cody Operator:
'site #: 01 Field #: 01
Robert M. Sams Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 11.1
Acres Utilized: 14.5 Acres Permitted: 14.5
o
�, S
o
S eci
Totals
Per
Acre
%
Solid
s
Dry Tons Per
Acre
Residual
Sources
(Summarize)
1 e
Cond,
Dry,
Wet,
i
Inches
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
Appli-
cation
Meth-
od*
Vola-
tili-
zation
Rate**
Miner-
ali-
zation
Rate
TKN
Ammo-
ma-
Ni-
trogen
Ni-
trate
and
Nitrite
PAN 1
PAN 2
Must Select
Crop 1 or Crop
2
Gal.
Cu.Yd.
Report
Totals
in Gal.
Crop 1
Crop 2
0/2/08
8100
558.62
12.7
0.295839931
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
48000
720
20
8.61723
#######
Fescue
1
0/3/08
6480
446.9
12.7
0.236671945
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
48000
720
1 20
6.89378
##44###1
Fescue
2
)/20/08
9720
670.34
12.7
0.355007917
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
48000
720
20
10.3407
#######
Fescue
3
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
1 0
6
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
111
0
0
1
0
0
12
?OTALS:
1 16761
As
Cd
Cr -
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
PAN 1
PAN 2
Lime Applied
annual lbs/acre
0.006745
0.00337
0.04615
0.5325
0.044381
0.0055
0.00834
0.04438
0.01136
1.33125
33.725
25.851
0
Date
lbs/ac
,urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
0.8166158
0.5678 V
1.6092
48.042
5.1252
.10996
.6810
2.2790
1.4490
29.599
-=
10/17/08
5400
'rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
0.8098708
0.56444
1.56312
47.5099
5.08083
0.10446
2.67272
2.23466
1.43767
28.2684
'ermitted C. P. L. R.***
36
34
nl
1338
267
IS
nl
374
89
2498
'ermit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
„, ._. .:;:. ,..� ,,•;�
'I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
lesigned to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
ignifica enalti s for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
��E ��V a2 C) *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
Signature of fadd App ier ate **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Iniection/Incorporation - 1.0
***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
*** The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into
the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1.
DENR FORM FSF (5/2003)

AINIIIUAL 1viL' lAL3 riL' Lll LV1iUllrlT aulvllriniml r Vi(lvl"
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name:
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
Town of Mars Hill WWTP Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Robert M. Sams
3.8 Acres Permitted:
5.147614801
11.1
—Owner: Larry Cody
3.8 Site #: 1 Field #: 2
Residual Analysis Data(Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent ft
• IN
Total
•
••
•l�l
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
o
d
CD
..
o
1.3546
Arsenic
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0103
0
0.0103
Cadmium
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0051
0
0.0051
hromiuir
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0704
0
0.0704
Copper
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.8128
0
0.8128
Lead
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0677
0
0.0677
Mercury
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0:0084
0
0.0084
Molyb-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0127
0
0.0127
denum
Nickel
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
0
0.0677
0
1 0.0677
Selenium
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0173
0
0.0173
Zinc
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.032
0
2.032
Total
Phos-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
51.476
0
51.476
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the
information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
inclu the ssibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations"
A' � `e r DENR FORM MFLSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Permit #: WQ0004298 Annual Dry Tons Applied: 5.1476148
Owner: Larry Cody
site #: 01 Field #:
Operator:
02
Robert M. Sams Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 11.1
Acres Utilized: 3.8
Acres Permitted: 3.8
�.
N o
2
Svecify
Totals
Per
Acre
%
Solid
s
I
Dry Tons Per
Acre
Residual
Sources
(Summarize)
Site
Cond.
Dry,
Wet,
Moist
Inches
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
Appli-
cation
Meth-
od*
Vola-
tili-
zation
Rate**
Miner-
ali-
zation
Rate
TKN
Ammo-
ma-
Ni-
trogen
Ni-
trate
and
Nitrite
PAN 1
PAN 2
Must Select
Crop 1 or Crop
2
*
Gal.
Cu.Yd.
Report
in Gal.
Crop 1
Crop 2
i 1/5/08
9720
2557.91
12.7
1.354.635474
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
48000
720
20
39.4578
#######
Fescue
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
12
COTALS:
25581
As
Cd
Cr -
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
PAN 1
PAN 2
Lime Applied
knnuallbs/acre
0.010295264
0.00515
0.07044
10.81278
0.06773
1 0.0084
0.01273
0.06773
10.01734
2.03196
514763
39.457
0
Date
lbs/ac
�urrent Cumulative lbs/ac
0.268443864 0.3024 1.2324 28.94 3.3406 .0963 1.5597 1.24497 .6719 17.754���
0.2581486 10.29728 1.16205 28.1302 3.27289 0.08791 1 1.54702 1.17724 0.6546 15.722
36 34 nl 1338 267 15 nl 374 89 2498 ,
10/17/08
5400
N.
11rior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
'ermitted C. P. L. R.***
?ermit PAN Limit l st/2nd Crop
`I. certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
iesigned to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
;ignifica enalties for submi 'ng false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Ql?lr�20 v *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
Signature o Land Applier Date **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Iniection/Incorporation -1.0
***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loadine Rate
k*** The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into
the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1.
DENR FORM FSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VEUTOR A'1'TRAUT1ON REDUCTION NORM
' Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Land Application Permit Number: WQ004298
WWTP Name: Town of Mars Hill WWTP NPDES Number: NCO057151
Monitoring Period: From January 12008 To December 312008
Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alternative 1 ❑
Alternative 2 ❑
Alternative 3 ❑
Alternative 4®
Alternative 5 ❑
Alternative 6 ❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost 01
Heat Drying ❑
Heat Treatment ❑
Thermophilic ❑
Beta Ray ❑
Gamma Ray ❑
Pasteurization ❑
Class B:
Alternative 1
Alternative 2 ❑
Alternative 3
If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ®
Air Drying ❑
Composting ❑
jAerobic Digestion 2
Anaerobic Digestion❑
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
in Sludge
g
Pathogen Density
Number of
Excee-
dences
Frequency
of Anal sis
y
Sample
Type
Analytical
Tech-ni u
q
Minimum
Geo. Mean
Maximum
Units
Fecal Coliform
2 x 10 to the 6th
power MPN per
gram of total
solids or 2 x 10 to
the 6th power
CFU per gram of
3400
4300
6300
col./gram
0
1/year
Grab
9222d
1000 mpn per
gram of total solid
(dry weight)
Sahnonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 MPN per 4
grams total solid
(dry weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 503.33) - Please indicate option performed:
Option 1 ❑ Option 2 ❑ Option 3 ❑ Option 4 2 Option 5 ❑
Option 6 ❑ Option 7 ❑ Option 8 ❑ Option 9 ❑ Option 10 ❑
No vector attraction reduction options were performed ❑ ;w
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement) .
® "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met."
❑ "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." (Please note if you check
this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the
system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
used to determine that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Robert M. Sams/Public Works Director
Prepare Name and Title (type or print) Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)

EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Residence — [phone]
Robbinsville Lab — [phone]
Marshall Lab — [phone]
Shelby Lab — [phone]'
E-Mail — earthenvser@,,webworkz.com\
October 21, 2008
NC ID#474, 052
Mr. Robert Sams
Town of Mars Hill
P.O. Box 368
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Dear Mr. Sams:
Following is a report of laboratory analyses for digester sludge samples received 10/15/2008.
Colony Counts
dt ,mm�le Pate Cnlifhr rlencitiec (enlnnirc/arum) o Tntnl Cnlvlc 1 0 ml 0 1 ml 001 rnl
1
1017/08
3,900 Colonies/Gram
0.88%
34
7
1
2
10/8108
4,200 Colonies/Gram
0.88%
37
10
1
3
10/9/08
3,500 Colonies/Gram
0.88%
31-
8
1
4
10/10/08
4,800 Colonies/Gram
0.89%
43
9
0
5
10/13/08
3,400 Colonies/Gram
0.88%
30
3
0
6
10/14/08
4,800 Colonies/Gram
0.88%
42
6
1
7
10/15/08
6,300 Colonies/Gram
0.89%
56
11
4
Geometric mean for all seven samples: 4,300 colonies/gram. Thank you for your
business. If you have any question or need additional sample analyses performed, please
call.
Respectfully submitted,
rn
J�X7'A ! 'C
Michael J. Ladd
Laboratory Director

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]�
Client:
Address:
),�t 14 P\j-C_ ac�'%���
Phone: 81 '— L!? T (2'T-s>
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177
MARSHALL, INC 28753
75 BISON LANE CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
MURPHY, NC 28906 Analytical Request
Report To: & 6e�,
Bill'To: ]nit Lab Temp:
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
FAX #:
Rec Lab Temp:
*Requested Due Date:
Sampled By (pri t)-
ole,4, M,
WA
REMARKS
'p SAMPLE- RIPTI
MME0111111
son
loss
1jjj
jolool
ME
E
=monsoon
11010100000
SHIPMENT
METHOD ITEM
ACCEPTED BY/ AFFILIATION
'DATE-,,
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS cP-0771-s

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Digester Temperature:'
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
a
146F
0.1
5.0
1.0
Ililiters
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
qrees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 5.81 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.54 mg Oxygen/glhr
Average Temperature: 16 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.31079601
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.70 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

(salnupw) owpl
9
:paaC) ale.N aMLqdn u96Rx®
Z90V9 + X9960'0- = A
■
A
N
N
O
fD
O.
ice:
3

t 1 t
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number:FMQ6042
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
3:
5/20/2098 13:30
Michael Ladd
1000
0.88
16
15.7
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient.
0.1
5.4
1.0
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
arees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 5.71 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.65 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 16 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.31079601
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.86 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

6
5
�. 4
a�
E
1
f
y =-0.0951 x + 5.5107
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1b it
Time (minutes)

r---
Y � 7
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:i
Biosolids Permit Number:,
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning
End
Dissolved Oxygen Level
16.
13/2008 9:4
0 6/13/2008 9:450
liliters
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
❑rees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.3
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.73 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.50 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 17 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.225043
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0,62 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

y =-0.0789x + 4.352
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
4.5
4 �
3,5
c 3
I
2.5
O
2-
o
N I
N '
0 1.5
1 I
0.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

t)
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Digester Temperature:'
Sampling Daterfime:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning T
End T
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
VA
Ladd
liliters
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
arees Celsius
0.1
4.0
1.0
5.08 mg Oxygen/hr
0.47 mg Oxygen/g/hr
18 degrees Celsius
1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.54 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

r-
4.5
4
3.5
3
8
aci 2.5
O
d 2
0
N
N
cl
fib
y =-0.0847x + 4.0648
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Il lG lJ i`r
Time (minutes)

♦' ( 1 7
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name-,
Biosolids Permit Number.'
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
illiliters
Dry Solids
agrees Celsius
mrees Celsius
0.1
4.5
1.0
5.10 mg Oxygen/hr
0.56 mg Oxygen/g/hr
19 degrees Celsius
1.07
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.60 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

4.5
4
3.5
E 3
m
a�
2.5
m
0 2
N
1.5
A
0.:
y =-0.0851 x + 4.5793
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II IL
Time (minutes)

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number: WQ004298
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Ladd
1
0.83 % Dry Solids
18.3 degrees Celsius
18.5 dearees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 6.2
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 5.95 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.72 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.82 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

7
6
0
2
1
c
y =-0.0992x + 6.2873
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1E
Time (minutes)

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility
Biosolids Permit N
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:'
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor.
1
/2008
17.
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
arees Celsius
0.1
5.5
1.0
6.06 mg Oxygen/hr
0.59 mg Oxygen/g/hr
18 degrees Celsius
1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater 0.68 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

6
5
4
0)
E
c
w
M
0 3
1
y =-0.1009x + 5.6023
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1t
Time (minutes)

Town of Mars Hill WQ0004298
Request for additional information: 2008 Exchangeable Sodium
Robert M.Sams
Town of Mars Hill
IECEW D
AUG 12 2CU9
Asheville regional Office
=tagea-jifer Protection
icuC-WED 1 DENR 1 DWQ
Aquif— P mtertion Section
AUG 10 2009

Town of Mars Hill WQ0004298
2008 Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
Field #1- 1.9%ESPY C1LS
\>
I
Field #2- 2.5% ESP
See attached calculation sheet for. details.
QA

04 09 01:38p Earth Environmental Ser. 8288358631
` (828}b'ts�sss�
,inn 04,09 12:49p MmW Boone aca-c�rnoys t I -Lee r�o�rnoc r-sae
_ ass -as= IU: w rnA+-rU1=1"
o ors - 14"+ y1 Apo yt c am`
4I120.1"
sod"m= pro OMP) is an evalmdos that cm 1
posswe access 3OwOM won ia*c, Soil itsdf m o Fsw is
soils eatioa exshst wit!► (Cq .that r °Od h9 *e s
detaasiaatioa cm 6t Mack lion s tYPical sp0 fa 7 �nduata
rOWTIs:
Ift s 190
EWw
CED
EsP=Rw*MjPwbft sodains Pareec"w
NK-Soawmc+WA01080M
CEO $ coon Ent rw
WSORIPID 1: tip')
0 MW CDC of a soil is 5.4 aAW100 cm; aad the Na % 0.7
WbalisamewboomblauxUMPOCOGROW
Pbx 100
ESP=
COC
a7:100
5.4
Wa100
S
/[dog op
q
aged a dde mine
pie of the
and CawUbwa as
p.2
1, p 7a Ese
r0�
r7S ��G e
Na�yQ?.3b Cwc-�,�
eSez +2-7-4737 °%
a
6.30 0 W a
r17 � C7
� � �jt l� ! f •�`J

-oto/l of Mars ffi rl ���9�°0?
Annual Report Review SOP Class B Land Application
Annual Land Application Certification Form
• Was a certification form submitted? YZT
• Was land application conducted during the reported year?ye-
• How many dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied? /$ D% 1ko
• Were the applications within the permitted amount? y,,-,-S
• Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre .
• Did it indicate compliance?YRS
• . Was it signed by the appropriate people? Yes
2. Monitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency? Y eS
• Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form?ye'
• Were the results reported in mg/kg?yes
• Were the metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?jPlls
• If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested?y,,s .
• Was TCLP analysis conducted? NA. _. On �� re-70.�vace �Pe,��if Cr��%
• Were the TCLP contaminants within regulatory limits?
3. Field Summary
o Were the land application events recorded on the Field Summary Forms?ya
• Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field applied on?10.5
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?y25
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources?1,95
• Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)? yIe5
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated? fe1
• Were the calculations correct? U45
• Were the. PAN loading rates within permit limits?14-5 .
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?e $
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?10
• Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season?Ve,s
• Were the Field Summary Forms complete?la
• Was lime application on Field Summary Form? yes
4: Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of the Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction Form submitted?
a Did the form indicate period of coverage, the residual class, and the pathogen reduction alternative and the
vector attraction reduction option used? ✓�'
0 Was the .ap�ropriate documental -ion to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report? GO•
• Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503 or 2T?
5. Soil Tests ff--
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each field applied on?y.&S� -%_C&l 6-Sp
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field?yes
• Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field (state soils lab)?jej
6. General
• Was the report in the proper format?1-2S ®N
• Were any parts of the annual report missing? Ijo COVP-r PO
o Was the report submitted on time?,45
sew - 4dd —1� �. /��/©� Reived 2li2/09

Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative 1 - Fecal Coliforin Density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? ItY
• Were seven samples takenN. 4-S
• Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly?1,45
• Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids)19 &S
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (one of five)
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Aerobic Digestion
® Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 15°C (59°F)?
_Air Drying
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was theambienttemperature above 0°C 02°F) for two months?
• Were the residuals partially digested?
• Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (not snow covered)?
Anaerobic Di eg stion
• Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period? ..
• Was the time and temperature between 15 days at 350C (95°F) to 55°C (131T) and 60 days at 200C
(68°F)?
Composting
• Was it a. composting procedure (notnatural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the temperature raised to 40°C (104T) or higher and remained at 40°C (104T) for five days?
o Did the temperature exceed 55°C (13IT) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and .temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
o Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)?

�j
Vector Attraction Reduction Review
a
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction'
Was there 38% reduction?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)?
• Were calculations correct?
40-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
® Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
• Was the test run for 40 days?
® Was the test done between 300C (86°F) and 370C (990F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
o Was the reduction less than 17%?
® Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
® Were calculations correct?
30-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
® Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
o Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
® Was the test run for 30 days?
o Was the test done at 200C (680F)?
m Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
® Was the reduction less than 15%?.
a Were lab'sheets/calculations in report?
© Were calculations correct?
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR)
® Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?yt5
m Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?yam'
® Was the test done between 10°C (50T) and 30°C (86T)?Yes
® Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (68'.F)?)z5
® Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)?1,0
• Was the sample holding time under two hours?Y111r-
9 Was the test started within15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained? T&-5

14-DE Aerobic Process
® Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
® Were the residuals treated for 14 days?
® Was the residuals temperature higher than 40T (104T) for the 14-day period?
® Was the average residuals temperature higher than 45T (11.3°F)?
Alkaline Stabilization
® Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher by the addition of alkali?
® Did the pH'of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition
of more alkali?
® Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty-two
hours without the addition of more alkali?
• Was the pH corrected to 25T (77T)?
Dryingof Stabilized Residuals
® Does the residuals .contain any unstabilized residuals?
® Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
® Were the residuals dried to 75% total solids?
Drying of Unstabilized Residuals
© Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
® Were the residuals dried to. 90% total solids? .
Injection
® Was there any significant. amount of residuals on land surface one hour after
injection (Inspection)?
® Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
® Was injection done at time that crop was growing?
o If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals injected within eight hours
after discharge from pathogen treatment?
Incorporation
® Were the residuals incorporated into the soil within six hours after application?
® Was incorporation done on pasture or hay field?
® Was incorporation done at time that crop was growing?
® If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals incorporated within eight
__.._.._..__._.hours -after -discharge- from -pathogen- treatment?..__________...__.___._._.._..._..___..._.._._.._______.._.__.__..__:.__..__._._.__._._.............__..

Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
FAX TRANSMITTAL
To:
%, -� sc_�,,S
� o �-�"
(o - 3333
From: b,, V
Comment:
-4zO bF-A I
-e-V
o-� N\(,,-S JA; l k w w'( p
�.VL
North Carolina Division of Water Quality — Asheville Regional Office 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778
Aquifer Protection Section
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Nose Carolina
Nturldif
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
Exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) is an evaluation that can be used to determine
possible excess sodium concentration in the soil itself. The ESP is the percentage of the
soil's cation exchange capacity (CEC) that is occupied by the sodium cations. This
determination can be made from a typical soil fertility evaluation and calculated as
follows:
Nax100
ESP =
CEC
ESP = Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
NA = Sodium Concentration
CEC = Cation Exchange Capacity
Example 1: (ESP)
❑ The CEC of a soil is 5.4 meq/100 cm3 and the Na is 0.7 meq/100 cm3.
What is the exchangeable sodium percentage?
Na x 100
ESP =
CEC
0.7 x 100
5.4
0.7 x 100
5.4
= F13.0
6-30

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0004298 Effective: 06/20/06 Expiration: 05/31/11 Owner: Town of Mars Hill
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Residuals Land Application Program
County: Madison PO Box 368
Region: Asheville
Mars Hill NC 287540368
Contact Person: L Darhyl Boone Title: Town Manager Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
From the intersection of NC Hwy. 213 and NCSR 1609, travel south on NCSR 1609 approximately 1.1 miles until the intersection with
NCSR 1559. Tr vel southwest on NCSR approximately 0.5 miles until the intersection with NCSR 1560 the site is to north.
System Classitications:
Primary ORC: Robert M Sams Certification: 14793 Phone: [phone]
Secondary" ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/22/2009
Primary Inspector: Beverly Price
Secondary Inspector(s):
Robert M Sams
Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspectio T pe: Land lication of Residual Solids (503)
Facility S s: ■ Compliant Not Compliant
Question eas:
Miscellaneous ues ions Record Keeping
(See attachment summary)
-73> ©�
�i
Page: 1