Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SW6221004_Design Calculations_20221021
Hydrologic & Hydraulic Design Data for Automotive Maintenance Repair Shop - 3563 Camden Road Site Development by: EEB Holdings, LLC. Prepared By. - Kenneth Smith Jr., PE PLS Smith Site Consultants, PLLC. NC Firm # P-2144 121 Bulittle Drive Linden, NC 28356 S mithSte .,, CONSULTANTS, PLLC CA SEAL - 45277 s = �nm� Stormwater Narrative - Automotive Repair Shop Site Development for EEB Holdings, LLC. EEB Holdings, LLC. intends to develop an automotive repair shop at 3563 Camden Road Fayetteville, NC 28306. The proposed property is 4.98 acres and zoned commercial but the site currently is undeveloped, wooded land. When NCDOT widened Camden Road around 2017 for the super street design, they acquired two permanent drainage easements on this parcel in which they placed drop inlets storm drainage structures within each easement in order to accommodate for future development, as the street's back of curb elevation was much higher than the site's existing topography. The intent with this site will be to raise the site's building & parking area via grading it, implement a storm network to convey the runoff to an infiltration basin stormwater control measure for treatment. Any flow beyond the 1" treatment volume will be sent towards NCDOT's existing infrastructure within Camden Road. Upon completion of construction, the intended built upon area (the site's impervious area) will be 1.275 acres or —25.6% of the entire site's 4.98 acres between the building, the parking lot area and the various concrete features such as the sidewalk along the front of the building and the rear concrete delivery pad and potential future impervious areas. The drainage areas tributary to the stormwater control measure will be 3.74 acres with all of the impervious area treated by the SCM (1.275 acres) and giving its watershed an impervious percentage of 34.1%. The remaining areas on the site will be completely grassed and shall continue to drain directly to NCDOT's existing drainage infrastructure as it did before the site's development. The site has gentle natural topography that ranges from 1-3% slopes of Lakeland Sand (hydrologic class A) and falls from the rear towards the frontage along Camden Road — SR1003. A formal soil investigation has been conducted for the site by a NC licensed soil scientist to determine the in -situ soils ability to infiltrate (included in this package) and infiltration rates of 3.4 to 8.4 inches per hour were observed where the intended infiltration basin stormwater control measure will be located. Additionally, the seasonal high water table was found to be at elevation 205.46 which is over 24" below the bottom elevation of the intended basin at elevation 208.25. Given the site's sandy nature and upon analyzing the soils report, it was determined that an infiltration basin would be the most suitable stormwater control measure for the site. Attached to this package are the simple method treatment volume calculations, infiltration basin's drawdown time with stage storage calculations, storm network pipe calculations, the site's hydrographs, rip rap apron calculation, USGS Quad Map for the site, NCRS Soil Survey as well as the site's soils investigation report, which was performed by a NC Licensed Soil Scientist. Please review them and let me know if you have any questions —thank you. Kenneth Smith Jr., PE PLS Smith Site Consultants, PLLC. — NC Firm # P-2144 ASmithSite CONSULTANTS, PLLC o 0 cow 70 ^^� GL 0 L 5 0 M Q > E Q (n U fO Lo M Lo limmill, V 4-• N yC) 4- Q) �0 ay 4-- 0 LL L a Ca U_ .Q .- Q� co 4- C m L E L 0 4- U) IN E L 0 U) a U) N Z3 0 4- a) O Q' 0 N L L 0 0 a E 0 0 0 O U Q fit'? M mot' M 00 r, "t cC G v 0 m 111 w O_ O s N W U C C W c 2 W O E O 3 Q I PU C � U a cn 11 T CO M CO c �- � v cn U iti LL. �t v _ ) V L6 (6 r-- a � v • mo Co U O � O OGGM LnN 41 � (',J — LO Lr) U ZD C) G') G) O O C 4m Q CyJ m C L!7 LO u7 LO Lf-) O N C N (N N (N 'w. ::0 C) O_ — N_ N N j N N N _d LU Q U Y U O r C 7 C)7 2 C L > .7 O .� O cr t v, in LL 0 jj II II II (1) LL 0 V) L ►4= W W 3 0 W > O 0 7 L.L v > L cn 0 Or aJ O 0), C) O p `n m _E E H II II F- a i— Q C 3 Cf) 3 -00 75 -o0 J m � 0 Watershed Model Schematic HydraflowHydrographsExtension for Autodesk®Civil 3D®byAutodesk,Inc. v202O PRE -DEVELOPED POST -DEVELOPED POST -DEVELOPED GRASSED SITE SITE TO THE AREAS NOT TO THE INFIL BASIN INFIL BASIN 1 2 4 tit Project: EEB Holdings Hydrograph 10-1-2022.gpw Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 Hydraflow Table of Contents EEB Holdings Hydrograph 10-1-2022.gpw Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 WatershedModel Schematic...................................................................................... 1 1 -Year SummarvReoort......................................................................................................................... 2 HydrographReports................................................................................................................... 3 Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre Developed Site..................................................................... 3 TR-55 Tc Worksheet........................................................................................................... 4 Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin .............................................. 5 Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Post Site to Basin..................................................................... 6 PondReport - Infiltration Basin............................................................................................ 7 Hydrograph No. 4, Rational, Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin ................................... 8 TR-55 Tc Worksheet........................................................................................................... 9 10 -Year SummaryReport....................................................................................................................... 10 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 11 Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre Developed Site................................................................... 11 Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin ............................................ 12 Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Post Site to Basin................................................................... 13 Hydrograph No. 4, Rational, Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin ................................. 14 25 - Year SummarvReoort....................................................................................................................... 15 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 16 Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre Developed Site................................................................... 16 Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin ............................................ 17 Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Post Site to Basin................................................................... 18 Hydrograph No. 4, Rational, Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin ................................. 19 100 - Year SummaryReport ....................................................................................................................... 20 HydrographReports................................................................................................................. 21 Hydrograph No. 1, Rational, Pre Developed Site................................................................... 21 Hydrograph No. 2, Rational, Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin ............................................ 22 Hydrograph No. 3, Reservoir, Post Site to Basin................................................................... 23 Hydrograph No. 4, Rational, Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin ................................. 24 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cis) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 Rational 1.660 1 33 3,286 Pre Developed Site 2 Rational 3.939 1 24 5,672 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin 3 Reservoir 0.000 1 210 0 2 209.18 5,054 Post Site to Basin 4 Rational 0.413 1 33 818 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Ba EEB Holdings Hydrograph 10-1-2022.gpw Return Period: 1 Year Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 3 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 112 / 2022 Hyd. No. 1 Pre Developed Site Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 1.660 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 0.55 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 3,286 cuft Drainage area = 4.980 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.15 Intensity = 2.222 in/hr Tc by TR55 = 33.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 0.00 -Y i 0.0 0.2 — Hyd No. 1 Pre Developed Site Hyd. No. 1 — 1 Year 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 Q (cfs) 2.00 1.00 ---J- 0.00 1.2 Time (hrs) TR55 Tc Worksheet 4 Hyd. No. 1 Pre Developed Site Description Sheet Flow Manning's n-value Flow length (ft) Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) Land slope (%) Travel Time (min) Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) Watercourse slope (%) Surface description Average velocity (ft/s) Travel Time (min) Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) Wetted perimeter (ft) Channel slope (%) Manning's n-value Velocity (ft/s) A = 0.400 = 250.0 = 3.70 = 3.50 33.23 = 0.00 = 0.00 = Unpaved =0.00 = 0.00 = 0.00 = 0.00 = 0.00 = 0.015 =0.00 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 B 0.011 0.0 0.00 0.00 + 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paved 0.00 + 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.015 C 0.011 0.0 0.00 0.00 + 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paved 0.00 + 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.015 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 TotalTravel Time, Tc.............................................................................. Totals = 33.23 M..gin �a�M 0.00 33.00 min 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 112 / 2022 Hyd. No. 2 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 3.939 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 0.40 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 5,672 cuft Drainage area = 3.740 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.39* Intensity = 2.700 in/hr Tc by User = 24.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Composite (Area/C) = [(1.270 x 0.95) + (2.470 x 0.10)] / 3.740 Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 a� Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin Hyd. No. 2 — 1 Year r �I 1 Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Time (hrs) ��- Hyd No. 2 6 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 Hyd. No. 3 Post Site to Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.000 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 3.50 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 0 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post Developed Site to I nfil Mbasi Elevation = 209.18 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage = 5,054 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 Post Site to Basin Hyd. No. 3 -- 1 Year Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 Time (hrs) Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 2 Total storage used = 5,054 cuft Pond Report ' Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 112 / 2022 Pond No. 1 - Infiltration Basin Pond Data Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 208.25 ft Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgft) Incr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cuft) 0.00 208.25 5,000 0 0 1.00 209.25 5,928 5,457 5,457 2.00 210.25 6,913 6,414 11,870 3.00 211.25 7,955 7,427 19,298 4.00 212.25 9,052 8,497 27,794 Culvert / Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PrFRsr] [A] [B] [C] [D] Rise (in) = 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) = 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El. (ft) = 209.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Invert El. (ft) = 208.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = 1 - - - Length (ft) = 33.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multistage = Yes No No No Slope (%) = 1.85 0.00 0.00 n/a N-Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(in/hr) = 3.400 (by Contour) Multistage = n/a No No No TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 Stage (ft) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 000 Note: Culvert/Orifice outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) and outlet (oc) control. Weir risers checked for orifice conditions (ic) and submergence (s). Stage / Discharge Elev (ft) 212.25 211.25 210.25 209.25 208.25 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Total Q Discharge (cfs) 8 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 Hyd. No. 4 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.413 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 0.55 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 818 cuft Drainage area = 1.240 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.15 Intensity = 2.222 in/hr Tc by TR55 = 33.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 -- 1 Year 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.0 0.2 0.3 - Hyd No. 4 0.5 0.7 0.8 Q (cfs) 0.50 0.45 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 1.0 1.2 Time (hrs) 9 TR55 Tc Worksheet Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D@ by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 4 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin Description A B C Totals Sheet Flow Manning's n-value = 0.410 0.011 0.011 Flow length (ft) = 110.0 0.0 0.0 Two-year 24-hr precip. (in) = 3.67 0.00 0.00 Land slope (%) = 1.00 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 29.12 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 29.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow Flow length (ft) = 300.00 0.00 0.00 Watercourse slope (%) = 0.75 0.00 0.00 Surface description = Unpaved Paved Paved Average velocity (ft/s) =1.40 0.00 0.00 Travel Time (min) = 3.58 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 3.58 Channel Flow X sectional flow area (sqft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter (ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope (%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 Manning's n-value = 0.015 0.015 0.015 Velocity (ft/s) =0.00 0.00 0.00 Flow length (ft) ({0})0.0 0.0 0.0 Travel Time (min) = 0.00 + 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 TotalTravel Time, Tc.............................................................................. 33.00 min 10 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 Rational 2.744 1 33 5,433 Pre Developed Site 2 Rational 6.396 1 24 9,210 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin 3 Reservoir 3.031 1 35 2,712 2 209.40 6,411 Post Site to Basin 4 Rational 0.683 1 33 1,353 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Ba EEB Holdings Hydrograph 10-1-2022.gpw Return Period: 10 Year Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 11 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3130 by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 Hyd. No. 1 Pre Developed Site Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 2.744 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 0.55 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 5,433 cuft Drainage area = 4.980 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.15 Intensity = 3.673 in/hr Tc by TR55 = 33.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 Pre Developed Site Hyd. No. 1 -- 10 Year Q (cfs) 3.00 2.00 1.00 W11001 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 Time (hrs) - Hyd No. 1 12 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 Hyd. No. 2 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 6.396 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 0.40 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 9,210 cuft Drainage area = 3.740 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.39* Intensity = 4.385 in/hr Tc by User = 24.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 " Composite (Area/C) = [(1.270 x 0.95) + (2.470 x 0.10)] / 3.740 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 -- 10 Year Q (cfs) 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0 00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Time (hrs) --fn Hyd No. 2 13 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3DO by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 Hyd. No. 3 Post Site to Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 3.031 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 0.58 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 2,712 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post Developed Site to InfilAEmiElevation = 209.40 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage = 6,411 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exflltration extracted from Outflow. Q (cfs) 7.00 M 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.2 Hyd No. 3 Post Site to Basin Hyd. No. 3 -- 10 Year 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 Hyd No. 2 ® Total storage used = 6,411 cuft Q (cfs) 7.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1.0 Time (hrs) 14 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 112 / 2022 Hyd. No. 4 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.683 cfs Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time to peak = 0.55 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 1,353 cuft Drainage area = 1.240 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.15 Intensity = 3.673 in/hr Tc by TR55 = 33.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 -- 10 Year 1.00 0.90 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0 00 - Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 Time (hrs) Hyd No. 4 15 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cuft) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 Rational 3.162 1 33 6,261 Pre Developed Site 2 Rational 7.313 1 24 10,531 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin 3 Reservoir 4.131 1 33 3,978 2 209.44 6,667 Post Site to Basin 4 Rational 0.787 1 33 1,559 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Ba EEB Holdings Hydrograph 10-1-2022.gpw Return Period: 25 Year Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 16 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 31D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 Hyd. No. 1 Pre Developed Site Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 3.162 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 0.55 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 6,261 cuft Drainage area = 4.980 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.15 Intensity = 4.233 in/hr Tc by TR55 = 33.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 Pre Developed Site Hyd. No. 1 -- 25 Year Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 u 11 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 Time (hrs) --�•— Hyd No. 1 17 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 112 / 2022 Hyd. No. 2 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 7.313 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 0.40 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 10,531 cuft Drainage area = 3.740 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.39* Intensity = 5.014 in/hr Tc by User = 24.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Composite (Area/C) = [(1.270 x 0.95) + (2.470 x 0.10)] / 3.740 Q (cfs) 8.00 4.00 2.00 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin Hyd. No. 2 -- 25 Year Q (cfs) 8.00 4.00 2.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Time (hrs) - Hyd No. 2 Hydrograph Report 18 Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 3 Post Site to Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post Developed Site to I nfilMiBsi Elevation Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Q (cfs) 8.00 MR 4.00 O �� 0.00 0.0 0.2 Hyd No. 3 Post Site to Basin Hyd. No. 3 -- 25 Year Wednesday, 10112 / 2022 = 4.131 cfs = 0.55 h rs = 3,978 cuft = 209.44 ft = 6,667 cuft 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 Hyd No. 2 Total storage used = 6,667 cuft Q (cfs) 8.00 . 11 4.00 2.00 0.00 1.0 Time (hrs) 19 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 Hyd. No. 4 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.787 cfs Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time to peak = 0.55 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 1,559 cuft Drainage area = 1.240 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.15 Intensity = 4.233 in/hr Tc by TR55 = 33.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 -- 25 Year 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 Hyd No. 4 Time (hrs) 20 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cfs) Time interval (min) Time to Peak (min) Hyd. volume (cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation (ft) Total strge used (cuft) Hydrograph Description 1 Rational 3.808 1 33 7,540 Pre Developed Site 2 Rational 8.700 1 24 12,528 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin 3 Reservoir 4.942 1 33 5,898 2 209.53 7,232 Post Site to Basin 4 Rational 0.948 1 33 1,877 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Ba EEB Holdings Hydrograph 10-1-2022.gpw Return Period: 100 Year Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 21 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil MID by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 ! 12 / 2022 Hyd. No. 1 Pre Developed Site Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 3.808 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 0.55 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 7,540 cuft Drainage area = 4.980 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.15 Intensity = 5.098 in/hr Tc by TR55 = 33.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 IF I' 0.0 0.2 0.3 - ---= Hyd No. 1 Pre Developed Site Hyd. No. 1 — 100 Year Q (cfs) 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 Time (hrs) 22 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Hyd. No. 2 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin Hydrograph type = Rational Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min Drainage area = 3.740 ac Intensity = 5.965 in/hr OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Composite (Area/C) = ((1.270 x 0.95) + (2.470 x 0.10)] / 3.740 Wednesday, 10 / 12 / 2022 Peak discharge = 8.700 cfs Time to peak = 0.40 hrs Hyd. volume = 12,528 cuft Runoff coeff. = 0.39* Tc by User = 24.00 min Asc/Rec limb fact = 1 /1 Post Developed Site to Infil. Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 — 100 Year Q (cfs) 10.00 10.00 8.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 1) 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Time (hrs) - Hyd No. 2 23 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 112 / 2022 Hyd. No. 3 Post Site to Basin Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 4.942 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 0.55 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 5,898 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post Developed Site to InfilMiDsifflevation = 209.53 ft Reservoir name = Infiltration Basin Max. Storage = 7,232 cuft Storage Indication method used. Exfiltration extracted from Outflow. Q (cfs) 10.00 . 11 4.00 2.00 Post Site to Basin Hyd. No. 3 — 100 Year Q (cfs) 10.00 . II 4.00 2.00 m 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 Time (hrs) Hyd No. 3 Hyd No. 2 Total storage used = 7,232 cuft 24 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. v2020 Wednesday, 10 112 / 2022 Hyd. No. 4 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin Hydrograph type = Rational Peak discharge = 0.948 cfs Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time to peak = 0.55 hrs Time interval = 1 min Hyd. volume = 1,877 cuft Drainage area = 1.240 ac Runoff coeff. = 0.15 Intensity = 5.098 in/hr Tc by TR55 = 33.00 min OF Curve = Fayetteville NC.IDF Asc/Rec limb fact = 1/1 Post Const Grass Areas not to Infil Basin Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4 - 100 Year 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0 00 Q (cfs) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 Time (hrs) Hyd No. 4 m IL 4-0 � � E � O ,w co 0 a a a § § / 4 \ § § § § § \ ©s co 2 m« Cl) o G - f 8 \ § § \ Cl) R LO co k - � § @ A $ § 2 N 7 \ ] § _ o 6 6 0 CO e e f f f� F Dm - o \ § \ LO - a ? ! 8 8 8 8 £ \ 6 6 6 a f o- f 2 f 2 )0 £ 6 % 6 j . . N N 2 f § § § f 2 3 0■ a _ S S S S §/ E 6 6 6 a 6 � _ £ ¥ ¥ « 4 « . 2 \ $ \ q ow w »qq CL » 0 2& Cl)G S f - F- 2 \ w w¥ a f 0 ® r-� R M k % Cl) § q & }_ k 2 [ S S R 7 / M § b / _ \ - {R / / o g » 2 9 m_ & - E 2 \ F ( [ ( ( ( 9CL R S / ; _ / Cl) \ ° q� ® \ § 5 CL 2 e= * o 0 / 0 G £ $ 3 \ \ c \ § j \ § § / e< & , k 2 i 2 ■CD L w E { R § § ' 7 g z z / / # - n j § ƒ } k o o c c § \ - ( @ d n « LO �y k N m lC d N N O N d' N (0 N N C O N 4 E Z E N N N O N R Y O N Z O OO E m O U � U ui LL O U O H N N O N N N N N d Z E 4— O a 3 co E L O 4.0 co O O O O O O O O O O O O N N CDO N N N N N N O O LO ;n0 g :u-1 0 Lo v ul o O ln0 4 : uj 0 to co ul ln0 0 0 cn £ :u-j to N O O N ul }n0 z :ui HUMN LO O J w W i ul i ,n I O J ( .u- _ ul 5� Ile14nIloilo to 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O O N N N N N N W III Rip Rap Apron for FES #1 into TSSB #1 3 0 ��l Outlet diameter (Lb) (W = Do + La pipe 1 T ilk water < 0.5Do DESIGN L = 12' DESIGN W = 16' DESIGN d50 = 8" (CLASS B) DESIGN THICKNEgoS 18' pp u pt 60 v50 fl �.�+ `i�l M ww�a�w�w�ww��ww��wwv.w��awww��www��ww�ww�www■��w � 00 200 500 100 Discharge (Olsec) Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 9321 Fayetteville, NC 28311 Phone/Fax (910) 822-4540 Email mike@southeasternsoil.com December 14, 2021 Mr. Ken Smith, Jr. PE Smith Site Solutions, PLLC Fayetteville, NC Re: Hydraulic conductivity (permeability) analysis & Seasonal High -Water Table determination (SHWT) for proposed stormwater retention/treatment area, EEB Holdings, LLC property, PIN 0425-36-6692, 3563 Camden Road, Fayetteville, North Carolina Dear Mr. Smith, An evaluation of soil properties and hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) has been conducted at your request on a portion of the aforementioned property. The purpose of the investigation was to determine seasonal soil water table depths (SHWT) based on soil profiles. In addition, Ksat was to be provided at varying depths for use with stormwater retention basin design. Saturated hydraulic conductivity of the unsaturated zone was measured in a similar method as described in the Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 53, no 5, Sept. - Oct. 1989, "A Constant Permeameter for Measuring Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of the Vadose Zone" and Comparison of the Glover Solution with the Simultaneous Equations Approach for Measuring Hydraulic Conductivity." This consists of advancing a small diameter bore hole to a predetermined depth (typically at least 2.0 feet above SHWT). At this depth, a constant head (pressure) was established and maintained. Flow measurements were made at timed intervals after flow stabilized. Soils at the proposed basin site are most similar to the Candor soil series (see attached boring logs). Three soil borings were advanced to 7.25 or more feet below the existing ground surface. Seasonal High -Water Table (SHWT) as determined by evidence of colors of chroma 2 or less (and/or concentrations of high redox mottles) was encountered at depths of 65 to 71 inches below the ground surface. No static water was observed in any boring on the day of testing. SOIUSITE EVALUATION • SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS • LAND USE/SUBDIVISION PLANNING • WETLANDS GROUNDWATER DRAINAGE/MOUNDING • SURFACE/SUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS, EVALUATION & DESIGN Six compact constant head permeameter (CCHP) tests were conducted at varying depths below the ground surface (at least 2.0 feet above SHWT; see attached). The measured Ksat rate ranged from 6.65 to 21.29 cm/hr. (equivalent to 2.62 to 8.38 inches/hour). The attached map shows approximate locations of the sample points as well as Ksat location. It should be noted that the reported SHWT does not necessarily reflect the elevation of static groundwater (due to variations in groundwater recharge rates, annual rainfall, drought conditions, etc.). Reported static water levels are simply a measurement on the day of analysis. The data presented in this report are limited by a number of considerations. The primary consideration is that soil formations can be highly variable. The soils found on this site can be subject to inclusions of other soil types, perched water, artesian conditions and/or layers of undulating low permeability clay seams. These and other soil conditions can have an effect on the steady state of groundwater flow. To the extent possible, we have identified the soil types that will impact the flow of groundwater and have provided a professional opinion as to the depth of SHWT. I trust this is the information you require at this time. Sincerely, Mike Eaker NC Licensed Soil Scientist #1030 SCII so �yr*� 7030 e^� �N)m Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 9321 Fayetteville, NC 28311 Phone/Fax (910) 822-4540 Email mike Csoutheasternsoil.com SHWT depths, 3563 Camden Road, EEB Holdings, LLC, Fayetteville, North Carolina BORING SHWT DEPTH (inches) Observed Water (inches) Bore Top Elev: B1 71 - elev 204.90 None 210.82 B2 68 - elev 205.46 None 211.13 B3 65 - elev 205.22 None 210.64 SOIUSITE EVALUATION • SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS • LAND USE/SUBDIVISION PLANNING • WETLANDS GROUNDWATER DRAINAGE/MOUNDING • SURFACE/SUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS. EVALUATION & DESIGN Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 9321 Fayetteville, NC 28311 Phone/Fax (910) 822-4540 Email mike@southeasternsoil.com Measured Ksat Rates, 3563 Camden Road, EEB Holdings, LLC, Fayetteville, North Carolina Ksat Ksat Location Depth in cm/hr in/hr 1 36 6.65 2.62 1 47 15.30 6.02 2 36 21.29 8.38 2 44 8.65 3.40 3 36 10.43 4.11 3 41 15.30 6.02 SOIL/SITE EVALUATION • SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS • LAND USEISUBDIVISION PLANNING • WETLANDS GROUNDWATER DRAINAGE/MOUNDING • SURFACE/SUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS, EVALUATION & DESIGN Southeastern Soil & Environmental Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 9321 Fayetteville, NC 28311 Phone/Fax (910) 822-4540 Email mike@southeasternsoil.com Typical Soil Profile Description, 3563 Camden Road, EEB Holdings, LLC property, Fayetteville, North Carolina This map unit consists of nearly level to gently sloping well drained soils that formed in sandy and loamy sediment on uplands. Slopes range from 0 to 1 percent. A - 0 to 5 inches; black (IOYR 2/1) loamy sand; weak fine granular structure; very friable; common fine roots; abrupt smooth boundary. E - 5 to 32 inches; light yellowish brown (2.5Y 6/3) loamy sand; weak fine granular structure; very friable; few fine roots; clear wavy boundary. Btl - 32 to 58 inches; yellowish brown (IOYR 5/8) light sandy clay loam to sandy loam; moderate medium to weak fine subangular blocky structure; friable to firm; gradual diffuse boundary. BC - 58 to 71 inches; olive yellow (2.5Y 6/6) sandy loam; weak fine subangular blocky structure; friable; gradual diffuse boundary. Cl - 71 to 82 inches; mottled olive yellow (2.5Y 6/6), light gray (2.5Y 7/1) and red (2.5YR 4/8) sandy loam; weak fine granular structure; friable; gradual diffuse boundary. C2 - 82 to 87 inches; mottled light yellowish brown (2.5Y 6/3) and light gray (2.5Y 7/1) sandy loam; weak fine granular structure; friable. SHWT @ 71 inches below ground surface in boring 1 (2.5Y 7/1) SHWT @ 68 inches below ground surface in boring 2 (1OYR 6/2) SHWT @ 65 inches below ground surface in boring 3 (1 OYR 7/1) SOIL/SITE EVALUATION • SOIL PHYSICAL ANALYSIS • LAND USE/SUBDIVISION PLANNING • WETLANDS GROUNDWATER DRAINAGE/MOUNDING • SURFACE/SUBSURFACE WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS, EVALUATION & DESIGN T�n'saamnw°fl:Fe .3° ••� _ Y110.1'i11MUl�S1NV1lI15Np73LSHLWS @ p Z65-I6E-°i6 9SE827N'N3amn 3AN1(13iLLnn8 RE Md 31l$All rw1l3Md /2JY'l15Y173tJd 8•dy i 19111I.M. -1 SN]833Nl9N3 Q 1N3Wdol3A30 ONtll "]ll bbR ON n HIM - d -dYWHl3]N § W` 55� mndausdoxsa]Nmr3u�lvwanuowolnv-)nd'SINVIInSMO:):l H11S - 3 lu zo Q i //CM-H 40 IlL z ww "s Ewa HE s 3 � e 7/` �N / If� .� cl _ o 0 99 ado/ 1 Z 7o N � SI,�1 I .� �• �.-, 0 =w w =M i« ow�QN° 1 a awa a r uj ed vlw wago 21 Lu \ Q X O - n�¢oxa zzz /�I 6n Z > wwaao ��o S- s II o 0 0 03�? 1 ,= w� ail r i. W <� o J o-ov p o! o f j ✓ 3 he6vrt•°Iti o z 6B8-.Bd >66 a Ga ���� Sli1'1 3dOH O1 'E� 35o N 21" N 350 0' 1r N Soil Map —Cumberland County, North Carolina (Automotive Maintenance Shop - EEB Holdings, LLC.) 3 s b En, Map Scale: 1:1,570 if printed on A portrait (83' x 11') sheet N � Mks � NN 0 20 40 80 120 A 0 50 100 20D 300 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84 350 0' 21" N 35- a 11" N USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/12/2022 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Z 'W V W J a I N 7 O O 0 0 O V L H _ a O O � �' w° U O 0 a C (Tj N N U m O O E DI C (oj m m N E m 0 C V) cm U O Y O c> m 'n 3 m = O C ELn a) > 0 ID c > a,a 'm O L c a o °D c a n 5 co9 m U E nomm m w m E c w O a cm:c.ci y o c m EE a)a1 CD -0 m ` m j a N m wa)0m u1E�oo) O L U) m _- M N co? 7 U a U U O y a) m cc U IO co 2c E a) U a� a ca a 7 Cl a r U O a,-o m N c Y () '0 m E O O «') U L N O' -d m U U (n ,a CD a) m 00 M C O_ a) O N U L O ) .-: C N m U U O L Z -0 N Z O N ZN in 3 L E h a ro2)a>) O. m c O vU-m m c Q 0 «M O L 3` m a) E W U co d o �mnLm U c0 CD �Q m m cmwm O >. V Co O m d m � o O w 3 O N U(A o ma nE aj C O N N O U C E a) � Nc'l (n L L E N O m ��. m� O� c Q oi� m ro m U m o o. a a 2 .Un y Em a) � Q m � w .0.. J 0Z U C� tU) O' C'n ;6u, — U d 3 N � �3 L N m m fY ZZ)E L N Q U C a)o(dm° U in acid 6 m m . N m 0 .a] O N O ... = -0 'E y >. 2 a) In � L a) a) f6 U_ 0) m y a m� U0 m (D E O D) T O O a m a O G U N (� .L-. ' m R V C a m C V O Q T m w --. m 'E O a a m L C w E m T E N O E C m U o E2 O� U� Z Q 7 0 CL m m o� 0 L O N O C U 0 a) a) U U m aL m 0 E c ur 0- O U Cl t3iJ m m a V c. o m C n°;:° m e a) (nL Co U _ Z —o �`° {,l a) E mq5 a) U _ [L E O >U O Cn > U m O V) L U _ n a Q m L i- O U U u? C!) `° O N E I U .- y v, � N N 3 m ca L n ) li U 6 U T O C C 2 N 'aaco -aO a) n p p J y « « O O L C U U m N N O O p O_ O U (A N L p_ O U a) U) U C m O [Y c CO m J a) .O Q ja C _ O } Oco Q E � C U m j F S m c o O O CD m 0 (n N O O CL w 0 CL y N n E m -p to _ n o n m 3 0o m (7 :3 d m 7ja n uy ) w om o n n n d o. O EL ' O m O U > 0a)a `om Q O O>. a > ) >a m a) 0) U C N U CLL — -p C > Ld Y U O m w N .0 'Q U U .0 (n C O a m m CO U O U N o N C7 J m J C m m CL O w m U m U a) 0) C U O U O U m LL 0 x ,,j_.Arx lk N 13 O. Q W N M N — O O N N N U mIL •o ZU 3 U U — m 'o U a -0 o 9U m O m Z g Soil Map —Cumberland County, North Carolina Automotive Maintenance Shop - EEB Holdings, LLC. Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI LbB Lakeland -Urban land complex, 1 to 8 percent slopes 5.1 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 5.1 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/12/2022 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 12/16/21, 9:17 PM North Carolina Secretary of State Search Results File an Annual Report/Amend an Annual Report • Upload a PDF Filing • Order a Document Online - Add Entity to My Email Notification List • View Filings • Print a Pre -Populated Annual Report form • Print an Amended a Annual Report form Limited Liability Company Legal Name EEB Holdings, LLC Information Sosld: 1879458 Status: Current -Active O Date Formed: 8/13/2019 Citizenship: Domestic Annual Report Due Date: April 15th CurrentAnnual Report Status: Registered Agent: Borger, Benjamin Addresses Mailing 7357 Mariners Landing Drive Fayetteville, NC 28306 Reg Mailing 7357 Mariners Landing Drive Fayetteville, NC 28306 Company Officials Principal Office 7357 Mariners Landing Drive Fayetteville, NC 28306 Reg Office 7357 Mariners Landing Drive Fayetteville, NC 28306 All LLCs are managed by their managers pursuant to N.C.G.S. 57D-3-20. Manager Member Benjamin Borger 7357 Mariners Landing Drive Fayetteville NC 28306 Benjamin Borger 7357 Mariners Landing Drive Fayetteville NC 28306 https:/Iwww.sosnc.gov/online_services/search/Business_Registration_Resu Its 1 /1 BK 1 1 t 5 3 POO 126 FILED CUMBERLAND COUNTY NC J. LEE WARREN, JR. FILED Jun 14, 2021 AT 11:01:14 am BOOK 11153 START PAGE 0126 END PAGE 0129 INSTRUMENT # 27434 RECORDING $26.00 EXCISE TAX $700.00 KC NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED PREPARED WITHOUT TITLE EXAMINATION Excise Tax: $'7 PD. 00 Parcel Identifier No. 0425-36-6692 Verified by County on the day of 20_ By: to: Attoney Rebecca F. Person This instrument was prepared by: The Real Estate Law Firm 2919 Breezewood Avenue, Suite 300, Fayetteville, NC 28303 Brief description for the Index: "See Exhibit A" THIS DEED made this 2nd day of June, 2021, by and between GRANTOR GRANTEE Mary W. Sutton, widow 1859 Kings Landing Rd Hampstead NC 28463 EEB Holdings, LLC a North Carolina limited liability company 7357 Mariners Landing Drive Fayetteville NC 28306 Enter in appropriate block for each Grantor and Grantee: name, mailing address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g. corporation or partnership The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot, parcel of land or condominium unit situated in the City of Fayetteville, Pearces Mill Township, Cumberland County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows: " See Exhibt A" Parcel ID: 0425-36-6692 Property Address: 3563 Camden Road, Fayetteville, NC 28306 The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 2171 page 175. All or a portion of the property herein conveyed _ includes or X does not include the primary residence of a Grantor.A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book page NC Bar Association Form No. 3 ® 1976, Revised ® 11112010, 2013 Ibis standard form has been approved by: Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association North Carolina Bar Association - NC Bar Form No. 3 OKI1153 PG0121 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple. And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, other than the following exceptions: `X See Exhibit B IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has drily executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written. M�j d - 0� g� � 1 w �lrl��%L�] `�GCc3', PrinVfype�Name:ary W. Sutton A/K/A ary Welsh Su on by All J Sharon Marie Sutton STATE OF r I COUNTY OF I, A oaa Notary Public for said County and State, do hereby certify that Sharon Marie Sutton individually and A attorney in fact for Mary W. Sutton A/K/A Mary Welsh Sutton , personally appeared before me this day and being by me duly swam, says that he executed the foregoing and annexed instrument for and in behalf of the said Mary W. Sutton A/K/A Mary Welsh Sutton , and that their authority to execute and acknowledge said instrument is contained in an instrument duly executed, acknowledged, and recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds in the county of Cumberland, State of North Carolina and that this instrument was executed under and by virtue of the authority given by said instrument granting her power of attorney. I do further certify that the said Sharon Marie Sutton acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing and annexed instrument for the purposes therein expressed for and in behalf of the said Mary W. Sutton A/K/A Mary Welsh Sutton . Witness my hand and official seal, this the June 9, 2021. ffo up (/ b HEIEW►ALYCEc - No TERRIO thCar NO ubliC - t" Notary Public -North Carolina New Hanover County My Commission Expires: III G Uµy Commission Expires Mar 9, 2026 (N.R SEAL) The foregoing Certificates) of is/are certified to be correct. This instrument and this certificate arc duly registered at the date and time and in the Book and Page shown on the first page hereof. NC Bar Association Form No. 3 ® 1976, Revised ® 111 /2010, 2013 This standard form has been approved by: Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association North Carolina Bar Association - NC Bar Form No. 3 8K 1 1 1 5 3 P001 Z 8 EXHIBIT A BEGINNING at an iron stake in the eastern margin of the Camden Road, said road sometimes being known as the Old Wire Road, said stake being approximately 1.7 miles South of the intersection of the eastern margin of the said Camden Road with the southern margin of the Cumberland Mills Road; and running thence South 42 degrees 20 minutes East with the Glenn Kline line 638.2 feet to an old iron stake and pine pointers; thence South 4.44 minutes West and with the line of the land owned by the Durham Joint Stock Land Bank 386.9 feet to an old iron stake and pine pointers; thence with the Fisher and Breece lines North 42 degrees 01 minutes West 902.2 feet to an iron stake in the eastern margin of the aforesaid Camden Road; thence with the eastern margin of said road North 48 degrees 35 minutes East 282 feet to the point of BEGINNING. Containing 4.85 acres, the aforesaid description being in accordance with a survey made by Paul G. Nystrom, Registered Surveyor, dated October 29,1947. And being the same property described in deed recorded in Book 2171, Page 175 and Book 510, Page 155, of the Cumberland County Registry. OKI f 153 P00129 EXHIBIT "B" 1. Taxes for the year 2021, and subsequent years, not yet due and payable. 2. Right of way to City of Fayetteville recorded in Book 566 at Page 33. 3. Easement(s) to AT&T recorded in Book 4597 at Page 277. 4. Judgment of condemnation by North Carolina Department of Transportation in Book 8994 at Page 889. 5. Any inaccuracy in the area, square footage, or acreage of Land described in Schedule A or attached plat, if any. The Company does not insure the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land. 6. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment" includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. Paragraph 2 (c) of the Covered Risks is hereby deleted. Parcel ID: 0425-36-6692 Property Address: 3563 Camden Road, Fayetteville, NC 28306 Legal Description JJ-36906-21-SF135 ROY COOPER Governor ELIZABETH S. BISER Secretary BRIAN WRENN Director EEB Holdings, LLC Ben Borger, Member/Manager 7357 Mariners Landing Drive Fayetteville, NC 28306 NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quafity February 16, 2022 LETTER OF APPROVAL RE: Project Name: Automotive Maintenance Shop - EEB Holdings, LLC Acres Approved: 4.98 Project ID: CUMBE-2022-089 County: Cumberland, City: Pearces Mill Address: Camden Road River Basin: Cape Fear Stream Classification: Other Submitted by: Kenneth Smith Date Received by LQS: January 18, 2022 Plan Type: Commercial Dear Mr. Borger: This office has reviewed the subject erosion and sedimentation control plan. We find the plan to be acceptable and hereby -issue this Letter of Approval. The enclosed Certificate of Approval must be posted at the job site. This plan shall expire three (3) years following the date of approval, if no land disturbing activity has been undertaken, as is required by Title 15A NCAC 4B .0129. As of April 1, 2019, all new construction activities are required to complete and submit an electronic Notice of Intent (NOI) form requesting a Certificate of Coverage (COC) under the NCGO10000 Construction Stormwater General Permit. This form MUST be submitted and COC issued prior to the commencement of any land disturbing activity on the above -named project. The NOI form may be accessed at dea.nc.gov/NCG01. Please direct questions about the NOI form to Annette Lucas at Annette.lucaska cdenr.Rov or Paul Clark at Paul.clark(cf�,ncdenr. ov. After you submit a complete and correct NOI Form, a COC will be emailed to you within three business days. Initially, DEMLR will not charge a fee for coverage under the NCGO1 permit. However, on or after June 1, 2019, a $100 fee will be charged annually. This fee is to be sent to the DEMLR Stormwater Central Office staff in Raleigh. No{ -th Carolina Department of Environmental Q,ual ty ; Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Fayetteville Regional Office 1 225 Green Street. Suite 7141 Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 910433-4300 Title 15A NCAC 4B .0118(a) and the NCGO1 permit require that the following documentation be kept on file at the job site: 1. The approved E&SC plan as well as any approved deviation. 2. The NCGO1 permit and the COC, once it is received. 3. Records of inspections made during the previous 30 days. Also, this letter gives the notice required by G.S. 113A-61.1(a) of our right of periodic inspection to insure compliance with the approved plan. North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Act is performance -oriented, requiring protection of existing natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following the commencement of this project, the erosion and sedimentation control plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 (North Carolina General Statute 113A-51 through 66), this office may require revisions to the plan and implementation of the revisions to insure - compliance with the Vcf.--_ Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with Federal and State water quality laws, regulations, and rules. In addition, local city or county ordinances or rules may also apply to this land -disturbing activity. This approval does not supersede any other permit or approval. Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the Financial Responsibility Form, which you provided. You are requested to file an amended form if there is any change in the information included on the form. This permit allows for a land -disturbance, as called for on the application plan, not to exceed the approved acres. Exceeding the acreage will be a violation of this permit and would require a revised plan and additional application fee. Any addition in impervious surface, over that already noted on the approved plan, would also require a revised plan to verify the appropriateness of the erosion control measures and the stormwater retention measures. (GS 113A-54.1(b)). In addition, it would be helpful if you notify this office of the proposed starting date for this project. Please notify us if you plan to have a preconstruction conference. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, Chris Baker Assistant Regional Engineer DEMLR - Fayetteville Regional Office Enclosures: Certificate of Approval cc: Kenneth Smith, P. E., Smith Site Consultants, PLLC — electronic copy Michael Naylor, Cumberland County Inspections Office — electronic copy Fayetteville Regional Office n o a '� �• E oN N O r4, C►•� N J �+ CD f.r. ow. V01 1C-C� O w w01IrD CD CD CD l J c o"•01 y IrD O O ow r4- CD M H �. rDD O y e dO.W. ow q. ►r CD ow � N p ris F..3 CD � M m � � R>T �y O CD CD i�CD n i CA *0 �+� c o o y d j?oarVa ar�q '=:s y Ul tz plot � rq. lot Ow A� r••r- p' � � �p a o I=w CD elf- rA r•+ CD �, a � 0