WQ0004298_Residuals Annual Report 2015_20160222

Town of Mars Hill NCB 4 3 //
2015 Land Application Report R p
WQ0004298
Attached are the required forms for the Town of Mars Hills 2015 land application
program.
The town has land applied 13.3021 dry tons of sludge over 14.5 acres in the calendar year
2015. We have also maintained compliance with all terms and conditions. At the current
time we are in the process of renewing the land application permit and have all the
paperwork ready to be sent in for approval.
Contact Information:
Preparer/ORC
Robert Sams
Public Works Director
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]
Permittee
Darhyl Boone
Town Manager
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]
RFCF;IVEr)-
FEB 12 2016
DWR SECTION
INFORMATIO14 PROMSINO UNIT

P ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
WQ Permit#: WQ00004298 County: Madison Year: 2015
Facility Name (as shown on permit): Town of Mars Hill
Land Application Operator:
Robert M Sams
Phone: [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
D Yes ®, No - If,No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Application Summary:
Total number of application fields in the permit:
2
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year:
1
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
13.3021
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
14.5
Part B - AnnuabCom iai a Statement:
Facility was compli-mit i uring calendar year 2015 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Resources. ® Yes ® No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .1105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1111 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503
regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C - Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature 156Permittee Date
Darhyl Boone- Town Manager
Signature of Preparer* / Date Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
WQ Permit Number: WQ0004298 Laboratory:
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill
Residual Source WQ # or
NPDES #:
NCO057151
WWTP Name: Town of Mars Hill WWTP
Residual Analysis Data
1) Earth Environmental
2) Environmental Testing Solutions
3) A&L Eastern Laboratories
4)
5)
Parameter
(mg/kg)
Ceiling
Conc.
Limit
Sample or Composite Date
7/21/15
Percent Solids (%)
NA
13.5
'
Arsenic
75
17:9"-
Cadmium
85
7.17
Copper
4,300
245
Chromium
NA
28.6
Lead
840
23.8 v
Mercury
57
0.99
Molybdenum
75
17.9
Nickel
420
16.8
Selenium
100
17.9
Zinc
7,500
569
Total Phosphorus
NA
16500
TKN
NA
61800
Ammonia -Nitrogen
NA
15000
Nitrate and Nitrite
I NA 1
453.2
For surface disposal facilities the ceiling concentration limits listed in this form are not applicable. Reference the individual permit for metals limits.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system, designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant
penalties f9mbmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Preparer * Date
1W
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
nFNR FORM RSRF (iwgnorn

Feb 11 1,6 08:44a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.1
hriil Rvimllo tal Services
Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
weaverville Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
Name and Address of Facility: Date: 2/11/2016
Town of Mars Hill WWTP Sample Collector: RS
P.O. Box 368 Date and Time Sample Received: 7/22/2015 11:30 AM
Mars Hill, NC 28754 Date and Time Sample Collected: 7/21/2015 10:30 AM/2:00 PM/2:30 PM
Att: Robert Sams Date and Time Sample Analyzed: < MHT
Land Application Analyses - Note: All results In mglKg Dry Basis unless otherwise noted.
Test
Belt Press Sludge
Soil Site #1
Sol Site #2
Report Limit
CLk
lnd,tX 1
C
�n�i Vpf
!
it
C- coo
5 1�.Lt�/j®®Gy4 CCo N
CD
~
t" '
r+
--- - -.--- - -- -
ACIDITY
0.0 megl100g
0.0 m_eg1100g
TOTAL SUSPENDED RESIDUE
1.0
/
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY V
10.6 1100g
7.4 megq/1009
pH ✓ f
77
� g
6
0.14
AMMONIA NITROGEN y✓
15000
0.5
NO2+ NO3-n
453.2
1.0
//
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN 1/
61800
TOTALPHOSPHOROUS y
16500
382
688
PERCENT TOTAL RESIDUE Y,
13.5%
81.3%
82.3%°
% ORGANIC MATTER
3.8%
3.6%
BASE SATURATION - K ✓
6.7%
4.0% .
- H V
0.0%
0.0%
-Mg
25.2%
37.0%
-Ca ✓
67.9%
59.5%
.I- ✓
n 7CV.
n 70u
PLANTAVAILABLE (surface) 1
26673.2
PPMldw
NITROGEN- PPM DRY 1NT (subsurf)
34173.2
PPMldw
SAR
1.406343
ESP
17.8812%
14.06 67%
MANGANESE
294
SCA
mg/L
MAGNESIUM 1/
2100
1960
SCA
mg/L
SODIUM 1/
505
�2600
( 29.2
22.3
SCA
mg/L
CADMIUM V
< 7.17
1 < 1.22
12.43
SCA
mg1L
CHROMIUM
28.6
22.3 _
_ 62.7
SCA
m IL
COPPER
245
r14.4
63.0 .
SCA
mg/L
E
LEAD ti
23.8
9.61
15.5
SCA
mg/L
-1
NICKEL
C
YBDENUM
N.C. Laboratory ID#352
Lab Supervisor. Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville
i
16.8
7.66
19.0
,: e e� A
569
41.7
61.8
-i
6250
�3910
881
-�567
/C'-J- ` 1-CSu�lk S
3160
many1,13G. S�,ov(C,
6490
NIA
NIA
<17.9
<3.06
<6.06
Gil knc�­A
'
m
< 17.9
< 3.06
< 6.Ofi
rurv1°
r
..'tc
E
<17.9
<3.06
<6.06
SCA
,�
n
N
0.99
< 0.12
< 0.12
SCA
mg/L
C7 y
• •n
Analyzed By:
_-_/�1.�
Certified By:
-G3p!�( L•�

SAR & ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site #17/21115
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100
M
ESP = 117..8812 0 7) —
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq-
The percentage of sodium ions occul
ZNIa (ME)
1.269.15652173
I r
ie-cation exchange complex of soils
Should be less than 15% (15-20%)
>
E
0
yd N
114

SAR & ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site #2 7/21/15
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100
ESP14A5167 % 1
Na on NC soil test is expressed as.meq.
The percentage of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of soils
Na (ME _ CEC
0.96956521739
S
I Should be less than 15% (15-20%)
I�j
C , C&i L
b a,� W E
z
N
^,� 47
W M
Csu" 'Crp&I\
00
N
CP
w
Cn
w

S013
Mars Hill Land Application Belt Press Sludge 7121/15
PAN
Mineralization
as decimal
Total dr—v
tons&tar
Acres
Anp!Led on
Rate
0.4
TKII
6181
NO3--F—NO2
60.2
3-93
% Solids
0.135
PAN Surface q5A%6q
2. 73.2 1 mg/16 53-3464 lbstdry ton__
011bs 411,01:81 P N
#D111101 Jlbz PAN/acre
PAN Injection
668.3464 Ibsfdry ton
OI Ibs total PAN
�O—DIIVIOII lbs -PANIacra
Dry Tons/1000 gal.
1 0.56296
MR(TKN-NH3)+ +.5(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x.002 =Ibstdry ton
MR(TKN-NH3) + 1(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x.002 =lbs/dry ton
1000 X 8.34 X %solids X sp. gravity "=dry tons/1000gal."
2000
1st year PAN
Ibs./acre
Surface Ibs.
1 01
Surface
#DIV/O!
O.V
1st year PAN
Ibs./acre
R 4 -
A6
-injected Ibs.
01
Injected
9DIV
CIO! /-< C Q-
00
00
w
CP
CO

SAR. & ESP Mars Hill Land Application Belt Press Sludge 7/21115 tom;
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Na(Mq/L . Ca(M /L) M M 1L)
Ca: Calcium (Mg1L) Equivalent weight: 20
505 6250 1 2100
+
Mg: Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
N�y1�
Ca ME
Mca ME
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
SAR = 1:4Oo34i3 (Prom Fi,9tg/L entered above)
SAR= 1.4063 43, (from ME entered below)'
Na (ME)
21.95652
Ca ME
1
Mo (ME)
312.5
1 175
V
The amount of exchangeable sodium ions
amount of exchangeable calcium & magne
material.
Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 re
m
0
.A
v
m
D
m
z
O
z
m
z
D
r—
tn
m
w
N
Do
OD
W
CJ1
60
W
W

�1) ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name:
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
Town of Mars Hill Land Application Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
Robert M Sams Owner: Larry Cody Predominant Soil Series:
14.5 Acres Permitted: 14.5 Site #: 1
13.31
7.7
Field #: 1
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
Sample or
Com-
posite
Date
1
7/21/15
2
7/21/15
3
7/21/15
4
7/21/15
5
7/21/15
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
% Solids
13.5
13.5
13.5
1 13.5
13.5
Arsenic
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
Cadmium
7.17
7.17
7.17
7.17
7.17
Copper
245
245
245
245
245
Chromium
28.6
28.6
28.6
28.6
28.6
Lead
23.8
23.8
23.8
23.8
23.8
Mercury
0.99
0.99
0.99
0.99
0.99
Molyb-
denum
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
Nickel
16.8
16.8
16.8
16.8 1
16.8
Selenium
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
Zinc
569
569
569
569
569
talos-
LLhorus
16500
16500
16500
16500
16500
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
Total
LIJ2
3
4
5
6
71
819
10
11
12
DT/Ac./
o
App.
Event
0.14
0.21
0.07
0.35
0.14
Arsenic 1
0.005 V
0.008"
0.003"O'l
0.013 V
0.005'
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.033
Cadmium
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.005
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.013
Copper
0.069
0.104
0.035
0.173
0.069
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.450
Chromium
0.008
0.012
0.004
0.020
0.068
0.000
0.000
6.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.053
Lead
0.007t
0.01V
0.003°'
0.017v
0.607w
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.044
Mercury
0.000
0.000
0.000.
0.061
0.000.
0.000
0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.602
Molyb-
0.005.
0.008.-
0.003-
0.013
0.005
0.000--
0,000.
0.000.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.033
denum
Nickel
0.005
0.007
0.002
0.012
0.005
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.000
0.000 1
0.000
0.000 1
0.031
Selenium
0.005 '
0.008
0.003
0.013
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.600
0.006
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.033
Zinc
m6oNT
0.241d
0.081d
0.402 '
0.160
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.0.00
0.000
0.000
1.045
Total
Phos-
4,653 .
6.996..
2 343 :
11.649.
4.653 ,
0.00.0 .
0.000
0.000. ,
0.00.0 .
0.000
0.000
0.000,
30.294
horns
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imp ' me for knowing ' lations".
Signature of Land Applier Dat6 DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)
t/

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill WQ Permit #: WQ0004298 Field #: 1 Acres Utilized: 14.5
Land Owner: Larry Cody Annual Dry Tons Applied: 13.3021 Site #: 1 Acres Permitted: 14.5
Operator: Robert M Sams Predominant Soil Series: Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503)�
Crop 1 Name: Winter Wheat Crop 1 Max. PAN: Crop 2 Name: Crop 2 Max. PAN.
i
9/15
Volume applied
PP
(enter one) Solids/
Liquid
Cu. Yds Gallons
18
%
Solids
13.5
Volume
Applied per
P
Acre
(Dry Tons/Ac)
0.141
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste' etc )
Belt Press Sludge
Soil
Cond.
(Dry'
Wet,
Moist)
Dry
Precip.
Past 24
firs.
Inches
0
y
��., ...
�;
o
s
c
� �
*
0
e
0.5
'
� �
0
p
30%
TKN
mg/kg
61800
Z
c
� o
9.
mg/kg
15000
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
453.2
PAN Applied
(lbs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
P YP
ReceivingResidual
Application
PP
Crop 1
6.208
Crop 2
NA
Crop 1 Crop 2
inter Wheat
/9/15
21
13.5
0.212 '
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
61800
15000
453.2
9.312
NA
inter Wheat
16115
9
13.5
0.071
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
61800
15000
453.2
3.104
NA
inter Wheat
20/15
45
13.5
0.353
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
-s
0.5
30%
61800
15000
453.2
15:520
NA
inter Wheat
21/15
18,
13.5
0.141
Belt Press Sludge
Dry
0
s
0.5
30%
61800
15000
453.2
6.208
NA
inter Wheat
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals
on FORM FSF supp ( attach
FORM
FSF supp to this form):
�*
PALS: 1171 01M
nual lbs/acre
As
0.033 V
Cd
0.013
I Cu
0.450
Cr
0:053
Pb
0.044t-'
HR
0.002
Mo
0.033
Ni
0.031
Se
0.033
Zn
1.0451r'
7.8624
8.907
2498
P 40..3531 0.000
7 30.294
Lime App lied
Date lbs/ac
or Years Cumulative lbs,
0.961154
0.63325
52.4997
2.07257
5.49399
0.13549
2.84821
2.64244
1.62478
rrent Cumulative lbs/ac
.mitted C. P. L. R.****
0.994 ✓
36
0.646
34
52.950
1338
2.125
NL
5.538
267
0.137
15
2.881
NL 1
2.673
374
1.658
89
mit PAN Limit 1 st/2nd Crop-
WINE,%a
certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
alified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
brmation, i uding the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
s -----------�'�A
•� a �� G i � ..•-
ts��► I
/ *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
b **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Date Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge , 0.4
R' ****C.P.L.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
nGnIQ �nRnn FeG ���i�nnai
c

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM (02T Rules)
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill
WWTP Name: Town of Mars Hill WWTP
Monitoring Period: From 8/11/2015 To
WQ Permit Number: WQ0004298
NPDES Number: NCO057151
8/20/2015
Pathogen Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1106) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A
Alt. A (time/temp) 0 Alt B (Alk Treatment) Alt. C (Prior Testing)
Alt.D (No Prior Test) ® Process to Further Reduce Pathogengs El
� 4
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost 0
Heat Drying 0
Heat Treatment ®
1 Thermophilic 0
Beta Ray ®
Gamma Ray ®
Pasteurization ®
Class B:
Alt. (1) Fecal Density ®
Alt. (2) Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens
If applicable to alternative
performed (Class
B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization 0
Air Drying ® Composting ® Aerobic Digestion 21,
Anaerobic Digestion I�
,�i'�°'�r i tYb, "`�4 x}�i �. } 1 t..'�p�i.ya',^
�������� , �T��� �a��h`� s.,���
If applicable to alternative pe med (Class A or Class B) complete the following
monitoring
data:
Parameter
Allowable Level
Sludge
g
Pathogen Density
um er o
Excee-
Frequency
of Analysis
y
Sample
Type
Analytical
Tech-
i oue
inim
Geo. Mean
axim
Units
Fecal Coliform
2 x 10 to the
6th power
per gram of
total solids
WN
400
2100
3700
col/gram
0
1/year
grab
9222d
CFU
4
1000 mpn per gram
of total solid (dry
weight)
Salmonella bacteria
(in lieu of fecal
coliform)
3 WN per 4 grams
total solid (dry
weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (15A NCAC 02T .1107) - Please indicate alternative performed:
Alt.1 (VS reduction)
Alt. 2 (40-day bench) 0
Alt. 3 (30-day bench)
Alt . 4 (Spec. OZ uptake) 0
Alt. 5 (14-Day Aerobic) ®
Alt. 6 (Alk. Stabilization ®
Alt 7 (Drying - Stable) 0
Alt. 8 (Drying - Unstable) '0
Alt. 9 (Injection) 0
Alt. 10 (Incorporation) 0
No vector attraction reduction alternatives were performed 0
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate states
R1 "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requiremej
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T .1`
® "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requireme�
vector attraction reduction requirement in 15A NCAC 02T X. N'T j4Zj ob`C
if you check this statement attach an explanation why you hai t 9, i"Id - e7
i>1 sir°�
requirements.)
!1
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision--in-accoraance with the system
designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine
that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Robert M Sams- Public Works Director
Prepare a andAT'd(type print)
allo`
Signature of Prep er* ate
Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
Signature of Land Applier (if applicable) Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM PVRF 02T (12/2006)

,Feb 16,g6 08:50a
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI
828-835-8631 p.1
NC ID #352
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Residence — (828) 837-954;
Robbinsville Lab — [phone]
Weaverville Lab — [phone]
Fax — [phone]
E-Mail — [e-mail]
February 15, 2016
Mr. Robert Sams
Town of Mars Hill
P.O. Box 368
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Dear Mr. Sams:
Following is a report of laboratory analyses for digester sludge samples received 8111, 8/12, 8/13, 8114,
8/18, 8/19, 8/20/l5.
Colony Counts
n,M-1 nnlnmi nnm mt
1
8/11/15
3;700 ColonieslGram
0.97
--
4
0
0
2
8112115
17,000 Colonies/Gram
1.00
19
0
0
3
B/13/15
2,800 Colonies/Gram
0.96
3
0
0
4
8114115
1,800 ColonieslGram
1.03
2
0
0
5
6/18115
900 Colonies/Gram
1.06
1
0
0
6
8119/15
1,700 Colonies/Gram
1.05
2
0
0
7
8120/15
400 ColonieslGram
0.98
4
0
0
Geometric mean for all seven samples: 2,100 colonies/gram. Thank you for your
business. If you have any question or need additional sample analyses performed, please
call.
Respectfully sub 'tted, jq
V '
Michael J. Ladd
Laboratory Director

Ifeb 16 W 08:51 a
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI
828-835-8631
p.2
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
5.
511
15
4/15/2015 13:20
Michael Ladd
1000
J
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.8
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Ililiters
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
arees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 7.90 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.82 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 15 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.402551731
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 1.15 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Slue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

6
5
4
E
c
o�
3
O
as
0
N
N
02
1
0
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y=-0.1316x+4.932
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1
Time (minutes)

Feb 161B08:51a
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI
828-835-8631
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time: 5/2
Sampled By: Micha
Analysis Date/Time: 5/2
Analyzed By: Mich
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.8
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
liliters
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
arees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 6.05 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.66 mg Oxygenlg/hr
Average Temperature: 14 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.500730352
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater 1.00 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

6
5
02
1
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.1008x + 4.897
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1
Time (minutes)

Fjeb.1.615 08:51 a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.6
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
.15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars
Biosolids Permit Number: WQO
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
3.81
3.76
3.
2.981
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
151
17.
000 milliliters
1.02 % Dry Solids
17.3 degrees Celsius
16.9 degrees Celsius
0.1
4.0
1.0
4.67 mg Oxygen/hr
0.45 mg Oxygenlg/hr
17 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.225043
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: O.b5 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes, The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

4.5
4
3,5
3
CD
E
v
�.5
0
d
2
0
01,6
1
0.5
0
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.0762x + 4.098
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1
Time (minutes)

,t Feb A 6;; 6 08:51 a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.8
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10 .
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number.
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time: 7/28/201
Sampled By: Michael La
Analysis Date/Time: 7/28/201
Analyzed By: Michael La
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
3.f
3
3.!
2.
2.
M
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
1
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
wees Celsius
0.1
3.9
1.0
5.30 mg Oxygenlhr
0.53 mg Oxygen/g/hr
19 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.07
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:;J, 0.57 mg Oxygen/glhr
Instructions: Enter'Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

4.5
4
3.5
3
a�
E
v
�.5
O
2
0
1
01.5
1
0.5
0
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.0883x + 3.9578
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1E
Time (minutes)

Fehr6:1608:51a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631r p.10
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
ki
0
3.
2.
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
1
11
1000 milliliters
0.95 % Dry Solids
18.4 degrees Celsius
18.4 degrees Celsius
0.1
3.6
1.0
3.78 mg Oxygen/hr
0.40 mg Oxygen/g/hr
18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.1449 r
r,
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 616 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

4
3.5
3
�.5
E
C
0
1
0.5
tl
Oxygen Uptake. Rate Chart
y =-0.0631 x + 3.6248
L 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1
Time (minutes)

,1 *646 08:51 a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI 828-835-8631 p.12
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.
Slope:
Intercept
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
17.9
9/11/2015 15:35
ael
51
1000 milliliters
0.9 % Dry solids
17.9 degrees Celsius
17.7 deorees Celsius
0.1
4.3
1.0
4.00 mg Oxygenlhr
0.44 mg Oxygenlg/hr
18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.144V
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rater 0.51 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart Y =-0.0666X + 4.3945
ji�
m
D
2
m
z
0
z
m
z
D
r
cn
m
X
co
N
1p
0o
W
U1
co
W
W

f eA 6 08:52a
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI
828-835-8631 p.14
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars
Biosofids Permit Number. WQO
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/ Time: 10/2
Sampled By: Michc
Analysis DateMme: 10/2
Analyzed By: Mich.
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.
3.98
3.9
15.
0
5 11:3
...ram
dd
5 11:3
1000 milliliters
0.75 % Dry Solids
15.5 degrees Celsius
15.3 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.3
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.24 mg Oxygenlhr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.57 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 15 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.402551731
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:,' mg Oxygen/glhr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart Y = -0.0706x + 4.398
W.
0
N
N
m
D
-i
2
m
z
0
z
m
z
D
r
cn
m
X
w
N
W
co
W
Y,
co
CD
W
Ul

Annual Report Review SOP Class ID Land Application 13P.
Reporting Period: .I 11h
Permit Details: WQWO 4gq e r�
Is 503? .
Class A on
Maximum Dry,Tons Per:Year: �,
Number of acres permitted: 1 %3
Number of fields in permit:. 2:
Counties that land is permitted for: M AX,
Monitoring Frequency.for TCLP: 1 f p fW,'• &y Cie
Monitoring Frequency for Residuals Analysis: AnnVPA
Monitoring Frequency for.Pathogen & Vector Attraction Reduction: A �'\naP-
Groundwater monitoring: N/A:. 13.A
1: Annual Land Application Certification Form ,.
• Was a certification form. submitted?
Was land application conducted during the reported year?
How many dry tons and dry tons per acre. were applied?D T -h
Were the applications within the :permitted amount?
Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre?
Did it indicate compliance? Y
Was it signed by the appropriate people?
2._Monitoring
Were.the analyses conducted at -the required frequency?_
Was. an analyses taken for -each source.that was:.land.applied? y
Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form?
Were the results reported -in mg/kg? Y
Were the pH's 6.0'or greater for each residual sample?fir
Were the heavy metals :withimceiling-concentration permit limits?y .
Were the labanalyses attached?. Y
Were all the required parameters tested?!
Was TCLP analysis conducted?
Were the TLCP contaminants within regulatory limits?
.�
Was a corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity analysis conducted? 4�3 Cor r415 •: 3,
3. Field Summary��
events.recorded.on the_Field_S:ummary Forms?
• How many. fields were applied on.this.year?
Was a Field..Summary Form submitted for each. field? y
Were- all the residuals applied to permitted land?
Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources?j
Were the field loading. rates for eaah.metal and PAN. calculated (year to date)? �f
Were the cumulative.pollutant loading rates calculated?V
-- Were the calculations correct?
:• Were the PAN loading rates within permit limits?
• . Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?
Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?, _

Were the applications conducted during the' '�s growing season. crop 5" Were the Field Summary Forms complete? Dk
Was lime application on Field Summary Form.?No lime applied.
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
Was a.signed copy of the Pathogen and Vector Attraction Red -action Form submitted?
Did the f6rhi indicate the period of coverage; the residual class, and the pathogen reduction
alternative and the vector attraction reduction optio sed? Para a
-Was the. Appropriate documentation to show path6gpn and vector attraction -reduction. includ6l
in the report%x A
Was Pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 QFR Part 503?
Class B Pathogen Review
Alternative I — Fecal Coliform Density
Was the sampling conducted* at the required frequency?Were seven samples * taken?
Was the geometric. . mean calculated and done correctly?'
- Did the results show compliance (less than either 2 �-00 . 0,000 NRN/grain'pf total solids or
2,000,000 Colony Forming Units/gram of total §blids')?
Alternative 2 — Use of Process to Significantly.Reduce Pathogens (one of five)
Was the sampling Conducted at the required frequency?
L Aerobic Digestion
Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
,'Were logs submitt6d showing tim.e.and.'.temperi.ature?
Were temperatures within range for complete time-Teriod?
Was the time and temperaturb,betwe6n'40 days, di-20PC(6.80F),and-60days at-15OC-
(59-F)?
2. Air Drying
Were the residuals on sandbeds or pave'or-unpaved basins for three months?
Was the ambient temperature above 00 C (32°F) for two months?
Were the residuals partially digested?
Were.residuals exposed
�p6sed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (not snow
covered)?
3. Anaerobic Digestion.
-Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)? .
-Were logs subiiiifted-sho.wmg'rime :and itemperature?
:'-
-Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
-Was the time and temperature bot . w6dn l-5days .AtJ51:.1 G(95T) to 55.0c (13 IT) and 60
days at 20°C (68-F)?
4. Compbsting (4§ually will bb,.Cl.a§s composting is used)
Was ltac compostingprocedure (iibt:*natdral.deday-dnder:uncotitrolledconditiotis).?
OMP
Were logs submitted shOwing time and temperature?
Was thjt6mp6'ratare, raised to 40
5. Lime Stabilization

I
Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime
containing kiln dust or.. fly ash)?
Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
Was the pH,raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and. pH?.
Was temperature corrected to•25°C (776E)?
Alternative 3 Use of Processes Equi-Ment.toRSRP
(Not commonly use. See White House Manual page 100-103, tables 114 and 11-2.)
Vector Attraction Reduction Review
Was the sampling conducted at the: required, frequency? yP'5
Option 1— 38% Volatile Solids Reduction
Was there 38% reduction?
Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Were the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)?
Were calculations correct?.
Option 2 — 40-Day Bench Scale. -Test
Were residuals from anaerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab
Was the test run for 40 days? .
Was the test done between 30°C (96°F) and.37°C (999F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Was the reduction less than 170/o?
Were lab sheets/calculations in: report?
• Were calculations correct?' .
Option 3 — 30-Day Bench. Scale Test'
Were residuals from aerobically.digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
.Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
if not 2% total solids, was the test ran on a sample, diluted to 2% with unchlorinated.
effluent?
Was the test run for 30 days? .
Was the test done at 20°C (680F)?
Was the reduction of on volatile solids (not total solids)?
Was the reduction less than 15%?
Were lab sheets/calculations in. report?
Were calculations correct?
Option 4 — Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate(SOUR)
Were residuals form aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?
Was the test done between 10°C (50°F) and 30°C (8.66F)?Y.
Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (680F)?
Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total
residual solids (dry weight basis)? y
3

Was the sampling holding time two hours? y
Was the test started withifi 15 minutes of sampling or acration,maintained?
Option 5 — 14-Day Aerobic Process
.Were the residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
Were the residuals treated for 14 .day
s?
Was the residuals temperature higher than 400C (104°F) for a 14-day period?
Was the average residuals .temp 6rature higher than 450C (I 130F)9
-Option ' 6 — Alkaline Stabilization
Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 or higher'by.the addition of alkali?
Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition of
more alkali?
Did the .pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additionat tviienty-two hours
without the addition of more alkali?
Was the PII corrected to.25°C .(77T)?
U..
Option 7 Prying of Stabilized Residuals
Does.the residuals contain any unsiabilized residuals?
Were the residuals mixed with.any other materials?
Were the residuals. dried up to 75% total solids?
Option .8 — Drying of Vnstabilized Residuals
Were the residuals mixed with any other.materials?
Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids?
Option 9 —Injection
Was there any significant amount of residuals on -land surface one Hour after injection
(Inspection)?
Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
Was injection done at time that crop was growing?
If Class A with rospoato patho
gen,,were residuals: injected With eight hours after
discharge from pathogen treatment?
.5. Soil Tests
Was a Standard Soil Fertility -Analysis conducted for each application field?
Were thesoil pH's 6.0 or. greater for each applicati6n field? -Y.
applied to those fields?,p 11
Jf no, was lime
Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less -than 2000 for.eachapplication. field?
-Was sodium less than 0.5 meq/100 cm^3?,4'
:Was the exchangeable sodium peirc6htage (ESP) less than 15%?
fl%edliil -C-1410 1E5_N__ VJ A
6..General
Was the report in the proper format?
Was the annual report c6mpl0eT-/
Was the report submitted on timeq,

tnvlrovmeniqlTesdqq5qfutlo siipip
Certif cafe of
PO Bax-,7.565.
Phone: �828} 56,§j64
'Pro"J"p"d. ha&e` Earth Efivir6iinientil I Sety . Ws Projectnumber... 180722.51"0
Collecttari datev
Date received:' 22-Jid-15+-. S himplie: iderififlodtion.' 4071517 oionumb.erz.. 12$301..
:
RL Date
11itt Anaiyst Awtakes:
Mercury:
7471A
- Mz-
Q-,'P
Pft
,ArsePic,
'
0-10C
<3-i06+
1.06
fin-klkg,
:6-A-ugr15-
MEG
J.
.Ckdmi4rq
we
MEG
4
3.06
Lead
Q10G
961
1 -
Utc,
if
Mot*$jlini
"Pioc
2660
-j�53
ih
C
Mansenese
60JOP
294
12
og,/k
-g
ME
I
Mo
4A 6.
31.06,,
M
&AW5
NEG
N&O
610M
:z
j:, -4
on
8
OJIT
G41wk
NEC
_.g
60100
44.42..
L22.
bg(kg
a rs
MEQ
Sadttur'6
1 oc
"Wil
611
NU
M —9:
Is
WC>
I
07
Total
I Phpsph�4'
J
wc.
OR!
SW8469Wt
7A
'S.U-.
.2-744-6
AT
4
-Acidity
$6 AttachedSheets
nly inlhisreport relate oi zto the samples submiited

7021 W.11ite0ine'lld, 01;hmorvd,, 1319.7,
- 4,
W YpAkLYT 7
Client c Grower,: bpqrf-No;
�M" ENVIRONMENTAL SVC Ei=S 46220
75 BISON LN "POP Hotod, 07)3112016.
MURPHY,Nb 28906 b
Date Anol . �rsj . s, 47/3
Page.: -4 of
Leib Nuinber.-Z 26 4 Fled. 10
$a k (d #071518
6 -RAEPV
ITZAIPt T
r6ot
.8 d
OPP -Apo
1"ti6w
p
8:
16-14Y
comments:
Lawn,.-
. T11. m— I
a
PH
than i 0 1
�wmperal
IongetfD
Use a
on
I l!q47YY 5PPRg-fain 'PePq!11ng,.quq the grassespo.K pale green: Spring can start as.saon
tpsaseof pmeptionai Warm sp d d'
s Oelernental;sdbr pa 1000 ftiati feet for ev
ery
161,§ulfur f0:2' 2 6) Da r►at apply mitre than.5 bs per l000 square feetper apptieafiortor more,
pTJ­ ��p Ilk n �qw�rq: qq,pprypof, .jbg,'botWjeen p. �a6 m shoulc[Fbo rru6imurn of months -_W',aftn-
Wcored 900: it Will take
kryon:of-the N�reqplrement-to. rpo . Ucep".
'the s011 test ah4:(0ornrn.dnda1ljpnsjKte
'go to our w,wkiateast6rhxorn and se[edthe:"Lawn
age_ JJJ PFW.PioOUncle. .
n. a - Soil -Testkeport_�header
Ariff101i pibOdied bp'Wayp-omtAnaWca1v14nj'a, Inc.
ov 60
F'aurrr. m0wry

Cart"rof - '-Odd'An alysis.
pm*tnagfe:. Farm
Phones [phone]
93 8::
d
tiate v
e.
Sam'pli�en.
:$mAleidentmeiflon..' #07154
Oak
Aranie er pw§uli AL ; bafts- Anafvzia' AA41y.st: Footnotes
923
OJO
A/6
45r,.-jbws�
LU
:lVtkercent
ercury
��0-12
bA2
mg/ k
V�o
1.
senk
-6
'66
M.O.C.
-rng/kg
:6-AugIS
MEG
T
C41oftun
60TQG
j7 6
152
WC
C
.62.7
06
&AI4;s
Cqpper-
m
ZlZi&
15. 5,
6.06.
It
-1-060
152-
m& -g
mapgenesc
-OQMQ.
644g-a.
Molybdenum:
6fl10C;
� 66.'
6.:66
mg/kg
&Avg
"Nickel
6QI0C'
ip.q-
2.0
&Aig-ls
IWO
Vbiassrlum.
01110Z
-567—
cot.
Mwu
MEC
I:$01enium
Sodium
2243
12A.
g/k
Zinc
(P�99)
64�
6g�l
Mte
J
TOW, MOP dNso'
s 4500,P-F-
`658
121
mg/kg
6-Aid 15
*iriisou
AV,W ��tq 9Q4
S.U-
AI
4
AcidifyA&L
-2
"D
Paotnotest.
0
n— . Repor . f ing Limit. Values-arereporteddo-wa.to-'the .R600r'hn vmstonly'
I.- Sample analiyzedby kogers &,Cdl6ottE&IfQDmeritaT--
.1. Sample analyzed by 'Va: poiniAnairitcal,
Sample analyzed outside holding time. Fedex shipping erroi:
Sample -anazly ed ouisiI deholdiffiglime.
bate reviewed: NC Q.-ertificatipiR Number000
IS .-
Data -reviewed by XA&Y, E, Keenan
I qC Drinking Wker(Certiffcaiion'gumber 31196
Signature.
foran4iyst

ppge, I Of I
ROPPOP; 154i�-2-0629is.,
Aced.unt,NO; 46939
W ay
ch poitnt Mtiri 8044439401`�-
' -$94.
-1.11=64kNALYTICAL. WWWmlo4
yltionpI ob,
AdVIPPlt- 'E!4VIkqN.MEN'TAL,,rEsTING
SQWTIP4S'JNC Form iD::,
,ASHEVtLLE,'NC2B8o:Z,.- Date Rdc -'.07(31/ZO15
Datd,bf-R
I
'
Hm ww",
0: s
%
N li15 -
5 wj 17 11
Comm6nt:
NOT ENOUGH SAM P-L9 T TOJE­ SFQR,..$jVV-
ER
MIN I'l 71 ' 0 0 -2T 34 20, 16$ 1
'2 _ 11 . . . 4 . � 1.09-- 64, ,Wr O.R. :0-1
Test resultunits —.CEG%*and.-N* in ngjc
i13
North #257;AnaJysls;kdlsrUI(ty-' -pqryi -r�fQDA 9610611h si AnqlyAls
re rnl�nqa on :qho on neqqdgrq�peffoimcdln accofdahc4.wjffija
v�n
Aypolml Anslyttic inia -1hr.

Rogers &CaUcott
ENVIRONMENTAL
thylronmenial,Test'iOg Solutions projea:
351 Depot 9t: Work Order.
Asheville, NC-11990 1 -43 1 o
Repolted.-
Sawpkbata-
sample Number" 50711,73-0 . I
0-1y,140-il M--enW'Servjc&§ #071517 c6flect6d.bil 07421/15.1.4-00
oO.f i 7,3.
Restit
RCpqrlji qg
Limit UniiLq
NUtho'd
Fin
Total,S.dtfds
'81.3
0.1.0
I
040!� 1:0:10
SM 2540G.
K3 !LCB
B5G W 91
Total -Metals
ND
0 .. r. 12
mg/kg E Iry
500
08165tlS 1.0.-45
BOA,*
MEC
Bat59
kschio
.ND.
106
.
fniAidw.
I., 1 11
J,00
WW,15:14,74
EPA 6016C
WHOM:
'C6�dffiiuin
.
TSAO!-
1.06
08106115 14:24
tPA60)oc
MEC
558009�
61ciwn
3910
153
mg/kg�diy-
5Q'.b
68'/06If5 1416
EPA 6010C
MEG
BSH0058Cliiomium 1
22.3-1
3.06
Piftdly
1.00
006115 14:24
EPA-60)OC
MEG
BSiidbSs
topper
14.4.
-LA$-dy
1-00
08MIS 14--24
:EPA66106
-MEC:
Lead
01.
3.06.
niYA9 d'q
1-00
OSMI 5 14-:24,
EPA 6.010C
tvlagtiesium
200
153
-A-u Oly
60.0
09/06/f5 "14--16
tpkbloc.
MRC
H Aqo*
Manganese
.294
1--22
mOg di�
1-00
14�24
-,
EPAMIDC
MEC
,
I�SH0058
Molybd6n4b,
'-'kel
ND
.5.06
TAg, dry
1.00
.081crufS, 14:24-
EPA 6010C.
. - 11 .
MEC
BSH0Q58
Vi
746
:1.n
mgikgdlY
.1.66
006j,15- 1.4-24
EPA 601 dc
MEC
WIJQO5$
Potassium
'01
"194--d'Y
LOO
0 fS, .14.2*4
4PA 01.0c
MEC
B5146653'
Swenium
ND.
306.
hilTtkg-,dxy
j.66
09166115 14:2-4
EPA-66 (dt
MEC
WOO:�8.
silver,
-1
ND
1;2:2
ingfk- dr-
0861-
15 14:24
wc
85H . 00:58
S odlum
29.2,
6-11
mgtkg Ofy
LOG
MOWS 14,14.
-EfA,60f6c
lvffic
wiiwS8
T6.6-la'hpspWm.T, ps p
382
123
mglkFdy
EPA,6016C
MEC
41.7
3.06
m -&O!y
1.00
o8/06/15 14-
:14
EPA 60,10C
MEC
-wHdoss
5' greenlrjlle, Sit 29606 ( 426 Grewvffle,,'3C� 29
- 607
1556 hi 864.132.6[40: rogersAndcallcott com
an empii)yee-npd �mp
W102011.5 I0,P any
Then rq

���' uE3 rfy1
Rogers r&Cakott
ems_ E.NYtRONMEN I L
Environin6ntal Testing Solutions
Project: Barth.Environmenial Services
=NC
Work.Order: 5071173
288014310. Reported: R8/l 0115 d 6:5�
Sample Nurubee 50.71173-02
Sample Description Earth Environmental Services #!37]518;co11ectedori 07/21t15 74:30,
Paramefq
RccuJt
Reporting
Limit Uaits
DF
Analyzed
Method,
Flag
Analyst
General;Cherulstrs� Paia_meters
Tatz1 Solids
82.3
0.1Q
1.00
o7r'Ui5 l0ao.
sm:4340G
IU
'LCl3
BSG1;19I
Total Metals
Mercury
ND
0,1.2
m9JX9k
5.60
09105115'10:53
EPA7471B
MEC
BSflOQ59
Arsenic
Nib
6:06
mukt'drv.
4.00
08/06/15 14':54
EPA 6010C,
X_
MEC
BSH0058
Cadutiuin
NG7
2;43.
rPz*,9,4'
2,00
0810611S. 14.M
FPA 6010e
X,
'MEC
85H0058
Catcium
Chrorr rum
2776
152
++is/ks'd?y
50:0
0$/o67ia i4:is
EPA
MEG'.
W140658-
6Z.7
6.06
mA-,c dry.
2.00
08/06/15 14:54
EPA 60.COC
MEC
WHOMCopper
63.0:
2,43
mg/k'g k'
2.00
-'08/0.6/15 14:54
EPA,6010C
MEC
BSH0058
Lead:]5:5
6.66
ms!49dry'
100
08106/1514:54;
EPA-6010C;
ivIEC
-B51-i0D5$
Iulagpesium.
1960,
152
*94 d y
50_Q
08/696/15 1418
'EPA ;6010C
MEC
B5H0058
Manganese
3F8;
2:43
m9&0.dl.
2.00
08/0:6115 14:54
fTAO1oC
MEC
$5H00S8.
Tvlolybdenum
ND.
6:06
m419dW
2.00
09106-11-5' 14'54
EPA6016C
X
MEC
BSH�A51t
Nickel:
Potassium
1.9.6
2.43,
m dry
160
08/06/15 14,54
EPA.601.DC
MFC
B5F10058.
Silenigni
567
12!1:
mglk9d}y
2,00:
08106ITS I4:54
tPA,6016t
MEC
BSHO05R:
Silver
Nlt
&06.
mYA9.dn
100,
Q$/06/i5 14:54
EPA6010C
X
Iv1EC:
BSH0058.
$OdltlIfl`
ND
2.43:
mglkg,dry
100
'03/06/15 '1.4:54
EP4!60IOC
X
MEC
05HQ038
Fatal PhasplibFus as E
22.3
1-2.1
'--SAk:dry
2.60
681OU15 14:54
EPA"6010C'
NEC
.B5HO058
Zinc.
688
np
121'
rog/ Ary
50:0
081Q6/.15 14- 8
EPA 601QC'.
Iv1EC
BSHQQ58
� 61;8
6,Ob
mfi S dry ?
-00
08106115 14 54
EPA'6010C
v1EC
.BSHOOSB
PO y x 5655 1 Greei.w lfe, SC 29606 4 f'r-irforesr.-W-,Iy Greenville. SC 29607 f main 864,132.1556 : t-k $64.232414G: ('pg.GCS f1CfC: i COtt.00i11`
an p-zip Yee onmed m neany
frx /U 2AI�. l6rS?' I744 re]Vif nrcrl,-V-6c:rrpreAced,, r7rceprin.jddl, n fihor1Frenrleitpernm.nnn,frnm Rngar a X Cidk(w,,:lnc.
7aga4,if 1A

Page 1 of 1
Report No: 15-212-0629
Account No: 46933
Advisor: ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
SOLUTIONS INC
POB 7565
ASHEVILLE NO 28802
V, V " I W". V, V,
7621 WhItepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Win 804449-5401 - Fax 9. ' - 04-271-64
46
'WWW.Wayp(j*lntanalyticiRl.com
Farm ID:
Date Received: 07/31/2015
Date of Re ort: 08/06/2 015
V �
071518 MIN
1.7 7.1 0.0 .27 34 29 188 133 Z' 133 535 9.1 100 64 33 0.9 01
Comment:
7-
NOT ENOUGH SAMPLE TO TEST FOR SILVER
A c
Test result units = CEC and Na in mecilloac0; NOON in mg/dm3: VVIV in glCM3
North Carolina Division of Water, Quality Certification #257, Analysis a . nd fertility recommendations shown on this report are performed in accordance within NCDA guidelines, Analysis prepared by. Waypoint Analytical Virginia, Inc.

10,

7621 WhitePhtd-Acial,, 237
Po
'MOO 946
NALYTICAL.
Sijbmitt6d By. ?41cHAEL�LAO— 1��0643--F' fttLeoin:
SOILANALySl
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL 8V.CS. .EES IPPO N 15 -4
b�
du ME,
-N LN
MURP.-W NC 28906 Qate Adt*da'
Rage Lab N 3 of.4
Fieldid-L"
Samnfaid;! A67.4'k)i
c
Analysis Prepared by W@YR6 jnfA..Iyjjsj Virginia
Paudd Mc'Gro4rv.

May 20 16 07:28a �RTK ENVIRONMENTALSERW
P.5
int Wavo.o.
ANALYTICAL
EARTH ENVIRON44ENTAL SVCS
7.5 MON LN
WRN Y-NO: 28906
La,b Number ,=o
. 0lqpiuso�
wwwiwaypolntahiij
UeAnalysis,
Sample id #071.61117
2 4 4 1.,
SIJGSTEL)ERTtLtZAi�lON
First
orl
nd ''PlIcat-w
'Third-App
#160on
Fourth A
pp,006tlon
Moad, s4i Ft.
F4rllfizor'
Nallizar
*10006•4.Ft:
11 Fertilizer
10.60 4,11. n
The aftUnf of feifilbmr recommended . on the first page WetdtW-smunt needed for th6enfire-growing -seas
applications bkeep the lawn green artd,,prdvont feftiliker bss.. YQU,should not apply hwe4han 0.7)b.i i of soluble
square feet, in a30 day period. Or more than;0'.5. Prs.0 nitm-gen per 100Q s " slowor-c
square feet if q are using
_.yo
product in &30 dayC' ukdrifenti iFffft is.-Ifft pmp . ip-m-blerid t6. the above:
4 1;4466 r hkpav(isimilar W Jsa'6eher*guideUtha,.]r! es pa 00N, rep with,FM Lze
tune tvapply, fertilizer wgrlas4i (bjibegrass, fewoe, ryagrau)1s, In -the Fid when lheg' Win�
region the time is from lafe August to Na�rember--.-For fregion the time is er. Fi
$ Augus
start as-64on,m; the day*ne. high temperatum is; belo.w.$U�OF, apply with -the interval m I of onaonth f-you start
Fall and do . natfinishilith,r.ee, appltc46ns,'rdpestthe sarnwapplicitiqnsln theFalfdnext year .Sprid
.when excEpg..onM-fBMlik&ios.dj4tbh6#vysgral-n']p "Wh*6,ardth'id_ �application-cani_P.'a,16green rlqg app11m
as ft grass starts . in April, in thaacase of exceptional wamspnnglh6 bo Mai f6 earuer.
ammorifum,sulfate as all or 0 * *.op eq Mmen cd 0 - 9M -.the.:N r. ul. j to!, H
:ora'.m' ' Wdepthd 66 #01 test recomm b s M www. al ea Stern,.CGM
F more i j(plaqMlon of e(oatidns., gdlob(ir end. 6aide . n*-fe'batth_qtbpofh6 page:. Under. the "How tb Understa ndaSoil ,T6siReporr-reader 5wikWfind
4sbll Test, Report & Faltulizzor Riecommandal Ex ned tion plai
Ana4mit prepwed-by_- Wspplkmsfy&sf Virginia. Inc.
34
1000-
kn should
late irk the
rneniloO
id. iks:sdon
he *Lawn
he article

�,ay -20 1.6, OT.28a EARTH'ERWRQNM,ENTAL SERVI
'p,4
76zl.wwt
mgiii:
ENVtRONt�AEN'FAL SACS
75:B[SONIN.
MUR.PW';Nq ZOO 1 00
Lab Mum6r - 2626.3.
Test, Resuffs
PK06phoriAl JFPJ, PPM
tddiaiaNitogeR
-6,01L.PEk-TILITY GUIDEILI.M.Ml
Crap. LELWrf+
Firre 0.0
U04; 401.1'000.Wl
OPI UME *4
4
Fe
I j
Drop;
t
, 61-
-Fiautic; McGroarvy
t

M'ay•20-16°0728a EARTH:5NVIRONMENMALSERV I - $28-83
-8631
A.2
I
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond,
W,
�
R 23237
10i. '� ,. Motif' 80,742 4461 ° Fax 8�
IA..NALYTICAC wHanrwaygtntarsat
_ SubmRteB , MIGHAEL LADQ i.
t4446
cal ccdi
SOIL
AlYSiS:
Re opt No l5-'HbC
P
Oust Nc ;
Cbent ` Grerwer :
F. ITN ,NU(RONMEt�FAL $�fCS EES
"'540
4822Q
78 BISON LV �
MURPkiY NG 2OO&
Matz Pr( w'd 47f3i12Q15
Date Received: i
if2s 2Q15
Date Analysis
pQT (
17MU/2015
Page ?
3- , 4
Lab -Number: 25284 'Fieidld.: r Sample Id ;'#071518.
s
SOIL TEST RFIY'Ifi1GS ...,
' Best Results:
` 1:dtir: - :Alied[urr►. 0
tfated Cat[ae _
rlge Capaelty
Gak
Etch
i
74
l3uNerpH _
i�W
Phosphettus (P) 24?Pm„ ?
Cea1(of;
Caleyla0ed
% }T 0
Hmeq QiQ'
Sil71:i.;FER_TlriY .GUif�E�111ii:.S
Crop: Lavim: Rec.,UnEs:.
LIME (tone}
N'
P.;O.g
K'iC'
HI$:.
S
B
Ct Mn
Zn
Fe
drop
Kec Uni$s:
Com(mu
F
-Analysis prepared;t y. W4y.pointAnaly lcai Virginia, Inc,

4
May 201:G 07 28a EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SE'RVI p.3
j
• ( I
wavooin 7'0Z1 VyNteptne.Road.Richmond; `Z3237
C6ept . Grower t "port 140. 15410-0546
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS EES: us1_hto; ( 45220
76 6tSO:N LN i ate-Printed: of&i 2015.
.M;JRPHY'NC 2890.E 36terRedgved:: OW29120-15
_ i toAna►ysis,; 07t30'1201:5
E
POD s
page. 4 df 4.
l:ab-tdurnbi r s 25284 Field Id I S rnple id : #0715T8:
I,iG.GSTEERT�IJ'ifOM F'R�G[�.JV!
—�
First_Appllca$roR,
4404dAP: lication
TfiirdApp( catiort
FoeirihApptiatatJan
1i(1000 �q. i FecEiIWK
All tl00•Sq Ft
Fertilizer
#I * Sq FL
Fertilizer
#li000 $% FL
!r Orw,I.aer
8' i64 8
8
tfi 4 8.
6
9 21 3=7
a
Comments:: �r
Lawn L The amount'of fertiti errecommended:on? e.first,page is the folal:amount,needed for the entire g "ng,season Split in:o 3�4
applications-to'keep the (awn greeruand preventfertillzer Iris .You should not apply More itian 0.7 fb oftuble nrtrogen'.er 1000
square feetina 30 day -period: Qr more than- 0.9 lbs-of nitrogen per 1000 squarerfeetldyou,are using _slow or controlled rilease
product in a 30. day period CustDrrl blend is best to meet'exactly the requirement, if;thls � Impassible,_ el
above specific fetOzer
application is a genera[guidefne; if ttie spedfled grades can not �be found, replace. with fertilizer haven 'stmtiiM K rafia The lest
time to apply fertilizerfor,.cool season grass.(btuegrass, fescue, ryegrass) is in the Faliwhen the gran Ps growing.. For Wd-�itlantie
region the time is framilate August to. November Eor,lUortlieast,region the time is trorrt mid Augustto ctober. Fall applicat♦on.stiould
startas soon as the daytirnel igh temperature is below 8Q 5F; applyw►th'the interval o .64E i lohth.: you ttait application late in the
Fall and.do notfinuh ail three applicatians, repeaf'the. same applications in the Fall-dti:next year. Sprin application is'recorr.rnended.
wizen exceptional-fertili er loss due to heavy spring: rain leaching and the grasses.lookpale green. Spring application can S.. ' as.soon
as the grass starts to g'.rdW in April In the case of exceptional warm spring, the application can be ma earlier E
Tosort pH apply 25 pounds of, elemental sulfur per 1000 square;feat for airy 01; of pH qh above 7.2 For example,,;a soil
pH of 7 4 requ%res pounds of elemental sulfur (t12 ` 2.5.). 'Do not apply more than 5 ibs per 1000 squ re feet per appl6ca nor m""ore
Phan 10 Ibs of elemental sulfur per 1006 square feet per year Timing tsetweer► applications should be: inimurn of 3 month Warm
temperature and mmsi'soil are needed for sulfur to reduce soil p4 , If sutfue k applied vrin er or uncle' drqu.ght;con¢i rows 4- will lake
longer for the: the sod.p''H to be lowered. i
tJse ammonium sulfate as all: or portion of the N. requirefnenf to reduce pE[ i
For a more in depitt`evlanation of the soil test and recammendaiioris,.go to ourw�bsite www:alea tem:cam and�select ilia: °Lawri
and Garden" tab at the ;top of-tmme page. Under file "Hovii to Understand a Sod Test FteporE°header ' u wriil':find the link. fulthe article
Soil.Test Report &.Fertilizer Reaamniendafinn Ekplainetl". �.
a
C
I
i
Analysis prepared bys, WaypoliitAna{ybCai Virginia, Inc.

Report
15
0628
Aftfltllftf4o� 46933
"te I.i.W.6pnd,'VA43237,
10804443-1401 P Fax 8044*71�A4
ANALYTICAL
www.wqpalhtsffallweaLcq,
Advisor, ENVIRONMENTAL. -TESTING
,SOLUTIONS INC
FhrmsDo-
ASHEVILLE NC ZWO2
01511.208
Lob ki
swi 6865.
Ac. P.4, A-1. 84
mn,4-I, 'kjjrA 004: CEO sw Nain
M
MIN
0-of 26 33
503. -178 170 186 9;5• 400f , �.24 b.1 '0 . .4
M.
25783.
071518
MIN.
7?1 0,0 Z?, '44! 28
188 133 133
<
C 0 M
Comment:
z
E
tI4OIj4jHL $AM
NO T OIL T. JE�$TfOR.
E 0 q1LV NO ER
M.
2)
M.
A c. L
T'Rms"qtt u!'w-'CEq so No lei
KcAh.Cam ' u L na DIVision of rp Om!�AnOysls and ftelfilly rvcommsndiktiovs.�h �a lj1jaLre art am p4qrmedfri acc Walol2ualltyCe RqMW *_Wn .

PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
sum!
� ys
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Certificate Of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services Project number: 150722.509
Collection date: 21-Jul-15 y r /
Date received: 22-Jul-15 I ��/ t4i V ( d� x�
Sample identification: #071516 l(G' I ��'L' j.S Sample number: 128301
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
Percent Solids SM 2540 G 13.5 0.10 % 31 JW-15 LCB 1,3
Mercury 7471B 0.99 0.73 mg/kg 5-Aug-15 MEC 1
Aluminum 6010C 6490 1790 mg/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Arsenic 6010C <17.9 17.9 mg&g 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Cadmium 6010C <7.17 7.17 mg/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC I
Calcium 6010C 6250 896 mg/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC I
Chromium 6010C 28.6 17.9 mg
/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC I
Copper 6010C 245 7.17 mg/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Lead 6010C 23.8 17.9 m g/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Magnesium 6010C 2100 896 mg/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Molybdenum 6010C <17.9 17.9 mg/kg 6 Aug-15 MEC I
Nickel 6010C 16.8 7.17 mg/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Potassium 6010C 3160 35.9 mg
/kg 6-Aug-IS MEC j
Selenium 6010C <17.9 17.9 mg/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Silver 6010C 8.27 7.2 mg/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Sodium 6010C 505 35.9 mg
/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Zinc 6010C 569' 17.9 mg/kg 6-Aug-15 MEC 1
Nitrate + Nitrite 453.2 30.00 mg/kg 1,2
Total Phosphorus 6010C 11Q,58,a 748 mg/kg MEC 1
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 351.2 61800 23900 mg/kg 11-Aug-15 LEW 1
Total Nitrogen Calculation 62300 743 mg/kg 13-Aug-15 LDP 1
Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 D 15000 42 mg/kg 23-Jul-is KEK
Percent Solids SM 2540 G 12 % 22-Jul-15 AI
pH in Soil SW 846 9045D 7.7 S.U. 22-Jul-15 Al 4
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Sample analyzed by Rogers & Callcott Environmental.
2. Methods EPA 9210A and SM 450ONO2 B by LDP and REH on 08-13-15 and 08-06-15.
3. Sample analzyed outside hold time due to FedEx shipping error.
4. Sample analzyed outside hold time.
Date reviewed: (b.0 .ts
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan
A-
NC Certification Number: 600
SC Certification Number: 99053
NC Drinking Water Certification Numb -re 37786
Signature:
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
WEAVERVILLE OFFICE
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Client: [ Vw f) af A \ V"S 1�F C/ CU
Address:
Phone: -' J-ck-,
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL:SSRVICES
MICHAELLADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 2733 ^'75?BISON LANE
WEAVERVILLE, INC 28787 MURPHY, NC 28906
Report Tj: }C L7 C>/'+ c�
Bill To: -UD''Vx
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
FAX #: _ (a
w
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD -
Analytical Request
[nit Lab Temp:
Rec Lab Temp:
*Requestec.Due Date: 4�-B
CD
0
LL
z
REMARKS
ImL
# SAMPLE DESCRIPTION RESID. TIME MATRIX EE&
ENFAM
1, Ar
00
13
NEEMENEENEENO
m
sell
Is
MEMENEENSINESEEME
I
Is
Is
Is
Is
=
mossonso
monsoon
Is
0
NEEMENEENSIN
0
son
1
0
NEEMENEENEEN
I
son
I
ME
EEE=Emammmlmmmlmmmmm
ME
Em=mmmmmmlmmmlmmmm
MEN
0
SHIPMENT METHOD ITEM
OUTIDATE' RETURNED/DATE #
RELINQ�ISED BY AFFIXIATION
ACCEPTED BY,/ AFFILIATION*
DATE IM
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS,
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS cROM-a

0
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc -
Certificate of Analysis
PO Box 7565
Asheville; NC 29802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number. 150819.507
Project name: Earth Environmental Services / f
Collection date: 19-ug=i5
Date received: 19-Aug-15 V
Sample number: 129202
Sample identification: #081519
Date Analyst Footnotes
Method Result RL Units Analyzed
Parameter - vi-uRT\a 2
keac3ive Cyanide
335.4
<0.124
0:50
U./4
0.124
mgixg
mg/kg
to-nuu-
25-Aug-15
.. —
ECHEM
2
fecactive Sulfide
rgapitability
SM 4500 S D
SW 946 1030
<0:8
0.8
mm/sec
27-Aug-is
ECHEM
2
SW846 9095 B
<0.1
0.1
ml
21-Aug-15
KEK
3
a t Filter
9045 D
3.2
S.U.
20-Aug-15
KEK
1
I in Soil
TCLP
6010 C
<0:25
0.25
mg/L
31-Aug-15
MEC
MEC
I
,A semc-
RE6 - TCLP
6010 C
C
�2.50
<0.05
2.50
0.05
mg/L
mg/L
31-Aug-15
31-Aug-15
MEC
MEC
1
Goa earn -TCLP
6010
6010 C
<0.10
0.10
mg/L
31-Aug-15
MEC
I
Chromium - TCLP
6010 C
<0.25
0.25
mg/L
31-Aug-15
MEC
1
Le TCLP
6010 C
<0.25
0.25
mg/L
31-Aug-15
MEC
I
1
el nium - TCLP
6010 C
<0.10
0.10
mg/L
31-Aug-15
MEC
I
elver - TCLP
6010 C
<0.0020
0.0020
mg/L
1-Sep-15
MEC
1, 2
Mercury - TCLP
See attached sheets
Full Scan TCLP Organic
Footnotes:
RL =Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Sample analyzed by Rogers & Callcott Environmental.
2. Sample analzyed by Enviro Chemists, Inc.
3. Sample analzyed out of hold time:
NC Certification Number: 600
Date reviewed: © - P - Sc Certification Number: 99053
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan
NC Drinking Water Certification Number: 3778
Signature:
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

Name and Address of Facility:
Town of Mars Hill
P.O. Box 368
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Att: Robert Sams
TCLP - Belt Press Sludge
Eod E0*00010181 suvices
Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
Madison County Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
Date: 10/15/2015
Sample Collector:
SR
Date and Time Sample Received:
8/19/2015 11:45 AM
Date and Time Sample Collected:
8/18/2015 11:30 AM
Date and Time Sample Analyzed:
< MHT
Test
Influent
Belt Press Sludge
Upstream
Downstream
Report Limit
Method
Units
pH
3.2
0-14
SCA
units
EPA - 8151
< 0.0003
0.0003
SCA
mg/L
EPA - 8260 B
< 0.100
0.100
SCA
mg/L
EPA 8270 D
< 0.100
0.100
SCA
mg/I
EPA 8081 B
< 0.0050
0.0050
SCA
mg/I
CORROSIVITY
NOT CORROSIVE
SCA
IGNITABILITY
< 0.8
0.8
SCA
PAINT FILTER TEST
I < 0.1
0.1
SCA
TOTAL REACTIVE CYANIDE
< 0.124 mg/Kgg
0.124
SCA
mg/Kg
CADMIUM
< 0.05
0.05
SCA
mg/L
CHROMIUM
< 0.10
0.10
SCA
mg/L
LEAD
< 0.25
0.25
SCA
mg/L
SILVER
< 0.10
0.10
SCA
mg/L
REACTIVE SULFIDE
0.50
0.124
SCA
mg/Kg
BARIUM
< 2.50
2.50
SCA
mg/L
ARSENIC
< 0.25
0.25
SCA
mg/L
SELENIUM
< 0.25
0.25
SCA
mg/L
MERCURY
< 0.0020
0.0020
SCA
mg/L
N.C. Laboratory ID# 352
Lab Supervisor: Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville
Analyzed By:
Certified By:
Y /�/
MB

Rogers & C kott
i
ENVIRONMENTAL
Environmental Testing Solutions Project: Earth Environmental Services
MI. Depot St. Work Order: 5080923
Asheville, NC 288014310 Reported: 09/14/15 10:50
Sample Data
� ��
1'�
Sample Number
5080923-01
Sample Description
Earth Environmental Services #091519
collected on 08/18/15 11:30
Parameter
Result
Reporting
Limit
Units
DF
Analyzed
Method
Flag Analyst
Batch
TCLP Metals
Mercury
ND
0.0020
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 10:34
EPA 7470A
MEC
B5Hl 188
Arsenic
ND
0.25
mg/L
5.00
08/31/15 11:58
EPA 6010C
MEC
135H1057
Barium
ND
2.50
mg/L
5.00
08/31/15 11:59
EPA 601OC
MEC
1351­11057
Cadmium
ND
0.05
mg/L
5.00
08/31/15 11:58
EPA 601OC
MEC
B5H1057
Chromium
ND
0.10
mg/L
5.00
08/31/15 11:58
EPA 6010C
MEC
B51­11057
Lead
ND
0.25
mg/L
5.00
08/31/15 11:58
EPA 6010C
MEC
B51`11057
Selenium
ND
0.25
mg/L
5.00
08/31/15 11:59
EPA 6010C
MEC
B5H1057
Silver
ND
0.10
mg/L
5.00
08/31/15 11:58
EPA 6010C
MEC
1351­11057
TCLP Volatile Organics
Benzene
ND
0.100
mpJL
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260E
LBW
13510055
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND
0.200
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260B
LBW
B5I0055
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 826013
LBW
B510055
CHorobenzene
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260B
LBW
B5I0055
Chloroform
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260E
LBW
B510055
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260B
LBW
B5I0055
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260B
LBW
B510055
],1-Dichloroethee
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260B
LBW
B510055
Tetrachloroethene
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260B
LBW
BSIO055
Trichloroethene
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260E
LBW
B5I0055
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.100
mg/L
50.0
09/04/15 01:27
EPA 8260B
LBW
B510055
Surrogates
% REC
% REC Limits
Flog
1,2-Dichloroethane-D4
94
70-130
Toluene-D8
95
70-130
4 Bromo luorohen_ene
105
70-130
TCLP Semi -Volatile Organics
2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol)
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 9270D
RJM
B51­11059
3/4-Methylphenol (m,p-Cresol)
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
B51­11059
total Cresol
ND
0.200
m9/1-
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
BSH1059
2-4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
B51­11059
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
BSH1059
Hexachlorobutadiene
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RIM
B5H1059
Hexachloroethane
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
B5H1059
Nitrobenzene
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
B51­11059
PO Box 5655 1 Greenville, SC 29606 1 426 Fairforest Way 1, Greenville, SC 29607 I main 864.232.1556 1 fax [phone] rogersandeallcott.eom
_ _- _ _ _ __ ��_ -- _ _ ---._ _ _ _ --.• - an employee -owned company
09114.12015 10:50 This report any not he reproduced, except infill, tll, without written peraission front Roger & C'allcott, Inc. Page 3 Of 19

Rogers &Cakott
ENVIRONMENTAL
Environmental Testing Solutions Project: Earth Environmental Services
351 Depot St. Work Order: 5080923
Asheville, NC 28801-4310 Reported: 09/ 4f15 10:50
r
Sample Number 5080923-01
Sample Description Earth Environmental Services #081519 collected on 08/18/15 11:30
Parameter
Result
ReportingLimitUnits
DF
Analyzed
Method
Flag Analyst
Batch
TCLP Semi -Volatile Organics
Pentachlorophenol
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
1351-11059
Pyridine
ND
0.100
M91L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
1351-11059
2,4.5-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
B51-11059
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.100
mg/L
10.0
09/01/15 21:26
EPA 8270D
RJM
135H1059
Surrogates
%REC
%.REC Limits
Flag
NitrohenzeneDS
89
35-114
1-Fhtorobtp1tertv1
78
43-116
1-Fhmrophenol
60
21-110
Phenol-D5
41
10-110
2,4.6-Tribromaphenol
106
10-123
Terpheryl-U14
91
33-141
TCLP Pesticides
Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
ND
0.00050
mg/L
10.0
08/29/15 01:28
EPA 8081E
RICH
1351-11029
Chlordane
ND
0.0050
mg/L
10.0
08/29/15 01:28
EPA 8081B
RICH
B5H1029
Endrin
ND
0.00050
mg/L
10.0
08/29/15 01:28
EPA 8081B
RICH
135H1029
Heptachlor
ND
0.00050
mg/L
10.0
08/29/15 01:28
EPA 8081B
RICH
1351-11029
Heptachlor epoxide
ND
0.00050
-g/L
10.0
08/29/15 01:28
EPA 9081B
RICH
1351-11029
Toxaphene
ND
0.0050
-9/L
10.0
08/29/15 01:28
EPA 8081B
RICH
135H1029
Methoxychlor
ND
0.00050
mg/L
10.0
08/29/15 01:28
EPA 8081B
RICH
B51-11029
Surrogates
%REC
%REC Limits
Flag
2,4.5.6-Teirachlorn-m-xvlene
76
60-130
Decachlorohiphenyl
60
30-150
PO Box 5655 1 Greenville, SC 29606 1 426 Fait -forest Way I Greenville, SC 296D7 I main 864.232.1556 fax [phone] rogersandeallcott.com
an employee -owned company
09.141015 10.50 "Phis report may not he reproduced, except in ftll, without written permission Iron Rogers & Callcon. Inc. Page 4 of 19

' Environmental Chemists, Inc.
�envirochem 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Pax
© 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Pax
255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Pax
ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Date of Report:
Sep 11, 2015
Post Office Box 7565
V'� S�`�a 1""Customer PO #:
Asheville . NC 28802
Customer ID:
08100055
Attention: Kelley Keenan (ETS) ,
Report #:
2015-11144
Project ID: Earth Environmental
Lab ID Sample 1D:
Collect Date/Time Matrix
Sampled by
15 26358 #081519 \
�1`U 0
Site:
8/18/2015 11:30 AM Solid/Sludge
Client
Test
(C�C� Method
Results
Date Analyzed
2,4,5 TP
SWe46 Method 8151A
<0.0003 mg/L
09/02/2015
2,4-D
SW846 Method 8151A
<0.0003 mg/L
09/02/2015
RCI
lgnitability
EPA 1030
<0.8 mm/sec
08/27/2015
Cyanide
EPA 3WA
<0.124 mg/kg
08/26/2015
Sulfide
SM 4500 S D
0.50 mg/kg
08/26/2015
Comment:
Reviewed by:
Report t: 2015-11 144 Page 1 of 1

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
Lavyind
WEAVERVILLE OFFICE
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone] W
FAX: [phone]
Client: (A /i`'c&6 Tug wow
Address: A-b e 2
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 2733
EAVERVILLE, NC 28787
75 BISON LANE CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
MURPHY, NC 28906 Analytical Request
Report To: 2& eG
Bill To: C, vvt +�_ [nit Lab Temp:
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
Rec Lab Temp:
Phone: O�L'o �[ �� (k�° ) #: <-'°�'�*Requcted Due Date:
-
J � s „ yr , r %
�•
Sam Signature Date
r
�s $
ITEM CL
•
�`/ ,
# SAMPLE DESCRIPTION R SID. TIME MATRIX EES. #
MEN
�����■■■■■■■
mossonsomm
MEN=
monsoon
■■■■■■■■NEE
NEEMENE
NONE
son
0
MEN
MEMENSEEMEN
I
son
ME
No
Is
I
on
MIMME
MEMO
mmommons
son
on
SEINE
SHIPMENT
OUT/DATE
METHOD ITEM
RETURNED/DATE #,ADDITIONAL
RELINOUISED BY /AFFILIATION ''
=
" ACCEPTED'BY / AFFILIATION " ,° .
,DATE TIME,
COMMENTS:
■
■
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS CP-0771-B