WQ0004298_2010 Residuals Annual Report_20110208

Town of Mars Hill NC
2010 Land Application Report
WQ0004298
RECEIVED / DENR / D Q
Aquifer Protection Section
FEB 032011
Attached are the required forms for the Town of Mars Hills 2010 land application
program.
The town has land applied 29.2441266 dry tons of sludge over 18.3 acres in the calendar
year 2010. We have also maintained compliance.
Contact Informations
Preparer/ORC F'Q 0 8 N 11
Robert Sams Asheville R8910111al OfficO
Public Works Director , u.9i��� Trrotofion__—
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]
Permittee
Darhyl Boone
Town Manager
Town of Mars Hill
PO Box 368
Mars Hill NC 28754
Phone # [phone]

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
Firm: WQ0004298 County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
Land Application Operator:
Madison Year: 2010
Town of Mars Hill Land Application Program
Robert M. Sams Phone: [phone]
Land application of residual solids as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
p Yes ❑ No If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A:
Total number of application fields in permit: 1 2
Total number of fields land application occurred during the year: 1 2
Part B:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2010 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. p Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain
corrective action taken.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime -was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at
least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three
(3) copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required
and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 503.13 or the
Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13 (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14 were
complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation,
prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of
violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were removed
in accordance with the crop management plan.
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Darhyl Boone- Town Manager
PermitAe Name and Title (type or print)
Signature of Preparer* Date
('_ �-1 1- 4//
Signatur o Permittee Date
Signature of Land Applier Date
DENR FORM ACF (5/2003)

0
ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
.
Attach this form to the corresponding Annual Report
NPlease note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed than those required to be summarized on this form.
Permit Number:
W,Q0004298 Laboratory:
1) Earth Environmental Services
Facility Name:
Town of Mars Hill
2) Environmental Testing Solutions
d�
NPDES # or
NCO057151
3) A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
7 N
J -
WQ#:
4)
c� N
WWTP Name:
Town of Mars Hill WWTP
5)
Residual Analysis Data
Sample or
Compose Date
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
signific t penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
I �
4-Signature of Preparer D to
DENR FORM RSSF (5/2003)

Earth Eoviroowlol Services
f Michael Ladd
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Robbinsville Lab [phone]
.h'eave Alle Lab [phone]
Residence [phone]
Name and Address of Facility:
Town of Mars Hill WWTP
P.O. Box 368
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Att: Robert Sams
J t All It
Na _7�6 If
L( J
IsDD „
Date: 1 /2412011
Sample Collector.
RS
Date and Time Sample Received:
5/12/2010 10:35 AM
Date and Time Sample Collected:
5112/2010 7:35 - 8:00 AM
Date and Time Sample Analyzed:
< MHT
Lana Appiivauulllvjaly--, Oe.
'
Test Bell Press Sludge Soil Site #1 Soil Site #2 Report Limit Method Units
ACIDITY 0.0 meq/100g 0.2 meq/100g SCA mg/L
TOTAL SUSPENDED RESIDUE 1.0 SM2540D mg/L
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY 21.3 meq/100g 13.3 meq/100g SCA per 100m1
PH 5.7 7.1 6.9 0-14 SCA units
AMMONIA NITROGEN 6800 0.5 SCA mg/L
NO2 + NO3-n < 45 1.0 SCA mg/L
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN 63000 SCA mg/L
TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS 2000 81 430 SCA mg/L
PERCENT TOTAL RESIDUE 11.1% 81.9% 80.2% SCA mg/L
% ORGANIC MATTER 7.6% 4.4°/6 SCA NTU
% BASE SATURATION - K 4.2% 7.4% SCA mg/L
- H 0.0% 1.4%
-Mg 26.6% 24.2%
- Ca 68.9% 66.9%
-Na
PLANTAVAILABLE (surface) 20,305 1 PPM/dw
NITROGEN- PPM DRY wT (subsurf) 23,705 PPM/dw
SAR 0.159493 0.201024
ESP 7.55256% 11.74564%
MANGANESE 320 870 t SCA mg/L
MAGNESIUM 4000 5400 5400 r^�I SCA mg/L
SODIUM 790 37 36� SCA mg/L
CADMIUM < 2.2 1.3 1.1 SCA mg/L
CHROMIUM 24 34 58 SCA mg/L
COPPER 210 38 24 SCA mg/L
LEAD 17 18 11 SCA mg/L
NICKEL 17 15 16 SCA mg/L
ZINC • 570 81 87 SCA mg/L
CALCIUM 9000 5900 7200 SCA mg/L
POTASSIUM 8600 3900 1900 SCA mg/L
ALUMINUM 8900 N/A NIA SCA mg/L
ARSENIC < 4.4 < 0.30 < 0.31 SCA mg/L
SELENIUM 8.7 < 0.60 < 0:61 SCA mg/L
MOLYBDENUM 5 < 0.60 < 0.61 SCA mg/L
MERCURY 1.4 < 0.12 < 0.12 SCA mg/L
N.C. Laboratory ID# 352 Analyzed By: r VA
Lab Supervisor. Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville Certified By: lL
N.C. Laboratory ID# 352 Analyzed By: r VA
Lab Supervisor. Michael J. Ladd; EES-Robbinsville Certified By: lL

Mars Hill Land Application Belt Press Sludge 5/12/2010
PAN
I Rate TKN NH3 NO3 NC
3000 6800 45
0.3 60
PAN Surface Ux
20305 mg/k 40.61 Ibs/dry ton
0 Ibs total PAN
#DIV/01 jibs PAN/acre
PAN Injection
237061 mgikq 1 47.41 Ibs/dry ton
0 Ibs total PAN
#DIVIO! Ibs PAN/acre
Dry Tons/1000 gal.
0.46287
I
1st year PAN
Ibs./acre
Surface Ibs.
Surface
p
#DIV/0!
1st year PAN
Ibs./acre
Injected Ibs.
Injected
01
#DIV/0!
U
.otal dry IAcres
tons/year ,Applied on
0.111
MR(TKN-NH3)+ + .5(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
MR(TKN-NH3) + l(NH3)+NO3+NO2 =mg/kg
mg/kg x .002 =Ibs/dry ton
1000 X 8.34 X %solids X sg. gravity "=dry tons/1000gal."
2000

SAR & ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site #1 5/12/2010
S7.taq qqg
Sodium Absorption Ratio Na M /L Ca M /L Mg(Mg/L)
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23 37 2936-6-80
Ca : Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: or)
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
Na (ME)
'r6U8696
Ca ME
Mg (ME)
1 1-46-8
56-66667
Llq .C�S 37
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0,5 power
!3---I(From Mg/L entered above)
2 32,
SAR= 0.159493 (From ME entered below)
Na ME
--.608696_L
1
Ca ME
Ma (ME)
146.8 156.66667
The amount of exchangeable sodium ions versus the
amount of exchangeable calcium & magnesium ions in a given
material.
Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 require ESP in permit.
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of soils
0=N,3 `oz
ESP = 7-552-563- 0%
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq-.
Na ME
.1;608696.
CEC
21.3
Should be less than 15% (15-20%)

SAR & ESP Mars Hill Land Application Soil Site #2 5/12/2010
Sodium Absorption Ratio
Na: Sodium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 23
Ca: Calcium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 20
Mg : Magnesium (Mg/L) Equivalent weight: 12
Milli Equivalent = Mg/L / Equivalent weight
Na M /L Ca M /L M M /L
36 1 1780 1 387
Na ME
Ca ME
Ma (ME)
1.565217
89
32.25
SAR= Na Milli Equivalent/[0.5 X (Ca Milli Equivalent + Mg Milli equivalent)]0.5 power
AAR 00.201®(From Mg/L entered above)
SAR= 0.200633 (From ME entered below)
Na ME
Ca ME
M ME
1.56217
1 89
32.25
The amount of exchangeable sodium ions versus the
amount of exchangeable calcium & magnesium ions in a given
material.
Permitting guidance is if greater than 10 require ESP in permit.
Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
ESP = Na (Milli Equivalents) / CEC X 100 The percentage of sodium ions occupying the cation exchange complex of soils
Na ME CEC 3.7
1.56217 13.3 __
ESP = 11.7I/® �/6j.� ' Should be less than 15% (15-20%)'
Na on NC soil test is expressed as meq.
i
�l!f

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Client: QUA n ► " ' C>`rs A, 1 oJw
Address
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177
MARSHALL, NC 28753
75 BISON LANE
MURPHY, NC 28906
ReportTo:
Bill To:
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
FAX #: ga ^ &� q — 3 '3 3
07600 --,
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request V
Init Lab Temp:
Rec Lab Temp:
*Requested Due te:
H
Now -
•By •
•
•
!
:• �I
��`
�� �� -
•
•.
•
•
�/r / ���.� ' .I / sue,
ITEM CL
�# SAMPLE DESCRIPTION RESID. TIME MATRIX EES. #
MR.
so
loss
MEN
o
11h.
0
long
I
0
MEN
0
ME
N
MENEM
N
NONE
so
on
0
EMMEM
IMMMMM
.01
son
MEMO
on
IN
NINE
NO
on
ENNON
on
MEMMENEMENNE����
SHIPMENT
OUT/DATE
METHOD ITEM
RETURNED/DATE #
RC.LINQUI£ED BY / AFFILIATION
ACCEPTED BY / AFFILIATION DATE : TIME
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:■
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUC

ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY LOMW
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Client
Address:
Phone:
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177 75 BISON LANE
MARSHALL, NC 28753 MURPHY, NC 28906
Report To:�'�� �� S
Bill To: J J
P.O. # / Billing Reference:
FAX #:
07601
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request
Init Lab Tempe:
l
Rec Lath Te
*RecfU t Due Dated' (2�
•
LL
•
'
Mj
e� * �"
•
- • - Sampled
Si
r
ITEM CL ?
# SAMPLE DESCRIPTION RESID. TIME: MATRIX EES. #.
10A I
IVA &
pla 6
A
�
monsoon
MENOMONEE
MEN
monsoon
son
0
MENEM
MEMENESEENESEN
mossomm
MEN
mossommossonso
MINE
EE=mmmmmmmmmmmmm
MENEM
ME
mmossommoso
SOMEONE
SHIPMENT
OUT/DATE ,
METHOD ITEM
RETURNED/DATE #
RELINOOISED
BY./ AFFILIATION
ACCEPTED BY / AFFILIATION
DATE t TIME
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:■
Ot
■
__
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS CP-0771-B

Report Number: 10-139-0551
Account Number:46220
Send To: EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS WWW.allabs.com
75 BISON LN
MURPHY NC 28906
A &L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
7621 Whftepine Road Richmond, Virginia 23237 [phone] Fax [phone]
Grower:
EES#051035 & EES#051036 Farm ID:
SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT Analytical Method(s):
Date Received: 05/19/2010 Date Of Analysis: 05120/2010 Date Of Report: 05/21/2010 Mehlich 3
Sample ID
Lab .
Organic Matter
Phosphorus
Potassium
Magnesium
Calcium
Sodium
Field ID.
Number
%° Rate ENR
': Mehlich 3 Reserve
K
Mg
Ca
C E C
Rate ppm Rate
Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
Nappm
ppm Rate
SoilIbs/A
pH
FHAcidity
Hppm
051035
17066
7.6 H 150
350 VH
353 VH
680 H
meq/100g
meq/100g
2936 M
NC = 292
NC = 181
7•1
0.0
21.3
051036
17067
4.4 M 119
47 M
383 VH
387 H
1780 M
-
INC = 39
NO = 196
6.9
6.91
0,2
13.3
ID
Percent Base Saturation
Nitrate Sulfur
Zinc
Iron
Co ppChloriderAluminum
Manganese
Soluble SaltsSample
Field ID
K
�g
Ca
Na
H
NO3N S
Zn
Mn
Fe
Rate ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
ppm Rate
CuB
ppm
TBoron
Rate
SS%ppm
mslcm Rate
CIAI051035
ppm Ratepm
4.2
26,6
68.9
0.0
-
051036
7.4
24.2
66.9
1.4
Values on this report represent the plant available nutrients in the
soil. Rating after each value: VL (Very Low), L (Low), M (Medium),
H
Explanation of symbols: % (percent), ppm (parts per million), Ibs/A This report applies to sample($) tested. Samples are retained a
(pounds per acre), ms/cm (milli -mhos
(High), VH (Very High). ENR - Estimated Nitrogen Release.
C.E.C. - Cation Exchange Capacity.
per centimeter), meq/100g maximum of thirty days after testing.
(milli -equivalent per 100 grams). Conversions: ppm x 2 = Ibs/A, Soluble
Salts 640
by; Pcw7�c� G�oKy/
ms/cm x = ppm. Analysis prepared by: ESL Faslem Laboratories, Inc.
o
Pauric McGroary
�-d-s /-t 11
7 "tir

ME
_.i Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services
Collection date: 12-May-10
Date received: 13-May-10
Sample identification: 9051034
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 100513.513
Sample number: 71336
Parameter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analvzed
P,�ei• nt Solids
SM 2540 G
11.1
0.100
%
t9-May-10
JAB
1
11r1 rc�7 r
7471 B
1.4
0.90
mg/kg
2o-blay-to
RWF
1
A�Id "
6010C
8900
22
mg/kg
19-41av-10
DJS
I
c
6010C ,
<4.4
4.4
mg/kg
19-May-10
DJS
1
6010C
<2.2
2.2
mg/kg
19-May-10
DJS
I
m
6010C
9000
/ 88
mg/kg
t9-may-to
DJS
1
ium
6010C
24
2.2
mg/kg
19-May-10
DJS
1
C-fper
6010C
210
4.4
mg/kg
19-May-lo
DJS
1
J
adEstum
6010C
17
2.2
mg/kg
19-May-10
DJS
1
6010C
4000'
22
mg/kg
19-stay-10
DJS
1
.�161 denum
6010C
5.0
4.4
mg/kg
19-May-10
DJS
1
r'c i"
6010C
17
8.8
mg/kg
19-May-lo
DJS
I
P.efa turn
6010C
8600
22
mg/kg
t9-may-10
DJS
1
SeteJ lum
6010C
8.7
4.4
mg/kg
t9-%tay-10
DJS
1
Ssdiu
6010C
790
130
mg/kg
19-tviay-10
DJS
1
6010C
570
22
mg/kg
t9-May-lo
DJS
1
rat Nitrite
Lal
SM 4500 NO3 F
<45
45
mg/kg
19-May-10
KBC
I
hosphorus
SM 4500 P F
2000
120
mg/kg
wun-10
KCP
1
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
EPA 351.2
63000
45000
mg/kg
26-may-lo
KCP
1
To itrogen
Calculation
63000
45000
mg/kg
26-May-10
CDE
I
A606nia Nitrogen
SM 4500 NH3 D
6800
91
mg/kg
i t-May-10
KEK
Solids
SM 2540 G
11
%
13,May-lo
KEK
7t
Soil
SRC 846 9045C
5.7
S.U.
13-May-lo
KEK
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Analyzed by Prism Laboratories. Inc.
Date reviewed: 00-0-�-Lo
Data reviewed by: KellleyynE. Keenan
`y
NC Certification Number: 600
SC Certification Number: 99053
Ni Drinking Water Certification Number: 37786
Signature:
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

I
�a
{
3
i
�! Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services
Collection date: 12-May-10
Date received: 13-May-10
Sample identification: 9051035
PO Box 7565
Asheville, -NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 100513.514
Sample number: 71337
Paratneter Method Result RL Units Date Analyst Footnotes
Analyzed
Pdr Solids
SM 2540 G
81.9
0.100
%
19-May-lo
JAB
1
jent
eYcury
7471B
<0.12
0.12
mg/kg
20-May-lo
RWF
1
rn urn
6010C
1.3
0.30
mg/kg
19-May-lo
DJS
1
alpum
6010C
590t3
1200
mg/kg
2o-May-io
DJS
1
Cfi nium
6010C
34
0.30
mg/kg
19-May-lo
DJS
1
rtop
6010C
3
A.
0.60
mg/kg
i9-ntay-lo
DJS
1
,v�er
[s�hd
6010C
0.30
mg/kg
19-Niay-to
DJS
1
Itch' esium
6010C
5400
300
mg/kg
20-May-10
DJS
I
e ese
6010C
20
30
mg/kg
20411,io
DJS
1
I denum
6010C
<0.60
0.60
mg/kg
19-May-lo
DJS
l
c I.
6010C
15
1-2
�mg/kg
t9-May-io
DJS
I
Peft�sium
6010C
3900
300
mg/kg
22-ktay-io
DJS
1
S�l�ftJ'm
6010C
<0.60
..0.60
mg/kg
i9-May-lo
DJS
1
si,fir
6010C
<0.30
0.30
mg/kg
tv-\•ray-io
DJS
1
S6 ' m
6010C
�
18
mg/kg
t9-Mayao
DJS
I
• c
6010C
81
3.0
mg/kg
i9-,41ay-lo
DJS
I
i al Phosphorus
SM 4500 P F
620
26
mg/kg
i- .io
KCP
I
;T
in Soil
SW 846 9045C
7.2
S.U.
13-May-10
KEK
Acidity
See Attached Sheets
2
This report should not be reproduced, exept in its entirety, without the vmtten consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
a

Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Certificate of Analysis
Project name: Earth Environmental Services
Collection date: 12-May-10
Date received: 13-May-10
Sample identification: 9051036
PO Box 7565
Asheville. NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project number: 100513.514
( ��) �L J+ _-; L' •t� .'
n
Sample number: 7133QU
Parain�ter Method Result RL Units Dj tied Analvst Footnotes
// Y
t'er t1t solids SM 2540 G 80.2 0.100 % 19-May-10 JAB I
iv c ry 7471B <0.12 0.12 mg/kg 20-May-10 RWF I
} um 601OC 1.1 0.31 mg/kg 19-May-10 DJS 1
Cal um 6010C 7200 1200 mg/kg 20-May-10 DJS I
mium 601OC 58 0.31 mg/kg 1q-May-10 DJS I
0, er 6010C (J-0 0.61 mg/kg 19-May-to DJS I
1/ 6010C 11 0.3I mg/l:g t9-May-to DJS I
M e ruin 601OC 5400 310 mg/kg 2o-May-10 DJS l
enese 6010C 870 31 mg/kg 20-May-10 DJS I
�denum 6010C <0.61 0.6I mg/lcg t9-May-to DJS I
Ni e 6010C 16 1.2 mg/kg19-May-to DJS l
P 'sium 6010C 1900 3.1 mg/kg 19-May-to DJS I
em 6010C <0.61 0.61 mg/kg t9-May-to DJS I
601OC <0.31 „,0.31 mg/kg 19-May-10 DJS I
Sbd m 6010C 18 mg/kg 19-May-10 DJS 1
601OC 807 3.1 mg/kg 19-May-10 DJS 1
T / 1 Phosphorus SM 4500 P F 430 25 mg/kg w.,,10 KCP I
V1 in Soil SW 846 9045C 7.0 S.U. 13-May-10 KEK
Acidity See Attached Sheets 2
Footnotes:
RL = Reporting Limit. Values are reported down to the Reporting Limit only.
1. Analyzed by Prism Laboratories. Inc.
2. Analyzed by A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc.
Date reviewed: 0p-0,4-1 0 NC Certification Number: 600
Data reviewed by: Kelley E. Keenan SC Certification Number: 99053
d} /A NC Drinking \Water Certification Number: 37786
Signature: w 1�f-` .
This report should not be reproduced, esept in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name:
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
Town of Mars Hill Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual):
WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only):
14.5
Robert M. Sams
Owner: Larry Cody
15.7468374
21.3
Acres Permitted: 14.5 Site #: 1 Field #: 1
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
Sample
or Com-
posite
Date
5/12/10
2
1 5/12/10
3
5/12/10
4
5/12/10
L5J
5/12/10
6
5/12/10
7
8 J
9
10
11 J
12
% Solids
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Arsenic
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
Cadmium
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
Chromium
24
24
24
24
24
24
Copper
210
210
210
210
210
210
Lead
17
17
17
17
17
17
Mercury
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
Molyb-
denum
5
5
5
5
5
5
Nickel
17
17
17
17
17
17
Selenium
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
Zinc
570
570
570
570
570
570
Total
Phos-
horus
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
1b tJT
DT X qr.,
c
1
2
L3J
L4J
L5J
61
7
L8J
L9J
10 J
11
12
oy w
y
t�1 •o d
0
�
o 9�
0.1034
0.1551
0.1034
0.2069
0.362
0.1551
'069 6'
Arsenic
0.0009
0.0014
0.0009
0.0018
0.0032
0.0014
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0096
Cadmium
0.0005
0.0007
0.0005
0.0009
0.0016
0.0007
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0048
hromiu
0:005
0:0074
0:005
0:0099
0:0174
0:0074
0
0
0
0
0
0
0:0521
Copper
0.0434
0.0651
0.0434
0.0869
0.152
0.0651
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.4561
Lead
0.0035
0.0053
0.0035
0.007
0.0123
0.0053
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0.369
Mercury
0.0003
0.0004
0.0003
0.0006
0.001
0.0004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.003
Molyb-
0.001
0.0016
0.001
0.0021
0.0036
0.0016
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0109
denum
Nickel
0.0035
0.0053
0.0035
0.007
0.0123
0.0053
0
1 0
0
0
0 1
0
0.0369
Selenium
0.0018
0.0027
0.0018
0.0036
0.0063
0.0027
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0189
Zinc
0.1179
0.1768
0.1179
0.2359
0.4127
0.1768
0
0
0
EO
0
0
1.2379
Total
Phos=
0.4136
0.6204
0.4136
0.8276
1.448
0.6204
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.3436
-horns
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the
information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
includin possibility of fines an imprisonment for knowing violations"
//J Aj
Signature of Land Applier Da e
* See bottom -of FSF Form for helpful instructions for this MFLSF Form and the mathematically linked FSF Form
,701
DENR FORM MFLSF (5/2003)

O,bgS�bFS -��o
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill
Owner: Larry Cody Operator:
Site #:
Field #:
Permit #: WQ0004298
Robert M. Sams
Acres Utilized: 14.5
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 15.7468374.
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 21.3
Acres Permitted: 14.5
c
a, a
o
A
Specify
Totals
Per
Acre
%
Solid
s
Dry Tons Per
Acre
Residual
Sources
(Summarize)
1 e
Cond.
Dry,
Wet,
_ '
Inches
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
Appli-
cation
Meth-
od*
Vola-
tili-
zation
Rate**
Miner-
ali-
nation
Rate .
TKN
Ammo-
ma-
Ni-
trogen
Ni-
trate
and
Nitrite
PAN 1
_
PAN 2
Must Select
Crop 1 or Crop
p p
2
Cu.Yd.
Report
in Gal.
Crop 1
Crop 2
4/5/10
3240
223.45
11.1
0.103427503
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
4.20019
#######
Fescue
1
4/6/10
4860
335.17
11.1
0.155141255
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
6.30029
#######
Fescue
2
4/12/10
3240
223.45
11.1
0.103427503
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
4.20019
#######
Fescue
3
4/15/10
6480
446.9
11.1
0.206855007
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
8.40038
########
Fescue
4
10/11/1
11340
782.07
11.1
0.361996262
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
14.7007
#######
Fescue
15
10/12/1
4860
335.17
11.1
0.155141255
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
6.30029
#######
Fescue
6
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
1
10
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
12
TOTALS:
23461&
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
PAN 1
AN 2
Lime Applied
Annual lbs/acre
0.00955592 A
0.0047
0.0521T
5.45657-0.0369Y
0.00302r
0.0108e
0.0369Y
0.0188V
1.2379K
4.3436
44.102
0
Date
lbs/ac
x
Current Cumulative lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.***
Permit PAN Limit 1 st/2nd Crops
0.881259966
0.871704046
36
�`£K"Ya1,,, � „�
0.6005 1.7637
0.59575 1.71158
34 nl
FS -�i' M 2 i ,`"�°
49.40 5.2447 0.1216 2.7470 2.3907 1.5230
48.9474 5.20784 0.11862 2.73615 2.3538 1.50412
1338 267 15 nl 1 374 89
.�'''�J:"aS
u
32 631
31.3935kf
2498
1 j ff,�
w
x.
7/2010
9840
A
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
significant Penalties. for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Ar 4 A V *Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
- //; Q1111
Signature of Lan Applier ate **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Iniection/Incorporation -1.0
***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant LoadinS Rate
The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into
the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1.
DENR FORM FSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name:
Permit #:
Operator:
Acres Used:
Town of Mars Hill Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 15.7468374
WQ0004298 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): 21.3
Robert M. Sams Owner: Larry Cody
3.8 Acres Permitted: 3.8 Site #: 1 Field #: 2
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent #):
Sample
or Com-
posite
Date
1
5/12/10
2j
5/12/10
3
5/12/10
4
5/12/10
5
5/12/10
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
% Solids
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
11.1
Arsenic
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
Cadmium
2.2
2.2
2:2_
2.2
2.2
Chromium
24
24
24
24
24
Copper
210
210
210
210
210
Lead
17
17
17
17
17
Mercury
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
Molyb-
denum
5
5
5
5
5
Nickel
17
17
17
17
17
Seleniuml
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
Zinc
570
570
570
570
570
Total
Phos-
horus
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
,3,, <.5")9 l 9;7, t
K c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0 2�
0.7893
1 1.184
0.3947
0.592
1 0.592
Arsenic
0.0069
0.0104
0.0035
0.0052
0.0052
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0313
Cadmium
0.0035
0.0052
0.0017
0.0026
0.0026
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0156
Chromiunj
0.0379
0.0568
0.0189
0.0284
0.0284
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1705
Copper
0.3315
0.4973
0.1658
0.2486
0.2486
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4918
Lead
0.0268
0.0403
0.0134
0.0201
0.0201
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1208
Mercury
0.0022
0.0033
0.0011
0.0017
0.0017
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10.0099
Molyb-
0.0079
0.0118,
0.0039
0.0059
0.0059
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0355
denum
Nickel
1 0.0268
0.0403
0.0134
0.0201
0.0201
01
0
0
1 0
0
0
0
0.1208
Selenium
0.0137
0.0206
0.0069
0.0103
0.0103
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0618
Zinc
0.8998
1.3498
0.45
0.6749
0.6749
0
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
14.0493
Total
Phos-
3.1572
4.736
1.5788
2.368
.2.368
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14.208
horus
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the
information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
includin possibility of fines an prisonment for knowing violations"
DENR FORM MFLSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH APPLICATION FIELD.
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill . Permit #: WQ0004298 Annual Dry Tons Applied: 13.4972892
Owner: Larry Cody Operator:
Site #: 1 Field #: 2
Robert M. Sams Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 21.3
Acres Utilized: 3.8
Acres Permitted: 3.8
�.
°
o
S eci
Totals
per
Acre
%
Solid
s
Tons Per
Acre
Residual
Sources
(Summarize)
1 e
Cond.
Dry,
Wet,
Inches
Preci p'
Past 24
Hrs.
Appli-
cation
Meth-
od*
Vola-
tili-
zation
Rate**
Miner-
ali-
nation
Rate
TKN
Ammo-
nia-
Ni-
trogen
Ni-
trate
and
Nitrite
PAN 1
PAN 2
Must Select
Crop 1 or Crop
2
Gal.
CuCu.Yd.
Report
Totals
in Gal.
Crop 1
Crop 2
6/7/10
6480
1705.3
11.1
0.789315158
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
32.0541
#######
Fescue
1
6/8/10
9720
2557.9
11.1
1.183972737
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
48.0811
#######
Fescue
2
6/25/10
3240
852.63
11.1
0.394657579
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
16.027
#######
Fescue
3
7/6/201 C
4860
1278.9
11.1
0.591986368
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
24.0406
#######
Fescue
4
7/7/10
1 4860
1278.91
11.1
0.591986368
Belt Press Sludge
dry
0
s
0.5
30%
63000
6800
45
24.0406
#######
Fescue
15
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
9
0
1
0
0
0
110
0
0
0
0
ill
0
0
0
0
12
TOTALS:
7674
As
Cd
Cr
Cu
Pb
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
PAN 1
JPAN 2
Lime Applied
Annuallbs/acre
0.0312576
0.0156
0.1705
1.4918
0.1207
0.0099
0.0355
0.120
0.061
4.0492
14.208
144.24
0
Date
lbs/ac
<t-
Cumulative lbs/ac
. `7/2010
0.268443864 0.30243 1.23249 28.943 13.34062 10.09631 1.55975 1.2449710.671941 17.754
36 1 34 nl 1338 267 1 15 nl 1 374 1 89 1 2498 r
9840Current
Prior Years Cumulative lbs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.***
Permit PAN Limit 1st/2nd Crop
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
sig:R7F
bmitti g false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
Signature o Lan App ier Date **Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Iniection/Incorporation - 1.0
***C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
* * * * The RSSF Data and the Dry Tons Per Acre are to be entered on the MFLSF Form. The FSF and MFLSF are mathematically linked so this information needs to be entered into
the same numbered column on the MFLSF as is entered on the identically numbered FSF row to properly complete the metals equations. ie. FSF row # 1 to MFLSF column # 1.
DENR FORM FSF (5/2003)

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION FORM
Facility Name: Town of Mars Hill Land Application Permit Number: WQ0004298
WWTP Name: Town of Mars Hill WWTP NPDES Number: NCO057151
Monitoring Period: From 5/4/2010 To 5/12/2010
Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) - Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed:
Class A:
Alternative 10
Alternative 2 ®
Alternative 3 ®
r
Alternative 4
Alternative 5 ®
Alternative 6
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A only) indicate "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens":
Compost ®
Heat Drying ®
Heat Treatment ®
Thermophilic
Beta Ray ®
Gamma Ray ®
Pasteurization ®
Class B:
Alternative 10
Alternative 2 ®
Alternative 3
If applicable to alternative performed (Class B only) indicate "Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens":
Lime Stabilization ®
Air Drying ®
Composting ®
jAerobic Digestion
Anaerobic Digestion®
y ry a 6
oW
If applicable to alternative performed (Class A or Class B) complete the following monitoring data:
Allowable Level
Pathogen Density
Number of
Frequency
Sample
Analytical
Parameter
Excee-
inim
Geo. Mean
axim
Units
in Sludge
g
dences
of Analysis
y
Type
Tech-ni ue
q
2 x 10 to the 6th
power MPN per
15000
30000
48000
col./gram
0
1/year
grab
9222d
gram of total
solids or 2 x 10 to
Fecal Coliform
the 6th power
CFU per gram of
1000 mpn per
gram of total solid
(dry weight)
Salmonella bacteria
3 MPN per 4
(in lieu of fecal
grams total solid
coliform)
(dry weight)
Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 503.33) - Please indicate option performed:
Option 1 ®
Option 2 ®
Option 3 ®
Option 4
2
Option 5
Option 6 ®
Option 7 ®
Option 8 ®
Option 9
®
Option 10 ®
3 t .
No vector attraction reduction options were performed
El
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 amd-thevector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met."
® "I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32 and the vector
attraction reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." (Please note if you check
this statement attach an explanation why you have not met one or both of the requirements.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the
system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
used to determinne that the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements have been met. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment."
Robert M. Sams -Public Works Director _
Prepay ame d Title (type or print) Land Applier Name and Title (if applicable)(type or print)
i�% 03—

s I,
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
75 Bison Lane
Murphy, NC 28906
Residence — [phone]
Robbinsville Lab — [phone]
Weaverville Lab — [phone]
Fax — [phone]
E-Mail — earthenvser a,webworkz.coml
May 31, 2010
NC ID #352
Mr. Robert Sams
Town of Mars Hill
P.O. Box 368
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Dear Mr. Sams:
Following is a report of laboratory analyses for digester sludge samples received 5/12/2010.
Colony Counts
# Samnle Pate
1
5/4/10
48,000 Colonies/Gram
1.12
TNTC
v.i sill
54
U.U1 M1
10
2
5/5/10
38,000 Colonies/Gram
1.02
TNTC
41
2
3
5/6/10
49,000 Colonies/Gram
1.05
TNTC
51
2
4
5/7/10
40,000 Colonies/Gram
1.06
TNTC
42
1
5
5/10/10
23,000 Colonies/Gram
1.09
TNTC
25
2
6
5111/10
19,000 Colonies/Gram
1.06
TNTC
18
4
7
5/12110
15,000 Colonies/Gram
1.10
TNTC
17
1
Geometric mean for all seven samples: 30,000 colonies/gram. Thank you for your
business. If you have any question or need additional sample analyses performed, please
call.
Respectfully submitte
s
Michael J. Ladd
Laboratory Director

110
ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone] I
Client:
Address
Phone: karel�_ cc
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177
MARSHALL, NC 28753
Report To: 1i Q
Bill To: Q ��
75 BISON LANE
MURPHY, NC 28906
P.O.'# / Billing Reference:
FAX#:
07 599
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
Analytical Request
Init Lab Temp:.
Rec Lab Temp:
*Requested Due Date:
Sampled By (print): 0
REMARKS
CL
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION RESID. TIME MATRIX EES_ 4
EMEMENESSIMMAININE
SEMEN
SHIPMENT METHOD ITEM
OUT/DATE RETURNED/DATE #
RELINQUISED BY/ AFFILIATION
ACCEPTED BY AFFILIATION
DATE TIME
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
A,
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS
CP-0771-B

.r i
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
75 Bison Lane
Mu>phy, NC 28906
Residence — [phone]
Robbinsville Lab — [phone]
Weaverville Lab — [phone]
Fax — [phone]
E-Mail — [e-mail]\
May 31, 2010
NC ID #352
Mr. Robert Sams
Town of Mars Hill
P.O. Box-368-
Mars Hill, NC 28754
Dear Mr. Sams:
Following is a report of laboratory analyses for digester sludge samples received 5/12/2010.
Colony Counts-
# Samnle Date Colifnrm Densities (cnlnnies/Pram) Q/ Tntal Sn1iA, 1 0 ml 0 1 ml 001 ml
1
5/4/10
48,000 Colonies/Gram
1.12
TNTC
54
10
2
5/5/10
38,000 Colonies/Gram
1.02
TNTC
41
2
3-
5/6/10
49,000 Colonies/Gram
1.05
TNTC
51
2
4'
5/7/10
40,000 Colonies/Gram
1.06
TNTC
42
1
5
5/10/10
23,000 Colonies/Gram
1.09
TNTC
25
2
6
5111/10
19,000 Colonies/Gram
1.06
TNTC
18
4
7
5/12110
15,000 Colonies/Gram
1.10
TNTC
17
1
Geometric mean for all seven samples: 30,000 colonies/gram. Thank you for your
business. If you have any question or need -additional sample analyses performed, please
call.
Respectfully submitte ,
s
Michael J. Ladd - -
Laboratory Director

8
ROBBINSVILLE LABORATORY
[phone]
MADISON COUNTY LABORATORY
[phone]
FAX: [phone]
RESIDENCE [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Client: ni�U�(��/l li (%�(-S 1Ti V1 �l(�5p
Address I✓f v ���� 3 ���
Phone: &IR:—
EARTH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
MICHAEL LADD-OWNER
P.O. BOX 1177
MARSHALL, INC 28753
07 599
75 BISON LANE CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD`
MURPHY, NC 28906 Analytical Request
Report To:
Bill To: Q
P.O.# / Billing Reference:
FAX #:
[nit Lab Temp:
Rec Lab Temp:
*Requested Due Date:
Sampled B (print):
wIffAw"m
MINI REMARKS
R'n
ITEM CL
# SAMPLE DESCRIPTION RESID. TIME MATRIX EES. #
OEM
1101010ME
SHIPMENT METHOD ITEM
OUT/DATE RETURNED/DATE #
RELINQUISED BY/ AFFILIATION
ACCEPTED.BY AFFILIATION
DATE TIME
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
0
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS
U-0771-B

r
I
1. Complete all Client Information at top of sheet: name, `address, phone, contact (person to whom report will be
sent and contact can be made if questions arise), billing information if different from client, PO#, Project Name
and/or Project Number as it will appear on the report.:
2. EES Client No., Project Mapager and Project No. will be completed by EES.
3. A separate COC must be filled out for each day of sample collection.
i
4. Sampler should print their name in the space provided and sign their name followed by the date of the sampling
event.
5. Complete Sample Description as it will appear on the 'laboratory report; include time of sampling, sample matrix;
no. of containers and container types.
6. Analyses Requested: Complete analyses.on the linesprovided and place a check in the column for the samples
requiring the analysis. It may be 'necessary to use the; space provided for additional comments or include
attachment for extended lists of parameters.
7. Indicate method of shipment used for return of,samples and date sent.
8. Submission of samples to laboratory: Indicate Item Number of those samples- being transferred; sign
relinquished by, and include your affiliation.
*IMPORTANT NOTE:
Standard Turnaround Time. is 3-4 Weeks. If this does ;not satisfy your requirements, arrangements must be
made prior to samples being submitted to the laboratory. Contact your project manager.
Special Promect Requirements such as Low Level Detection Limits or level or QC reported must be indicated on
the chain of custody. (UseAdditionalComments Section.)

Feb 01)11 03:37p Earth Environmental Ser. 8288358631
p.1
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name;
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date
Digester Temperature.
Sampling Date/Time
Sampled By
Analysis Date/Time
Analyzed By
Sample Volume
Total Solids
Beginning Temperature
End Temperature
Dissolved, Oxygen Level
4
4
3.
Mars Hill
WQ00.4298
q l tiv2#�►r
15.1
4/12/2010 14:30
Michael Ladd.
4/12/2010 14:30
Michael Ladd
1000
1.22
15.1
15.3
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.8
Correlation Coefficient: 0.9
'nilliliters
Yo Dry Solids
legrees Celsius
legrees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 6.58 mg Oxygenihr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.54 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 15 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.4025517311
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake"Rate:. 0.76;mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

10
5
4
+,
1
Ef
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
y =-0.1101 x + 5.0653
�
1
I
�
1
I
I
i
i
I �
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time {minutes}

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number:E53
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:Sample Volume:
Total SolidsBeginning TemperatureEnd Temperature
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.82
4.77
4.69
4.61
4.54
4.43
4.35
4.29
4.23
4.19
4.08
3.97
3.84
3.76
16.
0 10:4
1.08 % Dry Solids
16.6 degrees Celsius
16.1 degrees Celsius
Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 5.0
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 5.06 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.47 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 16 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.31079601
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.61 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

M.
5
4
0 2
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 F. 9 lu IL+ 'J 'u
Time (minutes)

1 4 ,ii ,
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number: W00042
Date: 18-Ju
Digester Temperature: 17..
Sampling Date/Time: 6/18/2010 10:4
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Date/Time: 6/18/2010 10:4
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume: 100
Total Solids: 1.
Beginning Temperature: 18.
End Temperaturel 1
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4.36
4.29
4.2
4.13
4.08
3.92
3.89
3.83
3.76
3.66
3.5
3.42
3.31
3.22
3.15
- Slope: 0.1
Intercept: 4.5
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Dry Solids
grees Celsius
arees Celsius
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 5.18 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.43 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:1 0.49 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
0
2
1.5
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
Noun
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1. I `( s i l
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name:
Biosolids Permit Number:
Date:
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
3.01
2.92
2.87
2.8
2.73
2.66
2.61
2.49
2.43
2.36
2.29
2.21
2.14
2.03
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
Average Temperature:
Temperature Correction Factor:
Hill
11-JUI
17.7
7/22/2010 13:45
Michael Ladd
7/22/2010 13:45
1000 milliliters
1.02 % Dry Solids
18.1 degrees Celsius
18.5 deorees Celsius
0.1
3.1
1.0
4.38 mg Oxygen/hr
0.43 mg Oxygen/g/hr
18 degrees Celsius
1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:1 0.49 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

3.5
Ml
2.5
0.5
y =-0.0731 x + 3.1605
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 '10 '10
Time (minutes)

1 .( ' N ( ) Y
Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Na
Biosolids Permit Num
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
(mnlll
5.35
5.16
5.04
4.93
4.86
4.76
4.69
4.62
4.54
4.46
4.3
4.22
4,11
4.03
3.94
3.83
18.
010 :1
�e
Ladd
�s
010 11:1
0.98 % Dry Solids
18.6 degrees Celsius
18.4 degrees Celsius
Slope:
0.1
Intercept:
5.3
Correlation Coefficient:
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate:
5.71 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:
0.58 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature:
19 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor:
1.07
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:11 0.62 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

0
E
c
m
cM
O
4)
0
A
4
1
C
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1u
Time (minutes)

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars
Biosolids Permit Number: WQO
Digester Temperature:
Sampling Date/Time:
Sampled By:
Analysis Date/Time:
Analyzed By:
Sample Volume:
Total Solids:
Beginning Temperature:
End Temperature:
Dissolved Oxygen Level
Slope:
Intercept:
Correlation Coefficient:
0 15:30
dd
1000 milliliters
0.9 % Dry Solids
18.8 degrees Celsius
18.3 decrees Celsius
0.1
.4.8
1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 5.74 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.64 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 19 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor. 1.07
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Ratel 0.68 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

A
4
l w
1
0
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
VII
4, t 5 {.
t:
y 00 86.3
,
I. u'
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

Time
(minutes)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate
SOUR
Facility Name: Mars Hill
Biosolids Permit Number: WQ004298
Date: 28-Oct
Digester Temperature: 17
Sampling Date/Time. 10/28/2010 10:45
Sampled By: Michael Ladd
Analysis Date/Time: 10/28/2010 10:45
Analyzed By: Michael Ladd
Sample Volume: 1000 milliliters
Total Solids: 0.88 % Dry Solids
Beginning Temperature: 17.7 degrees Celsius
End Temperature: 17.9 degrees Celsius
Dissolved Oxygen Level
4
3.
3
Slope: 0.1
I ntercept: 4.4
Correlation Coefficient: 1.0
Oxygen Uptake Rate: 4.30 mg Oxygen/hr
Ambient Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate: 0.49 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Average Temperature: 18 degrees Celsius
Temperature Correction Factor: 1.1449
Temperature Corrected Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate:1 0.56 mg Oxygen/g/hr
Instructions: Enter Data in the Blue Boxes. The Calculation and the Spreadsheet execute automatically.

5
4.5
4
3.5
E 3
c
d
2.5
m
0 2
N
_N
0
1.5
1
0.5
0
'rr `
-r
s
Oxygen Uptake Rate Chart
MEMO
i
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Time (minutes)

a;old yla 6 hi
I rni1: ;':e
I. Annual Land Application Certification Form
• Was a certification for n submitted? yes
• Was land application conducted during the reported year?y�S
• How mam,� dry- tons and dry tons per acre were applied? ���
o Were the applications within the permitted amount? Y1�
• Verify PANif if more than 10 tons/acre
• Did it indicate compliance? Ie5
• Was it signed by the appropriate people?�eS
2. iVlonitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency? Pl s
• Were the metals analyses reported>on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? ye-Y
• Were the results reported in mg/kg? VP-5
• . Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?*y.e,5
• If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested? y�S
• Was TCLP analysis conducted? No p�,(�. re7&j,. 1 pi-Q, eye%
3. Field Summary
• Were the land application. events recorded on the Field Summary Forms? pe S
• Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field? ye.S
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?10-5 .
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources? yes
• Were the field Ioading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)?yes
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated?�,&S
• Were the calculations correct? V
• Were the PAN loading rates. within permit Iimits?.,1.0
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?AJ.4eS
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?yP-5
• Were the applications,conducted during the crop's growing season?yes
• Were the Field Summary Forms complete? lis
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of the Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction Form subm ted?gyres
• Did the form in��dip�ate the perigd of coverage,'the residualas , and the path o nl rn reduction alteati} e and the
vector attractiorireduetion option used?�ie'oIV
•. Was the appropriate docume}tation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report? �S
• Was pathoCen and vector hftraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CPR Part 503?yCT
5. Soil Tests
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field?yam
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field?y, S
Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field?
CGa�I' ��d r ��1► � �j C,a nor' any-x
6. General ETS z,a Ierj V- ,=;,,�w , /y- /o„c �'i�G`a 3
• Was the report in the proper format?y 5.
• Were, any parts of the annual report missing?Oia
• Was the report submitted on time?yes
* Any violations of ceiling concentrations should be reported to. Pretreatment for.municipalities.only.

Class JB Pathogen Review
Alternative 1 - Fecal Coliform Density
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency? Yz6
• Were seven samples taken?Yes
• Was the geometric mean calculated and done correctly?y^
• Did the results show compliance (less than either 2,000,000 MPN/gram of total solids or 2,000,000
Colony Forming Units/gram of total solids) Y.&5
Alternative 2 - Use of Process to Significantly Reduce Patho ens (one of five)
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
Aerobic Digestion
• Was it an aerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
• Was the time and temperature between 40 days at 20°C (68T) and 60 days at 15°C (59°F)?
Air Drying
• Were residuals on sand beds or pave or unpaved basins for three months?
• Was theambient.ternpe'rature above 0°C (32°F) for two months?
• Were the residuals partially, digested?
• Were residuals exposed to atmosphere during two months above 0°C (riot snow covered)?
Anaerobic Digestion
Was it an anaerobic process (Inspection)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Were temperatures within range for complete time period?
® Was the time and temperature between 15 days at 35°C (95T) to 55°C (13IT) and 60 days at 20°C
(68-F)?
Composting
• Was it a. composting procedure (not natural decay under uncontrolled conditions)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the temperature, raised to 40°C (104T) or higher and remained at 40°C (104T) for five days?
• Did the temperature exceed 55°C (131T) for four hours during the five-day period?
Lime Stabilization
• Was alkaline material added to residuals a form of lime (hydrated lime, quicklime, lime containing
kiln dust or fly ash)?
• Were logs submitted showing time and temperature?
• Was the pH raised to 12 after two hours of contact?
• Were logs submitted showing time and pH?
• Was the temperature corrected to 25°C (77°F)?

Vector Attraction Reduction Review
• Was the sampling conducted at the required frequency?
38% Volatile Solids Reduction
• Was there 38% reduction?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not -total solids)? �.
• Was the samples taken at beginning of digestion process and before application
(Inspection)?
• Were calculations correct? ,
4.0-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from anaerobically'digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals anaerobically digested in lab?
• Was the test run for 40 days?
• Was the test done between 300C (86°F) and 370C (990F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the reduction less than 17%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations in report?
• Were calculations correct?
30-Day Bench Scale Test
• Were residuals from aerobically digested.treatment (Inspection)?
• Were residuals aerobically digested in lab?
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids?
• Was the test run for 30 days?
• Was the test done at 200C (68°F)?
• Was the reduction on volatile solids (not total solids)?
• Was the reduction less than 15%?
• Were lab sheets/calculations. in report?
• Were calculations correct?
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR)
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)? �(�S
• Were residuals 2% or less total solids (dry weight basis) (not diluted)?,ye_5
• Was the test done between 100C (50°F) and 30°C (860F)?y*0,s
• Was the temperature corrected to 20°C (680F)? y o,5
• Was the SOUR equal to or less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of total residual
solids (dry weight basis)? jzfi
• Was the sample holding time under two hours? yeS
• Was the test started within15 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained?I-C$

14-Dgy Aerobic Process
• Were residuals from aerobically digested treatment (Inspection)?
• Were the residuals treated for 14 days?
• Was the residuals temperature higher than 40°C (104°F) for the 14-day period?
• Was the average residuals temperature higher than 45°C (113T)?
Alkaline Stabilization
• Was the pH of the residuals raised to 12 •or higher by the addition of alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 12 or higher for two hours without the addition
of more alkali?
• Did the pH of residuals remain at 11.5 or higher for an additional twenty-two
hours without the addition of more alkali?
• Was the pH corrected to 250C (770F)?
Dr dag of Stabilized Residuals
• Does the residuals contain any unstabilized residuals?
• Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 75% total solids?
Drdg of Unstabilized Residuals
o Were the residuals mixed with any other materials?
• Were the residuals dried to 90% total solids?.
Injection
• Was there any significant. amount of residuals on land surface one hour after
injection (Inspection)?
• Was injection done on pasture or hay field?
• Was injection done at time that crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals injected within eight hours
after discharge from pathogen treatment?
Incorporation
• Were the residuals incorporated into the soil within six hours after application?
• Was incorporation done on pasture or hay field?
• Was incorporation done at time that crop was growing?
• If Class A with respect to pathogen, were residuals incorporated within eight