20221462 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20221019

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
8/9/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20221462 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
11717 Appaloosa Run East
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sean Clark
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
lb. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
10/19/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Upper Barton Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
WS-IV;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.9568 -78.7014
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lh. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Senta, Stephen & Amy
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB: 17347 DP: 265
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
11717 Appaloosa Run East
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal /Zip Code
27613
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Hamlin
4b. Business Name:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
3707 Swift Drive
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27606
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0880833351
2c. Project Address
Street Address
11717 Appaloosa Run East
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27613
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Upper Barton Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
WS-IV;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010602
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
2.26
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is a single-family residence with a driveway crossing. Land use in the vicinity includes residential development.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown

4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
475
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the project is to replace an existing, failing 36" RCP with two 42" pipes that are 56 feet long. The existing culvert is not sufficient size to provide adequate conveyance and
overtops the driveway during larger storm events. Stormwater from smaller storm events have velocities greater than can be managed by the existing outlet protection. This has created an
emergency safety issue as the pavement above the culvert is failing.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project proposed to replace an existing 36" RCP with two 42" pipes that are 56 feet long. Temporary coffer dams and a pump around will be used to allow the culvert installation to
occur in the dry. Outlet protection in the form of a riprap pad is proposed. All riprap will be countersunk so that the top of the riprap is flush with the stream bed. Total proposed permanent
stream impacts are 31 LF (125 SF) for culvert installation. Total proposed permanent no loss impacts due to the riprap dissipater pad are 35 LF (154 SF). Total proposed temporary stream
impacts for dewatering are 10 LF (40 SF). The pavement above the work area will be replaced after installation of the new pipes. Typical equipment used in culvert installation will be
utilized including backhoes and tractors.
Riparian buffer impacts are also proposed due to the culvert replacement. Proposed permanent Zone 1 impacts total 5,424 SF and proposed permanent Zone 2 impacts total 1,391 SF.
The proposed riparian buffer impacts are deemed "Allowable Upon Authorization" per the Table of Uses.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc. (Sage)
Yes No
Unknown
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
no
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
3. Stream Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
length*
S1
Impact 1 - Culvert installation
Permanent
Culvert
Stream SA
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
31
(linear feet)
S2
Impact 1 - Rip Rap pad
Permanent
Rip Rap Fill
Stream SA
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
35
(linear feet)
S3
Impact 1 - Dewatering
Temporary
Dewatering
Stream SA
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
10
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
66
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
10

31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
76
3j. Comments:
Total proposed permanent stream impacts are 31 LF (125 SF) for culvert installation. Total proposed permanent no loss impacts due to the riprap
dissipater pad are 35 LF (154 SF). Total proposed temporary stream impacts for dewatering are 10 LF (40 SF).
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
Neuse
Catawba
Goose Creek
Other
Tar -Pamlico
Randleman
Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Impact 1 - Driveway Crossing - Allowable Upon
Authorization
P
Stream SA
No
5,424
1,391
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Total combined buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Zone 1
0.00
Zone 1
5,424.00
Zone 2
0.00
Zone 2
1,391.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
5,424.00 1,391.00
Proposed permanent Zone 1 impacts total 5,424 SF and proposed permanent Zone 2 impacts total 1,391 SF for culvert replacement. The proposed
riparian buffer impacts are deemed "Allowable" per the Table of Uses. Total proposed riparian buffer impacts are 6,815 SF (0.156 ac).
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
u
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed project is designed to meet the purpose and need of replacing the existing driveway culvert to reduce erosion and overtopping while
avoiding and minimizing impacts to the stream channel to the maximum extent practicable. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction
corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from stormwater runoff.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Work within
jurisdictional areas will be conducted during periods when dry weather is predicted, and large bare areas of soil will be reseeded and protected as soon
as practicable. Silt fencing will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Permanent proposed stream impacts are below mitigation thresholds. There are no proposed wetland impacts. Riparian buffer impacts are considered "Allowable Upon Authorization" and
are below mitigation thresholds.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No

What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
The project is within a single lot with an existing residence and driveway crossing. There will be no increase in impervious area.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project involves replacement of an existing culvert and will not result in additional development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Per the NCNHP database report (dated October 5, 2022) there are no threatened or endangered species on or within 1.0 mile of the Site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Essential Fish Habitat Mapper (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper). The proposed project is within Wake County
which does not have any Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NCSHPO HPOWEB Map Service
According to NCSHPO, the Site is not a historic property or within a historic district. Four historic properties are located within 1.0 mile of the Site. Figure
4 depicts these historic properties in relation to the Site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
FEMA Floodplain Map Service - Panel 3720088000K, effective on 07/19/2022
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
NWP 29 Request - 11717 Appaloosa Run East - Raleigh - Wake County - Sage Project #2020.079.pdf 4.99MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
ATTACHMENTS
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 — USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Map
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
NCNHP Database Report
USFWS IPaC Report
Impact Maps
ORM Spreadsheet
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Package
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kimberly Hamlin
Signature
e
Date
10/19/2022

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
".2
October 19, 2022
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regulatory Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Lyle Phillips Attn: Ms. Colleen Cohn
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105 512 N. Salisbury St., Archdale Bldg. 91h Flr
Wake Forest, NC 27587 Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: 11717 Appaloosa Run East — Driveway
Request for NWP 29, GC 4256, and Riparian Buffer Authorization
Sage Project #2020.079
On behalf of Ms. Amy Senta and Mr. Stephen Schilling (owners and applicants), please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) that the activities associated with the proposed 11717 Appaloosa Run East driveway (Project) may
proceed under Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 and corresponding General Certification (GC) 4256. A Riparian
Buffer Authorization is also being requested.
Project Purpose and Location
The purpose of the project is to replace an existing 36" RCP with two 42" pipes that are 56 feet long. The existing
culvert is not sufficient size to provide adequate conveyance and overtops the driveway during larger storm
events. Stormwater from smaller storm events have velocities greater than can be managed by the existing outlet
protection. This has created an emergency safety issue as the pavement above the culvert is beginning to fail.
The +/-2.26-acre Site (NC PIN: 0880-83-3351) is located at 11717 Appaloosa Run East in Raleigh, Wake County,
NC. The coordinates of 35.9568°N, 78.7014°W generally correspond to the center of the Site. The Site is located
within Upper Barton Creek watershed of the Neuse River Basin.
Project Detail
The project proposed to replace an existing 36" RCP with two 42" pipes that are 56 feet long. Temporary coffer
dams and a pump around will be used to allow the culvert installation to occur in the dry. Outlet protection in the
form of a riprap pad is proposed. All riprap will be countersunk so that the top of the riprap is flush with the stream
bed. The pavement above the work area will be replaced after installation of the new pipes. Typical equipment
used in culvert installation will be utilized including backhoes and tractors.
In the NCNHP database report dated October 5, 2022, there are no threatened or endangered species on or
within 1.0 mile of the Site. IPaC lists four T&E species, one Candidate species, and the bald eagle as being
potentially present on the Site. No habitat for Neuse River waterdog or Carolina madtom is present on the site
due multiple pipes and a dam that the Stream SA passes through before reaching Upper Barton Creek. Habitat
for red -cockaded woodpecker is not present on the site due to lack of older pine stands with open understory.
Habitat for Michaux's sumac is not present as the site is either forested or maintained as part of a residential
lawn. Habitat for the monarch butterfly is present on the site. Suitable foraging habitat for bald eagle is present
within 1.0 mile of the site; however, no evidence of bald eagles was present on the site.
The Site is not listed as a historic property or within a historic district. No historic structures were found on the
Site. Four historic properties were identified within one mile of the Site. These properties are designated as either
"Surveyed Only (SO)" or "SO -Gone."
11717 Appaloosa Run East Page 1 of 2

Project History
The Site contains an existing single-family residence with a driveway connection to Appaloosa Run East.
Vegetative composition of the forested areas includes a combination of pines and hardwood species in the higher
stratum, and shrubs, vines, and herbs, occupying the remaining strata. A portion of the lot is maintained as a
lawn. Land use in the vicinity includes suburban residences and neighborhoods.
A wetland, stream, and riparian buffer delineation was performed on the Site by Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
(Sage) in August 2022. A preliminary jurisdictional determination request is being submitted with this application.
Project Impacts
Total proposed permanent stream impacts are 31 LF (125 SF) for culvert installation. Total proposed permanent
no loss impacts due to the riprap dissipater pad are 35 LF (154 SF). Total proposed temporary stream impacts
for dewatering are 10 LF (40 SF). Riparian buffer impacts are also proposed due to the culvert replacement.
Proposed permanent Zone 1 impacts total 5,424 SF and proposed permanent Zone 2 impacts total 1,391 SF.
Avoidance and Minimization
A wetland, stream, and riparian wetland delineation was performed to locate potential jurisdictional areas on the
site. The proposed culvert was designed to meet the purpose and need while maintain adequate conveyance of
stormwater flows under the driveway. Outlet protection is proposed to protect the downstream areas from erosion,
and was minimized as much as practicable. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor
and prevent any accidental additional impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from
stormwater runoff.
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any
accidental additional impacts. Equipment will be parked and cleaned in uplands away from jurisdictional areas.
Work within jurisdictional areas will be conducted during periods when dry weather is predicted, and large bare
areas of soil will be reseeded and protected as soon as practicable. Silt fencing will also be used to prevent
sediment runoff into the stream and wetland areas.
Mitigation
Permanent proposed stream impacts are below mitigation thresholds. There are not proposed wetland impacts.
Riparian buffer impacts are considered "Allowable Upon Authorization" and are below mitigation thresholds.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Respectfully submitted:
Kim H mlin, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Form
Agent Authorization Form
Figure 1 — USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 — Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
Figure 3 — Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Map
Figure 4 — NCSHPO Map
NCNHP Database Report
USFWS IPaC Report
Impact Maps
401 Prefile Email
ORM Spreadsheet
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request Package
a4tcan Clark, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
11717 Appaloosa Run East Page 2 of 2

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 4: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: 11717 Appaloosa Run East
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The purpose of the project is to replace an existing 36" RCP with two 42" pipes that are 56 feet long. The existing culvert is not
sufficient size to provide adequate conveyance and overtops the driveway during larger storm events. Stormwater from smaller storm
events have velocities greater than can be managed by the existing outlet protection.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Senta, Amy & Schilling, Stephen
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Kim Hamlin, Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
The Site is located at 3420 NC 98 Highway in Youngsville, Franklin County, NC. The coordinates of 35.9822 °N, 78.3619'
W generally correspond to the center of the Site.
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 0880833351
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Wake
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Raleigh
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Upper Barton Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03020201
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit 4
Regional General Permit 9
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST, 704
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Representative
Name: -1-eP ' er\ �1i 15�� qnc� A("\y SeIj l q
Address: `\ __1 `7
gglei ��
q 10 o501 P, err) F_
NC_ 2-7 � 5
Phone: l 1 0� - 3 C)s — C is `k 3
Email: 9 r A S! r)+CI I� el(� M g 1 l. C 0 M
Project Name/Description: 11717 Appaloosa Run East
Sage Project # 2020.079
Date: 10 I i 3 I - -
The Department of the Army NC Division of Water Resources
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District 3800 Barrett Drive
P.O. Box 1890 Raleigh, NC 27609
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Lyle Phillips Attn: Colleen Cohn
Field Office: Raleigh RFO Regional Office: Raleigh RO
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under
Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.1 also hereby
designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit
applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site. }
BY:
Print Name of Landowner or
Legal Representative
RM•} ser&q
BY:
Signature of Landowner or
Legal Representative

{=ram
i Nnkh"
14
1
!'�Qa I�i4►1i�\a
�i
x�
�a
ti
L
. 2ME
liL4Q .
i
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
EST. # _0 ,
4
i

651 11 CeB2 G �
Apg -_ r CeC
CgC2' - 1 1
l AgC N CeD
v� Ap �� Cgs= CeB
�_- w
AS CeR- �r C
estnut r ���, CeD
f rc
W y A p R A B
A C G r
=� �y
��jj � Feature A
1
CeC CeB2
'tie
AgC B.
Appp +
t GeC2 �]
y W
s %
g82 CeD' CeD
CgC C
Ag g 1 F !�_ !� - M
:. ABC
Project Study Area
Map Location NRCS Soils Map Figure 2
GRANVILLE 11717 Appaloosa Run
FRANKLIN DURHAM Sage Project # 2020.079
SAGE
N
Wake County, NC Soil Survey 1970 ECOLOGICAL
NASH Soil Sheet # 12 SERVICES
WAKE Map Prepared by: Philip Beach
CHATHAM September 29, 2020
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
JOHNSTON 0 550 1,100 Office:919-335-6757
LEE HARNEFeet Cell: 919-559-1537
TT

NOTE: Features depicted herein must be field verified
by the USACE and/or NCDWR, or its delegated authority
before being valid. Location, shape, and size of depicted
features on the evaluated site are approximate and should
be surveyed by a licensed NC surveyor for final site planning.
Legend
Project Study Area
Potential Non -wetland WOTUS - Perennial Stream
main.contour
Map Location
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Map
0
11717 Appaloosa Run
Sage Project #2020.079
Prepared by: K. Hamlin
October 5, 2022
1 inch = 100 feet
100 200
Feet
N
Figure 3
SAGE
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Cell: 919-559-1537

a
ry�9r 4b
�
s
4
NCSHPO Data Download: August 2022
,
http://www.ncdcr.gov
°' rF�n°'c�4
cy
a
trerr
NevvBethel
Baptist Church "Nufv av,:
- WA1336
_ ♦,5argarBtx
-
livid in
¢
%z
House-
�`aaney Beck-m
Brogden-Sith
a _ WA----
�
House`(Gone)
o '-
WA1335
= a
r Y
_ s
G
D
�esr
�
y1act�d9`
a
1151No,seu^
- a"
Y ban
s T Ra
4061
e
a J sy
(q
use Elkw oad Cr
1"4
L,a�ey
�7 !
ay
I dQt
- O
w
r a
4
0
�
1
I o
y Ct �
� e G�vtvao
kega[wood Or
m
House -
Y
gig ° o p•
's WA---- a` c
�'
�o ; n ^Gruen ndyo
c • __r"a Ct s
o-
E
,ICJ i6rseman Tel
fc Pg¢ �
ry
�cgct �
Ps gouiuer L',eek Ln `ri,� s �
b
�s n
ip p3
F9iar Kir�B Ld
Y
�
°laengate
c b n
G
0 L 0
Gf
�.
Hors esh ne4 a °P
CS � ryorWpprll
8e001'd MAN kanyary
. b
�ie�gvo�
�l ii dW Qr
Ct p Gad rrr Qt�
Ii 'i
i�NB
�
j
III' CarioM G
Legend
�v°°
�
I,
Project Study Area afro
3
-
$
4
1-Mile Project Buffer ", r�enr,a�n
-way %
0'E z TMe
p5r�'sr
0.
NCSHPO Status
(�
ell
si
Surveyed Only
tia e, ate'=^fawu
• Surveyed, Gone
o4b`
nr
fo 7 P.'c vesuY W'`y x;,,;dalc
kr
'e-
Map Location
NCSHPO Map
Figure 4
Granville
Franklin
11717 Appaloosa Run
Orange
9 Durham
Sage Project #[2020.079
N
Nash
Prepared by: K. Hamlin
SAGE
Wake
Chatham
October 5, 2022
Johnston
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Lee
Harnett
0 2,000 4,000
Office:919-335-6757
Feet
Cell: 919-559-1537

Roy Cooper, Governor
9" 0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
""i ■
WMk.M 1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■-000
October S. 2022
Kim Hamlin
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: 11717 Appaloosa Run East; 2020.079
Dear Kim Hamlin:
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 1N. JON S STREET, RALEIGI I_ NC 27603 - 16Sl MAOL SERVICE CENTER. PAL EIGH. rkc 276�0
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAK 919.707.9421

/
CO �
2 ®
\
s
a
a a
§
/ / /
\
3
z
CO
/
\
u
3 / CO e
e
CO % « CO
® 7 F
\
s
\
..
\
0co
\,
0
CO
J CO
2
Gƒ
E
\/
%_
}
>
2 %4
\/
g
COu
�
\\
?
{\
\
m
u
2y
\(e
\cn
6mu
®
E \ /
e 2
H
3/
�0
\ = 9 \ a
®
O
\.z
s=o
cc ® e \
ƒ /
\
_
(7\d/
2 ±
)\
o \ \
e
±
2 \
mo /
/D m — m
/
«
/\ w o z
< a e o o
\:
CO 0 Z
u \
\
±®�
°
m
ƒ
\
2
3
y
-
e
Z
e
0E
0
\
cn
-
\\
%
% CO:z
/z
/
5
Dt
/
§
\ = e
»
CO
:
±
E° ©
E
CO
�0
§
d E \
\
\ u
/
\ \
\
z
» }
=
O
O
CO-~
/
COs
k
CO
§
\\
k
=
y
3
?e CO
y
/±
\
\E /
e u
»/
2
\\ \
\
\\ n
\
E .± Z
\
=
u
_
// /
/
/
\\
/
/
\
/{
o /
§
\
\
\
`
Ln
\
CO
x\
§
\
<
_\
/
g \
O -
\
\
s
�/
%/
E >�
e
z>
\
=
/ z 0 \
E °=
CO
®
CO/
®
CO E
/ do /
/
/
/
\\\\
§
\
c

M
W
0
0
Q
d
Q
r
r
r
co
LO
M
LU
i
U
n Church
ka
�
�etn°
Mt
ti
ry
e
—1
4
a
�o
ry
u
4101AR 177¢g
d
0\d
�a
a
C
a
0
yr
Black Horse Rr'4
Ra
of
F�
a
eco`i
4 J�
ao� oa of
�
O 0
d
e14d
s
and
d \
J
\
D
�\
s
P
\
Iil ojrlpllM
a
V�
$x
tic dam'
='rZLL
E
e cox..
a2��5
F �+
M
O
M
N
a

IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
WaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust
resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project
area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project
may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -
specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the
defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS
Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina e4A
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Servicesr
o
[phone]-
l(
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
C0406\010
CP

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence
(AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected
by activities in that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may
indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can
change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects
to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species
which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted,
permitted, funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement
can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or
from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official speci
list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species! and their critical habitats are managed by the Eco o ical Services Program of the U. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries?).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA
Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction. 14
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or
proposed, for listing. See the Listing status pag-e for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds Ift
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Wherever found
N.o critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical
habitat.
hUps://ecos.fws.goy/ecpLSpecies/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS

Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical
habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/speci es/528
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with e en r�ll species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats
should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
49-
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/ ibrary/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-
incidental-take-migratorry it
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-
conservation-measures.pcif
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and
how this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every
bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds
in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on
your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and
abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important
information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory
birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to

be present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because
of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferu!
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor ++
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska. � ��
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska. 4
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
CRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and
Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds Apr 28 to Jul 20
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
oe 0
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This
information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you
read and understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular
week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The
survey effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:

1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was
detected divided by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and
the Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the
probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability
of presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of
any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values
fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no
yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the
10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is
areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much
more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no datz
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN 4JUL 'Of AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle Jill Jolt JJJJ 111 �1,1 I ! j Jill Jill I I Il i+ Jill Jill
Non -BCC Vulnerable
Cerulean Warbler ++++ ++++ +++ +++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
BCC Rangewide (CON) ____ ____
Eastern Whip -poor -will +++ + +++" t I T+ ��"I'+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Kentucky Warbler ++ +++ ++++ +++ 1 1 1 +i" '+ I ♦ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prairie Warbler it ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prothonotary Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ 'l'l +1-1 '+++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Red-headed Woodpecker 11+1 mill Jill Jill 11i1 1111 Jolt Jill
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Rusty Blackbird I +o+ ++++ +++I ++++
BCC - BCR T ++++ +--+ +++— +—++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Wood Thrush ++++ ++++ ++++ +++' 11+— +—++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON) 1�1 1■■1
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round.
Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the
area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are
most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable
depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC). and other species that may warrant special attention in

your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKIN data is based on a
growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the
10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may
occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This
data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability
of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these
graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may queryyour
location using the RAIL Too and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your
results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be
nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds? oe\ N
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including
Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for
eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy
development or longline fishing). -
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the
birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help
avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts an ui ments for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
♦M%k
Details about birds that are potentially affected by qffshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area
off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may
be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA
NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf
project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on
survey data may not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag
studies or contact Caleb SpiegEl or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your
list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the
migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort
(indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If
the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar
means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying
what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might
be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures
to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit
the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird
trust resources page.

Coastal Barrier Resources System
Projects within the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) may be subject to the restrictions on federal
expenditures and financial assistance and the consultation requirements of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) (16 U.S.C.
3501 et sec.). For more information, please contact the local Ecological Services Field Office or visit the CBRA Consultations website.
The CBRA website provides tools such as a flow chart to help determine whether consultation is required and a template to
facilitate the consultation process.
There are no known coastal barriers at this location.
Data limitations
The CBRS boundaries used in IPaC are representations of the controlling boundaries, which are depicted on the official CBRS maps. The boundaries
depicted in this layer are not to be considered authoritative for in/out determinations close to a CBRS boundary (i.e., within the "CBRS Buffer Zone" that
appears as a hatched area on either side of the boundary). For projects that are very close to a CBRS boundary but do not clearly intersect a unit, you
may contact the Service for an official determination by following the instructions here: https://www.fws.gov/service/coastal-barrier-resourcesmsystem-
property-documentation
Data exclusions
CBRS units extend seaward out to either the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location of the unit). The true seaward extent of the
units is not shown in the CBRS data, therefore projects in the offshore areas of units (e.g., dredging, breakwaters, offshore wind energy or oil and gas
projects) may be subject to CBRA even if they do not intersect the CBRS data. For additional information, please contact CB��fws.gov.
Facilities 0\
National Wildlife Refuge lands _.
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination'
conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individdal Refuges 4Aiscuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
op
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or
other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We
recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
RIVERINE
Riverine
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website

NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional information
on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of
these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and
geography. A margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of
the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the
collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source
imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon
boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used
to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries
and nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These
habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in
this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state,
or local government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or local agencies concerning
specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such> ivs. '
Gp�
O� �p�

TSLO-d asuaOil S13SON dVW 1JVd WI
TLSl ZON'all!nsa�56£9-S£b-6T6
ON O1
9 xo^^..9 Od on�Alninm a�vM
staaui8u3 PIP Eulllnsua�l, 1I 3n� mN3s xwe x��
6uedwo� neN a41 1N3W3JVld3d 19VNMICI °
1SV3 Nnd VSOOIVddV LTLTT
e
nl e
ca Gm_
_U

Kim Hamlin
From:
Kim Hamlin
Sent:
Tuesday, August 9, 2022 1:00 PM
To:
401 PreFile
Subject:
Notice of intent to file 401 permit
Good afternoon,
This email serves as notice of intent to file a 401 permit for the Appaloosa Run East driveway drainage replacement
project located in Wake County, NC.
Thank you,
Kim Hamlin
Kim Hamlin, PWS
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Cell: 919.622.7888
[e-mail]

wardin_Codel HGM_Codel Meas_Typel Amound Units I Waters Typel Latitude I Long ituc�Local_Waterway ji
Stream SA NORTH CAROLINA R2 RIVERINE Linear 475 FOOT RPW 35.95730000-78.70120000 UPPER BARTON CREEK
Stream SB NORTH CAROLINA R4 RIVERINE Linear 32 FOOT RPW 35.95630000-78.70140000 UPPER BARTON CREEK

Resourte ryp� m_unn9I.-N an P—_I I.Ro V P.P _I inna�N P.wm]RovNea_IRw�ea_Rw�e��ninnaem_Inulw -Ipnmo IomA9 xdes
pxt�-CUlvcrtlmtallAron o square Feet 1
pact-xtp iap wa square Feet
St.. sn Im t1-oex .q mner(pawcvwwre, wont, �aorsuomannecadecmssnps) airenst— NO Tem— aerrova area square Feet 10 a

0
Q
v
I.L
N Y
Z
O
O > U
W W
Z p N
N
�
_O }
p O L L I Z O
CL Q M
A/
N
(^Q
�Ooo (n �O m
SON W
Z` 00
(6
C^ L W
M 0 0 _ W U U W
N 0 0 - O W D
-j U I� O O
U Q Z V p (n U
N
N
i.i
Q
Cl) O� J
W p� Q N
<IN O O O W O U W C' OU
04 p
J a r p Q' w O O
I`
O O O�
OW O�V D W U-00
`nNQD O JJ�ODM2�
0
WYO� W(n() to -.0
J
p
{
r
r
ti
d 0 J J Q �-' Q' J �-' DW� Ur a aN
I00g QQ�UdQDQzww Iz22�
O (� H 0 Q Q U= r Z
r�OQQ OJJQv)�O
r
w Q ZIWI�I�IJIaIQ 0ImI0W a171C7 C7 Z Z Z
Z N mI I UIUIUIO Z H
w> C� U
r
U oC7-<j w��ww--z W
Q W Z Z Q O W O Q W W a a W W J O O>
000, >>
oowwwE ZZZ CO
D O W W W Z U
O
did dJmH WOH(n�2 ��D OdH HL.LO
Q Q Q> z
0000OD JJJ HOQ L.L
'-
F
Q
0
d

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 11717 Appaloosa Run East
City, State: Raleigh, NC
County: Wake
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Kim Hamlin, Sage Ecological Services
Mailing Address: 3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27605
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultants
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Amy Senta
Mailing Address: 11717 Appaloosa Run East
Raleigh, NC 27613
Telephone Number: 919-308-9043
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Kim Hamlin
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ✓❑ Authorized Agents
10/13/2022
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
' For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 2.26 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.9568
Longitude:-78.7014
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
F] Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
zCompleted appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
z Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
z Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
7 Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attn: Kim Hamlin — Sage Ecological Services, Inc., 3707 Swift Drive, Raleigh, NC 27606
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE
TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Wake County City: Raleigh
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.9568, Long:-78.7014
Universal Transverse Mercator: Zone 17S 3981599 707297
Name of nearest waterbody: Upper Barton Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):

TABLE OFAQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAYBE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resources
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non -
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
SA
35.9573
-78.7012
475 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404
SB
35.9563
-78.7014
32 LF
Non -wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area,
and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types
of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWT) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NAT or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not
requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWT or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD fmds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable
waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that
could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below
where indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: PJD Sketch Map — Figure 3
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Bayleaf, NC Quadrangle
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County Soil Survey. 1970 (Sheet 12)
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap Orthoimagery. 2021
or ®Other (Name & Date): Site Photos
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory staff
member completing PJD
n�&MiL October 13, 2022
Sigliature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless
obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary
prior to finalizing an action.

NOTE: Features depicted herein must be field verified
by the USACE and/or NCDWR, or its delegated authority
before being valid. Location, shape, and size of depicted
jr,.'
features on the evaluated site are approximate and should .,r f.�•i�. ,
be surveyed by a licensed NC surveyor for final site planning. #'. �.-} {,
- }
¢'.'
N-: S
al Non -wetland
i - SAY+'N' 75. LF
l �
— _ -"6 1wF
Legend
Project Study Area
O Stream Data Point
Potential Non -wetland WOTUS - Intermittent Stream
Potential Non -wetland WOTUS - Perennial Stream
1' Contour
a
ntial Non —wetland
•US - SB +/- 324LF
Ma Location Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Map
Granville
orange Franklin 11717 Appaloosa Run
Durham Sage Project #2020.079 N
Nash Prepared by: K. Hamlin
Wake
Chatham October 5, 2022
Johnston 1 inch = 100 feet
Lee Harnaft 0 100 200
Figure 3
SAGE
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SA-1
Date:10/9/2020
Project/site:11717 Appaloosa Run E
Latitude: 35.9565
Evaluator:
S. Clark
County:
Wake
Longitude:-78.7014
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if
Stream Determination: Pe re n n l a l
Other: Ba leaf
e.g. Quad Name : Bayleaf,
>19orperennialif>30
NC 1:24K
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =25 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple- pool
sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =1_5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
3
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology (Subtotal =9_5) 1 Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0
perennial stream may also be identified using other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet)
Bankfull Width (feet)
Water Depth (inches)
Sketch:

mft
r
/
h
T Firy '
�L4

Photo 3: Stream SA looking downstream from outlet of existing culvert. Wooden outlet headwall
is visible in photo right.
Photo 4: Looking upstream at the existing culvert outlet.
11717 Appaloosa Run East - Photo Log 2

Photo 5: Existing driveway crossing facing southwest toward Appaloosa Run East.
Photo 6: Photo taken by homeowner during an overtopping event. View facing southwest
toward Appaloosa Run East
11717 Appaloosa Run East — Photo Log

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SB-1
Date:10/9/2020
Project/site:11717 Appaloosa Run E
Latitude: 35.9562
Evaluator:
S. Clark
County:
Wake
Longitude:-78.7014
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if
��.�
Stream Determination: Intermittent
Other: Ba leaf
e.g. Quad Name: Bayleaf,
>19orperennialif>30
NC 1:24K
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =13 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
0
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple- pool
sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
0
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =7 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology (Subtotal =4_5) 1 Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0
perennial stream may also be identified using other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet)
Bankfull Width (feet)
Water Depth (inches)
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:10/9/2020
Project/site:11717 Appaloosa Run E
Latitude: 36.9563
Evaluator:
S. Clark
County:
Wake
Longitude:-78.7014
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if
Other: Ba leaf
Bayleaf,
1 11
Stream Determination: Ephemeral
e.g.QUadName:
> 19 or perennial if >3 0
NC 1:24K
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =6.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
0
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple- pool
sequence
0
1
2
3
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =1.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
C. Biology (Subtotal =3 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0
perennial stream may also be identified using other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Bank Height (feet)
Bankfull Width (feet)
Water Depth (inches)
Sketch: