20140781 Ver 2_401 Application_20141114

r°` � -_ . . d e .:e , ae. o a a m 4 � °'.o .� . � .e° °.ma -.; a•s°m; ,; . ®• a ®'e r�
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.523.4726
704.525 -3953 fax
To: NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
npC�CS'VVr ' :- 5&ME
W I Nov 2 s 2014
Date: November 24, 2014
Job No. 4335 -14 -212
Line 330 HDD Replacement
Attn. Ms. Karen Higgins
We Are Sending You ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
following items
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Contract ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Report
the
Copies
Date
No
Description
5
11/24/14
1
PCN for Wetlands, Stream and Riparian Buffer Impacts
1
11/7/14
2
Check for $240 00 to NC Division of Water Quality
1
11/24/14
3
CD with PCN
These Are Transmitted As Checked Below
®
For approval
®
For your use
❑
As requested
❑
For Review
❑
For Bids Due _/ /_
❑
Prints Returned After Loan To Us
Remarks Enclosed is 5 copies of PCN, check and CD for your review
If you have any questions, feel free to call Joey Lawler at 704 - 523 -4726.
Signed
Gloria A Keiffer, Administrative Assistant
S &ME, INC / 9751 Southern Pine Boulevard / Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560 / p 704 523 4726 f 704 525 3953 / www smeinc com

tS&ME
November 24, 2014
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Attention: Mr. David Bailey
Reference: Line 330 HDD Replacement Project
Pre - Construction Notification for
Wetlands, Stream and Riparian Buffer Impacts
Guilford County, North Carolina
S &ME Project No. 4335 -14 -212
Dear Ms. Higgins and Mr. Bailey:
On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), S &ME, Inc. (S &ME) hereby submits this
Pre - construction Notification (PCN) for temporary stream and wetland impacts, along
with riparian buffer impacts, in connection with the above - referenced project. The
project entails replacement of a circuitous segment of natural gas pipeline with a shorter,
straight segment of pipe by horizontal direction drill (HDD). Construction of the new
pipeline segment will involve removal of above - ground vegetation within portions of a
new right -of -way (ROW) adjacent to an existing Duke Energy ROW. The proposed
work conforms with Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12/ General Water Quality
Certification (GC) No. 3884, and is part of a larger project that entailed reclamation of
PNG's existing Line 330 ROW. Authorization for buffer impacts associated with the
parent project (S &ME project No. 1357 -14 -090) was granted on August 21, 2014 (DWR
Project No. 14- 0781).
The pipeline replacement activities currently proposed by PNG will involve 27 linear feet
(If) of temporary stream impact, 0.13 acre of temporary wetland impact, as well as
additional riparian buffer impacts. None of the wetland or stream impacts will be
permanent or result in a loss of waters of the U.S. The project area is located in Guilford
County, North Carolina, within the Randleman Lake Watershed. In support of this
application, please find enclosed the following:
• Figures: Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2) and a 2013
Aerial Photograph (Figure 3)
S &ME, INC. / 9751 Southern Pine Blvd / Charlotte, NC 28273 / p 704.523.4726 / f 704.525.3953 / www.smeinc.com

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 4335 -14 -212
Line 330 HDD Replacement Project November 24, 2014
• Appendix I: Completed PCN and Authorization to Act as Agent
• Appendix II: Site Photographs
• Appendix III: Buffer Impact Table
• Appendix IV: Impact Drawings
• Appendix V: Agency Scoping Responses
• Appendix VI: Restoration Plan and Mitigation Request Letter
A completed PCN and Agent Authorization Form are included in Appendix I. Because
the project does not involve activities requiring submission of a PCN to the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers ( USACE) under NWP -12, a copy of this application is being
provided to the USACE only as a courtesy.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
PNG is in the process of ROW maintenance and pipeline integrity inspection activities in
the Greensboro, North Carolina area. The parent project, within which the proposed HDD
work will be conducted, is identified as Line 330. Line 330 originates at an existing
station site of Old Greensboro Road in Kernersville, North Carolina, and then runs
generally southeast for approximately 20.7 miles while terminating at a second existing
station site on the west side of Hunt Road in Pleasant Garden. The proposed HDD work
area is located roughly near the mid -point of the route (36.003667 N, - 79.914401 W),
south of Guilford College Road and north of Stanford Road in Greensboro, North
Carolina. The general project location is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1),
and in greater detail on the appropriate USGS Topographic Map (Figure 2), and a 2012
Aerial Photograph (Figure 3).
The combined buffer impacts previously authorized by NCDWR in connection with the
parent project were limited to 2,056 square feet. There were no stream or wetland
impacts associated with that work.
PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED
The purpose of the replacement is to retrofit the subject segment of pipeline to
accommodate passage of an in -line inspection device (aka "smart pig ") by eliminating a
series of incompatible bends. As the pipe is currently configured, the smart pig would
not be able to travel through the pipe and continuously record data that would allow the
pipeline to be assessed in terms of its structural integrity. The data collected by the smart
pig are necessary to identify areas that require further inspection, potential repairs or
remediation.
While the new pipe will be installed within PNG's existing ROW where possible, new
ROW has been acquired in order to establish a continuous path for the replacement
segment. That portion will abut an existing Duke Energy ROW. The new pipe segment
will be tied back to the existing line within PNG's existing easement.
PNG considers establishment and regular maintenance of the existing ROW system an
important part of their responsibility to provide safe and reliable energy to the
2

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 4335 -14 -212
Line 330 HDD Replacement Project November 24, 2014
communities they serve. To that end, maintaining and adequate amount of easement on
each side of the pipe is required to support:
• Leakage surveys from ground mobile units or aerial technology.
• Aerial patrolling for possible encroachment activity near the pipeline.
• Aid in identification of possible repairs and maintenance.
• Promotion of damage prevention in that the easement can be more easily identified by
the public.
• Minimization of potential canopy encroachment, which creates visibility concerns.
• Minimum turn- around requirements for mechanized mowing and side - trimming
equipment.
In this instance, the new ROW will abut an existing Duke Energy ROW. As such, the
new pipe must be sited at least 25 feet from the edge of the Duke Energy ROW. Limiting
the width of the new maintained ROW to 30 feet at this location would leave only 5 feet
of cleared easement along the south side of the ROW, or require an "island" of trees
between the existing Duke Energy and PNG easements. Accordingly, PNG proposes to
clear and maintain the entire 50 feet in this location. PNG is prepared to provide
appropriate riparian buffer mitigation for these additional required impacts.
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
The project area consists primarily of PNG's existing maintained ROW, which is
bordered to the north by a Duke Energy powerline easement. The project area is bisected
by a sewer line and active railroad and a parking area associated with a municipal
training center, beneath which the new pipe will be installed. The project area is located
in the Piedmont physiographic province in the Randleman Lake watershed, which itself
comprises part of the Cape Fear River basin (HUC 03030003). The nearest stream is an
unnamed tributary that drains to Bull Run (Index No. 17 -5 -(1) — Class WS -IV), which is
located approximately 1,800 feet northwest of the project area. Land use in the vicinity
of the project corridor consists primarily of a mix of woodland, open, maintained land
residential and urbanized institutional /light industrial and commercial areas.
To determine which streams within the Line 330 ROW, which includes the current HDD
project area, were subject to the buffer rules, S &ME originally conducted field reviews
over a period ranging from April 8, 2014 through April 28, 2014. In addition to those
features that appeared on the most recent version of the appropriate Natural Resources
Conservation Service Soil Survey or the appropriate 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute)
quadrangle topographic maps, those that scored greater than 19.0 points on the NCDWR
Stream Assessment Form (Version is 4.11, effective September 1, 2010) were considered
subject to the buffer. Results of the field assessment were provided to NCDWR as part
of the Line 330 ROW Reclamation Project.
3

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 4335 -14 -212
Line 330 HDD Replacement Project November 24, 2014
S &ME re- visited the site on October 9, 2014 to confirm that stream conditions remained
consistent with those previously observed, and to delineate wetlands located within the
project area. To conduct the delineation, S &ME followed the procedures set forth in the
1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Regional Supplement Guide). Streams within the current project area were
identified as SRI (perennial) and SR2 (intermittent). Two wetland areas (Wetlands WR1
and WR6, both of which are classified as headwater forest wetlands currently in an
herbaceous state, will be affected by the project.
Typical vegetation observed within the existing ROW was varied, but generally included
species such as rye grass (Lolium sp.), goldenrod (Solidago sp.), sericea lespedeza
(Lespedeza cuneata), big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), dogfennel (Eupatorium
capillifolium), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), blackberry (Rubus spp.), poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), little
buttercup (Ranunculus abortivus), and various grasses (Festuca spp.). Soft rush (Juncus
effuses), Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium vimineum), tearthumb (Polygonum
sagittatum) and shallow sedge (Carex lurida) were observed in wetter areas.
Woody saplings observed within less - frequently maintained portions of the ROW
included various oaks (Quercus spp.), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), black cherry
(Prunus serotina), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), winged sumac (Rhus copallina),
red maple (Acer rubrum), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), shortleaf (Pinus echinata)
and loblolly pine (P. tadea). Tag alder (Alnus serrulata) and black willow (Salix nigra)
shrubs and saplings were observed in the wetland areas.
Photos of the typical project corridor conditions are included in Appendix II.
PROJECT IMAPCTS
Construction of a temporary road to afford the equipment access to the west side of the
project area will impact 271f of Stream SRI and 0.05 acre of Wetland WR1. Both the
stream and the wetland are located within PNG's exiting ROW. At the eastern end of the
project area, establishment workspace to accommodate the drill rig will temporarily
affect 0.076 acre of Wetland WR6. All of the affected wetlands are herbaceous, and
timber removal will not be required.
Zone 1 Buffer impacts associated with the temporary access road, drill rig workspace and
clearing the new easement total 26,540 sf. Of these impacts, 14,555 sf will result from
permanent removal of trees, while the remaining 11,985 sf will result only from
temporary disturbance to accommodate the equipment. With respect to Zone 2, the
project will affect 11,254 sf. Of this, 3,018 sf of forested area will be converted to
grassed area, while the remaining 8,236 sf will result only from temporary disturbance to
accommodate the equipment.
These impacts are broken out by crossing on the Riparian Buffer Impact Table
(Appendix III), and are depicted on the attached drawings (Appendix IV).
4

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 4335 -14 -212
Line 330 HDD Replacement Project November 24, 2014
ADDITIONAL REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Protected Species
Pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 1543), S &ME provided the N.C. Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) and the U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service ( USFWS) with a scoping package that included maps and
information related to the proposed project on October 6, 2014. The NCNHP responded
with an October 20, 2014 letter stating that database does not show any records for rare
species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project area. Within one mile of the site, the only record of the
NCNHP identified was for the Greensboro burrowing crayfish (Cambarus catagius), a
state - listed species of special concern. At the time of the submittal, no response from the
USFWS has been received.
S &ME also review of the USFWS list of federally protected species was consulted for a
listing of protected species documented within Guilford County, North Carolina. This
review identified only one federally - protected species (a plant) - small whorled pogonia
(Isotria medeoloides). A majority of the proposed work will occur within and adjacent to
an existing ROW where gas and overhead electric utilities are co- located. Habitat in this
area is not suitable for small whorled pogonia, and no plants resembling small whorled
pogonia were observed in the wooded area during an October 9, 2014 site visit by
S &ME.
Historic Properties
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, S &ME provided the
N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) with a scoping package that included
maps and information related to the proposed project. The SHPO responded with an
October 21, 2014 letter stating that they had conducted a review of the project and are
aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project, and therefore, had
no further comment.
Although unlikely, in the event previously unknown historic, cultural or archeological
remains and artifacts are encountered while performing the work, the USACE will be
notified, and to the maximum extent practicable, reclamation activities that may affect the
remains and artifacts will be avoided until the required coordination has been completed.
Copies of the agency scoping responses are included in Appendix V.
Sediment and Erosion Control
An appropriate Sediment and Erosion Control Plan incorporating best measures practices
as outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Planning and Design Manual" shall be approved and implemented to comply
with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard.
5

Pre - Construction Notification SWE Project No. 4335 -14 -212
Line 330 HDD Replacement Project November 24, 2014
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Through agency coordination, the project has implemented avoidance and minimization
procedures. Impacts will be minimized by incorporating the following best management
practices (BMPs):
• Woody vegetation within the buffers shall be cleared at ground level. No land
grubbing or grading will be minimized.
• Vegetative root systems within the buffer shall be left intact to maintain the integrity
of the soil. Stumps shall remain.
• No fertilizer shall be used other than a one -time application to re- establish vegetation.
• Construction activities shall minimize the removal of woody vegetation, the extent of
the disturbed area, and the time in which areas remain in a disturbed state.
• Active measures shall be taken following the reclamation and during routine
maintenance to promote diffuse flow of stormwater through the buffer.
MITIGATION
Mitigation for impacts to Zone 1 of the riparian buffer will be provided through the N.C.
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). Mitigation for impacts to Zone 2 is not
required, as the area is to remain grassed without above -grade construction or impervious
surface. A letter requesting the appropriate amount of credit (14,555 sf x 3 = 43,655) is
included in Appendix VI.
CLOSING
Thank you for your review of this PCN and associated support materials. If you have
questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S &ME
l
Senior Project Manager
Senior Review by Jason Reeves, P.E.
Attachments
CXP
Crystal J. Fox, C.E.
Project Scientist
CC. Jeff Smith, PLS — Regional Land Surveyors
Jim Kalish — PNG
[:1

FIGURES

APPENDIX I:
COMPLETED PCN AND
AUTHORIZATION TO ACT AS AGENT

%VNq a
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 1
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
El Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Line 330 HDD Replacement Project
2b.
County:
Guilford
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Jamestown
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Piedmont Natural Gas
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte N.C. 28210
3f.
Telephone no.:
704.572.7985
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
jim.kalish @piedmontng.com
Page 1 of 1
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Utility Company
4b.
Name:
Jim Kalish
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d.
Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte N.C. 28210
4f.
Telephone no.:
704.572.7985
4g.
Fax no.:
704.731.4098
4h.
Email address:
jim.kalish @piedmontng.com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
S &ME, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, N.C. 28723
5e.
Telephone no.:
704.523.4726
5f.
Fax no.:
704.525.3853
5g.
Email address:
jlawler @smeinc.com
Page 2 of 2
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Project is a linear utility line replacement
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.00356 Longitude: - 79.91435
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
— 1.3 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
LIT to Bull Run
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV
2c.
River basin:
Randleman (Cape Fear — 03030003)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is limited to PNG's existing 50 -foot wide ROW, which is routinely mainatined, and a new segement
required to accommodate the new pipe. Land use in the vicinity of the project corridor consists primarily of a mix of
woodland, open, maintained land, scattered residential, light commercial and institutional areas.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
— 1 acre
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
— 600 If
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the replacement is to retrofit the subject segment of pipeline to accommodate passage of an in -line
inspection device (aka "smart pig ") by eliminating a series of incompatible bends. As the pipe is currently configured, the
smart pig would not be able to travel through the pipe and continuously record data that would allow the pipeline to be
assessed in terms of it's structural integrity. The data collected by the smart pig are necessary to identify areas that
require further inspection, potential repairs or remediation.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The work will entail retirement of the circuitous segement of pipeline and replacement with a straight segement. The new
pipe will be installed by HDD with tie -ins to the existing pipe made at each end. Above - ground vegetaion within the new
ROW will be cut at grown level to accommodate a clear line of site and to create workspace for the drilling equipment.
Equipment mats will be placed in workspace where wetlands are located, and a single stream crossing is required in
order to allow equipment access to the west side of the project area. Industry drilling and construction equipment will be
used.
Page 3 of 3
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: To our knowledge, the USACE has made no
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
previous assessments of the site. Streams subject to
buffers were identified along Line 330 in its entirity during the
relamation phase of the project easrlier in 2013. The stream
within the current project area is subject to the buffer rules.
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: S &ME, Inc.
Name (if known):.
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
N/A
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 4
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ®T
WR1 - temp
HW Forest
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.055
access road
® No
® DWQ
W2 ❑ P ®T
WR6 - temp.
disturbance
HW Forest
El Yes
® No
® Corps
®DWQ
0.075
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.13
2h. Comments: Impacts are temporary.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Temp crossing
SR1
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
4
27
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: Stream will be impacted in connection with temporary equipment crossing
Page 5 of 5
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: No open -water impacts are required.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: No pond or lake construction is required
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ® Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number -
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Buffer Impact Table in
Page 6 of 6
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Construction equipment operating within wetlands and buffers will be limited to that necessary for construction and restoration
activities. Wetland vegetation within the project will be cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to promote re-
growth.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The project will also incorporate the following best management practices (BMPs): 1) Woody vegetation within the buffers
shall be cleared by hand. No land grubbing or grading will be allowed. 2) Vegetative root systems within the buffer shall be
left intact to maintain the integrity of the soil. Stumps shall remain wher practicable. 3) No fertilizer shall be used other than a
one -time application to re- establish vegetation. 4) Construction activities shall minimize the removal of woody vegetation, the
extent of the disturbed area, and the time in which areas remain in a disturbed state. 5) Active measures shall be taken
following the reclamation and during routine maintenance to promote diffuse flow of stormwater through the buffer.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 7 of 7
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 8
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Project is a linear utility located belowground. The ROW will remain
❑ Yes ® No
grassed with no imperveous surfaces.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project will not result in additional
imperveous surface
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
N/A
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
F1 USMP
apply (check all that apply):
0 Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 9
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is not considered "growth- inducing" in that its purpose is only to replace a segment of natural gas
transmission pipeline.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will not generate waste water.
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See cover letter and agency scoping responses
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See cover letter and agency scoping responses
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Available FEMA mapping
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
11.24.14
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

APPENDIX 11:
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo 1. View of SR1 where it flows through the ROW.
Photo 3: View of SR1 east of the existing railroad tracks.
Photo 5: Second view of WR1 within the existing ROW.
Photo 2-.View of WR1 within the existing ROW.
Photo.4: View of WR6, adjacent to SR1.
Photo 6: View of SR1 where it flows onto the existing ROW.
Project No.: 4335 -14 -212
Taken by: S &ME #S&ME PNG Line 330 HDD Replacement SITE
PHOTOGRAPHS
Checked by: CD Guilford County, North Carolina
Date: 10.15.14 Photo Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX III:
BUFFER IMPACT TABLE

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACT TABLE
Line 330 HDD Replacement Project
Stream
ID
Sheet No.
of 4
Notes
Perpendicular
Crossing?
More than 40 If of
buffer affected?
Permanent Conversion (sf)
Temporary Impacts (sf)
Mitigation
Required?
Required Mitigation
Credits*
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 1
Zone 2
SR1
2
Perennial UT
No
Yes
0
0
2,209
1,222
No
0
SR1
3
Perennial UT
No
Yes
14,555
3,018
6,270
2,987
Yes
43,665
SR1
4
Perennial UT
No
Yes
0
0
3,506
4,027
No
0
Totals:
14,555
3,018
11,985
8,236
43,665
*Required mitigation = (total area of Zone 1 permanent conversion - replant area) x 3. Impacts to Zone 2 do not require mitigation, as the area will consist of a grassed right -of -way with no aboveground structures or impervious surface.

APPENDIX IV:
IMPACT DRAWINGS

\`,_ `\ \ \
r \ ` /
ca O� �� OR ` \\\\ \
IN
F� o-
SIT
` I
STANF \��
RD \ /
\ \\ O N DSO, \ /
OFF , Is" G�
VICINITY MAP `\ X03
(NOT TO SCALE)\ `s \ S8 /N� Z/C �L ` -Ij \ T -100 /�tV � G STREAM \ � q,�' �' �"`.�'
SR1
WETLAND
SEE SHEET 2 s / •' ---''
' /
CY
M
J
d 330 -GUIL- 047_001 /` P �°' /� 'j /' o
/ cloo CD PIN: 7822815567 " J` / / T -51 Z
CY
�- o- TRUSTEES OF GUILFORD TECHNICAL T -101 // H
o COMMUNITY COLLEGE
0 D.B. 5988, PG. 1797
.- / \ r m
STREAM � • i I \
SR1 A
/ SEE SHEET 3
330 -GUIL- 047_003 STR -5 1
1 _ PIN: 7822802578 I 1
1 _ NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD / T -102 j `\
1 COMPANY �%-
i D.B. 7081, PG. 1651 STREAM / y/ I 330- GUIL - 048_003
P.B. 178, PG. 25 SR1A / \ E PIN: 7822905929 \
1 STREA GUILFORD TECHNICAL
1 330 -GUIL- 047_002 * / / R1 B COMMUNITY COLLEGE
PIN: 7822817244 / / / \ I 1 D.B. 5957, PG. 933
I 1 TRUSTEES OF GUILFORD TECHNICAL \ \ 1
/ \
i COMMUNITY COLLEGE
I 1 D.B. 5988, PG. 1797 / STREAM _ WETtAN
/ T -49 SR2 WR6
PIN: 7832010013 °` \
PIEDMONT NATURAL \
i GAS COMPANY `\ `
i / / D.B. 2499, PG. 762 SEE SHEET 4
330 -GUIL- 049_000
1 / / PIN: 7822905929 I ` �\
GUILFORD TECHNICAL �� \\'\� \
COMMUNITY COLLEGE `� ` \\ T -103 `
/ D.B. 4487, PG. 1265
/
LEGEND GENERAL NOTES ��i11111/��/
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
-G c G G - EXISTING GAS PIPELINE \\��`�\ -\\A CARo / / /i� // SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON Regional Land Suve y ors, Inc. P i e d m o n t
O� •' • ..... •ESSIp ' C� REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S &ME
-G G G c -NEW GAS PIPELINE .`` OF ;_j' •'• ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ON 11 -19 -2013. 8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100 N a t u ra I Gas
---------- - - - - -- EXISTING PNG PERMANENT EASEMENT =••��SEAL •� Q GREENSBORO NORTH ECAROLINA 13627409
_.._._'_.._CENTERLINE OF STREAM =
L-4464 = JE FE Y S. SMI PLS 11 'v 64 )RAWN 1 BY: JB4 DATEREVISIONS I JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF
— — — — —EDGE OF WATER : �� �: *Z \ oB No. 1280.99 DATE: 11/19/14 LINE ID3 ON NORTH U CAROLINA
----------EDGE OF WETLAND ::1MEILAND:: STREAM \,: „ -
RAILROAD REPLACEMENT
-TREE LINE 'i�� FF'...... cj \��` SCALE: 1 20o GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
/AIRY IS,\\\���` 200 100 0 200 # IR 0426433 SHEET 1 OF 4

� F O
�c
SITE
` \� 1/2" IRON PIPE \
` FOUND
N: 822194.90 \
\ \ E:1728579.20
NAD83 (NSRS 2011) G
~\G1\,2 \\ T -101
LATTICE Zb
STRUCTURE O
,. c\ \ d2 �i Sp• �Qj A
1i \ 22 �� O
� O&, FSJ O
VICINITY MAP \�� _ 2t 2i\ ` \ �`� J
'--POINT
}-
(NOT TO SCALE) Al \ AL A, `\ N: 821893.24 F
E: 1728792.55 O'Q STOgNS
WETLAND WR1 2t
NAD83 (NSRS 2011)
21 mfr X22
\ \ \ `� \ \ A, ,r 4 N Z2 Z2
1i \ \ \ \\ \
1>7 Zj Z11
1>1 A4 4D
wo, AL AL
Or
Z2 Z2 Z2
IN
co
\?? 21 , \WETLAND WR1 ... .
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L1
S56'30'1 6 "E
28.93'
L2
S12'46'21 "E
0.53'
L3
N62'53'12 "W
26.06'
L4
N12'46'21 "W
4.72'
L5
S12'46'21 "E
0.89'
L6
S56'2639 "E
42.60'
L7
S56'26'39 "E
43.31'
L8
S50'24'30 "W
21.37'
L9
N56'07'04 "W
48.31'
L10
N56'07'04 "W
31.40'
L11
N12'46'21 "W
17.60'
L12
S82'1 6'30 "E
25.15'
L13
S81'57'38 "E
23.20'
Zi
22 N STREAM TO BE ` �\ \ \ -- ` \ / \ sURv
Z2 4 22 MATTED FOR ACCESS `� .
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L14
S85'5456 "E
4.70'
L15
S83'25'57 "W
13.15'
L16
j S39'05'41 "W
j 11.76'
2 \ \`\
22
::::::.:
..............................
..: ..:.:.:.::. \�\, \
\ `\ h0 cc
y
20 ACCESS TO BE \
...........:::..............
S23'29'11 "E
.
TEMPORARY IMPACT
\`rr\
..::zi::: :::.. ...::. .......
S38'27'1 0 "E
13.35'
90.00'
C3
? `
2
21.53'
ti
\ .L1.5::::::.. \\ \ \
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
BEARING
CHORD
RADIUS
C1
S23'29'11 "E
33.46'
90.00'
C2
S38'27'1 0 "E
13.35'
90.00'
C3
S49'34'29 "E
21.53'
90.00'
C4
N43'58'04 "W
47.53'
110.00'
C5
N28'27'1 0 "W
11.66'
110.00'
C6
N1 9-05'36"W
24.22'
110.00'
2 ` .. .. ..... � .::..........
\ �� ::::::::
330 -GUIL- 047 -001 �` ::::a:::::
PIN: 7822815567 \ `\
TRUSTEES OF GUILFORD TECHNICAL N, `\
COMMUNITY COLLEGE \�' _41
\. \\
D.B. 5988, PG. 1797 \
\ ? :.:. ..... h °�.�\ �c•0 \
TEMPORARY IMPACT ` \ ` \� N, 0 ` \\
TEMPORARY IMPACTS BUFFER ZONE 1: \ \�`� ~`� \O�/rF \``\
AREA IN WETLAND WR1: 2,209 S.F.f, 0.051 AC.f
2,396 S.F.f, 0.055 AC.t
BUFFER ZONE 2:
STREAM SR1: 27 L.F.t 1,222 S.F.f, 0.028 AC.t
O ` �
LEGEND
-G G G G- EXISTING GAS PIPELINE
GENERAL NOTES
/ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
\�� �� CAI}�� �//i� SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON
Regional Surveyors, Inc.
Land
Piedmont
-G G G G -NEW GAS PIPELINE
�\`` O� •OFESSIpN•C� ��i� ENVIRONMENTAL DSERVICES ON 11-19-2013. PROVIDED BY S &ME
_;' 9
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
N a t u ra I Gas
---------- - - - - --EXISTING PNG PERMANENT EASEMENT
_� '.
SEAL �_
g
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
NC FIRM LICENSE NO. C -1362
DRAWN BY: JBH
REVISIONS
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF
- • • - • • - • _.-CENTERLINE OF STREAM
_
�
= L -4464 = J S. S 64
ATE: 10/31/14
DAIS: 11 4 14
- -EDGE OF WATER
_ _ FF RY , PLS -
- =
.•'�'�b'•'`
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
LINE 330 NORTH CAROLINA
oB No. 12so.ss
DATE: 11/19/14
----------EDGE OF WETLAND ::WETLAND::: STREAM
:�
%�.<'••° Su�•'�.�
RAILROAD REPLACEMENT
"
• TREE LINE
.`
RY• S.•
SCALE: 1 = 3o
GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
30 15 0 30
IR# 0426433 SHEET 2 OF 4
��`�\\
/l/llliw%"

Oe Fc oR
\, Ro
0
\c Al
SIT o�
� Q
STANF p1 ��
\ RD \
VO\
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
330 -GUIL- 047 -002
PIN: 7822817244
TRUSTEES OF GUILFORD TECHNICAL
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
D.B. 5988, PG. 1797
\� \ IHEADWALLt
1>1 \ \
J� f S \ Z2
o zh sR F
72
zZ z, \ ^h
\
G�li
�O
T -101 `/c Riot
LATTICE
STRUCTURE
750,
z2
Z1 Z, \\
Z2 \%
\ \ \
`zz
STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS:
GENERAL NOTES
�//� 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
CARP /�i�i SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON
ZONE 1 TEMPORARY IMPACT.
6,270 S.F.f, 0.144 AC.t
ZONE 1 PERMANENT IMPACT.
14,555 S.F.t, 0.334 AC.f
ZONE 2 TEMPORARY IMPACT:
2,987 S.F.t, 0.069 AC.t
ZONE 2 PERMANENT IMPACT:
3,018 S.F.f, 0.069 AC.t
330 -GUIL- 047 -003
PIN: 7822802578
NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD
COMPANY
D.B. 7081, PG. 1651
P.B. 178, PG. 25
O �
r
,4
N
a
\ F
RFC �'yF rR
T
oRq �N Ns�/8 723 � O
\03 V
�
F
R,
�P
�
o �Q
G
\
\
de
z IN 11
STR -50
c \ TWO POLE
p
HOLD -DOWN
't6 Ly
\\ HEADWAL
t � a 6lb
330 -GUIL- 049 -000
PIN: 7822905929
GUILFORD TECHNICAL
\ \q, \ \ COMMUNITY COLLEGE
`� \ /\ ti \ D.B. 4487, PG. 1265
VIA
zi TA
\ \
c
\
LEGEND
—G r G — EXISTING GAS PIPELINE
GENERAL NOTES
�//� 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
CARP /�i�i SUPERVISION AND THAT THE WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON
r T
Regional Land Surveyors, Inc.
\�\�� �N
��
Piedmont
-G G G G -NEW GAS PIPELINE
. \\ O� .••'ESS /p • %� REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S &ME
�.OF hq�,. -� ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ON 11 -19 -2013.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO,
F&I Natural G a S
---------- - - - - -- EXISTING PNG PERMANENT EASEMENT
= SEAL '_
NORTH CAROLINA 27409
NC FIRM LICENSE NO. C -1362
— — — — — CENTERLINE OF STREAM
= _ ��
-4464 : J S. SMI
DRAWN BY: JBH
REVISIONS
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF
ATE: 10/31/14
DATE: 1144114
— — — — —EDGE OF WATER
_ _ . PLS -4 64
- �� -
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
LINE 330 NORTH CAROLINA
oB No. 1280.99
DATE: 11/19/14
----------EDGE OF WETLAND ;:WLTLAND;: STREAM
�Ry \� \�
RAILROAD REPLACEMENT
\
/i���i��
M
SCALE: 1 = 50'
' TREE LINE
\\
"RY S •
GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
50 25 0 50
IR# 0426433 SHEET 3 OF 4
�\\
//►IIIIII\\\

°9p
O
c\F'QO
SITE
Z2 z2 Z2 m
----__ Z2 �Q Z2 Z I
c� I
z1
3/4" IRON PIPE z1 . _._ _>0-Q1
FOUND
'AN D� N: 821141.11 r 21 i j2 1 �0
� E:1729900.30 Z � � A N
RD \ -,NAD83 (NSRS 2011) m" I ?i 3
Ge C
50' I EXISTING \ ?, \ \�� C/c 11 O Z
- I D.B. 25495 PG N$ EASEMENT �2 r'Vq fc�
c _ I ? 330 -GUIL- 048_003 '��'G' oN1�
GU
PIN:
ILFORD TECHNICAL J O�6 ��
VICINITY MAP I y„o
(NOT TO SCALE) I � COMMUNITY COLLEGE Z2 Z2 Z2 Z2 -.-- z2 z2 2? suRV 22
\ ` \s 9 S � i . \ \ � D.B. 5957, PG. 933
\
c •
� 2' — Z2 —_ 12
66 39' i� ./ ' \ cy° \ 2 — z2 — Z2 — Z2 Z
\ �-•�— I — — — z1
O \ Z1 I �c1 1 Z1 I \ / ` zj ' — . ____Z1 Z1 Z1 — 21 /
�e 1
• :: ..... \ Ty �i°Z1 — z,,� �--- 71 A4 — Z A4 A, ,
\
s., z2 -I-- z2 \�S �/ `,� : :: ::::.. \ No =��- /V. <�
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L17
S81 *12'26 "W
36.93'
L18
S82'25'52 "W
30.77'
L19
N40'42'35 "W
16.25'
L20
N22'16'14 "W
15.93'
L21
N38'50'29 "W
23.23'
L22
NO2.55'21 "W
20.50'
L23
N36'54'32 "W
27.61'
\ Z2 G \ Jac
� do
IT
w I :..., :::a::.:,:.:: : : : : :: : :::: ::::::. �39 NC 1p �0,��0i�
6 �? :::: z:.:\: 6A' WETLAND WR6 �3� 44
\ ............................. \
............•::::::::fir:: \ ..:::.:::.::..:::.:.:.::::.. Z1 zi
zi —71
Z1 �� u O ,o —� 21 �� I
:.:::::::: Z1
.:.:::::.:.:.:.:.... — z1 zi
ItJ • • :.•.• Zt : : :.. zi
..:.:.:.: ::.::.:.:..:•::.•:::: ::•:•: :•:::•:•:•:•:•:•:• ::::::::::::. — Z2 Z 2 Z2
z2 > :::..:.:..:.. ..::.:::.....:....:.......... \ `_ tie . Z2
.�� :.'.:.:.:.:.:. ::. :......:..:.::.:::...... L17 \ — Z2 Z2
PIN: 7832010013 ............ �--
PIEDMONT NATURAL ....... L18 2 2'2 _ - `rte' Z2 - Z2 - 72
GAS COMPANY Z2 Z2
D.B. 2499, PG. 762 ° ��F , \
EXISTING
/8070
N GgGs /NE
330 - GUIL- 049_000\,��
PIN. 7822905929 \ \ \
GUILFORD TECHNICAL v \
COMMUNITY COLLEGE \
D.B. 4487, PG. 1265 TEMPORARY IMPACT
TEMPORARY IMPACT 1" IRON PIPE
WETLAND WR6: BUFFER ZONE 1: ` N FOUND
82 996.73 Nc
3,506 S.F.t, 0.080 AC.t
3,289 S.F.t, 0.076 AC.t E:1730114.71
BUFFER ZONE 2: NAD83 (NSRS 2011) N. I cqS\
4,027 S.F.f, 0.092 AC.f 41
LEGEND
—G G G G ® EXISTING GAS PIPELINE
GENERAL NOTES
���1111111���
//� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY
CARO/ /�i� SUPERVISION AND WETLANDS SHOWN
Regional Suveyors, Inc.
Land
��� �N THAT THE HEREON
Piedmont
-G G G G -NEW GAS PIPELINE
�� O�•'••ESS /p' `,, ��� REFLECTS THE DELINEATION EVIDENCE PROVIDED BY S &ME
ENVIRONMENTAL S RVICES ON 11 -19 -2013.
�• Nq� ,.-9
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
Natural G a s
---------- - - - - -- EXISTING PNG PERMANENT EASEMENT
•,Q�OF
SEAL -
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
NC FIRM LICENSE NO. C -1362
DATE JB4
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF
— - - • • - • • — CENTERLINE OF STREAM
= `L
L-4464 = JEF
1BY-
DATEREVISIONS I
—..—..—..—..—EDGE OF WATER
= E Y S. TH, PLS 44
•
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
LINE 330 NORTH CAROLINA
OB NO. 1280.99
DATE: 11/19/14
- - - - - -EDGE OF WETLAND ::WETLAND::: STREAM
%�•� \�\
RAILROAD REPLACEMENT
"
• TREE LINE
i ... �
����ERY
SCALE: 1 = 30
GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
S ����\
/III III II
30 15 0 30
IR# 0426433 SHEET 4 OF 4

ACCESS
ROAD
ACCESS
ROAD
PLAN VIEW
SIDE
BOARD
F LV VV
CROSS SECTION
TIMBER
MATS
ACCESS
ROAD
ACCESS
ROAD
/ FOOTER \
BEAM GEOTEXTILE
RIPRAP UNDERLAIN FABRIC
WITH GEOTEXTILE
FABRIC
Stream S1
m s -m mom m': m m at m x t m rm m
NTS
s
dmrxzmdmr tmimi mimr�smimr�nmimrs7lmimr�6mdm<
Drawn by: JoL EQUIPMENT CROSSING DETAIL Fig No.
Checked by: CD � Line 330 HDD Replacement Project
Guilford County, N.C. D1
Date: 11.05.14
Project No.: 4335 -14 -212

APPENDIX V:
AGENCY SCOPING

United States Department of the Interior
Joey Lawler
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
October 31, 2014
Re: PivG Line 330 HDD Replacement Project - Guilford County, NC
Dear Mr. Lawler:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally - protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally- protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern] that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non - federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally- listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally- protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
1 The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally- listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally- listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
(919) 856 -4520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
P to Benjamin
Field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
rd
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

�.�. STATE
m. iryy (A91
V
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
October 21, 2014
Joey Lawler
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273 -5560
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Line 330 HDD Replacement Project South of Guilford College Road, S &ME 4335 -14 -212,
Guilford County, ER 14 -2318
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Thank you for your letter of October 6, 2014, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or
environmental.reviewnncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(1� aL�L-��.
�fvRamona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax: (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599

A IFJ
NCDEN�
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Office of Land and Water Stewardship
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. Joey Lawler
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
jlawler @smeinc.com
Bryan Gossage
Director
October 20, 2014
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) Line 330 Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Replacement Project
South of Guilford College Road, Jamestown, Guilford County, North Carolina
S &ME Project No. 4335 -14 -212
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) database for the proposed project referenced above. The NCNHP database does not show any
records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation /managed areas
within the proposed project area as depicted in the map(s) submitted with your request for information.
Within one mile of the proposed project, the NCNHP database shows an element occurrence record for
the following rare species:
* For status definitions, please see the Help document at http: / /www.ncnhp.org /web /nhp /database- search.
Of the two occurrences of Greensboro Burrowing Crayfish documented within one mile of the project
area, one is located ca. 0.75 miles northwest in the vicinity of Guilford Road, and the other is ca. 0.7
miles south in the vicinity of Vickery Chapel Road.
In addition, the NCNHP database shows several parcels identified as Guilford County open space and
owned by the Town of Jamestown within one mile of the project area; one is ca. 0.2 miles northwest of
the proposed project area, one is ca. 0.4 miles northeast, and another is ca. 0.9 miles southwest of the
project area.
Please note that although the NCNHP database may not show records for rare species within the
proposed project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. Occurrences of a rare species documented within one mile of the
proposed project area increase the likelihood that this species may be present within the project area if
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Phone: 919 - 707 -86001 Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 1 10% Post Consumer Paper
ELEMENT
OCCURRENCE
STATE
FEDERAL
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME
STATUS*
ACCURACY
STATUS*
STATUS*
Current
Medium
Comborus cotagius
Greensboro Burrowing Crayfish
(2 records)
1 (2 records)
1 SC
- --
* For status definitions, please see the Help document at http: / /www.ncnhp.org /web /nhp /database- search.
Of the two occurrences of Greensboro Burrowing Crayfish documented within one mile of the project
area, one is located ca. 0.75 miles northwest in the vicinity of Guilford Road, and the other is ca. 0.7
miles south in the vicinity of Vickery Chapel Road.
In addition, the NCNHP database shows several parcels identified as Guilford County open space and
owned by the Town of Jamestown within one mile of the project area; one is ca. 0.2 miles northwest of
the proposed project area, one is ca. 0.4 miles northeast, and another is ca. 0.9 miles southwest of the
project area.
Please note that although the NCNHP database may not show records for rare species within the
proposed project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. Occurrences of a rare species documented within one mile of the
proposed project area increase the likelihood that this species may be present within the project area if
1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Phone: 919 - 707 -86001 Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 1 10% Post Consumer Paper

Piedmont Natural Gas (PING) Line 330 Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Replacement Project
South of Guilford College Road, Jamestown, Guilford County, North Carolina
SWE Project No. 4335 -14 -212
October 20, 2014
Page 2
suitable habitat exists. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual
field surveys if needed, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species.
Feel free to contact me at 919 - 707 -8629 or Allison.Weaklev @ncdenr.gov if you have questions or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
Allison Schwarz Weakley, Conservation Planner
NC Natural Heritage Program

APPENDIX V:
MITIGATION REQUEST LETTER AND RESTORATION
PLAN

RESTORATION PLAN
LINE 330 HDD Replacement Project
Guilford County, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts
where practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan is
proposed for implementation to restore the temporarily- affected wetland areas. This plan
entails restoration of temporarily - disturbed areas to their original contours and conditions
to the degree practicable upon project completion. Further, it specifies that disturbed
wetland areas will be permanently stabilized with a native vegetative cover, and affected
streambanks seeded and matted. The measures outlined below will be specified in the
contract documents prepared for construction of the proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities include removal of temporarily - placed fill material and
restoration of original pre - disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to
the tie -in trench to the extent possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on
an upland site. Excavated topsoil shall be stockpiled separately and then replaced
uniformly over the area of excavation from which it was removed.
At temporarily- affected wetlands and portions of the riparian buffer, the native riparian seed
mix specified in Table 1, or a similar, native substitute, shall be utilized.
Table 1: Riparian Seed Mix*
Species
Common Name
Percentage of Mix
EI mus vi r inicus
Virginia wild rye
15
Panicum vir atum
Switch grass
15
Agrostis stolinifera
Creeping bent grass
10
Rudbeckia hirta, NC ecotype
Black-eyed Susan
10
Coreopsis lanceolata
Lance leaf tickseed
10
Panicum clandestinum
Deer tongue
10
Andropogon gerardii
Big bluestem
05
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
05
Echinochloa muricata
Awned barnyard grass
05
Schizach rium scoparium
Little bluestem
05
Sorghastrum nutans
Indian grass
05
Tripsacum dact loides
Gamma grass
05
100
• Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed streambanks, extending five feet landward following construction.
• Recommended application rate: 20 -25 lbs. per acre

Restoration Plan S &ME Project No. 4335 -14 -212
Line 330 HDD Replacement Project — Guilford County, NC November 24, 2014
To provide quicker cover, the mix specified in Table should also be augmented with the
appropriate cover /companion species, as identified in Table 2.
Table 2: Cover /Companion Crops
Species
Common
Season
Mix
Notes:
Festuca
3 -5 Ibs /acre;
Weak competitor; does not
brevipila
Hard fescue
Fall, Winter
20%
interfere with native grasses.
Shade tolerant.
Festuca ovina
Sheep
Fall, Winter
3 -5 Ibs /acre;
fescue
20%
Secale cereale
Ceareal or
Early Spring
30 Ibs /acre
Grows 3 -4' tall, but not a strong a
Winter rye
or Fall
competitor.
Lolium
Perennial rye
Spring,
20 -50%
Shorter rye; lasts about 2 years,
perenne
Summer
then dies out.
Foxtail or
Spring,
Good germination; dies off with
Setaria italica
German
Summer
o
20-50%
frost; does not tolerate mowing.
Millet
Use of annual rye (Lolium multiorum) is not recommended, as it competes with native
grasses for water and nutrients.

Statement of Compliance with Session Law 2009 -337 An Act to Promote
the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks and SL 2011 -343.
(link to SL 2009 -337) (link to SL 2011 -343)
Prior to accessing the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) In -Lieu Fee Mitigation Program, all
applicants requesting wetlands, stream and/or riparian buffer mitigation are now required by law to
comply with Session Law 2009 -337 An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as
well as Session Law 2011 -343, which made changes to the operation of the NCEEP. All new requests
submitted on or after June 27, 2011 MUST include this form signed and dated by the permit applicant or
an authorized agent. Please refer to DENR's Implementation Policy for more detailed guidance.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand SL- 2009 -337 and SL- 2011 -343 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with their requirements. I understand that participation in the
NCEEP is voluntary.
Please check all that apply:
Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local government
meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143 - 214.11 (as amended by SL 2011-
343) and is not required to purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
X There are no known mitigation banks with the requested credit type located in
the hydrologic unit where this impact will take place (link to DWQ list) (see
"approved mitigation bank" link under "Options for compensatory mitigation" heading)
I have contacted the mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the
impacts will occur and credits are not available.
The DWQ or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a mitigation
bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
Note: It is the applicant's responsibility to document any inquiries made to private
mitigation banks regarding credit availability.
have read and understand EEP's refund policies (attached)
initial here
Signature plicant or Agent
11.21.14
Date
PNG Line 330 HDD Replacement Project
Project Name
Joey Lawler
Printed Name
Jamestown, N.C.
Location

NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM, NCEEP
IN -LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM
Revised 8/11/2011
Print this form, fill in requested information, sign and date, and either mail to NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
1652, fax to 919- 715 -2219, or email to kelly.williams(a)ncdenr.gov. Attachments are acceptable for clarification purposes (location
map or lat long is required). Review meetings are held on Tuesday afternoons. Information submitted is subject to NC Public
Records Law and may be requested by third parties.
CONTACT INFORMATION
APPLICANT'S AGENT (optional)
APPLICANT
1. Business or Individual Name
S &ME, Inc.
Piedmont Natural Gas
2. Street Address or P O Box
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
3. City, State, Zip
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
Charlotte, N.C. 28210
4. Contact Person
Joey Lawler, P.W.S.
Jim Kalish, P.E.
5. Telephone Number
704.523.4726
704.731.4598
6. Fax Number
704.525.3953
-
7. E -mail Address (optional)
ilawler(c�smeinc.com
iim.kalishCa�piedmontng.com
15. Non - Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
0
16. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
PROJECT INFORMATION
8. Project Name
Line 330 HDD Replacement Project
9. Project Location (nearest town, city)
See Attached Map
**ATTACH MAP SHOWING IMPACT LOCATION **
10. Lat -Long Coordinates (optional)
11. Project County
Guilford
12. River basin & Cataloging Unit (8- digit)
Randleman (Cape Fear — 03030003)
(see Note 1)
13. Project Type * *specify owner type and
Government X Private
write in project type (e.g. school, church, retail,
residential SD, apartments, road, utilities,
military, etc.) **
14. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
0
15. Non - Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
0
16. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
0
17. Stream Impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
Warm
Cool
Cold
0
0
0
18. Riparian Buffer Impact (sq. ft.)
Zone 1: 14,555
Zone 2: N/A
(where applicable)
19. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts
USACE: N/A
DWQ: Sue Homewood
Indicate names, if known)
20. Other Regulatory ID Information
(e.g., USACE Action ID, if known
IMPORTANT
Check U below if this request is a:
revision to a current acceptance, or
extension of unexpired acceptance
re- submission of an expired acceptance
By signing below, the applicant is confirming they have
read and understand EEP's refund policy posted at
nceep.net
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent:
Date: 11.241154
Note 1: For help in determining the Cataloging Unit, visit: www.nceep.net or contact EEP
Direct questions to Kelly Williams at 919 - 716 -1921 or kelly.williams(- 3ncdenr.gov or to EEP's front desk at 919 - 715 -0476.