20191233 Ver 3_ePCN Application_20221021

DW R
mrlsloa of ware.Besourcrs
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13,2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre-Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
2/3/2021
BIMS#Assigned* Version#*
20191233 3
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required What amout is owed?*
Fee received $240.00
Fee needed-send electronic notification $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Central Office-[phone] Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
Information for Initial Review
1a.Name of project:
Crabtree Creek Greenway-Lindsay Drive to Ebenezer Church Rd.
1a.Who is the Primary Contact?*
Lisa Schiffbauer,City of Raleigh
1 b.Primary Contact Email:* 1c.Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
10/21/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Crabtree Creek,Richland Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
QNSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.842792 -78.714409
A. Processing Information
County(or Counties)where the project is located:
Wake
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
Yes No

1a.Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit(wetlands,streams and waters,Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit(navigable waters,tidal waters,Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
Please provide the date of the previous submission."
3/5/2021
1 b.What type(s)of permit(s)do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit(NWP)
Regional General Permit(RGP)
Standard(IP)
1c.Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit(NWP)Number: 14-Linear transportation
NWP Numbers(for multiple NWPS):
1d.Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification-Regular 401 Water Quality Certification-Express
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Riparian Buffer Authorization
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le.Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No
1f.Is this an after-the-fact permit application?"
Yes No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g.Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h.Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j.Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d.Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant(other than owner)
le.Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?"
Yes No
2.Owner Information
2a.Name(s)on recorded deed:
City of Raleigh,NC
2b.Deed book and page no.:
2c.Contact Person:
Lisa Schiffbauer,Engineering Supervisor of Capital Improvements

2d.Address
Street Address
222 W.Hargett Street
Address Line 2
Suite 601
City State/Province/Region
Raleigh NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27601 USA
2e.Telephone Number: 2f.Fax Number:
[phone]
2g.Email Address:"
[e-mail]
4.Agent/Consultant(if applicable)
4a.Name:
David G.Cooper
4b.Business Name:
VHS
4c.Address
Street Address
Venture 1,940 Main Campus Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 500
City State I Province/Region
Raleigh NC
Postal/Zip Code Country
27606 USA
4d.Telephone Number: 4e.Fax Number:
[phone]
4f.Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1.Project Information
1 b.Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c.Nearest municipality/town:
Raleigh
2.Project Identification
2a.Property Identification Number: 2b.Property size:
2c.Project Address
Street Address
Multiple,easements obtained
Address Line 2
City State/Province/Region
Postal/Zip Code Country
3. Surface Waters
3a.Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Crabtree Creek,Richland Creek
3b.Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
QNSW
3c. What river basin(s)is your project located in?*
Neuse

3d.Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010803
4. Project Description and History
4a.Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:
The project area is a forested riparian corridor surrounded by residential development and a Hanson Aggregates quarry.Portions of the project area also include maintained sewer
easements.
The City of Raleigh has been in contact with NCDEQ regarding protection of the greenway trail from erosion caused by an existing stormwater discharge from an adjacent lot,as well as
minimizing the potential for sedimentation to Richland Creek from this discharge.Revisions to the project design in this area including addition of a 24"pipe under the greenway and
additional riprap stabilization required recalculations of stream and buffer impacts.
4b.Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project(including all prior phases)in the past?
Yes No Unknown
If yes,please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID(exp.SAW-0000-00000).
DWR:20191233
USACE:SAW-2017-00269
4f.List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.946
4g.List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
9,935
4h.Explain the purpose of the proposed project:"
The project will construct a greenway trail between Lindsay Drive and Ebenezer Church Road.
41.Describe the overall project in detail,including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
The project has been previously described in detail in prior submittals,and has not changed since the Version 2 approval.
The proposed design change to add the pipe under the greenway trail will protect the trail from undercutting due to stormwater flow.The additional riprap will reduce stormwater velocity
and protect the adjacent bank of Richland Creek from erosion.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a.Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
5b.If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2017-00269
5c.If 5a is yes,who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name(if known): David Cooper,Ed Hajnos
Agency/Consultant Company: VHB(formerly Ecological Engineering)
Other:
5d.List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
USACE site visit date:Nov.29,2016,Tasha Alexander.No PJD letter received to date.NCDWR site visit date:10/31/2016,Stephanie Goss.Please see attached NCDWR determination
letter.
6.Future Project Plans
6a.Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s),regional general permit(s),or individual permits(s)used,or intended to be used,to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a.Where are the impacts associated with your project?(check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams-tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2.Wetland Impacts

2a1 Reason(?) 2b.Impact type*(?) 2c.Type of W. 2d.W.name 2e.Forested 2f.Type of Jurisdicition" 2g.Impact
i area
11 18"HDPE P Headwater Forest WI Yes Both 0.008
(acres)
11 Mechanized clearing P Headwater Forest WI Yes Both 0.003
(acres)
13 Mechanized clearing P Hardwood Flat WH Yes Both 0.001
acres)
2g.Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g.Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.012
2g.Total Wetland Impact
0.012
21.Comments:
No changes to wetland impacts since the Version 2 approval.
3. Stream Impacts
L 3a.Reason for impact 3b.lmpact type* 3c.Type of impact* 3d.S.name* �3e.Stream Type* 3f.Type of 3g.S.width 3h.Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
S1 Riprap 18"HDPE outlet Permanent Bank Stabilization Fdrawi7ngsite
reek(permit Perennial Both 70
1) Average(feet) (linearfeet)
g2 Riprap ditch outlet Permanent Bank Stabilization SB(permit drawing site 2) Perennial Both 4 11
Average(feet) (linearfeet)
S3 Riprap ditch outlet Temporary Bank Stabilization SB(permit drawing site 2) Perennial Both 23
Average(feet) (linearfeet)
S4 Boardwalk crossing Permanent Bank Stabilization Richland Creek(permit Perennial Both 45 40
drawing site 3) Average(feet) (linearfeet)
S5 Both Boardwalk crossing Temporary Bank Stabilization Richland Creek(permit Perennial 45 34
drawing site 3) Average(feet) near reef)
S6 Boardwalk crossing Permanent Bank Stabilization Richland Creek(permit Perennial Both 40 38
drawing site 4) Average(feet) (linearfeet)
g7 Boardwalk crossing Temporary Bank Stabilization Richland Creek(permit Perennial Both 40 29
draWing site 4) Average(feet) (linearfeet)
S8 Boardwalk crossing Permanent Bank Stabilization J
SC(permit drawing site 5) Perennial Both 21
Average(feet) (linearfeet)
gg Boardwalk crossing Temporary Bank Stabilization J
SC(permit drawing site 5) Perennial Both 8 42
Average(feet) (linearfeet)
�01
Boardwalk crossing Permanent Bank Stabilization Richland Creek(permit Perennial Both 40 28
drawing site 6) Average(feet) (linearfeet)
S71 Boardwalk crossing Temporary Bank Stabilization Richland Creek(permit Perennial Both 40 27
dra wing site 6) Average(feet) pinearfeet)
F2]�Riprap 18"HDPE out Permanent Bank Stabilization Crabtree Creek(permit Perennial Both 50 11
drawing site 7) Average(feet) (linear feeQ
�13 �Riprap 36"HDPE out Permanent Bank Stabilization Crabtree Creek(permit Perennial Both 60 22
drawing site 8) Average(feeQ pinear teat)
F4]�Riprap ditch outlet Permanent Bank Stabilization Fdra
tree Creek(permit Perennial Both 70
ing site 9) Average(feet) (linearfeet)
S15 Riprap 18"HDPE out Permanent Bank Stabilization Crabtree Creek(permit Perennial Both 70 13
drawing site 10) Average(feet) (linear feeQ
�61�Riprap 18"HDPE out Permanent Bank Stabilization Crabtree Creek(permit Perennial Both 70 13
drawing site 12) Average(feeQ pinearfeet)
S17 Riprap 15"HDPE out Permanent Bank Stabilization Crabtree Creek(permit Perennial Both 70 12
drawing site 14) Average(feet) (linearfeet)
g1g Riprap 24"HDPE outlet Permanent Bank Stabilization Richland Creek(permit Perennial Both 40 10
drawing site 15) Average(feet) (linearfeet)
3i.Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31.Total permanent stream impacts: 31.Total temporary stream impacts:
235 155

31.Total stream and ditch impacts:
390
3j.Comments:
Corrected a typo for SC from 11 to 21 LF of permanent bank stabilization impact(S8 in above table).
Added the bank stabilization impact that resulted from the design change(S18 in above table).
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a.Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
Neuse Tar-Pamlico
Catawba Randleman
Goose Creek Jordan Lake
Other
6b.Impact Type 6c.Per or Temp 6d.Stream name Se.Buffer mitigation required? 6f.Zone 1 impact 6g.Zone 2 impact
Site 1,Allowable P Crabtree Creek No 2,733 4,635
Site 2,Allowable P Crabtree Creek No 10,045 11 12,124
Site 3,Allowable P Crabtree Creek No 4,729 4,563
Site 4,Allowable P Richland Creek No 4,012 10,924
Site 5,Allowable P Richland Creek No 11,889 13,610
Site 6,Allowable P Richland Creek No 5,214 6,483
Site 7,Allowable P Richland Creek No 4,068 4,839
Site 8,Allowable P Crabtree Creek No 17,484 15,614
Site 9,Allowable P Crabtree Creek No 6,549 12,160
Site 10,Allowable P Crabtree Creek No 20,654 15,625
Site 11,Allowable P SG No 473 1,279
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 87,850.00 101,856.00
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 87,850.00 101,856.00
6i.Comments:
Added 416 SF of impact to Site 5 Zone 2.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.Avoidance and Minimization
la.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The project design is constrained by the steep topography of the slopes above Crabtree and Richland Creeks.Bridges have been designed in order to
minimize impacts to the stream bed.Boardwalks are utilized to cross tributary streams.Wetland impacts have been almost entirely avoided.Where
feasible,the trail has been designed to utilize existing cleared sewer easements.
1 b.Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Erosion control has been designed to adhere to the design standards for sensitive watersheds.The contractor shall be responsible for minimizing
impacts through construction techniques.Boardwalks will be constructed using the"top-down"method,which minimizes disturbance.
2.Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State
2a.Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S.or Waters of the State?
Yes No

2b.If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation,explain why:
Impacts to Neuse riparian buffers for greenway projects are allowable if no practicable alternative exists.The steepness of the topography makes alternative routes impracticable.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance(lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale(higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30%nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a.Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes No
2b.Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H.1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la.Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local)funds or the use of public(federal/state)land?*
Yes No
1 b.If you answered"yes"to the above,does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State(North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments:*
The project is a City of Raleigh project,with environmental review/oversight by NCDOT.
2.Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a.Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules(15A NCAC 2H.0500),Isolated Wetland Rules(I SA NCAC 2H.1300),or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B.0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a.Will this project result in additional development,which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes No
3b.If you answered"no,"provide a short narrative description.
The greenway trail is not expected to catalyze additional development in the area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a.Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a.Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b.Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c.If yes,indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh

5d.Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
What Federal Agency is involved?
FEMA
5e.Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f.Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g.Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h.Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
51.Does this project involve(1)blasting,and/or(2)other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines,such as jackhammers,mechanized pile drivers,etc.?
Yes No
5j.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS previously concurred with effect determinations for the prior two approved submittals.All species have determinations of No Effect or Not Likely
to Adversely Affect based on survey results in the project area.Surveys for protected aquatic species were conducted,and no specimens were found.
An updated IPaC species list for the project study area,reviewed on 1 0/1 712 0 2 2,did not include any bat species.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a.Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA fisheries EFH mapper.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.Will this project occur in or near an area that the state,federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b.What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC SHPO letter is provided in the attachment.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8b.If yes,explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
An approved CLOMR has been obtained for the project.
8c.What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC FIRM 3720078600J(NC panel 0786)
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review.Documents should be combined into one file when
possible,with a Cover Letter,Table of Contents,and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Supporting Information_CrabtreeWestVer3.pdf 150.68MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Attachment includes updated construction drawings showing the current project configuration and changes,including voided sheets.These construction drawings are in review by the City
of Raleigh,pending final approval.If construction drawings change again resulting in impact increases,an update will be provided.
Signature
*
By checking the box and signing below,I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true,accurate,and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief';and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true,accurate,and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction"subject to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,Article 40 of the NC General Statutes(the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature;AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.

Full Name:
David G.Cooper
Signature
06�1 4-0�&Avewt
Date
10/21/2022