NCS000574_Final NPDES and SW Application Submittal_20140922

DUKE
P ENERGY.
PROGRESS
Mr. Jeffrey O. Poupart
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources, Wastewater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Mr. Bradley Bennett
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Subject: Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant NPDES Permit NC0003433
NPDES Application Update
Dear Messrs. Poupart and Bennett:
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
500 C P & L Road
Moncure, NC 27559
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) hereby provides this update to the NPDES permit
application package submitted on December 2, 2010. This amendment reflects current
wastewater and stormwater sources and flows at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, Chatham
County.
Enclosed are copies of the affected pages of EPA Forms 1, and 2C, with attachments, that have
changed since our current NPDES wastewater permit became effective in January 2012.
Specifically, the following modified pages are included.
• EPA Form 1;
• EPA Form 2C, pages 1-4;
• An updated flow chart and description of wastewater flows (Form 2C Attachment 2- Item
II -A, page A2-1 through A2-2);
• An updated narrative description of sources of pollution and treatment technologies
(Form 2C Attachment 3 Item II -B, pages A3-1 through A3-5); and
• An updated list of potential discharges not covered by analysis (Form 2C Attachment 4
Item VI pages A4-1 through A4-2).
The following supplemental information has also been enclosed:
• Seep Monitoring Report for Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant - June/July 2014
• Groundwater Monitoring Program, Sampling, Analysis, and Reporting Plan for Cape
Fear Steam Electric Plant
• Receptor Survey for Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Duke Energy has also enclosed an updated Form 2F for stormwater outfalls associated with
industrial activities at the Cape Fear Plant that was included with the 2011 NPDES permit
renewal application package. Stormwater outfalls were historically permitted through the plant's
NPDES permit. As you recall, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) indicated their intent to separate industrial stormwater from the

wastewater permit during the 2011 renewal timeframe. Before the new individual stormwater
permit was issued, Duke Energy submitted a request to withdraw the stormwater application
based on the changed conditions at the plant due to ongoing demolition projects where the
stormwater watersheds no longer drain areas with industrial activity. A request to withdraw the
subject permit application was made in a letter from Mr. Danny Wimberly to Ms. Bethany
Georgoulias dated December 13, 2012 (Form 2F Attachment 2). NCDENR concurred that an
NPDES Stormwater discharge permit was not applicable (Form 2F Attachment 3).
Since January 2013, demolition activities have continued at the site. Duke Energy believes that
the same factors are in place which led NCDENR to determine that an NPDES stormwater
discharge permit is not applicable at this time. Those key factors are:
1. The plant is no longer generating power. Some non -categorical stormwater (drainage from
plant areas) is still being routed to the ash ponds while the plant is being demolished. This
volume of stormwater is diminishing as pump stations are cleaned and removed during the
demolition process.
2. The 2011 draft stormwater permit proposed four stormwater (SW) outfalls (Outfalls SW001,
SW002, SW003, and SW008). These outfalls are not currently impacted by industrial
activity.
a. Outfalls SWO01 and SW008 drain areas from the inactive ash basins. These basins
have not been used in 30+ years, are fully vegetated/forested, and there are no
exposed materials. In the past, NCDENR determined that these outfalls do not
require permit coverage since discharges are not possible in events smaller than the
25 -year, 24-hour storm.
b. Outfall SWO02 was originally proposed to capture runoff from the railroad. Coal is no
longer being brought onsite by rail (or any other means).
c. Outfall SWO03 was originally proposed to contain potential leakage and minimize
environmental impact from an ash sluice line. Ash is no longer being sluiced and the
line has been physically disconnected.
3. There is no storage of raw industrial materials onsite.
4. Stored coal has been removed from the plant site and the remaining area has been covered
with soil and grass in accordance with the approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control
(E&SC) plan.
5. The #2 Fuel oil storage tanks have been removed from the site.
6. The site has an approved E&SC plan and is subject to the Stormwater General Permit for
Construction -Related Activities (NCG010000), also called Construction Stormwater.
7. Should conditions at the site change in a manner that would subject stormwater to industrial
activity, Duke Energy will work with NCDENR to secure the necessary permits.
Based on the above-mentioned factors, Duke Energy believes that the Construction Stormwater
Permit is the appropriate permitting mechanism for this site. However, we are hereby providing an
updated Form 2F with 2010 data (our applicable 'current' application), plus additional stone event
data from historic outfalls SW -002 and SW -003 (Form 2F Attachment 4) to provide NCDENR with a
full characterization of stormwater activities at this site. Duke Energy asks that DENR use this

information to confirm it's previous determination that an individual stormwater permit is not
currently applicable at this site.
If there are any questions regarding this package, please contact either.
• Ms. Toya Ogallo, Environmental Specialist at our North Carolina Regional Headquarters,
phone [phone] or email Letoya. Ogallo,.duke-energy.com, or
• Mr. Larry Baxley, Environmental Professional for the Cape t=ear Steam Electric Plant;
phone [phone] or e-mail Larry. [e-mail].
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Sincerely,
Issa J. Zarzar
Director Demolition and Plant Retirement
Enclosures

Please print or type in the unshaded areas only
Form Aooroved. OMB No 2040-0088
FORM
U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
I EPA I.D NUMBER
1
-"/EPA GENERAL INFORMATION
s 7M e
Consolidated Permits Program
F NCDO 0 0 8 3 0 919 D
GENERAL
(Read the GmeralInstructums before
starting)
, 2 +] +. +
LABEL ITEMS
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
If a preprinted label has been provided, afro it it the
designated space Review the information carefury f any of f
1. EPA I.D NUMBER
Is incorrect cross Uwough it and enter dx correct data in the
PLEASE PLACE LABEL IN THIS SPACE
appropriate fillin area below A 3o f any of the preprinted data
nfo matron that should acne krt of me raver space fists the
ppeart pear provide d in the proper
fill-in areaisl below If the lobe' is complete and correct. you
III FACILITY NAME
V FACILITY MAILING
need not complete hems I. III, V and VI +sxcepf Vi -B which
ADDRESS
must be completed regardless; Complete all items f no late
has been provided Refer to ere instructions for detailed item
descriptions and for the lega authorizations under which this
VI FACILITY LOCATION
data is collected.
II POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS
INSTRUCTIONS. Complete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA. It you answer yes' to any questions you must
submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the parenthesis following the question Mark 'X' in the box in the third column if the supplemental fois attached If
rm
you answer'no' to each question, you need not submit any of these forms You may answer'no' if your activity Is excluded from permit requirements see Section C of the
Instructions See also, Section D of the Instructions for definitions of bold-faced terms
Mark *x1
MWk x
M
NO
FORM
ATTACHED
YES
No
FORM
ATrACHM
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
SPECIFIC QUESTION5
A. Is this facility a publicly owned treatment works which
results In a discharge to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2A)
X
B Does or will this facility (either existing or proposed)
Include a concentrated animal feeding operation or
X
aquatic animal production facility which results in a
to
17
is
r.
r
discharge to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2B)
C Is this a facility which currently results in discharges to
waters of the U.S. other than those described In A or B
X
X
D Is this a proposed facility (other than those described In A
In discharge
XO
above? (FORM 2C)
or above) which will result a to waters of
the U,S.7 (FORM 2D)
a
a
a
E. Does or will this facility treat, store or dispose of
F Do you or will you Inject at this facility Industrial or
hazardous wastes? (FORM 3)
X
municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum
X
containing, within one quarter mile of the well bore,
sources of drinking water? (FORM 4)
m
23
so 1underground
G Do you or will you Inject at this facility any produced water
H DD you or will you Inject at this facility flu ds for special
or other fluids which are brought to the surface in
processes such as mining of sulfur by the Frasch process
connection with conventional all or natural gas production,
X
solution mining of minerals, in situ combustion of fossil
X
Inject fluids used for enhanced recovery of all or natural
fuel, or recovery of geothermal energy? (FORM 4)
gas, or Inject fluids for storage of liquid hydrocarbons?
(FORM 4)
34
33
a-
n
xt
1 Is this facility a proposed stationary source which is one
J Is this facility a proposed stationary source which Is
of the 28 industrial categories listed In the instructions and\/
X
NOT one of the 28 industrial categories listed in the
X
which will potentially emit 100 tons per year of any air
instructions and which will potentially emit 250 tons per
pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act and may affect
year of any air pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act
40
4+
i2
43
a
or be located in an attainment area? (FORM 5)
and may affect or be located In an attainment area?
(FORM 5)
III NAME OF FACILITY
e
1 SKIP Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
m
■
IV FACILITY CONTACT
A. NAME & TITLE (hast, firer, h title)
B PHONE (arra code h no.)
c
2 Larry Bax ey, Lead E S t?ra essiona
(;16)12 2-7 6
le +e
4e 46 4e 14g 51 1 W. W
V FACILTY MAILING ADDRESS
A. STREET OR P O. BOX
50 C & oaf+e
I
ry
B CITY OR TOWN
C STATE D ZIP CODE
e
4 Moncure
C 2 549
is I is
n 42 47 s+
VI FACILITY LOCATION
A. STREET, ROUTE NO OR OTHER SPECIFIC IDENTIFIER
J5C 5 0 C & 6jad
o w
a
B COUNTY NAME
Chatham
C. CITY OR TOWN
D STATE E ZIP CODE F COUNTY CODE (07tuvn)
e
B M n u e
C 24599
3
f7 10
A
41 p 47 31
ST A4
EPA Form 3510-1 (8-90) CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
VII. SIC CODES 4dr f to order of o
A. FIRST
B. SECOND
(ape
(specifjJ
7 4911
,s ,6 ,T
ric Power Services
,s ,6
H
C. THIRD
D FOURTH
(spcc,fy) �
(speC�)
7
,� ,.
VIEI.OPERATOR INFORMATION
A. NAME
B Is the name listed in ltem
c
V:I -A alsa the ownef7
8 Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
m YES E3 NO
is is
'IN
C. STATUS OF OPERATOR (Enter the apprwapriate leter,nro rhe artsmer box t "0$her, " specify.)
D. PHONE (area n-xJe & nn.)
F = FEDERAL M = PUBLIC (other thanfederal orsrare)p
(speck)
q (93 9 } 516-1980
S = STATE O = OTHER (speck)
P =PRIVATE
n e •. :, tt m
se
E. STREET OR P.O. BOX
4 561 IJPJL Roa
a. m
F. CITY OR TOWN
G- STATE H. ZIP CODE
IX. INDIAN LANG
Is the fadlity located on I ndlan 'ands?
13
B Moncure
I
NC
27559
YES M NO
n
X. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
A. NPDESDischa pS7u ace i6'ater D. PSD rlirEmfss,ans
T 1
m pry edSvurcer
T
9 N NC0003433 9 p
is
B.UIC Unde undinectianofFlnldr
E OTHER is cifv
C T f C T 1
(specifj)
9 u s
a
C. RCRA
E. OTHER (specify)
M,..
Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property boundaries. The map must show the outline of the facdlity, the
location of each of its existing and proposed Intake and discharge structures, each of its hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities, and each well where H
injects flulds underground Include all springs, fivers, and other surface water bodies in the map area. See instructions for precise requirements
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant is a retired electric generating facility that formerly consisted of two
-fired units and four combined -cycle combustion turbines.
X111 CERTIFICATION (see instructions) 0.
I cerdfy under penalty of law that l have personally examined and am famifiar with the information submitted In this application and all attachments and that, based on my
inquiry of those persons immediately responsible for obtaining the information contained in the application, 1 believe that the information is true, accurate, and complete. 1
am aware that there are significant penalties for sutunifft'ng false information, including the possibilly of fine and imprisonment.
A. NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (type or print) B SIGNATURE C DATE SIGNED
Issa J. Zarzar
Director Plant Demo and Retirement /-2, , A /� ^ sem J 2A,--z4e '2-3 a 2-01 y
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
EPA Farm 3510-1 (8-90)

Please print or type in the unshaded areas only.
EPA I.D. NUMBER (capyfi +m Itcm I aft arm!)
NCDC,00830919
Form Approved
OMB No 2040.0088
Approval expires 3-31.98
FORM U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
2 C �. EPA EXISTING MANUFACTURING,
ACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING AND SILVICULTURE OPERATIONS
NPDES Consolidated Permits Program
I OUTFALL LOCATION
For each outfall test the latitude and longitude of its Location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water
A, OUTFALL NUMBER
(lisr)
B LATITUDE C. LONGITUDE
D RECEIVING WATER
t DEG 2 M.N 3 SEC 1 DEG-
2 MIN. 3 SEC
007
35 35 15 79
02 39
Unnamed tributary to Cape Fear RiviT
II FLOWS, SOURCES OF POLLUTION. AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility. Indicate sources of intake water, operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, and treatment units
labeled to correspond to the more data led descriptions In Item B. Construct a water balance on the tine drawing by showing average flows between Intakes operations,
treatment units, and outfalls. If a water balance cannot be determined (e g., for certain mining activities), provide a p ctorial description of the nature and amount of any
sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.
B For each outfall, provide a description of. (1) All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent including process wastewater, sanitary wastewater cooling water.
and storm water runoff; (2) The average flow contributed by each operation; and (3) The treatment received by the wastewater Continue on additional sheets if
necessary
1 OUT-
2 OPERATION(S) CONTRIBUTING FLOW 3 TREATMENT
FALL
NO (list)
b. AVERAGE FLOW b. LIST CODES FROM
a OPERATION (IIsi) (include units) a. DESCRIPTION TABLE 2C-1
007
Ash pond discharge 7.5 MG, (historic flows) Sedsxntation, neutralization 1 a : - F.
Once thru coo-ing flow w/ towers G MGP E�aporstion 1 F
Once thru cooling flow w/o towers G MG'S Evaporation a
Low volume wastes G MGO Sedimentation, neutralization 1-u i e
Coa_ pile runoff pc•: srdimentation
Storm water runt! (non cacegorica_I 1B MO_, sedimentation 3-!!
Sanitary wastes G MGD C:xidation. sedimentaticn. 1 e t .,
disinfe-ti.;n
See Attachment 3 for descriptions.
OFFICIAL USE ONLY (effluent guidelrnrs sub-enregnries)
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE 1 of 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
C Except for stor— runoff 'eaks or spills, are any of the discharges described in Items II -A or B Intermittent or seasonal?
❑ YES (,nR.,i er,•rlrefr,lluuurgruhle) m NO (gota Secturn li
1 OUTFAIL
NUMBER 1610
2 OPERATION(s)
CONTRIBUT'NGFLOW
(h;r)
3 FREQUENCY
4 FLOW
a. DAYS PER
WEEK
(ywcifp
+nrnrge}
b MONTHS
PER YEA'R
(.greclf}.
a FLOW RATE(m mpl)
B TOTAL VOLUME
j.gVrrfi r. rh "nal)
C DURATION
f.+1,An.r,•
1 LONGTERM
AVERAGE
2 MAXIMUM
DAILY
1 LONGTERM
AVERAGE
2 MAXIMUM
DAILY
III PRODUCTION
B OPTIONAL. You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect your
discharges) you now have underway or which you plan Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned and Indicate your actual or planned schedules for
construction.
❑ MARK -X' IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IS ATTACHED
A. Does an effluent guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act appy to your facility?
® YES (•:.mpfete Lem Ill B) ❑ NO (go t:+Section 11)
B Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production (or other measure at operation)?
❑ YES (i - -mei ete hent 111.0 ® NO (go to &rtiun 11)
C If you answered 'yes' to Item III•B. list the quantity which represents an actual measurement at your level of production, expressed in the terms and units used in the
applicable effluent guideline. and indicate the affected outfalls.
1 AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION
2. AFFECTED OUTFALLS
(kiss aulall nrinihers)
a QUANTITY PER DAY
b UNITS OF MEASURE
c. OPERATION PRODUCT, MATERIAL ETC
b SOURCE OF DISCHARGE
a REQUIRED b PROJECTED
(six, i fy)
IV IMPROVEMENTS
A. Are you now required by any Federal State or local authority to meet any Implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operations of wastewater
treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This Includes but is not limited to,
permit conditions, administrative or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedule letters, stipulations court orders, and grant or loan conditions
YES (c-unrpiete the folloN•mt table) 0 NO Uv -, Item 11'-B)
1 IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION,
AGREEMENT, ETC
2 AFFECTED OUTFALLS
3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
4 FINAL COMPLIANCE DATE
a. NO I
b SOURCE OF DISCHARGE
a REQUIRED b PROJECTED
B OPTIONAL. You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect your
discharges) you now have underway or which you plan Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned and Indicate your actual or planned schedules for
construction.
❑ MARK -X' IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IS ATTACHED
EPA Form 3510-2C (8-90) PAGE 2 of 4 CONTINUE ON PAGE 3

EPA I D NUMBER (rapt fir n, hent 1 r jl•orm 1)
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 1NCD000830919
v 6vIMncnntJCrrgvr_Nt 4RYdWt..tr_mz, i iva
A, B, & C See instructions before proceeding —Complete one set of tables for each outfall—Annotate the outfall number in the space provided
NOTE Tables V-A, V-8, and V -C are included on separate sheets numbered V-1 through V-9
D Use the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2c-3 of the instructions which you know or have reason to believe Is discharged or may be discharged
from any outfall For every pollutant you list briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your possession.
1 POLLUTANT
2 SOURCE
1 POLLUTANT
2 SOURCE
Asbestos Trace amounts in insulation
Strontium Trace amounts in coal
Uranium Trace amounts in coal
Vanadium Trace amounts in coal
Zirconium Trace amounts in coal
VI. POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS
Is any pollutant listed in Item V -C a substance or a component of a substance which you
currently use or manufacture as an Intermediate
or final product or byproduct?
® YES (hu all such prrllutonn helve• ) ❑
NO (gu ut Item Il -B)
EPA Form 3510.2C (8-90) PAGE 3 of 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
VII. BIOLOGICAL TOXICITY TESTING DATA
Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological test for acute or chronic toxicity has been made on any of your discharges or on a receiving water in
telation to your discharge within the east 3 years?
© YES (idvw& the waft] and des ribe their proposes below) ❑ NO (go to Section vile
As required by the current NPDES permit chronic t:axicity tests have been performed on a quarterly basis on
the combined wastewater dicharge {Dutfall 007). All tests have pas!:ed fccr the last three years.
%111 CONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION
Were any of the analyses reported In Item V performed by a contract laboratory or consulting Finn?
® YES (liar the name address and telephone number of, and palluroncr onaiy-ed by ❑ NO (go to Secrwn LY)
each such laboratory orfrrm below)
A NAME
(3. ADDRESS
C. TELEPHONE
D POLLUTANTS ANALYZED
(area code dr no.)
(Est)
Pace Analytical Labs
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
[phone]
All pollutants
2225 Riverside Drive
Asheville, NC 28804
IX. CERTIFICATION
1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualfied personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. t am aware that Mere
are sigrtifiicant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A- NAME S OFFICIAL TITLE (rypa orprim)
8 PHONE NO (arra code r4 no.)
Iasa J. zarzar, Director Plant Demo and Retirement
[phone]
C. 51G ATURE
D DATE SIGNED
�i
EPA Form 3 D•2C (8-90) PAGE 4 of 4

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
Attachment 2
Form 2C - Item II -A Line Drawing Flows
Flows
Estimated Average Flow
Comments
A
0.58 MGD
Outfall 001 — West ash pond effluent to effluent channel
(based on historic flows)
B
0.66 MGD
Outfall 005 — East ash pond effluent to effluent channel
(based on historic flows)
C
0
Outfall 003 — Once through cooling water to effluent channel
D
1.24 MGD
Outfall 007 — Discharge to tributary of the Cape Fear River
(based on historic flows from ash ponds)
E
0
Cape Fear River intake
A2-1

m C
0 -0
it
G C
L)
z
r
C
m
CL y
w a
ag
a
z�
m
CL
v
N
L
U LT
y C
C
LU
U
m
c
L-
W
r-
0
12
a�
v
3
C r.
0 LO
culc a.
Ll r'
3
Cl)
y
m
c
L-
W
r-
0
12
C
CL
w
N
U L
9.

Duke Energy progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric PIant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
Attachment 3
Form 2C - Item II -B Description of Operations Contributing Wastewater
The Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant is a retired steam cycle electric generating plant that formerly
consisted of two coal-fired units, two heat recovery boilers and four Internal Combustion (IC) Turbines.
The site was retired in 2011 and is currently being demolished. No industrial activity is currently occurring
onsite.
All wastewaters formerly generated by the site historically discharged to the effluent channel prior to the
combined outfall (Outfall 007). Components of the discharges and wastestreams are described below.
Additionally, a detailed map with the location of various seeps on the property is being provided as part of
this permit application.
Four stormwater outfalls were historically permitted through the NPDES permit. A discussion of those
outfalls is included in this document following the wastewater discussion.
Chemical constituents contained in the discharges from this site will, in part, be representative of the
naturally -occurring chemical quality of the intake water and will also have chemical constituents of such
quality and quantity associated with similar discharges for fossil generating facilities of this size, type, and
in the geographical location. Either all or part of the elements listed on the Periodic Table, either
singularly or in any combination, may from time to time be contained in the discharge until the ash basins
are permanently closed.
Outfall 007 Combined Wastewater Discharge
This outfall contains all waste stream flows including West Ash Pond discharge, once -through cooling
water, and East Ash Pond discharge. Outfall 007 is located in the effluent channel approximately 250
feet downstream of the last internal outfall. Downstream of the effluent channel, the manmade canal
becomes an unnamed tributary which flows to the Cape Fear River.
West Ash Pond 0978 Pond) Discharge — Internal Outfall 001
The West Ash Pond formerly received coal pile runoff, settling basin drains, No. 2 fuel oil tank runoff,
sand bed filter backwash, parking lot drains, equipment cooling tower blowdown and drain, boiler
blowdown, oil unloading area drains, demineralizer regenerate, various yard and floor drains, ash trench
drain, and miscellaneous low volume wastes. This pond also received bottom and fly ash either by ash
transport system waters or by truck. The ash pond provides treatment by sedimentation, oxidation,
neutralization, equalization, and adsorption. The dry areas of the ash pond may be treated with dust
suppressant. Although all waste stream contributions to the ash pond will be eliminated, waste water
remaining in the basin will continue to be removed through existing outfalls. As the water in the ash pond
lowers, additional treatment may be brought onsite to ensure the ash pond discharge maintains
compliance with NPDES permitted limits, such as a portable filtration unit. Descriptions of the individual
waste streams are below.
Coal Pile Runoff
The coal has been removed and the "coal pile area" has been covered with soil and graded in
accordance with an approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. Historically, storm water
runoff from the coal pile was routed to the West Ash Pond for treatment.
Low Volume Wastes
The low volume wastes retention basin contains an oil water separator and historically received
various plant process wastes streams and stormwater from industrial areas. In 2013 Duke Energy
submitted to NCDENR a 90- day closure letter for this basin. This basin will be cleaned and breached
A3-1

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NCO003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
in accordance with that closure letter. Comingled wastewater from this basin flowed to the West Ash
Pond.
Boiler blowdown, drainage, and wastes from the equipment cooling tower and its associated heat
exchangers may have contained minute quantities of treatment chemicals. The small quantities of
these low volume wastes were sent to the low volume wastes retention basin.
Miscellaneous Wastes
Plant area floor and yard drains were routed to the West Ash Pond and included equipment drainage
wash down water, and rainfall runoff. Drains from areas likely to contain oil -filled equipment or
storage were routed to the low volume wastes retention basin which contained an oil/water separator.
Waste oil was disposed of according to the appropriate regulations.
Internal combustion turbine facility false start drain tanks were discharged into the low volume wastes
retention basin.
Cooling tower basin sludge, residuals from the low volume wastes retention basin and the coal pile
ditch; ash trench materials; circulating water tunnel sediment; boiler, electrostatic precipitator, and
associated appurtenances vacuuming sediments; sludge from catch basins, sumps, etc.; and other
miscellaneous low volume wastes from plant process were also transported to the West Ash Pond.
Once -through Cooling Water— Internal Outfall 003
Once -through condenser cooling water for the coal fired units and heat recovery units was withdrawn
from the Cape Fear River, passed through the condenser, and discharged directly into the effluent
channel. Some cooling was accomplished in the effluent channel. When the temperature at Outfall 007
approached 32°C, cooling towers were placed in service to keep the channel water at or below 32°C.
East Ash Pond (1985 Pond) — Internal Outfall 005
The East Ash Pond historically received ash transport waters (bottom and fly ash), runoff from yard
drains, air preheater washes, electrostatic precipitator washes, spent sandblast material, sewage
treatment plant effluent, and miscellaneous low volume wastes. The ash pond provides treatment by
sedimentation, oxidation, neutralization, equalization, and adsorption. Descriptions of the individual
historical waste streams are below. Currently no wastestreams are routed to the east ash pond. The dry
areas of the ash pond may be treated with dust suppressant. Although all waste stream contributions to
the ash pond have been eliminated, waste water remaining in the basin will continue to be removed
through existing outfalls. As the water in the ash pond lowers, additional treatment may be brought onsite
to ensure the ash pond discharge maintains compliance with NPDES permitted limits, such as a portable
filtration unit.
Ash Sluice Water
Fly ash and bottom ash from both units were hydraulically conveyed by an ash sluice pipeline to the
ash pond. As needed, alum was added to the ash sluice influent to aid settling.
A Rotamie system was used to inject urea into Units 5 and 6. In the boiler, the ammonia/urea
reacted with NOx to form water vapor and nitrogen. The system was designed to minimize any
ammonia formation and ammonia slip. Any unreacted ammonia adsorbed on the fly ash from this
system was carried to the ash pond via ash sluice water.
Sanitary Waste Treatment Effluent
Historically, sanitary wastes were treated at an extended aeration package plant prior to discharge to
the East Ash Pond which provided secondary treatment for the effluent. Currently, sanitary wastes
are treated in an onsite septic system permitted by Chatham County. Temporary, portable toilets are
occasionally brought on site as needed to accommodate staffing levels.
Miscellaneous Wastes
Cooling tower basin sludge; residuals from the low volume wastes retention basin and coal pile
retention basin; ash trench materials; circulating water tunnel sediment; boiler, electrostatic
A3-2

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NCO003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
precipitator wash, spent sandblast material, air preheater wash, and other miscellaneous low volume
wastes from plant process were also transported to the East Ash Pond.
Outfalls SW -1, SW -2, SW -3, and SW -8 — Storm Water
In 2011, Duke Energy Progress applied for an individual stormwater permit (prior to that, stormwater
outfalls were included in the NPDES wastewater permit). During the permitting process, DEP and DENR
concurred that since there is no industrial activity occurring onsite, the industrial stormwater permit is not
applicable. DEP withdrew the permit application and NCDENR responded with a letter accepting the
application withdrawal. Since 2013, the site has been further demolished and holds an approved Erosion
and Sedimentation Control Plan, which subjects the site to the requirements of the Construction
Stormwater General Permit.
The following descriptions apply to the SW outfalls identified in DEP's 2011 application for an individual
stormwater permit.
Outfall SWA and Outfall SW -8 are legacy riser structures from inactive ash ponds. Discharges of
stormwater from these outfalls are rare and NCDENR has concurred with the estimation that it would take
greater than the 25 -year, 24- hour storm event to generate a discharge from these outfalls. Outfall SW -1
discharges directly into the Cape Fear River and Outfall SW -8 discharges into Shaddox Creek which
flows into the Haw River just above the confluence with the Deep River which forms the Cape Fear River.
Storm water collected along the railroad track between the plant entrance road and the plant site
combines with the drainage of an open field which is directed via Outfall SW -2 into Shaddox Creek that
flows into the Haw River just above the confluence with the Deep River. Historically, coal was moved
along the railroad track, however coal is no longer brought onsite. There is currently no industrial activity
occurring within this drainage area.
Stormwater collected along the roadside swell beside the plant entrance road is directed via Outfall SW -3
towards drainages that go to Shaddox Creek. Historically this location was selected to capture potential
impacts from an ash sluice line that crossed under the entrance road. Ash is no longer sluiced and the
line has been physically disconnected.
Other Wastes
Herbicide Usage in the Treatment System Ponds
Herbicides are used as needed to control nuisance aquatic vegetation. These herbicides are applied by
licensed applicators, or persons under the immediate supervision of a licensed applicator, in accordance
with the manufacturer's instructions.
A3-3

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NCO003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
Attachment 4
Form 2C - Item VI Potential Discharges Not Covered by Analysis
A44
Estimated
Quantity
Chemical
CY
Purpose
Wood fibers in proprietary binder mixture
350-750
Iblacre per
Every 4
months or
Soil stabilizer and dust control
(BioCoverSS)
application
as needed
for ash pond
Anionic Water Soluble Polymer in
825 gal
Every 4
months or
Soil stabilizer and dust control
Emulsion (EcoGreen Barrier)
as needed
for ash pond
Recycled paper (Country Boy Cellulose
700 bales
Every 4
months or
Soil stabilizer and dust control
Fiber)
as needed
for ash pond
Bentonite, hydrated aluminum silicate
12,500 lbs
Every 4
months or
Soil stabilizer and dust control
(BEN -GEL)
as needed
for ash pond
Listed chemicals are no longer being utilized for the purposes identified below. However, they
were used during historic operations and trace amounts have the potential to be discharged
during plant demolition.
No Longer
Aluminum sulfate
None
Used
Water treatment flocculent
No Longer
Aluminum chlorohydrate
None
Used
Water treatment coagulant
GEBetz Spectrus OX103
(1-bromo-3-chloro-5,5-
No Longer
dimeth h dantoin)
None
Used
Binfouling control
No Longer
Biofouling control in sewage
Calcium hypochlorite
None
Used
treatment
Sanuril 115
(calcium hypochlorite and 1-bromo-3-
No Longer
Biofouling control in sewage
chloro-5,5-dimeth h dantoin)
None
Used
treatment
AB Cutrine Plus
(copper carbonate, triethanolamine,
No Longer
monoethanolamine)
None
Used
Algae control in ash ponds
Cygent Plus
(alkyl hydroxypoly oxyethylene,
No Longer
d'limonene)
None
Used
AI ae control in Ash Ponds
No Longer
VITEC 3000 (proprietary)
None
Used
Antiscalant
No Longer
Oxygen scavenger; passivating
Steamate PAS3040 (proprietary)
None
Used
agent
GEBetz Steamate PAS3040
No Longer
Oxygen scavenger; passivating
(hydroquinone)
None
Used
acient
GEBetz Steamate NA0240
No Longer
(morpholine)
None
Used
pH control in condensate
No Longer
Sodium hydroxide
None
Used
pH control
No Longer
Caustic soda (anhydrous)
None
Used
RH control
GEBetz Optisperse HP9410
No Longer
Solids dispersant in boiler, pH
monosodium phosphate)
None
Used
control
A44

Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
2014 Permit Application Amendment
Estimated
Quantity
Chemical
er ear
Frequency
Purpose
No Longer
Solids dispersant in boiler, pH
Disodium phosphate
None
Used
control
No Longer
Solids dispersant in boiler, pH
Trisodium phosphate
None
Used
control
No Longer
Solids dispersant in boiler, pH
Sodium polyphosphate
None
Used
control
Dianodic DN2126
(phosphoric acid, potassium hydroxide,
No Longer
1-H-benzotriazole, methyl tol triazole)
None
Used
Corrosion inhibitor
No Longer
NOx control during ozone
Aqueous urea 50%
None
Used
months
No Longer
Citric acid 50%
None
Used
Boiler cleaning
No Longer
Sodium nitrite
None
Used
Boiler cleaning
No Longer
Ammonium bicarbonate
None
Used
Boiler cleaning
No Longer
Soda ash
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Ammonium persulfate
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Ammonium bifluoride
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Sodium bromate
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Hydrochloric acid
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
Eth lenediaminetetraacetic acid EDTA
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
No Longer
ChelClean 675 (proprietary)
None
Used
Boiler cleaning, if needed
Renewz
No Longer
sodium hydroxide, potassium silicate
None
Used
Condenser coil cleaning
TC -X10 Plus
No Longer
sodium hydroxide)
None
Used
Steam cleaning
No Longer
RoClean L403 (proprietary)
None
Used
RO membrane cleaning
No Longer
RoClean P111 ra rieta
None
Used
RO membrane cleaning
No Longer
RoClean P303A (proprietary)
None
Used
RO membrane cleaning
20 Degree Baume Muriatic Acid
No Longer
(hydrochloric acid
None
Used
RO membrane cleaning
No Longer
Morton softener salt
None
Used
RO softener regeneration
No Longer
Cargill salt
None
Used
EDI cleaning
Cl 38B (Alum)
No Longer
aluminum chlorohydrate)
None
Used
TSS control in ash pond
No Longer
Laundry detergent e.., Tide
None
Used
Laundry cleaner
No Longer
Bleach
None
Used
Laundry cleaner
A4-2

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
A4-3
Estimated
Quantity
Chemical
er ear
Frequency
Purpose
No Longer
Weed herbicide e.., Roundup)
None
Used
Weed killer treatment
Ant pesticide
No Longer
e.., h drameth anon inerts
None
Used
Ant killer treatment
No Longer
Alk I alcohol
None
Used
Freeze conditioning agent
No Longer
Propylene glycol
None
Used
Freeze conditioning agent
No Longer
Calcium chloride
None
Used
Freeze conditioning agent
No Longer
Diethylene glycol
None
Used
Freeze conditioning agent
No Longer
Glycerin
None
Used
Freeze conditioning agent
A4-3

Please print or type in the unshaded areas onl Y
EPA ID Number (copy from Item f of Form f)
NCD0 00 B 3 0 919
Form Approved OMB 2040-0086
Approvvaa l expires 5-31.92
FORMo
V
NPDES
U S Environmenta Protection Agency
E PA Washington DC 20480
Application for Permit to Discharge Storm Water
Discharges Associated with industrial Activity
Paperwork Reduction Act Notice
Pub :c reporting burden for this application is est mated to average 28 6 hours per application. including time for reviewing instructions searching existing data sources
gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of:nformabon Send comments regarding the burden estimate any other aspect
of this collection of information, or suggestions for improving this form, Including suggestions wh-ch may increase or reduce this burden to Chief Information Policy
Branch, PM -223, U S Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460 or Director, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affa rs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503
(.Outfall Location
For each outfall, list the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water
A. Outfaa Number D Receiving Water
(list) 8 Latitude C. Longitude (name)
5W-001 3S 1 3- _ 791 2 E5 ShaddSx Creek
SW -002 35 3� 41 79 2 48 Shadd:x Creek
SW -003 35 3� 3: 79 2 40 Tributary to Shaddox Creek
SW -006 35 34 56 79 3 tape F,ar River
II. Improvements
A. Are you now required by any Federal, State, or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operation of wastewater
treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application? This includes, but is not limited
to. permit --onditions, adm nistradve or enforcement orders, enforcement compliance schedu a letters, stipulations court orders and grant or loan conditions,
2 Affected Outfalls 4 Final
1. Identificalon of Conditions, Compliance Date
Agreements, Etc number source of discha e 3 Brief Descrl tion of Project
rg P 1 a req b proi
None
B You may attach additional sheets describ,ng any add.tional water pot:ution (or other environmental projects wh-ch may affect your discharges) you now have under
way or which you plan Indicate whether each program is now under way or planned and indicate your actual or planned schedules for construction
III -ruto Frninone MWn
Attach a site map shoving topography (or Indicating the outline of drainage areas served by the outfalls(s) covered in the application if a topographic map is unavailable)
depicting the facility Including each of its intake and discharge structures the drainage area of each storm water outfa I; paved areas and buildings vnthin the drainage
area of each storm water outfall, each known past or present areas used for outdoor storage of d.sposal of significant materials, each existing structural control measure
to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff materia s loading and access areas areas where pesticides herbicides, soil conditioners and fertilizers are applied, each of
its hazardous waste treatment storage or d sposa: units (including each area not required to have a RCRA permit which is used for accumulating hazardous waste
under 40 CFR 262 34), each wef where fluids from the faciFty are injected underground springs. and other surface water bodes which received storm water discharges
from the facility
EPA Form 3510.2F (1.92) Page 1 of 3 Continue on Page 2

Continued from the Front
r., .r---.,
IT. nmsauvc 160c7J..r11JULIjj VI r"UlJuldlll .7vurQU5
A_ For each outfall. provide an esrenale of the area ,.include units) of imperious surfaces (including paved areas and building roofs) dra'rred to the outfall, and an estimate of the total surface area
drained by the outfall.
Outfall
Area of Impervious Surface
Total Area Drained
Outfall
Area of Impervious Surface
Total Area Drained
Number
provide units)
(provide units)
Number
(prowde, -,ts1
(Provida units)
SW -001
0 acre
10 ares
SW -002
1 acre
9 acres
SW -003
0 acr;'
2 acres
SW -008
0 acr-
5, a r e
S. Provide a narrative description ar sign ficant materials that are currently or in the past three years have been treated, stored Or disposed in a manner to allow exposure
to storm water method of treatment. storage, or disposal; past and present materials management practices employed to minimize contact by these materials with
storm water runoff, materials loading and access areas. and the location manner, and frequency in which pesticides, herbicides. soil conditioners, and fertilizers are
applied
Outfalls SW 001 and SW -u:4 would discharge storm water frim aband_ned ash pends that have not been used for more than 35 years.
These areas are new covered with vegntation. previously, NCDENR concurred that it would take greater than a 25 -year storm event
to have storm water discharge from the existing stand pipes in these inactive ash pends.
Outfall SW002discharges storm water from along the east side of a railroad spur that formerly received coal shipments its, the
plant. All coal has been removed from site. Tw-� pipes direct flow from this less than one acre area into a field. A c.-sllection
point within the field discharges into Shaddox Creek. Appr=ximately :ne acre of impervious surface, including a roadway and a
gravelled employee parking lot, also drain to this collection point. No herbicides nor fertilizers are applied to the field,
Outfall SW 003 discharges storm water from along the south side of the entrance road. This email, grass -lined area is not
located near any industrial processes at the plant site n ---r is it located near any portion of the site where coal or other
chemical are unloaded. No herbicides nor fertilizers are applied in this area.
C For each outfa I, provide the location and a description of existing structural and nonstructural control measures to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff; and a
description of the treatment the storm water receives, Including the schedule and type of maintenance for control and treatment measures and the ultimate disposal
of any solid or fluid wastes other than by discharge.
Outfall
List Codes from
Number
Treatment
Table 2F-1
SW -001 None. 1-U
SW -002 Rock filter dam at :_utfall pipe. q -A
SW -003 None.. 4-A
SW -009 Crone. 1-U
V. Nonstormwater Discharges
A. I certify under penalty of law hal the outfall(s) covered by this application have been tested or evaluated for the presence of nonstormwater discharges, and that all
nonstormwater discharged from these outfalls) are Identified in either an accompanying Form 2C or From 2E application for the outfall
Name and Official Title (type or print)Signature
Date Signed
Larry Baxley, Environmental Spec.
B. Provide a description of the method used, the date of any testing, and the onsite drainage points that were directly observed during a test,
Previously, when the SW outfalls were permitted, the Cape Fear Plant ORC conducted an annual a visual inspection of all storm
water outEalls during an extended period of dry weather. This visual inspection served to ensure that there are no nonetorm
water discharges from the permitted storm water outfalls. Certification statements were signed, dated, and maintained onsite
I. Significant Leaks or Spills
Provide existing Information regarding the history of significant leaks or spills of toxic or hazardous pollutants at the facility In the fast three years, including the
approximate date and location of the spill or leak, and the type and amount of material released
nave been no leaks or spills of toxic or hazardous pollutants at the facilty in the last three years.
EPA Form 3510.2F (f -92) Page 2 of 3 Continue on Page 3

L EPA 10 Number (copy Rom Item 1 of Form 1)
Continued from Page 2 ,NCDo00e30919
I:— , J1111111111111 I
ria. Discharge mrormauon
A, B, C, d D7 See instructions before proceeding. Complete one set of tables for each outfal' Annotate the outfall number In the space provided,
Table 'Al -A, VII -B, VII -C are included on separate sheets numbers VII -1 and V11-2.
E Potential discharges not covered by analysis - is any tordc Pollutant ;isted in table 2F-2. 2F-3. or 2F-4 a substance or a component of a substance which you
currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or byproduct?
❑✓ Yes (list all such pollutants below) ❑ No (go to Section Do
Elements that may be present in coal at the plant--
lant-Antimony
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
zinc
III. Biological Toxicity Testing Data
Do you have any knowledge or reason to beileve that any biological test for acute or chronic tonicity has been made on any of your discharges or on a receiving water in
relation to your discharge within the last 3 years?
❑ Yes (list all such pollutants below) ❑�/ No (go to Section Do
IX. Contract Analysis Information
Vkre any of the analyses reported in Item VII performed by a contract a aboratory or consulting firm?
❑ Yes (fist the name, address, and telephone number of and pofiutants
© No (go to Section )t)
analyzed by; each such laborara y or firm below)
A. Name
B Address
C, Area Code & Phone No,
0 Pollutants Analyzed
5
—
X. Certification
I tartly under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my drection or supervision In accordance with a system designed to assure
that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the imbrmadon submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and befief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that
there are signiftent penalties for submitting false information, Including the possibility offine and Imprisonment for knowing violations.
A. Name 6 Official Title (Type OrPrini)
B. Area Code and Phone No.
Issa J. Zarzar, Director Demo and Retirement
[phone]
C. Signature
0. Date Signed
A7 Ll
EPA Form 3570-2F (7-92) 'j
Page 3 of 3

EPA Form 3510-2F (1-92) Page VII -1 Continue on Reverse
EPA ID Number (copy from Item t of Form 1)
1CDD00930915 outfall SW 002
Form Approved OMB No 2040.0488
Approval expires 5-31 92
VII. Discharge information (Continued from page 3 of Form 2F)
Part A — You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table Complete one table for each outfall See instructions for additional details
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values
(include units)
Average Values
(include units)
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow -Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow -Weighted
Composite
Oil and Grease
5.5 irg/L
NIA
1
Biological Oxygen
Demand (BODS)
3 6 ��/L
•
1
Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COO)
48.6/L
1
Total Suspended
Solids (TSS)
4.a `r`g/L
•
1
Total Nitrogen
1.62 mg/L
1
Total Phosphorus
0.17 mg/L
1
pH
Minimum 6.3
Maximum 6. 3
1 Minimum
Imaximum
1
Part B — List each pollutant that is limited in an effluent guideline which the facility is subject to or any pollutant listed in the facility's NPDES permit for its process
wastewater (if the facility Is operating under an existing NPDES permit) Complete one table for each outfall. See the instructions for additional details and
requirements.
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values Average Values
(include units) (include units)
Grab Sample Grab Sample
Taken During Taken During
First 20 Flow -Weighted First 20 Flow -Weighted
Minutes Composite Minutes Composite
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
PH
1 6.3 SU tl/A
1
Natural environmental processes
'ISS
4.e mg/L •
1
Erosion, settled dust/debris
Oil & Grease
5.5 mg/L N/A
1
May be present in coal along rail
Temperature
22 degrees C N/A
1
Ambient
TRC
0.05 mg/L N/A
1
Chlorination process at plant
Copper, Total
0.007 mg/L •
1
May be present in coal along rail
Iron, Total
0.3x2 mg/L
1
May be present in coal along rail
Arsenic, Total
< 3 ug/L
1
May be present in coal along rail
Mercury
2.41 ng/L +
1
May be present in coal along rail
Selenium, Total
< 2 ug/L +
1
May be present in coal along rail
Chromium, Total
c 5 ug/L •
1
May be present in coal along rail
Nickel, Total
c 5 ug/L •
1
May be present in coal along rail
Phosphorus, Tot
0.17 mg/L
1
Natural environmental processes
Ammonia -N
< 0.02 mg/L N
1
Natural environmental processes
Nitrate -Nitrite
0.39 mg/L N
1
Natural environmental processes
Kjeldahl -N
1.24 mg/L
1
Natural environmental processes
Nitrogen, Total
1.62 mg/L •
1
Natural environmental processes
Fecal coliform
4950 CFU/100ml •
1
Natural environmental processes
-Composite samples not taken, by
permission of NCDWp.
EPA Form 3510-2F (1-92) Page VII -1 Continue on Reverse

Continued from the Front
Part C - List each pollutant shown in Table 2F-2, 2F-3 and 2F-4 that you know or have reason to believe is present. See the instructions for additional details and
requirements Complete one table for each outfall
Maximum Values Average Values
(include units) (include units) Number
Pollutant Grab Sample Grab Sample of
and Taken During Taken During Storm
CAS Number First 20 F ow-Weighled First 20 Flow -Weighted Events
(if available) Minutes Composite M.nutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
Aluminum
May be present in coal along rail
Antimony
May be present in coal along rail
Beryllium
May be present in coal along rail
Boron --
May be present in coal along rail
Bromide --
May be present in coal along rail
Cadmium ---
May be present in coal along rail
Lead
May be present in coal along rail
Magnesium
May be present in coal along rail
Manganese
May be present in coal along rail
Molybdenum ---
Y
May be present in coal along rail
Silver --
May be present in coal along rail
Thallium
May be present in coal along rail
Tin
May be present in coal along rail
Zinc
May be present in coal along rail
Part D — Provide data for the stone event(s) which resulted in the maximum values for the pow weighted composite sample
1
Date of
Storm
Event
2
Duration
of Storm Event
(in minutes)
3
Total rainfall
during storm event
(in inches)
4
Number of hours between
beginning of storm measured
and end of previous
measurable rain event
5
Maximum flow rate during
rain event
(gallons/minute or
specify units)
B
Total now from
rain event
(gallons or specify units)
09/26/2010
thru
09/29/2010
2,160 minutes
3.0 inches
768 hours
2 gallons/minute
11,440 gallons
7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate
Storm water flow wan timed with a stopwatch as it filled a bucket to a known volume to measure flow from outfall.
EPA Form 3510-2F (1-92) Page VII -2

EPA ID Number (copy from item i of Form 1) Fcrm Approved OMB No 20400085
NCD000830919 outEall SW o03 Aoorova expires 5.31-92
VII. Discharge information (Continued from page 3 of Form 2F)
Part A — You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table Complete one table for each outfall. See instructions for additional deta.ls
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values
(include units)
Average Values
(include units)
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow -Weighted
Composite
Grab Sample
Taken During
First 20
Minutes
Flow -Weighted
Composite
Oil and Grease
5 mg/L
N/A
1
Biological Oxygen
Demand (BODS)
9 3 mg/L
1
Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COD)
s7 mg/L
1
Total Suspended
Solids (TSS)
35.2 mg/L
•
i
Total Nitrogen
1.99 mg/L
1
Total Phosphorus
0.69 mg/L
1
PH
Minimum ri. 81
Maximum 5-a
1 Minimum
IMaximum
I1
Part B — List each pollutant that is limited in an effluent guideline which the facility is subject to or any pollutant listed in the facility's NPDES permit for its process
wastewater (if the facility is operating under an existing NPDES permit) Complete one table for each outfall See the Instructions for additional details and
requirements.
Pollutant
and
CAS Number
(if available)
Maximum Values Average Values
(include units) (include units)
Grab Sample Grab Sample
Taken During Taken During
First 20 Flaw -Weighted First 20 Flow -Weighted
Minutes Composite Minutes Composite
Number
of
Storm
Events
Sampled
Sources of Pollutants
PH
5.8 SU N/A
Natural environmental processes
TSS
35.2 mg/L
Erosion, settled duet/debris
Oil 4 Grease
c 5 mg/L N/A
May be present in coal along ra;l
Temperature
22 degrees C N/A
Ambient
TRC
0.05 mg/L N/A
IChlorination process at plant
Copper, Total
0.006 mg/L *
May be present in coal along rail
Iron, Total
0.955 mg/L
May be present in coal along rail
Arsenic, Total
a 3 ug/L
May be present in coal along rail
Mercury
5.53 ng/L
May be present in coal along rail
Selenium, Total 2.52 ug/L "
May be present in coal along rail
Chromium, Total < 5 ug/L *
May be present in coal along rail
Nickel, Total
c 5 ug/L •
May be present in coal along rail
Phosphorus, Tot
0.69 mg/L
Natural environmental proteases
Ammonia -N
0.26 mg/L N •
Natural environmental processes
Nitrate -Nitrite a 0.02 mg/L N
Natural environmental processes
KJeldahl-N
1.99 mg/L
Natural environmental processes
Nitrogen, Total
1.99 mg/L "
tratural environmental processes
Fecal coliform
1710 CFU/100mL "
Natural environmental processes
•Composite samples not taken, by
permission of NCDWQ.
EPA Form 3510.2F (1-92) Page V11-1 Continue on Reverse

Continued From the Front
Part C - List each pollutant shown in Table 2F-2, 2F-3, and 2F4 that you know or have reason to believe is present. See the instructions for additional details and
requirements. Complete one table for each outfall.
Maximum Values Average Values
(include units) (include units) Number
Pollutant Grab Sample Grab Sample of
and Taken During Taken During Storm
CAS Number First 20 Flow -Weighted First 20 Flow -Weighted Events
(ifavadable) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
Aluminum ---
May be present in coal along rail
Antimony ---
May be present in coal along rail
Beryllium --
May be present in coal along rail
Boron ---
may be present in coal along rail
Bromide ---
May be present in coal along rail
Cadmium ---
May be present in coal along rail
Lead ---
May be present in coal along rail
Magnesium ---
May be present in coal along rail
Manganese ---
May be present in coal along rail
Molybdenum ---
Y
May be present in coal along rail
Silver ---
May be present in coal along rail
Thallium --
May be present in coal along rail
tin --
May be present in coal along rail
Zinc --
May be present in coal along rail
Part D — Provide data for the storm event(s) which resulted In the maximum values for the flow weighted composite sample
�.
Date of
Storm
Event
2
Duration
of Storm Event
(in minutes)
3
Total rainfall
during storm event
(in inches)
4
Number of hours between
beginning of storm measured
and end of previous
measurable rain event
5
Maximum now rate during
rain event
(gallons/minute, or
specify units)
6
Total flow from
rain event
(gallons or specify units)
09/26/2010
thru
09/29/2010
2,160 minutes
13.0 inches
760 hours
1 gallons/minute
72: gall ---no
7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate
Storm water flow was timed with a stopwatch as it filled a bucket to a known volume to measure flaw fr=m outfall.
EPA Form 3510-2F (1-92) Page VII -2

St.�rtdptpt� "�
IT.. �.
Outfall SW -00I
r`t Outfall SW -002
Impervious' �Y' <--' Outfall SW -003
C# -
L J
surface
i ' � lY � '��� a'r s� L L • '~ ti�� iK
t
a
I
St.,,at,pl.
Outfall SW -008

,
Outfall SW -008
- ---
Rmopgrt/
boundary �

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. NPDES Permit NC0003433
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant 2014 Permit Application Amendment
Form 2F — Attachment 1
Item III Topographic Site Drainage Map (Zoom)
2F A7-3

Farm 2F Attachment 2
December 13, 2012
File No.: 12520-R
Ms. Bethany A. Georgoulias
Stormwater Permitting Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Carolina Power & Light Co. d/b/a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. (Progress Energy), a
Subsidiary of Duke Energy Inc.
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant (NPDES NC0003433/NCS000550 draft)
NPDES Storm Water Permit Application Withdrawal
Dear Ms. Georgoulias;
Progress Energy is hereby withdrawing the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant NPDES Form 2F Application for
Permit to Discharge Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity submitted to Mr. Tom
Belnick on December 2, 2010. This power plant has ceased all categorical industrial activity and no longer
requires authorization to discharge storm water.
The submitted Form 2F application requested authorization to discharge storm water from four outfalls:
SW -001, SW -002, SW -003, and SW -008. As acknowledged in the draft individual storm water permit, there
are no discharges from Outfalls SW -001 and SW -008 (inactive ash basins) for events less than a
25 year/24 hour storm, thus, these outfalls are not subject to storm water permitting. No more coal is being
delivered to the power plant thus authorization for the drainage area along the rail spur, which discharges
via Outfall SW -002, is no longer required. A de minims amount of coal remains along this short spur but this
insignificant amount of material is not expected to cause any environmental impact. The ash sluice line
crossing the swell at Outfall SW -003 is no longer in use. The line was rinsed and portions of the piping were
removed on November 8, 2012, the last categorical activity to be ceased at the power plant.
Progress Energy Carolinas. Inc.
fagie Foal steam Pi doll
500 UK lipid
hinnruir.. NC 2755

Form 2F Attachment 2
Ms. Bethany A. Georgoulias
Page 2 of 2
December 13, 2012
Because no categorical industrial activity is currently conducted at the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, no
authorization for the discharge of storm water associated with industrial activity is required. Therefore,
Progress Energy believes that the current NPDES storm water permitting requirements are no longer
applicable. Please respond with concurrence of our understanding by either a letter to me at the power
plant address or an email to Ms. Robin Bryson, Environmental Specialist in our corporate office, at
robin.brvsonlanenmail.com.
1 certify, under penalty of low, that this document and oil attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. i am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Sincerely, /
Danny Wimberly
Acting Plant Manager
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
DW/rb
cc: Larry Baxley
Henry Gales
John Velte

Form 2F Attachment 3
60f WArFR
`?-ua N
aE
1
Ms. Victoria K. Will
Cape Fear Steam Plant
500 CP & L Road
Moncure, North Carolina 27559
i e-ky
Dear Ms. Will:
Michael F Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E , Director
Division of water Quality
October 12, 2005 RECEIVED
OCT 17 200
CAPE FEAR PLANT
Subject: NPDES Permit NCO003433
Cape Fear Steam Plant
Wake County
The Division evaluated your request to waive sampling requirements for the stormwater outfalls for the Cape
Fear Steam Plant's renewal application. Five stormwater outfalls are covered under the NPDES permit, SW -1,
SW -2, SW -3, SW -4, and 008. Outfalls SW -1 and 008 drain the area were the old ash ponds were located. The
ponds have not been used for more than 30 years and are covered with vegetation. In this case the application
requirements are not applicable because there is no exposed materials or industrial activity. Outfall SW4 drains
an area near the railroad tracks and is tributary to outfall 007. Outfall 007 is the outfall at the discharge canal and
is monitored and sampled under the permit. Outfall SW -4 is represented by outfall 007, therefore no sampling is
necessary for the application. Outfalls SW -2 and SW -3 drain small areas from the road and railroad line and are
combined with parking and grassy areas. As informed by Progress Energy, these outfalls do not collect enough
flow to obtain a representative sample. The sampling and testing requirements for outfalls SW -2 and SW -3 are
also waived for the permit renewal application. At this time the Division is not granting any modifications to the
conditions pertaining to stormwater outfalls in the permit. Due to the proximity of the renewal date,
modifications to the permit pertaining the elimination of outfalls shall be requested with the permit renewal
application. If you have any questions please contact Teresa Rodriguez of the NPDES Unit at [phone],
extension 553.
Sincerely,
- �,/
Gil Vinzani
EAST NPDES Unit Supervisor
cc: Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
EAST NPDES Unit Files
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 276WI617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer VISIT Us ON TWE INTERNET @ hltpJlh2o.enr.state nc.uOPDES

Duke Energy Progress, Inc
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Form 2F Attachment 4
Current Stormwater Sample Data
NPDES Permit NCO003433
2014 Permit Application Amendment
Flags
131 Target analyte detected in method blank at or above the reporting limit. Target analyte concentration in
sample was greater than 1 O the concentration of the target analyte detected in the method blank. Analyte
concentration in sample is not affected by contamination.
M4 M4 - The spike recovery value was unusable since the analyte concentration was disproportionate to the spike level.
The associated Laboratory Control Sample recovery was acceptable.
Outfall SWO02
Outfall SWO03
Collected Date
Component
Mfho
units
MDL
RUL
S or >-
Result
Flag
S or >
Result
E1119
07/10/14
COD
HACH 8000
mg/L
3.78
20
39
0
82
0
07/10/14
Chloride
EPA 300.0
mg/L
0.22
1
6.7
0
8.7
0
07/10/14
Fluoride
EPA 300.0
mg/L
0.17
1
<
1
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
mg/L
0.36
2
140
0
80
0
07/10/14
Oil and Grease
EPA 16648
mg/L
5.0
5.0
<
5.0
0
<
5.0
0
07/10/14
Mercury (Hg)
EPA 245.1
ug/L
0.006
0.05
<
0.05
0
<
0.05
0
07/10/14
Aluminum (Al)
EPA 200.7
mg/L
0.002
0.005
3.21
81
1.23
B1
07/10/14
Barium (Ba)
EPA 200.7
mg/L
0.0001
0.005
0.049
0
0.032
0
07/10/14
Boron (B)
EPA 200.7
mg/L
0.0033
0.05
0.097
0
0.212
0
07/10/14
Calcium (Ca)
EPA 200.7
mg/L
0.007
0.02
25.2
01, M4
16.9
B1
07/10/14
Hardness
EPA 200.7
mg/L (CaCO3)
0.1273
0.19
119
0
74.4
0
07/10/14
Iron (Fe)
EPA 200.7
mg/L
0.0013
0.01
4.67
0
1.4
0
07/10/14
Magnesium (Mg)
EPA 200.7
mg/L
0.0044
0.005
13.6
0
7.81
0
07/10/14
Manganese (Mn)
EPA 200.7
mg/L
0.0002
0.005
0.188
0
0.972
0
07/10/14
Zinc Vnj
EPA 200.7
mg/L
0.0026
0.005
0.064
0
0.077
0
07/10/14
Antimony (Sb)
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.106
1
<
1
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Arsenic (As)
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.078
1
2.39
0
1.51
0
07/10/14
Cadmium (Cd)
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.101
1
<
1
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Chromium (Cr)
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.061
1
6.1
0
1.5
0
07/10/14
Copper (Cu)
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.11
1
17.1
0
5.83
0
07/10/14
Lead (Pb)
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.065
1
4.9
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Molybdenum (Mo)
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.066
1
<
1
0
<
1
0
07/10/14
Nickel (Ni)
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.194
1
5.48
0
13.2
0
07/10/14
Selenium (Se)
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.092
1
<
1
1
0
1.05
0
07/10/14
Thallium (TI) Low Level
EPA 200.8
ug/L
0.134
0.2
<
0.2
0
<
0.2
0
07/10/14
TDS
SM2540C
mg/L
16.75
25
290
0
210
0
07/10/14
TS5
SM2540D
mg/L
6.7
30
1
62
0
26
0
Flags
131 Target analyte detected in method blank at or above the reporting limit. Target analyte concentration in
sample was greater than 1 O the concentration of the target analyte detected in the method blank. Analyte
concentration in sample is not affected by contamination.
M4 M4 - The spike recovery value was unusable since the analyte concentration was disproportionate to the spike level.
The associated Laboratory Control Sample recovery was acceptable.

tip
syn,T(erra
SEEP MONITORING REPORT -
JUNE/JULY 2014
FOR
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
500 CP&L ROAD
MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA 27559
CHATHAM COUNTY
NPDES PERMIT #NC0003433
PREPARED FOR
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
�>DUKE
ENERGY
PROGRESS
SUBMITTED: JULY 2014
/I /Z-2�
rry/' lie; MC PG 1425
/ Proje Geologist
A�Ab-'
at y W b, IAC PG 1328
i Project Manager

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
1.0 Introduction.....................................................................................................................1
2.0 Seep Monitoring.............................................................................................................. 2
2.1 Seep Identification..................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Seep Flow Measurement........................................................................................... 2
2.3 Seep Sample Collection............................................................................................. 3
3.0 Recommendations...........................................................................................................5
List of Figures
Figure 1— Site Location Map
Figure 2 — Identified Seeps and Water Quality Sample Locations
List of Tables
Table 1— Seep Locations and Descriptions
Table 2 — Seep Flows and Analytical Results
Table 3 — Analytical Parameters/Methods
List of Appendices
Appendix A — Analytical Sample Handling, Preservation and
Holding Time Requirements
Page 1
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ Cape Fear \ Seep Monitoring Plan\ Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7-30-14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following report summarizes an evaluation of the Cape Fear Plant seepage flow
downgradient of the ash ponds toward Shaddox Creek and the Cape Fear River. The
evaluation included a detailed site reconnaissance to identify potential seeps followed
by the collection of flow measurements and representative water quality samples at
select locations. The site reconnaissance was conducted during the spring of 2014.
Representative seep locations were evaluated for water quality and flow rates during
late June to early July 2014.
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003433. The purpose of the evaluation was to determine additional
potential outfalls for inclusion within the permit.
Fifteen seep locations were identified during wet weather conditions in early spring of
2014. However, only six locations contained sufficient water for water quality sample
collection in late June to early July 2014. Seven of the sample locations were located
upstream of the Outfall 007 to the canal on the property.
The low volume of water characteristic of the seeps coupled with the relatively low
constituent concentrations in the samples, suggest that there is little potential to
influence water quality of Shaddox Creek or the Cape Fear River. If reasonable
potential analyses demonstrate that there is no potential to exceed water quality
standards, then Duke Energy proposes to re-evaluate the seep locations listed in this
document annually over the next 5 -year permit cycle. These annual evaluations would
be documented and would verify the condition of the existing seeps and determine the
presence of new seeps. DWR will be promptly notified if any new seeps are identified
or any significant changes are observed for the existing seeps. If any existing or newly
identified seeps are determined to reach the Cape Fear River and the seepage has
reasonable potential to exceed a water quality standard, Duke Energy will take
measures to either (1) stop the seepage, (2) capture and route the seep so that it is
discharged through a NPDES permitted outfall, or (3) address the seep using Best
Management Plans approved by DWR.
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\Cape Fear\Seep Monitoring Plan\Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7-30-14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) owns and operates the Cape Fear Steam
Electric Plant (Cape Fear Plant) located on approximately 900 acres in central North
Carolina near Moncure, North Carolina. The Cape Fear Plant is located in Chatham
County along the east bank of the Cape Fear River southeast of Moncure and west of
Corinth Road. The site location is shown on Figure 1.
The Cape Fear Plant began operations in 1923 and additional units were added in the
following years. Throughout its operational history, the Cape Fear Plant employed six
coal-fired units along with four oil -fueled combustion turbine units to produce steam.
Ash generated from coal combustion was stored on-site in ash management ponds.
Operations were terminated at Cape Fear Plant in October 2012 and demolition
activities are currently underway.
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003433.
This report summarizes an evaluation of seepage flows across the Cape Fear Plant. The
evaluation included a detailed site reconnaissance to identify potential seeps, flow
measurements of identified seeps, and collection of seep water and other surface water
with chemical analysis of collected samples. The site reconnaissance was conducted in
late February 2014. Seep sampling and flow measurements were completed from June
30 through July 2, 2014.
Page 1
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Seep Monitoring Plan\ Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7-30-14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
2.0 SEEP MONITORING
2.1 Seep Identification
A detailed reconnaissance of the outside perimeter of each historic ash management
pond present at Cape Fear Plant was conducted in late February 2014 for the purpose of
identifying and locating any potential seeps originating from the ash ponds. Identified
seeps were described, photographed, noted on a field map, and surveyed as to location
using GPS (Table 1). Identified seeps were further evaluated in June/July 2014. During
the June/July evaluation, it was observed that some of the seeps identified in February
2014 were dry reflecting an intermittent or seasonal nature. The locations of seeps
identified are presented on Figure 2.
2.2 Seep Flow Measurement
Flow measurements were made in June/July 2014 at water -bearing seep locations using
either a Son -Tek F1owTracker ® Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter or the timed -volumetric
method. The F1owTracker® measures stream velocity and discharge using sound
waves. The timed -volumetric method was used at two locations where the flow was
constrained in a location that prevented the F1owTracker from recording a signal
without interference.
The timed -volumetric method was employed by collecting a volume of water from the
discharge of the seep directly into an appropriately sized container (graduated cylinder
or bucket). The entire seep flow was routed to the container. The amount of time (in
seconds) required to collect a known volume of water was recorded. Five timed
volumes were recorded and the flow rate for the seep was calculated based on an
average of the timed volume measurements.
The F1owTracker® was used to measure seep flows at the majority of seeps and in the
Shaddox Creek stream channel. The method is designed for streams that can be waded
following established procedures such as the U.S. Geological Survey standards. Use of
the F1owTracker® was generally limited to channels of sufficient width (approximately
0.5 feet or greater) and depth (approximately 0.17 feet or greater). Flow measurements
(water velocity and depth) within quality control bounds of the instrument were
recorded manually for estimation of discharge at a seep.
Locations were selected where channel banks were fairly parallel. The channel width
was measured at the water line and recorded. If the channel width was less than one
foot, the average depth was recorded and three velocity measurements were taken. The
average of the three velocity measurements and the channel volume (depth and width)
were used to calculate the discharge at a given location.
Page 2
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Seep Monitoring Plan\ Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7-30-14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
If the channel width at the water line was between 1.0 and 2.5 feet, velocity and depth
were recorded at a minimum of three locations spaced evenly across the channel. If the
channel width was between 2.5 and 5 feet, velocity and depth were recorded at a
minimum of five evenly spaced locations. An exception to the methodology occurred at
the surface water location on Shaddox Creek because conditions made it unsafe to enter
the stream and access five locations.
Consistent with USGS methodology, velocity measurements were collected at 60% of
water depth.
The averages of the calculated flows (in MGD) for seeps with measurable flow in
June/July 2014 are included in Table 2. Seepage flow is generally variable. Flow may
increase or decrease depending on the amount of rainfall, groundwater levels, weather
conditions, and other variables.
2.3 Seep Sample Collection
Six seep locations with measurable flow, water from two ash ponds, and four surface
water bodies were sampled during June/July 2014 for water quality analysis. The
sample locations are described in Table 1 and shown on Figure 2.
To prevent dilution from stormwater runoff into seep flows, seep samples were
collected during a period preceded by very low precipitation. For the approximate
three weeks preceding the June/July sample collection, only 0.14 inches of rain fell in the
area as recorded at the Raleigh Executive Jetport (Sanford, NC), located about three
miles west-southwest of the Cape Fear Plant.
Samples were collected from the seep flows directly into sample containers. Care was
taken to avoid disturbing and entraining particulate soil and sediment. During sample
collection, in-situ field parameters (temperature, pH, specific conductance) were
measured utilizing a YSI Pro Plus multi -function meter. Turbidity was also measured
in the field using a Hach 2100Q turbidimeter.
In addition to seep samples collected from seeps, four samples were collected from the
surface water bodies that bound the Cape Fear Plant. Three sample locations (Haw
River and Cape Fear River) were accessed using a personal watercraft. The samples
were collected at a midstream location as a grab sample from a depth of approximately
one meter. The sample from Shaddox Creek was accessed from the shore.
• A surface water sample was collected from the Haw River approximately 200
feet upstream of the northern Plant property line, upstream of Shaddox Creek,
Page 3
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Seep Monitoring Plan\ Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7-30-14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
and upstream of the confluence of the Haw River with the Deep River that forms
the Cape Fear River.
• A surface water sample was collected from the Cape Fear River downstream of
the Plant, approximately 300 feet upstream of the railroad trestle that crosses the
river near Brickhaven, NC.
• A surface water sample was collected from the Cape Fear River downstream
near the NC Highway 42 bridge (Avents Ferry Road) upstream from the surface
water intake located on the west side of the Cape Fear River. This location is
approximately 300 feet upstream of the bridge and surface water intake.
• A surface water sample was collected from Shaddox Creek on the north side of
Corinth Road, north of the intersection of Corinth Road and CP&L Drive. This
location is upstream of the Cape Fear Plant.
Samples were also collected of the water in the 1978 and 1985 ash ponds.
Laboratory analyses were conducted by Duke Energy's Huntersville analytical
laboratory and Pace Analytical Laboratories (NC Wastewater Certifications #248 and
12). A summary of the laboratory and field data is provided in Table 2. A listing of
analytical parameters and associated methods are included in Table 3. Sample
handling, storage, and preservation methods are summarized in Appendix A.
Page 4
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Seep Monitoring Plan\ Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7-30-14.docx

Seep Monitoring July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The very low discharge of water characteristic of each seep location, including a
number of seep locations that only flow during periods of wet weather, suggests
minimal potential to influence water quality in the Cape Fear River. If ongoing analyses
demonstrates that there is no potential to exceed water quality standards, Duke Energy
proposes to re-evaluate the identified seep locations listed in this document annually
over the next five-year permit cycle. These annual evaluations would be documented
and would verify the condition of the existing seeps and determine the presence of any
newly developed seeps. DWR will be promptly notified if new seeps are identified or
any significant changes are observed for the existing seeps. If any existing or newly
identified seeps are determined to reach the Cape Fear River and the seepage has
reasonable potential to exceed a water quality standard, Duke Energy will take
measures to either (1) stop the seepage, (2) capture and route the seep so that it is
discharged through a NPDES permitted outfall, or (3) address the seep using Best
Management Plans approved by DWR.
Page 5
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Seep Monitoring Plan\ Cape Fear Seep Monitoring Plan 7-30-14.docx

FIGURES

agLn
to BS
e,'
v •..• ti
/ :
1916
—
/Ir
r233
B8
sz
190
y
B MG
—Water rr%
193
I
Tank'//_
�o I
o
J
p
,
o
r PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
o-
BOUNDARY 174 \„
1 erpl
nt,-
V
ri
WASTE
ubsta
BOUNDARY
1
177 ; `\
1916
°0
75
it
i 33
II
1
\
Little
Cem;; v�
C�eyPl = �`
- � 142
a •
� ,��� 0 � ���� 'r �r
15
-
24i \ �� i ii;'� �, - -=2.Lkhave'n
- - ---- -- -
- --
BM 204 1
V
DATA
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OBTAINED FROM THE NRCS GEOSPATIAL
GATEWAY AT http://datagateway.nres.usda.gov/
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
*cncewsaono
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
IR 11111
500 CP&L DR
•GREEh'1"lLLE
MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA
VnTerra
CAPE FEAR TEAM
MONCURE, NC QUADRANGLE
148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA
ELECTRIC PLANT
CHATHAM COUNTY
Wn 14m'GTO�v
DRAWN BY: 5. ARLEDGE DATE: 2014-07-23
GRAPHIC SCALE
PHONE [phone]
www.synterracorp.com
PROJECT MANAGER: KATHY WEBS CONTOUR INTERVAL: 10 FEET
LAYOUT: FIG 1 (SITE LOCATION) MAP DATE: 1993
1000 0 1000 2000
P: Pro ress Ener .1026 10. NC Sites Ol. Seep And NPDES Permit
IN FEET
Assistance CAPE FEAR dw CAPE FEARFIG1 OSGS SITE LOCATION.d,g

LEGEND
all°
aW O
5 SEEP LOCATION
O - SURFACE WATER SAMPLE LOCATION
CFHAW
• 74
\ •, O ,; - / ' y'; A NPDES OUTFALL 001 NPDES OUTFALL LOCATION
pf
COMPLIANCE GROUNDWATER
` a : CMW--3
l \ J
MONITORING WELL
k� Mwll VOLUNTARY GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
' ° 1 ,I I �'
- 1 / 77 PIEZOMETER (APPROXIMATE)
jAl
° ' ° —y y. .'/ / —� •.' 19,6 r„r I �t ��� �( `-' \
aIS
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS CAPE FEAR PLANT
c -
p
O CF -HAW - '► _ I' f
z 500 ft COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
1 _
�I i ( I 1� �� �� s
e I _
= _ y �` + � �� `),o( E WASTE BOUNDARY
ASH POND BOUNDARY (APPROXIMATE)
1
B Mr to !
a
,` °� „, � (� � il,�`�l �- c � jf; .y POSSIBLE CONTINUOUS SEEP (APPROXIMATE)
NY
���t
c - - 1 1
n C�/!J'3 -�'g , ( � �,i �( �” I,� POSSIBLE INTERMITTENT SEEP (APPROXIMATE)
ekhaven
BGMW-4. BGTMW-4 - u i -
- � / '° - I � r •.. i -•. _ �! 1 � _'_ � y '- '. - °.. 1 (`x_ r _ L �'� ) f �, Illy - !)'�1� v� _
Ile
i
CF -DOWN 1 = � /� 3� ,��with01
� ,
O PZ -10 �ei "
�
00
ye"
- -
• 1956 ASH POND "` j �J•'
/
I /
FORMER COAL STOCKPILE
V •� J �o _ /
\ / _
'V - -
,SQA . al u �_ —. • h >� _ � r �� / � /_ �I ��. l��� lii ,V,� /�r'�I�'
9
/
P - CFSHCK-iu - _- = J� \ i ��� r L.' x�
-- m
UP it
F� 1
C11iV3
1
��� p
z
P
ce i9 21A A �O lL }ill �h JI
-1 �
Q I _
,
v,
/
BUCKHORN DAM
r' O J-O2Memphis
,Ce
U
a
Ic
r F
P— 5-04 P°w�R
O Z-1 \ \ �iNg
\
CANAL 90 }•/ / O PZ-2�.-
re
TJ
- _ ti `
I
\ ` SOURCE: GRAPHIC SCALE
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OBTAINED FROM THE NRCS GEOSPATIAL DATA 1500 0 1500 3000
\ \ ° ��ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION PowE GATEWAY AT http://datagateway.nres.usda.govl
\ R
_. N
E
d r -iHh
POwER LINE R°w • - p -
\
1 \ \ O NPDES OUTFALL 003 RqQ \ 1985 ASH POND'
\ \ S -OS _ 909 \ \ (EAST ASH POND) \ a
O
-
-• — O S-0 7
Q P/.1' \ iV CANAL.
F
p
\ \ 1978 ASH POND
v
\ V
(WEST ASH POND) V I ,�.
\ I
1963 ASH POND
/ NPDESOUTFALL001
s
\ \ CF -78 ASH POND
c7M1118k.
t R
` S
\ \ \ I °� ' �� `tit ' #� x SOURCES:
9 a
1 I CMW-7 CTMW-7 \ I - ,.,� 1. 2013 HIGH RESOLUTION AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM CHATHAM COUNTY
�– — — — — — — — — / I CANAL a \ �isnN BRIDGE
SHORT t r+} GIS WEBSITE AT http.//www.chathamgis.com/ AND LEE COUNTY GIS WEBSITE AT
SOOT
O PZ -7 I CF -85 � � http.//leecountyne.gov/Departments/GISStrategeServces.aspx
NPDLS OUTFALL 005
2. 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WAS OBTAINED FROM WSP FLOWN ON APRIL 17, 2014.
101
I a ' '• Ais g?` 3. DRAWING HAS BEEN SET WITH A PROJECTION OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE
5-09 FI
T COORDINATE SYSTEM PS 3200 (NAD 83).
S 0 8 PZ 4 C- Or MW -9 bg�
•f
GRAPHIC SCALE
ti
400 0 200 400 800
/ 1 ' • :� (IN FEET)
\ 1970 ASH POND I ` / O S-1 % °`v • - .;:'..
f,
9a
\ \ - =MIFl2
_ '!!
\ °• I ! „ S ; , _ 0 07 " • � I � ° ,�+� ,
1 FOOT BRIDGE OVER CANAL-
.�r
\ • • • [ l a • iia— ' •+,
\ \ r ' °� •� • ° 1110-
RAILROADBRIDGE ° S'
\ _ a - -
\ F - UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
u •
0
148 River
Street, Suite
220
'11/11 13 � Greenville, South Carolina
01
%
864-421-9999
www.synterracorp.com
1 DRAWN BY: S. ARLEDGE DATE: 2017-07-31
y _ _ �_ CHECKED BY: J WYLIE DATE' 2014-07-31
L• - �° ' +
- i x PROJECT MANAGER: KATHY WEBB
.. _
LAYOUT NAME: FIG 2 (SEEP SAMPLE LOCATIONS)
��
nHKP
1 ry�III rr . I I LI
,
_
'
�r
d ' �!�' 1 • • v ..iA`4 'iyR'q k' e^:"Y'S1U iN �ilf
11 &A
.:
Is.ENERGY
JL
PROGRESS
u + rCAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
.ti � • .a :�� � �. � •`�° r a. 500 CP & L DRIVE
MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINAall
1 .
t _ pp
6 FIGURE 2
III ^. 9#t,vw/ IDENTIFIED SEEPS AND WATER QUALITY
G' -H r •y 41-.L4�4:,,'� d '� a T 'lid A- I a ,pl t- .1-^k• , { `'' .=;k - t;��,
a
- W , �- `': , SAMPLE LOCATIONS
a

TABLES

Table 1
Seep Locations and Descriptions
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. - Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina
Seep ID
Flow
(June/July 2014
Latitude
Longitude
Description
Description
sample description, if present)
Broad, grassy area that drains to a former stormwater outfall pipe located northwest of the 1985 ash pond and northeast of the Duke Energy personnel trailer. The former stormwater outfall
5-01
35.594102
-79.045478
Intermittent
pipe runs under the power line right-of-way and former sluice pipes. The pipe daylights on the northeast side of the former sluice pipes in a small depression several feet below the elevation of
the surrounding area.
Seepage around former sluice pipes located on northwest corner of 1985 ash pond. Small flow in February 2014. No water present in July 2014. Flow from this area would merge with water
5-02
35.593275
-79.044527
Intermittent
near seep S-01.
5-03
35.592505
-79.045727
Intermittent
Small area of seepage/very shallow standing water on flat, grassy area between northwest end of 1985 ash pond and CP&L Drive. Small flow in February 2014. No water present in July 2014.
Flow from this area would merge with water around seep S-01.
5-04
Located on the north side of the 1985 ash pond. Drainage feature located at the base of the ash pond and appears to drain the area located to the north side of the ash pond. Several small low -
(CF -85N)
35.593009
-79.042762
Continuous
lying areas are present. Drainage area is shallow (a few inches) and narrow (12 to 36 inches) and flows to the northwest.
5-05
35.590292
-79.046627
Continuous
Continuous flowing seep emerges from a small pipe that drains areas of seepage west of cooling tower structure and north of 1978 pond. After emerging from pipe, flow follows a small (<12
(CF -J)
inches wide), shallow ditch that flows east to the canal near NPDES Outfall 003 and upstream of NPDES Outfall 007.
5-06
35.589811
-79.045365
Intermittent
Two small seeps located along the western bank of the canal by 1978 ash pond where rip rap has been placed. Flow observed in February but not in July 2014.
5-07
35.58993
-79.043569
Continuous
Discharge from two former stormwater outfall pipes that run under access road and railroad tracks on west side of 1985 ash pond. Discharge originates from seeps and low-lying areas along
CF -D
( )
the west side of 1985 pond. Flow emerges from the pipe and meanders through a flat, marsh area for several hundred feet before ultimate) flowing to canal.
P 9 p�P 9 Y Y 9
Discharge to canal that originates from seeps and low-lying areas along the southwest and south sides of 1985 pond. Flow is contained in small channel (-12 - 24 inches wide) within an
S-08
35.585847
-79.04267
Continuous
excavated ditch of about 20 feet width. The ditch and channel are cut about four feet down below the surrounding land surface elevation. The ditch extends approximately 700 feet from the
(CF-85SW-CANAL)
west side of the railroad tracks, southwesterly.
5-09
35.585944
-79.039791
Intermittent
Low-lying area with abundant leaf litter and downed trees/vegatation located between railroad tracks and cleared power line right-of-way. Flow is towards the southeast and the canal.
(CF-B-OS26)
5-10
35.585806
-79.038592
Stagnant Pool
Located southeast of the southeast corner of the 1985 ash pond. Drainage feature located at the base of the ash pond. Drainage appears to capture seepage and runoff in this generally broad,
low-lying area cut by numerous small streams and drainages.
Possible small seep and drainage ditch located adjacent to stormwater outfall 004 discharge to the canal, southwest of southwest corner of 1985 pond. Shallow depression formed beneath area
S-11
35.585012
-79.041236
Intermittent
of rip rap with a shallow drainage ditch extending towards the southeast and the canal.
5-12
35.587903
-79.044679
Intermittent
Ponded seepage area downslope of the southeast corner of the 1978 ash pond. Water was present in February 2014 but absent in July 2014 and not sampled in July. Area is a large, circular
shallow depression approximately 40 feet by 60 feet.
Seepage area located downslope of the southwest corner of the 1978 ash pond and southeast side/corner of the 1970 ash pond. Seepage area is a large circular, shallow depression
S-13
35.58463
-79.047426
Intermittent
approximately 30 feet by 30 feet that appears to drain to the south/southeast.
5-14
35.582439
-79.047787
Intermittent
Water was present in this location in February 2014 but absent in July 2014. Area is a bowl -like depression located in the flat area surrounding the south end of the 1970 ash pond. The area is
connected to a ditch that drains to the southwest.
Two distinct seepage flows were noted in close proximity to each other in February 2014 from the west side of the 1963 ash pond. When observed in July 2014, no flow was present in the
5-15
35.588886
-79.051373
Continuous
northernmost seep; although, stagnant, pooled water was present. Flow measurements and samples were collected from the continuous flow of the southerly seep. Flow emerges from beneath
(CF -G)
the lower access road in a small channel. The emerging channel is approximately six inches wide but flow dispersed over a broader area of several feet in width as the slope changed. The flow
coalesced into a single channel about 25 feet downslope from its emergent location.
Water Sample ID
Flow
(June/July 2014
Latitude
Longitude
Description
Description
sample description, if present)
CF-78ASHPOND
35.587718
-79.045613
Ash Pond Water
Standing water present in the southeastern portion of the 1978 ash pond.
CF-85ASHPOND
35.58644
-79.03943
Ash Pond Water
Standing water present in the southeastern portion of the 1985 ash pond.
CF-SHCK-UP
35.595498
-79.04331
Upstream
Surface water from Shaddox Creek upstream of the Cape Fear Plant on the north side of Corinth Road.
Surface Water
CF -HAW
35.599506
-79.050721
Upstream
Surface water from the Haw River approximately 200 feet upstream of confluence with Shaddox Creek (Plant northern property boundary) and upstream of the confluence of the Haw and Deep
Surface Water
Rivers.
Downstream
Surface water from the Cape Fear River downstream of the Plant and upstream of the Plant canal discharges to the Cape Fear River. Sample collected about 300 feet upstream of the railroad
CF-DOWN1
35.569835
-79.046924
Surface Water
trestle that crosses the river near Brickhaven, NC.
CF-DOWN2
35.549258
-79.025213
Downstream
Surface water from the Cape Fear River downstream near the NC Highway 42 bridge (Avents Ferry Road) and upstream from the surface water intake located on the west side of the Cape Fear
Surface Water
River. Sample collected about 300 feet upstream of the bridge and surface water intake.
Prepared by: JAW Checked by: KWW
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\Cape Fear\Seep Monitoring Plan\Tables\Table 1 - Seep Locations and Descriptions 7 30 2014.xlsx Page 1 of 1

Table 2
Seep Flows and Analytical Results, June 30 - July 1, 2014
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. - Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina
Prepared by: RBI Checked by: JAW
NF - Stream flow not present during this sampling event or too low to be measured.
NM - Not measured
TV - Timed Volume
AV - Area Velocity
MGD - Million Gallons Per Day
0 Seep may discharge to the Cape Fear River when sufficient flow is present
0 Seep may discharges to Shaddox Creek when sufficient flow is present
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\Cape Fear\Seep Monitoring Plan\Tables\Table 2 - Seeps Analytical Results.xlsx Page 1 of 1
Map ID
Sample
Description
S-04
CF -85N
5-05
CF -3
5-07
CF -D
5-08
CF-85SW-
Canal
5-09
CF-B-OS26
5-15
CF -G
S-15
Duplicate - G
CF -78
AshPond
CF -85
AshPond
Duplicate - 85
Ash Pond
CF-Downl
CF-Down2
CF -HAW
CF-SHCK-Up
Flow
MGD
NF
0.00102
NF
0.00323
NF
0.00090
0.00090
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
0.19388
Flow Measurement Method
--
TV
--
AV
--
TV
TV
--
--
--
--
--
--
AV
Oil & Grease
mg/L
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
<
5
COD
mg/L
<
20
<
20
<
20
<
20
36
<
20
<
20
<
20
<
20
<
20
<
20
<
20
<
20
81
Chloride
mg/L
20
29
18
19
21
33
33
33
17
17
19
19
18
43
Fluoride
mg/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
Sulfate
mg/L
160
200
330
170
160
180
180
91
90
90
13
14
12
23
Mercury (Hg)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
Aluminum (Al)
mg/L
0.082
0.050
0.075
0.324
0.028
0.141
0.059
0.052
0.165
0.160
0.141
0.092
0.115
0.190
Barium (Ba)
mg/L
0.072
0.023
0.068
0.031
0.071
0.078
0.067
0.076
0.179
0.181
0.025
0.022
0.030
0.113
Boron (B)
mg/L
5.37
0.309
5.86
5.69
4.67
1.35
1.31
0.196
1.24
1.24
<
0.05
<
0.05
<
0.05
0.076
Calcium (Ca)
mg/L
57.7
41.8
71.0
55.9
55.8
89.1
89.1
16.4
34.9
37.2
9.08
9.22
9.23
22.6
Hardness
mg/L(CaCO3)
295
137
351
259
260
333
334
66.4
108
114
37.4
37.9
37.3
82.6
Iron (Fe)
mg/L
9.22
15.3
23.7
0.449
0.116
1.41
0.831
0.022
0.021
0.017
0.297
0.210
0.694
2.23
Magnesium (Mg)
mg/L
36.7
7.97
42.2
29.0
29.3
26.8
27.0
6.17
4.96
5.02
3.58
3.62
3.45
6.36
Manganese (Mn)
mg/L
1.62
5.30
11.3
5.15
1.52
1.89
1.53
0.050
<
0.005
<
0.005
0.211
0.129
0.517
0.886
Zinc (Zn)
mg/L
<
0.005
0.007
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
0.020
0.006
<
0.005
0.012
Antimony (Sb)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
14.1
13.9
<
1
1.08
<
1
<
1
Arsenic (As)
ug/L
2.39
<
1
4.77
<
1
<
1
38.7
33.1
5.85
34.4
33.5
<
1
<
1
<
1
1.28
Cadmium (Cd)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
Chromium (Cr)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
Copper (Cu)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
1.04
<
1
<
1
<
1
1.29
<
1
<
1
1.2
1.26
1.01
2.01
Lead (Pb)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
Molybdenum (Mo)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
64.8
<
1
108
105
5.69
192
186
1.92
2.16
1.97
6.26
Nickel (Ni)
ug/L
3.52
9.37
4.65
5.32
4.16
4.26
3.74
3.67
1.92
1.78
1.32
1.20
1.10
1.76
Selenium (Se)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
2.39
65.7
64.4
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
Thallium (TI) Low Level
ug/L
<
0.2
0.254
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
0.644
1.15
1.57
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
TDS
mg/L
510
400
690
460
450
600
600
220
230
220
110
120
110
320
TSS
mg/L
23
5.0
53
12
<
12.5
8.0
9.0
<
5
<
5
<
5
7.0
7.0
6.0
8.0
PH
S.U.
6.7
5.7
6.4
7.7
6.8
7.0
7.0
6.9
7.7
7.7
7.2
8.2
7.1
7.4
Temperature
°C
28
24
24
28
26
19
19
32
30
30
29
29
27
33
Specific conductance
US/cm
717
615
908
626
632
907
907
384
376
376
195
191
233
447
Turbidity
NTU
25
0.23
29
11
30
3.7
3.7
1.5
1.3
1.3
7.5
6.5
9.1
9.5
Prepared by: RBI Checked by: JAW
NF - Stream flow not present during this sampling event or too low to be measured.
NM - Not measured
TV - Timed Volume
AV - Area Velocity
MGD - Million Gallons Per Day
0 Seep may discharge to the Cape Fear River when sufficient flow is present
0 Seep may discharges to Shaddox Creek when sufficient flow is present
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\Cape Fear\Seep Monitoring Plan\Tables\Table 2 - Seeps Analytical Results.xlsx Page 1 of 1

Table 3
Seep Analytical Methods
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. - Cape Fear Plant
Moncure, North Carolina
Parameter
Method
Reporting Limit
Units
Lab
COD
HACH 8000
20
mg/L
Duke Energy
Aluminum (Al)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg/L
Duke Energy
Antimony (Sb)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Arsenic (As)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Barium (Ba)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg/L
Duke Energy
Boron (B)
EPA 200.7
0.05
mg/L
Duke Energy
Cadmium (Cd)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Calcium (Ca)
EPA 200.7
0.1
mg/L
Duke Energy
Chloride
EPA 300.0
5
mg/L
Duke Energy
Chromium (Cr)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Copper (Cu)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Fluoride
EPA 300.0
1
mg/L
Duke Energy
Hardness
EPA 200.7
0.19
mg/L (CaCO3)
Duke Energy
Iron (Fe)
EPA 200.7
0.01
mg/L
Duke Energy
Lead (Pb)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Magnesium (Mg)
EPA 200.7
0.05
mg/L
Duke Energy
Manganese (Mn)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg/L
Duke Energy
Mercury (Hg)
EPA 245.1
0.05
ug/L
Duke Energy
Molybdenum (Mo)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Nickel (Ni)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Oil and Grease
EPA 1664B
5.0
mg/L
Pace Analytical
Selenium (Se)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
5
mg/L
Duke Energy
TDS
SM2540C
25
mg/L
Duke Energy
Thallium (TI) Low Level
EPA 200.8
0.2
ug/L
Duke Energy
TSS
SM2540D
5
mg/L
Duke Energy
Zinc (Zn)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg/L
Duke Energy
Prepared By: RBI Checked By: KWW
P:\Progress Energy.1026\10. NC Sites\01. Seep and NPDES Permit Assistance\CAPE FEAR\Seep Monitoring Plan\Table 3 - Analytical
Methods.xlsx Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX A
ANALYTICAL SAMPLE HANDLING,
PRESERVATION, AND HOLDING TIME
REQUIREMENTS

Parameter name
Containerl
Preservation 3
Maximum holding
time
Table IB—Inorganic Tests:
1. Acidity
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C
14 days.
2. Alkalinity
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C78
14 days.
4. Ammonia
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C18, H2SO4 to H <2
28 days.
9. Biochemical oxygen demand
P, FP, G
Cool, :56 °C18
48 hours.
10. Boron
P, FP, or Quartz
HNO3 to pH <2
6 months.
11. Bromide
P, FP, G
None required
28 days.
14. Biochemical oxygen demand, carbonaceous
P, FP G
Cool, 56 °C18
48 hours.
15. Chemical oxygen demand
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C18, H2SO4 to pH <2
28 days.
16. Chloride
P, FP, G
None required
28 days.
17. Chlorine, total residual
P, G
None required
Analyze within 15
minutes.
21. Color
P, FP, G
Cool, :56 °C18
48 hours.
23-24. Cyanide, total or available (or CATC) and free
P, FP, G
Cool, 156 °C18, NaOH to pH >10'
14 days.
6, reducing agent if oxidizer
present
25. Fluoride
P
None required
28 days.
27. Hardness
P, FP, G
HNO3 or H2SO4 to pH <2
6 months.
28. Hydrogen ion (pH)
P, FP, G
None required
Analyze within 15
minutes.
31, 43. Kjeldahl and organic N
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °Ct', HISO4 to pH <2
28 days.
Table IB—Metals:'
18. Chromium VI
P, FP, G
Cool, :56 °C18, pH = 9.3-9.720
28 days.
35. Mercury (CVAA)
P, FP, G
HNO3 to pH <2
28 days.
35. Mercury (CVAFS)
FP, G; and FP-
5 mL/L 12N HCI or 5 mL/L BrCl17
90 days. 17
lined ca P17
3,5-8,12,13,19,20,22,26,29,30,32-34,36,37, 45,
P, FP, G
HNO3 to pH <2, or at least 24
6 months.
47, 51, 52, 58-60, 62, 63, 70-72, 74, 75. Metals, except
hours prior to analysis19
boron, chromium VI, and mercury
38. Nitrate i
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C18
48 hours.
39. Nitrate-nitrite
P, FP, G
Cool, 156 °C18, H2SO4 to H <2
28 days.
40. Nitrite
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C78
48 hours.
41. Oil and grease
G
Cool to 56 °C18, HCI or H2SO4 to
28 days.
PH <2
42. Organic Carbon
P, FP, G
Cool to 56 °C18, HCI, H2SO4, or
28 days.
H3PO4 to pH <2
44. Orthophosphate
P, FP, G
Cool, to <_6 °C1824
Filter wi7minutes;Analyzehours.
46. Oxygen, Dissolved Probe
G, Bottle and top
None required
Analyzeminutes
47. Winkler
G, Bottle and top
Fix on site and store in dark
8 hours.
48. Phenols
G
Cool, 56 °C18, HISO4 to pH <2
28 days.
49. Phosphorous (elemental)
G
Cool, 56 °C18
48 hours.
50. Phosphorous, total
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C18, H2SO4 to pH <2
28 days.
53. Residue, total
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C18
7 days.
54. Residue, Filterable
P, FP, G
Cool, :56 °C78
7 days.
55. Residue, Nonfilterable (TSS)
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C18
7 days.
56. Residue, Settleable i
P, FP, G
Cool, :56 °Ct8
48 hours.
57. Residue, Volatile
P, FP, G
Cool, :56 °C18
7 days.
61. Silica =
P or Quartz
Cool, <_6 °C18
28 days.
64. Specific conductance
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C18
28 days.
65. Sulfate
P, FP, G
Cool, :56 °C18
28 days.
66. Sulfide
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C18, add zinc acetate
7 days.
plus sodium hydroxide to pH >9
67. Sulfite
P, FP, G
None required =
Analyze within 15
minutes.
68. Surfactants
P, FP, G
Cool, <_6 °C18
48 hours.
69. Temperature
P, FP, G
None required
Analyze.
73. Turbidity
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 °C18
48 hours.
1iP" is for polyethylene; "FP" is fluoropolymer (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE); Teflon®), or other fluoropolymer, unless stated otherwise
in this Table ll; "G" is glass; "PA" is any plastic that is made of a sterilizable material (polypropylene or other autoclavable plastic); "LDPE" is
low density polyethylene.
2Except where noted in this Table II and the method for the parameter, preserve each grab sample within 15 minutes of collection. For a
composite sample collected with an automated sample (e.g., using a 24-hour composite sample; see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR Part
403, Appendix E), refrigerate the sample at :56 °C during collection unless specified otherwise in this Table II or in the method(s). For a
composite sample to be split into separate aliquots for preservation and/or analysis, maintain the sample at <_6 °C, unless specified otherwise
in this Table II or in the method(s), until collection, splitting, and preservation is completed. Add the preservative to the sample container prior
to sample collection when the preservative will not compromise the integrity of a grab sample, a composite sample, or aliquot split from a

composite sample within 15 minutes of collection. If a composite measurement is required but a composite sample would compromise sample
integrity, individual grab samples must be collected at prescribed time intervals (e.g., 4 samples over the course of a day, at 6 -hour intervals).
Grab samples must be analyzed separately and the concentrations averaged. Alternatively, grab samples may be collected in the field and
composited in the laboratory if the compositing procedure produces results equivalent to results produced by arithmetic averaging of results of
analysis of individual grab samples. For examples of laboratory compositing procedures, see EPA Method 1664 Rev. A (oil and grease) and
the procedures at 40 CFR 141.34(f)(14)(iv) and (v) (volatile organics).
3When any sample is to be shipped by common carrier or sent via the U.S. Postal Service, it must comply with the Department of
Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR part 172). The person offering such material for transportation is responsible for
ensuring such compliance. For the preservation requirement of Table 11, the Office of Hazardous Materials, Materials Transportation Bureau,
Department of Transportation has determined that the Hazardous Materials Regulations do not apply to the following materials: Hydrochloric
acid (HCI) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.04% by weight or less (pH about 1.96 or greater; Nitric acid (HNO3) in water solutions at
concentrations of 0.15% by weight or less (pH about 1.62 or greater); Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.35% by
weight or less (pH about 1.15 or greater); and Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.080% by weight or less (pH
about 12.30 or less).
4Samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection. The times listed are the maximum times that samples may be held
before the start of analysis and still be considered valid. Samples may be held for longer periods only if the permittee or monitoring laboratory
has data on file to show that, for the specific types of samples under study, the analytes are stable for the longer time, and has received a
variance from the Regional Administrator under Sec. 136.3(e). For a grab sample, the holding time begins at the time of collection. For a
composite sample collected with an automated sampler (e.g., using a 24-hour composite sampler; see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR part
403, Appendix E), the holding time begins at the time of the end of collection of the composite sample. For a set of grab samples composited
in the field or laboratory, the holding time begins at the time of collection of the last grab sample in the set. Some samples may not be stable
for the maximum time period given in the table. A permittee or monitoring laboratory is obligated to hold the sample for a shorter time if it
knows that a shorter time is necessary to maintain sample stability. See 136.3(e) for details. The date and time of collection of an individual
grab sample is the date and time at which the sample is collected. For a set of grab samples to be composited, and that are all collected on
the same calendar date, the date of collection is the date on which the samples are collected. For a set of grab samples to be composited, and
that are collected across two calendar dates, the date of collection is the dates of the two days; e.g., November 14-15. For a composite
sample collected automatically on a given date, the date of collection is the date on which the sample is collected. For a composite sample
collected automatically, and that is collected across two calendar dates, the date of collection is the dates of the two days; e.g., November 14-
15. For static -renewal toxicity tests, each grab or composite sample may also be used to prepare test solutions for renewal at 24 h, 48 h,
and/or 72 h after first use, if stored at 0-6 °C, with minimum head space.
5ASTM D7365 -09a specifies treatment options for samples containing oxidants (e.g., chlorine). Also, Section 9060A of Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (20th and 21st editions) addresses dechlorination procedures.
6Sampling, preservation and mitigating interferences in water samples for analysis of cyanide are described in ASTM D7365 -09a. There
may be interferences that are not mitigated by the analytical test methods or D7365 -09a. Any technique for removal or suppression of
interference may be employed, provided the laboratory demonstrates that it more accurately measures cyanide through quality control
measures described in the analytical test method. Any removal or suppression technique not described in D7365 -09a or the analytical test
method must be documented along with supporting data.
7For dissolved metals, filter grab samples within 15 minutes of collection and before adding preservatives. For a composite sample
collected with an automated sampler (e.g., using a 24-hour composite sampler; see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR Part 403, Appendix E),
filter the sample within 15 minutes after completion of collection and before adding preservatives. If it is known or suspected that dissolved
sample integrity will be compromised during collection of a composite sample collected automatically over time (e.g., by interchange of a metal
between dissolved and suspended forms), collect and filter grab samples to be composited (footnote 2) in place of a composite sample
collected automatically.
8Guidance applies to samples to be analyzed by GC, LC, or GC/MS for specific compounds.
91f the sample is not adjusted to pH 2, then the sample must be analyzed within seven days of sampling.
10The pH adjustment is not required if acrolein will not be measured. Samples for acrolein receiving no pH adjustment must be analyzed
within 3days of sampling.
11When the extractable analytes of concern fall within a single chemical category, the specified preservative and maximum holding
times should be observed for optimum safeguard of sample integrity (i.e., use all necessary preservatives and hold for the shortest time listed).
When the analytes of concern fall within two or more chemical categories, the sample may be preserved by cooling to 156 °C, reducing residual
chlorine with 0.008% sodium thiosulfate, storing in the dark, and adjusting the pH to 6-9; samples preserved in this manner may be held for
seven days before extraction and for forty days after extraction. Exceptions to this optional preservation and holding time procedure are noted
in footnote 5 (regarding the requirement for thiosulfate reduction), and footnotes 12, 13 (regarding the analysis of benzidine).
121f 1,2-diphenylhydrazine is likely to be present, adjust the pH of the sample to 4.0 t0.2 to prevent rearrangement to benzidine.
13Extracts may be stored up to 30 days at <0 °C.
14 For the analysis of diphenylnitrosamine, add 0.008% Na2S2O3 and adjust pH to 7-10 with NaOH within 24 hours of sampling.
15The pH adjustment may be performed upon receipt at the laboratory and may be omitted if the samples are extracted within 72 hours
of collection. For the analysis of aldrin, add 0.008% Na2S2O3.
16 Place sufficient ice with the samples in the shipping container to ensure that ice is still present when the samples arrive at the
laboratory. However, even if ice is present when the samples arrive, immediately measure the temperature of the samples and confirm that
the preservation temperature maximum has not been exceeded. In the isolated cases where it can be documented that this holding
temperature cannot be met, the permittee can be given the option of on-site testing or can request a variance. The request for a variance
should include supportive data which show that the toxicity of the effluent samples is not reduced because of the increased holding
temperature. Aqueous samples must not be frozen. Hand -delivered samples used on the day of collection do not need to be cooled to 0 to 6
°C prior to test initiation.
17 Samples collected for the determination of trace level mercury (<100 ng/L) using EPA Method 1631 must be collected in tightly -
capped fluoropolymer or glass bottles and preserved with BrCI or HCI solution within 48 hours of sample collection. The time to preservation
may be extended to 28 days if a sample is oxidized in the sample bottle. A sample collected for dissolved trace level mercury should be
filtered in the laboratory within 24 hours of the time of collection. However, if circumstances preclude overnight shipment, the sample should
be filtered in a designated clean area in the field in accordance with procedures given in Method 1669. If sample integrity will not be
maintained by shipment to and filtration in the laboratory, the sample must be filtered in a designated clean area in the field within the time

period necessary to maintain sample integrity. A sample that has been collected for determination of total or dissolved trace level mercury
must be analyzed within 90 days of sample collection.
18Aqueous samples must be preserved at _<6 °C, and should not be frozen unless data demonstrating that sample freezing does not
adversely impact sample integrity is maintained on file and accepted as valid by the regulatory authority. Also, for purposes of NPDES
monitoring, the specification of "<°C" is used in place of the "4 °C" and "<4 °C" sample temperature requirements listed in some methods. It is
not necessary to measure the sample temperature to three significant figures (1/100th of 1 degree); rather, three significant figures are
specified so that rounding down to 6 °C may not be used to meet the :56 °C requirement. The preservation temperature does not apply to
samples that are analyzed immediately (less than 15 minutes).
19An aqueous sample may be collected and shipped without acid preservation. However, acid must be added at least 24 hours before
analysis to dissolve any metals that adsorb to the container walls. If the sample must be analyzed within 24 hours of collection, add the acid
immediately (see footnote 2). Soil and sediment samples do not need to be preserved with acid. The allowances in this footnote supersede the
preservation and holding time requirements in the approved metals methods.
20To achieve the 28 -day holding time, use the ammonium sulfate buffer solution specified in EPA Method 218.6. The allowance in this
footnote supersedes preservation and holding time requirements in the approved hexavalent chromium methods, unless this supersession
would compromise the measurement, in which case requirements in the method must be followed.
21Holding time is calculated from time of sample collection to elution for samples shipped to the laboratory in bulk and calculated from
the time of sample filtration to elution for samples filtered in the field.
22 Sample analysis should begin as soon as possible after receipt; sample incubation must be started no later than 8 hours from time of
collection.
23 For fecal coliform samples for sewage sludge (biosolids) only, the holding time is extended to 24 hours for the following sample types
using either EPA Method 1680 (LTB -EC) or 1681 (A-1): Class A composted, Class B aerobically digested, and Class B anaerobically digested.
24 The immediate filtration requirement in orthophosphate measurement is to assess the dissolved or bio -available form of
orthophosphorus (i.e., that which passes through a 0.45 -micron filter), hence the requirement to filter the sample immediately upon collection
(i.e., within 15 minutes of collection).
[38 FR 28758, Oct. 16, 1973

tip
syn,T(erra
GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
SAMPLING, ANALYSIS, AND REPORTING
PLAN
FOR
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
500 CP&L DRIVE
MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA 27559
NPDES PERMIT #NC0003433
PREPARED FOR
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
!Ln DUKE
ENERGY,-,
PROGRESS
SUBMITTED; 3ULY 2014
]e, �yriet,NCC A6 125
rYroject C='eologist
athyebb, NC PG 1328
Project Manager

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0
Introduction.....................................................................................................................1
2.0
Site Description............................................................................................................... 2
2.1
Plant and Ash Management Areas.......................................................................... 2
2.2
Ash Management Area Description........................................................................ 2
3.0
Site Geology and Hydrogeology.................................................................................. 4
3.1
Geologic Framework................................................................................................. 4
3.2
Hydrogeologic Framework...................................................................................... 4
4.0
Monitoring Program....................................................................................................... 6
4.1
Regulatory Requirements for Groundwater Monitoring ..................................... 6
4.2
Description of Groundwater Monitoring System ................................................. 7
4.3
Monitoring Frequency............................................................................................... 7
4.4
Sample Parameters and Methods............................................................................ 7
4.5
Data Quality Objectives............................................................................................ 8
5.0
Sampling Procedures...................................................................................................... 9
5.1
Sampling Equipment and Cleaning Procedures ................................................... 9
5.2
Groundwater Sampling............................................................................................ 9
5.2.1 Development of Monitoring Wells.................................................................... 9
5.2.2 Groundwater Level and Total Depth Measurements ..................................... 9
5.2.3 Well Purging and Sampling.............................................................................
10
5.3
Sample Collection....................................................................................................11
5.4
Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Time ........................
11
5.5
Sample Tracking.......................................................................................................
11
5.6
Sample Labeling.......................................................................................................
11
5.7
Field Documentation...............................................................................................
12
5.8
Chain -of -Custody Record.......................................................................................13
5.9
Sample Custody, Shipment, and Laboratory Receipt.........................................13
6.0
Analytical Procedures..................................................................................................15
7.0
Internal Quality Control Checks................................................................................16
8.0
Validation of Field Data Package..............................................................................18
9.0
Validation of Laboratory Data....................................................................................19
10.0
Report Submittal...........................................................................................................
20
11.0
References.......................................................................................................................21
Page i
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014. docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
List of Figures
Figure 1-
Site Location Map
Figure 2
- Sample Location Map
Figure 3
- Typical Monitoring Well Construction Details
Figure 4
- Example Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet
Figure 5 - Example Field Sampling Calibration Form
Figure 6 - Chain -of -Custody Record and Analysis Request Form
Figure 7 - North Carolina Groundwater Sampling Checklist
List of Tables
Table 1- Monitoring Well Information
Table 2 - Sample Parameters, Analytical Methods, Containers, Preservatives, and
Holding Times
List of Appendices
Appendix A - Boring Logs and Well Construction Records
Appendix B - Permit Condition A (9) Attachment XX, Version 1.0, dated
November 12, 2010
Page ii
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Groundwater Monitoring Program Sampling, Analysis, and Reporting Plan (Plan)
is developed to support the Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) requirement for
groundwater monitoring around the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant (Cape Fear Plant)
ash management area operated under NPDES Permit NC0003433.
This Plan describes the groundwater monitoring network, methodologies of field
sampling, record-keeping protocols, analytical procedures, data quality objectives, data
validation, and reporting that will be used for the Cape Fear Plant ash management
area groundwater monitoring program.
Page 1
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 Plant and Ash Management Areas
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. owns and operates the Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant (Cape
Fear Plant) located on approximately 900 acres in central North Carolina near Moncure,
North Carolina. The Cape Fear Plant is located in Chatham County along the east bank
of the Cape Fear River southeast of Moncure and west of Corinth Road. The site
location is shown on Figure 1.
The Cape Fear Plant began operations in 1923. Additional units were added from 1924
to 1969. Throughout its operational history, the Cape Fear Plant employed various
combinations of six coal-fired units along with four oil -fueled combustion turbine units
to produce steam. Ash generated from coal combustion was stored on-site in ash
management ponds. Operations were terminated at the Cape Fear Plant in October
2012 and demolition activities are currently underway.
2.2 Ash Management Area Description
Ash generated from coal combustion throughout the operational history of the Plant
was stored in on-site ash management ponds. Throughout most of its history, ash was
conveyed as a slurry to the ash ponds. Five ash management ponds have historically
been used at the Cape Fear Plant and are referenced using the date of construction:
1956, 1963, 1970, 1978, and 1985. The 1956 ash pond is located north of the former
power plant, and the remaining ash ponds are located south of the power plant area.
The 1963 and 1970 ash ponds were constructed on the west side of the Plant property
adjacent to the Cape Fear River. The 1978 ash pond was constructed east of and
abutting the 1963 and 1970 ash ponds. The 1985 ash pond was constructed east of the
existing ash ponds between the discharge canal and Corinth Road. The ash ponds are
impounded by earthen dams. A 500 -foot compliance boundary encircles the ash
management areas. The ash pond locations are indicated on Figure 2.
Currently, the 1956, 1963, and 1970 ash ponds are entirely covered with vegetation
(both hardwood and pine trees). No free-standing water is present in the 1956 or 1963
ash ponds. Only a very small area near the southern end of the 1970 ash pond is
seasonally wet. The 1978 ash pond is partially vegetation -covered (both trees and
scrub), and a portion of the southern end of the ash pond retains water. The 1985 ash
pond has some grass cover and ponded water in the southwest corner of the ash pond.
Page 2
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003433. Permitted outfall locations are indicated on Figure 2.
Page 3
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
3.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
3.1 Geologic Framework
Topographically, the Cape Fear Plant is situated in the Piedmont plateau region of
central North Carolina, only a few miles north and west of the contact between the
Piedmont and the North Carolina Coastal Plain. The Piedmont is characterized by well-
rounded hills and rolling ridges. Elevations in the area of the Cape Fear Plant are
between 150 and 200 feet above mean sea level.
Geologically, the Plant is located within the Deep River Basin (specifically the northern
portion of the Sanford Sub -basin), an irregular, half graben structural feature of Triassic
age. In the area of the Plant, the basin is surrounded by and presumably underlain by
igneous and metamorphic rocks of the Carolina Terrane (formerly Carolina Slate Belt)
rocks. Over time, continental sediments filled the basin to great thicknesses and have
subsequently been cut by numerous diabase dikes. The stratigraphy of the basin,
consistent with other basins in North Carolina and Virginia, is represented by a lower
sequence of coarse-grained arkosic sandstone and conglomerate; a middle sequence of
siltstone, shale, and thin coal deposits; and an upper sequence of sandstone, mudstone,
siltstone, and conglomerate. In general, the strata of the Deep River Basin dip gently to
the east (Horton and Zullo, 1991).
According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the Cape Fear Plant is situated
within the rocks of the Pekin Formation of the Chatham Group; although, the Plant
appears to be situated just at the gradational contact of the Pekin Formation with the
Cumnock Formation. The Geologic Map of North Carolina describes each of these units as
being comprised of fluvial sedimentary rocks such as conglomerate, sandstone, and
mudstone. These general observations are consistent with site-specific observations
from drilling activities at the Cape Fear Plant, which generally describe the sedimentary
rocks underlying the Plant as brown to gray mudstones and siltstones.
Rocks of the Piedmont, except where exposed in road cuts, stream channels, and steep
hillsides, are covered with unconsolidated material formed from the in-situ chemical
and physical breakdown of the bedrock. This unconsolidated material is referred to as
saprolite or residuum. Direct observations at the Cape Fear Plant confirm the presence
of residuum, developed above the sedimentary rocks of the Plant area, that is generally
15 to 30 feet thick and extends from the ground surface to the contact with rock.
3.2 Hydrogeologic Framework
Groundwater within the Piedmont exists under unconfined, also known as water table,
conditions within the residuum and/or saprolite zones and in the fractures and joints of
Page 4
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
the underlying bedrock. The water table and bedrock aquifers are interconnected. The
residuum acts as a reservoir for water supply to the fractures and joints in the
underlying bedrock. Shallow groundwater generally flows from local recharge zones in
topographically high areas, such as ridges, toward groundwater discharge zones, such
as stream valleys. Ridge and topographic high areas may serve as groundwater
recharge zones. Groundwater flow patterns in recharge areas tend to develop a
somewhat radial pattern from the center of the recharge area outward toward the
discharge areas and are expected to mimic surface topography. The closest surface
water discharge for the subject property occurs to the west as small, perennial and
intermittent streams and creeks flow toward and discharge to the Cape Fear River, a
large regional river. The predominant flow direction for groundwater is to the west
and west-southwest.
Groundwater beneath the Plant area occurs within the residuum at depths ranging
from about 10 feet to about 20 feet below the ground surface. Depths to groundwater in
wells completed in the shallow bedrock are similar. Groundwater elevations from
paired wells typically show slight downward vertical gradients in upland areas and an
upward gradient near the Cape Fear River. Analysis of potentiometric data for Plant
wells confirms that groundwater flows from upland areas located east of the Plant
towards the west-southwest with discharge to the Cape Fear River. The approximate
groundwater gradient for June 2014 data was 10.55 feet (vertical change) over 4,200 feet
(horizontal distance) or 2.5 feet/1,000 feet as measured from upgradient well CMW-5 to
downgradient well CMW-1.
Page 5
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
4.0 MONITORING PROGRAM
4.1 Regulatory Requirements for Groundwater Monitoring
The NPDES program regulates wastewater discharges to surface waters to ensure that
surface water quality standards are maintained. Cape Fear operates under NPDES
Permit NC0003433 (effective September 1, 2011) which authorizes discharge as follows:
• West Ash Pond (Internal Outfall 001L- This outfall discharges the following
treated wastewaters to outfall 007: ash sluice waters (bottom and fly), coal pile
runoff, No. 2 fuel oil tank runoff, settling basin drains, sand bed filter backwash,
parking lot drains, equipment cooling tower blowdown and drain, boiler
blowdown, metal cleaning waste, oil unloading area drains, softener regenerate,
demineralizer regenerate, acid/caustic sump wastewater, yard and floor drains,
and ash trench drain wastewater.
• Once -Through Cooling Water and Stormwater (Internal Outfall 003).
• East Ash Pond (Internal Outfall 005): This outfall discharges the following
wastewaters to outfall 007: ash sluice waters (bottom and fly), runoff from yard
drains, air preheater washes, electrostatic precipitator washes, metal cleaning
wastes, spent sandblast material, and treated sanitary wastewater.
• Combined Wastewater to the Cape Fear River (Outfall 007): This outfall is a
combination of all internal outfalls.
In addition to surface water monitoring, the NPDES permit requires groundwater
monitoring. Permit Condition A (6) Attachment XX, Version 1.0, dated March 30, 2011,
lists the groundwater monitoring wells to be sampled, the parameters and constituents
to be measured and analyzed, and the requirements for sampling frequency and results
reporting. Attachment XX also provides requirements for well location and well
construction. The as -built well information is summarized in Table 1 and the
constituent list, analytical methods, preservatives and holding times are summarized in
Table 2. The well logs for the listed wells are provided in Appendix A. A copy of
Attachment XX is included as Appendix B.
The compliance boundary for groundwater quality associated with the Cape Fear Plant
ash management area is defined in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a) as being
established at either 500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property boundary,
whichever is closer to the source.
Page 6
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
In accordance with the March 30, 2011 Groundwater Monitoring Plan, analytical results
have been submitted to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) before the last day
of the month following the date of sampling. In the future, analytical results will be
submitted to the DWR within 60 days of the date of sampling.
4.2 Description of Groundwater Monitoring System
The current groundwater monitoring plan for the Cape Fear Plant includes the
sampling of 13 wells. These 13 wells include two background wells and 11
downgradient wells. The locations of the monitoring wells, the waste boundary, and
the compliance boundary are shown on Figure 2. Well construction data is provided in
Table 1 and Appendix A. Figure 3 is an example of the construction of a typical
monitoring well.
Based on water levels measured from site wells, the general direction of groundwater
flow is to the west and southwest, toward the Cape Fear River. The site wells provide
monitoring data for the groundwater downgradient of the ash management area.
The compliance monitoring network includes two background monitoring wells,
BGMW-4 and BGTMW-4, one upgradient compliance boundary monitoring well,
CMW-5, plus 10 monitoring wells located in side -gradient and downgradient positions
along the compliance boundary.
Wells BGTMW-4, CTMW-1, CTMW-2, CTMW-7, and CTMW-8 were installed in the
upper bedrock and were paired with shallow wells BTMW-4, CMW-1, CMW-2, CMW-
7, and CMW-8, which were installed above the bedrock, to monitor the vertical
hydraulic gradient in the area and aquifer conditions within the shallow bedrock. The
remainder of the compliance boundary wells, CMW-3, CMW-5, and CMW-6, were
installed in the saprolite or residuum, above bedrock.
Groundwater monitoring for the compliance wells began in December 2010.
4.3 Monitoring Frequency
The monitoring wells will be sampled three times per year in March, June, and October.
4.4 Sample Parameters and Methods
The monitoring program consists of sampling and analysis for parameters and
constituents identified in Permit Condition A (6), Attachment XX of the NPDES permit
(Appendix B).
The parameters and the analytical methods are presented in Table 2.
Page 7
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
The analytical results for the detection monitoring program will be compared to the NC
2L Standards or the site-specific background concentrations.
4.5 Data Quality Objectives
The overall Quality Assurance (QA) objective is to ensure that reliable data of known
and acceptable quality are provided. All measurements will be documented to yield
results that are representative of the groundwater quality. Data will be calculated and
reported in units as required by the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR).
The analytical QA objectives for precision, accuracy, and completeness have been
established by the laboratory(s) in accordance with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) or other accepted agencies for each measurement variable where
possible. The objectives are outlined in the Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Procedures Manual and are available upon request.
Appropriate methods have been selected to meet applicable standards for groundwater
quality. Instances may occur, however, in which the condition of the sample will not
allow detection of the desired limits for various parameters either because of matrix
interference or high analyte concentrations requiring sample dilution. The laboratory(s)
will provide sufficient documentation with each data package to notify reviewers about
any analytical problems with the data, if needed.
Page 8
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
5.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
5.1 Sampling Equipment and Cleaning Procedures
Development and sampling equipment shall be selected to ensure that materials are
compatible with the sample parameters and comply with state and federal regulatory
requirements for sampling.
New disposable sampling equipment (peristaltic pump tubing) is used for each
monitoring well sampled. For non -dedicated equipment used, such as water level
tapes, the equipment will be cleaned before and after use in each well in accordance
with standard EPA -approved cleaning procedures for field equipment. This standard is
outlined in the Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual,
Engineering Support Branch, EPA Region IV, February 1, 1991 as revised December 20,
2011.
5.2 Groundwater Sampling
5.2.1 Development of Monitoring Wells
Monitoring wells addressed in this sampling plan have been developed.
If new monitoring wells are installed, they will be developed prior to initial
sampling. Development removes silt that has settled into the bottom of the well
following installation and removes fine silt and clay particles from the well
screen and sand -pack surrounding the screen. Well development is necessary to
eliminate potential clogging and enhance well performance. Development
involves removing an estimated ten or more well volumes from the well using a
submersible pump with up-and-down agitation to loosen particles from the well
screen. If the turbidity for a well increases over time, the well may be re-
developed to restore conditions.
5.2.2 Groundwater Level and Total Depth Measurements
Water level measurements are collected and recorded to determine the
groundwater elevation and flow direction. Site monitoring wells have been
surveyed to determine the elevation of the top of well casing (TOC). Water level
measurements are referenced to the TOC and recorded to the nearest one-
hundredth of a foot.
Water level measurements are made with an electronic measuring device
consisting of a spool of dual -conductor wire and sensor. When the sensor comes
in contact with water, the circuit is closed and a meter light and/or buzzer
Page 9
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
attached to the spool signal the contact. When the signal is sounded, the water
level is recorded on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4). To
minimize sample turbidity, low flow sample methods are used whenever
possible. Using low -flow sampling techniques, the volume of the stagnant water
in the well is not calculated and the total well depth is not routinely measured to
avoid disturbing the bottom sediments. If conditions indicate a possible problem
with the integrity of a well, the total well depth may be measured.
5.2.3 Well Purging and Sampling
The selection of purging technique is dependent on the hydrogeologic properties
of the aquifer and hydraulic characteristics of each well. Hydraulic conductivity,
water column, well volume, screen length, and other information are evaluated
to select the purging technique to acquire groundwater representative of the
aquifer conditions. At the Cape Fear Plant, a low -flow purging technique has
been selected as the most appropriate technique to minimize sample turbidity.
During low -flow purging and sampling, groundwater is pumped into a flow-
through chamber at flow rates that minimize or stabilize water level drawdown
within the well. At the Cape Fear Plant, low -flow sampling is conducted using a
peristaltic pump with new tubing. The intake for the tubing is lowered to the
mid -point of the screened interval. A multi -parameter water quality monitoring
instrument is used to measure field indicator parameters within the flow-
through chamber during purging. Measurements include pH, specific
conductance, and temperature.
Indicator parameters are measured over time (usually at 3-5 minute intervals).
When parameters have stabilized within ±0.2 pH units and ±10 percent for
temperature and specific conductivity over three consecutive readings,
representative groundwater has been achieved for sampling. Turbidity is not a
required stabilization parameter, however turbidity levels of 10 NTU or less are
targeted.
The Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4) is used to record purge data
and field measurements.
Instrument calibration is performed and documented before the beginning of the
sampling event, at midday, and after each sampling event. The pH subsystem is
calibrated with two pH standards (pH 7.0 and 4.0) bracketing the expected
groundwater pH. The specific conductance subsystem is calibrated using two
Page 10
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
standards bracketing the expected groundwater conductivity. Calibration results
are recorded on a Field Sampling Calibration Form (Figure 5).
5.3 Sample Collection
Groundwater samples are collected after the indicator parameters have stabilized.
Sampling personnel wear new, clean, disposable, non -powdered nitrile gloves at each
location. Samples are collected in the order of the volatilization sensitivity of the
parameters:
• Metals, metalloids, and selenium
• Sulfate, nitrate and chloride
• Total dissolved solids
Groundwater samples are preserved and stored according to parameter -specific
methods and delivered to the laboratory under proper Chain -of -Custody (COC)
procedures. All pertinent notations, water -level measurements, removed well volumes,
and indicator parameters are documented on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet
(Figure 4).
5.4 Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Time
Sample containers supplied by the laboratory shall be new and pre -cleaned as approved
by EPA procedures appropriate for the parameters of interest. Table 2 summarizes the
sample containers, sample volume, preservation procedures, and holding times
required for each type of sample and parameter for the monitoring program. Sample
containers will be kept closed until used. Sample containers will be provided by Duke
Energy or vendor laboratories.
5.5 Sample Tracking
The COC procedures allow for tracking the possession and handling of individual
samples from the time of field collection through laboratory analysis and report
preparation. Samples are logged by the laboratory with a unique tracking number for
each sample. An example of the COC Record is provided as Figure 6.
5.6 Sample Labeling
Sample containers shall be pre -labeled and organized prior to field activities as part of
the pre -sampling staging process. As samples are collected, the sampling personnel
write the following information directly on the label: sampling date and time, and
initials of sample collector. This information is also recorded on the Groundwater
Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4) and the COC Record (Figure 6).
Page 11
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ Cape Fear \GW Sampling and Analysis Plan \Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
5.7 Field Documentation
Field documentation from each sampling event is recorded on the Groundwater
Monitoring Data Sheets (Figure 4), the Field Sampling Calibration Form (Figure 5), and
the Chain -of -Custody Record (Figure 6). Additionally, a Groundwater Sampling Site
Checklist (Figure 7), or equivalent, is completed indicating information about the
monitoring wells such as proper identification (ID) tag and condition of protective
casing and pad. Field notations shall be made during the course of the field work to
document the following information:
• Identification of well
• Well depth
• Static water level depth and measurement technique
• Well yield - high or low
• Purge volume or pumping rate
• Sample identification numbers
• Well evacuation procedure/equipment
• Sample withdrawal procedure/equipment
• Date and time of collection
• Types of sample containers used
• Identification of replicates or blind samples
• Preservative(s) used
• Parameters requested for analysis
• Field analysis data and methods
• Sample distribution and transporter
• Field observations during sampling event
• Name of sample collector(s)
• Climatic conditions including estimate of air temperature
The Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet, Field Sampling Calibration Form, and COC
Record and Analysis Request Form will be filed by project and date. Recorded entries
will be made on electronic forms or on paper forms in indelible ink. Errors on paper
documents will be corrected by drawing a line through the error, initialing and dating
the correction, and starting a new entry on the next line (if necessary).
Page 12
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
5.8 Chain -of -Custody Record
The COC Record (Figure 6) accompanies the sample(s), traces sample possession from
time of collection to delivery to the laboratory(s), and clearly identifies which sample
containers have been designated for each requested analysis. The record includes the
following types of information:
• Sample identification number
• Signature of collector
• Date and time of collection
• Sample type (e.g., groundwater, immiscible layer)
• Identification of well
• Number of containers
• Parameters requested for analysis
• Preservative(s) used
• Signature of persons involved in the chain of possession
• Inclusive dates of possession
5.9 Sample Custody, Shipment, and Laboratory Receipt
For the purpose of these procedures, a sample is considered in custody if it is:
• In actual possession of the responsible person
• In view, after being in physical possession
• Locked or sealed in a manner so that no one can tamper with it after having been
in physical custody or in a secured area restricted to authorized personnel.
Samples shall be maintained in the custody of the sampling crew during the sampling
event. At the end of each sampling day and prior to the transfer of the samples off site,
entries shall be completed on the COC form for all samples. Upon transfer of custody,
the COC form is signed by a sampling crew member, including the date and time. If
outside vendor laboratories are utilized, samples shall be delivered to these facilities by
Duke Energy personnel or courier.
COC forms received by the laboratory(s) shall be signed and dated by the respective
supervising scientist(s) or their designee (at the Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services
lab) or the laboratory sample custodian (at vendor labs) immediately following receipt
by the laboratory. The analysts at the laboratory(s) maintain a sample tracking record
Page 13
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \Cape Fear\GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
that will follow each sample through all stages of laboratory processing. The sample
tracking records show the date of sample extraction or preparation and analysis. These
records are used to determine compliance with holding time limits during lab audits
and data validation.
Custody procedures followed by Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services laboratory
personnel are described in detail in the Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services
Procedures Manual.
Page 14
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The main analytical laboratory used in this program is the Duke Energy Analytical
Laboratory Services: N.C. Drinking Water (NC37804) and Wastewater (#248)
Certifications. The organizational structure and staff qualifications of the laboratory are
discussed in its generic Quality Assurance Program (QAP). The QAP and the
Analytical Laboratory Procedures Manual are available for review upon request.
Vendor laboratories that meet EPA and North Carolina certification requirements may
be used for analyses with approval by Duke Energy.
The analytical procedures used for the samples analyzed for this Groundwater
Monitoring Program are listed in Table 2. Specific conductance, field pH, and
temperature are measured in the field according to the Duke Energy Groundwater
Monitoring and Sample Collection Procedure or the instrument manufacturer
instructions.
Page 15
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
7.0 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS
Internal laboratory quality control (QC) checks used by the laboratories are described in
each laboratory's generic QAP and procedures manual. Using the internal laboratory
QC checks, the laboratories demonstrate the ability to produce acceptable results using
the methods specified.
Internal quality control checks for sampling procedures and laboratory analyses will be
conducted with each sampling event. These checks will consist of the preparation and
submittal of field blanks, trip (travel) blanks, and/or field replicates for analysis of all
parameters at frequencies described in the laboratory(s) procedures manuals.
The field QC blanks and replicates that may be included as internal QC checks are
described below. The specific type and number of blanks used may vary depending on
the sampling event and will be determined by the Duke Energy field sampling
personnel:
• Field Blanks: A field blank consists of a sample container filled in the field with
organic free, deionized, or distilled water prepared and preserved in the same
manner as the samples. The field blank is transported to the laboratory with the
samples and analyzed along with the field samples for the constituents of
interest to check for contamination imparted to the samples by the sample
container, preservative, or other exogenous sources. Field blanks are typically
utilized for each sampling event. The field blanks are typically analyzed for
major anions, cations and metals.
• Trip Blanks: A trip (travel) blank is a sample container filled with organic -free
water in the laboratory that travels unopened with the sample bottles. Trip
blanks are typically utilized when sampling for volatile organic compounds. The
trip blank is returned to the laboratory with the field samples and analyzed
along with the field samples for parameters of interest.
• Equipment Blanks: If non -dedicated equipment is used, it is recommended that
equipment blanks be collected. The field equipment is cleaned following
documented cleaning protocols. An aliquot of the final control rinse water is
passed over the cleaned equipment directly into a sample container and
submitted for analyses.
Page 16
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
• Field Replicates: A field replicate is a duplicate sample prepared at the sampling
locations from equal portions of all sample aliquots combined to make the
sample. Both the field replicate and the sample are collected at the same time, in
the same container type, preserved in the same way, and analyzed by the same
laboratory as a measure of sampling and analytical precision.
Page 17
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
8.0 VALIDATION OF FIELD DATA PACKAGE
The field data package includes all of the field records and measurements developed by
the sampling team personnel. The field data package validation will be performed by
Duke Energy personnel. The procedure for validation consists of the following:
• A review of field data contained on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets for
completeness.
• Verification that equipment blanks, field blanks, and trip blanks were properly
prepared, identified, and analyzed.
• A check of the Field Sampling Calibration Form for equipment calibration and
instrument conditions.
• A review of the COC Record for proper completion, signatures of field personnel
and the laboratory sample custodian, dates and times, and for verification that
the correct analyses were specified.
Page 18
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
9.0 VALIDATION OF LABORATORY DATA
The laboratory will perform a validation review of the submitted samples and
analytical results to ensure that the laboratory QA/QC requirements are acceptable.
Page 19
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
10.0 REPORT SUBMITTAL
Two copies of the report of the monitoring results for the compliance wells will be
submitted to the DWR within 60 days of the date of sampling. The monitoring results
will be submitted on NCDENR Form GW-59CCR.
The DWR will be notified in the event that vendor lab analyses have not been
completed within this time frame. Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets, Field
Calibration Forms, Chain -of -Custody Records, Laboratory QA data, and Data
Validation Checklists shall be kept on file by Duke Energy and are available upon
request.
Page 20
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
11.0 REFERENCES
Horton, J.W., Jr. and V. A. Zullo, 1991, The Geology of the Carolinas - Carolina
Geological Society Fiftieth Anniversary Volume, The University of Tennessee
Press, Knoxville, TN.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina: North
Carolina Geological Survey, General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000.
Page 21
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ GW Sampling and Analysis Plan\ Cape Fear GW Monitoring Plan 7-30-
2014.docx

FIGURES

9 in
• a 85
:, • • �44 33 / B8 i90 ori
n, i,
\ �� o•� ' BM U
j, X193
Water �%
\ Tank•rr/ i
/ \ I 1
t PROPERTY BOUNDARY
500' COMPLIANCE
/ BOUNDARY
ns 0r (
�.,%' r I ` ` ♦ ♦ a°rr WASTE
/ i� ♦ ubsta BOUNDARY
r II
,77 t
It
' GG
75 33
Little 'Shaddox
''' /' aCem: • -,\
k q' CT n Cjeypr e
eek
ti i, II 11 ~ 11
1 `u . / • • 11 OO r /!
rr / f rG
O (i� ► = - = rf<7 ckhaven
q
—<.. BM 204
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OBTAINED FROM THE NRCS GEOSPATIAL DATA
GATEWAY AT http://datagateway.nres.usda.gov/
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
GREENSBORO CAPEFEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
'RAEEG 500 CP&L DR
•GREF,h'1%LLE
SynTerra CAPE FEAR TEAM MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA
ELECTRIC PLANT MONCURE, NC QUADRANGLE
148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220 CHATHAM COUNTY
WRM/NG'TON DRAWN BY: S. ARLEDGE DATE: 07/17/2014
GRAPHIC SCALE
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA
PHONE [phone] PROJECT MANAGER: KATHY CONTOUR INTERVAL: 10 FEET 11000 0 1000 2000
WWW.SyntefraCorp.00111 LAYOUT: RG 1(SITE LOCATION)
MAP DATE: 1993
P: Pro ress Ener .1026 10. NC Sites 01. See And NPDES Permit Assistance CAPE FEAR dw CAPE FEARFIG1 USGS SITE LOCATION.dW IN FEET

sk
N
t. °<:.> ' , , � - , .' - .. ,��„ ; : • .:
ice,.. .-i, T.
�. i,_ .:, , .,
,>�..
,• t � ',
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY MONITORING WELLS
v ... a • ... �, i
-_ fl
. 1�, i'i,
,:
} _.:
°'':' a
.: " . y"
, _
"• ^�j, N cr'
.�..: ", k;'
LEGEND
MEASURING PT GROUND SURFACE
WELL ID NORTHING (Y) FASTING (X) FEET (msl.) FEET (msl.)
s '"
tJ ;��' r.` .,•
���� �r*��' .. .:., ,. ,•,
, s. -, r• - ,"� �;•$
BGMWIJ BACKGROUND MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
O WATER LEVEL IN FEET msl.
CMW-1 666928.02 1985167.50 165.67 162.30
Ctb16�'-3 e
CTMW-1 666936.52 1985163.26 166.04 163.40
DOWNGRADIENT MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
CMW-2 671530.05 1984677.55 169.40 166.60 $CMW-S WATER LEVEL IN FEET (msl )
\it CTMW 2 671538.77 1984675.45 169.17 166.50
t
`F BGTMW11,
ab CMw3 672774.76 1985020.89 175.96 172.70 C DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS CAPE FEAR PLANT
/ �� BGMW1l t%'?3t "t ,' 3 CMW 5 670569.11 1988084.54 182.44 178.60
/ CMW-6 668117.34 1988906.82 169.89 166.60
/ \ ¢ � 500 ft COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
CMW-7 668474.28 1986974.79 184.58 181.50
CTMW-7 668479.37 1986975.86 184.66 181.40 WASTE BOUNDARY
CMW-8 668852.85 1984746.56 170.21 167.70 - - - - - ASH POND BOUNDARY (APPROXIMATE)
ol
s
o� CTMW-8 668845.58 1984743.29 170,32 167.40
BGMW 4 672664.35 1986489.61 180.74 177.70
r�..R(TMW-A 175.50
':1. - •1,
A P N D I
1956 SH 0 Y
�A W
y.
s`
/ Y1,1 kii+'� , 1 , •i. is .rb - Y. '� +,1. »
^
r
-
, J
MM t
,
PRT ,
4�
/ AMP 'i�.
FORMER COAL STOCKPILE • !' F ° A f t w �?,
,
1 -
1
CTMW-2
vA
oer
iok
js
'., P.T. - ' --, . ,..r,.f .,. i • ., . ., r .�.: 5, ,A' ,_ .}
,
L
, si^
�r
,
r �
pr
�t
y: B;
.F 'L • ' '. ! r .. .. F`. , ,,.:,, ,- b, r .�Ai ./yys.•. Mlb. - ' 6.. 1y,+ J,,% 'R:'
> ,
1 •�
}
,
�i -
t�
y
IP �,.+�-
� ' MAIN OFFICE
g"
1'N3
•
/UVF
\ 0,' -/9CANAL
` p,.+�
CMW-5
w / \
�r i.:
a \ .. o, �; ELECTRICAL
\ \ ICAL SUBSTATIO% a Pp
IN,
,
r2 \: j I
\ iL
IN
r.
,i
�.
\ob NPDES h'9i \ 1985 ASH PONDpf
\ \
\ lqo \ (EAST ASH POND)
-
}
..CANAL . '. `\ \
\ \ A ' ttR � w j € o'" �t Tie `\ °�yF, °%` \ I ��• Cid: t:
v�i P
i*' 4'
4
1978 ASH POND
o \ \ (WEST ASH POND)
kk �,
AN
1963 ASH POND �J��
/ NPDESOUTFALL 001
\ \ -' / .. \ I ,.gin '�'� a •,P ,X• �� \ 5
CMW-b'
l e
\ \ h, I CTMIv7
\\ I \ „
_ u PIK+
' I
i- - - - - - - - - - - I I l..W_/-;FOOTBRIDGE
I
i
/
r
NPDES OUTFALL 00�
II I
1
1 1970
0
\ 1 ` NPDES OUTFALL 007 �,FOOT BRIDGE OVER CANAL
A .
\ 1 4 a +4 RAILROAD BRIDGE_
,K
s�UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
,
4A ♦ ; r
CMW-1 ------ .
CTMW-1 a'
+,A'► } "7
�'�,�'•' t.. tot �„ ;!'' c 1 �,., r j , s 2. :��F '. �ef
P W ClNFROw
s x a•
IMz! y� i4��♦
COR/n,TyR };h
D
SOURCES:
���! �,�� ,,,,f, w. ',�, :•, \ 1. 2013 HIGH RESOLUTION AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM CHATHAM COUNTY
;• GIS WEBSITE AT http.//www.chuthumgs.com/ AND LEE COUNTY GIS WEBSITE AT
ix-h(tp.//leecountyne.gov/Departments/GISSbrrtegicSetvices.aspr
• „��`"�r « �. �,� ply � � 2. 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WAS OBTAINED FROM WSP FLOWN ON APRIL 17, 2014.
k �,.A,) 3. DRAWING HAS BEEN SET WITH A PROJECTION OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE
IN r'� @ COORDINATE SYSTEM RIPS 3200 (NAD 83).
a �t
CA
GRAPHIC LE
R SCALE
•, '� � 1}} > � , �, ,ay �•- � 'I'ieE�•'� 300 0 150 300 600
(IN FEET)
erra
148 River Street, Suite 220
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
864-421-9999
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: S. ARLEDGE DATE, 2014-07-31
CHECKED BY: H. FRANK DATE: 2014-07-31
A`t PROJECT MANAGER: J. WYLIE
LAYOUT NAME: FIG 2 (SAMPLE LOCATION MAP)
DUKEF�
e �YS
wj ENERGY
i
r.
PROGRESS
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
500 CP & L DRIVE
MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE 2
'`.t SAMPLE LOCATION MAP

ABOVEGROUND WELL PROTECTOR
(4 INCH X 4 INCH X 5 FOOT STEEL CASING WITH
HINGED LOCKABLE LID)
2' b" TO 6' V (NOMINAL)
STICK-UP
NEAT CEMENT OR NEAT CEMENT BENTCNITE
MIX FROM BENTONITE SEAL TO GROUND
SURFACE
WELL SCREEN
(0.010' MANUFACTURED SLOTS, TYPICAL)
WELL PACKING
(TYP. #1 OR #2 SAND)
MALE PVC PLUG
DRILL g" DIAMETER VENT HOLE BELOW
PLUG
2" DIA. PVC
WELL CASING GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE PAD
6" MIN, 2 FT X 2 FT SQUARE
BORING
(S" NOMINAL DIAMETER)
BENTONITE SEAL
2' -0" (MINIMUM)
2'-0" (MINIMUM)
SCHEEN LENG I H VAHIES
(5' TO 15' TYP.)
6±" OF WELL SAND
Typical Well Construction Details
(no scale)
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS.. LLC
synTQ
148 RIVER STREET; SUITE 220
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29601
PHONE[phone]
hftp://www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: H. Frank Date: 7/10/2014
PROJECT MANAGER: Kathy Webb
FIGURE 3
GENERALIZED WELL SCHEMATIC
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
P:\Progress Energy.1026\10. NC Sites\01. Seep and NPDES Permit Assistance\CAPE FEAR\Sampling and Analysis Plan\

FIGURE 4
LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
CAPE FEAR PLANT
COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO
Associated midday/end-of-day pH check within ±0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO. If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as
flagged accordingly
* SynTerra is not NC -certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only
WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD
] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONI
WATER LEVEL
FIELD PERSONNEL:
TEMPERATURE
s nTerra
DO
WEATHER: ❑ SUNNY ❑ OVERCAST ❑ RAIN TEMPERATURE (APPROX):
148 River Street, Suite 220
TURBIDITY`
NOTES'
'
TIME
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
(mL/min)
(° Celsius)
(AS/CM)
[phone]. [phone] Fax
(Su)
(mV)
www.synTerracorp.com
NOTES
WELL ID:
PUMP/TUBING INTAKE DEPTH: (FT)
START PURGE TIME:
MEASURING POINT:
W
r
START PURGE DATE:
END PURGE TIME:
WELL DIAMETER:
(IN)
END PURGE DATE:
FINAL READING TIME:
WELL DEPTH:
(FT) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: (GAL)
u
DEPTH TO WATER:
(FT)
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLE COLLECTION
TIME:
PURGE METHOD: ❑ Grundfos Pump
❑ 12 Volt Pump
❑ Peristaltic Pump ❑ Dedicated Pump
❑ Teflon Bailer ❑ Polyethylene Bailer
SAMPLE METHOD: ❑ Grundfos Pump
❑ 12 Volt Pump
❑ Peristaltic Pump ❑ Dedicated Pump
❑ Teflon Bailer ❑ Polyethylene Bailer
COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO
Associated midday/end-of-day pH check within ±0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO. If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as
flagged accordingly
* SynTerra is not NC -certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only
WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD
] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONI
WATER LEVEL
FLOW RATE
TEMPERATURE
CONDUCTANCE
DO
pH
ORP'
TURBIDITY`
TIME
(FT)
(mL/min)
(° Celsius)
(AS/CM)
(mg/L)
(Su)
(mV)
(NTU)
NOTES
W W
z
r
W
r
v
v
u
s
m F w
w
Q J
J
J
vb a
a
o
O
Q l7
l7
l7
d
E
E
w
N
z
EE
E
E
z
x=
�z 0
w
w H
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED
N
N
__=
u
z
a"
z :E o
COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO
Associated midday/end-of-day pH check within ±0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO. If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as
flagged accordingly
* SynTerra is not NC -certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only
WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD
] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONI
NUMBER
OF CONTAINERS
PRESERVATION
W W
z
r
W
r
v
v
u
s
m F w
w
Q J
J
J
vb a
a
o
O
Q l7
l7
l7
d
E
E
w
N
z
EE
E
E
z
x=
�z 0
w
w H
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED
N
N
__=
u
z
a"
z :E o
COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO
Associated midday/end-of-day pH check within ±0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO. If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as
flagged accordingly
* SynTerra is not NC -certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only
WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD
] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONI

synTerra
Instrument ID: YSI-556-MPS
Analyst:
Instrument Calibration Log
SynTerra Corporation
148 River Street, Suite 220
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
NC Field Parameter Certification No. 5591
Date:
Location:
pH Initial Calibration (standard units)
Reference Method: SW846 9040C
Cal. Time Cal. Buffer 4.0 Cal. Buffer 7.0 Cal Buffer 10.0 *Check Buffer 7.0
{pH buffer checks are to be within± 0.1 pH units of the standards true value
4 Buffer Reference:
7 Buffer Reference:
10 Buffer Reference:
Check Buffer Reference:
H Calibration Check (standard units
Time Check Buffer True Value *Check Buffer Measured Value
Mid -Day
End -of -Day
Other
*pH buffer checks are to be within ± 0.1 pH units of the standards true value
Check Buffer Reference: Action Required:
Specific Conductance (umhos/cm)
Reference Method: SW946 9050A
Time
Calibration Std 1413 Verification Std 1413
Initial Cal
Barometric Pressure
mm H
Meter DO Reading
(mg/L
Mid -Day
Theoretical DO
m /L
Not Applicable
End -of -Day
Not Applicable
*Verification standard ± 10 percent of the standards true value
Calibration Standard Reference: Verification Standard Reference:
Action Required:
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Reference Method: SM 4500 0 G-2001
-I heoretical llU = llU trom " Uissolvecl Oxygen Meter Ualibration V entication" Table at ambient temp X Uorrection Nactor at barometric Pressure
Theoretical DO and Meter DO reading within + 0.5 mg/l, if not calibrate meter.
Action Required:
C: \ Users \ hfrank.SYNTERRACORP \ Desktop \ Instrument Calibration Form Rev6 556 MPS.docx
Time
Temp
°C
Barometric Pressure
mm H
Meter DO Reading
(mg/L
Correction
Factor
Theoretical DO
m /L
Initial
Mid -Day
End -of -Day
-I heoretical llU = llU trom " Uissolvecl Oxygen Meter Ualibration V entication" Table at ambient temp X Uorrection Nactor at barometric Pressure
Theoretical DO and Meter DO reading within + 0.5 mg/l, if not calibrate meter.
Action Required:
C: \ Users \ hfrank.SYNTERRACORP \ Desktop \ Instrument Calibration Form Rev6 556 MPS.docx

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD AND ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM
Duke
r --------------------------------------------------------------------
Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services i j Analytical Laboratory Use Only i
Samples
P4ftrEnergys-
Mail Code 9MG03A2
Hager (Building 7405) i iLIMS# Originating NC 1 13339 Hagers Ferry Rd j i From SC i
Huntersville, N. C. 28078 i (Logged By Date & Time SAMPLE PROGRAM I
For Detailed Instructions, see: [phone]j I I
http://dewww/essenv/coc/ Groundwater
Fax: [phone] I i NPIDESi
m
0.
E
0
U
N
E
d
E
0
3
U
1)Project Name
2)Phone No:
3)Client
4)Fax No:
5)Business Unit: 20036
6)Process:
7)Resp. To:
8)Project ID:
9)Activity ID:
10)Mail Code:
----------------
LAB USE ONLY I
12 Chem Desktop
"Lab ID I No.
I I
I I
or ID
Vendor Drinking Water
UST
i Cooler Temp (C) R(an IA/..f. !
jPO # "Preserv.:1=HCL
2=H2SO4 3=HNO3
4=Ice 5=None
:MR#
i
NON -SHADED eas.
'QCollection Information E
0
Date I Time Signature v
19Page 1 of 1
DISTRIBUTION
ORIGINAL to LAB,
COPY to CLIENT
0
21)Relinquished By
Date/Time
Accepted By
Date/Time
0
22
m
.N
Requested Turnaround
Relinquished By
Date/Time
Accepted By
Date/Time
v
r
14 Days
o v
Relinquished By
Date/Time
Accepted By
Date/Time
E 0
'7
:: ca
Days
23)Seal/Locked By
Date/Time
Sealed/Lock Opened By
Date/Time
E
o v r
w
v*Other
'48 Hr
24)Comments
o
' Add. Cost Will Apply

LOCATION / SITE
SITE CONTACT
WEATHER
NORTH CAROLINA GROUNDWATER SAMPLING SITE CHECKLIST
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC./CAPE FEAR STEAM ENERGY PLANT
PERMIT #NC0003433
Moncure, NC / Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Henry James
SAMPLE DATE
FIELD CREW
ACCESS TO WELLS
Access cleared into well
Access cleared around well
Fallen tree blockinq access
------------------
WELL SECURITY
------------------
Well found locked
Well found unlocked
------------------
WELL LOCK CONDITION
Lock in good condition
Replaced damaged lock
------------------
WELL CASINGS
------------------
Casing in good condition
Damaqed casinq still functional
Damaqed casinq repair required
------------------
CONCRETE PADS
Pad in good condition
Minor cracks
Major cracks / broken / repair required
Undermined / washing out
Fire ants around concrete pad
------------------
WELL PROTECTIVE CASINGS
Casing in good condition
Damaqed casinq still functional
Damaged casing repair required
Broken hinqe on protective lid
Wasp nest inside protective casinq
Ants inside protective casinq
------------------
NOOK "ImwWaYTT,
------------------
Well cap in good cond�on
Damaged / needs replacement
Replaced damaged well cap
------------------
FLUSH MOUNT WELLS
Vault in qood condition
Water inside vault
Vault bolt holes broken or stripped
Bolts stripped
Vault lid cracked or broken
------------------
WELL ID TAGS
Well tag in good condition
Well tag missing
Well tag damaged / illegible
Lacks required information - Driller Reg #
Lacks required information - Total well depth
Lacks required information - Depth to screen
Lacks required information - Non potable tag
NUIk:
FIGURE 7 - NORTH CAROLINA GROUNDWATER SAMPLING CHECKLIST

TABLES

Table 1
Monitoring Well Information
Duke Energy Progress, Inc./Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Moncure, North Carolina
Well ID
Date Installed
Northing
Easting
Use
Type of
Casing
Well
Diameter
(inches)
Top of Casing
Elevation
(NGVD 29)
Well Depth*
TOC
Well Screen
Interval*
TOC
Screen
Length
(feet)
BGMW-4
7/28/2010
672664.35
1986489.61
Background
PVC
2.0
180.74
22.19
12.2-22.2
10
BGTMW-4
11/18/2010
672663.82
1986496.35
Background
PVC
2.0
180.85
52.24
42.2-52.2
10
CMW-1
8/24/2010
666928.02
1985167.5
Compliance
PVC
2.0
165.67
18.55
8.5-18.5
10
CTMW-1
8/26/2010
666936.52
1985163.26
Compliance
PVC
2.0
166.04
55.61
40.6-55.6
15
CMW-2
8/30/2010
671530.05
1984677.55
Compliance
PVC
2.0
169.40
17.25
7.3-17.3
10
CTMW-2
9/1/2010
671538.77
1984675.45
Compliance
PVC
2.0
169.17
56.47
46.5-56.5
10
CMW-3
9/2/2010
672774.76
1985020.89
Compliance
PVC
2.0
175.96
18.92
8.9-18.9
10
CMW-5
11/19/2010
670569.11
1988084.54
Compliance
PVC
2.0
182.44
23.83
13.8-23.8
10
CMW-6
11/22/2010
668117.34
1988906.82
Compliance
PVC
2.0
169.89
18.12
8.1 -18.1
10
CMW-7
12/1/2010
668474.28
1986974.79
Compliance
PVC
2.0
184.58
28.38
18.4-28.4
10
CTMW-7
12/3/2010
668479.37
1986975.86
Compliance
PVC
2.0
184.66
52.34
42.3-52.3
10
CMW-8
11/30/2010
668852.85
1984746.56
Compliance
PVC
2.0
170.21
18.39
8.4-18.4
10
CTMW-8
11/30/2010
668845.58
1984743.29
Compliance
PVC
2.0
170.32
52.60
42.6-52.6
10
Prepared By: HJF Checked By: JAW
Notes:
TOC - Top of Casing
NGVD 29 - A vertical control datum in the United States by the general adjustment of 1929
* - Well depths and screen intervals are based upon field observations.
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\Cape Fear\GW Monitoring Plan\Tables 1 and 2

Table 2
Sample Parameters, Analytical Methods, Containers, Preservatives, and
Holding Times
Duke Energy Progress, Inc./Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Moncure, North Carolina
Parameter
Units
Containers
Preservatives
Holding Times
Analytical Method
Field Parameters
Field pH
SU
Flow-through Cell
None
Analyze Immediately
YSI 556 Multi -Meter
Specific Conductivity
mmhos/cm
Flow-through Cell
None
Analyze Immediately
YSI 556 Multi -Meter
Temperature
°C
Flow-through Cell
None
Analyze Immediately
YSI 556 Multi -Meter
Water Level
ft
-
-
Water Level Meter
Laboratory Analysis
Aluminum
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Antimony
pg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Arsenic
pg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Barium
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Boron
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Cadmium
pg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Chloride
mg/L
125 ml HDPE
Cool 4° C
28 days
EPA 300.0
Chromium (total)
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Copper
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Iron
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Lead
pg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Manganese
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Mercury
pg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
EPA 245.1
Nickel
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Nitrate (as Nitrogen)
mg/L
125 ml HDPE
Cool 4° C
28 days
EPA 300.0
Selenium
pg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Sulfate
mg/L
125 ml HDPE
Cool 4° C
28 days
EPA 300.0
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
250 ml HDPE
Cool 4° C
28 days
SM 2540C
Thallium
pg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Zinc
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Prepared By: HJF Checked By: JAW
Notes:
SU - Standard Units
mS/cm - micro siemen per centimeter
ft - feet
my - milli volts
mg/L - milligrams per liter
pg/L - micrograms per liter
NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity Units
TRM - Total Recoverable Metals
EPA - Environmental Protection Agency
SM - Standard Method
PADuke Energy Progress. 1 026\Cape Fear\GW Monitoring Plan\Tables 1 and 2

APPENDIX A
BORING LOGS AND MONITORING WELL
CONSTRUCTION LOGS

WELL LOGi �. CATLIN
Lincpntrcrs anU SciunUtits
1 i L103ri
�wir.nir t+(; SHEET 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO.: 210036 1 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham ILOCATIONMoncure
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY. Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear --- - -
DRILLER John E. Wood III C MW -1
NORTHING: 666928 0 I FASTING 1985167.5 cREw: Roger Caulder
SYSTEM_ NCSP NAD 8'3 -'-
BORING LOCATION SW of site aiong aver 5 of TMW-1 I T.D.C. ELEV.: 165.67
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV !METHOD: _ H.S. Augers I D HOUR DTW_ 9 4 1 TOTAL DEPTH 16.0
START DATE' 8/24/10 i FINISH DATE._ 8/24/10 _ 24 HOUR DTW: 8 7 WELL DEPTH: 15.0_
BLOW COUNT OVA i SOIL AND ROCK WELL
DEPTH LAB. o I
tin 5'n Gin l fim (Ppl�) g � !DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
3.4
0.0 --LAND SURFACE 162.3
3.0
13.0
113131 I I IM
� VV
0
H
I
Sat.
I
1
i
i
1 1 1! I I I Sat.
(CL) - Brown SILTY CLAY, Soft, Uniform.
Medium plasticity. Moist. No odor.
158.3
(SM/CL) - Brown CLAYEY to SANDY SILT
Low plasticity. Soft. Moist.
(CL) - Brown CLAY w/ trace SILT. Soft. High
plasticity. Saturated at 8.5' BLS.
5.0
(SP) - Brown fine SAND w/ some CLAY. 15.0
Saturated.
---14
Boring Terminated at Elevation 146.3 ft-
4;GLd Rentanite Pellets L ! 42 Medium Sand
ry V
3.5
15.0

L CATLIN
Engmcen and socnl,sls
N� SHEET 1 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 2.10036j STATE_ NC I COUNTY: Chatham ILOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME:- LOGGED BY _ ' Justin Heter ' WELL ID:
F
Progress Energy Cape ear _
( DRILLER. John E Wood III C TMW-1
NORTHING: _666936.5 { EASTING: 1985163.3 1 CREW Roger Caulder
SYSTEM: NCSI NAD 83 (USft) I BORING LOCATION: SW of site a1on0 river, N of rnw•1 _ T.O.C. ELEV.: 166.04
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV METHOD I-1 S. Augers/M.R. R. 0 HOUR DTW 0.0 TOTAL DEPTH 53,0
START DATE: 8/24/10 _ (FINISH DATE --8/26/10 _ 24 HOUR DTW T1 WELL DEPT 53.0
BLOW COUNTI i L SOIL AND ROCK WELL
DEPTH OVA LAB 0 o � o
Gm Gin 6;n Gin (Pm) S �' DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
j ! _._I _._----------- -
2 6_
0.0 LAND SURFACE 163.4 I
(CL) - Brown SILTY CLAY. Uniform. Medium -
plasticity. Soft. Moist. --
3.0-
1 3 1 3 I M 4.0 _.__.._... —._ 1594 -
I (SM/CL) - Brown CLAYEY to SANDY SILT.
Low plasticity. Soft, Moist.
_
i 6.0 157 4
W O 1 H ; Sat.
(CL) - Brown CLAY w/ trace SILT. Soft. High
plasticity. Saturated at 8.5' BLS. -
i
I -
13.0 - ----
1 1 1 Sat. a c 149 a
1 (SP) - Fine SAND w/ some CLAY. Saturated.
146.4 —
1 (HWR) - "Driller notes very hard/dense layering v
16.0 ~17' BLS. Hard rock. _ 145.4
60/' I f (CL) - Brown SILTY CLAY w/ high plasticity. N -
4 j 10I Sat.
10.2 i9.o __..___ __. _ _ia4 a 19.0
12 Portland Coment Bentonite Pellets [—]#2 Medium Sand

WELL LOG
�- "' CATLIN
Caxlutcc[s an[l Scicntisls
? t oU:56
_ rim .lta rtc SHEET 2 OF 3
PROJECT NO 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION Moncure _--- —T l
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear — — ----
DRILLER: John E. Wood III TMW-1
NORTHING: 666936.5 �EASTING: 1985163 3_Roger Caulder
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 USft) j BORING LOCATION SW ot�si!e'along river, N. of MW -1
DRILL MACHINE CME 45B AN I METHOD: H. S. Augers/M: R. O HOUR DTW 0.(
.-- — –
START DATE 8/24/10 I FINISH DATES 8/26/10 24 HOUR DTW: T -
BLOW COUNT OVA I o t SOIL AND ROCK
DEPTH ! LAB. o
Oul [.u, i cin 6m (ppin) ( ' C DESCRIPTION
s DEPTH ELEVA
43.0
60/'i
0.11
(HWR) - Weathered rock w/ large gravel -sized
pieces of granite/gneiss/quartz grains (from
appearance).
*[Driller notes continuous hard/rock
layering/could not drill deeper using hollow
stem augers.
*"From drilling mud flow outfall, rock appears to
have switched at 43' BLS to a less hard,
fragmented mudstone. (continued)
T.O.C. ELEV.: 166.04
TOTAL DEPTH: 53.0
1yWELL DEPTH 53.0
WELL
TION I DETAIL
EAPortland Cement Bentonite pellets ILI#2 Medium Sand
36.0
35.0

WELL LOG
v CATLIN
limimeeN and Scwnfists
1i 3�r;
vai �yi,„� we $HEFT i r1F i
PROJECT NO —210036 STATE-- NC�COUNTY - _ Chatham LOCATION Moncure
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY: _ _ Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear DRILLER: John E. Wood III
- ---- - - _- -- - --_ - - _ L� C TMW-1
NORTHING: 606936 5 �EASTING — 1985163 3 CREW: _ _ Roger Ca j er_
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83USft BORING LOCATION 5W of site alon river, N. ofMW-1 T.O.C. ELEV
-- - - _ -
DRILL MACHINE CME 45B ATV METHOD: H.S.Augers/M.R. 0 HOUR DTW: 0.0 TOTAL DEP'
START DATE 8/24/10 FINISH DATE: 8/26/10 24 HOUR DTW: 7,1 1 WELL DEPT
_ -- -- ,-
DEPTH I BLOW COUNT I OVA j LAB
o i SOIL AND ROCK
! Gui j 131n tiro ( m (pprn) r DESCRIPTION
DLPTH
ELEVATION
48.0
0.1 F1
j
j
53.0 - -
II60/
—r-0.1:
Portland Cement Bentonite Pellets 92 Medium Sand
1.66.04
53.0
53.0
WELL
DETAIL
CL
<� a
0
7' x
x
x % i
X %
x %
x x
% x
X %
ix
% x
Ix x
—yx
x' (HWR) -Gray SHALY MUDSTONE. Very
x x
D
x x i dense. Friable. Moderate amounts of soft
X CLAY w/ moderate plasticity. Clay is wet.
-
x x 'Driller notes not feeling any changes in
x x hardness in layering w/ depth/ no structural
% x . faults/fractures,
x x
x x Al 48BLS, gray very consolidated
xx MUDSTONE w/ friable/brittle shale -like
x X properties. Dry. Breaks up to VF dust,
x x
x x (conlinuod)
X x i
X x 53.0
4 v -I _.Boring
Terminated at Elevation 110.4 ft
D
Portland Cement Bentonite Pellets 92 Medium Sand
1.66.04
53.0
53.0
WELL
DETAIL
CL
<� a
0

WELL CATLIN
LOGEngweers and Seicnt+sis
100:76
SHEET 1 OF 1
PROJECT No.: 210036 STATE NC COUNTY Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear ---- ---
-_ DRILLER. T John E Wood, III C MW -2
NORTHING: 671 530,1 FASTING: 1984677.6 CREW _ Roger Caulder
SYSTEM _ NCSP NAD 83 (USft) BORING LOCATION: heft side of N. pond aeon river T O.C. ELEV.: 169.40
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV METHOD: KS. Augers O HOUR DTW 9.5 TOTAL DEPTH: 14.0
START DATE: 8/30/10 FINISH DATE: 8/30/10 24 HOUR DTW: 1 1 A WELL DEPTH: 14.0
BLOW COUNT OVA T M � I SOIL AND ROCK WELL
F
DEPTH LAB DESCRIPTION DETAIL
Gin 61rl 1 bin I @:n (PPrrl) 5 I DEPTH ELEVATION 2.8
3.0
41313
C
W { 0 Sat
0.0 LAND SURFACE 166.61 1 1 00
v
fs
Vi
(SC/CL) - Brown CLAYEY SAND to SANDY
CLAY. Organic debris. Uniform. Loose/soft.
Moist.
4 0 162.6 i 4.0
(SP) - Brown very fine SANG. Loose. ry
Uniform. Dry. I a
At 8' BI_S, some CLAY. Saturated. 5
Boring Terminated at Elevation 152.6 ft
Bentonde Pellets 1-1i22 Medium Sano
M

CAT LIN
1"11(IIIICGI JIl() SI;ICIIIIS13
WELL LOG
SHEET 1 OF 3
PROJECT NO,: - 210036 STATE: NC_ COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: i LOGGED BY: Justin ' WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear
DRILLER John E. Wood, III CTMW-2
NORTHING: 671538.8 FASTING 1984675_5 CREW: Roger Caulder
_ --. _-•- -_ .. _
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 (USft) BORING LOCATION: Left side of N�Nond, N. of MW-2 _ T.O.C_ELEV.: 169.17
DRILL MACHINE CME 45B ATV METHOD H.S.Augers/M.R. 0 HOUR DTW: 0.0- TOTAL DEPTH_ _ 53.0
STARTDATE:8/30/10 FINISH DATE: 9/1/10 24 HOUR DTW: — WELL DEPTW 53.0
DEPTH I BLOW COUNT OVA LAB ° o SOIL AND ROCK WELL
(ppm) c DESCRIPTION
GIn 1 rin Gln Gin
S DEPTH ELEVATION DETAIL
I ; 27
C 0.0 LAND SURFACE 166.5jo
---
'
i
_ (SC/CL) - Brown CLAYEY SAND to SANDY
i I I CLAY. Organic debris. Uniform. Moist. -
j 1 -
4.0 --- --- 4 U - .. 162 2 5 —
�_ I —
4 1 3 1 2 I D I � __ _ _�—.__.�.__ � F
i
I -
(SP) - Brown very fine SAND. Loose. -
8.0— Uniform. Dry,
At 8' BLS, of SAND w/ some CLAY. Saturated.
W ` O H Sat. _
I -
i -
f 120 154.5
_—
I � I -
a
7 (CL) - Brownish-gray very high plasticity CLAY.
(From auger cuttings/pulled augers) -
I -
1
y
18.0
I
(I-IWR) - Brownish-gray unform ROCK. Very i
L -{ 2 16 1 18 1 521 D t 1 hard. Thickly bedded. Very granitic in a
I appearance. Very finely grained rock. Q
--- 17.5-19.5' intermitten rock layers.
19.5-40' dense rock. _
ry _
I 1 27,0
� I I
LJ Portland cement Bentonite Pellets El#2Medium Sand

1�.." CAT LIN
WELL LOG ,,�s� f„4ir,00rs dr,(t SGe,tt,sts
__.-...-- --- _ x, ,i NC SHEET 2_OF 3
PROJECT NO 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: 'LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear ---- ----
DRILLER; John E. Wood III C TMW-2
NORTHING _ _ 671538 b_J EASTiNG _ 1984675 5 GREW_ _ _ Roger Caulder
SYSTEM_ NCSP NAD 83 (USft) -BORING LOCATION Left side of N. pond N of MW -2 _ T.O.C. ELEV.: 169.17
DRILL MACHINE CME 45B ATV METHOD: ­KS.Augers/M_R 0 HOUR DT W*: 0.0 TOTAL DEPTH 53.0
START DATE _ 8/30/1 O I.FINISH DATE 9/1 /1 O 24 HOUR DTW: WELL DEPTH 53.0
--. T- - r-- i ..... _ ._. __ --- --- _....— --- -_..-_....._.._._ _ - -r--...__..-...__ -.
DEPTH BLOW COUNT i OVA LAB o [.]DEPTH
v 501E AND ROCK WELL
G:n¢rn n (Ppm) { ! g_' DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
(HWR) - Brownish -gray unform ROCK. Very
hard. Thickly bedded. Very granitic in
appearance. Very finely grained rock.
17.5-19.5' intermitten rock layers.
19.5-40' dense rock. (continued)
I
x x
x x
x x
x x
(HWR) -'Driller notes decrease in hardness,
x x
though still very hard rock layering.
x x
Gray VF rock dusUrock fragments. Some
x x
CLAY. Brittle. SILTSTONE characteristics,
x x
Medium hardness. Thickly bedded. Thin
x
layers of clay (lenses) throughout siltstone
x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
layer,
Cement EM Bentonite Pellets F-1 k2 Medium Sand
42.5
40,0

WELL LOG
CATLIN
IinOutcen and 9crenusta
wow
.NL; SHEET 3 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 210036 ]STATE: NC 1 COUNTY Chatham !LOCATION, Moncure
PROJECT NAME:- I LOGGED BY: _ Justin Heter WELL ID:
Energy nergy Cape Fear
DRILLER: John E. Wood Ill C TMW 2
NORTHING: 671538 8 EASTING 1984675.5 ( CREW Roger Caulder
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 (U5ft)_ 3ORING LOCATION: Left side of N. pond,, N. of Mw -2 _ T O.C. ELEV.: 169.17_
DRILL MACHINE CME 45B ATV I. METHOD. H.S.Augers/M.R _ o HOUR DTW 0.0 TOTAL DEPTH 53.0
START DATE $/30/10 FINISH DATE_ 9/1/10 24 HOUR DTW _ _ 1 WELL DEPTH: 53.0
l r r M
BLOW COUNT OVA o r SOIL AND ROCK WELL
DEPTH I LAB. o
(nn Gin Gin I t,.n ' (PPIrI) ' G DESCRIPTION DETAIL
! s DEPTH ELEVATION
! x ,
i
x r
x x i
x x -
x x
x x U
a --
;x x (HWR) - `Driller notes decrease in hardness,
48.0 -fix x though still very hard rock layering.
100/ ! j D x Gray VF rock dust/rock fragments. Some -_
0.2'! x x CLAY. Brittle. SILTSTONE characteristics.
f ---
___� x x Medium hardness. Thickly bedded. Thin -
x x layers of clay (lenses) throughout siltstone
layer. (continued)
x x
I x x
I x x
x x
{ x x _-
x x
x x
1 l x x —
X x 52.5
� x x
I I x x I53.0 113.5 Fs3.0 c� n
Boring Terminated at Elevation 113.5 ft
�_JPertland Cement Bentonite PelletsLJl#2 Medium Sand

WELL LOG CATLIN
1 3(3 fayincers and Scientists
"0
- — - - — "V 9"T N(` SHEET 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC ( COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION; Moncure
_ -_ -- _ _—
PROJECT NAME:- LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
Fear
Progress Energy Cape ear - - ----
DRILLER John E. Wood III 1 C MW -3
NORTHING: 672774.8 !FASTING 1985020 9 ; cREw — Roger Caulder
SYSTEM. NCSP NAD 83 (USft) I BORING LOCATION; Nw of site along ever T O.0 ELEV , 175,96
-._ --
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV _ j METHOD H.S. Augers 0 HOUR DTW; 10.5 TOTAL DEPTH 15.0
START DATE__ 9/2/10 FINISH DATE_ 9/2/10 24 HOUR DTW: WELL DEPTH. 15-0
DEPTH BLOW COUNT OVA LA© o o SOIL AND ROCK WELL
45rn 6,in Gin Gin I (PPM) 5 0 DEPTH DESCRIPTION ELEVATION DETAIL
Ij 7.3
— 1 -- -- .. _ .... 1.— 10. .0 __.._ LAND SURFACE 172.7 - uq
N
3.0 _ __ (SP) - Brown fine SAND w/ organic debris,
Grades to very Fine-grained SAND to SILT
14 7 7 ( M SAND. Medium dense. Uniform. Moist, I I
5,0
f os 1662
(CL) - `Driller notes very hard CLAY layer r
I 6.5-8' BLS.
8.0
cif 60 Tsai
3 8 6 M
(SP) - Brown fine SAND. Uniform. Medium r o�
i
dense. Moist. oa
I o a
N V)
I
11.9- 161 7
T (HMR) - 'Driller notes very hard rock layer
7z" 10-11' BLS, possible mudstone w/ granitic 160.7
appearance �—
13.0
i ( I ( r (SP) -Br
won
fine SAND. Loose. Uniform.
2 3 2 Sat.
Boring Terminated at Elevation 157.7 It
t3entonite Pellets h-_.) 92 Medium Sand

CATLIN
WELL LOG 1Enyuwcrs and ycienYs is
71001',G
14� SHEET 1 OF _1_
PROJECT NO . 2,10036 STATE: NC COUNTY Chatham LOCATION. MOr1CUre
_ l - _ _-------- _____._ e -
PROJECT NAME: LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
Progress Energy Cape Fear --- ------ —� —
DRILLER John E Wood III Mw -4
NORTHING: G72664,4 �'EASTING�_ 1986489 6 CREW: w _RO�er Caulder
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 (l)Sft) BORING LOCATION: NE corner of site atong traintracks T.O.C. ELEV.: 180.74
.-- - -- — _ _�_ __
DRILL MACHINE CME 45B ATV METHOD H S Au ers o HOUR DTW: 17.1 TOTAL DEPTH 19.0
START DATE 7/28/10 FINISH DATE 7/28/10 24 HOUR DTW: l WELL DEPTH: 19.0
BLOW COUNT i OVA t 1 SOIL AND ROCK WELL
DEPTH (pp to ) . LABo l
1 DEPTH DESCRIPTIONELEVATION DETAIL
i
j 3.0
j 0.0 LAND SURFACE 177.7 ao
i
i
>'I
(CL) - Gray CLAY. Moderate plasticity.
l E�� Uniform (From cuttings)
4.0 --j . __ ____ — At 4' BLS, brown CLAY w/ some SILTY CLAY r
W/ low plasticity. Moist.
3 7 1 10 12 a M
i
i ! i
i
_ 1
7.0
7 5 — 170.2
I i -
9.0
I ,
W J.I
1 (SM) - Brown SILTY SAND w/ trace CLAY.
i_. —._...____ _._._... ___ . j Uniform. Low plasticity. Medium i, h
I I ' dense/medium stiff. Wet.
i -
o>
7 iia"
' 14.0 _ o
1a 3 1634
1 4 2 1 2 3 Sat.
-
I Y -
' 1 (SP) - Brown fine SAND. Uniform. Loose.
i Saturated.
I
L
r
19,0 _ —1587 19.0
Boring Terminated at Elevation 158.7 ft
I
j
Bentonite Pellets I_J #2 Medium Sand

c
P
WELL LOG
CATLIN
Engineers and Scientists
210036 cuar-T 1 nC
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: IC COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
DRILLER: John E. Wood III
NORTHING: 672664.4 1 EASTING: 1986489.6
BGTMW-4
CREW: Josh O'Connell
SYSTEM: NCSP NAD 83 (USft BORING LOCATION: Paired with BGMW-4 T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV !METHOD: H.S. Augers/ M.R,
o HOUR DTW: 22.3 TOTAL DEPTH: 50.0
START DATE: 11/16/10 FINISH DATE: 11/18/10
24 HOUR DTW: 16.9 WELL DEPTH: 48.0
DEPTH
i BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
°
n
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
sin sin sin ein
(PPM)
S
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
3.5
0.0 LAND SURFACE
o.o
(SP) - Dark brown fine SAND w/ organics.
Uniform. Medium dense. Moist.
i
30
-
4.0
-
--
3
7
10
12
M
_
i
Brown
(CL) - ow SANDY CLAY. Low plasticity.
9.0
Uniform. Med. stiff. Moist.
_
2
3
4
5
W
i
v
14.0
14.0
_
1
2
2
3
Sat,
(GW) - HARD WEATHERED ROCK.
16.0
>U
4
(CL) - Interlayered CLAY and ROCK
Q
-
18.0
fi
(GW) - HARD WEATHERED ROCK
(V
19.0
-
�._
1 s o
6
5
5
6
W
(SP) - Brown very fine SAND to SILTY SAND.
Unifrom. Medium dense.
23.0
2s.o
1
'
(SW) - Brown fine SAND w/ GRAVELS and
12
23
50/
i
Wi
24.0 some CLAY.
24.0
- -
2' 1
1
MBentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets Lj#2 Medium Sand

WE L L � � z,wss � C�1TLIN
Engineers and scientists
SHEET 2 OF 2
_ V:'-rirafon t:C
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC^ COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
DRILLER: John E. Wood III BGTMW-4
NORTHING: 672664.4 EASTING: 1986489.6 CREW: Josh O'Connell
SYSTEM' NC.qP man R3 ti i:;ftl Rnolrur•_ t nrnrtnni.r,_:__�...:.� r .. �r
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN METHOD: H.S. Augers/ M.R.
0 HOUR DTW: 22.3 TOTAL DEPTH: 50.0
START DATE: 11/16/10 FINISH DATE: 11/18/10
24 HOUR DTW: 16.9 WELL DEPTH: 48.0
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
M
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
sin sin sin sin
(PPM)
S
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
(GW) - HARD WEATHERED ROCK, very
hard/dense. Appears to be a sandstone.
26.0
27 0 Thickly bedded. Large gravel -sized rocks
coming from auger cuttings. *Took —3hrs to
28.0
28 p drill from 26-36' BLS. (continued
(SW) - GRAVELLY SAND w/ fragmented /
27
60/
weathered rock.
(CL) - Gray SILTY CLAY. Low plasticity.
2'
TXX
Brittle. Stiff. Dry. Grading to a MUDSTONE.
x X
x x
x x
x x
(GW) - Very dense/hard layering, MUDSTONE.
x x
Drill rig could not easily penetrate (Tricone bit
x x
having difficulty). Auger cuttings reveal
x x
fragmented coarse grains, silty clay,trace
x x
quartz/crystalline grains. Softer layer 33-34'
xx
BLS, possibly fracture or sand vein.
x x
36,0
x x
X x
x x
x x
38.0
(GC) - Soft layer of fragmented rock
1x42,0
(MUDSTONE) and SILTY CLAY. Some very
fine to coarse grained SAND. Bit more easily
penetrated through this layer than above layer.
43.0
r
(CL) -Gray SILTY CLAY. Verydense. Brittle.
L
60/.__
'
__
M
Low plasticity. Moist. Mudstone appearance.
�U
2'
450
x x
x x
x x
_
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x
(GW) - S.A.A. 31-38' BLS. While drilling, mud
x
in boring dropped to 16.5' BLS, possibly into
48.0x
x
cavity from 38-42' BLS,
48.0
48,0
60/
__
x x
x x
1'
_
M
x x
x x
x x
50.0
-- - -
Boring Terminated at Depth 50.0 ft
---
y
Bentonite Grout nBentonite Pellets LJ #2 Medium Sand

� �•A'I'LII�
WELL LOG
Engineers and Scientists
Zvlitryon,Nc SHEET 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO.: 210036 ( STATE: NC I COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
DRILLER: William J. Miller
CMiN-5
NORTHING: EASTING:
CREW: Josh O'Connell
SYSTEM: I
BORING LOCATION: Along Road near Substation T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV
METHOD: H.S. Augers
0 HOUR DTW: 15.0 TOTAL DEPTH: 21.0
START DATE: 11/19/10
FINISH DATE: 11/19110
24 HOUR DTW: NM WELL DEPTH: 20,0
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
M
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
bin sin sin sin
(PPM)
s
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
3.5
0.0 LAND SURFACE
0.0
(SC) - Brown fine SAND to CLAYEY SAND.
Some SANDY CLAY. Medium dense.
Uniform. Moist.
3.0
3.0
c
__
6
11
16
19
M
(ML) - Brown CLAYEY SILT to SILTY CLAY.
Low plasticity. Stiff. Uniform. Moist.
5.0
8.0
9.0
3
5
6
6
E
M
(SM/ML) - Brown very fine SAND to SILT w/
trace CLAYEY SILT. Uniform. Medium stiff.
10.0
Moist.
}
11.0
r
14.0
4 0
2
3
3
4
W f
(SP) •Brown very fine SAND to SILTY SANK
s
Uniform. Wet @ 15' BLS.
�0
- .-
<V
1
(GW) - Very hard rock.
17.5
"
19.0
—
19.0
8
7
6
5
Sat.
(SP) - Brown fine SAND w/ trace SILTSTONE
20.0
20.0
fragments. Loose. Saturated.
_
z1.o
Boring Terminated at Depth 21.0 ft
Bentonite Pellets 0#2 Medium Sana

WELL
LOG
— �-� �.,ATLenIV
_
Engineers and Scientists
w drtdngmn, WG
aming SHEET 1 OF 1
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear
_
LOGGED BY: Rick Garrett WELL ID:
DRILLER: William J. Miller
CMW-i
NORTHING; FASTING:
CREW: Roger Caulder
SYSTEM: BORING LOCATION: S. of'78 Ash Pond nested w/ CTMW-7 T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN METHOD; H.S. Augers 0 HOUR DTW: 17.0 TOTAL DEPTH: 26,0
START DATE: 12/1/10 FINISH DATE: 12/1/10 24 HOUR DTW: 17.9 WELL DEPTH: 26.5
DEPTH
BLOW
s:n
sin
COUNT
Gin
sin
OVA
I (PPM)
LAB
to
s
o
G
SOIL AND ROCK
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
WELL
DETAIL
5.5
I
0.0 LAND SURFACE
0.0
4.0
(SP) - Brown -orange SAND w/ SILT, very
-
3
6
6
5
D
fine-grained. Firm. Moderately well -sorted.
� o Dry.
aU'
q
V
L
U
_
9.0
I
`°
N
~
Lstaining./D
4
7
9
6
D
and CLAYS Reddish -brown iron ry
11.0 fine grained. Firm. Dry,
15.0
14.014.0
i
(CL) - CLAY w/ SAND and SILT.
5 r
9
12
14
I
D
Reddish -orange and tan mottled. Low to
j�
1500medium plasticity. Firm. Dry.
-
i
19.0
1
2
3
4
4
W
(CL) - Tan and gray SILTY CLAY. Low
plasticity. Soft. Wet.
210
qj
oa
o�
N�
iV N
24.0
24.0
--
—
(SP) - Brown and orange medium to coarse
4
6
6
5
W
grained SAND w/ some SILT. Poorly sorted.
ae Subangular. Friable, Wet.
Boring Terminated at Depth 26.0 ft
26.5 26.5
Bentonite Pellets CJ #2 Medium Sand

WELL LOQ ----�'" �:A�TLIN
Engineers and Scientist
210 o SHEET 1 OF 3
Wi;mingian, NC
PROJECT NO--� 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION; Moncure
PROJECT NAME: _ _ LOGGED BY: Rick Garrett WELL ID: ^
Progress Energy Cape Fear DRILLER: William J. Miller
NORTHING: EASTfNG: _ CTMW-'7
I CREW: Roger Caulder
SYSTEM:
q
RING LOCATION: S. of'78 Ash Pond nested w/ CMW-7 T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATTHOD: H.S. Au ers/ M.R. 0HOUR DTW: 35.0 TOTALDEPTH: 50.Q
START DATE: E12/2/10ISH DATE: 12/3/10 :4:,
4 HOUR DTw: 35,0 WELL DEPTH: 48.0
DEPTH BLOW COUNT OVA LAB o o SOIL AND ROCK WELL
sin _Vin sin (ppm) s G DEPTH DESCRIPTION DETAIL
3,5
D.0 LAND SURFACE____ I J 0.0
SEI
W
(SP) - Brown and orange SAND w/ SILT. Very
D fine grained. Firm. Moderately well sorted.
Dry.
s.o
N (SM/C L) - Brown and orange SILT w/ very fine
D grained SAND and CLAY. Reddish -brown iron
staining. Firm. Dry.
14.0 1 1 14,0
v
(CL) - CLAY w/ SAND and SILT. Reddish
D orange and tan mottled. Low to medium 4
plasticity. Firm. Dry.
19.0
W(�// (CL) - Tan and gray SILTY CLAY. Low
VA plasticity. Soft. Wet.
Bentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets 11#2 Medium Sand

WELL
LUU CATLrN
Engineers and Scientists
z,�ss 36
t"1Aminylun, NC SHEET 2 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC7 COUNTY: Chatham LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Rick Garrett WELL ID:
DRILLER; William J. Miller
CTMW-%
NORTHING: EASTING:
CREW: Roger Caulder
SYSTEM: BORING LOCATION: S. of'78 Ash Pond nested w! CMW-7 T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN METHOD: H.S. Au ers/ M.R. o HOUR DTW: 35.0 1 TOTAL DEPTH: 50.0
START DATE: 12/2/10 FINISH DATE_ : 12/3/10 124HOUROTW. 35.0 WELL DEPTH: 48.0
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB.
°
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
Gin sin sin sin
(PPM)
S
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
24.0
24.0
(SP) - Brown and orange medium to coarse
W
SAND w/ some SILT. Poorly sorted.
25.0
Subangular. Friable. Wet.
i
260
28.028.0
x x
W
X x
X X
X X
X X
(GW) - SHALE/SILTSTONE. Purple/dark gray.
Highly weathered. Firm. Alternating bends of
fissility.
29.0
X x
(partial recovery)
30-0
33.0X
33:0
X
63/
X X
x x
33.5
25
2,
--
--
D
X X
XX
(GW) - S.A.A. w/ greasy talc -like texture. Dry.
X X
X X
35 0
38.0
--
_
i
3a.0
3s.o
x X
_
73�
XX
X X
(GW) - S.A.A. Medium green, dark gray, purple
15
32
--
D
x X
and brown stain. Less fissilie. Highly
X X
weathered. Dry.
X x
40.0
07
43.0
43.0
OQ -
XX
50
2�/
- I
D
X X
x
x x x
X X
X X
(GW) - S.A.A. Reddish -brown color.
V L
Bentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets D#2 Medium Sand

M Bentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets Ej#2 Medium Sand
WELL
LOG
'���'' CATLIN
0036 Engineers and Scientists
t�Ai on, NC SHEET 3 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE:NC COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape dear LOGGED BY: Rick Garrett WELL ID:
DRILLER: William J. Miller I
CTMI�!-i
NORTHING: FASTING; CREW: Roger Caulder
_
SYSTEM: BORING LOCATION: S. of'78 Ash Pond nested w/ CMW-7 T.O.C. ELEV,:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B ATV METHOD: H.S. Augers/ M.R.
0 HOUR DTW: 35.0 TOTAL DEPTH: 50.0
START DATE: 12/2/10 FINISH DATE: 12/3/10
24 HOUR DTW: 35.0 WELL DEPTH: 48.0_
DEPTH
BLOW
COUNT
OVA
LAB
M
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
sin sin
sin
sin
(PPm)
s
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
48.0
48.0
48.0 48.0
x x
x x
65/
` 2'
-
--
D
x x
x x
x x
(GW) - S.A.A. Thin lens w/ higher fissility,
_
x x
x x
500
I
ii
Boring Terminated at Depth 50.0 ft
M Bentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets Ej#2 Medium Sand

WELL
LOG
�T�.I�
Engineers and Scientists
_
N,,��_. SHEET 1 OF 1
u nuc
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC I COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: progress Energy Cape Fear LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
DRILLER: William J. Miller
CMW-8
NORTHING: LEASTING: CREW: Roger Caulder
SYSTEM: BORING LOCATION: Aton river W. of '63/'70 Ash Pond T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN METHOD: H.S. Augers
0 HOUR DTW: 6.5 TOTAL DEPTH: 16.0
START DATE: 11/30/1 O FINISH DATE: 11/30/10
24 HOUR DTW: 7.6 WELL DEPTH: 15.0
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
o
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
sin sin bin sin
(Ppm)
s
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
3.5
0.0 LAND SURFACE
o.o
a
P
�
(SP/SC) - Brown fine SAND w/ SANDY CLAY.
U
N
Organic debris. Moist.
3.0
4.0
4 0
(SP/SC) - Brown fine SAND w/ trace CLAY
1
1
1
1
W
grading to SANDY to SILTY CLAY, Soft.
5'0
i
Loose. Wet @5.5' BLS.
u.o
i
1
9.0
W
O
H
-
Sat.
(SC/CL) - Gray SANDY to SILTY CLAY.
v
Uniform. Soft. Moderate plasticity. Saturated.
CJ V
14.0
-
is o
(SM/CL) - Brown and gray CLAYEY SILT to
O
2
2
6
Sat.
SILTY CLAY. Medium stiff. Uniform.
�s.o
15.0
Saturated.
_
i
16.0
I
Boring Terminated at Depth 16.0 ft
Bentonite Pellets #2 Medium Sand

C
® Bentonite Gaut Bentonite Pellets 0 ✓k2 Medium Sand
�'ATLIN
WELL LOU
Engineers and Scientist
036
210031
l:C SHEET 1 OF 3
~
W,LOCATION:
_ _hninr�lon,
PROJECT No.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham
Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
DRILLER: John E. Wood III
CTMW-8
NORTHING: EASTING:
CREW: Josh O'Connell
_
SYSTEM: BORING LOCATION:Alon river K of'63/70 Ash Pond TAC. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: C_ME 45B ATV METHOD: H.S. Augers/ M.R_.
0 HOUR DTW: 16.5 TOTAL DEPTH: 50.5
START DATE: 11/23/10 FINISH DATE: 11/30/10 F
24 HOUR DTW: 16.5 WELL DEPTH: 48.5
BLOW COUNT
OVA
f o
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
DEPTH
OFin sin sin
iPPm)
LAB
s
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
3,5
I
0.0 LAND SURFACE
0.0
:'X
(SP) - Dark brown fine SAND. Uniform.
Organic debris. Moist.
3.0
4.0
4.0
—
2
2
1
Sat.
(SP/SM) - S.A.A. w/ some SILTY to CLAYEY
SAND. Saturated at 5' BLS.
i
9.0
W
O
H
I
Sat.
(CL) - Brown SILTY CLAY. Moderate plasticity.
Soft. Saturated.
�—
tos
Q
i
14.0
14.0
c
W
0
H
Sat.
(SP/SC) - Gray fine SAND to CLAYEY SAND.
Loose. Uniform. Saturated.
I
:J
i
4
G
t
19.0
190
N
N
2
2
12
Sat.
(ML) - Gray SILTY, Loose/soft, Uniform.
Saturated. Hard rock at base of sample.
20.5
�t
(HWR) - Dark gray MUDSTONE. Very hard
rock, Thickly bedded. Consolidated, Uniform.
® Bentonite Gaut Bentonite Pellets 0 ✓k2 Medium Sand

Bentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets El #2 Medium Sand
LOG
_WELL
Engineers and Scientists
J X100 6 NQ SHEET 2 OF 3
PROJECT NO.: 210036 STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
DRILLER: John E. Wood Ill
CTMW-8
NORTHING: EASTING: CREW: Josh O'Connell
SYSTEM:
BORING LOCATION:Alon river W. of'63/70 Ash Pond T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE: CME 45B AN
METHOD: H.S. Au ers/ M. R.
o HOUR DTW: 16.5 TOTAL DEPTH: 50,5
START DATE: 11/23/10
FINISH DATE: 11/30/10
24 HOUR DTW: 16.5 WELL DEPTH: 48.5
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB.
M
0
a
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
sin 6in sin sin
(PPM)
S
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
I
(HWR) - Dark gray MUDSTONE. Very hard
zz,o
1 rock. Thickly bedded. Consolidated. Uniform.
(continued)
23.5
71
(CL) - Gray CLAY w/ MUDSTONE-like grains.
24.0
24.0
18
33
51
M
Very consolidated clay. Low plastcity. Very
r
stiff. Moist.
I
2.5 5
i
29.0
290
- -
29.5 (CL) - S.A.A.
x x
x x
xx
x x
xx
30
40
42
M
x x
x x
x x
x x
xx
x x
(CL) - Dark gray MUDSTONE interlayered w/
x x
CLAY and SILT. Very stiff. Friable. Moderate
x x
xx
plasticity. Saturated.
34.0
x x
x x
x x
-100y
2
-
-
SatIxx
x x
x x
x
x
xx
x x
x x
36 C
36.5
i
38.5
39.0
39.0
52�
x x
(CL) - Gray CLAY w/ moderate plasticity. Very
44
--
M
x x
stiff. Trace stone fragments. Easily broken,
x x
405 Shaleymudstone, Friable. Moist.
O :J
na
.
-
4v
44.0 --
aa0
N
N
M
x x
x x
(CL) - S.A.A.
100
Bentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets El #2 Medium Sand

WELL
LOG
CATLIN
PROJECT NO.: 210036 I
Engineers and Scientists
210036
�Tan. NO, SHEET 3 OF 3 _
STATE: NC COUNTY: Chatham
LOCATION: Moncure
PROJECT NAME: Progress Energy Cape Fear
LOGGED BY: Justin Heter WELL ID:
_
DRILLER: John E. Wood Ili
NORTHING: EASTING:
�.r��s$
CREW: Josh O'Connell
SYSTEM: BORING LOCATION: Along river W. of'63P70 Ash Pond T.O.C. ELEV.:
DRILL MACHINE; CME 45B AN METHOD: H.S, Augers/ M.R.
0 HOUR DTW: 16.5 TOTAL DEPTH: 50.5
START DATE: 11/23/10 FINISH DATE: 11/30/10
24 HOUR DTW: 16.5 WELL DEPTH: 48.5
DEPTH
BLOW COUNT
OVA
LAB
o
o
SOIL AND ROCK
WELL
sin sin sin sin
(PPM)
s
G
DEPTH DESCRIPTION
DETAIL
-
-
M
7—x
x x
(continued)
45.5
48.548.5
49.0
�a.o
100
__
W
x x
x x (CL)
- Gray SHALEY MUDSTONE w/ SILTY
2
x x
CLAY. Very stiff. Friable. Wet. Low plasticity.
x x
50.5
l
I
Boring Terminated at Depth 50.5 ft
-
MBentonite Grout Bentonite Pellets L-1#2 Medium Sand

d• '�� STAI£y
J;�� NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department ol' I'atvironment and Natural Resoltrcos - Division of Water Otiality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III _
�Woli Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Wail Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmintg onNorth Carolina__ 2,8405
T
city or rown Slate Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicablecMW-1
3. WELL USE (Check One Box): Monitoring 9) Municipal/Public ❑
Industrial/Commercial ❑ AgncURural ❑ Recovery ❑ injection ❑
Irrigation I] Other ❑ (list use).
DATE DRILLED: August 24, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
�MJ (�iwet alne, um Ors, Community, ubdivis oon, Lot no arcel, ip Cerle)
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge El Other:
LATITUDE: _35.56285 DD
LONGITUDE: ___. 79.05000 DD
Latitude/longitude source: ® GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to Mrs form it not using a GPS.)
5. FACILITY (Name of iho busness where the wok is located.)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant _ N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State zip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 15
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO 21
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing:8.7 __ FT.
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING I8_3., FT. Above Land Surface'
fop or casing terminated allor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118,
o. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: N/A
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
Top _
Bottom
Top . Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter eight Material
Top 0
Bottom __
5
Ft. .-
2 in. Sch. 40 PVC
Top
Bottom
_
Top
Bottom
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
Top _
Bottom ___
FL
Top 1
Bottom _
3.5
Ft.
_
Top __
Bottom
Ft.
_
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter
Slot Size Material
Top 5
Bottom _
15
Ft._
2 in. Slot .010 in. ___„ PVC
Top
Bottom
Top _
Bottom
—Ft.
_in, in. _
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size Material
Top 3.5
Bottom _
15
Ft.
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top _
Bottom
Ft.
^_
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
i
—_
----SEE.--
A T TA C H E D-
12. REMARKS; _
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
`,)o
in
NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR (TATE
E. Wood, III _
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2109

NUN RI;SIDF.N7711 L WE1A, C0Ns•riwCT10N REC011D
Nrlrih t'arolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division ut Water (duality
WELL CON11ZAC OR CERTIFICATION 9: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III
Well Contractor tlndrvldual) Noma
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
IJr'I Cdntraclor Company N erne
220 Old Dairy Road
.`Street Address
VVilmm ton North Carolina 2_6405
!aty or lawn ,!ate 6pcode "--
( 910) 452-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT it: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if apphcabiCa TMW-1
3. WELL USE (Check One Box)- Mdmtonng X Muria{ al7Puolic ❑
II'��
IrtduslrfalM,ommeraal ElAgncultural u Recovery Uj rn)ecficn (_1
Imgabon ❑ Other L-1 ibsl use)
DATE DRILLED: A_ Ujt ust 26, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
r treat Name. Numbers. �ummurnty, Suodrosrun. L01 N—o , �rea1, �Ip ,Oco
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE. 35.58285 DD
LONGITUDE: __29-105000 05000 DD
Latitude/longitude source: X GPS ❑ TODD. map
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map arid
aftached to this form d not using a GPS.)
S. FACILITY (Name of ire business where mo wea a located)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant _ N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address v
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh _ NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6• WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 53
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: _7.06 _ FT
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing}
d. TOP OF CASING IS? FT Above Land Surface`
Top of casing terminated avor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 16A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type NIA Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top T� Bottom w Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
'Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight
Material
Top 0
Bottom
38
Ft.
-_.2 in. Sch.40
1 PVC
fop
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Ftin.
8, GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top . 0
Bottom
19
Ft.Portland
Cement
Tremie
Top 19
Bottom
_35
Ft.
_Bent_ Pellets Surface Pour
fop —
Bottom
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size
Material
Top - 38.—
Bottom
53
Ft.
—2 in. Slot .010 in.
PVC
Top
Bottom
--Ft.—in.
Ft.
in. in.
Top ^A
Bottom
—Ft.—Vin.
__-__in.
10, SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top _35
Bottom
53
Ft.
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
_
Top -
Bottom
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
--
!
-ATTACHED
12. REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL'NAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
0:42 r
Si NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
John E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No, [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

�•'�';.a SfArF�y .
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONST[t WTION RECORD
North Carolina Department ol'Environnlent and Natural Resources - [Avision of Water i)uality
Wb'[.L CON'I'RAC'I'Ott CN',12'I'IFIC,t'I'ION #: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III
Vvell Con{ractor Indw dual; :tiar.ta
CATLIN En ineers and Scientists
INell ;)untractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy_ Road _
Street Address -_—_-- - -
„Wilmington_ North Carolina 28405
Cay or Town State Lip Code
( 910 ) - 452-5861
Area code • Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (d applicabldCMW-2
3. WELL USE (Check One Box): Mondonng DO Munlclpal/Public ❑
IndustnaVCommercml ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use):
DATE DRILLED: August 30 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
- --- �... -- —n:
r,Slrzel Name. umbers, Lem n,mdy.Subdlwson.Lcl , u ,areal, Zip vn. 6j
CITY Moncure COUNTY Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (chock appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley L%Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35.594925 DD
LONGITUDE:._._ 79.051459 DD
Latitude/longitude source: 91 GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS.}
5. FACILITY (Narne of the business where the well is located)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
-500 CPBL_Road_
Street Address _
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
41_0 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh — NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 14
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NO
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing:.. 1 1.4 _ FT.
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
/
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
:ATTAC H E D--_ _-.
i DO HEREBY CER'T'IFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED 10 THE WELL OWNER
i 1 ,
1 t .
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
John E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09
2..,6 C>
d• TOP OF CASING
FT Above Land Surface'
' fop of casing tonninated allot
below
land surface. may reyutro
a vanence in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.01 18.
e. YIELD (gpm): NIA
METHOD OF TEST: NIA
t. DISINFECTION: Type
NIA
Amount: NIA'
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top. Bottom
Top , Bottom
Top Bottom
Top Bottom
'Top Bottom
Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight Material
Top 0. Bottom .
4 Ft.
2 in. Sch. 40 PVC
Top —� Bottom
Top Bottom
Ft.in.
8, GROUT: Depth
Material Method
Top _-- Bottom
Ft.
Top 1_ Bottom
3 Ft._
Top Bottom
Ft.
�-
9. SCREEN: Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 4 Bottom
14 Ft.
2 in. Slot .010 in. PVC
—In.
Top Bottom
Ft..
Top Bottom
Ft._
,_.__In. in.
10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size Material
Top 3 - Bottom _
14 Ft,
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top Bottom
Ft.
Top Bottom
FL
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
/
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
:ATTAC H E D--_ _-.
i DO HEREBY CER'T'IFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED 10 THE WELL OWNER
i 1 ,
1 t .
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
John E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

r,,• l/;It r�
NON RESIDENTIAL WEUcc)Ns'rriucrloN RECORD
North (';1n11ina Dcparunent ui't'.nvuvnnlent and Natural Resources - Division of Willer duality
n; 1Vft;1.L CON'!'1tAC'1'OIt (:Ir:lt'r'IFICrt'('1ON is 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III
Nall f ontractor 0nd vi(jual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
eel Address ^---
Wilmingtton North Carolina 28405
Uy or sown State /zp Code
( 910 ) - 452-5861
area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicabIC; TMVV-2
3. WELL USE (Check One Box)' rdonrtwing ® Municipal/Public ❑
Indusinal/commercial U Agficullural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use): _
DATE DRILLED: September 1_201 0
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
(�UeeTNamo. Num ars: emery Zu'utlivcsiOn, Lul'iJ0`r a�f-Zip �o o� `
CITY Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley (Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE_ —_ _ 35.594925 DD
LONGITUDE: _ 79.051459 DD
Latitude/longitude source ® GPS ❑ Topo. map
!Location of tvell.musr be shown ort a USES lope rnap and
attached to This form ;f not using a GPS)
5. FACILITY iNamo Df the usniess whore ole y,11;5 IOcip o T
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
MoncureNC 27_559
City or Town — State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address —
Raleigh _ NC 27.601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS;
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 53
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 0.0 FT
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
Z.w7
d, TOP OF CASING IS_: FT Above Land• Surface'
fop of rasing lermmated atior below land surface may require
a vara tic in ace Ord a nee •mth 16A NCAC 2C.0118.
o. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: N/A
I. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: N/A�
g. WATER ZONES (depth);
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom _ Top Bottom
Top Bottom -Top A Bottom
7. CASING: Thickness/
Depth Diameter Weight Material
Top 0 Bottom 42.5 Ft. 2 in. SCh. 40 PVC
Top Bottom Ft.- in.
Top — Bottom Ft. In. _
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top 0 Bottom W_21 Ft.Portland Cement Tremie
Top 21 Bottom 40 Ft, v_Bent. Pellets SUrface Pour
Top Bottom
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 42.5 Bottom 52.5 Ft. 2 in, Slot .010 in. PVC
Top Bottom _ Ft. yin. in.
Top Bottom
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Top 40 Bottom 53 Ft. #2 Medium_ Torpedo Sand
Top Bottom Ft. ~
Top Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
-- -ATTACHED:
12, REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITFI
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
t}QiJ
SI�NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
John E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Cantor, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev 2/09

NON �\E.S'IDF�NTIA 1, 1, CO N5'rRt_!c' rl()N RI;( c)Ru
`\birth Carolina Dt:p;ulnlcnl t)f Flivirtmnient and Nsuural Resources - I)ivisioll ui 1V:ncr Omtliiv
^: NVELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2799
I. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III _-
Wall Contractor (Indivlduaq Name—
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists_
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
street Address
__Wilmincgton North Carolina 28405
.. �._ --- __- _- -...___----------
City or rown Slate !q) Code
( 910 ) - 452-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicablCMW-3
3- WELL USE (Check One Box): Monitoring ® h1un,c,pat/ElPublic
Industrial/Commercial LJ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use)' _.__...
DATE DRILLED: September 2, 2010
4, WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
iS`trea! Namt:, r umoors-Gammu.ndy: Suodrorsrcn. Lel ho. Parrei. 24,
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
(Slope ❑Valley NFlat []Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35.598991 DD
LONGITUDE: -.__._ 79.050386 DD
Latitude/longitude source: N GPS ❑ Topo. Trap
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS.)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located,)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name _
—41 -0 -South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Lip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 15
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO 91
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 10.5 5FT.
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing
3, z4.
d. TOP OF CASING 13__ _3 FT Above Land Surface'
Fop of caaing terminated auor below land surface may require
a variance In accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
o. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: N/A
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom Top _ Bottom
FOP _ Bottom Top Bottom _
Top _ Bottom _ Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter
Weight
Material
Top 0
Bottom 5Ft
i
2 in.
Sch. 40
� _
PVC
�----i
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in,
Top -
Bottom
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top
Bottom _._
Ft._.�-_--
Top _- 1
Bottom 3
Ft.
Top —
Bottom _- —Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter
Slot Size
Material
Top _ 5
Bottom 15
Ft.,
2 in.
Slot 010 in.
PVC
Top
Bottom
Top _ _
Bottom
10, SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 3
Bottom 15
-Ft.
#2 Medium
Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom ___Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
/
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
SEE
ATTACHED
I DO HERE6Y CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
vhco�)
NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
n E. Wood, III _
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONS -T RUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2109

•':, ulnif','�5
NUN LSIDCNTIAL WELL, CONS•rRUC'1'ION RE('OR1)
North r'arnlina Department of Environment and Natural Ilesnurces - Division of Water Otiality
N '1,1, CON'I'Rik("l'OR CEIZ'I'IFICA'I'ION #: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, til
"del; Contractor tr"(!iwdJal) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
:^Jell Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
;;trent Address
Wilminston _ North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #7 N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if ap J9MW-4
3. WELL USE (Check One Box): fAonitonng N PAuniclpal/Public ❑
inclustnaliConvnerclal [] Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation L] Other ❑ Qlst use)'
DATE DRILLED: July 28, 2010
4, WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road 27559
{ Iraal-amo, tdumbors• ommundy_ Subdivision. of No, Parcel, Zip �)
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
alope ❑Valley ®Fiat F1 Ridge ❑Other
tATITUDE: 35.598101 DD
LONGITUDE: __ __._..__7-9.045451 DD
Latitude/longitude source GPS ❑ ropo. map
(Location of well must be shown on a JSGS topo map and
attached to Ibis form if not using a GPS. j
5. FACILITY tNarne of Ina business wnere the ,soli is located)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant _ N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road _
Street Address
Moncure _ NC_ 275_59
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street _
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
j9l 9)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 19
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 1707 FT
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
3.0`t
d. TOP OF CASING IS—�7-_FT Above Land Surface
' Top of casmy terminated aLror Lwow land surface may require
J variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
o. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST: NIA
I. DISINFECTION: Typo NIA Amount: NIA
g, WATER ZONES (depth):
Top
Bottom
_
Top
Bottom
Top _
Bottom
Top
Bottom _
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
T. CASING:
TWeighs/
Depth
Diameter
Weight Material
Top 0
Bottom
9
—Ft,—In,
Ft,
2 in.
Sch.40 PVC
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top ,T_-_.._.._
Bottom
Top __2__
Bottom
7
Top
Bottom
Ft.
_
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter
Slot Size Material
Top 9
Bottom
19
Ft.
2 in.
Slot .010 in. PVC
Top _--
Bottom
Ft.
.—in.
__in. M�
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
in, _
10, SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 7
Bottom
19
Ft.
#2 Medium
Torpedo Sand
- -_
l op
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
i
12. REMARKS:
-----5 E E -
_ATTACHED
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUC I ED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF This
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
NO Y -to
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR PATE -
John E. Wood, Ill
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality • Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

��y�SfA]F.r
,5 �! .NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2799
Uri
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) BGTMW-4
3. WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring N MunicipaVPuhlic❑
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Iniection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use): _
DATE DRILLED:NOVember 18, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
treetTIame,Numba;s ommunty, u division Lot No, arcel,tpCode)
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35.598101 DD
LONGITUDE: 79.045451 DD
Latitude/longitude source: N GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location of well must be shown, on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS.)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is locative)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address ^
Raleigh__ NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a, TOTAL DEPTH: 48
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
C. WATER LEVEL BQlow Top of Casing, 20.4 FT.
(Use "+" If Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING is 3.50 FT. Above Land Surface'
Top of casing terminated atior below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: NIA
f. DISINFECTION: Type NIA Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight
Material
Top _`0
Bottom
38
Ft.
2 in. Sch.40
PVC
Top 0
Bottom
26
Ft.
4 in. Sch.40
Top
Bottom
Ft,
in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 24
Bottom
36
Ft.
Bent. Pellets Surface Pour
Top
Bottom _
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size
Material
Top 38
Bottom
48
Ft.
2 in. Slot .010 in.
PVC_
Top
Bottom _
-Ft.-
-in, in.
_
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 36
Bottom _48
Ft.
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
^ `
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
/
/
/
I
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
__—SEE
ATTACHED
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
o,� I�-1.3- Jo
*qAtUREkE�RT IFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
Mhn E. Wood, Ill
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

' ON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
4 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2927
1. WELL CONTRACTOR,
William J. Miller
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452-5861
Area code • Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CMW-5
3. WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring ® Municipai/Public❑
IndustrialtCornmercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use):
DATE DRILLED: November 19, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
treet ams, Numbers, Community, Su`division, Lot No.. Parcel" lip o e)
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: _._ 35.592378 DD
LONGITUDE: -79.040033 DD
Latitude/longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo, map
(Location of well must he shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS.)
5. FACILITY (Name or the business where the well is located)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name ~
410 South Wilmington Street _
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 20
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing! 18.5 FT.
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING 15 3.50 FT, Above Land Surface`
' Top of casing terminated atlor below land surface may require
a variance In accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f, DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
7. CASING:
TI1Weighs/
Depth
Diameter
Weight Material
Top 0
Bottom
10
_Ft.
2 in.
Sch.40 PVC
Top
Bottom
-Ft.—in,
Top
Bottom
_1711—in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top _______
Bottom
Ft-�
Top 1
Bottom
8
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter
Slot Size Material
Top 10
Bottom
20
Ft.
2 in.
Slot .010 in, __ PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in,
in.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 8
Bottom
20
FL
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
4
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
12, REMARKS:
Formation Description
—SEE
-ATTACHED.
I DO HEREBY CERI IFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF'rius
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
SIGNATUREJalf-CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
William J. Miller
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1 b
Rev. 2/09

mss*' ;w srArF•
%�% p�
.•-r l � ON RESID'ENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
.G WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
John E. Wood, III
Weli Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
vVell Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910) - 452-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CMW-6
3. WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring® Municipal{Public❑
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recover/0 Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use): T
DATE DRILLED: November 22 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
1reet Name, Numbers, Community, Subdwi5ion. Lot No., P8rcel. 4,p ,ode
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑ Valley X Flat ❑ Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35-58634 DD
LONGITUDE: -79.037447 DD
Latitude/longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo map
(Location of -well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS)
5. FACILITY ;Name of the ousiness where the well is Iccatdd )
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 2755_9
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
_Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
L2121- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 14
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO LK
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing, 9 FT,
(Use '•+" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING 13.3.50 FT. Above Land Surface'
Top of casing terminated altar below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: N/A
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight
Material
Top .__ 0
Bottom 4
Ft.
2 in. Sch.40
PVC
: Top
Bottom
Ft.
--in.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 0.5
Bottom 2
Ft.
Top -
Bottom -Ft,--
t._9.
9.SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter
Slot Size
Material
Top 4
Bottom 14
Ft.
2 in. Slot .010 in.
PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
in. in.
Top
Bottom i_Ft.
in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 2
Bottom 14
Ft.
#2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
/ --
/
:12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
_SEE!_
-ATTACHED
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
• 15A NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO'rHF. WELL OWNER.
S NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
ohn E. Wood, III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1 b
Rev. 2/09

a 5r,
N®N ESMDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
WELI. CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION 4: 2927
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
William J. Miller
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code T
(910)-2
45-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CMW-7
3, WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring ® Municioai/Public❑
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural O Recovery O Injection O
Irrigation O Other O (list use):
DATE DRILLED: December 1. 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
beet, ane, unbars, ommunity, ub nasion, o o., Parcel, Lip ode)
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
OSlope ❑Valley ®Flat ORidge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35.587335 DD
LONGITUDE: -79.044238 DD
Latitude/longitude source: O GPS O Topo. map
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS topo man and
attached to this form if not using a GPS.)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well Is located.)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant _ N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
_Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 26.5
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 21.4 FT.
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING IS 3.50 FT. Above Land Surface`
Top of casing terminated 4t or below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): NNS METHOD OF TEST: NIA
C DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: N/A
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter Weight
Material
Top 0
Bottom
16.5 Ft. 2 in. Sch.40
PVC
Top
Bottom
-Ft.-in-
t.in.Top
Top
Bottom
Ft. in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material
Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 1
Bottom
13 Ft,
Top
Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size
Material
Top 16.5
Bottom
26.5 P. 2 in. Slot .010 in.
PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft. in. in.
Top
Bottom
Ft. in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size
Material
Top 13
Bottom
26.5 Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING
LOG
Top Bottom
Formation Description
/
SEE-
=ATTACHED
f
/
12, REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
NO
SIGNATURE -OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
William J. Miller
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617, Phone No, [phone] Form GW -1 b
Rev. 2/09

tSthi�o
r.I .NON ESTI) ENTI
i r � AL WELL T.,LL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2927
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
_ William J. Miller
Well Contractor (individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910) - 452-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CTMW-7
3. WELL USE(Cheek One Box): Monitoring ® Municipal/Public❑
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use):
DATE DRILLED: December 3, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
( !r3 Pet frame, Numbers, ,.nnimun�ty, uod rrisior., Lot N., Parcol, Zip Cocei
CITY: Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Vailey ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other;
LATITUDE: 35.587335 DD
LONGITUDE: -79.044238 DD
Latitude/longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS tomo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS-)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well +s located-)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code . Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 48
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
c. WATER LEVEL Bplow Top of Casin 38 5 FT.
(Use "+" If Above Top of Casing
d. TOP OF CASING IS 3.50 FT. Above Land Surface`
Top of casing terminated atlor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
s. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST:
f. DISINFECTION: Type JN/_A Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top
Bottom Top Bottom
Top
Bottom Top Bottom
Top
Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth Diameter ightMaterial
Top 0
Bottom 38 Ft. 2 in. SCh. 40 PVC
Top 0
Bottom 29 Ft. 4 in. Sch.40
Top
Bottom Ft. in.
8. GROUT:
Depth Material Method
Top
Bottom Ft.
Top 25
Bottom _33,5 Ft. Bent. Pellets Surface Pour
Top
Bottom Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Top . 38
Bottom 48 Ft._ 2 in. Slot .010 in. PVC
Top ^�
Bottom `Ft._ ,in. __in,
Top
Bottom Ft, in, in. _
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Top 33.5
Bottom 48 Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top
Bottom Ft,
Top __
Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING
LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
1
SEE
=ATTACHED
/
/
12. REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CERTII'Y THAT THIS WELL WAS CON TRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITti
15A NCAC 2C WELL
CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAI A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
SI�URE O
ERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
William J. Miller
PRINTED NAME
OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1 b
Rev. 2109

ON ESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality
WELL CON'T'RACTOR CERTII+ICATION #: 2927
1, WELL CONTRACTOR:
William J. Miller
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Dairy Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910 ) - 452-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CMW-8
3. WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring ® Municipal/Publico
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use):
DATE DRILLED: November 30, 2010
4, WELL LOCATION:
500 CP&L Road, 27559
(Street Name, Numbers, community, u melon, Lot No.. parcej,..? Cone
CITYMoncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley ®Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other:
LATITUDE: 35.588286 DD
LONGITUDE: -79.051394 DD
Latitude/longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using a GPS.)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the welt is located.)
Progress Energy Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Street Address
Moncure T NC 27559
City or Town State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Contact Name
410 South Wilmington Street
Mailing Address
Raleigh NC 27601
City or Town State Lip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a, TOTAL DEPTH: 1
d. TOP OF CASING IS 3.50 FT. Above Land Surface'
' Top of casing terminated atior below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): N/A METHOD OF TEST: NNNN/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount:
g. WATERZONES(depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
7. CASING: Thickness/
Depth Diameter Weight Material
Top 0 Bottom 5 Ft. 2 in, Sch.40 PVC
Top Bottom -Ft. in.
Top Bottom -Ft.-in.
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top Bottom Ft,
Top 1 Bottom 3 Ft.
Top Bottom FL
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 5 Bottom 15 Ft, 2 in. Slot .010 in. PVC
Top Bottom Ft.__ in. in.
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Top 3 Bottom 15 Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand
Top Bottom _Ft.
Top _` Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
_ SEE-
-ATTACHED-----
12.
TTACHE®12. REMARKS: -
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONS1 RUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO /Z - 13 s
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casings 11.1 FT. SIGNATU OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing— William J. Miller
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -ib
Rev. 2/09

AIIt s
NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
d North Carolina Department of rivironment and Natural Resources - Division of Nater Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION #: 2799
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
_John E. Wood, III
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Well Contractor Company Name
220 Old Daily Road
Street Address
Wilmington North Carolina 28405
City or Town State Zip Code
( 910) - 452-5861
Area code - Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT #: N/A
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT # (if applicable): N/A
SITE WELL ID # (if applicable) CTMW-8
3. WELL USE(Check One Box): Monitoring N MunicipaVPublic❑
IndustdaVCommercial❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation ❑ Other ❑ (list use). _
DATE DRILLED: November 30, 2010
4. WELL LOCATION:
500 1 Road, 27559
{. veet Name. n( mhers, omreunny. u drois�on, Lot No, Parcel, Zip-- Vie)
CITY. Moncure COUNTY: Chatham
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley NFlat ❑Ridge ❑Other:,
LATITUDE: 35,588286 DD
LONGITUDE: -79.051394 DD
Latitude/longitude source: ❑ GPS ❑ Topo. map
(Location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this foim if not using a GPS.)
5• FACILITY (Nama or the business where the well is located.)
Progress Energv Cape Fear Plant N/A
Facility Name
Facility ID # (if applicable)
500 CP&L Road
Top
Street Address
Top Bottom
_Moncure
NC 27559
City or Town
State Zip Code
Steve Cahoon
Thickness/
Contact Name
Depth
410 South Wilmington
Street
Mailing Address
38.5 Ft. 2 in. Sch. 40 PVC
Raleiqh
NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919)- 546-7457
Area code - Phone number
6, WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 48.5
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
c. WATER LEVEL 89 ow Top of Casing, 20 FT.
(Use "+^ I Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING IS 350 FT, Above Land Surface
' Top of casing terminated aVor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.0118,
e. YIELD (gpm): NIA METHOD OF TEST: N/A
f. DISINFECTION: Type N/A Amount: NIA
g. WATER ZONES(depth):
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
7. CASING:
Thickness/
Depth
Diameter eightMaterial
Top _ 0
Bottom
38.5 Ft. 2 in. Sch. 40 PVC
Top 0
Bottom
24 Ft. 4 in. Sch. 40
Top
Bottom
Ft, in.
8. GROUT:
Depth
Material Method
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top 22
Bottom
36.5 Ft. Bent. Pellets Surface Pour
Top
Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
Top _ 38.5
Bottom
48.5 Ft. 2 in. Slot .010 in. PVC
Top
Bottom
-Ft.--in, in.
Top
Bottom
Ft. in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size Material
Top 36.5
Bottom _
48.5 Ft. #2 Medium Torpedo Sand_
Top
Bottom
__FL
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING
LOG
Top Bottom
Formation Description
--SEE
ATTACHED
_
_
/
12. REMARKS:
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY I HAT THIS VIFLI, WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE %ATH
15A NCAC 2C, VVELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RFCORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
.U0'U-13-lo
7NATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
0thn E. Wood III
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Information Processing, Modified from
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617, Phone No. [phone] Form GW -1b
Rev. 2/09

APPENDIX B
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
PERMIT CONDITION A(G)
ATTACHMENT XX, VERSION 1.0
MARCH 30, 2011

A WAIr
1p"
OENK
North Carolina department of Environment and Datura Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Ewes Perdue %oleen H Sullins
governor
Director
March 30, 2011
Mr. -John Toepfer
Senior Environmental Technical Specialist
Progress Energy Service Company, LLC
410 South Wilmington Street
PEB 4
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Subject: Cape Fear Stearn Station
RECEIVED APR 04 20n
Revised Final Groundwater Monitoring Plans and Maps
Dear Mr. Toepfer;
Gee '"reeman
Secretary,
Attached is the revised final Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Cape Fear facility. This plan
will supersede the final Groundwater Monitoring Plan for Cape Fear dated 3/17/11. The map
attached with the 3117111 Groundwater Monitoring Plan can be used with this revised version as
has not changed.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Eric 'Smith at [phone] or me at (919)
715-6699.
Sincerely,
Debra J. Watts
Supervisor — Groundwater Protection Unit
Attachments
cc: APS Central Office Files w/ attachments
SWP — NPDES (Serge] Chernikov) w/ attachments
Raleigh Regional Office — APS
AOLJIFFR PROTECTION SECTIC3P;
testi Iola 3 S rr1�e Carte: Ral;?ign North uanxtna
Carol4 6D, One
�r+nn Lia ; 222t F v'1s 5.OSE� h,>.d 915 1b.604�'1::ustome.rG?tutCewi-r�;, S23.67a�, 1\ orl[]Cut7lhia
rra€ mei vtwtiv r -w ry .ar l!%� 11 ■�
` C Jit �"l Plrrl ry. _,.-.. Cr°f11gv+- _ j� �^i iI

A• (6) GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION AND SAMPLING
1. The permittee shall conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to determine
the compliance of this NPDES permitted facility with the current groundwater Standards
found under 15A NCAC 2L .0200
2• WELL CONSTRUCTION. Within 120 days of permit issuance, monitoring wells, as
{proposed on Attachment XX, shall be installed to monitor groundwater quality.
a. Monitoring wells shall be constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0108
(Standards of Construction for Wells Other than Water Supply) and any other
jurisdictional laws and regulations pertaining to well construction, The general
locations for all monitoring well's are indicated on Attachment.XX.
b. Within 30 days of completion of well construction, a completed Well
Construction Record (Form GW -1) must be submitted for each monitoring well
to Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section, 1636 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636.
C. The Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number [phone] shall approve
the location of new monitoring wells prior to installation. The regional office
shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to the construction of any monitoring
well and such notification to the Aquifer Protection Section's regional supervisor
shall be made from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 P.M. on Monday through Friday,
excluding State Holidays.
d. Within 60 days of completion of the monitoring wells, the Permittee shall
submit two original copies of a site map with a scale no greater than 1 -inch
equals .500 feet. At a minimum, the map shall include the following
information:
i. The location and identity of each monitoring well.
ii. The location of major components of the waste disposal system.
iii. The location of property boundaries within 500 feet of the disposal
areas.
iv. The latitude and longitude of the established horizontaf control
monument.
V. The elevation of the top of the well casing (i.e., measuring point)
relative to a common datum.
vi. The depth of water below the measuring point at the time the
measuring point is established.
vii. The location of compliance and review boundaries.
viii, The date the map is prepared and/or revised.
ix. Topographic contours in no more than ten (10) foot intervals
e. The above information should be overlaid on the most recent aerial photograph
taken of the site. Control monuments shall be installed in such a manner and
made of such materials that the monument will not be destroyed due to
activities taking place on the property. The map and any supporting
documentation shall be sent to the Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection
Section, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636.
f. The well(s) must be constructed by a North Carolina Certified Well Contractor,
the property owner, or the property lessee according to General Statutes 87-
98.4. If the construction is not performed by a certified well contractor, the
property owner or lessee, provided they are a natural person, must physically
perform the actual well construction activities.
NCO003433 — Cape Fear Steam Station
Groundwater Monitoring Flan Pale ] of 4
3/29/11

g. The monitoring wells shall be regularly maintained. Such maintenance shall
include ensuring that the well caps are rust -free and locked at all times, the
outer casing is upright and undamaged, and the well does not serve as a conduit
for contamination,
3. GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND COMPLIANCE. Monitoring welts shall be sampled after
construction and thereafter at the frequencies and for the parameters as specifies{ in
Attachment XX. All maps, well construction forms, well abandonment forms and
monitoring data shall refer to the permit number and the well nomenclature as
provided on Attachment XX.
a. Per 15A NCAC O2H .0800, a Division certified laboratory shell conduct all
laboratory analyses for the required effluent, groundwater or surface water
parameters.
b. The measurement of water levels shall be made prior to purging the wells. The
depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on the
top of the casing_ The measurement of pH shall be made after purging and prior
to sampling for the remaining parameters.
C. The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be
surveyed to provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for each
monitoring well. The measuring points (top of casing) of all monitoring wells
shall be surveyed relative to a common datum.
d. For monitoring welts that are not located at the Compliance Boundary, the
Compliance Monitoring Form (GW-59CCR) is not required. However, predictive
calculations or modeling shall be submitted to the Regional Office annually (i.e.
12 months after permit issuance) demonstrating groundwater quality standards
at the Compliance Boundary.
e. Two copies of the monitoring well sampling shall be submitted an a Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW-59CCR), and received no later than the last working day
of the month following the sampling month. Copies of the laboratory analyses
shall be kept on site, and made available upon request. The Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW-59CCR) shall include this permit number and the
appropriate well identification number. All information shall be submitted to
the following address:
Division of Water Quality
Information Processing Unit
1517 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1517
f. For groundwater samples that exceed the ground water quality standards in
15A NCAC 02L .0202, the Regional Office shall be contacted within 30 days after
submission of the groundwater monitoring report; an evaluation may be
required to determine the impact of the waste disposal activities. Failure to do
so may subject the permittee to a Notice of Violation, fines, and/or penalties.
NCOOD3433 — Cape Fear Steam Station
Groundkvater Nionitorim, Plan Page 1 of 4

4. COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY. Part of this disposal system was individually permitted prior
to December 30, 1983; therefore, the compliance boundary is established at either 500
feet from the effluent disposal area, or at the property !boundary, whichever is closest to
the effluent disposal area. This compliance boundary shall be specified in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a). Part of this disposal system was individually permitted
after December 30, 1983 (1985 Pond), therefore, the compliance boundary is
established 250 feet from the effluent disposal area, or 50 feet inside the property
boundary, whichever is closer to the effluent disposal area. This compliance boundary
shall be specified in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(b). An exceedance of
groundwater standards at or beyond thn compliance boundary is subject to remediation
action according to 15A NCAC 02L .0106(c) as well as enforcement actions in accordance
with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A through 143-215.50.
NCO003433 — Cape Fear Stearn Station
Groundwater Monitoring Plan Page 3 ot'4 3/29/11

ATTACI-IME11T XX -- GROUNDWATER MONITORING PLAN
Permit Number: NCO00343.3
Version 1.0
WELL
NOMENCLATURE
PARAMETER DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
Monitoring Wells:
CMW-1, CTMW-I,CMV►'-2,
MercuryTDS
CTMW-2,
hromiunn
Nickel Thallium
CMW-3, CMI -5, CMW-Co
QAluminumChloride
er
Nitrate Water Level
March. June,
b, CMW-7, CTM W-7,
Iran
H 2i
October
CMMA. CTMAV-8,
Lead
Selenium
BGMW-4, BGTM'A'-4
anganese
Sulfate
Note 1: For locations of monitoring wells, see attached neap.
Note 2: Monitoring revisions may be considered, as applicable, if there are no significant detections prior to permit
renewal.
NCO003433 — Cape Fear Stearn Station
Groundwater Monitoring Plarn Page 4 of 4 3/2911 1

» • « ° 2 �
;
, Q q � $■ � � § ) � §
/w
I

410
syn,T(erra
RECEPTOR SURVEY
FOR
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
500 CP&L DRIVE
MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA 27559
NPDES PERMIT #NC0003433
PREPARED FOR
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
RALEIGH,, NORTH CAROLINA
/7 DUKE
ENERGY.
PROGRESS
SUBMITTED: JULY 2014
erry/'JVyiie, AJC PG�1425
r Pra e_t Gealog 1st
�J
Kai ebb, IAC PG 1328
Project Manager

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
1.0
Introduction.....................................................................................................................1
2.0
Background...................................................................................................................... 2
2.1
Plant Description........................................................................................................ 2
2.2
Description of Surrounding Properties.................................................................. 2
3.0
Receptor Survey Activities............................................................................................ 3
3.1
NCDENR Records Review....................................................................................... 3
3.2
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records Review .......................................... 3
3.3
USGS Hydrography Review.................................................................................... 3
3.4
SynTerra Field Survey............................................................................................... 4
3.5
Previous Water Supply Well Survey Information ................................................ 4
4.0
Findings............................................................................................................................ 5
4.1
NCDENR Records...................................................................................................... 5
4.2
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records........................................................ 5
4.3
USGS Hydrography Review.................................................................................... 5
4.4
SynTerra Field Survey............................................................................................... 5
4.5
Summary of Geosyntec Survey Findings............................................................... 7
4.6
Summary of Receptor Survey Findings.................................................................. 7
List of Figures
Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — Receptor Survey Map
List of Tables
Table 1 - Water Supply Wells
List of Appendices
Appendix A — EDR Report
Page i
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \Cape Fear\Receptor Survey\Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7-30-14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) owns and operates the Cape Fear Steam
Electric Plant (Cape Fear Plant) located on approximately 900 acres in central North
Carolina near Moncure, North Carolina. The Cape Fear Plant is located in Chatham
County along the east bank of the Cape Fear River southeast of Moncure and west of
Corinth Road. The site location is shown on Figure 1.
The Cape Fear Plant began operations in 1923 and additional units were added in the
following years. Throughout its operational history, the Cape Fear Plant employed six
coal-fired units along with four oil -fueled combustion turbine units to produce steam.
Ash generated from coal combustion was stored on-site in ash management ponds.
Operations were terminated at the Cape Fear Plant in October 2012 and demolition
activities are currently underway.
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003433.
SynTerra has completed a receptor survey to identify water supply wells, public water
supplies, surface water bodies, and wellhead protection areas (if present) within a 0.5
mile radius of the Cape Fear Plant ash management area compliance boundary (Figure
2). The compliance boundary for groundwater quality in relation to the ash
management area is defined in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a) as being
established at either 500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property boundary,
whichever is closer to the source.
The survey scope and findings are presented in the following sections.
Page 1
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7-30-14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 Plant Description
The Cape Fear Plant began operations in 1923 and additional units were added in the
following years. Six coal-fired units, in combination with four oil -fueled combustion
turbine units, were employed throughout the operational history of the plant to
produce steam. Ash generated from coal combustion was stored on-site in ash
management ponds that were constructed in 1956, 1963, 1970, 1978, and 1985.
Operations were terminated at Cape Fear Plant in October 2012 and demolition
activities are currently underway.
Wastewater discharges from the ash ponds are permitted by the NCDENR under
NPDES Permit NC0003433. The permit allows for the discharge of wastewater at four
outfalls to an "unnamed tributary to the Cape Fear River'. Upstream of the Outfall 007
the water body is referred to as the "Canal". Downstream of Outfall 007 it is referred to
as "Unnamed Tributary". Outfall 001 is an internal outfall from the "West Ash Pond"
(1978 ash pond). Outfall 003 is an internal outfall from once -through cooling water and
stormwater. Outfall 005 is an internal outfall from the "East Ash Pond" (1985 ash
pond). Outfall 007 is a combination of all of the internal outfalls.
2.2 Description of Surrounding Properties
Properties within a 0.5 mile radius of the Cape Fear Plant compliance boundary are
located in southeastern Chatham County and eastern Lee County, North Carolina. Lee
County, located west of the Cape Fear Plant, is physically separated from the Cape Fear
Plant by the Haw, Deep, and Cape Fear Rivers. The Deep and Haw Rivers come
together northwest of the Cape Fear Plant property to form the Cape Fear River.
Property uses within the 0.5 mile radius include residential, recreational, industrial, and
agricultural. Figure 2 depicts the properties surrounding the Cape Fear Plant.
Page 2
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7-30-14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
3.0 RECEPTOR SURVEY ACTIVITIES
3.1 NCDENR Records Review
SynTerra reviewed the NCDENR Department of Environmental Health (DEH) Public
Water Supply Sections (PWSS) Public Water Supply Water Sources Geographic
Information System (GIS) point data set (pwsws.shp) and the Water Distribution Map
Service (WDMS) data set obtained from the NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal
(http://data.nconemap.com/geoportal/catalog/main/home.page) to identify public water
supply sources and water supply lines within a 0.5 mile radius of the Cape Fear Plant
compliance boundary.
According to the NC OneMap website, the Public Water Supply Water Sources point
data was current through November 18, 2009, and that it is the most current GIS data
set of public water supply locations available from North Carolina state agencies. The
GIS point data for the public water supply wells includes, but is not limited to,
information such as public water supply (PWS) system identification numbers,
ownership information, PWS source type, well depth, and well yield. The WDMS data
set contains information on municipal water lines and other appurtenances.
On June 24, 2014, SynTerra reviewed the NCDENR Division of Water Resources (DWR)
Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) online database for public water supply
sources to identify wells located within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary; to
confirm the location of wells included in the Public Water Supply Water Sources GIS
point data set, and to identify wellhead protection areas located within a 0.5 mile radius
of the compliance boundary. The NCDENR SWAP database provides detailed
assessments of public drinking water intakes and wellhead protection areas in North
Carolina. The website address is: (http://swap.ncwater.org/website/swap/viewer.htm).
3.2 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records Review
A review of public database information provided by Environmental Data Resources,
Inc. (EDR) was also conducted. The public water well information has been
incorporated in the summary table (Table 1) and on Figure 2. A copy of the EDR report
is included as Appendix A.
3.3 USGS Hydrography Review
SynTerra reviewed the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Hydrography
Dataset (NHD) obtained from the USGS National Map Viewer
(http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/) to identify surface waters within a 0.5 mile
radius of the compliance boundary.
Page 3
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\Cape Fear\Receptor Survey\Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7-30-14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
3.4 SynTerra Field Survey
During February, March, and April 2014, SynTerra personnel conducted vehicular
surveys along public roads located within 0.5 mile of the compliance boundary.
Observations on property use, apparent proximity to available municipal water lines,
and structures that may represent potential water supply wells were noted. Field
observations were checked against parcel ownership information available through the
Chatham County and Lee County on-line GIS databases.
The GIS websites for both Chatham County and Lee County were reviewed for water
line information. The presence of water lines managed by Chatham County Utilities &
Water Division was noted in the area of Cape Fear Plant; although, for a number of
residences, both a possible water well structure and the presence of a water line were
observed. Mr. Leonard McBryde (Chatham County Utilities & Water Division) was
contacted for information about which residences were connected to municipal water
lines. Mr. McBryde declined to provide the requested information and referred any
further inquiries to the County's attorney. SynTerra made no further attempt to acquire
public water use information. Municipal water lines do not serve the area of Lee
County included in this water well survey.
3.5 Previous Water Supply Well Survey Information
The results of a previous receptor survey conducted by Geosyntec Consultants in
November 2013 have been incorporated into the findings of this report.
Page 4
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7-30-14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
4.0 FINDINGS
4.1 NCDENR Records
No public water supply wells were identified in the Public Water Supply Water Sources
GIS point data set (obtained from NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal) or on the NCDENR
SWAP online database within a 0.5 mile radius of the ash management area compliance
boundary.
No wellhead protection areas were identified on the NCDENR SWAP online database
within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary.
4.2 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records
A review of public database information provided by Environmental Data Resources,
Inc. (EDR) was also conducted. No water wells or public water supply systems within a
0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary were noted in the EDR report. A copy of
the EDR report is included as Appendix A.
4.3 USGS Hydrography Review
The Cape Fear Plant is bounded on the west by the Haw River and the Cape Fear River.
The Haw River bounds the property from its confluence with Shaddox Creek south to
its confluence with the Deep River, a distance of about 1,200 feet. The Haw River and
Deep River come together to form the Cape Fear River which extends along the western
side of the Cape Fear Plant property for about two miles (river distance). The Haw,
Deep, and Cape Fear Rivers flow south. Shaddox Creek is a perennial stream that flows
generally from northeast to the west and enters the Cape Fear Plant property in the
northeast corner of the property, eventually discharging to the Haw River. Several
small intermittent streams enter the property from the northeast and east and flow
through in the eastern and southern part of the property, eventually discharging to the
"canal". A small stream flows through the southern portion of the property and
discharges to the Cape Fear River. The unnamed tributary partially discharges to the
Cape Fear River at the southern end of the property and also continues to the south to
Buckhorn Dam.
Two perennial streams (Womble's Creek and Little Shaddox Creek) are indicated on the
west side of the Cape Fear River in Lee County.
4.4 SynTerra Field Survey
SynTerra conducted a visual reconnaissance of the survey area by driving public road-
ways and noting properties that appeared to be developed or occupied. Structures
resembling water supply wells or well houses were noted where visible and are shown
Page 5
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7-30-14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
on Figure 2 as reported/observed water supply wells (DW). Observations related to the
survey area are presented below:
Corinth Road (North of Cape Fear Plant) - Chatham County. This area is
upgradient of the compliance boundary. A municipal water line is located along
Corinth Road. Three large industrial facilities are located north of Cape Fear
Plant along Corinth Road. No wells were observed.
• Corinth Road (East/Southeast of Cape Fear Plant) - Chatham County. This area
is upgradient of the compliance boundary. A municipal water line is located
along Corinth Road. Two residences are located within or very near to the 0.5
mile distance from the compliance boundary (east/southeast) that appear to have
water well structures. An additional three occupied residences and one
unoccupied property are located just outside of the 0.5 mile distance and were
observed to have suspected water well structures. For these properties, direct
visual observation of a structure likely housing a water well was made.
Depending on the installation date for the municipal water line that runs along
Corinth Road, it appears that private water supply wells may have been in use
prior to the installation of municipal water lines for most residences.
• River Point Road (Northwest of Cape Fear Plant) - Chatham County. River
Point Road is located on the northwest (far) side of the Haw River and
upgradient of the compliance boundary. River Point Road is serviced by a
municipal water line. Occupied residential properties are located along River
Point Road. The area is bounded on the east by the Haw River, on the west by
the Deep River and on the south by the confluence of these rivers into the Cape
Fear River. One property within the survey area appears to have a structure that
may contain a water well. A municipal water line and water meters were
observed for the residences.
• Nottingham Lane/Farmington Lane (West of Cape Fear Plant) - Lee County.
This area is located on the west side of the Cape Fear River which is a large,
regional hydraulic boundary for groundwater; therefore, the area is not within
the shallow groundwater flow path of the Cape Fear Plant. Thirteen residences
are located in Lee County, North Carolina within or near approximately 0.5 miles
of the compliance boundary. There are no municipal water lines in the area;
therefore, it is assumed that occupied residences are served by water wells.
• Surface Water Intakes. Two surface water intakes were noted during field
reconnaissance activities (Figure 2). A surface water intake on the Cape Fear
River, located west of the power plant, was historically used for plant operations.
Page 6
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7-30-14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
Currently, water from this intake is periodically used for dust control during site
demolition work. Drinking water is not supplied by the intake.
Beyond the survey area, an active surface water intake is located on the Cape
Fear River approximately 2.5 miles downstream of the Cape Fear Plant. The
intake structure is located near the west bank of the river where NC Highway 42
(Avents Ferry Road) crosses the Cape Fear River. This intake is maintained by
the City of Sanford/Lee County Water Utilities Division and is the primary water
supply for the Sanford and Lee County area (according to information on the
City of Sanford Public Works website).
4.5 Summary of Geosyntec Survey Findings
A receptor survey conducted by Geosyntec Consultants (November 2013) focused on an
area within 1,500 feet of the compliance boundary and included a search for potential
water supply wells, surface water bodies, and wetlands. The survey identified a total of
14 properties that appeared to have a structure that indicated the presence of a water
supply well within 1,500 feet of the compliance boundary. The survey identified three
surface water features: the Haw River, the Cape Fear River, and the Deep River. The
survey identified 11.6 acres of freshwater emergent wetlands, 11.3 acres of freshwater
ponds, and 366 acres of freshwater forested/shrub wetlands with 1,500 feet of the
compliance boundary.
4.6 Summary of Receptor Survey Findings
A summary of the receptor survey findings is provided below. Assumed and observed
water supply well locations are shown on Figure 2. The well locations are numbered on
the map to cross-reference information provided in Table 1. The table summarizes
property location and owner information where a water supply well may be present.
• No drinking water wells were identified downgradient of the compliance
boundary.
• No wellhead protection areas were identified within a 0.5 mile radius of the
compliance boundary.
• Approximately 20 possible water supply wells were observed, or are assumed to
be located, within 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary, but each well
location is either upgradient of the compliance boundary or across a regional
groundwater divide (Haw and Cape Fear Rivers).
Page 7
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7-30-14.docx

Receptor Survey July 2014
Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003433 SynTerra
• A number of surface water features are present within the 0.5 mile radius of the
compliance boundary. The surface water features flow toward the Cape Fear
River which bounds the Cape Fear Plant on the west for a distance of about two
miles, flowing south.
• One former surface water intake is located adjacent to the Plant and is only used
for dust control during ongoing site demolition activities.
Page 8
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ Cape Fear \ Receptor Survey \ Cape Fear Receptor Survey 7-30-14.docx

FIGURES

9 agin
• a 85
:, • • �44 33 / B8 i90 ori
n, i,
\ �� o•� ' BM U
j, X193
Water �%
\ Tank•/r/ i
79 , • I ,1
t PROPERTY BOUNDARY
500' COMPLIANCE
/ BOUNDARY
ns 0r (
�.,%' r I ` ` ♦ ♦ a°rr WASTE
/ i� ♦ ubsta BOUNDARY
,77 t
It
'GG
• 75 /moo i• IIS_. ..-_ 2 33
Little""Shaddox
�—��_•'�
n • l•• ii ;a
1/
.l
It �� rf<'> ckhaven
11 p
�..\ i,• l / 236
—<. - BM 204
SOURCE: Go
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OBTAINED FROM THE NRCS GE SPATIAL DATA! \" 1
GATEWAY AT http://datagateway.nres.usda.gov/ \,
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
GREENSBORO CAPEFEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
'RAEEG 500 CP&L DR
•GREF,h'1%LLE
SynTerra CAPE FEAR TEAM MONCURE, NORTH CAROLINA
ELECTRIC PLANT MONCURE, NC QUADRANGLE
148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220 CHATHAM COUNTY
Wn 14m'GTOv DRAWN BY: S. ARLEDGE DATE: 2014-07-23
GRAPHIC SCALE
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA
PHONE [phone] PROJECT MANAGER: KATHY CONTOUR INTERVAL: 10 FEET 1000 0 1000 2000
wwwsynterracorp.com LAYOUT: FIG 1(sIT6 LOCATION)
N) MAP DATE* 1993
P: Pro ress Ener .1026 10. NC Sites 01. Seep And NPDES Permit Assistance CAPE FEAR dw CAPE FEARFIG1 USGS SITE LOCATION.d,g IN FEET

FH �
„
ix
LEGEND
;01_ ASSUMED PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELL
"Y'
,, o REPORTED/OBSERVED WATER SUPPLY WELL
�—
�,. Lam, ' �� 9t
1��?�_ ,�/� HALF MILE WATER WELL SURVEY BOUNDARY
--6si ,r / `� _: _ - `1J '' _. — l r•_�}� DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS CAPE FEAR PLANT
WASTE BOUNDARY
500 ft E BOUNDARY
- f9t6 2 - - ( —' \
COUNTY LINE (APPROXIMATE)
\ W CHATHAM COUNTY WATERLINE (APPROXIMATE)
�� ,
I�zi��' ,,A, FH FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION (APPROXIMATE)
( r�
„y c
,- / f
FH
FP r,
n I c
n
8 PVC
ekhaven
. I Y
ZZ
i
��`.✓
1
t 1
FH
• �� ,. �v :. ,'r�r wP,t � � • �� � � ' � �� �� � 2 1511 ��� �-�`--��
�" �1 j'
--� �r,� - 1.„F 11ni
=— ' n
+ `. + � CITY OF SANFORD I ' n�
- LEE COUNTYES INTAKEI� /
iviU
,. - -* •.
r i
TER
: ILI ��
UTILITIES �
1956 ASH POND
. • r '' ,� i
i
_J Z""'
,.
r I�
BUCK DAM
np 1L +� / �HORN
.L^. - :2 r �•` -� : 7 '' -� '1 % Ch -.cep_ a7) -- I __
i
CAPE FEAR PLANT T lc�
OURCE: GRAPHIC SCALE
SURFACE WATER INTAKE SGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OBTAINED FROM THE NRCS GEOSPATIAL DATA 1500 0 1500 3000
u - - ATEWAY AT http://datagateway.nres usda gov/
PR bV 1
✓/ ,c .t;. . "°Ak ei . ;: t �� � , oda ' 'x r c ¢�'�
104
�1�, S�' ,
1 1985 ASH POND �/ �,:' pi y, m I z, '
R W 2 v (EAST ASH POND) FA, A �3
/�j�nr� f x� t�p`'h�y w ��.,M�i�i `.;:•;,t,'�
.. ti
• '_. .. .• a ,1
PRW-3 �� � � '" ,. •..
1978 ASH POND
WEST ASH POND) ` - a P t•,�
1963 ASH POND '^ W`w1
� .. x. 'i r •l
aw _
1 1x�f'k.
DW-5 E SOURCES:
- •��' 1. 2013 HIGH RESOLUTION AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OBTAINED FROM CHATHAM COUNTY
y GIS WEBSITE AT http.//www.chathanigis.com/ AND LEE COUNTY GIS WEBSITE AT
� � � xt`�. http.//leecountyne.gov/Departments/GISStralegicServrces.aspx
•
1970 ASH POND
1 2. 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WAS OBTAINED FROM WSP FLOWN ON APRIL 17, 2014.
- ,.,.-am,._
As 3. DRAWING HAS BEEN SET WITH A PROJECTION OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE
_ r y
COORDINATE SYSTEM FIPS 3200 (NAD 83).
/WONCOF�P� ' tll�• i+:- `' DI�'nY FH RCFLA
TWOOOR� nr y
t
"
" AP C
UNNAMEDTRIBUTARY - O GRAPHIC SCALE
+wF 600
0
600 0 300
�..
(IN FEET)
PRW-6 0���
81, Pvc
x
DW -2 ,
PR bV 7 DW -3 g "'
.s
Fro y!`y, C
r �
PRW-10 � /
Q°
�r
rra
s:
148 River Street, Suite 220
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
s ; 864-421-9999
_ www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: S. ARLED DATE: 2014-07-31
CHECKED BY: J WYLIE DATE' 2014-07-31
ti aa �. �7�. �yy��, �.�.. � .,�. - r � ,. -fit x s:;,.a .'a � r ` •sk
r. - -•.. . ,. _ i �" i'' y "r. a- '.,�`' �re'x'�R�� roar s',<,
PROJECT MANAGER' KATHY WEBB
LAYOUT NAME: FIG 2 (RECEPTOR MAP)
."°��'•Ea':1_ ^"' ,�, �. � - � k„�y;. '''� S k s ,fir'.-.
* �' w S CHAPEL R� �! �,` rR c c �., • # . ti ' _•'r . DUKE
E r„
w :� L :. 4•�. '�.. `..x, - ., ..; + .yes- k .1r�'.-ip,:"�f:..- �� . ,^< ,„�� i ��y��, w ,•' .;
•. g 4
�i. .: \ `5"'• - • [ is •{i p si w
m
ENERGY
` '3"r. +, ....!r... _',=.: . - -•_.,, -:4 :.\ -. : *i^.# �3 i . 6.. ®�," �, �: i• :y • . , � #B` Y,i� :a.:3.�. :�•>¢`.,�s.. wt{,` �'
,
is�•,rR•" pY^ .. 9 4'lr.', - ".. 1 rf,* _ -. `*c - :,r?rr': #,. 4-
.6
_
- PROGRESS
CAPE FEAR STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
.yq q
500 CP & L DRIVE
�
- X' ,. a. .. 4. . �`. .,. --.. '- k• err a. w- _ '� - �,;.. ,: �_, •pe�'a _
.;t"� . ..-�-.�, .; ,•, .>r��- ,.� '� ... -�.ti ; s�, _r o ,- - �' � - _ �� �, `' e - s° PVC �� _ MONCURE NORTH CAROLINA
.:�' ��, .,�� ♦, .. ��'-t _ ✓��� ' T... . a S " yy. ..,., P,. ,.'�I. yam, n}t-_-_. '-e e >r„ _.- ,,I� .1111 �:. • � ,. -_ � '�.• s
UL .•,�
�.. F H
a'�,.. _ , ., !� 1 iE'�.. , � , P i ,a � • 4'* « +� "� .li". ,� -. �— .:.- ,�,p - W "rk
6.
r = D
E I R
7 mg
c �{ r". 41•„ � _ , ., � �"- �` ., __ �` 'mss- ICK PLAN
,
� •
;pt T
, ,� � � � � • �� � � _ `,: � FIGURE 2
�.
•
• . - , ,w.., ..rte-- 't. •• .» , . . �„
}� ..., - - ., . >.' RECEPTOR SURVEY MAP
--,-,. J. ..... '.. � :x'..,.. •s r;y*. �. ,,�.,'. , ,4,.. .. r: M �*..k: .... .. ." - 4' ".iA.� 'Y�h 1dc.
j �,g 9 '
y ww�� r.
Y _, .z.. e ••VTr't„ a.. '�� . m 1 :: ,. .-, .°: 4,. _ - :tire. ��'
C 1 i
• -.. ter ...� , •' '.h k� , .:, :• XrjTY .'..z '.5. "R . .. i r :.., m£� , �'. .. ,'S. `� "- h
:.,�.,�.. ¢a, ,".. .... ' `�Jae�, v ..-. ,: .:-. T."I „. ,' x ,. i ._ ..-,.•a., a .. ., a � .Zx Y ••Qt.
q y �^i
.�."
3 , .s
�. .N, f. - .-,.w ..3 ;,s, ".: ,�...a 1�0n �- -,�-.:�r.. �. :'+^. �• �• ,; . . •mac rj '�.,�, ,y. ^,�•. -
�fli,"l: i .:.. _ - . , .. .. �",�",, w• Y ,:��i � ,a ' aj*,� ��,
'.a

TABLE

Table 1
Water Supply Wells
Within 0.5 Mile Radius of Ash Management Compliance Boundary
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. - Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Moncure, North Carolina
Map Well ID# Parcel ID
Parcel Address
Owner
Field Description / Notes
LEE COUNTY
l
DW-2/DW-3 9686-37-8312-00
365 FARMINGTON LN GUERNSEY, JOHNNIE D
Well structures observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area; on opposite side of Cape
Fear River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
DW -10
9687-30-4517-00
0 NOTTINGHAM LN
RIGGS, JOHN L
Occupied residence (assumed); well structure observed; no municipal water lines in area; on
opposite side of Cape Fear River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
PRW-1
9687-30-3847-00
248 NOTTINGHAM LN
THOMPSON, JOEL W JR
Occupied residence (assumed); no well structure observed; no municipal water lines in area;
on opposite side of Cape Fear River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
PRW-2/PRW-3/PRW-4
9686-29-1747-00
185 NOTTINGHAM LN
STEPHENS, WILLIAM W
Occupied residence (three assumed); no well structure observed; no municipal water lines in
area; on opposite side of Cape Fear River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
PRW-5/PRW-6
9686-27-4454-00
0 LOWER RIVER RD
RIGGS, JOHN L
Occupied residences (two assumed); no well structure observed; no municipal water lines in
area; on opposite side of Cape Fear River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
PRW-7
9686-16-6609-00
0 LOWER RIVER RD
ALLEN, DOYLE W & BETY J
Occupied residences (assumed); no well structure observed; no municipal water lines in area;
on opposite side of Cape Fear River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
PRW-8
9686-37-8062-00
415 FARMINGTON LN
ADAMS, BOBBY R
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal water lines in area; on opposite
side of Cape Fear River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
PRW-9
9686-36-9747-00
481 FARMINGTON LN
VAVROCH, ERIC D
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal water lines in area; on opposite
side of Cape Fear River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
PRW-10
9686-25-6567-00
494 FARMINGTON LN
REED, LYNN A
Occupied residence (assumed); no well structure observed; no municipal water lines in area;
on opposite side of Cape Fear River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
CHATHAM COUNTY
DW -1
9687-00-33-0546
960 RIVER POINT RD
HUSSEY DAN B & LINOLA Y
Well structure observed in yard; municipal water line present along road; upgradient of
compliance boundary; on opposite side of Haw River (across groundwater divide) from Plant
DW -4
9696-00-19-9375
2501 CORINTH RD
DICKENS RV PARK LLC
Well structure observed; municipal water line present along road; upgradient of compliance
boundary
DW -5
9696-00-18-4323
2462 CORINTH RD
DICKENS, FRANK KENT & KIM C
Well structure observed in yard; municipal water line present along road; upgradient of
compliance boundary
DW -6
9696-00-17-9816
2666 CORINTH RD
BROWN, CAROL H
Well structure observed in yard; municipal water line present along road; upgradient of
compliance boundary
DW -7
9696-00-37-0857
163 MONCURE-FLATWOOD RD
UTLEY, DOUGLAS E
No residential structure present; well structure observed; municipal water line present along
road; upgradient of compliance boundary
DW -8
9696-00-27-1514
2756 CORINTH RD
DICKENS, FRANK D & LULA E
Well structure observed in yard; municipal water line present along road; upgradient of
compliance boundary
DW -9
9696-00-17-3039
2878 CORINTH RD
DICKENS, FRANK K ETUX KIM C
Well structure observed in yard; municipal water line present along road; upgradient of
compliance boundary
Notes:
0 - Reported/Observed water supply well
- Assumed private water supply well
Parcel ID, owner and address information were obtained from the Chatham County, North Carolina website (http://new.chathamgis.com/mapguide/ChathamGISWeb/)
and the Lee County, North Carolina website (http://www.leecountync.gov/Departments/GISStrategicServices/tabid/124/Default.aspx).
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 3026\Cape Fear\Receptor Survey\Table\Table 1 Water Supply Wells 1 OF 1

APPENDIX A
EDR REPORT

Duke Energy - Cape Fear
500 C P and L Rd.
Moncure, NC 27559
Inquiry Number: 3887529.1s
March 21, 2014
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
www.edrnet.comt.com Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc Toll Free: 2.0050
FORM -NULL -CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
PAGE
Physical Setting Source Addendum
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary
A-2
Physical Setting Source Map
A-8
Physical Setting Source Map Findings ----------------------------------------
A-9
Physical Setting Source Records Searched -------------------------------------
A-12
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC3887529.1 s Page 1

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE REPORT
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
DUKE ENERGY - CAPE FEAR
500 C P AND L RD.
MONCURE, NC 27559
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision
35.5932 - 35° 35' 35.52"
79.0508 - 79° 3' 2.88"
Zone 17
676589.8
3940379.2
186 ft. above sea level
35079-E1 MONCURE, NC
1993
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC3887529.1s Page 1

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General SE
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
b
m
W
C
0
m
w
North I South
TP
Target Property Elevation: 186 ft.
TP
1/2 1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC3887529.1s Page 2

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Target Property County
CHATHAM, NC
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property:
Additional Panels in search area:
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
MONCURE
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Flood
Electronic Data
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
37037C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data
37105C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC3887529.1s Page 3

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Mesozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Triassic
Series: Triassic
Code: Tr (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name:
CHEWACLA
Soil Surface Texture:
silt loam
Hydrologic Group:
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class:
Somewhat poorly. Soils commonly have a layer with low hydraulic
conductivity, wet state high in profile, etc. Depth to water table is
1 to 3 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil meets the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > Winches
TC3887529.1s Page 4

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
Permeability
Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr)
(pH)
1
0 inches
8 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 6.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
2
8 inches
24 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 6.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
3
24 inches
34 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE-GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 6.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
34 inches
58 inches
silt loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 7.80
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
5
58 inches
70 inches
variable
Not reported
Not reported
Max: 0.00
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
Min: 0.00
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: loam
loamy sand
Surficial Soil Types: loam
loamy sand
Shallow Soil Types: sandy clay loam
clay
clay loam
Deeper Soil Types: stratified
loamy sand
sand
TC3887529.1s Page 5

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS 1.000
State Database 1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL HERITAGE ELEMENT OCCURRENCES
ID Class
NC50003979
Plants
NC50006257
Plants
NC50007240
Plants
NC50016122
Plants
TC3887529.1s Page 6

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
NORTH CAROLINA SIGNIFICANT NATURAL HERITAGE AREAS DATABASE:
ID Name
NC10002041 LOWER MONCURE ROAD WETLANDS NORTH
NC10002042 LOWER MONCURE ROAD WETLANDS SOUTH
NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION GAME LANDS DATABASE
Site Name
NC30000588
NC30000589
NC30000608
TC3887529.1s Page 7

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP -3887529.1s
o
/ 3B d0ard Coasi Aoe
g u
0. ti
i
a pp
0
I
0
/ Q �
p o
SITE NAME: Duke Energy - Cape Fear
County Boundary
CLIENT: SynTerra
0 1141 1Y2
1 Maes
CONTACT: Richard Jacobs
Major Roads
INQUIRY #: 3887529.1s
LAT/LONG: 35.5932 / 79.0508
N
Contour Lines
Groundwater Flow Direction
Wildlife Areas
Power transmission lines
c 1
Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location
Natural Areas
OEarthquake
epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
c v
Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o
Rare & Endangered Species
®
Water Wells
0
100 -year flood zone
©
Public Water Supply Wells
0
500 -year flood zone
Cluster of Multiple Icons
0
National Wetland Inventory
SITE NAME: Duke Energy - Cape Fear
CLIENT: SynTerra
ADDRESS: 500 C P and L Rd.
CONTACT: Richard Jacobs
Moncure NC 27559
INQUIRY #: 3887529.1s
LAT/LONG: 35.5932 / 79.0508
DATE: March 21, 2014 11:08 am
Copyright ro 2014 EDR, Inc. (c 2010 Tale Atlas Rel. 07/2009.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
TC3887529.1 s Page 9
NC—WILD
NC30000588
Site Name:
Chatham
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Safety Zone
Acres:
521.32861328125
Status:
PRV
County:
CHATHAM
NC—WILD
NC30000589
Site Name:
Chatham
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Game Land
Acres:
100.830940246582
Status:
PRV
County:
CHATHAM
NC—WILD
NC30000608
Site Name:
Chatham
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Game Land
Acres:
2364.48852539062
Status:
PRV
County:
CHATHAM
NC_NHEO
NC50003979
GIS ID:
12510
Classification by Type:
Plants
Occurrence Status:
X
NC_NHEO
NC50006257
GIS ID:
81615
Classification by Type:
Plants
Occurrence Status:
Historic, no evidence of destruction
NC_NHEO
NC50007240
GIS ID:
41947
Classification by Type:
Plants
Occurrence Status:
Extant
TC3887529.1 s Page 9

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
GIS ID: 91947
Classification by Type: Plants
Occurrence Status: Extant
Site Name:
Quality:
Acres per Polygon:
Site Name:
Quality:
Acres per Polygon:
NC_NHEO NC50016122
NC_SNHA NC10002041
LOWER MONCURE ROAD WETLANDS NORTH
Not Reported
153.27
NC_SNHA NC10002042
LOWER MONCURE ROAD WETLANDS SOUTH
Not Reported
31.79
TC3887529.1 s Page 10

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
Federal EPA Radon Zone for CHATHAM County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for CHATHAM COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 3
Area
Average Activity
% <4 pCi/L
% 4-20 pCi/L
% >20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1st Floor
-0.033 pCi/L
100%
0%
0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Basement
0.900 pCi/L
100%
0%
0%
TC3887529.1 s Page 11

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC3887529.1 s Page A-12

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
NC Game Lands: Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC3887529.1 s Page A-13

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC3887529.1 s Page A-14