960012_Inspection_20221006

Facility Number
147
a Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Ca Compliance Inspection 0 Op ration Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: r Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name: /(
Mailing Address: yJ
Physical Address: /IQ yj-r/P 4
Facility Contact: 73 7.4.Vde
Onsite Representative:
Arrival Time:
/?. 3c
Departure Time:
�.�Llil�ttlJ�
Certified Operator: /f
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
1oa
Owner Email:
County: ![/�t��iy f Region: /..d d.
Phone: 977 — �� yid
Latitude:
Phone: '7/ -
Integrator: ff F
Certification Number: , 5 b
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine,
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
3�7�A
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
D Poul Ca s aci Po
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Application Field
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure
❑ Other:
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste agement system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part bf the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
El Yes No NA El NE
▪ Yes No El NA NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
El Yes
El No ❑NA ❑NE
Di No ❑ NA ❑ NE
o El NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: % - / Z—
Date of Inspection: /d - aav--
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes I2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
l7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2(No ❑NA ❑NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen 1 threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes m No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Yes li-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes /o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yeso ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Other:
❑ Yes
No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections/ ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑NA ❑NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: qh -
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Date of Inspection: // - ` -
❑ Yes IZ(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes q[7'No
Yes EiNo
Yes 12(No
Yes dNo
Yes 7No
Yes [No
Yes EriTo
Yes o
Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments Emmet toquestion#): Explain any YES answers undfor any additional recommendations or any of
Use drawing,s of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
comments.
�' 3D - 22- _ /. o )
✓r- - a2 = 1, 3r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
A. 4,v/75 rfr
Phone: a� - i ,S— 74.
Date: /19d (s AO
5/12/2020