Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout770017_Routine_20221011Facility Number 11 9) Division of Water Resources 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: i1.'.2 Arrival Time: -10 Farm Name: WIIScn SLtiiNe f()tM Owner Name: Paul SJ(1r LuilsoN Departure Time: Owner Email: Phone: County: Pi (-NMI 4 Region:(11 (i Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: �1 QrCL\ kA1SOr1 Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: cQ ffie, Certified Operator: j 0 6 n Co Fe( Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Swine Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Dry Poultr Design Current Capacity Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Cattle Design Current Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑NA ❑NE O Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA D NE Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued Facility Number:.11 - IT Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Yes [Z1No ❑NA ❑NE Structure 5 Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ Yes M No n No ❑ NA ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NE ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Yes [E]No ❑NA ❑NE n Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): Ut; 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available'? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. n W UP ❑Checklists n Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ri Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE n Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 7120 Minute Inspections n Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections n Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued 1\1No ❑NA ❑NE Yes No ❑NA ❑NE riYes t No ❑NA ❑NE Facility Number: -1-1 - Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE ❑Yes NINo ❑NA ❑NE 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ISI No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes IIR No 0 NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes IN,No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IN No 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE ❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Yes E.No 0 NA 0 NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). qt-t- more lagnon woic1-e campieG. c)-e1' poi I CI1-1411Sl k-ohfi- ro I a3 nCcI-eni - goy Reviewer/Inspector Name: Kate fo(q,nOt Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: <akkiL.., Page 3 of 3 0741no-t- Date: fOil ')2. 5/12/2020 FACILITY #: 1 1 17 FARM NAME: W (o 1NI w \ N -e firM LAGOON LEVEL PERMIT (#19) DUE EVERY 5 YEARS EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS CURREN ER OF ANIMAL OIC CA DYE R NO �Pnfl Coei 62.gq WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20) SOIL TYPES CROP TYPES (`L1thQt ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT (#21) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE NITROGEN LEVEL DATE NITROGEN LEVEL DATE NITROGEN LEVEL SOIL REPORT (#21) EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE P-I (NO MORE THEN 400) PH (Note if 4 or less) Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) Date of event ZN IRR2 (#21) �°` (� Available PAN Crop FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Field or Pull Date of event t - 2-i FLOW RATES Available PAN_ Crop NITROGEN (N) .__ Field or Pull Date of event%' ( Available PAN Crop FLOW RATES Date of event NITROGEN (N) Field or Pull Available PAN _ Crop FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Field or Pull