Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
NC0049905_Wasteload Allocation_19930920
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT September 20, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Susan Robson Pi FROM: Susan A. Wilson A THROUGH: Carla Sanderson W SUBJECT: Chevron USA (NPDES No. NC0049905) UT Grants Creek, Yadkin River Basin Rowan County The Rapid Assessment Group has the following comments with regard to Chevron's inquiry to their proposed permit: Item 1. Discharge to a "dry ditch" is still considered waters of the state and is subject to North Carolina water quality regulations. Item 2. Because Chevron has not been subject to a turbidity, TSS, or temperature limit in the past, a monitoring requirement can be inserted for one year with a limit to be imposed after the completion of that year. This will allow the facility time to comply with the limit. Item 3. The limits imposed are based on standard operating procedures for facilities discharging this type of mixed wastewater (i.e. stormwater runoff, non contact cooling water, boiler blowdown). Item 4. The total suspended solids measurement includes only nonfiltrable matter. The turbidity measurement includes most solids (dissolved and colloidal particles, as well as suspended solids) in order to assess the clarity of the water. Because these measurements are not the same, both should be included in the permit. Item 5. The temperature limit is based on standard temperature language for the discharge of cooling water and/or boiler blowdown. Since the discharge is essentially to a ditch with no stream flow, the effluent temperature should not exceed 32°C. The Rapid Assessment Group does not feel that any of the requirements imposed in this renewal are excessive and recommends that the requirements be implemented in the final permit. cc: D. Rex Gleason, MRO MEMO TO: S 7 i F t. aL L.t 75 - 5 tiSPelP SO L I T. S DATE• SUBJECT: { CoN A,4 c e&NGiT M� 5'- (TLC CUT (CAN'T- rl3.- p_E4Aov e s y 1_ tAa=Asue T 1f1GL-uPc5 CO" ENrc0NPL C.IPAV'T`! 9€€T71-IPJ4) -7 S i_r<frOLe -- --- C L. `i 5 MI rZ.E Co I, u o I to L. =As S p F-rJ r? ) ! &_ I © j \----i wonll=1LT2.PI3LE (l:-E.iA)/J 7 or,' FIL-Tc`2) 1-u9.13Ty - �oMe1�Jk /u61r5u-265 CoLc-0Sou}7S. D1�soL�1El� AS L7 1).111.1- IMLOPE, 5 &ALL u SP.e'JPEU k5 06LL 'lS CoLLot7/ . �cl L A- 5 Su.Spc' JPe.. 7 0 % g ?moo. "." ! ----� - +t/►c‘ - L ./JI5«.L J\JOr •. ?) tk.c . 4.6194,„ ►OLe -! }.(Ta't& . } f itAtUD Z y R 5 9F (5 oN L`1 R FErJ i14,E5 Tnwu4 -r? 91z-1) A-t u.r 17c21 PP' Lim ITS; Atom Te,a4lo S(ti1 CCy •(C4frd?4e guT {4RS b2o?pc0 From. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources gs) Printed on Recycled Paper State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director MEMORANDUM C E I -I N Fi. September 10, 1993 To: Carla Sanderson, Rapid Assessment Group Rex Gleason, P.E., Mooresville Regional Office From: Susan Robson, Environmental Technician Subject: Comments on Draft Permit Chevron U.S.A. Rowan County NPDES: NC0049905 Attached please find a request from Chevron, U.S.A. requesting a reduction/deletion of temperature, TSS, and turbidity monitoring. Please review this request and comment as appropriate. Thank you for your comments. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-9919 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper chevronitigo August 12, 1993 COMMENTS ON DRAFT PERMIT NPDES NO. NC0049905 Ms. Coleen Sullins NPDES Permits Group North Carolina Department of Environment Health and Natural Resources 512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 Dear Ms. Sullins: Chevron Chevron U.S.A. Products Company 1200 State Street Perth Amboy, New Jersey 08861 Pursuant to my telephone conversation on August 9, 1993 with Ms. Susan Robson and Ms. Susan Wilson, I am submitting this letter requesting a modification to the draft permit dated 7/28/93, Section A, "Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements Final" (attached). The draft permit specifies new monitoring characteristics and limits for temperature, TSS and turbidity. These effluent characteristics are inappropriate for the following reasons: 1. The effluent from the facility batch discharges from an earthen basin to a dry ditch. For this type of discharge there is no environmental benefit for regulating these characteristics. 2. The effluent (to our knowledge) has never been tested for these characteristics, and we do not know if these limits are achievable. We are very uncomfortable accepting limits which we have no idea can be complied with. 3. There is no statement identifying the basis for monitoring these new characteristics or setting these limits. 4. Having limits on both TSS and turbidity is excessive since both are measurements of suspended solids. 5. The temperature effluent characteristic is inappropriate because the discharge is to a dry creek, there is no receiving stream. We request that this characteristic be deleted. For the above reasons we request that TSS and Tturbidity characteristics be deleted from the permit or, at the very least, monitor only for TSS with no discharge limitations specified. If you have any questions, we would appreciate the opportunity to discuss them with you. Please contact Larry Ettel, Terminal Manager, at (704) 636-0781 or Bill Nowak at (908) 738-2222. Very truly yours, >II 7/07A/42 kao(L W. G. Nowak Compliance Specialist WGN:ams Attachment cc: Larry Ettel NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NC0049905 PERMITTEE NAME: FACILITY NAME: Chevron USA, Inc. Salisbury Facility Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor -'1 Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: Domestic (% of Flow): Industrial (% of Flow): 100 % Comments: Stormwater, dust -control water, NCCW. BBD, & "spill clean-up". STREAM INDEX: 12-109 RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Grants Creek Class: C Sub -Basin: 03-07-04 Reference USGS Quad: E16NE, Rowan Mills County: Rowan Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/92 Treatment Plant Class: 0 Classification changes within three miles: ; �t >3mi. ' 6 Requested by: Prepared by: Reviewed by: WQmac, Jule Shanklin J ( (please attach) Date: 4/24/92 Date: Date: i Modeler Date Rec. (tm 4 Drainage Area (mil ) z 0. Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 4 D - I 7Q10 (cfs) CJ Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0 30Q2 (cfs) 6 Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic Instream Monitoring: Parameters Upstream Location Downstream Location Effluent Characteristics ,k.om-n-tt-y AA46 PAIL-' Mv),Ki&unn BOD5 (mg/1) NH3-N (mg/1) D.O. (mg/1) TSS (mg/1) ,e1-cJ F. Col. (/100 ml) pH (SU) _9 Olt- 4t omt/L) 4-5 v..p./ ,D P-1 cr\iTu : So (w e i . )e' d') 1C%"PU2C. ascMRe4e SNJlu. Nor was IratOEPAlute CAUSE 145 AFL ,M To EJCcer,* 2.$ "c. A 114‹..041LOtirJP kn13, uJ 3 Z°C_ No CASG (AUStT jc Comments: 5-(ANPAP-47 c ou +J4 lestAreg. LAM (, E soon L SD IN RPPriioni ro PiSive umi z/,.4O.J rrl ZAJ,+c ZPAcArrri g-D • ri . • (SALISBURY) ca 4955 IN NW Piseitala f" is ..•., . • • // H POINT 3.2 MI. TO INT. 85 C'v/'2 U.S4. NpvEs 'omit A/o. Nc0a9905 Ro Alai; • fV C ` "'^ `-^.° : ��EX88/MP COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALY%I% REPORT 03/3i/92 PAG E i "^ PERMIT .... .... NC0049905 1:1IPE--001 REPORT PERIOD: 002-920i LOC---E FACILITY --CHEVRON U%A INC %ALI%BURY FLOW-- .O0OO CLA%%--0 LOCATION --- -%ALI%BURY REGION/COUNTY--03 ROWAN 50050 00400 00556 32730 MONTH Q/MPH OIL-TR%E PHENOL% LIMIT 9.0 6.0 F 30.O00 9i/02 LIMIT NOL 9.0 6.O F 30.00O NOL 91/03 .Oi40 5.8-5.8FLE%IS, THAN LE%IS, THAN 9i/04 9i/05 9i/06 9i/07 9i/O8 9i/0(;) .Oi40 7.O-7.0 LE%%THAN LE%�THAN .0i40 6.2-6.2 /'4.00LE%%THAN ` ^0140 6.2.... 6.2 ''12 2 1 .. THAN -^ _ ` AVERAGE .0140 ------__ 8.300 MAXIMUM .01140 7.000 i2.600 MINIMUM ^0i4O 5.880 4^000 ________ UNIT MCD 11U MG/L MG/L __ , ' , , ^ � EX88/Mp , COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALY%I% REPORT 03/ 3 i/92 PACE i ^ PERMIT--NCO049905 PIPE--00i REPORT PERIOD- 9002-9i�i FACILITY --CHEVRON U%A INC %ALI%BURY PLT DESIGN FLOW ^ -- 00O0 CLA%%--0 LOCATION %ALI%BURY -----'' '--- ^ -- RE�ION/COUNTY--03 ROWAN MONTH 50O50 Q/M�D OO400 00556 32730 PH OIL -ARSE PHENOL% LIMIT NOL 9.O 6.0 F NOL 90/02 .0i40 6.8-6.8 i M .080O 90/03 90/04 .2086 7.0~7.0 LE%%THAN LE%%TH/N 90/05 .2i80 6.i--- 6.i LE%%THAN .0600 90/06 90/07 .0i40 7.i-7.i LE%%THAN .0600 90/08 90/09 90/i0 .0860 6.5-6.4 LE%%THAN LE%%THAN AVERAGE .108i . 12.000 .0666 MAXIMUM .2i80 7.i00 i2.000 .08O0 MINIMUM .0 0 6.i00 i2.000 .0600 UNIT MGD %U MO/L MCh/L , - �xcvoo/uo ~w1-^""'`I ''"" COMPLIANCE EVALUATION ANALAll % REPORT vu/u//�� PAGE i , . ^ PERMIT--NCO049905 1:1IPE--00i REPORT PERIOw 8902-908i FACILITY --CHEVRON USA INC %ALI%BURY PLT DE%RN FLOW-~ .000O-- CLA%%--Ell LOCATION .... .... %ALI%BURY REG%ON/COUNIT Y--03 ROWAN 50050 00400 00556 32730 MONTH Q/M6D PH PHENOL% LIMIT 9.0 6.0 F 30.00O 89/O2 89/03 89/04 LIMIT NOL 9.0 6.0 F 30'000 NOL 89/05 .024O 7.4-7.4 .000 .0000 89/06 .0420 7.4.... 7.4 LE%%THAN LESit THAN _ 89/O9 .0420 6.6-6.6 LE%%THAN LE%%THAN 89/i0 89/i1 89/12 .0420 5.9-5.9F 36.000FLE%%TH01N AVERAGE .0375 ._.__ i8.000 .0O00 MAXIMUM .0420 7.4O0 36.000 MINIMUM .0240 5.90O 36.000 UNIT MGD to MG/L MG/L - Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Chevron USA NC0049905 Industrial - 100% Existing Renewal UT Grants Creek C 030704 Rowan MRO J. Shanklin 4/24/92 E16NE Request # 6894 D. DST. O? NATURAL RESOURCES AND Oomi 1JN1T ' DEVELOPMENT OCT 1 5 1992 DIVISION OF F.NtIROWaNTR. NUWACEatFIIJ =RESYALLE RECIONAL IFH Stream Characteristic; USGS # Date: Drainage Area (nii2): Summer 7Q10 (cfs): Winter 7Q10 (cfs): Average Flow (cfs): 30Q2 (cfs): IWC (%): <0.1 0 0 <0.1 0 100.0 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Wasteflow consists of stormwater runoff, water used for dust control, spill cleanup, 200 gpd NCCW, 1500 gpd of boiler blowdown, and hydrotest water for testing new tanks (occasionally). The facility processes base asphalt material. MRO reports that the facility is well maintained. TSB recommends keeping frequency of twice per month for this discharge. Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: MA-e- #(.c .( Recommended by:, J� ,,,_ `-7/ Date: l 0 8 Reviewed by Instream Assessment: Regional Supervisor:/Y'�' Permits & Engineering: RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: Nov Date: /6 Date: Date: /l/I��GI 2- 1 1. 1992 Existing Limits Flow (MGD): Oil & Grease (mg/I): Phenols pH Recommended Limits Flow (MGD) pH (SU): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Turbidity (NTU): Temperature 6.91-A0 ma-0 Goot.1.04 wKr4 LArAuk4t y rtouq> 1tJ) TOXICS Mon. Avg, Daily max Freq, monitor 30 monitor weekly est 60 2/month 2/month 6-8.5 weekly Monthly Average Daily Max. monitor 6-9 45 45 50 Discharge shall not cause the receiving water's temperature to exceed 2.8°C above background and in no case cause it to exceed 32°C. -- Flow metering is not required. Flow may be estimated. Mon. Freq. WOJEL instantaneous or estimate 2/mQrH 2/i or rr 2/ Martl 2/ ivtoti'[tl EL EL EL (See page three for special monitoring requirments.) *The turbidity in the receiving stream will not exceed 50 NTU. (If 7Q10 = 0, 50 NTU applies as an effluent limit.) Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected New regulations/standards/procedures pH, O&G,turbidity,flow New facility information OR _X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. WASTELOAD SENT TO EPA? (Major) _N (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how wasteload fits into basinwide plan.) Additional Information attached? _N_ (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. &!gli,e0iJ USA .. i Cl/e 7- (74y in J) C it 70D ;7: 7o f 4 ( ojit&(L SAAA u. Pc5c iAr(ui” I),,1 FL- k'`t o1P812- 1 ' i1JAL5) po, 900 cPP 6' %(ry .GEY L t 2D A) Z'ISchF EZ.) F o(k1 COnl 74((Vf1 EA T S/A/ y t f.,l s, f�c.o:A' CO Ns t srS OF �7O Mtiro i2/IJOT; fZo !/S tv2 Ls-_ , c7W, 200 SPp NCCV\/ tSJO f 7 of L'l-tX. &mil/- DovUN. -`4 I /�I DI2a7resr 1-t�0 �;= r�srr('& W 570,244L 626GE5S6S !3Asc A 'Lr (v±f?T ,.,%,!'?/r LiN_t7 a�C�' ,wse 71P• Ct4ve '=> 3a/o ,EI - , Afro N 17212-' A/ 1 _ _ _ 7 /PE SOL_U7 2/ ovo 5A /4 p,Nk 57-02A4, 6 'TANK/ dcz 7-j4,✓/z J ,/6114,9Al Glyn t Coeds -� (Q,Z a3074 /GI/20 gePvg-rs ILt 7 45 mI GG.-/d44/nl /AiEE. 4'r 3E r4/; Mte,C9 (6, ,e6cerm2 N, % -c' '4E b k? c/t/5 l��l{<fZ�/u�NTs F/+4/G,Ty (mm ,tco,utcQ D /vx iu,/L8. (p.- CtAkse PcatAiq //pg i,Y/z{ plot Zrruom rif 2-40.61774 446, 2/of,) GKBX8i/LP 'MPDE% PERMIT NONC0049905 PIPE NO001 " CURRENT PAGE i CHEVRON U%A INC %ALI%BURY PLT 03 ROWAN i825 JAKE ALEXANDER BLVD %ALI%BURY NC 28144 FIN MONITORIN� REQUIREMENT% FOR PERMIT PERIOD EFFLUENT DATE %AMPLE MEA�URINC CHARA�TERI%TIC% FROM/TO LOCATION FREQUENCY PH (004O8) PH (�0400) -- / PH (00400) ���_----' OIL-G,R%E (OO556) OIL-C;R%E (00556) PHENOL% (32730) Q/MGD (50050) / / Q/M(.,;D (5009O) 82/04/3O 86/0i/0i 86/0i/02 87/04/3@ 87/i0/0i 92/O9/30 82/04/30 86/01/01 86/0i/02 87/04/3O 87/i0/0i 92/09/30 87/i0/0i 92/09/30 86/0i/O2 87/O4/30 87/i0/01 92/09/30 � E ONCE/ MONTH E WEEKLY E WEEKLY TYPE SAMPLE GRAB %AMPL GRAB %AMPL - GRAB % ONCE/ MONTH GRAB %AMPL THROUGH 9 2 / 0 9 / 3 0 DURING MEA%URING' MONTH % OF FREQUENCY TWIC,E/ MONTH - TWICE/ MONTH - ONCE/ MONTH WEEKLY WEEKLY GRAB %AMPL GRAB %AMPL GRAB %AMPL IN%TANTOU% _ E%TIMATE � �KE~8i/"P 'ibiPDES PERMIT NONC0049905 PIPE NCI� 00i " CURRENT PA�E i CHEVRON USA INC %AL%%BURY PLT 03 ROWAN i825 JAKE ALEXANDER BLVD %A ... I%BURY NC 28144 FIN DI%CHARC;E LIMITATION% FOR PERMIT PERIOD EFFLUENT CHARACTER%C DATE FROM/TO PH 82/O4/30 PH 86/0i/02 PH 87/i0/0i \ OIL-GR%E 82/04/3O PHENOLS _ 87/i0/0i Q/M�D 86/0i/02 Q/MGD 87/i0/0i (00400) 86/0i/0i (00400) 87/04/30 (O04O0) 92/09/30 . - - (0@556) 86/0i/0i THROUGH 92/09/30 QTY UNIT%/ CONCENTRATION UNIT% QUANTITY LIMITS CONC UNIT% AVERAGE MAXIMUM MINIMUM %U %U %U MG/L (00556> 87/04/30 MC/L --__'-_----___- (00556) 92/09/30 MG/L 92/09/3@ / (�0050) 87/04/3O (5005 92/09/30/ `-_--_-'------ 8.5O0 6.000 MAXIMUM MINIMUM 9.000 6.000 MAXIMUM MINIMUM 9.000 6.000 MAXIMUM MINIMUM 30.0O0 60.0O0 30DA AV DAILY MX 30^0OO 6O.000 30DA AV DAILY MX 30.000 60.000 30DA AV DAILY MAX To: Permits and Engineering Unit Water Quality Section Date: March 31, 1992 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS County: Rowan NPDES Permit No.: NC0049905 E OV MRO No.: 92 - 53 APR 0 3 le,62 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and Address: Chevron U. S . A. , IncAEC*C4 WP°RT BRAt1CH 1825 Jake Alexander Boulevard Salisbury, North carolina 28144 2. Date of Investigation: March 30, 1992 3. Report Prepared By: G. T. Chen 4. Person Contacted and Telephone Number: Mr. L. A. Blackman, Plant Supervisor; (704) 636-0781 5. Directions to Site: From the junction of Highway 150 and Highway 70/601 (Jake Alexander Boulevard) in Salisbury, Rowan County, travel north on Highway 70/601 approximately 1.8 miles. Chevron USA is on the left (west) of the road. 6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge Points: - Latitude: 35° 41' 03" Longitude: 80° 30' 34" Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicate treatment plant site and discharge point on map. USGS Quad No.: E 16 NE USGS Quad Name: Rowan Mills, NC 7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): Limited land area available for expansion/upgrading of the contain- ment basin. 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): 1 - 2% slopes toward containment basin which does not appear to be in a flood plain. 9. Location of Nearest Dwelling: None within 500 feet of the facility. PLOTTED 10. Receiving Stream or Affected Surface Waters: Unnamed tributary to Grants Creek. a. Classification: C b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin and 03-07-04 c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Wasteflow is discharged from the containment basin (via a manually operated gate) into a dry ditch which is parallel to railroad tracks. The dry ditch is tributary to Grants Creek. Downstream users are unknown. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. Type of Wastewater: 0% Domestic 100% Industrial a. Volume of Wastewater: N/A MGD* (Design Capacity) *Intermittent Discharge b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: Wastewater collected in the containment basin consists primarily of storm runoff, water used for dust control, spill clean-up, and also approximately 200 gpd of non - contact cooling water plus approximately 1,500 gpd of boiler blow -down. The Company also proposes to discharge hydrotest water used for testing new storage tanks during the installation process. c. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: N/A d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A in development should be required approved not needed 2. Production Rates (industrial discharges only) in pounds per day: N/A a. Highest month in past 12 months: lbs/day b. Highest year in the past 5 years: lbs/day 3. Description of Industrial Process (for industries only) and Applicable CFR Part and Subpart: Processing base asphalt material into a variety of asphalt products. 4. Type of Treatment (specify whether proposed or existing): The existing facility consists of mainly a spill containment basin (capacity: 100,000 gpd) and a series of subsurface drainage pipes leading to the basin. Effluent is discharged from the containment basin into a dry ditch parallel to rail -road tracks by manually opening a gate valve. 5. Sludge Handling and Disposal Scheme: Grit chamber is cleaned annually; and an insignificant amount of dirt and grit is disposed to an on -site dumpster. Sediment formed in the basin is removed when necessary and placed on Company property. A permit for the disposal of sediment may be necessary. 6. Treatment Plant Classification (attach completed rating sheet): Class 0, see attached rating sheet. 7. SIC Code(s): 2951 Wastewater Code(s): Primary: 73 Secondary: 14, 16 Main Treatment Unit Code: 00000 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants Funds (municipals only)? N/A 2. Special monitoring requests: N/A 3. Additional effluent limits requests: N/A 4. Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous waste utilized at this facility that may impact water quality, air quality or groundwater? The existing wasteflow is primarily of stormwater, water used for dust control and spill clean-up, and a small amount of non -contact cooling water and boiler blow -down. No hazardous waste is utilized at this facility. No adverse impact on air, groundwater and/or water quality is anticipated from the subject discharge. 5. Other: N/A PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS On -site inspection indicated that the subject facility was properly maintained. However, one violation of Permit limits for pH was noted (March, 1991) for the period from February, 1991 through January, 1992. It is recommended that the subject permit be renewed as requested by the applicant. —r 04-01—f-a Signature f Report Preparer Date D r2i,e C-et4-4,-\ 11-0 2--- Water Quality ReonalSupervisor Da e ..,`• % 1 h AIkil'I‘ s '1: A I / tv i 1 • 0 i • *Alt` W. II • ../ 1111 4i/411 • 7/( (SALISBUJRY) 4955 III NW trt Piz4i/742 point W POINT 3.2 Ml. TO /NT. 85 N 4 Gu 0 r. Cewi U.S. . NpPFs propt No, Ncoaf905 R014410 L'oun�J • 0 e O • / 64 A o • ► o • Name of Plant: elekon • vl5'I) Owner or Contact Person: M. ljr._)'. 5 61141 t15k) Mailing Address: 1125-,Ake Ail xa,d eadgairei County: ,Dit/40 Telephone: (04) Z36 -.ON NPDES Permit No. NCOO 44 910c Nondisc. Per. No. lssueDate: Sot'/. /7, /9B7 Expiration Date: Existing Facility V New Facility Rated By: 6. 7.' _ Date: Reviewed (Train. & Cert.), Reg. Office Reviewed (Train. & Cert.) Central Office ORC Z 4. /3l1c4m4,t Grade Plant Class: (circle one) I II ID 1V Total Points ITEM POINTS (1) Industrial Pretreatment Units and/or Industrial Pretreatment Program (see definition No. 33) 4 (2) DESIGN FLOW OF PLANT IN GPD (not applicable to non -contaminated cooling waters, sludge handling facilities for water purification plants, totally closed cycle systems (def. No. 11), and facilities consisting only of Item (4) (d) or Items (4) (d) and (11) (d» 0 -- 20,000 ' 1 20.001 -- 50.000 1� 50.001 -- 100,000 3 100,001 — 250,000 4 250.001 — 500,000 5 500,001—1,000,000 8 1,000,001 -. 2,000.000 10 2,000,001 (and up) - rate 1 point additional for each 200.000 gpd capacity up to a maxi um of 30 Design Flow (gpd) : %gtt/Ihitte dfS / g (3) PRELIMINARY UNITS (see definition no. 32) (a) Bar Screens 1 or • (b) Mechanical Screens, Static Screens or Comminuting Devices (c) Grit Removal or (d) Mechanical or Aerated Grit Removal (e) Flow Measuring Device or (f) Instrumented Flow Measurement (g) Preaeration 2 1 2 1 2 2 (h) Influent Flow•Equatization 2 (i) Grease or Oil Separators - Gravity 2 Mechanical 3 Dissolved Air Flotation. 8 (j) Prechlorination 5 (4) PRIMARY TREATMENT UNITS (a) Septic Tank (see definition no. 43) 2 (b) Imhoff Tank 5 (c) Primary Clarifiers 5 (d) Settling Ponds or Settling Tanks for Inorganic Non -toxic Materials (sludge handling facilities for water purification plants. sand. gravel. stone, and other mining operations except recreational activities such as gem or gold miniing) v /frz (5) SECONDARY TREATMENT UNITS (a) Carbonaceous Stage (i)Aeration - High Purity Oxygen System 20 Diffused Air System 10 Mechanical Air System (fixed, floating or rotor) 8 Separate Sludge Reaeration 3 (ii) Trickling Filter High Rate 7 Standard Rate 5 Packed Tower 5 (i i I) Biological Aerated Filter or Aerated Biological Filter t 0 (iv) Aerated Lagoons 10 (v) Rotating Biological Contactors i 0 (vi) Sand Filters - intermittent biological 2 recirculating biological 3 (vil) Stabilization Lagoons (viii)Clarifier 5 (ix) Single stage system for combined carbonaceous removal of BOD and nitrogenous removal by nitrification (see def. No. 12) (Points for this item have to be in addition to items (5) (a) (i) through (5) (a) (viii) 8 (x) Nutrient additions to enhance BOD removal 5 (xi) Biological Culture ('Super Bugs') addition to enhance organic compound removal 5 (b) Nitrogenous Stage (i) Aeration - High Purity Oxygen System 2 0 Diffused Air System 10 Mechanical Air System (fixed, floating. or rotor) 8 Separate Sludge Reaeration 3 (ii) Trickling Filter - High Rate 7 Standard Rate 5 Packed Tower 5 (i i i) Biological Aerated Filter or Aerated Biological Filter 10 (iv) Rotating Biological Contactors 10 (v) Sand Filter - intermittent biological 2 recirculating biological 3 (vi) Clarifier 5 (6) TERTIARY OR ADVANCED TREATMENT UNIT (a) Activated Carbons Beds - without carbon regeneration 5 with carbon regeneration •- 15 (b) Powdered or Granular Activated Carbon Feed - without carbon regeneration 5 with carbon regeneration 15 (c) Air Stripping 5 (d) Denitrification Process (separate process) 10 (e) Electrodiatysis .. 5 (I) Foam Separation • 5 (g) ton Exchange 5 (h) Land Application of Treated Effluent (see definition no. 22b) (not applicable for sand, gravel. stone and other similar mining operations) (i) on agriculturally managed sites (See def No 4) 10 (ii) by high rate infiltration on non -agriculturally managed sites (includes rotary distributors and similar fixed nozzle systems) 4 (iii) by subsurface disposal (ncludes low pressure pipe systems and gravity systems except at plants consisting of septic tank and nitrifica- tion fines only) 4 (i) Microscreens 5 (j) Phosphorus Remoial by Biological Processes (See def. No. 26) 2 0 (k) Polishing Ponds - without aeration 2 with aeration 5 (1) Post Aeration - cascade • - 0 diffused or mechanical • . 5 (m) Reverse Osmosis 5 (n) Sand or Mixed -Media Filters - low rate 2 high rale 5 (o) Treatment processes for removal of metal or cyanide 15 (p) Treatment processes for removal of toxic materials other than metal or cyanide • • (10) CHEMICAL ADDITION SYSTEM (S) (See definition No.-9) (not applicable to chemical additions rated as item (3) (!). (5) (a) (xi). (6) (a). (6) (b). (7) (b). (7) (e)• (9) (a). (9) (b). or (9) (c) 5 points each: List: 5. 5 5 MISCELLANEOUS UNITS (a) Holding Ponds. Holding Tanks or Settling Ponds for Organic or Toxic Materials including wastes from mining operations containing nitrogen and/or phosphorous compounds in amounts significantly greater than is common for domestic wastewater 4 (b) Effluent Flow Equalization (not applicable to storage basins which are inherent in land application systems)2 (c) Stage Discharge (not applicable to storage basins • inherent in land application systems 5 (d) Purnps.N.NN...N.•••••••..•N.NN.N.^N3 (e) Stand -By Power SupplyN.NN.NN.NN.NN.NN.NN.N...N.N.NNNN.NN.NN.N3 (f) Thermal Pollution Control Device 3 TOTAL POINTS Class L 5 • - 25 Points Class II NN .NNN N 26- 50 Points Class I11N.....NN.NN NN.rM.MMMMN.NN 51- 65 Points Class IV- 66- Up Points CLASSIFICATION Facilities having a rating of one through four points. inclusive, do not require a certified operator. Classification of all other facilities requires a comparable grade operator in responsible charge. 15 Facilities having an activated sludge process will be assigned a minimum classification of Class 1I. SLUDGE TREATMENT (a) Sludge Digestion Tank • Heated 10 Aerobic . 5 Unheated 3 (b) Sludge Stabilization (chemical or thermal) 5 (c) Sludge Drying Beds • Gravity 2 Vacuum Assisted 5 Sludge Elutriatron 5 Sludge Conditioner (chemical or thermal) 5 Sludge Thickener (gravity) 5 Dissolved Air Rotation Unit (not applicable to a unit rates as (3) (i) 8 Sludge Gas Utilization (including gas storage) • . • • 2 Sludge Holding Tank - Aerated 5 Non -aerated 2 Sludge incinerator - (not including activated carbon regeneration) 10 Vacuum Filter. Centrifuge or Filter Press or other similar dewatering devices . - 10 SLUDGE DISPOSAL (including incinerated ash) (a) Lagoons 2 (b) Land Application (surface and subsurface) (see definition 22a) -where the facility holds the land app. rmit ... 10 -by contracting to a land application operator who holds the Land application permit 2 -land application of sludge by a contractor who does not hold the permit for the wastewater treatment facility where the sludge is generated 10 (c) Landlilled (burial) • 5 (g) DISINFECTION (a) Chlorination 5 (b) Dechlodnation 5 (c) Ozone 5 (d) Radiation 5 (8) Facilities having treatment processes for the removal of metal or cyanide will be assigned a minimum classification of Class II. Facilities having treatment processes for the biological removal of phosphorus will be assigned a minimum classification of Class 11I. In -plant processes and related control equipment which are an integral part of industrial production shall not be considered waste treatment. Likewise. discharges of wastewater from residences having a design flow of 1.000 gpd or less. shall not be subject to rating. ADDITIONAL COMMENTSz