WQ0034880_Inspection_20220928 (2)

Facility Number
is
0-
le Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: q)2M/;;} Arrival Time: f ..3p l Departure Time: Z:ppp,a County ld[ue II p
Region: 4-PO
.t3
Farm Name: . et tp-3�Det Ca'scJ1O_ csoOwner Email: (AJE_C2h[({)�/
I t✓r X' ia.C_O7(�
Owner Name: L\r9lsiJ I errp l",lL Phone: 23-2,g 3-9% - 7d_0% 69)
Mailing Address: q - P ram. M l;Pd6 q/4 tte falls it) . 2ts6 �o
Physical Address:
/-EPA 3- ` elva.. (M U ! h ra Je + U S AJC 2-€(o3-©
Facility Contact: Ii0e.C/C- 1 Low` Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
1
Certified Operator: UJ e.t./ F .. —6W �-Q 1
Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: `(P© '/ 3- Ponat tU t I Ed Latitude:
Integrator: p� / /�'7
Certification Number: /.(7O t - 9 q
Certification Number:
g. % a-- Longitude:
5/ d / 3-1
C912-Aurim 554716 AIZ. Genoa
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dr Poultry Ca,aci Po,.
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
L Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ig No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/42015 Continued

Facility Number: (Li - b, .-
Date of Inspection: 9'/r}a--
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
SR*I SB4 5;B 43 s1)rtf L99C6Jn! - a-
G ,9 3 i 9
p jp /Vs n
IS ` /tea /
/51' / Xn
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ®_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 14,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window IDEvidence of Wind Drift ❑ ApplicationpOutside of Approved Area (2MILL
1
12. Crop T3pe(a): r L<GC( li (in/PAtST ' r ) 62- id ( , 7L a 1264-/A0 AI [.lam wva�
13. Sod Type(s): C nn RZ / G />a. 012 '1� E4- +-`�/ v- {� -- iC-cr A>-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA D NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes IZI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 2, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes gi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes '0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 51 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes igNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection: yin! ,.,L.
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey DFailure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 54 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0No
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
El Yes 0No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes No
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes g[No
❑ Yes SNo
❑ Yes �.No
❑ NA El NE
❑ NA ID NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Orlu [Fez szcf2coied fizz ��e, 6c)e52'a l oupe�
( gsm•ed 84fr? i o th e `
Pi%d-Pak) 'o 7-Troi&?'% 5607/Je. 9p24/4.-75OeU.
Wi c'iz. (.4 m•plled u-g7 into 1uo-t6tad9 Irro—A1
V� Mel yJ (L [ A Ev i /8 ,' /�ti 0-� a h_ Meth (.i �.��r
Starr i i ethyl i ?ttit i)uti) ez- / o Oirtdoh
ctck- nu2ui&td aid aptd a7_ awa,e-d ci6'
(eat"-Beide
SPsr dtsaes - Nv h t en 1 Sa7 pt I kart-.r7y,i zab
9/10a099-tiAG= --r(SF (htf2a8 t to
ca N=3.11
.7;(j oe.)
hr.- c(a�
lr e. ka( I- vttr--
iit 2-09-3.
pint) PecP
5m mplc record
auto'l�
-rev ?-oa-3 at,),q inn kS,
clock tAot"a
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
b
1
tL- 3i-2o2tQ
Date:
Phone: SC U /d'-[t� V I tf
?leVb
5/12/2020