20140984 Ver 1_Emails_20141120 (10)

Fox, Tim
From:
Fox, Tim
Sent:
Friday, November 14, 2014 4:12 PM
To:
'Crystal Fox'; Price, Zan (George); David.W.Brown @usace.army.mil
Cc:
Barnett, Kevin
Subject:
RE: Sweetwater Hills Drive
Crystal,
Thanks for meeting with us and discussing the project.
The corresponding WQC with the Division of Water Resources for a NW3 is WQC 3883. Link below:
htto: / /oortal.ncdenr.ora /c /document library /eet file? uuid= 2b58d4d8- e847- 4f8d- 942c- 976bd5c6433a &RrouDld =38364
We would like to see your new design depending on what option you use. Once we review the new design we can
clarify written approval and any other needed material.
Please demonstrate how the proposed design will not adversely impact conditions downstream.
If you have any additional questions please let us know.
Have a good weekend.
Tim
Tim Fox - tim.fox @ncdenr.ROv
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources— Water Quality Programs
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Notice: Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Crystal Fox [mailto:CFox(a)smeinc.mm]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:23 PM
To: Fox, Tim; Price, Zan (George); David W [e-mail]
Subject: Sweetwater Hills Drive
Tim and Zan,

Thank you to you both for coming out yesterday! We are still working with the Land Owner and the Gas Coto come to
an amenable decision regarding the fine line details. One thing you guys brought up was extending the culvert. This is
amenable . to the land owner and the Gas cc is considering it as well. The current though would be to extend the culvert
the length of the ROW leaving enough space at the discharge end for a drop box. We of course would draw this up
showing bringing it to grade then installing culvert and backfilling: Any specifics you would require from me? What
paperwork would you require? I think this would be authorized under 3883. We would beat or below thresholds for
notification, but within existing ROW.
David —the current situation is the impacts have been reduced from the original 9O linear feet to what we think should
be roughly around 40 linear feet. We met with DWR and are going to incorporate some natural rock, native plants
where possible, etc if this proceeds as armor to the channel. The other option is to place a culvert for the 40 feet of
impact. Since this is a reduction (either way we go) and impacts are minor — could I provide you with an updated plan
without revising the whole PCN? Thoughts on using a culvert instead of armor?
Let me know your thoughts.
Thank you gentlemen!
Crystal
Crystal Fox, CE
Environmental Staff Professional
*S&ME
ENGINEERING INTEGRITY.
S &ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte NC 28273 in
Ph. 704- 523 -4726
Fax [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
cfoxidsmeinc.com
www.smeinc. cam
This electronic message is subject to the terms of use set forth at www.smeinc.com /email. If you received this message
in error please advise the sender by reply and delete this electronic message and any attachments. Please consider the
environment before printing this email.