20140866 Ver 1_Preliminary JD App_20141029

Shelton Sullivan
NCDENR — Div. of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617
Re: Preliminary JD for Flea Hill Ditch EEP restoration project
Greetings Shelton,
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 600
Cary, North Carolina 27518
(919) 463 -5488, FAX [phone]
October 24, 2014
OCT2�20141
DEN. - WA "rER RESOU ' E
any p o„��. -.. kCS I
Enclosed you should find a copy of the Preliminary JD application for the Flea Hill Ditch EEP stream restoration
project in Cumberland County for your review. I recently sent the application to Tyler Crumbley in the
Wilmington office of the US Army Corps of Engineers. He and Eric Kulz were the respective Corps and DWR
representatives to the IRT that reviewed the project as a mitigation site this summer. As per our email exchange
earlier this week, I was unsure who our new point of contact would be since Eric has recently departed DWR, so
thank you for working with Ginny Baker to help me with that. It's a pretty straightforward project —just an
incised stream through a farm field. Please feel free to contact me if you have any specific questions about the
site. Thank you for your time on this matter.
Sincerely,
jl�/"' / -
Scott King
Scott.King @mbakercorp.com
(919) 219 -6339
Baker I

Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the,following info:
1. Project Name Flea Hill Ditch project
2. Name of Property,Ownet /Applicant: Linda D. McLaurin, Sandra D. Tew, and Joan R. Daughtry
3. Name of Consultant/Agent: Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. / Scott King / 919 - 481 -5731
'Agent authonzation needs,to be,attached
4: Related /Previous Action ID number(s): N/A
5. Site Address: Apx. 5047 Daughtry Rd; Wade, NC 28395
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City: Wade
8. County: Cumberland
9. Lat: 35.16950 Long: - 78.77590 (Decimal Degrees Please
10. Quadrangle Name: Slocomb, NC
11. Waterway: UT to Cape Fear River (the Flea Hill Ditch)
12. Watershed: Cape Fear 04
13. Requested Action:
❑ Nationwide Permit #
❑ General Permit # _
® Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ Pre - Application Request
Attachments
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form;
Landowner Authorization Forms;
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets;
Corps Wetland Determination Data Forms;
DWR Stream Identification Forms;
Project maps (including Vicinity, Aerials, USGS Topo,
Watershed, NRCS Soil's, FEMA, and NWI);
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM - Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project, Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
-Site /Waters Name:
Keywords:

ATTACHMENT
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Scott King, Michael 'Baker Engineering; 8000 Regency Parkway - Suite 600, Cary, NC
2751.8. Contact information: (919) 48 f-5731 ot,[e-mail]
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:CESAW -RG-R;
D. , PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State:North Carolina County /parish /borough: Cumberland City:
Wade
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.16950 N
,'Long. - 78.77590 W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 3894105.3 Northing and
702550.7 Easting
Name of nearest waterbody: UT (a drainage ditchyto the,Cape Fear River located
apx. 0.78 miles downstream.of the site.
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 2,300 linear feet: 3 to 6:width (ft) and /or acres.
Cowardin Class: Riverine +
Stream Flow: Perennial Plus
Wetlands: Offacres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
w_ aters:
Tidal: N/A
Non - Tidal: N/A
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (,CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
M Field Determination. Date(s): 10/9/14
1. The Corps of Engineers believes thatthere may be jurisdictional waters, of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD it hereby advised of his or her option to

request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site
Nevertheless, the. permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2 In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
,a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other,general permit verification - requiring
"pre- construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit'applicant is hereby made aware of the
following (1), the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictiona_I waters, (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could' possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions, (3) that
the applicant has the,right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit, authorization and thereby agree to,comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary„ (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without,requesting
an approved J,D constitutes the applicant's acceptance; of the use of'the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e g , signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization ,based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal, or in any Federal' court,, and (7) whether,
the applicarit'elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary.JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be adm`rnistratively,appealed pursuant_to 33 C F'R Part 331,
and that'in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F R 331 5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site,-the Corps will,
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of'the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic - features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information
2

SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested,.appropriately reference sources,bel6w):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared /submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑' Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000,
Slocomb Quadrangle
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:gSSURGO data for North Carolina.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:CQNUS GIS layer.
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:FIRM Panel 3720056100J.
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):2012 and, 1993.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
'later Wrisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Signature and dA of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

NORTH ,CAROLINA, ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT`PROGRAM
LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION VORM.
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRITION:
Deed Book: Page: 61 L'L County:
Parcel ID Number: 6F -
S
lgftOtAddress.
Property Owner(please print:
PiropertykOwner (pleas`e� print):
The undersigned,;repst6red propertyYowner(Wof theta -ove property,; do-tiereby authorize.
Contractor %A ent/Pro ec"t 1Vlana er Name of Contractor eni Firm A nc
to take all actions, necessary for the evaluation of the property,as,h potential streabi,,wetland,and /or
riparian'tiuf(er mytigation "_,,project, including,e_onducting,stream and %or wetland determinations and
y.n
dMmeation`s;.a's -,well fk§`,issuance and�acceptance of•any", required permit(s) or certifcatioi (s). I
agree-to allow regulatory agencies,.including the US A-rinyrCorpsof'Engineers, to visit the:property
as,part;of._ _ese,environniental.review's.,
Property Owners(s) Address: ` 22� V- x Al Al
(if- different.from above)
Pr`,'operty Owner Telephone Number: �%41 f r"
Property Owner- Telepho'ne'Nuinber:
We hereby,certify the above information to be,true and accurate.to the best of our knowledge.
(Property Owner'Authdrized' Signature) (Date)
'Name of full delivery staff member (full - deliveries) or -EEP project manager (design -bid- build).
ZName'of company (full- deliveries)�or Ecosystem Enhancement Prog-ram (design- bid- build).

NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRITION:
Deed Book: [ //T Page: 0,1 LL- County: &/n b C k L Ald
Parcel ID Number: 1;; - j /y3 -,P0 05w,"I —4,.7
v
Street Address: low
Property•Owner,(please print: 111a2i9 /? hfjr4, A_ %/I) -�,
Property Owner (please-print): \50 R/V R,
The undersigned, registered property,owner(s) of`the above property`, do hereby authorize
Cam/ /•�.S %�� �SGe�� of.//l�l�
(Contractor /Agent/Project Manager)' (Name of Contractork ent Firm/Age y)
to take all - actions necessary for the evaluation of the property as a potential.stream,,wetland and/or
riparian buffer mitigation project, including conducting stream and /or wedand•determinations and
delineations, as°well as issuance and acceptance of any required permit(s) or certification(s). I
agree to allow regulatory agencies, including the US Army Corps of Engineers, to visit the property
as part of these environmental reviews.
Property Owners(s) Address: ( b ° ? r
(if different from above)
Property. Owner Telephone Number:
Property Owner Telephone Number:
We hereby certify the above information to be true and accurate to the.best of our knowledge.
Sao-
(Property Owner Authorized Signature)
(Date)
(Property Owner Authorized Signature) (Date)
'Name of full delivery staff member (full - deliveries) or EEP project manager (design- bid - build).
2Name of company (full- deliveries) or Ecosystem Enhancement Program (design- bid - build).

NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
LANDOWNER AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRITION:
Deed,Book: U6' o Page: 6) ILL, County:
Parcef ID Number: 0S+-Q\ - '1%-° -'� �s3 4- � 0%N°1
Street Address: wz) �.Ae- _
Property Owner, (please print: � ., t�c=�,.d:.� I -- " --)a �r� ) .
Property,Owner (please print): -`rAL ? 4 Sew,
Tlie!undersigned,,regis_teced property ownef(s) „ofthe above property, do,hereby °authorize
of
( Goniracior /Ageni/ProjecfManageryr (,Name of Contract ” Agent Firm/, gency)
J
to take-all- actions necessary for the evaluation of 'the property-asfa
potential stream, wetland,and /or
riparian buffer mifigation.project, inctuding,conducting,stream and /or• wetland determinations.and
delineations; as,�well as issuance and acceptance of any required permit(s) oracertification(s). I
agree,to allow regulatory,,agencies, includIing.fherUS Army Corps of'Engineers; to visit the property
as�part of these environmental reviews.
Property+Owners(s), Address: VV5, `�'��y, 4&4',.1 y.=r;: 3°� �,, �y_Q-W-y *.� \�, *4
(if°different;,from.above)
Prd per'ty'0wnier "Teleph6he.Number:, q'\o"=3QP�
PropertyDwner Telephone Number,:
We hereby certify the °above information to be true and accurate to the best of our knowledge.
(Property Owner Authorized
(Property Owner Authorized Signature) (Date)
Name of full delivery staff member (full- del►vdies)-or, EEP_, project manager (design - bid - build).
NName of company (full- delivefies) or Ecosystem Enhancement Program (design- W- buildy.

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate owattached map)
Stream: Ste_
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET AQP
Provideithe following information for the stream reach,under assessment: ��
1. Applicant's name : ir'rt 2. Evaluator's name S # ei
3. Date of evaluation r( nn / 4. Time of evaluation 2.� 30 PM
5. Name of stream: Neg �A � ii•C�. ' (UT +v �oiL1Q �sw,�, Riverbasin:- Cape Fear 0 4 (0 3 0 3 00 0y)
7. Approximate drainage�area• �. $ s tnti 2 8. Stream,order: n
9. Length of 'reach evaluated: StY 10. County- .t,L4, J2.�„If
11.- Site coordinates (if known)- / Orr�efer in decimal degrees 12. Subdivision name (if an
Latitude (ex 34 872312): S. t & ,t -S V /V Longitude (ex -77 556611): S . `5a W
Method location,determined (circle) GPS Topo,Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS Oth GI Other
13.16c4tion of reach under evaluation (note nearby ro -ds'and' landmarkks and attach �ch map stream(s) location).
0 �
� U2ieYnT l Q, WQ% /V� w[TWAO, M.A( trAar.?` LDi 4J._T
14. Proposed channel work (if an�5 S4, -4,,a, res 4v,.,+
15.,Recent weather.conditions A - w'[ • i 3 H
16. Site_conditionsmt,time of visit, Suinnu a (.la.,n 111.S0
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding'Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water,Supply Watershed (1 -IV)
18. Is there a, pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface•area
19.'Does channel appear on USGS=quad map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? 6E NO
21. Estimated watershed land use. 3, -% Residential D % Commercial D %Industrial 40% Agricultural
JJ% Forested Z,'�% Cleared / Logged % Other( 4hay(���v,X )
22.,Bankfull width: ' -JtJ 5 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank)-
24. Channel slope,down center of stream X Flat (0 to 2 %) _Gentle (1,to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %) _Steep ( >10 %)'
25. Channel sinuosity- $—Siraight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located'on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic, must be scored using,the same ,ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range, shown for the ecoregion. Page 3' provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet Scores, - should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a•pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a - stream of the,
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 2 S Comments: U&C', ii
OA
Evaluator's Signature Date f L f ( I _
This channel evaluation form is intended to bigused only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to-make a preliminary assessment of ,stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version`06 /03,. To Comment, please °call 919- 876 -8441 x.26.

Stream'.,5_
:STREAM,QUAILITTY ASSESSMEN'T°WORKSIIEET
*'These ',charactehstics'aremot assessedIn coastal streams
Qker
#
CHA RACTERISTICS'
ECOREGION POINT
RA NGE
SCORIE-
Cotista
• Piedmont
Mountain
-
Presence of flowf lieriistent pools 'in,striam
i
- ii6 flow•or_satufation = 0' stron gflow- _maz_-oints
0 ='S
0 -4.
2 r
Evidence,of past.human alteration,
0-6
'
0 ;5
0 ='S,
°
6densive°alteraiion = 0• no alteration = =:max° ints ;
-
_
Riparian zone`
no buffer= 0;-c onti Gds wide buf er = max- Tints
4
Evidence, of nutrient or chemical discharges
'
0-5-
0 - 4
.- `
0-44
-
extensive dischar es'= 0• no discharges = max' points)
-i "
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4-n
no disch e = 0; springs, sees wetlands etc. a maic, oints .
-
6,
Presencemf adjacent floodplam, - :
-0-4
0 -4
-0�= -2
O
no flood lain =-O;-extensive flood lain = max- oints), -
Ent'r'enchment / floodplain access, °
Q'
7.,
"
'=
0-5'
0-4- .
O-
Q
{dee f" entrenched°` =L0• fie u6t'floodin t3ibk points
��
t2
3
P,resence'of adjacent wetlands--
-=
- no wetlandsI 0; large ad acent,wetlands = max= ints );, _
+'
_ =
-
- " - Channel sinuosity
_
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meandet = tnax, oints )_
10
Sediinent,input
0-5
0 _ 4 _
0 ='4;
-
exterisive,de osi6on= 0 ~little of no sedunent.= mak points)
1 '
Size &,diversity of channel bed substrate;
NA'
0 = 4
fine homo enous = O;, lar ei dwerse,sizes� =,maz iMS) -
3
-
,Evidence,of cheunel incision or, widening,
~
12
dee I incised,= 0 ,stable bed,& banks = max, "mts
0 ='S
0," 4;
- z
E '0 ;5, '
Cy,
Presence of major bank failures,
severe erosion = O; ,no erosion; stable banks = max( points
°
,14r
_ r Root<deokand density on banks
:0 - 3
' 0 = 4
_
0 =5,'
3
F
(no visible roots =_6 'densc roots.throu out ! inak rots
to
15
=impact by- agriculture;, livestock; or timber- production
`no
0;- 5
0 -'4
t_
Y 0-5,
_
substantial im act --0 evidence = max_ ints
16
�' - Presence:of riffle- pool/ripple= pool,compleaes,
0_- 3�
_ 0 -�5
d'
> o
n61rifiles /ri lessor o& =,0`, well- de_velo' ed = nt'az+ points)-'
I7 '
�Habftat complexity
o_
-0- .6
0-6
little orno.habitat'- 0 fre ent; varied habitats 7�,maz rots
>_A
1� °
Canopy coverage over'streambed
no shadin ` ve jetae6fi =_0; continuous cano == max' oints ,
0 -5
,0 -5
19
Sutistrste4mbeddedness
dee l ,embedded = 0 loose structure =max
NA°
0.= 4 ~
x
0 =,4_ '
A'
A
Piesence,of stredmInvertebrates,(see page�4)`�
evidence = numerous
°'
-
-
z�:
_ no _0 ; >coinmo types maz ints
OY
Presence of am hibians
p
` V 'niifnerous, max;
=4
0: =4
`
(no ,vidence,,= 0•icotnmo s�= oinfs)..
=_s
=Pri sen&df fish,
= 'e§
f no common.,numerous --,max points)-
Y
'
23
- Evidence,of wildlife use . -
'; ~no `rots
0=6
0` -�5
0_,5,
-, evidence = lY-, abdndanrevidence' = max ,
f y
TotaLPoinfs Possible.
100,'
100
r1 d0
- _
s
TOTAir;SCORE (al§o�eriterbn.firstpage)
• r;
*'These ',charactehstics'aremot assessedIn coastal streams
Qker

USAGE All DWQ # Site # '(indicateon atiachedsmap 11
)
J STREAM QUALITY AgSESSMENT' W0_,Okk-9Ht9-T,
-Provide,'the'fonowing,info-rmation'-for,the stream rea6,undler assessment:
&ICA_
J. Applicant's.name: EimA t.A ace-iv% J. EValuaior's,name. e-6tr
U
3.'D 4. Une�oVevaaiiow,
dte('6fevaluaiion W
_O_Lk'(U_T 4- r)'6.:Rivcr-Sasin:_�C5O6 Fear 0,4
'5. Nam�,,6f itream- f 6 , xl( to�-_? e-
- ­ I —, - , ?_ _T_
7.Appr45xiiKite (driiifii-e,-ariei--AO.95 M-1 8.,Siream order
g
,9.,•efigth off6cKeyiwated-, SO, 10x4unty.
,1'1;,Sife,c6o-rdifi*tis,(if,W"n)- -,pr6lf
.�r_'gn,Oeciinal degrees- 12!SiibdMgion-fiaffie (if any).
Latitude (ex'34 872312j- _ S: Longitude (ex ­7755ali j.
'Method;lotaitondeterinined,(cireie)I 4§ 'fopoSheet 6)rtho(AbfiabThot6i IS' ,' Othefa Other
IS. Location of reach -under evaluation 1 (ndie, nearby road's and landmarks and. aiiadfi'map' ident6,ing±stiearR(§) .Iociii6n):
114dNop6sW channel w6rk;(if anv
15. Recdfit4eathei, b6diti6ni
17; ldenfffy,,ifi
4
knoqn.- —Sedti6h 10 Xidal Wiitef§,, - - Essenti4l7ish6riesMabitit
— Tf6ut'W, it6fs — _Outsta- ndffig-kgspur d - WI a­ te r­ § —
NIu- t­ rien­ t S- , d- is;t- - e W_ if- ers- ' — WM6S-pply'Wgifs 6
d, - I
V
tiAs'Adeea vofi otIake [&at dluvgtidam of the bUiati6n-ObinO Y ES' _� 'If �k §, est6 at&tW&Wat&`s6fhce iff!h'
110. Does channel "appear on,USGSquAd,ffiap?,' I' NO iO. Do�srciannO a p
pe&on USDA Sdil Survey? 0'NO
ILEstimated watershed -land use. 3 O/o kesidenfiaf 0 NoTdminbrcial 0, % Industrial i�gricuftural
ai� Forested ?L6/0tkarej i Logged , 1Y PW6ther'( Art-�-,(O-AAQ
12.,Bankfidl widtifi:_= -12- 2343ankheight,(Iiorrf bed to,t6p,6f,bankJ:,
24..'Channel slope downtcentertof stream: _X, Flat' _Steep (?]0 %)
,(P,to,2%�) ___Penth�(Ito^), ___Moderate,(_4io'fO%)
25. Channel ginuosity Straight- accasional:bends = Frequent meander —Very-sinuous Braided channel
Instfuctions f6rcomplifion of worksheet (locnied,on page -2): Begin by,deierniinilng 4he most, appropriate ecoregibn based, on
Io'cdtldn, terrain, v6giititiffi, streiffi diagsifi6iii6n,lew Every chdracfenOic musi,bescbred usingltheisame,ecoregion."�kssign p6ints
t6 dabh';chiiidt6nsilc
, within the fid&, showfi fibf'the eI coregioh. ,Page '3 , p_fovidis, a bfiefAe
i&6- 0tion
b
Chow to re'*w ifie
,
�iiira4t� �fc&Jain&d jnthd-W6rksWdt, Sc66s'shd6ld rdflidviih overall ass&sg efit of A6,:ste eaffil ichUnUr-iialditibb. If,a
-Iaiacte c n n tl Pt eV AluatW due to site or wdathei conditidfis- Snper-O,h the scoring box and p i ov de
cbmirent,secti6n Wifer Ae,
!;�thbre,are-obvious,c anges in chirdct&, of a-,stream ptid'ifeview �6. ,,the stream flo-Wi'fr
9 k. __ 9M a pAsturg
into -a i6resf),,ihe stream may be divided ihuity, and.a UgeY,to4v;ilUate each
reach-.The total score assigned to!a,stream rea&h'must range',between 6 and 160; with a,,Ecore',of,1166 tepresenti-n'p,-a,s-tr-e-a'mof'f'he
highesuquility,
Total Score (frowmverse): 22 Comments:
Evahfat6i's Signature. Date 10-14 11 !-f
,This channel evaluatioirform is intended to ed,only,as'a,guide•to assist'hiddowners,and eniviron&ehtal f5rofessibilils'in
gathering the data, required by-the United "States Army ,Corps of-Engineers to -make a preliminary assessment 'of, stream
y �ss__ - I- I -
quality: mpi'tion of this form is subject to'U9,kCA: approval and does not imply -a
y. The total4score resulting the,c e
--§' -8 x
particular miiigation ratio or requirement. Forfn subject to change�- version 06/01 To,Commeni, please call 1-9 i76444i '
Aker

St�eam:y5� 2
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
s
° ` 7
GION PPOM
- -
RANGE
C HARACTERISTICS ,
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
M6untain
1
Presence of flow /persistent pools,in,siream-
-0 -5
0=4
0 ° =`5L '
3
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow =,maze points)
,2
= Evidence of past human alteration,
0 —6
0 = 5
a exiensive alteration = °O;,no alteration =,max rots),
f"
Ripari$n zone
"
no bnffer4 ='0 Conti Woos wide_bufier = max rots -
4
Evidence of nutrienf or' chemical,- discharges
' '
0 —5
0'— 4
6-4 `
(extensive disch es = d no-disch es = max, ints
5
Groundwater-discharge
.0-11
0'— 4 ;
0 - 4,
D
no dischar e'= 0 rip seep wetlands etc. ='malt rots
_
b
Presence of adjacent floodplain'
—
0; 4
0 —,4:
-
0 =2
;
no_,flood lain = 0, extensive,fliiodplain — max,points)�
a
T
u7,
Entrenchment /'floodplain access'
'
0-5
0 —`4
- 0 = 2
(�
_ d 1 -entrenched = 0•'fre uerit floodin = max' rots
8
n ' "Presence of adjacent wetlands -
0 6
0,— 4
0 = 2
_
_ no_wetlazids = 0; I e adjacent wetlands - max points _
- _
9
_
_' Channel sinuosity,
0= 5
y 0-4
0e— 3
extensive channelization = 0; natural, meander _max- , ints
10
-0 - ' Sediment input,
extensive de os�tion= 0 lkeof no sediment; max' 'oiirts),
0 —°5
0 - 4
; -6,—'4, -
-
_Size &- diversity of=

WETLAND'DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlaniic,and Ciulf Cdastal Plain Region
Project/Site ,FIea,Hdl;DitcFi; City' /County Cumberland ;Sampling Date 10%9/14
ApplicanttOwner- BakeriEngineenng, State _NC Sampling Pointy W1
Investigatoi(s) _ "Scott'King, Section; TownshrpsRange_ N/A,
Landform,(hdlsiope; terraoe_ etc ), `a flat Local relief, conca_v_e, &rfve_x,,norie) none Slope ( %) �1%
Siibregion;(LRR,orMLRA). 234, P L'at 351690 Lo "78"7766 'Datum NAD83
nq r=
Roanoke rio`ne
°Sod Map�Unit Name NWl +classification
Are.climabc`/ hydroiogic,conditioris,on the site_typical for this time of- year?' Yes' ,X` ,No- (If no, ez _Iainari Remarks)
Are Vegetation ;,Sod ; or Hydrology �signi aht 'disturbed ?' Are "Normal'Circumstances" present? Yes. —X - No
Are Vegetation ,Boll_ or HydrologV. naturally problematic'?-- (If needed „explain °any,answers ihAemarks,)
tkUMMAKT - -�Ut FINDINGS'— Attacn ;sit@;maprsnowing,sampling point, locations,"transects „important - features, etc.
Hydroph,0c Vegetation Present? Yes X No -
lwthe,8ampled Area
HydncSoil,Present7 Yes - -'X' Nom Jirithir4tWe11and? ly6s - No; 'X=
Wetlantl Hydro logy; Present? AYes No V
nams ,.
is sampling point is not°located within -a wetland.
'HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
— -
Secondarv,lndicators (minimum of,two reguired)-
Q Surfa`oe;50",CraGcS,(B6)
Sparsely�Vegetated ConeavelSurfacez(Bt3j
; Primarvjlndicators,(minimum,of one`IS_reauired. check all that aoolv)
Surface.Water (A1) t ❑� Aquatic Fauna(B)3)
High WatelTabte,(A2)
1u-r, Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR,U)
Drainage Patterns;(B10)
Satti ation (A3)
Hydrogen, Sulfide 6d6r(C1)
Moss Tnm,Lines (B16)
Water Mattis,(Bi)
'SedimentDeposits1(B2)
110
11u��ff.Oxidized R_hizospheres alongjLivmg Roots (C3)
Irom(C4)
❑ D-ry,Season'1Nater Tables(C2j
g Crayfish'Burro%W(CS)�
Drift,0eposits,(t33i
:LJ,IPresen_ce;oi,Reduced
a,' -kc
IromReduction
Q
, Recent in-Tdled Sods,(C6)
Saturation ,Visible`on'Aenal,lmagery'(C9)
Q Algat,Mator Crust (B4),
Thin Muth Surface (67j
B:,Other
Q Geomorphic Position(D2)
Q Iron`Deposits -(B5)
(Explain in Remarks)
Q Shallo- Aquftardi(D3)
Q Inundation,Visibie on,Aenal'imagery,,(B7),
Q FAC- Neutral Test %(D5),
Q Water, - Stained Leaves, 6):
Sphagnum mos "s;(D8).(LRR T; U)r
Field Observatlons:
- - -
Surface,Water Present? Yes
'No - X Depth (inches)
WaterTable,Present7' Yes
No' Xr Depth (inchgs)y
Saturation.Pres'ent? Yes
No X Dap 0j(ihc6es)
�Wetland,Hydrology Present? Yes No X
iAGudesca dia 1fnn' e),
"
Descnbe ,Recorded,Data'(stream,gauge, moridonng Well; aenal photos, previousnrispechons), if available
Remarks -
There ar, no indicators of'hydrology found at this sampling point. The adjacent, 'deeply incisedrditch
has drained this area.
`US,Army Corps of`Engmeers Atlanticiand Gulf Coastal Piain4kegion — ,Version 2 0

VEGETATION;,(Foun'Str'ata)�= Use{scientiftc names of plants' Sampling Point - W1`
Tree Stratum .(Plot size 30 fl
1 Melia azedarach
)
Absolute Dominant Indicator
%"Cover 'Soecies? Sta s
30 Y UP_L
Dominance Test-worksheet -
Number of f)ominant'Species
That'Are OBL•, FACW, or FAC-
2xPuerc4s phellos
30
Y FACV1f
Total NumliefoCDo7iunant g
SpeGes- Across All`Strate . , ;(B)
Percent�of Dominant•Speciesr o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC Tg �'
_
3 , Uquidambar'styraciflua
4 Diospyros,mrgimana_-
5 Prunus serotrna
6 ' Carpmus'carolm+ana
.20
:20,'
157
-10'
Y FAC
;Y FAC
N FACU
N FAC
Prevalence Index,worksheet:
Total % Cover of, Multiply by
OBL species
;7 Acer saccharum -5 N FACU
g Celbs laev+gata :5' N FACW
135 - rTotal'Cover
gg,
50% of fotal'cover -Ill - -
96 27,
20 of total cover � -�
FACW species`, x 2 - =,
- - - - . -•
Sapling/Shrub Stratum" (Plot size 30 R; )
Diospyros V141niana'
2 Melia azedarach
3 g4a;c& s ptiellos
_
15
15'
5
Y FAC
Y UP. L
N FACW
FAC "es z 3 =
FACU species - - - x4=
UPLrs'peecies z 5=
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence 'Index = ABlA =.
q Ulmue alata 5 N FACU
,5
Hydrophytic +Vegetation) lndicators•
❑ 1 - Rapid Test'for Hydroptrytic,Vegetabon
§
2,- Dominance Test is >6A,
8
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is 5.3 0'
1--I +
0 Problematic "rophybc,Vegetaboru,(Explam)
40 = TotalrCover
50% of totahcover '20
20% of total,cover B,
(PIdt,s.e, '15 -ft
Herb Stratum i
- • �
,f Arundman&g+gantea
r )
10
Y FACW
Indicators,of hydncsod and wetland h 'ydrology +mu`s_t
be present? unless disturbed'or- peot616rimatio-
,2 Sohdaga iugosa
5
Y, FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
ThW Woody plants, ezcludmg vines; Xin (7 6 cm) ;or
moremmidiamete� et tireasiyhe�gfit (DBH);,regardless of `
Height
,3
4
5
-6 - -
Sapling/St rub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 m DBH and `greater thaw3r26ft (1im);tall
7
'8
Herb - All herbaceous (non;woody),piants, regardless
of size, and;woody,pfants less;itian'3 28'ft tall
Woodywine - All woody vines+greafer ;than,3f28 ft',in,
g•
`10
1d .
height` `
12,
15
_ = Total'Cover
50 -5,of total cover 8
20 °k of total cover 3
Woody Vine Stratum '(Plot siie
15'ft _ )
.1 �Campsisiadicans
10
N FAC
2, Toxicodendron radicans 50 Y FAC
3 Lor cera japonica
10
N FACU
Hydiophytic,
Vegetation
Present? Yes `No, x,
-
4
5
60_ = Total Cover
50 %,ot'total cover 3U 209'0 of total `cover 12
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this sampling point
US Army Corps;of Engineers Atlantic and bulf,Coastal'Plaln Region - Version 2 0

SOIL
Depth
-Matrix
;P,olyvalue Below Surfacei(S8) (LRR S; , U),
Redox,FeatuWs
(inches)
Colof (moist)
f % `
Color (moist) % w0b, w'- Textu?e
'6-2"
16YR 4/3
1 Q0
_
- sift'loain
4'
1 A 5/3,
1,00
- sift'ldam
4-10,'
1OYR 7/21
100,
- sift loam
10 -12"
16YR 712;,
190
7.5YR'516 10 C M silt loam
.Sampling,Point , 'W1-
Remarks
Hjdric, Soil Indicators: (Applicable to aII L
D; H' osol (A1)
' Histic E ipedon (A2)
Black',His!SQ 3)
Hydrogen Sulfide_,(A4)
�Stratified,Layers (A5)
,Or`ganic Bodies (A6), "(LRR,P, T,'U)
5;cni Mucky,Min'eral (A7j „(LRR P;,T; U)
Muck,P.resence,(A8)'(LRR U)
x
1 cm�Muck'(A'9) (LRR�,. P,_T)
Q• Depleted,mi&;w bark�Surface (Ai q
❑I Thi6k.0ark Suffice (Al2)
"CoasWrame Redox,(AlQ(MLRA 150A)
,Sandy Mucky Mineral ('S);(LRR,O,.S)
s
,Santly Gleyed Matnz;(S4)
S",-.T, U)
Type
DeptFi,(inches)- ,
unless "otherwise noted:)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
;P,olyvalue Below Surfacei(S8) (LRR S; , U),
'1 cm#bgk (A9)`(LRR O)
`Thin. Dark Surf aee,(S9)',(LRRS,, T,,IJ)`,
Muck (A10) (L'RR,S)'
YLoamy MuckyrMineral',(F1)',(LRR Oj
Reduced'Vertic (E18_) °(outside'MLRA 150A,6j,
; Loamy,VGleyed,Matriz,(F2)
❑
Piedmont FloodplainSoils,(0,19) (LRR +Pj3,'T)
Depleted I Matrix' (F3)
Ao d-tttL Sods (F20)%
Aedox Dark, §urfaF6)
(MLRA 153B)
Depieted 'ark;Surfaoe;(F7)
,
`losBxn
❑ RedParentMatenalot9(TmFy2,)
1Redox;aDepressions,(FS)'
'W`
] VeryplShallow Dark Surface (TF12),
;' y,,f i
,Marl +(F10j (LRR. U).
Other;(Explaui in Remarks)
.Depleted Ochnc (F1'1)y(MLRA 151 j
_hon- Manganese 4ass4k(F12)z(LRR'O, P, T)
'Indicators:of hjdrophytic,vegetaiion and
,Umbirc Surface (F13) (L'RR P ; U)
wetland hydrology.rh it be present
iDelta'Oehric (F17,);(MLRAr151)
u_nless dis_ t_u_rbed`or problemabcF
Reduced 'Vertica(F18)�(ML+RA�150A, 1SOB)
,Piedm6iiVFl6,odpiain;

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic,and GUIf'COast46il,Plall7 Region
Proted/Site, Flea Hill Ditch CitylCounry" Uinberiand Sampbng Date 10/9/,14'
,ApplicanUOwner ;Baker Engineeirng° State NC Sam U Pant ,
P :_
'In CiE fh ator(s) 'Scott King ,Section`, Township, Range N/A
La_n'dform;(hdlslope,,teirace „etc) a flat Local reGef,(cbmave, convex_ „none);• none Slope (%)_ <1%
-Subregion (tRR or,MLRA) j =234, P Lat 35 1684 _ _ Long '78 7759 Datum ?NADl 3 _
Soil Map Unit,Name .Roanoke __ _ _ NWlldassil7caUon none _
'Are ,c6matic! hydrologic conditions on,the site typical for this-time of year? -Yes. X : No -- (If no, explam,in Remarks ),
AreiVegetabon4 ,,,Soil- ,,orHydrology . _ significanily'disturbed? Are' SNormal,Circumstances "'present? Yes', 'x INo,
,AreVegetatton, ,Soil „or Hydrology naturally problematic? Of needed, explain any'answers in kemarkO
tUMMARY�OF FINDINGS — Attachsite'map showing sampling point locations „transacts; important,features,'etc:
Hydrophybc Vegetation- Oresen0 Yes X No Is`the Sampled'Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes X No X
x withida Wetland? Yes. - - No
Wetland Hydrology;Present? Yes , No - �-
The�samplinopoinils,not Iocated,vithin a,wetland.
HYDROLOGY-
Wetland Hydrology'Indicato_ rs-
SecondarGlIndlcatofd (mmimum'of tWolre(iuired)
lndicat ors'U rnromuin o ore is
fi auireId�: heck'all that'aooly)
,
❑ Surface Soil Craks•(B6) )
Su4ace,Waier (Af j,
High Water Table
iuo,Aquaic Fauna (013)
U)
Sprsely Vegetated Conc ave�Surfacet(BB)
Drainage,Patterns:(B10
(A2)
Saturation (A3)
uDPrimary
(615)�(LRR
Hydrogen Sulfide 0dor'(C1)
Moss'Tnm Lines
Water Marks
fc,
Oxidized Rhizospheres'alohg,Uy6g Roo_
(616)
Dry-
(B1)
Deposits
tL-Jt ts.(C3)
Redueed,lr6ns(C4)
Season'Watei Table?(C2)
Crayfish_Burrows
Sediment (B2).
LJ, Dn8 Deposds (B3)
1L-Jt Fresence of
Iron Reduct on'in Tilled Sods (C6)
(C8)
0 Saturation Visi6le+6n'AeriaPlmageryi,(C9)
a •Alg&Mat &CrU 134)
IiJ,'Recent
,
t
eomopic±Posfion�(D2)°
a lio'n_lDeposfi',(B5)
:0theif(Expla!i0 Remarks)
❑ Shallow,Aquitaid�(D3)
Q'Inuridation Visible on,Aenal lmagery`(K),
✓ FA'C Neutral T,est`(D5)
r]
a , Water-5tained Leaves'(B9)
-
❑ Sphagnum -,moss,(158j (LRRT, U)
Field ,Observations - '
Surface Water Present? Yes,
No X Depth (inches) -,
Water Table Present? Yes
No aX, Depth pnchesj --
SaturaboniPresent� Yes
No 1W Depthl(mches)
Wetland
Hydrology:P,resent7 Yes No, 'x
includes ca dla -frnn e
Descnbe'Recoided Datay(stream gauge,;monrtonng well; aerial °photos, previous'inspections). if a'vailable-
Remarks
There are no indicators of
hydrolog_ y found at this sampling_ point.
The adjacent, deeply incised ditch
has drained this.area
US +Army Coips'of,Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal'Plam;Region - Version 2 0

vr-"c i A i iviv jr-i;!yr pirala) ­ use scit:Mipr, names ui,p!5jni5
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum St_ ze 30 - f
96,`Cover species
N
40 Y,
PIKUirtaicli, 30 Y"
4, Aber rubrum }30,
z,ampq.n
-.-, � g-,gint,
,;r -
Indicator -Dominance Test worksheet:
. StaWs' Numti&r of,D6rfiifi6fiVSj5'eaes-
f That Are b b L
t �5_=Jotal Cover
t505 oMotal cover? '58. 12A cftotal'covqr '23',
;Siplin6/Sfifub'Strat&h (PIAI sure Mft )•
Ater rubrum -§O Y FAC
15
'3,,6uercqs 0 N TAbW
7
�4 Ulffitis "'V 5 N 'FAC
8
60' =aTotal Cover
'50% 6f,tbtakl_cbvbr, 40' t20% 6f,t-otal cBv-err 12,
Heib §traibm,(Plot size, 15"ft
1 VacamAartioreum 10' Yj ,FASUI
,2
Total Niihibiir 6f,DomIri4nt
.dpe6es; Acr6ss,411'Strata- 9 (B)
Percent,ofDomin
I _ IkItSpecles;
that-Are LOBL, FACO.' or FAC 89% (")
- Total % Cover -,of
Mullmly b4,,
.OBL'species
tx
17A(ZVVspecies
FAq,species
'x3=,
tFAC Vipet
x4=
pecfes,
5
'doibmn t6tils,
Prevatenoe'lndex4 =2B/A=
,❑ i _: Rapid :Test fdr HydrolihyicVegeiation
2, DorfiIndrice TesCi6'>50%-
U'43 -'Prevalence index ii 53 b,'
,0 Problematic HqprophyticVeqetabon' (Explain)
f, hydnc,soil and wetland ,Indiciiors, o ' ' vflandhydrology must
be,preiint, uiiesi,disiurbed�or,,pro-6fi6mab6
3- Tree ­Woody.iilanis,�excludjng vin6s,�_3'in (7 §;qn) or
'terit','bTi4Vhe6htt�b - -, regardliss,of
4�1 more in iitlm� _BH)
f5 _ height
6 -Salp4nd1§Iirub,,,Wbo , dy plants, exc[Liding 4ines, less
7. than 3 in be�k and.greiter than 3 26 ft_',(1!mj) till
'8 - -----------
9,
10
12"
101
50% of total cover 5 -20% of totil,&ver
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 15,ft
1 Cimoiijradi& fl � 15 Y 'FAC
- qsl
2 foxicodendron,radicans '10 Y ;FAC
3 Smitaxrotundn'61ia 20 'Y' FAC
4
45 =' Total Cover
5POkof total ,cover 23 20% of total cover 9-
Hyc[rophytic vegetation i&,present-,at this ,sampling point
Herb —All,Wbabedus (non-woody) plant%,,regardlesi
of-iiiii., and- vic6dy plints" Iess,th5fi,6,28'ff, fall -
,Wool , vine — All ,woody 21 vinesgreaterthin',281tin
fiildht
Hydrophytic
`V9996tion
Pr6senfi y6s X Ho-
US Army qorps,6f E,ngirfeers, Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Ve�si&f 2 0
t

sollL
Depth I Mainz
,Sampling -Paint 'M, -
(inches)
'Coior(moist)
PN Color(moist)
% T06, Coe, Texture _ Rema)ks
0 -2"
1 6f 66
100 -
silt loam
2-6"
10YR 7/3
100, -
silt loam T l
6 =127
10YR 7/2
90 10Y.R,,6/8
10 ;C. 'M sllt',loi- v
Hydr_ic
Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all -LRRs
„unless otherwlse'noted.j Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':__ '
Histosol (A1)
Potyvalue Below Surface (SBj,(LRR,S; T;•U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9)'(LRRO)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Hi`i4b,(A3)
Tlnn Dark Surface (S9) (LRRIS;,T; U) 2- cm'Muck (A10) (LRR S)
�'LoamyMucky'Mmeral
Black
(F1j (L`RRO) L!- Reduced VerUc (F18),(out'sitle MLRA 1S0A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)'
D „L`oamy,4Gleyed Ma`_tnz (F2), 1Piedmorit Floodplain Soils (F19),(LRR P, S, T)
�(Stratified
Layers;(A5)
Bodies
�✓ ,Depleted'Mat ix',(F3) Ariomalou's,Bngfit;L'oamy Soils;(F20),
0 dar'k,Surface -(F6)
POrgamc (A6)'(LRR'P, T,`lJ)•
�. -
,5 cm`MLickyiMineral,jA7 ,(LRR P, T, U)
Redox _ y(t LRA 1536)
Depleted D`_ark Surface (F7) T ❑1 Red Parenf,Materiali(7F2j
N
-Muck Presence (A8)b(LRR•U)
<R4d6x(,De-pf ions,(Fa) u Very Shallow Dark,Surface (TF12)
I CM Muck,(A9) (LRR P, �
Depleled,Below Dark,Surface
� Marl,(F10),,(LRR U), � Other_ Uplam id, Rematks)'
Ochnc
(A1;1)
Depleted (F11);(ML'RA,1ti1)
0,
Th&Dr rk Su face,(Al2)'
0 �irori- Manganese MasseB,(Ft2L(LRR O; P,,,T)' 'Indicators of liydrophytic vegetation and
❑,'Coast
P•rame Redoz,(A16) (MLRA"150A)
S)
Umbnc�Surface,(F13),(LRR P, T, U) wetlantl`hydrology must b6 pfeseni;
H,Delta
D'Sandy
Mucky Mmeral (81),(LRR O,
Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151) unleseftturbed oir"problematic,
'Sandy Gleyed,Matnxt(S,4)
Reduced'Vertic (F18j (MLRA 166A,-150B)
Sandy Retloz
Piedmo6t•Flo6dplainjSoils,(F19) jMLRA 149A)
H-Wn6m
Stnpped Matnic (S6)
1_ my' S6ds,(F20) (ML'RA'149A;153C;153D)
.'Dark Surface,,W) "(LRR P;,S, T ;IU)
Type
Depth (m'che`_s)
1 ydric soil is present at this sampling point
Yes X Ne
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastd Plain Region - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf CoastaI- Plain`Re,gloii
ProlectlSde Flea Hd(I Dttcfi Cdy /County; Cumberland Sampting;Date
AppticantlOwner pak`er'Engineenng State NQ, Sampling,Pomt- VV3,
Nivestigato�(s) , =Scott Krng, "Section; Townslifp; Range N/A
Laridfo�m (hdl §lope, temac'e, etc') "_ a'flat, Local,reliit,(concavg, convex „nonej,.none _"slope (%)_
5utiregion (LRR or,MLRA); 2 P' Lat- 35':1659 Long -78 7756 _ _ Da`tum NAD83
,SoiLMap'UnA,Name Roanoke} _ _ _ _ NWI classification, none _
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of,yeatt Yes X 'No- (Ii no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod. , or Hydrology�V significantly disturbed? Are'"Normai Circumstances ""presenh Yes: _ X, No.
Are Vegetation- ,'Soil - or Hydrology L naturally problematic, - (If,needed,,explam,anV,answers in,Remarks j,
SUMMARY OF'FINDIPIGS - - Attach4site;map shor"i"ng sampling point locations; transects, impor'ant'4eatures,,etc.
Hydrophytic VegeiAon.Present ?, Yes . ,X _ , No -
;Is,tfie,Sa_`rtipled'Aiea,,
Hydnc,Sod Present? Yes X` No X
Wetland Hvdrologv'Present? 'Yes No, x` Within a Wetland? Yes No,,
Theasampling,point;is not located"within amotland.
:RYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Seeondarv'lndicators`(munrnurn
of twotreawred),
Surface Sod Cracks.(B6j
Sparsely VegetatedConcave :Surface,(B8)
PnmaN Ihdicators (minimum obone is'reawred check all,that'aoniv)
❑
�Surface;Water,(A1)'
,❑ Aquahc;Faunat(B13)
THlgh'1Mater'Tablet(A2)
❑�--rf Marl Deposits (B15) (L RR U)
Damage Pattems,(B10)
�Saturation
(A3)
I
u. ^Hydrogen Sulfide Odor•(C1)'
❑=
MosslTrim1Unes (B16),
, Water,Marks,@1)
`SedimeffDeposrls`(62),
f Ozidlzed Rhizospheres , along, Lnnng'RootS,(C3),
Pr`es'ence Iron
Dry- Season Water Table,(C2),
B
Dnft Deposits (83)
fL—Jt of Reduced (C4)
u Reoent Iron,Reductwn in-Tilled S_ods,(C6)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (98)
Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9p
❑
Algal Mat or',Chat (B4)
Thin Muc Su"rface,(C7)
B
❑
Geomor'ph(c'Position (D2)
❑
'Iron Depos&,@5)
Otfier`(Ezplainm Remarks)
❑
Shallow,Aqu'_dard.(D3j
❑
„Inundation Visible`on,Aenal Imagery�(B7)'
Q
FAC- Neutral Test (Dbj
❑
'Water= StainediLeaves (69)
❑'1Sphagnum,mosv(D8)'
(LRWT, U)
`Field'Observations:
-
-
-- - W
Surface Water Present? , Yes
No 'X Depth;(inches),•-
Water Table- Present? Yes
No sx Depth pnches)
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth - (inches)
`Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No. X-
rncludes ca Illa `inn e ,
Descnbe'RecoFded Data "(stream,gauge,•morntonng well, aenal' photos`; prevrous'insoctioris); if available
Remarks
There are no,ihdicaiors-of hydrology found ;at this sampling point.
The adjacent, deeplyincised' ditch
has drained this area
US Am9y Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf ,Coastal 'Plain Region - Version 2'0

VEGETATION (FoucStrata) -� Use-scientific names'ofiplants.
Point wro
Absolute,,, liorninant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
,.Tree Stratum;(plot slie 301 ) _Cover ,.SpecleO S t s Number of Dominant, Species
1 .Aced r ,tie 30 Y FAC" That Are OBI, FACW or FAC q (A)
.2 _Quercus plsellos" 30 Y 'FACW'_ Total Number of D'o "minant
g Diospyrds Wgmiana 5 N' FAC Species AcrossWStfata� 5 (B)
q _ _Ulmus alata 10 N , FA_CU_
Percent of Dominant Spgbi6s
15 _ ; ,'_ _ - _ That Are OBL, FACW; or'FAC 80% (AB)
*6,
,Prevalence'Index;

SOIL
Profile Description: ,(Describe to_the de
Depth
Matrix
66cliesl'
Color (moistl` I
0 3�'
10YR - -5/3 100,
3,=6"
10YR °6/3 �85
Er12"
10)(R,7/2 180
Redox Features
Colorl(mor §th '_ - T4oe'L'ocr,
10YR'5/6; 15: C w M
10YR 6/8: 20' C M
Sampling Point YP ,
- Teztuii Renf4kti - -
slft`loam
sdt, loam
silt,loam �� `
ricentration,,D= Depletion, RM= Reduced'Matnx; MS =Masked,S6rfdT ralni, ZLocaiion ,PL= Pdre�,Cinmd. M= Matrix
(Applicable
Histosol,(A1)
Hisbc'Epipedon (A2j'
,Bla'bk Hi_stfC,(A3j
Hyd(ogen SulfIde,(A4);
Stratdied Layefs(A5j
Organic.Bodies A'6),(L'RR P „T, Uj
5 cm Mucky Mmeral.(A7);(LRR'P; T, U),
Muck Presen'c_e"=`(A8),(LRR -U)
15am Muck (A9),(LRR P. T)
Depfeted'Below Dark,Surface (A11)-
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Coe §t P,raine Redox (A16) (IYII_RA,I50A)
1
Sandy;Mucicy'Mlneral (S1),(LRR,O; S) .
Sandy,Gleyed,Matnxt(S4)
Sandy, Redox,(S5)
Stnpped.Matnz (S6)
Dark,Surface;(S -15 (LRR,P „S; T; lJ)
Type ,
�D"_e"pth,pnclies),
unless; otherwise notedif
Indicators f6i�Piibb— maticHidrie Soils':-
Polyvalue Below�Surfab&'(S8) -(L ttC§ T, U)'
'
'
1 6Fn'Muck'(A9),(LRR�O):
Thm�Daik - uU face;(S9), (LRRk3; T, U)'
2,cm"Muck (A10),(LRRrS)'
Loamy Mucky,
I
Reduced'Verdc'(F1f3) �outside;MLRA`150A;6);
rriy;Gleyed'AAatiizi(E2)
Loa
Piedmont Ftoodplain'Soils
Depleted Mithi (F3)
Anomalous,Bnglit Coamy'Soils (F20)
Redox Dark;36rface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surtace,(F7)
(MI-RA-15313)
❑ Red,Parent Matenaf(TF2j
Redox'Depressions,(”)
.`Very Shallow;Dark'Surface,(TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR,U)
1:3 Other (F�iplain in Rer)iaitcs)
Depleted Ochnc,(Fi,1),(MLRA 151)_
Iron- Manganese Masses'(F12)' {LRR O, 0,,T),
'Indicators of hydrophytic,vegetabon and
U�mtincLS6rface'(F13)F(LRR P; T;'U)
wetland hydrology,must,be;present,
Delta'Ochnc;(F17p(MLRA161)'
unless distu_rbedz6u0jr:( matic,
Reduced Vertic (F113) (a LRA,ibl)A 1508)
Piedmont Floodptam Soils(Ft9)t(ML�RA 149Ap
Anomalou§ Bnlj ff Loaryiy Soil's (F20) (MLRA- 49A;,;143C; 153Dp
,
Hydric soiljis present at:this„sampling, paint.
Present? Yes X Not
USArrny Corp"s_sbf Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal,Plam Region-Version 2 0

WETLANDDETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic,and;OulfCoastal;Plain Region
F(lect/Site flea ',Hill Ditch CO County Cumberland Samphnd;Date. 1019/1'_4'
Applicant/Owner, Baker EnglneenhgF State NC 'Sampling Pant '
-Investigator(s)='Scott I(ing, _ 'Section, Township, Range - N/A
Landform (hillslope„ ten-ace, etc) a flat _ _ Local relief- (concave, convex „none] none Slope j%) .101W
3S6bredion (LRRCor wkL )', Z34, P Lat , 35:17704 _ Long '787754 _ _ _ Datum LNADO
,soil Map unit Name _Roanoke _ 1W classification- -none _
Are climatic / hydroiogic conditions on;fhe,stte typical for ihis.iime of year? Yes - X No (If norexi5tii' !in Remarks j
-Are,Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? - Are`°Norrnal Circumstances” present? -Yes, 'X No
Are•Vegetation .,,Soil ; or Hydrology naturally,problemati6? i(If needed;.explain any, answers'in Remarks')
x
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —A, :ske map showing °sampling point'locationsA�ansects, importanOeatures;;etc.
Hydrophytic,Vege-tabon'Present? Yes No, X
is the Sampled Area.
Hydric Soll,Pfesent? Yes X, No _ within a,Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydroiogy Present? Yes No, X I -
The „sampling";point "is not IocatedWthin arwetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrologyilndicators.
Secondary lndicatorss(minimurr of two reduired)
Pnmary,lndicatofsYminimurn.of one is,reauired: check ^all that'aooly)
❑ 'Surface Soil Craks,(66),
r
Surface Water (A1)
❑-r Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑� Spaisely_Vegetated Concave Surface,(38)
Higti Water Table,(A2)
t
L-I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
F
LJ Drainage Pattems;(B10)
Saturation_(A3)
Q- Hydrogen Sulfide Odor,(C1)
❑ Moss Trim unes,(B16),
_Water Marks`(61)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along L!vmg Roots (C3)
Dry- Season Watee Table (C2)'
Sediment,De,
1Qf.
Pree_ne of,Reu ron;(C4p
Crayflsh,Burrows (C3)
Drift Depo sk
u Tille6_Soils(C6)
❑ Saturation Visibleron ``Aenal`linadery','(C9)'
❑ Algal Mat or Crust`(84)
Thin Muck,Surface,(C7)
❑ GeomoipFiicposition,(D2)
❑ Iron Deposits,(85)
Other,(Ezplam;inlRemark§)
,❑, StiallowA-gdifard (63)`
Q I- nundation Visible on Aenal;lmage_ry (67)
❑ FAC= Neutral Test (DS),
Q Water - Stained Leaves msi)
❑ Sphagnum moss,(08j,(I R T, U)
Field Observations
Surface ^Water P,resent?, Yes,
No X Dept6w inches) -
1Naier.Table Presents Yes
No .X' Depthi(mches)
Saturation Presents Yes
No 'X: Depth (inches)
Wetland
Hydrology Present?, Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
DescnbeiReeorded Data'(stream,gauge;
momtonng well; aerial photos; previous inspections); if available
Remarks
There are no Ind icators,'ofhydrology "found•at this sampling point
The adjacent, - deeply incised ditch
has drained,this area
US -Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Versi6rr2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)- Usess66ntlfic names ofXplants
Absolute', ,Dommant� Indicator'
Tree 6tratum (Plot'size 30,ft f ) %,Cover Species ) Status -
Llquidaml>arstyraaflua 50 Y FAC
Celts taeyhgata' 15 N FACW'
3 'Til6'amencana _ - 15 N :FACU
4
8 '
5
6,_-
8
80
=+Total Cover
5096 of total cover .40'
20 °k oftotal cover
1§
Sa6hrio /Stff6b'StratuM ',(Plot site 30 ft- )
50 %; of total;cover' 28•
% oftotal'cover
Herb 6tratum,(Ploi, size ; 15 ft,
11, duercus phellos' _
10
N
FACW
i
2 Liquamayaca
6
Y
FAC
t
3 _
- -
FACU
•q D�ospyros yirginlana
•1,0
4 N
FAC
5
6,_-
8
-
x,1,.=
FACW species
_
55 ='TTotaPCover
,F, G,V ches
50 %; of total;cover' 28•
% oftotal'cover
Herb 6tratum,(Ploi, size ; 15 ft,
-)
>t Rhh66 copallmd
(A) I(B)
`5 Y UPL,
r2 Lespedbza cuneate
'S Y ,FACU, _
3
- -
•5
•11
-
;12- _
10 =total Cover
X50 %'6ftotal cover, ?
'20°% of totil,c6eir`, ?
Woody Vine=8tratum (Plot'shze
15ft ),
6_(6
1s L ra japonka
30 Y FACU.
`2 Toxicodenaron radhcans,,_
5' N' 'FAC
g _Smilax roturidifolia
10 Y FAC -
4-
Sampl1gg'Pomt W4
Tit
�Numbef,of D`omhnent'Speches
That Are OBL„ FACW, of FAC (A),
(A),
Total Number of Dominant
species °Across!All,Straia 7 - (B)
Percedof Dominant, Species
ThatAre OBL, FACW, or, FAC, 43% (A%B)
Total *liver of
- Multiply by ,
66L.spe6esc
x,1,.=
FACW species
;x 2'=
,F, G,V ches
Y x,3 =
FACU species
z 4r=
!UPL,speaes
'Column'Totals .
(A) I(B)
Prevalence. Index, =,BlA =
Q 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophyb&Vegefabon,
�:2 - ,Dominance Testis;> __
,Q 8 - Ffevalenoe Index Is 53 t),'
,O ;P_roblematic Hydrophybc Vegetation''(Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc� sod and wetland
be,present; unless disturbed or probl
Definitionsoffour VegetatlonsSt_r.
Tres Y,1/Vo6dy plants, excludin g vines; 31in- (7B cm),or
more'in dia-meti r,et breast height,(DBHj, regarcile_ss of}
height `
SaplinglShrub- _Woody pl'ants,-excluding vmes;Lless
dhen=3 in DBKand'greater thari 3 2 &ft (1 m) tall
Herb`-,AII herbaceous (non - woody)` plants', fegardless
of _size, antl woody plants less thin'3 28 ft tall
W6ody vine-•AII woody i r* 'greater than,3128 A in
tierigM -- -
5 : - ..- . ,`Hydrophythc
'45 = :Total Cover +Vegetation
5096,of total,cover 23 20°% of total cover , 9 Present? Yes; No - X
Remarks (If observed, -list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic vegetation is 'not present at -Ahis sampling point
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Aversion 2'0

"SOIL
Sampling Point 'W4 -
Depth Matrlxj - Redo_x'Featureds
firi tm) Color (moist) ,w Color (moist) 1% Wine' 'Loci Texture.
0 -3" 10YR35/3 106. - ,silt,loam
3 "12" 10YRti712 ;85' 10YR;5/8 15' C M silt1darb
'type C=Coricentratron; D= Depletion, RM=Reduceid Matnz; MS =Masked,Sand'Giairis ?Locahon P.L =Po "re Lrnind..M =Matrix^
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicabie to,all LRIU,�unless,otherwise
noted:) Indiccators for.Protitemafic Hydric'Soll§':
0
Histosoi (A1)
D P Belo`w,Surfacq,(S6),(LRR S;-T, U) El 1�cm Muck,(A9) (LRR O)'
Hrsdc Eprpedon (A2j
Black -(A3)
,Iyvalue
Thin Dark'Surface:(S9) -(LRR S, T; U) }TAI 2 cm Muck'(A10) -,(LRR Sy
Muft MLRA
Hi4tic
Loamy ineral,(F1) (LRR?O)` LJ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside 150A;B)
D
Hydrogeii:Sulfide (A4).
SUatHied Layers,(A5)
Loamy.Gleyed`Matnx (F2) y Piedmont Floodplain Sohs #I9j;(L'RR "P, S„ STj
✓, Depleted; Matrix "(F.3) Anomalous Bright LoamySods (F20);
_
Organic Bodres (A6) (LRR, P, T, lJ);
5 crn Mucl_ryMir;e4 (A7)'(LRR P „T, U)
Redox Dark-.Surface'(F6), (MLRA "153B),
Depletedbark Surface (F,7) Red = Parent+Matenal (TF2)
Muck Presence'
Very`Shkllow Dark;Surface (TF12j,
D
1 rn Mud (Q9) (LRR P, 1 `
:� °... ...
3Mr0.10) (LRR U
) Other.(EzplarnimRgmarks
D
Depeted belovDark,Surface(A11):
leed,O L M
II
Thick_Dark,Suiface (Al2)
Iron -M angaanese;Masses,(F12)'(LRR O; P,.Tj Nndreators,of hyd'rophytrc,vegetehowand`
CoastlPrarne Redoz,(A16) (INLRA 150 #)
T;.U) sw&q'!d,hydrology,must`be pfeserit,
,Sandy'MuckyUM eral (S1j'(LRR't); 3)
L Delta 6chric,(F17) (MLRA,'151) unless disturbed'oi problematic,
D
Sandy Gieyitl Matra (9'4j
Reduced Vertrc,(F18) (MLRA•160A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Flood`p_lain;SZ6 F19),(ML'RA ,149A)
°Bright
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Loamy” Sods,(F20),(MLRAA49A; 153C, 153D)
Q
Dark Surface; W) (LRR P,,S; f U)
Type ,
Depth (nchesj _
Present? Yes X` . 'Ho'
Hydcic_soil is present atj, is sampling point.
r
US Army, Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version,2 0

0A L's . S�m4r"
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: '�
Pr6j6ct/Site: r^'1 a r
Latitude:
Evaluator: p. , +uv1{ v !
County: CvP -S��ar, Igy
Longitude:
Total Polhts:
Stream Determination (Clfidcpgq
Other
Stream Is at least Intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent - erennial/
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 "perennial tf a 30•'
2
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Mbdbrate
Strong.
1a Continuity ofchannel bed and bank- ,a-
0
1
2 -
3
_
2-. Sinuosity 61 channel along ttialweg
0
1
2
3
3: in- channel structure: ex: riffle =pool, step -pool,
0
1 �)
2
3
'4. Particle size ofstieam substrate
0
_ 1
2
3,
,5. Active /relict floodplaln
0 _
1
-2
3
6.iDeposidonal;bars or,benches
0
.1
2 ,
3
7: Reeentalluvlal ,'deposits
0'
1
r
3
8: I-leadcuts
I
42
3
A. Grade control
Q
05
1_
1.5
10. Natural°valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yese 3
eartiflaw ditcdiies are not rated; sea discuW6n�s'in manual
R I-Ivrlrnlnnv /Cl lhtntal = 7 e sl
12. Piese6ce of BaWflow
0
1
2.
3
13.-Iron ozidizing bacteria
A
1
2
3
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5-
0
1`5..Sedimenf on,plants or debris
0
1
2
1.'_5'
16.AOrganlc debiisdlries,or plies,
0
0.
1.5
17:'Soll -based evidence of high water; table?
No = V
Yes '3'
(', RIMnnv !Ci ihtnf=I = L/ _ 7.4""
18JF rous roots'ih streambed`
3
_ _ 2
1
0
19. Rooted upland `plants 16 streambed
t
1
0 {
20. Macrobenthos (notediversity and abundance)
1
2
3
'21'. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22: Fish
0
0.
1.5
23: Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
,24. Amphiblans
0
0.5
1
25. Algae
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FAGW = .7
;, OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
•perennlal'slreams mey also tie_ Identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes:
'Sketch:

t�%Gl G�t•J"f 1.4
NC DWO_Stream'identifleation Form Version 4.11
Date: 3 Z(a)
Project/Site' pis
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County: C
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Js at least - intermittent
Stream Determination (circ nek
Other
lie 19 or rennet d z 30' S _
Ephemeral Intermittent erennl
e g Quad Name:
. / _ i""
A. Geomor 'holo Subtotal. =_ `! l �_
Absent-
Weak
Moderate
- Strong
V Continulty otchannel bed and bank /_
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3_ In- channel structure: ex. raffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4 Particle size of.stream substrate
0
1
2
_ 3
S. Activo /relict floodpiain
0
Yes ,
2
31
6. DeposiNonal,bars or benches
0
05
2,
'3
7. Reoe6t alluvial deposits
0
Z
2
3
8 Headcuts
11
2
3
9. Grade,control
0 z
5'
_1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes= 3
amnow oncrnes are not ratea, see oiscu tons in manual —7-
R_ Hvdminav 1Suhintal = V 1
Ell
12. Piesence,of Baseltow
0
1
2
3
13: Iron . oxidizing bacteria
0
1 )
2
3
14 Leaf litter
1.5
_ 1
012
0
15 Sediment on plants or debris
0
3
1
1:5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
3
1.5
17.'Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes ,
U. 1310100V (Subtotal— I C 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
•2
1
0'
19. Rooted`upland plants-In streambed
3"
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
2
3
22 Fish
0
1
1 5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1 _
1.5
24.,Amphibians
0
0.5
1
25. Algae
0
0.5
5'
26 Wetland'plants in,streambed
FACW­0.M;, OBL.
1:5 ther =0
'perennial streams may,also be identified using other methods ,Sewp. 35 of manual.
Notes.
Sketch:

}
OOF
l
- N
03030004104010
1
� I
Ca ear River
River R
a _
Site Location o�
,1 SwemP R Wade'
� r
0
io
301
141300
I
030300041400011 1
X
Note: Site is located within targeted local
watershed 03030004130010.
Project Vicinity Map
Flea Hill Site
Milwl Bak •1 Elpinwrinp, Inc.
_ 8090 Repay P--
Bu1e 809
Cry, NC der
27516
9 9
Plrne 919 X838188
Fey 919183 8190
0 0.5 1 2
Miles

%I
a
1718
i
�r
r'
r
r
ma
� O ■
i
L
f� 103 Conservation Easement
Ybhael Baker Enpinearinp, Inc. USGS Topographic Map
- 8009 000
ker Parkway
SC",, NNooah cwokwr 18 0 250 50Feet (Slocomb)
Plow: ptp 183 5188
F. 910,/835490 Flea Hill Site