Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
550001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200316
acil#y`Number 5 Division of Water Resources O Division of Soil and Water Conservation O Other'Agency Type of Visit: @'Com s liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: C: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: ? -(‘- Farm Name: Owner Name: Arrival Time: r0o0 Departure Time: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: 120 Owner Email: Phone: County: Region: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: / 1 r Title: Phone: Latitude: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Swine Design , Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Other Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Layer Non -Layer Design Current Dry Poultry Capacity Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Design- Current Capacityy Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker 'too .2_ Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D NE ❑ Yes ❑No NA ❑NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes lErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes /"No ❑NA ❑NE , Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: f-S- Date of Inspection: 3 - ((2, -Zo2O Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA D NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 3�' 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 11No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 11rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA El NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [1 'No El NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes MiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? El Yes [YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE -16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA El NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes [L]rNo El NA El NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? El Yes IIKTo ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check El Yes IEKlo El NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other: ❑ Yes J j No El NA ❑ NE 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE El Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code D Rainfall El Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Page 2of3 ❑ Yes 131V O ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes El No El NA NE 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: j S - / Date of Inspection: 3 - 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA 0 NE ▪ Yes El No [ NA ❑NE 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 0 Yes Ei<lo 0 NA 0 NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No IIKIA 0 NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [114�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [>�No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes al o ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes IRio ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 0 Yes [I/No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE Comments,`(refer to question #): Explain:any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any,other comments. Use drawings of facility to:better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). OS11\.Q,cc a Jck fi- TecApi\2c; ©r .� FWrvoJ Annu,a,1 �' g n C, a e,r1 r. o V � y N ec -I— S a;1 SussoVR o sU e, e,r\ 5p (o t + (—v.n' oN9 P LRT ►n p;eildt,s. U Fla rvwker �,; n s 336 11/0-Sao Hp r1 I Reviewer/Inspector Name: Mr r cl' l 1 ' (e_l (`-p ez' Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Phone: Date: 764'_23s 2/6 3 3,/C-2p2O Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015