Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20220914 Ver 1_More Info Received_20221003Strickland, Bev From: Brian Rubino <brubino@quible.com> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 1:22 PM To: Tankard, Robert Cc: billy.w.standridge (billy.w.standridge@usace.army.mil); Troy Murphy; trip@realwatersports.com Subject: RE: [External] RE: RED SHED RESIDENTIAL DEVEOLPMENT Attachments: DWR Additiional Information V2 10-3-2022.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Robert, Pleased see updated response letter for this project. Let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks, Brian Brian D. Rubino, P.G. Vice President Quible & Associates, P.C. 8466 Caratoke Highway, Bldg 400 Powells Point, NC 27966 P.O. Drawer 870 Kitty Hawk, NC 27949 t 252.491.8147 f 252.491.8146 www.quible.com LEGAL DISCLAIMER The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. i From: Brian Rubino Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 2:41 PM To: Tankard, Robert <robert.tankard@ncdenr.gov> Cc: billy.w.standridge (billy.w.standridge@usace.army.mil) <Billy.W.Standridge@usace.army.mil>; Troy Murphy <tmurphy@quible.com>; trip@realwatersports.com Subject: RE: [External] RE: RED SHED RESIDENTIAL DEVEOLPMENT Robert, I will revise the response letter I sent to discuss the avoidance and minimization considerations. The owner's goal was to build 4 of these multifamily structures due to workforce housing shortages on Hatteras Island. We found out, after some initial feasibility steps, that the property width, presence of wetlands, minimum parking needs and septic in a suitable area would not allow for that. Also, when the owners initially had this property under contract, the wetlands would have qualified as non -JD (prior rules). I will explain this all in my response #4 revised. Thanks, Brian From: Tankard, Robert <robert.tankard@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 2:07 PM To: Brian Rubino <brubino@quible.com> Cc: billy.w.standridge (billy.w.standridge@usace.army.mil) <Billy.W.Standridge@usace.army.mil>; Troy Murphy <tmurphy@quible.com>; trip@realwatersports.com Subject: RE: [External] RE: RED SHED RESIDENTIAL DEVEOLPMENT Brian, thanks for the additional info. Could you also talk about minimization (elimination of a structure, downsizing of structures and/or elimination of parking spaces)? Thanks! Robert Robert Tankard Assistant Regional Supervisor Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Office: (252) 948-3921 I Cell: (252) 402-5694 Robert.tankard@ncdenr.gov 1:1__EQA5, NORTH CAROLINA \ �/ Department of Environmental Quality Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 2 From: Brian Rubino <brubino@quible.com> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 12:22 PM To: Tankard, Robert <robert.tankard@ncdenr.gov> Cc: billy.w.standridge (billy.w.standridge@usace.army.mil) <Billy.W.Standridge@usace.army.mil>; Troy Murphy <tmurphy@quible.com>; trip@realwatersports.com Subject: [External] RE: RED SHED RESIDENTIAL DEVEOLPMENT CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Robert, Please see attached responses and supplementary information. Let me know if you have any additional questions or if you need anything else. Thanks, Brian Brian D. Rubino, P.G. Vice President Quible & Associates, P.C. 8466 Caratoke Highway, Bldg 400 Powells Point, NC 27966 P.O. Drawer 870 Kitty Hawk, NC 27949 t 252.491.8147 f 252.491.8146 www.quible.com C.9:11 LEGAL DISCLAIMER The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. From: Tankard, Robert <robert.tankard@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2022 2:25 PM To: Troy Murphy <tmurphy@quible.com>; trip@realwatersports.com Cc: billy.w.standridge (billy.w.standridge@usace.army.mil) <Billy.W.Standridge@usace.army.mil>; Brian Rubino <brubino@quible.com> Subject: RED SHED RESIDENTIAL DEVEOLPMENT 3 Mr. Murphey, please find attached is a add -info letter requesting more information about the project. If you should have any questions, please let me know. Thanks! Robert Robert Tankard Assistant Regional Supervisor Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Office: (252) 948-3921 I Cell: (252) 402-5694 Robert.tankard@ncdenr.gov 1:tEC15, NORTH CAROLINA \ �/ Department of Environmental Quality Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 4 Quible Quible & Associates, P.C. ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING SINCE 1959 Mr. Robert Tankard NCDEQ, DWR 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27909 October 3, 2022 RE: Red Shed Residential Development NCDWR Responses, V.2 SAW-2022-00395 Robert, P.O Drawer 870 Kitty Hawk, NC 27949 Phone: 252-491-8147 Fax: 252-491-8146 web: quible.com We appreciate your review of the proposed project that requires Nationwide 14/18 Permitting as well as a 401 Water Quality Certification from NCDWR. Please see below responses to your September 22, 2022 review letter and the accompanying supplementary information. DWR Item 1- The Division needs to understand why the use of Gray Ave./Lances Way cannot be used to access the proposed structures and parking areas. Applicant Response- Gray Ave. and Lances Way are not public or private rights -of -way, they are driveways for the adjacent private developments adjacent to the north and south of the subject property. Those driveways are part of the deeded lot areas for the adjacent properties. Please see attached Dare County GIS map. This is unlike some of the nearby public streets, for example, Sea Isle Hills Dr. to the north and Laughing Gull Ln. to the south. And, it is also important to note that neither Gray Ave. nor Lances Way are dimensionally compliant to be converted to public streets, since public streets must include a 45 ft wide r-o-w. Also attached is the section of the Dare County Code of Ordinances related to Public Streets. In unincorporated Dare County, a new development must abut a public street such as NC 12, but may have a private driveway that is suitable to support ingress/egress and emergency vehicle access. DWR Item 2- Please explain why the proposed structures cannot be elevated to accommodate the parking spaces for the project of why the project could not be minimized to reduce wetland fill. Applicant Response- There is not sufficient lot width to support a common driveway or a public street on the subject property to allow parking beneath the proposed structures. Initially, the owner's goal was to build four of these multifamily structures due to workforce housing shortages on Hatteras Island. It was determined, after some initial feasibility steps, that the property width, presence of wetlands, minimum parking needs and septic in a suitable area would not allow for that, but they could construct three of the structures with the appropriate USACE and NCDWR Permits. The parking spaces shown are the minimum needed to facilitate this project. Also, when the owners initially had this property under contract, the wetlands would have qualified as non -JD (prior rules) which would have allowed impacts to all of the wetland area without compensatory mitigation. This proposal would include compensatory mitigation at a 2:1 ratio. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or requests for clarification. Sincerely, Quible & Associates, P.C. ifi'l2;6`'r-- Brian Rubino CC: Billy Standridge, USACE Trip Forman