Re_ Notice of Initial Credit Release_ NCDMS Bull Chute Mitigation Site_ SAW-2020-00049 _ Randolph County

From:
Davis, Erin B
To:
Baker, Caroline D
Subject:
FW: [External] FW: [Non-DoD Source] Re
SAW-2020-00049 / Randolph County
Date:
Thursday, October 6, 2022 12:00:04 PM
Attachments:
BullChute WETS Table 1992-2022.odf
Laserfiche Upload: Email & Attachment
DWR#: 20200021 v.I
Doc Date: 10/3/22
Doc Type: Mitigation Information
Doc Name: General topic of email title
Notice of Initial Credit Release/ NCDMS Bull Chute Mitigation Site/
-----Original Message -----
From: Isenhour, Kimberly T CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Kimberly.D.Browning(a,)usace.army.mil>
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 10:20 AM
To: Davis, Erin B <erin.davis&cdenr.gov>
Cc: Kevin Yates<clearwatermitigation(ogmail.com>
Subject: [External] FW: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Notice of Initial Credit Release/ NCDMS Bull Chute Mitigation
Site/ SAW-2020-00049 / Randolph County
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to Report Spam. <mailto:report.spam(Wnc.gov>
Hey Erin,
Here is Kevin's response. I had your email address wrong again. Apologies.
Kim Isenhour
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1 919.946.5107
-----Original Message -----
From: Kevin Yates<clearwatermitigation(ogmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2022 12:56 PM
To: Isenhour, Kimberly T CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Reid, Matthew <[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<Todd.J.Tugwell(ousace.army.mil>; [e-mail]; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CEMVP (USA)
<Casey.M.Haywood(ousace.army.mil>; Wilson, Travis W.<travis.wilson&cwildlife.org>; Munzer, Olivia
<[e-mail]>; Bowers, Todd <[e-mail]>; Wiesner, Paul
<[e-mail]>; Grant Lewis (glewis(oaxiomenvironmental.org) <glewis(oaxiomenvironmental.org>;
Melonie Allen <melonie.allen&cdenr.gov>; Kenan Jernigan<kjemigan(oaxiomenvironmental.org>; Crumbley,
Tyler A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) -�'[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Notice of Initial Credit Release/ NCDMS Bull Chute Mitigation Site/ SAW-
2020-00049 / Randolph County
Hey Kim,
We discussed internally and we will default to using the WETS table to establish growing season for the Bull Chute
Site for the entire monitoring period. The most recent 30-yr data set from 1992-2022 with 50% prob of >28 degrees
gives 243 days, with a date range of 3/19 to 11/16, which we will utilize for the entire monitoring period.
We will provide a statement about defaulting to the WETS table to establish growing season, within the MY report
and include the WETS table within the appendix of the MY report.
Let us know if this amendment to the MY will work.
Thanks,

Kevin
Kevin Yates
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
919-624-6901
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:56 PM Isenhour, Kimberly T CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail] <mailtaKimberly.D.Browning&usace.army.mil> > wrote:
Kevin,
Thanks for the responses. Here are some thoughts on growing season dates, but the take-home message is that
the dates should be established in the beginning and stay consistent throughout monitoring.
If the NRCS WETS tables state that March 1 - Nov 13 is the growing season, then we are fine if you use those
dates and stick with them. There's no need to take soil temperatures and measure vegetative indicators. If the WETS
tables list a different set of dates, you should use those dates. If you would like to use a modified growing season
that is not listed in the WETS tables, you will need to measure the soil temperature using a continuous monitoring
device, and document vegetative indicators such as bud burst and leaf drop. Ideally, this data would be collected
prior to submitting the final mitigation plan so you have accurate dates, similar to collecting pre -data for
hydroperiods. If you decide to use a modified growing season, once you establish the dates (assuming it's a normal
year), you will need to stick with those dates throughout the life of the project for consistency. A lot of
inconsistencies can occur when documenting bud burst and leaf senescence, such as which species are selected, the
location of the vegetation, shading, etc., so that's why it's best to only measure the vegetative indicators once and
stick with those dates.
Let me know if you would like to discuss.
Thanks
Kim
Kim Isenhour
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1 919.946.5107
From: Kevin Yates <[e-mail] <mailto:clearwatermiti ation4=ail.com> >
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 5:55 PM
To: Isenhour, Kimberly T CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]
<mailtaKimberly.D.Browning &usace.army.mil> >
Cc: Reid, Matthew <matthew.reid&cdenr.gov <mailto:matthew.reidoa_ncdenr.gov> >; Tugwell, Todd J CIV
USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:Todd.J.Tugwellusace.ar=.mil> >;
[e-mail] <mailto:erin.davisnndenr.gov> ; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CEMVP (USA)
<Casey.M.Haywood(ousace.army.mil <mailto:Casey. M.Haywood &usace.ann mil> >; Wilson, Travis W.
<travis.wilson&cwildlife.org <mailto:travis.wilson000)ncwildlife.org> >; Munzer, Olivia

<[e-mail] <mailto:olivia.munzer&ncwildlife.org> >; Matthews, Kathryn
(kathryn matthews(Ofws.gov <mailtakathryn_matthews&ffws.gov> ) <kathryn [e-mail]
<mailto:kathUn_matthewsVfws.gov> >; Bowers, Todd <[e-mail] <mailto:bowers.todd(a�ena.gov> >;
Merritt, Katie <[e-mail] <mailto:katie.merritt(c_ncdenr.gov> >; Crumbley, Tyler A CIV USARMY
CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailt0:Tyler.A.Crumbley2C uusace.army.mil»; Fennel,
Tommy E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]
<mailto:Tommy.E.Fennel(cr�usace.army.mil> >; Wiesner, Paul <paul.wiesner&cdenr.gov
<mailto:paul.wiesnernncdenr.gov> >; Grant Lewis ([e-mail]
<mailto:glewis(&_axiomenvironmental.org> ) <[e-mail]
<mailto: lewis & axiomenvironmental.org> >; Melonie Allen <[e-mail]
<mailto:melonie.allenoa_ncdenr.gov>>; Stanfill, Jim <[e-mail] <mailtoJim.stanfiII&nc�gov»;
Harmon, Beth <[e-mail] <mailto:Beth.Harmon(a)ncdenr.gov> >; Kenan Jernigan
<[e-mail] <mailto:kjemi an q axiomenvironmental.org> >
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Notice of Initial Credit Release/ NCDMS Bull Chute Mitigation Site/ SAW-
2020-00049 / Randolph County
Good Afternoon Everyone,
Please find below responses to your comments, dated September 6, 2022, from the Bull Chute Mitigation Site -
As -Built Report (MY-0). Actions and responses will be incorporated into the Year-1 field monitoring and
subsequent report where applicable. Thanks, Kevin
Kim Isenhour, USACE:
1. I concur with DWR's comment #6. When the Corps issues the Intent to Approve letter, it is with the
understanding that we are approving the Draft Mitigation Plan, contingent upon the IRT comments being addressed
in the Final Mitigation Plan. If additional changes are made to the Final Plan, those changes/additions should be
added to the errata sheet Response to IRT comments and submitted with the Final Plan.
Re: Apologies for the misunderstanding. This has been noted. Additionally, Dactylis glomerata will not be
proposed for seeding in future projects.
2. Section 42: Were groundwater gauges installed to collect pre -construction data? If so, it's helpful if you
include the pre -construction gauge data in the MYl report to show functional uplift.
Re: Pre -construction gauges were not installed.
In future monitoring, please capture the wetland reestablishment areas on UT-3 and UT-4 with random
plots.
Re: The wetland reestablishment areas along UT3 and 4 will be captured with random plots during MY1
monitoring and beyond.
4. I concur with EPA's comment #1.

Re: See response to EPA comment 41.
5. Page 7: What is the growing season start date? You should state a growing season start date and use that
same date throughout monitoring for consistency.
Re: The growing season is listed in section 3.0 as March 1 to November 13, with the March 1 start date to be
confirmed by soil temperature and documented bud burst. If these parameters are not met on March 1, the growing
season start date is subject to change depending on when the parameters are met. This is the methodology outlined
in the approved mitigation plan. Please advise if the IRT would like to see different growing season start/end dates
or methodology for MY 1.
Erin Davis, NCDWR:
DWR was glad to see the change from culvert to bridge stream crossings.
Re: Noted.
2. Based on the monitoring summary table, please clarify whether the growing season start date is proposed
to vary from year to year during monitoring.
Re: The growing season will be March 1 to November 13, with the March 1 start date to be confirmed by soil
temperature data and documented bud burst. If these parameters are not met on March 1, the growing season start
date is subject to change depending on when the parameters are met. This is the methodology outlined in the
approved mitigation plan. Please advise if the IRT would like to see different growing season start/end dates or
methodology for MY 1.
3. DWR understands that stem species identification at as -built is a challenge and may be corrected in the
MYl survey. However, we would recommend keeping an eye on species diversity, particularly in plots currently
showing only 3 to 4 species or a significant number of Sycamore.
Re: Species diversity will be watched closely during year 1 monitoring.
4. What was the stream condition along UT7 that initially warranted the proposed structure installation?
DWR understands that this is an enhancement reach, but what is the risk of stream instability and/or potential
sediment source to downstream if the current stream condition is not addressed through an alternative treatment or
structure?
Re: The stream is incised, and the log cross vane was initially proposed to reduce further incision. Although
property constraints prevented installation of this structure, another cross vane was installed further downstream
where property boundaries allowed, and a large marsh treatment area was installed above the stream origin to catch
sediment. Further the stream bank has become densely vegetated with rooted black willows to aid in stability. If the
stream bank does become unstable and a sediment source, remediate measures will be taken.

5. As noted in the report, some of the permanent veg plots shifted compared to locations in the approved
final mitigation plan monitoring plan figure. DWR questions whether the new locations provide representative
coverage to demonstrate performance standard success for all proposed credit areas. DWR requires either veg plot
19 or 20 be relocated to nearby wetland reestablishment areas.
Re: One plot, either plot 19 or 20, will be moved into a nearby wetland reestablishment area prior to MY 1
monitoring.
6. For future projects, please don't propose seeding orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) within the project
easement. Orchardgrass is a perennial non-native species. It wasn't in the draft mitigation plan, and I didn't catch its
addition to the final mitigation plan.
Re: Dactylis glomerata will not be proposed for seeding in future projects.
Todd Bowers, USEPA:
1. Table 6a/Page 33 and 124: Recommend adding the wetland indicator status here and updating the table to
show deviations from proposed planting plan in final mitigation plan.
Re: Red -line changes from the design planting plan to as -built are on sheet AB-04W of the record drawings
(Appendix F). Wetland indicator status will be added to each species in the planting list in the MYl document.
2. Modifications made during construction and red line deviations in site plans noted with no issues. The
explanation given in subsequent documents as to why bridge crossings were changed from culverted crossings is
sufficient but I am curious if there was a significant increase or change in the cost of the project. Bridge photos were
excellent but an oblique angle of the crossing would be valuable.
Re: Noted.
3. While overall, vegetation stem counts are performing as expected, several plots have dominant species
(>50%) and/or less than 4 species. Recommend keeping a close eye on the areas with these plots (fixed plots 3, 7, 9,
11 and random plots 1, 2, 7, and 9).
Re: The bare -roots were thoroughly mixed up before planting occurred, however, some overlap with same
species can occur with planting crews. Species diversity will be watched closely during year 1 monitoring.
4. Table 7/Page 35: I'm not convinced that success criteria was met for all the plots for the reasons
mentioned above if diversity and dominant species are considered.
Re: This will be re-evaluated during MY 1.

5. Overall, I am very satisfied with the report and the work that CMS has completed at the site. Having not
been able to visit this location, I really appreciated the detailed ground -level wetland, vegetation and stream feature
photos to illustrate the grading, planting and features implemented. I recommend the appropriate credit release
(Milestone 2) for warm stream and riparian wetland mitigation units for this monitoring milestone. I have no other
substantial comments not requesting a site visit at this time.
Re: Noted, thank you.
Kevin Yates
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
919-624-6901
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 4:11 PM Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)
<[e-mail] <mailto:Kimberly.D.BrowningCq)nsace.army.mil> > wrote:
Good afternoon all,
The 15-Day As-Built/MYO review for the Bull Chute Mitigation Site (SAW-2020-00049) ended
September 2, 2022. Per Section 332.8(o)(9) of the 2008 Mitigation Rule, this review followed the streamlined
review process. All comments received from the NCIRT are incorporated in the email below. There were no
objections to issuing the initial 30% credit release of 2,322.881 warm stream mitigation units and 1.177 riparian
wetland mitigation units. Please find attached the current signed ledger. A site visit is not requested at this time.
Kim Isenhour, USAGE:
1. I concur with DWR's comment #6. When the Corps issues the Intent to Approve letter, it is with the
understanding that we are approving the Draft Mitigation Plan, contingent upon the IRT comments being addressed
in the Final Mitigation Plan. If additional changes are made to the Final Plan, those changes/additions should be
added to the errata sheet Response to IRT Comments, and submitted with the Final Plan.
2. Section 42: Were groundwater gauges installed to collect pre -construction data? If so, it's helpful if
you include the pre -construction gauge data in the MYl report to show functional uplift.
3. In future monitoring, please capture the wetland reestablishment areas on UT-3 and UT-4 with
random plots.
4. I concur with EPA's comment #1.
5. Page 7: What is the growing season start date? You should state a growing season start date and use
that same date throughout monitoring for consistency.
Erin Davis, NCDWR:
DWR was glad to see the change from culvert to bridge stream crossings.

2. Based on the monitoring summary table, please clarify whether the growing season start date is
proposed to vary from year to year during monitoring.
3. DWR understands that stem species identification at as -built is a challenge and may be corrected
in the MYl survey. However, we would recommend keeping an eye on species diversity, particularly in plots
currently showing only 3 to 4 species or a significant number of Sycamore.
4. What was the stream condition along UT7 that initially warranted the proposed structure
installation? DWR understands that this is an enhancement reach, but what is the risk of stream instability and/or
potential sediment source to downstream if the current stream condition is not addressed through an alternative
treatment or structure?
5. As noted in the report, some of the permanent veg plots shifted compared to locations in the
approved final mitigation plan monitoring plan figure. DWR questions whether the new locations provide
representative coverage to demonstrate performance standard success for all proposed credit areas. DWR requires
either veg plot 19 or 20 be relocated to nearby wetland reestablishment areas.
6. For future projects, please don't propose seeding orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) within the
project easement. Orchardgrass is a perennial non-native species. It wasn't in the draft mitigation plan, and I didn't
catch its addition to the final mitigation plan.
Todd Bowers, USEPA:
1. Table 6a/Page 33 and 124: Recommend adding the wetland indicator status here and updating
the table to show deviations from proposed planting plan in final mitigation plan.
2. Modifications made during construction and red line deviations in site plans noted with no
issues. The explanation given in subsequent documents as to why bridge crossings were changed from culverted
crossings is sufficient but I am curious if there was a significant increase or change in the cost of the project. Bridge
photos were excellent but an oblique angle of the crossing would be valuable.
3. While overall, vegetation stem counts are performing as expected, several plots have dominant
species (>50%) and/or less than 4 species. Recommend keeping a close eye on the areas with these plots (fixed plots
3, 7, 9, 11 and random plots 1, 2, 7, and 9).
4. Table 7/Page 35: I'm not convinced that success criteria was met for all the plots for the reasons
mentioned above if diversity and dominant species are considered.
5. Overall, I am very satisfied with the report and the work that CMS has completed at the site.
Having not been able to visit this location, I really appreciated the detailed ground -level wetland, vegetation and
stream feature photos to illustrate the grading, planting and features implemented. I recommend the appropriate
credit release (Milestone 2) for warm stream and riparian wetland mitigation units for this monitoring milestone. I
have no other substantial comments not requesting a site visit at this time.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Kim

Kim (Browning) Isenhour
Mitigation Project Manager, Regulatory Division I U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1 919.946.5107

WETS Table
WETS Station: ASHEBORO 2
W, NC
Requested years: 1992 - 2022
Month
Avg Max
Avg Min
Avg
Avg
30 0
30 o chance
Avg number
Avg
Temp
Temp
Mean
Precip
chance
precip more
days precip 0.
Snowfall
Temp
precip less
than
10 or more
than
Jan
49.6
30.9
40.2
3.95
2.78
4.69
7
2.7
Feb
53.9
33.6
43.8
3.33
2.39
3.93
7
-
Mar
62.1
40.3
51.2
4.11
3.23
4.74
7
Apr
71.4
48.1
59.7
3.83
2.47
4.61
6
May
77.8
56.5
67.1
3.82
2.53
4.58
7
Jun
84.9
64.8
74.9
4.30
2.81
5.17
7
Jul
88.3
68.6
78.4
4.30
3.03
5.10
8
Aug
86.6
67.3
76.9
3.81
2.96
4.40
7
Sep
80.7
61.3
71.0
4.98
2.36
6.08
6
Oct
71.1
49.7
60.4
3.62
2.38
4.35
5
Nov
61.0
39.2
50.1
3.51
1.92
4.28
6
Dec
52.9
34.1
43.5
3.61
2.52
4.29
6
Annual:
42.21
51.08
Average
70.0
49.5
59.8
-
-
-
-
Total
-
-
-
47.16
78
GROWING SEASON DATES
Years with missing data:
24 deg =
28 deg =
32 deg =
3
3
3
Years with no occurrence:
24 deg =
28 deg =
32 deg =
0
0
0
Data years used:
24 deg =
28 deg =
32 deg =
28
28
28
Probability
24 For
28 F or
32 F or
higher
higher
higher
50 percent *
3/4 to 12/
3/18 to
4/2 to
8: 279
11 /16:
11 /3: 215
days
243 days
days
70 percent *
2/27 to
3/12 to
3/29 to
12/14:
11 /22:
11 /8: 224
290 days
255 days
days
* Percent chance of the
growing season occurring
between the Beginning and
Ending dates.
STATS TABLE -total
precipitation (inches)
Yr
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Annl
1926
3.66
5.20
2.07
1.32
3.63
7.61
1.98
0.
0.
3.
4.76
35.
74
76
63
36
1927
1.00
4.07
4.16
1.94
2.93
4.47
6.61
6.90
1.
7.
2.
6.27
48.
32
09
03
79
1928
1.45
3.12
2.72
6.25
4.68
5.04
3.41
6.98
14.
1.
0.
1.01
50.
16
41
61
84
1929
2.06
6.88
6.87
4.05
5.41
5.20
4.62
4.61
2.
9.
3.
2.70
58.
86
45
98
69
1930
3.45
1.06
2.23
1.66
1.89
4.81
5.66
2.06
1.
1.
3.
5.19
35.
64
63
88
16
1931
2.07
1.25
4.01
3.74
5.25
2.75
5.28
5.29
0.
0.
0.
6.95
37.
28
70
31
88
1932
6.47
2.57
5.77
1.38
3.08
4.02
2.46
2.76
5.
7.
5.
6.36
52.
30
42
10
69
1933
2.17
3.31
2.61
3.33
2.30
1.13
2.80
4.47
0.
2.
0.
2.09
27.
71
01
97
90
1934
1.57
4.29
5.88
2.65
6.28
4.85
4.94
5.42
5.
2.
4.
3.75
51.

69
07
53
92
1935
3.25
2.89
M5.90
4.27
4.12
1.54
6.02
1.51
4.
1.
4.
M2.
42.
53
85
00
27
15
1936
7.37
2.88
6.09
6.64
0.06
6.42
8.25
3.32
2.
5.
1.
6.02
57.
80
45
96
26
1937
8.25
3.11
2.11
6.52
1.56
5.14
6.68
10.55
2.
3.
2.
1.74
53.
05
55
42
68
1938
3.17
1.20
3.02
3.46
4.81
7.06
9.27
4.44
2.
0.
4.
3.83
47.
05
89
40
60
1939
2.62
7.52
4.70
3.95
2.84
4.88
6.38
7.36
0.
1.
1.
2.27
45.
06
78
48
84
1940
3.36
3.90
3.52
2.53
4.73
2.65
3.08
7.97
0.
0.
4.
2.62
39.
63
67
27
93
1941
1.79
1.44
4.03
3.08
0.89
1.65
7.34
0.47
1.
0.
0.
4.15
27.
69
88
49
90
1942
1.86
4.64
5.45
0.91
6.12
5.74
4.22
4.05
7.
3.
2.
4.96
50.
06
06
05
12
1943
5.55
1.26
M4.63
M3.49
2.46
M9.44
9.37
M3.02
3.
0.
1.
3.14
47.
61
33
44
74
1944
3.90
5.46
6.52
4.60
2.91
2.80
12.97
2.72
10.
3.
2.
1.91
59.
05
10
84
78
1945
1.63
5.69
2.46
5.46
1.52
2.07
8.37
0.77
13.
3.
1.
6.20
52.
32
49
56
54
1946
3.47
3.85
1.71
3.65
4.09
6.49
4.37
6.06
1.
3.
2.
0.83
41.
26
26
52
56
1947
6.89
1.38
3.10
1.81
2.70
4.14
2.31
4.02
6.
4.
5.
1.16
43.
14
28
37
30
1948
4.55
3.67
4.80
3.65
5.76
5.08
2.55
5.60
2.
2.
8.
48.
34
12
74
86
1949
3.15
3.07
6.09
1.39
3.45
15.08
2.
5.
1.
2.03
43.
02
93
64
85
1950
2.37
1.81
3.56
1.07
6.43
3.51
8.04
2.87
2.
2.
1.
2.62
38.
24
64
12
28
1951
1.38
1.35
3.11
4.55
1.03
6.28
2.96
1.21
1.
1.
2.
5.18
32.
60
12
72
49
1952
3.68
4.32
7.67
3.21
6.66
1.74
5.23
10.45
2.
0.
3.
3.84
53.
55
99
62
96
1953
4.52
4.88
4.43
3.67
3.43
4.30
2.18
3.45
4.
0.
0.
M3.
39.
31
40
48
22
27
1954
7.15
1.36
4.84
2.58
4.00
1.25
1.82
4.66
1.
9.
2.
3.33
44.
65
72
29
65
1955
2.49
3.89
2.40
2.94
3.48
3.55
4.13
6.65
3.
4.
2.
0.42
40.
88
81
33
97
1956
1.23
5.57
3.49
2.75
2.81
2.10
5.52
4.74
7.
3.
1.
3.23
44.
99
29
37
09
1957
1.92
5.26
2.68
3.29
2.67
3.94
3.80
3.00
5.
2.
6.
2.38
43.
12
40
57
03
1958
3.92
3.62
2.42
7.22
6.29
3.15
8.23
2.76
0.
2.
1.
2.95
45.
93
63
44
56
1959
2.65
3.90
3.20
4.96
2.92
3.14
M5.26
5.26
4.
6.
2.
2.14
46.
77
43
09
72
1960
5.59
5.39
4.81
3.79
3.50
2.17
5.20
5.67
2.
1.
0.
1.99
43.
96
97
66
70
1961
2.08
6.27
4.72
3.61
3.24
2.84
3.93
5.36
0.
0.
2.
5.06
40.
14
88
27
40
1962
6.47
3.66
4.72
3.71
2.07
8.11
3.38
4.98
4.
1.
5.
5.23
53.
80
25
40
78
1963
2.33
3.07
5.71
3.22
1.81
2.81
2.21
1.34
5.
0.
5.
2.61
36.
27
28
98
64
1964
4.73
4.31
3.24
4.11
1.92
2.37
6.02
4.83
2.
7.
1.
3.81
47.
99
41
73
47
1965
1.90
2.69
4.91
2.89
1.91
8.79
13.79
1.37
3.
2.
2.
0.26
46.
65
38
12
66
1966
4.49
4.95
2.07
1.26
4.95
1.22
2.09
10.81
4.
3.
1.
2.58
43.
58
06
87
93
1967
1.64
3.76
1.34
2.13
3.70
0.46
4.96
12.76
1.
0.
1.
6.96
41.
94
52
73
90
1968
4.67
0.88
4.62
2.40
4.56
4.17
8.77
1.23
0.
6.
3.
1.76
44.

99
78
75
58
1969
2.36
4.11
3.91
4.80
1.78
4.58
6.81
2.49
4.
1.
0.
3.98
41.
34
51
80
47
1970
1.91
3.62
3.69
4.13
4.19
3.04
4.40
8.76
0.
4.
2.
2.72
44.
96
55
80
77
1971
2.40
4.67
4.05
3.42
5.90
2.62
2.78
7.77
1.
8.
2.
2.23
48.
95
51
65
95
1972
3.33
3.85
2.52
3.01
6.78
9.44
3.41
1.81
6.
2.
5.
6.27
53.
00
08
47
97
1973
3.50
5.53
4.37
4.40
6.62
4.61
3.81
1.
1.
0.
6.11
42.
70
30
77
72
1974
3.87
3.61
3.10
2.86
7.55
4.10
2.15
4.16
7.
1.
2.
4.95
46.
00
08
11
54
1975
7.72
3.67
7.84
1.79
9.70
2.22
13.88
2.29
8.
2.
2.
3.37
66.
98
53
34
33
1976
2.51
1.10
3.34
0.48
6.28
8.92
2.20
3.29
3.
5.
2.
4.49
43.
42
75
06
84
1977
2.94
1.97
6.47
1.41
1.39
1.44
1.54
6.90
6.
5.
2.
2.91
41.
20
57
65
39
1978
8.72
0.62
3.99
4.36
4.31
3.96
3.66
7.27
2.
1.
2.
3.71
46.
32
10
85
87
1979
5.56
6.35
4.35
5.24
4.53
4.46
3.03
3.56
7.
1.
4.
1.19
52.
74
97
76
74
1980
4.65
1.55
6.33
1.86
4.36
2.77
4.67
2.47
4.
2.
2.
1.55
39.
86
47
34
88
1981
0.81
4.50
2.08
1.07
2.97
4.62
6.82
7.61
4.
3.
0.
4.61
43.
56
33
57
55
1982
3.69
5.00
1.71
6.01
4.69
6.45
4.47
3.86
1.
6.
1.
5.20
51.
73
36
95
12
1983
2.04
6.10
5.78
4.27
4.44
2.76
2.06
2.25
1.
3.
5.
5.76
45.
68
16
26
56
1984
4.42
5.97
7.12
4.67
4.79
1.88
8.31
0.72
1.
1.
1.
2.91
45.
17
26
81
03
1985
4.29
5.74
1.40
0.83
6.04
6.31
4.35
10.94
0.
4.
9.
1.33
55.
04
34
80
41
1986
0.92
1.34
2.39
1.55
1.59
0.81
3.39
6.24
0.
2.
4.
3.47
29.
74
36
34
14
1987
6.71
4.27
3.38
7.21
0.65
3.33
1.99
2.82
9.
0.
3.
3.22
47.
32
98
64
52
1988
3.76
2.38
2.21
2.64
4.93
2.30
1.73
5.97
5.
3.
3.
0.81
38.
29
56
09
67
1989
1.67
7.09
5.75
3.85
3.87
5.39
4.37
4.04
3.
5.
2.
3.55
50.
59
21
44
82
1990
4.47
5.58
4.17
2.44
8.25
1.14
1.63
3.53
1.
13.
1.
2.90
50.
46
70
56
83
1991
5.44
1.24
5.58
4.06
2.91
1.36
4.04
5.70
3.
0.
1.
2.50
39.
60
77
88
08
1992
3.26
3.64
3.33
5.18
2.79
6.49
3.52
3.77
1.
4.
4.
2.99
45.
30
75
29
31
1993
6.01
3.37
8.35
6.00
5.94
1.62
1.21
2.29
0.
2.
3.
3.47
45.
73
30
85
14
1994
4.73
3.33
6.09
1.82
2.81
3.70
5.61
4.14
3.
1.
2.
1.92
42.
64
46
97
22
1995
4.52
5.28
2.31
1.58
4.75
9.08
7.37
3.10
9.
5.
1.79
54.
63
58
99
1996
5.70
2.33
4.33
3.76
2.77
2.89
4.52
3.69
8.
4.
4.
3.00
50.
69
89
10
67
1997
3.51
3.06
3.45
5.86
1.42
3.03
8.57
2.46
5.
2.
3.
3.55
46.
80
76
26
73
1998
7.48
6.00
5.81
4.80
3.20
2.19
2.00
2.55
5.
1.
2.
4.61
47.
08
40
59
71
1999
7.48
1.91
2.80
3.64
0.61
3.14
2.15
5.42
U .
3.
2.
1.56
45.
23
23
10
27
2000
6.22
2.14
2.57
4.53
3.58
3.45
5.
0.
2.
1.85
31.
05
00
05
44
2001
1.87
2.53
4.86
1.25
1.95
3.46
3.86
5.45
2.
1.
0.
2.16
31.
21
53
48
61
2002
6.26
1.14
4.28
0.34
2.52
1.77
1.68
5.40
3.
9.
4.
6.11
47.

57
47
81
35
2003
2.36
4.43
6.39
7.80
5.66
6.30
6.77
7.44
5.
2.
1.
2.31
59.
50
61
93
50
2004
1.08
M2.35
2.15
1.91
4.04
4.05
3.71
3.92
10.
1.
3.
2.19
40.
36
61
62
99
2005
2.87
3.13
4.35
3.50
1.61
1.86
5.96
3.50
0.
2.
3.
5.08
39.
74
94
84
38
2006
2.60
1.39
1.76
4.52
2.37
7.85
2.97
2.99
2.
4.
7.
2.60
43.
48
57
45
55
2007
3.02
3.48
2.58
4.45
1.17
3.88
1.70
1.99
0.
5.
0.
4.28
33.
68
45
62
30
2008
1.32
2.91
3.74
5.69
5.35
1.52
5.97
5.26
5.
1.
2.
3.95
45.
28
63
54
16
2009
2.55
2.04
6.20
2.78
3.71
11.10
4.21
2.80
3.
3.
8.
6.08
56.
69
18
46
80
2010
4.50
4.15
3.65
1.25
5.32
2.94
3.92
1.89
6.
1.
1.
2.27
39.
63
96
29
77
2011
2.14
2.76
4.42
2.93
4.65
3.41
4.60
3.17
7.
4.
3.
2.62
46.
41
21
90
22
2012
2.15
2.33
4.65
2.93
5.51
2.78
3.58
3.98
4.
2.
0.
2.32
38.
76
41
72
12
2013
3.79
3.37
3.07
3.46
3.51
9.73
8.71
3.72
1.
1.
2.
5.85
50.
55
12
82
70
2014
3.54
3.79
5.74
4.93
4.14
3.12
3.00
3.34
3.
1.
3.
2.99
42.
09
25
73
66
2015
2.74
2.92
3.46
4.09
1.79
3.40
5.59
2.86
4.
6.
7.
11.
57.
88
77
61
11
22
2016
1.11
4.11
2.60
1.94
5.87
2.24
3.58
3.05
10.
3.
0.
2.03
40.
28
68
50
99
2017
4.88
0.76
2.94
5.90
5.63
7.62
1.29
M2.31
4.
3.
1.
2.00
43.
68
59
74
34
2018
4.48
3.01
4.94
M6.00
7.56
1.79
2.69
9.26
14.
5.
9.
6.41
74.
11
24
18
67
2019
4.43
5.86
3.86
5.42
2.51
6.27
4.07
2.49
0.
5.
3.
5.19
49.
06
74
51
41
2020
6.29
6.74
2.54
6.23
9.74
2.71
4.97
4.44
5.
4.
5.
4.25
63.
74
65
12
42
2021
4.38
6.84
4.92
1.04
2.60
6.70
5.74
4.84
5.
4.
0.
1.86
49.
08
64
61
25
2022
5.20
1.99
5.31
3.17
3.04
2.48
6.16
3.02
M2.
32.
52
89
Notes: Data missing in any
month have an "M' flag. A "T'
indicates a trace of
precipitation.
Data missing for all days in a
month or year is blank.
Creation date: 2022-09-29