20140882 Ver 1_Modifications_20141027

j �wnr�,�o�
r
oNii� -1c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: No. 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Ellis Site — Stream Enhancement Project
2b.
County:
McDowell County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Old Fort, NC
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
John Eric Ellis & Wife
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
499, 491 / 914,589
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
583 Pine Cove Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Old Fort, NC 28752
3f.
Telephone no.:
828 - 442 -5333
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Resource Institute, LLC
4b.
Name:
Charles Anderson
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
2714 Henning Dr.
4e.
City, state, zip:
Winston - Salem, NC 27106
4f.
Telephone no.:
336- 750 -0177
4g.
Fax no.:
336- 750 -0177
4h.
Email address:
canderson (@resourceinstituteinc.
5.
Agent /Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Aaron Earley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Wildlands Engineering Inc.
5c.
Street address:
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
5e.
Telephone no.:
704.332.7754 x109
5f.
Fax no.:
N/A
5g.
Email address:
aearley @wildlandseng.com
Page 2 of 11

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0658 -54 -2699 / 0658 -65 -2106
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.589056 Longitude: 82.176033
1 c. Property size:
38.68 & 47.8 acre tracts
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Little Crooked Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Catawba 03050101
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The project area is located within a rural watershed located in McDowell County, NC. On -Site conditions
include agricultural fields and open pasture land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
No wetlands exist within the project area.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 2,050 linear feet of perennial channel within the project area.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The Western Stream Initiative (WSI) program is a partnership in its first year of implementation to complete projects that
have been identified by Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) staff in Western North Carolina. The purpose is
to conduct channel and bank enhancement work to reduce instream erosion. The NRCS funds WSI and similar bank
stabilization projects as agricultural best management practices for the purpose of reducing erosion and sedimentation
into streams, and in some cases for habitat enhancement.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The work performed on the site will consist of laying back stream banks to a stable bank angle that can be matted and re-
vegetated for long -term stability. In some cases, stone and wood structures will be installed to stabilize stream toes and
protect stream banks in areas where the existing stream pattern is diverting flows towards stream banks and jeopardizing
stability. Banks will be re- vegetated based on NRCS best management practices and will include seeding, matting, and
livestaking along the banks. Existing vegetated buffers will be maintained or enhanced where needed.
Streamwork will be conducted with trackhoes and tracktrucks and stream crossings should not be required. Due to the
large stream size, a pump around is not a realistic option and work will be performed in the wet. Bank grading will be
done with caution to avoid spillback of graded sediments into the stream.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Comments: Tasha Alexander of Asheville Office indicated
that photographs and USGS mapping should be sufficient
based on large size of the stream.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
[�Ogt ency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
he r:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number—
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ® T
Construction/
Little Crooked
® PER
® Corps
15
2,050
Enhancement
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
2,683
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
2-19519
2,683
3i. Comments: All impacts to on -site streams include temporary enhancement activities.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
131 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P FIT
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The project constitutes a positive impact, promoting high quality bank and channel stabilization efforts. Banks will be re-
vegetated based on NRCS best management practices and will include seeding, matting, and livestaking along the
banks. Existing vegetated buffers will be maintained or enhanced where needed.
1 b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction practices will follow guidelines from the NC Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
Bank grading will be conducted with caution in order to avoid spillback of graded sediments into the stream. A
prequalified stream restoration contractor with a high level of experience and competency will be used.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The project is located in the French Broad River Watershed (HUC
❑ Yes ® No
06010105) that isn't identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection
Rules.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This
project involves the enhancement
of on -site stream channels, no increase in impervious cover will result from the construction
of this project.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This is a stream enhancement project and will not cause an increase in development nor will it negatively impact
downstream water quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
This is an NRCS planned project and T &E species concerns were screened in- house. Additionally, a copy of this
permitting package has been forwarded to the USFWS Asheville Office and NC Wildlife Resource Commission to request
additional information on the projects effects on federally protected species and habitat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The enclosed permitting package has been forwarded to USFWS Asheville Office and the NC Wildlife Resource
Commission to request additional information on the projects effects on Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
This is an NRCS planned project and the cultural resources were screened in- house.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: This is a stream enhancement project and only involves temporary,
non - structural work within the floodplain. The floodplain administrator has been contacted and a floodplain development
permit will be obtained through no -rise certification, and more extensive modeling if required.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Map No. 3710065800J, effective date October 2, 2008
Aaron Earley, PE, CFM
s sw,u
10/27/2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
is
Date
Applicant /Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 11 of 11

WILDLAND'S
ENGINEERING
October 27, 2014
Ms. Tasha Alexander
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 288o1 -5oo6
Subject: Modification to Permit Request
Pre - Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 27
and Water Quality Certification No. 3885
Ellis Stream Enhancement Project
McDowell County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Alexander:
The Ellis Stream Enhancement Project is part of the Western Stream Initiative (WSI) program which is a
partnership between Resource Institute (RI) and the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) in its first
year of implementation this year. As this is the first year, we have run into some minor landowner concerns for
this project and have had to expand the scope of the project. The landowner had upstream banks that were
eroding and which will now be addressed as part of the project. In addition, the existing stream crossing
required improvements and it was necessary to include stream alignment modifications in order to make this
feasible. Lastly, some additional stream realignment is being proposed for the area just upstream of the
crossing which will allow for greater benching within the existing stream corridor. The project is constrained by
agricultural land uses and realignment presents the best opportunity for long -term stability.
Please find a revised planset for this project. The Ellis Stream Enhancement Project is on Little Crooked Creek
and now involves approximately 2,683 linear feet (originally 2,05o) as shown on revised Figures 2 & 3, and
consists of intermittent bank grading, benching, and some channel realignment and instream structures. There
are two tributaries that enters from the left bank within the new project reach limits, but neither will be
impacted by the work being proposed.
We have included the following supporting data that have been revised:
PCN form (revised),
USGS (revised), and Site Maps (revised), and
11" x 17" copy of the 50% plan set (revised).
Jurisdictional Determination
The increased area has been assessed for presence of streams and wetlands, and only the additional stream length
indicated is present.
Proposed Impacts
Streamwork will be conducted with trackhoes and tracktrucks and stream crossings should not be required.
Instream work will be necessary to remove or reconstruct problematic structures. Due to the large stream size (5
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. • phone 704 - 332 -7754 • fax 704 - 332 -3306 • 1430 S. Mint Street, # 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

square miles drainage area), pump around is not an option. Bank grading will be done with caution and water will be
diverted away from banks where possible to avoid spillback and transport of finer bank sediments into the river.
We have included the following supporting data:
• PCN form (revised),
• USGS (revised), and Site Maps (revised), and
• "" x 17" copy of the So% plan set (revised).
This same information has been submitted to the NC Division of Water Quality, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Office, and North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. If you have any questions, please contact me at
0:704.332.7754 xiog M:7o4.8ig.o848.
Sincerely,
Aaron Earley, PE, CFM
Water Resource Engineer
Enclosure

r r in-'
���. ` •..��
Parcel Boundaries ,i11 + •+ "rye
4 ■ 1 •� ' r . •i t
Existing Stream Alignment 7 . • + • `t
• +• r • f
f • f
fr ?}', .r _,,..,• f` ^mod `` t! `""
Project Reach I ♦ moo` rf r" f
,i f t • . t f ,l, �/ {mow y ` '��q
41 \i:�, - °.....„ fl 1 - s-- �....,,,r ♦ Cam? 3 ,-,./ ! + -r
�•.f } 11 'j J 9 f +r 1128
�� � �/` ,..r•r � � 2179
loll
�110,-
JP
r
:•w....µ
ff Gov' ra hie Qua ran le
kt W T L D L A N D S 0 500 1,000 Feet
ENGINEERING
I I I
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map
Ellis Stream Enhancement Project
McDowell County, NC

Figure 3 Site Map
W I L D L A N D Ellis Stream Enhancement Project
W ENGINEERING 0 500 1,000 Feet
I I I I
McDowell County, NC

FORT
140
R
TO 140 /OLD
PINE COVE RD FORT
SITE��
�o
�o
LP
O P�
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
Western Stream Initiative -Ellis
McDowell County, NC
for
Resource Institute
It5IIIl'9L
REVISED 60% PLANS
ISSUED: OCTOBER 22, 2014
BEFORE YOU 0401
CALL 1 -800- 632 -4949
N.C. ONE -CALL CENTER
ITS THE LAW
Sheet Index
Title Sheet 0.1
General Notes and Symbols 0.2
Project Overview / ESC / Planting 1.0
Plan Sheets 2.0 -2.4
Details - Structures 3.1 -3.3
- Vegetative 4.1
- Erosion & Sediment Control 5.1
Project Directory
Surveying:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
License No. F -0831
1430 South Mint Street
Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Engineer /TSP:
Aaron Earley, PE
704 - 332 -7754
Construction Manager:
Jake McLean, PE
828 -545 -3865
Owner:
Resource Institute
Site Rep:
Angela Green
NRCS Representative:
Kara M. Cassels
District Conservationist
Buncombe and McDowell Counties
155 Hilliard Ave., Suite 204
Asheville, NC 28801
(828) 254 -0916 x3
(828) 251 -4908 (fax)
m
Q
zz�o�
l��v�Mmv
wz� F
�Z�y�o
Qz '62
�z �s x t =5
60� I 0�1
U
Z
m -
W �
O
aU U
4- —'
•� 3
O
� Q
U
a�
c}n o
4-
4 V
o
v a
V
•O
N
1101
r 1

NOTE:
TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING COMPLETED BY
WILDLANDS ENGINEERING.
GCniCDAi ninTCC.
1. CONTACT NORTH CAROLINA "ONE CALL" CENTER (1- 800 - 632 -4949) PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF
WORK. ALL DAMAGE TO UTILITIES BY CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ACCESS TO NON - PARTICIPATING LANDOWNER'S BANK HAS BEEN
APPROVED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ON RIGHT BANKS BELOW STATION 8 +80
3. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR DISTURBED AREAS ON ALL PROPERTIES ACCESSED TO PRE - EXISTING
CONDITION.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF EXCESS SOIL, ROCK, GRAVEL AND OF CLEARED AND GRUBBED
MATERIALS INCLUDING TREES, SHURBS, AND INVASIVE SPECIES AT AN APPROPRIATE LOCATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS & REGULATIONS.
5. DISPOSE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS GENERATED OR COLLECTED DURING WORK ACTIVITIES OR INDICATED
ON PLANS AND DISPOSE OFFSITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS & REGULATIONS.
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. LOCATION OF FEATURES TO BE DELINEATED BY ENGINEER IN FIELD. NO CONSTRUCTION
SURVEY IS NEEDED FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT, HOWEVER MEASUREMENTS AND SURVEY WILL BE
REQUIRED AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE DIMENSIONS IN DETAILS.
2. EXCESS CUT MATERIAL FROM BANK GRADING TO BE REMOVED FROM 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN
TO SUITABLE ON -SITE LOCATION (TO BE DETERMINED WITH LANDOWNER PERMISSION).
3. WORK SHALL BE LIMITED TO AN AREA THAT CAN BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, STRAW AND
MATTING BY THE END OF EACH WORK DAY.
— — — — —
Existing Property Line
— —
Existing Thalweg
- - - - -- 100- - - - -
-- Existing Major Contour
Existing Minor Contour
x x
Existing Fenceline
Existing Treeline
i
Existing Tree
Q
Small tree (existing)
See Detail 2, Sheet 3.1
Existing Power Pole
N RCS LEGEND 50% QTYS
Proposed Major Contour
— — — — — — — Proposed Minor Contour
10 +00
— �— — Proposed Thalweg Alignment
[xl [xl Proposed Temporary Silt Fence
See Detail 2, Sheet 5.1
L°D L°D Proposed Limits Of Disturbance
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BASED ON WEATHER CONDITIONS OR
ADDITIONAL DISTURBANCE SHALL BE AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
2. LOCATE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS STAGING LOCATIONS SO AS TO MINIMIZE SITE
DISTURBANCE. ENGINEER TO APPROVE ANY STAGING AREAS NOT DEPICTED ON PLANS.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE ON STREAM SIDE OF ALL SOIL STOCKPILE AREAS OR STAGING
AREAS THAT CREATE BARE GROUND CONDITIONS OR STAGE OTHER MATERIALS OR
EQUIPMENT THAT COULD LEAD TO POLLUTION OF ADJACENT LAND OR WATER.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW APPROVED HAUL ROUTES DEPICTED ON PLANS AND
SHALL NOT DISTURB OTHER AREAS WITHOUT ENGINEER APPROVAL.
5. INSTALL APPROPRIATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES PRIOR TO
COMMENCING WORK.
6. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO INSTALLADEQUATE MEASURES WHEN CROSSING LIVE
STREAMS AT EXISTING FORD CROSSINGS IN ORDER TO PREVENT EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION.
7. EQUIPMENT BROUGHT TO PROJECT SITE SHALL BE CLEAN AND FREE OF LEAKS.
8. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ALL EQUIPMENT AT LEAST 100 FEET AWAY FROM STREAM
AND SHALL MANAGE ALL FLUIDS TO PREVENT LEAKING ONTO GROUND OR TO ALLOW
FOR IMMEDIATE CLEAN -UP.
58O -STR .780- BI[;/VFC7�I I7 1 612 _Qid X -:ng WatPrs_m( -.
SHI I C.
=. 1 )
•. -ia ,i r',. rl :i� :i�,.,'::t.:;:.. ,i ri-i...::i -. il':;Y::::: iY•,::,rji.�..- �....s�,:i
�
r�w. Proposed Boulder Toe Protection
'-''rJ See Detail 1, Sheet 3.2
FEMA FP FEMA FP Effective FEMA 100 -Year Floodplain
N R CS LEGEND 50%
Proposed Brush Toe
n
aV�
Proposed Boulder Sill J -Hook
Proposed Construction Entrance
See Detail 3, Sheet 5.1
Existing Woody Debris or Fallen Tree
See Detail 1, Sheet 3.1
i
Proposed Log Vane
Proposed Log Toe Vane
See Detail 2, Sheet 3.1
W w
See Detail 3, Sheet 3.2
— — — — Temporary Access Road
580 - vegetative
(along existing farm road)
NUMENEWON
Proposed Rock Vane
See Detail 4, Sheet 3.2
See Detail 3, Sheet 3.1
x x x x 342 - critical area planting
Proposed Cover Log
_. _ _ _ _ Temporary Access Road
(in field, requires post - construction repair)
(see meandering
- • pool typical)
v
Proposed Constructed Riffle
Ford X -in g
%�,• ?-:
See Detail 4, Sheet 3.1
Linetype Descriptions
(Depicts from centerline to
JT JT
terrace tie -in on one side of
Proposed Stockpile Area / Staging Area
�
r�w. Proposed Boulder Toe Protection
'-''rJ See Detail 1, Sheet 3.2
FEMA FP FEMA FP Effective FEMA 100 -Year Floodplain
N R CS LEGEND 50%
Proposed Brush Toe
BT BT See Detail 2, Sheet 3.2
Existing Woody Debris or Fallen Tree
i
Proposed Log Toe Vane
580 - structural
See Detail 3, Sheet 3.2
580 - vegetative
Proposed Root Wad
See Detail 4, Sheet 3.2
x x x x 342 - critical area planting
Proposed Cover Log
/ Pt Bar
See Detail 1, Sheet 3.3
(see meandering
- • pool typical)
v
Proposed Channel Layout
Ford X -in g
Proposed Juncus
She t 4.
See Detail 7, Sheet e
Qio a0r °E6, m Z
ose tom' T
Linetype Descriptions
(Depicts from centerline to
JT JT
terrace tie -in on one side of
creek)
P� °posed
_ Back of8e
_ nch
This applies to the Ellis site
Approx. Tie_in
above the Ford X -ing
with T
,,race
Tree to be Removed
OTree to be Protected
Area outside of bank grading areas to be
Planted with Temporary and Permanent Seed
and with Permanent Planting (areas to be converted
to riparian buffer)
X k X x
x x x x Area to be Planted with Temporary
and Permanent Seed (typically fields and haul roads)
Cut down existing bar to bankfull elevation
m
Q
zz���oo
d
�wNz
AZ5o�
t7��ai<a
aZ,•U
�„ u w
C�
U
w r4
I o
a� U
� V
r
�4 ^^O
H I--I
5V
� I
U) C)
r. F-+
y u
O
F� 1
V
Q�
0
;_4
r�
P-1
0
Cf
z
ry
Q)
� � y
� N
g O
r5
a z v
A ; F 6 6
vtI

o
R < <is
FS /�FNC �
4 dd bW33
41
n, -
u
l dy b
C
D
7�
t =kL3
i
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
(TYP)
UNLOCKED
GATES
HAUL ROAD ALONG
EXISTING FARM ROADS
(TYP)
HAY
BARN
STAGING/
STOCKPILE
(TYP)
NOTE .
cn
1. AL BAN RADING SHALL E SEED RAWED, AND MATTED
Q$���o
zZ
PE EROSION ONTROL MAT ING DETAIL 1/5.1
����w
j �wT"zmPz
2. ALL DISTURBE BANKS TO E PLANTED WITH PERMANENT
EEDING AND PL T DETA LS 3/4.1 and 4/4 .1
�WU
3. ALL HAUL RO S AND A A DISTURBED DURING GRADING F
BA S SHALL E SEEDED NL IT IS AN EXISTING FARM ROA
ALL XIST G ROADS, ENCES A THER SITE FEATURES T
BE ETU D TO PRE- ISTING CONDIT
SILT FENCE, ALL
STAGING AREAS A�
AND WHERE
DIRECTED (TYP)
HAUL ROADS THROUGH FIELD (TYP)
TREAT COMPACTING AND RESEED I
UPON COMPLETION
/ STAGING/
STOCKPILE
(TYP)
Zp +Op2�X
3
18 +00 X�C� a
0
O 0l x °!
&-0 1pkpp -,�� r
g +00
o '
o
6 +00' ^x�•
m�
2 +50 END OF
PROJECT
PROPERTY
LINES
FEMA 100 -YEAR
FLOODPLAIN (TYP)
GEORGE
IV
';�>
�c oo
0
:,
T
J �Q
Q
Q ��1
CE
0' 200' 400' 600'
(HORIZONTAL)
I
tl
� � c
Lu
f
�b c
Q �
az
a

1'
11 W,
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLES (TYP)
�x �
00
i
'2 +00
�.
+ + + + +
+ + + +A-�
+ + /+
+ + TIE -IN GRADING TO
♦1 + + EXISTING GROUND (TYP)
BACK OF
BENCH (TYP)
1 TOP OF BANK,
BANKFULL (TYP)
TOE OF
BANK (TYP)
START BUILDING
TYPICAL BENCHING ON
RIGHT BANK ALONG
CENTERLINE
a4Aw_
START BUILD TYPICAL
RIFFLE AND POOL
SECTIONS ALONG
CENTERLINE
ROCK
VANE
(TYP)
t t t t t +
+/t
JE (TYP)
o +/
eb
W
0
e�
b
a
z
€z
10,
HAUL /ACCESS NRCS QTYS FOR THIS SHT
ROADS (TYP) 580 - structural: 358 LF
580- vegetative: 378 LF
342 - critical area: 0.25 ac (haul rd +staging)
612 -tree: n/a
1,
1 °
0. 40.
m
z
aZ NxF=w�
Al
co
eb
W
0
e�
b
a
z
€z
10,
HAUL /ACCESS NRCS QTYS FOR THIS SHT
ROADS (TYP) 580 - structural: 358 LF
580- vegetative: 378 LF
342 - critical area: 0.25 ac (haul rd +staging)
612 -tree: n/a
1,
1 °
0. 40.

_ MATTING DETAIL 1/5.1
ROCK �." ,A� Cn
VANE i' / S
CONSTRUCTED (TYP) _ -�= p�� ��` z= �°
RIFFLES (TYP) "
, � xO za�y
iy I \ M� R u
+ +
/ 0 +
+ +
/ X + + + + +� + + �6�
+ + e���°5w��`�
ROOTWADS (TYP)
/
Y / NEW CROSSING
114 TIE -IN GRADING TO + AND WATERLINE
EXISTING GROUND (TYP) + + +
�. + + +
++ +
BACK OF '�" pp � �=�� ++ + + + ++ -
BENCH (TYP) / N13 y'- - + + + + +
i' "o + + + +
+ + + + ++
/ +
TOP OF
BANK (TYP) / / +/ BOULDER TOE b
++ PROTECTION WITH
TOE OF /I + JUNCUS PLANTED BEHIND
BANK (TYP) GRADE
XpO / CONTROL
+ J -HOOK °
I
+�+
BUILD TYPICAL i �+
RIFFLE AND POOL
SECTIONS ALONG — .�_�`$xp0 + + HAUL /ACCESS �
CENTERLINE ROADS (TYP)
REMOVE
TREE (TYP) �� +
+ + ++ + + ROCK CROSS VANE (TYP)
++ + + ++ + SAVE TREE
+ + (TYP)
+ NRCS QTYS FOR THIS SHT
TO / END BANK 580- structural: 578 LF
GRADIN i 600, 580- vegetative: 672 LF
oo' + • 342- critical area: 0.25 ac (haul rd +staging)
+ + + 552 612 -tree: n/a
J6, T1
+ + stream crossing: 1 -_
4o ± + + + + + REMOVE FALLEN TREE waterline pipe: 150 -250 LF
+ +�` ++ + / FROM CHANNEL
�+ -
I.
r ' + ++ + REMOVE WOODY DEBRIS FROM - F
i' + + + + CENTER OF CHANNEL,
+ 0' 40' 80' 120'
INCORPORATE INTO BRUSH TOE _
HORIZON-)
zJ

NOTE:
1. ALL BANK GRADING SHALL BE
SEEDED AND MATTED PER EROSION
CONTROL MATTING DETAIL 1/5.1
STAGING AREAS
(TYP)
HAUL /ACCESS
ROADS (TYP)
LOG TOE VANE,
& BANK GRADING
BOULDER TOE +
PROTECTION + �+
Bj- + +
LOG VANE: FILL BEHIND + + + + + + + + + + +
VANE ARM AND BELOW + + + + + + 18 +00
UNDERCUT TREE + + + + +
1 �+ A7 + + '
BOULDER TOE �+
PROTECTION + +
WITH JUNCUS
PLANTED BEHIND +
LOG VANE x
+ + + + + + 1w
< +
+
\ +
+ os:
s
t ss.
a
OULDER TOE
ROTECTION
TH JUNCUS
PLAN D BEHIND
i
�y
r�
+\ r'
14'`00
17 +00
t/, J
O /X
REMOVE FALLEN '
TREES FROM CHANNEL
MINOR POINT BAR GRADING
AS DIRECTED IN FIELD, KEEP
TREES IF POSSIBLE
boo
NRCS OTYS FOR THIS SHT
0 580 - structural: 425 LF
0 580 - vegetative: 157 LF
342 - critical area: 0.25 ac (haul rd +staging)
612 -tree: 0.1 ac
>� 1
CUT DOWN BAR TO
BANKFULL ELEVATION _
(TYP)
moor,
01 ao' so, izo"
(HORIZONTAL)
b F
� I
b k
4
T
TA
IIIIIIIII
Q �
H VVV
+ +
X
G
boo
NRCS OTYS FOR THIS SHT
0 580 - structural: 425 LF
0 580 - vegetative: 157 LF
342 - critical area: 0.25 ac (haul rd +staging)
612 -tree: 0.1 ac
>� 1
CUT DOWN BAR TO
BANKFULL ELEVATION _
(TYP)
moor,
01 ao' so, izo"
(HORIZONTAL)
b F
� I
b k
4
T
TA
IIIIIIIII

NOTE:
1. ALL BANK GRADING SHALL BE
SEEDED AND MATTED PER EROSION
CONTROL MATTING DETAIL 1/5.1
ROCK VANE, 2:1
BANK GRADING AND
BOULDER TOE
Ac
EXISTING
TRIBUTARY
/I
RELOCATE
FENCE
BUILD OUT TOE WHERE BOTTOM
WIDTH PERMITS, INSTALL
BENCHING TYPICAL SHT 0.3
HAUL /ACCESS
ROADS (TYP)
ry
� II �
(� O
X
k
k
k k
k
BRUSH TOE
+ to
/ /41
x k �r \
21 +00
syFF
yFFrT ?3
REMOVE TREE
AND DEBRIS
FROM CHANNEL
X k
k
STAGING AREAS
(TYP)
BUILD OUT TOE WHERE
BOTTOM WIDTH PERMITS,
INSTALL BENCHING
TYPICAL SHT 0.3
2:1 SLOPING
FROM EXISTING
TOE
x
�x
k�
11
•K . 1k
RECONFIGURE EXISTING
WOODY DEBRIS AS
DIRECTED IN FIELD
K
BOULDER SILL FW D
J -HOOK
5 "pp'
�y sZMm7
z
EXISTING BANK
�yU
;'SCOUR AND
3
DEBRIS
END OF
PROJECT
k
k
X
T _ BT
2`55 +�p0
cn
e
c
�O �J
b
REMOVE b
TREES /DEBRIS AND
RESHAPE CHANNEL
" BED AS DIRECTED
w
CONSTRUCTED ♦��
RIFFLE k
. • f 460
to
4,
� �' •sIw�AA...
y +
L
NRCS QTYS FOR THIS SHT
580 - structural: 323 LF
580 - vegetative: 149 LF
342 - critical area: 0.5 ac (haul rd +staging)
612 - tree /shrub: n/a
o' ao so' izo'
INOa2otirnq
v
Q
P
PH
PH
a�

1/3
Plan
PLACE HEADER BOULDERS
WITH V TO 2' CLEAR SPACE
BETWEEN ROCKS —
FLOW
TOE OF SLOPE
Little Crooked Creek
H (FT)
1.3'
X (FT)
24.0'
Y (FT)
8.0'
B (")
25"
S(910
5.5%
PLACE HEADER BOULDERS
WITH V TO 2' CLEAR SPACE
BETWEEN ROCKS —
FLOW
TOE OF SLOPE
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
BACKFILL (ON -SITE ALLUVIUM
OR NO. 57 STONE) 1 CHANNEL BED
LEAVE GAP
1.
BETWEEEN N BOULDERS
TYPE 2 TOE OF SLOPE
SLOPE 15)
FILTER FABRIC
B ( °)
25"
S( %)
CLASS A
Profile B -B'
STONE
CLASS 1
STRUCTURE ELEVATION POINT STONE
LOCATED ON FOOTER ROCK.
5' MIN.
Section A -A'
SCOUR POOL TO BE
FOOTER ROCK
EXCAVATED PER DIRECTION
CLASS B
OF THE ENGINEER.
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
(2) Boulder Sill T -Hook
3.1 Not to Scale
EXCAVATE POOL
B / PER PROFILE
A, SCOUR 1
_ \ POOL 1
Y l ,
IENG m
HM
(k) ___
ELEVATION POINT PER PROFILE.
H (FT)
TOP OF BANK
X (FT)
24.0'
SLOPE 15)
8.0'
B ( °)
25"
S( %)
° J
mLL�_
Profile B -B'
o F x
zN
Ca
CLASS A
(2) Boulder Sill T -Hook
3.1 Not to Scale
EXCAVATE POOL
B / PER PROFILE
A, SCOUR 1
_ \ POOL 1
Y l ,
IENG m
HM
(k) ___
3 Rock Vane
3,7 / Nof To Scale
B'
Q
p�
Little Crooked Creek
H (FT)
1.3'
X (FT)
24.0'
Y (FT)
8.0'
B ( °)
25"
S( %)
S -6%
3 Rock Vane
3,7 / Nof To Scale
B'
Q
p�
HEADER ROCK
BACKFILL (ON -SITE NATIVE
1
X (FT)
STRUCTURE INVERT
ELEVATION PER PROFILE.
HEADER ROCK
T POF A K
TOE OF „.v,
SLOPE
L
— � �7FOOTER ROCK
Profile View B -B'
6” SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE /GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
HEADERLOG
NONWOVEN STREAMBED
FILTER FABRIC T �.O FOOTER LOG
o
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
FLOW
T
ILIZE VANE
ONE BOULDER
%CH SIDE
AVATE POOL
PROFILE
Plan View
2 Log Vane
3.1 Not to Scale
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIO
POINT PER PROFIL
Profile A -A'
SLOPE
/ HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
Profile B - B'
SEE PROFILE
HEADER ROCK
BACKFILL (ON -SITE NATIVE
1
X (FT)
MATERIALS OR NO. 57 STONE)
1'�
OFFSET HEADER
IrI- 0.25' 700.5'
NONWOVEN TOE OF SLOPE
25°
I UPSTREAM OF FOOTER
FILTER FABRIC ac.
— CHANNELBED
CLASS A
STONE
FOOTER ROCK
CLASS B
STONE
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
STRUCTURE INVERT
ELEVATION PER PROFILE.
HEADER ROCK
T POF A K
TOE OF „.v,
SLOPE
L
— � �7FOOTER ROCK
Profile View B -B'
6” SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE /GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
HEADERLOG
NONWOVEN STREAMBED
FILTER FABRIC T �.O FOOTER LOG
o
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
FLOW
T
ILIZE VANE
ONE BOULDER
%CH SIDE
AVATE POOL
PROFILE
Plan View
2 Log Vane
3.1 Not to Scale
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIO
POINT PER PROFIL
Profile A -A'
SLOPE
/ HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
Profile B - B'
SEE PROFILE
Plan View
B
HEAD IF RIFFLE
0
"
P RIFFLE ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
m
Q �
zl,�8�oo
Z «>rvnm i
w W N O
+`•ZmmZ
Qzo$�v
aZo, I
Go�
-1
W �
I O
•� O
u
� I
c11 O
� O
a
u
.O
i-I
F--1
U)
Q)
I~
u
v
v,
v
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE /GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
/'��%�/i✓ /� /,�i� /.� /y!� TOP OF BANK (TYP)
Section B -B' ?
4
Constructed Riffle
3.1 Not to Scale -
Ew`
a
Little Crooked Creek
H (FT)
1.3'
X (FT)
24.0'
Y (FT)
8.0'
B (")
25°
S( %)
5.5%
Plan View
B
HEAD IF RIFFLE
0
"
P RIFFLE ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
m
Q �
zl,�8�oo
Z «>rvnm i
w W N O
+`•ZmmZ
Qzo$�v
aZo, I
Go�
-1
W �
I O
•� O
u
� I
c11 O
� O
a
u
.O
i-I
F--1
U)
Q)
I~
u
v
v,
v
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE /GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE
/'��%�/i✓ /� /,�i� /.� /y!� TOP OF BANK (TYP)
Section B -B' ?
4
Constructed Riffle
3.1 Not to Scale -
Ew`
a

MATTING WHERE SPECIFIED ON PLANS
BACKFILL (ON -SITE NATIVE
MATERIALS OR NO. 57 STONE)
EXISTING
NATIVE MATERIAL AND COURSE FILL FROM EXISTING ERODED BANK SEGMENT ERODED BANK
STREAMBED. REPLACE ERODED BANK GENTLER SLOPE
TO MATCH MORE STABLE UPSTREAM AND B
DOWNSTREAM BANK CONDITIONS
FLOW
\ n
i
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
Section A -A' (CASE 1)
k
m
z
Little Crooked Creek
PLACE BOULDERS TO COVER TOE EROSION
GRADING /MATTING WHERE SPECIFIED ON PLANS
0.5 -1'
e
24.0'
Y (FT)
1
Plan View
EXISTING
BANK WITH VERTICAL TOE
ffi:1
HEADER ROCK
BASE FLOW c FLOW E
ELEVATION SLS
-yam a
EMBED BOULDERS 1.0 (MIN) FOOTER ROCK
BELOW CHANNEL BEDS ^^
NOTE.
1. FOR STREAM BEDS WITH
COARSE SUBSTRATE
PROVIDE FOOTER ROCKS.
OFFSET HEADER
0.25' TO 0.5'
UPSTREAM OF FOOTER
EL BED
ROCK
OFFSET HEADER
0.25' TO 0.5'
UPSTREAM OF FOOTER
CHANNELBED
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC FOOTER ROCK
5'M IN. UPSTREAM
Section A -A' (CASE 2)
THIS IS TYPICAL CASE FOR TOW NSEND SITE
TOP SITS 0.5'
NORMAL ABOVE BASEFLOW.
BASEFLOW o
TOP OF BANK
EXISTING
/.✓r✓�/,��� ERODED BANK
Section B -B' FOOTER ROCK
Boulder Toe Protection
s.2 Not to Scale
6" SALVAGED ONSITE
COBBLE /GRAVEL
BED MATERIAL
TOEVANELOG
NONWOVEN STREAMBED (NO FOOTER REQ'D)
FILTER FABRIC o
EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
5' MIN. UPSTREAM
Section A -A'
INVERT ELEVATION
PER PROFILE TOP OF BANK
FLOW
s
TOE OF
SLOPE \�
STABILIZE VANE
WITH ONE BOULDER TOE VANE LOG
ON EACH SIDE (NO FOOTER REQ'D)
Profile B - B'
�. '71ORE BOULDERS
Plan View OR CLASS A STONE
Log Toe Vane
32 Not to Scale
3'
Little Crooked Creek
H (FT)
0.5 -1'
X (FT)
24.0'
Y (FT)
8.0'
0 ( °)
15 -20°
S(%)
5.5%
3'
FILTER FABRIC
BACKFILL
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
BRUSH AND WOOD DEBRIS
#57 WASHED STONE
AAX Yi TO
BRUSH AND WOOD DEBRIS
BANKFULL
457 WASHED STONE
i
BASE LOGS
4 " -6" DIAMETER
Section A -A'
e 3.2 Brush Toe
Not to Zicale
3E LOGS
E RNATING #57 STONE
BRUSHNVOODY DEBRIS LAYERS
TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL)
NOTES,
1. OVEREXCAVATE 3' OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).
2. INSTALL BASE LOGS IN A CRISS CROSS PATTERN, DRIVING THEM
INTO THE EXISTING BANK A MINIMUM OF 2'. BASE LOGS SHALL
BE 6 " -12" DIAMETER.
3. INSTALL A LAYER OF #57 WAHSED STONE ON TOP OF THE BASE
LOGS. LIGHTLY SPREAD #57 WASHED STONE TO FILL VOIDS
BETWEEN BASE LOGS. AVOID HEAVY COMPACTION TO
PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE BASE LOGS.
4. INSTALL A LAYER OF BRUSH /WOODY DEBRIS, WHICH SHALL
CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED
ON -SITE. LIGHTLY COMPACT BRUSH /WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.
S. BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY
PARALLEL AND IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.
6. INSTALL ALTERNATING #57 WASHED STONE AND
BRUSH /WOODY DEBRIS LAYERS TO N TO Y. BANKFULL HEIGHT.
7. INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER FINAL BRUSH/WOODY LAYER
ACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS.
8. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND BANK
STABILIZATION PER PLANS.
1. EXCAVATE A TRENCH A MINIMUM OF TWO
TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE TRUNK AND DEEP
ENOUGH SUCH THAT % OF THE ROOTMASS IS
BELOW THE CHANNEL BOTTOM AND THAT
FOOTER LOG CAN BE PLACE
2. PLACE ROOT WAD IN TREN(
COMPACT.
INSTALL ROOT WAD SUCH THAT ]
MASS IS BURIED BELOW THE CHANNEL BOTTOM (TYP)
Plan View
4 Root Wad
32 Not to Scale
BENCH
Q �
'z 0 v"�i N V�
Z.:rvnm'L
w W N O
+`•ZmmZ
aZo,�IE
�WN LL
I Q
^0
u
� I
Q
� Q
a
u
O
i-I
P-4
3
on
OJ
U
V
v
N
C'�
BT BT
e 3.2 Brush Toe
Not to Zicale
3E LOGS
E RNATING #57 STONE
BRUSHNVOODY DEBRIS LAYERS
TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL)
NOTES,
1. OVEREXCAVATE 3' OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).
2. INSTALL BASE LOGS IN A CRISS CROSS PATTERN, DRIVING THEM
INTO THE EXISTING BANK A MINIMUM OF 2'. BASE LOGS SHALL
BE 6 " -12" DIAMETER.
3. INSTALL A LAYER OF #57 WAHSED STONE ON TOP OF THE BASE
LOGS. LIGHTLY SPREAD #57 WASHED STONE TO FILL VOIDS
BETWEEN BASE LOGS. AVOID HEAVY COMPACTION TO
PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE BASE LOGS.
4. INSTALL A LAYER OF BRUSH /WOODY DEBRIS, WHICH SHALL
CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED
ON -SITE. LIGHTLY COMPACT BRUSH /WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.
S. BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY
PARALLEL AND IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.
6. INSTALL ALTERNATING #57 WASHED STONE AND
BRUSH /WOODY DEBRIS LAYERS TO N TO Y. BANKFULL HEIGHT.
7. INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER FINAL BRUSH/WOODY LAYER
ACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS.
8. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND BANK
STABILIZATION PER PLANS.
1. EXCAVATE A TRENCH A MINIMUM OF TWO
TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE TRUNK AND DEEP
ENOUGH SUCH THAT % OF THE ROOTMASS IS
BELOW THE CHANNEL BOTTOM AND THAT
FOOTER LOG CAN BE PLACE
2. PLACE ROOT WAD IN TREN(
COMPACT.
INSTALL ROOT WAD SUCH THAT ]
MASS IS BURIED BELOW THE CHANNEL BOTTOM (TYP)
Plan View
4 Root Wad
32 Not to Scale
BENCH
Q �
'z 0 v"�i N V�
Z.:rvnm'L
w W N O
+`•ZmmZ
aZo,�IE
�WN LL
I Q
^0
u
� I
Q
� Q
a
u
O
i-I
P-4
3
on
OJ
U
V
v
N
C'�

Q �
z0�NVa OOc
Z rvnmi
WHNO
ate. ZryMj ryMjZ
aZo E
�WN LL
U
z
�1
W�
I Q
a�
u
� I
c11 O
� O
a
u
O
s�
U)
OJ
u
V
u,
v
C'�
FOOTER LOG COVER LOG BURIED 5' INTO BANK
(OFTEN UNDER FOOTER OF STRUCTURE ARM, NOT DEPICTED)
A
k
Qp OQ
O
\
Plan View
COVERLOG
FOOTER LOG
BURIED 6" BELOW
MAX POOL DEPTH
Section A -A'
Cover Lo
3.3
Not to Scale
Q �
z0�NVa OOc
Z rvnmi
WHNO
ate. ZryMj ryMjZ
aZo E
�WN LL
U
z
�1
W�
I Q
a�
u
� I
c11 O
� O
a
u
O
s�
U)
OJ
u
V
u,
v
C'�

vPP Et *x Nn OPBIE 9arnory PXOSxaR PF lz
xBEULL A`ND.1.A,TH aA
N 8
�°Lr ALL[n,EFPw °E axO rZOy� y
O S Oh R
xaM 1, PIANTRS AMA STALL BE REP m
PLPMn6APEASxatt BE DISHED, u
"\ r mEMTAS ALLEEFUxnX° Q 5
PEARREA PRGOTCHNOTUUioNT° �a 88=
MR ALL
PLAGET PUX mglAiE 4EN6T iO � °� -
ESENT_.. _ JJbGTNE "m
O O O n\ O O
IL
1.00MOMESVIEFIF
RNSEATTEN fll4 v OR
Sxwu,SBMAHiMOwx I.x I'LSxiHF Sx° DENE.TO THE .1 am mF[Pn°naM
INTO TO 1 .1 TO THE FUEL SEEDI ROM Fuu °F VM OF THE BUMF. PLANTING FRO D THEN PETER UPTHE OPENING BEER
OEWHOEME BPBIBLED T EHEADER, HOT AL LEM, AND PUSH OFF LEON °B TOP WAMIEVCIMEiHEiOP, HEEL BEUPENLI.AVOUO
TUE,R ON ME HANDLE HALFWAY INTONE SOIL 5 DAMAGING IRE SELDOM.
O OPEN THE PWIErv, TOP RE TE PAGE NO +DEATH EvISTAXOPOSHTHE AFTER O IRE ROM,
HOLE lDOn °TPMUmE THE ROOT WHOP SHOULD BE OMEE BAa AND "RE, ALLOW ME WIT
.."CAEBEBSOIEINTHE SUMAL11 UPMl15HA11C HESEEPARI
KOREAN HOLE TORE TEALLEWTHE PUG'.
MPAGEM, INXIBPIXG RLEDUNTLE
POO,GBOWFH. °ONOTTW6i OR SPIN THE
HEATED OR LEASE THE FORM @ aze Root Planting
EI N @Containerized Planting J
No[,HU I
J
W ^�
I rQ,
v
d FRAFFILLON 3 .p GANNERSES, DE
C Q PROARY a EG S.
5U ;
C 3 YEN v 1 AD n o ❑
N
0--. PARPREFENERE
O
Pl,NFEr CSYRMS To BE h a
RevlesveoPDX ]o(voPLnrvs. N
3
Foie.a genLAI H,- ,:eMing mix ix fields and A—OHAI 'Q^
Permanent Planting HEStroam TUHU dfa —MAR, Bwnm b.ffwH.oOD-
�- nl,n R,le n Permanent Seeding
U�
'FDA TERMS PEL °.IaNEMRFBGL
M1tA1nX6NXi WESiAREIFYPI iOVOF BP EVE STARE FREE ISFE DETaEI
SEE OETaG s . MPCFMNK
tIYESFPItFIIYP) A µ A RNA A PSHP[XO iOPOFONLP
A POh A A A A A A A Or �r n v�
IDS OF BEER A A A A "'
A A A A INFREAR
''EF ., T, TOFOFS,OP1
NINE:
,TD, I"� oa sPVAIRMTH FOLESw51 OIn PO Prn XMH F XH a R' _
wNETT, \xllVll Z'~ 1. IN NPLL�pNa.111OSCSWHEPFFEIE EOOry S 4 3
Main IN wLL DURING wIIErvxipNEEF Y N
d
A
Llve Stake RhaJ V
Staking Q� �fTce Protection y = e a @ i
Nw[b S`ia e-(—`—
PBPXNN BUFFERPLANTNG2OXE
]ptlL•
CanmenM
~"•
IMd
B
Mrt OPp
Yu.
1patlq
IMX.
Spetlp
SYY1ef eMWm
BWassm
11P
61]1
B. E' -+P
B•
E%
roY
slv
nasvo-
S[Ies AN UnxTNn
+sx
O.'wpl
�¢[6r[bOrs
Arp1M�0
6111
OS -1P
B1
B%
xx
6121
4S -1P
m
i
6111
6'd+P
sR
M
osvo-..l
"—.
1
6111
6]SnP
IP.
Mow.wxsw
cn1
os -+P
P'
ss+]1
e1z1
Bl12FA1BN2XPIAXTIX6ZOXE
MfM MIYb[f
Ln5
WlmonMme
BISYa
Cwim xuna
Yu.
1patlq
IMX.
Spetlp
Yla 51re
YPNm
•%anm
PgePMMM
B•
M
o - Pa.
96
zsx
Mbgx
� Wv�a.
S[Ies AN UnxTNn
IBbMO'km
2B
�¢[6r[bOrs
Arp1M�0
slx�
BYrww
B1
a
xx
4xrowervq,eq ONTO
MEUy
m
PI„+agwawMPw
sR
M
osvo-..l
IsL
PEWIYXBii RN0.1GPM 9EFD PL0.XPXG ZOXE
MfM MIYb[f
EygaNma
WlmonMme
141xn
arrua arvmpa
[>Fi{eg mtgxcc
Prauvgmte
SYWRSgYmS
PP
[urryag6
Name NTere
N•e P.mE
96
Mbgx
S[Ies AN UnxTNn
IBbMO'km
2B
�¢[6r[bOrs
Arp1M�0
lfi
xMSb[n
maxMMOM
Pasty+
m

m
Q
z0�NVa OOc
��mLL
W N u N O
Z m M Z
v
U
z
�1
W�
I O
•� O
u
c11 O
� O
a
u
O
F--1
0
�r
U
v
0
0
w
v
Is,
U-)
2"
6" MIN. OVERLAP IN
DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION
AT MAT ENDS r
STAKE (TYP) TOP OF BANK
8' MAX. WITH WIRE
(6' MAX. WITHOUT WIRE)
3M
MIDDLE AND VERTICAL W
RES
SagC�
12 i GAGE MIN
FILTER FABRIC
TOP AND BOTTOM STRAND _ _
SHALL BE 10 GAUGE MIN. pE
TOE OF SLOPE
Plan View
Typical Stake
WIRE
EROSION CONTROL
FILTER FABRIC
MATTING (TYP) TOP OF BANK
26 APPLY LIVESTAKING (TYP) SECURE MATTING IN
NOTES: COMPACTED FILL
EXISTING GROUND
3.4 6" DEEP TRENCH
STAKE (TYP)
j
1. USE WIRE A MINIUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND WITH
j\ \� \\ \\�� \ ✓\/
SPACING UM OF 6 LINES OF WIRES WITH 12" STAY
\ \\
a0
2. USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36" IN WIDTH
TOE OF SLOPE j/�
O� \'
AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRES AS
z
DIRECTED By THE ENGINEER.
3. PROVIDE T STEEL POST OF THE SELF FASTENER 4"
0 a
o
-
ANGLE STEEL TYPE. ANGLESTEE)_TYPE. EXTEND FABRIC
w -
j
INTO TRENCH
'��'9
iN
Section View
Erosion Control Matting
Temporary Silt Fence
r2--,,
5.1 Not to Scale
5.1 IN of to bcale
NOTES:
TEMPORARY SEEDING
1. PROVIDETURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO
APPROVED DATE TYPE PLANTING RATE
ACCOMMODATE LARGE TRUCKS.
(lbslacre)
5. LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL POINTS
Rye Grain Secale Cereale
120
P OF INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED.
Ground iculturalLimestone
Jan 1 h.1ay 1
2,000
PROVIDE OF THE DEVICE AND
—
10 -10-10 Fertilizer
750
AI NTENNTCHECKS
J�J TIMELY MAINTENANCE.
Q 6. MUST BE MAINTAINED INA CON DITION WHICH
Straw Mulch
4000
WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD
German Milet Setana da(ca
40
_>O• ONTO STREETS. PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH
Ground Aaricultural Limestone
000
STONE WILL BE NECESSARY.
May 1 —Aug 15
10 -10-10 Fertilizer
750
7. ANY MATERIALTRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY
MUST BE CLEANED IMMEDIATELY.
Straw Mulch
4,000
8. USE CLASS A STONE OR OTHER COARSE AGGREGATE
Rye Grain Secale Cereale
120
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
Ground A.Wicultural Limestone
2,000
9. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONE.
Aug 15 —Dec 30 10 -10-10 Fertilizer
1,000
CLASS A STONE
Straw Mulch
4,000
8" MIN. DEPTH tip'
Construction Entrance
Temporary Seeding
5.1 of to Zcale
5.1 Not to bcale
m
Q
z0�NVa OOc
��mLL
W N u N O
Z m M Z
v
U
z
�1
W�
I O
•� O
u
c11 O
� O
a
u
O
F--1
0
�r
U
v
0
0
w
v
Is,
U-)