NC0041696_Permit Issuance_20060214

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING: COVER SHEET
NC0041696
Valdese — Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
ermit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Owner Name Change
Compliance
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
February 14, 2006
Whim document is prirntect on rein paper - ignore arty
conterit on the reverase aside

Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, ]r.,•Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
February 14, 2006
Mr. Jeffrey V. Morse
Town Manager
P.O. Box 339
Valdese, North Carolina 28690
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit
NC0041696
Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
Burke County
Dear Mr. Morse:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to
the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9,1994 (or as
subsequently amended).
This final permit contains the following significant changes from your draft permit:
• A mercury limit of 0.25 µg/L has been added to this permit. Although 28 of 29 samples reported were
below the detection limit of 0.2 µg/L, the single detection was 0.54 µg/L. Since this value is above the
allowable concentration a limit has been added.
• Selenium monitoring has been removed. Monitoring for this parameter will continue to be required
as part of your LTMP.
• Silver monitoring has been reduced to monthly based on the fact that silver is an action level
parameter and this facility has consistently passed its WET tests.
• The total residual chlorine limit will take effect September 1, 2007.
• The cyanide limit was incorrectly expressed as a weekly average limit. Since this parameter has an
acute water quality standard, it must be limited on a daily maximum basis.
In response to your comments on the draft permit:
• Per Division regulations, class IV facilities must monitor limited toxicants on a weekly basis.
Therefore we cannot reduce the monitoring frequency for cyanide at this time.
• In your comments to the draft permit, you requested a lower tier with reduced monitoring
frequencies. Less frequent monitoring requirements are available for facilities with less than 2.5 MGD
of flow. There would be no difference in monitoring for a 5 MGD permit versus a 7.5 MGD permit.
• Your comments also noted that "the 10.5 MGD limitations and monitoring requirement page could
probably be omitted". The Lake Rhodhiss WWTP has been approved for this expansion. If the 10.5
MGD page were to be removed from the permit, the facility would need to re -submit an EAA, permit
application, and prepare a SEPA document if this flow was needed at a future point.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty
(30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such
demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 On the Internet at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
IsffirthCarolina
Naturally

1
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits
required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or
Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Toya Fields at telephone number (919)
733-5083, extension 551.
cc: Central Files
Asheville Regional Office/Surface Water Protection
NPDES Unit
PERCS Unit
Aquatic Toxicology
Marshall Hyatt, EPA Region IV
2

Permit NC0041696
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
the
Town of Valdese
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Lake Rhodhiss Wastewater Treatment Plant
Lake Rhodhiss Drive, north of Valdese
Burke County
to receiving waters designated as Lake Rhodhiss (Catawba River) in the Catawba River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set
forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective March 1, 2006.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on February 28, 2010.
Signed this day February 14,1006.
to" 1an W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0041696
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this permit
issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to
operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included
herein.
The Town of Valdese is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a 7.5 MGD wastewater treatment facility consisting of the following
components:
• Influent pump station,
• Bar screen,
Grit removal,
• Primary clarifiers,
• Aeration basins,
• Secondary clarifiers,
• Chlorination,
• Dechlorination
• Gravity sludge
• Thickeners,
• Residual centrifuges,
• Residuals composting operation
• SCADA system
The facility is located at Valdese Wastewater Treatment Plant, on Lake Rhodhiss Drive, north
of Valdese, Burke County.
2. After receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division, construct and operate
additional wastewater treatment facilities and upgrade the existing influent pumping,
aeration equipment, plant outfall, and residuals management facilities. The ultimate
design capacity after expansion and modification to existing facilities shall be 10.5 MGD.
3. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into
Lake Rhodhiss (Catawba River), which is classified WS-IV & B CA waters in the Catawba
River Basin.

Lake Rhodhiss WWTP - NC0041696
USGS Quad Name: Drexel
Receiving Stream: Catawba River
Stream Class: WS-IV & B CA
Subbasin: Catawba - 03 08 31
I .at.: 35°46'41 "
I .ong.: 81°32'25"
Facility
Location .-
North
Not to SCALE

Permit NC0041696
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[7.5 MGD]
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expansion to 10.5 MGD or
expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Locations
Flow
7.5 MGD
Continuous
RecordingInfluent
or
Effluent
BOD5 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
NH3-N
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
(June 1 through September 30)
3/Week
Grab
U & D
Dissolved Oxygen
(October 1 through May 31)
Weekly
Grab
U & D
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pH
> 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Phenols
21 µg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Mercury
0.25 pg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Silver
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Cyanide3
22 pg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine4
28 pg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
(June 1 through September 30)
3/Week
Grab
U & D
Temperature
(October 1 through May 31)
Weekly
Grab
U & D
Total Nitrogen
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Priority Pollutant Analysis6
Annual
Grab
Effluent
Notes:
1. U: Upstream at least 100 feet from the outfall. D: Downstream 1 mile below the outfall at NCSR 1001. Instream
samples shall be grab samples collected three times per week during June, July, August, and September and once
per week during the remaining months of the year.
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The detection limit for cyanide is 10.0 µg/L. If the measured levels of cyanide are below the detection limit, then
the measurement is considered to be zero for purposes of compliance evaluation and should be reported on the
DMR as < 10.0 µg/L.
4. The TRC limit shall take effect September 1, 2007.
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F @ 4.8%; January, April, July, October [see A. (4)].
6. See A. (6) for details.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0041696
A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
[10.5 MGD]
During the period beginning upon expansion to 10.5 MGD and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored
by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location'
Flow
10.5 MGD
Continuous
RecordingInfluent
or
Effluent
BOD52
15.0 mg/L
22.5 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent Effluent
NH3-N
4.0 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
(June 1 through September 30)
3/Week
Grab
U & D
Dissolved Oxygen
(October 1 through May 31)
Weekly
Grab
U & D
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200/100m1
400/100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
pH
> 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Phenols
15 µg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Cyanides
22 pg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Mercury
0.18 pg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
28 ug/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
(June 1 through September 30)
3/Week
Grab
U & D
Temperature
(October 1 through May 31)
Weekly
Grab
U & 0
Total Nitrogen
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity'
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Priority Pollutant Analysis
Annual
Grab
Effluent
Notes:
1. U: Upstream at least 100 feet from the outfall. D: Downstream 1 mile below the outfall at NCSR 1001. Instream
samples shall be grab samples collected three times per week during June, July, August, and September and once
per week during the remaining months of the year.
2. The monthly average effluent BODS and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentrations shall not be less than 5 mg/L.
4. The detection limit for cyanide is 10.0 µg/L. If the measured levels of cyanide are below the detection limit, then
the measurement is considered to be zero for purposes of compliance evaluation and should be reported on the
DMR as < 10.0 µg/L.
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F @ 6.6%; January, April, July, October [see A. (5)].
6. See A. (5) for details.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0041696
A. (3) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) @ 7.5 MGD
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 4.8 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or
"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent
versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July, and October. Effluent sampling
for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit
limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as
described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or
subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does
have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic
Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the
pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the
following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30
days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all
concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature.
Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee
will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit
number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the
form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required
during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.

Permit NC0041696
A. (4) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY) @ 10.5 MGD
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to
Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 6.6%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or
"North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent
versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July, and October. Effluent sampling
for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit
limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as
described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or
subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest
concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does
have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection
methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic
Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the
pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the
following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the
end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response
data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee
will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit
number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the
form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required
during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring
requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival,
minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.

Permit NC0041696
A. (5) PRIORITY POLLUTANT SCAN
The permittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in the table below (in accordance with
40 CFR Part 136). The annual effluent pollutant scan samples shall represent seasonal (summer, winter, fall, spring)
variations over the 5-year permit cycle. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable."
Additionally, the method detection level and the minimum level shall be the most sensitive as provided by the appropriate
analytical procedure.
Ammonia (as N)
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
1,1-dichloroethylene
Dissolved oxygen 1,2-dichloropropane
Nitrate/Nitrite 1,3-dichloropropylene
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen Ethylbenzene
Oil and grease Methyl bromide
Total Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds:
Acrolein
Acrylonitri le
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1 ,1,1 -trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Acid -extractable compounds:
P-chloro-m-cresol
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-dinitrophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Base -neutral compounds:
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichtorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachiorocyclo-pentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- DMR-PPA1 or in a form approved by the Director, within 90 days
of sampling. A copy of the report shall be submitted to Central Files to the following address: Division of Water Quality,
Water Quality Section, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.

Town of Valdese
LAKE RHODHISS WWTP
2100 Lake Rhodhiss
P.O. Box 339
Valdese, N.C. 28690
(828) 879 - 2131
November 10, 2005
Mrs. LeToya Fields
Western NPDES Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject:
Dear Mrs. Fields
Draft NPDES Permit
Permit NC0041696
Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
Town of Valdese
After reviewing the Draft NPDES Permit, I have some concerns and questions
about the proposed monitoring requirements. I am concerned with the increased
monitoring and the additional cost that will be associated with this monitoring. I am
concerned with the prospect that I may lose flow, due to the shutdown of another
Textile Plant at anytime; therefore any additional cost worries me.
I have specific concerns or questions about the following items:
1. Monitoring for Mercury
2. Monitoring for Selenium 411~4
3. Monitoring for Silver /1-e LP 6(
4. Frequency of monitoring for Cyanide —
On the Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements page, Phenols are
required to be sampled Weekly. I believe this should 2/Month as it states on the first
page of the Draft.
#1
Having reviewed data for the years 2002 - present I feel that
monitoring for Mercury, Selenium, and Silver to be unwarranted.
From 2002 to present there was 29 reported samples tested for
Mercury, 28 of the 29 samples came back as `Non -Detects'. Only
one sample had reportable limit .5 ug/1.

#285#3
The same could be said for the Selenium and Silver monitoring.
Silver was tested for 22 times from 2002 - present with 21 of the
test resulting in `Non -Detects'. The one reportable test was in
2003. Selenium was tested 22 times from 2002 - present with 21
of the tests resulting in `Non -Detects'. The one detection was in
2004.
#4 The frequency of monitoring for Cyanide seems to be a bit
excessive. I would like to request that monitoring be no more than
2/Month and that the Weekly limit be dropped as well.
There are no near -future plans for the plant to be upgraded to a 10.5 MGD
plant. The 10.5 MGD Limitations and Monitoring Requirement page could probably be
omitted. It seems more likely at this point that The Plant flow will decrease in the near
future as opposed to increasing.
I would further like to request limits and monitoring requirements for less flow
as well, a tiered Permit. Due to the volatility of the Textile Industry, as much as 80% to
90% of the flow would be lost with the closing of the Textile Plants. If this were to
happen, it could become almost financially impossible to continue all the proposed
monitoring. At present, the average daily flow is 4.2 MGD. Would it be feasible to set
monitoring limits and requirements based on lower than 7.5 MGD? Maybe permit 5
MGD and for the future 2.5 or 3 MGD?
If any other information is needed please call me, Greg Padgett at 828-879-2131.
I will be glad to make my staff or myself available to answer any questions or clarify any
comments about the Draft NPDES.
Thank you for assistance in this matter.
Regards,
Greg Padgett, Superintendent/ ORC
Cc: Mr. Jeff Morse, Town Manager of Valdese

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
ksz.ervw
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION
December 20, 2005
MEMORANDUM
TO: Le Toya Fields — Western NPDES Programs
7 �
THROUGH: Roger Edwards Asheville Region Supervisor
FROM: Larry Frost — Environmental Chemist jam_
SUBJECT: Staff Recommendations
Town of Valdese, Lake Rhodhiss Wastewater Treatment Plant - NC0041696
Permit Renewal
Toya,
The following are ARO staff recommendations on the draft permit for Valdese;
• Total Residual Chlorine should be put into effect 18 months after issuance of the permit.
•
id., ' Cyanide frequency should be 2/month rather than weekly has is shown in the draft permit.
IDAt �r
Selenium should be dropped from the final permit, it has been monitored 22 times since 2002 and 21
of the 22 times have returned as non -detect.
Silver should be dropped from the final permit or at least from the 7.5 MGD tier, it has been
monitored 22 times since 2002 and 21 of the 22 times have returned as non -detect.
2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
• Mercury monitoring and limits should not be in the final permit for the 7.5 MGD tier. The facility has
monitored 29 times since 2002 and 28 of the 29 times results have returned as non -detect.
The WWTP has currently a tiered permit with flows of 7.5 MGD and 10 MGD as the tiers. Staff
recommends that a 5 MGD tier be added, with relaxed monitoring limits and/or frequencies.
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Re: NCO041696 - Valdese
Subject: Re: NC0041696 - Valdese
From: Toya Fields <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:05:27 -0500
To: Larry Frost <[e-mail]>
Hi Larry,
I wasn't going to wait for a staff report, but if you have comments then let me
know. I can use a 'memo' as a staff report.
I can't say for sure whether we'll give them a nutrient limit in 2010. My guess is
that they may at some point but whether its in 2010- I'm not sure. I can talk to
Mike Templeton about the odds on Monday when he gets back from vacation. I know that
the other dischargers affecting Lake Rhodhiss and Lake Hickory are getting the same
requirement to do a nutrient study that Valdese did during their last permit.
Mercury: Yes, this parameter will get a limit. I tried to just give them monitoring
but because they reported a value of .540 ug/L (higher than the allowable of .248
ug/L) then EPA commented that our state policy requires us to give them a limit.
Selenium: monitoring for selenium will be taken out. They'll just have to continue
quarterly monitoring through their LTMP.
Silver and Cyanide: I gave the facility silver and cyanide monitoring based on the
regulations for class IV facilities. But if we can justify it, we can change them.
I think it can be justified in the case of silver because there was only one
detection (even though it was very high- 140 ug/L) and the fact that its an action
level parameter. I have to talk to Susan about it. The facility requested that the
weekly cyanide limit be dropped and monitoring reduced. I definitely can't take out
the limit. I don't know that I have a justification for reducing monitoring on that,
other than "they asked for it to be reduced". Any comments?
The TRC limit was an oversight- they'll get 18 months after the effective date of the
final permit.
As far as I know, I'm not waiting for any more staff reports.
If you have any questions, let me know!
Toya
Larry Frost wrote:
Toya
Are you still waiting on ARO (me) for a staff report on this draft?
Do you know if we (DWQ) have any intent of giving this WWTP a nutrient limit in
2010, they discharge to 303d Lake Rhodhiss?
Have you made any decisions on monitoring for;
selenium?
silver?
mercury?
frequency of cyanide (weekly or 2/month)?
Will the WWTP be expected to comply with the TRC limit immediately upon issuance
of the new permit?
Thanks - sorry I'm so late on this.
Are there other draft permits that you are looking for staff reports?
Larry
Larry Frost - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
1 of 2 12/29/2005 2:35 PM

Re: NC0041696 - Valdese
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Toya Fields - [e-mail]
Environmental Engineer I
Western NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
Tel: [phone] x 551
Fax: [phone]
Toya Fields <[e-mail]>
Environmental Engineer I
Western NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
1 cal
12/29/2005 2:35 PM

Norm l.e,roUna
Division of
Environmental Health
Division of Environmental Health
Terry L. Pierce, Director
Public Water Supply Section
Jessica G. Miles, Section Chief
State of North Carolina
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
122@lit)W1Es
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. David Goodrich
NPDES Permits Group Leader
Discharge Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Jessica G. Miles, P.E., C.P.M., Chief
Public Water Supply Section
DATE: December 12, 2005
SUBJECT: Draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Permit—NPDES #NC0041696
Town of Valdese WWTP, Caldwell County
JAN 0 5 2006
retary
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SECTION
Reference is made to the above -mentioned Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Permits. We have reviewed the permit information and determined the proposed discharge will not
adversely affect water quality upstream of any existing or known proposed public water supply intake.
We concur with the issuance of the permit provided the facility is operated and maintained properly, the
stated effluent limits are met prior to discharge, and the discharge does not contravene the designated
water quality standards.
If we can be of further assistance, please contact us.
JBM/crm
a. .•
,...,
JAN - 9 2006
1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1634 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: http://ncdrinkingwater.state.nc.us/
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled 110 % Post Consumer
G:IWPDATA\PWSWPDES\NATIONAL POLLUTANT-JESSICA MEMO doc
NorthCarolina
Naturally
1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1634 One
Telephone [phone] ♦ Fax [phone] ♦ Lab Form Fax [phone] NorthCarolina
http:/Incdrinkingwater.state.nc.us/ �aurally
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
yw REGION 4
;
111W7) ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
Z3Fti�+i+�02 61 FORSYTH STREET
Paa ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
NOV 4 2005
Ms. LeToya Fields
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NOV - 8 2005
SUBJ: Draft NPDES Permit
Lake Rhodhiss WWTP- Permit No. NC0041696
Dear Ms. Fields:
In accordance with the EPA/NCDENR NPDES MOA, we have completed review of the
draft permit specified above and have no comments or objections to its conditions. We request
that we be afforded an additional review opportunity only if significant changes are made to the
draft permit prior to issuance or if significant comments objecting to it are received. Otherwise,
please send us one copy of the final permit when issued.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Marshall Hyatt, Environmental Scientist
Permits, Grants, and Technical Assistance Branch
Water Management Division
Internet Address (URL) • http:dwww.epa.gov
Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnled with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)

Re: Fw: comments on NC0041696, Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
Subject: Re: Fw: comments on NC0041696, Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
From: Toya Fields <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:12:29 -0500
To: [e-mail]
Thanks Marshall,
I agree with you that mercury should get a limit. It looks like mercury may have
been an issue in the previous permit as well, so it seems reasonable. I'll have to
call the facility and let them know what to expect.
Toya
[e-mail] wrote:
Hi, Toya:
thanks for considering my comments.
re #1 - I agree with your conclusion to treat Se the same as As.
re #5 - mercury - for consistency's sake, we use the conditional/delayed
limit only when statistics alone show RP. In this case, you have an
actual hit. The best I can suggest is a limit with a compliance
schedule, the time allowed being based on what they need to do to
comply. If they can provide sufficient data in the interim to show that
RP no longer exists, the permit could be modified to remove the limit.
How does that sound?
Toya Fields - [e-mail]
Environmental Engineer I
Western NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
Tel: [phone] x 551
Fax: [phone]
Toya Fields <[e-mail]>
Environmental Engineer I
Western NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
1 of 1 12/7/2005 1 1:20 AM

r
Re: Fw: comments on NC0041696, Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
Subject: Re: Fw: comments on NC0041696, Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
From: Toya Fields <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:10:46 -0500
To: [e-mail]
Hi Marshall,
In response to your comments on the Lake Rhodhiss permit;
#1 and #5) After looking at the data and RPA analysis one more time with an eye
towards consistency, I've come to some slightly different conclusions.
Selenium. The data for this parameter is actually very similar to the data for
arsenic. Both have 1 detection out of 12 samples. In both cases that single
detection is significantly below the allowable concentration. Actually the selenium
data even uses two detection levels (<20 ug/L and <5 ug/L). I think both parameters
should be treated the same. Unfortunately one was given 2/month monitoring and the
other was given continued monitoring through the LTMP. I'd recommend that both
continue to be monitored through the LTMP based on the argument I gave for arsenic in
the fact sheet.
I do not compare either of these parameters to cyanide, because in that case one of
the values actually was far above the allowable concentration.
Mercury. Actually, the single detect for mercury is above the allowable
concentration. For consistencies sake, I think this parameter should be given a
conditional limit. I'm not sure why I didn't put a limit in the permit. I suspect
it was just an oversight. This was a uniquely tricky permit to draft.
2, 3, 4, 7) Ok
6) Yes, only A(2) needs a DO limit. This is based on the WQ model that was performed
when the facility requested limits at 10.5 MGD. Incidentally, the facility called me
to say that they will probably request to have the limits at 10.5 MGD removed from
the permit. They don't expect to expand in the forseeable future.
[e-mail] wrote:
forgot one comment...
Forwarded by Marshall Hyatt/R4/USEPA/US on 10/27/2005 09:24 AM
Marshall
Hyatt/R4/USEPA/U
S To
[e-mail]
10/27/2005 09:18 cc
AM
Subject
comments on NC0041696, Lake
Rhodhiss WWTP
thanks for sending the permit appl. hope these comments are useful.
will you be able to respond by Nov 4? thanks Marshall
1 of 2 12/7/2005 11:21 AM

PRe: Fw: comments on NC0O41696, Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
1. Selenium is somewhat similar to cyanide, in that you have 12 samples
for each and one big hit for each. However, cyanide is being limited,
but selenium is only being monitored. For selenium, would you consider
a delayed limit effective in 18 months and requiring monthly monitoring
so that at the end of a year, if all are non -detect or do not show
reasonable potential, the limit can be withdrawn by you? Alternately,
since you are requiring 2/month sampling, would you consider
reevaluating the data submitted after 6 months - 1 year to see if RP
exist and a limit needed, instead of waiting until permit renewal?
In footnote #2 in A.1 and 2, recommend changing "total suspended
idue" to "total suspended solids".
3. For all metals except mercury, recommend changing sample type from
grab to composite.
. Re cyanide, most other NC permits include std language that discusses
if the reported sample is less than 10 ug/1, compliance is deemed to
have occurred. Does this permit need similar language in A.1 and A.2?
Do you need additional language to discuss how to handle non -detects
when calculating the weekly average?
5. In A.2, did you mean to include a mercury limit? My reading of the
act sheet is that you didn't. If you did, why isn't Hg limited in A.1
also?
6. just checking - A.2 has a DO minimum requirement, but A.1 doesn't.
I assume that is intentional.
7. The fact sheet should include language that says that the permittee
will continue to implement its existing pretreatment program.
Toya Fields - [e-mail]
Environmental Engineer I
Western NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
Tel: [phone] x 551
Fax: [phone]
Toya Fields <[e-mail]>
Environmental Engineer I
Western NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
2of2
12/7/2005 11:21 AM

PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE
CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617
NOTIFICATION OF
INTENT TO ISSUE A
NPDES
WASTEWATER PERMIT
On the basis of thorough stall
review and application of NC
General Statute 143.21, Pub-
lic law 92-500 and other lawful
standards and regulations, the
North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission
proposes to issue a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimina-
tion System (NPDES) waste-
water discharge permit to the
person(s) listed below effec-
tive 45 days from the publish
date of this notice.
Written comments regarding
the proposed permit will be
accepted until 30 days after
the publish date of this notice.
All comments received prior to
that date are considered in the
final determinations regarding
the proposed permit. The Di-
rector of the NC Division of
Water Quality may decide to
hold a public meeting for the
proposed permit should the
Division receive a significant
degree of public interest.
Copies of the draft permit and
other supporting . information
on file used to determine con-
ditions present in the draft per-
mit are available upon request
and payment of the costs of
reproduction. Mail comments
and/or requests for informa-
tion to the NC Division of Wa-
ter Quality at the above ad-
dress or call the Point Source
Branch at [phone], ex-
tension 520 or 363. Please in -
dude the NPDES permit num-
ber (attached) in any commu.
nication. Interested persons
may also yisit the Division of
Water Quality at 512 N. Salis-
bury Street, Raleigh, NC
27604-1148 between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. to review information on
file. -
The Town of Valdese (P.O.
Box 339, Valdese, NC 28690)
has applied for renewal e1
NPDES permit NC0041696 for
the Lake Rhodhiss WWTP in
Burke County. This permitted
facility discharges 7.5 MGD of
treated wastewater to the Cat-
awba River in the Catawba
river Basin. Currently phenols,
cyanide, and total residual
chlorine and water quality
limited, This discharge may af-
fect future allocations in this
portion of the Catawba River
Basin.
PUBLISH. November 4, 2005.
23424
NORTH CAROLINA
CATAW$A COUNTY
being first m
she is�. y swo r, lays: That he or
11"rt► 1�� "of the
Hickory Daily Record,a � newspapernewspaper pub-
lished at Hickory, North Carolina; that in
the issues of the said newspaper for the
following days, to wit:
1\\Doeryp r—M6
c
there appeared -. v • • • • spaced
lines of advertising as per attached named
advertiser:
The Hickory Daily Record is a qualified news-
paper within the meaning o section 1-597 of the
General Statutes of N. C.
Affiant
Sworn to and subscribed before me,
this
My Commission Expires
day of
,20DS
otary Public
Z009"

Draft Review
Subject: Draft Review
From: John Giorgino <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:09:56 -0500
To: Toya Fields <[e-mail]>
Hi Toya, I reviewed NC0041696 - Valdese WWTP. The first page lists the facility name
as Lake Rhodiss WWTP. Other than that, I have no comments on the tox sections.
Thanks for forwarding it.
-John
John Giorgino
Environmental Biologist
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mailing Address:
1621 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Office: 919 733-2136
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Web Page: http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us
1 of 1 11/10/2005 10:10 AM

NCDENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
Town of Valdese
NC0041696
Facility Information
(1.) Facility Name:
Town of Valdese WWTP
(2.) Permitted Flow (MGD):
7.5 MGD; 10.5
MGD
(6.) County:
Burke
(3.) Facility Class:
IV
(7.) Regional Office:
Asheville
(4.) Pretreatment Program:
Full LTMP
(8.) USGS Topo Quad:
D12SE
(5.) Permit Status:
Existing
(9.) USGS Quad Name:
Stream Characteristics
(1.) Receiving Stream:
Lake Rhodhiss (7.) Drainage Area (mi2):
(Catawba
River)
Lake
(2.) Sub -basin:
03-08-31 (8.) Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
228.7 (min release)
(3.) Stream Index Number:
i
DVS -IV & 13 (_':1
Not listed
1 (9.) Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
-
(4.) Stream Classification:
(10.) 30Q2 (cfs):
-
(5.) 303(d) Status:
(1 1.) Average Flow (cfs):
-
(6.) 305(b) Status:
- (12.) IWC %:
4.8
1.0 Proposed Changes Incorporated Into Permit Renewal
• Update facility description to include 2001 changes.
• Mercury monitoring will be added during this renewal.
• The selenium analysis each showed only one detection, however the value detected was
above the allowable concentration. Therefore monitoring will be added.
• The maximum predicted concentration for cyanide was above the allowable concentration.
Out of 12 samples there were 8 detections, one of which (140pg/L) was above the allowable. A
limit of 103 pg/L will be added to the permit.
• Add annual PPA requirement
• Add nutrient language. "Please be advised that there are water quality concerns about
nutrient loading into Lake Hickory. Duke Power is conducting an extensive water quality model
in the Catawba River mainstem and preliminary results indicate that point source nutrient limits
may be necessary in the future to reduce the impact on Lake Rhodhiss and Lake Hickory."
• Add weekly NH3 limit at 10.5 MGD tier.
• Add TRC limit at 7.5 MGD tier
• Change phenol monitoring to weekly to be consistent with requirements for Class IV facilities.
• Change toxicant monitoring to 2/Month to be consistent with requirements for Class IV
facilities.
2.0 Summary
The Lake Rhodhiss WWTP is a 7.5 MGD plant treating domestic and industrial wastewaters from
the towns of Valdese, Drexel, East Burke County, and Rutherford College. The facility has an

NPDES Permit Fact Sheet — 10/11/05 Town of Valdese/ Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
Page 2 NC0041696
approved LTMP with 9 SIUs in its pretreatment program. Biosolids are processed onsite,
through composting, and the product is available to the public.
In 2001, the Lake Rhodhiss WWTP completed a facility upgrade. Changes include a new bar
screen and grit removal system, 2 new variable speed influent pumps, refurbished rake drive
units for the primary and secondary clarifiers, new primary sludge pumps, a sulfur dioxide
dechlorination unit, and a SCADA system. The designed permitted flow remains at 7.5 MGD.
As a condition of the prior permit, the facility was required to conduct a TP optimization study
that would identify the sources of TP loads and evaluate how to reduce and minimize these
inputs to the plant. Evidence has shown that nutrient levels discharges in Lake Rhodhiss are
having significant impacts to Lake Hickory, downstream. The study required the facility to
review operational and treatment techniques to determine if TP removal is being maximized. In
June 2002, the findings of the study were submitted to the division. The highlights are as follows:
Phosphorus Contributions
• Influent TP levels range from 5.42 mg/L to 7.89 mg/L. Average level was 6.875 mg/L.
• Major sources and percent TP contribution: Town of Valdese (83%), Town of Drexel
(7.9%), portion of Burke County (3.2%), and industries (5.9%). Among industrial
dischargers the percent contribution is as follows: Valdese Manufacturing (37.3%),
Valdese Weavers (20.2%), and Carolina Mills (34.8%).
Operational Efficiency
• Effluent levels range from 2.69 mg/L to 7.31 mg/L with an average of 4.97 mg/L.
Average removal was estimated at 28%.
• COD/BOD5 ratio is a factor in the evaluation of anaerobic selector zones for biological
phosphorus removal. Ratios greater than 2.0 indicate the wastewater may need more
anaerobic retention time and a higher anaerobic biomass fraction to maximize phosphorus
removal. At the WWTP, influent ratios ranged from 1.56 to 4.76 with an average of 2.64.
Typical COD/BOD5 ratios for municipal waste are in the range of 1.5 to 2.0.
• COD/TP ratio ranged from 31.69 to 94.95 and averaged 56.31. It has been reported that
in order to achieve an effluent TP of 1.0 mg/L or less, the influent TP/COD ratio should
be greater than 40.
• BOD5/TP influent ratio ranged from 13.11 to 30.07 and averaged 23.87. In order to
achieve a TP concentration of 1.0 mg/L or less, the influent BOD5/TP ratio should
typically be in the range of 20 to 35, depending upon the sludge retention time of the
system. However, the Valdese system is operated at a higher sludge retention time to
assimilate textile wastes and will require a BOD5/TP ratio of 30 to 40 for phosphorus
removal.
Plan of Action (begun in 2002)
• The town has modified the activated sludge system operation by shutting off the first
aerators in each aeration tank to create anaerobic/anoxic zones.
• The sludge recirculation rate has been increased to achieve simultaneous denitrification
in the anaerobic/anoxic zones of the aeration tanks.
• It was determined that the recycle flows from the sludge thickening tanks and centrifuge
sludge dewatering operations contained high levels of phosphorus (9.93 mg/L average
from sludge thickening tanks and 16 mg/L average from centrifuge dewatering recycle).
To address this, the town installed a diffused aeration system in the sludge thickening
tanks. The cyclic aeration operation will help control release of phosphorus and total
nitrogen in the decant and recycle flows.

NPDES Permit Fact Sheet - 10/ 11 /05 Town of Valdese/ Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
Page 3
NC0041696
Although the town has not yet submitted results of these modifications, it does appear that
average phosphorus levels have decreased slightly. Average levels in 2002 were 4.09 mg/L while
the average from January -July 2005 is 3.53 mg/L.
3.0 Compliance Summary
DMR Data Review
DMRs were reviewed for the period of January 2002 through June 2005. Monthly average values
are summarized in the table below. Average monthly flows are at 59% capacity with maximum
monthly average flows at 72%. The facility has applied for an expansion and is authorized to
discharge at 10.5 MGD once they apply for and receive an ATC from CG&L. Effluent levels for
all parameters are within permitted limits, with the exception of phenols. Phenol violations are
discussed in more detail in the section on Compliance History.
Flow
(MGD)
ROD
(mg/L)
TSS
(mg/L)
TN
(mg/L)
NH3
(mg/L)
TP
(mg/L)
Fecal Coliform
(#/100 ml)
Phenols
(pg/L)
TRC
(pg/1)
Avg
4.116
2.45
5.35
5.42
0.28
4.19
10.37
6.59
318.90
Max
5.42
5.56
15.68
14.66
1.12
9.20
114.74
36.00
888.41
Min
3.56
0.66
2.10
1.08
0.15
0.%
1.14
0.009
1.69
RPA Analysis
RPAs were performed for the permitted parameters copper, phenols, and mercury. The
maximum predicted copper concentration was far above the allowable concentration (145 pg/L),
however since copper is an action level parameter and the facility is not failing whole effluent
toxicity tests, no limit will be added to the permit.
There was one mercury detection over the review period. That value was 0.54 pg/L, which is
above the 0.25 iig/L allowable concentration. Mercury was determined to be a parameter of
concern in the previous renewal, however due to the concerns of the Town and the
recommendation of the regional office, the facility was given a deferred limit. This limit was
removed based on submitted data in 2002 and since then mercury has been monitored in
accordance with the LTMP. Monthly monitoring will be added during this renewal.
The facility has violated its phenol limit several times over the permit cycle. The 21 pg/1 limit
will be retained in this renewal.
RPAs were also performed for those parameters being monitored in accordance with the facility's
LTMP: arsenic, sulfate, cadmium, chromium, cyanide, chloride, lead, molybdenum, nickel,
selenium, silver, and zinc.
Data for sulfates, cadmium, chromium, chlorides, lead, molybdenum, nickel, and zinc yielded
maximum predicted concentrations that were far below the allowable concentrations. These
pollutants will not be added to the NPDES permit but will continue to be monitored through the
LTMP.
Arsenic data showed only one detection in 12 samples. That value was 55 pg/L which is far
below the allowable concentration of 207 pg/L. In this case the low detection level and
consistency of the data (11 samples below detection) are factors in creating a very high

NPDES Permit Fact Sheet — 10/ 11 /05 Town of Valdese/ Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
Page 4
multiplication factor and the 'impression' of a very extreme variance. Due to these factors,
arsenic will continue to be monitored through the LTMP.
NC0041696
Selenium and silver analyses each showed only one detection for each pollutant, however in each
case the value detected was above the allowable concentration. Silver is an action level
parameter, therefore additional monitoring will not be added. 2/Month monitoring will be
added for selenium.
The maximum predicted concentration for cyanide was above the allowable concentration. Out
of 12 samples there were 8 detections, one of which (140pg/L) was above the allowable. A limit
of 103 pg/L will be added to the permit.
WET Test Results
The facility has passed 22/23 WET tests administered since January 2001.
Correspondence File Review/Compliance History
The facility had 10 daily maximum phenol violations from 1/2003 to 7/2005. The most severe
violation was a value of 1,200 µg/L in October 2004. A summary of phenol violations is
presented in the following table.
Date
Value (}ig/L)
Violation Action
Fine
1/6/03
75.8
Proceed to Enforcement Case
$600.00
2/4/03
79.9
Proceed to Enforcement Case
6/4/03
33.7
Proceed to Enforcement Case
$300.00
10/22/03
23
No Action, BPJ
N/A
5/10/04
23
Proceed to NOV
N/A
10/22/04
1,200
Proceed to NOV
N/A
12/21/04
37
Proceed to NOV
N/A
7/15/05
32
Proceed to Enforcement Case
$300.00
7/27/05
40
Proceed to Enforcement Case
$600.00
The town has been unable to determine a source of the phenol. The Regional Office has noted
that the town has attempted to determine the source of phenol and been unsuccessful. The
PERCS Unit will be notified that phenols are a parameter of concern. The limit will remain in the
permit.
4.0 Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance
Draft Permit to Public Notice: 10/12/05
Permit Scheduled to Issue: 1/01/06
5.0 State Contact Information
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Toya Fields at [phone], extension 551.
Copies of the following are attached to provide further information on the permit development:
• Draft permit

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
NC0041696
77me Period 0
Ow (MGD) 7.5
7O10S (cis) 228.7
7010W (cis) 228.7
3002 (cis) 228.7
Avg. Stream Flow, OA (cis) 228.7
Rec'wrig S ream Catawba River
WWTP Class IV
/WC (%) ® 7O10S 4.8372
® 7O10W 4.8372
0 3002 4.8372
O CIA 4.8372
Stream Class WS-IV & B CA
Outfall 001
Ow = 7.5 MGD
PARAMETER
TYPE
(1)
STANDARDS &
CRITERIA (2)
POL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NC WOs/
Chronic
'1 FAV/
Acute
n
INt Mu Awe CW Asow+bi•LW
Arsenic
C
10
ug/L
12
1
675.4
Acute: N/A
_ _ __ _ ___
Chronic: 207
_ _ _
1 detection -------------------- - -- ---
Max predicted > allowable,
Sulfate
NC
250.0
mg/L
12
12
1026.0
Acute: WA
_ _ _ _ __
Chronic: 5.168
_ _ _ _ _ _______ ___________
_
Max predicted < allowable
Monitored through LTMP
Cadmium
NC
2
15
ug/L
12
0
0.5
Acute: 15
Chronic:--41 --Nodetections---------•-------•-•-•---
Monitored through LTMP
Chromium
NC
50
1,022
ug/L
12
7
14.7
Acute: 1.022
_ _ _
Chronic: 1,034
_ _ _ _ _ _ _---•-•-----------
Monitored Through LIMP -
Copper
NC
7
AL
7.3
ug/L
56
56
1776.5
Acute: 7
_
Chronic:._-145_ _
max _ predicted___ -a _
» allow_ able ---------------.-
Action level parameter
Cyanide
NC
5
N
22
10
ug/L
12
8
1817.2
Acute: 22
_ __ _ __
Chronic: 103
_ _ _ _ _______
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Nov 2003 value is above allowable (140 ug/L)
max predicted » allowable
Chloride
NC
250
mg/1
12
12
940.9
Acute: WA
_ _ _
Chronic: 5,168
_ _ _ _ _ _ ___________________
Monitored through LIMP
Lead
NC
25
N
33.8
ug/L
12
0
9.2
Acute: 34
_nic: __ _ __
Chro517
_ _ _ _ _ ___________________
Monitored through LIMP
Mercury
NC
12
ng/L
12
1
2332.8000,
Acute: N/A
_ __ _ ___
Chronic: 248
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________
2/2005 value Is above allowable (540 ng/L)
Molybdenum
A
3,500
ug/L
12
11
Mule: N/A
42.9 _ __ _ ___
Chronx:: 72,356
_ _ _ _ _ _•-----_----------_
Monitored Through LTMP
Nickel
NC
25
261
ug/L
12
0
2.5
Acute: 261
_ _ __ _ __
Chronic: 517
_ _ _ _ _ ___________________
Monitored through LTMP
Phenols
A
1
N
ug/L
77
46
156.2
Acute: N/A
_ _ ________
Chronic: 21
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________---- _
Several values above allowable
Retain limit.
Selenium
NC
5.0
56
ug/L
12
1
573.6
Acute: 56
_ _ __ _ __
Chronic: 103
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Max value 58 ug/L in 11/2004. All other values are below
detection
Silver
NC
0.06
AL
1.23
ug/L
12
1
2497.6
Acute: 1
_ _______
Chronic: 1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Max value 140 ug/I in 11/2003.All other values below
detection
Zinc
NC
50
AL
67
ug/L
12
12
107.4
Acute: 67
Chronic: 1,034
Monitored through LTMP
•Legend:
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Nans4 0r709enic
A = Aesthetic
" Freshwater Discharge
41696_ rpa.xls, rpa
10/11/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
5/20/2004 <
8/13/2004 <
11/11/2004
2/8/2005 <
5/17/2005 <
8/11/2005 <,
Dec-2002
Nov-2002
Arsenic
Sulfate
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data 8DL=1/2DL Results
4/15/2003 < 5.0 2.5 Std Dev. 15.2379 1 4/15/2003 ` 420 420.0 Std Dev. 134.3221
8/20/2003 < 5.0 2.5 Mean 6.6669 2 8/20/2003 340 340.0 Mean 416.6667
11/14/2003 5.0 2.5 C.V. 2.2856 3 11/14/2003 + 240 240.0 C.V. 0.3224
5.0 2.5 n 12 4 2/20/2004 550 550.0 n 12
5.0 2.5 5 5/20/2004 410 410.0
5.0 2.5 Mult Factor = 12.2800 6 8/13/2004 ; ;; 550 550.0 Mult Factor = 1.8000
55.0 55.0 Max. Value 55.0 ug/L 7 11/11/2004570 570.0 Max. Value 570.0 mg/1.
5.0 2.5 Max. Pred Cw 675.4 ug/L 8 2/8/2005 .C"e 530 530.0 Max. Pred Cw 1026.0 mg/1
5.0 2.5 9 5/17/2005 290 290.0
5.0 2.5 10 8/11/2005 500 500.0
5.0 2.5 11 Dec-2002 160 160.0
0.0 0.0 12 Nov-2002 .-_. 440 440.0
KFS
41696_ rpa.xls, data
- 1 - 10/11/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Cadmium
Date Date BDL=1/2DL Results
1 4/15/2003 < 1 0.5 Std Dev.
2 8/20/2003 '4 1 0.5 Mean
3 11/14/2003 `:< 1 0.5 C.V.
4 2/20/2004 '< 1 0.5 n
5 5/20/2004 < 1 0.5
6 8/13/2004 -<: 1 0.5 Mult Factor =
7 11/11/2004 < 1 0.5 Max. Value
8 2/8/2005 ;< 1 0.5 Max. Pred Cw
9 5/17/2005 ( 1 0.50
10 8/11/2005 < 1 0.50
11 Dec-2002 < 1 0.50
12 Nov-2002r 1 0.50
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Chromium
Date Data BDL=1/20L Results
0.0000 1 4/15/2003 < 2.0 1.0 Std Dev.
0.5000 2 8/20/2003 2.0 2.0 Mean
0.0000 3 11/14/2003 3.0 3.0 C.V.
12 4 2/20/2004 < 2.0 1.0 n
5 5/20/2004 4.0 4.0
1.0000 6 8/13/2004 < 2.0 1.0 Mull Factor = 2.7300
0.5 ug/L 7 11/11/2004 5.0 5.0 Max. Value 5.4 ug/L
0.5 ug/L 8 2/8/2005 3.0 3.0 Max. Pred Cw 14.7 ug/L
9 5/17/2005 < 2.0 1.0
10 8/11/2005 4.0 4.0
11 Dec-2002 a 5.0 2.5
12 Nov-2002 5.4 5.4
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
1.6014
2.7417
0.5841
12
41696_ rpa.xls. data
- 2 - 10/11/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Copper
Cyanide
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 4/15/2003 14 14.0 Std Dev. 70.6054
2 8/20/2003w 26 26.0 Mean 34.4643
3 11/14/2003 gli 26 26.0 C.V. 2.0487
4 2/20/2004 30 30.0 n 56
5 5/20/2004 y 51 51.0
6 8/13/2004 rAl 22 22.0 Mult Factor = 3.2300
7 11/11/2004$ 26 26.0 Max. Value 550.0 ug/L
8 2/8/2005 / 24 24.0 Max. Pred Cw 1778.5 ug/L
9 5/17/2005 '��"' 20 20.0
10 8/11/2005 28 28 28.0
11 1/8/2002
12 2/15/2002
13 3/22/2002
14 4/4/2002
15 4/19/2002
16 5/10/2002
17 5/11/2002
18 6/7/2002
19 6/18/2002
20 7/11/2002
21 7/12/2002
22 8/21/2002
23 9/18/2002
24 10/23/2002
25 11/14/2002
26 12/3/2002
27 1/16/2003
28 2/14/2003
29 3/19/2003
30 4/16/2003
31 5/15/2003
32 6/16/2003
33 7/17/2003
34 8/20/2003
35 9/23/2003
36 10/22/2003
37 11/14/2003
38 12/9/2003
39 1 /21 /2004
40 2/20/2004
41 3/11/2004
42 4/22/2004
43 5/20/2004
44 6/21/2004
45 7/20/2004
46 8/13/2004
47 9/14/2004
48 10/21/2004
49 11/11/2004
50 12/16/2004
51 1/19/2005
52 2/8/2005
53 3/16/2005
54 4/19/2005
55 5/17/2005
56 6/15/2005
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
20 20.0
19 19.0
27 27.0
16 16.0
14 14.0
30 30.0
22 22.0
26 26.0
23 23.0
25 25.0
25 25.0
26 26.0
26 26.0
36 36.0
19 19.0
16 16.0
25 25.0
30 30.0
22 22.0
14 14.0
16 16.0
19 19.0
21 21.0
26 26.0
19 19.0
25 25.0
26 26.0
19 19.0
21 21.0
30 30.0
22 22.0
550 550.0
51 51.0
30 30.0
53 53.0
22 22.0
26 26.0
20 20.0
26 26.0
20 20.0
22 22.0
24 24.0
33 33.0
26 26.0
20 20.0
35 35.0
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 4/15/2003 2 5.0 Std Dev. 38.9711
2 8/20/2003 3 5.0 Mean 16.2500
3 11/14/2003 140 140.0 C.V. 2.3982
4 2/20/2004 < 5 5.0 n 12
5 5/20/2004 6 5.0
6 8/13/2004 7 5.0 Mult Factor = 12.9800
7 11/11/2004 6 5.0 Max. Value 140.0 ug/L
8 2/8/2005 < 5 5.0 Max. Pred Cw 1817.2 ug/L
9 5/17/2005 8 5.000
10 8/11/2005 < 5 5.000
11 Dec•2002 5 5.000
12 Nov-2002 < 2 5.000
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
41696_ rpa.xls, data
- 3 - 10/11/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Chloride
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Resuts
1 4/15/2003, ., 180 180.0 Std Dev. 112.7713
2 8/20/2003 350 350.0 Mean 307.9167
3 11/14/2003 320 320.0 C.V. 0.3662
4 2/20/2004 380 380.0 n 12
5 5/20/2004 430 430.0
6 8/13/2004 350 350.0 Mutt Factor = 1.9400
7 11/11/2004 485 485.0 Max. Value 485.0 mg/I
8 2/8/2005 263 263.0 Max. Pred Cw 940.9 mg/I
9 5/17/2005 200 200.0
10 8/112005 407 407.0
11 Dec-2002 : 120 120.0
12 Nov-2002 210 210.0
Lead
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 4/15/2003 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 0.9731
2 8/20/2003 < 5 2.5 Mean 2.9167
3 11/14/2003 < 5 2.5 C.V. 0.3336
4 2/20/2004 < 5 2.5 n 12
5 5/20/2004 < 5 2.5
6 8/13/2004 < 5 2.5 Mult Factor = 1.8300
7 11/11/2004 < 5 2.5 Max. Value 5.0 ug/L
8 2/8/2005 < 5 2.5 Max. Pred Cw 9.2 ug/1
9 5/17/2005 < 5 2.5
10 8/11/2005 < 5 2.5
11 Dec-2002 < 10 5.0
12 Nov-2002 < 10 5.0
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
41696_ rpa.xls, data
• 4 - 10/11/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Mercury
Molybdenum
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 4/15/2003 < 200 100.0 Std Dev. 127.0171
2 8/20/2003 < 200 100.0 Mean 136.6667
3 11/14/2003 < 200 100.0 C.V. 0.9294
4 2/20/2004 < 200 100.0 n 12
5 5/20/2004 < 200 100.0
6 8/13/2004 < 200 100.0 Mult Factor = 4.32
7 11/11/2004 < 200 100.0 Max. Value 540.0 ng/L
8 2/8/2005 540 540.0 Max. Pred Cw 2332.8 ng/L
9 5/17/2005 c 200 100.0
10 8/11/2005 < 200 100.0
11 0ec-2002 c 200.0 100.0
12 Nov-2002 < 200.0 100.0
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 4/15/2003 7 0 7.0 Std Dev.
2 8/20/2003 8.0 8.0 Mean
3 11/14/2003 10.0 10.0 C.V.
4 2/20/2004 9.0 9.0 n
5 5/20/2004 19.0 19.0
6 8/13/2004 14.0 14.0 Mult Factor = 2.2600
7 11/11/2004 < 5.0 2.5 Max. Value 19.0 ug/L
8 2/8/2005 8.0 8.0 Max. Pred Cw 42.9 ug/L
9 5/17/2005 6.0 6.0
10 8/11/2005 6.0 6.0
11 Dec-2002 13.0 13.0
12 Nov-2002 11.0 11.0
4.37
9.46
0.46
12
- 5 - 1 1 1-200-.

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Nickel
Phenols
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 4/15/2003 x< 5 2.5 Std Dev. 0.0000
2 8/20/2003 5 2.5 Mean 2.5000
3 11/14/2003 5 2.5 C.V. 0.0000
4 2/20/2004 5 2.5 n 12
5 5/20/2004; 5 2.5
6 8/13/2004 5 2.5 Mult Factor = 1.0000
7 11/11/2004 5 2.5 Max. Value 2.5 ug/L
8 2/8/2005 5 2.5 Max. Pred Cw 2.5 ug/L
9 5/17/2005 5 2.5
10 8/11/2005 5 2.5
11 Dec-2002 i 5 2.5
12 Nov 2002 3 5 2.5
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 1/8/2002 13 13.0 Std Dev. 13.2180
2 1/18/2002 ii,k 16 16.0 Mean 11.7377
3 2/5/2002 13 13.0 C.V. 1.1261
4 2/15/2002 10 10.0 n 77
z r::
5 3/7/2002 //i 7 7.0
6 3/22/2002 8 8.0 Mult Factor = 1.9800
7 4/4/20025 2.5 Max. Value 79.9 ug/L
8 4/19/2002 w 18 18.0 Max. Pred Cw 158.2 ug/L
9 5/2/2002 8 8.0
10 5/10/2002 5 2.5
11 6f7/2002:s„« 5 5.3
12 6/18/2002 5 2.5
13 7/2/2002 q�?." 15 14.9
14 7/12/2002',t,17 16.8
15 8/2/2002 . 16 15.6
16 8/21/2002 rS 5 2.5
17 9/3/2002 @ 5 2.5
18 9/19/2002 5 2.5
19 10/23/2002 q' 5 2.5
20 11/4/2002 5 2.5
21 11/14/2002 13 12.8
22 12/3/2002 13 13.0
23 12/13/2002 5 2.5
24 1/6/2003 76 75.8
25 1/16/2003; 8 7.6
26 2/4/2003 80 79.9
27 2/14/2003 13 12.8
28 3/7/2003 5 2.5
29 3/19/2003 6 6.4
30 4/3/2003 $ 15 14.5
31 4/16/20030j 7 6.9
32 5/6/2003 "T-4 9 8.9
33 5/15/2003¢` „ 13 12.5
34 6/4/2003 „ 34 33.7
35 6/16/2003 0 13 13.2
36 7/7/2003V 8 7.5
37 7/17/2003l` 15 15.0
38 8/8/2003 5 2.5
39 8/20/2003 5 2.5
40 9/9/2003 p 7 7.0
41 9/23/2003 s 5 2.5
42 10/9/2003; 9 9.0
1,0
43 10/22/2003!v 23 23.0
44 11/3/2003 20 20.0
45 11/17/2003 10 10.0
46 2/10/2004€ 12 12.0
47 2/20/2004 r` 16 16.0
48 3/5/2004 ' 18 18.0
49 3/17/20041- 19 19.0
50 4/12/2004 a'µs 32 32.0
51 4/23/2004 �'?< 13 13.0
52 5/10/2004 .,v 23 23.0
53 5/20/2004 -;; 18 18.0
54 7f7/2004's<r 10 5.0
55 7/21 /2004='4:` 10 5.0
56 8/6/2004 ,. 21 21.0
57 8/13/2004;i<° 10 5.0
58 9/10/2004'.< 10 5.0
59 9/24/2004 <!. 10 5.0
60 10/8/2004 < 10 5.0
61 10/22/2004 ' t 1 1.2
62 11/2/2004 < 10 5.0
63 11/11/2004::„' 16 16.0
64 12/10/2004,'?, 13 13.0
65 12/21 /2004t5i- 37 37.0
66 1/10/2005 < 10 5.0
67 1/20/2005'`<10 5.0
68 2/8/2005 ?:c' 10 5.0
69 2/18/20051 <' 10 5.0
70 3/8/2005 ;<-' 10 5.0
71 3/18/2005 :'- 7 7.0
72 4/7/2005'4i' 10 5.0
73 4/21/2005< 10 5.0
74 5/6/2005 <>s 10 5.0
75 5/17/2005 (< 10 5.0
76 6/3/2005 <i 10 5.0
77 6/15/2005'1<. 10 5.0
78
41696_ rpa.xls, data
10/11/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Selenium
Silver
Date Data BDL=1/20L Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 4/15/2003 < 5 2.5 Std Dev. 15.8933 1 4/15/2003 < 2 1.0 Std Dev. 40.1258
2 8/20/2003 < 5 2.5 Mean 8.3750 2 8/20/2003 < 2 1.0 Mean 12.5833
3 11/14/2003 < 5 2.5 C.V. 1.8977 3 11/14/2003 140 140.0 C.V. 3.1888
4 2/20/2004 < 5 2.5 n 12 4 2/20/2004 < 2 1.0 n 12
5 5/20/2004 < 5 2.5 5 5/20/2004 < 2 1.0
6 8/13/2004 < 5 2.5 Mult Factor = 9.8900 6 8/13/2004 < 2 1.0 Mull Factor = 17.8400
7 11/11/2004 58 58.0 Max. Value 58.0 ug/L 7 11/11/2004 < 2 1.0 Max. Value 140.0 ug/L
8 2/8/2005 c 5 2.5 Max. Pred Cw 573.6 ug/L 8 2/8/2005 < 2 1.0 Max. Pred Cw 2497.6 ug/L
9 5/17/2005 < 5 2.5 9 5/17/2005 < 2 1.0
10 8/11/2005 < 5 2.5 10 8/11/2005 < 2 1.0
11 Dec-2002 < 20 10.0 11 Dec-2002 < 2 1.0
12 Nov-2002 < 20 10.0 12 Nov-2002 < 2 1.0
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
51 51
52 52
53 53
54 54
55 55
56 56
57 57
58 58
59 59
60 60
61 61
62 62
63 63
64 64
65 65
66 66
67 67
68 68
69 69
70 70
71 71
72 72
73 73
74 74
75 75
76 76
77 77
78 78
41696_ rpa.xls, data
- 7 - 10/11/2005

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Zinc
Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results
1 4/15/2003 32 32.0 S1d Dev. 11.1423
2 8/20/2003 28 28.0 Mean 33.8333
3 11/14/2003 23 23.0 C.V. 0.3293
4 2/20/2004 27 27.0 n 12
5 5/20/2004 39 39.0
6 8/13/2004 23 23.0 Mull Factor = 1 8200
7 11/11/2004 42 42.0 Max. Value 59.0 ug/L
8 2/8/2005 30 30.0 Max. Pred Cw 107.4 ug/L
9 5/17/2005 48 48.0
10 8/11/2005 59 59.0
11 Dec-2002 24 24.0
12 Nov-2002 31 31.0
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
41696_ rpa.xls, data
10/11/2005

NPDES/Non-Discharge Permitting Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
NPDES OR NONDISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART:
Date of Request 9/9/2005
Facility Town of Valdese- Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
Permit # NC0041696
Region Asheville
Requestor Toya Fields
Pretreatment A-F Towns- Dana Folley (ext. 523)
Contact G-M Towns- Jon Risgaard (ext. 580)
N-Z Towns- Deborah Gore (ext. 593)
COMMENTS TO PRETREATMENT UNIT:
PRETREATMENT UNIT COMPLETES THIS PART:
Status of Pretreatment Program (circle all that apply)
3) the facility has (or is developing) a Pretreatment Program
3a) is Full Program with LTMP
Flow Permitted MGD Actual MGD
Industrial 5.082 2.634
STMP time frame:
most recent
next cycleAii
Domestic 1.0
_
L
(S)
T
MP
Pollutant
Check List
POC due to
NPDES/Non-
Discharge
Permit Limit
Required
by EPA'
Required by
503 Sludge"
POC due to SIU"'
STMP
Frequency
effluent
V
at
LTMP
Frequency at
effluent
Site spec!fic POC (Provide Explanation)""
BOD
X
4
Q M
TSS
X
4
Q M
NH3
X - NPDES monitoring req.
4
Q M
Arsenic
X
4
Q M
4
Cadmium
q
X
4
Q M
d
Chromium
J
4
Q M
NI
Copper
NI
X
4
Q M
Cyanide
X
4
Q M
J
Lead
J
X
4
Q M
Mercury
X
4
Q M
Molybdenum
X
4
Q M
4
Nickel
J
X
4
Q M
Silver
X
4
Q M
Selenium
X
4
Q M
J
Zinc
J
X
4
Q M
Phenol
X
4
Q M
TKN
X
4
Q M
NO2 + NO3
X
4
Q M
Chloride
X
4
Q M
Phosphorus
X
4
Q M
Sulfate
X
4
Q M
'Always in the LTMP
"Only in the LTMP if the POTW land applies sludge
"' Only in LTMP while the SIU is connected to the POTW
"" Only in LTMP when the pollutant is a specific concern to the POTW (ex -Chlorides tor a POTW who accepts Textile waste)
O=Quarterly
all LTMP/STMP effluent data
on DMRs?
Yes _ _ X
No (attach data)
M=Monthly
Comments: LTMP data from March 2002 through February 2003 is attached.
available in spreadsheet?
—
9/13/2005: contacted PT coordinator in Valdese to request
Yes _X No
current data via email. LTMP data is available on DMRs.
version 10/8/03
NPDES_Pretreatment. requ es t. f orm.031008. xl s
Revised: August 4. 2000

0262 /11,2/1-1 hoh 12e/wylii- ho
MONITORING REPORT(MR) VIOLATIONS for:
Permit: nc0041696
Facility Name: %
MRs Between: 1 -2002
Param Name: '•
and 8 -2005 Region: °h
County: %
Violation Category: ;%
Subbasin:
Report Date: 09/13/05
Program Category:
Violation Action:
Page 1 of 4
PERMIT: NC0041696 FACILITY: Town of Valdese - Lake Rhodiss WWTP
COUNTY: Burke
REGION: Asheville
Limit Violation
MONITORING OUTFALL
REPORT / PPI LOCATION PARAMETER
01 - 2003
01 - 2003
02 - 2003
06 - 2003
10 - 2003
05 - 2004
10 - 2004
12 - 2004
07 - 2005
07 - 2005
01 - 2002
001 Effluent
Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent Phenolics, Total Recoverable
001 Effluent pH
Monitoring Violation
VIOLATION
DATE FREQUENCY
01/06/03 2 X month
01/06/03 2 X month
02/04/03 2 X month
06/04/03 2 X month
10/22/03 2 X month
05/10/04 2 X month
10/22/04 2 X month
12/21/04 2 X month
07/15/05 2 X month
07/27/05 2 X month
01/02/02 5 X week
UNIT OF
MEASURE
Ma
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
su
LIMIT
21 0.0758
21 0.0758
21 0.0799
21 33.7
21 23
21 23
21 1,200
21 37
21 32
21 40
6 5.8
VIOLATION TYPE
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Maximum Exceeded
Daily Minimum Not Reached
VIOLATION ACTION
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
No Action, BPJ
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to NOV
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
Proceed to
Enforcement Case
DMR conversion
history
MONITORING OUTFALL
REPORT /PPI
07 - 2002
09 - 2002
05 - 2004
06 - 2004
LOCATION
001 Effluent
001 Effluent
001 Effluent
001 Effluent
PARAMETER
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C)
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C)
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C)
BOD, 5-Day (20 Deg. C)
VIOLATION UNIT OF
DATE FREQUENCY MEASURE
07/06/02 5 X week mg/I
09/07/02 5 X week mg/I
05/29/04 5 X week mg/I
06/26/04 5 X week mg/I
CALCULATED
LIMIT VALUE
VIOLATION TYPE
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
Frequency Violation
VIOLATION ACTION
No Action, BPJ
No Action, BPJ
No Action, BPJ
No Action, BIMS
Calculation Error

Permit Enforcement History by Owner
09/14/05
Owner: Town of Valdese
Facility: Lake Rhodiss WWTP
Permit: NC0041696
Region: Asheville County: Burke
Penalty Remission Enf EMC EMC OAH Collection Has
Assessment Penalty Enforcemen Request Enf Conf Remission Hearing Remission Remission Memo Sent Balance Pmt Case
Case Number MR Approved Amount t Costs Damages Received Held Amount Held Amount Amount to AGO Total Paid Due Plan Closed
LV-1998-0164 10/16/98
$1,000.00 $103.00
$1,103.00 $.00 No 11/16/98
LV-1999-0369
09/24/99 $1,000.00 $79.46
$1,079.46 $.00 No 11/16/99
LV-2000-0051
02/25/00 $1,000.00 $79.46
$1,079.46 $.00 No 03/08/00
LV-2000-0243
06/19/00 $1,250.00 $79.46
$1,329.46 $.00 No 01/30/01
LV-2001-0187
05/18/01 $1,750.00 $79.48
$1,829.46 $.00 No 06/07/01
LV-2001-0451
11/05/01 $1,250.00 $79.46
$1,329.46 $.00 No 11/30/01
LV-2003-0221
07/03 $500.00 $100.00
$600.00 $.00 No 04/22/03
LV-2003-0345 2-2003
$250.00 $50.00
$300.00 No
LV-2003-0346 1-2003
$250.00 $50.00 $300.00 No
LV-2005-0339 7-2005
$500.00 $100.00
$600.00 No
Total Cases: 10 $8,750.00 $800.30
Total Penalties: $9,550.30
$8,350.30 $1,200.00
Total Penalties after remisslon(s): $9,550.30

town of \71dgg
LAKE RHODHISS WWTP
2100 LAKE RHODHISS
P.O. BOX 339
VALDESE, N.C. 28690
(828) 879 - 2131 r
July 28, 2004
Mrs. Carolyn Bryant
NCDENR / Water Quality / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Renewal Application for Permit NC0041696
Lake Rhodhiss WWTP
Dear Mrs. Bryant,
<j.
AUG 3 2004
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
The Town Of Valdese currently requests the renewal of NPDES Permit
NC0041696 and has enclosed the requested supporting information through the
renewal application. Since we were unable to determine our EPA I.D. Number,
we were told to submit the following "FRS 110000531354" by ( Mike Donehoo of
the EPA ).
In 2001, the Lake Rhodhiss WWTP completed a mechanical overhaul /
upgrade of the facility. Changes include new bar screen and grit removal
system, 2 new variable speed pumps (Influent), refurbished rake drive units for
primary and secondary clarifiers, new primary sludge pumps, and the additions of
a de -chlorination unit (sulfur dioxide) and SCADA system. The designed
permitted flow remains at 7.5 MGD.
Every effort has been made to gather the requested information for this
renewal application and analytical results for this process have been conducted
by certified laboratories (commercial & in-house). If there are any questions,
Greg Padgett (WWTP ORC) can be contacted at the above number or me at
828-879-2117.
Sinc
effrey V" Morse
Town Manager

SLUDGE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Solids generated at the Lake Rhodhiss facility, through the treatment process, are
handled by centrifugation. The dewatered solids are trucked to the composting area (on -
site) and then mixed with a bulking agent (wood chips). The mixture is then constructed
into windrows and aerated for a minimum of 14 days, where temperatures are monitored
and recorded. Each windrow must be over 40 degrees Celsius, with an average
temperature of 45 degrees Celsius, and have 3 consecutive days of temperatures of 55
degrees Celsius or higher. Once these requirements are met, the windrows are broken
down and placed in a static pile for an additional 30 days of curing. The composting area
is large enough to hold 8 windrows, storage for approximately 6-8 months worth of
product, as well as storage for bulking agent and a mixing area.
The compost produced at the plant is Class A Bio-solids and is given away to the
public with an information pamphlet. Before any piles/ windrows are released, bacterial
testing is performed to ensure that it meets the Class A designation and a "residuals"
analysis is conducted on a quarterly basis (permit specified). Composted solids not
meeting any of the above requirements is re -introduced into the composting process.
There are 2 centrifuges utilized for dewatering, and established contacts for the
contracting of a belt press (if contingency plan is needed to be implemented) for the
continued solids handling and operation of the plant. There's also a regional composting
facility that could potentially handle feed sludge, in worst case scenario.
The solids collected from the grit chamber gather in a durnpster and is
contractually hauled off.
Greg Padgett
Superintendent / ORC
Lake Rhodhiss WWTP

2
3
4
5
6
9
12'• 1000.0
r' - 1010.2
12'• • 1005.0
1.. - 1021.1
1021.0
0 039.0
12"•1 1
6"- 1041
12" - 1035.1
6" - 1035.6
12" - 1037.5
r• - 10E9,6
0" - 1041.6
27- 1063.0
A" - 1037.9
10 / 5 1039.7
11 6" - 1040.3
t•'-1040.7
6" - 1039.3
12" • 999
I . - 1003.9
12" • 1010.5
12•• - 1033.6
12"-1034.9
12•'•1035.4
- 103e.6
r• - 103 -.
9•' - 10379
6' - 1936.4
r'-1039.3
50\
`
I
EXIST. MH.
INV. 993.6
GO'
SEE CONNECTION DETAIL
SHEET G- 8
O
ONE 48"4/-12' PIPE
JOINT BY CONTRACT
6.0 FOR CONNECTION
BY CONTR ACT7.0
MK 2
22
c. ELE
III VERT BEND
AT BASIN EFFLUENT
BEND
EV. 1006.0± MK5 Et _ KL!.2
12• / 11 I.L11.4 ^ U,i`
4" ^ SO ` I TI
84' CL2 t3611/i• I
/ M.H.3 CONTACT 12,111
2'-y OEWATERNG BOG. 6"
/ BASIN '''''It-
2-2"POLYMER
MH6 FEEDLINES
12" Ie-i1 l 4'
/ M.H.7 I.-r-82-4.- - -1'- T
rr 1,
30" F.M.-1 �• 48" 12-4 30"ENT. �, Y 13
MH.2 4' CL2 FEED LNE- 4
22 %Z BEND
48"-90' 4"CL2 FEED LINE
BEND Q ELEV 1020.0
E rwv'v4-Y
M.H.3
MI-L9
As-r, ��o�e,1 r9e1
EXISTING 24" SEWER, DOWNSTREAM OF M.H. 3, IS TO 8E
ABANDONED AFTER PLACING TREATMENT PLANT INTO OPERATION.
91 017JQ JMD
MR®- MLW
6610E 07 CDC!
cacao JMD
50' O 50' 100'
6NL I DATE
3EVD10N I INIT.
MINISTRATION
BUILDING
4-2" LIME FEED LINES
(2 LINES TO THE THICKENERSI
2 LINES TO THE DISTRIBUTION BO
LIME STORAGE TANK
2-6"LIME SLUDGE F.M.'S
-•� LIME SLUDGE P/S
�8"WASTE UDGE
F,M,
PLAN
TerO'BRIEN&GERE
ENGINEERS
48"NITRIF
CATION EFFLUEN
18"RECYCLE F,M
ALUM TANK
Ca,npa%f ?A'
%Q2R
NITRIFICATION BASIN NO.I
48'NITRIFICATION
INFLUENT
I8"RECYCLE
SLUDGE
FM.
18"RECYCLE
SLUDGE
F. M
NITRIFICATION BASIN NO. 2
NOTES:
1. ALL YARD DRAINS ARE A PART OF CONTRACT 6.0 UNI.ESS
OTHERWISE DESIGNATED CONTRACT 6.3 SHALL EXTEND
ALL BUILDING DRAINS TO 5-FEET OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURES
FOR CONNECTION BY CONTRACT 6.0.
2. ALL PIPES -TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3-FEET OF COVER UNLESS
OTHERWISE DESIGNATED. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS WITHIN
THE MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM LIMITS OF DEFLECTION.
AND/OR VERTICAL BENDS SHALL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY
TO MAINTAIN COVER AND GRADES SHOWN.
3. ALL PRESSURE PIPING TO HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT ALL
TEES AND ELBOWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAILS ON SHEET
G-6 UNLESS OTHERWISE DESIGNATED.
4.
IMPROVED BEDDING WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE 42•• DIAMETER
INFLUENTS TO REACTOR AND SECONDARY CLARIFIERS.
EXCAVATION SHALL BE EXTENDED TO 0•• BELOW THE SUBGRADE
DESIGNATED. PIPE EMBEDMENT MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF
7 OR 10 GRANULAR MATERIAL FROM THE SUBGRADE TO THE
CENTERUNE OF THE PIPE EMBEDMENT ABOVE THE CENTERLINE
SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MP -I 3.05 OF THE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS
5. THE EXTISTING SEWER SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNT1LL THE
TREATMENT PLANT IS PLACED IN SERVICE
6. CLEARANCE OF ALL PIPING. MANHOLES, AND ETC WITH
OTHER PIPING AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN
THE FIELD BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY CONFLICTS OR
CHANGES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
7. ALL BURIED LIME SLUDGE F.M..S AND LIME SLURRY
FEED LINES SHALL HAVE WYES OR TEES. AS APPROPRIATE,
WITH BU ND FLANGES AT ALL TURNS
TOWN OF VALDESE, N.C.
WASTEWATER FACILITIES
PROCESS PIPING PLAN
FIE NO.
914. 027.17F
DATE G - 4
DECEMBER, 1978

t'iJ ION- NOINT.-
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
® .DRAINAGE
AREA BOUNDARY LINE
;DO
STORMWATER DISCHARGE DUTFALL
" "`
STDRMWATER DRAINAGE DITCH
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PIPES
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM INLETS
CONCRETE DITCH TO SANITARY SEWER INLET
'_' -
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
SANITARY SEWER INLET
1
SANITARY SEWER JUNCTION BOX
FLOOR DRAIN TO SANITARY SEWER
No. ACTIVITY
1 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
2 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
3 COMPOST AREA
4 WASH AREA
5 VEHICLE PARKING
6 ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS (DIESEL FUEL)
7 SULFUR DIOXIDE STORAGE
B LIME STORAGE
9 CHLORINE STORAGE
10 EMPTY ALUM STORAGE (NOT IN USE)
11 VEHICLE FUELING
12 CLARIFIERS
13 AERATION BASINS
14 CHLORINE CONTACT
15 INFLUENT SCREEN BUILDING
99 PAST SPILL AREA
NOTE:
THIS DRAWING VAS PRODUCED USING STORM
SEWER MAPPING BY THE WOOTEN COMPANY AND
GIS DATA PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF
BURKE. NC. THE GRAVING IS INTENDED
TO SUPPLEMENT THE SWPPP DEVELOPED FOR
TOWN OF VALDESE LAKE RHODHISS WASTE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND REFLECTS
FIELD INVESTIGATIONS CONDUCTED DURING
FEBRUARY. 2003. IT IS NOT OF SUFFICIENT
ACCURACY TO BE USED FOR DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
OF VALDESE. NORTH CAROLINA
fP DLV.dgn 08/20/2003 11:00:54 AM

'*7
0$)
/ xi
1`
r
,�� #P
LD� \ (
l � I
/ \
PCT BENCHMARK
R M EXlNG M.Ii
EVATION 1000.32
w eepK JMD
perm MLW
tone pr CDO
a® JMD
50'
1050- -
_ 1040
♦6
031S c.. . -
NO.
-w
_ -
LW ITS OF CLEARING
DATE
War.
1035- 080
1055
NITRIFICATION` BASIN
1051
•
�\
V ,l
1050 'O+T,
1055
\1 I
T-7----
LIMITS OF -���� `- - --i
1045
CLEARING __ __
_ 47...
p�p11.--
----' 1__ _"'".'r'"°.:'.-
----�-_�% _ '--
--1 7 - - - - - -: : : : - - - - 17: :::: ' -.- -- ,
- - `,�.,4.0 .-/,
7 '' /
' �FDf,F OF WATER �.. \� '/
GO'BRIEN&GERE
ENGINEERS
40.
w
Mir
TOWN OF VALDESE, N.C.
WASTEWATER FACILITIES
/ LEGEND
LIMITS (IF CLEARINGIAREAS
OUTSIDE LIMITS OF CLEARING'
ARE TO BE UNDISTURBED)
-----A05Q EXISTING CONTOURS
-1050- FINISHED CONTOURS
GRADING PLAN
FILE NO.
914. 027.18F
DATE
DECEMBER. 1978

/080_
LIMITS CLEARING --- -
060
1055-
-1050
/
\ ;/ 7/ �'/
,� �' /''
"
'
\cep* 7
\ i
to%9// / Vic`,
�\ L. (�
OJECT BENCHMARK
IF RIM EXISITING M.H.
EVATION 1000.32
l
9w
•
0
J
0
LIMITS OF CLEARINGIAREAS
OUTSIDE " LIMITS OF CLEARING
ARE TO BE UNDISTURBED)
--IOW— EXISTING CONTOURS
—1050— FINISHED CONTOURS
G-5

LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE
,_ cDRAINAGE
AREA BOUNDARY LINE
;DO
STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL
STORMWATER DRAINAGE DITCH
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM PIPES
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM INLETS
`i__. `CONCRETE
DITCH TO SANITARY SEWER INLET
..'..,.,,,SANITARY
SEWER PIPE
L.
SANITARY SEWER INLET
C
SANITARY SEWER JUNCTION BOX
-
FLOOR DRAIN TO SANITARY SEWER
No. ACTIVITY
1 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
2 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
3 COMPOST AREA
4 WASH AREA
5 VEHICLE PARKING
6 ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS (DIESEL FUEL)
7 SULFUR DIOXIDE STORAGE
B LIME STORAGE
9 CHLORINE STORAGE
10 EMPTY ALUM STORAGE (NOT IN USE)
11 VEHICLE FUELING
12 CLARIFIERS
13 AERATION BASINS
14 CHLORINE CONTACT
15 INFLUENT SCREEN BUILDING
99 PAST SPILL AREA
THIS DRAWING WAS PRODUCED USING STORM
SEWER- MAPPING BY THE WOOTEN COMPANY AND
GIS DATA PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF
BURI(E. NC. THE DRAWING IS INTENDED
TO SUPPLEMENT THE SWPPP DEVELOPED FOR
TOWN OF VALDESE LAKE RHODHISS WASTE
WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND REFLECTS
FIELD INVESTIGATIONS CONDUCTED DURING
FEBRUARY. 2003. IT IS NOT OF SUFFICIENT
ACCURACY TO BE USED FOR DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
PREPARED FOR,
TOWN OF VALDESE. NORTH CAROLINA
rPDLV.dgn 08/20/2003 11:00:54 AM
oZ.ao3

2 I2" - 1000A
3 9"-1010.2
12" - 1005.0
4 4.-1021.1
• 1021.0
5 6039.0
12"• 1• 1
6 O. - 1041
12. • 1035.1
7 0" - 1035.6
12••- 1037.5
6 6"-10494
0"-(01f1A
2^=1043.0
3"- 1037.9
5" - 1036.3
10 S. • 1039.7
II 6"- 10403
12: ' 4" • 1040.7
B"- 1039.5
12.-999
1. . 1003.9
12"-10103
12"• 1033.6
I2" • 1034.9
12"- 1035.4
.• 1036.6
r'-103
9" - 1037.9
6" - 10311.4
6" - 1039.3
1
W1?-1
LL
.00
N
1
EXIST. MH.
INV. 993.6
GO
SEE CONNECTION DETAIL
SHEET G- 8
22 ie BEND
ELEV 1006.02
12"DIP
22 %Z BEND
ONE 484-12 PIPE
JOINT BY CONTRACT
6.0 FOR CONNECTION
BY CONTRACT 7.0
a \
7
00 \
•
IN ow= JMD
01510011 MLW
NUN NT
01021
COO
JMD
IIig VERT BEND
AT BASIN EFFLUENT
MHS t' MH.12
H.4�
r SOa
or.*
12'-q DEWATERING 8DG.
MH6 9- FEED POLYMER
E DAL NES
12-111t
km 7 �•� B Z -
8"
48•-90. 4"CL2 FEED LINE
BEND Q ELEV 1020.0
r-•.es .4er+'-Y P�
��-wlrE jl]
12.
MH9
f
O' F.M.
4-2" LIME FEED LINES
(2 LINES TO THE THICKENERS)
(2 LINES TO THE DISTRIBUTION 130
LIME STORAGE TANK
2-6'LD4E SLUDGE F. M.'S
CLIME SLUDGE P/S
REACTOR
8' WASTE
SLUDGE �,
F.M. 42' `
"CL2 I ROOM
-' ti��
AST s D •use l t;3e-1
MR 2
ABANING DONED4 AFTER PLACCIINNG STREATMAM ENT PLANT IS TO BE
INTO OPERATION.
4
50' 0 50' 100'
NO.1 DATE
REVISION
INIT.
__1-__ .a ONDARY
CLARIFIER
LL2
^"WASTE • UDGE
PLAN
gra O'BRIEN&GERE
V ENGINEERS
REACTOR'
CLARIFIER
48"NITRIF CATION EFFLUEN
M'REC K FM.I JI
ALUM TAN
CcN,PaSc
rsiten
TOWN OF VALDESE, N.C.
WASTEWATER FACILITIES
A
NITRIFICATION BASIN N0.1
I"RECYCLE •
SLUDGE
F.M.a
NITRIFICATION BASIN
NOTES:
1. ALL YARD DRAINS ARE A PART OF CONFR ACT 6.0. UNLESS
OTHERWISE DESIGNATED CONTRACT 6.3 SNALL EXTEND
ALL BUILDING DRAINS TO 5-FEET OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURES
FOR CONNECTION BY CONTRACT 6.0.
2 ALL PIPE530 HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3-FEET OF COVER UNLESS
OTHERWISE DESIGNATED. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS WITHIN
THE MANUFACTURERS MAXIMUM LIMITS OF DEFLECTION.
AND/OR VERTICAL BENDS SHALL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY
TO MAINTAIN COVER AND GRADES SHOWN.
3. ALL PRESSURE PIPING TO HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT ALL
TEES AND ELBOWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAILS ON SHEET
G-6 UNLESS OTHERWISE DESIGNATED.
4. IMPROVED BEDDING WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE 42" DIAMETER
INFLUENTS TO REACTOR AND SECONDARY CLAR1F1ERS.
EXCAVATION SHALL BE EXTENDED TO 9" BELOW THE SUBGRADE
DESIGNATED. PIPE EMBEDMENT MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF
7 OR 10 GRANULAR MATERIAL FROM THE SJBGRADE TO THE
CENTERLINE OF THE PIPE. EMBEDMENT ABOVE THE CENTERLINE
SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MP-13.05 OF THE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS
5. THE EXTISTING SEWER SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTILL THE
TREATMENT PLANT IS PLACED IN SERVICE.
6. CLEARANCE OF ALL PIPING. MANHOLES. AND ETC. WITH
OTHER PIPING AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN
THE FIELD BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY CONFLICTS OR
CHANGES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
7. ALL BURIED LIME SLUDGE F.M..S AND LIME SLURRY
FEED LINES SHALL HAVE WYES OR TEES. AS APPROPRIATE.
WITH BLIND FLANGES AT ALL TURNS
PROCESS PIPING PLAN
FILE NO.
914. 027. 17F
DATE
DECEMBER, 1978
G-4

PROCESS FLOW NARRATIVE
Influent wastewater is first introduced into the headworks, passing through the bar
screen and grit chamber, then entering the influent pump station wet -well. The flow is
then pumped uphill to the primary clarifiers, which flows into aeration basins. The flow
then continues into secondary clarifiers and onward to the chlorine contact basin.
Chlorine is fed at the beginning of the contact chamber, then sulfur dioxide is utilized
prior to effluent reaching the cascade, then finally flowing back downhill and discharged
into the Catawba River (Lake Rhodhiss).
Solids accumulated in primary and secondary clarifiers are pumped into the 2
thickeners, which in turn are pumped through centrifuges during the de -watering process.
De -watered biosolids are then taken to the northeast section of the compound (compost
area) and processed on -site. Additionally, portions of the solids within the plant are re-
introduced into the waste stream at the influent pump station wet -well.
All flows (wastewater and sludge) within the plant are monitored through
electronic metering devices and recorded into the SCADA system. Hard copies are
printed monthly and retained on -site. Metered points include influent, effluent, sludge
pumps to centrifuges, return sludge, primary and secondary waste -activated sludges. All
metering equipment is checked and calibrated quarterly.

•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
1` LAKE RQb1.- MS3 PYVrtLN C-004. Wltn
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Berm t'YAI—
RIVER BASIN:
CATArr6A
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA.CERCLA. or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
q
of each of the following types of
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
%Yes 0 No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of Dills.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary. Name: 1 \ 0uSTonr \OSZ-Eay. m=LL.5 SnIG.
}
Mailing Address: I 0 8 ?ILA L. Y S-r • -SW
VAL.nCSC NG d?�o
t
F.4. Industrial Processes.(Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
LJ L _. AGI-t-Z NG.- E /EZt NG 0 F- YG GitS
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): -JO CM S
(�\ c JAL.TS
Raw material(s): 1.-)1-F ACI-t 1)YE S 1'YORifiC-c.fi RER4)4z-I r,
, r
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
J.5, pOp gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes " No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
p
RIVER BASIN:
Chronic:
NOEC
%
%
IC25
%
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
/ /
/ /
/
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation.
❑ Yes Ja No
Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one -hall years, provide the dates
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
Summary of results: (see instructions)
S( & ATIACt't€.0 VmnnAiti I-IIEC;
END OF
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE
OF FORM 2A YOU
PART
MUST
E.
1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
COMPLETE.
EPA Form 351 O-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
R1r...i:E Rtiv'DN:.sS 1.\
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes X No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page ' 9 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system. complete Part G.
G.1. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge paints.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds. sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
c. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
c. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge point.
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County) (State)
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) ft.
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
❑ Rainfall ❑ CSO pollutant concentrations ❑ CSO frequency
❑ CSO flow volume 0 Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
G.4. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events (0 actual or 0 approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (0 actual or 0 approx.)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 20 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LAKe_ RI-attri�.S3 1f",1WTP NCOa`t14oVo
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RcNt►.-AL.,
RIVER BASIN:
�HTAwf"A
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatrnent works receiving discharges
complete part F.
from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
GENERAL INFORMATION:
works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
(SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
treatment works.
G
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment
xf Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users
industrial users that discharge 10 the
a. Number of non -categorical Skis.
b. Number of CIUs.
to the treatment works, copy
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary. (� INC-.e: r3%A..{Zt-.EE �.5t.L5•
�s-
I
Mailing Address: 1 —1 1 JTE -L XI1CT ST. N �I
t
VAL_nt5` NC cCn9CI
I
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
inAnrvPAc—�rR_C QF ►)Yetb r-- 1cX -vR.-ED YAP..,vS
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge. \ /
Principal product(s): i A R.A15
A
Raw material(s): UYE..S /iC-TD5 C-4±u�jT-= C JAB-"'r
, t
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
as 5, QU Q gpd ( X.continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
5' coo gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
t
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ,Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes X No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99) Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550.22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
I--gKE R�c.tot-t=Ss wVITP NCov`-IIC,,Scci
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RE:N .WHr_
RIVER BASIN:
C—A-rF)wa/)
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes , -No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
D Yes El No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous
❑ Intermittent
If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS.
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22
Paoe 19 0l 22

•
•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LAl< RKobHz3S -P N C"Q° fC\.l°
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
ReNE.yY,9t-
RIVER BASIN:
CATAwaA
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges
complete part F.
from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment
Si Yes 0 No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users
industrial users that discharge to the
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of CIUS.
works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
(SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
treatment works.
9
of each of the following types of
.25
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary. Name: O � A%/-r1\ (N, 1 l Z. mot- S �_r/G .
t
Mailing Address: 1 O 5-L-v v ESA i)? RI).
V AL'DESG N c. o?-V(01O
I
F.4. IndustrialLProcesses. Describeall the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
III-.rvG. 1>y612rJG Fs1•1S$1-1zrlG
t r
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal
discharge.
Principal product(s): a.,nmz.5� r r.J IJ�EAc. s.)y€=—
processes and raw materials that affect
or contribute to the SIU's
r
0e 1 -,ImbTtii G- go PS
TV c.F- I (3V� AP
Rawmaterial(s): i3Le,AU-t byes 1Ex-r Gc7ab5
I I
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
I O O'4 Opd gpd ( X continuous
volume
following:
❑
subcategory?
of process wastewater discharge into
or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
1 t
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous
gpd ( continuous
of non -process wastewater flow discharged
or intermittent.
or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the
a. Local limits "Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
No
No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18of22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Laice: RKv'Drtiss wWQ �flc_00`kKaiCo
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RENE-W,t_
RIVER BASIN:
C.—RI-fit-AA
• F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) al the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ �g Yes No If yes. describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 0 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck 0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
rCOrl A /el IOGOGI IMn11MAQT=M/ATCo Orrin QGnnl=nlnTiriroirrlDOrTIVC ArTI/,AI
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.)
❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets it necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatrnent works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent
If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER°PART
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LAKE RIlob1-1ZS3 wWTP NCOOyV65c.5
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Re NEvsrRE.-
RIVER BASIN:
CA T Rr,raA
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
iti Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. q
b. Number of CIUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary. �
Name: RC) 62N5UeJ lA053-E./ZY 1' t t:L.L.$ =Nc •
t
Mailing Address: \ ` 3 1`q (l2 N S o ".) T1-E.0 i
VALES. N C. a?CcU
/
F.4. Industrial S. Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Kfg1- tyE FZN:115'H Hd5 R9 PRI3'pVCTS-
i
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Materlal(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): SO (- t 5
Raw material(s): 1 V y L V N 1. Cv ITV N rfl V3{ZF C,T A 2 -b1 J Ye" Le r CM F i NC2
� r� r&
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
cR I-{ OUC7 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits )4 Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99) Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 &.7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
f p�
LAKE f vkcyt, -t=ss- w\-\FT C) NC_00`-\K,S(3
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RC NE L
RIVER BASIN:
CH"f'AwQA
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes ,No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
0 Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has i1 been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets i1 necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHERPARTS =
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE -.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 R 7550.22.
Pane 19 of 22

4
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LAKE RKpbHZSJ ti-,(W.-P N C001-I lfo\(o
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RE,,,,-- ry-At_
RIVER BASIN:
CATRi-taA
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
. PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
XYes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 9
b. Number of ClUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary. I
Name: JA2A Le ISAicE1e-y G-P.rnlre, =^/G.
Mailing Address: Sao EA$T Mra�-rd ST . PO (?)X OZOZO
vA LD c=S N C� cR Gn �1 O
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrialprocesses that affect orLcontribute rto the SIU's discharge.
\(� 1^! Has--ESA�c` 3. L T R—
�Anll1FRC-T12.G =" SAL-E OP i- .ATI,� I1Jv"/S- f Ct
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): ' J RtcF?iD ' J vnf 3
` 1 (�` q�
Rawmaterial(s): .t_dvP VY FY K SV4RR R2.G-t{ FfLuc,TUSe---c1fW Sl`12-vPt G�-ft,.Aa� °a-)aL
t t
F.6. Flow Rate. �Rp'Hr SESAME S s-.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
73 OC,]U gpd ( X continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rale. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits Ar. Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes X No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 &.7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
L A{cE RKvorl=ss wV-4"rP /4 C— OC) Lk Ro S(0
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RtNcwIcIL-
RIVER BASIN:
/rTAw4A
F.S. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contritnrted to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes MNo If yes. describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 0 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all That apply):
0 Truck 0 Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Rernediation Waste. Does the treatrent works currently (or has it been notified that i1 will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate In
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents That are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous 0 Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
�' f=- END OFPARTF•
4+ 1 ,S
REFER TO.THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW=(PAGE 1) TODETERMINEWHICH OTHER
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE " P
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
.LAKE Rt-LpbH=S5 WWrT-P NC_00LI1co5(,,,
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RePIE ,y-AI__
RIVER BASIN:
CATAI--r(3A
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAJCERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges
complete part F.
from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
(SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number
treatment works.
of each of the following types of
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment
Yes E No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users
industrial users that discharge to the
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
b. Number of CPUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary. \
Name: Y/Ai UC.5t (Y1A)NIc,.FACrvR-a.r1Cr CQr.,.Pftn/Y
Mailing Address: Po 1) t2Awa2 LQ 3 cl. C-or-ore% ao -S.T .
VAL->ZsE. NL d8(II Jo
1
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.\
nn- .. _ _... .— —, r L n_ .i_.--..f—_� 1lvr, Ynn_ir
V
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): 1'3YE,t Q4$
Raw material(s):
F.6. Flow Rate.
C orv/SY.4T►IETTcr✓Yc{S S-Vi r rre25f �:.�Di j r.1cCAC-ft
CA„STz� t HYOROGE•Q 1 e!t-pxz1
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
7--; cXD:3 gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd
continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits , Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes jgrNo
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510.2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LAILE Rttv'DH=ss 1^4W t P NCc�0LARA cc,
PERMIT((�ACTION REQUESTED:
1�c+`/elW/`iL
RIVER BASIN:
C-H"THvv-aA
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets. interference) al the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ,No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes 0 No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) 0 No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility al which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets i1 necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
0 Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PARTF.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER^PARTS-- -^
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-0 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LAKE RKobHzs3 W\oriP Ne00ti(05e4
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
P.e=NEvy-AL._
RIVER BASIN:
ATRreaA
SUPPLEMENTAL. APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges
complete part F.
from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
GENERAL INFORMATION:
works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
(SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
treatment works.
of each of the following types of
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment
,(Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users
industrial users that discharge to the
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs.
h. Number of CIUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information.
as necessary.
Name: VAL((--�DLSc�
Provide the name and address
of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
IE�T2.LE.S
, M
Mailing Address: O rJ O X L G 0 �� !' tRSn/ �T, t -A S 1
VA LbeSE N tv ,)xc,,90
1
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge-
Wr
E A V M-rust � Y' 2n/ G .Z Nam- S tt - Ai G Q (- rA QZ(L.71:- CS
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s).
discharge.
Principal product(s): 1
Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
E x, i ter✓ 'FA (`J(L- 77 C$
/�
Rawmaterial(s): YAIZA!$r byam.S DYE-IrVG- R5`%T.STftN S
r
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volurne
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
9 030 gpd ( ) continuous
volume
following:
0
subcategory?
of process wastewater discharge into
or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
discharged into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate, Indicate the average daily
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous
gpd ( continuous
of non -process wastewater flow
or intermittent.
or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject 10 the
a. Local limits Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
No
No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99) Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22
Page 18 of 22

t
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
-- 0=i KE Rob t-t m-S S 1''1P N L-001-k Ka Ito
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RE. r✓r= WFi r.-
RIVER BASIN:
CA"i-A vv6A
F.8.
Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes Ail No If yes. describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated tripe-
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount
Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
=I=
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or wit be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent 11 intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
•
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99) Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 o122

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LAKi= RF•IObHMS3 V4\nrTP NC00`1l(0..tn
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
f Me-NEf.,-At_
RIVER BASIN:
CATAv-,an
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges
complete part F.
from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
works have, or is subject ot, an apptoved pretreatment program?
(Sills) and Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs). Provide the number
treatment works.
9
of each of the following types of
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment
)"I Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users
industrial users That discharge to the
a. Number of non -categorical SlUs.
b. Number of ClUs.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.B and
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary. VA
I \ / 1^J
Name: AL-DE.5 YvC/9 VtflS T4C. ` LAArr # I
f
Mailing Address: tJU X '70 1000 �E(Z f�Zrd S Zp • E.
1
VAL.0t.SE; N� ? SO
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
IYEZnI G -4CAVZNG .t_Asrt= NF 0 QHOu--57G2Y HA a22G5
r 1
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Materfal(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): FA (j (Z-S G5 E?OL S-Et--;)
Raw material(s): Y E 5 YES../Cr P S5 �5 TA I T 5
t
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
LI tcm t) gpd ( X continuous
volume
following:
❑
I�
subcategory?l
of process wastewater discharge into
or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous
gpd ( continuous
of non -process wastewater flow discharged
or intermittent.
or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the
a. Local limits X Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards 0 Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
No
tJo
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Laic€ RNAQI ..ss- w "P NC_0o,-ltc„ ki
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RE NEwAI—
RIVER BASIN: ,
�.H"TF3wQA
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributeerto any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes XNo If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply): -
0 Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or rnass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or wilt be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
y
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS'` -
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE •
6
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 o1 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LAKE Rl .cibHm s \r4hrl P N cooLtkf3c.5
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Rersi -tyAL_
RIVER BASIN:
CATrat,rlAA
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges
complete part F.
from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment
Yes 0 No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users
industrial users that discharge to the
a. Number of non -categorical Sills.I
b. Number of ClUs.
works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
(SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number
treatment works.
of each of the following types of
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary. Narne: VA
/ V 1L-bE.Sc EA�/ci2.S .ini _. TLAN i #oZ
�W/
r
Mailing Address: -P d U x r(0 a a n GRE S e- r, i •\ • r V
t
VAL.7.sf.. nl c, d�{ 6 SO
/
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
b.i St_R7t-ts.41/4ICr vPH01-5T1 F616Rzc1
Ye..IG W�E.IRvs.piG
j
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute 10 the SIU's
discharge. ' (�
Principal product(s): v [, I-t V t_ 5 "�v L 1 f"- A 6 r....5
/���
Raw material(s): b Y c S.-0 Y C.2n/tr- t`1 3 S35T,IN 7 5
1
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume
day (gpd) and vwhether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
I O O ono gpd ( X continuous
volume
following:
0
subcategory?
of process wastewater discharge into
or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
r
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous
gpd ( continuous
of non -process wastewater flow discharged
or intermittent.
or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the
a. Local limits ,N- Yes
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and
No
No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99) Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
LAKt RKvDHis S 1-4W'f P NLtpOylCoCt<o
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
1\cNE- 1✓HL
RIVER BASIN:
�./978Val A
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
0 Yes No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport- Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CFRCI A /SIiPFRF11Nf)1 WASTFWATFR_ RCRA RFMFf)IATIC)N/CC)RRFCTIVF ACTIC)N
_ k
WASTEWATER. AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.)
❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets it necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22