20221367 Ver 1_App_B_Data__20220926

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Big Buffalo - SAM UT 1 Date of Assessment 3/29/22
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Axiom - Lewis
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Big Buffalo - SAM UT 2 Date of Assessment 3/29/22
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Axiom - Jernigan
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Big Buffalo - SAM UT 4 Date of Assessment 3/29/22
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization Axiom - Lewis
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) In -stream Habitat
HIGH
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
MEDIUM

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Big Buffalo - SAM UT 6 Date of Assessment 3/29/22
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization Axiom - Jernigan
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Big Buffalo - SAM UT 7 Date of Assessment 3/29/22
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Axiom - Lewis
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Big Buffalo - SAM UT 8 Date of Assessment 3/29/22
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Axiom - Lewis
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Biigper Buffalo - SAM UT 14 Date of Assessment
3/29/22
Up
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization
Axiom - Lewis
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All
Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall LOW

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Big Buffalo - SAM UT 14 Date of Assessment
3/29/22
Lower
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization
Axiom - Jernigan
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All
Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall LOW

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Big Buffalo - SAM UT 16 Date of Assessment 4/8/22
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization Axiom - Keith
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Big Buffalo - SAM UT 17
Stream Site Name Date of Assessment
4/8/22
upper
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization
Axiom - Keith
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All
Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Big Buffalo - SAM UT 17 Date of Assessment
4/8/22
lower
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization
Axiom - Keith
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All
Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall LOW

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM 1 Date of Assessment 03/29/22
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Veaetation Composition
Condition
LOW
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM 2 Date of Assessment 03/29/22
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Veaetation Composition
Condition
LOW
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM 3 Date of Assessment 03/29/22
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Veaetation Composition
Condition
LOW
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM 4 Date of Assessment 03/29/22
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Veaetation Composition
Condition
LOW
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAM 5 Date of Assessment 03/29/22
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jernigan/Axiom
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
YES
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Veaetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
YES
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

ql3
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3 2 1 Az Z
Project/Site:
Latitude: 3 �� _
Evaluator: ji'yt< _
County: Ghwarl/►
Longitude: _
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent j
Stream Determination (cir
Other L bti
if >_ 19 or erennial if >_ 30" 31
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennia
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i 3 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2p
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
T
<P
3
9. Grade control
0
' I
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
t .5
11. Second or greater order channel
Na =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual `l
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 3 ,-'� )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
CD
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
(j
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0)
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 4.5 ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3}
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
(D
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
&52
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
ProjectlSite:
Latitude:
Evaluator: �. -w l
County: aL+a
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent v
Stream De te circle one)
Other L H
if >_ 19 or perennial if? 30"
Ephemera Intermitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1 D )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1"Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1'
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
r'1" }
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
`'"1
-0
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0'
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
sp
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
Qj
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No'= 0
Yes = 3
GRl weal WW V0 PIG IIVL 10LGV, JGG VIJLiV JJIV 1J Ill manual
B. Hvdroloav [Subtotal = I
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
F'
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biolow (Subtotal = 7- ) 1 .
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
02
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
-3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
r
1
2
3
22. Fish
®
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
Co
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

N L to W k2 stream Wennucation norm Version 4.11
Date: 12,7 Project/Site: - La Latitude: 3 S
,l
Evaluator: .Y E - � County: 6'1'LotA-k a Longitude: _ 7 9 5 j /9
Total Points: Stream Deter circle one) Other 1,1 CA
Stream is at least intermittent r r Ephemeral Intermitte'Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 orperennial if >_ 30'
A. Geomomholoov (Subtotal = A . ) I Absent I Weak I Moderate I Strong
12, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2)
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
[►
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1W
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
i 0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o _
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussiRs in manual
B. Hvdroloov tSuhtntal = C. .7 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
C_ Blolon►r tSuhtntal = I _ ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3 Z y ZZ
Project/Site: I r�lo
Latitude: 3 5, 92G Syr
Evaluator: A Ile i
County: Cka41AQ r"
Longitude: _ 7-9, t /8 8Z&
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle
Ephemeral Intermittent •;Perennia
Other
e.g. Quad Name: 1 bu
if a 19 orperennial if a 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
J!
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
1
62
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
q
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(J
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2.
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
'Z
3
9. Grade control
0
0.54
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 .
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. HArolow (Subtotal = 145 ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
/3 ,
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1V
3
14. Leaf litter
11.5)
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes �3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
: $
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
C'7
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

U-F9+
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: a {�, . `c ,
Project/Site: r
+`(0
Latitude: .-
,1 tZ DZI
Evaluator: r« �
County: C� a s
Longitude: ,.�q 5 Z,� 9 y
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 'Z
Stream Deteymi circle one)
E hemeral :lntermitte Perennial
Other
e. Quad NameW 6 �
if a 19 or perennial if 2 30'
P
g'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = t L 5 } Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1'
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
12
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
r '
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
;'No = 0 '
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 •6, )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes =
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0 1
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
01
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
01
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0'
0.5
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
1
Other = 0
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 "1-` 1 "L
Date: 3 ZZ
Project/Site: 918"�°� '' U
Latitude: 3'3Zb 5 3
Evaluator: 4 11( / - k
County: CM a it,, a ✓vt
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
N
if z 19 or ,perennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral InvirmiffaMf erennial
e.g. Quad Name:Li�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_._)
Absent
0
Weak
Moderate
2
Strong
3
12, Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
`1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1!
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
F
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0.
�le�
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5?
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
6.5
1
1.5_
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = `0 I
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
1
1
2
2
1-3,
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
1"5)
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
-
11-0) s
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
j 0
tj.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high wa r table?
No = 0
I Yes 3,'
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = It.1 ' )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
,1`
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
�3
�,"2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity, abundance)PIT _
ki�
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks L Sh -114
0
1
1_
3
_
22. Fish
0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians L A4,
0
0.5
' D
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
_
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 3 2 ��
Project/Site: -_
Latitude: 3 5- $ y
Evaluator: A Kr `
County: CLA x a��/1
Longitude: _� " CBS
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral : Intermitter Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: L'+ % r^
if >_ 19 or perennial if 2-30"
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = t ' )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
'1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
LO
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
M.
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
5
�_.
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
ailll ACII UILI II0D 010 IIUI IaLOU, Dec uIII I1a1wal
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = L Zi )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
(Z
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Lo
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
s = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
ED 1
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
022
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
<< �
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 ?_
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
; 0 r
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

lr L L W q btream l(lientitttcation i orm Version 4.11
Date: 4 / 41? l 711 Project/Site: j UT111
Evaluator: MadtciiG County:
Total Points: Stream Determ' circle one)
Stream is at least intermittent 2 i Ephemeral ntermittent erennial
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30" '
Latitude: 3 S i 8 283 11 ,r
Longitude: - 79, 51),;72, u
Other
e.g. Quad Name: L e
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = / J
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
O
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
V
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
(D
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
0
1 1.5'
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = i
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
C0773
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = 1. 7 l
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
4
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
0
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
&Krer = 0-
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: f016
d %5 j-o tl*i 4

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 U f 1-1 rd" 0r "'� I r)
Date: 4/2--1
Project/Site: $a �Q
Latitude: -.� 5. 81g 15 1
Evaluator: V) 4 , e A �
County: C�� � �� �.�
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle
Other `r
at 3 c
if >_ 19 orperennial if >_ 30* �i J
Ephemeral Intermittent erenn al
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = 1 J
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolocly (.Subtotal = 9 ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
cy
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
0
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using
other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: ('Jf i t^Cs de•,r.-�
Cn Owe. �O res } e.d
ue
SP,ve 1 k(_f sue 1
��I-c/ d �f fu'�1ed PQS�v���
a reVl
.511`)14� Ls, f- Gral �; s h

.$
i�g
w
O
�Q
CA
�Q
O
O
O
O
.O.
�
�
� a
I
I
I
I
I
I+
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

0
M
•I
yy
d
N
O
�Q
CA
�Q
op
O
O
O
O
.O.
O
O
awi u N �
(;aafi u011nn01a
0.4 U xS
O
O 01 01 x h \o \o \o \o \o \o h x x x x
y 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
W
�' y i•w
0 0�� 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0�� O O
v���CwAw
01
'�
01
01
O
C,
O
w+
3
G
E 5
� a
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

0
N
p'
>y
O
�Q
CA
241
It
COO
�Q
C,iclicli
rn
CD
rn
rncl�
U
a,
� a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

—,
2
k
c_
... .
q
�
iclicli
k
00
cli
�
rn
CD
CD
CD
rn
CD
rn
2
\
\ \
e
z z
3%ƒ)/ƒ
m6m�J
14JxiI
jmmmrzmzzz=rm�__
\///%//\\\//%///
w
� (
:
ill
\
]
!>
�
)/)
|
|�|

tii
a
w�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
I
N
�
I
F
I
I
I
I
_
I
I
I
�
�
I
I
y
F
I
w
COO
U
I
I
O
I
CC
I
I
I
N
C,
C,
CA
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
O
I
M
O
O
Imo.
O
rn
O
rn
p
I
I
O
(1aaj) u01nnalg
0.1
U
xC
:4
O
i00
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
01
00
01
C,
C,
.i4
W
it2

. •
.2
.
.
�
\�\
�
r x
�
k
�
rn
cD
cD
cD
cD
\
t
/}\
°
a / )
» 2
z z
/§_ /)
3
m6m�J
=1 a x2
jr-
zemer_---- -- ee
\///%%/\/\\\/////
w
� (
:
\
]
}
»
j
�
)\
!>
|
|�|

I
&
I
9
I
I
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
_� r
� I
w
0
�Q
CA
�Q
O
O
M
O
M �
O y
� O
awi N (;aaj) u011DA01a
0
w+ - — - - O N O - - 01 CO �n N M - 01
C, C, 00 h h \o \o � \o 00 00 00 00
y C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C,
W
CDN h 00 C, O O N N M M \O 01
0
01
'�
00
01
0^0
01
C,
O
w+
3

a- ,y
N
rl
'
0.0
oc
0.0
11
�Q
GA
�p
�Q
rn
7
O
N
O
O
O
O
'O
N
awi 00 N .�
(1aaj) U011DA01a
0.1 u x x v
0
w o a� - �o - v N o 0 00 — N oo v - o N
C, x x x I; I; I; I; I; � I; I; I; x x C, C,
W
y
it "� DC W A Li.
h
\O
00
i�i
C,
O
w+
Uj
3
I
I
I
�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

<»!\\\
d
Q
®
ƒ
_
�
®
�
\
\
/2r /
o
061DA01J
3Sx
j=eze_ez=e=_eee_e
\/%%%%//\/\//%%//
w
� (
:
412
\
]
�
)\
!>
|
|�|

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 1
Bank Length
673
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
114
right
Mod
Mod
0.05
114
2
11.4
2
231
right
Low
Low
0
117
1
0.0
3
336
right
Low
Low
0
105
1
0.0
4
5
6
7
8
9
162
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
162
1
8.1
10
279
left
Low
Low
0
117
1
0.0
11
337
left
Low
Low
0
58
1
0.0
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
19.5
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
0.7
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
0.9
Erosion per unit length
Total Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.001

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 2
Bank Length
1842
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
63
right
High
Low
0.1
63
3
18.9
2
127
right
Mod
Low
0.02
64
2
2.6
3
281
right
High
Mod
0.15
154
4
92.4
4
406
right
High
Mod
0.15
125
3
56.3
5
618
right
Mod
Low
0.02
212
2
8.5
6
804
right
Mod
Low
0.02
186
3
11.2
7
925
right
Low
Low
0
121
1
0.0
8
9
63
left
High
Low
0.1
63
3
18.9
10
127
left
Mod
Low
0.02
64
1 2
2.6
11
281
left
High
Mod
0.15
154
4
92.4
12
397
left
High
Mod
0.15
116
3
52.2
13
609
left
Mod
Low
0.02
212
2
8.5
14
720
left
Mod
Low
0.02
111
3
6.7
15
762
left
High
High
0.2
42
3
25.2
16
796
left
Mod
Low
0.02
34
3
2.0
17
917
left
Low
Low
0
121
1
0.0
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
398.2
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
14.7
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
19.2
Erosion per unit length
Total Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.010

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 3
Bank Length
574
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
287
left
Low
Low
0
287
1
0.0
2
3
4
287
right
Low
Low
0
287
1
0.0
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
0.0
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
0.0
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
0.0
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.000

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 4
Bank Length
4972
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
660
left
Low
Low
0
660
3
0.0
2
903
left
Very High
Extreem
1.5
243
5
1822.5
3
1366
left
Low
Low
0
463
1
0.0
4
1695
left
Mod
Low
0.02
329
2
13.2
5
1921
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
226
3
33.9
6
2233
left
High
High
0.2
312
4
249.6
7
2461
left
High
High
0.2
228
3
136.8
8
9
10
642
right
Low
Low
0
642
3
0.0
11
885
right
Very High
Extreem
1.5
243
5
1822.5
12
1384
right
Low
Low
0
499
1
0.0
13
1677
right
Mod
Low
0.02
293
2
11.7
14
1890
right
Mod
Mod
0.05
213
3
32.0
15
2215
right
High
High
0.2
325
4
260.0
16
2511
right
High
High
0.2
296
3
177.6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
4559.7
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
168.9
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
219.5
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.044

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 5
Bank Length
548
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS,
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
118
left
Very High
High
0.3
118
2
70.8
2
187
left
Low
Low
0
69
1
0.0
3
274
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
87
1
4.4
4
5
6
118
right
High
High
0.2
118
2
47.2
7
187
right
Low
Low
0
69
1
0.0
8
274
right
Mod
Mod
0.05
87
1
4.4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
126.7
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
4.7
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
6.1
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.011

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 6
Bank Length
1818
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS,
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
310
left
High
High
0.2
310
2
124.0
2
713
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
403
1
20.2
3
909
left
Low
Low
0
196
1
0.0
4
5
6
407
left
High
High
0.2
407
2
162.8
7
603
left
Low
Low
0
196
1
0.0
8
909
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
306
1
15.3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
322.3
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
11.9
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
15.5
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.009

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 7
Bank Length
1290
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
235
left
Low
Low
0
235
1
0.0
2
529
left
High
High
0.2
294
3
176.4
3
645
left
High
High
0.2
116
2
46.4
4
5
6
302
left
High
High
0.2
302
3
181.2
7
442
left
Low
Low
0
140
1
0.0
8
645
left
High
High
0.2
203
2
81.2
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
485.2
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
18.0
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
23.4
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.018

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 8
Bank Length
1769
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
458
left
Low
Low
0
458
1
0.0
2
729
left
High
Mod
0.15
271
2
81.3
3
885
left
High
High
0.2
156
2
62.4
4
5
6
597
left
Low
Low
0
597
1
0.0
7
759
left
High
Mod
0.15
162
2
48.6
8
884
left
High
High
0.2
125
2
50.0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
242.3
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
9.0
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
11.7
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.007

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 9
Bank Length
54
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
25
left
Low
Low
0
25
2
0.0
2
3
4
5
6
29
right
Low
Low
0
29
2
0.0
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
0.0
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
0.0
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
0.0
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.000

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 10
Bank Length
1150
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
239
left
Low
Low
0
239
1
0.0
2
471
left
Low
Low
0
232
1
0.0
3
575
left
Mod
Low
0.02
104
1
2.1
4
5
6
239
right
Low
Low
0
239
1
0.0
7
471
right
Low
Low
0
232
1
0.0
8
575
right
Mod
Low
0.02
104
1
2.1
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
4.2
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
0.2
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
0.2
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.000

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 12
Bank Length
682
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
187
left
Low
Low
0
187
1
0.0
2
341
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
154
1
7.7
3
4
5
6
142
right
Mod
Low
0.02
142
2
5.7
7
296
right
Mod
Mod
0.05
154
1
7.7
8
341
right
Low
Low
0
45
1
0.0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
21.1
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
0.8
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
1.0
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.001

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 14
Bank Length
5856
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
600
left
Mod
Low
0.02
600
2.5
30.0
2
820
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
220
2
22.0
3
915
left
High
Mod
0.15
95
3
42.8
4
951
left
Very high
High
1
36
5
180.0
5
1213
left
High
Mod
0.15
262
3
117.9
6
1603
left
High
Mod
0.15
390
2
117.0
7
1805
left
Low
Low
0
202
2
0.0
8
2200
left
Low
Low
0
395
1
0.0
9
2657
left
Mod
Low
0.02
457
3
27.4
10
2933
left
Mod
Low
0.02
276
2
11.0
11
3114
left
High
Mod
0.15
181
3
81.5
12
13
221
right
Mod
Mod
0.05
221
2
22.1
14
316
left
High
Mod
0.15
95
3
42.8
15
697
left
High
High
0.2
381
3
228.6
16
1003
left
High
Mod
0.15
306
2
91.8
17
1205
left
Low
Low
0
202
2
0.0
18
1273
left
High
High
0.2
68
3
40.8
19
1909
left
Mod
Low
0.02
636
2.5
31.8
20
2210
left
High
Mod
0.15
301
3
135.5
21
2511
left
Mod
Low
0.02
301
2
12.0
22
2742
left
Mod
Low
0.02
231
2.5
11.6
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
1246.5
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
46.2
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
60.0
Erosion per unit length
Total Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.010

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 15
Bank Length
70
Observers
KRJ
Date
29-Mar-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
35
left
Low
Low
0
35
1.5
0.0
2
3
4
5
6
35
right
Low
Low
0
35
1.5
0.0
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
0.0
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
ITotal Erosion (yd/yr)
0.0
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
ITotal Erosion (tons/yr)
0.0
Erosion per unit length
ITotal Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.000

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 16
Bank Length
3136
Observers
AEK
Date
8-Apr-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
947
left
Low
Low
0
947
2
0.0
2
1000
left
High
Mod
0.15
53
3
23.9
3
1114
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
114
3
17.1
4
1194
left
Low
Low
0
80
3
0.0
5
1321
left
High
Low
0.1
127
3
38.1
6
1402
left
High
High
0.02
81
2
3.2
7
1568
left
High
Low
0.1
166
3
49.8
12
13
947
right
Low
Low
0
947
2
0.0
14
1000
right
High
Low
0.02
53
3
3.2
15
1114
right
Mod
Mod
0.05
114
3
17.1
16
1194
right
Low
Low
0
80
3
0.0
17
1321
right
Mod
Mod
0.05
127
3
19.1
18
1402
right
Mod
Low
0.02
81
2
3.2
19
1568
right
Low
Low
0
166
3
0.0
20
21
22
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
174.7
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
6.5
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
8.4
Erosion per unit length
Total Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.003

Site
Big Buffalo Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Site
Stream
UT 17
Bank Length
1594
Observers
AEK
Date
8-Apr-22
Station
Bank
BEHI
NBS,
Erosion Rate
Length
Bank Height
Erosion
1
64
left
High
High
0.2
64
5
64.0
2
104
left
Low
Low
0
40
3
0.0
3
205
left
High
Low
0.1
101
5
50.5
4
242
left
High
Low
0.1
37
5
18.5
5
261
left
Mod
Low
0.02
19
3
1.1
6
349
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
88
3
13.2
7
475
left
Low
Low
0
126
3
0.0
8
592
left
Low
Low
0
117
2
0.0
9
678
left
Low
Low
0
86
1
0.0
10
797
left
Mod
Mod
0.05
119
2
11.9
12
13
64
right
High
High
0.2
64
5
64.0
14
104
right
Low
Low
0
40
3
0.0
15
205
right
High
Low
0.1
101
4
40.4
16
242
right
High
Low
0.1
37
5
18.5
17
261
right
Mod
Low
0.02
19
3
1.1
18
349
right
Mod
Mod
0.05
88
3
13.2
19
475
right
Low
Low
0
126
3
0.0
20
592
right
Low
Low
0
117
2
0.0
21
678
right
Low
Low
0
86
1
0.0
22
797
right
Mod
Mod
0.05
119
2
11.9
23
24
Sum erosion sub -totals for each BEHI/NBS
Total Erosion (ft3/yr)
308.4
Divide total erosion (ft3) by 27
Total Erosion (yd/yr)
11.4
Multiply Total erosion (yard3) by 1.3
Total Erosion (tons/yr)
14.8
Erosion per unit length
Total Erosion (Tons/yr/ft)
0.009

BEHIMBS Summary
Stream Reach
Erosion Rate
(tons/year)
UT1
0.9
UT2
19.2
UT3
0.0
UT4
219.5
UT5
6.1
UT6
15.5
UT7
23.4
UT8
11.7
UT9
0.0
UT10
0.2
UT12
1.0
UT14
60.0
UT15
0.0
UT16
8.4
UT17
14.8
Total
380.8

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/8/2022
Project/Site: Big Buffalo Mitigation Site
County, State:
Chatham County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Soil Profile 1 (35.831366,-79.523653)
Investigator:
W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series:
Wehadkee
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-3
10 YR 5/1
100
loam
3-9
10 YR 6/1
95
10 YR 4/6
5
C
M
sandy clay loam
9-18
10YR 7/2
95
10 YR 4/6
3
C
M
fine sandy loam
10 YR 5/4
2
C
M
18+
10YR 6/1
40
10 YR 3/1
20
C
M
fine sandy loam
10YR 4/6
40
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matri)
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: '""� Jt^-n
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/8/2022
Project/Site: Big Buffalo Mitigation Site
County, State:
Chatham County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Soil Profile 2 (35.832108,-79.520939)
Investigator:
W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series:
Wehadkee
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-2
10 YR 4/1
99
10 YR 4/6
1
C
PL
loam
2-9
10 YR 7/1
95
10 YR 4/4
5
C
M
sandy clay loam
9-15
10YR 6/2
95
10 YR 4/4
3
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 5/6
2
C
M
15+
10YR 7/1
60
10 YR 5/6
20
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 4/4
20
C
M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matri)
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: '""� Jt^-n
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/8/2022
Project/Site: Big Buffalo Mitigation Site
County, State:
Chatham County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Soil Profile 3 (35.834339,-79.519103)
Investigator:
W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series:
Wehadkee
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-2
10 YR 5/1
80
10 YR 5/6
20
C
PL
sandy clay
2-9
10 YR 6/2
90
10 YR 5/6
10
C
M
sandy clay
9-15
10YR 6/2
80
10 YR 5/6
10
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 5/1
5
D
M
10 YR 6/6
5
C
M
15+
10YR 6/1
70
10 YR 5/6
20
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 4/6
10
C
M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matri)
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: '""� Jt^-n
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/8/2022
Project/Site: Big Buffalo Mitigation Site
County, State:
Chatham County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Soil Profile 4 (35.829049,-79.511632 )
Investigator:
W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series:
Wehadkee
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-3
10 YR 4/1
95
10 YR 4/6
5
C
PL
sandy loam
3-6
10 YR 6/1
50
10 YR 5/8
10
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 6/2
40
6-14
10YR 7/2
70
10 YR 7/6
28
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 2/1
2
C
M
14+
10YR 7/1
75
10 YR 5/8
23
C
M
sandy clay
10 YR 2/1
2
C
M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matri)
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: '""� Jt^-n
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/8/2022
Project/Site: Big Buffalo Mitigation Site
County, State:
Chatham County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Soil Profile 5 (35.820438,-79.525931)
Investigator:
W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series:
Wehadkee
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
Depth (inches)
Matrix
Mottling
Texture
Color
%
Color
%
Type
Location
0-3
10 YR 4/2
95
10 YR 4/6
5
C
PL
loam
3-14
10 YR 5/1
50
sandy loam
10 YR 6/2
30
10 YR 4/6
30
14+
10YR 7/1
85
10 YR 5/6
10
C
M
sandy clay loam
10 YR 4/6
5
C
M
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matri)
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: '""� Jt^-n
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis

AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
919-215-1693
SOIL BORING LOG
Date: 4/8/2022
Project/Site: Big Buffalo Mitigation Site
County, State:
Chatham County, NC
Sampling Point/
Coordinates:
Soil Profile 6 (35.825104,-79.526467 )
Investigator:
W. Grant Lewis
Soil Series:
Wehadkee
Axiom Environmental. Inc.
Depth
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matri>
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: '""� Jt^-n
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Locaction: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matri>
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist
Number: 1233
Signature: '""� Jt^-n
Name/Print: W. Grant Lewis