The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20141142 Ver 1_401 Application_20141014D Cit ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service" Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities Ms. Sue Homewood North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Programs 585 Waughtown Street Winston - Salem, NC 27107 Subject: Pre - Construction Notification Application Request for 401 Water Quality Certification Proposed Road Access for Subdivision — Liberty Road Guilford County, North Carolina ECS Project 09.24290 Dear Ms. Homewood: NC Registered Engineering Firm F -1078 October 22, 2014 RECEIVED N.C.DeDt. of.EN OCT 2 7-2014 Winston -Salem Re ioraalOffice Please find five copies of the Pre - Construction Notification Application for the above referenced site. The site is located on Liberty Road in Guilford County. The site consists of an approximately 33.76 acre tract of land that contains pasture and wooded land. In order for the area to be used as a borrow site, a new neighborhood access road must be constructed that will impact 0.206 acres of wetlands will be impacted by the proposed project. Please feel free to contact us at (336) 856 -7150 if you have any questions concerning this request or if additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely consideration of this matter. ECS CAROLINAS, LLP M Eric J. McClanahan Senior Project Manager Brian E. Maas, VP, REM Environmental Director Attachments: Pre - Construction Notification Application 401 Water Quality Certification Fee - $240.00 4811 Koger Blvd., Greensboro, NC 27407 • T: 336- 856 -7150 • F: 336 -856 -7160 • www.ecslimited.com ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Carolinas, LLP • ECS Central, PLLC • ECS Flonda, LLC • ECS Mid - Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Texas, LLP PAID COa rF o� o < 2 0 1 4 1 1 LW7 Office Use Onl : 4 Corps action I n i DWQ project n 401 &BUFF _ 01 I SING Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? _T ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: ❑ Yes ❑X No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes ® No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. ❑X Yes ❑ No 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h below. ❑ Yes ❑X No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ❑X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: The Farm at Forest Oaks 2b. County: Guilford 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Greensboro 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a Applicant is ❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify Contract Purchaser 4b Name David B Michaels, Manager 46 Business name ,(if applicable) Redwolf bevelopment Company, ,LLC 4d i8treet address ' 621 Eugene Court, Suite 103 4e City, state; zip Greensboro, NC 27406 4f Telephone no 336 - 378 -8888 4g Fax;no 336- 378 -8862 4h Email address dbmichaels @triad rr corn 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a Name Eric J McClanahan, PWS 5b Business name (if applicable) ECS Carolinas 5c Street address 502 Wando Park Blvd Ste 109 Zd City, state, zip Mt Pleasant, SC 29484 'Se Telephone no (843) 654 =1276 office, Cell (843) 696 -9865 (preferred) '5f Fax,no (8,43) 884 -7990 5g Email address emcclanahan @ecslimited corn Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a Property Identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID) 788181,7258 lb Site coordinates, (in decimakdegrees) Latitude _ Longitude 1c Property `size = 33 746 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a Name of nearest body of water to proposed project Big Alamance Creek 2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water WS -IV NSW '2c Riverbasin- Cape Fear 3. Project,-'Description 3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application The surrounding area is a mix of low density�residential to the west,and north, and medium density residential to the north and east The property consists of a primarily open pasture and old farm field, with small wooded fringes, and, one open water ponded area within one of the lowest lying areas on,the site 3b List'the,total estimated acreage, of, all °existing, wetlands, on the property 0 94 3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property 0 3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project The construction of a proposed single family residential subdivision This is to provide housing for the greater'Greensboro metro area, 3e Descnbeithe overall projectAnWdetail, Including the type of equipment to be used Use of heavy,equipment Including track- hoe,'bulldozer, graders and paving equipment for sitelclearance and,construction of site.and its facilities 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project, (including all prior phases) in the past? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments SAW -2014 01591 4b If the;Corps made the jurisdictional determination; what type of determination was made? ❑' Preliminary, ® Final 4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas Name (if known) .Eric McClanahan, PWS Agency /Consultant Company ECS Carolinas Other 4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations, or State determinations and attach documentation ECS,conducted a wetland delineation In June 2014 USACEFIIe number Is SAW- 2014 -01591 No streams are located on the site All wetlands ,found'on,site are jurisdictional 5. Project History _ 5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all pnor phases) in the past? ❑Yes ®No ❑ Unknown 5b If yes, explain In detail according to "help file" Instructions 6. Future Project,Plans 6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b If yes, explain Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 14 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a Which sections were completed below,for your project (check all that apply) ❑X 'Wetlands '❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑, Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts ! If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted 2a Wetland impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary 2b Type of impact 2c Type of wetland 2d Forested 2e Type ofjunsdiction Corps (404;10) or DWQ�(401', other) 2f Area of impact (acres) W1 P Fill Headwater Wetland No Corps 0 206 W2 Choose one Choose one Yes /No - W3 Choose one Choose one Yes /No W4 Choose,one Choose one, Yes /No = W5 Choose one Choose one Yes /No W6 Choose one Choose one Yes /No - 2g Total Wetland Impacts: -0206 2h Comments - Wetlands "are tokbe`filled for proposed'access,roadway,from Liberty Road, as needed to maintain,pr_oper traffic flown,and "alignment of ingress /egress for the proposed subdivision Alternatives are not possible due AoAhe shape of the property at that location and position of the wetland on the property 3. Stream'Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted 3a Stream impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b Type,of impact 3c, Stream name 3d Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e 'Type of jurisdiction 3f Average stream width (feet) 3g Impact length (linear feet) S1 Choose one - S2 - Choose one S3 - Choose,one S4 - Choose,one - S5 - Choose one S6 - Choose,one 3h Total stream,and tributary impacts 31 Comments Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 14 January`2009 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U S then indiv ually list all open water impacts below 4a Open water impact number Permanent (P) or Temporary 4b Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c Type of impact 4d Waterbody type 4e Area of impact (acres) 01 Choose one Choose O2 Choose one Choose 03 Choose one Choose 04 Choose one Choose 4f, Total open water impacts 4g Comments 5. 'Pond or Lake Construction Jf pond or lake construction proposed, the com leterthe chart below 5a Pond ID number 5b, Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d Stream Impacts (feet) 5e Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 Choose one P2 Choose one 5f Total: 5g Comments 5h Is a.dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no 61 Expected pond surface area (acres) 5j Size of pond watershed (acres) 5k Method of construction 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below ,If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below rf'any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out,Secfion D of this form 6a. Project•is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse ❑Tar - Pamlico '❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ® Other Cape,Fear 6b Buffer Impact number — Permanent (P) or Tem ora '6c 'Reason for impact 6d 'Stream name 6e Buffer mitigation required? 6f Zone 1 impact (square feet 6g Zone 2 impact (square feet 131 Yes /No 132 Yes/No 63 Yes /No 134 - Yes /No 65 - Yes/No 136 - Yes /No 6h Total Buffer Impacts: 61 Comments Page 5 of-10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a Specifically describe measures taken to, avoid or minimize the proposed`impacts in designing project Road,crossing is aligned as straight as possible to reduce impacts Due to small area of access to site, this wetland cannot be,avoided,as it crosses the small access route Less impacting altematives are not possible due to the shape of the property at that location and position of thewetland ondh_e property (See figures for clarification of property line shape and wetland location) lb Specifically describe measures -taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through construction techniques Clearing and grading of wetland will be stabilized and bordered by silt fence Construction will be completed as rapidly as possible to reduce run -off and excess erosion into waters of the U S 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Im acts,to Waters of the U.S..or Waters of the State 2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State? ® Yes ❑ No 2b If yes, mitigation'is required,by (check all that apply) Q DWQ ® Corps 2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ® Mitigation bank ,® Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Sank 3a Name of Mitigation Bank 3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Riparian wetland Type Choose one Type Choose one Quantity 0 206 Quantity Quantity It bank credits are,available they will a use-U, as none are currently available, the EEP e er is attache 3c Comments 4. ',Complete if Making a Payment to lh -hear Fee'Pr0 ram 4a Approval letterfrom,in -lieu fee program is attached ® Yes 4b Stream mitigation requested linear feet 4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature Choose one 4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet 4e 'Riparian wetland mitigation requested_ acres 4f Non- npanan wetland mitigation requested acres 4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres 4h - Comments 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a,description of the proposed mitigation plan Page(6;of 10 PCN Form - Version 14 January 2009 6. Buffer-Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) —required by DWQ 6a Will,the protect result,m an impact within a,protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes ❑X No 6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the amount,of mitigation required Zone 6c Reason for impact 6d Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) 0 Zone 2 15 0 6f Total buffer mitigation required: 6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into amapproved in -lieu fee fund) 6h Comments Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow'Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a ;Does the project include,or is it.adiacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑X No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why Project only includes the road crossing, clearing and grading to create ingress /egress for the proposed ❑ Yes ❑X No subdivision 2. Stormwater Mana ement.Plan 2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 35% 2b Does this project re uire,a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No 2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why 2d' If'this,proiect DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan Grading and piping of all run- offfrom proposed built areas will'be to two'proposed permanent wet ponds for water <quality and quantity control 2e Who will be responsible for the review of the,Stormwater'Management Plan? CityYof Greensboro 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a In,which local governments jurisdiction is this project? City of Greensboro ❑ Phase ll ❑ NSW 3b Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply) ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other 3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been []Yes ® No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review []Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ORW (check all that apply) []Session Law 2006 -246 ' ❑Other 4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan,with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ® No attached 5. DWQ 401 Umit'Stbftfiwa-ter,Revldya 5a Does the Stormwater Management, Plan meet'the,appropriate requirements? ❑'Yes, ❑;No 5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form - Version 14 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a Does the,project involve an expenditure of public (federal /,state/local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter') Comments- 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated Wetland,Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC.26 0200)? 2b Is this,an after- the -fact permit application? ❑Yes ® No 2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s), 3. Cumulative Impacts (DVVQ Requirement) ,3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑Yes ®No additional_,development, which could'impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b Ifyou answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no;" provide a short narrative description 4. Sewage0sposal (DWQ, Requirement) 4a Clearly�detail the,ultimateAreatment,methods and disposition (non- discharge�or discharge) of wastewater generated from the'proposed project, oravailable capacity of the,subject facility Sanitary Sewer Wastewater collection systemto be installed and tied,to the City of Greensboro system for treatment at'City of Greensboro facility/ WWTP Page 9 of 10 PCN Form'— Version 14 January 2009 5. Endingered Speples,and Desl6njated,,Critibal Hdbftt-,j(;0r�, ps Requirement 'Se Wll'thi s project occur in or near'an areavith,fedeniilly pirpt6bbia",ipe cjes,,or I h 816iCat? 0 Yes Q No 6b. HaVe,,y6u chtcl(ed,OAthloe�U,§FM�conce�,ning,, qrJJg6h§d,,Specie&-'A6t impacts _ -End Yes O'No &c. WyOsl, indicate'thi USFWSe,Ffeld,O% ,ry(g('fiov contacted 001 *_ktAq4rstqurces',did,you use to det6rm.inCW L--i(ieryourritb would,impact Endangered Species or Dbsignated Critical H kti t? 'End-an.gWed SpeCiesi -ThNq" �Spep*,Fed ral,SPi&69,of debeniand,dakdOalp S 6 - P-ebies, Guilford County, North Carolina review f' (iiii�rfd�habitatss&e'doisd6 not i�eefitoiriamei�t§fo-r,'- th -_g 6. Essential Fish - Habitat (Cbfps Rdquiiernehi) 6a. Will, this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish, haUftat� Yes No 6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Opact Essential Fish Habbir 7. Historic or-pm- historic CultuMl Resources V*06 W-006tIoccur ihoi,nbaiah iiiba that the staie..*gg;O-,Of, I !vinq isto6 raC or cuttiaral pm9r4bon Yes RNO N6M Camrma htAory an&archaeology)7 7b. Wh6t'data souroes did you use to determine wheth& your site WouldomPadtUstoncvr archeo0c§'icaQ,masouTces? Nt-Nd6t.k.gov tWttnal resources mapping we6sfte for No ft Wona, 8. Fji:kW-Zone Designation (Corps Aaqujirement) W. WU this Pi0jeUt=cUr in a !FE04kdesig nated Yes No 8b. ifyeO,,.expI;Wn how project. meeWFEMA requireftnts* 'k'What'S9urqe(s) did-you 4se to,Mdke the flbodplain deitermi=ian? MI& N-C'bOV vwebsite. site search David B. Michaels, Manager 10-15-2014 Applicant/Agent's Printed Name "- -pbcant/Agent's,Signature Date (Agent's signature is valid only if an aulhonzation I - letteffrom the applicant is provided ) Page 10 of 10 b 4r 1p « +, w r ( .44 7 • J i 1 aQ► e . z� jt FIGURE 1 ` USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SOURCE: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS LIBERTY ROAD RESIDENTIAL NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY Approximately 33.76 Acre Site WEBSITE LAYER Greensboro, Guilford County, NC NTS ECS Project 09 -24290 x b o� �04 1� llbe SOURCE: e NCSS — WEB SOIL SURVEY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, DATED 2012 NTS w Map Map Unk Name Acres Percent U411 In of AOI Symbol AOI Ct8 cod sandy loam, 2 to 6 11.7 14.7% percent slopes Ccc cod sandy loam, 6 to 10 Patent slopes 3.7 4.7% Ce82 Cecil sandy clay ban, 2 to 6 7.7 94% percent slopes, moderately eroded r.1hd, Chew ada loam, 0 to 2 0.6 0X% percent slopes. frequen[ly flooded En8 Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 29.0 36.S% percent slopes Ewt Erwn fine sandy loam, 6 to 5.4 6,8% 10 percent slopes MhG2 Meddenburg sandy day 20.6 25.9% loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, moderately eroded W water 0.8 1.1% Totals for Area of Interest 79.6 100.0% FIGURE 2 SOILS MAP LIBERTY ROAD RESIDENTIAL Approximately 33.76 Acre Site Greensboro, Guilford County, NC ECS Project 09 -24290 SOURCE: NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, DATED 2013 NTS FIGURE 3 NATONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP LIBERTY ROAD RESIDENTIAL Approximately 33.76 Acre Site Greensboro, Guilford County, NC ECS Project 09 -24290 + tk got k or - ' Wf . 1 + r r rrr. 1 ft 1 A • / b /l SOURCE: MONTGOMERY COUNTY TAX MAP 2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY FIGURE 5 PARCEL MAP LIBERTY ROAD RESIDENTIAL Approximately 33.76 Acre Site Greensboro, Guilford County, NC ECS Project 09 -24290 Simon I Wreby certffy that the 5uve�J Prepaed b1J me entitled WETLAND IMPACT MAP - THE FARM 0 FOREST OKAS 1 / May l4 made upon the good and tld it aid the Wayrd o xa sesAstares I shown actually exist The of Uus,survey is to shots the E reacted wetlands as flagged 9 in the Held by ECS G�LLP All bwday hFamatlon Is taen from a wetlad survey by ftim, Wade and Associates, PA ad dated August 2T, 2014. Bw tall% &h do September 2014 GIs" l 11 CAR "*,* Registramn NO. LEI 0/ Homer 5 Wade 59abm t b21 t>gelie Ct Re., 100 6reelts =,'NL. 21420 Date J SEAL Ns•4r46, �� L -3731 17 ,% ' 9:�0 sum {••' �, / �1 011 I fWLFi3m.Rm7 PA1rAA16FF3D5A!60C O FUMINIM ZWFS 00OW Ofz� WETLAND AREA 'A' 11,412 SF - 0.40 AG TOTAL AREA \ 8,960 5F - 020b AG TOTAL \ AREA IIMPAGTED SEE SHEET WLI -2 \ 1,181 5F - 0.183 AG TOTAL 1 \ \0 REMAIN UNDISTURBED AN \ A14 I o Ir PETLAND AREA 'G' COORDINATE TABLE CA 8043A64 riD94907401 G2 912w2aw rr994865r12 c3 OWMtral Yi7CN -4FMf4 C4 8@932225 r1894646384 F944F564 812908608 rIOMS552 ce PETLAND AREA 'G' COORDINATE TABLE CA 8043A64 riD94907401 G2 912w2aw rr994865r12 c3 005a m rre9479A126 C4 8@932225 r1894646384 G5 812908608 rIOMS552 ce 612N8.193o rlbombo23 Cl 812168.401 r066161b cb M2 9620M rffiMg'026 w 81226b2% rre9?eoao97 CIO 812248.2620 r99211.CW CII 81225kgW r1847845700 O � � � 9I 2WM C44 81224BA640 r1893242407 C6 SU2628Lii1 rre9385869 C46 817J695g62 r8!<9675621 W 00250W r1894015667 60 817760M r04020= CI9 81228/861 r094raM CM BM 4431 8 4431 r1894906307 a I /I � � I o I--' ', � `"0 PIN 7881923205 METLAND AREA 'G' 215M 5F - 0.44 AG TOTAL AREA (IWUVE5 AREA OF OPEN WATER) TO REMAIN'UNDISTURBED PIN 7881819919 SF F044 L1 � Fa/1 14!� WETLAND AREA 'B' -1 3,260 5F - 0.07 A6 TOTAL AREA TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED WETLAND AREA °B' COORDINATE`TABLE POINT el e12num rla9y w.- 92 812w07310 r09ft=4 B3 8=2886 11895416009 B4 82M509 r18453.T194 B5 814186.7199 r16q39A63 B& 8122o09Bg2 rlowiOw 91 81220e7995 118gri0163m BB 8M-96M r19431 A7U B9 9127DWM r18RM53901 910 812209.4206 riBgs<i734o COORDINATE TABLE p /immMaT w,6 MWSr . n« �F POINT NOR�ft EAST AI 8108861538 r1880368580 A2 810044$48 rOOM4543 61091L r186M15 A l m® KmW6r1 / M A4 6109442347 1'18868.784 I 810936823 1197989.4465 A13 AS 810968023 rr8b188S107 A14 8OW443 1791971.7612 Ab 8109880183 r188209.7086 Al M AD 6110028416 rfflbW4 699 BBMW= r=05= AIO 8 10 9 85 3351 r039046h406 A l alocm48ab r1879996669 Al2 810936823 1197989.4465 A13 ew933ba5 ' MW5c525 A14 8OW443 1791971.7612 573'44' 'W A5 ammh239 rffi1494r84 x98(TIE .40 ) A A \T N811056DT91 '^"°�*n 67611' AV . E r1992463827 9 A aa�iam° 0 5315E - OD12 AG. OFF Fb�(rWQl6Y1 SITE AREA TO REMAIN ❑ UNDISTURBED \ \ mF®.arre I I - �1 l?"1 3l X41 `q-1 L 5N - -1 W 04 I � 51 T E VIGINITY MAP SITE DATA SCALE: ,I° = 2000' w PIN: 7881817258, 788181gglq tend 78814123205 DEED R :ERENGE. DB 4644 P6.0368, DB 4644 P6.0365 ad I DB 3488 P6.0238 ZONIN6: R5-40 (COUNTY) WATER5FED: LAKE MAGINT05H W5 IV (6WA) 015T. TO FLOODWAY: >2000' e TOTAL AREA: 33.146 AC. WETLANDS FLA66ED IN THE FIELD JM b, 2014 BY EG5,GAROLINA5, LLP AND FIELD 511RVEYED'13Y BORUM, WADE, AND A%O., PA. WETLAND IMPACT SUMMARY u AREA °A',- 17,4,72 51= - 0.40 AG. - 8,160 5F - 020b AC. IMPAG`TED (INCLUDING 8115F - DAIS AG. OFFSITE) AREA °8' - 3,260 5F -0.08 AC.; NO IMPACT PROPOSED AREA to - 21,506; 5F - 0.4q AG, NO IMPACT` ,PROPOSED - OFF 51TE -5315F - OD12 AG. -'NO IMPACT PROPOSED TOTAL NET 400gb 5F -,0.94 AG. - TOTAL IMPACT 8,gbO'5F,- 0.206 AG. ROADWAY 015TUR13ANGE = 7,610 5F - 85X1 OF TOTAL DISTURBANGE POND 6RADIN67 DISTURBANCE = 1,350 5F -15% OF'TOTAL DISTURBANCE Gave`. o F-1 ur000aue 621 E.V=C-%S.I. iao, 6tm.A- NCZM1 mi PO Ba 2167 Gm..b —, NC 7749L i W F6c W5447: Fat 37627SG3719 wd, .....e—&- Ncu�_-a CQ61 QvEpt wa m ISHU VEAaCFMWCA Ur, a awe Gr - 9118108 6FE063= WM CAFZ A 2M01 ON 394M comr. DAVID wwas 0A15 68Ieee 6,2014 I9L11G1 m _ swYmb WETLAND I MPAG,T MM FU FVWxftVdMi_FadM4TW MAMW SCATS r • 207 RANI SW W Yq L I e I o�< Q O s Cr Ct O � � ■� LU OL 9n a = UJI o LU N ;o nc x LL_ O W w 4y ne Ln 'D LU QvEpt wa m ISHU VEAaCFMWCA Ur, a awe Gr - 9118108 6FE063= WM CAFZ A 2M01 ON 394M comr. DAVID wwas 0A15 68Ieee 6,2014 I9L11G1 m _ swYmb WETLAND I MPAG,T MM FU FVWxftVdMi_FadM4TW MAMW SCATS r • 207 RANI SW W Yq L I e I i I I certly that die wivey pvpaed by w entitled PE LM IMPACT MAP - TW FARM a FOREST OKAS / / . -\Q no adolly made upon the gourd and tbt it and the Worinadon carrrrses4stakA \ \� sinrm actually exist. The purpor�e oP this wrvey is to sim the irpacted wetlads as flagged / in the field by EGS GARDLJWES LLP All W dcq Wmdlon is talw from a waded a" by Bonrnh, Wade and Associates, PA and dated Aught -71,2014 Breahedthis 8Jt_dayof Sedgjw 2014 RegStratlon No. L3731 �•'�,,(i�N.. CAR04 �•�.,�. / / /..._...�. Horner 5. Wade c � �D:.�oFESS ipH '•.� l'y '� ,�' -, , -- ..�..._ . b21 Egene GL Ste 100 ften,boro, KG. SEAL / \ 27420 pad L -3731 %14b AQ �'••.,MCR S P / / 4- 7plo ry I &-TLAND AREA / 11,12 5F - 0.40 AG TOTAL AREA 8;A60 5F = 0208 AG TOTAL : o� AREA IIMPAGTED j — � 1,881 SF - 0183 AG TOTAL REMAIN'UNDI5TURBED � BEGIN WETLA - 5TA., 0+00 J �2 All \ 13/Al }, All C/ A2 fflr� Eff/ft—A"I"M � l 1 / E1,6\ � / VICINITY MAP L SITE DATA SCALE: I'= 2000' ��" � /� PIN: 1881811258,188181gglq and 188Ig23205 / DEED REFERENCE: OB 4644 PG. 0368,013 4644 PG. 0365 and �Cg� T3 °44'44 °W / DB 3488 P6.0238 88.40' (TIE)/ / ZONING. R5-40 (COUNTY) / WATERSHED P-W. SIR %'N 81105bD-191 :: / 531 5F - 0.012 AG. OFF 51TE AREA TO REMAIN / UND15TL RE ED X WETLAND5 UIS I UKbAIVLG 5TA.1+03, A I\ LAKE MACINTOSH WS IV (GWA) �¢ 015T. TO FLOODWAY: >2000' TOTAL AREA: 33.74b AG. VETLAND5 FLAGGED IN THE FIELD im b, 2014 BY EG5 GAROLINA5, LP AND FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, WADE AND A% O, PA. NETLAND IMPACT 5UMMARY AREA °A° - 11,412,5F = 0.40 AG. - 0605F - 0206 AG. IMPACTED (INGLUDING 811'5F - OAIq AG. OFF5ITE) AREA °B° - 3,280 5F - OA8 AG. = NO IMPACT PROP05M AREA °G° - 211506 5F - 0.4q AG. - NO IMPAGT PR6P05ED - OFF 51TE -531 5F'- OD12 AG. - NO 'IMPAGT PROPOSED TOTAL NET 40,8gb SF - O.g4,AG. - TOTAL IMPAGT 8,gb0 5F - 0206 AG. ROADWAY' DI5TURBANCE = `1,610 5F - 85Ai O,F TOTAL; D15TURBANGE POND GRADING DISTURBANCE = 1,350 5F - I% t7F TOTAL 0- 15TURBANGE Jlaanera` ` B°raID, Wade and Asioclatee, P A "1570 nw, "I I PO )� 11182 C�bmo, NC I/47DI88! Ph=a6r2Sag1 Fm 336 -M3719 Web .W Wb�mdi� Ncu=�.# -C4W Wis i e t `1 f { f ha < -Ir. *P- LLJ LL— J Z O Lu = o vr W %n Q W W C.4 W Lrs _ .o i e t `1 f { f I WreN (at4 that the survey prepaed by me) entitled t FnM IMPACT MAP - TtE FARM a FOREST orAs mm- actually made upon the goud aid that It ad ft h mattoncwrses 6wnces sM►ui actually exLsk The' p' of this suVey 5 to show the' wetlads as flagged h the fleld by,EGS GAROLINAS UP Al bairiday kiamatbn 6 Wm from a ►+surd survey by Borum, Wade ad Associates, PA ad dated August 27, 2014 ExecutW lhls _8 _day of 5 kff .212 14 Reo d,.. {No L -MI Now 5 Wade 544b" 621 ftgerie Gk Ste 100 6reen5bD_ ro, HL. 27420 Date n•CA Ro .� SEAL L -3731 ��•• yO9� SUR�yo M£RSWP 185 z z w m :• WETLAND UNDI' ll5 110 B.AMM ELEV 765.00 �r r r O 4. �ry m O Q 0+00 0 +50 1+00 is T iBorum, Wade and Associates, P A uir�msm�iao,c,,NCnwin„ eoe�zu Ic,�,, 33&M ell ' 1— Pomc i767/51M71 C wal_ 3719 NG:�tt C-0Aq sus YIG'INITY MAP 5G-kb is = 2000' SITE DATA NOW. PIN: 1881811258 „1881819919 and 1881925205 DEED REFEIRENGE: OB 4644 PG. 0368, OB 4644 P6.0365 and DB 3488 P6.0238 ZONING: R5-40 ((OUNTY) WATERSHED: LAKE MAGINT05H W5 IV (6WA) o < DIST. TO,FLOODWAY: )2000' do TOTAL AREA: 33.146 AG. cc NE•RANDS FLAGGED IN THE FIELD JUNE b, 2014 BY EGS GAROLINA5, LLP AND O FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, WADE' AND, m A%O., PA. t_ W WETLAND I M P A G T 5 U M M A R Y UJ oc oCO AREA °A° - 11,412 5F - O:AO' AG. - 8,960 5F - 0,206 AG. IMPACTED tl— O' W (INCLUDING 811 SF - OAiq AG. OFF5ITE) V- O UJ ”' C,4 oe oe AREA °B° 3,260 5F - 0.08 AC. - NO IMPAGT PROPOSED Ln _ `D AREA °G" - 215106 5F - 0.4q AG. - NO IWAGT PROPOSED U_ - OFF 51TE -5315F,,- OD12 AG. - No IMPAGT PROPOSED TOTAL NET 40,896 5F - 0.94 AG. - TOTAL IMPACT 8,%00 ff - 0.206 AG. ROADWAY 015TURBANGE = lb10 5F - 85x6 OF TOTAL D151iRBANGE POND GRADING DISTURBANCE = 050 5F -1% OF TOTAL DISTURBANCE GRAPHIC SCALES ai i 201 401 wl 1 120' ,• 40'H0RJZ aim mmmww,mok6_lcAwmrw o w 3�m CMA6T DAd MUMS mover, woo DA,B MM3, tg2M MVEM smnm WETLAND IMPACT HPp Fum r -up� ORAY0G5WS METED RAN9E RI IN L 3 �o O �O z � N iza PtnA TO RE IN; D15TLRB 6E TURBED 0+00 0 +50 1+00 is T iBorum, Wade and Associates, P A uir�msm�iao,c,,NCnwin„ eoe�zu Ic,�,, 33&M ell ' 1— Pomc i767/51M71 C wal_ 3719 NG:�tt C-0Aq sus YIG'INITY MAP 5G-kb is = 2000' SITE DATA NOW. PIN: 1881811258 „1881819919 and 1881925205 DEED REFEIRENGE: OB 4644 PG. 0368, OB 4644 P6.0365 and DB 3488 P6.0238 ZONING: R5-40 ((OUNTY) WATERSHED: LAKE MAGINT05H W5 IV (6WA) o < DIST. TO,FLOODWAY: )2000' do TOTAL AREA: 33.146 AG. cc NE•RANDS FLAGGED IN THE FIELD JUNE b, 2014 BY EGS GAROLINA5, LLP AND O FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, WADE' AND, m A%O., PA. t_ W WETLAND I M P A G T 5 U M M A R Y UJ oc oCO AREA °A° - 11,412 5F - O:AO' AG. - 8,960 5F - 0,206 AG. IMPACTED tl— O' W (INCLUDING 811 SF - OAiq AG. OFF5ITE) V- O UJ ”' C,4 oe oe AREA °B° 3,260 5F - 0.08 AC. - NO IMPAGT PROPOSED Ln _ `D AREA °G" - 215106 5F - 0.4q AG. - NO IWAGT PROPOSED U_ - OFF 51TE -5315F,,- OD12 AG. - No IMPAGT PROPOSED TOTAL NET 40,896 5F - 0.94 AG. - TOTAL IMPACT 8,%00 ff - 0.206 AG. ROADWAY 015TURBANGE = lb10 5F - 85x6 OF TOTAL D151iRBANGE POND GRADING DISTURBANCE = 050 5F -1% OF TOTAL DISTURBANCE GRAPHIC SCALES ai i 201 401 wl 1 120' ,• 40'H0RJZ aim mmmww,mok6_lcAwmrw o w 3�m CMA6T DAd MUMS mover, woo DA,B MM3, tg2M MVEM smnm WETLAND IMPACT HPp Fum r -up� ORAY0G5WS METED RAN9E RI IN L 3 X MCEI North Carolina Department,of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Michael Ellison, Director John,E.,Skvarla,;III Governor Ecosystem Enhancement Program Secretary October 16, 2014 David Michaels Redwolf Development Co, LLC PO Box 20706 Greensboro, NC 27420 Expiration of Acceptance: April 16, 2015 Project: The Farm at Forest Oaks County: Guilford This is a conditional acceptance letter. The purpose of this letter is to notify you'that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept payment for,compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the- abov_erreferenced project as indicated in, the tableibelow Please note that this decision does not assure that participation imthe NCEEP will be approved!by the permit issuing agencies as- mitigation for project impacts. It is thezresponsibrhty of the applicant to contact these, agencies to determine - if payment to the NCEEP will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal�or local government-permits. Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by S L 2011 -343. This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable If we,have not received a copy of.the, issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this,acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to,NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice wili;be issued based on the required mitigation to that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount,of the In- Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net. Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following table Theaamount of mitigation required and assigned to NCEEP for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below. Impact River Basin CU Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I (Sq. Ft.) Buffer II (Sq. Ft.) Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non- Riparian Coastal Marsh Cape Fear 03030002 0 0 0 0 0 206* 0 0 0 ,EEP does-not have non- riparian wetland initigation.credit in this CU. This acceptance is conditional in that the permitting agencies would need,to allow the use of riparian wetland credit in the authorizations. Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performe&m accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In- Lieu.Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010 Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please- contact Kelly Williams at (919) 707 -8915. Sincerely, .14e .14ej B Stanfill Assei Management Supervisor cc Jennifer Burdette, NCDWR Wetlands /401 Unit David,Bailey, USACE, Raleigh Sue Homewood, NCDWR - Winston -Salem Eric McClanahan, agent 1652 MailZervice Center,, Raleigh, North Carolina,27699 -1652 Phone 919=707189761 Internet www ncdenr gov An Equal,Opportunity VAfrirmative Actiom Employer -Made in part by recycled paper NC WAM'Wetland Rating Sheet, Accompanies User Manual,Version 4.1' Rating Calculator Versiom4.1 Wetland $ite Name Wetland,A -,SAW= 2014 -01591 Date 8/28/2014 Wetland Type, Headwater Forest, Assessor Name /Organization David'E Bailey (USAC' Notes on {Field,Assessment Form,(Y /N) NO Presence,of regulatory considerations (Y /N) NO Wetland is,intensively managed ',(Y /N) YES. Assessment area is- located within,501eetofa natural,tributary or other openwater (Y /N), NO Assessment,area is substantially,altered by9beaver,(Y /N); NO Assessment ar6wexpehences overbankiflooding during normal (Y/N) NO Assessment area4s on a coastalisland (Y/N) NO Sub - function Rating'Summary Function Sub - function Metrics Rating° Hydrology SuifacwStorage�and Retention Sub- SurfaceAStorage�and,;Retention Condition Condition LOW MEDIUM Water Quality, Pathogen Change _ 'Condition HIG1 VegetatiomComposition Condition LOW Function Rating Summary Function Condition /Opportunity HIGH Hydrology 0pporturnty Presence? (Y /N) NO Particulate Change Condition °OW Condition /Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence? (YIN) NA Soluble�Change Condition _HIGH 'Condition /Opportunity 'HIGH Opportunity Presence? (Y /N) NO Physical ;Change Condition LO,VU Condition/Opportunity LOW Opportunity Presence? (Y /N) YES pollution'Change, Condition _ NA Condition /Opportunity NA Opportunity Presence? (Y /N) NA Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW L =andscape Patch Structure Condition « LOW. VegetatiomComposition Condition LOW Function Rating Summary Function Metrics/Notes Rating Hydrology Condition LOW Water'Quality Condition MEDIUM' Condition /Opportunity MEDIUM_ Opportunity Presence? (Y /N) YES Habitat Conditon LOW' 'overall WetlandlRating, LOW