HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110720 Ver 4_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20141030HATLEY BANK SITE NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER &°
NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION SITE
PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHASE
MONITORING YEAR 2 REPORT
DWQ PROJECT NUMBER: 2011- 0720v.4
SEPTEMBER 12, 2014
W'R
OICT 3 0 2014
D401,& BUFFER PERMITTING
McADAMS
Raleigh /Durham ❑ 2905 Meridian Parkway ❑ Durham, NC 27713
Charlotte ❑ 11301 Carmel Commons Blvd ❑ Suite 111 ❑ Charlotte, NC 28226
McAdamsCo.com
Designing Tomorrow's Infrastructure & Commu .pities
HATLEY BANK SITE
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER &
NUTRIENT OFFSET
MITIGATION SITE
PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHASE I
MONITORING YEAR 2 REPORT
DWQ Project # 2011- 0720v.4
September 12, 2014
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction....... ..... ...... . ... .................. ....... ........................ .. ............ ..... 1
L I Project Location and Description ............ . ....... .......... ............ .................... 1
1 2 Project Goals and Objectives.. ......................... .............. .... 1
2.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison .. .... .. ........... ............................... .... .................. 2
3.0 Methodology............ ... ...................... .... ... ............................... .... ...2
..... .................. .
3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots .......... ... ........ ..................... .. ........ ............................... 2
3.2 Photo Stations ....... .... ....... ..... . ......... ........ . ....... ...................... ....... .... 2
4 0 References ....... ...................... ..... ......... .......... ....... .. .... ............ .... 4
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figures 2.1 — 2.4: Bank Site Phase 1
Figure 2A: BPDP Bank Site Phase 1
Figures 3.1 — 3.4: As Built Easement Plat
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 1: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 2: Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Table 3: Planted Species Comparison by Vegetation Plot
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
Appendix E: Photo Stations
H
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Location and Description
Located at 888 John Rogers Road, in Hurdle Mills, North Carolina is the Neuse buffer and
nutrient offset mitigation site currently known as the Hatley Bank Site (hereafter referred to
as the Bank Site). The Bank Site is located in the Flat River Township in the south central
section of Person County, North Carolina, approximately 8.6 miles southwest of the City of
Roxboro, North Carolina, and approximately 14 miles northeast of the Town of Hillsborough
(Figure 1). More specifically, the Site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of
John Rogers Road and Terry Road and approximately 0. 15 miles west of the intersection of
John Rogers Road and Berry Pearce Road.
The Bank Site is being developed in two (2) phases: Phase 1 and Phase 2. Figures 2.1
through 2.4 (Appendix A) depict Phase 1. Phase 1 consists of 16.34 acres and is located
along the western, southern, and eastern portions of the Bank Site. Phase 2 consists of + 3.97
acres and is located on the northwestern portion of the Bank Site. Figure 2A (Appendix A) is
provided to illustrate the constructed Phase I Conservation Easement compared to the
approved Hatley Bank Site Bank Parcel Development Package (EcoEngineering, October
2012). Future construction within the Bank Site will be consistent with the previously
approved Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP).
The purpose of this Bank Site is to improve water quality within the Neuse River watershed,
specifically the Falls Lake watershed, by providing off -site mitigation for development (both
existing and proposed) requiring stream buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits. The
Conservation Easement (CE) for Phase I of the Bank Site is 16.34 acres (711,770.4 sf).
Within the 16.34 acre CE, the total area dedicated to Neuse Riparian Buffer Credits is 8.3
acres (361,549 sf) and the total area dedicated to Nutrient Offset (nitrogen and phosphorus)
Credits is 7.38 acres (321,473 sf).
The Bank Site is located within the Upper Falls Lake watershed in the Neuse River Basin (8-
digit USGS HUC 03020201, 12 -digit USGS HUC 030202010102), more specifically within
Neuse Sub -basin 03- 04 -01. Sto er bunoff from this site drains into South Flat River
(Stream Index #27 -3 -3) and int 2 `t s unnamed tributaries. According to the Basinwide
Information Management System IMS), South Flat River is classified as Water Supply III
(WS -III) and NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters).
This Bank Site will be established under the terms and conditions of the EBX Upper Neuse
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank), signed on February
10, 2012, made and entered into by Environmental Banc and Exchange, LLC (EBX), acting
as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality (DWQ). The Division of Water Quality is
now hereby referred to as Division of Water Resources (DWR).
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this nutrient offset mitigation project are to:
Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed
tributary of the Neuse River by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams
caused by agricultural influences,
Improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation
easement, and
Provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributary to the Neuse River and
associated riparian and upland buffers
These goals will be met through the 'following objectives:
- By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the
Bank Site,
- By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Site through
chemical methods,
- By establishing a conservation easement to provide long -term protection for the Bank
Site,, and
- By donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an
accredited ,or approved land trust or stewardship program.
2.0 Vegetation Condition and Comparison
J
Current stem counts (i.e. stem is defined as a single living tree) were calculated using vegetation
plot monitoring data. Within Neuse buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas, success will be
defined as the survival of a minimum density of 320 planted trees per acre after five (5) years.
Within Neuse buffer enhancement areas, success criteria will be based on a minimum of at least
two tree species at an average density of 320 planted trees per acre following five, (5) years of
monitoring. As of - Monitoring Year 2, the Bank Parcel had four (4) plots encompassing 0.0988
acres, containing 63 planted stems, 'which yielded a density of 637 planted stems per acre.
Monitoring Year 2 field activities were conducted on August 26, 2013. The planted vegetation
survival threshold was met for plots 1, 2, and 4. Plot 3 had a planted stem density of 283 stems
per acre. Summary tables of the data collected are provided in Appendix B.
3.0 Methodology
3.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots,
Baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted in accordance to CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Ve etation (CVS -EEP, v4.2). All monitoring methodologies follow the most current
templates and guidelines provided by EEP (EEP, 2010; EEP, 2011). All four (4) vegetation plots
installed by McAdams were located in Monitoring Year 2. Figures 3.1 through 3.4 (Appendix A)
depict location of the vegetation plots. Table 1 (Appendix B) provides a success summary for
each vegetation monitoring plot. Based on the vegetation monitoring, three (3) of the four (4)
vegetation monitoring plots were above the five (5) year monitoring period requirement. Table 2
(Appendix B) provides a stem count total, and planted stem total by each individual vegetation
plot. Table 3 (Appendix B) provides a summary of only planted stem counts asp compared to
planted stem counts of the As Built.
During Monitoring Year 2 field investigations, it was determined that Vegetation Plot 3 did not
meet the vegetation threshold of 320 trees per acre. Therefore, replanting within the area of
Vegetation Plot 3 will occur sometime between the months of November 2014 and April 20,15.
Vegetation monitoring plots were photographed and are located in Appendix C. Vegetation
Monitoring Plot Data Sheets are provided in Appendix D. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot
Data Sheet provides measurements, location, and vigor of each planted species within a
respective vegetation monitoring plot.
2
-�4-,
3.2 Photo Stations
Photo documentation is essential to monitoring the success the Bank Parcel. Photo's provide a
visual assessment of the vegetation conditions, All four (4) photo stations installed by McAdams
were located -in Monitoring Year 2. Figures 3.1 through 3.4 (Appendix A) depict location of the
photo stations. Photographs were taken at high resolution using an Olympus FE -115 5:0
megapixel digital camera. The location& of the photo stations are depicted in the Monitoring
Year 2 Exhibit (Appendix A, Figure 2). Photographs for the photo stations are located in
Appendix E.
3
4.0 References
EcoEngineering, — A division ,of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. October-, 2012.
EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. Jule 2013. Hatley Bank
Site Proposed Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site — As -Built
Report
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) October 2004. Guidelines for Riparian
Buffer Restoration.
Available at internet site: hLtp://www.nceep.net/news/reports/buffers.pd
Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) January 15, 20'10. Procedural Guidance
and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) November 7, 2011. Monitoring
Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation
Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage_ Program, Division of
Parks and Recreation; Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh,
North Carolina.
APPENDIX A
Site Maps
ORANGE
F�+4a
N HATLEY BANK SITE
VICINITY MAP
jk 0 5,000 10,000 20,000
Feet
I inch - 10,000 feet
DURHAM
McADAMS
Figure 1
•• Omm�
aa�marro•xatuna,anumarasaa
sviaJr�e�
sa
�
t
� �
e E°
� �'
'
' �.
S
vtmoaivoxntortuHnaoNOSUSad�tsNemostrsnat ,ovu
.7•US NOILVIDUM CINV73M
g ►:3.�`�%��
A ag1V -;
7P •b1[0 • •BNaBNIBN
'CHI `,�it�dblt0�
S
AIi�Qi�ihI '2I,I�IHOf 3H.L
�
., -»,�a �., � �
Iae01MA28
t
as
b
r�
s
'oil
ri / 11 f1 QIM W
n
4 1 $-
88 b
TIN � via z
viol' r t
#IF3# g �� agr 1 !g �b
a g
��� a g�
iIC�Y� I '� 285 6dD a a ddld d wdd
r.y «wn• •NwMooa
ttus LtCu� XMrZDWMnsr°0M
LV7dd1�6Yr1 a
VtII' 1aAVO HWOMAIKRWMOMMMONAWALIZNHw1a
SUS KOLLVOUI i amvm2 A GI
I 3S'VHd
A. rLLVH
I
e
MIN
.
m
•B1m4Hd8A8• N8
'DMI'ANVdWOD
swvavow 'HNHor,aHl
®
.,
a,,,,�,,,,
t Jo z Zags � n
n
OLDQ
i>I ii
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A
14— 7nr
bbggs I ;�p�
Nil I
ice' I
i I
.-- ----- .-- --. — --- - {- �.— ..-- �. --..— I
II I r�mnM aim .— .— — — ..— — — .— —• —.
� "w ...+�f1 • � •O)OPCtL<00
[IW ]! +ova 'Aqq! �IIWY COq
wantra� • 7dfolatONrAUB�xrasax
,LVId Jl�86VS o
V)UWUVO XU iMAIti M Room dU[6NabO1.maw xm
RUS NOLLVDcrIK QNv1. zm
a .�CI
A2plLVH
g
S
Yn�
1
N
mp
I ee
Nil 7
l •SHOxUM- offifflwa --m KlONB
'�i1iI `�dNiO�
swvaww '2i NHor alli
• ,..,..
nil •
O a
S
Yn�
I
I ee
Nil 7
1A
I
I
nil •
I
ggI
bl
I
gig
i ^
I
FpRR
I
O�Y
I
g�Y
1
i
I
1p ,d0 S j2rjI8
o ■�oa•
Ale
h ,w _ \ Y111PWI[ 81[[T
a
Un9 Mt mn •YlWi ,=
fL MM M MM
einM
VAR10il VJiIONaWl0NOS�ID7Q�ld6QLtBAQ(1d
&us HOUVOLLM Q uam
I sSVHCI
A=VH
a qq
9 i
eY 6
m, aseene•
•DNI `)LmvdwoD
gNv(lvow *9 NHOP aHZ
®
., �.,.
,�,�► ,
hh
un
pill
5118
_ga
ZI IN
as
F-
44
f
s
ZppZ 0 Q 0
F � w4$rM
G
8...
i►,d0 i►��i6
ri 024004
1, Y 1�M�/�[ BR-w J � I �-. —
� Y�{Ip{JIC 81Qi � � � — — — —
1
f ax
\ Ile
ux�
v
I
— r. -! i �-y p, '✓�+►(�V, -.•,%
?; •� p+ ` :/ f vi . ` r�4y``+;� r�''`•'`� .r � u� �i +�+: �lr�e•fr���,'"�
r'4 - �� r►� �,�� ' -)•
r
i' i�. Vic. ti+�% ^A`� �• •,� ��
fill. •s e �
Af
eP.
.tea i �.a 1 <_ • � �; �/� �v
, M
_.
r r
ww w w+ + ww + +w +w +■ + r - www. rr + i !� r■ r '"'+ r
qtrG ,�4G4�itit,titi,tit,�G�i „�i,�t���i
kl1;_ ILtC R.► .0 r�C�Ltit — *t�LL L .L rrrrLrC'r i.CrrLrLrr Lrrrrrrrr i.Lrrrr LLr E(r �6.L LLLr� rrrrrr�. .L L.
�gAgqqqq��q ■ggA��q�q�qA�q AAgAAAAAgqqq.�qqqAAq A-R �q��A! ggA�AAA�AAAAqAAA AA�A�AAAgAAAAA((jA (r(A AE A A A A a 11 q4
���! 1 -. J L.Lt 1 �. _. z c.l —s.; .; r - r _ t / (, ; r t•I ■ \■'
e 6 F � r l c ,a r. F r. r 1 ,., .: � 1 �
LlrrirrYrLrrritY�rir r �YlYirrriii�r "r'r "iirrrrrf:iirrrrrlikiiLr6' 6rr66i m iiEtrYrrrrLirCiiii�Cri�r LGt rL'
�I�IIO�tt1�11�11tttIt1�111Att1111111�It1111111Aet11t1111t1111tl tl.... .. 1I111t111�t�111t11111
•'r_ikFl r..itl }ir.Fkt[ il'f,Il}jt:f ° .i 7
tIt•�� 1 �IJ�`1 (. t. f•1 F t i (1`I ' 1 Lt'I
t((LLF F M L M Ili. IFi.IIL Itr f{� 1. {t1. h 1.I {Y. F IIF� I It {jy iI
I�L` C^ rLL" LrrtrL ~rLL�LLL1.'rYrMl+i.i.rrMr rFLrrrrl.M�HMF
L v r�r .LL ..Lr..L� L L rLL L LL
. �gsAt���gAgjq��FqAr�■ �g`AgQ�q��1q�A���AAAAAgAAqAAA�q�Arq ,�rgA��,FAAA�A,�A• r��gAt�A�ggAA�AAqqAA���
L�C�:GLL��'6L -'LL `�G�� iiltYLi�lilirrrirrrY6r 66sk Yt�GCtG�''r{r�GY�fiG�Li��YiLL� G �r�GYLir66' 6'0'
IIIIIIIIIAIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIttt11
iii�eiiiittiitiiiiliitttttttitttt�ttttlttttt�tttlttt��tttl�ttti�ItI1t11t111111t1��1i
0
®�O�Oi7RoDIQ4ffi8
stwvavm
Fri
o
8 B
y
F
i
WRI�Il9Di��tiOL�tii�i�
Zug HOUNDUM COM Yam
VH
....m vo
tADCJZM e
004094
♦ --------------
--------- - - - - -- -- - -- 1
I
\♦ ♦ I
ee ♦\
AW
I
ad / I
— — — — — — — -- —� —�
♦ � i
- - - -tea f I
Air
♦11!PP 1��
\♦ I
♦ / I
t I ♦ad I
`% ♦\
�1 \\ I
/ / I %
oil 100
cc I L
I X43
I
I
D--------- - - - - -- III-- - - - - -- �---- - - - - -- -,
III
e � oar
BPWVUV M
Fri
i
11
SM NOILEVOUM
A LLVH
.,„.�ea
1
E�a
Be e
�! l
1�1
tADBJZ 6
•m4n
�t
w � �
i
- - - - - - - - �i--
�ao.•rv�.wo�saar
os` 'moo
Fri
�ern�oeo��os��s
sm NOEVWMLLM car*
$
N
ee
all
,logo
a"
off
H
eSe
W-
i
M
Sete
\ � •NON
nI
f
80
1
Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 1. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Hatley Bank Site
Neuse Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Phase I
Person County, NC
Monitoring Year 2: August 26, 2014
EcoEngineering Project #,: EBX -13010
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation
Threshold
Met ?*
Tract Mean
1
Yes
75%
2
Yes
3
No
4
Yes
* Within Neuse Buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas, target density is a minimum of 320 planted trees per acre at the
end of the five (5) year monitoring period Within Neuse buffer enhancement areas, success criteria will be based on a
minimum of at least two tree species at an average density of 320 planted trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year
monitoring period (Hatley Bank Site - Bank Parcel Development Package ", October, 2012)
^_O
C
O
CC
bA
O
O
d
IFy
b
C
C�
O
H�
r..t
G
O
U
N
Chi
�UU
FI
CC
F+4
C�
wo
C
O
bD
a+
w
O
�zy IIIII� �
"V
i.
W
a
a
C�
Cet
W
6�
y
O
VA-
IV
PI �
0 �
N �
� M
inn W
N v
CC
O �I
w
O
O
a
y
C
V
7
U
M
0
N
.0
L
�.O
V
a
00
00
,lam
�
°0
C
cl
I�
O
r�
I m
Q
M
O
N
�
L
d
u
N
M
v'i
O
a
r
00
00
C
N�
CD
0
N
h
c"
00
N
M
N
�E
-n
ONO
d
Ln
O
C
O
eny
Or
AL
M
-
[�
O
"
00
O
N
N`
N
O
In
r.l
In
N
O
L
V
L
V
V
L
N
L
u
q
Q1
E
U
Co
Cn
y
c
�'-,
�n
�
3
a'
3
3
❑
o�
�
i
a
d
fi
u
Q
cvi
4
C
h
h
U
N
L
r
a
Ol
d
p�
CA
�°
5
g
O1
V
00
:2
0
h
0
M
u
cd
W
U
cd
F°.
Table 3. Planted Species Comparison by Vegation Plot
Hatley Bank Site
Neuse Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
Phase I
Person County, NC
Monitoring Year 2: August 26, 2014
McAdams Project #: EBX -13010
Note The difference between planted stems from the As Built and Monitoring Year 2 is due to species which were deemed "missing" or
"dead" at'the "time of monitoring One possible,explanation for "missing" species is due to thick herbaceous growth obscurnng,the
species from identification during Monitoring Year 2 Therefore, it is possilbe "missing" species could grow larger than the herbaceous
layer and allow fortheir identification Fand measurment in subsequent monitoring years In addition, species which were deemed "dead"
could survive in subsequent years because the species may have gone dormant at the time of monitoring while the roots of the species
are surviving below ground Therefore, in subsequent years the species could grow under more favorable conditions
VIDA
VP -2
VP -3
VP-4
Monitoring Year 2 Planted Stem Count Total
24
14
7
18
As Built Planted Stem Count Total
25
16
17
21
Planted Stem Difference from As Bud
-1
-2
-10
-3
Sunvabili Rate % per Monitoring Plot
96%
88%
41%
86%
Note The difference between planted stems from the As Built and Monitoring Year 2 is due to species which were deemed "missing" or
"dead" at'the "time of monitoring One possible,explanation for "missing" species is due to thick herbaceous growth obscurnng,the
species from identification during Monitoring Year 2 Therefore, it is possilbe "missing" species could grow larger than the herbaceous
layer and allow fortheir identification Fand measurment in subsequent monitoring years In addition, species which were deemed "dead"
could survive in subsequent years because the species may have gone dormant at the time of monitoring while the roots of the species
are surviving below ground Therefore, in subsequent years the species could grow under more favorable conditions
APPENDIX C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
VEGETATION PLOT I: VIEW FAGINO 326 °.
VEGETATION PLOT 2: VIEW FACING 154 °.
VEGETATION PLOT 3: VIEW FACING 128 °.
VEGETATION PLOT 4: VIEW FAGIN6 152 °.
APPENDIX D
Vegetation Monitoring Data Sheets
Site Hatley Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year MY -2
Date 8126/2014
Area Phase 1
Vag Plot No 1
X -axis
Plot Location
28°
see sketch below
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY -1 OCT, 2013
10 -50
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DSH
cm
Vigor
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
mm
cm
1
Quercus michauxu
swam chestnut oak
B
06
0 B
B 94
87
3
0 732
5B
2
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
31
1 1
916
90
3
0 512
57
3
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
71
1
1062
111
3
0 556
56
4
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
95
1 3
741
54
3
0 695
51
5
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
94
31
1036
63
3
missing
6
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
72
31
661
42
3
0 401
31
7
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
5
31
147
81
3
0 712
56
8
Betula m ra
river birch
B
29
28
1003
89
3
missing
9
Betula m ra
river birch
B_
27
27
M
missing
10
Quercus alba
white oak
B -
1 2
46
1032
78
3
missing
11
Betula m ra
river birch
B
29
47
534
51
3
0 523
57
12
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
5
49
965
72
3
0 513
50
13
Quercus ni ra
wateroak
B
73
5
726
54
3
0 539
49
14
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
94
48
1246
31
3
0 551
47
res rout
15
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
9
69
917
60
3
0 492
46
16
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
7 5
69
982
63
3
missing
17
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
57
6 8
993
56
3
0 725
58
18
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
39
68
11 75
59
3
0 572
57
19
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
2 3
6 5
1006
78
3
0 463
56
20
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
0 6
65
982
56
3
0 592
61
21
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
14
8 4
66
52
3
0 351
45
22
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
3 7
8 6
1323
89
3
missing
23
Quercus michauxn
swam ,chestnut oak
B _
53
87
11 51
85
3
missing
24
Quercus michauxu
swam tchestnut oak
B`
74
8 7
14 85
76
3
0 722
61
25
Quercus michauxu
swam chestnut oak
B
9 5
8 8
1245
83
3
0 731
81
B = bare root
x xy
CROPFIELD
FORES
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -50
50 -100
> 100
Lmodendron tuli rfera
30
3
Li uidambar styraciflua
25
Platanus occidentalis
15
Quercus michauxti
1
Site Hatley Brndge,Sde
Page` 2
Monitoring Year MY -2
Date 8/26/2014
Area Phase 12
Veg Plot No� 1
X =a)as 28°
1
I
f
e
1
05
0,0
O
(2)326°
6 t UI 9 1U
X-AXIS'
lenotes "Missing" Stem maybe missing because,of thick, herbaceous layer and - therefore not visible, at
ie time of,monitonng Stem should be� searched �for at location dunng subsequent Mon itonng Years,
ecause the stem may growrabove herbaceous layer
ienotes "De`ad" 'Stem should still be searched for at,location during subsequent Monitoring Years
ecause,the roots of the,stemimay survive and therefore re- sprout,imsubsequent Morntonn 'Years
M-
mmmmmmm
=ME
Y
Mm-
"NOMMMMMMM
=men=
mm
===!Ow_===O!IlM
on
MMMMMMMMMM
O
(2)326°
6 t UI 9 1U
X-AXIS'
lenotes "Missing" Stem maybe missing because,of thick, herbaceous layer and - therefore not visible, at
ie time of,monitonng Stem should be� searched �for at location dunng subsequent Mon itonng Years,
ecause the stem may growrabove herbaceous layer
ienotes "De`ad" 'Stem should still be searched for at,location during subsequent Monitoring Years
ecause,the roots of the,stemimay survive and therefore re- sprout,imsubsequent Morntonn 'Years
Site Hatley Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year MY -2
Date 8/26/2014
Area Phase 1
Vag Plot No 2
X -axis
Plot Location
264°
see sketch below
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY -1 OCT, 2013
X
Y
ddh
Height
DBH
ddh
Height
Notes
Map ID
I Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
meter
meter
millimeter
centimeter
cm
I Vigor
Imm
cm
1
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
1 9
1 2
987
61
3
missing
2
Quercus michauxn
swamp chestnut oak
B
41
1 2
101
33
3
0 745
38
3
Fa us grandifolia
beech
B
67
12
521
13
2
0 494
37
deer
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
91
12
12 94
56
3
0 778
62
5
Fa us grandifolia
beech
B
83
35
M
0 523
51
6
Betula ni ra
nver'buch
B
581
35
M
missing
7
Quercus michauxu
swam chestnut oak
B
29
.3 2
854
29
3
1 15
56
8
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
08
38
11 68
61
1 3
06231
62
9
Quercus phellos
willow oak,
B
04
66
823
51
3
0 512
55
10
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
26
6
1034
45
3
missing
11
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
53
59
10
78
3
0 576
59
12
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
87
59
844
75
3
0 598
63
13
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
78
84
1208
93
3
0 592
52
14
Quercus m ra
water oak
B
5 7
8 4
5
7 851'
42
3
0 478
53
15
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
I B 1
271
861
9641
711
3
0 524
53
16
Qu6rcds m ra
water oak
IB 1
031
891
9871
541
3
0 312
47
B = bare root
— — — — —
I
CROPFIELD
FORES xy x
Site: Hatley Bank Site
Page: 2
Monitoring Year: MY -2
Date: 8/26/2014
Area: Phase 1
Veg Plot No.: 2
X -axis: 2640
1(
f
0.5
0.0 0.5 1
0
0
L ;3 4 n b 1 6 y 1 u
X -AXIS
)enotes "Missing ". Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
he time of monitoring. Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
iecause the stem may grow above herbaceous layer.
)enotes "Dead ". Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
ecause the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re- sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years.
16 I
-
--
15
-
T ---------
1 14
- -
-
13
-----------------
- a- - - - - - --
- ----- -- f-- ----
------- +- -- - - --
--- ----- f- - - - - --
----- -- + --- ---
- --- --- -- - - - ---
-------- F - - - - --
------- 4-- - - - ---
-- --- --- f- - -----
-- ------ - - - - --
- 1 ------
-------- --- - --
10
-- ------f- --- - --
-------- F------
---- --- i-- - - - ---
--- --- 1 - - - - --
------- +- - - - - --
-------- +- --- - --
-- ---- -+ - - - - --
11
12
8
-
--- - - - - -; - - - - --
- - - -- --
7
----- •-- - - - - --
------- -� -- - - --
- -- - -- 6
I
�
--- - --- �
5 -
-
- a-- - - -- --
1
- -- ----- F -- -- --
---- ---r- - - - - --
-------- 1- - - - - --
--- ---- T- - - ---
2
F F -
------ -4-- - - - - --
------- -F- - - ---
3
---- -- --- --- - ---
i
- -- --- --f-- - - - - --
----f- --- ----
-- - - - -- - - --- --
4
----- -- +- ---- --
f - - - - --
------- +- - - ----
-------- f - - - - --
------- f-- - - - - --
-------- F - - - - --
0
0
L ;3 4 n b 1 6 y 1 u
X -AXIS
)enotes "Missing ". Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
he time of monitoring. Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
iecause the stem may grow above herbaceous layer.
)enotes "Dead ". Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
ecause the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re- sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years.
Site Halley Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year MY -2
Date 8/26/2014
Area Phase 1
Vag Plot'No, 3
X -axis
Plot Location
174°
see sketch Nelow
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY -1 OCT, 2013
X
meter
Y
meter
ddh
millimeter
Height
centimeter
DBH
cm
Vigor
ddh
Height
Notes
Ma -,ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Source
mm
cm _
1
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
06
05
M
0 582
58
2
Quercus alba
white oak
B
36
08
Dead
57
DEAD
3
Quercus alba
white oak
B
66
06
M
missing
4
Quercus alba
white oak
B
97
04
M
0 546
51
5
Quercus alba
white oak
B
1 5
28
M
0'512
47
6
Quercus alba
white oak
B
42
36
M
0 575
47
7
Betula ni ra
river, birch
B
7
36
227
30
2
res rout
8
Betula m ra
river birch
B
99
34
M
0 512
61
9
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
16
51
511
32
2
0 607
58
res rout
10
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
41
61
M
0 512
63
11
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
6 5
6 3
524
15
2
missing
res rout
12
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
9 1
6 5
M
missing
13
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
1 9
76
M
0 471
42
14
Quercus michauxu
swamp chestnut oak
B
4 8
84
472
10
2
0 586
52
15
Fa us rand6olia
beech
B
7 4
8 8
5 4
26
1
0 527
42
4resrout
16
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
0 1
9 8
7 04
45
2
0 558
49
17
Quercus alba
white oak
B
2,2
9 8
795
37
2
0 572
55
B = bare root
y FORES
xy x
CROPFIELD
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name 10-60 60 -100 > 100
Site: Hatley Bank Site
Page: 2
Monitoring Year: MY -2
Date: 8/26/2014
Area: Phase 1
Veg Plot No.: 3
X -axis: 1740
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
0.5
0.0 0.5 1
1s
17
- - 4 ------------------------------ I
I
15
-----------------
- -
- -
------- a- - - - - --
--- - - - - -F 13
------ r- - - - - --
- -- ----- +-- - -- - --
- - - - -- + -
----- a-- - --- --
-------- E- - - - - --
-- - - - - -+ -
-- -- --- -- ---- ----
---- --- +- - - - - --
- -- i --------
f
+
f
f -
10
- i --------
----- (1 -
i -
--- -- 1------
12 t-- - - - --
.9
I
I
6
7
;
8
5
,
I
,
128°
O
(2)
J 4 5 b / 6 V I
X -AXIS
Denotes "Missing ". Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
the time of monitoring. Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the stem may row above herbaceous layer.
Denotes "Dead ". Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re-sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years.
�3
6- wL ,A - U aL5 Z
Site Hatley Bank Site
Page 1
Monitoring Year MY -2
Date 8/26/2014
Area Phase 1
Veg Plot No 4
X -axis
Plot Location
220°
see sketch below
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA
MY -1 OCT, 2013
10 -60
X
meter
I Y
meter
ddh
millimeter'
Height
centimeter
i or
ddh
Her ht
Notes
Ma ID
Scienti fic Name
Common Name
Source
mm
cm
1
Platanus occidentalis
s camore
B
2 1
0 9
16 67
145
3
0 723
57
insect
2
Platanus occidentalis
s camore
B
4 3
0 8
17 84
191
MDBH
3
0 713
51
insect
3
Platanus occidentahs
s camore
B
6 5
0 8
18 23
179
3
missing
in -sect
4
Fa us randifolia
beech
B
86
09
M
missin
5
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
98
31
528
53
3
0 312
49
6
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
76
29
795
65
3
0 448
41
7
Quercus phellos
willow oak
B
531
31
789
69
3
0 542
55
8
Quercus m ra
water oak
B
33
3
992
104
3
0 756
62
9
Betula m ra
river birch
B
1 2
3
715
71
3
0 356
51
10
Betula ni ra
river birch
B
08
52
65
102
3
0 378
58
11
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
28
52
826
108
3
0 517
48
12
Quercus ni ra
water oak
B
54
52
M
missing
13
Betula ni ra
nver birch
B
77
52
8621
105
3
0 392
14
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
8
72
972
72
3
0 592
15
Fraxmus enns vamca
green ash
B
54
7
828
48
3
0 719
16
Fa us randifolia
beech
B
31
7
M
missing
17
Fraxmus enns Ivanica
re en ash
B
09
72
101
80
3
0 721
ginsect
18
Platanus occidentalis
sycamore
B
05
89
1297
95
3
0 591
19
Betula m ra
nver birch
B
2 3
8 8
6 58
68
3
missin
20
Quercus hellos
willow oak
B
4 8
8 8
6 51
'32
3
0 563
21
Betula ni ra
Inver birch
B
74
921
6651
'881
1
3
Imissing
B = =barvroot
x
CROPFIELD
1
I y xY
I FORES
CURRENT MONITORING YEAR DATA VOLUNTEER
HEIGHT CLASSES cm
Scientific Name
10 -60
50 -100
> 100
Platanus occidentalis
15
Linodendron tuli ifere
8
Site: Hatley Bank Site
Page: 2
Monitoring Year: MY -2
Date: 8/26/2014
Area: Phase 1
Veg Plot No.: 4
X -axis: 2200
Q
0.5
0,0
U.b 1 Z 3 4 5 b
X -AXIS
0
152° 0
t3 U 1 U
Denotes "Missing ". Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
the time of monitoring. Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the stem may grow above herbaceous layer.
Denotes "Dead ". Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re- sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years.
=wow=
C
0
=pow
OEM
=M_
Mwe-
mmmm
M-M
d
�
U.b 1 Z 3 4 5 b
X -AXIS
0
152° 0
t3 U 1 U
Denotes "Missing ". Stem may be missing because of thick herbaceous layer and therefore not visible at
the time of monitoring. Stem should be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the stem may grow above herbaceous layer.
Denotes "Dead ". Stem should still be searched for at location during subsequent Monitoring Years
because the roots of the stem may survive and therefore re- sprout in subsequent Monitoring Years.
APPENDIX E
Photo Stations
PHOTO STATION I: VIEW FAGING 242 °.
PHOTO STATION 2: VIEW FAGING 68 °.
PHOTO STATION 3: VIEW FAGINC 264 °.
PHOTO STATION 4: VIEW FAGIN6 152 °.