20221349 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20220929

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/25/2022
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20221349 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone] Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Mayflower Subdivison
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Deborah Shirley
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
9/29/2022
Nearest Body of Water
UT to Bones Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.051466 -79.051459
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cumberland
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No

la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 29 - Residential Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
K&G Developers, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
DB: 7456 DP: 0322, DB: 7456 DP: 0317 & DB: 7493 DP: 0219
2c. Contact Person:
Harold Kidd
2d. Address
Street Address
6885 Cliffdale Road
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28314
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Jacob Palmer
3b. Business Name:
Cape Companies NC 1, LLC
3c. Address
Street Address
4 Noel Henry Drive
Address Line 2
City
East Sandwich
Postal / Zip Code
02537
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Deborah Shirley
4b. Business Name:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4c. Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Address Line 2
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27615
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
MA
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Fayetteville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
9487-34-3260, 9487-33-7848, 9487-33-9006
2b. Property size:
+/- 42

2c. Project Address
Street Address
8506 Olted Road
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28314
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
UT to Bones Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040608
4. Project Description and History
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of forested land. Specifically, there is one (1) wetland feature (W1) that bounds the property along the southwest. General land use in the
vicinity of the project consists of forested land and residential areas.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
AID 2009-00355 on 11/1/2012, we do not have a record of a 401 Approval being issued, likely because it was under notification thresholds.
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 5.19 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of this project is to construct a single family residential development and its necessary infrastructure.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The overall project consists of the construction of single family residential development including but not limited to; roadway infrastructure, residential lots, utilities, SCMs, mail kiosk and
other amenities. Specifically, there is one (1) road crossing that impacts a wetland. Equipment typically used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators,
graders, pavers etc. will be utilized for this project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2022-01234
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
Steven Ball
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No

Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
It is my understanding that there are no intended future phases beyond the property boundaries shown. Therefore, no additional NWP, Regional General Permits, or IP are anticipated.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type*(?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
Impact 1
Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland 1
J(acres)
Yes
Both
0.073
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.073
2i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.073
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
S&EC completed a wetland delineation for the entire property so that natural resources could be identified and impacts can be minimized to the
maximum extent practicable. Impact 1 is proposed permanent wetland impacts for a road crossing. This road crossing is necessary to provide access
and connection to the east and west sides of the property, also providing two points of ingress and egress for safety. The crossing is proposed at a
narrow section of the wetland and at a perpendicular angle. A culvert will be utilized to provide a hydrologic connectivity for the remaining wetland.
Additionally, a riprap dissipator is proposed to minimize erosion during large storm events.
lb. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fence and erosion control matting will be used to protect the wetland during construction
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
There are no stream impacts associated with the project and all permanent wetland impacts are less than 0.10 acres. Impacts have been avoided to the maximum extent practicable.
Therefore compensatory mitigation in the form of mitigation payment has not been proposed.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No

2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater program?
Yes No
N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
Local Government State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
Phase II NSW USMP Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Fayetteville
Comments:
See attached wet pond drainage area map.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and
silvicultural operations. The Mayflower Subdivision project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the town of Fayetteville
ETJ, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Phase
II NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition
to post -construction stormwater management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Non -discharge wastewater will be generated
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No

5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
S&EC completed a Threatened & Endangered Species Report, to include a self -certification letter through the US Fish & Wildlife Services (USFWS),a
query through the NC Natural Heritage Program database, and an official Species List through iPac. Determinations made by S&EC that the proposed
actions is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical habitat, or species
currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species report is attached. A formal
request was sent to the USFWS on August 8, 2022. To date we have not received comments back from USFWS.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No Essential
Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on July 12, 2022, no historic listings or study list
entries or determined eligible listings were identified within the property boundaries. S&EC completed a environmental review request for the entire
property and submitted to SHPO on July 27, 2022 for review. SHPO provided a letter (ER-1888) stating that the project would not affect any historical
resources. ER-1888 attached.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Risk Information System Floodplain Mapping Program and confirmation from the project engineer.
Miscellaneous u
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Mayflower PCN Attachments.pdf 24.83MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Deborah E. Shirley
Signature
4. t da Gtly
Date
9/29/2022

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
R412 Falls or Neuse Road, Suiic 1(14, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: (919) R46-59(X) • Fax (9f 9) 846-9467
snndec.cnm
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: Mayflower Subdivision
Date:
� I Zl 12o2Z
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
S&EC Project # 11925
Attn: Liz Hair Field Office: Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for
the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and all associated standard
and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for
this project.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9487-34-3260. 9487-33-7848. 9487-33-9006, 9487-33-9796, 9487-43-
2996, 9487-43-0116, & 9487-43-4555
Site Address: 8506 Olted Road
City, County, State: Fayetteville Cumberland County, NC
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Name: CA Q (: 101%i- S NL I LL-(-
Mailing Address: Li No-No-e3, kvvri)(,; 02531-
Telephone Number: ' - f9-lo - 200\
Email: 170-10v►eC Ca) - e. CA- -- Ccs IN\
Jo.trch Palmer
Applicant (pleasprint) Date
/ 21 f
Applica't
tore
We hereby certify the above information submitted In this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Deborah Shirley
From: Camden Brunick
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 9:40 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Mayflower Subdivison, Fayetteville, NC Pre -filing Meeting Request
Attachments: 1837-CONCEPT PHASE II.pdf
Good morning Chad,
This pre -filing meeting request is for the Mayflower Subdivision project located at 8506 Olted Road in Fayetteville,
Cumberland County, NC. The project is approximately 42 acres. The project purpose is to construct a mixed use single
family and multi -family residential development and its necessary infrastructure including but not limited to; residential
lots, roadway infrastructure, SCM's, and utilities. Specifically, there is one proposed road crossing that impacts a wetland
as well as a utility crossing that impacts a wetland. Existing conditions onsite consists primarily of underdeveloped
forested land with a few structures on site. General land use in the vicinity of the project consists of forested land and
residential areas. Please see the attached site plan above. Please note this may change as we work with the engineers
on minimizing impacts.
Project Name: Mayflower Subdivision
County: Cumberland
Applicant Name: Cape Companies NC 1, LLC (attn: Jacob Palmer)
Applicant Email: [e-mail]
Thank you,
CAMDEN BRUNICK
Environmental Consultant
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone](cell)
1

AVERSTONE)
UTTERMERE DR I
r
1-
RD
3
0
AMR
0
LOWELL
Project Number:
11925.W1
Project Manager:
SB
Scale: 1" 1000
Date:
01/19/2022
0
0
HARRIS, RD
Map Title:
Figure 1 - USGS Map
Branchwood Circle
Fayetteville, NC
FJWETTE I�LL'E
CC D %VIVI*
rTI
BEVERLY DR
alki
Source: USGS 2019 Quad
Cliffdale, NC
0
I I
S&
EC
1114111
1 � �
NC Center for Geog,r`ap hic Inform)tigyn & Analysis
1,000 2,000
1 1 1 1 1 1
Feet
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Nense Road. Suite 104, Raleigh. NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fay: (919) 846-946
sand, corn

Branchwood Circle
Fayetteville, NC
Source: Cumberland County
Soil Survey Sheet 10
NC Center foGeographic Information & Analysis
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] i
sandee.com

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 2009-00355 County: Cumberland U.S.G.S. Quad: Cliffdale
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner: K&G Developers, LLC
Attn: Mr. Harold Kidd
Address: 6885 Cliffdale Road
Fayetteville, North Carolina
910-864-9727
ECEIVE
Nuv 05 2012
Ily: soil 8 Eawaixment l Consailemis.
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): The property is 80 acres of land located south of
Cliffdale Road and at the end of Olted Road, approximately 0.3 miles east of the intersection of Olted Road and Rim Road in
Fayetteville, North Carolina. Latitude: 35.052334 Longitude: -79.053722
Description of projects area and activity: This permit authorizes the permanent impact to 113 linear feet of stream channel for a
road crossing associated with the hunters Crossing West residential development.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number or Nationwide Permit Number: 29
SEE ATTACHED NATIONWIDE AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS.
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated 9/18/2012 . Any violation of the attached
conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or
appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management .
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Crustal Amschler at 910-251 70.
Corps Regulatory Official ��� Date: 11/1/2012
Expiration Date of Verification: 11/1/2014
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit http://per2.nwp.usace.anny.mil/survey.html to complete the survey
online.
Pg 1 of 2

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued _ . Action ID
Basis For Determination
The site exhibits wetland criteria as defined in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and appropriate Regional
Supplement and is adiacent to an unnamed tributary of Bones Creek, a tributary of Little Rockfish Creek, a tributary of
Rockfish Cree, which is a navigable water of the United States. The unnamed tributary exhibits an ordinary high water mark
as indicated by the presence of bed and banks and the absence of vegetation in the stream channel.
Remarks.
Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will fmd a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Divis. n Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above ess by 12/31/2012 .
**It is not necessary to submit an RFF fur o the Di if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date: 11/1/2012 Expiration Date: 11/1/2017
Copy furnished: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA, Attn: Debbie Edwards, 11010 Raven Ridge Rd, Raleigh, NC 27614
Pg 2 of 2

NOTIFICATION Or ADMINI`7RATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: K&G Developers. LLC File Number: 2009-00355 Date: 11/1/2012
Attached is:
See Section below
1
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
'
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at http: /www.usace.army.mil inet''functions/cw;eecwo/reg or
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL c}r OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
•
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Crystal Amschler, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process.
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi
and any government
You will be provided a 15 day
ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Crystal Amschler, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

Action ID Number: 2009-00355 County: Cumberland
Permittee: K&G Developers, LLC
Date Permit Issued: 11/1/2012
Project Manager: Crustal Amschler
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date
CESAW-RG

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
To: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
August 5, 2022
S&EC Project No: 11925.W4
Re: Online Project Review Request, Mayflower, Fayetteville — Cumberland County, North
Carolina
We have reviewed the referenced project using the USFWS North Carolina Field Office's online project
review process and have followed all guidance and instructions in completing the review. We
completed our review August 5, 2022 and are submitting our project review package in accordance with
the instructions for further review.
Our proposed action consists of: A planned residential development that is proposing impacts to
wetlands.
The location of the project and the action area are identified on the enclosed maps.
Mayflower (35.051153, -79.053300). The site is located at 8506 Olted Road, Fayetteville — Cumberland
County, North Carolina.
Construction will commence following the anticipated Section 404 & 401 Approvals and should be
completed by the Nationwide Permit Expiration date of March 15, 2026.
This project review is needed under provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
per General Condition 18 of Nationwide Permit 29.
The enclosed project review package provides the information about the species and critical habitat
considered in our review. The species conclusions table included in the package identifies our
determinations for the resources that may be affected by the project.
For additional information, please contact Mason Montgomery at [e-mail]
Sincerely,
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Enclosures:
1. Project Request Review Package
2. S&EC T&E Species Report
3. Vicinity Maps
4. S&EC Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS Official Species List
7. NIIP Report
8. FWS Species Conclusion Table
9. FWS Self -Certification Letter

S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandcc.com
August 5, 2022
S&EC Project No.: 11925.W4
To: Cape Companies NC I, LLC
Attn: Jacob Palmer
405 Washington Street
Duxbury, MA 02332
Re: THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT
Mayflower (+/- 42 acres)
8506 Olted Road, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, NC
Dear Mr. Palmer:
On July 26, 2022, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) evaluated the Mayflower property
shown on the attached maps for potential endangered species. The property is located at 8506 Olted Rd
in Cumberland County, NC. Surface waters on -site flow into Bones Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin,
which has been classified in the "Classification and NC DWQ Standards Applicable to Surface Waters
and Wetlands of North Carolina" as C.
We obtained the attached automatically generated official species list from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (FWS) and N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) report identifying the protected species on or
within one mile of the project area that could potentially be affected by the project. These FWS & NHP
reports were updated as of the date of this report. The official species list is valid for 90 days.
We conducted site assessments to identify potential suitable habitat and preliminary surveys for the
individual species listed on the official species list. This included assessing the physical characteristics of
the streams, identifying forest types, and looking for evidence of the listed species on -site. This survey
did not include any detailed sampling or netting. The results of the search are discussed below.
Mayflower - S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 1 of 6

August 5, 2022
S&EC Project #11925.W4
RESULTS:
The FWS official species list identified the following species for the Evaluation limits:
• Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) , Endangered
• American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Threatened
• Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) , Candidate
• Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly (Neonympha mitchellii francisci), Endangered
• American Chaffseed (Schwalbea americana), Endangered
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxil) , Endangered
• Pondberry (Lindera mellisifolia) , Endangered
• Rough -leaved Loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia), Endangered
Of the species identified on the official species list, the NHP report did identify a Federally endangered
species within one mile of the project area. This historical elemental occurrence is for Saint Francis'
Satyr and is from 1997. Other State listed species were found within the project area as listed in the
attached NHP report. The NHP report identified five managed areas within one mile of the project
area. These are listed out in the attached NHP Report.
RED -COCKADED WOODPECKER (Picoides borealis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat (foraging and cavity trees) and
individual Red -cockaded Woodpeckers (RCWs) within the project area. We found no individual
RCWs within the project area. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
project area or within one mile of the site. We found no ideal suitable habitat (e.g., Long Leaf pine
forests) within the project area. The Loblolly pine stands on -site are too young (± 20 years old) and
dense to be considered suitable habitat. Given the lack of species present, and no presence of suitable
habitat we concluded that the project would have "No effect" on RCWs.
AMERICAN ALLIGATOR (Alligator mississippiensis) :
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat for the American Alligator. The
NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrences within the project area or within one mile of
the project area. Suitable habitat for the American Alligator consists of lakes, rivers, creeks, marshes,
swamps, and ponds. There are no streams or ponds on -site. The development will be staying outside of
Mayflower- S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 2 of 6

August 5, 2022
S&EC Project #11925.W4
the swamp along the southwestern property boundary. Due to these observations, S&EC believes that
the project would have "No effect" on the American Alligator.
MONARCH BUTTERFLY (Danaus plexippus):
The Monarch Butterfly is currently listed as a candidate species, and not yet listed or proposed for
listing as threatened or endangered. Due to the current status of Monarch Butterfly, consultation with
USFWS under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not required. FWS recommends conserving
pollinator habitat where practicable.
SAINT FRANCIS' SATYR BUTTERFLY (Neonvmpha mitchellii francisci):
S&EC conducted preliminary surveys of the site for potential suitable habitat for the Saint Francis'
Satyr butterfly. We found no individual species during our evaluation. The NHP report did list a
historical occurrence within one mile of the site from 1997. However, all known subpopulations are
within Ft. Bragg (+/- 10 miles away). The suitable habitat for this species consists of primarily wet
meadows, beaver impoundments, and fire -maintained areas. The project area is primarily wooded,
except for paths and easements. All open disturbed areas within the site were evaluated. S&EC
believes there is no suitable habitat on -site, and we have concluded that the project would have "No
effect" on the Saint Francis' Satyr butterfly.
AMERICAN CHAFFSEED (Schwalbea americana):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of the site for potential suitable habitat for the
American Chaffseed. We found no individual species during our evaluation. The NHP report did not
list an elemental occurrence on or within one mile of the site. American Chaffseed is a hemi parasitic
stem that grows in openly disturbed areas that are routinely burned 1-6 years. There was no evidence
of controlled burns on -site. The areas S&EC believes could be suitable habitat include the power
easements, due to mowing. These areas were surveyed in detail and no species were found. Due to
these observations, S&EC believes this project would have "No effect" on the American Chaffseed.
MICHAUX'S SUMAC (Rhus michauxii):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat within the project area. We visited
a known population of Michaux's sumac within Wake County prior to conducting our preliminary
Mayflower- S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 3 of 6

August 5, 2022
S&EC Project #11925.W4
surveys. We found no individual Michaux's Sumac species within the project area. The NHP report
did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area. We found suitable habitat within
the project areas to include primarily disturbed open areas along paths, easements, and pond edges.
Given the lack of species present within the areas believed to be suitable habitat, we concluded that the
project would have "No effect" on Michaux's sumac.
PONDBERRY (Lindera melissifolia) :
S&EC personnel conducted a preliminary survey of the site for potential suitable habitat for
Pondberry. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the project area or
within 1 mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species is within wetlands, coastal sites, and in
shady areas. It should be noted this survey took place outside of the optimal survey window (February
through March; September through October). S&EC believes suitable habitat exists along the paths,
easements, and wetland edges. These areas were observed in detail and no Pondberry was found.
Given that the survey was done outside of the optimal survey window, but within the growing season,
we have concluded that the project would "No effect" on Pondberry. USFWS should be consulted to
see if the survey done on July 6, 2022, is sufficient to concur with a "No effect" determination because
it was still within the growing season. Additional surveys may be required.
ROUGH -LEAVED LOOSESTRIFE (Lvsimachia asperulaefolia):
S&EC personnel conducted a preliminary survey of the site for potential suitable habitat for the
Rough -Leaved Loosestrife. The NHP report did not list any known elemental occurrence within the
Project area or within one mile of the site. The suitable habitat for this species is edges between
longleaf pine stands, and pond pocosins. This species can also be found alongside roads and
maintained easements. During our assessment we found no species of Rough -Leaved Loosestrife.
Our preliminary survey concluded that potential suitable habitat exists on -site. There are disturbed
areas along the paths and easements. These areas were surveyed in detail. Since no species were
observed within the areas believed to be suitable habitat, we have concluded that the project would
have "No effect" on the Rough -Leaved Loosestrife.
Mayflower- S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 4 of 6

August 5, 2022
S&EC Project #11925.W4
BALD EAGLE (Haliaeetus leucocephalus):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys of suitable habitat, nesting sites, and individual Bald
Eagles within the project area. During our survey, we found no evidence of Bald Eagles or any nesting
sites within the project area. The NHP report did not identify any known nests on -site or within one
mile of the site. Given the lack of species present, we have concluded that the project is " Unlikely to
disturb nesting bald eagles. " We believe no Eagle Act Permit is required.
NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT (Mvotis septentrionalis):
S&EC personnel conducted preliminary surveys for suitable habitat and individual Northern Long-
eared Bats (NLEB's) within the project area. During our survey, we found no individual species.
Relying upon the findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our project -specific
section 7 responsibilities." Due to the nature of the project being residential development, we
concluded that the project would "May affect, but not likely to adversely affect" NLEB's.
CONCLUSION:
After completing the habitat assessments and preliminary surveys, S&EC completed the attached
"Species Conclusion Table" and "Self -Certification Letter." Using language typically used by the FWS
in their conclusion letters, we have concluded that it appears the proposed project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species, their formally designated
critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
We strongly recommend requesting a concurrence letter from the FWS.
Sincerely,
SOIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
Mason Montgomery
Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department
Mayflower- S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 5 of 6

August 5, 2022
S&EC Project #11925.W4
Attachments:
1. USGS Vicinity Map
2. Soil Survey Vicinity Map
3. Aerial Map
4. Photo Report
5. Overall Site Plan
6. FWS List of threatened and endangered species that occur in your proposed location, and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. Official Species List. July 7, 2022.
7. NHP Report: July 7, 2022.
8. S&EC — FWS Species Conclusion Table. August 5, 2022.
9. S&EC — FWS Self -Certification Letter. August 5, 2022.
References:
- North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2017. Biotics Database. Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
- US Fish and Wildlife Service. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) & Raleigh Ecological Services Field
Office Online Project Reviews website.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1993.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 30pp.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003.
Second Revision. Atlanta GA 316 pp.
Michaux's Sumac Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia:
Recovery Plan for the Red -cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
Mayflower- S&EC Threatened & Endangered Species Report
Page 6 of 6

!
Ii4NGRO
VE DR ) 3
%%1
a
_-.0
ERSTONE
DR
`
Flo
F-A--YETTE
ILLE
1 �‘\
o
r �( t
TERM EREi DR731
a
-i.=o
1
Rp
D<
\o
)/1.0(
:vSToN
,y1ARI-RD
�.4Y
D
DR
411
]
7
z _xi
LD
lILgSSwoo
1
1�pFz
tF Gv� 1
/�-O 0,
\�o
Pp�
4
�1009 1'
0�
■I$ #1>'p,QiQC,
1
'-0." -i_ % T,
O� i
?,O _ -
v
-1400 �0
ibi
_..
44\•, tovs
Ac\
ra,II
10 <•-•
- 4".. ,
1141 K14*/11,
RIS
4,,t
' 1:111.
..i.,
1)1,4E1
44
ii)
FA-
14
,e. A BR,
iirric 1...,,,,
:ic)fte,
RD
GOODEN DR
iii
4'
' ,
er
0
w
ih(4
in
z.
z.
1111‘ 0
c,�l1n�formaVon
�.�1:7;\ 0 12riz.-^. NSC`emterk.fcarGeograph�
&Antyrsis
Project Number:
11925.W5
Map Title:
USGS Map
Branchwood Circle
Fayetteville, NC
N
0 1,000 2,000
I i i i I i i i
Project Manager:
MM
Feet
Scale:
1 " = 1000'
S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falla of Neuse Road. Suite 104,gh. Raleigh. VC 27615 • Phone (919) 846i900 • Fam [phone]
and°h.
Source: USGS 2019 Quad
Cliffdale, NC
Date:
08/05/2022

Project Number:
11925.W4
Project Manager:
MM
Scale: 1 1000'
Date:
08/04/2022
Map Title:
Soil Survey Map
Branchwood Circle
Fayetteville, NC
Source: Cumberland County
Soil Survey Sheet 10
1P
enter for Geographis Information{ Analysis
0 1,000 2,000
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Feet
S&
EC
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls ofNeuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sand.: corn

y t
MELISSACT
4 •
- 4
li/rhs
• \
\' "\•-.
\
tiL
- • s
*•-• \
Photo 4
‘‘‘ 14‘
,
11F s‘ •
N. N. \ I
\ 1, \ \
'4111414 • \
• \ \
\ \ \ 1\
,‘,\ \,,\•\\\•\• \
'\• \\\
• •\\k•
\\•
\\\ \ \ • N- „ I
I
I II
-.1-14"'• •• •
•
/ •• •
\ \•
• \ •\
.\,\ ••"\
\ \\ \
\
\ •,„„\\
.\• •\
\ \\
•
\ N\\ • •
I
4t1
\‘‘\\‘\\‘
\ \ I 1 \\\\
\\\\• \• \\‘\‘\\\\
:\•
\
• \ \ \‘\\\:\
\\• N•_/// I //\ ll \\
‘ \\\ \ \ \ \\ \\ n\
,\\N
S
• •\\ \
v• • \\\ \•
\•\
/ \ \ \ \•
s`\\ ,•.•
\ \
•\•\
/ \
\
\\*/ / d>\ \ • 4\
/ • \ • •4 I /
IIII
\\ \• //• N• / a
\ ; \ \ \ \ \'1
I.. \ \\V
\. \ \ /
x •
11 1,1
1111 !1\! 11.
\\. :1 \:1k
•
\
•
\ \ • N\ \\ \
\
\;\k: /\\\\ \Nt.4; , " 41'
• \
-• \ • ‘,
• :\\\.00.,L,.3.• / N.„ \ \ k
\ \ \ \ \
• / \
- _ , VI" • \ • \
\ • •
• • '/I -; •
• • • \--_- \ \\ , \ \ \
‘111
\
‘, • • .__ • • • \ • • • •
• • • • • • • • • //49/ \ \ \-
\\11 • ;f1'.
\ \ \ \ \ \
\ •
'>• \\\\\\ -***
• iry."
or II, • • • • • • • \
• \ • \ • •
• •, \ • \ \ \ \ \
Ak /
\4> *%\\ \V•,‘•‘\\‘\4•‘\\N\\‘\\ \'X-
••\ \\+••\••• •.• ••• • • N\ ••N \ • •‘• • •• •N\ \
\\ •• •\• •
\ \ •\A1
..\• N‘\\‘\.\•\1\6\\•‘• 1.•\\•‘`
\‘
\‘\
\\\s
\ \ I \
-s//••)•
••./
I 1 II • \
A • •••••• • \\ •\
1A
, X
/ I
l
A\ \\ • / I I/I I
%
\•
/ • 1
\ /I ///
NN • \ \ /// /1/ /
1 \ ,/ IV////lifjf•"
\T • 1
.„1•7‘ I \ ••
\ I •,
I \„
•
•
\NN• •/ / I I
Photo 5
..----. \ •..+A N \ \‘\.\.•\\* \ \\ •••' (I
• \.
\Ls
• ''', \\\\,\\
\\\\.\\.„„ ..„....• ,... / \
\•\\\,\ ..„, ....„...,„„.• /
\\\\,.....,.......- ,,...--„„---•
7-
\ I \ I. % 1 ‘ ._ 1 ' .• '
• . \\ \ \ S.1......../....,,
/ /// • A ie / \
„„.../,- - /--• 1 S. • •N•,•
\ \ ‘•...\.• \N\ . ‘ \
\ ,1
X
I 1 .
/ /
-
‘:•\ \ • N
•••.• \\•\ \ \ '
• \I\\ ,
,- -
N \ \ \ \ \
\..._• \*‘:C..• ..:'..----_
Ns. .\• •
• • `....\,\.:-
... s. \
• , \.. \ L
'''.•-•
...\\ \
,c '‘ I.P.-• -'''• %0,:...'. \--• Ni1S'r•‘•t-.N,
S-' •.
.",..'..'.,.•.,.„•,r...'.•.••" •II ••,
,•_•..-•.."z- '.'
•..
•.\.r.4•' -\.‘•.\.
\•-
..•
\—•:I_
Q
\‘
\!‘•._\ .:',•,,,/,\
,‘ ..I..C.
N.\
"\\,s,_I,•...1.°-.s.\?-,\\„/ ! .ti/•‘r-•)_,\
,
/
1N
i. . .IN:)'-.4\'„'%.\'e1,.N'.•V4'04..\O(0
•
. „.
.
-N
11Ii
I11-
4
-I ,I.
.
.•\.
-.
.,..
\ N / I .... .•
\.•
\..•,.:\.•.,i
‘ *
...w\\ ..I'\•. \
„\1N
\‘
V‘1\\
I
,l\1/4, •• .• •iv‘,l\fh,
a\1
-.-t,
..\ , :
\,,// ,\ \ \\•
•
1\ .\0•
1
.•`,414".."-A,* • i \:
.tC.. -
-"\/ I
e‘• \%-
A \.\I. I
‘ 111 /iN \\‘I:5
c•I! \ til (7I/(/ Ti0--
•
/
,. II /*•\ ...,
..1V.11 .11 \ ,...,\ \
• 1II1 \21
('g
-Ni-
/
ILin 1 \\ \\
c :\\-
. 1
1
• 111 I .
---, /, i • i
•1 ( i/i . no I ,
% Il/inii
ig/
, , , ..1,,
At I
k
r4c4"A"r4
Legend
10 Property Boundary
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland
2' Contours
fZ Z3111"41VISIPT 1111M-N
Project No.
11925.W4
Project Mgr.:
Scale:
1" = 250'
MM 08/05/2022
Aerial Photo Map
Branchwood Circle
Fayetteville, NC
Aerials from NC One Map
Prepared by: MM
EC
Photo 3
Photo 1
Photo 2
Drained pond
AUK, 7-plir.
250 500 1,000 Feet N
8412 Falk ,NCILit, Road. Sudo 104, Raloi&h, NC. '27615 •• Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandeneom

Job #: 11925.W4
August 5, 2022
Threatened and Endangered Species Photo Report for the Mayflower Property
Photo 1: Powerline easement
Photo 2: Powerline easement
1

Job #: 11925.W4
August 5, 2022
Photo 3: Path between ponds
Photo 4: Sewer easement
2

Job #: 11925.W4
August 5, 2022
Photo 5: Wetlands
3

I:\The Cape Companies\1837-Mayflower Subdivision\CIVIL 3D\DWG \CONCEPT\1837-CONCEPT PHASE II.dwg • CONCEPT • 5.5.2022 5:09:17 PM
HOPPER R
C
ETA
RD
o Hog pR
0
,cp m IliaO
m
1
ARAILIA DR
0
i
cD
cD
DR o
Q7
MELISSA CT
l BAs
♦
c�cr Os� �-p
I.,'PG5P0°
TROPHY CT6kF.F
Lj
0
wl
III
C"\
o
14,
OEM%
IT
NORTH
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
EIP Oa EIP—EXISTING IRON PIPE
EIR Oa EIR—EXISTING IRON ROD
ERBO ERB—EXISTING REBAR
\ \ EPKO EPK—EXISTING PK NAIL
-NSF= JVOW OR FORMERLY
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
CPP — CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CI — CURB INLET
PROPERTY LINE --
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
TIE LINE — —
RIGHT—OF—WAY
SANITARY SEWER LINE —
STORM -DRAINAGE
WATER LINE
// OVERHEAD UILITY
— CREEK
WETLANDS
X FENCE LINE
WOODE1 ITERCE
sr — SILT FENCE LINE
TREE LINE
-0 BENCHMARK
SIGN
Mg MAILBO
Ee ELECTOICAL BOX
1' TRANSFORMER
c LIGHT POLE
PP. I�TILITY POLE
N �E./GUY WIRE
\ ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
\ © CABLE PEDESTAL
\ D I WATER VALVE
_ FIRE HYDRANT
tr WATER METER
sD STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
------®-C,TCH BASIN
SANITARY SEWER
oco CLEANOUT
'.j CONCRETE
�'.... WETLANDS
I SIGN I
MANHOLE
/ / \
/ / \ N \
/ / / / --- \ N \
/ i—
\
/ /
N: 474,651.239
\ \ E. 1,984,188.562
\ \ \
\ NC GRID NAD 83
\ \ \ \ (NSRS 2007) \-
�sx _ \ \ \ i� NAVD 88
1" EIP
\ __ (PINCH TOP)
EXISTING
AXLE WITH
NAIL
REMOVE PLUG AND
BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY
TO EXTEND
OPEN SPACE
THIS IS A ZERO LOT LINE SUBDIVISION. THE
CURRENT ZONING SETBACKS MUST BE HELD
AROUND THE PARENT BOUNDARY AND ALONG THE
STREET RIGHT—OF—WAYS. THERE ARE DIFFERENT
SET BACK REQUIREMENTS FOR INTERNAL LOT LINES.
*NOTE /
ALL EXISTING s3"TRUCTURES, CONCRETE, ETC.
SHALL BE -MOVED DURING DEMOLITION
SALT MARSH STREET
50' PUBLIC R/W
)
11
1
11
11
I
1
1
/ 1
11
/
11
OLD KING'S AVENUE
50' PUBLIC R/W
II
1
1
- 1—
I
1
I
I ,
I
I i
1 _1—
_
----
IRONSIDE DRIVE
50' PUBLIC R/W
IL
J
1 II
II
11
11
11
\
v----
Ii1'L1
I
II
—
LOTHROPS LANE
50' PUBLIC R/W
5/8"
5/8" EIR EIR
WITH BOLT--
N N
/
N / /
STORM — —
POND _ 1 1
— AREA — - _
/ __
-� --
�- —�
— �� �_\
`-__-�
1/2„
ERB.---
EIS WITH --
BOLT
OPEN SPACE
AREA
N: 437,716.373
1.rr_f3/1e ^_sS
• JIND. S.— —
(N.RS 2007)
AVD 88
r
/
_,_ 1
_
_
7;
1
I \\
1
1
\\
1
1
1
1
1
1
111
1
L Jj
1
L _1i
** �" " - — ..-� ." *. - „� _ -
�11Y1�' -
"." " .is """ * .""" "y "� — "-
m — � / 1" .fir• .�.""
"" . .•' ".".".. * " ."."."..". .* * .\."."."" AREA .— — —
• • • • . * • • • . • • . * * * * * * * * * * ............ ( *
"-�`•". " "—"""-"-�. .� .".`
"fir . " .".".*
" " " " " "
BARK
PARK AREA
OPEN SPACE
11 ERB
BUGLE CALL DRIVE
50' PUBLIC R/W
170 RESIDENTIAL LOTS
148 TOWN HOME LOTS
*NOTE: LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS
LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS SHALL FOLLOW THE
FAYETTEVILLE UDO ACCORDING TO
SECTION 30-5 PART E
*NOTE: STREET TREES
NO STREET TREES REQUIRED PER ARTICLE 30-5 SECTION
F PARAGRAPH 10. NO STREET CREATED WILL BE CONSIDERED
A COLLECTOR ROAD OR ABOVE.
*THE SITE WAS TIMBERED DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS.
NO SPECIMEN TREES EXIST ON THE SITE. I,
\ �_ N \ �\ /
\ —� \� / /
X. \
—� \ - �� _ / /
\ \- - 1/2„
1/2" ERB
(BENT)
��— —�
�X. ' -- \
\ \ -
-- ---- �\ \
__--� ��/
- ./..
"ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE
OF FAYETTEVILLE STANDARDS AND .Sf'ECIFICAT19Dl
/ (BENT)
\
/5- ":• ":• 18/ "Z"
/ • ERB
LIP— —/ 1//
' — ERB• r'
B LE CALL DRIVE 4.
50R/W PUBLIC
0
1 /2"
ERB
1/2". --
ERB
�� ��\ �\ \
N
\
� 100 200\N N \ \ \ \40\ \\
\
MI \ \ \\
( \\\ 1 1 \ \ \ \\\\\
- \ \ \1 inch \ �100 ft. \ ` \ ) 1
\
N
\ \ \ \ \ N \\ \ \\ \\ \\ II Il I
JZ
O
a0
1— U
1— F-
— Z
2O
COcol—
cc
DLL
VJ C^ W
OLu
cc
d O
Z
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
wwwAD site solutions.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
MAYFLOWER
SUBDIVISION
(ZERO LOT LINE)
CONCEPTUAL
OVERALL SITE PLAN
CLIENT
THE CAPE
COMPANIES
4 Noel Henry Drive
East Sandwich, Massachusetts 02357
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
SEAN
DRAWN BY:
SEAN
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1837
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=100'
DATE DRAWN
MAY 5, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
1
OF 4

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0061307
Project Name: Mayflower
July 07, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

07/07/2022 2
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see hops://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

07/07/2022 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

07/07/2022 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

07/07/2022 2
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0061307
Event Code: None
Project Name: Mayflower
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: This project is located in Cumberland County, NC and is approximately
42 acres.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.05164635,-79.05565559474175,14z
•
r
Counties: Cumberland County, North Carolina

07/07/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 8 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly Neonympha mitchellii francisci
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5419
Endangered
STATUS
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
STATUS
Candidate
Endangered

07/07/2022 4
Flowering Plants
NAME
STATUS
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Pondberry Lindera melissifolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

07/07/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws. gov/ecp/species/9587
Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws. gov/ecp/species/6177
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug
31
Breeds May 1 to
Sep 30
Breeds May 1 to
Aug 20

07/07/2022 2
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental
USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Jul
31
Breeds May 10 to
Sep 10
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (I)

07/07/2022 3
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
• probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel
BCC - BCR
Bachman's Sparrow
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Eastern Whip -poor -
will
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
-I-- ---- ---- -.� 1111 III 1111 1111----------------
'----1111 1111 1111
1111 1111
- --- 1111 1111 1111 III-
- --- "II IIII 1111
11111111
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.

07/07/2022 4
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?

07/07/2022 5
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of

07/07/2022 6
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

07/07/2022 7
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency:
Name:
Address:
Address Line
City:
State:
Zip:
Email
Phone:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mason Montgomery
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
2: Suite 104
Raleigh
NC
27615
[e-mail]
7047732837

■ ▪ Mr'S' NC DEPARTMENT OF
U MW
NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
July 7, 2022
Robert Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE: Mayflower; 11925.W4
Dear Robert Zarzecki:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Directtrr, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-18552
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
4) 121 W. JONES STREET, RALEiGh 1_ NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC V9 707.9120 • FAx 919.707.912i

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Mayflower
Project No. 11925.W4
July 7, 2022
N CN H D E-18552
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
Butterfly
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name
33913 Callophrys hesseli
Observation
Date
Hessel's Hairstreak 1972-07
Butterfly 34488 Neonympha helicta Helicta Satyr
Butterfly 8676
Crustacean 32580
Dragonfly or 33740
Damselfly
Dragonfly or 33780
Damselfly
Freshwater Fish31812 Enneacanthus
chaetodon
Vascular Plant 20660 Desmodium fernaldii
Neonympha mitchellii Saint Francis' Satyr
francisci
Cambarus hystricosus Sandhills Spiny
Crayfish
Somatochlora Coppery Emerald
georgiana
Stylurus ivae Shining Clubtail
Blackbanded Sunfish
Fernald's Tick -trefoil
1997-06-24
1997-08
2004-10-29
Element
Occurrence
Rank
H
Accuracy Federal
Status
1
5-Very
Low
H? 5-Very
Low
H? 5-Very
Low
E 3-Medium
2004-Pre H?
2004-Pre H?
2003-10-20 E
1992-10-02 E
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name wner
City of Fayetteville Open Space City of Fayetteville
City of Fayetteville Open Space City of Fayetteville
Cumberland County Open Space
Fayetteville Fish Hatchery
Fort Bragg Military Reservation
Cumberland County
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
US Department of Defense
5-Very
Low
5-Very
Low
3-Medium
3-Medium
State
Status
MI i
Significantly
Rare
Significantly
Rare
Endangered Significantly
Rare
Significantly
Rare
Significantly
Rare
Significantly
Rare
Significantly
Rare
Significantly
Rare
Peripheral
er Type
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State
Federal
Global State
Rank Rank
1
G3 S3
G3G4
G2T1
G2
G3G4
G4
G3G4
G4
S1?
S1
S2
S1?
S1?
S3
S1
Page 2 of 4

Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.oro/help. Data query generated on July 7, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q1, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-18552: Mayflower
276ft
•
s
a
°Oa''+ark Dr
0
QP
�cr1YOr v
i
11111111111111111W
`250 ft
:
a
2441ft
•
12951
$�`0.6 1.2 Miles
July 7, 2022
T I Managed Area (MAREA)
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
❑ Project Boundary
Sources: Esn. Anbus DS. USGS. NGA NASA. CGIRR. N Robinson, NCEAS.
NLS, O5. NMA. Geodalaslyrelsen. Rgkswaterstaal. GSA Geoland FEM.
Inlermap and the GIS user osmmunily
Sources! Esti. HERE. Garmin. FAO. NOAA. USGS. ® OpenSlreelMap
conlnbulors. and the GIS User Carnrnunny
Page 4 of 4

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Mayflower
Date: August 5, 2022
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
(Picoides borealis)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on July 26, 2022.
American Alligator
(Alligatormississippiensis)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on July 26, 2022.
Saint Francis' Satyr Butterfly
(Neonympha mitchellii
francisci)
No suitable habitat present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on July 26, 2022.
American Chaffseed
(Schwalbea americana)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on July 26, 2022.
Michaux's Sumac
(Rhus michauxii)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on July 26, 2022.
Pondberry
(Lindera melissifolia)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on July 26, 2022.
Rough -leaved Loosestrife
(Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
No effect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on July 26, 2022.
Bald Eagle
(Haliaeetus Ieucocephalus)
Unlikely to disturb nesting
Bald Eagles
No Eagle Act permit required
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on July 26, 2022.
Northern Long-eared Bat
(Myotis septentrionalis)
Suitable habitat present,
species not present
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
Preliminary habitat survey completed by S&EC
staff on July 26, 2022. Relying upon the
findings of the 1/5/2016 Programmatic
Biological Opinion for Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities
Excepted from Take Prohibitions to fulfill our
project -specific section 7 responsibilities.
Critical Habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an informed
decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
Mason Montgomery / Environmental Scientist, Wetlands Department at S&EC, PA
Signature /Title
August 5, 2022
Date

L7.li
FE LI Y W ILD JFE
SLiNV Lct
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: August 5, 2022
Self -Certification Letter
Project Name Mayflower
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
"may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
"no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pp.html.
If you have any questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact
Leigh Mann of this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D. Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
August 18, 2022
Camden M. Brunick
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[e-mail]
Re: Construct Mayflower subdivision, 8541 Olted Road, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, ER 22-1888
Dear Mr. Brunick:
Thank you for your email of July 27, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS Gy UHT Vr ,vU4UJl . H.U.. LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
PP(1FFCCI(*AIAI I AMl CI IRUFY(1R — I _4 71
IMPACT AREA #1
WETLAND IMPACT:
3,200 SF PERMANENT IMPACT
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering 1 land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910.426.6777 fax 191E-426.6777 license number 1 C-2354
wwwADsltesolutlone,com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
MAYFLOWER
SUBDIVISION
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
CLIENT
CAPE COMPANIES
NC I, LLC
4601 Hoe Court
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28314
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1837
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=200'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 29, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
w-1
OF 3

-l' le3WNMIII�1�1�/
IMPACT AREA #1
WETLAND IMPACT:
3,200 SF PERMANENT IMPACT
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS Gy UHT Vr ,vU4UJl . H.U.. LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
PP(1FFCCI(*AIAI I AMl CI IRUFY(1R — I _4 71
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering 1 land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910.426.6777 fax 191E-426.6777 license number 1 C-2354
wwwADsltesolutlone,com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
MAYFLOWER
SUBDIVISION
OVERALL
SITE PLAN
CLIENT
CAPE COMPANIES
NC I, LLC
4601 Hoe Court
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28314
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1837
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=200'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 29, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-2
OF 3

LEGEND:
R/W — RIGHT OF WAY
INV — INVERT OF NEW PIPE
RCP — REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
— LOC— LOC— LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
WETLANDS
PERMANENT IMPACT AREA
I, SEAN R. SEEVER, CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SUPERVISION. WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL
THIS Gy UHT Vr UL14uii H.U.. LULL.
FINAL DRAWING
THE EXISTING WETLANDS WILL BE IMPACTED BY
CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROADWAY AND
ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE AS SHOWN.
25.50LFC�
0.50% 15"_MIRCP
RIP RAP DISSIPATER
L=60' W=18766'
D5o=14" DNAx=21"
CCLASS� 5" THICK
2PIPE 2B
104.00 LF
0.67% 60" RCP
PIPE 2A
104.00 LF C�
0.67% 60" RCP
I v IIIt
r
o
o
c) Ai
Gc,,
AwA
2X104.00 LF
®0.67%
60" RCP/
tits
RAP
—
_I _
i.=.\
������
EMBEDDED
RIP
Ln
co
co
2 lq
O
rn
=.=.=.~
♦ice"�.
G
40
10+00 11 +00
4Dsite
solutions
civil engineering 1 land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910.426.6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2334
wwwADsltesolutIons.com
REVISIONS
PROJECT NAME
MAYFLOWER
SUBDIVISION
IMPACT AREA #1
CLIENT
CAPE COMPANIES
NC I, LLC
4601 Hoe Court
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28314
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1837
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 29, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
W-3
OF 3

`- EK RD \
Im
HERD D
FORD
115
-I
4Dsite
solutions
I:\The Cape Companies \1837-Mayflower Subdivision\CIVIL 3D\DWG \1837-DESIGN.dwg • C3.0 G&EC • 8.25.2022 7:21:42 AM
LEGEND:
EiP Oa EIP-EXISTING IRON PIPE
EiR Oa EIR-EXISTING IRON ROD
ERBO ERB-EXISTING REBAR
EPKO EPK-EXISTING PK NAIL
N/F - NOW OR FORMERLY
R/W - RIGHT OF WAY
CPP - CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE
RCP - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CI - CURB INLET
PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
TIE LINE
RIGHT-OF-WAY
SANITARY SEWER LINE
STORM DRAINAGE
WATER LINE
// OVERHEAD UILITY
- CREEK
- - WETLANDS
X FENCE LINE
WOODEN FENCE
SF - SILT FENCE LINE
TREE LINE
PROPOSED EASEMENT
PROPOSED FENCE LINE
-0 BENCHMARK
SIGN
Mg MAILBOX
Ee ELECTRICAL BOX
TRANSFORMER
LIGHT POLE
PP
• UTILITY POLE
C GUY WIRE
❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
© CABLE PEDESTAL
N WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
❑❑ WATER METER
so STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
® CATCH BASIN
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
,c0 CLEANOUT
CONCRETE
WETLANDS
210 MAJOR CONTOUR
207 MINOR CONTOUR
x 208 47' SPOT ELEVATION
- Loc- Loc- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
- SF - SF - SILT FENCE LINE
- JUTE NETTING
- Div -Dlv- DIVERSION BERM
OINLET PROTECTION
-HOPPER R
C L
RD
a
o MELISSA CT
fr
Q BASS,
z DR o�
/-(/4N ���
-( P
ARAILIA DR
9)-
Ct-
S�°
c�°Gse ��
TROPHY CT ti ::::�
•
c:\
SpO
NORTH
OQ
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
- SF
I SIGN I
I
- JN
ss
SD
WL
GRADING NOTES
• Riw eith,G
,1R/FS OQ
te-
/
©0
N /F
AQUA NORTH CAROLINA
PB 38, PG 75
DB 7302, PG 580
DB 3360, PG 389
• 1
N /F
OAKLAND PARK, LLC
PB 38, PG 75
DB 8419, PG 232
1. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE
BENCHMARK AND MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE FINISHED
GRADE OF THE CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. ALL SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN WALKING SURFACES
SHALL HAVE A CROSS SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2% AND
LONGITUDINAL SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 5%.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE
WITH THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT AND
MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND CLEAR ANY
DEBRIS LEAVING THE SITE ON NEIGHBORING ROADS.
4. EXISTING GROUND UPON WHICH FILL OR BASE IS TO BE
PLACED SHALL BE CLEARED OF WEEDS, DEBRIS, TOPSOIL,
AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS; NO FILL SHALL
BE PLACED UNTIL PREPARATION OF THE EXISTING GROUND
HAS BEEN COMPLETED
5. PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN BY THE
CONTRACTOR AND THE OWNER TO PROTECT ADJACENT
PROPERTY, THE PUBLIC AND UTILITIES DURING GRADING
OPERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY FOR
THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES, CONDUITS, OR
STRUCTURES, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT ON THE PLAN
6. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY
THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES ABOVE
AND BELOW GROUND, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE
PLANS. THEY WILL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE
TO ANY UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES CAUSED BY HIS
OPERATION.
7. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED BOTH
DURING AND AFTER GRADING BY THE CONTRACTOR TO
DETERMINE IF ANY SLOPE STABILITY PROBLEMS EXIST. IF IT
IS DETERMINED THAT THERE IS A SLOPE STABILITY
PROBLEM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD SHOULD BE NOTIFIED.
8. STOCKPILE AREAS THAT WILL EXCEED 10' IN HEIGHT
SHOULD BE GRADED WITH 3:1 SLOPES AND SURROUNDED
BY SILT FENCE.
9. APPROVED COPIES OF THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL
PLANS SHALL BE ON THE PERMITTED SITE WHILE WORK IS
IN PROGRESS.
10. ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE COURSES THROUGH THIS SITE
SHALL REMAIN IN A CONDITION SUCH THAT THEY CAN
TRANSPORT THE NATURAL DRAINAGE UNTIL FACILITIES TO
HANDLE THE STORM WATER ARE CONSTRUCTED. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE
DUE TO OBSTRUCTING NATURAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS.
11. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN
SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR
TO IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHANGE.
12. ALL SLOPES 3:1 OR STEEPER THAT EXTEND TEN FEET OR
MORE SHALL BE LINED WITH NORTH AMERICAN GREEN S75
TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR EQUAL
SUBSTITUTE.
13. STORM PIPE DISTANCES SHOWN ARE TO THE CENTER OF
THE BOX FOR ALL STRUCTURES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
z
v,
4,
m
w
4,
CS)
00
cn
UTILITYEASE
1-9
2
N/F
THE VILLAGES AT PARCSTONE, LLC
DB 9698, PG 187
PB 136, PG 73
S31 23'41 "E 439.16,
i�wz _.-
St**1
1 /
BEL CANTO NPRC PARLSTO C
PB 128, PG 177
DB 10612, PG 45
-jaNi
..
138
139
140'
l
®
128
460
1130
P
PR
130
129
126
®
124�
/
/
/
1
•
/
I
I
I,-
2
\,_ /
\
( 4�\
\,_ /
r-�
S37°01'35"E 727.18'
5 /
0
r7
N
1'•:
3 /
N/F
DORIS BUNNELLS
PB 60, PG 57
DB 6634, PG 71
I\
•
S40'49'07"E
\�6J
�
®I�I
69
7iii0�
67
-
U
65
64
:633
66 1
1623
�61�
6
",_ /
I //
8
I
I
I
I
( 9�\
•
I
I
1
1
I
1
S40'50'02"E
I
I\10
NOTIFICATION OF COMBINED SELF -MONITORING AND
SELF -INSPECTION FORM:
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN
2006 TO REQUIRE THAT PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH
PHASE OF THE PROJECT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING
FOLLOWED. RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE
INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT OCTOBER 1, 2010.
TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS
AND NPDES SELF -MONITORING REPORTS, DWQ AND DEMLR
DEVELOPED A COMBINED FORM. THE SELF -INSPECTION
PROGRAM IS SEPARATE FROM THE WEEKLY SELF -MONITORING
PROGRAM OF THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THE FOCUS OF THE
SELF -INSPECTION REPORT IS THE INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL
MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLAN. THE
INSPECTIONS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OF
THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL PERMANENT GROUND
COVER IS ESTABLISHED. THE FORM CAN BE ACCESSED AT:
HTTP: //PORTAL.NCDENR.ORG/WEB/LR/EROSION
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS THE FORM,
PLEASE CONTACT THE FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE AT (910)
433-3300.
ICONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS AND
IHOLD PRE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.
2. INSTALL STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, TEMPORARY SILT
FENCE, AND DIVERSION BERMS WHERE SPECIFIED.
3. INSTALL SEWER MAIN FROM MH-40 TO SSMH #8260
AROUND POND & REMOVE EXISTING SEWER MAIN.
4. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN.
5. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE AS NEEDED.
6. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE AND APPLY TEMPORARY SEEDING
TO AREAS TO REMAIN GRASSED.
7. INSTALL UTILITIES.
8. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION ON ALL NEW STORM WATER
INLETS.
9. PERFORM FINE GRADING.
10. INSTALL AND PREPARE BASE COURSE.
‘ 11. PAVE ROADWAYS AND PARKING LOTS.
‘ 12. FERTILIZE, SEED AND MULCH ALL REMAINING DISTURBED
AREAS.
UPON SITE STABILIZATION, SEEK NCDEQ APPROVAL TO
REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES.
14. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED
AS OUTLINED IN THE DETAILS WITHIN THE PLANS AND
ACCORDING TO THE NCDEQ EROSION CONTROL MANUAL.
15. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE UNDER THE NPDES GENERAL
STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST
BE REQUESTED BY THE PERMITTEE VIA A NOTICE OF
TERMINATION (NOT). THE NOT IS AVAILABLE AT:
HTTPS: //EDOCS.DEQ.NC.GOV/FORMS/NCG01-TERMINATION.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CLOSE OUT INSPECTION REPORT
MUST BE UPLOADED AS PART OF COMPLETING THE NOTICE
OF TERMINATION PROCESS.
\13.
S26'46'49"W
28.54'
I
N /F
DORIS BUNNELLS
PB 60, PG 57
DB 6618, PG 493
©0,0
(\12/
S36'08'04"E 583.96'/
14 )
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. ALL INLET/OUTLET PROTECTION WILL BE CHECKED FOR
MAINTENANCE AND FAILURE EACH ACTIVE DAY ON SITE.
SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SEDIMENT TRAP
AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WHEN THE STORAGE
CAPACITY HAS BEEN APPROXIMATELY 50% FILLED. GRAVEL
WILL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED WHEN THE SEDIMENT POOL
NO LONGER DRAINS PROPERLY. SEDIMENT WILL BE
REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT
BECOMES ABOUT 0.5' DEEP AT THE FENCE. THE SEDIMENT
FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A
PROPER BARRIER.
2. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES AND/OR
PERMANENT FACILITIES INTENDED TO CONTROL EROSION OF
AND EARTH DISTURBANCE OPERATION SHALL BE INSTALLED
BEFORE ANY EARTH DISTURBANCE OPERATIONS TAKE PLACE
OR AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE POINT DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
3. TEMPORARY & PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE DETAILS HEREIN, OR
SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORTH
CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUAL.
4. THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE NCDEQ
OFFICE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 910-433-3300
5. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR
OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
PAVEMENT AREAS. REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS
WHEN TRACKING OCCURS.
6. LOCATE SOIL STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN FIFTY (50) FEET
FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE
CHANNEL. IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS,
STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES BY VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS,
OR OTHER MEANS. CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL
STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES.
TEMPORARY STOCKPILES LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES
MUST BE NO LESS THAN FIVE FEET FROM THE
DRAINAGE/GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE COVERED IF LEFT
MORE THAN 24 HOURS.
7. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING
DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT
TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON
A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, OR
ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY.
8. TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DENUDED
AREAS WHICH HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED, AND ALL
DENUDED AREAS IN WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING
(\ 15 )
•
i
1
(\78 )
(•77 )
(\76 )
J
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
co
CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY
AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN, WIND AND RUNNING WATER
WITHIN 14 DAYS. USE SEEDING AND MULCHING, EROSION
CONTROL MATTING, AND/OR SODDING AND STAKING IN
GREEN SPACE AREAS AND OTHERWISE APPROPRIATE
MEASURES. USE EARLY APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON
AREAS TO BE PAVED.
9. DO NOT REMOVE ANY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
DEVICES AFTER THE PROTECTED AREA HAS UNDERGONE
FINAL STABILIZATION AND PERMANENT VEGETATION HAS
BEEN ESTABLISHED, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT NCDEQ
APPROVE THE ACTION PRIOR TO REMOVAL.
10. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED
CONCURRENTLY WITH THE INITIATION OF CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY.
11. THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL
TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES.
12. THE PERMITTEE SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
ACTIONS AND PERFORMANCE OF ANY OTHER PARTIES
PERFORMING WORK ON THIS PROJECT.
13. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE
CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY
RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN
ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE
IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL PRACTICES AS DESIGNED.
14. PURSUANT TO G.S. 113A-57(2), THE ANGLE FOR GRADED
SLOPES AND FILLS SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN THE
ANGLE THAT CAN BE RETAINED BY VEGETATIVE COVER OR
OTHER ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES OR
STRUCTURES. IN ANY EVENT, SLOPES LEFT EXPOSED WILL,
WITHIN 7 OR 14 CALENDAR DAYS OF COMPLETION OF ANY
PHASE OF GRADING, BE PLANTED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDED
WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT GROUND COVER, DEVICES
OR STRUCTURES SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION.
PURSUANT TO G.S. 113A-57(3), PROVISIONS FOR
PERMANENT GROUND COVER SUFFICIENT TO RETAIN EROSION
MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED FOR ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN
90 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT.
15. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN AND ANY ADDITIONAL
MEASURES REQUIRED TO CONTROL THE SEDIMENT DURING
THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.
16. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS
NECESSARY, AND MULCHED ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS
HEREIN.
17. THE CONTACT PERSON FOR EROSION CONTROL ISSUES THAT
ARISE ON SITE IS MATTHEW ALFONSO. CONTACT
774-487-1626.
GROUND STABILIZATION CHART
SITE AREA
DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION
TIME FRAME
STABILIZATION TIME
FRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES,
SWALES, DITHCES
AND SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH QUALITY
WATER (HQW)
ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES STEEPER
THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR
LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 2:1,
14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR
FLATTER
14 DAYS
7-DAYS FOR SLOPES
GREATER THAN 50 FEET
IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS
WITH SLOPES FLATTER
THAN 4:1
14 DAYS
NONE
(EXCEPT FOR
PERIMETERS AND
HQW ZONES)
(\98)
1
y 173 )
GLE CALL DRIVE
50' R/W PUBLIC
99 /
100 /
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
100
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 100
168 /
200 400
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft.
THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT NORTH CAROLINA ONE CALL CENTER AT 1-800-632-4949 A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING IN ORDER TO HAVE THE EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATED
civil engineering I land surveying
409 Chicago Drive, Suite 112, Fayetteville, NC 28306
office 1910-426-6777 fax [phone] license number I C-2354
wwwAD site solutions.com
REVISIONS
0
Z
J
z
z
0
H
U
cc
z
0
U
cc
0
u_
0
w
fn
w
J
w
cc
O
z
PROJECT NAME
MAYFLOWER
SUBDIVISION
(ZERO LOT LINE)
WET POND
DRAINAGE AREA
CLIENT
CAPE COMPANIES
NC I, LLC
4601 Hoe Court
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28314
Phone: [phone]
PROJECT INFORMATION
DESIGNED BY:
CALEB
DRAWN BY:
CALEB
CHECKED BY:
SCOTT
PROJECT NUMBER:
1837
DRAWING SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=100'
DATE RELEASED
AUGUST 24, 2022
SHEET NUMBER
0-3.0