20170887 Ver 2_Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank - Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report_20220926

ID#* 20170887 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 09/30/2022
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/26/2022
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address-*
Jason Lorch [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20170887 Version:* 2
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Site
County: Chatham
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank - Monitoring
2.86MB
Year 4 Annual Report.pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name: * Jason Lorch
Signature:

Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR ID# 2017-0887v2
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC’s Cane Creek Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank

Monitoring Year 4 Report
September 2022

PREPARED BY:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.

312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]

MONITORING YEAR 4 REPORT
Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC’s Cane Creek Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Project Description ................................................................................................................. 2
1.2 Bank Sponsor .......................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Project History ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.4 Project Location ...................................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Project Design ......................................................................................................................... 3
2 VEGETATION MONITORING .................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Success Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol ................................................................... 5
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring .......................................................................................... 5
2.4 Parcel Adaptive Management ................................................................................................ 6
2.5 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 7
3 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 7

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Project Reporting History
Table 2 Tree Species Selected for Buffer Restoration
Table 3 Character/Existing Tree Species
Table 4 Monitoring Plot Summary – Planting (As-Built)
Table 5 Monitoring Plot Summary – Year 4

APPENDICES
Appendix A: Figures
Figure 1 Parcel Location Map
Figure 2 Service Area Map
Figure 3 Credit Generation Map
Figure 4 Monitoring Components Map
Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledger
Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results
Appendix E: Overview Photographs
Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 1
Monitoring Year 4 Report

1.0INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
The Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel (Parcel) is part of the Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC
(Sponsor) Cane Creek Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank (Bank). The Parcel was designed in
concurrence with the Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Bethel Branch Stream and Wetland
Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2016-02365). The Chatham County project surrounds three unnamed tributaries
which drain to South Fork Cane Creek, Cane Creek, and eventually to the Haw River. The Parcel location
is depicted in Figure 1. The purpose of the Parcel is to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits to
compensate for unavoidable buffer impacts in the 03030002 Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) of the Cape
Fear River Basin, within the Haw River Sub-watershed of the Jordan Lake Watershed (Figure 2).
Prior to construction, the Parcel had been mostly used for livestock grazing with small portions
maintained as managed herbaceous cover since before 1993. The livestock pastures were dominated by
fescue grasses (Festuca spp.) and although much of the riparian area on UT2 was wooded, livestock had
access to the streams throughout.
Riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated streams onsite were restored and
livestock was fenced out in order to help reduce non-point source contaminant discharges to
downstream waters in the Jordan Lake Watershed within the Cape Fear River Basin. Approximately
16.30 acres are now protected with a permanent conservation easement. Of the 16.30 acres, 10.86
acres were mitigated to generate Jordan Lake riparian buffer credit. Of those 10.86 acres, 3.44 acres
qualify for buffer restoration, 4.87 acres for enhancement (via livestock exclusion), and 2.55 acres for
buffer preservation (Figure 3). Riparian area widths are a minimum of 30 feet from the top of stream
banks out to a maximum of 60 feet. Together these activities have generated 266,899.400 ft² of riparian
buffer mitigation credits after applying the appropriate credit reductions and ratios.
1.2 Bank Sponsor
The Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel is a part of the Bank. The Umbrella Mitigation Banking
Instrument (UMBI) for the Bank was signed in March 2018.
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Attn: Shawn Wilkerson
Email: [e-mail]

1.3 Project History
The construction of the Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank was completed in April 2019. No major
adjustments were made during construction that would drastically affect the Buffer Mitigation Bank
Parcel. Due to a survey error some adjustments were made to the conservation easement boundaries,
but the total acreage remains the same. The Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) for the
Bank and the Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) were approved in March and November of 2018.
Project reporting history dates can be found in Table 1 below.

Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 2
Monitoring Year 4 Report

Table 1. Project Reporting History
Activity Completion Date
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC Cane Creek UMBI March 2018
Bank Parcel Development Package Approved November 2018
Conservation Easement September 2019
Bare Root PlantingApril 2019
As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Document September 2019
Year 1 Monitoring Completed November 2019
Year 2 Monitoring Completed September 2020
Year 3 Monitoring Completed October 2021
Year 4 Monitoring Completed September2022
1.4 Project Location
The Parcel is located in Chatham County near the town of Snow Camp, NC (35° 49’ 45.56” N and 79° 22’
11.37” W) in the Cape Fear River Basin (03030002) and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) Subbasin 03-06-04 (Figure 2). From Raleigh, take US-64 West to the exit for NC-87 N. Continue
north on NC-87 for 1.8 miles and turn left onto Silk Hope Gum Spring Road. Continue on Silk Hope Gum
Spring Road for 8.1 miles. Turn right onto Silk Hope-Lindley Mill Road and continue for 2.9 miles. Turn
left onto Moon Lindley Road and continue for 0.6 miles. Turn right onto R E Wright Road and the project
area is accessible through the gate 0.1 miles on the left.
1.5 Project Design
Approximately 16.30 acres are now protected with a permanent conservation easement. Of the 16.30
acres, a total of 10.86 acres of riparian areas have been mitigated to generate Jordan Lake riparian
buffer credit. Credit generation is shown in Figure 3 and the current credit ledger is in Appendix B. All
areas of the conservation easement were fenced using woven wire fencing and barbed wire to prevent
encroachment by livestock. The pond and earthen dam at the upstream end of UT3 were removed and
the stream channel was fully restored as a part of the Bethel Branch stream and wetland mitigation
bank. The buffer restoration areas were replanted with appropriate native tree species within the
project corridors. The revegetation plan included permanent seeding, planting of bare root trees, live
stakes, herbaceous plugs, and controlling invasive species growth. Bare root trees selected for planting
were native bottomland hardwood species typical for Piedmont Bottomland Forest communities as
defined by Schafale (2012). Tree species selected, as well as size specifications, planting density, and
plant composition are detailed in Table 2.

Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 3
Monitoring Year 4 Report

Table 2. Tree Species Selected for Buffer Restoration
Size Planting Density Planting Composition
Scientific Name Common Name
(feet) (Stems/Acre) (%)
2-3129 20
Betula nigra River Birch
2-3203
Celtis occidentalis Northern Hackberry
2-3109 17
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
2-3396
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar
2-312920
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
2-36410
Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak
2-3447
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak
2-36410
Quercus phellos Willow Oak
2-3447
Ulmus americana American Elm
Totals 642 100
Natural recruitment of desirable Character Tree species shall be counted towards the survival and
success rate of the restored site. “Character Trees” are defined as planted or volunteer species
identified from a survey of local vegetation on less degraded sections of the specified stream and from
reference literature that details native species. A partial list of Character Tree species is included in Table
3 below.
Table 3. Character/Existing Tree Species
Scientific Name Common Name
Acer rubrum Red Maple
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgum
Quercus alba White Oak
Quercus nigra Water Oak
Quercus phellos Willow Oak
Ulmus americana American Elm
Source: Schafale (2012)
2.0VEGETATION MONITORING
2.1 Success Criteria
Buffer vegetative success criteria are based upon the density and growth of Character Tree species, as
defined in Tables 2 & 3. Vegetative success criteria arebased upon guidelines set forth in the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015). Success is
defined as a minimum of 260 live stems per acre at the end of the 5-year monitoring period with a
minimum of four native hardwood species, where no one species comprises more than 50 percent of
stems. Height, DBH, and visual assessment of damage and vigor will be used as indicators of overall
health. Desirable volunteer species may be included to meet the success criteria upon NCDWR approval.
If vegetative success criteria are not achieved based on acreage density calculations from combined
monitoring plots over the entire restoration area, or if an inspection of a buffer restoration site indicates
that portions of the Parcel do not have sufficient stem densities or are otherwise deficient,
supplemental planting shall be performed with tree species approved by NCDWR. Supplemental
Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 4
Monitoring Year 4 Report

planting shall be performed as needed until vegetative success criteria are met. No quantitative
measurements of herb assemblages will be required to meet the vegetative success criteria.
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol
The quantity of monitoring plots was determined in accordance with the Carolina Vegetative Sampling
(CVS) Protocols (Levels I & II) such that at least 2 percent of the restoration area is encompassed in
monitoring plots. Two 10-meter by 10-meter and one 5-meter by 20-meter vegetation monitoring plots
were installed within the buffer restoration area to measure the survival of the planted trees (Figure 4).
GPS points were taken, and PVC pipe was used to mark the four corners of each plot. Each year a
reference photo is taken from the southwest corner of each plot. All planted stems within the plots
were marked with flagging tape and recorded. The total number of each tree species planted within the
monitoring plots, as well as planting density and composition at as-built are included in Table 4 for
comparison purposes. No planting was required in livestock exclusion or preservation areas, however
visual assessments are conducted each year and any issues identified will be photographed, corrected,
and reported as part of the annual monitoring report.
Table 4. Monitoring Plot Summary – Planting (As-Built)
Total Stems Flagged Calculated Planting Density Planting Composition
Scientific Name
(MY0) (Stems/Acre) (%)
9 20
Betula nigra
121
1 2
Celtis occidentalis
14
6 13
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
81
3 7
Liriodendron tulipifera
40
12 27
Platanus occidentalis
162
3 7
Quercus lyrata
40
7 15
Quercus pagoda
95
3 7
Quercus phellos
40
1 2
Ulmus americana
14
Totals 45 607 100
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring
The three vegetation plots were sampled in September 2022 at the end of the fourth growing season.
Reference photos taken from the southwest corner of each plot can be found in Appendix D along with
the stem count raw data. The total number of each tree species planted within the monitoring plots, as
well as planting density and composition, for Monitoring Year 4 are detailed in Table 5 below.
Vegetation result tables with planted stem density, stem count by plot and species, as well as a
vegetation plot success summary are available in Appendix C.
Vegetation monitoring at Year 4 resulted in an average planted stem density of 364 planted stems per
acre, which exceeds the final requirement of 260 stems per acre. All plots have 5 planted species per
plot. Volunteer stems include desirable species, such as black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica), black walnut, (Juglans nigra) and an elm species (Ulmus spp.).

Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 5
Monitoring Year 4 Report

Table 5. Monitoring Plot Summary – Year 4
Calculated Live Stem Density Live Stem Composition
Scientific Name Total Stems Flagged
(Stems/Acre) (%)
27
Betula nigra
27
1 4
Celtis occidentalis
14
519
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
67
1 4
Liriodendron tulipifera
14
11 41
Platanus occidentalis
148
2
7
Quercus lyrata
27
0
0
Quercus pagoda
0
3
Quercus phellos 11
40
2
7
Ulmus americana
27
Totals 27 364 100
Visual assessments of the livestock exclusion and preservation areas within the conservation easement
concluded:
Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
no livestock access within the conservation easement;
no encroachment has occurred;
diffuse flow is being maintained in the easement area; and
there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the function of the buffer.
In July of Monitoring Year 4, resprouts of small populations of tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) along
UT2 in the buffer preservation area and resprouts of scattered populations of Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense) along UT1 received follow up treatments. Both were treated using glyphosate in a cut stump
herbicide application.
The percent cover of vegetation in the previously bare area along the downstream left side of UT3
continues to increase each year. Herbaceous vegetation is present and the hillslope is stable, as
illustrated in the last overview photograph in Appendix E. This photograph shows the vegetation
establishment in the old pond bed with UT3 flowing from right to left.
Additionally, soil amendments were added to the base of the trees along sections of UT2 to help them
outcompete thick herbaceous vegetation. Wildlands will continue to monitor the health of planted
stems throughout the project.
Specific actions being taken to address the issues mentioned above are included in section 2.4 below.
2.4 Parcel Adaptive Management
Adaptive measures will be developed, or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented in the event
that the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in the
BPDP. Parcel maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have
a high likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include but are not limited to; excess tree
mortality caused by fire, flooding, drought, easement encroachment, or insects. Any actions
implemented will be designed to achieve the success criteria and will include a work schedule and
updated monitoring criteria.
Lingering sporadic invasive species will be treated using various methods of herbicide application
including foliar, cut stump, hack and squirt, and stem injection. Because of their persistent nature, the
Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 6
Monitoring Year 4 Report

small populations of tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) will receive an additional treatment via cut
stump and basal bark application in the winter of 2022/2023. Wildlands will continue to monitor
invasive species and treat them, as necessary.
Soil amendments and/or ring sprays will be applied around tree stems as necessary to help them
outcompete thick herbaceous vegetation.
2.5 Conclusions
Vegetation across the Parcel is exceeding performance standards. Monitoring Year 4 data shows an
average planted stem density of 364 planted stems per acre across vegetation plots. When including
volunteer species, the stem density increases to 701 stems per acre. The Parcel is on track to achieve the
final success criteria of 260 stems per acre at the end of Monitoring Year 5. In addition, desirable
volunteer species, such as black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), black walnut,
(Juglans nigra) and an elm species (Ulmus spp.) are establishing themselves. Wildlands will continue to
monitor planted tree stem health as well as invasive species and treat them as necessary.

3.0REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., Steven D., & Wentworth, T.R. (2008). CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
Version 4.2 \[PDF file\]. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
5.pdf
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. (2004).
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration \[PDF file\]. Retrieved from
https://ie.unc.edu/files/2019/10/buffer-restoration.pdf
NC Department of Environmental Quality. (2015). 15A NCAC 02B .0259 Mitigation Program
Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers \[PDF file\]. Retrieved from
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.R., & White, P.S. (1998). A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure \[PDF file\]. Castanea, 63:262-274. Retrieved from
http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/pubs/castanea63;262.pdf
Schafale, M.P. (2012). Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation \[PDF
file\]. Retrieved from https://files.nc.gov/dncr-nhp/documents/files/Natural-Community-
Classification-Fourth-Approximation-2012.pdf
Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC. (2018). Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Development Package.
NCDWR, Raleigh NC.
Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 7
Monitoring Year 4 Report

APPENDIX A. Figures

APPENDIX B. Bank Credit Ledger

APPENDIX C. Vegetation Assessment Data

T 3326
432
17
688
3115
2291
364
0.02
VP 3P-all
3115
229
364
PnoLS
T 6115
21
11
445
115
2161
11
445
0.02
P-all
115
216
11
445
VP 2 (Stream VP 5)
PnoLS
Current Plot Data (MY4 2022)
T 158
11112
1224
971
15
121271
283
0.02
P-all
1
121275
283
VP 1 (Stream VP 2)
PnoLS
size (ares)
Stem count
size (ACRES)
Species count
Species Type
TreeTreeTreeTreeTree
TreeShrub TreeShrub TreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTree
Stems per ACRE
Common Name
Overcup OakCherrybark OakWillow OakElm spp.Winged Elm
River BirchSugarberryNorthern HackberryAmerican PersimmonGreen AshBlack WalnutTulip PoplarBlack GumSycamoreAmerican Elm
Scientific Name
Planted Stems Excluding Live Stakes
All Planted Stems
All Woody Stems
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 4 - 2022 Betula nigraCeltis laevigataCeltis occidentalisDiospyros
virginianaFraxinus pennsylvanicaJuglans nigraLiriodendron tulipiferaNyssa sylvaticaPlatanus occidentalisQuercus lyrataQuercus pagodaQuercus phellosUlmus spp.Ulmus alataUlmus americana

Color Coding Exceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species
included in total AbbreviationsPnoLS - P-all - T -

3
T 81633729
1245
607
3
81633729
3
1245
607
0.07
P-all
MY0 (2019)
3
81633729
1245
607
PnoLS
T 51233329
101241
553
515233329
3
1236
486
0.07
P-all
MY1 (2019)
515233329
1236
486
PnoLS
T 51131329
131140
540
26131328
3
1129
391
0.07
P-all
MY2 (2020)
Annual Means
26131328
1129
391
PnoLS
T 51111413
412
10114513
607
1512129
223
11
27
364
0.07
P-all
MY3 (2021)
1512129
22
11
27
364
PnoLS
T 111144
652
161111
52
701
151238
223
11
27
364
0.07
P-all
MY4 (2022)
151238
22
11
27
364
PnoLS
size (ares)
Stem count
size (ACRES)
Species count
Species Type
TreeShrub TreeShrub TreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTreeTree
Stems per ACRE
Common Name
River BirchSugarberryNorthern HackberryAmerican PersimmonGreen AshBlack WalnutTulip PoplarBlack GumSycamoreOvercup OakCherrybark OakWillow OakElm spp.Winged ElmAmerican Elm
Scientific Name
Planted Stems Excluding Live Stakes
All Planted Stems
All Woody Stems
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 4 - 2022 Betula nigraCeltis laevigataCeltis occidentalisDiospyros
virginianaFraxinus pennsylvanicaJuglans nigraLiriodendron tulipiferaNyssa sylvaticaPlatanus occidentalisQuercus lyrataQuercus pagodaQuercus phellosUlmus spp.Ulmus alataUlmus americana

Color Coding Exceeds requirements by 10%Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%Volunteer species
included in total AbbreviationsPnoLS - P-all - T -

APPENDIX D. Vegetation Monitoring PlotPhotos and Data Results

Veg Plot 1 (Stream VP 2) - Year 4

Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm)
1 Platanus occidentalis 0.40.6350
2 Liriodendron tulipifera 2.30.6102
3 Betula nigra 4.80.7Dead
4 Liriodendron tulipifera 7.20.8Dead
5 Quercus pagoda 9.70.5Dead
6 Betula nigra 9.55.0Dead
7 Liriodendron tulipifera 6.94.8Dead
8 Quercus pagoda 4.84.9Missing
9 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2.65.0154
10 Quercus phellos 0.54.862
11 Betula nigra 0.59.1Dead
12 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2.79.1167
13 Celtis occidentalis 5.29.067
14 Quercus pagoda 7.89.0Dead
15 Platanus occidentalis 9.79.2370

Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot2 (Stream VP 5) - Year 4

Tree IDSpecies X (m)Y (m) Height (cm)
16 Quercus pagoda 9.70.5Dead
17 Betula nigra 9.7 4.2 315
18 Betula nigra 7.9 2.7 Dead
19 Betula nigra 6.4 1.4 273
20 Platanus occidentalis 4.23.4555
21 Platanus occidentalis 4.7 4.7 560
22 Quercus lyrata 5.8 5.8 Missing
23 Platanus occidentalis 7.0 7.1 540
24 Platanus occidentalis 8.1 8.4 550
25 Quercus lyrata 8.99.8132
26 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.5 9.8 Missing
27 Platanus occidentalis 2.7 9.9 375
28 Platanus occidentalis 2.5 8.2 520
29 Quercus phellos 1.2 5.9 213
30 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.2 10.0 157

Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 3- Year 4

Tree IDSpecies X (m)Y (m) Height (cm)
31 Platanus occidentalis 0.90.3Dead
32 Quercus phellos 1.0 2.2 171
33 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3.2 0.4 243
34 Quercus pagoda 5.2 1.2 Dead
35 Quercus pagoda 4.73.5Dead
36 Platanus occidentalis 8.3 4.8 380
37 Platanus occidentalis 8.4 2.7 310
38 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.4 0.7 127
39 Betula nigra 11.6 3.2 Dead
40 Platanus occidentalis 11.50.4300
41 Betula nigra 15.7 0.4 Dead
42 Quercus pagoda 15.8 3.4 Dead
43 Quercus lyrata 19.3 4.4 158
44 Ulmus americana 19.7 2.5 88
45 Ulmus americana 19.9 0.2 77

Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

APPENDIX E. Overview Photographs

Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix E: Overview Photographs

Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Appendix E: Overview Photographs