20141119 Ver 1_401 Application_20141014

J
i
Kimley » >Horn
October 17, 2014
Mr David Shaeffer
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27587
Ms Karen Higgins
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
2 0 1 4 1 1 1 9
PA
OCT 222014 D
D0N$e FFFRRl Ss
R PERM UR NG
RE: SAW -2014 -00385 -- Capital Ready Mix Concrete Plant
After -the -Fact Permit Application — Nationwide 39
Dear Mr Shaeffer and Ms Higgins
On behalf of our client, Capital Ready -Mix Concrete, LLC, Kimley -Horn is submitting the attached \
after - the -fact permit application for unauthorized activities conducted on the Capital Ready -Mix
Concrete Plant property (Wake County PIN 1764757306) located in Knightdale, North Carolina The
property is located within the Neuse River Basin (USGS HUC 03020201), east of Three Sisters Road,
south of US 64 Business, and west of the Norfolk Southern Railroad corridor and US 64
As discussed with Mr Shaeffer at the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) field review held on site
on March 11, 2014, and as noted in the subsequent Notice of Unauthorized Activity issued on April
29, 2014, the property owner has constructed a concrete driveway through a jurisdictional wetland
(wetland W1) and stream (stream S1) feature located towards the southern end of the property in
order to allow access upland material storage areas on the property (Figure 3) During a subsequent
field review with NC Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) environmental specialist James Graham
on March 25, 2014, the impacted stream was determined to be not subject to Neuse River Basin
riparian buffer rules The stream was piped beneath the driveway and the property owner wishes to
permit the unauthorized wetland and stream impacts through an after - the -fact permit under
Nationwide Permit 39
Since the field reviews held on site in March, the property owner has removed excess concrete pipe
that was placed in stream S1, cutting back the pipe so that it is flush with the concrete driveway This
reduced the stream impacts from the 67 5 linear feet discussed at the field review to 37 linear feet As
a result, the total impacts due to the unauthorized activity conducted within the property total 0 07
acres of wetland fill, and 37 linear feet of permanent stream impact through culvert installation To
offset these impacts, the property owner has secured 0 14 acres of riparian wetland credit from the

Kimley » >Horn
Page 2
EBX sponsored Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank and 37 linear feet of stream credits
from the EBX- sponsored Forrest Creek Stream Mitigation Bank and Neu -Con Wetland and Stream
Mitigation Bank as compensatory mitigation for these losses
To facilitate your review of this after - the -fact permit application, the following attachments have been
included
• After - the -Fact PCN Application Form
• Agent Authorization
• Figures and Impact Maps
• NCDWQ Stream Identification Form
• USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
• USACE Wetland Determination Forms
• NCDWR Buffer Determination Letter
• Plan Sheets
• NCDWR 401 Application Fee of $240
If there is any additional information that you need to assist in the processing of this request, please
do not hesitate to contact me at Cason hartshorn @kimley -horn com or 919 - 678 -4155
Sincerely,
Jason Hartshorn
Attachments
Cc Jeff Wing, P E, Kimley -Horn
James Lochren, Capital Ready -Mix

o�pF�WNA7- 9Q
O Y
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 39 or General Permit (GP) number
1 c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
® Yes
❑ No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Captial Ready Mix Concrete Plant
2b
County
Wake
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Knightdale
2d
Subdivision name
N/A
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Three Sisters Ready Mix, LLC
3b
Deed Book and Page No
13361 -0762
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
James Lochren
3d
Street address
512 Three Sisters Road
3e
City, state, zip
Knightdale, NC 27545
3f
Telephone no
919 - 217 -0222
3g
Fax no
919- 944 -0059
3h
Email address
JIM @CAPITALREADYMIXCONCRETE COM
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
® Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Jason Hartshorn
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Kimley -Horn
5c
Street address
3001 Weston Parkway
5d
City, state, zip
Cary, NC 27513
5e
Telephone no
919 - 678 -4155
5f
Fax no
919 - 677 -2050
5g
Email address
Cason hartshorn @kimley -horn com
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
1764757306
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 35 795875 Longitude - 78 434982
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c
Property size
5 3 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
Marks Creek
proposed project
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C, NSW
2c
River basin
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site location is within a mostly forested tract at the southern end of a developed industrial site (concrete mixing plant)
within a larger industrial business park The site is bordered by the Raleigh East Airport to the west, and a Norfolk
Southern rail line and US 64 to the east The project area is the southern end of the site, which is primarily forested and a
low -lying wetland feature is present between the high ground of the mixing plant and the high ground at the southern end
of the property General land use in the vicinity of the site is primarily low- density industrial development, historic airport
property, and vacant forested lots The project vicinity has been historically disturbed due to the presence of the airport,
US 64, and the railroad line
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 17 acres
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
190 linear feet of intermittent stream
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The project constructed a concrete driveway connecting the active cement plant to the upland material storage areas
located at the southern end of the property, providing a safe and permanent access to the southern part of the property
while protecting the existing septic field located adjacent to Three Sisters Road
3e
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The project constructed a concrete driveway that connects the Capital Ready Mix Concrete main buildings to a storage
area located at the southern end of the property The project was constructed through a forested low -lying area, and a
concrete culvert was installed to maintain stormwater drainage flowing thorugh the site from the Raleigh East Airport
Typical roadway construction equipment was used, including front end loaders, track hoes, back hoes, graders, dump
trucks, and bulldozers
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments A request for jurisdictional determination was
made on May 27, 2014 and concurrence is pending A field
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
review was conducted on March 11, 2014 with David
Shaeffer, USACE
A Buffer Determination Letter was received from NCDWR on
March 27, 2014 (N BRRO#1 4-079)
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Kimley -Horn
Name (if known) Jason Hartshorn
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
USACE Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was requested, and concurrence is pending NCDWR Buffer
Determination was issued on March 27, 2014 (NBRRO #14 -079)
5. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
n/a
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, explain
n/a
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ® P ❑ T
Driveway
Rivenne
® Yes
® Corps
007
Construction
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
007
2h Comments The project constructed a driveway through a low -lying area of the site to access high ground material storage
areas in the southern portion of the property
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Driveway
UT to Marks
❑ PER
® Corps
3
37
Construction
Creek
® INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
37
31 Comments The project constructed a driveway through a low -lying area of the site, crossing feature S1, which carries
primarily stormwater flows from Three Sisters Road and a BMP located on the Airport property upslope of the project area
The feature was crossed using an 18" RCP culvert to maintain flow and connectivity beneath the driveway, initially 67 5 LF in
length, but was shortened after the USACE field review to smalled impact possible, 37 LF
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
N/A
4g Comments No open water impacts resulted from the construction
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g Comments No ponds or lakes were constructed as a result of the construction
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
N/A
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
N/A
5k Method of construction
N/A
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired�
B1 ❑P ❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
N/A
N/A
61 Comments The impacted feature is not subject to the Neuse River Basin riparian buffer rules (see attached determination)
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The crossing location was selected at the narrowest point of the low -lying area as possible while remaining safely away from
the existing septic field The driveway was designed so that a truck turnaround area is located outside of the low -lying area,
and allowing the driveway to be constructed with the narrowest crosssection practical while remaining usable
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Impacts were minimized throughout construction of the driveway by locating all material and equipment staging areas on high
ground throughout the property
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑ ro Payment to in -lieu fee ram
y p g
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank Forrest Creek Stream Mitigation Bank (stream credits), Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Mitigation
Bank (stream and wetland credits)
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Rivenne
Quantity 0 14 acres of rivenne wetland,
Wetland & Stream
37 LF of stream
3c Comments Per USACE on -site review held on 3/11/2014 with David Shaeffer, impacts from the driveway construction will
require mitigaton at a ratio of 2 1 for wetland impacts and 1 1 for stream impacts Credits have been secured with the
following EBX- sponsored mitgation banks Forrest Creek Stream Mitigation Bank and Neu -Con Wetland and Stream
Mitigation Bank See attached "Mitigation Bank Statement of Availability" documents Credits will be purchased once
approval of this mitigaton approach has been received from the USACE
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments n/a
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
n/a
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required.
n/a
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments The impacted feature is not subject to Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules (see attached determination)
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments n/a
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
516%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why n/a
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
See attached plan sheets for approved stormwater management plan for the site
® Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Wake County
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
® Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments n/a
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
® Yes ❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
® Yes ❑ No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s) A concrete
driveway was built through a low -lying area of the property to connect the existing concrete plant to an upland material
storage area located at the southern end of the property, and the placement of the driveway cross a small drainage feature
within a larger low -lying depressional area The property owner constructed the driveway without coordination with the
USACE or NCDWR based on a review of previous determinations and site plan approvals from 1998 and 2008/2009 that
referred to specific features identified as jursidictional within the property, but those approvals did not specifically address the
portion of the site crossed by the driveway Upon further review, the property owner realized that the activity may have
required a permit from the USACE and NCDWR, and approached the USACE to rectify the activity and secure the approvals
needed to get the site back into compliance
Based on a USACE field review with David Shaeffer on 3/11/2014, it was determined that the drainage feature crossed was
an intermittent stream (S1), and the low -lying area was a jurisdictional wetland (W1) An NCDWR field review held on -site
with James Graham on 3/25/2014 found that the feature was not subject to Neuse River Basin riparian buffer rules Based on
these determinations, this After - the -Fact permit applicaton was prepared, and mitigation has been proposed for impacts
resulting from the driveway construction Per consultation with the USACE, mitigation for the wetlands has been proposed at
a 2 1 ratio, and impacts to the jurisdictional stream feature will be mitigated at a 1 1 ratio Additionally, the 18" RCP installed
to carry the stream feature beneath the driveway was installed such that extra length of pipe extended on either side of the
driveway Based on the field review conducted with the USACE and in an attempt to further reduce impacts resulting from the
driveway construction, the pipe lengths were cut back to be flush with the driveway and the stream channel was restored to
natural contours, reducing the impacted reach of the stream as much as possible
The property owner is aware that any future activity on the site should be reviewed with the USACE and NCDWR prior to
intiating construction
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The project constructed a concrete driveway to provide a permanent access to upland material storage area in the
southern end of the property Without the driveway, to utilize this portion of the property, the wetland and stream system
would have been heavily degraded by equipment crossings By installing the driveway and stabilizing the crossing,
downstream water quality has been protected
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
The project will not generate wastewater
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a
WIII this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
Impacts?
El Raleigh
5c
If yes, Indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
According to the NC Natural Heritage Program Element Occurrence Database (updated July 2014), no known
occurrences of any federally threatened or endangered species are located within 1 0 mile of the project area Based on
a field review by Klmley -Horn staff conducted on March 25, 2014, suitable habitat is not present within the project area for
dwarf wedgemussel, red - cockaded woodpecker, or Michaux's sumac
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a WIII this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper (Accessed October 6, 2014)
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a
WIII this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
® Yes ❑ No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant In
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A search of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service (Accessed October 6, 2014)
revealed three National Register Study List sites within one mile of the project area George W Scarborough Farm (HPO
Site ID WA1958), Smith- Robertson -Knott Farm (HPO Site ID WA1959), and Thomas Richard Debnam House (HPO Site
ID WA1960) The George W Scarborough Farm is listed as being no longer present by HPOWEB All three locations
are north of the project area on the northern side of US -64, opposite from the project location, approximately 3,000 LF
from the Site Based on the nature of the project and distance to the study list properties, the project will not have any
impact on the National Register Study List sites
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a WIII this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements N/A
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplaln determination? FEMA FIRM Panel 3720176400J
Jason Hartshorn
10/15/2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/ gent's Signature
(Agent's signat a is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

INVInKimley -Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Letter of Authorization
Capital Ready Mix Concrete, LLC, audionzes Kimley -Horn and Associates,
Inc, to act as oui agent to prepare and coordinate the appheation to the U S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the N C Division of Water Quality for 404/401
permits andjurisdictional determinations associated with the Capital Ready Mix
Concrete Site Upgrades project located m Wake County, NC Authorization
will terminate on either final agency action of upon written notification
Printed Name
Title
2 Z /S-
Date
i0
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
91
P 0 Box 33058
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636 -3068

FIGURES

N
0
o!
U)
U-1
w
w
X
F-
N�RF�
C�
sa K SQ (JT N'E�RN R
t
Mark
s
n
y^
v:
KN�G/y Q
T�q
OFF
WATERMELON DR
97
Project Location Legend
Streams (DWQ)
Project Area
sa 0 600 1,200 Feet
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
CAR}_APITAL Capital Ready Mix Concrete
DYMIXC(NJCRLIF Knightdale, Wake County, NC
October 2014

♦ • �4 V , } 1
%0 f N' ' { + I•
f V � 11
4 �r r�i R
I r Air poet" rr
�� � r #� f � ••s
+ 1 {�
I, •� i U rr r
J Iff f' i I. 00
e --
�
+
1 rOil �.
Ada
Legend
Project Area
0 500 1,000 Feet -
I
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map (Knightdale Quad, 1981)
Capital Ready Mix Concrete
RFADY A71XIXlM1l HI II
Knightdale, Wake County, NC
October 2014

Legend
-^o^- Jurisdictional Intermittent Streams
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Project Area
0 200 400 Feet
�pPITAL
Figure 3: 2013 Aerial Photograph and JD Features Map
Capital Ready Mix Concrete
Knightdale, Wake County, NC
October 2014

N {
1 I
li
Capital Ready -Mix Concrete, LLC Soil Legend
Map Unit
Soil Unit Name
Hydric
ApC2
Appling sandy loam 6 -10% slopes) moderately eroded
No
WyA
Worsham sandy loam 0 -30/o slopes)
Yes
T o i4 Ap
Me ,1 _
L i r a• �� i
r,
r
L D
I ll �
I � C n�
r7ding
Strip ; V
C111
ApB2 ' r
(i w.-- .
_.-� -� •tir .. l I A p r.
I
lil APB2 D
' 1 II ApC2
i�ApD. DuB
Ap C2 ''14.L0D
C LoC ��� ApB2 Win•
Legend
A p /l Project Area
ApC2
��` �� • 0 500 1,000 Feet
ti Q
Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey (Wake County, 1970)
O
PITAL Capital Ready Mix Concrete
KI.ADYMIXCONCREIP Kni htdale, Wake County, NC
� Y
October 2014

WETLAND IMPACTS

WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT /FILL (HERBACEOUS /FORESTED WETLAND TO BE
DELINEATED WETLAND
FILLED WITH CONCRETE FOR CONSTRUCTED STORAGE PAD)
0.0705 AC
STREAM IMPA
I
\ II
{
{
�Ni
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
II
I i
I I
I
I I
I
n I
I
r
t
I t `
�t
t
t
CT 37 LF
EXISTING RCP SD HAS BEEN r`' ' • J
REMOVED FLUSH WITH
i DRIVEWAY WALL
� I �
! I I
� I
I I
I !
I I r wt
I I
I !
I (I
I I I + I \
I I I \
I I I I I \ f
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I
1 !
I
I \
I
•
r1
!
\
\
n�
o:
r\
1
i
V
a �•• •: /'ems /
.WETLAND IMPACT, \ -_'i /� •' tt
(0.0705 AC)
STREAM IMPACT IN V=
EXISTING RCP SD HAS BEEN
REMOVED FLUSH WITH t�
DRIVEWAY WALL
•1 • _. '..�! � � �� !! ll Ott '/
✓•�• • 4
�.. ,
t
t \t
\\
•'f /Ak /
i v
,,1(n wpwLm
/
/
/
/
�C
/ G
18" R P /
INV. =254. /
i
LEGEND
PERMANENT FILL IMPACT
DELINEATED WETLAND
\
I {
I
\ II
{
{
. v titim
I
I
— TPf-
II
{ II
{
{ I
{ I
1 I
I I
II
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
{ I
V I
II
II
II
I
�I
I
(III
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
wo•
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
I i
i I
I I
wr
t
I t `
�t
t
t
CT 37 LF
EXISTING RCP SD HAS BEEN r`' ' • J
REMOVED FLUSH WITH
i DRIVEWAY WALL
� I �
! I I
� I
I I
I !
I I r wt
I I
I !
I (I
I I I + I \
I I I \
I I I I I \ f
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I
1 !
I
I \
I
•
r1
!
\
\
n�
o:
r\
1
i
V
a �•• •: /'ems /
.WETLAND IMPACT, \ -_'i /� •' tt
(0.0705 AC)
STREAM IMPACT IN V=
EXISTING RCP SD HAS BEEN
REMOVED FLUSH WITH t�
DRIVEWAY WALL
•1 • _. '..�! � � �� !! ll Ott '/
✓•�• • 4
�.. ,
t
t \t
\\
•'f /Ak /
i v
,,1(n wpwLm
/
/
/
/
�C
/ G
18" R P /
INV. =254. /
i
LEGEND
PERMANENT FILL IMPACT
DELINEATED WETLAND
0
EXISTING TREELINE
PROPOSED CLEARING LIMITS
. v titim
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
— TPf-
0 r 1.4err
4
QtAPM SCALE N FEET
f0 40
pmINp N 1E Qlfl<i p. CLIENT: ° -
- CAPITAL READY MIX CONCRETE ` ��P� / / /', T.
Kimley- Horn' �r CAPITAL READY MIX CONCRETE
and Associates, Inc. D
m. ra: �inac we wuw er: oevaa er. n�E =`� ' DOB
. t � - P.O. BOX 33068 - RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 276363068 NC LICENSE #F -0102 WETLAND IMPACTS
v ..arm r. =4 ' " ^'• „ 11{aa` arnan ar •r*�m i•svmicc rux �. ��
��• N r-raa r as M rsrt Iwi¢Ib. w �rw% r ..�.....� ._......� -. .,...... �...
T �

STREAM AND WETLAND
DATA FORMS

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 4.5
Capital Ready -Mix
Weak
Date: 1/22/2014
Project/Site: Concrete
Latitude: 35.795947
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
Stream S1
1
Evaluator: J. Hartshorn (KHA),
R. Sullivan (KHA)
County: Wake County
Longitude: - 78.434777
Total Points: 16
0
1
2
St Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemera Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Knightdale
if z 19 or perennial if >! 30
3
0
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 4.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
0
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
-
1
2
3
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active /relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
aruticiai aitcnes are not rates; see aiscussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other
= 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S1 is a minor drainaae feature located Drimarilv within
wetland W1. The feature may have been channelized at one time but is now
functioning as a ditch with low bed /bank. S1 is primarily maintained by rainfall
and drainage from a sediment basin located on the west side of Three Sisters
Road. No biology was observed in the stream, and the feature is completely
dry with no baseflow on the east side of the property near the railroad track.

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Capital Ready -Mix Concrete, LLC 2. Evaluator's name: J. Hartshorn (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA)
3. Date of evaluation: 01/22/2014 4. Time of evaluation: 12:30 pm
5. Name of stream: Capital Ready -Mix - Stream S1 6. River basin: Neuse
7. Approximate drainage area: 20 acres 8. Stream order:. First Order
9. Length of reach evaluated: 323 linear feet 10. County: Wake
11. Site coordinates (if known)
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
prefer in decimal degrees.
35.795947
12. Subdivision name (if any): n/a
Longitude (ex. -77.556611): - 78.434777
Method location determined (circle): ✓ZbPSE1Fopo Sheet❑✓ Ortho (Aerial) Photo /GIS[D)ther GIS❑Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
The feature flows beneath Three Sisters Road, south of Capital Ready -Mix Concrete's facility, towards the railroad.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): n/a
15. Recent weather conditions: Cold, temps near freezing, light snow within previous 24 hours.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Cold but clear, temperature in the low 20's.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: FISection 10 n Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
IITrout Waters 00utstanding Resource Waters n Nutrient Sensitive Waters DWater Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: n/a
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: 0 % Residential 0 % Commercial 20 % Industrial 0 % Agricultural
80 % Forested 0 % Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: 3'
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): < 1
24. Channel slope down center of stream: DFlat (0 to 2 %) QGentle (2 to 4 %) Moderate (4 to 10 %) nSteep (> 10 %)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 00ccasional bends DFrequent meander OVery sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 37 Comments:
Stream S1 is a small, low -grade channel that eventually flows into Marks Creek. The stream has likely been channelized in the
past, and exhibits minor baseflow. The stream is hydrologically maintained by an upstream sediment basin constructed on
airport property which drains via 30" RCP culvert beneath Three Sisters Road Channel has heavy iron oxidizing bacteria
presence, but poor substrate sorting. Appears to mainly flow during high precipitation events.
Evaluator's Signatures /utis -n J(u7' /,'1Ao -r,n Date 01/22/2014
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919- 876 -8441 x 26.

Capital Ready -Mix - Stream S1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams
� �a
'
koW,
RANGE; _
r-
� "SCORE
s
� s#
m.,�••, ���,. �� .,. ERISTrICS� °��_`
� _ �_ ,��- � »
�.- - . b.5�
�
_
• ^� _.' °_�
"
Coastal, ^Piedmon_ t`
•..k4 �.
1Vlountainy
_._�e w _wv rr E
_ ="
=
- �Y �C. +IR,"T. .`.� .. -. xrrW -.J 1?'dF:t'A r yry..,....
iPresence;of tlow /persistent poolskin- stream':=
.. r,�,
M .� - s`'��
_0�- S��r�
= J•`�d�
0:`P4�°s�
2
,
—p
- 3` -ham n i fi- n�: 1
saturation�M9tron omt's
e
-�0`_ 5:a
no�tlow�or °fl
x
Evidence ofF ast human {alteration <
romts
F-° T
O ;r �6=
= �� r l
m��
eXiensivealtecatiori - 0 no'. -
x ' k, ; alteration imax,
- - - -
�
_ -
-
=
---,�
X-
-
_ -� -r"' ' _ ��
;_ .;,',r� ,�r _
c. p -Y$-
r;
r��, s ��<� =�
-.
' , ��
2
3
-� � ���� ,�;�_�� °-
� b6'��
501 =°4 ���0
54�
3
i zt` +no�buffer °
a' .Evidence offnutr�ent .or_,scliem�caledtscharges�. q ;�Eyr
%m
_ � -;;
4
�4,
' ezte`nsivedischar
,_
���
;' es� 0n_o °dischar esrriaz omts
,-
�
-. _� : �
_
r `io.. n n_ d_w' -ffi at erj d i- s cA-h•, a-e.�r_ ms e r . -. - .3 - �,..: • -•w
�Vi•a.. .." - � ` -_ _ _•GfR'
-4- =
°�8 -
^�_ te a ,
?'' _:.` 'a'>• " __�_: .-W -
- �
0
�;?���-` ;�.
r� 5
c,z
�zGs-
0
0S =
� Y
:
_ n_ o- ._d,.° i s°
fia r e •_ ;O_ M s�ses ;vdtland
_=
T'_- - -]" i CT zE"'i _J -'T'2:
v
6
x ��:' Pr,esen e'_lA dlacentPQ dplam,� ��
bb _. --� eis - -flyv e
i0 �
� -
' t -
�0;= 2
1
�/�
°Jvlhe
."• _rs Per; �•
'flood "Iaih�= "_exiensive�flood
�.
-`4-
Or��n4' ^,
�
'��e
P
�•. 'n_o A lam��f,maz� orris:����°�,•
-• :.�- „�,��,_�..r
=�
°��
`, y:
s °� , _'' �Entrenchinent +� /�floodplamaccess,� =��
n q
�` `w
R,s
a
4 =i7.•
' R;,, = _� _ _ = , .
0 =�5:- > ,
0:- 4
k� _._
¢ :0� 2 '- a
2
dee 1 uentrenched = 0 fre” uenfifloodin w:max, oinfs
EPreseneeofadjacent- wetlands.°
no wetlands =90 Iar ge ad acentiwetl`arid "s
�`'"
P
-, -r
- NCliannel'sinuos�ty
(�
Fl� y �� »a
,�n„1,� Es .,�^ °nom
403'
1
b.,�r rfr
=`(exterisiv elchannelization 0 nnatura eerW = omts)
,__.0'
`�
. ,Na
__ '^_' - - - - --^wr -
tea'= 'a
:w .
•°'. '4
-
��l�iy�
�" 'r
4• r.'k_- P.:�k*� w ¢�, �r �,�
ediment�mputr. 5 `- ;'-,:.;
-aY' a.'�'w*'��r
> -; :` 1�
�T cr. . yyu
rtP �� °- -
-��
°nom £ -�Rl
_
=�10�
_ ,.
r, wi a
`
r0,?
Qta-_4
extensive de ositiori =,
- _ T O; little =or�no sediment - o�max' ouits
s
�.w Ytr'
s `"
'
`_ �' - 'Size & diversi Fof ctianoel bed substrate
-
-- g R-
-�'7
_
;` �4 =. = _mss .�a,
fine;,ht6o
NA*
- 0 y4'° _EF,101Y5!ze=�
°�
1
i enousg= O, Kar e; diverse sizes= ;max; dints
-`
_1.,'
' -
_ __ 4
«
» , _ : LL
1.2
«_`
�.:.: "" .:4_ 1...��,J •.'
channel(inc�swn;vor,;widenmg =E
. ;. �� -- , tea^ > PO
='dee
o ``` ,
kx -* �
5, �,
=
�J _
e °
F „: ° o
0 = 5 l
2
' +&
,�
z ` 1` ;mcased'W =�O t_abl_e?6_edf &banks max omt`s ��
____....-r-
=
KF r, w' x
,Oo''4
t `` e
A°
3 vz: « n ; -ae3 :T. ; "
E'resenee of�ma orsbank =failures > „ °• - '-
=rt Iw ” "_ ='�d�'
y
' W ,.-
M40<
l _.
f_
4
�_�_ ?Y`
erosion; `6x,
-�5=
_, severe erosion ^`= O;,4no stalile�liankse_ dints
14;;
1 r.,� -� o �'1x- .-'CS.r
"� �Root',deptti�and density lontbanks
;SKr- -
0� =
_ ��
vis�bl `erroots;�= throu >�m5
<3<
rn_o L0;_den'se,`roofs _out dints
t
Imgip by,agriculture; livestock;aor�tiinlier, production
_
�a T., a _ ,6-
'acts
5s ^' 45
-
,sulistaritialluri 0;,rioevidence� ,gmaxw dints t'F
,1 <
l•,_- L P - 1- °f, e�x,e�., srppe=
'- r;�t%e= pooUp_
e%rs� e n" ceFof
- 3,
0
0
.
`,� ;6;
r
no ^ r iff1l'`ers oo leso '
0t
+_ -,5
-
,
a rt iaueriof m
A° . �
'01
�-
yT °fbre
' �littleorkrio��h` aliitat: �H0; d;y
°
,irs
;vpalr'eiexitd
z2[:Yt AC^a. °c. _ Y a •r��r�jr ir/'
` Canop "y�coverageover�streambed
'" -ir nI - ^_ r _ F
-�,. o _..r- c
�X �. o .-...; C°5
5
"
r=
- _ rioysliadin 'eve etation Y2 =.O; contmuousrcano ,,k= lmaxwi dints `t
=m, ` �7 "= Air �
"�
e
v °f9'
- =lSalistrate embed "dedne sl °%` , . -
'=
NA *. ;'
_ `Y 4 _ _
° . •_n,
4'P
2
loose _ Vr_
_ _ .0 T4•
Q0.=
`embedded` =�0; - s`tructur'e - max
..�.
T-
-
—
1
- - 4",er,T Aw_ - • •ir- �- `_s1..:. =.
:�Presenee'of streaininvertelirates (see'pag`e4_)” _ _ -=
- '
J�"__ � _k `2
'�_
4 '
C' < b :_ „"a
4�p 5`
'
-5
0
°
20+
_o °X' ff ,•
.y- ti0`= w �
v r -
- Az =
'
$;� s
iio�evide`rice, 0;tcommonumeroust es maic;`'
"` "'�
;�. �"r,'k
:In �` �'a°, aY?•,,inM � n: R: :1^.' =:s.
f� �.r-. 'E
o hili ia"\::.ns
"i0''
4,;,
0
`on; =,n^ iunero�r�us esf °.° _ m•ba�xl ' d4� i nts ° • �d
L rio;ednc"cdm m
4r - x ;4
1 ' 9
»
>022r.=
e " .m-..n
s •�: --mss- • x � .�� u: .h r; r a+ T'a �
1+ m # k �.ry
Y °'0'4
� .. "�
r-> •b --- ^-
0
common;�riumerou's_.
-
„ -{per ��cry y" _ "\ _ .'P� � T.' %'r,
`
.lT.. -..:r� JsZSS`f -` �
a _ �.�_.^i.- ��... -�
.L.- ..c.�- __- '",-•� - -
��23�:�' 'Evidence;of =wildlife�use� _ ��•�. L �.� � a,»
��
} 0
= �
-
5 °
0
"�° no'ev %derice't =�0- evidence°oi_nts
i '_'t ��
"' -�6;; `
-'0;5�
Ya: `12.a k
,'abuniiant
-. aeTi.`8" f v.4t�a �'a_ V° `�n.- -°^ail
5 � - � & c `a.+,r �
��TotaiYPo�ntsr_Possible,
1? .:..�. t✓' Y..,..`L,r.^.,.y
� V 4
>,.. P.nt .3..,.. --.
� >•^�
-., G?. ,..
'k'-9�o s`} � @�
t�
n. T u 4
x�y`- � - ✓ zF4 Vie_ .��'
F'' -
C
_ ae%° fir, °^: ,• i"'A�4 -_ �_„ _ - ?e� -s'�'�
SR t
� 7y -
TIOE
37
_
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Capital Ready Mix Concrete City /County Knightdale / Wake County Sampling Date 1/22/2014
Applicant/Owner Capital Ready Mix Concrete State NC Sampling Point W1 /W2 -UP
Investigator(s) 3• Hartshorn (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) Section, Township, Range Knightdale
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none) Concave Slope ( %) 1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat 35.795683 N Long 78.434939 W
Soil Map Unit Name Ap - Appling Sandy Loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No= (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation = Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present?
Datum NAD 1983
Yes = No =
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No IZI
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
The W1 /W2 -Up data point is located approximately 20' south and 5' higher in elevation from the
W1 /W2 -Wet data point. This area may have been historically filled. Based on established tree sizes
the filling was not done recently and the site has naturalized.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_J Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (132)
7]Drift Deposits (133)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water - Stained Leaves (139)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Field Observations
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aqutard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Surface Water Present? Yes No qV.5 Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes - No Depth (inches) >30"
Saturation Presents Yes No
Dept h (inches) )30" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No IZI
(includes caodlary fnnae)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
There were no indicators of wetland hydrology observed at this data point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
30'
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1 Quercus alba
20%
Y
FACU
2 Quercus falcata
20%
Y
FACU
3 Acer rubrum
10%
N
FAC
4 Liquzdambar styraciflua
10%
N
FAC
5 Pznus taeda
5%
N
FAC
6
7
8
Saplino /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30'
1 Quercros alba
2 Lzquidambar styraczflua
3 Acer rubrum
4 Vaccmrum fuscatum
5
6
7
8
9
10
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30'
1 Mzcrostegrum vrnnneum
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
65% =Total Cover
5%
Y
FACU
5%
Y
FAC
5%
Y
FAC
5%
Y
FAC
Sampling Point W1 /W2 -UP
Dominance Test worksheet-
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
10
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 70%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
20% =Total Cover
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
40% Y FAC Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
40% =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Gelsemrum sempervrrens 5% Y FAC
2 Vitis rotundr olrum 5% Y FAC
3 Smilax rotundtfolra 5% Y FAC
4
5
6- - -
15% = Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28,ft (1
m) tall
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No F1
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
The canopy cover was well established around the data point, and the understory consisted of a diverse mix of sapling
tree species.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point W1 /W2 -UP
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
04" 10YR 3/2 100% Sandy Loam
3 -20" 2.5Y 6/4 100% Sandy Loam
20 -30" 10YR 6/8 100%
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, I
Hydnc Sod Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
®Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Sandy Clay
educed Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matnx
IjRedox Depressions (F8)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
®Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes F] No IZI
Soils were not saturated in the upper 30 ", and the water table was not observed within the upper
30 ". No indicators of hydrlc soil were observed at the data point location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods
Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Praine Redox (Al 6)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matnx (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
IjRedox Depressions (F8)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
®Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes F] No IZI
Soils were not saturated in the upper 30 ", and the water table was not observed within the upper
30 ". No indicators of hydrlc soil were observed at the data point location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site Capital Ready Mix Concrete City /County Knightdale / Wake County Sampling Date 1/22/2014
Applicant/Owner Capital Ready Mix Concrete State NC Sampling Point W1 /W2 -WET
Investigator(s) J. Hartshorn (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) Section, Township, Range Knlghtdale
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Bottomland Local relief (concave, convex, none) Concave Slope ( %) 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat 35.795819 N Long 78.434735 W Datum NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name
/A - Worsham Sandy Loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes I */ I Nol [ (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ❑
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No ❑
L I Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ♦ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No ❑
Remarks
The sampling point is located approximately 10' east of the southeastern corner of of the concrete
pad. Wetland W1 and Wetland W2 appear to be the same system separated by a large concrete pad.
The soils and plant communities within both wetlands are similar in composition.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two requited)
✓
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that aooly)
❑
Surface Water (Al) True Aquatic Plants (1314)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Water Marks (131) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Sediment Deposits (132) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Drift Deposits (63) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
✓
✓
✓
Algal Mat or Crust (134) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
,Iron Deposits (B5)
'Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Water - Stained Leaves (139)
✓
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
✓
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field observations -
Surface Water Present? Yes No V( Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes - No ✓ Depth (inches) >24 n
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches) >24
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No ❑
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
Wetland hydrology at W1 /W2 appears to be maintained in a depressional area where surface water
is semi - impounded at a culvert that runs under the concrete pad. Water marks in the interior of W1
indicate inundation to a depth of 12 ". Saturation was not found in the upper 24 ", and the water
table was not observed within the upper 24 ". W1 and W2 may also receive hydrologic input from
surface runoff from the concrete pad and adjacent properties. There is a stormwater basin just
east, across Three Sisters Road, that empties into W1. However, despite field observations
conducted within the dormant season and after a precipitation event, the wetland was not
inundated or saturated.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant In
dicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' ) % Cover Species? Status
1 Acer rubruin 70% Y FAC
2 Liquidainbar styraciflua 30% Y FAC
3
4
5
6
Sampling Point W1 /W2-WET
Dominance Test worksheet-
Number of Dominant Species
7
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total % Cover of
Multiply by
90% =Total Cover
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30`
)
FACW species
x 2 =
1 Acer a-ubrum
20% Y FAC
FAC species
x 3 =
2 Ltriodendron sty•aciflua
10% Y FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
3
UPL species
x 5 =
4
Column Totals
(A) (B)
5
6
7
8
9
10
30% =Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 4rundinaria gigantea 20% Y FACW
2
3
4
5
6
7,
8
9
10
11
12
20% =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Smilax rotundtfolta 5% Y FAC
2 Vitis rotunda olia 5% Y FAC
3
4
5
6
Prevalence Index = B/A = I
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 ft (1
m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No ❑
10% = Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
The giant cane was more abundant In W2 than in W1, but that may be due to higher levels of ponding In W1 compared
to W2. Herbaceous cover was light In W1.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point W1 /W2-WET
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loci
Texture Remarks
0 -2"
10YR 5/3
100%
Loam
2 -12"
10YR 5/1
80%
10YR 6/8 20% C M
Clay Loam
12 -24"
10YR 5/1
60%
10YR 6/8 40% C M
Clay Loam
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion,
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
®Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped, Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matnx
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soi
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Coast Praine Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes . r No ❑
Saturation was not present In the upper 24 ", and the water table was not observed within 24" of
the soil surface. Soils were depleted at a depth of 2 ", with concentrations increasing in frequency
with depth.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

NCDWR BUFFER
DETERMINATION LETTER

4 7j2p2
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural, Resources
Pat McCrory John E. SI(varla, III
Governor Secretary
March 27,2014
Three Sister "s Ready Mix, LLC,
Jaes F L,ocKrren
,51'2 m Three, Sisters, Rd.
Krughtdale; NC 27,545
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
NBRRO# 14 -079
Wake County,
Determination Type -
Buffer Call
Isolated or EIP'Call
® Neuse (115A NCAC 2B 0233)
Stop@
,❑ Tar- Par (15,4 NCAC 2B 0259)
:E] ( Ephemeral /Intermittent/Perennial Determination
*A i
❑ Isolated'Wetland Determination
❑ Jordan ('15A NGAC 2B ,0267)
_
Project Name, Three Sisters Ready Mix, L•LC
Location/Directions= Property is,lbcated at•512 Three Sisters,Rd. Knightdale,NC
Subject Stream. UT to Marks Creek
.Determination Date: March 25, 2014 'Staff: James Graham
Feature/Fla g
Not
Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
;Soil,
Survey
USGS
To 0
- —
*A i
X
_
X
*Feature.A'Was the,only feature evaluated -on, 03/25/2014
'Explanation- The,feature(s) lrsted•above has,or have been located,on'"the 5oi1:Survey of Wake,County, North
Carolina•or the most recent copy of fhe`(JSGS Topographic map,at:a 1:24;000 scale. Each feature that is-checked-
"'Not Subject" has been deterrioiried;not -to be a stream of is not;present on the property. Features,that,are,checked'
"Subject "have been located on the,property and possess characteristics that qualify itito be aistream There may be,
otherstreams located on your, property that do not;show,up on the map§,referenced above but; still maylbe
consideredjurisdictional. accordmg'xo.the US,Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
,(D WR).
1Nizally a
Carolin
North Carolina Div_ision,of Water'Resources 1628 Mad Service Center Raleigh, NC27699- 1628,P,hone (949) 791 -4200
Internet' wwwmcwatewality orq Location .3800 BaRettiDnve iRaleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal, OpportundylAffiimabveAchon Employer -500/o'Recycled /10 6/o,PosfConsumer Paper

Three, Sisters Ready iMix
Wake,County
March 27, 2014
Page 2 of 2,
this on -site determination,shall.expife five (5) years'from the date oft . his letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute,a determination made by the,DWR dr Delegated Local Authority may _request a determination by the
Director. An' appeal,request, must be'made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from, the date the affected
party'(including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this'letter. A request for a determination bythe
Director shalt, be referred to-the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail, ervice
Center,'Raleigh, -NC 27699.
This determination is final and'biipding unies`s, as detailed above,,you ask for a, hea "_ring oeappeal within sixty (60)
days.
i
The�dwner %futu_ee,owners,shotild notify'fhe Division of Water`Resources (ineluding any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerniing:any future,corre"spond'ences, regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may regaire•a Section 404%401 Permit, foe the proposed,activity: Any inquiries should be
directed Ito the Division of Water Resourcesi(Central,Office) at (91,9)- 807- 6300,,and the US.Army Corp of Epgineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Fieid Office) at (919)- 554 -4884.
If you -have questions,regardmg ihis,determination, please.feel free to,contacf.James °Graham at (949),'7,9,1' -4256.
7R-)ectftilly,
Danny, Smith, Supervisor
Water Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc RRO /SWP File Copy

Neuse Buffer Rules (NBR) Determination

USACE NOTIFICATION OF
UNAUTHORIZED ACTIVITY

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action Id. SAW- 2014 -00385 County Wake
NOTIFICATION OF UNAUTHORIZED ACTIVITY
Property Owner. James F. Lochren
Three Sisters Ready Mix, LLC
Address. 512 Three Sisters Road
Knightdale. North Carolina 27545
Telephone Number- (919) 217 -0222
Size (acres) 5.45
Nearest Waterway Marks Creek
USGS HUC 3020202
Nearest Town Knightdale
River Basin Neuse
Coordinates Latitude: 35.7961
Longitude. - 78.4347
Size and Location of Property The subject property is located at 512 Three Sisters Road in Knightdale, Wake County, North
Carolina The property is primarily upland with approximately 0 17 acre of forest wetlands and 400 linear feet of stream. The
property includes a concrete mixing plant office building, parking lot and wastewater treatment pond. The unauthorized activity
occurred in a forested portion of the lot between the wastewater treatment pond and the southernmost property ,boundary. PIN:
1764757306.
Description of Unauthorized Activity• The unauthorized activity included the placement of fill material in 67.5 linear feet of
stream and 0.07 acres of wetlands to facilitate the construction of a roadway which is currently used to access uplands on the
southernmost end of the property for storage.
The following actions and authorities apply-
X Unauthorized Activity River & Harbor Act, Section 10 (33 USC 403)
Noncompliance with Permit X Clean Water Act, Section 301 (33 USC 131 1)
Unless you have a Department of the Army permit for the above- described activity, it is a violation of federal law as specified above You
have agreed to do no further work in waters or wetlands without the required Department of the Army permit. Any further unauthorized
work in waters or wetlands will be considered an intentional violation,of federal law
if you do no further work in waters or wetlands and perform the remedial action requested below, the Corps of Engineers will take no
further action in this matter If you continue to work in waters and wetlands without the required authorization, and/or fail to perform the
requested remedial action, the Corps will take further administrative action, and may request the U S Attorney to file suit against you If
you need further information about the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact me at (919) - 5544884 Ext 31
Remedial Action Requested According to satellite photography available to our office the unauthorized work occurred
M
unauthorized work.
You must sign the enclosed tolling agreement before we can accept your after - the -fact permit application. Once we.receive the
signed tolling agreement we will forward the document to our legal counsel for review and approval. The after - the -fact permit
application will not be reviewed until our legal counsel has approved the tolling agreement.

You have 90 days from receipt of this correspondence to return the.signed tolling agreement. If you have any questions
,regarding this notification or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program please contact David L. Shaeffer by telephone at
919 -554 -4884 ext. 31 or by e-mail at david.I.shaeffer(a)usace.army.mil.
Your signature acknowledges receipt of this notification
Property Owner /Responsible Party Signature
Project Manager Signature °r tL
Date q/ �a!� / ao t `A
Copy furnished:
Jason Hartshorn, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Incorporated, Post Office Box 33068, Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Danny Smith, Water Quality Program Supervisor, North Carolina Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, 1628 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 276069

TOLLING AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the United States of America, on behalf of the United States Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) may file a complaint against Three Sisters Ready Mix,
LLC potential defendant(s)") for, inter alia, alleged violations of Sections 301(a), 309, &
404 of the Clean Water Act ( "CWA "), 33 U.S.C. Sections 1311(a), 1319, & 1344 and/or
Section 9, 10, or 13 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. Sections 401, 403,
or 407, and/or Ocean Dumping Act Sections 101 and /or 103 (33 U.S.C. 1411, 1413), at a
site commonly known as Capital Ready Mix Concrete Site, Knightdale, North
Carolina, which is the subject of the enforcement action initiated by the Wilmington
District Regulatory Division, Action ID SAW- 2014 - 00385.
WHEREAS, the purpose of any such complaint would be to obtain appropriate
injunctive relief and to impose appropriate civil or criminal penalties for potential
defendant'(s) alleged violations of the statute(s) cited above;
WHEREAS, the Corps accepted an after - the -fact (ATF) permit application from
the potential defendant(s) in an attempt to settle the above claims;
WHEREAS, both parties believe that their interests will best be served by
continuing the ATF permit process without the disruption that might be occasioned
should the United States file a complaint in the immediate future;
AND WHEREAS both parties acknowledge the requirement found at 33 C.F.R.
331.11(c) for an applicant for an ATF permit to provide a signed tolling agreement;

THEREFORE, the United States and potential defendant(s) stipulate and agree as
follows:
1. The United States and potential defendant(s) agree that the time between the
acceptance by the Corps of the ATF permit application and the final Corps decision (as
defined at 33 CFR 331.10), plus one year thereafter, will not be included in calculating
any statute of limitations that might be applicable to the alleged statutory violation(s)
described above. Potential defendants agree not to assert, plead, or raise in any fashion
on behalf of any party, whether by answer, motion, or otherwise, any defense or
avoidance based on the running of any statute of limitations that may apply during that
period or any defense or avoidance based on laches or other principle concerning the
timeliness of commencing a civil action, based on the failure of the United States to file
its complaint during that period.
2. Potential defendants further agree not to transfer the property in question
during the pendency of this tolling agreement nor during the pendency of any civil action
brought as described above, without first notifying the United States and giving the
United States a reasonable opportunity to oppose such transfer.
3. Nothing in this tolling agreement shall restrict or otherwise prevent the
United States from filing a complaint regarding any alleged statutory violation(s) not
described above, at any time.
4. This tolling agreement does not constitute any admission of liability on the
part of potential defendants; nor does it constitute any admission or acknowledgment on
the part of the United States that any statute of limitations has run or that any statute of
limitations is applicable to the statutory claims described above.
5. This tolling agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties, and
no statement, promise or inducement made by any party to this agreement, or any agent
of such parties, that is not set forth in this agreement shall be valid or binding. This

tolling agreement may not be enlarged, modified or altered except in writing signed by
the parties. This tolling agreement may be executed in counterparts.
FOR the United States of America:
M. Brooke Lamson Date
District Counsel
Wilmington District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
FOR ( "potential defendant(s) ")
r�
V`James F. Lochren Date
Owner
Three Sisters Ready Mix, LLC

WAKE COUNTY
STORMWATER APPROVAL

co-W TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
WAKEEnvironmental Watershed Management
COUNTY
NOR III c AROI wA Services 336 Fayetteville St e P O Box 550 a Raleigh, NC 27602
July 30, 2014
Capital Ready Mix Concrete
512 Three Sisters Rd
Knightdale, NC 27545
Subject: Authorization for Capital Ready Mix Concrete to seek offsite nutrient credits
This letter confirms our receipt and review of the revised stormwater plan dated 5/2/14 you
provided for the subject development. Our review confirms that your development has not met
the target loading rate of 3.6 lbs N /ac /yr for the Neuse Nutrient Strategy. You have, however
met the thresholds that allow you to buy down the remainder of your nutrient load offsite.
Attached to this letter is a table characterizing your development project. As indicated on this
table, you need to purchase an additional 558 19 lbs to achieve the loading rate targets and
satisfy your nutrient requirements for this site.
When you have purchased the remaining nitrogen credits, please provide us with a copy of the
credit purchase certificate
If there are any questions, please contact the watershed manager at 919- 842 -7142
Sincerely,
� ) I
Debra Ryals
Watershed Manager
Division of Water Quality

Invoice
Date Invoice #
8 -8 -14 0014
Bill To
Mr. Jim Lochren
Capital Ready Mix Concrete, LLC
512 Three Sisters Rd.
Knightdale, NC 27545
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
Payable To
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Attention: Robert Bugg
1430 South Mint Street
Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
NC EIN # 56- 0651376
Project Name
Terms
Bank Name
Unit Price
Amount
WEI — Neuse 01 Nutrient
Nutrient Offset Credits
Reserved — Price
Offset and Buffer Umbrella
Capital Ready Mix Concrete
Bank - Buck Swamp Parcel.
Valid for 15 Days
Neuse 14UC 03020201
Thank you for your business If you have any
DWQ Project # 2012 -0411
Line
Item
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
01
Nutrient Offset Credits
558.19 lbs.
$17.00
$9,489.23
Sales Tax
N/A
Thank you for your business If you have any
questions regarding this invoice please call
Total
$9,489.23
Robert Bugg at 704 - 719 -2100 or
rbugg@wildiandseng com
WEI — Buck Swamp, LLC Wlldlands Engmeermg, Inc 5605 Chapel HIII Road, Suite 122 Raleigh, NC 27607

Neuse, Tar - Pamlico, and Falls Lake Developer Nutrient Reporting Form
(Note: A separate form Is available for Jordan Lake Watershed reporting.)
Please complete and submit the following information to the local government permitting your development project to
characterize it and assess the need to purchase nutrient offsets. Contact and rule implementation information can be
found online at http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/nps/nutrientoffsetintro.
PROJECT INFORMATION (foruse in Neuse, Tar - Pamlico, or Falls Lake)
iApplicant Name: Capital Ready Mix Concrete
Project Name: Capital Ready Mix Concrete Site Improvements
Project Address (if available): Street: 512 Three Sisters Road City/Town: Knightdale County: Wake
Date: (me✓dryr)511912014 Project Lat: ( dedmal degrees) Long: (decimal degrees)
Location: 35.786618 - 78.434521
Is this Redevelopment? ❑ -Yes Development Type (Please check all that apply)
I
No
Impervious Impervious Cover MY 2.17% ❑ Commercial I ❑ Mixed -Use I ❑ Single Fam. Residential
(Pre - Construction) --
Indust6al
- - - — - - -- ❑ Duplex Residential ❑ Multi Fam. Residential
Impervious Cover ( %): 51.14% ❑ Institutional
(Post - Construction)
(B) (c) (0) 1 (E)
Treated Load Rate Target Reduction Need Project
Loading Rate (lbs/aclyr) (Ibs/aclyr) Size (ac) !
(lbs/adyr) g _
(F)
Offset
Duration (yrs)
WATERSHED INFORMATION
12- Digit Watershed 1D: (See online maa)
New Development Load Requirements
(see individual rules for a full
Not Applicable '
description of nutrient requirements.)
Nutrient Strategy (Please check one)
Local Govemment Name: Wake County
Stormwater Services
Nutrient I Loading Rate Targets
Staff Name:
Tar - Pamlico ' Falls
Neuse HUC
Lake Nitrogen (N) and
Strategy
Offsite Thresholds
HUC Sub
-Area Phosphorus (P)
®' 03020201 i ❑ 03020101
Upper 3.6 N lb /ac/yr;
pp Neuse
Ci)11J
below Falls `
i ( � I �
❑ 03020102
No P oat
Falls � - -- goal _ __ -
- 6 N Ibs /ac - Residential; i
❑� 03020202 � ❑
Lower Tar 4.0 N !b /ac/yr;
10 N Ibs /ac Commercial
❑ 03020103
Pam 0.4 P Ib/actyr
❑ 03020203
❑I 03020104
Falls i�
1
30% of N & P reduction need onsite
❑ 03020204
2.2 N Ib /adyr;
for projects less than one acre;
Falls 0.33 P lb /adyr
50% of N & P reduction need onsite
1
for projects over one acre
NUTRIENT OFFSET REQUEST Must meet
- -- -
the o(fsite thresholds -see above
-
Nitrogen Loading / Offset Needs
i (A) (B) (c) I
(D) (E) (F -
(G)
(H) (Nrhere Applicable) 4
Untreated Treated Loading Rate
Reduction Need Project Offset
State Buy Doom
Local Gov't Buy Down
Loading Rate Loading Rate Target (lbs/aclyr)
(lbslaclyr) Size (ac) Duration (yrs)
Amount (Ibs)
Amount (Ibs) i
(lbs/actyr) (lbs/aclyr)
B- C
D' E• F
761.15
9.41 7.85 3.6
4.25 5.97 30 (202.96 Ibs Paid
Not Applicable
-� - -�
Previously)
PhosahoruS Loading f Offset Needs (For the Tar -Pam Basin and Falls Watershed areas)
(A)
Untreated
Loading Rate
(lbs/aW)
- - -- -
(B) (c) (0) 1 (E)
Treated Load Rate Target Reduction Need Project
Loading Rate (lbs/aclyr) (Ibs/aclyr) Size (ac) !
(lbs/adyr) g _
(F)
Offset
Duration (yrs)
(G) (H) (Where Applicable)
State Buy Down Local Gov't Buy Down
Amount (ibs) Amount (Ibs)
D , E , F
30
Not Applicable '
Not Applicable
Authorizing
Local Govemment Name: Wake County
Stormwater Services
Staff Name:
Staff Email:
U C
rC2. �(,� _($ @ qC(/,
Ci)11J
I Phone:
��a -
i Lf A
`' Ncuse Tar - Pamlico, and Falls Nutrient Load Reporting Form September 12, 2012

COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY

Forrest Creek Stream Mitigation Bank - Forest Creek UT -2 Site
Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank -Cedar Grove Site
Statement of Availability- October 17, 2014
NC Division of Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Ms Katie Merritt Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
401 Oversight /Express Permitting Unit Regulatory Project Manager
1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650 3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: Capital Ready Mix Concrete Plant
This document confirms that Three Sisters Ready Mix, LLC (Applicant) for the Capital Ready
Mix Concrete Plant has expressed an interest to utilize 37 Linear Feet of Stream Mitigation
Units (Linear Feet of Stream Mitigation Units from Forrest Creek Stream Mitigation Bank
including the Forrest Creek -UT -2 site or Linear Feet of Stream Mitigation Units from the Cedar
Grove site), located in Neuse HUC 03020201. As the Bank Sponsor for all banks and related
sites, EBX attests to the fact that mitigation is available for transfer upon permit issuance
Banker will notify applicant if the 37 Stream Mitigation Units become considered "At Risk" of
not being available prior to permit issuance Credits are not considered secured until payment
in full is received from the applicant resulting in the issuance of an Affidavit of Sale by the bank
acknowledging that the applicant has fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has
accepted full responsibility for the mitigation obligation requiring the credits /units
The Banker will issue the Affidavit of Sale within ten (10) days of receipt of the balance of the
Purchase Price. Banker shall provide to Applicant with a copy of the Affidavit of Sale and a
documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s) showing the
permit number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Affidavit of Sale,
with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 239 - 872 -1678
Best Regards
/j2"4 4;k-
Matthew R. Fisher
EBX
909 Capability Drive Suite 3100 Raleigh, NC 27606

Cedar Grove Stream Mitigation Bank Site
Neu -Con Umbrella Wetland Mitigation and Stream Restoration Bank
Statement of Availability October 17, 2014
NC Division of Water Quality U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Ms Katie Merritt Mr Eric Alsmeyer
401 Oversight /Express Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Re Project: Capital Ready Mix Concrete Plant
Regulator Project Manager
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
This document confirms that Three Sisters Ready Mix, LLC. (Applicant) has expressed an interest
to utilize 0.14 Riparian /Riverine Wetland Mitigation Credits from EBX Sponsored Neu -Con
Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank (Cox II Site) located in the Neuse HUC 03020201. As the
Bank Sponsor for the site, EBX attests to the fact that mitigation is available for transfer upon
permit issuance at this time.
Banker will notify applicant if the 0.14 Riparian /Riverine Wetland Mitigation Credits become
considered "At Risk" of not being available prior to permit issuance Credits are not considered
secured until payment in full is received from the applicant resulting in the issuance of a and
Affidavit of Sale by the bank acknowledging that the applicant has fully secured credits from the
bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation obligation requiring the
credits /units
The Banker will issue the Affidavit of Sale within three (3) days of receipt of the Purchase Price.
Banker shall provide to Applicant with a copy of the Affidavit of Sale and a documented copy of
the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s) showing the permit number and the
resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Affidavit of Sale, with an updated Official
Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the proper documentation
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 239 - 872 -1678
Best Regards
/4444 k
Matthew R Fisher
EBX
909 Capability Drive Suite 3100 Raleigh, NC 27606

v
.a
v
v
m
E
v
rn
0
N
N
O
Q
EXISTING PROPERTY OWNER: CAPITAL READY MIX CONCRETE, LLC
512 THREE SISTERS ROAD
KNIGHTDALE, NORTH CAROLINA 27545
ATTN: JIM LOCHREN
DEVELOPER: CAPITAL READY MIX CONCRETE, LLC
512 THREE SISTERS ROAD
KNIGHTDALE, NORTH CAROLINA 27545
ATTN: JIM LOCHREN
CIVIL ENGINEER: KIMLEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
3001 WESTON PARKWAY
CARY, NORTH CAROLINA 27513
PHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
ATTN: JEFFREY J. WING, P.E.
SURVEYOR: M—III ENGINEERING, PLLC
970 TRINITY RD.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607
PHONE: [phone]
ATTN: RANDY D. MASON, PLS
..
b12 THKEE SISTERS ROAAA),
KNIGHT;DALE, NORTH CAROLINA 27545
i
r i
xY „
f z;:
y-
t
3M"
I
i
s..
i vz
�- � -� � � •I �
311:1
VIII. ,•" ,. �. � . � • ' ' •. �,
jqliiiil
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
SHEET
110.
1 COVER SHEET
2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
3 SITE LAYOUT PLAN
4 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
NO. DAVE I DESCRIPTION
This document, together with the concepts and designs
presented herein, rs an instrument of services, is intended
only for the specific purpose and client for which it was
prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document
without written aut=horization and adaptation by Kimley—Horn
and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley—Horn
and Associates, Inc:.
Copyright Kimley—hiorn and Associates, Inc., 2014
a AAV
RA, 1 2014
KHA PROJECT NO:

ELECTRIC
/ 3
CHAINFARMER GRAVEL / INV IN458.45 60" \HDPE
3 05
NCE IiPI �j �g , INV OUT: 257.50 60'� RCP
1 M 1 0 /
c -L2 7.85 PID \ e
I P / r \
5F CONCRETE
I;7
INV W 361.01 "HDOE I WALL _
INV OUT: 360.86 60" HDPE \ CONCRETE
5. NG WALL
cN / 289 i
_ \ _' /
N/F
-} - \ � r-13' PINE MARGARET DEAN
GIBSON MARTIN
= I I I \ \ \ �- CO 10566` 267.8_ - Z(0563 05 1 /1 N 8b+
o YI3 X2'' � ,� / \ r / / DB 2577, 252
I 50 & VEG--,ATI ® 271.09 / 50" s.H.o.D. 1 t" P E �! PIN. 1764865965
PROTECTFDN` 10518 _ L - ( 6.3 J BUFFER YARD /`L
YI 2 I / 269.65 OL 1054 10541
j3" INE <s1 270.201 \ I o
RIM: 266.08 ' / q i' BOL6" 269.69' 269.67 2 0.48 1 2 TREE r� vECETAnON
o1Ec11on AREA
0 / I F.E. 10515 C06„' C 6,. �C i I �� -45 /
INV IN: 262.42 30' HDPE I 2 sTORY 10517 OL 10542 CON ETE 1 546 EDGE \ /
BRICK /--269.(: 1
INV OUT: 262.35 18" HDPE 43 269.70' BUILDING 269.64 /269.67` 270 40 / ONCRETE � CONCRETE ( �o" OAK 3�,
d PINE F.F.E. BOL6" OL/ B0�' - - �69 _ _ 105 5_� C` 6, I n I \
0516 / 9.07 CONCRETE 27033 \ / / /�
�10" PIN
a I I 267. 269.59 06" \ CN 'ON Erc
o - IGN �PARI�1 (� BOL -6" L _/ NAIL4061 GENERATOR26 80 10 40 V A V °°W,�TE/ W I�
-� II
I 1 .3 20 ATEA VALVE PAD TRAJ* SAL I c / / 3" PINE
YI 3 I o 26, 58 GRAVEL r - rC06" F.E. / , / 7 j 12' PINE y /IIID
LP \ 72.74 CONCRETE / / CONCRETE /IIII
WALL / WALL 25• ILDING
RIM: 364.06 � \ l � I i�
INV IN: 261.39 18" HDPE \ \ _ `RAVE` � LERF.F.E.
INV OUT: 261.29 18" RCP co/�RED 272.3 I 1 IIS
\ NCRETE
// \ U _ ..-- - - /AREA COWWALL I I COEDCONWALL
/ CONCRETE
CONCRETE ( s i
2 a \ t STORY
oBUILDING
/ ELECTRIC HAN'9HOLD CONCRETE WALL
GRAVEL
\ \ O \ \
SEPTIC -1DIA ® \ CONPCARDETE
(0 ET19
X MAR -205 Wv " \ v CONCR
�+"K 6 -ELECTRIC O3'/�PIN*81- iP/iINi
SE TIC DI GRA 80Z NIF
NENDELL FALLS DfVELOPMENT,
�
-
)
/
LLC.
DB 11755, PG 2624 I ,� -2 3 \ \ \ } \ } 9 cP� \ L1 PIIVEA / r j ✓//ii✓/ / /
z PIN: 1764849503 I I I i , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
14" 0 FUEL TANK 274.1 4
J p I I 1 \ \ l 4023 CL
\ " PINF'j",INE
Z I Ica J I' \2'b\ I }�L _ , 2.65.78
\ I I I \ \ I BOLLARD =
„y AVER E TOP ELV.=268.0
_ _ v+� _ AVERA BTM ELV 260.0 / CONCRETE
X J I I I li s --26b - o - CONCRETE \ \ ° DIRT` WALL
.j1 APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING I i I 266.09-� 4024 PAD BER
LEACHFIELD LINES (TO BE FIELD I I i \ t2" PINE Z
\ 1 E PID / 265.71
/ ) I 12 INE _
VERIFIED BY CLIENTS SUBCONSULTANT I I I \ . � �� 12 PINE v ( BOLLARD
Q I CN \ l 12 PINE r RIP RAP r 268. \ �3 / // / // /
\25' BUILDING
IE G '1 I 'i \\ \ 1 / I I ! \ I CONCRETE \ 1 P P P E 15-
n o PI SPILL�y/`� \ 1
1 I ® f�^ I 1� LAR \ I `3� I 11 \ T.O.C.�285.91 T EL -2 95
v , \ \ - \ } 1 / INV. -265.46
/ I I 14 INE 16" PINEkPI
I } / / \ / �` `� ✓ i� /
U I I \ SJ 2" J / L \ /` \ NV,.265. O9
J I ( O MJM I ( CHAIN LINK \ I' 6 Q 18" 12" TO pp ELV�gg5.93
W FENCE \ /0 I \ t R RAP T#i V.-28 64 • /09' 1 / / / /
0' 11" E \ SMH 3 \ \
A07 Y 6.6 12" \ ( RIM: 264.67 \ j } ' : ,• :. 9�� ? '� // /
I CL $91.74 /30, p \
_ ( I i �K ,: �2 / \ 1o�P j INV IN: 231.06 60" RCP \ 2�. // N/F /
.) o p 00, \ Irk OUT' 250.6 60 RCP / c�1 132
W / /� CAROLYN PROPERTIES, LLC.
►-- to I I I js' POP } I M 5• / / Anon /
( a'Xa ounEr coNT1ZoL STRUCTURE / / / / DB 11721, PG 1278
zax I \INOvP \INR=Iz-s7=2e6s3q %®ry�`��{' I
/\
/Tc
/
PIN:
1/76
4750977I0
04 10" GUM 0 1' Ori6c\
74.03LLJ M\
R5t2p-
33� WALL(0
i �fCONCCRE
NV712' 261 o _ SMH 2
° °\ / \IIII ��/i \ r
._ RIM: 266.93
I 12INV IN: 252.38 60RCP/s,
BUFFER YAM B INV OUT:252.33 60" CP'
1GUM
I IIII / o�. PPDPMI \ \ _ _ / i TOP OF WALL /
- , GU \ �` _ ____ __._ // / i' .ELV-258.76
\2i GUM / `' a GUM v-249.81
w II(° \ /-1 "GUM t5" GW-\ w� 17' // /. /
/-t4" G153x: Q0
" G�1M
0 -1/ r
*\-,,
- WCONCRETE
O 12. 1 GUM ?'� \ �tOGI�, \ L12 -GU /
24 RCP x "� N \ FES OUTLET STRUCTUR
WV -256.76' I z 1 1 1 1 11" U _ \ 1 I\ INV. -253.02
I I I\ 14' GUM o� / /
OA
\ fDc
12" G 111 O
> GUM, 1 87 R255.24'
�I I n 11' 1 M \ \ \ / \/ � 1 M
Qa
i
I 12 'GUM 11"" GUM-,
/ 11s' � toGUM /
12 \ / 1}�"
I I I I \ i //
xv-21a
� // ELINEA
TE
D WETLA S, TYP.' 14
10PINE 129 M1 GUM
2" POPLAR 30'MP
INV -246.74'
18INE } o
I 0'POPLAR
/
/
961.x3 /
18" RCP
1/� OAK, \ / INV. -254.29' /
III GLq \\
a \
� 0 I 10' PINE
ZI III I I V 11• GUM-
II II 1 110 GU AP
12E
/ \
Z
11270.7
3003 ti j I�E 12'� 1 \ 1Q" 0 K C� 20' POPLAR
PP } I III I -14" GUM /O
11111 \ 1V GUM I 20" POPLAR �Q
II1\_•
�2' GU
p 14" PI�1 IN \ 4' LcINE M 10 GUMM P /
0 I 1�-12 PINE
10' Gut 14 PINE !,
/ 710, OAK\ PINE Oc
0 III ( 1 13" IN 16- GUM
lI111 15' PINE `�1 O,K r-10' GUM / NC DOT
D / 1 11 CP �,� / TRAVERSE STATION
x IIII 3" PINE B Y104- 3
x_
// I I15 GU 7' PINE GV
° 1 10 P0� '20" PINE
Y
+ h/ �=1 I E7E" PINE /
r-12' RNE /
OE
N
n
GENERAL SITE NOTES
1. EXISTING CONDITIONS BASED ON BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY M -III ENGINEERING, PLLC, 970 TRINITY RD.,
RALEIGH, NC 27607.
2. ALL PRIMARY UTILITIES DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION THAT SERVE ACTIVITIES OTHER THAN THE SITE SHALL BE
PROPERLY PRESERVED AND PROTECTED.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER AND ENGINEER ANY UNFORSEEN OR ADVERSE
CONDITIONS, INCLUDING UNCHARTED UTILITIES, DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
� US -64
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
KHA F.'ROJECT
�ttttti nt1t�
® 0128,;8001 �, SHEET NUMBER
CYVi
�
DATE "p
I l -/2'.-9 514 ® ' UPGRADES
a
2
SL
SCALE 1 " = 40' PREPARED FOR .,. "A "TIK" C" ITINSEMS U U IN
n O 2014 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. OF
No. REVISIONS DATE BY 3001 WESTON PARKWAY, CARY, NC 27636 DESIGNED BY JJWCAPITAL MIX 7 LL �&
n
a This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of serve, is intended only PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone] DRAWN BY DGB
0)for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without f�f
written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability t Kimley-Horn and NC LICENSE #F-0102 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM !d8'I1i,t11iti
0 Associates, Inc. CHECKED 3Y SEAL:

:s> .. .
11
i € s ' a �< ;r,�' ,r '.aa,-` �.r,r,.,,,. ..,..,.:.�. ", ,.,,. <. ,l i ." f",� Fj`I s,".�€:` vi�<,✓;. ..-. _.€ \E'.; °.,3`,}, '"s. n`;� ',f`,,vE 1 t \
\s rr ,•=%x ., nr £'�, r <-„ ,,,;.,.:%ce>a; ;7::L §'c ,F,�, . ".,i :n L? .....,, L ,It c },w s`',"?<:.s'Ia„t --€I'
-:,.: - ,
v.
/'_ ,,,, a�,1_t ,; _r zo <OU " �' Its f d?' €,, w v.f IDI I. y.e 3 I ""
NY`
I
a
f r _.
42
s,rkl %/,,. .__.H-- --- "...._ _" r-.__.'__- ,. _f ",_, .� _„_„ "...,_..._ ,.."_w___._.."_,,.-_, i' I I °`a f."p,�'?,i �s z ,.,r-
_...._.... " _.". ,",.__... __� _d _ __,__._.. __ . _
i - \. zx - f ,,,,� "_- µ s,,, -.. .." . _ - f " i°;, ..a' $r4z€dsipi�uii' ''f<€.3_ ) "`
' 1 „ :" ;
/ r' f
rid ` �x S FT
�r
„ _ ._
_ _... ,,
/
rra>a,,, r /"' _._,......... ....,,,mmw,m," wm>w_m,"._.-,-","<..u<w..m.m:..,.".
i 11
' <
iH., cr.s.. r ,
..mv,,, a . ..ter ..w� /-
w - M -
, .. ,-,,x,. .✓\,;�.. .,...�, .. < ....,, ,. .... r. a�/„ >,,,,,,m< ,,,,, , �.!'"v'`-^', r ✓" ;.um,�,rW.�,v,,,,�..m....,,,,,,,,,,,,,vmw,,,,,,,,,,,,, --moi.
., . $ .. -„ y.~ ,..s>.,..h„ "a ..,,/ <.: h .s N + x > //„," ,,,<,.v, . ? t. , o mom,...,..,,,
% , %`' f..
1�1.n'> m,. € ..,,,,,rw ./, ✓. r- /,:./:/ �`w .rm i%='y. E-+,.., .,,u.,,e ;�sr,`.ar.<,i,'f3VL , -,""` ^a<e I=,%:
�,�
�cro\, sr <,r - �;�,',€m�s, x ._ ' „_<%,".wrr,ds 3,, 5�<�,.t ARET ,
,
,
I ""< ,. € _ ,.-,,..,.,... ... - r,..i , 6-; .:o , rm-m.' ., r/,�, a&°90 _. _.., z +ab,L.,,v.,.r'+_,d ; m,."^,na,�.'^<rr<,>�,,.:; . i ?d s f °P<,5 ;^ � rid,, . <st.. : ,
t { ^�`gg. ,. G ,m<�r�rao" ., r r. " :rw, <..,.,, _. _. r o,sit .,;:,r„A„>r-// -..._ ... -",/ c v,"„r,. �<r \ f,�.1z�e`` �'@<x
Ill
r . ram.. .,rr
e , \ L .,
m i ,f. } is
a a 4 �<f .
m. - F r.
.� \ .,,,:. r ,, ..r, '<, „.�" ,-,..:,,.. ......... ,,,,,_, r,.rv,�,";w:,J// n� ✓, {', a' __.. ," r.:,.„ � ,, f. , . ',`i8SC °r>h4f"i s
t ,/'r y <:,,„� a,. -_ r . ";,;;a r . /y/ /l r asG.. re zrr .......- - <,! c�°fit \ s=,s
I ;dF R ,f -
:} .r ,1 ,� a.; 3# ,/,.n / - .... /rnn< ed .a „az. ia<"<' $� w`qv .,.3w ryy•....
_.. _,, g
, 2\ , v..M 10 •. ;.. re ^ " 4 v ., I <, `' x >
'�,.: (Sd, >. \. _ �;,.-'•, /• ,_. ..U.:r,,:,...a <�',�<.u<,,.aix :x�,�//,, ,< w5 d ''f:, w;.h$ s � ria /'
.. vi✓ .i ., .; ' < 3 mr+c,s,rnvmttx,m>x. .,,... I ,..3.- % / % I$, .1 A 'f' / �'4Fv'%+
e � i2
.m. €' ..
i s
)"/-/
fi '°' i rra;�.�,. / rr, , iai:r,.a „ _. - >/ /r f < 'fi'"E t` ,d d. 7 f�'z3.s.s.,.;
.' y r " i cza o 'I', , r,:r,,, r , - �: : - ; , Z', f ' / , ::` Y r , €, " 3v r"z<.",,,,,,...,,.<„ m, ,,,.a.<,�' ..,
C"3 .. i r a m-, .'v -_ .. > . ; ' ".,. , . ",_ " ". ' r I , s r rerxi -. 111" roti/ ........_, i. , rk^ �v
y .,."> r r € € "„",..,",,,., r .- ' f f r r 4, yrs>, x, g ....,, `
_� x k / ,. PROPOSED 10x40a„,, _ ,, h f?ROPOSEp BACK-UP WELL€a a..:„
_..
{..,.._,,,,_",,,,,,_.,wainvviviv,err C�,/,ri mrrviii,vvia ...'/!✓/! :.✓cgfv
I , r .: i:,,..:'a3./d'k.e. , , - € J """«„"<C „u,:'rxi�ia; w,w,svra.,w�, .. , ri:t .:.'c° 43,$1a"vf� `%� ks} 4
£.s. 3„3 s.vMr,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,n»»»»-....,.,."...w"..<az'�_.-ar,.. j //, r <,,,..,,.:-w,", warn ➢� ...,.r".�v..7"".w.r / a 1 �a 's 3,
€��///, PARKING SPACES 3 t �,,w: r.' ~`' I t __
/i i ( ) j/ " , ", M,y l v,', ,m„d „r,.., mw, bm, i I /
1 { / , I 11 - �`'` F� I:� , �% ` REMOVE STRIPING` FROM s � � � v „
ay a W /' t _ ria PROPOSED 8.5 x18 !, 69,6 i 711 "" /
f
ea w.G , a ; r� € I , - EXISTING ``PARKING; SPACES `'. 1's, ✓ m
z
1 2)
s^y �1 _"" I ; : , ;, r € a ( PARKIN ES` a �" 1 @ % g a r .
INV 11\1:26142 .J l} j HDPE ,/✓, d' S t a .:;z\. ,"�-„>..,,, \\. ,. a<z r
$, j y�r� f r .,,,,`•.. ,,,a^ / `. W, r'r'"'/'1s3 , gkw, f' s "rr- kl� �n /' 7
r°,€ r-rrj -sem: p a.{„ <'
♦ ;s d n
xy:,>� ,, 4 r 2'
jj 9, . I 77 r I"-; ""-„ i '"'•+, '4 i a k a, 5q {w, A p,?
INV w'r,J `< i✓G„ ., ,✓ 3�.i Di E 1, '� ,,1,` i .,v ..,..,,✓. ,/.. "S �4i}''%iA4C' .,-,,,,...w^^ r ,` {a q. %. & " 43`f WP2i<,
I
' > $ T r a E€ fj ,.. ! ... , , v i h .'S, a ,, ', "b� ," tk
s-< s '" `
1 ' ' $fn ' , i''1a�4}"-, ,., s i � f � ___. T"`"-'-._, t` mak: C. i �S °ia .....,,,..,.,,, .��" „yya (( f�f
€ € E r ,» ;s e t,p. ...,_., ". ... ,'`f r .,.. `^as <; rrr 4 _.., Sum,,,.,„"..,";,.`�",..,,..,.1<r„M.,..., ,.
o" s gy`� e ( ,
` E i //b" € `i ,� r{'.' :a- f'9 ,; ,i.... Yi ri .,,a a Edaa ",,,_.,. ...,,
_.
."
/ d�
TENT STRUCTURE COVERED ' =r` a , 01 ,aa ,> �
I
�_ I : ` V
i ®Ol r
i .<
< AREA AND CONTAINER m „ " <; a c$z r : -
y: a.: i, : r k Iia
$.
TO BE REMOVED 1 l` r ,; <. , I
_ ,.
I $.. .1 a = .$',,E PROPOSED 8.5 x18 \
I <<„
s, r- m
/ �'
3."_
_. .
_." , f
�'
-1111 -,,,,.. _., „I._ / PARKING SPACES 3 „<a �> -,. t a " I�aN `� :}
;� f i' . x i ,�
;.1_11�,XRM 11111
a ., j
1.��
,H
/
I�Ift�< `6 <,06 , -11-11111-1111
< i..�. s 4 ," f . ,� TCNG ' ODULAR UNIT 1 „ „ �iw<„<;.;,ij
r, €t 3
,k { y f��' f 1l'vr ,/'d
w J ;E_ /'°
,
x. t r �,,,u e
"
k /� / c E r,
__ "_.. P
I\a r . (<.. � ,d $ ..��� 1 c5 I-€ c �. _ < �....."_"..... �.. € i, ," r".."......"...:.," „a .. �\, , € /'�0 BE ERMIITED x < , a,,r �f 1
: E € ' € 1 r C`k `\, y,. ° ""\/�
af / �a °et" i,a" >'rgv%'.rs±1 f `� _ :.-a'�'4
INV 1 7i I , 2.0 , < I ROP PROPOSED 12x32 TRUCK'• 1 s+ > j I .,'E ,ea /,,,€:
I Ii } ; "" .>`� f EXISi1NG' MODULAR UNIT li, �, � /
,
\ ` r1<
„,
r
� IfPARKI G SPACES 8 5 „ ' \ y {�
I N \ )
() � r \
rf - o': , I TO3E P RMIED,MN:i: \ s :f w' J:
s ., ' �, '< , > .._ C) .. -a!0 } -'' i Ir.' \1" ? .'i /l"' \ .. 7i''61"� \ r ,�./ Zl .r:
e' , ,>, § $ I I 11, a :s PS;� 1"«,.. €.$,,, �a, : 6 < ,> %«,,' �'',/n^ dno w.g�"` ,>n,, 4 r/;
t / S x z a �� z, „ c Cr.F a11
,
m
,.:
:„` ; i yr'> "� a ,// / �/ � UiM €`iEf :f .z s �, € i ,p \ ,>✓- '�� r ,rr"' a
-.1. { i 1, $ o,., , ,. .-_....._..... .L,<::;:,«,_ ,.." 3 i r',,,r t ;$ a C ., t % ,'Ta ,''r,'"� r111",a,� c,..\ s F
I ``oa I $. ~, PROPOSED..,_. OCATION OF, t rte; r ,/ F
I
;'
r N�1 r
,>
IA. 50x50, MODULAR BULLRING .,,. \ N
<,
\ _._. o
ter/ ._,_W-,
- �r € �._.._..�. FFE=268.75...,. a ri ' :,\�\\I
wy
m.-, r,r,, r v o " w
f>''' i , > tt N yam~ a ` ..".
A
t-" ft�;,� _,. '; yrr.,.,,.,�'-,.a:ar, @ ;r^,„Yl :� �, I: :z J.,„N.... z.. F, "a`x�x� „'✓" .�/\,F
E (3 e ,kyr/x""'r'"r ' ,!. __ H \ -i,, v, ?d." ; \> t 6t N '`, . "qr'" � ,�
j 'i
1
"I'll D
.,�?.: ,.s t.r as <,A.€. µPxK-a. , i-.\ n: , �; ,i w,s<rr,r- ,m„x., $°< �\„ a`'o B ,r,, ';;."";,.'.,,-'„
�aNE
n.. / �; C. '� f : ,7 r , , i ' f W ' Via„ \,arr`' "„r
w „
11
m
s ,, of , , I (?ROPOSED $5'x18`. ,ice %\ ";
,- T f.' 3 i s i. t , n, sr, s , ,., r</ . ,/ w;, ,,.« ,,,> ,. ..,, n., : .Cr r'„ m, ,"! 1 ?1 .,.>v"'H
>a% ',s r t s .,,. } , r. P t , �S s ,. ,., ! / , r.. , , - . ! , - ~ s , N . ,./ , e,,/K' ,,.°.r' ' r,+r"'"r
N
r
rs£,,Ir a"LL F;,u,,,., �s,.rw,..,3r �yrr �€€s �.r"�< ., s-„ ,c y 9"'� ,r, ;..,, g !� , r , : y 5, ,r ? c����� { �,
s ,,.. . " r" /, s ,,.1/ , r ; ., �( .r w, . , ' ; :�"� r^>+ " r'r'.,ryIw..,� ,s
a \ �� PARKIN ,PACES �'.a,'€:
Lf "I
L lG 2u< r , r LifD cr ', y/f�� K err.,
1 % i ( , ' ag 3 /i /�/'�',r//f ' 'g'p f P fes,. �.: �l riY /!. t ca°" rr" ,,,, ',,,,'
:7 PROPOSED STORMWATER' // n
F= [ s I /, PfflPOSED` 1 x58 TRUCKr �✓ r/, n
. < , - 4959,3 , I , . *�� /'
.€ r `. ' r! / X /✓N,,x it < <
DIVERSION BERM I n ae . '"'
i � d1 x /, 'N`' I /,i
€ a .._. \4` 'fn� PARKIN DACES 2 /z 'r r; "
E DETAIL 4.4 ir" 9 / b ld€i r is/
'° o ""
a 11 r : PROPOSED 12x32 TFe; 14i „ �
I� /
,
PROP SED PR MARY"'
3 0
z =-
- PARKING SPACES 3 ��
�' \ m
I
f
I
y SEDIME TA1I0 BAST;::'.=~ ":.
J E 3 I .u, ! , € Si >2a; 1 , , F , h,�t,T i ✓/''' % ,f,_:,r\, `irk' ' ''✓''r'�' „''"'� i
i�. .....
,
' } r ,:, ; SEE DET 4.$ rte'° , .rte
i
I /, \
n>,:,.:.y % ':riirr/zr r , i. rri_„ ,r ,riiiirro , „ 5
.. , f .. r_. , 4 'i € 'g, r .r, i ,. '.� i \` r%r 2 ,✓;, r r,r /
, 5 ::., "" FOR CONS` U/��'�(ON DETAI S r � / . , - '>
APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING LEACH ;1 N s"''
- ;
a) ? f 1,<rr' /,
_ . EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO �, { . '" \
LINES TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CLIENTS .. , '"' / ,�'/, :; - "' "
jj
V) ( i -x : -..... _. 1 /"". a l2_ ,.;; r... ?; r l r. / s' G g
/, <€ r ° _ f LATE / v,
SUBCONSULTANT. CAPACITY OF EXISTING a BE RELO DI BY 'O / f, -11,1, �„
7 r , f f' rte. -• ., , �3 "
I `�«." f € , \„ .. ? 9c, i y a.,i ., ,. f ' 'C r �,y .,,. / . , € nr ,Cr / % _;........ °a / : , ; ,-' ,,."
i LEACH LINES TO DETERMINED BY OTHERS. /� : r , r ':,_ , v �
I <..' d I i. <r e < ' �`�-_.,pro - .per ' i `"�... .,"..:, // / r / r"= ri ,
5 \. aa< r }i r'' x }` ,�c.«9 4, •,,�vi c"ar,5. r/P ,iiyz / n,«, ,/ ,, e, r'. ~ ;%rr' ;>
S i ` [ } `., (.. ., -r,.' :,z"� €}, ''.,>/�-r,,r� - >'z , \ I n,F._ f r'<:>,s-. ,/' 2 r'dx31€JYaa$a ,
E i J�,-''
N ;2 €11
S ,';yt'', ,,a. ' '�;'.�;. r%>"«,"/'rd(;€'cT"c \ '/'r '`'` ,e', „r'. „% w..iu�CCK fyr',r�'
\ 3'
r '
%/: "
'
i r ✓
f, j
'J" € } %. 'max '- ' i:' r6 yi!/ .,\<r 'r
i
,.
>. _-
/" "
i /
ram s/ .,,"^<,�w. > ,
%
S. e
M s
y€
@e
} /i' €4' �ru f
I #f >
3 t�
w`
,r
r
" �w
:;
y s'
.t . ,: .�' ^-"".,.,,,_� r/� .o�' r �� "/''r"> /:✓'„ `'�.^a;.. a}�a 'c_b..�3,1a�`C?„ ,-",,�.' „�� /•" ,��'' "^'� ,.r'
/.
y ,> , ", /,
"", f� v
s r <,. ori ., f I :+ Gr , e. "S�11 o5$....
r ',
ol�l
f
I -_.7,x ./ (, ... rk €., a 1 i - f ,r, „! ,� "j„ r - Xi,;t `„"
p \. / <,
11, I
w / s „t
r'
w
\ EXISTING DIRT BERM
r%
:::Y
«$
REMOVE E IS
�,-,: P
/ \
\
I 11-1
kio --I I .,a:ro ,�.., v%,,dr' '-' �::i..;< ;tE 'S / ,.,~., � <y� ..ri;,, / -✓ r' s
d \ 4< i� rr r j
U i
s f l
S: \ r ` t c:` - ak3
2
I
° ,. `n*.
- 11
a ( ,.
I a1 i I v.. .3' /" ' $.... e;",^,,l -c.�,. '..r. _,';, % xsT I r. :'r € y°°' v`o xt % ,,//' r"
{ r ... \ >.Yi ,.a _11of s ^� �'
�...� , , , � � �� ,/ .- € $ $ - . d , 0 ✓✓//'',.:;d ` ,c ,sP ATI 4 / r^ r"; , �'i-' -}-c`' } € s"
_,_, , (F ,, `€ O .�;fq„__�" �p�'. _ s ' � f� ,' � G v�� r"rcti'<'aECTI°wj<'a / � f0 �/ -X- r3' -'�
'q 1 f ,a€, ,, ,UVI € tk 4i"' .> ,,,,,.r.,<.. r I/' f, .. ,.I , ar ,/ "'.�€' r r ,-'
I :.f 7 ; , l.a r3 x Y, .,3< O: ' a t / u,''-' "1 < " r,l,r`.....
d, 3 d }.. x.a., 3r , r r/ _ 3 :: ' r/'' 1 < 1, f< rd,� „
✓ ; } "s°"„', E:I ,.6 1 i� $ €`! ;%;-2-° ,H , . .2r� 1<,., 'a�' ,ice s , a� j / /r'/
p ! i, Ttr r`e ,.t, si ss :11 ha 's �, t \., '„, ,jig ..`,�\i'` ,. /'
n
s, /
U I I Ili} $ °„ H, _ t ,, PR POSE /COr CR ',, rz f// �0,. ; ' ,9!/ ,,r
`3 . ,. _ I (g,... ' j�.o/G - f V( N E y. r , ,r'l sa? ,,•< r/"
X /,.CHANNEL, S DE�fAI(„ „/ / , 1, 4
f 1 _ i� ,.. < t, .. °'/ FF. /7"' f/ 7 s, 4111 'za>, ,✓':e'r^` o :;r," v t / ,'/ ,rr'
j ;(I T r " ? Wry y,. "/ / /
/'
:L�"�£;>T 1 ,.,<._., £ .1:;I i I "»» s a. ," %,',/, /% n,,,.i ''' ✓<`� Zlra r,a,< r f' \' ,/
wv�ro
T -_.,b...-.,. ', S s - € . € i' s .,,;%r oz .." "„ /f i , '% f : oy',<t'!, %% -' 4 � , ° \- f w:a 'f<'
. '/ , \\ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
_;.,,..
0 M.11,
, �"..,
%h
0 I \ a m.,.... � a
c
Ly 5
11
� 4 0
7 \a
0 20 o s
f
f f'"IRI c
11
y
,,;e:,,,, 4 I i ili�i , r : 14 ;313' �,.ril g ` ,:' _....e.✓' ; .'mss' d A,
�_ " :s- ; ✓ /,. : r. if� - ^, ,.. 1. VIl t ✓ , i ` !S,J r_.,-i<s ui.)" 'str'..;
",..,,,,,,,_,,..,",,..,., w_,_,r,,,,-I ..^`.. , ,.r11 .J /lkGws. // >, '^ Lj:'- •,',., '/
Q .<,,,» , <_ .. _
ri / ,'� I , s�
> ; , -
g
¢¢ C
t ( : i"-� �"_ - .1 „;,, s $`>dz' F.,a ..,.,... .. ._ ... ... y�,., i' �'`3r'"'"�i /' Y.' f j f f
g " g P OSED CON11
. ,,�` \:,°:ti F :.ir ; ; - /'gr' / ��i. 7i€" 9' `s"sA€.a, f; I
\� C r, s„ , f <,,
ROP CRETE FLUME
' : ;r'„ ,% �!' /f„i :r ./'" y ,,,s <r'; �/O „,: n _ a qx 5F,X ,//' Q ✓ /f ' f f ., s ,/'
, ' d ,_-"1., (�Iw`rii .", /,1,.:, ,4 �r .4 'zr i :/s.3 / __t,.. .r3. i `.i vA' r.GI
y
a
I W 1 - r /r t? s fis9 ; / f'
<, j' ,I ra y / ,, f> ,.
O '�wb"+ \ i f o f%,°s 1 ir/A.i �,o✓1¢/ r l� of r•,.,.0 f ,,
v
I it / it t, / r, , / ( �.. I -' r §
''c,"I .i �, } " "\ t - .,_ „" .w / f?p1m, h� r:, Cs ,✓d r�i n;`�,., s, iii,,;
co }
p r,. � w
1-1 I
N „fc.r 1'"� i _ a ' t ' '�,° y ifi _' ,,. ,, : \.. pa, qr` t art \, fy'�i ; .� f \ r� r,. i ,s'
r,
z
O 7
r
2/e e£fir> "' f `I 14 _� �\ max, $, - n,'/i° _ 1 fl, rf't l-/ r 0 1,,.-. `CS ::'s,i":..; " SY"ai:Ci<�'
rMY-<'zwe,r ' j %'€ $ , "� ,41
- �,us y.., 1 / # - ..__ O f.>/ ' ,,,.' -"€tkv,_x�."s.:�<
N t 1 h t,.s, / T:z -< <,.r,r' Ft;z $ �`> CfJ / h. r,"./ / /, s'<a°e v ,'•,£s i"./' �.
�11/
• 13 ` 3 % a'"s I tr... . „a :' 1 `€ izv�.` , a .t 3 ,....._ I/ "I . , ° '€ ` aai'" a Iia. _ ,.: p / . f ✓
x€y' £�€f_,. „,_,E"'{� € ,3'b //'ro/ € .'ro, v< t , i/,/ 5, a �'c s< .i ,/y f{ /
i I"t k' 1,,(' 4� f ���IllRE14OVE 10 LL, ECITON I / , A> f �''
JI I IE ,� � f/// DFTAII� T„�M / / \
� I I 1; I .f `a«£ i c ) 49 /k "i € 1<_ /j// rf � ;f / a. i
",.f, ,",N, � /
� /. / ' r \I
0 ( €: 3 L£ ,, °/ � ,'` LIMITS 9F /,r, ..;:,> % '<
( 6, / / DISTURB CE /�' .! / ;
I
I m q ,-
E q € ; E 11 'c'd'a''1$F / -�, _ _ /�,�5,,."". < .$ .b„<d Zr°., SE,_� .",, , €f">
2i �i i' �f i.r / au �, / /
1 ( Iz rr- / ::w� %/ 'a! -fa' f''a% iF'4 r , f % /It l
l �� .,",
I 2 i ,�. /�
�, 7 (� y. /
0 I i /1111­`� , CUTXISIING CONCRETE ST
I ?f ' f, 1111
DR 1N PIPE FLUSH/;'WITH EDGE
I I �.
c'l r / ''"' , 0r DRIVEWAY ' /
0
`f ., s I 1..,,. /
11�1
PROPOSED CONCRETE WALL } ' r`; ' � _.a :�X-` , �, / / z /
N TOP ELEV=>259.50 1 , .. A' `` f
_ •
s /
° PROPOSED STORAGE ��/ s ,
� - ) ate.; •.� / n
Q STRUCTURE (20' x 30') I / ' F . / `�
FFE=259.75 I I I; I I . �_
Q ADD111ONAL STORAGE I `
AREA TO BE PAVED I I I , r /
I I I ;