NCG160066_Inspection Report_20220922

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG160066 Effective: 08/01/19 Expiration: 05/31/24 Owner : Barnhill Contracting Company
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Barnhill Contracting Co
County: Wake 4425 Pleasant Vly Rd
Region: Raleigh
Raleigh NC 27622
Contact Person: David Glover Title: Phone: [phone] Ext.231
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SWNC,
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 09/22/2022 Entry Time 02:15PM
Primary Inspector: Thaddeus W Valentine
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
Exit Time: 03:50PM
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG160066 Owner - Facility: Barnhill Contracting Company
Inspection Date: 09/22/2022 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Meet with Tramaine Johnson (Plant Foreman) and he showed me the SP3 (stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan)binder with
the permit documents. There didn't appear to be a list of significant spills, or lack of, for the site. Maintain a yearly log of
spills, if there are no spills, note no spills for that year
A feasability study for alternative to current practices was not included in the documents -A feasability study should be
performed annually or at least ever permit cycle to evaluate the effectiveness of current practices- This study needs to be
performed to identify the many areas on site that have stormwater pollution issues and date the year the study is done. The
study will help you identify the problems and then you can look at ways to solve those problems (Ex. batteries stored
outside, dumpsters open to the whether, drums stored upside down)
There are poly tanks with chemicals (Asphalt Release) stored without the required secondary containment- provide
secondary containments for all vessels on site that hold potential pollutants
The (PP&G)preventive maintenance and good housekeeping plan is not site specific -The (PP&G) should cover all the
potential areas on site that have the potential for polluting stormwater (asphalt production at the top of the site and vehicle
maintenance at the bottom). This plan should be provided as training to all employees and with focus the particular pollutant
that each employee may encounter doing their job. Yard personnel should know to watch for fuel leaks, oil spills, sediment
or product buildup on site, Leaky equipment and improperly stored materials for anywhere they may be associated with
while doing their job
All employees were not properly trained- all employees should know what there stormwater training is and what it involves
and they should sign off on their yearly stormwater training. The stormwater training should include deverything that the
employees of the facility may have to deal with or come into contact with.
There was an inspection checklist but it should be a site specific stormwater inspection program and checklist -A checklist
should be developed that covers all the areas on site that have the potential for polluting stormwater and it should identify the
area being inspected, what was found, and repairs or cleanup and any desposal details. This would include the desposal of
water from the secondary containment areas on site because every containment area on site has petroleum contaminated
interiers. If water is ever removed from any of the secondary containment areas on site, it should be removed and disposed
of at a qualified facility to handle and dispose of petroleum laced liquids. Additionally, there is evidence of spills at some of
the fueling areas and those areas should be cleaned up and that material should be disposed of properly as well. The
disposal of these materails should be documented and kept in the SP3.
The facility has airborn dust from dry areas not properly being watered- all areas of the site should be kept clean by
sweeping and wet enough to prevent dust. During any dry spell, dust must be maintained.
There is a maintenance shop area was found to have drums flipped upside down and shouldn't be due to drippings. Any
drums or any containers should be capped or plugged when when not in use and preferably under shelter or in secondary
containment. (used drums that are empty are still considered a pollution source unless washed out profesionally).
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG160066
Inspection Date: 09/22/2022
Owner - Facility: Barnhill Contracting Company
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Many of the required records were available on site, but some of the key components have not
been implemented and documented correctly or fully (outlined in summery)
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The sample data was available at the site but there is no record of sample data ever bein
submitted to our office. A letter was sent to Barnhill (David Glover) on 03/08/2021 with
electronic reporting requirements, but non have ever been recieved
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: Sample data was available at the site but has not been submitted as required. There is vehicle
maintenance activities accurring on site
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: The (2) outfalls were viewed and there is some descrepency on where exactly one of the
samples is being taken. Another site visit is planned to confirm those sample locations. Elicit
discharge inspections should be performed as required
Page 3 of 3