20141106 Ver 1_Application_20141021

OF W A 7F9 TlggN ENR I,y - JP 014
��• p� SPpRTgn N p� Mp �G A,7,
2 0 1 4 1 1 0 6
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
la.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
© Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes © No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
0 Yes ❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Craven 124
2b.
County:
Craven
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Bridgeton
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
17BP.2.R.56
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d.
Street address:
105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e.
City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
3f.
Telephone no.:
252 -439 -2800
3g.
Fax no.:
252- 830 -3341
3h.
Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent QX Other, specify: Division Z Environmental Officer
4b.
Name:
Jay B. Johnson
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d.
Street address:
P.O. Box 1587
4e.
City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
4f.
Telephone no.:
252- 439 -2800
4g.
Fax no.:
252- 830 -3341
4h.
Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
N/A
5b.
Business name
(if applicable)
5c.
Street address:
5d.
City, state, zip:
5e.
Telephone no.:
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
Page 2 of 10

t
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Craven 124 Bridge to Pipe Replacement
11b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.177327 Longitude: - 77.05397
1c. Property size:
acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Mills Branch
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
SC; Sw, NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1433 (Antioch Rd.) is a paved secondary road. Woodlands, agriculture and residences dominate the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 118
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge to pipe replacement. The existing bridge has deteriorated and needs replacement.
The existing 25'•5" long timber bridge�wll be replaced with including l @ 31y5 x 7'-3" al equipment box culvert.
4, Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this props /
ro'ect includin all rior hases in the property Yes ❑X No El Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type Comments:
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Preliminary ❑ Final
Name (if known):
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination Agency /Consultant Company
Other:
s or State determinations and attach documentation.
5- Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the
5b. If yes, explain in detail according ast? Yes
g to "help file" instructions. ONo DunkROWR
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b if yes, explain.
D Yes No
Page3oi10
�Gff�117 - �B �s i � f, 4 ✓a n va ry 1 D D9

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
on the site,
then complete
1. Impacts Summary
proposed
if there are perennial of intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) prop 3g
question for all Stream sites impacted.
q acted
p
3d .
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams - tributaries
project (check all that apply):
❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
3a. 3b.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
width
(feet)
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
Corps
W3
Choose one
_ Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
5
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
5
11
W5
Choose one
PER
Choose one
Yes /No
11
S3
W6
Choose one
PER
Choose one
YesfNo
�E9
Mills Branch
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
���. vVnunCr115.
3. Stream Impacts
on the site,
then complete
this
proposed
if there are perennial of intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) prop 3g
question for all Stream sites impacted.
q acted
p
3d .
3e.
Type of
3f.
Average
Impact
3a. 3b.
3c.
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
�
(INT) •
YP
jurisdiction
I
stream
length
(linear
Stream impact Type of impact
intermittent
width
(feet)
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Corps
5
59
_ Choose one
Mitls Branch
PER
5
59
S1 cw�n
PER
Corps
5
11
S2 P Culvert
Mills Branch
PER
Corps
11
S3
Mills Branch
PER
Corps
5
� Culvert
64
Mills Branch
Culvert
' mpacts
S5 T
Choose one 3h. Total stream and tributary 1
� - -�
Comments' 66 is temporary impaci for S3
gq s emporary imr�a`'
1011
,�e�s�o�
page A o�QCNFoco
qr

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indiv" ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑x Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
6C.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
-Temporary
B1 P
Fill
Mills Branch
No
1,613
868
B2 P
Fill
Mills Branch
No
1,847
932
B3 P
Fill
Mills Branch
No
1,628
365
B4 P
Fill
Mills Branch
No
788
0
B5
Yes/No
B6 -
-- - - - - --
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
5,876
2,165
61. Comments:Zone 1 Impacts = 0.1349 Acres: Zone 2 Impacts = 0.0497 Acres
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are 5,876 sq.ft. of buffer zone 1 impacts and 2,165 sq.ft. of buffer zone 2 impacts due to the installation of 1 @ 31' -5" x 7' -3" aluminum box
culvert.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes X❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity.
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
E] Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
See Stormwater Management Plan.
❑X Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%u
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
N Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project involves the replacement of Craven County Bridge *240124 on SR 1433 (Antioch Rd.) over Mills Branch. The existing bridge consists of 1
25'- 5" timber deck span on steel 1 -beams and is to be replace with a 1 @ 31' - 5" x 7' - 3" Aluminum Box Culvert (58.5' total length, 7.25' total
width) at the same location. The project also includes 150' of approach roadway improvements and 250' of the improvments to the existing roadside
ditches.
The existing ditches in the northwest and southeast quadrants will be improved with 3:1 side slopes to provide treatment of the stormwater runoff into
Mills Branch outside the buffers.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
DWR 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase If
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
DHOW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
E] Session Law 2006 -246
❑X Other: NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes X❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes Q No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge)
of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Onsite field investigation by Jay Johnson "No Effect"
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCWRC - See attached document.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT HEU Historic Architecture and Archaeology - See attached documents.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
X❑ Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Designed to no rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson
10 -13 -2014
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
A Ica gent's nature
(Agents nat e ' valid o ff an authorization
le r fro e a li is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Project Tracking No.:
13 -10 -0020
NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM A1094�
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
a o p a�hjt� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the L •�.., �
�tC ✓ Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Bridge 124
WBS No: 17BP.2.R.56
F.A. No:
Federal Permit Required?
County: Craven
Document: MCS
Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP14
Project Description: This project proposes to replace Bridge 124, which carries SR-1433 (Antioch Rd) over Mills
Branch in Craven County, North Carolina. According to the environmental input request, the undertaking
involves the in place replacement of the structure along the existing alignment, thereby minimizing potential
surface and subsurface disturbances at this location. An off -site detour route (SR 1520 to US17 to SRI 433) is
anticipated. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) is centered upon Bridge 124 and measures 600ft
in length (300ft from each bridge end point) and 1 Soft in width (75ft from each side of the SR1433 center - line).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The project area is located in the very southeastern portion of Craven County, a short distance east of the Neuse
River and immediately west of US17 within the small Forest community. Mills Branch is a first order stream flowing
northeast to southwest beneath the Bridge 124 structure. It empties into the Neuse River roughly one mile south
of the bridge location. The APE is characterized by residential land alteration impacts in the northeastern and
southwestern quadrants, agricultural lands in the southeastern quadrant, and a poorly drained forested section in
the northwestern quadrant.
First, construction design data and other pertinent project information were examined for determining the
character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces surrounding Bridge 124. Once an APE was
defined, a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Friday,
October 25, 2013. This background work determined that no previously documented archaeological sites are
located within or adjacent to the archaeological APE. Based on the local archaeological site profile, diffuse scatters
of artifacts related to 20th century domestic occupations are commonplace in this general vicinity. These resource
types do not represent significant or meaningful historic remains and are rarely recommended for further study.
An inspection of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD),
Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website
evidenced an absence of these historic resources within the project area. In addition, historic maps of Craven
County were appraised for former structure locations, land use patterns, or other confirmation of historic
occupation in the Bridge 119 vicinity and archaeological /historical reference materials were inspected as well. In
general, the cultural background review established some potential for the recovery of historic artifacts associated
with 20`h century agrarian occupations. Typically, these redundant local resource types are unlikely to provide
meaningful data.
Further, topographic, geologic, and NRCS soil survey maps (Ln) were referenced to evaluate pedeological,
geomorphological, hydrological, and other determinants that may have resulted in past occupation at this location.
Aerial photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) and the Google Street View map application (when amenable)
were also examined /utilized for assessment of disturbances, both natural and human induced, which compromise
the integrity of archaeological sites. Environmental factors do not suggest a heightened archaeological site
potential in the project APE. Modern impact elements dominate the diminutive APE corridor.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for Minor Trauusportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
I of 2

Project Tracking No.:
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The project APE contains no NRHP listed historic properties, previously documented archaeological sites, or
cemeteries. Predicated on aerial and on- ground imagery, the APE has been irretrievably altered by road and
residential construction impacts. The remaining areas are poorly drained or have been subject to years of
agricultural utilization. As such, no potential exists for the recovery of significant archaeological artifacts or cultural
deposits /features within the currently defined APE. No further work is recommended for this in- place, state -
funded NCDOT Division 2 bridge replacement project.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
® Photos ❑Correspondence
Other:
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for Minor Traniporinlion Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreemeul.
2 of 2

Craven 124 CRAVEN 124
SR 1433, ANTIOCH ROAD
OVER MILLS BRANCH
ASKINS USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 9 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF CRAVEN COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 5582
MAP NUMBER 3720558200)
LOWER NEUSE 03020204
MILLS BRANCH C;Sw,NSW
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BR2.R.56
JULY 16, 2013
rj
CRAVEN 124 '' �'. •.. ") F..-
N 525164.7865
E 2581468.0311 ,
N 35 -10 -38
W 77 -03 -14 ._
N 35.177327
W 77.053970
fix
mot•, —
.,
ti
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet r t -

0
0
0
v
N Oy
W j
Q
U
0

0
0
0
N
.-
W
J
Q
U

Ln —Leon sand
Map Unit Setting
• Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 200 to 280 days
Map Unit Composition
• Leon and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Leon
Setting
• Landform: Flats on marine terraces
• Down -slope shape: Linear
• Across -slope shape: Concave
• Parent material: Sandy fluviomarine deposits and /or eolian sands
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Poorly drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Low (about 3.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: Farmland of unique importance
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 4w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Typical profile

• 0 to 3 inches: Sand
• 3 to 15 inches: Sand
• 15 to 30 inches: Fine sand
• 30 to 33 inches: Fine sand
• 33 to 66 inches: Fine sand
• 66 to 80 inches: Fine sand
TaB— Tarboro sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
• Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Map Unit Composition
• Tarboro and similar soils: 75 percent
Description of Tarboro
Setting
• Landform: Ridges on stream terraces
• Landform position (two - dimensional): Shoulder, summit
• Landform position (three - dimensional): Crest
• Down -slope shape: Convex
• Across -slope shape: Convex
• Parent material: Sandy fluviomarine deposits and /or alluvium
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 6 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Very low (about 2.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 3s
• Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Typical profile
• 0 to 9 inches: Sand
• 9 to 48 inches: Sand
• 48 to 99 inches: Gravelly sand
De— Deloss fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
• Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period. 200 to 280 days
Map Unit Composition
• Deloss, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
• Deloss, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Description of Deloss, Drained
Setting
• Landform: Marine terraces

• Down -slope shape: Concave
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Loamy fluviomarine deposits
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Very poorly drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 3w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Typical profile
• 0 to 9 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 9 to 19 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 19 to 45 inches: Sandy clay loam
• 45 to 80 inches: Loamy sand
Ap— Arapahoe fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
• Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
• Frost free period: 200 to 280 days
Map Unit Composition
• Arapahoe, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
• Arapahoe, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Description of Arapahoe, Drained
Setting
• Landform: Depressions, flats
• Down -slope shape: Linear
• Across -slope shape: Concave
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Very poorly drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Knot): High (1.98 to 5.95 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 3w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D

,
I ;
,• ,
cig
r
�
Gm
s
#
ryio
x
C
T
.b• �. y,
Gr k
4
+
elrito�
[
Eli
C z;
L4(wro
.e \
goy E• °~
�,: b
�.
•J
Or
•�CAtkx�y.
\
♦
Cem.
,�,t
Cy�1- {ti�fi%
r~
/per
Forest--'-
Shad
cow,
�J
-'"
i
s �
,. _ :, i �
4P •.,,... ... Yom` t
�.
_; gP
�
�
�
Y
�{ a -i
X
♦ • t
{{'
+� ?, t
...
' P,
O
��
_ . y .:I.
n I,
jrp•`

'o
Or
Qa
or.
I
al
ro

r`
p
r+'
ko

4i !4

Project LIU(* No. Internal Use)
REQUEST FOR CULTURAL -/0- 670 Z o
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM
MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Joyner, Human Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1598
Send Electronic Submittals to: PAtracker @ncdot.gov
ATTENTION: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor E�T�REQ
Mary Pope Furr, Historic Architecture & Lan
FROM: BILL BRAME JR =0CT DIVISION 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST 13
DATE: OCTOBER 9 2013
PROJECT INFORMATION wr ...�...en.•a.�eA!!
Project No:
Craven 124
County:
Craven
WBS No
17BP.2.R.56
Document
Minimum Criteria Sheet
Existing ROW.
60'
Type:
60'
Fed. Aid No:
N/A
Funding:
State Federal
USGS Quad
Askins
Project
January 2015
Name:
Schedule:
Project Description:
Timber floor on I -beams
Structure
Replacement of bridge 124 over Mills Branch.
Replaced:
s4 1-0�33
Additional Design Information:
** Work cannot begin until a charge number is provided that can be billed to by staff in the Human
Environment Section.
DESIGN INFORMATION
Project Length:
500' from each end of
Detour
SR1433 -US 17- SR1433
existing bride
Route:
Existing ROW.
60'
Proposed
60'
ROW.-
Existing X-
N/A
Proposed X-
N/A
section:
section:
Structure to be
Timber floor on I -beams
Structure
1961
Replaced:
Build Date:
Additional Design Information:

Praject Tracking No. (Internal Use)
13 -10 -0020
- sr
♦ HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
' This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County:
Craven
WBS No.:
17BP.2.R.56
Document
Type:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
X State ❑ Federal
Federal
Permit(s):
X Yes ❑ No
Permit
Typ e (s):
NWP 14
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 124 on SR 1433 (Antioch Road) over Mills Branch (off -site
detour planned).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIPTION OFREVIEWACTIVITIES, RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS: HPOWeb reviewed on 4 November
2013 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Craven
County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated an APE of cultivated
fields, woodland, and cleared, mostly residential, parcels on which stand unexceptional resources dating
mostly to the second half of the twentieth century (viewed 4 November 2013). A circa -1935 house
southeast of the existing bridge is altered in both form and use. Constructed in 1961, Bridge No. 124 is
neither included in the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey, nor representative of any distinctive engineering or
aesthetic type. Google Maps "Street View" confirmed absence of critical historic structures /landscapes in
APE (viewed 4 November 2013).
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDES A RELIABLE BASIS FOR REASONABLY PREDICTING THAT
THERE ARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE. RESOURCES IN
THE PROJECTAREA: APE extends 700 feet from each end of the existing bridge (S -N) and 100 feet to
either side of the existing SR 1433 (Antioch Road) center line (W -E) to encompass proposed construction.
County GIS /tax materials and other visuals support the absence of significant architectural resources.
The county comprehensive architectural survey (1980 -1983) and related publication, as well as later
studies, include no properties in the APE (Peter B. Sandbeck, The Historic Architecture of New Bern and Craven County,
North Carolina (New Bern: Tryon Palace Commission, 1988)). No National Register- listed properties are located
within the APE, including the Federal permit area, or along the proposed off -site detour route (US 17 and
SR 1433).
Should any design elements of the project change, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture
as additional review may be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
--NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Date
Hisi"nc Archilectum takMindcacpes NOS( l' HGQ( % /lUsU Juno fm' d4inur 1 ranspnrlaaai Praieds as Oaalijed in the 2(H)? 11mgmnaeatic AKirement

43
a i
171 ,
",v vj,ng
ro j t Area
a 1,1 CRAVEN
a '•1
43
0 >.
ov
f'
1 ytti38�14
/,V
,
Vallmt Enrurakl �,l P
1), Gull CNIb y
Sri21 tai
CI
Bridge No. 124 Replacement WBS No. 17BP.2.R.56 Craven County
Base map: HPOWeb, nts
NCDOT — Historic Architecture
November 2013
Tracking No. 13 -10 -0020

I�
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Maria Rogerson, P.E.
Division Bridge program Manager, NCDOT
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: August 29, 2013
SUBJECT: Division 2 Bridge Replacements
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661- 667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699 -1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Bridge Memo Page 2 August 29, 2013
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush -hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist should be
notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be required.
NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for information on
requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
11. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long -term erosion control.
12. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
13. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
14. Only clean, sediment -free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
15. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be

1
Bridge Memo Page 3 August 29, 2013
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40 -50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100 -year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
• Pitt County, replace bridge No. 208 on SR 1907 over Ditch: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County, replace bridge No. 119 on SR 1538 over Hunting Run: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Craven County, replace bridge No. 124 on SR 1433 over Mills Branch: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 150 on SR 1530 over Fork Swamp: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.

4
Bridge Memo Page 4 August 29, 2013
• Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 105 on SR 1326 over Broad Creek: Anadromous
species are found in this portion of Broad Creek. NCDOT should follow all stream
crossing guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including an in -water work moratorium
from February 15 to June 30. We recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge.
Standard recommendations apply.
• Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 249 on SR 1336 over Duck Creek: Duck Creek is
designated as a Primary Nursery Area. NCDOT should follow all stream crossing
guidelines for anadromous fish passage, including an in -water work moratorium from
February 15 to September 30. We recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge.
Standard recommendations apply.
Beaufort County, replace bridge No. 119 on SR 1520 over Beaverdam Swamp: We
recommend replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at (919) 707 -0370. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on this project.

Craven 124 CRAVEN 124
SR 1433, ANTIOCH ROAD
OVER MILLS BRANCH
' - - - - - -- ASKINS USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 9 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF CRAVEN COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 5582
MAP NUMBER 3720558200J
LOWER NEUSE 03020204
MILLS BRANCH C;Sw,NSW
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
l _ WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.56
•n ly T - - -••- - -.:.
JULY 16, 2013
tp
;._. ,-- i
_ _ _ , • ._ � �. , -^ Jam^ . _ _ �.� -� �_ - -- _.. - �_.__.
Roo
�.. - I - .^ �. I•. :gym - .. •; I - � - '• `� ,'t
I r • • 1 -y'Y. � � t t � I l . • - 41 -
CRAVEN 124
I r N 525164.7865
E 2581468.0311
N 35 -10 -38 i
W 77 -03 -14
1. -N 35.177327 � + f. � -- _ y —...•
W 77.053970
.y iam
_ ,p 'per ,,� ,• `. ' -
• ' ' � 1509 �� -` r "� ti • e>3 ! � -__._ - -_ - , . `,
shad �9- - i�` C' •�
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet

;,� craven 124 CRAVEN 124
SR 1433, ANTIOCH ROAD
OVER MILLS BRANCH
ASKINS USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 9 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF CRAVEN COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 5582
MAP NUMBER 3720558200)
LOWER NEUSE 03020204
MILLS BRANCH C;Sw,NSW
NEUSE RIVER BASIN
WSS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.56
JULY 16, 2013
S �
�� S \ \s>>
ip
j435
CRAVEN 124
N 525164.7865
E 2581468.0311
N 35 -10 -38
W 77 -03 -14
N 35.177327
W 77.053970
5�1�90
W
W
SR15�9 r �
19
sR�so3
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
0
SR�6 8
0
5 ��/

)e

0
(n
X)
1
A
W
W
v
mr
m
r
Ov
<0°
�v
mz
Zc�m
_,
�r
0
om
AZ
mX
c0Z
Z
00
J
m

�
§
o»
-4
-0
%§
e
§
Wto
9
=
CD <
(D
\E
#
»
a
-m —
\
�-
§
0
\
/
\
2
(
-0
§w
<
X1
Cl)
k C/ o
}
}/k }
o
CL
gg|
}\°
}
\\
CD
>
OD
(
}\
0
y
0
/
)
0=
_
\
m
CD
J
k
.\
M
7
}@
§
/
G
2
CD
}
,
o
»
}
\\
\
CR
, m, &
®@a
E
\*/y CDCD n
cm
] ! m ..
zy, CD
( ¥f
CL
)/j
®k/
)
73
) \\
OD
Z3
\�D
CD
«3(
]\2
(D3.\
\k3
CDx
X.
/nX
CL Ul
CD
a�(
0/\
01 7
//
i\
CD
cc
)\\
(E
a\ o
CD
\}
CD
[
ƒ 7
§ m
\ =
C)
)
\ /
{
CD rn ca.
�
�
\
ƒ
'o §
AZ
}' /0
�§
-O•
{I
/
%§
0
§
9
=
z
z
#
»
o§ -0 Ga
o
-m —
\
§
{
}
\
/
\
m
<
°
\
k C/ o
}
}/k }
o
CL
\f�
}\°
}
OD
(
j
:om 0
y
0
/
\
m
J
;m° ]
]
§
2
G
2
CD
}
,
o
z
®E -
\\
\
CR
�§
-O•
{I
/
o m § m
, m = CL f
n20 =
{o3 § \
» b e R a g;
Q
cn \ / \ cn
� § %}
\-4
§o
\/
83
\
)\ ND
¢
� �\
/
k
m
o m § m
, m = CL f
n20 =
{o3 § \
» b e R a g;
Q
cn \ / \ cn
� § %}
\-4
§o
\/
83
\
)\ ND
¢
� �\
°
k C/ o
j
:om 0
J
;m° ]
§
2
G
2
'o
C)
,
o
®E -
\\
#�E
, m, &
®@a
E
Q
B
) m J ,
; -�;
E
U)r-
«
\q.
E
m E
©
#
o m § m
, m = CL f
n20 =
{o3 § \
» b e R a g;
Q
cn \ / \ cn
� § %}
\-4
§o
\/
83
\
)\ ND
¢
� �\

� R}
/ \/
«
�
{ƒ
�
§/»
\/)
\}
�'m
/&
/(D
222;
{E.®.
§
\.
.
}g)
=
7-
/k
(D
_ _
e\
� &
\ \j
CD
z%
U)
0
(
\)
_
~
\F/
mA
°
/
k
-
-
UT
e
`
ED
_
0
\
/
z
7
-
}
3
CD
_
z
E
©
�
\
,Z
`
z
z
2
}
\2,J�
�[
$
CO
; /ice
2
2 A o
N
9
m 2
z;±
7
)/
G
k
2 >] K
j
§
4
2
I| §
{
\
(
/
CD
a
a•®
30
\
2Mj(
ID
3
`
'
§k\ (
/
\
o
V r. k
z
\
/
)
Cl)
/
B\
§
$(E
t
$E_
(
0
I
�
\
/(\
/
(
»�
CD
Z
z
0
®
®_-
Q
\ �\
z
w
z
w
0
c ;
E
.

a
A
A
U
OZ
_
a0
.,
m
N
r
r r f
CmY
`
cn
+Arno
3 �'
Z
m°
oocno
O
-
O
rrxwu0
1
- --4
Z _
N
-a
a<
N n N
W
<
O
A
A
0 —
y N
v
Q
(D
v
v
N d
N
3
� �
m
3
ca
� �
d
X CD
O
O
y
x (D
� �
a
w �
s
n
O (D
T
0
O
C
y
0
!D
Q (D
(D
_D
(Q
7 (D
d
m
N
<
C7
x
_CL
O
(D
O
z
(D
(D
c
Z
p ?
a
O
Dn
3 W
CD
d to
m
a
m
m
z m `� 0
N m
w
N
° m o d
m
m
n
i z 3 3
=3
Dmi
0
CD
3
c(°D
m 0
(mn
< C) D =
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
o C
(D
CD
°J
r (D
m 9
y
to O.
y
r 3 v
CD
Z �
CD
m D
n
O
O
O
S
0
o
r
O
0
N�
n
w
o 00 C
o'
o
o
m a
m
w
_
_
N
O
O
7
(D
3
Q
<
W
(D
(D'
1
O
O-
J
v
n
y O
0 9[
Z
0
Z
0
c m
y (D O
(D n 0
a 7c 7c
W

! § ¥
\
f/
<
j
?e
/
\
\
\Cl)
�
�}
!e
/
@
» ƒ
\ }\)
»mow
k / })
rr
«
m
® §
m
a
_
§
m
\\
�
__
¥
\2[
�
$ e
_
a
n
- *(g
�
}»)\
}\
_
^
&
a792
N
�
2
RJ)
/j\
/ /\)
f
\
2®£
\r;E
g2E
\ //\
e §
�T9R
02 }%
\(= §k
OD
=zo=-
)JmS�i\
�{
� /
z
}»)\
}\
a792
N
RJ)
/j\
2®£
\r;E
g2E

O
m
�
m
D
Z
r
CO
M
'
w
C') i
n
C
x
m
J
(n
W
-
N
m
D
r
�
w
n
v
v
m
T U)
w
O D
O
�O
A
O
OZ
n
Q
Ln
z
Q
m
m
O
m
m
'fl
� D
D D
r
0
\/
r
'^
O
cn
m
m
rn
Z
�= m
C
N
N
Q
Z
m
W
C7
N
r
m
_
r
O
m
N
O
s
v m
D
N
co
m
0
� O
N�
-- n
r
O
M
m
x m
W
D C
nT
mT
MM
z
m
M
Z
N

- .♦91819- 9. N WPC vw6 E851 PYpPY d.,Iy p+rMwa PW1 Pw urxlrwWw *1'•Y.-.arn
C'961 MSIA3MOJOHd WY Ob5l Yawl uyde.Ikgrwr0ln.*Y L.,y Yw ......n W1•'CHIs
9L♦i 193n03N NO 116VlIYAY 4 S109NA5 ON, — ..dY99Pda1 9w916363n 630 --, 11
L5011 VINISaIA'NOl S3a'A3Aans ivoiw1010 5'n Aa 31Y5 80{ P"N Unn Wde 191941 'sydVAO"leuaa uo M, el
9L0'!1 "19'LL09E SOtlYONYlb A3YNN33V dVo 1-11VN NI�M 4311nb�� aVN Snr,l lJa1lM.eril PiaV p1.Y PIWI pmPwaa gVJlpll rFn'1 payarp q. Nx{
)�nrr r. e+ ax. ax .,,y.. .ra iJ:6N p l3tND IV N(AlNagb �N11 Hu10a pryerp /Q w.OyCw 1)!M
'7' N t•NINSV ne.M,p)F ]w nw ux� Y. •n,l - ,olxau v„ x1r0. 3NDIOYII ewl Fw Fun Nln valrw a We rpaPPirlaw 11 Ywn upolalold llR lAUu
Y)lYM x!xN NYpI >t• 1Ni, )Irwmirxn ,xl '.1r'rcwaY rrn•.s :xmxran F %I w1VPO uevJaury V
nw,em Si PFn1.w nai all xrnx.le rr6NPNrur au ' V3N p rMd aa W
"::=.0001 a! q Oy r31M C. "Mv.- 13w SANI. H— 91 Pul P-n xw iu- 1
.'-N al G w-a s n C11ro8 Yl .-W l - 6151 D 19111,9 inum 31191030 WN0,11" Isuw IYw.a1uF� 4+awe11 walr.4 aHni.Pxnv w1101q
tlww 133A S IVA031NI onomm) :1f; 7�,1', VWN,rI PaNNl MO11 P!®wn10 w' 'YONx!oM pwaa!{mt
. .. _. pro. wk,J n �••�•� alryns p.e4 j'� .�,! SXOdMd Ilumle&MV W PlpAliw. lu1 i� Ud1FUgtUI NVI
ArMy91y AJ9puonas - __� VOF.&SLg PaI SI 1 , n
'aJJ4a l31aa•lF f 0 S 1 I L 45 SON -q pNld.uo� eleP �r aa55
♦ �. .'.. -. a19yn5 Paan.dwl - j-1Vly _-- '_'- -]- -_�.S' 3?�ar �3TaSFd qO, NN Sf61 Wtl304p PIM{ OL5[UaNn sVdedbwyd
Jdo` io play pa0. AmP149!1 AMMO V A.aw.rd - _ - __�Wcf_ =000c aW -� OW[ .mt 3_ =Q __ pppt r_ • Hua.,uU.I5W4)ew l�WwweJ9nM"M A9 A411.BOda1
NOUV301S5Y10 OYOa 1 —S NOPOe'J eaxa.q 4WN pur
000,9,1 31VJ5 AamnS 1a318opaD a41 A9 pa4s!IQ d p .ePa3 pe'pWdeyy A
�•„ 1wNli. 9u ` v » J£.1 El' b39 { 'I. fiE,GO.tL
.........+• .o........nr n..w.oro reM... e _
,.OF,/O.SC .- -- -- r • ' }� i4 --- -` -' -. - lr- .- -- - - -� .. j_ H S
�, 1\ �+ ? � -T. 01
raflj '. '� p f -' - - - -- - - -- -- -
9 I
aJ...
• uaua'I O , {. I .__._ IJ __ .... IfrWf.u. __ _. -.. __ i33J
PIG
�', / '•- oN ; -
� � •I I d rplM'M aN, �7
I
' Br
I
((w
iv
i
n I ..
16.
1 _ , ,IT9� r •Y b �
�,..... �{........ i. ) +. .. I.. I I '. 1CaApAj`• 2 A i
1Ip ! 'i•. s �
.01 - "WR
Ace I
. I
M
l0. • ,. -- -.._ -- v.GO
I
n
4
l0. _,.. •., .. � .�._— � ,� / „- •'.,, •\. d6f � 1� i- _ a �, ', „y
I' Fu
,I 1
_
q
_ N
�Plrw aD• af3•rf t 1 �.
r a,
y
i
I-
1(31 • . -�_ � % -^ _ .��- � �.. r• `• ��! ; '/ '' ._._ t -IBa.iLL.
F.
y
(W
.51.4E 11 �� - ..___... __- -_ _ -_ _.... -- .L,r• -__ — __.__... _.i _ 7 �. __._L._ —_. ._ - -... 1 _... - -.) __ _ _, ti :1.... -_ , -
.90r /1 N 1":31d bODObai 94 .OE,. rl� [I. IYWb ll. lU Mh ]rrl6
.Of•L0.lG
P5� nlox.,crrn .� Nrda Flr +," VNn08V0 H18ON 'HD131Va A3Adns 1VDIDO1030
+d'A (OIHdY8DOd01) S31tl3S 31f1NIW S'L S3 MnOS38 01WON003 ONY 1V8rllVN J0 1N3W1.MVd30 b�
oar '00 N3AV80- VN!IOaVO H18ON MOIN31N1 3H1 d0 LN3Wd,8Vd3Cl y$,
31ONVNOVf10 NINSV VNIIOLIVO HILTON d0 31V1S
S31V1S 031INf1