20141093 Ver 1_401 Application_20141014

- MULKEY
ENGIN[ I CON L_TAN 7
6750 Tryon Road
Cary, North Carolina 27518
PH: (919) 851 -1912
FAX: [phone]
2 0 1 4 1 0 9 3
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit D October 15, 2014
NC Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
From: Mark Mickley
Mulkey Engineers and Consultants
6750 Tryon Road
Cary, NC 27518
Re: Hoke County Regional Sewer System Job No.: 2012076.00
Proposed Sandy Grove Pump Station
Hoke County, NC
I am sending you the following item(s):
COPIES
DATE
PAGES
DESCRIPTION
1
10/15/2014
Permit Fee check
2
10/15/2014
PCN Package with full size drawings
2
10/15/2014
PCN package with half size drawings
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑ As requested ❑ For your use
® For approval ❑ For signature
® For review and comment ❑
Remarks:
To Whom it May Concern,
Please find attached four copies (2 full, 2 half) of a PCN package requesting approval of a GC3884 to
supplement a NWP12 for proposed sewer line activities in Hoke County, NC. Please contact me at 919-
858 -1797 or mmickley @mulkeyinc.com with and questions or comments.
Copy to: File RECEIVED
OCT 15 2014
DENR -LAND QUALITY
STORMIIVATER PERMIT•f INQ
Signed: —�
z�
ark Meanager ley
Project

October 14, 2014
Mr. Chad Turlington
Fayetteville Regional Office
NC Division of Water Resources
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
MULKEY
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS
Subject: PCN for Hoke County Regional Sewer System; Sandy Grove Pump Station
Dear Mr. Turlington,
This letter is in reference to the attached PCN for your review. The PCN describes the proposed
work to be done within a sanitary sewer easement purchased by Hoke County beginning near the
intersection of Old Wire Road and Chason Drive in Sandy Grove, NC. The work will include
installation of new infrastructure to upgrade the existing sewer service at the Sandy Grove
elementary and middle schools from pump and haul service to a gravity flow system. A pump
station and force main sewer alignment are also proposed to connect the gravity flow alignment to
existing infrastructure. Permanent impacts will result from installation of a gravel maintenance road
to access the proposed pump station.
Permanent stream or wetland impacts for the proposed project do not exceed 150 linear feet or
1/10` of an acre, however, mechanized clearing and permanent impacts within wetland areas are
proposed. Therefore, a General Certification 3884 is being requested from NCDWR along with a
NWP 12 from the US Army Corps of Engineers. The current permanent impacts are exactly 1/10`'
of an acre (4,316 sgft).
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (919) 858-
1797 or by email to mmickley @mulkeyinc.com.
Sincerely,
ark Mickley
Project Manager
MULKEY ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS, INC.
Attachments:
Maps of site
Impact drawings
Pre - Construction notification
CC: Christine Wicker, USACE, w/ attachments
RECEIVED
OCT 15 2014
DENR -LAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMITTING
MULKEY INC. 6750 TRYON ROAD CARY. NO 27511 PO Box 33127 RALEIGH. NO 27636 PH: 919 - 851-1912 FAx: 919-B51-1918 WWW.MULKEYINC.COM

O/0� , \\NAT 96
plqiii�Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Sandy Grove Pump Station
2b.
County:
Hoke
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Sandy Grove; Stonewall Township
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A RECEIVEn
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
OCT 1 r
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Hoke County STORM WATER PE
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
4 -56; pg 004
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Tim Johnson, County Manager
3d.
Street address:
227 N. Main Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raeford, NC 28376
3f.
Telephone no.:
910 - 875 -8751
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
I tjohnson @hokecounty.org
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
® Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
Michael D Allen, PE, LEED AP
4c
Business name
(if`applicable)
Mulkey Engineers and Consultants, Inc
4d
Street address
6750 Tryon Road
4e
City, state, zip
Cary, NC
4f
Telephone no
919 - 858 -1888
4g
Fax no
91'9- 851 -1918
4h
Email address
mallen @mulkeyinc com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Mark Mickley
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Mulkey Engineers and Consultants, Inc
5c
Street address
6750 Tryon Road
5d'
City, state, zip=
Cary, NC
5e
Telephone no
919 - 858 -1797
5f
Fax,no
919- 851 -1918
5g,
Email address
mmickley @mulkeyinc com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2609

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
PIN 794730001319
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 34 9526 Longitude -79 0957
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
6 0 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
Rockfish Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
B
2c River basin
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a Describe,the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the, vicinity of the, project at the time of this
application
Existing conditions on the property consist of 50% forested and 50% maintained /disturbed areas in the form of existing
utdity,easements and roadside rights -of -way- Surrounding area consists primarily of rural residential housing and
agriculture
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 289 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent; and perennial) on the property,
22 linear feet
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
To upgrade the existing sewers stem currently servicing Sandy Grove Elementary and Middle School
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The proposed project will upgrade the existing sewer system to service Sandy Grove elementary and middle schools
with a gravity sewer system Existing service at the schools is pump and haul The project will require a 30' easement
with permanent 14' access /maintenance road heading north from Arabia Road to a proposed 8'x12' pump station
location south of Rockfish Creek From there a 20' easement is proposed heading-west from the pump station to Ellis
Rd paralleling an existing power line corridor The proposed easement will be mechanically timbered prior to sewer
installation using a feller buncher or skidder Stump removal and pipe installation will be conducted with an
excavator
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have,jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the pa`st?
❑ Yes 0 N ❑ Unknown
Comments A JD has not be, requested, however,
delineations were conducted at the project site by Mulkey
Inc in February 2013
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was�made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Mulkey, Inc
Name (if known) Mark Mickley
Other
4d If .yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Project,History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, explain /
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1,a , Which sections,were completed below for your,prolect (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ®T
Mechanized
clearing,
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
0 041 P
excavation, fill
forest, PFO
1:3 No
El DWQ
0 047 T
W2 ®P ®T
Mechanized
clearing,
Headwater
® Yes
'® Corps
0 047 P
excavation, fill
forest, PFO
❑ No
❑DWQ
0 037 T
W3 ®P ®T
Mechanized
clearing,
Headwater
® Yes
® Corps
0 011 P
excavation, fill
forest, PFO
[_1 No
❑DWQ
0 012 T
Mechanized
® Yes
® Corps
W4 [:I P ®T
clearing,
PEM /PFO
El No
E] DWQ
0 083 T
excavation
Mechanized
® Yes
® Corps
W5 [:I P ®T
clearing,
PEM /PFO
❑ No
❑DWQ
0.011 T
excavation
2g. Total wetland impacts
0-289
2h Comments -Permanent impacts are a result of a permanent access road necessary for pump station maintenance
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial ocintermittent stream impacts,(including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ —,non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ®T
Open cut sewer
S1
❑ PER
® Corps
3
22
line install
® INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑, PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑, Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
22,
31 Comments
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number —
Permanent'(P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if- applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Water'body
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑ P ❑,T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake,construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
Sf. Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ® No If`yes, permit,ID no"
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts( for DWQ)
If project will impact,a protected npanan buffer, then complete the chart.below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If an ,im acts require mitigation, then you MUST'fdl out Section D of this form
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes El No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes, E] No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes E] No
B4 ❑P ❑T
El Yes No
B5 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The proposed easement has been designed to follow existing property lines and easements As much as possible, the
easement was designed to cross wetlands at the most narrow point to minimize impacts The location of the pump station was
moved uphill and out of the floodplam of Rockfish Creek where it was originally anticipated to avoid additional wetland
impacts Additionally, the gravel access road has been designed to cross wetland areas at -grade to avoid interruption of
hydrologic flow
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Silt,fence and tree protection fence will be installed parallel to, the easement to identify the limits of construction and ensure
that construction equipment avoids additional impact The gravel access road will be constructed at -grade within the wetland
,areas as to not disrupt flow Trenched areas for sewer line installation within wetlands,will be backfdled with the excavated
material and topped with the 12" of excavated topsoil Surface flow at the one stream crossing will be pumped around the
proposed impact area to maintain downstream flow during installation The sewer line install through the stream will be
backfdled with original stream bed material All disturbed areas will be seeded to prevent erosion and the discharge of
sediment into jurisdictional features
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of
❑ Yes ® No
the U S- or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ, ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State'Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer
❑ Yes ® No
mitigation?
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c
6d
6e-
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact (square feet)
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for
Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1'a
Does'the project include or is it adjacent,to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is'a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent'imperviousness of this project?
123%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why General Certification 3884 does not
require submittal of a stormwater management plan Additionally, total impervious of the project is only 123%
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ, Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
'3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Hoke County
❑ Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof,of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes
❑ No
use of pubhc,(federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter )
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A'NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
❑ Yes
® No
2c
If you answered "yes" to one or both,of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past,and reasonably-anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
® No
additional development, which could'impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description -
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
There will be no wastewater generated by the proposed project
Page 10 of'11
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
F-1 Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina National Heritage Program data was reviewed within 1 mile of the study area, and no Federally listed
species or critical habitats were found in the area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
TO Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Essential Fish Habitat Mapper v3.0
htt : / /www.habitat.noaa. ov/ rotection /efh /habitatma p per. htm1
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodmaps, Flood Risk Information System online
viewer
IC ME L
LW
-31
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

y,4
Y
Sc, � iioyoow
03-401 EUS-40
al'wppv
Creek
Rocktah Rd
Legend
Study Area
WA'-)
?It.e .�"
Cour+r
i24�IprHkUU3.40, RS
Rt G, E I V E EY�°'N
OCT 1 5 2014
DENR -LAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMITTING
SSG
Qy
, t
S
Y
F
k+nn
f
1
V..1.

e� 4.7 -
omw
ddo -ONO-
, Z ter-,,
7 ` `
Sill
• f W4
• • W5,..
•' • �• � \ �i�' S— W2
wi
— * !Ut Sinai �", r '' •
A� Gap 00
Sand Gigre
Legend • j-` tiJ
Streams '
Wetlands
Study Area ,%�" �

Gd
WaB
l�
Legend
Streams
® Wetlands
Study Area
TN, E-bD • fpr plannng purposes Dory a mason aDOwm
Mreon Does not meet NC d) -M Rwpireme MS IDe,eb,e is rot
b, Design, con —bw o ew,Daq or transfer of Me TM E.hbe
mpleD Dom ava,YDle mbrmatcn oDlairoD Imm IDs w
es1eD ac 1c,w Streams OM VNbllaMa All fell— bcale0 in IDs field
,W d wl,q a mapping g,abe T-ble GeoXT o, GBOXH GPS
ens, wID ,pw-d euDmeY, acc,mty
Sourus
cVZ Da18 Hoke co,nry GIS
Imagery So,l Survey of CumDerhM IM Hoke Couples. tgBa
AV
W4
OEM
Vol-
1 toe f j :t.
04 v� .
eA II

Fri
0
@
H0RIZONTALE�'ALE1"=10'
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT: 527 SF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT: 475 SF
------GG------ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
--'----HN-----' PROPOSED FORCE MAIN
-------yy------ PROPOSED 2" PE WATER SERVICE
---8F--'LOC-- SILT FENCE / LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION
------LOC---- LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION
El
ME
�
�
1
I
�
I
l'Zl
I
�
�
I
m
RROJECT NO:
201
DESIGNED BY: KES/BLW
DC3N. CHECKED
BY: MDA w.
DRAWN BY:
KES fj
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DATE:
09-23-14

I
E2
Nim
Z.V. PATE, INC.
PIN #794730001C111, D13.230 PGA63
BM.7 PG.67 TRkCT NO.1 & NO.2
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT-, 493 SF_\
Lod L�oc LOC f LOC LOC'
0 10' 20'
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=10'
I-
ON
SILT FENCE OUTLET
f
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION I
SILT FENCE
L SF LOC
LOC SF — 2(oc-
S F i SF
7 —
PROPOSED 20 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
FIVI FM
FM rm FM FM FM FIVI/ 11 M FM - FM FM FM FM
RIA�lk_��
41
LOC CI
, LC-
0 L C l;::j 1, ,l,0 LOC-j --
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
G]
If
WETLANDS
TEMPORARY WETLANDS IMPACTS
PERMANENT WETLANDS IMPACTS
(RIP RAP FORD)
— SS PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
_FM PROPOSED FORCE MAIN
— W PROPOSED 2" PE WATER SERVICE
SF—LOC — SILT FENCE / LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
—LOC — LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
L_�
to <El
4 LL do
z om mozz
-7 rl W ul
13 C4 Se Z
>. rj j W
w
W in Ln :3 El
z
Dw -almx:i
z 13>---
25
Z M 0 3�.
w wu__
•
14
En
Z
13 mw
ul
W
0L
IN
w
Z m
101 � I w
PROJECT NO: 2012076.00 <
DESIGNED BY: KES/BLW
z
DGN. CHECKED BY: MDA wl
DRAWN BY: KES 3 0
13
DWG. CHECKED BY: MDA
SCALE: AS SHOWN 3:
DATE: 09-23-14 T1
-mr-,v j 0
III—A,
SHE.u-i- 6
z 0
0
W3 Q
X06
•
14
En
Z
13 mw
ul
W
0L
IN
w
Z m
101 � I w
PROJECT NO: 2012076.00 <
DESIGNED BY: KES/BLW
z
DGN. CHECKED BY: MDA wl
DRAWN BY: KES 3 0
13
DWG. CHECKED BY: MDA
SCALE: AS SHOWN 3:
DATE: 09-23-14 T1
-mr-,v j 0
III—A,
SHE.u-i- 6
-mr-,v j 0
III—A,
SHE.u-i- 6