WQ0023427_Inspection_20220926

Ponntt: WQ0023427 Owner - Facility: The John David Schlloman Revocable Trust
Inspection Date: 09105/2022
Inspection typo : Compliance Evaluation Reason for visit: Routine
35(82
Lagoon Spray, LR
infiltration System
Reuse (Quality)
Activated Sludge Spray, LR
Single Family Spray, LR
Activated Sludge Drip, LR
Recycle/Rause
Activated Sludge Spray. HR
Single Family Drip
Imaimmt
Are Treatment facilities oonslstent with those outlined In the current penult?
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? (if no, note below.)
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
•
Yes P 1A NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
III ❑❑❑
Comment: The current non -discharge permit, which was issued April 8. 2021 expiredMilirh3Ln21
Treatment Sludge StoraaelTreatmen%
Is the aeration operational?
Is the aeration pattern even?
1f required, are Sanitary "Ts' present in tankage?
Comment:
Treatment plsinfectio.
Is the system working?
Do the fecal odiform results indicate proper disinfection?
Is there adequate detention time (a=30 minutes)?
Is the system properly maintained?
If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe?
Is the fan In the chlorine feed room and storage area operable?
Is the chlorinator accessible?
If tablets, are tablets present?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth?
If UV, are extra UV bulbs available?
If UV, is the UV Intensity adequate?
# Is it a dual feed system?
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibe of Chlorine (CAS No. 77$2.50{)?
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑❑❑
▪ ❑ ❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑M
xmituame
▪ ❑❑❑
❑ ❑❑■
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑❑❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑❑■
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ 1❑
❑ ❑■❑
Page 3 of 5

Permit: W00023427 Owner - Facility:The John David Schlleman Revocable Trust
Inspection Date: OEU0612022
Inipoctton'type : Compliance Evaluation Ranson for Visit: Routine
If yes, then Is there a Risk Management Plan an site?
If yes, then what Is the EPA twehre digit ID Number? (1000- -,_)
If yea, then when was the RMP Iast updated?
Comment:
Record Iteaolna
Is a copy of current permit available?
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR?
NDAR?
Are flow rates less than of permitted pow?
Are flow rates less than of permitted paw?
Are application rates adhered to?
Is GW monitoring being conducted, ff required (GW-59s submitted)?
Are ail samples analyzed for ail required parameters?
Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW?
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards?
Are annual soli reports available?
# Are PAN records required?
# Did Iast soil report Indicate a need for lime?
If so, has it been applied?
Are operational loge present?
Are lab sheets available for review?
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR?
Do lab sheets support data reported on OW-59s?
Are Operational and Maintenance records present?
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete?
Has parmlttee been free of public complaints In Iast 12 months?
Is a copy of the SOC readily available?
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection?
Comment:
End Uae4rdnatloq
Are buffers adequate?
Is the cover crop type specified in permit?
Is the crop cover acceptable?
is the site condition adequate?
❑ ❑111❑
xamsualut
■ ❑❑❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑■❑
■ ❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
■ O❑❑
❑ ❑■❑
O 1:1110
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑N❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑N❑
O 000
I❑❑❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑MCI
❑ ❑■❑
▪ ❑❑❑
IMOD
❑ ❑❑❑
❑ ❑❑❑
❑ ❑❑❑
Yiliaulua
■ ❑❑❑
❑ ❑■❑
■ O❑❑
■ ❑❑❑
Page 4 of 5

pow: W0002342? Owner • Pedllty:The John David Schlieman Revocable Tnist
Inspection Date: 08105l2022
Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
la the site free of runoff 1 ponding?
Is the acreage spedfled In the permit being utilized?
1s the application equipment present?
Is the applicatbn equipment operational?
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes?
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active she use?
Are any supply wells within the CB?
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB?
How close Is the closest water supply well?
Is municipal water available in the area?
# Info only: Does the permit cafl for monitoring welts?
Are GW monitoring wells located properly wl respect to RB and CB?
Are OW monitoring wells properly constructed. Including screened interval?
Are monitoring wells damaged?
Comment:
■ ❑❑❑
• ❑❑❑
▪ ❑ ❑❑
•❑❑❑
❑ ❑❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑❑■
• ❑ ❑❑
▪ ❑❑❑
▪ ❑ ❑❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑■❑
❑ ❑U❑
❑ ❑■❑
Page 5 of 5

II
i
■
■ ■ ■ Em
•
■
1
L • ■
■ •
1 I - - - -
■ ■ I.
■ - _ ■ ■
`1 _■ l - ■■
' ■ ` ■ -. _1■. - ■ ■ ■ ■
•I ■ ■ ■
■