Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0003425_Renewal Update_20141013DUKE 47 ENERGY, ' PROGRESS ' October 13, 2014 ' Jeff Poupart, Chief Water Quality Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Water Resources ' 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617 Subject: Duke Energy Progress, Inc ROXBORO STATION RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR OCT 15 2014 vvater Quality Permitting Section Duke Energy Progress 1700 Dunnaway Road Semora, NC 27343 Roxboro Steam Electric Plant NPDES Permit No. NC0003425 Person County Update of Renewal application originally submitted on September 28, 2011 Dear Mr. Poupart: The current NPDES permit for the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant expired on March 31, 2012. As Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (hereinafter "Duke ") made timely application for renewal of the subject NPDES Permit on September 28, 2011, consisting of EPA Application Form 1 — General Information, EPA Application Form 2C — Wastewater Discharge Information and EPA Application Form 2F — Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity, all in triplicate, the site continues to operate under an administratively extended permit. Two additional administrative updates have been submitted since the permit has been last issued. Those updates were submitted on July 27, 2011 and March 30, 2012 respectively. This update consists of: 1. An updated EPA Form 1. (The EPA Form 1 and Form 2F are also being submitted to the NC DEMLR). 2. An updated line drawing showing water flow through the facility in accordance with EPA Form 2C Item II -A. (An update to Attachment 3 in the September 2011 application). 3. An updated description of Flows, Sources of Pollution and treatment technologies in accordance with EPA Form 2C Item II -B. (An update of Attachment 4 in the September 2011 application). 4. An updated list of potential discharges not covered by analysis in accordance with EPA Form 2C Item VI. (An update to attachment 5 of the September 2011 application). 5. A seep monitoring plan including site map, a summary of sampling analysis conducted of seeps and a monitoring plan for seeps. 6. An updated ground water monitoring plan, receptor survey, and a generalized ground water flow directional map. Duke also hereby provides an additional update to EPA Form 2C Item VII as follows: Since ' submission of the NPDES renewal application in September 2011, Duke has conducted an additional 13 toxicity samples in accordance with the terms of the subject permit. None of the tests exhibited toxicity at the required testing concentrations. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed information please contact Shannon Langley at (919) 546 -2439. 1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and ' belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. Sincerely, /1-�' Michael Mosle - Manager Roxboro Steam Electric Plant Enclosures ' cc: Robert Howard Shannon Langley — NC14 Update to Form submitted September 26, 2011 Please print or type in the unshaded areas only Form Approved OMB No 2040 -0086 FORM U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY I EPA I D NUMBER 1 PA GENERAL INFORMATION F \=.E Consolidated Permits Program fD ��F14 GENERAL (Read dre "(;eneral lnrtrwe acme ' helore starting.) I - " LABEL ITEMS GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS If a prepnnted label has been provided . affix it in the - designated space Review the information carefully it any of it I EPA I.D. NUMBER is incorrect. cross through it and enter the correct data in the appropriate fill -in area below Also if any of the preprinted data Is absent (the area to the left or the label space lists the III FACILITY NAME PLEASE PLACE LABEL IN THIS SPACE nformawn that should appear) please provide it in the proper - - -- fill -1n area(s) below If the label is complete and correct you V. FACILITY MAILING need not complete Items I III V and VI (except VI -8 which ADDRESS must be completed regardless) Complete all items it no label has been provided Refer to the instructions for detailed item VI. FACILITY LOCATION descriptions and for the legal authorizations under which this data is collected II POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS INSTRUCTIONS Complete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA. If you answer 'yes" to any questions. you must submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the parenthesis following the question Mark 'X' in the box in the third column if the supplemental form is attached. If you answer 'no" to each question you need not submit any of these forms You may answer "no" if your activity is excluded from permit requirements. see Section C of the instructions See also Section 0 of the instructions for definitions of bold -faced terms Mark 'x- Mark 'X' YES NO FORM ATTACHED YES NO FORM ATTACHED SPECIFIC QUESTIONS SPECIFIC QUESTIONS A Is this facility a publicly owned treatment works which B Does or will this facility (either existing or proposed) results in a discharge to waters of the U.S.1 (FORM 2A) X include a concentrated animal feeding operation or X aquatic animal production facility which results in a discharge to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 28) C Is this a facility which currently results in discharges to �/ X D Is this a proposed facility (other than those described In A waters of the U.S. other than those described in A or B /� or B above) which will result in a discharge to waters of X above? (FORM 2C) the U.S.? (FORM 2D) E Does or will this facility treat. store. or dispose of F Do you or will you inject at this facility industrial or hazardous wastes? (FORM 3) X municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum X containing within one quarter mile of the well bore . underground sources of drinking water? (FORM 4) i, ]' G Do you or will you inject at this facility any produced water H Do you or will you Inject at this facility Fluids for special or other fluids which are brought to the surface in processes such as mining of sulfur by the Frasch process . connection with conventional oil or natural gas production. X solution mining of minerals in situ combustion of fossil X inject fluids used for enhanced recovery of oil or natural fuel or recovery of geothermal energy? (FORM 4) gas or inject fluids for storage of liquid hydrocarbons) (FORM 4) � 34 )5 3fi I Is this facility a proposed stationary source which is one J Is this facility a proposed stationary source which is of the 28 industrial categories listed In the instructions and NOT one of the 28 industrial categories listed in the X which will potentially emit 100 tons per year of any air instructions and which will potentially emit 250 tons per pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act and may affect year of any air pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act a or be located in an attainment area? (FORM 5) and may affect or be located in an attainment area? (FORM 5) III NAME OF FACILITY ISKIP Roxboro Steam Electric Plant IV FACILITY CONTACT A. NAME 8 TITLE (last, first. R bile) B PHONE (area rode X no) 2 Mos ey, Mike - Plant Manager ( A)'5 5 7 -6 0 t5 16 u 46 b 48 St 52 5' V FACILTY MAILING ADDRESS A. STREET OR P O BOX 3 1700 Dunnaway Road 5 6 45 B CITY OR TOWN C STATE D ZIP CODE i dRoxboro C 2 33 16 4C 41 42 47 51 VI FACILITY LOCATION A. STREET, ROUTE NO. OR OTHER SPECIFIC IDENTIFIER 1 00 unn away Roa 5 d d B 45 B COUNTY NAME 1person ,a C CITY OR TOWN D STATE E ZIP CODE F COUNTY CODE (ilknoi,n) �1�� T_7 S - - 6 m r C 2 3 4 3' EPA Form 3510 -1 (8 -90) CONTINUE ON REVERSE CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT VII, SIC CODES (4-digit in order of non ) A. FIRST 8 SECOND ( +peLiA) Electric Power Seroi_es 7 (epeclti) s 44 911 +3 +B 15 P6 C THIRD D FOURTH (,pc rh) 7 ('re, 7 'S 15 15 i6 19 VIII OPERATOR INFORMATION A NAME B. Is the name listed in Item $ I . Duke Energy Progress, Inc. VIII -A also theowner7 GI YES ❑ NO 5 'S 55 56 C STATUS OF OPERATOR (1:i iter the appropriate letter into file answer box. if "Other, "specrfy.) D PHONE (area cudeRno) F = FEDERAL M = PUBLIC (other thanfederalorstate) P (st-6) TE O = OTHER ftpecr(r) A P = PR E STREET OR P O BOX 4 0 South Wi mington Street :s ,t F CITY OR TOWN G STATE H. ZIP CODE IX. INDIAN LAND I0 s the located lands g Raleigh NC YEScility 27601 ID NnOdian X. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL FERMITS A. N P D E S I)ischar c hr Sttr1a e If ter) D. PS D .air P..*mtsvmrrs rnnt /'ro rased Sotercec) c I r g p is +6 +s b g N NC0003425 - •s b B UIC r)n/er rowa( /n ec note nl Flurcls E OTHER s eet = ' r 010(JlY41J Title V Air permit 9 U 9 C. RCRA Ha_urdouc Ifusler E OTHER sect z r - (spectfy) State on discharge permit for ash 9 R 9 G]Q0000020 reuse 15 16 t] +5 b 15 1 16 1 17 113 b XI MAP Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property boundaries. The map must show the outline of the facility, the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures each of its hazardous waste treatment. storage. or disposal facilities. and each well where it injects fluids underground Include all springs rivers, and other surface water bodies in the map area. See instructions for precise requirements XII NATURE OF BUSINESS (provide a bnefdescnption) Electric utility - This facility is an electric generating facility consisting of four coal fired units with a total generating capacity of 2558.2 Megawatts. XIII CERTIFICATION (see instructions) 1 certify under penalty of law that l have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and all attachments and that. based on my inquiry of those persons immediately responsible for obtaining the information contained in the application 1 believe that the information is true, accurate and complete I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information. including the possibility of fine and imprisonment A NAME & OFFICIAL TITLE (ripe or print) B SIGNATURE C DATE SIGNED Mike Mosley, Plant Manager Roxboro Steam Electric Plant r ��f�� /y COMMENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY J�c EPA Form 3510 -1 (8 -90) \ C7) E '\ \� \ 4 k a f _ P 2 _o � ./ v (D W E c � � 0 0 -0 x 0 IA �k ( cy- \ I \ } z .41 \ E ) P _ - ¥........ 5 ƒ {2� ^o \ sgt/ °§ °7 �0> \ / } /\5 3 .§ f n k z LU g= e o$ ,{ ®f c o zƒ 37 ® ice a) Cl ; c� 2_§ G°)/ o 'e {....... u - q \ ( �/ 2 a)m 00� o ` \£: - n ° °� E c g 2 § ui a) C, \ 0 M » = e } ) ® o \ CL �a ;& �<)\\ \ 2$ § e O 2 \/ 2 \/ n q 2 G � \ 2ƒa / \2\2 nk=0 =0 7 \0 / 04 (D E ,u E o o e , 2LL �2 = ®06 ) } 3 _c \Q) /4 CU 22/ 7 £ _ , In \ _ E ƒ /$ ( \E IG0 \ i E / >/ \ _ !g \ ) $ E \ : 0 _t Wot+a o !H mGd / 2 E f / ƒ { / ( \E IG0 \ i E I+cn Q) \ \ 2 : 0 _t \ \R 2 \� \2§( F- can) } ® -aa @tee£ ® ES 3 ` Wot+a o !H mGd / 2 E f / ƒ { c c ( \E \ \ 2 I+cn _ }cn \ Wot+a o !H mGd / 2 E f / ƒ ............... c c / E \ e n : § \ E 2 < = k E o :c < / & _ :2 E § () < S )[ / J :t E :/ / \ _ ) -� E\ E : d o 0 k / + §\ \ \ \ / & L § 0 o Cl) \t \2 % 77 ©f E< /4 /4 a) c • Z) \ )� / ƒf Wot+a o !H mGd / 2 E f / ƒ Duke Energy Progress, Inc. ' Roxboro Steam Electric Plant National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425 Attachment 3 Form 2C — Item II -A - Flow, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies Stream Estimated Average Flow Comments A B C D 4 505 592 7 Make -up water for Water Treatment Systems Unit 3 Cooling Water Intake Units 1 & 2 Cooling Water Intake Unit 4 Cooling Tower Blowdown E 505 Unit 3 Cooling Water Discharge F 17.3 Unit 4 Cooling Tower Intake G 505 Unit 3 Cooling Water Discharge H 0.015 Sewage Treatment Plant Discharge 3 Low Volume discharge into Ash Pond J 12 Ash transport into Ash Pond K 0.17 15 Silo wash water L Ash Pond discharge into Discharge Canal and small dam drainage M 1067 Discharge Canal flow into Hyco Lake N 0.09 Coal Pile Runoff Pond discharge to Hyco Lake O 1.92 Flue Gas Desulfurization Discharge P 5.81 (maximum) Intake to Flue Gas Desulfurization October 2014 Attachment 4 Form 2C - Item II -B Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies Intrneh it-tinn The Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, located in Person County, North Carolina, consists of four coal fired generating units with nameplate generating capacities of 410.8, 657, 745.2, and 745.2 MWe for units 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. All plant waste streams are routed directly or indirectly to the Hyco Reservoir. Chemical constituents contained in these discharges will, in part, be representative of the naturally occurring chemical quality and quantity of the intake water and will also have chemical constituents of such quality associated with similar discharges for fossil generating facilities of this size, type, and in this geographical location. Either all or part of the elements in the Periodic Table, either singularly or in any combination, may from time to time be contained in the discharges. Each component of the discharges is described below. Outfall 003 — Effluent Channel At the point that the effluent channel enters the Hyco Reservoir, it contains the flows from several waste streams, including once - through cooling water, stormwater runoff, and the effluent from the ash pond, which in turn receives and treats combined flows from the ash transport system, the low volume waste system, the dry fly ash handling system, cooling tower blow down, stormwater runoff, drainage from the ash landfill, east ash pond, various seepage flows and from occasional wastewater piping leakage. Once - Through Cooling Water Condenser Cooling Water (CCW) for Units 1, 2, and 3 is drawn from the Hyco Reservoir via an intake canal and discharges to the Hyco Reservoir via a effluent channel. Flows for Units 1, 2, and 3 are 249 MGD, 342 MGD, and 505 MGD respectively. Cooling is accomplished by evaporation from the surface of cooling water in the effluent channel, cooling towers, mixing and convection with Hyco reservoir waters. October 2014 Page 1 During the summer months, Unit 3 CCW is routed through mechanical draft cooling towers where most of the waste heat is removed by evaporation before the water is discharged to the reservoir via the effluent channel along with the CCW of Units 1 and 2. Additionally, once - through cooling water is used for heat exchange of component closed cooling water, the flow of which is combined with the CCW prior to introduction into the effluent channel. Stormwater Runoff The stormwater, which flows into the discharge canal includes runoff from the plant drainage area, the drainage area from the dry fly ash handling system (including roadways), Unit 4 cooling tower drainage area, the fuel oil storage containment area, the switchyard drainage area, the anhydrous ammonia tank farm, and the gypsum storage pile area. Ash Pond Discharge The ash pond receives ash transport water, low volume wastes, runoff from the ash landfill, landfill leachate, dry fly ash handling system wash water, blow down from Unit 4 cooling tower, coal mill rejects and pyrites, and sewage treatment plant effluent. The pond provides treatment by sedimentation, oxidation, neutralization, equalization, adsorption and chemical precipitation. The following flows are routed to the ash pond treatment system: 1. Ash Transport Water Water for sluicing ash to the ash pond is withdrawn from the CCW system as needed. The plant will primarily supply ash sluice water from Unit 2. However, the facility will continue to maintain the ability to operate the unit 4 ash sluice pumps. The Unit 4 ash sluice pumps are and will continue to be utilized for the following i) during maintenance draining of the cooling tower, ii) back -up supply for the fire suppressant system, and iii) ash October 2014 Page 2 sluicing pumps during operational events which require additional pumping. Normally, only bottom ash is conveyed to the ash pond by ' sluicing. Fly ash is handled dry by a pneumatic system and is land filled on site or sold. If the dry fly ash handling system is out of service during plant operating periods, fly ash will be sent to the ash pond via the ash sluicing systems until the dry system is restored. Such occurrences are ' expected to be infrequent and brief. 2. Silo Wash Water Ash silo wash water runoff, stormwater from around the ash silos and dust suppressant spray runoff from the dry fly ash handling system are routed to the ash pond. 3. Low Volume Wastes Boiler make -up water is withdrawn from the intake and filtered, softened, and de- mineralizered for treatment. This process includes treatment via a process water reverse osmosis system. Boiler water is treated with ammonia, hydrazine, phosphate and occasionally sodium hydroxide. Boiler blow down is sent to the ash pond via the low volume wastes collection system (LVWS). These are special drains in the plant that flow by gravity to collection sumps and are pumped to the ash pond. Ethylene glycol is used for freeze protection of some equipment and may be discharged to the LVWS, as is some molybdate waste from the closed cooling water system, during periods of maintenance. When this equipment is rinsed, small amounts of these chemicals are discharged to the low volume system via the neutralization basin. The plant's Reverse Osmosis system produces a reject wastestream of approximately 250 gpm, when in operation. Essentially all plant equipment, floor drains, water treatment filter backwashes, clarifier and sedimentation basin sludge, and ash hopper seal water overflow also discharge to the LVWS. Plant drains around oil containing equipment are routed to an oil /water October 2014 Page 3 separator for treatment prior to being sent to the ash pond via the LVWS. Various boiler sediments and ash accumulations collected during maintenance activities may also be transported to the ash pond or the onsite ash landfill. Seepage through the ash pond dam may be released to the effluent channel. 4. Cooling Tower Blow down Unit 4 is the only unit that produces cooling tower blow down. A blow down stream is used to maintain concentrations of total dissolved solids in the cooling tower to within proper operating limits. Make -up to the Unit 4 cooling tower is from the Heated Water Discharge Canal. 5. Domestic Sewage ' Domestic sewage is treated by an extended aeration treatment plant consisting of a screen, comminutor, surge tank, aeration tank, clarifier, chlorine contact chamber, and a sludge holding tank. 6. Air Preheater Cleaning (Low Volume Waste) The air preheater will be water washed once per year or more frequently as needed. The wastewater from this activity will be discharged to the ash pond. 7. Chemical Metal Cleaning Wastes The boilers are chemically cleaned approximately every five -to -eight years as required using Tetraammonia ethylene diamine tetraaccetic acid (EDTA) solution or citric acid. This cleaning solution and its rinses are stored on site for disposal by evaporation in an operating unit's furnace. Should evaporation not be used, the wastewater can be treated by neutralization and precipitation prior to being conveyed to the ash pond. October 2014 page 4 Alternatively, the wastewater can be disposed by other acceptable disposal methods. Cleaning of other heat exchanger surfaces may produce 5,000- 10,000 gallons of wastewater approximately every three -to- five years. ' 8. Flue Gas Desulfurization Blow down Low Volume Waste The Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) system directs flue gas into an absorber where limestone (calcium carbonate) slurry is sprayed. Sulfur ' dioxide in the flue gas reacts with the limestone slurry to produce calcium sulfate (gypsum). The system reclaims any un- reacted limestone slurry to be reused in the absorber. A small blowdown stream is used to maintain the chloride concentration in the reaction tank. The blowdown stream is ' discharged to a gypsum settling pond where suspended solids are settled out prior to entering a bioreactor. The bioreactor utilizes microbes to ' reduce targeted soluble contaminants to insoluble forms that then precipitate from solution. The treated wastewater enters the ash pond ' effluent channel prior to outfall 002. 9. Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) System Blow down Emergency Overflow /Pipeline Drain ' Emergency overflow from the FGD System blow down will discharge to the ash pond. If the FGD System blow down pipeline requires emergency draining, the contents of the pipeline will be drained to a sump that is pumped to the ash pond. 10. Ash Landfill Drainage ' Water for sluicing a minimum amount of bottom ash to the ash landfill is withdrawn from the ash transport system as needed. The bottom ash is ' used to enhance the subsurface drainage of the landfill. October 2014 Page 5 1 The facility may transfer settled ash from the west ash pond to fill remaining capacity in the east ash pond as needed. This activity may be undertaken to provide treatment capacity (i.e. volume) in the active, west ash pond and or in preparation for landfill expansion in accordance with permits issued through the NC Division of Solid Waste. 11. Stormwater Runoff The stormwater runoff, which flows into the ash pond includes runoff from the plant drainage area, landfill runoff (including silo area drainage), and the drainage area from the ash pond (including roadways). 12. Seepage Small seepage flows through engineered drainage features in the ash basin dam and other points on the property comingle with the ash pond discharge and cooling water discharge. Outfall 006 — Coal Pile Runoff Runoff from the coal pile, limestone pile, small potential gypsum pile on the west side of the plant, truck wheel wash and other coal handling areas of the plant is routed to a retention pond for treatment by neutralization, sedimentation, and equalization. The pond is designed to store in excess of the 10- year /24 -hour storm event. Releases are controlled by a standpipe structure. Approximately 0.006 MGD of wheel wash water will be sent via gravity drain to a solids settling basin. Solids from the wheel wash will accumulate in a separate settling basin to be removed by front end loaders and sent to the onsite landfill. Water from the settling basin will go to outfall 006. Stormwater from the FGD and Fuel Handling maintenance area located west of the coal pile flows to the coal pile runoff pond. October 2014 Page 6 Attachment 5 Form 2C - Item VI Potential Discharges Not Covered By Analysis Chemical Quantity (Estimates) Frequency Purpose Anhydrous Ammonia 14,000 gal /wk per unit As required Flue Gas Conditioning Nalco 8338 385 gallons As required Corrosion Inhibitor Nalclear 8173 (flocculant) 250 Ibs As required Water Treatment H -130 (Microbiocide) 2300 gallons As required Unit 4 Cooling Tower Algae Control Nalco 71 D5 Plus (Antifoam Agent) 630 gallons As required Unit 4 Cooling Tower Foam Control Nalco 7396 (Polyphosphate) 110 gallons Twice per day Corrosion Inhibitor Potable Water Ice Free Conveyor (Propylene glycol) 750 gallons 2100 Ibs As required Conveyer Belt Freeze Protection Aluminum Sulfate 4000 gallons As required Water Treatment Sodium Chloride 100,000 Ibs As required Softener Regeneration Ethylene Glycol 6,000 gallons As required Freeze Protection Hot Water Coil System Lime 2,500 Ibs As required Wastewater pH Control Hydrazine 1,760 gallons As required Feedwater Oxygen Ammonia Hydroxide 1,760 gallons As required Boiler Water pH Control Sodium Hydroxide 200 Ibs As required Boiler Water pH Control Sodium Hypochlorite 400 gallons Twice per day Potable Water Treatment BT -210W 40,000 Ibs (estimated) As required Dust Suppressant Sodium Bicarbonate 20,000 Ibs As required Wastewater pH Control Chemical Quantity (Estimates) Frequency Purpose 1 October 2014 Update Caustic Soda (20 10) 110 gallons Twice per day Potable Water pH Control Sanuril Tablets 135 lbs As required Biocide for Sewage (Calcium Hypochlorite) Treatment Nalclean 200 lbs As required Softened Water System Sodium Carbonate 8,000 lbs As required Air preheater wash water neutralization EDTA 69,000 lbs/boiler As required Boiler Cleaning A300 50 gallons /boiler As required Boiler Cleaning (Cheiating Agent) M045 Silicone 15 gallons /boiler As required Boiler Cleaning Antifoam Agent GEOMELT 87,000 gallons Winter months Anti -icing Fluid for Coal per month BT -930 87,000 gallons Winter months Anti -icing Fluid for Coal per month Limestone (calcium 492,000 tons Continuous Flue Gas carbonate) Desulfurization EN /ACT 7880 As needed As Required Coagulant for Coal Pile Runoff Sodium Hydroxide 1270 lbs. As required RO cleaning (Approximately 1 -3 months) Hydrochloric Acid 1871 lbs. As required RO cleaning (Approximately 1 -3 months) RO Clean P111 675 lbs As required RO cleaning (Avista detergent (Approximately 1 -3 cleaner) months) RO Clean P112 675 lbs. As required RO Cleaning (Avista detergent (Approximately 1 -3 cleaner) months) October 2014 Update Chemical Quantity Frequency Purpose (Estimates) Citric Acid 675 lbs. As required RO Cleaning (Approximately 1 -3 months) Sumaclear 1000 6 gallons per day Continuous Filter aid (Poly aluminum chloride) Vitec 3000 5 gallons per day Continuous RO antiscalant (Avista Antiscalant) Phosphate (Nalco BT As needed Internal Boiler 3400 or similar) Treatment Nalco ST70 25 gallons per day As needed Biofouling cotrol in per unit cooling system Nalco 7766 Plus 250 gallons per year As needed Polymer used in water treatment process Nalco 90005 5000 gallons per year As needed Biocide used in cooling tower Hydrated lime 20,000 tons per year Continuous S03 mitigation Hydrogen peroxide As needed As needed H2S mitigation and oxegenation of Bioreactor efflent Alum As needed As needed Aid settling in ash pond Anodamine As needed As needed Boiler layup Sodium Bisulfite As needed As needed Bioreactor ORP control 0.04 and 0.10 lbs per As needed Boiler slag control Coaltreat 120 ton of coal Clean Coal 0.4% per coal ton Continuous Nitrous oxide control M45 -PC Additive A October 2014 Update Clean Coal 0.0005% per coal ton Continuous Mercury control M45 -PC Additive B Flogard 20 GPD Continuous FGD make up water MS6201 piping corrosion control Gengard 10 GPD Continuous FGD make up water GN8004 piping deposit control Mereontrol 240 GPD Continuous Mercury re- emission 8034 Plus control Nalco 10 GPD As needed FGD absorber foaming 60103 control Coaltreat 300 1.1 lbs. per ton of coal Continuous Boiler slag control Magnesium reclaimed Hydroxide Coaltreat 600 1.4 lbs. per ton of coal Continuous Boiler slag control Calcium Carbonate reclaimed Coaltrol 60 .0034 gallons per ton of As needed Dust suppression coal unloaded Coaltrol 35 .50 gallons per ton of As needed Dust suppression coal reclaimed Nalco 7330 5 gallons per As needed Closed cooling water application treatment October 2014 Update tip syn)T(erra SEEP MONITORING REPORT - AUGUST 2014 FOR ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT 1700 DUNNAWAY ROAD SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA 27343 PERSON COUNTY NPDES PERMIT #NC0003425 PREPARED FOR DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA j DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS SUBMITTED: OCTOBER 2014 �;• t1 CAR ? �GENSF9 r SEAL 1425 ~FOt OG�boo eolo `10E NSF F i SEAL } 3 46 .r ��328 ro :.CtMSnager Seep Monitoring Report Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION EXECUTIVE SUNINI.ARY 1.0 Introduction ....................................................... ............................... 2.0 Seep Monitoring ................................................ ............................... 2.1 Seep Identification ....................................... ............................... 2.2 Seep Flow Measurement ............................. ............................... 2.3 Seep Sample Collection ............................... ............................... 3.0 Recommendations ............................................. ............................... List of Figures Figure 1— Site Location Map Figure 2 — Identified Seeps and Water Quality Sample Locations List of Tables Table 1- Seep Locations and Descriptions Table 2 - Seep Flows and Analytical Results Table 3 - Analytical Parameters/Methods List of Appendices Appendix A - Analytical Sample Handling, Preservation and Holding Time Requirements October 2014 SynTerra PAGE ...........................1 ........................... 2 ........................... 2 ........................... 2 ........................... 3 ........................... 4 Page 1 P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026\ ALL NC SITES \NPDES Pemiit Deliverables\ Roxboro\ Seep Report \Roxboro Seep Monitoring Report.docx Seep Monitoring Report October 2014 ' Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following report summarizes an evaluation of the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant (Roxboro Plant) seepage flow surrounding the ash basins toward Hyco Lake. The evaluation included a detailed site reconnaissance to identify potential seeps followed by the collection of flow measurements and representative water quality samples at ' select locations. The site reconnaissance was conducted during March 2014. Representative seep locations were evaluated for water quality and flow rates on ' August 25 and 26, 2014. Wastewater discharges from the ash basins are permitted by the North Carolina ' Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit NC0003425. The purpose of the evaluation was to determine additional ' potential outfalls for inclusion within the permit. Eleven seep locations were originally identified during wet weather conditions in early ' spring of 2014. However, of those 11 identified seeps, only six locations contained sufficient water for water quality sample collection in August 2014. Three additional ' seeps were sampled in August 2014. Eight of the seeps are located upstream of NPDES Outfall 003 to Hyco Lake. The remainder of the seeps are located upstream of the intake canal. ' The low volume of water characteristic of the seeps coupled with the relatively low constituent concentrations in the samples, suggest that the seeps have little potential to influence water quality of Hyco Lake. The combined flow of all measured seeps is 0.03 million gallons per day. The typical NPDES wastewater flow for the Roxboro Plant is 1.07 billion gallons per day. If reasonable analyses demonstrate that the seeps have no ' potential to exceed water quality standards, then Duke Energy proposes to re- evaluate the seep locations listed in this document annually over the next 5 -year permit cycle. These annual evaluations would be documented and would verify the condition of the existing seeps and determine the presence of new seeps. DWR will be promptly notified if any new seeps are identified or any significant changes are observed for the ' existing seeps. If any existing or newly identified seeps are determined to reach Hyco Lake and the seepage has reasonable potential to exceed a water quality standard, Duke Energy will take measures to either (1) stop the seepage, (2) capture and route the seep ' so that it is discharged through a NPDES permitted outfall, or (3) address the seep using Best Management Plans approved by DWR. P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables\ Roxboro\ Seep Report\Roxboro Seep ' Monitoring Report.dooc Seep Monitoring Report October 2014 Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 1.0 INTRODUCTION Duke Energy Progress, Inc. owns and operates the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant (Roxboro Plant) located in north - central North Carolina near Semora, North Carolina. A large part of the Plant area encompasses Hyco Lake. The Roxboro Plant is located in Person County along the east bank of Hyco Lake north of Roxboro, NC and west of McGhees Mill Road. The site location is shown on Figure 1. The Roxboro Plant began operations in 1966. Additional units were added in 1968, 1973, and 1980. Throughout its operational history, the Roxboro Plant has employed coal -fired units to produce steam. Ash generated from coal combustion is stored on -site in ash basins (the 1966 semi -active East Ash Basin and the 1973 active West Ash Basin). Wastewater discharges from the ash basins are permitted by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit NC0003425. This report summarizes an evaluation of seepage flows from the Roxboro Plant ash basins. The evaluation included a detailed site reconnaissance to identify potential seeps, flow measurements of identified seeps, and collection of seep water and other surface water with chemical analysis of collected samples. The site reconnaissance was conducted in March 2014. Seep sampling and flow measurements were completed on August 25 and 26, 2014. Page 1 P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES\ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro\ Seep Report \ Roxboro Seep Monitoring Report.docx Seep Monitoring Report October 2014 Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 2.0 SEEP MONITORING 2.1 Seep Identification A detailed reconnaissance of the outside perimeter of the ash basins at the Roxboro Plant was conducted in March 2014 for the purpose of identifying and locating potential seeps originating from the ash basins. Identified seeps were described, photographed, noted on a field map, and surveyed as to location using GPS (Table 1). Identified seeps were further evaluated on August 25 and 26, 2014. During the August evaluation, it was observed that some of the seeps identified during the initial reconnaissance were dry, reflecting an intermittent or seasonal nature. The locations of seeps identified are presented on Figure 2. 2.2 Seep Flow Measurement Flow measurements were made in August 2014 at water - bearing seep locations using either a Son -Tek F1owTracker ® Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter or the timed- volumetric method. The FlowTracker® measures stream velocity and discharge using sound waves. The timed - volumetric method was used at six locations where the flow was constrained in a location that prevented the F1owTracker® from recording a signal without interference. One location did not have sufficient flow to measure a flow rate. The timed - volumetric method was employed by collecting a volume of water from the flow of the seep directly into an appropriately sized container (graduated cylinder or bucket). The entire seep flow was routed to the container. The amount of time (in seconds) required to collect a known volume of water was recorded. A minimum of five timed volumes were recorded and the flow rate for the seep was calculated based on an average of the timed volume measurements. The F1owTracker® was used to measure seep flows at two locations. The method is designed for streams that can be waded following established procedures such as the U.S. Geological Survey standards. Use of the F1owTracker® was generally limited to channels of sufficient width (approximately 0.5 feet or greater) and depth (approximately 0.17 feet or greater). Flow measurements (water velocity and depth) within quality control bounds of the instrument were recorded manually for estimation of discharge at a seep. Locations were selected where channel banks were fairly parallel. The channel width was measured at the water line and recorded. If the channel width was less than one foot, the average depth was recorded and three velocity measurements were taken. The average of the three velocity measurements and the channel volume (depth and width) were used to calculate the flow rate at a given location. Page 2 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Pernut Deliverables\ Roxboro\ Seep Report\Roxboro Seep Monitoring Report.docx Seep Monitoring Report October 2014 ' Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra ' If the channel width at the water line was between 1.0 and 2.5 feet, velocity and depth were recorded at a minimum of three locations spaced evenly across the channel. If the channel width was between 2.5 and 5 feet, velocity and depth were recorded at a ' minimum of five evenly spaced locations. Consistent with USGS methodology, velocity measurements were collected at 60% of water depth. The averages of the calculated flows (in MGD) for seeps with measurable flow in ' August 2014 are included in Table 2. Seepage flow is generally variable. Flow may increase or decrease depending on the amount of rainfall, groundwater levels, weather conditions, and other variables. 2.3 Seep Sample Collection Eight locations with sufficient water for sample recovery were sampled during August 2014 for water quality analysis. The sample locations are described in Table 1 and shown on Figure 2. To prevent dilution from stormwater runoff into seep flows, seep samples were collected during a period preceded by low precipitation. For the week preceding the August sample collection, 0.37 inches of rain fell in the area as recorded at the Person County Airport (Roxboro, NC), located about ten miles south - southeast of the Roxboro Plant. Samples were collected from the seep flows directly into sample containers. Care was taken to avoid disturbing and entraining particulate soil and sediment. During sample collection, in -situ field parameters (temperature, pH, and specific conductance) were measured utilizing a YSI Pro Plus multi- function meter. Turbidity was also measured in the field using a Hach 2100Q turbidimeter. Laboratory analyses were conducted by Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory and Pace Analytical Laboratories (NC Wastewater Certifications #248 and 12). A summary of the laboratory and field data is provided in Table 2. A listing of analytical parameters and associated methods are included in Table 3. Sample handling, storage, and preservation methods are summarized in Appendix A. Page 3 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables\ Roxboro\ Seep Report \ Roxboro Seep Monitoring Report.docx Seep Monitoring Report October 2014 ' Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The very low flow of water characteristic of each seep location, including a number of seep locations that only flow during periods of wet weather, suggests minimal potential to influence water quality in Hyco Lake. If ongoing analyses demonstrates that there is no potential to exceed water quality standards, Duke Energy proposes to re- evaluate the identified seep locations listed in this document annually over the next five -year permit cycle. These annual evaluations would be documented and would verify the condition of the existing seeps and determine the presence of any newly developed seeps. DWR will be promptly notified if new seeps are identified or any significant changes are observed for the existing seeps. If any existing or newly identified seeps are determined to reach Hyco Lake and the seepage has reasonable potential to exceed a water quality standard, Duke Energy will take measures to either (1) stop the seepage, (2) capture and route the seep so that it is discharged through a NPDES permitted outfall, or (3) address the seep using Best Management Plans approved by DWR. Page 4 P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables\ Roxboro \ Seep Report \ Roxboro Seep Monitoring Report.docx FIGURES . - — ;`Y "f•9�" gjiF• a �--+- - - ,c� ii }yam 1 i'. ` _•,\ _ � 1 f t, le 1 }` r �; G.Yy� {v _��r0 �"� �./""'•.1 a �'?• r /- r _/� ` t' _ ,°�J � :-�i 1;4ti O BOUNDARY H } ( COMPLIANCE /BOUNDARY fY��� } '+h •J ' � .� 1,.45 � � � ��� �._. J `V.� `- v �.�. �� `a 1A�� '#�vl`i �.r/' fi ,, .�.? � Y r � i��` -_ i � • � I k�a_ �. � •� -..•?J �J > ,. , -�� � ' � �- :�� ► � �.� 'mil � • �• � . � r�`��r' (.1 �.- �, ��, �r' 4 .�.i.,. 7 "' ' r�� ,_, . ,� �'-� 1`� it � d • � � `t=om � , (- +, - .� � ..-- ` � �• # '"fir �J n - . PROPERTY BOUNDARY 1 NV I � � �Si•r �fe .�.�" r► R l �t ��` ♦ . �.�rr� f �' �/ y ___.�" �� ? SJ � �.i '-'1�_ � �,1\ " � � 1ri�`"%. •� .. V 1 F , ..} � � �� SOURCE: ' rvr USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OBTAINED FROM THE NRCS GEOSPATIAL DATA GATEWAY AT l '? NO //dXeyMBwsY rrcv.uf0e qav� 16 ROXBORO POWER PLAN- FIGURE 1 PERSON COUNTY USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS ' ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT 5�/nTerra SEMO 1700 DUNWAY RD ' RA, NORTH CAROLINA 148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220 OLIVE HILL, NC QUADRANGLE GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA DRAWN By S ARLEDGE DATE 2014-1009 GRAPHIC SCALE PHONE 864- 421 -9999 °ROIECT MANAGER MAT NY HEBB OONTOUR NTERVAL 1: ^ 1000 0 1000 2000 wwwsynterracorp.com UYOUT 10 I'SIT LOCATION) MAP DATE 1994 IN FEET (D 'o m ((D a a- D n (D n 77 (D a Q 'G a rD 0 v c A m m Z m rX C) < ;p m -0 O M C) 0 0 n V�fVf►" • :4 O ZD(A> �x> r m a m X C) r Mn� Oar-+ X O � Z n a X O r H Z a cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn m m r r r r r O O O O O O O O O W N r O �o Co O) Ul •A w N r Fy v w w w w w w w w w w W w w r S" � � a 00 0 14 w �I m r co co �D co rn rn m rn rn rn c r Ul r N �I v V tD �D O O w O O) m w r w `D Ul N Ul v 00 U, w o to 0 ko rn r w in w m r .i z 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn v, U, cn U, w -�j v -�j Ili -j v v 6.+ V U•I �-' w W 01 V Ul r O �J N pl v r N Ul V w C) w N O V v m m n n 5 D 5 n n n 5 5 n n n D O O C IMP (D -1 rr (D rt (D O O 7 O D r* (D rt (D O o 0 O 0 rr (D rt rt 7 3 -1 3 -1 3 rr 7 Er 7 rt 7 -I 3 -I 3 rt 7 rt 7 _rt 7 s 3 r r�i 0 C C rt r-r r-r C C C -' -' -' rt* C O C o C (D r* (D rr (D O C o C O C rrt-r (D (D o C O C O C (D G H U1 V1 rt rt r:3r V1 U1 LA r7-r r0-r VI VI Ln r7-r O Z T N T ° Y ° a (D (D W (D ` ' (D (D (D O 7 (D (D a (D N Cp rt rD C0 rt (D (D (D (D rt (D r W r -0 W o_ rt _0 (D r�-r Ortl rN-r d r�-r r�-r r�-r r�-r LrtL� r�-r Qj 0 O (D (D (D (D S O V) 0 Ln V) (n V) o Vi 3 7 3 O S O S S S S O S io rt -1 CD U) -, m W U) `'' co w w o3 �' m 0 Oo (D (D (D a rr (D rD a a a a a a a (D rt a 0) a (D V) LI) V) V) in w = a m a a a a a 3 ° a o 0 0 m o D 1° 0 v a in (n m 0 o 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Q) c rt (D v, n � m 3 x Y a o � ° x. 3 � � :3 a °rt' _� _D7 D- _� _� Lo Q a � v (D D Lo CD 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 vi `-r (D d K � (D (D m (D Z) (D C (D : (D C CD (D o < < < c o cc a o a a a a a a a p 0 o _ rt v � a, a a W o, � S a - D O Ul ] w N r o U a a fi (n a o Ln — (D 0 (D o Q 3 Q. ((DD `i (D rt 7 7 7 7 7 a o p 3 _S_ a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 rD rn p 0 rn n a a a a a a a a Lo m N m rD cc < n n n n n n n = a Ln rt a (A n rt S S S � S S O C o D � rNr D = a a a N o N o a a a a a Q N CD 3 zT rD oZ) v rD W S „ o D' ? D D D o m " m 0 w V Ln (n �n zi CD V) a c o o c c c O l0 7 w o -~'i o Ln r--r 3m rr-r r�-r rN-r —" 3 3 `D a v 3 o O O ? 0 0 0 O rt (D p — Ln r p' r r r Z- _ (D (D C C -? C v O ° 6 � — 6 (D 3 rt l0 to �, `E Lo Ui r� (D r* rt O C Ln to rt cn er Ut Vl V) n = O O? C 3 �. S 3 rt S rt O N O N O rt O rt O rt O N %n M O rt � S ror N O S r r S S S O r ° S S m m C (D (D CD a a a a C o a (D D D D Z 3 S rt a s S a o n zT �r O p �_ to 0 C 70 (D v (D (D v v of CD o rD 0 rr � 0 Ln Lo � 0 o rte* 0 m 0 Z3 O N O a 3 r ° to to rat d a �. a (D — rt O o �( !D (D (D -I CD -I � _„ C rt -0 -0 rt --" (o 3 0 O 3 3 3 0 O �q O O 0 O N a X X X X ° O (D D rt rt > > 7 rt a (D D a O O O to Lo to 0 n Q lD a S S a a a S Q -1 d 0 (D (D °rt' (D �' (D ((D (D � a a a a g a (D (D (D Z5 n (D a .� (D a ni _ rt o_ o_ rt (D rt (D rt m o_ N 3 ((D � � In o (11 r* :3 a a c c :3 a Ort 41 rt r�-r r�r rt — rt r�-r O O n o (p (p o 0 0 (D tD a tD T S _ ::- -0 _0 "O r a Q 0 j CD a a rD (D (D a (D a c rt a cn a 3 (D CD 3 3 3 rD n Q rD rD Q rt D rY 3 3 r7 rt rt 3 rt (D zr (n CD o_ X, x D a D n D o_ x a — • rD 7 0 7 a Q 0 0 3 O 0 0 =. rt r-r rt C L C C C 0 No a a rt a ::E a rt S = (D (D = n a' (D (D a o_ VI D o_ (D r O o _ O _ O N V) O rt rt O O O rr 0 rr (D a w S S w w w S rt S (D rt (DD (DD o m 7 rD 7 (D 7 (D :3 a (D 5' a) VI 0 1-t O rt O rt O r-* rDr a (D r a o 0 a) 27 a r<D CD (D (7D (D a 3 3 3 n a a rtt rtr a 7 N v r W OL a `Da ffDa rrtr (Do n7, v c A m m Z m rX C) < ;p m -0 O M C) 0 0 n V�fVf►" • :4 O ZD(A> �x> r m a m X C) r Mn� Oar-+ X O � Z n a X O r H Z a Z) _ 1O rt ° l R i 0 0 � O 6 i = N l i n N -1 < v -1 C) 3 0 Z; r n n n D D D _i z T = n w ° D; 1 3 0 r3o n i p n CL 3 7 3 = y o ° a y C) l ^ _ Ln c -o Q d d (D (D d O d nLn lD O C S O _ O O C. v a l 7 3 .1 � � O rt r � 7 3 ° ^ 3 ^ 7 C 3 Z) _ 1O rt ° l R i 0 0 � O 6 i = N l i n N -1 0-1 v -1 -4 -4 0 Z; r n n n D D N ; ;� = n w W D; 0 r n n p n T 3 = y A O y -0 ? d H rt d d p o+ d O d C lD O C S O _ O O C. 3 3 ° ^ 3 ^ 7 C 3 a ? CT r, c ^ >> lD cu v a 0 ^ W `y ^ c ° (o N m in c 3 .cC a n y �' 0 3 d d 3= N c CL m .. M n a .. .. .. .. D ° ^ ° ; to 3 n m trD � 3 lD rt O a 3 to Z v► (n 3 3 c c c c c c c c c c 3 3 3 3 r 3 3 3 3 c 3 3 3 3 3 ; m (o (e (o (c (c (o m (e (e (c (o 3 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r' n r r r r r r r ° o W n n n n n n n n n n n n n n 0 GO 00 k.0 Q• A W O ' �O O CD O O LJ U1 O O O O N V V7 0 p Lfl O O O O N A n n n n n n n n n n V O N to V ~' O " r W N r O W 07 OJ tD i.... O V O) O N O O r N O O VI O N O O N m N r F., �+ F. A V F. V W N V Lil O O NJ r. O O O O W N O A n n n n n n n n n n N r � r r r r r-+ O N W W O N O O N to � OO O V V O CD N A A 00 0 O to r to V N p W Co A .A kO V r O O 0� O O O N A 0 A n n n n n n n n n n n n N Ul Ul NO O to O N 0� N O N In C O C) O O N O N C In O O O to O O W V A n n n n n n n n n W A � A r V W N A W tD N O r W to N A N r �' N tD O N O V O N r N o O r O O O p N ~ 07 �+ � r r µ r O Ul r. V 0� O tD O W A W r N N ~ p V O O V O O V O A n n n n n n n n n n N O W A co V M i-+ �-+ r r r f.. lf1 f.. O r r W �+ O r O� Ll N U'I T O O O N O V Ln W N � 0� 07 A C) r O 0o M O O lD A n n n n n n n n n n n n O Z 3 V'7 Ni F.. V O to W O r r W � r f.. r r r r O �+ N Qt N A N O r r A O p r tD O r N O V V) r O N r W A V W O W �D � tD Ou A r, O to W O O 07 w A n n n n n n n n n n o ° 3 Z C, o N to A O W r r O -j O r V C _ I" O O N � In O O� tD to O N �D a) to O In W O O co III W to N N N A n n n n O � �. V ~ .A N W V tD �-' N Oi N W r. O N A N N Cn �+ O W A W �-+ W V N �• O O F+ V r r N In D C O co VI N V O O N tD Qt A O tD A N Ul V �... ? V ? Cl r r to V to A V W ? t0 �+ �. O O tD O O CD A co v rc m m m Z m T ;a O G) IIww Y! O^ W a Yl oa Mom m �. Z XmN m O m N X A C O U3 ra Z O ;a N = N n � n N X ° r � M Z D ' Table 3 Seep Analytical Methods ' Duke Energy Progress, Inc. - Roxboro Steam Electric Plant Semora, North Carolina Parameter Method Reporting Limit Units Lab COD HACH 8000 20 mg /L Duke Energy Aluminum (Al) EPA 200.7 0.005 mg /L Duke Energy Antimony (Sb) EPA 200.8 1 ug /L Duke Energy Arsenic (As) EPA 200.8 1 ug /L Duke Energy Barium (Ba) EPA 200.7 0.005 mg /L Duke Energy Boron (B) EPA 200.7 0.05 mg /L Duke Energy Cadmium (Cd) EPA 200.8 1 ug /L Duke Energy Calcium (Ca) EPA 200.7 0.1 mg /L Duke Energy Chloride EPA 300.0 5 mg /L Duke Energy Chromium (Cr) EPA 200.8 1 ug /L Duke Energy Copper (Cu) EPA 200.8 1 ug /L Duke Energy Fluoride EPA 300.0 1 mg /L Duke Energy Hardness EPA 200.7 0.19 mg /L (CaCO3) Duke Energy Iron (Fe) EPA 200.7 0.01 mg /L Duke Energy Lead (Pb) EPA 200.8 1 ug /L Duke Energy Magnesium (Mg) EPA 200.7 0.05 mg /L Duke Energy Manganese (Mn) EPA 200.7 0.005 mg /L Duke Energy Mercury (Hg) EPA 245.1 0.05 ug /L Duke Energy Molybdenum (Mo) EPA 200.8 1 ug /L Duke Energy Nickel (Ni) EPA 200.8 1 ug /L Duke Energy Oil and Grease EPA 1664B 5.0 mg /L Pace Analytical Selenium (Se) EPA 200.8 1 ug /L Duke Energy Sulfate EPA 300.0 5 mg /L Duke Energy TDS SM2540C 25 mg /L Duke Energy Thallium (TI) Low Level EPA 200.8 0.2 ug /L Duke Energy TSS SM2540D 5 mg /L Duke Energy Zinc (Zn) EPA 200.7 0.005 mg /L Duke Energy Prepared By: RBI Checked By: KWW P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \Seep Repo rt\Ta bles\Ta ble 3 Analytical Methods Page 1 of 1 APPENDIX A ANALYTICAL SAMPLE HANDLING, ' PRESERVATION, AND HOLDING TIME ' REQUIREMENTS Parameter name Container! Preservation' 3 Maximum holding time" Table IB— Inorganic Tests: 1. Acidity P, FP, G Cool, s6'C" 14 days. 2. Alkalinity P. FP, G Cool, 56 °C'" 14 days. 4. Ammonia P. FP, G Cool, <_6 °C''. H,SO, to pH <2 28 days. 9. Biochemical oxygen demand P, FP, G Cool, 56 °C`" 48 hours. 10. Boron P. FP, or Quartz HNO, to pH <2 6 months 11. Bromide P, FP, G None required 28 days 14. Biochemical oxygen demand, carbonaceous P, FP G Cool, <_6 'C'5 48 hours. 15. Chemical oxygen demand P. FP, G Cool, 56'C' ", HZSO, to pH <2 28 days. 16. Chloride P, FP. G None required 28 days. 17. Chlorine, total residual P. G None required Analyze within 15 minutes. 21. Color P, FP G Cool, 56 C " 48 hours. 23-24. Cyanide, total or available (or CATC) and free P. FP, G Cool. 56 °C1 °, NaOH to pH >105 14 days. °, reducing agent if oxidizer present 25. Fluoride P None required 28 days. 27. Hardness P, FP, G HNO3 or H2S0" to pH <2 6 months. 28. Hydrogen ion (pH) P. FP, G None required Analyze within 15 minutes 31, 43. K)aldahl and organic N P, FP, G Cool, s6 'C". H2SOa to PH <2 28 days - Table IB— Metals:` 18. Chromium VI P, FP, G Cool, s6 'C'°, pH = 9.3 -9.7r' 28 days. 35. Mercury (CVAA) P, FP, G HNO3 to pH <2 28 days 35. Mercury (CVAFS) FP, G; and FP- 5 mLIL 12N HCI or 5 mLL BrCI" 90 days_" lined cap' ` 3, 5-8, 12, 13, 19, 20, 22, 26, 29, 30, 32 -34, 36, 37, 45, P, FP, G HNO, to pH <2, or at least 24 6 months 47, 51, 52, 58-60, 62, 63, 70 -72, 74, 75. Metals, except hours prior to analys s15 boron, chromium VI, and mercury 38. Nitrate P, FP, G Cool, 5fi'C'" 48 hours. 39. Nitrate- nitrite P. FP, G Cool. 56 'C' ", HIM to pH <2 28 days 40. Nitrite P. FP, G Cool, 56'C'" 48 hours. 41. Oil and grease G Cool to s6 'C ", HCI or H;SO, to 28 days PH <2 42. Organic Carbon P, FP, G Cool to s6 'C' °, HCI, HnSO ", or 28 days. H3PO4 to pH <2 44. Orthophosphate P, FP, G Cool, to 56 'C'" `° Filter within 15 minutes: Analyze within 48 hours. 46. Oxygen, Dissolved Probe G, Bottle and top None required Analyze within 15 minutes. 47. Winkler G, Bottle and top Fix on site and store in dark 8 hours. 48. Phenols G Cool, 56 °C'", HrSO, to pH <2 28 days. 49. Phosphorous (elemental) G Cool. 56 "C" 48 hours. 50. Phosphorous, total P. FP, G Cool, 56'C", HrSO, to pH <2 28 days 53. Residue, total P. FP, G Cool. 56 `C'" 7 days. 54. Residue, Filterable P, FP, G Cool, s6 °C', 11 7 days. 55. Residue, Nonfilterable (TSS) P, FP, G Cool. 56 `C" 7 days 56. Residue, Settleable P, FP, G Cool, 56'Cll' 48 hours. 57. Residue, Volatile P, FP, G Cool, 56 'C'" 7 days. 61. Silica P or Quartz Cool, 56 °C'" 28 days. 64. Specific conductance P, FP, G Cool 56 'C" 28 days 65. Sulfate P, FP, G Cool. s6 °C" 28 days. 66. Sulfide P, FP. G Cool. 56 `C'", add zinc acetate 7 days plus sodium hydroxide to pH >9 67. Sulfite P, FP, G None required Analyze within 15 minutes. 68. Surfactants P, FP, G Cool, 56 -C" 48 hours. 69. Temperature P. FP, G Norte required Analyze. 73. Turbidity P. FP, G Cool, s6 `C" 48 hours. ' "P" is for polyethylene: 'FP- is fluoropolymer (pntytetrafluornelhylene (PTFE): Teflon"), or other fluoropolymer, unless stated otherwise in this Table 11. "G" is glass; "PA" is any plastic that is made of a sterilizable material (polypropylene or other autoclavable plastic), "LDPE" is low density polyethylene. Except where noted in this Table II and the method for the parameter, preserve each grab sample within 15 minutes of collection For a composite sample collected with an automated sample (e.g , using a 24 -hour composite sample; see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR Part 403, Appendix E), refrigerate the sample at s6 'C during collection unless specified otherwise in this Table II or in the method(s). For a composite sample to be split into separate aliquots to- preservation and /or analysis, maintain the sample at 56 'C, unless specified otherwise in this Table II or in the method(s), until collection, splitting, and preservation is completed. Add the preservative to the sample container prior to sample collectioi when the preservative will not compromise the integrity of a grab sample, a composite sample, or aliquot split from a composite sample within 15 minutes of collection. If a composite measurement is required but a composite sample would compromise sample integrity, individual grab samples must be collected at prescribed time intervals (e.g., 4 samples over the course of a day, at 6 -hour intervals). Grab samples must be analyzed separately and the concentrations averaged. Alternatively, grab samples may be collected in the field and composited in the laboratory if the compositing procedure produces results equivalent to results produced by arithmetic averaging of results of analysis of Individual grab samples. For examples of laboratory compositing procedures, see EPA Method 1664 Rev. A (eil and grease) and the procedures at 40 CFR 141,34(f)(14)(iv) and (v) (volatile organics). 'When any sample is to be shipped by common carrier or sent via the U S. Postal Service, it must comply with the Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR part 172). The person offering such material for transportation is responsible for ensuring such compliance. For the preservation requirement of Table II, the Office of Hazardous Materials, Materials Trarsportation Bureau, Department of Transportation has determined that the Hazardous Materials Regulations do not apply to the following materials: Hydrochloric acid (HCI) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.04% by weight or less (pH about 1.96 or greater; Nitric acid (HNO)) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.15% by weight or less (pH about 1.62 or greater), Sulfuric acid (H,SO4) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.35% by weight or less (pH about 1.15 or greater), and Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.080% by weight or less (pH about 12.30 or less). 'Samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection. The times listed are the maximum times that samples may be held before the start of analysis and still be considered valid Samples may be held for longer periods only if the permittee or monitoring laboratory has data on file to show that, for the specific types of samples under study, the analytes are stable for the longer time, and has received a variance from the Regional Administrator under Sec. 136.3(e). For a grab sample, the holding time begins at the time of collection. For a composite sample collected with an automated sampler (e.g., using a 24 -hour composite sampler; see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR part 403, Appendix E), the holding time begins at the time of the end of collection of the composite sample. For a set of grab samples composited in the field or laboratory, the holding time begins at the time of collection of the last grab sample in the set. Some samples may not be stable for the maximum time period given in the table. A permittee or monitoring laboratory is obligated to hold the sample for a shorter time if it knows that a shorter time is necessary to maintain sample stability. See 136.3(e) for details. The date and time of collection of an individual grab sample is the date and time at which the sample is collected. For a set of grab samples to be composited, and that are all collected on the same calendar date, the date of collection is the date on which the samples are collected. For a set of grab samples to be composited, and that are collected across two calendar dates, the date of collection is the dates of the two days; e.g., November 14 -15. For a composite sample collected automatically on a given date, the date of collection is the date on which the sample is collected. For a composite sample collected automatically, and that is collected across Iwo calendar dates, the date of collection is the dates of the two days; e g , November 14- 15. For static - renewal toxicity tests, each grab or composite sample may also be used to prepare lest solutions for renewal at 24 h. 48 h. and /or 72 h after first use, if stored at 0-6 °C, with minimum head space. °ASTM D7335 -09a specifies treatment options for samples containing oxidants (e.g., chlorine). Also, Section 6060A of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (20th and 21st editions) addresses dechlorination procedures "Sampling, preservation and mitigating interferences in water samples for analysis of cyanide are described in ASTM 07365 -09a. There may be interferences that are not mitigated by the analytical test methods or D7365 -09a Any technique for removal or suppression of interference may be employed, provided the laboratory demonstrates that it more accurately measures cyanide through quality control measures described in the analytical test method. Any removal or suppression technique not described in D7365 -09a or the analytical test method must be documented along with supporting data. 'For dissolved metals. filter grab samples within 15 minutes of collection and before adding preservatives For a composite sample collected with an automated sampler (e.g., using a 24 -hour composite sampler, see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR Part 403, Appendix E). filter the sample within 15 minutes after completion of collection and before adding preservatives. If fi is known or suspected that dissolved sample integrity wil be compromised during collection of a composite sample collected automatically over time (e.g., by interchange of a metal between dissolved and suspended forms), collect and filter grab samples to be composited (footnote 2) in place of a composite sample collected automatically "Guidance applies to samples to be analyzed by GC LC. or GC /MS for specific compounds 'If the sample is not adjusted to pH 2, then the sample must be analyzed within seven days of sampling. 'C' The pH adjustment is not required if acrolein will not be measured. Samples for acrolein receiving no pH adjustment must be analyzed within 3 days of sampling. t, When the extractable analytes of concern fall within a single chemical category, the specified preservative and maximum holding times should be observed for optimum safeguard of sample integrity (i.e., use all necessary preservatives and hold for the shortest time listed). When the analytes of concern fall within two or more chemical categories, the sample may be preserved by cooling to <_6 'C, reducing residual chlorine with 0.008% sodium thiosulfate, storing in the dark, and adjusting the pH to 6 -9: samples preserved in this manner may be held for seven days before extraction and for forty days after extraction Exceptions to this optional preservation and holding time procedure are noted in footnote 5 (regarding the requirement for thiosulfate reduction), and footnotes 12. 13 (regarding the analysis of benzidine) 12 If 1,2- diphenylhydrazine is likely to be present. adjust the pH of the sample to 4.0 t0.2 to prevent rearrangement to benzidine. "Extracts may be stored up to 30 days at <0 °C. "For the analysis of diphenylnitrosamine, add 0 008% NaaS103 and adjust pH to 7 -10 with NaOH within 24 hours of sampling. '-The pH adjustment may be performed upon receipt at the laboratory and may be omitted if the samples are extrac'ed within 72 hours of collection. For the analysis of aldrin, add 0.008% Na2SIO3 "Place sufficient ice with the samples in the shipping container to ensure that ice is still present when the samples arrive at the laboratory However, even H ice is present when the samples arrive, immediately measure the temperature of the samples and confirm that the preservation temperature maximum has not been exceeded In the isolated cases where it can be documented that this holding temperature cannot be met, the permittee can be given the option of on -site testing or can request a variance. The request for a variance should include supportive data which show that the toxicity of the effluent samples is not reduced because of the increased holding temperature. Aqueous samples must not be frozen t-and- delivered samples used on the day of collection do not need to oe cooled to 0 to 6 'C prior to test initiation Samples collected for the determination of trace level mercury ( <100 ng/L) using EPA Method 1631 must be collected in tightly - capped fluoropolymer or glass bottles and preserved with BrCI or HCI solution within 48 hours of sample collection The time to preservation may be extended to 28 days if a sample is oxidized in the sample bottle. A sample collected for dissolved trace level mercury should be filtered in the laboratory within 24 hours of the time of collection. However, if circumstances preclude overnight shipment, the sample should be filtered in a designated clean area in the field in accordance with procedures given in Method 1669. If sample integrity will not be maintained by shipment to and filtration in the laboratory, the sample must be filtered in a designated clean area in the field within the time ' period necessary to maintain sample integrity. A sample that has been collected for determination of total or dissolved trace level mercury must be analyzed within 90 days of sample collection. "Aqueous samples must be preserved at s6 'C, and should not be frozen unless data demonstrating that sample freezing does not adversely Impact sample Integrity is maintained on file and accepted as valid by the regulatory authority. Also, for pt,rposes of NPDES ' monitoring, the specification of "s °C" is used in place of the "4 "C" and " <4 °C" sample temperature requirements listed in some methods. It is not necessary to measure the sample temperature to three significant figures (11100th of 1 degree); rather, three significant figures are specified so that rounding down to 6 'C may not be used to meet the 56 °C requirement. The preservation temperature does not apply to samples that are analyzed immediately (less than 15 minutes). ' "An aqueous sample may be collected and shipped without acid preservation. However, acid must be added at leest 24 hours before analysis to dissolve any metals that adsorb to the container walls. If the sample must be analyzed within 24 hours of collection, add the acrd immediately (see fcolnote 2). Soil and sediment samples do not need to be preserved with acid. The allowances in this footnote supersede the preservation and holding time requirements in the approved metals methods. 2''To achieve the 28 -day holding time, use the ammonium sulfate buffer solution specified in EPA Method 218.6. The allowance in this ' footnote supersedes preservation and holding time requirements in the approved hexavalent chromium methods, unless this supersession would compromise the measurement, in which case requirements in the method must be followed. "Holding time is calculated from time of sample collection to elution for samples shipped to the laboratory in bulk and calculated from the time of sample `titration to elution for samples filtered in the field. ''Sample analysis should begin as soon as possible after receipt; sample incubation must be started no later than 8 hours from time of ' collection "For fecal colifornt samples for sewage sludge (btosolids) only, the holding time is extended to 24 hours for the following sample types using either EPA Method 1680 (LTB -EC) or 1681 (A -1): Class A composted. Class B aerobically digested. and Class B anaerobically digested. "The immediate filtration requirement in orthophosphate measurement is .o assess the dissolved or bio- available form of ' orthophosphorus (i.e., that which passes through a 0.45 - micron filter), hence the requirement to filter the sample immediately upon collection (l.e., within 15 minutes of collection). [38 FR 28758, Oct. 16, 1973 161 synTerra GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING, ANALYSIS, AND REPORTING PLAN FOR ROXBORO STEAM PLANT 1700 DUNNAWAY ROAD SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA 27343 NPDES PERMIT #NC0003425 PREPARED FOR DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA �• DUKE ENERGY. PROGRESS SUBMITTED: OCTOBER 2014 CE N; •` SEAL ,�NCARI Y", iAGE N 3 �ti9 �' SEAL Z 1 425 --- s, F"- %-t OG -01��' C PG i y A'••r� -� Geologis'���,,,•,tit"% % PG 1328 Manager Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit r NC0003425 SynTerra TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................... ..............................1 2.0 Site Description .............................................................................................. ..............................2 Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Time ........ .............................12 2.1 Plant and Ash Management Areas ....................................................... ............................... 2 2.2 Ash Management Area Description ..................................................... ............................... 2 3.0 Site Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................................. ..............................3 3.1 Geologic Framework ................................................................................ ..............................3 5.8 3.2 Hydrogeologic Framework ..................................................................... ..............................4 4.0 Monitoring Program ...................................................................................... ..............................6 4.1 Regulatory Requirements for Groundwater Monitoring .................. ............................... 6 4.2 Description of Groundwater Monitoring System ................................ ..............................7 4.3 Monitoring Frequency ............................................................................ ............................... 8 4.4 Sample Parameters and Methods ........................................................... ..............................8 4.5 Data Quality Objectives ........................................................................... ..............................9 Validation of Laboratory Data .................................................................... .............................20 5.0 Sampling Procedures .................................................................................... .............................10 Report Submittal ........................................................................................... .............................21 5.1 Sampling Equipment and Cleaning Procedures ................................. .............................10 References ...................................................................................................... .............................22 5.2 Groundwater Sampling .......................................................................... .............................10 5.2.1 Development of Monitoring Wells ................................................. .............................10 5.2.2 Groundwater Level and Total Depth Measurements .................. .............................10 5.2.3 Well Purging and Sampling ............................................................ .............................11 5.3 Sample Collection .................................................................................... .............................12 5.4 Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Time ........ .............................12 5.5 Sample Tracking ...................................................................................... .............................12 5.6 Sample Labeling ...................................................................................... .............................12 5.7 Field Documentation ............................................................................... .............................13 5.8 Chain -of- Custody Record ....................................................................... .............................14 5.9 Sample Custody, Shipment, and Laboratory Receipt ........................ .............................14 6.0 Analytical Procedures .................................................................................. .............................16 7.0 Internal Quality Control Checks ................................................................ .............................17 8.0 Validation of Field Data Package .............................................................. .............................19 9.0 Validation of Laboratory Data .................................................................... .............................20 10.0 Report Submittal ........................................................................................... .............................21 11.0 References ...................................................................................................... .............................22 Page i P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan \ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.dcx-x ' List of Appendices Appendix A - Boring Logs and Well Construction Records ' Appendix B - Permit Condition A (6) Attachment XX, Version 1.0, dated March 17, 2011 IPage ii P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC srrES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \GW Monitoring IPlan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 ' oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra List of Figures ' Figure 1- Site Location Map Figure 2 - Sample Location Map Figure 3 - Typical Monitoring Well Construction Details ' Figure 4 - Example Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet Figure 5 - Example Field Sampling Calibration Form Figure 6 - Chain -of- Custody Record and Analysis Request Form ' Figure 7 - North Carolina Groundwater Sampling Checklist List of Tables Table 1 - Monitoring Well Information ' Table 2 - Sample Parameters, Analytical Methods, Containers, Preservatives, and Holding Times ' List of Appendices Appendix A - Boring Logs and Well Construction Records ' Appendix B - Permit Condition A (6) Attachment XX, Version 1.0, dated March 17, 2011 IPage ii P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC srrES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \GW Monitoring IPlan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Groundwater Monitoring Program Sampling, Analysis, and Reporting Plan (Plan) is developed to support the Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) requirement for groundwater monitoring around the Roxboro Steam Plant (Roxboro Plant) ash management area operated under NPDES Permit NC0003425. This Plan describes the groundwater monitoring network, methodologies of field sampling, record - keeping protocols, analytical procedures, data quality objectives, data validation, and reporting that will be used for the Roxboro Plant ash basins groundwater monitoring program. Page 1 P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026\ ALL NC STIES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Plant and Ash Management Areas Duke Energy Progress, Inc. owns and operates the Roxboro Steam Plant (Roxboro Plant) located in north - central North Carolina near Semora, North Carolina. A large part of the Plant area encompasses Hyco Lake. The Roxboro Plant is located in Person County along the east bank of Hyco Lake north of Roxboro, NC and west of McGhees Mill Road. The site location is shown on Figure 1. The Roxboro Plant began operations in 1966, and additional units were added in 1968, 1973, and 1980. Throughout its operational history, the Roxboro Plant has employed coal -fired units to produce steam. Coal combustion residuals (CCR) have been managed in on -site ash basins. 2.2 Ash Management Area Description Ash generated from coal combustion throughout the operational history of the Roxboro Plant was stored in on -site ash basins and a CCR landfill. Throughout most of its history, ash was sluiced as a slurry to the ash basins or conveyed in its dry form to the CCR landfill. Two ash basins have historically been used at the Roxboro Plant and are referenced using the date of construction and relative location: the 1966 ash basin (East Ash Basin) and the 1973 active ash basin (West Ash Basin). The 1966 semi - active ash basin is located southeast of the plant, and the 1973 active ash basin is located south of the plant. The CCR landfill was constructed as an unlined landfill on top of the former East Ash Basin in 1988. A lined landfill was subsequently constructed over the unlined landfill in 2004. The ash basins are impounded by earthen dams. Surface water runoff from the East Ash Basin and the CCR landfill are routed into the West Ash Basin to allow settling. A 500 -foot compliance boundary encircles the ash basin areas. The ash basin locations are indicated on Figure 2. Currently, the East Ash Basin and CCR landfill are covered with vegetation where the landfill is not active (grasses and shrubs). The active ash basin has some grass cover and ponded water, mostly along the southern and eastern edges of the basin. Wastewater discharges from the facility are permitted by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit NC0003425. Page 2 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \GW Monitoring Plan \ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # N IC0003425 SvnTerra 3.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 3.1 Geologic Framework The Roxboro Plant is situated in the eastern Piedmont Region of north- central North Carolina. The Piedmont is characterized by well - rounded hills and rolling ridges cut by small streams and drainages. Elevations in the area of the Roxboro Plant range between 410 feet above mean sea level (msl) during full pool at Hyco Lake to 570 feet msl near the Dunnaway Road and McGhees Mill Road intersection southeast of the Plant. Geologically, the Plant is located at the contact of two regional geologic zones: the Inner Piedmont zone and the Carolina zone. Both zones are generally comprised of igneous and metamorphosed igneous and sedimentary rocks of Paleozoic age. In general, the rocks are highly fractured and folded and have been subjected to long periods of physical and chemical weathering. The origination, genesis, and characteristics of the rocks of the region have been the focus of detailed study by researchers for many years. These investigations have resulted in a number of interpretations and periodic refinements to the overall geological model of the region. Rocks of the region, except where exposed in road cuts, stream channels, and steep hillsides, are covered with unconsolidated material formed from the in -situ chemical and physical breakdown of the bedrock. This unconsolidated material is referred to as saprolite or residuum. Direct observations at the Roxboro Plant confirm the presence of residuum, developed above the bedrock, which is generally 10 to 30 feet thick. The residuum extends from the ground surface (soil zones) downward, transitioning through a zone comprised of unconsolidated silt and sand, downward through a transition zone of partially weathered rock in a silt /sand matrix, down to the contact with competent bedrock. The Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985) places the rocks of the Plant area in the Charlotte Terrane: a belt of metamorphic rock trending generally southwest to northeast characterized by strongly foliated felsic mica gneiss and schist and metamorphosed intrusive rocks. The rocks of the area near the Plant are described as biotite gneiss and schist with abundant potassic feldspar and garnet, and interlayered and gradational with calc- silicate rock, silliminite -mica schist and amphibolite. The gneiss contains small masses of granite rock. The felsic mica gneiss of the Charlotte Terrane is described as being interlayered with biotite and hornblende schist. Later mapping generally confirms these observations and places the Roxboro Plant directly at the contact between the Inner Piedmont zone, characterized by the presence of biotite Page 3 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC STIES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 ' oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra gneiss and schist, and the Charlotte Belt (or Charlotte Terrane), characterized by felsic mica gneiss (USGS, 2007). I' Other researchers have conducted detailed investigations of the area and have provided additional description of the geology in detailed tectonic, structural, and litho - stratigraphic terms (Wilkins, Shell and Hibbard, 1995; Hibbard, et. al., 2002). One of the ' most important interpretations concerning the geologic nature of the region is the discovery and description of the Hyco shear zone, a tectonic boundary comprised of a ductile shear zone that sharply separates contrasting rocks of the Charlotte (Milton) and ' Carolina Terranes in north - central North Carolina and southern Virginia (Hibbard, et. al., 1998). The Hyco shear zone was mapped as directly underlying Hyco Lake. These general geologic observations are consistent with site - specific observations from well logs for the Roxboro Plant, which document the bedrock of the northwestern portion of the compliance boundary as mafic granitic gneiss and the remainder of the site as felsic gneiss and hornblende gneiss. Based on previous activities at the site, subsurface lithology beneath the Plant area is comprised of tan to olive brown sandy silt and fine to coarse sands grading into partially weathered rock and then competent bedrock. ' 3.2 Hydrogeologic Framework Groundwater within the area exists under unconfined, or water table, conditions within ' the residuum and /or saprolite zone and in fractures and joints of the underlying bedrock. The water table and bedrock aquifers are interconnected. The residuum acts as a reservoir for supplying groundwater to the fractures and joints in the bedrock. ' Shallow groundwater generally flows from local recharge zones in topographically high areas, such as ridges, toward groundwater discharge zones, such as stream valleys. Ridge and topographic high areas serve as groundwater recharge zones, and ' groundwater flow patterns in recharge areas tend to develop a somewhat radial pattern from the center of the recharge area outward toward the discharge areas and are expected to mimic surface topography. The Roxboro Plant is bordered to the west, south, and east by areas of topographic highs. The surface water flow direction for the plant is to the north toward Hyco Lake. ' Groundwater beneath the Plant area occurs within the residuum/partially weathered rock or competent bedrock at depths ranging from three to 20 feet below land surface ' (bls) along the downgradient compliance boundary and greater than 35 feet bls upgradient of the ash basin. Routine water level measurements and corresponding elevations from the compliance monitoring well network indicate that groundwater ' generally flows from upland areas along the south, west, and eastern boundaries Page 4 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra towards the north and Hyco Lake. Groundwater generally flows from the south to the north along the western portion of the property and from the southwest to the northeast across the remainder of the property. The approximate groundwater gradient along the western portion of the property for July 2014 data was 85.04 feet (vertical change) over 530 feet (horizontal distance) or 16 feet /100 feet as measured from upgradient background well BG -1 to downgradient well CW -2. The approximate groundwater gradient along the northern compliance boundary for July 2014 was slightly less at 76.64 feet (vertical change) over 570 feet (horizontal distance) or 13.4 feet over 100 feet as measured from well CW -1 to downgradient well CW -2. Groundwater elevation data collected from the two well pairs indicate the vertical gradient tends to be upward or neutral between the transition zone and upper bedrock. Page 5 P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026\ ALL NC STIES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan \Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.doLx Groundwater Nlonitorine P October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, N PDES Permit # NC0003423 SynTerra 4.0 MONITORING PROGRAM 4.1 Regulatory Requirements for Groundwater Monitoring The NPDES program regulates wastewater discharges to surface waters to ensure that surface water quality standards are maintained. The Roxboro Plant operates under NPDES Permit NC0003425 which authorizes discharge as follows: Ash Basin Treatment System (Internal Outfall 002): To treat ash transport, low volume wastewater including Reverse- Osmosis (RO) wastewater, runoff from the ash landfill, dry fly -ash handling system wash water, coal pile runoff silo wash water, storm water runoff, cooling tower blowdown from unit number 4, and domestic sewage treatment plant effluent. Effluent from the ash basin discharges to the heated water discharge canal and is ultimately released into Hyco Lake through Outfall 003. Heated Water Discharge Canal System (Outfall 003. At the point that the discharge canal enters Hyco Lake, it contains flow from several waste streams including: once - through cooling water, stormwater runoff, and the effluent from the ash basin (Internal Outfall 002). Cooling Tower Blowdown System Internal Outfall 005. Cooling tower blowdown from unit number 4 discharges into the ash transport system and ultimately flows into the ash basin (Internal Outfall 002). Coal Pile Runoff Treatment System ( Outfall 006): This system handles runoff from the coal pile and other coal handling areas including the limestone and gypsum piles and the truck wheel wash water. These waters are routed to a retention basin for treatment by neutralization, sedimentation, and equalization prior to being discharged directly to Hyco Lake. • Domestic Wastewater Treatment System (Internal Outfall 00& Effluent from the ' treatment system flows into the ash basin. Effluent from the ash basin discharges into the heated water discharge canal. ' • Chemical Metal Cleaning Treatment System (Internal Outfall 009): This waste stream may occasionally be discharged to the ash basin treatment system. It contains chemical metal cleaning wastes. Effluent from the ash basin discharges into the heated water discharge canal. Page 6 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables Monitoring t Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 October 2014 SynTerra Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Treatment System (Internal Outfall 010) This waste steam is generated from blowdown from the FGD treatment unit. After treatment in the bioreactors, effluent is discharged into the heated water discharge canal upstream from Internal Outfall 002, and is ultimately released into Hyco Lake through Outfall 003. In addition to surface water monitoring, the NPDES permit requires groundwater monitoring. Permit Condition A (6) Attachment XX, dated March 17, 2011, lists the groundwater monitoring wells to be sampled, the parameters and constituents to be measured and analyzed, and the requirements for sampling frequency and results reporting. Attachment XX also provides requirements for well location and well construction. The as -built well information is summarized in Table 1 and the constituent list, analytical methods, preservatives and holding times are summarized in Table 2. The well logs for the listed wells are provided in Appendix A. A copy of Attachment XX is included as Appendix B. The compliance boundary for groundwater quality associated with the Roxboro Plant ash basins is defined in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a) as being established at either 500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property boundary, whichever is closer to the source. In accordance with the March 17, 2011 Groundwater Monitoring Plan, analytical results have been submitted to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) before the last day of the month following the date of sampling. In the future, analytical results will be submitted to the DWR within 60 days of the date of sampling. 4.2 Description of Groundwater Monitoring System The current NPDES groundwater monitoring plan for the Roxboro Plant includes the sampling of eight wells surrounding the active ash basin. These eight wells include one background well and seven downgradient wells. The locations of the monitoring wells, the waste boundary, and the compliance boundary are shown on Figure 2. In addition to the eight wells sampled as part of the NPDES permit, the Roxboro Plant samples six monitoring wells and collects landfill leachate samples from four locations associated with the active CCR landfill in accordance with a second permit issued by DENR's Solid Waste Section. The locations of these sample points are shown on Figure 2. Page 7 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Pernut Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 ' oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra ' Well construction data for all 14 monitoring wells (active basin and landfill) is provided in Table 1 and Appendix A. Figure 3 is an example of the construction of a typical monitoring well. 1 Based on water levels measured from site wells, the general direction of groundwater flow in the vicinity of the 1966 East Ash Basin and the CCR landfill is to the northwest, ' toward the plant. The general direction of groundwater flow in the vicinity of the active West Ash Basin is to north, towards the heated water discharge canal system. ' The site wells provide monitoring data for the groundwater downgradient of the ash basins. ' The NPDES compliance monitoring network includes one background monitoring well, BG -1, and seven downgradient compliance boundary monitoring wells: CW -1, CW -2, CW -2D, CW -3, CW -3D, CW-4, and CW -5. Wells CW -3D and CW -4D were installed in the upper bedrock and were paired with shallow wells CW -3 and CW-4, which were installed above the bedrock, to monitor the t vertical hydraulic gradient in the area and aquifer conditions within the shallow bedrock. The remainder of the compliance boundary wells were installed in the saprolite or residuum, above bedrock. ' 4.3 Monitoring Frequency The monitoring wells will be sampled three times per year in April, July, and November. 4.4 Sample Parameters and Methods The monitoring program consists of sampling and analysis for parameters and constituents identified in Permit Condition A (6), Attachment XX of the NPDES permit ' (Appendix B). The parameters and the analytical methods are presented in Table 2. It is proposed that monitoring for aluminum be discontinued. Aluminum is a very ' common, naturally- occurring element in soil and rocks of the area. A preliminary statistical evaluation indicates that aluminum concentrations in site groundwater were determined not to be a statistically significant increase over the background well data ' set. Further, aluminum is not consistently monitored across the entirety of Duke Energy facilities, and there is no 2L Standard for aluminum. ' The analytical results for the detection monitoring program will be compared to the NC 2L Standards or the site - specific background concentrations. Page 8 P: \Duke Energy Progress. NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables Monitoring I Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.doLx Groundwater Monitoring Program oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 October 2014 SynTerra 4.5 Data Quality Objectives The overall Quality Assurance (QA) objective is to ensure that reliable data of known and acceptable quality are provided. All measurements will be documented to yield results that are representative of the groundwater quality. Data will be calculated and reported in units as required by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). The analytical QA objectives for precision, accuracy, and completeness have been established by the laboratory(s) in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other accepted agencies for each measurement variable where possible. The objectives are outlined in the Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory Procedures Manual and are available upon request. Appropriate methods have been selected to meet applicable standards for groundwater quality. Instances may occur, however, in which the condition of the sample will not allow detection of the desired limits for various parameters either because of matrix interference or high analyte concentrations requiring sample dilution. The laboratory(s, will provide sufficient documentation with each data package to notify reviewers about any analytical problems with the data, if needed. Page 9 P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ALL NC STIES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro\GW Monitoring Plan \Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Pro October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 5.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES 5.1 Sampling Equipment and Cleaning Procedures Development and sampling equipment shall be selected to ensure that materials are compatible with the sample parameters and comply with state and federal regulatory requirements for sampling. New disposable sampling equipment (peristaltic pump tubing) is used for each monitoring well sampled. For non - dedicated equipment used, such as water level tapes and submersible pumps, the equipment will be cleaned before and after use in each well in accordance with standard EPA - approved cleaning procedures for field equipment. This standard is outlined in the Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual, Engineering Support Branch, EPA Region IV, February 1, 1991 as revised December 20, 2011. 5.2 Groundwater Sampling 5.2.1 Development of Monitoring Wells Monitoring wells addressed in this sampling plan have been developed. ' If new monitoring wells are installed, they will be developed prior to initial sampling. Development removes silt that has settled into the bottom of the well following installation and removes fine silt and clay particles from the well screen and sand -pack surrounding the screen. Well development is necessary to eliminate potential clogging and enhance well performance. Development t involves removing an estimated ten or more well volumes from the well using a submersible pump with up- and -down agitation to loosen particles from the well screen. If the turbidity for a well increases over time, the well may be re- ' developed to restore conditions. 5.2.2 Groundwater Level and Total Depth Measurements ' Water level measurements are collected and recorded to determine the groundwater elevation and flow direction. Site monitoring wells have been surveyed to determine the elevation of the top of well casing (TOC). Water level ' measurements are referenced to the TOC and recorded to the nearest one- hundredth of a foot. ' Water level measurements are made with an electronic measuring device consisting of a spool of dual- conductor wire and sensor. When the sensor comes ' in contact with water, the circuit is closed and a meter light and /or buzzer Page 10 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC STIES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 October 2014 SvnTerra attached to the spool signal the contact. When the signal is sounded, the water level is recorded on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4). To minimize sample turbidity, low flow sample methods are used whenever possible. Using low -flow sampling techniques, the volume of the stagnant water in the well is not calculated and the total well depth is not routinely measured to avoid disturbing the bottom sediments. If conditions indicate a possible problem with the integrity of a well, the total well depth may be measured. 5.2.3 Well Purging and Sampling The selection of purging technique is dependent on the hydrogeologic properties of the aquifer and hydraulic characteristics of each well. Hydraulic conductivity, water column, well volume, screen length, and other information are evaluated to select the purging technique to acquire groundwater representative of the aquifer conditions. At the Roxboro Plant, a low -flow purging technique has been selected as the most appropriate technique to minimize sample turbidity. During low -flow purging and sampling, groundwater is pumped into a flow - through chamber at flow rates that minimize or stabilize water level drawdown within the well. At the Roxboro facility, low -flow sampling is conducted using a peristaltic pump or low -flow submersible pump with new tubing. The intake for the tubing is lowered to the mid -point of the screened interval. A multi - parameter water quality monitoring instrument is used to measure field indicator parameters within the flow - through chamber during purging. Measurements include pH, specific conductance, and temperature. Indicator parameters are measured over time (usually at 3 -5 minute intervals). When parameters have stabilized within ±0.2 pH units and ±10 percent for temperature and specific conductivity over three consecutive readings, representative groundwater has been achieved for sampling. Turbidity is not a required stabilization parameter, however turbidity levels of 10 NTU or less are targeted. The Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4) is used to record purge data and field measurements. Instrument calibration is performed and documented before the beginning of the sampling event, at midday, and after each sampling event. The pH subsystem is calibrated with three pH standards (pH 4.0, 7.0, and 10.0) bracketing the expected groundwater pH. The pH calibration is then verified using a different pH 7.0 buffer. The specific conductance subsystem is calibrated using one Page 11 P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026\ ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \GW Monitoring Plan \Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra standard and verified using a different specific conductance buffer. Calibration results are recorded on a Field Sampling Calibration Form (Figure 5). 5.3 Sample Collection Groundwater samples are collected after the indicator parameters have stabilized. Sampling personnel wear new, clean, disposable, non - powdered nitrile gloves at each location. Samples are collected in the order of the volatilization sensitivity of the parameters: Metals, metalloids, and selenium • Sulfate, nitrate and chloride • Total dissolved solids Groundwater samples are preserved and stored according to parameter - specific methods and delivered to the laboratory under proper Chain -of- Custody (COC) procedures. All pertinent notations, water -level measurements, removed well volumes, and indicator parameters are documented on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4). 5.4 Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Time Sample containers supplied by the laboratory shall be new and pre- cleaned as approved by EPA procedures appropriate for the parameters of interest. Table 2 summarizes the sample containers, sample volume, preservation procedures, and holding times required for each type of sample and parameter for the monitoring program. Sample containers will be kept closed until used. Sample containers will be provided by Duke Energy or vendor laboratories. 5.5 Sample Tracking The COC procedures allow for tracking the possession and handling of individual samples from the time of field collection through laboratory analysis and report preparation. Samples are logged by the laboratory with a unique tracking number for each sample. An example of the COC Record is provided as Figure 6. 5.6 Sample Labeling Sample containers shall be pre - labeled and organized prior to field activities as part of the pre - sampling staging process. As samples are collected, the sampling personnel write the following information directly on the label: sampling date and time, and initials of sample collector. This information is also recorded on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4) and the COC Record (Figure 6). Page 12 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit it NC0003425 SynTerra 5.7 Field Documentation Field documentation from each sampling event is recorded on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets (Figure 4), the Field Sampling Calibration Form (Figure 5), and the Chain -of- Custody Record (Figure 6). Additionally, a Groundwater Sampling Site Checklist (Figure 7), or equivalent, is completed indicating information about the monitoring wells such as proper identification (ID) tag and condition of protective casing and pad. Field notations shall be made during the course of the field work to document the following information: • Identification of well • Well depth • Static water level depth and measurement technique • Well yield - high or low • Purge volume or pumping rate • Sample identification numbers • Well evacuation procedure /equipment • Sample withdrawal procedure /equipment • Date and time of collection • Types of sample containers used • Identification of replicates or blind samples • Preservative(s) used • Parameters requested for analysis • Field analysis data and methods • Sample distribution and transporter • Field observations during sampling event • Name of sample collector(s) • Climatic conditions including estimate of air temperature The Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet, Field Sampling Calibration Form, and COC Record and Analysis Request Form will be filed by project and date. Recorded entries will be made on electronic forms or on paper forms in indelible ink. Errors on paper documents will be corrected by drawing a line through the error, initialing and dating the correction, and starting a new entry on the next line (if necessary). Page 13 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.doxac Groundwater Monitoring Program ' oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 October 2014 SynTerra ' S.8 Chain -of- Custody Record The COC Record (Figure 6) accompanies the sample(s), traces sample possession from time of collection to delivery to the laboratory(s), and clearly identifies which sample ' containers have been designated for each requested analysis. The record includes the following types of information: • Sample identification number • Signature of collector • Date and time of collection • Sample type (e.g., groundwater, immiscible layer) • Identification of well • Number of containers • Parameters requested for analysis • Preservative(s) used • Signature of persons involved in the chain of possession • Inclusive dates of possession 5.9 Sample Custody, Shipment, and Laboratory Receipt For the purpose of these procedures, a sample is considered in custody if it is: • In actual possession of the responsible person • In view, after being in physical possession • Locked or sealed in a manner so that no one can tamper with it after having been in physical custody or in a secured area restricted to authorized personnel. Samples shall be maintained in the custody of the sampling crew during the sampling event. At the end of each sampling day and prior to the transfer of the samples off site, entries shall be completed on the COC form for all samples. Upon transfer of custody, the COC form is signed by a sampling crew member, including the date and time. If outside vendor laboratories are utilized, samples shall be delivered to these facilities by Duke Energy personnel or courier. COC forms received by the laboratory(s) shall be signed and dated by the respective supervising scientist(s) or their designee (at the Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services lab) or the laboratory sample custodian (at vendor labs) immediately following receipt by the laboratory. The analysts at the laboratory(s) maintain a sample tracking record Page 14 P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003423 SynTerra , that will follow each sample through all stages of laboratory processing. The sample ' tracking records show the date of sample extraction or preparation and analysis. These records are used to determine compliance with holding time limits during lab audits and data validation. ' Custody procedures followed by Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services laboratory personnel are described in detail in the Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services Procedures Manual. Page 15 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC STIES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan \Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.dcxx I Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 ' oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003.125 SynTerra ' 6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES The main analytical laboratory used in this program is the Duke Energy Analytical ' Laboratory Services: N.C. Drinking Water (NC37804) and Wastewater ( #248) Certifications. The organizational structure and staff qualifications of the laboratory are ' discussed in its generic Quality Assurance Program (QAP). The QAP and the Analytical Laboratory Procedures Manual are available for review upon request. Vendor laboratories that meet EPA and North Carolina certification requirements may be used for analyses with approval by Duke Energy. The analytical procedures used for the samples analyzed for this Groundwater Monitoring Program are listed in Table 2. Specific conductance, field pH, and temperature are measured in the field according to the Duke Energy Groundwater Monitoring and Sample Collection Procedure or the instrument manufacturer instructions. Page 16 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 7.0 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS Internal laboratory quality control (QC) checks used by the laboratories are described in each laboratory's generic QAP and procedures manual. Using the internal laboratory QC checks, the laboratories demonstrate the ability to produce acceptable results using the methods specified. Internal quality control checks for sampling procedures and laboratory analyses will be conducted with each sampling event. These checks will consist of the preparation and submittal of field blanks, trip (travel) blanks, and /or field replicates for analysis of all parameters at frequencies described in the laboratory(s) procedures manuals. The field QC blanks and replicates that may be included as internal QC checks are described below. The specific type and number of blanks used may vary depending on the sampling event and will be determined by the Duke Energy field sampling personnel: • Field Blanks: A field blank consists of a sample container filled in the field with organic free, deionized, or distilled water prepared and preserved in the same manner as the samples. The field blank is transported to the laboratory with the samples and analyzed along with the field samples for the constituents of interest to check for contamination imparted to the samples by the sample container, preservative, or other exogenous sources. Field blanks are typically utilized for each sampling event. The field blanks are typically analyzed for major anions, cations and metals. • Trip Blanks: A trip (travel) blank is a sample container filled with organic -free water in the laboratory that travels unopened with the sample bottles. Trip blanks are typically utilized when sampling for volatile organic compounds. The trip blank is returned to the laboratory with the field samples and analyzed along with the field samples for parameters of interest. Equipment Blanks: If non - dedicated equipment is used, it is recommended that equipment blanks be collected. The field equipment is cleaned following documented cleaning protocols. An aliquot of the final control rinse water is passed over the cleaned equipment directly into a sample container and submitted for analyses. Page 17 P: \Duke Energy Progress1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 ' oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra ' • Field Replicates: A field replicate is a duplicate sample prepared at the sampling locations from equal portions of all sample aliquots combined to make the sample. Both the field replicate and the sample are collected at the same time, in ' the same container type, preserved in the same way, and analyzed by the same laboratory as a measure of sampling and analytical precision. Page 18 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables\ Roxboro\ GW Monitoring IPlan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 8.0 VALIDATION OF FIELD DATA PACKAGE The field data package includes all of the field records and measurements developed by the sampling team personnel. The field data package validation will be performed by Duke Energy personnel. The procedure for validation consists of the following: • A review of field data contained on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets for completeness. • Verification that equipment blanks, field blanks, and trip blanks were properly prepared, identified, and analyzed. • A check of the Field Sampling Calibration Form for equipment calibration and instrument conditions. • A review of the COC Record for proper completion, signatures of field personnel and the laboratory sample custodian, dates and times, and for verification that the correct analyses were specified. Page 19 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SFFES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring Plan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 ' oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 9.0 VALIDATION OF LABORATORY DATA The laboratory will perform a validation review of the submitted samples and ' analytical results to ensure that the laboratory QA /QC requirements are acceptable. it 1 Page 20 PADuke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITESINPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring IPlan\ Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit 9 NC0003425 SynTerra 10.0 REPORT SUBMITTAL Two copies of the report of the monitoring results for the compliance wells will be submitted to the DWR within 60 days of the date of sampling. The monitoring results will be submitted on NCDENR Form GW- 59CCR. The DWR will be notified in the event that vendor lab analyses have not been completed within this time frame. Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets, Field Calibration Forms, Chain -of- Custody Records, Laboratory QA data, and Data Validation Checklists shall be kept on file by Duke Energy and are available upon request. Page 21 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro\GW Monitoring Plan \Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.d(x-c Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014 ' oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 11.0 REFERENCES Hibbard, James P., Glenn S. Shell, Phillip J. Bradley, Scott D. Samson, and Greg L. ' Wortman, February 1998, The Hyco shear zone in North Carolina and southern Virginia: Implications for the Piedmont Zone - Carolina Zone boundary in the southern Appalachians. American Journal of Science, V. 298, p. 85 —107. Hibbard, James P., Edward F. Stoddard, Donald T. Secor, and Allen J. Dennis, 2002, The Carolina Zone: overview of Neoproterozoic to Early Paleozoic peri- Gondzuanan terranes ' along the eastern Flank of the southern Appalachians. Earth - Science Reviews, V. 57, p. 299-339. North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic Map of North Carolina. North Carolina Geological Survey, General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000. ' USGS, December 2007, Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina. United States Geological Survey Open -File Report 2005 -1323, Version 1.1. ' Wilkins, James K., Glenn S. Shell, and James P. Hibbard, 1995, Geologic contrasts across the central Piedmont Suture in north - central North Carolina. South Carolina Geology, ' V. 37, p. 25 — 32. Page 22 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \GW Monitoring IPlan \Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx FIGURES • � F' V. �' o °' ' 'y r + r - - ; r ' ` 1 � � ;' r 'J '^ `-'\.`.t,�,� \ iii r'I �'�r�`.w • -` r�.� ,' �! � \ 1 l < ``` � �.j/p .si j% 1(h1 r_� �S, �-.-�` d' ,1 � C.? ;_ F a RK {d/ ! ``• y / :-.4' ` y r .'i•_- l��i��c50 f` fir, .. >< r1 - WASTE BOUNDARY �7•;;" ,/ 500' COMPLIANCE Tom• (J a *,` �• I BOUNDARY T '\(• �. a � lid I �.i' �� �.�V \ /..,•,.. C PROPERTY BOUNDARY "^Y-� � 1� i/ � ` J ld r ��y cC•t -`- ""rte C7- 4 �1 -- � `• r +,� �-.r ''ate- -- � SOURCE: ' ,� t4�+ 4 .CCRr. •' ._- .. .� ,JSGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP .70 T > NED zRnAI SHE MRCS 3EOSPATIAL DATA GATE'NA'/ AT t+ r ` �• - H 7 ` ' 'INp iNefegarewer nrs ustle •lPr / ' 1 ROABORO POWERPLANT FIGURE 1 PERSON COUNTY USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT -terra SEMO 1700 DUNWAY RD RA, NORTH CAROLINA OLIVE HILL, NC QUADRANGLE Lad RIVER STREET. SLITE 220 �]REENVILLE. SOUTH CAROLINA DRAWN BY s ARLEDGE DATE 201a13J) GRAPHIC SCALE PHONE 864- 421 -9999 PROJECT MANAGER KATHY WEBB CONTOUR INTERVAL lOR 1000 0 1000 WWWSynteracorp.com UrWT FIG1$RE LDGTIDNI MAP DATE 1994 IN FEET � m m m = m = = m m m m m m m m m ABOVEGROUND WELL PROTECTOR (L INCH X L INCH X 5 FOOT STEEL CASING WITH HINGED LOCKABLE LID) 2'-6' TO 3'-0' (NOMINAL) STICK -UP NEAT CEMENT OR NEAT CEMENT BENTONITE MIX FROM BENTONITE SEAL TO GROUND SURFACE c WELL SCREEN (0.010" MANUFACTURED SLOTS, TYPICAL) WELL PACKING (TYP. #1 OR #2 SAND) MALE PVC PLUG DRILL ;" DIAMETER VENT HOLE BELOW PLUG 2' DIA. PVC WELL CASING i GROUND SURFACE T — CONCRETE PAD L 6' MIN. 2 FT X 2 FT SQUARE BORING (g' NOMINAL DIAMETER) BENTONITE SEA! 2' -0' (MINIMUM) 2'-0' (MINIMUM) SCREEN LENGTH VARIES (S TO 15' TYP.) 6_' OF WELL SAND cal Well Construction Details (no scale) INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS. LLC 10 synTerra 148 RIVER STREET. SUITE 220 GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29601 PHONE (864) 421 -9999 nttp:Owww s ynterracorp. com DRAWN BY: H. Frank Date: 8121/2014 PROJECT MANAGER: Kathy Webb FIGURE 3 GENERALIZED WELL SCHEMATIC FIGURE 4 LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC 0 FIELD PERSONNEL: FLOW RATE synTerm WEATHER: ❑ SUNNY ❑ OVERCAST ❑ RAIN TEMPERATURE (APPROXI: 148 River Street, Suite 220 NOTES: TURBIDITY' Greenville, South Carolina 29601 TIME (FT) (864) 421 -9999. (864) 421 -9909 Fax (° Celsius) www. synTerracorp.com (mg/L) (su) WELL ID: PUMP/TUBING INTAKE DEPTH: FT) START PURGE TIME: MEASURING POINT: START PURGE DATE: END PURGE TIME: WELL DIAMETER: lIN) END PURGE DATE: FINAL READING TIME: WELL DEPTH: (FT) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: (GAL) DEPTH TO WATER: (FT) SAMPLE DATE: SAMPLE COLLECTION TIME: PURGE METHOD: ❑ Grundfos Pump ❑ 12 Volt Pump ❑ Peristaltic Pump ❑ Dedicated Pump ❑ Teflon Bailer ❑ Polyethylene Bailer SAMPLE METHOD: ❑ Grundfos Pump ❑ 12 Volt Pump ❑ Peristaltic Pump ❑ Dedicated Pump ❑ Teflon Bailer ❑ Polyethylene Bailer COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO Associated midday /end -of -day pH check within ±0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as ftagged accordingly ' SynTerra is not NC- certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD ] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NON WATER LEVEL FLOW RATE TEMPERATURE CONDUCTANCE DO PH ORP' TURBIDITY' TIME (FT) (mL /min) (° Celsius) (pS /cm) (mg/L) (su) (mV) INTL) NOTES V U V W F w w F w F D > ID 0 J a > a Y a � ^ O Z E E E E E E E o S J 8__ Z `z o CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO Associated midday /end -of -day pH check within ±0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as ftagged accordingly ' SynTerra is not NC- certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD ] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NON NUMBER OF CONTAINERS PRESERVATION V U V W F w w F w F D > ID 0 J a > a Y a � ^ O Z E E E E E E E o S J 8__ Z `z o CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED ::E COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO Associated midday /end -of -day pH check within ±0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ NO If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as ftagged accordingly ' SynTerra is not NC- certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD ] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NON 4WIT synTerra Instrument ID: YSI- 556 -NIPS Analyst: Instrument Calibration Log SynTerra Corporation 148 River Street, Suite 220 Greenville, South Carolina 29601 NC Field Parameter Certification No. 5591 Date: Location: pH Initial Calibration (standard units) Reference Method: SW846 9040C Cal. Time Cal. Buffer 4.0 Cal. Buffer 7.0 Cal Buffer 10.0 *Check Buffer 7.0 "pH buffer checks are to be within t 0.1 pH units of the standards true value 4 Buffer Reference: 10 Buffer Reference: 7 Buffer Reference: Check Buffer Reference: H Lallnration LneCK stanaara units Time I Check Buffer True Value I *Check Buffer Measured Value Mid -Day End -of -Day Other 'pH buffer checks are to be within ±0.1 pH units of the standards true value Check Buffer Reference: Action Required: Specific Conductance (umhos /cm) Reference Method: SW846 9050A Time Calibration Std 1413 Verification Std 1413 Initial Cal Meter DO Reading (mg/L Correction Factor Theoretical DO m /L Mid -Day Not Applicable End -of -Day Not Applicable Mid -Day 'Verification standard ± 10 percent of the standards true value Calibration Standard Reference: Verification Standard Reference: Action Required: Dissolved Oxygen (mg /L) Reference Method: SM 4S00 O G -2001 t ncurcti(= w = uv tram utssotvea vxcgen meter LanDratwn venncanon t aD1e at amDtent temp x Lorrecnon t- actor at tsarometrtc eressure Theoretical DO and Meter DO reading within + 0.5 mg I, if not calibrate meter Action Required: _ FIGURE 5 - EXAMPLE FIELD SAMPLING CALIBRATION FORM Time Temp °C Barometric Pressure mm H Meter DO Reading (mg/L Correction Factor Theoretical DO m /L Initial Mid -Day End -of -Day t ncurcti(= w = uv tram utssotvea vxcgen meter LanDratwn venncanon t aD1e at amDtent temp x Lorrecnon t- actor at tsarometrtc eressure Theoretical DO and Meter DO reading within + 0.5 mg I, if not calibrate meter Action Required: _ FIGURE 5 - EXAMPLE FIELD SAMPLING CALIBRATION FORM I I I I I I i i i i i i i i i i i �i �i O, LL I H' NI Wl 7• QI w' a. l to I Nj JI Q• QI I Oi Ql �I OI U L. m >- -• 0I OI V)I �i U. LL I Oj zi ¢• 21 Ui i i i i i i i I I I i i i N N m a� m m � O O L LL z C L N o z R � I— a N N ai o v 7 N m o a N U N � punoiewnl pajisap aleolpui aseald N d T m E m E o t m t m t m C m 0 a` a 0 co a T m m d a O °o m iii m N m o a o J_ E m m C m m m V V Z 4) m N o U m V m c m E E E E m C t t7 Y] Op alaldwoo lsnw jawolsno ly6ij of suwnioo alepdadde alaldwoo of jawolsno i} J I O _ I ? m m _T O a a c N m o a N U N punoiewnl pajisap aleolpui aseald luepodwl 'jawolsn:) m E m E m E m E t m t m t m C m 0 0 0 0 T m m d a O W m iii m V a o a o J_ m m m m m m m V V V 4) ' n LL E E E E m C t C m m m 00 0 o a v 0 m a 0 a C 0 d E 0 J T m T m V T T L m m u c 7 c L m L w O m E d Q Q d E O � � C N U N m d N N 11 C fD V Z 0 rt A 0 d c� 0 c a rt 0 A c� n y rt > m O M r^ Z O � Z D� � w m m D r i v � n m A v m D rn • ■ A a 0 r w vz ca m X m0 Z m Z Xv C) T� X m O M �a m 3 � r Z Z A 6) m A m A r III�IIIIIII II 1111111 IIIIII� I��II�IIIIII II III�IIIII�■��IIIII�II IIII■IIIIIII IIIIIINYIUIII II�II �I ��Illl�l�l�lu��� �� 111111 II ������IIIIIIIIYIIII I III II�I�I �uuimwm i ii■n > m O M r^ Z O � Z D� � w m m D r i v � n m A v m D rn • ■ A a 0 r w vz ca m X m0 Z m Z Xv C) T� X m O M �a m 3 � r Z Z A 6) m A m A r TABLES C a U 'i U W E C E `0 -O L � L O V M 0 � L O 3 v Z = O L L O K L O L a C1 L W 0 L_ mil C O d 61 00 0) G) O 00 V OJ 30 r O r O r O O r O r O r (D d U m Z L m o N U' Lr) r, 0) C? LO rn 07 N cD 7 ch Ln � u7 Ln cn (D Lr) C LO V LO V = U N N O UD C) Cl) Ln m Cl) O m (n Cl) 01 ^ N `'� V N Q1 3 t_ a 3 O O 0) n (D V C 00 cD (D N cD C) N O N co 00 aO C7 00 r co r U� W) V O F, T )t) N V O N N ch D7 N N N (o cD r• Ln LO 00 c0 (3) SQ1 7 r O 'm w a0 OD T lD U) O ID N M M 0) lD Ln Q lD Ln V U) m ^ t0 IT 0) M E V) Q co O v N v N U) U) N Uf 00 m N � M Ul 01 � 0, UZ U) Ln V V V V V V U) U) Li ) V' V O Q O r d d E m y U o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 3 m y �j U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > U > o a d d d d a a Cl- a Cl- a a d n. C) CL F- Q) -0 C 0 O (U U C W a) U C T m U C tC v U C t6 y U C (O U C l0 a) U C fO p - O Cn N a - O Cn N a - O V Cn N a O y CO N a O y cn N O y M N cn 0 v E E E E E E E z z z zi� z z m CO O U 0 U O U o U 0 U 0 U O U w ❑ w O w O w O w ❑ w ❑ Ln 00 O i0 n 07 ko 4` Ln O N M m U) O O 0) 0) O O O O O) t` Ln r M C U .--� 0 ID - N ri .--i rl O) 0; Ln Ln N � n � )D o O � cf o 0) y R to O M V r\ It n M n M n U) Go M co O 0) O ti N .-c M M --� O .--� w N O) 00 Q\ r, Q` r, 0) r, 0) N 0) r, Q) n O) co 0) 07 O) 00 O) co 0) 00 0) N GN m O) O 1D M M CO M Ln f\ .-I N 00 D1 Ln rn O O n N O O O O N .--� L N 00 O O N U) co V O O Ln M N CO m N r, m --r m W N n O O tb N IT O M O M 0) CO Q\ 00 n N O M .--i M n )D M V M I-r 2 m 0) O) O (3) Q) m 0) co O) 00 O) CO Q) 0) 0) M m 0) M 0) O) 0) O) 0) O) 0) m 4) O O O O O O O O N O N N N N y •--� O .� O N .ti O N .� O N '-c O N ti O N O O O O O O O O O O O O y N N N N N N N N N C y N 01 N co N m .\-i M M ti CO N M .� M U1 N 00 N iO O O O O O r,4 Cl m U U U V U V <7 U CD % E J J b N U d L :J Y Q m N d a) rL N U m co't 7 m � C � y O U (� 0 3 a o o m O C7 r m N A Table 2 Sample Parameters, Analytical Methods, Containers, Preservatives, and Holding Times Duke Energy Progress, Inc. /Roxboro Steam Electric Plant Roxboro, North Carolina PARAMETER UNITS CONTAINERS PRESERVATIVES HOLDING TIMES Analytical Method Field Parameters Field pH SU Flow- through Cell None Analyze Immediately YSI 556 Multi -Meter Specific Conductivity mmhos /cm Flow- through Cell None Analyze Immediately YSI 556 Multi -Meter Temperature 'C Flow- through Cell None Analyze Immediately YSI 556 Multi -Meter Water Level ft - Water Level Meter Laboratory Analysis Aluminum mg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM I EPA 2007 Antimony pg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM I EPA 200.8 Arsenic µg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM / EPA 200.8 Barium mg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM / EPA 200.7 Boron mg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM / EPA 200.7 Cadmium pg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM I EPA 200 8 Chloride mg /L 125 ml HDPE Cool 4 C 28 days EPA 300.0 Chromium (total) mg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM / EPA 200.7 Copper mg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM / EPA 200 7 Iron mg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM / EPA 200.7 Lead ltg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM / EPA 200.8 Manganese mg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM / EPA 200.7 Mercury 4g /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months EPA 245.1 Nickel mg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM / EPA 200.7 Nitrate (as Nitrogen) mg /L 125 ml HDPE Cool C C 48 hours EPA 300.0 Selenium pg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO, 6 months TRM / EPA 200.8 Sulfate mg /L 125 ml HDPE Cool 4' C 28 days EPA 300.0 Total Dissolved Solids mg /L 250 ml HDPE Cool 4' C 28 days SM 2540C Thallium pg /L 500 ml HDPE pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TWO I EPA 200.8 Zinc mg /L 500 ml HDPE I pH < 2 HNO3 6 months TRM ! EPA 200 7 rreparea by mil- cnecKea by uHVv Notes. SU - Standard Units mS /cm - micro siemen per centimeter ft - feet my - milli volts mg /L - milligrams per liter pg /L - micrograms per liter NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity Units TRM - Total Recoverable Metals EPA - Environmental Protection Agency SM - Standard Method P Duke Energy Progress. IOMALL NC SITES %NPDES Permit DellveraoleMRoxWrolGW Monitonng PlamTablestTables 1 and 2 APPENDIX A BORING LOGS AND MONITORING WELL I CONSTRUCTION LOGS � I COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. BG -1 Shee! I of 1 PROJECT PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT PROJECT NO: 1584 -10 -026 WATER LEVEL. Depth to water 38.81 feet PROJECT LOCATION Person County below top of casing DRILLING CONTRACTOR. T. Whitehead ' DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer DATE DRILLED: 1112110 z 1- w c C C a C 0 L 0 0 E e LATITUDE: LONGITUDE. TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: o 0 533.69 DATUM: MSL LOGGED BY: E. Henriaues STRATA WELL o 0 0 = DETAILS ar W ar WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DESCRIPTION � a p w w — tn � r J J W PROTECTIVE CASING 0 0.00 GS Diameter. 000 CG TOPSOIL i Type. Interval Moist Brown Sandy SILT Quartz fragments and MnO 5 stains on relict I RISER CASING structure 8.00 BS Diameter: 2 Dry Brown Clayey SILT Small relic 10 Type: PVC feldspar phenocryst Interval: - 2.48 -32.5 Dry Gray - Brown -Black 15 Sandy SILT MnO \ 1 GROUT tarns on relict 1 Type: Portland fractures 20 Interval 0 -8 Dry Light Brown Sandy SILT Mat... with pebble size SEAL angular quarts 25 Type Bentonite fragments (Qtz vein) Interval 8 -29 Dry-Dense Brown andy SILT Sap rolite. 29.00 FP 32.50 TSC robe refusal at 14' bg 30 FILTERPACK Partially Weathered Rock Start air hammer Type #2 Sand drilling Alternating Interval. 29 -52.5 ofter -vs- harder air 35 ammer drilling, elding light brown ne rock powder, dry 40 — SCREEN Diameter 2 PaRially Weathered Rock Less frequent 1 _- Type 0.010 hard -vs- soft zone. interva 32.5 -52.0 Tilling only yields fine 45 fight brown powder Partially Weathered Rock Soft zone 35' -37'I 50 LEGEND bg (dry after 20 inutes) 52.00 BSC FILTER PACK ■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING Rock Granitic Gneiss -- GS GROUND SURFACE ® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL ® CUTTINGS/ BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK TSC TOP OF SCREEN _ STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN TD TOTAL DEPTH CG CEMENT GROUT COMPLETION REPORT OF *ME WELL No. BG -1 ENGINE HUNG . TESTING Sheet 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES STRATA COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW -1 SI eel I of 1 PROJECTi PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT = PROJECT NO: 1584 -10 -026 WATER LEVEL Depth to water 25.87 feet PROJECT LOCATION. Person County below top of casing LATITUDE. x DETAILS LONGITUDE DRILLING CONTRACTOR: T. Whitehead TOP OF CASING ELEVATION DESCRIPTION DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer 508.05 p DATUM DATE DRILLED: 10/29/10 MSL or LOGGED BY w L. Butler STRATA WELL = a o m x DETAILS W ; e I. M k 0 t COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW -2 Sheet 1 of 1 PROJECT PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT PROJECT NO 1584 -10 -026 WATER LEVEL Depth to water 13.77 feet PROJECT LOCATION Person County 0 below top of casing LATITUDE. LONGITUDE w DRILLING CONTRACTOR. T. Whitehead TOP OF CASING ELEVATION DESCRIPTION DRILLING METHOD 4" Air Hammer DATUM. 424.26 DATE DRILLED: 10129/10 LOGGED BY MSL } 0 W - 0 L. Butler STRATA WELL 0 0 DETAILS w ; i i s i COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW -2D Sheet 1 of 1 PROJECT. PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT PROJECT NO: 1584 -10 -026 WATER LEVEL Depth to water 13.78 feet PROJECT LOCATION: Person County o below top of casing LATITUDE m LONGITUDE _ DRILLING CONTRACTOR. T. Whitehead TOP OF CASING ELEVATION DESCRIPTION DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer 424.33 J J DATUM MSL DATE DRILLED 10128!10 LOGGED BY W PROTECTIVE CASING L. Butler STRATA WELL a o m DETAILS _ ; WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DESCRIPTION i o o J J ov W PROTECTIVE CASING 0 0.00 GS 422 07 Diameter. Type Topsoil 0.00 CG 42207 Residuum: Tan Interval range Slightly layey SILT 5 8.00 SS 414.07 RISER CASING an Fine to Medium /ery Sandy SILT Diameter 2 an Fine Slightly 10 Type: PVC andy SILT Interval: +2.26 -25.1 an Fine to Medium Sandy SILT 15 GROUT Partially Weathered Rock. sampled as Tan Silty Fine to Type: Cement Coarse Fine SAND Interval: 0 -8 20 22.70 FP 399.37 SEAL Rock Granitic Gneiss Fractured from approx. 25.10 TSC 396 97 Type Bentonite 28.0 to 28.5 Feet 25 Interval: 8 -22.7 30 29.90 BSC 39217 FILTERPACK 31J-4117- -717— Type #2 Sand Interval, 22.7 -30.4 SCREEN Diameter 2 Type 0.010 Interval 25.1 -29.9 LEGEND FILTER PACK . BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING GS GROUND SURFACE ® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL ® CUTTINGS I BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK TSC TOP OF SCREEN t STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN TD TOTAL DEPTH CG CEMENT GROUT COMPLETION REPORT OF �# S&ME WELL No. CW -2D ENGINEERING - TESTING Sheet 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1 COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW -3 sheet 1 o +1 PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT PROJECT NO 1584 -10 -026 WATER LEVEL Depth to water 4.86 feet PROJECT LOCATION. Person County below top of casing DRILLING CONTRACTOR. T. Whitehead ' DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer DATE DRILLED: 10/26/10 l C LATITUDE LONGITUDE: WELL TOP OF CASING ELEVATION o 0 451.69 DATUM m MSL LOGGED BY W 0 E. Henriques STRATA WELL o 0 m ? DETAILS W 0 ; WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DESCRIPTION g ^ a o J J U) o v W - PROTECTIVE CASING 0 0.00 GS 449.35 Diameter• 000 CG 449.35 Topsoil Type: Interval Residuum: Tan Fine Sandy SILT Probe 300 FP 446.35 iRefusal -2 feet 5 3.40 TSC 445.95 RISER CASING Partially Weathered Rook sampled as F•M Sandy SILT From Diameter 2 10 to 11 Feet 10 11.40 BSC 437.95 Type PVC Interval. +2.34 -3.4 Tan Fine Sandy SILT TO oft/fracture zone GROUT Type. Cement Interval 0.2 SEAL Type: Bentonite Interval 2 -3 FILTERPACK Type #2 Sand Interval 3 -11.4 SCREEN Diameter 2 Type. 0.010 Interval: 3.4 -11.4 LEGEND FI FILTER PACK ■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING GS GROUND SURFACE ® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL ® CUTTINGS / BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK TSC TOP OF SCREEN 1 STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN TO TOTAL DEPTH CG CEMENT GROUT COMPLETION REPORT OF #SWE WELL No. CW -3 ENGINEERING - TESTING Sheet 1 of 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW -3D Sheet 1 of 1 PROJECT- PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT PROJECT NO: 1584 -10 -026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 3.63 feet PROJECT LOCATION Person County Parfially Weathered below top of casing 000 CG LATITUDE FILTER PACK TSC LONGITUDE STATIC WATER LEVEL DRILLING CONTRACTOR T. Whitehead TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: TD DRILLING METHOD- 4" Air Hammer Diameter 2 451.45 DATUM: DATE DRILLED 10/29/10 Interval +2.3841.7 MSL LOGGFn BY t. menriques STRATA WELL n o M DETAILS W W ; WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DESCRIPTION M w z o W W U) O J W ... I ' TOP OF CASING 31 000 GS Parfially Weathered Diameter. Type 000 CG 449.07 FILTER PACK TSC Interval: STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN RISER CASING TD TOTAL DEPTH Diameter 2 CEMENT GROUT Type: PVC Interval +2.3841.7 GROUT Type: Cement Interval: 0 -31 water at 8' �elow SEAL 11"R R • Type: Bentonite Interval 31 -39 o � %9; 418.07 FILTERPACK /� Type: #2 Sand slow drilling ( 1 . � Interval 39-47 39 00 FP 410 07 hour). No signs of 11.70 TSC fracturesisoft zones Diameter 2 Type: 0.010 12'- 46', no additional Interval: 41.7 -46.5 water Si , I.. = z Fz ENGINEERING . TESTING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LEGEND FILTER PACK ■ BENTONITE TOG TOP OF CASING PROTECTIVE CASING 000 GS 449.07 Diameter. Type 000 CG 449.07 FILTER PACK TSC Interval: STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN RISER CASING TD TOTAL DEPTH Diameter 2 CEMENT GROUT Type: PVC Interval +2.3841.7 GROUT Type: Cement Interval: 0 -31 SEAL Type: Bentonite Interval 31 -39 3100 BS 418.07 FILTERPACK Type: #2 Sand Interval 39-47 39 00 FP 410 07 SCREEN 11.70 TSC 407.37 Diameter 2 Type: 0.010 Interval: 41.7 -46.5 LEGEND FILTER PACK ■ BENTONITE TOG TOP OF CASING GS GROUND SURFACE ® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL CUTTINGS/ BACKFILL ® FP FILTER PACK TSC TOP OF SCREEN STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN TD TOTAL DEPTH CG CEMENT GROUT COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW -3D Sheet 1 of 1 � I COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW-4 sheet' of 1 PROJECT PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT PROJECT NO 1584 -10 -026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 28.97 feet PROJECT LOCATION Person County below top of casing DRILLING CONTRACTOR. T. Whitehead ' DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer DATE DRILLED: 11/1/10 0 u u 0 a a LATITUDE LONGITUDE TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: 479.66 DATUM. MSL LOGGED BY: L. Butler STRATA WELL °z x o J m H DETAILS w ; _ ; WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DESCRIPTION M a'Tj o ui Uj rj pv I w PROTECTIVE CASING 0 0 00 000 GS 477 44 Diameter: Type: Residuum Brown CG 477 44 ,Slightly Clayey SILT Interval. Dry Tan Brown Fine rSandy SILT 5 Dry Tan Fine Slightly 800 BS 469.44 RISER CASING SILT Diameter- 2 ,Sandy Partially Weathered 10 Type: PVC Rock sampled as ',Tan Fine Sandy SILT Interval +2.22 -24.2 Fine Tan Slightly Sandy SILT -15 GROUT Type Cement Partially Weathered Rock: sampled as Tan Fine Sandy SILT 20 22.00 FP 455 44 Interval: 0 -8 Tan Slightly Sandy Fine Sandy SILT 24.20 SEAL TSC 453 24 Partially Weathered Rock: sampled as 25 Type' Bentonite Tan Fine Sandy SILT Interval 8 -22 Rock - Gneiss felsic 30 FILTERPACK Tan Slightly Sandy SILT Type #2 Sand interval 22 -39.5 Partially Weathered I Rock: sampled as 35 rTan Fine Sandy SILT 39.00 BSC 438 44 SCREEN Rock Gneiss; Mafic Diameter: 2 Type. 0.010 Interval. 24.2 -39.0 LEGEND FILTER PACK . BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING GS GROUND SURFACE ® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL ® CUTTINGS I BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK TSC TOP OF SCREEN 1 STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN TD TOTALDEPTH CG CEMENT GROUT COMPLETION REPORT OF #SWE WELL No. CW-4 Sheet 1 of 1 ENNRONAAE11TAL SEMKES u 0 c a C 0 l: a c v C c a u C COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW -5 sreet I of PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT PROJECT NO: 1584 -10 -026 WATER LEVEL Depth to water 9.92 feet PROJECT LOCATION: Person County 0 below top of casing LATITUDE: 0 M LONGITUDE a DRILLING CONTRACTOR. T. Whitehead WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DESCRIPTION g az TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: p DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer 459.51 rw rn -- o DATUM ' DATE DRILLED: 1113110 PROTECTIVE CASING MSL LOGGED BY, L_ Butler STRATA WELL o 0 0 M DETAILS a ;x WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS DESCRIPTION g az p w w rw rn -- o w PROTECTIVE CASING 0 0 00 GS 457.40 Diameter Type Residuum' Brown 0.00 CG 457.40 Clayey SILT Interval Dry Green Brown Fine Sandy SILT ` 5 4.70 TSC 452.70 Dry Tan Fine to RISER CASING (Medium Very Sandy ' SILT 10 Diameter 2 Type PVC Partially Weathered Rock: sampled as Dry Interval +2.11 -4.7 Tan Green Very Silty Fine SAND 15 ' Gray Green Silty Fine GROUT AND Damp 19.50 BSC 437.90 Type. Cement Interval 0 -2 Partially Weathered Rock: sampled as 20 Tan Green Very Silty 21.90 435.50 Fine SAND Moist SEAL Type Bentonite Interval 2.3.5 FILTERPACK Type #2 Sand interval 3.5 -20.0 SCREEN Diameter. 2 Type: 0.010 Interval. 4.7 -19.5 LEGEND FILTER PACK ■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING GS GROUND SURFACE ® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL ® CUTTINGS! BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK TSC TOP OF SCREEN t STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN TO TOTAL DEPTH CG CEMENT GROUT COMPLETION REPORT OF #S&ME WELL No. CW-5 ENGINEERING • TESTING Sheet 1 of 1 ENMRONMENUL SERVICES ' 1 � ONRESIDENTL4L WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality 04—M ' WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT Above Land Surface' Thomas Whitehead 'Top of casing terminated atior below land surface may require Well Contractor (Individual) Name a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C 0118 ' SWE. lnC, Well Contractor Company Name : o. YIELD f9Pm): METHOD OF TEST 3201 SDnng Forest Road : f. DISINFECTION: Typo Amount Street Address q. WATER ZONES (depth) Raleigh NC 27616 : Top Bottom Top Bottom ' City or Town State Zip Code :Top Bottom Top Bottom 9( 19 ) 872 -2660 Top Bottom Top Bottom Area code Phone number Thickness/ 2. WELL INFORMATION: 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material ' WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS : Top -2.48 Bottom 32.5 FL 2" sch 40 PVC : OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMITi(e applicable) Top Bottom Ft. SITE WELL 10 #(rf applicaae) SG -1 Top Bottom FL_____ ' 3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring W Municipal /Public ❑ :8 GROUT Depth Material Method IndustriaUCommercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑ : Top 0 Bottom_ FL Portland Pour Irrigation❑ Other U (Ilst use) _ : Topes_ Bottom Ft. BentOnite Pour ' DATE DRILLED 11 -2-10 ; Top Bottom Ft. 4. WELL LOCATION: 9. SCREEN: Depth Dlameler Slot Size Material 1700 Dunnawav Road :Top, 32.5 Bottom 52 Ft. 2 in .010 in PVC i' (Street Name, Numbers, Community. Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Z!p Code) : Top Bottom Ft in. in CITY: Selmora _ COUNTY Person Top__ Bottom Ft. in, in TOPOGRAPHIC 1 LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box) ❑Slope []Valley rw(Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other : 10. SAND(GRAVEL PACK: ' LATITUDE 36 -27 51 2000 DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX Dp - Depth Size Material : Top 299_Bottom 52.5 Ft Coarse _ SUrtd _ LONGITUDE 79 - 4 ' 11 9900 DMS OR 7X.XXXXXXXXX DD : Top Bottom Ft. Latitudelonglude source: QI;WS Qropographic map Top Bottom Ft. {location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andetlachad to ' this form If not using GPS} 1 1- DRILLING LOG 5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located y Top Bottom Formation Description Prmrpss Fnerav Carnlinas 0 14 Sandy Clay Facility Name Facility IDS (if applicable) 14 / 47 Weathered Rock ' 1700 Dunnawav Rnari 47 525 Rock Street Address / 4.mnrn NC 2734 ,3 If City or Town State Zip Code / ' John Tnetfer Contact Name I _410 R Wilminntnn Rt PER 4A / Mailing Address / Raleiah NC ?7601 ! Cry or Town State Zip Code : 12. REMARKS: ( 9198 546 -7863 Area code Phone number 6. WELL DETAILS: : 100 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH • 1SA NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS a. TOTAL DEPTH: 52' REC D 11AS BEEN PRONDE TO THE WELL OWNER. b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO �- 12 -21 -10 SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE ' c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 38.8 a FT. : Whttehead (Use " +• if Above Top of Casing) _Thomas : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL ' Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality - Inforinadon Processing, Form 1617 Mail Sw vlce Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -161, Photo : (919) Rev 2139 /99 807 -6300 �ars�a� NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Quality •a; ; �• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICA TION # 2907 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: Thomas Whitehe Well Contractor (Individual) Name SWE. Inc. Well Contractor Company Name 3201 Sorina Forest Road Street Address Raleiah NC 27616 City or Town State Zip Code 9� 19 872 -2660 Area code Phone number 2. WELL INFORMATION: WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#_ OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMITIF(d sI SITE WELL ID krf applicable) CW -1 3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring ji" MunrcipaVPubllc ❑ InduslriaVCommercial CI Agricultural Cl Recovery O Injection ❑ Imgabono Other ❑ (list use) DATE DRILLED-10-29-.10 4. WELL LOCATION: 1700 Dunnawav Road (Street Name. Number, Community, Subdivision, Lot No, Parcel. Zip Code) CITY. Semora COUNTY Person TOPOGRAPHIC f LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box) DSlope ❑Valley VFW QRidge ❑Other LATITUDE 36 • 28 566000 • DMS OR 3x.XXXXXXXXX DD LONGITUDE 79 • 3 27.9900 "DMS OR 7x.xxxxxxxxx DD LabtudellongRude source: Qr3PS OTopographic map (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to this form if not using GPS) 5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located ) Prnnress EnPrnv Carnlinas Facility Name Fa cility ID* (if applicable) 1700 Dunnawav Rnad Street Address Semnra NC 27343 City or Town State Zip Code .John TnPtfPr Contact Name 410 S_ Wiiminatnn St_ PFB 4A Mailing Address RalPinh NC 27601 City or Town State Zip Code ( 9198 546 -7863 Area code Phone number d. TOP OF CASING is 2,5 FT Above Land Surface' 'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.01 18 o. YIELD (gpm) METHOO Of TEST f. DISINFECTION: Type Amount g. WATER ZONES (depth): Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top _ Bottom___ Thickness/ 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material Top -2_14 Bottom 19.5 Fl. 2" Sch 40 PVC Top Bottom Ft. Top Bottom Ft. 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method Top -0 Bottom $_ Ft. Portland Pour Topes_ Bottoms Ft Bentonite Pour Top Bottom Ft. 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material Top 19 95 Bottom 39.75Ft. 2 in .010 In. PVC Top Bottom FL it in. Top Bottom Ft. in in. 10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material Top 18 Bottom 40.25 FL Coars e Sand Top Bottom Ft. Top Bottom Ft. 11. DRILLING LOG Top Bottom 0 /5 5 12 2 /40,25 / 12. REMARKS: Formation Description 6. WELL DETAILS: 100 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH . • 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS a. TOTAL DEPTH: 39 -751 RR ORO HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWt,ER U./{�1— 12 -21 -1a b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO C>i� SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRA TOR DATE ' c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 25 -87 FT Thomas Whitehead (Use ' +- if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit within 30 days of com lesion to: Division of Water Quality Form 9 1b , Y P ty - Information Processing, Rev. 2x)9 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -161, Phone: (919) 607 -6300 1 NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Qua!Nty ' •tea,,, �• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION If 2907 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: : d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT Above Land Surface' Thomas Whitehead `Top of casing terminated alJor below land surface may require Well Contractor (Individual) Name a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.01 1 B ' SWE. Inc. : e. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST Well Contractor Company Name f. DISINFECTION: Type Amount 3201 Sonna Forest Road Street Address : g. WATER ZONES (depth) ' Raleigh NC 27616 :Top Bottom Top Bottom City or Town State Zip Code Top Bottom Top Bottom 9( 19 1 872 -2660 ; Top Bottom Top Bottom Area code Phone number Thickness/ ' INFORMATION: 2. WELL FORMATION: • T. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Malarial WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS : Top -2.28 Bottom 7.7 Ft. 2" SCh 40 PVC OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(Rappnnle) Top Bottom Ft. ' SITE WELL ID #(,I apoicable) CW-2 Top Bottom Ft. 3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring lY Municipal/Public ❑ : 8 GROUT Depth Material Method IndustriallCommercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑ Top 0 Bottom 4.5 Ft. Portland Pour Irrigation❑ Other P. (list use) Top 4.5 Bottom s.5 Ft. Bentonite Pour t DATE DRILLED 1 0-29 -10 Top Bottom Ft. : 4. WELL LOCATION: : 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material 1700 Ounnawav Road : Top 7.7 Bottom 17.5 Ft 2 in. .010 n PVC ' (Street Name. Number, Community. Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel. Zip Code) :Top Bottom Ft. in in CITY Semora COUNTY Person Top Bottom Ft. in in. TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING (eheCc appropriate box) DSlope OValley ljiFlal ❑Ridge ❑Other 10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK: ' Depth Size Material : LATITUDE 36 •28 • 42 3000 " OMS OR 3x.xxxxxxxxx DD ; Top 6.5 Bottom 18 Ft Coarse Sand — LONGITUDE 79 •! • 35.9300 -DMS OR 7x.xxxxxxxxx DD : Top Bottom Ft Lalitudellongitude source BPS OTopographlc map Top Bottom Ft. (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to ' this fort if not using GPS) 11. DRILLING LOG 5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located) Top Bottom Formation Description Prnnress FnprnV C:arnlinAS 0 2 Sandy Clay ' Facility Name Facility IDS (if applicable) mow/ 18 Weathered Rock 1700 Qiinn;3wav Rnad / Street Address / SN=_mcim NC: 9`7343 / ' City or Town State Zip Code J John Tnetfer J Contact Name / 410 S Wiiminntnn St PPR 4A f Mailing Address / ' RnlPinh N 978M / City or Town Slate Zip Code : 12• REMARKS: ' ( 9196 546 -7863 Area code Phone number _ 6. WELL DETAILS: ; 1 W HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 'MTH • 15A NCAC 2C. WFLL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND THAT A COPY OF THUS a. TOTAL DEPTH:_ 17.5' R RD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OVVWR ' b . DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES Cl NO V �� r 12 -21 -10 SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 13.77 FT 'Thomas Whitehead (Use *+* it Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Form Qua! - Information PHrocessln g 1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -161, Phone : (919) , Rev. /09 Rev. zros UP-000 NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality '��,,'„�• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION p 2907 1, WELL CONTRACTOR: Thomas Whitehead Well Contractor (Individual) Name SWE. Inc. Well Contractor Company Name 3201 Sorina Forest Road Street Address Raleigh NC 27616 City or Town State Zip Code 9c 19 ) 872 -2660 Area code Phone number 2. WELL INFORMATION: WELL CONSTRUCTION PERM OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMITS(l applicable) SITE WELL ID 111(R appl -able) CW-2D 3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring (( MunicipaUPublic ❑ IndustrialfCOmmercial ❑ Agricultural (] Recovery ❑ Injection ❑ Irrigation(] Other ❑ (list use) DATE DRILLED 10 -28 -10 4. WELL LOCATION: 1700 Dunnawav Road (Street Name, Number, Community, SubdiAswn, Lot No, Parcel, Zip Code) CITY. Semora COUNTY Person TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING (chuck appropriate bola []Slope ❑Valley Flat (]Ridge (]Other LATITUDE 36 •28 42.2500 • DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX DO LONGITUDE 79 • 4 35.13WO - DMS OR 7X.XXXXXXXXX DO Latitudellongitude source: W3PS Oropographlc map (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andatfached to this form if not using GPS) S. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located ) Prnnress FnernV Carolinas Facility Name Facility JID* (if applicable) 1700 Minnawav Rnari Street Address Semnrn NC 27343 City or Town State Zip Code _.Inhn Tnetfer Contact Name 410 S_ Wilminnton St PFR 4A Mailing Address Raleiah NC 27601 City or Town Stale Zip Code ( 9198 546 -7863 _ Area code Phone number 6. WELL DETAILS: a. TOTAL DEPTH: -29.9' b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES O NO Lt/ d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT Above Land Surface' 'Top of casing terminated atlor belay land surface may require a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C 0116 e. YIELD (gpm) METHOD OF TEST I. DISINFECTION: Type Amount g. WATER ZONES (depth) Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Thickness/ 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material Top -2.26 Bottom _25.1 Ft. 2 sch 49 PVC Top Bottom Ft. Top Bottom Ft.___ 8 GROUT Depth Material Method Top 0 Bottom 8 FL Portland Pour Top 8 Bottom 22.7 Ft. Bentonite Pour Top Bottom Fl 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material Top 25.1 Bottom 29.9 Ft. 2 in .010 in PVC Top Bottom Ft in. in Top Bottom Ft. in in 10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material Top 22.7 Bottom 30.4 Ft Coarse Sand Top Bottom Fl. Top Bottom Ft. 11. DRILLING LOG Top Bottom 0 5 5 1 22 22 / 30.4 12. REMARKS: Formation Descnption NQUItAilar-ellil • 111160101 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ISA NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS REC9RD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER 12.21.10 SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL -RA CONTCT— DATE c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing 13-78 FT. Thomas W Ite pad (Use' -" if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Cual' Farm 109 y p dy - Infolmatlon Processing, �„ 2�g 1617 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -161, Phone: (919) $07.6300 ' 1 r ONRESIDENTM WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality ' q� �• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: d. TOP OF CASING IS. 2.5 FT. Above Lard Sa face' Thomas Whitehead 'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require Well Contractor (Individual) Name a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118 ' SWE. Inc. e. YIELD (gpm) METHOD OF TEST Well Contractor Company Name 3201 SDrina Forest Road I. DISINFECTION: Type Amount Street Address g. WATER ZONES (depth). Raleiah NC 27616 : Top Bottom Top Bottom ' City or Town State Zip Code : Top Bottom Top Bottom 9r 19 ) $72 -2650 : Top Bottom Top Bottom Area code Phone number Thickness/ ' 2. WELL INFORMATION: .7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT# : Tap -2_34 Bottom 3.4 Ft. 2" sch 40 PVC OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMITS(f applicable) Top Bottom Ft. ' SITE WELL ID #(a applicable) CW -3 Top Bottom Ft. _ 3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring ft{ MunicipaVPublic O 8 GROUT. Depth Material Method IndustnallConmercial C Agricultural C Recovery C Injection C1 : Top 0 Bottom_ Ft. Portland Pour Irrigattono Omer C (list use) Top 2 Bottom 3 FI Bentonite Pour ' DATE DRILLED 10-26-10 ; Top Bottom Ft. ; 4. WELL LOCATION: 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material ' 1700 Dunnawav Road (Street Name Numbers, Community, SuIxImsion, Lot No., Pu 1, Zip Code) : Top 3.4 Bottom 11.4 Ft. 2 in 10 in PVC : TOp Bottom Fl. in —_ in CITY. Semora COUNTY Person Top Bottom Ft. —in in TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box) CSlope ❑Valley p(Flal ❑Ridge ❑Other :10.SANDIGRAVELPACK: ' LATITUDE 36 -28 12700 • DMS OR 3x.xxxxxxxxx Dp Depth Material :7op�_Bottom 11.4 Ft. -Oar Bottom se _hand LONGITUDE 79 • 4 37.6200 "DMS OR 7x.XXXXXXXXx DD — Top Bottom FL LabtudeRongitude source WPS 1-11opographic map ; Top Bottom Ft. (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map endattached to ' this form it not using GPS) 11. DRILLING LOG 5_ FACILITY (Name of the business where the well Is located) Top Bottom Formation Description Prnnrpss FnPrnu .arniinas 0 Z Sandy Clay ' Facility Name Facility IDS (if applicable) x_ /11.4 Weathered Rock 17M Dunnawav Rnnci / Street Address / Semora NC 27343 / ' City or Town State Zip Code / John TnPtfer / Contact Name / 410 S. Wilminnton St PFR 4A J Mailing Address J ' Raleinh NC; 27601 – 1 City or Town State Zip Code : 12. REMARKS: 0.19 S46 -7863 Area code Phone number 6. WELL DETAILS: : 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH • 1SA NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS a. TOTAL DEPTH: 11.4 : RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER. ' b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELLS YES [3 NO Arp�(1,�,� 12 -21 -10 : SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 5.25 T. Thomas Whitehead (Use"-" if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit within 30 da s of com letion to: Division of Water y p Qual Form ity - Irtfortnatton Processing, Rev. zros /09 1617 Mall Service Canter, Raleigh, NC 27699 -161, Phone : (919) 807-SM tssArr�� u r NONRESIDENTIAL ON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality •��,, �• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION k 2907 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: Thomas Whitehead Well Contractor (Individual) Name $&ME. Inc. Well Contractor Company Name 3201 Sorina Forest Road Street Address Raleioh NC 27616 City or Town State Zip Code 9t 19 ) 872 -2660 Area code Phone number 2. WELL INFORMATION: WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMITS(a applicable) SITE WELL ID $(1 applicable) CW-3D 3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring V Muni cipa[/Public O Industnal/Commemial O Agricultural O Recovery O In)ection O Irrigation❑ Other p (list use) DATE DRILLED 10-29-10 4. WELL LOCATION: 1700 Dunnaway Road (Street Name. Numbers. Community. Subdiwwon. Lot No.. Parch. Zip Code) CITY: Semora COUNTY Person TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box) ❑Slope OValley Flat ORidge ❑Other LATITUDE 36 •26 -128M • DMS OR 3x.XXxxxxxxx DD LONGITUDE 79 • 4 37.7100 ' DMS OR 7x.xxxxxxxxx DD Latitudeilongitude source: QrPS Oropographic map (location of we/I must be shown on a USGS topo map andaftached to this fomr if not using GPS) S. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located ) Pr ril Fnernv Carolinas Facility Name Facility IDs (if applicable) 1700 ntinnawav Rnad Street Address SP_mnra NC 27343 City or Town State Zip Code .Inhn Trsetf .r Contact Name 410 S. Mminci nn St PFR 4A Mailing Address Raleinh NC 27801 City or Town State Zip Code (_ 9198 546 -7863 Area code Phone number S. WELL DETAILS: a. TOTALDEPTH: 46.5' b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES CI NO Y III. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface' 'Top of casing terminated aUor below land surface may require a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C.01 18. e. YIELD (gpm). METHOD OF TEST f. DISINFECTION: Type Amount g. WATER ZONES (depth) Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Thickness/ 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material Top -2_38 Bottom 41.7 Fl. 2., sch 40 PVC Top Bottom Ft. Top Bottom Ft. 8 GROUT: Depth Material Method Top 0 Bottom 31 Ft Portland Pour Topes Bottom 22_ Ft. Bentanite Pour Top Bottom Ft, 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material Top 41.7 Bottom 46.3 Ft. 2 In. _010 in. PVC Top Bottom Ft. In. in. Top Bottom Fl. in. in. 10. SAND /GRAVEL PACK: Depth Slze Material Top 39 Bottom 47 Ft. Coarse Sand Top Bottom Ft. Top m Botto Ft. 11 DRILLING LOG Top Bottom Formation Description 0 /.5 Sandy Clay ;5/ 12 Weathered Rock 12 /47 Rock / 12. REMARKS: I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COW OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WEELL,L OWNER SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL ACTOR 12 ATE 1 a c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 3.63 FT Thomas Whitehead (Use' +• if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit within 30 days of Completion to, Division of Water Quality Information Proeeeain , Form 09 Y P ���7 ' 9 Rev. 2/09 1617 Mail Sarvice Cantor, Raielgh, NC 27699 -161, Phone: (919) $07 -6300 fsw_ r, `- r NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD E, wl North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality •� ' �• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907 qi- 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: Thomas Whitehead Well Contractor (Individual) Name SWE, Inc. Well Contractor Company Name 3201 Sprina Forest Road Street Address Raleiah NC 27616 City or Town State Zip Code 9( 19 ) 872 -2660 Area code Phone number 2. WELL INFORMATION: WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMrT* OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT*(il applicable) SITE WELL ID #(1 app cable) CW-4 3, WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring 3( MunicipaBPublic ❑ IndustriallCommercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery E) Injection ❑ Irrigation❑ Other ❑ (list use) DATE DRILLED 11 -1 -10 4. WELL LOCATION: 1700 Dunnawav Road (Street Name, Numbers. Community, Subdivision. Lot No, Parcel, Zip Code) CITY Semora COUNTY Person TOPOGRAPHIC t LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box) ❑Slope ❑Valley Flat ❑Ridge (JOther LATITUDE 36 ' 27 ' 49.7d00 - DMS OR 3x.xxxxxxxxx DD LONGITUDE 79 • 21.11600 _" DMS OR 7X.xxxxxxxxx DD Latitude4ongitudesource (3PS []Topographic map (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to this form if not using GPSf 5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the wells located ) d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT Above Land Surface' `Top of casing terminated attor below land surface may require a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0115 e. YIELD (gpm) -- ---- METHOD OF TEST_ 1. DISINFECTION: Type Amount g. WATER ZONES (depth). Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top__ _ Bottom Top Bottom Street Address Thickness/ T. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material Top -2.22 Bottom 24.2 Ft 2" 5ch 4Q PVC Top Bottom FI Top Bottom Ft 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method Top 0 Bottoms FL Portland Pour Topes_ Bottom 22 Ft. BentonAe Pour Top Bottom Ft. 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Site Material Top 24.2 Bottom_,U_ Ft. 2 in .010 in. PVC Top Bottom FI. in. in. Top Bottom Ft in. in 10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material Top_22_Bottom 39.5 Ft. Coa , e Sand Top Bottom Ft. Top Bottom Ft. 11. DRILLING LOG Top Bottom Formation Description Pronrinss FnPrnv Carnhnas 0 6 Sandy Clay Facility Name Facility IDs (if applicable) 6 /26 Weathered Rock 1700 niinnnwav Rnar1 = 26 /39.5 Rock Street Address / Semora NC 27343 / City or Town State Zip Code / ' Jnhn TnAtfer I Contact Name / 410 S_ Wilminoton St PFR 4A / Mailing Address / ' Ralpinh NC 27601 / City or Town State Zip Code ; 12. REMARKS: t 919 Wi7863 Area code Phone number B. WELL DETAILS: ' : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCEVNTH 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. ADD THAT A COPY OF THIS a. TOTAL DEPTH: 39' • REC RD Ha4 BEEN PROVIDEDTO THE WELL OWNER ' b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO Lw ' 1 f 12 -21 -1 O SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR ` DATE c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 28.97 FT, Thomas Whitehead (Use " +" if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL 'Quality a Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Information Process) Forth GW tb Y P - Processing, Rev. 21D9 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27899 -161, Phone: (919) 807 -6300 1 Sys 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: Thomas Whitehead Wei! Contractor (Individual) Name S&ME, Inc. Wen Contractor Company Name 3201 SDrina Forest Road Street Address Raleiah NC 27616 City or Town State Zip Code 9( 19 7 872 -2660 Area code Phone number NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907 2. WELL INFORMATION: WELL CONSTRUCTION PERM OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT #(4 appl- cable) SITE WE LL ID t(4 applicable) CW-5 3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring (sr Municipal/Public C IndustriaUCommerdal ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery G Injection ❑ Irrigation❑ Other ❑ (list use) DATE DRILLED 11 -3-10 4. WELL LOCATION: 1700 Dunnawav Road (Street Name. Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Lp Code) CITY. Semora COUNTY Person TOPOGRAPHIC I (AND SETTING: (creck appropriate box) ❑Slope []Valley Flat []Ridge ❑Other LATITUDE 36 •28 42.0400 ' DMS OR 3x.xxxxxxxxx DD LONGITUDE 79 ' 4 24 9400 ' DMS OR 7x.xxxxxxxxx DD Latitude longitude source (BPS Qropographic map (location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andatfached to this lam of not using GPS) S. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.) PrnnrPSc FnPrnv Carofinac Facility Name Facility IDa (if applicable) 170f) Ninnawav Rnnd Street Address _ Semora NC 97343 City or Town State Zip Code John Tnetfer Contact Name 410,q Wilminoton St PFR 4A Mailing Address Raleinh NC 27601 City or Town Slate Zip Code ( 919 546 -7863 Area code Phone number 6. WELL DETAILS: a. TOTAL DEPTH: 19.5 - b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO G/ d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface' 'Top of casing terminated aVor below land surface may require a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C 0118. Ill. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST f. DISINFECTION: Type Amount g. WATER ZONES (depth) Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom_ Thickness/ 7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material Top -2_11 Bottom 4.7 Fl. 2" SCh 40 PVC Top Bottom Fl. Top Bottom Ft. 8, GROUT, Depth Material Method Topes Bottom 2 FL Portland Pour Top 2 _ Bottom 3.5 FL Bentonite Pour _ Top Bottom Ft, 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material Top 47 Bottom_ 19..` Ft.- 2. _ _ in. _010_ in Pte_. Top Bottom Ft in. in Top Bottom Ft. in in 10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material Top 3.5 Bottom 20 FL Coarse Sand Top Bottom FL Top Bottom Ft. 11. DRILLING LOG Top Bottom Formation Description 0 /3 3 /21.9 I J If 12. REMARKS: _Sandy Clay Weathered Rock 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH • ISA NCAC 7C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER lJoanr - 4n • nn.� __ 12 -21 -10 SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: _ 9.92 FT Thomas Whitehead (Use' *" if Above Top of Casing) PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Information Processing, Form 09 y p � � �' Rev. 209 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27688-161, Phone :(919) 807.6300 G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc. 426 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh NC 27803 (818) 828 -0577 PROJECT NAME CP &L Roxboro LOCATION. Roxboro, NC DRILLING CO: Richard Simmons Drilling DRILLING METHOD: Ali FIELD PARTY: NA GEOLOGIST: Logger: Ahlberg DATE BEGUN. 3/14102 COMPLETED: 3/14102 a FIELD BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW-6 Page 1 of 2 TOTAL DEPTH: 45 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION NA TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: NA STATIC WATER LEVEL (81-S) Depth (ft) 37 27.5 Time 3:00 5:00 Date 3114102 3114102 z x O z Z) r _ g O Of F- a o o 0- W m a o DESCRIPTION J fl z N 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 110 12.0 130 14.0 150 16.0 17.0 18.0 190 20.0 21.0 220 23.0 24.0 25.0 260 27.0 28.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 33.0 %n n 10,16,23,23 10,23,30,50/5 SS SS HSA SANDY SH T: Orange, brown and light tan sandy silt, dry. _ - _ - SILT: Olive, orange, pink and white silt to clay with - mica. P W R - 50/5" SS - 50/5, SS - 50/5" SS SILTY SAND: Olive brown slightly weathered silty T r sand, dry T T T .r T T T T T .r T .r. T T T.r. 50/0 SS TT. r+ -r. T. T. T. T m T T :r T T T T r T T TT T TT T 00 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 60 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 33.0 IA n G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc. l 426 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh NC 27603 1819) 828 -0677 PROJECT NAME: CP &L Roxboro LOCATION Roxboro, NC DRILLING CO Richard Simmons Drilling DRILLING METHOD: All FIELD PARTY: NA GEOLOGIST: Logger: Ahlberg DATE BEGUN: 3/14/02 COMPLETED. 3/14/02 0 FIELD BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW-6 Page 2 of 2 TOTAL DEPTH: 45 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION. NA TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: NA STATIC WATER LEVEL (SLS) Depth (ft) 37 27.5 Time 3:00 5:00 Date 3114/02 3/14/02 35.0 36.0 37.0 38.0 39.0 40.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 44.0 45.0 SILTY SAPID: Olive brown slightly weathered silty r.+- O ❑ sand, dry. Ntoisture noted at 45 feet Boring +-rr. 35.0 terminated +-r .T-r. 36.0 0 a • -r.T g X a 3 z O 37.0 = < Tr -7r.: 38.0 � T" T' •. i a m c W o DESCRIPTION H W Z h J TT 41.0 35.0 36.0 37.0 38.0 39.0 40.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 44.0 45.0 SILTY SAPID: Olive brown slightly weathered silty r.+- sand, dry. Ntoisture noted at 45 feet Boring +-rr. 35.0 terminated +-r .T-r. 36.0 +-r. • -r.T 37.0 Tr -7r.: 38.0 T" T' •. 39.0 TT. 7' Tr+ 40.0 TT 41.0 TT. -r 42.0 TrT 430- TT. T T 44.0 ' 7 45.0 Above —Grade Protecto Locked Steel Casing Concrete Pad Cement Grout 0' — 26' 7 77 Bentonite Seal 26' — 28' - Sand Filter Pack 28' — 45' 1. DEDICATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT. A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured by Monoflex was installed with the pump screen at the midpoint of the well screen. 2. AQUIFER TESTING. Aquifer testing performed on the well by Babb & Asssociates, P.A., yielded an average hydraulic conductivity =10.9 feet /day. 3. SURVEY. Well location, including ground and top of casing elevations surveyed by Smith & Smith Surveyors. Pump wellhead 3 ft. Stickup Ground Surface 5.25" Diameter Bore Hole 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser Interval: 0' — 30' Top of Screen 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen 0.010" Slot Size Screen Interval: 30' — 45' Bottom of Well Point: 45' n1". ROXBORO ASH LANDFILL X` AM spec Gary W. Ahlberg, P.E. "` not to 201 N. front Street. Suite 706 MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION GMW -6 ocale wlmington, NC 28401 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. Phore:910.382.9800 1700 Dunnaway Road $emora, NC 27343 cwa cwa P"Arcr tv: PEC —t A 3/14/02 BABB AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. Raleigh, North Carolina SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT: Roxboro Ash Monofrll Description Blow Count PROJECT #: Notes A 2'- 4' BORING ID: GMW -7 Replacement Page. 1 of 1 Date: 6128110 Total Depth: 54 feet Method: Air Rotary Boring Dia: 6 inches Contractor: Quantex, Inc. Field Rep: G. Babb Sample Number Depth Interval Description Blow Count Field Screen Notes A 2'- 4' Brown fine sandy LOAM B 6' Brown fine sandy LOAM C 8'- 10' Brown silty fine SAND with rock frags D 15'- 16' Tan quartz -rich felsic rock E 28'- 33' Tan quartz -rick felsic rock - weathered F 38'- 40' Tan felsic granitic rock wl mafic inclusions G 44' Possible water - no return N 48'- 53' Felsic granitic rock wl mafic gneiss 54' Well set at 54' below grade Comments: Water level at 25.5' below grade at time of drilling Above -Grade Protector Concrete Pad Babb & Associates, P.A. Cement Grout 0' - 37' Bentonite Seal -_ 37' - 39' H.___ Sand Filter Pack 39' - 54' Locking Well Cap 2.5' Stickup Ground Surface 6.25" Diameter Bore Hole 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser Interval: +2.5' - 39' Top of Screen 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen 0.010" Slot Size Screen Interval: 39' - 54' Bottom of Well Point. 54' nTCt G M W — 7 ncuA£ No: MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION Progress Energy Ash Monofill CH£C.Y£D BY• Dunnaway Road Roxboro, North Carolina scm.r.• PAOACr NO: I not to scale ORA*V sY.• I DATE: G. Babb 1 6/28/10 G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc. t 426 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh NC 27603 (919) 928 -0677 PROJECT NAME' ('P&I. Roxboro LOCATION. Roxboro, NC DRILLING CO Richard Simmons Drilling DRILLING METHOD: AH FIELD PARTY. NA GEOLOGIST: Logger: Ablberg DATE BEGUN: 3/13/02 COMPLETED. 3/14102 I = O n W } 3 E- � OU C7 W W a a O o m CC o DESCRIP 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 140 15.0 16.0 17.0 18,0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 330- '3A n . FIELD BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW-8 Page 1 of 2 TOTAL DEPTH: 65 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: TOP OF CASING ELEVATION. NA NA STATIC WATER LEVEL (BLS) Depth (ft) 58 C7 43.6 Time 3:00 3/14/02 ❑ate 3/13/02 O 3:00 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 33.0 1211 n z SILTY SAND: Tan silty sand - gneissic partially } O C7 weathered rock. � O I-- SS TION LU ~ J O Z 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 33.0 1211 n AR SILTY SAND: Tan silty sand - gneissic partially T. T weathered rock. T T r. �.TT. 7,16,26,36 SS Rr r T,. T. T T T ' T T TT .�. T TT 7,17,25,36 SS YT r R T r. +-r T T T TT. �'T. 8,12,25,50/5 SS +-r T. T T. T + TT 7T. T. T. TT. TT T.' 5010.5" SS .T.' TT .T. T. T.T. AH GNEISS Tan gneiss. No fractures noted. 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 29.0 30.0 31.0 32.0 33.0 1211 n G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc. 426 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh NC 27603 (919) 828 -0577 PROJECT NAME CP &i, Roxboro LOCATION: Roxboro, NC DRILLING CO Richard Simmons Drilling DRILLING METHOD AH FIELD PARTY: NA GEOLOGIST: Logger: Ahlberg DATE BEGUN: 3/13102 COMPLETED: 3114/02 0 FIELD BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW-8 Page 2 of 2 TOTAL DEPTH: 65 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: NA TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: NA STATIC WATER LEVEL (BLS) Depth (ft) 58 43.6 Time 3:00 3/14102 Date 3/13/02 3:00 35.0 36.0 37.0 38.0 390 40.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 47.0 48.0 49.0 50.0 51.0 52.0 53.0 54.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 58.0 59.0 60.0 61.0 62.0 63.0 640 65.0 0 O in ;lit CL w 35.0 36.0 37.0 38.0 39.0 40.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 47.0 48.0 49.0 50.0 51.0 52.0 530 54.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 58.0 59.0 600 61.0 62.0 63.0 64.0 65.0 Z O 5 J J � rn z J f- o O O w = U z > d d 0 J o m a U o DESCRIPTION 35.0 36.0 37.0 38.0 390 40.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 47.0 48.0 49.0 50.0 51.0 52.0 53.0 54.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 58.0 59.0 60.0 61.0 62.0 63.0 640 65.0 0 O in ;lit CL w 35.0 36.0 37.0 38.0 39.0 40.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 47.0 48.0 49.0 50.0 51.0 52.0 530 54.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 58.0 59.0 600 61.0 62.0 63.0 64.0 65.0 Z O 5 J J � rn z J Above -Grade Protecto Locked Steel Casing Concrete Pad Cement Grout 0' - 49' Bentonite Seal 49' - 51' - -- Sand Filter Pack 51' - 63' 1. DEDICATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT. A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured by Monoflex was installed with the pump screen at the midpoint of the well screen. 2. AQUIFER TESTING. Aquifer testing performed on the well by Babb & Asssociates, P.A., yielded a hydraulic conductivity = 2.14 feet /day. 3. SURVEY. Well lacotion, including ground and top of casing elevations surveyed by Smith & Smith Surveyors. Pump wellhead 3 ft. Stickup Ground Surface 5.25" Diameter Bore Hole 2.0' Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser Interval: 0' - 53' Top of Screen 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen 0.010" Slot Size Screen Interval: 53' - 63' Bottom of Wall Point: 63' )I � I nnc rxxw tin. SWE'. naa rcr Aoc Gary W. Ahlberg, P.E. RoxaoRV Asli LANDFILL not MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION GMW -8 PEC -' 201 N. Frost Street, Suite 706 scale s w:Imington, NC 284o1 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. ctirarco n. auwa sr.• a.rr Phoae:91a.362.980C 1700 Dunnawoy Road Sernora, NC 27343 GWA GWA 3/14/02 G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc. 426 North Boylan Avenue. Raleigh NC 27603 (919) 828 -0577 PROJECT NAME CP &L Roxboro LOCATION Roxboro, NC DRILLING CO Richard Simmons Drilling DRILLING METHOD: AH FIELD PARTY: NA GEOLOGIST: Logger: Ahlberg DATE BEGUN: 3/13/02 COMPLETED: 3/13/02 = O F- F U w o m 00 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 10.0 20-0- 21.0- 22.0- 23.O - 24.0 - 25 0 260- 27.0 - 28.0 - 29.0 - 30.0 - 31.0 - 32.0 - 33.0 - '1nn- FIELD BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW -9 Page 1 of 2 TOTAL DEPTH: 45 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: NA TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: NA STATIC WATER LEVEL (BLS) Depth (ft) 27.80 27.78 Time 11:00 3/14102 Date 3/13102 11:00 w g 0 o J 50/5" SS 50 /1" DESCRIPTION Y O z a w 0 0.0 1.0 2.0 30 40 5.0 6.0 7.0 80 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17,0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 29.0 300 31.0 32.0 33.0 �n n Z O J J � w Z AH SAND: Tan fine sand, dry. • , 50/5" SS 50 /1" SS GNEISS Dark tan gneiss Fracture at 13 - 14 feet. GNEISS: Dark gray gneiss QUARTZ: Quartz seam V V V GNEISS: Dark gray hornblende gneiss Fractures at 35 -36 feet and 42 - 43 feet. z a w 0 0.0 1.0 2.0 30 40 5.0 6.0 7.0 80 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17,0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0 28.0 29.0 300 31.0 32.0 33.0 �n n Z O J J � w Z G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc. ` 425 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh NC 27600 (919) 828 -0577 PROJECT NAME CP &L Roxboro LOCATION. Roxboro, NC DRILLING CO: Richard Simmons Drilling DRILLING METHOD: AH FIELD PARTY- NA GEOLOGIST' Logger: Ahlberg DATE BEGUN 3113/02 COMPLETED: 3113102 o o° o � = v z > a. O n m ¢ o DESCRIPTI 35.0 36.0 37.0 38.0 39.0 40.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 44.0 45.0 FIELD BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW -9 Page 2 of 2 TOTAL DEPTH. 45 GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION. NA TOP OF CASING ELEVATION. NA STATIC WATER LEVEL (BLS) Depth (ft) 27,80 _ 27.78 Time 11:00 3/14/02 Date 3/13/02 11:00 ON J o �: z 35 0 36.0 37.0 38.0 390- 40.0 410- 42.0 43.0 44.0 45.0 z o g o Y Y g J 35 0 36.0 37.0 38.0 390- 40.0 410- 42.0 43.0 44.0 45.0 ' Above -Grade Protecto Locked Steel Casing Concrete Pad Cement Grout 0' - 26' Bentonite Seal 26' - 28' - Sand Filter Pock 28' - 45' 1. DEDICATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT. A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured by Monoflex was installed with the pump screen at the midpoint of the well screen. 2. AQUIFER TESTING. Aquifer testing performed on the well by Babb & Asssociates, P.A., yielded an average hydraulic conductivity = 77.05 feet /day. 3. SURVEY. Well location, including ground and top of casing elevations surveyed by Smith & Smith Surveyors. Pump wellhead 3 ft. Stickup Ground Surface 5.25" Diameter Bore Hole 2.0' D ameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser Interval: 0' - 30' Top of Screen 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen 0.010" Slot Size Screen Interval: 30' - 45' Bottom of Well Point: 45' n�` ROXBORO ASH LANDFILL "W#`Mr. SrAU �`rMa Gary W. Ahlberg, P.E. not to 201 N. Front S,net, Suite 706 MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION GMW -9 scale PEC -I Wilmington, NC 28401 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. cwcxro A" A1140V,,_ a4m, Phone: 910.382.9800 1700 Dunnaway Road Semora, NC 27343 GWA GWA 3/14/02 GARY W. AHLBERG, P.E. Wilmington, North Carolina ,) SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT: Roxboro Ash Landfill PROJECT M LAM BORING ID: GMW -10 Date: 9/25102 Method: HSA -AIR Contractor, Richard Simmons Drilling Co. Page: 1 of 1 Total Depth: 45 feet 13oring Die: 5.25 inches Field Rep: GWA Sample Number Depth Interval Description Blow Count Field Screen Notes A D'- 5' SM: tan -brown silty sand dry p. weathered rock 5014" B 5' -12' SM: tan -brown silty sand dry p. weathered rock 501.5" 12'- 13' SM: gray dry softer pwr D 13' -20' SM: tan dry hard pwr 5011.5" E 20' - 27' SM: olive -tan dry mod. hard pwr 5010 27' auger refusal, change to air hammer drilling dark gray hornblende gneiss 32' apparent fracture zone, no moisture observed 45' moderate water show complete well with 15-ft screen (30 -45) sand to up to 28', seal and grout to surface Comments: Above -Grade Protec Locked Steel Casing Concrete Pod Cement Grout 0' - 26' Bentonite Seal - 26' - 28' - r f Sand Filter Pack 28' - 45' 1. DEDICATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT. A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured by Monoflex was installed with the pump screen at the midpoint of the well screen. 2. AQUIFER TESTING. Aquifer testing performed on the well by Babb & Asssociates, P.A., yielded an average hydraulic conductivity = 5.32 feet /day. 3. SURVEY. Well location, including ground and top of casing elevations surveyed by Smith do Smith Surveyors. Pump wellhead 3 ft. Stickup Ground Surface 5.25" Diameter Bore Hole 2.0' Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser Interval; 0' - 30' Top of Screen 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen 0.010" Slot Size Screen Interval: 30' - 45' Bottom of Well Point: 45' "nz ROXBORO ASH LANDFILL rxwwW.. scur" pwxcr� Gary W. Ahlberg, P.E. not to PEC -t I MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION GMW -10 scale 201 N. Front Street, Su'te 706 Wilmington, NC 28401 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.a�o,.„,% Phone: 910.362.9800 1700 Dunnaway Road Semora, NC 27343 GWA GWA 9/25/02 GARY W. AHLBERG, P.E. Wilmington, North Carolina SOIL BORING LOG PROJECT: Roxboro Ash Landfill PROJECT #: LAM BORING ID: GMW -11 Date. 912&02 Method: NSA -AIR Contractor. Richard Simmons Drilling Co. Page: 1 of 1 Total Depth: 45 feet Boring D'sa: 5.25 inches Field Rep: GWA Sample Number Depth Interval Description Blow Count Field Screen Notes 0'- 3' ML: reddish brown silty clay residual soils A T -5' ML: orange brown silty sandy clay residual soils 4 -8 -8 -9 B 5' -13' ML: orange brown - olive green silly sandy clay 6- 11 -13 -13 13' -16.5' SW: olive green hand drilling weathered rock 16.5' auger refusal, change to air hammer drilling dark greenish gray gneiss 30' apparent fracture, slight moisture 20 min. = 2 in water return 35' hard lense - dry 45' TD 30 min = 3 ft ester return complete well with 15 -ft screen (30 -45) sand to up to 28', seal and grout to surface Comments: Above -Grade Protect Locked Steel Coxing Concrete Pad Cement Grout 0' - 26' Dentonite Seal - 26' - 28' Sand Filter Pcck 28' - 45' 1. DEDICATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT. A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured by Monoflex was installed with the pump screen at the midpoint of the well screen, 2. AQUIFER TESTING. Aquifer testing performed on the well by Babb & Asssociates, PA, yielded a hydraulic conductivity = 2.07 feet /day. 3. SURVEY. Well location, including ground and top of casing elevations surveyed by Smith & Smith Surveyors. Pump wellhead 3 ft. Stickup Ground Surface 5.25" Diameter Bore Hole 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser Interval: 0' - 30' Top of Screen 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen 0.010" Slot Size Screen Interval: 30' - 45' Bottom of Well Point: 45' .) 1 Gary W. Ahlberg, P.E. ROXBORO ASH LANDFILL '!"D"cr"'� to MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION GMW -1 t note stole PEC -' 201 N. Front Street, Suite 706 S Mflmington, K mcli Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. CAIrcoroSX MO,oj DA Mr Phone: 910.362.9800 1700 Dunnawoy Road Semora, NC 27343 GWA GwA 9/26/02 F Ki-N : F`jD C 1,UL I W6 PHONE NO. : 704 662 067f1 Rpr. E2 2002 12: 21PM PS Ncx,h Vardina - Deoanrnarl d En"rcnrrtrA and NMrFJ Re50UrCe9 poision of W dar Quatty • Geolmdwaler Soww 1�361Aa1$uvlre Cenla - RaWgh. NC 27899.1858 Phone (91g)T33 -3221 DELL CO TRU 1OM_ ff"ttn WELLCONTRACTOR gjc zn " / WtL ECONTRACTORCERTIFICATION# M Wor Man Mmuoo M: m0e,m U,/— Cp STATE WELLCONSTLICTION PER%AT k 1. WELL LOGATION: (Show tket h of the k>GCkr1 belgw) NwrdtTmm RmbmO County. Pwoon pE'Tt1 WKWAN14WU Ceffo Groin In FWn m DwarWW R.M. C— ft 2- UWNM. CiPlt1- ADDRESS: cw of rw. sin zt C" 3. OATS DRtU 13 131tl2 4. TOTAL DEPTH' 48 6. CVTTINO COLLECTED; Y"-_ 6. DOES WELL RSPLACE EXISTING WELL? No 7. STATIC WATER LEVEL Bakes- Top of Cw rg' - (ue — *Ab —Too 0 QI•D 8. TOP OF CA8M418 3_ FT. Abum Land 0igaoa • ca.ayT.riwr Nm (f.1.�ILnarJ�a a bcr VMM wnrm d i..la Y b0errw~.M 18A ACAC 2C IM 18 0. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST: 10. WATER ZONES (deMh): _ 11. CHLORINATION Types ly_i Ar1)oua -__ . - -- If boMo M spice 11 rA uw bQck o/kxm 11 r•AAimA. =ATION SKI; _Ql (E40. aremm ana at harce Man tl *w t" Swu p000.. w 00w trap r UAraKe voin*4) N I DGM21MOYCIATIFY THAI WELL'*&"CGilr*UarlV M AOQCF16AMV WtH iSA hGEJrn AMICOKV*k CN TMOW0. ILO TATACOP. R THO R MkO)VS Lfta PnAVW/g 1MG vast 0mg RO)BGRO All= sra%kTL,FLr ciF ectirmpauR on Orr, - 6.rv+11 vbrnr s.6nsa.r SwisMMP�1 Yrpnra ■d mq ra w srs. Depth C1arAbor or Welow. Maww To 90 FL 2" sch 40 pyc Fcgn1 Ft From To ..rt 13 GROUT D%&I Maters! mew Fmm 0 To 26 Ft 2MMMMpqlonbe fn rule _ Frain To n 14 SCREEN, Oopth Dhmdw • Slat StIm " 0. koial From 0 To 48 FL T ,610 PVC � Fmm To FL _ Frcm To FL 13, SANDIGRAVEL PACK: owul 8aa MsLp1a1 Fran 28 To 44 Ft 82 Sand Fmm To Ft T- Ia. REMARKS: =ATION SKI; _Ql (E40. aremm ana at harce Man tl *w t" Swu p000.. w 00w trap r UAraKe voin*4) N I DGM21MOYCIATIFY THAI WELL'*&"CGilr*UarlV M AOQCF16AMV WtH iSA hGEJrn AMICOKV*k CN TMOW0. ILO TATACOP. R THO R MkO)VS Lfta PnAVW/g 1MG vast 0mg RO)BGRO All= sra%kTL,FLr ciF ectirmpauR on Orr, - 6.rv+11 vbrnr s.6nsa.r SwisMMP�1 Yrpnra ■d mq ra w srs. NONRESIDENTIAL WEL1. CONSTRUC "r10y RECORD Notch Carohim Ikpartnwid of 1-m iromncnl and Natural Rcuwrces Di%iNion Id kkater Qijalil} WFIA. C'0NTRA('1'0R ('ERTIFIC'ATION M 3468 -A 1. WELL CONTRACTOR: Stephen W. Keener Well Contractor (Individual) Name Quantex, Inc. Well Contractor Company Name — STREET ADDRESS P.O. Box 41673 Raleigh, NC 27_629 City or Town State — Zip Code _ (919 )- 219 -9604 Area code - Phone number 2 WELL INFORMATION: (y1 J SITE WELL ID Notapp�,artct_ WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT0(,f eticq;cantel. NA OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT #(if applicable) NA 3. WELL USE eCheck Applicable Box) Manitoring f Municipal/Pubhct3 Induslnal,-CommeraaEl AgricultuialO RecoveryO Injecbor0 Irngallort OtherD (lisluse) DATE DRILLED June 28, 2010 _ TIME COMPLETED 2 :30 Pm AMt3 Putt 4. WELL LOCATION: CITY Roxboro COUNTY Person 1 unnaway-Ro-ac� 27343 (Sveel Name, Numters Corrmwvty SutxhrKion Lct No Parch. I,p Code) TOPOGRAPHIC r LAND SETTING (Slope 0 Valley 0 Flat 0 Ridge D Other_ - lcheck arp-roprete br.q ,MaN N 11r ocklrl. LATITUDE N 36.470131 nNllulc +, ,;,,"w% u1 LONGITUDE W 79.053583 In a dMirLd Immu I .atitude /longitude source: 0 GIIS 0 '1 t p i#rlphic nuip (k)cauan nt well musr be shown on a USGS Iopo nup and dttiched to this loan it not using GPS) 5 FACILrrY \a.rw rd YV Wt"ess ire+. u..�•ln. �1 wt FACILTY ID /(1f applicable). NA NAME OF FACILITY Progress Energy STREET ADDRESS 1700 Dunnaway Road —_ Roxboro J_ NC _ 27343 City or Town State Zip Code CONTACT PERSON MAILING ADDRESS City of town State Zip Code — Area cede - Phone number 6. WELL DETAILS: a TOTAL DEPTH b DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? Y.ESi , NOD c WATER LEVEL FletcA Top of Cas,ng Or ss FT ltIse r I Above Top of ('asrng) E+ d. TOP OF CASING IS 25 FT Above Land Surface' top of casing terminated atlor below land surface may require a variance In accordance with ISA NCAC 2C 0118 e YIELD (gpm) NA_ METHOD OF TEST NA _ 1 DISINFECTION: Type NA Amount,NA _. g WATER ZONES (depth) - From. '' ` ' To From To__.__ Fran _�— To-- - _ . - From_— To From To_ From 7 CASING: Depth Diameter Th,ckn*ssVi*vhf Material From f,"To 1 _Ft 2" sch40 PVC FIC.m— — To Fill -- _.. —_ -- 8 GROUT Depth Material Method F tom To..-.? Ft Neat Cement Pour _ f rum ^To � i, e e _ e Frum- To --- Ft-- - -. - -1. - -_ 9 SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material r ror9 _j7— To ' ti _ Ft - 2" in 0.010_ in PVC -- – —in From_ To — `Tb —� -- Ft — ~m - -- in - - - - -- I rqm F1 In t 0 SANDIGRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material From r ,l To 0 '1'_ FI 92 Silica Sand _ F romT To Ft _- From` To Ft 1 (.DRILLING LOG Fir To Formation Description 12 REMARKS. r [A- 0.1 NE HY Lf RIO t P4 T1ry ►/F:1 WAS toWS, I NuC1E1) IN AY.1 -,r Fl ILO 1 V.1111 `J A •' :C .'AI l C[*.%TR*R'iiriN SIAMikW11 Aral PiAl A r(7F: rw t".S I41rI*♦(I _gjt,!(r+��S14rr ht� M.fir1r(aVNIrU - SIGNATtl F Cf CERTIFIED WFI I CONTRACTOR DATF Steptlen W Keener PRINTED 14,WE OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL ' Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt.. Forn Wr 1b 1617 Mall Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617 Phone No (919) 733 -7015 ext 568. Fier 1207 P (? P1 E<SD CP.RU,1 NRS PF 0AE ND. : 704 662 0679 Apr. 02 2092 12: 20PM P3 North Cafol na - [*a1manl of Environment and Natural Reswrcoa 0hAalon of wafer 0crality - Ciroundwatar Section 1630 "1 Service Contw - Ra!eigh, NC 276GS-16 iti Phone (919)733 -9221 MOLL CONSTRUCTION RE00P2f) WELLCONTRACTOR: haW C1Jmmflcs OM7r:ag PtiC3 WELL CONTRACTORCMIF=TIONi W2 Well k%ndficatlan is G m LAJ g GTATE WELL CONMOTION PERMIT A. 1. WELL LGc;A rION: (dhm air m o Ifle tac3im bfivo N&mv0 Tovm. Ft�cn CounfY Person �o - ot- 4 mih.rlwbdYr and tNNIU _'- 2 OWNER: CP&L ADDRESS: C&I.r n Rao aq elm - 1 DATE DRILLED: 3(19)02 4. TOTAL DEPTH- R 0. CUTTING COU.ECT150. yam_ & DOES WELL REDIACE EXI3TINt3 WELD No r. S7ATIC WATER LEVEL Below -Top of Cacing: p.b. w 4 Aaan Tao ar C40o d TOP OF CASING ►B 2± FT. Abam Land Surfws T ' Carp Traarraalbr6�,T �{w'MO�Yaglulra��.rsir gaudrrca. -A MA 1c none 9. YtELA (GPM), METHOD OF TEST' 10 WATER ZONES (doom): i 11. CHLORINATION Type' via Amount 12 CASING well Thk*jx" Depth O+rQxtm or WalghM Materaal From G— To 53 Ft 2" Sch 40 PVC _ From Ft V From To �"—Ft 13. GROUT: Depth M3fortal Method From 0 To CemM"ef_t n 4o hsrxnb _01 _Ft. Fran TO FL _ 14. SCREEN: ONAh Diameter, sltstta' mallmfal From 5_ To 19 Ft 2' 010 PVC From TO FL From To FL — 1& 3ANDIORAVM PACK Dem stm tc'A�TLaI From 51 To 10 Ft. M2 SaM from T9 F1 le. REMARKS: DEPTH OfiILLINO m from TO Formptan Dmertmn N add%*nai apao r n.re.d uw Eatk 011Mm L996II N 8KETGH Hoods. or mor rmep neawKe pck ta) N rOa KAPA Y C1141WY THAT YAU YAS 0OMETRU4rir! MACCORBMKZMP ISA W_%CS_ MELL CONFr aTom PANDA". ANn TYAT A COPY OF T110 m00011ri tW Nk" PROYKWU TO THE W01 Q*RR RO%@OIlO MME OR — — 411106 DAYS kb=w a*.I a D~ aI e+.lTOSrW wa+aa►*an r+t�u7y r .d.wur r 1 FROM : RSD CAt<OLINAS PHONE NO. : 704 662 0670 Apr. 02 2002 12:2?PM P2 t crth Carwna - Depah(ram of Enwcrmwd and Natural Rwourp" ON*iat of Water Quality • Orour4*Ptw Settitn IBM M0 Service Center - Rd14gh. NC 276861896 Pham (819)7333221 WELL COtiWUUCTIQNRECORD WELLCONTRACTOR �q /''�� WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATIONAI rrA Wvl Idu tS ftgdlon A' G t t W —q STATE WELL CONSTUCTION PERMIT Ak 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show 0don of the WAlton belew) Nearrsl Town: Rakt 9 County P_,nm DEPTH ORILUNO LQ-0 U10 tnun Tu Foe" on ma"VUon (Axed,O&ft�*. Md Wl X L) 2. OWNER r'PE Depth ADOttEBS 0"laroetvr Cb vTan a» Do C44r MaWal J DATE DRIL.LEO: W3,02 To 4. TOTAL C£PTH' 4S 21 5 CIJTT)NG (X- x"GlLD; yes PVC Q DOES WELL REPLACE EMSTING+AI_LL? No 7. STATIC WATER LFAL Betcw -Tup o(t:BSN: pie w area.. Teo a aorta B. TOP OF CASINO IS 2r FTT. Above Lund Sta!xa' �! • C+rW TenArda ra. e.wMi —fob a Mpl we,,.bce e UAW"P=wwv.w'4A ww; w 4143 9- YIELD (gprn): METHOD OF TEST: 1Q WATER ZONES (daf D)). 11- CHLORINATiONTypw. Lla Amount ree441ar"apaaeisrftm Rebw*dbm 17 t`jjvuel- agAh LQCATION SKETCk3 (Sitar ai9ctlw W ITaiwma Dam It Meet two Swe Rpr clr. ar 00 w rg" r4f rwra Pa►b) k RO)tB4R0 I CO 1ROMM OeRM ItNT VA U V"S GO"STAUCTW IN A(X.aIQ W A V M 11A NGAO 24 MO.60"IRVCTION VATKARX AND PAT A CM OF TMI RMQROMAe aEp( PQGVV pTC TM Val M*MA V11'02 1+ &A'ma w w OMAw a D1114ewAi W. "e sm NPf b`wl P+AC ILI i v Wal n UckneM Depth 0"laroetvr ar Wek tt!!ft MaWal FnYn 0 To 30 FL 21 sch �Q PVC Ffan Ft Fran To FL 13. GROUT; agAh AAatcrial Me(flai From 0 TO Ccnenl/9enionft trtatmlc From To _P _Ft. Ft L4- SCREEN: Depth Dtamater" Slut S'ae' tiAalwW Frcm 22 To 44 Ft 2" .010 Pyc frmm To FL _ Fran To Ft 18. SANUPGRAVEL PACK, own Size materta Flare 28 TO Ad FL ►2 UW4 From To Ft _ 18. REMARKS. LQCATION SKETCk3 (Sitar ai9ctlw W ITaiwma Dam It Meet two Swe Rpr clr. ar 00 w rg" r4f rwra Pa►b) k RO)tB4R0 I CO 1ROMM OeRM ItNT VA U V"S GO"STAUCTW IN A(X.aIQ W A V M 11A NGAO 24 MO.60"IRVCTION VATKARX AND PAT A CM OF TMI RMQROMAe aEp( PQGVV pTC TM Val M*MA V11'02 1+ &A'ma w w OMAw a D1114ewAi W. "e sm NPf b`wl P+AC ILI i v L F PM I : RSD CeV <CL 1: 4FG NF[7I iE I,U. _ 104 662 0618 rko 7: A102 let' 39f h1 P 1 1 North Caro:ina - Depalmeml of En%ronmord and Murat Resourcaa 0"ion of MW. Q 12kY - GroundwWr Sactson 1638 Mani UMca Center • Raleigh. NO 27629.1636 Phcrie(910)733 -3421 WE-11 CON$T UCT ON RECORD WELLCONTFtACTOK ,gam 4113DApka of NC WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICAMNV 29P We11 identification r- 014W-10 STATE 4'1ELL CONSTUCTION PERNMT 0 1- WELL LOCATIQN: (Shaw "ch of the location b0ow) Neareat Tvam .Rg y County Person Samara tab Ooran.A. a �aaM us r•Iil 2. OWNER' g&d RGmao P'anl ADDf1rr6S:1�00 t7unnaway d BCmon NC 2734] W nTaw lraa 7o aa+f 3. DATE DRILLED: W2W, 4. TOTAL DEPTH: 46 5. CUTTING COLLECTW¢ ^ A 0. RODS WELL REPLACE DRSTIFIO WELL? No 1. STATIC WATER LEVEL Batorr- Top of Cmk V N.a••` M A1r� Tap 01 C.*0 d TOP OF CASINO IS Z-6 Fr. Above tx4 Surface • e«rynin+..rd re.t.i.. rat can... . ip�r.ta.r.vra.i. AVAO b.ms�w wit iiA r4rJC ]CFI 9. YIELD (,fin): METHOD OF TEST: 10. WATER ZONES (clepth): _ i1, CHLORIWIONType jyj Amount iZ. C LNG: DEPTH DRJ.0 Qt.OG frsua To 'f0minmDeVAV" 9 addW 4 rcace w naadra wit aaa of Imn W ail ThicVwv % Dapfh r ;wndw or Weighn wmrtai LOCATION SKETCH From C TO 30 R. T $040 PVC (eew *Dcd o and OMwM fmm A saw lv.o StA: From T_ Ft. Raada, or 04rw map n(w nnoe Punta) From To Ft 13. GROUT. Dtipth Material Lis" To 2a F! Cemerd#lWtonde Lwrrrtue_ From Te _. Ft tilt 14. SCREEN: Dem OUnetar' SlatSUe' Material From 3_ To 45 R. r .010 PVC From To Ft. NTC From To R. - T - - --- 10. S ID)GRAVL'LPACK: MNY 57 Itnad1340 Depth Sa+a Maww From 24 To 46 Ft. ts2 S;rd From To Ft 14 112MMM: K" WO 100 HF71[aY CfAIiY THAI YJfLL 1MA7 CONiiFLCrN W ANasaMlCa MrM f 1A IIGG 1C. WFlI OgHaTRU01'ipi irANa�fl7e. iVaD rYIAi AOWY(O�/S}�H !ilCCea Wl4 7S0 TI�{Nlil�pV.81 \ MOMIURK OF COMPAO T UM on AGEM� DATE l' - %"V*wbolr— M0w-_- ftU w—t+mm a-1— Ff"I : RSD CRROL-INAS PIK14- NO. : 7124 662 KM Nov. 21 2201" 1230AM P10 Norm c4ro;" - Da"tTant of Enwomenl and Nalural rtmourcet omslon of W3tar puah y - Gfounomdfar Sectlw 1636 Mal Service Conti - Raiaiph, NC T/E99 -1438 Ptmo (91 a)733-3221 WELL0P13TRLFCTIONRECORp WELLCONTRAOTOR: Rlchafd §�=r12r9hU�NQ WELLMNTRACTOR CERTIFICATION! jp ' Well IdlnblIcallon 0. OMW -11 STATE WELL CONMCTION PERMIT V. 1 WF11. LOCATION: (Show sketch of R* Iwa[lon bolas) DEPTH ORIL,LIMG LOQ Fr" To fwrtvaon Dowate n wJTftMl sw4 u nooa0d jM beak Warn I=AATION SKEfC1i Mftw dhec m and AAmYa than Y Iwe tv Mw- RQUh, or Doer (Mo farerOVA DM U) 1, RO)MORO 10004P"YCOMPY IKAY MliL WAS 00?4% 4CTfOW M7H 161 W-kC 1C, WELL MI4 TTR OT10N 3T&WAM1, AMU ""t A(`QCPYY OF TNM pommoXJy �arit� 10 r"a A LOV*I* ,1 C 1TEESrvz .4 W1LR Of COHMOTOR OR A DATE 6-bN ee*w D ohA of M• TS YrcwE "ypy b YfCti1d Neorot Town: q County, pemon smtom CU.- .MlV2fSAt(Oe ml(Lt her? 2. OWNER. P4art ' ADE: id sw,Qm NC 27343 ovarewr aro zv GUde 3 DATE DRILLED: =? 4. TOTAL DEPTH: 42 ' 6. Cl1TTINt: COLLECTED: Yea _ 8. DOES WELL RPPLACE EXISTING WELL? No T. STATIC WATER LLVEL Bebw -Top of Ceeft, (tl n' �• aA=ew Too of Cary 8 TOP OF CH61NG 3 FT. Above land sur!n�' GA1V TeRA1rY} �Af b111 AIM t,/Trro• Y 1•yr v4a • L[1 tt iradMMM"IYMe 1rI�RM M'�rF fC �7fa ' 0. YIFL0 (gpm)_ METHOD OF TEST: 10. WATER ZONES (da)pth): I f1. CHLOIRINATIONTypa- Lam! Amarmt' ' 12 CASING: Will Thidgie 6 Oepth Urnalor or Wdgttfl. blaleft FMM D To 30 Ft. acs) 40 From Ft PVC ' From To FL 13. GtRfXfT Depth tilxerfal Method From D To 28 Ft Caarrlshl/Bentonite lmr(rne ' Frcm To FL 14. SCREEN; Dept+ Otaneler ~ slel sb. • Kawrld From so To 46 Ft T .010 PVC Fmm To FL ' Fran To FL IS- SANMGRAVML PACK: Depth SIM Meteeal From 124 To 48Ft 02 Sarhd ' From To Ft 1G. REMARKS: DEPTH ORIL,LIMG LOQ Fr" To fwrtvaon Dowate n wJTftMl sw4 u nooa0d jM beak Warn I=AATION SKEfC1i Mftw dhec m and AAmYa than Y Iwe tv Mw- RQUh, or Doer (Mo farerOVA DM U) 1, RO)MORO 10004P"YCOMPY IKAY MliL WAS 00?4% 4CTfOW M7H 161 W-kC 1C, WELL MI4 TTR OT10N 3T&WAM1, AMU ""t A(`QCPYY OF TNM pommoXJy �arit� 10 r"a A LOV*I* ,1 C 1TEESrvz .4 W1LR Of COHMOTOR OR A DATE 6-bN ee*w D ohA of M• TS YrcwE "ypy b YfCti1d APPENDIX B ROXBORO STEAM PLANT PERMIT CONDITION A(6) ATTACHMENT XX, VERSION 1.0 MARCH 17, 2011 A�A ' NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Guaht} ' Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freemar Governor Director Secretary March 17, 2011 Mr. John Toepfer ' Senior Environmental Technical Specialist Progress Energy Service Company, LLC 410 South Wilmington Street ' PEB 4 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 Subject: Progress Energy's North Carolina Ash Pond Facilities Final Groundwater Monitoring Plans and Maps Dear Mr, Toepfer: RE�f� QED BAR 2 4 ?011 Attached are the final Groundwater Monitoring Plans and maps for the Asheville, Cape Fear, Lee, Mayo, Roxboro, Sutton, and Weatherspoon facilities. These plans and maps will be incorporated in each facility's NPDES permits. Please note some minor additions and corrections to the individual Groundwater Monitoring Plans. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Eric Smith at (919) 715 -6196 or me at (,919) 715-6699. Sincerely, 0�) vs� Debra J. Watts Supervisor — Groundwater Protection Unit Attachments cc: APS Central Office Files w/ attachments SWP — NPDES (Sergei Chernikov) wl attachments Regional Offices — APS AQUIFER PROTECTION SE31KA. 1636 Mail Serva Canter. Rie9t. Moab Garokna 27699.163+' 01ir Lo-won 2,128 Capital gwo evard Rakrgl NwIri Laroh p na 2 ?o0t r � nl -1 I I C' a 1.01111 Phone 919 .733 -32211 FAX 1919.71505U F:J:.:$ty "56i>1C:Cust�ne bewrc� 187'- 5?3 -674f f -niel Www.wate Alitr i Ya` ` //i „ A. (6) GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION AND SAMPLING 1. The permittee shall conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to determine the compliance of this NPDES permitted facility with the current groundwater Standards found under 15A NCAC 2L .0200 2. WELL CONSTRUCTION. Within 120 days of permit Issuance, monitoring wells, as proposed on Attachment XX, shall be Installed to monitor groundwater quality. a. Monitoring wells shall be constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C ,0108 (Standards of Construction for Wells Other than Water Supply) and any other jurisdictional laws and regulations pertaining to well construction. The general locations forall monitoring wells are indicated on Attachment XX. b. Within 30 days of completion of well construction, a completed Well Construction Record (Form GW -1) must be submitted for each monitoring well to Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1636. C. The Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number (919) 791 -4200 shall approve the location of new monitoring wells prior to installation. The regional office shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to the construction of any monitoring well and such notification to the Aquifer Protection Section's regional supervisor shall be made from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday, excluding State Holidays. d. Within 60 days of completion of the monitoring wells, the Permittee shall submit two original copies of a site map with a scale no greater than 1 -inch equals 500 feet, At a minimum, the map shall include the following information: i. The location and identity of each monitoring well. ii. The location of major components of the waste disposal system. Iii. The location of property boundaries within 500 feet of the disposal areas. iv. The latitude and longitude of the established horizontal control monument. V. The elevation of the top of the well casing (i.e., measuring point) relative to a common datum, Vi. The depth of water below the measuring point at the time the measuring point is established. vii. The location of compliance and review boundaries. viii. The date the map is prepared and /or revised, ix. Topographic contours in no more than ten (10) foot Intervals e. The above information should be overlaid on the most recent aerial photograph taken of the site. Control monuments shall be installed in such a manner and made of such materials that the monument will not be destroyed due to activities taking place on the property. The map and any supporting documentation shall be sent to the Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1636. f. The well(s) must be constructed by a North Carolina Certified Well Contractor, the property owner, or the property lessee according to General Statutes 87- 98.4. If the construction is not performed by a certified well contractor, the property owner or lessee, provided they are a natural person, must physically perform the actual well construction activities. NC0003425 - Roxboro Steam Station Groundwater Monitoring Plan Page 1 of 4 3/17/11 g. The monitoring wells shall be regularly maintained. Such maintenance shall include ensuring that the well caps are rust -free and locked at all times, the outer casing is upright and undamaged, and the well does not serve as a conduit for contamination. 3, GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND COMPLIANCE. Monitoring wells shall be sampled after construction and thereafter at the frequencies and for the parameters as specified In Attachment XX. All maps, well construction forms, well abandonment forms and monitoring data shall refer to the permit number and the well nomenclature as provided on Attachment XX. a. Per 15A NCAC 02H .0800, a Division certified laboratory shall conduct all laboratory analyses for the required effluent, groundwater or surface water parameters. b. The measurement of water levels shall be made prior to purging the wells. The depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on the top of the casing. The measurement of pH shall be made after purging and prior to sampling for the remaining parameters. C. The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed to provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for each monitoring well. The measuring points (top of casing) of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed relative to a common datum. d. For monitoring wells that are not located at the Compliance Boundary, the Compliance Monitoring Form (GW- 59CCR) is not required. However, predictive calculations or modeling shall be submitted to the Regional Office annually (i.e. 12 months after permit issuance) demonstrating groundwater quality standards at the Compliance Boundary. e. Two copies of the monitoring well sampling shall be submitted on a Compliance Monitoring Form (GW- 59CCR), and received no later than the last working day of the month following the sampling month. Copies of the laboratory analyses shall be kept on site, and made available upon request. The Compliance Monitoring Form (GW- 59CCR) shall include this permit number and the appropriate well identification number. All information shall be submitted to the following address: Division of Water Quality Information Processing Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617 f. For groundwater samples that exceed the ground water quality standards in 15A NCAC 02L .0202, the Regional Office shall be contacted within 30 days after submission of the groundwater monitoring report; an evaluation may be required to determine the impact of the waste disposal activities. Failure to do so may subject the permittee to a Notice of Violation, fines, and /or penalties. NC0003425 — Roxboro Steam Station Groundwater Monitoring Plan Page 2 of 4 3/17/11 4. COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY. The compliance boundary for the disposal system shall be specified in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a). This disposal system was individually permitted prior to December 30, 1983; therefore, the compliance boundary is established at either 500 feet from the effluent disposal area, or at the property boundary, whichever is closest to the effluent disposal area. An exceedance of groundwater standards at or beyond the compliance boundary is subject to remediation action according to 15A NCAC 02L .0106(c) as well as enforcement actions In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143- 215.6A through 143- 215.6C. NC0003425 - Roxboro Steam Station Groundwater Monitoring Plan Page 3 of 4 3117/11 ATTACHMENT XX — GROUNDWATER MONITORING PLAN Permit Number: NC0003425 Version 1.0 WELL NOMENCLATURE Aluminum PARAMETER Chloride DESCRIPTION Mercury TDS I FREQUENCY MonitorIng Wells: Antimony Chromium Nickel Thallium CV-1, CW -2, CW -2D, CW -3, CW -313, CW -4, April, July. November Arscnic Nitrate Level Barium __Copper C Iron pH _Water Zinc CW -5, BG-1 J Boron Lead Selenium _ Cadmium I Man¢anese _ Sulfate - Note 1: For locations of monitoring wells, see attached map. Note 2: Monitoring revisions may be considered, as applicable, if there are no significant detections prior to permit renewal. NC0003425 — Roxboro Steam Station Groundwater Monitoring Plan Page 4 of 4 3!17/11 a n a 0 T U to � 17 oil- �.w_ .da.`` , '•'' / ` M� -1 �- �� i 444 I .� j ,,4G If • �R.7 UhDYrA 7ER CONTOUR MAP ... ROAOOAO ASII /OhO - 1 Is j , .l Mlalf rrcff .�r K V[M� K>1111 fJytAru L, synTerra RECEPTOR SURVEY FOR ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT 1700 DUNNAWAY ROAD SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA 27343 NPDES PERMIT #NC0003425 PREPARED FOR DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA DUKE ENERGY, PROGRESS SUBMITTED: OCTOBER 2014 0,itisiiurlr'ii10 ' .110 N- N CARR�ti � a�ENSF�'� i SEAL 1425 A. C PG 1328 :t Manager Receptor Survey October 2014 Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit A NC0003425 SvnTerra TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................... ..............................1 2.0 Background ....................................................................................... ............................... 2 2.1 Plant and Ash Management Area Description ....................... ............................... 2 2.2 Description of Surrounding Properties ................................... ............................... 2 3.0 Receptor Survey Activities .............................................................. ..............................3 3.1 NCDENR Records Review ........................................................ ............................... 3 3.2 Person County GIS ...................................................................... ............................... 3 3.3 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records Review ........... ............................... 3 3.4 USGS Hydrography Review ..................................................... ............................... 4 3.5 SynTerra Field Survey ................................................................ ............................... 4 4.0 Findings ............................................................................................. ............................... 5 4.1 NCDENR Records ....................................................................... ............................... 5 4.2 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records ......................... ............................... 5 4.3 USGS Hydrography Review ..................................................... ............................... 5 4.4 SynTerra Field Survey ................................................................ ............................... 5 4.5 Summary of Receptor Survey Findings ................................... ............................... 6 List of Figures Figure 1. Receptor Survey Map List of Tables Table 1. Public and Private Water Supply Wells List of Appendices Appendix A EDR Report Page i P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ Receptor Survey \Roxboro Receptor Survey.docx Receptor Survey October 2014 ' Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra ' 1.0 INTRODUCTION Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy), owns and operates the Roxboro Steam ' Electric Plant (Roxboro Plant), located near Semora, in Person County, North Carolina. The Plant operates four coal -fired units. Coal combustion residuals (CCR) have historically been managed at the Plant's on -site ash basins: the semi- active East Ash ' Basin (operated from 1966 to present) and the active West Ash Basin (operated from 1973 to present). An unlined landfill was constructed on top of the East Ash Basin in ' 1988 for the placement of CCR. A lined landfill was constructed over the unlined landfill in 2004. Figure 1 is a map showing the site and surrounding area. ' Discharge from the ash basin is permitted by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Resources (DWR) ' under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit NC0003425. SynTerra has completed a receptor survey to identify water supply wells, public water supplies, surface water bodies, and wellhead protection areas (if present) within a 0.5 mile radius of the Roxboro Plant ash basins compliance boundary (Figure 1). The ' compliance boundary for groundwater quality in relation to the ash basin is defined in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a) as being established at either 500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property boundary, whichever is closer to the source. 1 The survey scope and findings are presented in the following sections. Page 1 I P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables l Roxboro\ Receptor Survey \Roxboro Receptor Survey.docx Receptor Survey October 2014 Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit x NC0003425 SvnTerra 2.0 BACKGROUND 2.1 Plant and Ash Management Area Description The Roxboro Plant is a coal -fired electricity- generating facility located in Person County, North Carolina, near Semora, North Carolina. The location of the plant is shown on Figure 1. The Roxboro Plant started operations in 1966. The Plant is located on Dunnaway Road, approximately 10 miles north of the city of Roxboro, North Carolina. The Plant is situated on the south side of Hyco Lake, a lake formed from the impoundment of the Hyco River. The Plant property is roughly bounded by Hyco Lake to the north and west, NC Highway 57 ( Semora Road) to the south and west, and State Highway 1336 (McGhees Mill Road) to the east. The overall topography of the Plant generally slopes toward the north (Hyco Lake). Wet ash and nun off from the East Ash Basin /CCR landfill is contained in the West Ash Basin which encompasses approximately 200 acres. The Roxboro Plant NPDES permit (NC0003425) authorizes two discharges to Hyco Lake. Outfall 003 contains flow from several waste streams and internal outfalls including once - through cooling water, stormwater, and ash basin effluent. Outfall 006 primarily handles runoff from coal pile and other coal handling and discharges to Hyco Lake after neutralization sedimentation, and equalization. 2.2 Description of Surrounding Properties Properties located within a 0.5 mile radius of the Roxboro Plant compliance boundary are located in Person County, North Carolina. The properties uses include primarily residential, agricultural, undeveloped land, and limited commercial /industrial. Figure 1 depicts the properties surrounding the Roxboro Plant. Page 2 P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026\ ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables\ Roxboro\ Receptor Survey \Roxboro Receptor Survey.docx Receptor Survey October 2014 ' Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra ' 3.0 RECEPTOR SURVEY ACTIVITIES 3.1 NCDENR Records Review ' SynTerra reviewed the NCDENR Department of Environmental Health (DEH) Public Water Supply Section's (PWSS) Public Water Supply Water Sources Geographic ' Information System (GIS) point data set (pwsws.shp) and the Water Distribution Map Service (WDMS) data set obtained from the NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal (http: // data. nconemap. com/ geoportal /catalog/main/home.page) to identify public water ' supply sources and water supply lines within a 0.5 mile radius of the Roxboro Plant compliance boundary. ' According to the NC OneMap website, the Public Water Supply Water Sources point data was current through November 18, 2009, and that it is the most current GIS data set of public water supply locations available from North Carolina state agencies. The ' GIS point data for the public water supply wells includes, but is not limited to information such as public water supply (PWS) system identification numbers, ' ownership information, PWS source type, well depth, and well yield. The WDMS data set contains information on municipal water lines and other appurtenances. ' On September 2, 2014, SynTerra reviewed the NCDENR Division of Water Resources (DWR) Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) online database for public water supply sources to identify wells located within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance ' boundary; to confirm the location of wells included in the Public Water Supply Water Sources GIS point data set, and to identify any wellhead protection areas located within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. The NCDENR SWAP database provides ' detailed assessments of all public drinking water intakes and wellhead protection areas in North Carolina. The website address is: (http: // swap. ncwater .org /website /swap /viewer.htm). 3.2 Person County GIS Person County on -line GIS information was reviewed to identify any public utilities in the area surrounding the Roxboro Plant and to verify field observations of parcel ownership information. 3.3 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records Review A review of public database information provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) was also conducted. The public water well information has been incorporated in the summary table (Table 1) and on Figure 1. A copy of the EDR report is included as Appendix A. Page 3 P: \Duke Energy Progress. 102b \ALL NC STFES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ Receptor Survey \Roxboro Receptor Survey.docx Receptor Survey October 2014 Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra 3.4 USGS Hydrography Review SynTerra reviewed the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) obtained from the USGS National Map Viewer (http: / /viewer.nationalmap.gov /viewer /) to identify surface waters within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. Hydrography data obtained from the USGS NHD is included on Figure 1. 3.5 SynTerra Field Survey During March 2014, SynTerra personnel conducted a vehicular survey along public roads located within 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. Observations on property use, apparent proximity to available municipal water lines and structures that may represent potential water supply wells were noted. Page 4 P: \Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro \Receptor Survey \ Roxboro Receptor Survey.doLx 1 Receptor Survey October 2014 ' Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit 4 NC0003425 SynTerra ' 4.0 FINDINGS 4.1 NCDENR Records ' Two public water supply sources were identified in the Public Water Supply Water Sources GIS point data set (obtained from NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal) and on the NCDENR SWAP online database within a 0.5 mile radius of the ash basins compliance ' boundary. One of these sources is a recently installed water supply well located adjacent to Woodland Elementary School (location DW46 on Figure 1). The other source is the Roxboro Plant's surface water intake, identified on Figure 1 as "EDR Surface Water Intake ". No wellhead protection areas were identified on the NCDENR SWAP online database within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. The Water Distribution Map Service (WDMS) data set obtained from the NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal, did not identify municipal water supply lines located within the 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. 4.2 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records The EDR report identified one "Water Well" located within 0.5 mile radius of the ash basins compliance boundary. This well is the aforementioned well at Woodland Elementary School and is reported to be 280 feet deep. The EDR report identified the Roxboro Plant surface water intake but incorrectly designated it as a "Public Water Supply Well." A copy of the EDR Report is provided in Appendix A. 4.3 USGS Hydrography Review According to the USGS Hydrography map, Hyco Lake is a major surface water body located within the survey radius (Figure 1). In addition to the reservoir, several surface water features are present within the 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. An intake canal is located east of the Roxboro power plant that brings water from a portion of Hyco Lake northeast of the Plant. A small stream flows north from the small pond located on the east side of the CCR landfill and discharges to the intake canal. Sargents Creek, and several minor tributaries of Sargents Creek, flow from the south into a ponded area at the base of the West Ash Basin filter dam. The ponded water flows west and then north through a canal before discharging to the heated wastewater mixing area before ultimately discharging to Hyco Lake (outfall 003). 4.4 SynTerra Field Survey SynTerra conducted a visual reconnaissance of the survey area by driving public road- ways and noting properties that appeared to be developed or occupied. No municipal water lines are present within the 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. Page 5 P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ALL NC SITES\ NPDES Permit Deliverables\ Roxboro\ Receptor Survey \Roxboro Receptor Survey.doLx Receptor Survey October 2014 Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra Structures resembling water supply wells or well houses were noted where visible and are shown on Figure 1 as reported /observed water supply wells (DW). Properties within 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary that appeared to be developed and in -use (occupied) were assumed to have private water supply wells (PRW) even if not noted during field reconnaissance because no public water supply is available in the area. These properties are indicated on Figure 1. 4.5 Summary of Receptor Survey Findings A summary of the receptor survey is discussed below. The suspected water supply well locations shown on Figure 1 are based upon field observations, EDR, and NCDENR information. The suspected well locations are numbered on the map to cross - reference information provided in Table 1. The table summarizes property location and site information where a water supply well may be present based upon drive -by observations or EDR information. No wellhead protection areas were identified within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary; Approximately 57 possible private water supply wells are assumed to be located within 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary; One water well was identified by NCDENR records and the EDR report (Attachment 1). The well is located southwest of the Roxboro Plant at Woodland Elementary School. EDR reports that the well is 280 feet deep, but no other specific information was reported. The well location was observed during field reconnaissance activities; NCDENR records and the EDR report identified the Roxboro Plant's surface water intake structure (Figure 1); Several surface water features are present within the 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary; and A portion of Hyco Lake is located within the survey radius (Figure 1). Page 6 P: \Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables\ Roxboro\ Receptor Survey \Roxboro Receptor Survey.docx FIGURE = m = = = m = m m m = = m = m = m = = TABLE 1 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS WITHIN 0.5 MILE RADIUS OF ASH MANAGEMENT AREA COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA Map Well ID tt PARCEL ID STATE ZIP CODE PARCEL ADDRESS (Well Location) FIELD DESCRIPTION /NOTES DW -1 9989- 04 -64- 9710.000 NC 27343 4291 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed In yard, no municipal water lines in area DW -2 9989- 04 -64- 8345.000 NC 27703 2437 MCGHEES MILL RD 'Nell structure observed in yard, no municipal water lines In area DW -3 9989-04 -74- 0458.000 NC 27343 4268 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed In yard; no municipal water fines In area DW -4 9989- 04 -74- 0333.000 NC 27343 4236 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard: no municipal water Imes in area DW -5 9989- 04 -63- 6998.000 NC 27343 4165 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water Imes in area DW -6 9989- 04 -74- 0104.000 NC 27343 4180 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -7 9989- 04 -63- 9887000 NC 27343 4164 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines m area DW -6 9989- 04 -73- 0609.000 NC 27343 4114 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water Imes in area OW -9 9989- 04 -73- 0508.000 NC 27343 4094 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines In area DW -10 9989 -04- 63-9590.000 NC 27343 4072 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines In area DW -11 9989- 04 -82- 4547.000 NC 27587 4034 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water Imes In area DW -12 9989- 04 -63- 9166.000 NC 27587 4014 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water Imes in area DW -13 9989- 04 -62- 9926.000 NC 27574 3962 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DV/ -14 9989- 04 -62- 9806.000 MD 20744 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water Imes In area DIN-15 9989- 04 -62- 8666.000 NC 27343 3924 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -16 9989- 04 -62- 5459.000 NC 27573 3893 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -17 9989- 04 -62- 8437.000 NC 27573 3892 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines In area DW -18 9989- 04 -62- 5218.000 NC 27343 3853 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -19 9989- 04 -62- 7287.000 NC 21343 3854 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water Imes In area DW -20 9989- 04 -62- 7168.000 NC 27574 3830 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -21 9989- 04 -52- 9154.000 NC 27343 3781 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -22 9989- 04 -61- 6844.000 NC 27343 3770 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -23 9989- 04 -61- 3835.000 NC 27343 3749 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -24 9989- 04 -61- 1901000 PJC 27343 65 THE JOHNSON LN Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water Imes In area DW -25 9989- 04 -51- 8907.000 NC 27343 135 THE JOHNSON LN Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines In area DW -26 9989- 04 -52- 5074.000 NC 27343 156 THE JOHNSON LN Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines In area DW -27 9989- 04 -61- 0224.000 NC 27343 3617 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW-28 9989- 04 -51- 9175.000 NC 27343 3599 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines In area DW -29 9989- 04 -61- 3029.000 NC 27573 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines In area DW -30 9989- 04 -51- 8091.000 NC 27343 3579 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -31 9989- 04 -60- 1882.000 NC 27343 3558 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -32 9989- 04 -50- 7893.000 NC 27343 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -33 9988- 01 -39- 1733.000 NC 27574 399 DUNNAWAY RD Well structure observed In yard; no municipal water Imes In area P'.Duke Energy Progress 102b7ALL NC SITESVNPDES PwmA Deliverable %RoxboroAR ptor SurveytTables.Tabie t Publk Pnvate Well Supply xlsx Page 1 of 2 1 Map Well PARCEL ID STATE TABLE 1 PARCEL ADDRESS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS ID # WITHIN 0.5 MILE RADIUS OF ASH MANAGEMENT AREA COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY ' ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT (Well Location) DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS. INC.. SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA Map Well PARCEL ID STATE ZIP PARCEL ADDRESS FIELD DESCRIPTION / NOTES ID # CODE (Well Location) DW -34 9988-01 -39- 2741.000 NC 27343 381 DUNNAWAY RD 'Nell structure observed In yard, no municipal water lines in area DW -35 9988- 01 -39- 8619 000 NC 27343 285 DUNNAWAY RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -36 9989- 03 -40- 0170.000 NC 27573 DUNNAWAY RD 'Nell structure observed In yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -37 9988- 01-49- 1710.000 NC 27573 225 DUNNAWAY RD Well structure observed In yard; no municipal water Imes in area DW -38 9983- 01 -49- 8582.000 NC 27343 67 DUNNAWAY RD Well structure observed In yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -39 9988- 02 -59- 1781.000 NC 27343 3291 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -40 9988- 02 -59- 8579.000 NC 27343 3773 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -41 9988 -02 -59 -8579 000 NC 27343 3773 MCGHEES MILL RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines In area DW -42 9988- 01 -36- 0728.000 NC 27574 520 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -43 9988- 01 -36- 5373.000 NC 27574 462 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area DW -44 9988- 01 -36- 7254.000 NC 27574 430 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD Well structure observed In yard, no municipal water lines in area DW -45 9988 01-3S-1957.000 NC 27574 507 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD Well structure observed in yard, no municipal water lines in area Water supply well with water tower; well reported to be 280 feet DN / -46 9978- 02 -56- 5922.000 NC 27573 7391 SEMORA RD deep by EDR report Well structure observed behind building; no municipal water Imes DW -47 9978- 02 -66- 1992.000 NC 27574 7275 SEMORA RD in area Occupied /Operational industrial facility; reported to have water DW -48 9989- 01 -16- 5827.000 NC 27343 921A SHORE RD supply well; no municipal water lines in area Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal PRW -1 9989- 01 -08- 7367.000 NC 27343 137 COW PASTURE LN water lines in area Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal PRW -2 9989- 01 -07- 2923.000 NY 10457 224 MARTHA ROYSTER RD water lines in area Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal PRW -3 9989- 04 -74- 1639.000 INC 27343 4300 MCGHEES MILL RD water lines in area Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal PRW -4 9989- 04 -50- 4836.000 NC 27343 3469 MCGHEES MILL RD water lines in area Occupied residence, no well structure observed; no municipal PRW -S 9988 - 01-49- 7632.000 NC 27343 101 DUNNAWAY RD water lines in area Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal PRW -6 9988-01 -35 -4849 000 NC 27574 461 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD water lines in area Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal PRW -7 9988- 01 -36- 6080000 NC 27574 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD 395 water lines in area PRW -8 9988- 01 -05- 4153.000 NC 27574 571 DAISY THOMPSON RD Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal water Imes in area Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal PRW -9 9988- 00 -14- 0931.000 NC 27574 556 DAISY THOMPSON RD water lines in area Notes: Map Well ID : refers to well number shown on the Water Well Survey Map, Parcel ID, owner, and address information were obtained from the Person County. North Carolina websrte (http: /'www. personcounty .netiindex.aspx7page =138) . 0 - Possible water well. Water line not available. No well observed. - Observed water well IP -Duke Energy Progress 1026WLL NC S17ES'NPOES Pwma Delr.erablewRoxboro'Reeeplur SurveylTabl"a Table t Public Private WeH Supply alsx Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX A EDR REPORT Duke Energy - Roxboro 1700 Dunnaway Rd. Roxboro, NC 27574 Inquiry Number: 3887591.1s March 21, 2014 CEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc 6 Armstrong Road, 4th Floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com FORM - NULL -CCA TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION GEOCHECK ADDENDUM i I PAGE Physical Setting Source Addendum - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A -1 Physical Setting Source Summary ____________ _______________________________ A -2 Physical Setting Source Map_ _________ ______________________ ----- --------- A -7 Physical Setting Source Map Findings ___________________.__. ____________ A -8 Physical Setting Source Records Searched _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A -16 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1- 800 - 352 -0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS ". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding. or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources. Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources. Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC3887591 1 s Page 1 I ' GEOCHECW, - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE REPORT 1 TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ' DUKEENERGY- ROXBORO 1700 DUNNAWAY RD. ROXBORO, NC 27574 ' TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): 36.4689 - 36' 28' 8.04" Longitude (West): 79 0743 - 79° 4'27.48' ' Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17 UTM X (Meters): 672539.2 UTM Y (Meters): 4037480.5 Elevation: 503 ft. above sea level ' USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ' Target Property Map: 36079 -D1 OLIVE HILL, NC Most Recent Revision: 1994 ' EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: ' 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC3887591.1 s Page 1 GEOCHECKk - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site- specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General NNW SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES s C c R Q LL z OJ J 0 TIP �I 0 T O L A O A + a0 N N/ b West I East TP 0 1/2 1 Miles Target Property Elevation: 503 ft. Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 75 Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC3887591 1 s Page 2 GEOCHECK" - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property. what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). ' FEMA FLOOD ZONE FEMA Flood Target Property County Electronic Data PERSON, NC YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map ' Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: 37145C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data Additional Panels in search area: Not Reported ' NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic NWI Quad at Target Propert y Data Coverage OLIVE HILL YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION ' Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. AQUIFLOW Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW Not Reported TC3887591.1s Page 3 GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification. rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy - gravelly types of soils than silty - clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Paleozoic Category: Metamorphic Rocks System: Pennsylvanian Series: Felsic paragneiss and schist Code: m m 1 (decoded above as Era. System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data. Soil Component Name: WILKES Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to water table is more than 6 feet. Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil. Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: MODERATE Depth to Bedrock Min: > 10 inches Depth to Bedrock Max: > 20 inches TC3887591 1s Page 4 GEOCHECK" - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction Rate (in /hr) (pH) 1 0 inches 6 inches fine sandy loam Granular FINE - GRAINED Max: 6.00 Max: 6.50 materials (35 SOILS, Silts and Min: 2.00 Min: 5.10 pct or less Clays (liquid passing No limit less than 200), Silty, or 50 %), silt. Clayey Gravel and Sand. 2 6 inches 13 inches clay loam Silt -Clay FINE- GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 7.80 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.20 Min: 6.10 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No limit less than 200), Clayey 50 %), Lean Clay Soils. 3 13 inches 48 inches weathered Not reported Not reported Max: 0.00 Max: 0.00 bedrock Min: 0.00 Min: 0.00 OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may appear within the general area of target property. Soil Surface Textures: sandy loam loam loamy sand clay loam Surficial Soil Types: sandy loam loam loamy sand clay loam Shallow Soil Types: clay loam clay loam silt loam sandy clay loam Deeper Soil Types: sandy loam sandy clay loam fine sandy loam LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local /Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water Flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. TC3887591.1 s Page 5 GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS 1.000 State Database 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No Wells Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 2 NCO273409 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 1 NC2000000009826 1/2 - 1 Mile SW OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL HERITAGE ELEMENT OCCURRENCES ID Class NC50011604 Plants NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION GAME LANDS DATABASE Site Name N 030000019 NC30000021 NC30000022 N 030000024 TC3887591.1s Page 6 ' ^/ County Boundary Major Roads ' Contour Lines Power transmissicn lines OO Earthquake epicenter Richter 5 or greater ' ® Water Wells © Public Water Supply Wells i Cluster of Multiple Icons PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 3887591.1s 3 Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas c I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas cv Groundwater Flow Varies at Location Rare & Endangered Species 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone ■ National Wetland Inventory 31TE NAME: Duke Energy - Roxboro CLIENT: SynTerra NDDRESS: 1700 Dunnaway Rd. CONTACT: Richard Jacobs Roxboro NC 27574 INQUIRY #: 3887591.1s AT /LONG: 36.4689 / 79.0743 DATE: March 21, 2014 11:22 am Ccofm9'+I :' 1014 EDR. Inc. -a 2010 Tab Alin Rai. 0712009. GEOCHECK k. - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number 1 SW NC WELLS NC2000000009826 112 - 1 Mile Higher Pwsidentif NCO273431 System nam: WOODLAND ELEM SCHOOL Pws type. NTNC County: PERSON City: ROXBORO Primary so: GW Water type: GW Facility n: WELL #3 Facility a: S03 Latitude m: 36.462214 Longitude : - 79.082685 Availavili: A Well depth: 280 Well dep 1 FT Owner name: PERSON COUNTY SCHOOLS-0273407 Site id: NC2000000009826 2 NNE FRDS PWS NCO273409 112 - 1 Mile Lower Pwsid: NCO273409 Epa region: 04 State NC County: Person Pws name: ROXBORO STEAM PLANT Population Served: 500 Pwssvcconn: 7 PWS Source: Surface—water Pws type: NTNCWS Status: Active Owner type: Private Facility id: 5652 Facility name: TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type: Treatment _plant Treatment process: sedimentation Treatment objective: iron removal Contact name: ROWLAND, CECIL E Original name: ROWLAND, CECIL E Contact phone: 336 -599 -1174 Contact address 1700 DUNNAWAY RD Contact address2 Not Reported Contact city: SEMORA Contact zip: 27343 Facility id: 1176 Facility name: STORAGE—GROUND-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: sludge treatment Treatment objective: iron removal Facility id: 50722 Facility name: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type: Distribution_system_ zone Treatment process: ph adjustment. pre Treatment objective iron removal TC3887591.1s Page 8 GEOCHECKR- - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Facility id: 5652 Facility name: TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type: Treatment_plant Treatment process: Treatment objective iron removal Facility id: 1176 Facility name: STORAGE—GROUND-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 3117 Facility name: STORAGE—HYDRO-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 39228 Facility name: HYCO LAKE Facility type: Intake Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 50722 Facility name: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type: Distribution_system_zone Treatment process: Treatment objective inorganics removal Facility id: 5652 Facility name: TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STbI WTP Facility type: Treatment plant Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 1176 Facility name: STORAGE—GROUND-11 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 3117 Facility name: STORAGE—HYDRO-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective. inorganics removal Facility id: 39228 Facility name HYCO LAKE Facility type: Intake Treatment process Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id 50722 Facility name: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type: Distribution_system_zone Treatment process Treatment objective inorganics removal Facility id: 5652 Facility name TREATMENT PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type: Treatment plant Treatment process Treatment objective inorganics removal ph adjustment, pre coagulation coagulation coagulation coagulation coagulation filtration, pressure sand filtration, pressure sand filtration. pressure sand filtration. pressure sand filtration, pressure sand TC3887591 1s Page 9 GEOCHECK H:- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Facility id 1176 Facility name: STORAGE_GROUND_1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id 3117 Facility name: STORAGE—HYDRO-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 39228 Facility name: HYCO LAKE Facility type: Intake Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 50722 Facility name DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type: Distribution_system_zone Treatment process: Treatment objective inorganics removal Facility id: 5652 Facility name: TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type: Treatment_plant Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 1176 Facility name: STORAGE—GROUND-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 3117 Facility name: STORAGE—HYDRO-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 39228 Facility name: HYCO LAKE Facility type: Intake Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 50722 Facility name: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type: Distribution_system_zone Treatment process: Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 5652 Facility name: TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type: Treatment_plant Treatment process Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 1176 Facility name: STORAGE—GROUND-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process Treatment objective: inorganics removal flocculation flocculation flocculation flocculation flocculation sedimentation sedimentation sedimentation sedimentation sedimentation sludge treatment TC3887591 1s Page 10 GEOCHECK9- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Facility id 3117 Facility name: STORAGE_HYDRO_1 Facility type. Storage Treatment process Treatment objective: inorganics removal Facility id: 50722 Facility name: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type: Distribution_system_zone Treatment process. Treatment objective: manganese removal Facility id: 5652 Facility name: TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type: Treatment plant Treatment process: Treatment objective: manganese removal Facility id: 1176 Facility name: STORAGE—GROUND-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process. Treatment objective: manganese removal Facility id: 3117 Facility name: STORAGE—HYDRO-1 Facility type Storage Treatment process. Treatment objective: manganese removal Facility id 39228 Facility name: HYCO LAKE Facility type: Intake Treatment process: Treatment objective: manganese removal Facility id: 50722 Facility name DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type: Distribubon_system_zone Treatment process Treatment objective manganese removal Facility id: 5652 Facility name TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type: Treatment—Plant Treatment process Treatment objective: manganese removal Facility id. 1176 Facility name STORAGE—GROUND-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: disinfection by- products control Facility id: 3117 Facility name STORAGE—HYDRO-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective disinfection by- products control Facility id 39228 Facility name: HYCO LAKE Facility type: Intake Treatment process Treatment objective. disinfection by- products control sludge treatment sedimentation sedimentation sludge treatment sludge treatment sludge treatment sludge treatment sludge treatment flocculation flocculation flocculation TC38875911s Page 11 GEOCHECK K - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Facility id 50722 Facility name. DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type: Distribution_system_zone Treatment process Treatment objective disinfection by- products control Facility id: 5652 Facility name: TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type: Treatment_plant Treatment process: Treatment objective: disinfection by- products control Facility id: 1176 Facility name: STORAGE_GROUND_1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: disinfection by- products control Facility id: 3117 Facility name: STORAGE—HYDRO-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: Treatment objective: disinfection by- products control Facility id 50722 Facility name: DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type: Distribution_system_zone Treatment process: Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id 5652 Facility name: TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type: Treatment_plant Treatment process: Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id: 1176 Facility name: STORAGE—GROUND-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id: 3117 Facility name: STORAGE—HYDRO-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process Treatment objective organics removal Facility id: 39228 Facility name: HYCO LAKE Facility type Intake Treatment process Treatment objective organics removal Facility id: 50722 Facility name DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type Distribution_system_ zone Treatment process Treatment objective: organics removal Facility id: 50722 Facility name DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Facility type Distribution_system_ zone Treatment process Treatment objective corrosion control Flocculation flocculation sedimentation sedimentation sedimentation sedimentation ph adjustment, pre ph adjustment, pre ph adjustment, pre ph adjustment, pre ph adjustment TC3887591.1 s Page 12 GEOCHECW0- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Facility id: 5652 Facility name. TREATMENT PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP Facility type Treatment_plant Treatment process: ph adjustment Treatment objective: corrosion control Facility id 1176 Facility name STORAGE—GROUND-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process ph adjustment. post Treatment objective: corrosion control Facility id. 3117 Facility name. STORAGE—HYDRO-1 Facility type: Storage Treatment process: ph adjustment, post Treatment objective: corrosion control PWS ID: NCO273409 Date Initiated'. 6405 Date Deactivated: Not Reported PWS Name: ROXBORO STEAM PLANT ROXBORO, NC 27573 Addressee / Facility: System Owner /Responsible Party DR G J OLIVER OR MANAGER NOW PO BOX 1551 - -CPB 3A2 RALEIGH, NC 27602 Addressee / Facility System Owner /Responsible Party CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO PO BOX 1551- -CPB 3A2 RALEIGH, NC 27602 Facility Latitude: 36 28 50 Facility Longitude: 079 04 10 Facility Latitude: 36 23 36 Facility Longitude: 078 58 59 City Served. ROXBORO Treatment Class: Treated Population: 00000250 Violations information not reported ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION: System Name: ROXBORO STEAM PLANT Violation Type MCL, Average Contaminant: DI (2- ETHYLHEXYL) ADIPATE Compliance Period: 1995 -01 -01 - 1995 -03 -31 Violation ID 9541524 Enforcement Date: 1995 -03 -27 Enf, Action: State Formal NOV Issued TC3887591.1s Page 13 - -- - - - -- - - -- ------ - - - - -- -- - - -- - - - - -- - - IL! GEOCHECK k - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Datahaq . FDR ID N mb .r TC3887591.1s Page 14 NC-WILD NC30000019 Site Name: Hyco Owner Carolina Power & Light Site Type Archery Zone Acres: 758.943176269531 Status: PRV County: PERSON NC-WILD NC30000021 Site Name: Hyco Owner: Carolina Power & Light Site Type Archery Zone Acres: 310 483093261719 Status: PRV County: PERSON NC-WILD NC30000022 Site Name Hyco Owner: Carolina Power & Light Site Type: Restricted Firearms Zone Acres: 183.970397949219 Status: PRV County: PERSON NC-WILD NC30000024 Site Name: Hyco Owner: Carolina Power & Light Site Type: Game Land Acres: 558.192077636719 Status: PRV County: PERSON NC_NHEO NC50011604 GISID: 113466 Classification by Type: Plants Occurrence Status: X TC3887591.1s Page 14 GEOCHECKR- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database: NC Radon Radon Test Results Num Results Avg pCi /L Min pCi /L Max pCi /L 2 0.95 0.8 1.1 Federal EPA Radon Zone for PERSON County: 3 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi /L. Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi /L and <= 4 pCi /L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi /L. Federal Area Radon Information for PERSON COUNTY, NC Number of sites tested: 1 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi /L Living Area - 1 st Floor 1.200 pCi /L 100% Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported % 4 -20 pCi /L % >20 pCi /L 0% 0% Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported TC38875911s Page 15 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 75 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24.000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919- 733 -2090 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec. Geology of the Conterminous U S at 1:2,500.000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed ( SSURGO) soil survey maps SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800- 672 -5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360 Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic ( SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management TC3887591.1 s Page A -16 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL 1 REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202 -564 -3750 ' Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data ' Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202 -564 -3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). ' USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and /or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs. and other sources of groundwater. ' STATE RECORDS North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells Source: Department of Environmental Health ' Telephone: 919- 715 -3243 OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION ' NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Telephone: 919- 733 -2090 A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance. ' A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or other important ecological features NC Game Lands Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands ' Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Telephone: 919- 733 -2090 All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting and Fishing Maps. NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Telephone: 919- 733 -2090 A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural . ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites). RADON State Database: NC Radon Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources Telephone: 919- 733 -4984 Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703 - 356 -4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. TC3887591.1s Page A -17 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703 - 356 -4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U S with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 - 457 -6656 Epicenters World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America. Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC3887591.1s Page A -18