20081473 Ver 4_100 feet buffer update_20141016

Merritt, Katie
From:Norton Webster <[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday, October 16, 2014 10:22 AM
To:Merritt, Katie; Cara Conder
Cc:Ely Perry
Subject:RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports
Katie,
Thank you. We will get you a letter requesting the change along with the supporting documentation.
Norton

From: Merritt, Katie \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 10:05 AM
To: Cara Conder; Norton Webster
Cc: Ely Perry
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

Okay, we will need to “back track” a little, because banks are supposed to request & receive approval in writing before
being able to utilize that memo on projects that had their BPDP approved before the memo went out. I’ll need to have a
signed and sealed survey showing the acreage changes. Just like Ezell. It will get approved, so that’s not a problem, we
just have a procedure that I have to follow.

Thanks for your patience,
Katie

From: Cara Conder \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 5:49 PM
To: Merritt, Katie; Norton Webster
Cc: Ely Perry
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

Katie,

Yes, I believe the map has 100 foot buffers and not 50 foot. The project has not been planted yet, but will this fall. Please
let me know if there is anything else you need from EBX.

Thanks,
Cara

From: Merritt, Katie \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 3:29 PM
To: Norton Webster
Cc: Cara Conder
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

No problem. By the way, I noticed Eric put something in my Arrington Bridge file that was titled “100 foot buffers”. Cara
sent this map (see attached). Is this a 100 ft buffer on that stream instead of the approved 50 feet that was described in
the BPDP? If so, I’ll need to figure out how to document this, because there wasn’t any email exchange I can find from
Eric where he accepted that. It’s okay to do that according to Tom’s memo, but there is an approval process we go
1

through to document any changes from what was approved in the BPDP & As-Builts. Banks still have to notify and
receive approval (via a release of course) for adding buffer mitigation in that 51-100 feet. Eric wouldn’t have known any
different, which is why he sent the release letter anyway.

Please let me know if that is what happened. I ask this too, because that will affect how we move forward on the
Addendum for that additional area.

Thanks,
Katie

From: Norton Webster \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 3:21 PM
To: Merritt, Katie
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

Thank you so much for all of your help.
Norton

From: Merritt, Katie \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 3:19 PM
To: Norton Webster
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

Please note, that the email below from me is referencing the Forrest Creek Buffer Bank 2008-0229

From: Merritt, Katie
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:58 PM
To: 'Norton Webster'
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

Norton,
Please provide a signed and sealed survey showing the area proposed as additional buffer credits (square feet of the
additional area please), this is what you would normally provide with your As-Built. This is what we need to verify the
square feet of the area being claimed as mitigation credits. Eric has concurred that the additional areas proposed for
buffer credit are acceptable. However, prior to issuing the credit release, I need a survey. Please see the attached
survey (showing the different zones of the mitigation areas & the area broken out in square feet/acres) that was
submitted by EBX when the same type of request was received for the Ezell Mitigation Bank.

Thanks,
Katie

From: Norton Webster \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 1:47 PM
To: Merritt, Katie
Subject: FW: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

Here is the Forrest Creek information. Below references the date Eric and I went to Forrest Creek.
Thank you.
Norton

From: Tommy Cousins
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 10:32 AM
2

To: Norton Webster
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

Here is what I have on the FC buffer request. This is not on the shared drive so feel free to save it wherever you want.

Thanks,
Tommy

From: Norton Webster
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:42 AM
To: Thom Rinker
Cc: Cara Conder; Matt Fisher; Tommy Cousins
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

th
I am scheduled to take Eric Kulz out to Forest Creek for the additional buffer on Tuesday (Aug 26). I might be able to fit
Ivy-Ferguson into the day if Eric agrees. I will let you know.
Thank you.
Norton

From: Thom Rinker
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:26 AM
To: Norton Webster
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

Thanks Norton

Thom Rinker

From: Norton Webster
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 9:22 PM
To: Thom Rinker
Cc: Cara Conder; Matt Fisher
Subject: RE: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

They should finish Ivy-Ferguson tomorrow. I will check with George in the morning. They are fully aware of
the situation and working as fast as they can to complete it.
Norton

-------- Original message --------
From: Thom Rinker
Date:08/19/2014 5:20 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Norton Webster
Cc: Cara Conder , Matt Fisher
Subject: Carl Lloyd and Ivey-Ferguson monitoring reports

Norton….did you get McAdams moving on the 2014 monitoring reports?....when will they start and finish the field work?

Thom Rinker

3