WQ0011381_Application_20000327

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
MEMORANDUM
TO: rir� G�iy.�et diGC�'�
�di!/C Regional Office
FROM:
SUBJECT: Application for &. Permit Renewal,
New Permit
COMMENTS:
f
Facility Name: �'" ` �Sdrr //' //� r �--'
PermitAmendment
_a
� Fn)
JC1k MAR 2 9 2000 , ,�
,
Cro mdmte- Section 1
t iSi eVli(e Rt111k 011ce-__...-_-`
Repair/Aheration of Fzist Disposal System [DEHJ
County:
Type of Project:C� S/O�u213 CIATs'S
APPLICABLE PERMIT NO.s: WQ ©O&3, "l GW 000
DEH
EPA (CONST. GRANTS)
A to C
UIC
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE (1) copy of the referenced permit application. A copy of the
application should have been sent to your Regional Water Quality Supervisor, so please use that copy for
your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED IN THE REGIONAL OFFICE, PLEASE LET NE KNOW.
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE (1) copy of the referenced permit application. A copy of the
application should have been sent to , DEH's Regional Soil Specialist, so please use
that copy for your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED IN THE REGIONAL OFFICE, PLEASE
/LET NM KNOW.
The Groundwater Section received two (2) copies of the referenced permit application. One copy of the application
documents we received is attached.
Please review the applicati n materials for completeness. If you feel additional information is necessary, please let
me know no later than /,. • %® mid a A copy of any formal request for additional information will be
forwarded to you.
If you do not need any additional information to complete your review, please provide your final comments by
?.mod d If you request and/or receive additional information, your final comments are due no
lat than 14 days after you receive the additional information.
\6-98TRAN.SHL (rev. 6/22/98)

OFFIC9.RS: CITY OF HENDEASONViLLE CRY COUNCIL:
Fred H. Niehoff, Jr. BARBARA VoLK
Mayor "The City of Four Seasons"
T. LEE O$BORNE, JR.
T. Lee Osborne Jr.
Mayor Pro -Tern WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT
Chris A. Carter MARY Jo PADGM
City Manager Ezra Allman, Director
Tammie K. Drake LoNDAMuRRAY
City Clerk
March 8, 2000
Mr. Kim.H. Colson
NC DENR/Water Quality Section
Permits and Engineering Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617Q
Subject: Renewal of Residuals Permit WQ0011381 ��%�UN
HENDERSONVILLE WWTP
HENDERSON County po����0
Dear -Mr. C11
1
s7:
Attached herein.is.an.app_lication for -the purpose of renewal of the residuals permit
referenced above. The subject permit expires on July 31, 2000. The permit is for distribution of
clacc-A_ al.
The City is currently op-erating^under an :SOC;with construction. of new expanded.facilitiies
in progress and scheduled for completion in the spring of 2002.' Improved and. expanded sludge
handling_facilities are part of the upgrade/expansin.
Since August of 1998 the City has been disposing of residuals at an approved landfill in
South Carolina. The City will most likely. continue to dispose of excess residuals in this.manner
until our new facility is completed. The new design will incorporate the same pathogen and
vector reduction methods of. sludge treatment technologX. Narrative excerpts from the 201 study
detailing existing sludge handling conditions and'nlafketability statements as well as the design..
notes.for the. new sludge management .facilities is attached. We have enclosed and utilized the
most recent (1998) data from production of class -A material and the EPA and NC reports for that
period are. attached. Also enclosed. is a. waste generator's waste. profile sheet and TCLP for the
material being disposed of by. landfill and for class -A residuals as well as calculations of PAN and
AWRAR (AWSAR).from the most recent production of class -A residuals. Also enclosed is an
information sheet distributed to a person receiving the processed class -A material.
The City of Hendersonville needs to renew this permit at this time with an increase of dry
tons per year permitted to approximately 1500 dry tons per year: This would be necessary to
cover the facility. during the last. 3.years of the permit cycle in the. new facility.
318 Fourth Avenue East P.O. Box 1760 Phone: [phone]
Hendersonville, NC 28792 Hendersonville, NC 28793 Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail] www.cityofhendersonviUe.org

f The City of Hendersonville appreciates your time and assistance in this permit renewal,
and should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact
me at. (UR$ 697-3063.
Respectfully,
��Allman
Duector of Water.& Sewer Utilities
City. of Hendersonville
cc: file
enclosures-

,JLdLC 01 :NVLLIt �nlv,,••u
Departme; of Environment, Health and -'natural Resources
Division of Environmental M;____igement ''AA--
t 1VUr1-1JlsulimuC I'Cllflll HpPllCdtlUn t'Oirri �Yq
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL),nt
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLID
$ cO
This application is intended for facilities which are to be regulated underR�Pt�c 04
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. :Applicants iame (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, etc.):
9
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE
2. Print owners or signing official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
EZRA ALLMAN/DTBECTOR OF WATER &SEWER UTILITIES
3. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1760
City:
HENDERSONVILLE State: .NORTH CAROLINA Zip: 28793
Telephone Number: ( 828 ) 697 3063 fax—[phone]
4. Application Date: March 8, 2000
5. Fee Submitted: S NO FEE
[The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).1
6. Specify how these residuals will be distributed: XX sold or giver away in bags or other containers: lawn (bull:);
home garden (bulk); _ other,
7. If the alternative for residual disposal consists of "surface disposal" as defined under 40 CFR Part 503, please complete th
application* titled "SURFACE DISPOSAL: OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS. Please identify if there is any storage of residuals i
a surface impoundment or disposal thru landfilling. Explain:
N/A
S. Is the residual process facility also the generator? XX Yes; . No
9. Latitude: 350 21 ' 10 Longitude: 8 2 0 .2 7 1 54 of residual process facility
10. Specify whether the process facility is owned by: federal; private; state; XX local government;
11. County where facility is located: HENDERSON
II. PERMIT IINFORMATION:
i. Application No. (will be completed by DIDfi):
2. Specify whether project is: new; XX— renewal*; modification :ma Si nature and Seal not required f,
For renewals, complete all sections included in the application. Engineeg
renewals or if there is not any construction involved with the subject prof,
3. If this application is being submitw-d � a result of a renewal or tcYjncation to an existing permit, list the existing Peru
number WQ 0 0113 t31 and itc ;c—C date AUG 9, 1995
1 of 8
Pa
FORM: DRS 06/9Page

III. FACILITY INFORMATI (attach additional pages for additioi. sources of resialluals):t
es=? :ls are ge: cr�t^�? crYrepa d: CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE� WWTP
- --
2. Facility permit number:NPDES NC0025�fa&litypermit holder: CITY OF HENDERSONVIILLE
3. Specify whether facility in Section III.1 is owned by: federal; ' private; state; XX local Rove. gin;
4. Specify'facihty design flow: 3 • 2 mgd; facility average daily flow: 2.8
mad;
..,,,Type of residual storage: RANT nRVTtar RRTIs
Volume of residual storage: 30,800 s q. f t.
Length of residuals storage at facility: 18 0 d a ydays (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units tbt
are separate from treatment system, i.e. not in clarifiers, aeration basins, etc.);
Estimated volume of residuals: 800 (dry tonslyr.);
5. If the residual process facility is not the same as the generator, please specify delivery frequency and quantity of residua;
be processed: N/A
6. Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): M r . Vince Edwards (0 R C )
7. Facility contact's telephone number. ( 828 )-
6 9 7— 3 0 7 7
fax (8 2 8)
6 9 6— 0 8 0 3
8. Location oftreatment facility: SfJoBth. Carol iria
State; i`' :r:-Hefldersono
County
9. Mailing address: Renr3Prs;nnvi 1 1 P Water & Sewer Dept
P.O. Box 1760, Hendersonville, NC 28793
10. Specify the source of the residuals: X_ treatment of domestic wastewater, treatment of industrial wastewater;
other (explain):
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Pro
and complete details of the entire process.
11. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program? Xy Yes, No.
This includes facilities which are classified as a "Class I" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified_ as "Cl.
I" by the appropriate federal or State authority)
IV. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Hazardous. Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified bel(
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribute:
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sourc:.
a.. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? Yes; ,yy No. If Y:
list the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.21-261.24? Yes; —XX IN
Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, IRnitabDity, a;.
Corrosivity for each residual
N
FORM: DRS 06/94 Page 2 of 8

�z-haracteristic
jile: If the followi.__ ::onstituent levels (as determined by the Toxic, Leaching
Procedure Analyses) are
exceeded in the residuals or if the
pH of the residual
is not within the range listed below, the residual is by
definition a Hazardous waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
PPM
P- M
Arsenic'
5.0
Barium
100.0
Benzene _ _
0.5
Cadmium
1.0
Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
Chlordane
0.03
Chlorobenzene
100.0
Chloroform
6.0
Chromium
5.0
o-Cresol
200.0
m-Cresol -•
200.0
p-Cresol
200.0
Cresol
200.0
2,4-D
10.0
.1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
24-Diniteotoldene
0.13
Endrin
0.02
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide)
0.008
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
Hexachloroethane
3.0
Lead
5.0
Lindane
0.4
Mercury
0.2
Methoxychlor
10.0
Methyl ethyl ketone
200.0
Nitrobenzene
2.0
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
Pyridine
5:0
Selenium
1.0
Silver
5.0
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
Toxaphene
0.5
Trichloroethylene
0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
Vinyl chloride
0.2
pH (2:1 volJwt.): . >2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS
MEET
THE DEFINITIONS OF A
HAZARDOUS WASTE
AS NOTED IN EITHER "A"
OR "B"
ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOI
THAT MATERIAL AND
IT SHOULD NOT BE ' INCLUDED
AS PART OF THI:
APPLICATION.
2. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material: This analysis must be comprehensive enoug'
to completely characterize the residual. and. -Must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If th
facility that will -generate the residual is not yet in operation, .the characterization must be based on similar existin.
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameter
and any other known and suspected contaminants that are tributary to the system:
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Calcium
Phosphorus
Cadmium
Nickel
Magnesium
Potassium
Chromium
Selenium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium
Copper
Zinc
% Total Solids
TKI�l
Lead
Aluminum
pH
Mercury'
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation)
FORM: - DRS 06194 Page 3 of 8 -

IA
3. Wastewater residuals ca. A be sold or given away if concentration o_ �; C Y y pollutant -in the residuals exceeds the ceilir
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of.these residuals (attach lab analysis):
Pollutant
Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis
Pollutant Concentration (mg/l:g)
DryWeieht Basis
Arsenic
75
Cadmium
- 85 -
< -
Chromium
3000
32.5
Copper
4300
50.7
Lead
840
58.0
Mercur •
57
< 0.8
Molybdenum
75
3.5
Nickel
420
16.0
Selenium
100
11.0
Zinc
7500
146.9
4. Provide, all applicable pilot studies and any bench scale tests performed on each residual source and the results, includi:
the approximate fertilizer equivalent N/A
5. Wastewater residuals can't be sold or given away in bags or other containers for application to the land unless one of
following options is satisfied.
—Specify either A or B. Please be advised, if the residuals are. to be sold or given away in bulk for application
lawn or home garden then Option A is the only option.
A The pollutant concentration of the residuals must be less than Pollutant Monthly Average Concer -ic
listed in the table below.
Pollutant
Monthly Average Concentrations
Dry Weight Basis (mg/kg)
Pollutant Concentration
Dry Weight Basis (mJk )
Arsenic
41
.
Cadmium
- 39
1.7
Chromium
1200
32.5
Copper
1500
50.7
Lead
300
58.0
Mercury
17
< 0.8
Nickel
420
16.0
Selenium
36
11.0
Zinc
2800
146.9
B . The product of the concentration of each pollutant in the residual and the annual whole residual applicati _
rate for the residual shall not cause the Annual Pollutant Loading Rate to be. exceeded.
In order for the Annual Whole Residual Application Rate (AWRAR) to be calculated the Annual Pollutes
Loading Rate (APLR) is divided by the pollutant concentration (PC) times 0.001 (a conversion factor)
follows:
AWRAR _. .
0.001
FORM: DRS 06194 Paae 4 of 8 -

Pollutant
Pollutant
Concentration
Dry Weight Basis
P; al Pollutant
Loading Rates
(APLR)
kJhectare
Annual Whole Residual
Application. Rate
(AWRAR)
ke/hectare
Arsenic
7.72.0
2 59.7
Cadmium
1.7
1.9
< 11.17 •6
Chromium
32.5
150
4615.4
Copper
50.7
75
1479.3
Lead
58..0
15
258.6
Mercury
< 0.8
0.85
41062.5
Nickel
16.0
21
1312.5
Selenium
11.0
5.0
454.5
Zinc
146.9
140
953.0
The AWRAR for the residual is the lowest AWRAR calculated. This is the maximum rate at which the
subject residual can be applied (to convert kg/hectare to lbs/acre multiply by 0.8924). Please specify
kg/hectare or lbs/acre:
AWRAR = 258.6 mtons/hec (230.7 lbs/acre)
V . PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION INFORMATION (attach additional pages for
additional sources of residuals):
1. In order for the residuals to be Class A, in accordance with the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32(a), either Part a or
Part b aad one of the options in Part c must be completed .(please.submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
XX a. A Fecal coIiform density less than 1000 Most Probable VNumber per gram of total dry solids, or
XX <1 MPN/1g DWS.
b. A Salmonella sp. density less than 3 Most Probable Number per 4 grams of total dry solids.
2 43 MPN/4g DWS
c. In addition to Part a cW Part b being met, one of the following alternatives must also be completed. Please
specify 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g or 6 below being met:
1. time/temperature - an increased residuals temperature should be maintained for a prescribed period of time, in
accordance with .the following guidelines. The results (D) shall be the amount of time, in days, that the residuals
shall remain at the given temperature:
Time anti Temnerahire C;nirlelinec
Total Solids
Tem ra[ure (t)
?viinimum Time
Equkion
Notes
No heating of small
> or = 7%
> or = 500 C
> or = 20 minutes
D=131.7�,10, 00
particles by warmed
100.14 t
gases or immiscible
liquid.
> or = 7%
> or = 500 C
> or =15 seconds
D=131,700,000
Small particles heated by
100.14 t
warmed gases or
immiscible liquid.
< 7%
> or = 500 C
> or =15 seconds
D=131,700,000
to
100.14 t
< 30 minutes
< 7%
> or =Soo C
>or = 30 minutes
D = 50,070.000
100.14 t
FORM: DRS 06/94 Paue 5 of 8

2. alkaline treatment - the pH of the residuals is raised to greater tha- '2 for at least 72 hours. During thisN72bc
temperature of ; tsiduals should be. greater than 520 C for s. ,ast 12 hours. In addiuo0after th
period, the residuals are to be air dried to at least 50% total solids.
prior testing for Enteric Viru sfViable Helm in Lh (ova - the residuals are analyzed for,the presence of enteric virus
(Plaque -forming units) [pfu] and viable hehninth ova: If the residuals are analyzed before the -pathogen r "d.
process and found to have densities of enteric virus <l pfu/4 grams of total solids and viable helminth ova <1/-
total solids, the -residuals are_Class_.A.with respect -to enteric virus and viable helminth ova until the ne
monitoring episode. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction process and found to have densiu
of enteric virus > or = l pfu/4 g total solids or viable helminth ova > or = 1/4 g total solids, and tested again af;
processing and found to meet the enteric virus and viable helminth ova levels listed under "4" below, then t
processed -residuals will be Class A with respect to enteric viruses and viable helminth ova when the operas;-
parameters for the pathogen reduction process are.monitored and shown to be consistent with the values or rants
of values documented.
4. no prior testing for Enteric VialsNiable. Helminth (ova - if the residuals are not analyzed before pathogen reducd
processing for enteric viruses and viable hehitinth ova, the density of enteric viruses must be less than 1 pfu/4 g
total dry'solids and the density of viable helminth ova must be less than 1/4 g of total dry solids, or the residua
must be treated by a "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" or a "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" equival=
process.
5.' The "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP) are described as follows:
a. Compostina -using either the within -vessel or static aerated pile composting methods, the temperature of t
residuals are raised to 550 C or higher.for three days. Using the windrow composting method, the residuals
raised to 550 C or higher for fifteen days. During the high temperature period, there will be a minimum of f
turnings of the windrow.
b. Heat Drvng - residuals are dried by.direct or indirect contact with hot gases to reduce the moisture content
the residuals to :10% or lower. Either the temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals exceeds 800 C
the wet bulb temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals, when the residuals leave the dryer, P- ,Ae
80o C.
c. Heat Treatment - liquid residuals are heated to a temperature of 1800 C or higher for thirty minutes.
d. Thermophilic-Aerobic Digestion - liquid residuals are agitated with -air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditic:
at residence times of ten days at temperatures of 550 C to 600 C.
e. Beta Rav Irradiation residuals are irradiated with beta rays from -an accelerator at dosages of at least 1
megarad at room temperature (ca. 200 Q. y
f. Gamma Ray Irradiation - residuals are irradiated with gamma rays from certain isotopes such as 60Co an
1-37Ce, at dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature (ca. 200 Q.
g. Pasteurization - the temperature of the residuals is.maintained at 700 C or higher for at least thirty minutes.
6. The residuals shall be.treated in a process that is equivalent to a "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRF
as determined by the permitting authority based on evaluations of the recommendations. provided by the Pathog,.
Equivalency Committee.
2. When residuals are to be sold or given away, one of the following vector attraction reduction requirements (a, b, c, d, e,
g, or h) described below must be met.
f Specify the letter of the vector attraction reduction requirement that has been met (submit lab results, test results ar
calculations). Any variation of the below must be described in full detail -and attached.
a. Aerobic or Anaerobic Digestion - The mass of volatile solids are reduced by at least 38%. Volatile solids reduction
measured between the residuals, prior to stabilization, and the residuals ready for use or disposal. This criterion shou.
be readily met by properly designed and operated anaerobic digestors, but not as readily met by aerobic digestor.
Treatment facilities with aerobic digestors may need to meet the vector attraction reduction requirement through? oc :
19d.
FORM1: DRS 06194 Page 6 of 8

b. Anaernhic J ?Il - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannr-`+e. achieved, vector attraction reduction can 1
demonstrated r.y .,,ether digesting a portion of the previously di2'. A residuals in a bench scale unit for an addition
40 days at 3"' C to 371 C. If, at the end of the 40 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than 17%, vect
attraction reductoon is achieved.
c. Aerohic Dipe�: inn - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be demonstrat!
by further dig=sting a portion of the previously digested residuals that have a solids content of 2% or less in a bens
scale unit for Ln additional 30 days at 20° C. If, at the end of the 30 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less the
15%, vector armcdogreduction is kchi: ved.
ti Aerobic Di#atinn - The specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) shallbe equal to or less than 1.5 milligrams of oxygg
per hour per --am of total dry solids at 200 C.
e. Aerobic Proct4�ses - The temperature of the residuals for at least 14 days shall be greater than 401 C. During this tirr.
the aver ge temperature shall be greater than 450 C.
f. Alkabne Stabilization - The pH of the residuals is raised to 12 or higher by alkali addition and, without the addition
more alkali, retrains at 12 or higher for 2 hours and then at 11.5 or higher for an additional 22 hours.
g. DUin; (stabilized solids) - The total solids of residuals that do not contain unstabilized solids, and which are general
in a primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 75%. Blending with other materials is r.
allowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
h. allin; ( costa-�lized solids) - The total solids of residuals that contains unstabilized solids, and which are generated n
primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 90%. Blending with other materials is r.
allowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
VI. GENERAL INFORtiiATION:
1. Please provide a brief narrative concerning materials handling, including the following:
a. How will the materials will be handled and transported from where the residuals were produced to where it will be
treated?
b. Where will th,- residuals be stored until processed?
c. How will leach to collection be handled?
d What will be *the duration of treatment?
e. )Vhere will the fnal product be stored?
f. How long will the final product be stored before being distributed? .
g. How will the final product be distributed (packaging)?
2. Please attach a marketability statement detailing destinations and approximate amounts of the final product to
distributed.
3. Please provide either a label which shall be affixed to the bagged processed residual or an information sheet which shall
provided to the person who receives the processed residual. The label or information sheet shall contain, at a minimum, i
following information:
a. The name and address of the person who prepared the residual that is sold or given away in a bag or other container fc
application to the land.
b. A statement thlu application of the residual to the land is prohibited except in accordance with the instructions on the
label or information sheet.
c. A statement that the residuals shall not be applied to any site that is flooded, frozen or snow-covered.
d A statement that adequate procedures shall 17e provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any disposed or stored
residuals into any surface waters.
e. Information on all applicable buffers including a 10 foot buffer. between application site and any public or private wat
supply source ;including wells) and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way.
f. The Annual Whole Residual Application Rate (AWRAR) for the residual that does not cause any of the annual
pollutant loading rates to be exceeded (if necessary).
FORTM: DRS 06,94 Pagel of 8 -

Name and Complete Address of Efi, .;:eying Fi.-m:
City: _
Telephone Dumber: ( }
Professional Engineer's Certification:
I,
S tate:
attest that this application for
d R
Zip:
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowle
the proposed design has. been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of Llis subm:
package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I h:
reviewed this material and have"judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Enuineer's Seal, Signature; and Date:
Applicant's Certification:
attest that this application for renewal of perinif,
nbr. WQ0011381 for Distribution of Class A Wastewater Residuals
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my .knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of t
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application pack:
will be returned to me as incomplete.
. n _ A
Signature
Date 3 ^ �-av" CK
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE; INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTLNG INFORMATION AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS. AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOA: 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) "733-5083
FORM: DRS 06194 Paac 8 of 8

jtirN 1
KY : At- I ti;
n- I I -tin i i : -isam�
! `.l 1 (, (4 q- (p
I4-j(o4 SJ'—
GENERATOR'S WASTE PROFILE SHEET
Service Agreement o ile? []YES
PLEASE PRINT IN INK OR TYPE
ONO Profile Number: WMICF
3 84
Nazardous oii-Ilazardous
OTSCA
Ree icwul Date:
1.
Generatui Name: 4vv
2.
SIC Code:
3.
Facility Street Address:
�{> , ,8 .� I LA.
Phone. 7" 4 .7 -
5.
recility City:
tv; /t 6.
State/Province.
7.
Code:
3 B.
Generator USEPA/Federal ID #:
9.
County:
Coy::
10.
State/Province ID #:
11.
Customer Name:
- 12.
Customer Phone: yTel—I 7Vme7as
13.
Customer Contact:
/ ;> 14,
Customer Fax:I$.
Billing Address
above
1.
Description
a. Namo of Waste:
µ
b. Process Generating Waste:
d. Strong odor 1 e. Physical state @ 70°F f. Layers g. Free Liquid range
_ i (riwsmb I ❑Solid ❑Li Id ❑,"single Layor iu °14
I []Gas Judge Multi -layer
❑Other h. uh. Rauue
1. Liquid Flash Point: ❑<f3"F 073-99OF 0100-139OF ❑140-199°F p-- 200-F ENei a lica'
Chemical Composition Chit aU [anst Wenis includi ha eneapf -
�• � ( I np by lugarl{Ca, debris, end UHC'tJ Drawrrt in any ca11ce1Yra0on and submit
mp.eeentaove anatysis).
Constitue s _ .
Ge ��7_
Concentration Range.
Constituents
Concentration Range
asp.����.�.i.�wiaa��naullCa►*IN2rlaliwlllLRY�1:7�\�lgal��+� .
is [:]Oxidizer ❑Pyrophoric ❑F-xploslvc ❑Radioactive
[]Carcinogen DlnfecUous []Shock Sensitive !]Water Reactive
I. Does the waste represented by this tlrnfiiP contain any of the carcinogens which require OSHA
notification? (list in Section BAJ).............................................................................
.,..------------- ----------- .
m. Does the waste represented by this profile contain dioxins? .(list in Section B.1 J)........... .
n. Does the waste represented by this profile contain asbestos?................................................................
Ifyes........................................................................................................... ❑friable Anon -friable
o. Does the waste represented by this profile contain benzene?................................................................
If yes, concentration ppm
Is the waste subject tote benzene waste operations NESHAP?................
p. Is the waste subject to RCRA Subpart CC controls?................................................................................
it yes, volatile organic concentration ppmw
q. Does the waste contain any Class I or Class 11 ozone -depleting substances? ........................................
r. Duty* Vic waste contain debris? (list In Section B.1.1)...................................--..........................................
2. Quantity of Waste
Estimated Annual Volume .0 ©tons ❑Yards ❑Drums ❑Other (specify)
❑YES
❑YES C O
❑YES
[]YES E3KO
❑YES 6��9
❑YES C3fa0
❑YES Qo
(:DYESO
3. Shipping Information
a. Packaging:
E3K1ilk Snlid: Type/Size: a/,�d T ❑gulk Liquid; Type/Sire:
❑Drum; Type; Size: [jbther:
h Shipping Frequency: Units Per: onth ❑Quartor ❑Year f,]One time ❑Other
c. is this a U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Hazardous Material? (If no, skip d, e, and 0......... pYES O
Form Y1MI-4153

JJf SU `iti 14 Qi: INO.US�
_- UJ
O6Ptr a ,
GONERATOIR'S WAbrL VXMILE$HELT r`
PLEME PRINT IN INK OK TYPE CC- si—t�}
0. Repo duke Quarlydity pbs.: yga.); _ Q, HLnrd DlasidiD >M, a
f. USOOT Bhloohi; Name.
p. 11M40nal erviective Eglllai/rl�ry bqu tomortfl: — _
h. TraneportadTranplw 61nuerr
1. 1* Ihts l► JM13A ha44rrivus wash (40 GFR P,rt i01)? If Me kfuwtf 11 M atop to 2..•............. -- ..................
❑YEt3
a lr t, Ide ALL VOSPA Vetod p^
ys 4tilY $ writ rwrttDafi (0, r, ?{, t', V)
b, 11 ti Chst—k4 astdOU1 Wattildo Vn aVng harardot,s ewnt(it� J
(t!t•lL•s) oPW (i yes lest in 6eetien a.1.0.... ... ........................... .............................. Ong o�
a. 0081 thle MM f>0111 06t1197 (ii VIC flat tn'nd typt 16 Cl*mitAt
t7ompatlUtrr.a.t.y
................._..._,.,,.,........,,,,,,....,,.......... .... ....... ................ _................. ❑YES pf(o
LIt WF-4 state hsxsrd" ars.ln7 _... ... ...................................................
��•� " ...... ...........
DYES
l6did ry ALL state hazardous waste wda
�. to the we" horn • tsf_ItCLA (46 GFft ti02, App"k tat rr stela rrtsitaatet! alnettp'............................................
riYEE Mt
If yu, 1W100 ur III order or ooun Q'ciX tN1 goi,mt slip c4"N Vp
aot)vdN. For afati tnamistad c4an4rp. provide raliwom lrneunvh%tlon.
i. 15 1 4 VMM# Op"OW by this waste profile attest wrttoln radiuctive fnrrtertat, or It dig)> alai
r*§WW*4 y tt►s „vier fteytAafOf�r GcurrglsironT•,•.,..,....._..._............_....._..._..
...,..,. ,...._..._... ......... ...........
Oyes o
5 Does the wraetf Maresaated by 0" Wasik proA16 eltoal o'%win mnwnrratlors a( Pclyo(tbr V*d
Won& (POM) OQUletad by A CFR Tdt7 (M.yaa, flettn CtgMrAl 00,"p sfthn• C.1,)j...,:.
�
........................ ,,,,..,,-„.,ram
a. if were the OM MpedW We ttw u.8.?_.
[arF$ Vrta
yet, „........................... .......:.............. .................. >�YlzE Q
o, do Ihs waste prcllle shmd#nd ail PhIlOrNMs contain true sn0 a oauate domiptiont Pf (hit haste
material. and hat sh relevant infantsHan w+ale Ow p"4**j:an of the Ow,*aw rogMrdany known cx
swpualbd but?" pefteiming to the wseN rNn iiaaaaad lu Ulu Aurnr'Rvtt . __... ...,
DYES ONO
tmlt su ctfenQte tstllerl 04o1rr (a tits phscsc,(1r 1?f tM WIf b taus MAMI 'sd by the Gstwr4 r srW dltetosad
_-- _•bthsCortbaaiortx4rteprovidirrp!►MwastatoftC011kadw1.,,,.......... „,,. ..... E(6 ONO
pGhnek here if a C:"5wtf! of P449 lrltittrt or Rlapaaal Ili nwtd,enV,
My sample submKisel It ftPrkseht4*A ate defined to 40 eftl!181 - ApPkrtarx t or oy u*q sn equwaMrt Method, t auumize VOAl to abtalrt a
titl(tlPNtrv+ttt,lrtywelts ihlpmenttOrpUr t ot'rea tl0h. If!*cectiCoitivn 11 wilds by a! broker, UA und&Wgrtad ibr4 At-strthortzsd
apfCV th1 jonerstor drt4 hMi ooftjrtrad bits t'tformatloh s hied tri Ihl. pytAls SMatlftm Ihto'matlon rxtw+dad tw the comaratar and "Monai
lrft nkalrx. att fl hart MtsMUnrd (o tn. naa appy noasaelSfy It spptovw for moPfQerMrit CuntrA4tVr Nov till Vitt iwoesearV pttrmrz old
Names 101 bt% waari tlslRt hes been MAe tied and 66MNW by that "rand protrN,
Cerltticauon uiVi anulle: Titlo: of,
Nar w (Type orPMI)-. Company Nerne: pgte:
pc aQato0rta11 an Qmvt<on 1= a<ttttofll+d. � trl; t[Ie ft � palpe! � f
-"Q1laisrdoua EUVtkarliv LDOtiter (SLAW ) — —
Z. I'MOt9d UI (Mft Malnlemer4 Fid(V. +
3. Preoautlom, fip.e" 1 l"inq Pro0b+.yms, o an p-Oval;
A. W1116 -f—Orftr . 0 5.era
S";i l Fin.Qeolek+rt....................................................................................... •- �x�provid �t"`i�'iippte4oe .................
SatsaAarftr3tt'It SiQnitUfr'•: Dad;.
MiAlen Anpremal Signature (QpUan>zt): " ') Dairy; '
SDaCial IIVa>ne Aacrnvals Perim 918"furs-,faitY tV .-1 n.f.,. /C. 77.. Z."n"�'P'
rum wau+nu

ti� jnEt4
2.
—....
.. a
tUi0a
T4=:7Q4s@�=
FaK.744$75=9p�
June 17, 1998
RECEIVED
AIN 2 3.'
E' Q T W
Mr.. Scott Chovan
.
Hendersonville, City of
P. 0: Box 1760
Hendersonville, NC 28793
RE: PACE Project No. A80520.526
Client Reference: Hendersonville
WWTP `}
Dear Mr. Chovan:
-%
-
Enclosed is the report of laboratory
analyses for samples receimed.:; ,
-
May 22'. 1998.
°: r •.
Footnotes are given at the end of the
report:
I-f. you have an greport,:
y questions concerning
r ,:.: -:�•
this please feel:free:.`-
tocontact . us .
Sincerely,
•`r .x
Charlie Billings
;
Project .Manager
c:Yr'
:,.4A �rato Certification IpS
of .,2 . Y NALYSIS
x4c°p:we( : 3n REPORT' OF LABORATOR �4 . :.:
_.'... .: 99006 Ttii� ren...F e{»�� nw/ I.e J..��J ._.�.•

Face -41YUM Services. Inc
9800 10ncey-AVQnue,su11e 100
.Pace Analyficar HunteiS46',* NC'28078
T 1704-
eL - .875-9092
Hendersonville trit nF1 1 17 loan . Fax [phone]-
Hendersonville
P. 0. Box'1760
Hendersonville, NC 28793
Attn: Mr. Scott Chovan
PACE Project Number: A80520526'1';'.`
Client Reference: Hendersonville WWTP
PACE Sampl-e Number:
93 0569153'
Date Collected:
05/19/98
Date Received:
05/22/98
Client Sample ID:
Sludge
'ANALYZED`:
Parameter
Units
PRL
Leach—
METHOD. DATE
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP RCRA TOXICITY METALS
6010A
Arsenic
mg/L
0.005
ND
06/0
Barium w
mg/L-
0.010
1.5
-Cadmium
mg/L
0.010
ND
0 6_16.
Chromium
mg/L
0.010
ND
W01110
Lead..mg/L
10
ND
/'d
Metcury
mg/L
0.0002
-ND
-06/.02.*`/Zq.8I,4?
Selenium-
mg/L
0'..005
ND
Silver
mg/L
.0.050
ND
061011
.35
ORGANIC,ANALYSIS
A
TCLP* VOLATILES.
8260
Benzene
mg-/L
-0.05
ND
06/03-1.9'
2-Butanone(MEK)
mg/L
20
9D
-79 0 103
Carbon Tetrachloride
mg/L:
0.05
ND
Chl-6robenzene
-10
ND
06/0 -3 .1-98...e
Chloroform,
Mg./ L
0...60'
ND
06103
1, 2-Di chl oroethane
mg/L
0_05-
NO
1,1-Dichloroethene
-.mq /L
0.07
ND
06'
'
Tetrachl6roethene
mg/L
0 -'07.
ND
0
Trichloroethene-
-6.05
ND
Chloroethen'e- (Vinyl chloride)
mg/t
0.02-
ND
0603i...
TCLP BASE/NEUTRAL & ACID EXTRACTABLES
8270
Pyridine.
mg/L
0.50
ND
1,4 Dichlorobenzene
mg/L
�0.75
ND
06 A.
'
.1 2-Cresol
mg/L
20
ND
061Z
Hexachloroethane
ifig/L
0.30
ND
Wt.
1,3.& 1,4-Cresol
mg/L
20
ND
Nitrobenzene
mg/t
0.20
ND'
06/13/. 6'
LAboratory Certification IDS
f4c WasteWater* 12
NC Ddmmng Water M06 REPORT Of LABORATORYANALYSIS
w
ell -
990w

Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 2
Client Reference: Hendersonville WWTP
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP BASE/NEUTRAL & ACID EXTRACTABLES
Hexachlorobutadiene
2,4,.6-T.richlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachlorobenzene-
Pentachl orophenol
Surrogate - .2-Fluorophendl
Surrogate— Phenol-d5
Surrogate _ Nitrobenzene-6
Surrogate - 24luorobiphenyl
Surrogate - 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Surrogate - Terphenyl-d14
Date Extracted
TCLP PESTICIDES
Chlordane
Endr. i n
Heptachlor.
Heptachlor Epoxide
gamma-BMC-(Lindane)
MAhoxychl or
Toxaphene
Date Extracted, Pesticides:.& PCBs
TCLP HERBICIDES
2, 4-D - =
2,4,5-TP(Silvex)
Date Extracted
Aborato Cerlification ID
NC Wastewater.• - 12
.SIC Qr "g Water 37706
SC 99006
Pace AnalyliGal
9800 Kinsey gyei
Huntersv
Inc.;
1,
078 •.-ii
Tel: 704-875=9092
Fax:-704-875-9091*
June 17, 1998
PACE Project Number: A80520526.
93 0569153
05/19/98
05/22/98
Sludge
Units PRL Leachate METHOD
(1)
8270
mg/L
0,05
ND
mg/L
0.26
ND
mg/L
40
ND
mg/L
0.013
ND
mg/L
0.013.
ND
mg/L
10
ND
38-
%
30
%
76
%
69
%
96
%
96
Date
060498
8080
mg/L
0.003:
ND
mg/L
0.002
ND
mg/L
0.0008
ND
mg/L
0:0008
ND
mg/L
0.04
ND
mg/L
1.0
ND
mg/L
0.05 ND
Date
060198
mg/L
1.0 ND`'
mg/L
0.10 'ND
Date
060498
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be. reproduced, except in full..
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services Inr_
8150
DATE.ANALYZED.
06/13�
'06/I3';�8
08
-06/13%9$::
06 ' 3-
06/13[98`
06%13/0
06%13i��$:K
06/1.3 9$
0.6/13/.98
06/04./90
06 jo��r
06`0_;$
06' .09 .
o6%os�f�ss
06/01/9$:
06/10.98.
06/03/998'
Lg_boraTory Cerfificatlon lD��=`
:..
170 US
T 4
A
VA DtW.dng WBtef µ

OFFICERS
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE
COMMISSIONERS
Fred H. Niehoff, Jr.
"The City of Four Seasons"
T. Lee Osborne, Jr.
Mayor
T. Lee Osborne
Mary Jo Padgett
Mayor Pro-Tem
WATER AND SAVER DEPARTMENT
Chris A. Carter
Ezra Allman, Director
Barham Volk
City Manager
Tammie K. Drake
J. Crit Harley
City Clerk
9
January 21, 1999
FILE . C UU Y
TO:
Hector Danois
Clean Water Act Enforeement `Section
Water Programs Enfbfo ient,Branch
Water Management Division }
U.S. EPA Region 4 ;;.
61 ForsythStreet, SSW
Atlan`'GA 30303=3104
RE:
AnnuahSludge 503� eport
H�ndei-sonvllle� - ',
O Bdkd760, Hen ersonville, NC 28793°
telephone -4-697-3063 - x ' } . `="
MDES W.00025534', - i r :
, _
Henderson County; i�fortl Catolink
Dear Mrf, Danois.
In` accordance`with tt a reportangyre4uirea64i s FR 503,{�le�se find enclosed the
of-40'
503 report for the 1998 calendar yearYfor the facihiy refersncedtabove.
_} f ;
This facihty holds a land apg)icsattQn gerizilt` etmleWbr WQQ.0T1381);with the- State .of
North Carolu><a`issued`u1 August�1995 $,Tlie>4e wwasta py.4i &formed under this Permit during
1098. The analytical data andlnformatloiicontaaned in tliis.reg'Qri ar(�,­foi activities related to this
Permit.. -
..
The existing.3.2 MGI?rtraatmentfas'ilityata+ctLvat slusig�plantwithan_oxi=ted
ditch process followed by anaerobic digestion and belt press,; .;Cake solids are stored on
further processed into class "A" material by alkaline add techniques utilizing the N-VIRq@
process followed by the material being land applied. The resulting material is rated as Class "A"
and meets requirements as (ESA) residuals.
The N-VIRO® patented process l is conducted and administeredby Pozzcdanic Contracting
& Supply Co., Inc. based at 2401 Asbury Rd., Knoxville, Tn., Telephone [phone].
318 Fourth Avenue Fast P.O. Box 1760 Phone: [phone]
Hendersonville, NC 28792 Hendersonville, NC 28793 Fax: [phone]

V,
There was only one round of contracted Class. A-sludge_production during Apri11998.
Effective in August 1998 the City discontinued with the contracted production of Class A `
biosolids using the process previously described.. Since- that time, the City. has ,commenced
disposal in a RCRA approved lined landfill. Notification of this change and accompanying
information was submitted to the EPA and -state ofNorth.Carolina under separate.cover.
In addition to the information provided above, the following information is provided to
satisfy the reporting requirements for the 503 regulation:
1. The annual whole sludge,application rate (AWSAR) for the sludge that does not
cause the annualpollutant loading.rates in table 4. of 503.13 to be exceeded has
been calculated to be:
258.6 metric tons per.hectare.per. year. based on LEAD
2. The concentration .of each.pollutanf listed in table 4 of 503.13 is indicated by usage
of page B=1(Notice and Neeessary.Information).for convenience and by reference
to the enclosed copy of the laboratory results.
3. The- certification statement, with signature, found in 503.17(a)_ (6). (iii) pis. contained
on the enclosed -Notice and Necessary Information.
4. The Class "A", pathogea reduction_requirement of 503.32(a) was -met Biosolids
treated in a -High pH -High Temperature Process by the N-VIRO® process.
5. The vector attraction. reduction requirements in. 503.31(b) L through (b)S.-was Tet
by. meeting'the requirements of option 6 (alkali addition under specified
condition).
Supporting documentation not included in thisreport and --copies of the. North Carolipa
reports are .available upon request if you have additional questions.
If you need additional information or if I can be of any further assistance, please feel$ee
to contact me at [phone], ext. 23.
Respectful)ty,
W. Wayne Cooper
City of Hendersonville
cc: file
enclosures .

ANNUAL WHOLE SLUDGE APPLICATION 1,ATE
WORKSHEET
TREATMENT DATE
4113198
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration
mg/kg AWSAR
mglkg AWSAR
mg/kg AWSAR
POLLUTANT
< <
< <
< <
Arsenic
7.7
259.7
9DIV/01
#DIV/01.
Cadmium
<
1.7
<
1117.6
-
#DIV/O! -
##DIVIOI
._
Chromium
32.6
4615.4 - :
#DIV/O!"-.
#=101
Copper
60.7
1478.3 -
-.#DN/0l
#DIWO! .
Lead
58.0
258.6
#DN/01-':
#DN/O!
Mercury
<.
0.8
<
1-062:5--°
#DNIO1
_
#DN/01..
3.5
#VALUEI'
-#VALUE!.
#VALUEI
Molybdenum
16:0
1312.'5
- #DN/O1
#DN/0!
Nickel
Selenium
11:0
454.5 '.
#DN/01-
#DN/O!
Zinc
146:9
953.0
#DN/O! '
I -#DIV/0!
TREATMENTDATE
-
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration:
mg/kg AWSAR
mg/_kg AWSAR
mglkg AWSAR - - -
:<
POLLUTANT
< <.
< <
< _
Arsenic
#DIV/0!
:..:
#Q(V/0! .
Cadmium
#D1WQ!
##DIWOI :
#DIV/O!
Chrom[um
#DIV/O!
-
#DlwgI
Copper#DNIOI
.
-#DN/0!
#DIVfO�.
Lead
#DN/9! ::
- . ..
#DN/O!
-
.......
#DNIO!
Mercury.
#DIV/8! -
-:.#DN/O! .
:
#DN/O�.
Molybdenum
#"LUEr
#VALUEf
#VALUE1
Nickel
#DIV/UI
Selenium
#DIV/0.! -
#DIV/O! ;
#DIV/0!�
Zinc
#DIV/O!
-
-
- #DN/O.I '
-
#DIV/OF
Page A . .

NOTICE AND NECESSARY INFORMATION
This form is to assist compliance with the bulk sewage sludge not cation requirements [503.12(t)]. Please note,
however, that if the sewage sludge meets the exceptional quality criteria, then the notification requirements do
not apply. This form can be used by preparers of sewage sradge to transmit information to land appliers and
also by land appliers to transmit information to landowners or tease holders.
yl
-li !'T1R-
ti� j S
..7.4o nnllr.fnnf rnnrnnfrrifinnc
Name
Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight
4/13/98
Pollutant Concentrations
(Table 3, 40 CFR 503.13)
(monthly average).
Ceiling Concentrations*
Table 1, 40 CFR 503.13)
(daily maximum) _ _
Arsenic
7.7
.. 41 mg/kg _ ..
75 mg/kg..
Cadmium
<1.7
. . .39Lmglkg -
85- mg/kg - . .
Chromium
32.5
1-200-mg/kg -
300a mg/kg- ---
Copper
50.7
1-500 mg/kg -
4300 .mg/kg - - -
Lead
58.0
30G mg/kg ...
840 mg/kg - - - - :
Mercury
<0.S
17-mg/kg-
57 mgfkg--
Molybdenum
3.5
1$ mg/kg
-75-mg/kg
Nickel
16.0
-420 mg/kg_
420 mg/kg
Selenium
11.0
36 mg/kg
100 mg/kg
Zinc
146.9
2800 mglkg
7500 mg/kg
Nitrogen Concentration
N/A
N/A
* Sludge may not be land applied if any pollutant exceeds these values.
B. Pathogen Reduction (40 CFR 503.32) - Please indicate the level achieved.
C.
(BI
0 c Class A
❑ c Class.B
Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 503.33).- Please indicate the -option performed.
c Option 1 ❑ c Option 2 M c Option 3 ❑ c Option 4
c Option 5 :Option 6 ❑ c Option 7 0-c,_ Option 8
❑ c No vector attraction reduction options were performed
CERTIFICATION
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine -and impdsonment far knowing -violations.
A. Name and Official Title (type or print) B. Area Code and Telephone Number
W. Wayne Cooper/Pretreatment Coordinator [phone]
C. Signature D. Date.Signed

IV.
ow
ON
• i : I:
f
1015 G=Icn Lott Parkway Toledo, Odin 43614
Phoaa No 419-30-M. Fax Na 414-385-8i72
Laboratory .' RgTort
s
..I . F
Provided For.
sample
d47$ '•a~i,�
l Sludge Test #
7075
P0220ply Co.
=IAtayRoad
Sample Identification -N-Vito.Solt-:
Knoxville
Date of iieatm,mt 4/1315ii
37914
Date Received
Apfll-24199X
Plmno: 423,54&7616
Date TestLA
Fax: [phone]
Punt Name:
EmdezmnviUe W W7P
i''� '`
Eltadtc5oataZle. NC
.
.
• -
. -..: -tea
Physical Analysis
=ResIIit method
MAY t, .1
pH
12-9 SM 4500ii
r 0-
% Total Solids
a7 SM 2540 B
% Voladlo Solids
3.7 SM 25Q E
odor x
. 1.0 BCI V
[_ZJ
�Y
(�
Good 1�)/�•(/
v �`
St:
1UY
a�ry"y� ECLI-XV
-f
t+fWrallW Rafmg *'
VMS
..• �_�
:.
_'}=!►-its -
KEY Bm odor Tadrs Q - 5: 0=b1rff� $Fwoest : Strldfaess Ya. Lind=ii3Y, Sli�istlyy PIOi
�``Y
� Wax Mod=zt*_Ste.
Na O Val poaL Poor.Fali•.
GoeC. Vary �aaLFwdli�i. <-;
-
GAT v-Y t'ow� fbor. FsiL
Goo& VgW fond, F—ALMc
Microbiological Analysis
Result Method
:
EPA SU3
Taal 8acrrda
3A x 10,17 i�W 4g 01W$ SM 921 SC
Fecal Colifosao Results
<l MPXT IS DWS �SM9221B
40
Fatal Sac+cpnomcxi
SSS UM 4g DWS SM 9330A-C
Silmondli Rrsnits
<3 D+IPI�U4g Di34fS SM�2b0))
<3 M1NL-i��fltiYS
lmY=t
Meets EPA 503 YES
EQS Chios A LevieU
1.
`+eel
wbmimad
• 1)ivisiort Maas; _ QQaI14i
iiTPN a mtsY peal�hla Onmbc�r':>r'. • :i:.
Meet; Vector Atmactlon YE&
Reduction Criteria
. . 1 � 1jj} •�.1
�Mm
tad Tttdeg y.�. , .,•. .,..,r

----jj_jAM1L; GUNT
lDt42-463261
twouneCK Laboratories,
• MEDICAL COUZ-GE OF CH10 ADVMCM TE-CHNOLOGY PARK
-1015 GftdW L2i:§-- PffkWHY Toledo. Ohio 43614
PhOaa No 419-385-9$35 Fax No 4191-395-8573
La2oratory Report
Provided Fors
Sample #
4479
-Tobn Schmidt
Sludge Test
Fd=azaie Supply Co.
.2401 A*jxy Road
Sample Ideatificadan N-V1w "I
Knoxville -
Date of Treatment -4/11-A.
37914
pho= 423-S46-7676
Date ReceWed
AprU 7A IV911:
423-546-3261
Date TcaW
pl"t Nam=
HMd�ao Vluewwp
RcndeaonvMe NC
Trace Memetd
R"'*:4 MdRt Dry weight method
'EPA M 'Tglttc:3.xj`V-
Arseznc
7.7 meK9 SW4A6.6010
rAdM;Mn
4 1.7 tMVWZ SW-M6010
39 M
Chroutimn
32.5 InSK9 SW-946.6010
50.7 M&MV SW-846. 6010
Ljmd
5" OM SW-946.6010
Mercury
<0-9 MkrKg SW-946,7470
15 UL90C9 SW-M 60 IQ
1&0 MVY'-' SW-946.6010
42Q
Selcatsma
11.0 Mz(Kg SW-M. 6010
146-9 mg1Kg SW-846.6010
As-.4aAftuld Analysls
Dry WeLd, B=is As is B4&n
5.1 lbshon4.9 Ibshon
EPA
NM-N
03 lbshon 0.2 Ishon
EPA-OW*:-
Ptmpho=
6-0 lbshon 3-6 WL=
SM 17.-450045U
Potassium
35.6 thshon 21.6 lbs/ida
SW-946L: 6010
AS-li= Eq M
78.7 % '147.8%
ASTM C60149
Afeeft EPA, 503 EQS Metals Levcjs
Noa-- AU Values mporlcd cd a dry wei,4mbasis unlcss specified dillpmfly
Rmpbcdauy subruiacd
EHYMM 4 4Qv�' 4-ik-rd and TcWre

LIKESTAB.
LIME STABILIZATION RECORDS
0 a w a K K a w N a 0 w lu 24HR. TEMP. 52C r r w 'R lu 0 lm lK K K K K lK w w a a a K w K a a
DATE TIME
DATE
BEGIN TEMP. -I DATE
_F
TIME
1�
TECH
!C�H:l
END TEMP.
LOT
-,r c-
ds-
-7�?
` 3-: 3
-3 -3,?
V,
2 9,f'
7
-s-
72 UR. pH >12 m w K K "m m x K m K a m N K m 0 w m K 0 K a
DATE
TIME
TECH
BEGIN pH
DATE
TIME
TECH
END pH
[END PH
LOT #
A?, 7
-fx ifs
9s'
YK� V 99'
sir
7,
ST
sc
3 Y61
SG
/Z 7
COMMENT.S:
70 -57
q8 1.!ro

LIKESTAB
LIME STABILIZATION RECORDS
omammmmmaMal law mmammm■■■mmmmmmmmm 24HR. TEMP. 5Z'c.a°'°'°'�xnnae■■n■nem■■■■ee■�■`■■
DATE
TIME
TECH
BEGIN TEMP.
DATE
TIME
TECH
END TEMP. LOT #
A .
AL
14-
/_
0 4,1
Iq
Vid
m m m m m m'q m m m m m m a m m a m m m m m a m m e m m m m m 72 H R. PH ME e 4 m e m e c m e e n e In m e w m a a■ a
DATE
TIME
TECH
BEGIN PH
DATE
TIME
TECH
END PH
LOT #
I-ql
.' S7
J, 9
7-Q
I
-
4
'l
-
I
7-1

PH'STANDARDIZATION RECORD
MONTH:
• •�
I�I
f
I���I
�I
- �-
ICI
I �
��I
I
•
I�
� • .
►ll�l
�I
®I
ICI
lii®I
SI
lii
►��®i
ICI
I���I
�i�►
ilk►
I���I
I��®i
�I
�I
COMMENTS:

ppppp;-. � I
0MCMS
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE
COMMISSIONERS
Fred H. Niehoff, Jr.
"The City of Four Seasons"
T. Lee Osborne, Jr.
Mayor
T. lee Osborne
Mary Jo Padgett
Mayor Pro -Tern
WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT
Chris A. Carter
Ezra Allman, Director
Barbara Volk
City Manager
Tammie K. Drake
J. Crit Harley
City Cleric
January 27, 1999 FILETOPY
DENRMWQ/Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
P.O. Box 2953 5
Raleigh, NC 2762670535
SUBJECT: ;Annual�Land Application ofResiduals.(sludge�:Monitoring
City of Hendersonville .
Pdrmit No WQ001 8.1
Hendergon-tounty
Dear DWQ:
Enclosed is the annual report, ii1 triplidate foL:the land agplicaflQn adovities.per£orzn\ed
under the above referenced Permit No. WQ0011381_for the=C1ty of` Hendersonville, NorthZ.
Carolinas The reports is fortte_year 19�8.
The City operated under an -proik Class A, EQ niateznal one tizrie. dozing the regorti�g
period. The City has`discontinued-the produc
residuals at a RCRA approved landfill singO
notified of fins change: m "activity -related to e
If you Have any ,questions,: please feel.
Respectfully,
W. Wayne Cooper
City of Hendersonville, NC
cc: file
and_has been disposing of
ate and_the, EPA -have been
may'
J`.
1-697-3063,:ext. 23.
318 Fourth Avenue East P.O. Box 1760 Phone: [phone]
Hendersonville, NC 28792 Hendersonville, NC 28793 Fax: [phone]

ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETINGISURFACE DISPOSAL 9ERT,FICATION AND SUMMARY FORM
FACILITY NAME CITY OF'HENDERSONVILLE_ PERMIT # WQ00113811 COUNTY: HEN13ERSON
FACILITY TYPE (please check one): LJ C' Surface Dlsposal (complete Parf A (Source(s) and "ResidUal.1W Volume only) and part C)
Q C Distribution end Markdting (domplete Parts A, B, C)' ;
WAS THE FACILITY IN OPERATION dURING tHE•P'AST CALENDAR;YEAR? : _X YES; Nd' If NO, skip Parts d, B; dnc� C and certify Form Below
P,9rtA* 1 I I I III I I! I IIII i III'"i II'I'U il'I I li'�' II II' Il lli I`I I''I
Sources) , Volumed tons on
; Recipient Informat
Month (include NPDES # If applicable) Admendmeht/ Narrle(s) Volume Intended Use(s)
Bulking Agent IN • Resldual.IN _ product OUT dry tons
ieD
Totals: Annual (dg. tons) 614.01 I iui.uu 1. -141.1.uu
dmendrnent(s) wsed:CEMENT DUST BdIking,Agen (s) uaed: '
f more space is required, please use the cdmment space provided below or attach atlditlon�l slleef(s); ❑ C Check box if additional ehe@t(s) are attached.
Comments:
Part C
acility was compliant during calendar year 19_98_ with all conditions of the permit (including but not limited to Items 1-3 below) Issued by the Division of Water
,uality_X_YES . NO. If NO;, please provide a written description why the facility was not compliant.
All monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
All operations and maintenance requirements were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well.
I CERTIFY, UNDER PENALTY OF LAW, THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE.
AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINES AND
IAPRISONMENT FOR KNOW G VIOLATIONS"
SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE DATE SIGNATURE OF PREPARER" DATE
(if different from Permittee) Treparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r)

AIyNUAL RESIDUA► ,SAI�pP�INC� 1 MA X FO�tM
Attach. th s form to ifid corr6soonding:lat5orat�. analysiE. '
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be, analyzed than those required to be surl)wri�esl or this form.
1
Permit Number . Q 0 1381-
Facility Name ; Clty,of;H$n ersoAvi le•
NPDES # N00025534.
or WQ # (residual only f8cllities)
WWTP NaMe • Hen erso ville. WWTP
Residual Analysis Data
Date Sampled (grab) or 4/13/98
Date Com osited
Percent Solids 60:7
'EARLY AVG. PERCENT sOLIDS=> 60.:
•
Molybdenum
Selenium
(SIGNATURE OF PREPARER) DATE
" I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision
In accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and
evaluated the Information submitted. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting
false Information, Including the possibility of fines and Imprisonment for knowing violations"

r
• �t�k
LBioulieckLahoratories
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHO ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PARK
1015 Gmd= Leke Pasfwvay T010" Otid 43614
Pnoac No 419-3UaS85. Fax No 414-3854=
Laboratory: Report
Provided For.
Sammie
..-
'
Jai1u Scismidi
P02201anie Supply Co.
5iudge Teat
`--' : --
1073
=1 Asttgy Road
Sample Identitfication �N-Vito.Soll .: '- #
Knoxville
Date of i eatmcut
411319s
'IN 37914
Date Received
Aprft 24 199S
Phone: [phone]
Date Tcst&d
Fax- 423-546-3261
Plant Namm
.Hracic nnnvillc WWTP
=?
Fitadtc's&mrdlc. NC
Physical Analysis
Result Method
MAY t' .t
PH
1Z9 SM4soar3
Taal Solids
a7 SM 2540 B
% voladk Solids
3.7 SM 3540E
Oder
1.0 BCL.v
Compac dbilir "
wod=mly BLi XIV
GatimuIarity s
Vrcy Goad BcEp3av
'
SIICkl>7eSS s
MiOduate BCL-xv
Overall blaLing
Gard
J z
1 X BC L Odor Inch Q - 5 : 0ab.:m 5=w= SSCUBcss VCW. Mad®tdy. SULIWr. Nor
sje Cbatltq `ray. Mode�e�yh[ty. Noe - Orer.4 2 or Va7 PoPoor. Fait: OoeQ. VttyFaod..F.z.l�
Gi�a�rlcp Very�t?too::�.Coad.Ytt7rgood.Fsecllmc.`:
-
.>�-.:�`�
Microbiological A.aalysk
$-esuit method
EPA .503
Tod B,7r"�
3A x 10,17 a-w4g.ows SM 9215C
Fecal Colifosm RssnIts
<1 MPM lg DWS SM9221E
t d00(2-MPAF/,l��l
Focal SmVococci
03 UM 4g DWS Sari 9330A-C
silmontu Pe Cats
<3 MPN! 4g DWS SM92MD
< 3 MYiVL 4iIDtiY
w..rr Y CFC1=cntmt7to>odds t►�x�maapcsb,ti�.miabc=''
Meets EPA 503 Meets Vector Atm cdoa
SQS Class A Levels YES Reduction Cribeeaa
_ __..
giVOCEEZY.4,butitcad �-ezl A64,
DiVW= M=g - Qvallty
e
and Testing
m

r
iu CUNT ID.42---463261 "':;R'•
-.7
Bi0uf"**heCIf Laboratories
• MEDICAL COLLEGE OF ONTO ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PARK
1015 Gasden L.&.0 Pa kway Toledo. Ohio 43614
phoaa No 419-385-958.5 Fax No 419-385457-
Ubordtory Report
Provided For:
;ohn Scbmidt
F=danic Supply co-
2401 Asbwy Road
Knoxville
IN' 37914
.phon= 423-546-7676
Fax.- 423-546-3UI
Beade�sanvl'11t WWTP
Hendtr5oevsl Kc
Trace Element
A..-d=ltnral An8lyS1S
TKK-
. Ili-I�7
Ptiospilorus
Potas�iuui
Ag-lime J=q (�]
Con�l.s:
Sample #
4.478
Slndge Tea 4
1075
Sample Identifieatim P N4v Sciil
::
Date of TmAto ent
.4/i31S8
Date Received
Apri1241Y4S:
''``_nlq
Date Tcsted
��D
R"a ts, jnVKg Dry weight
Metbod
.EPA
7.7 • &M9
Sw 946. 6010
41 na lkg . =
41.7 jngaQ
SW-M 6010
39 in�•/K _'
32.5 mpg
SW-846.6010
50.7 niv%g
SW-946, 6010
1500
SS-0 MVXf
Sw-846. 6010
sOU .m
<0_9 VMfxg
SW 846. 7470
3.5 mgl&g
5W446.6010
I6.0 tns/K-,
SW 846.60I0
42Q°�;y.°:
11.0 M^8
SW-w. 6010
146.9. mg/Kg
SW-946. 6010
ZM.ine1K�. •
Dry Wright Basis
9.1 lbshon
03 lbshon
6.0 1)ishou
35.6 lhshon
78-7 %
As is Basis
4.9 Ibshon
0.2 Ibshon
3-6 UWLcn
21.6 ibs/toa
' 47.8
Meets EPA S03 EQS Metals Levels YE$
Now All Valucs rcPmicd on a dry weight basis unless bT,=ified dill dy
D1YW= MwaA..Wny amw and T
Sw_94fi:.6Qi0
ASLM C60.3-69

ANNUAL PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTIG.. FORM
Facility Name: CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE WWTP Permit Number: WQ0011381
WWTP Name: CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE WWTP NPDES # NC00256U
Monitoring Period: From_1/1/98_ To _12/31/98_
Pathogen Reduction (40CFR 503.32) -
Class A _XX_
. .Alternative 1 _
Alternative 4
Class B
Please indicate level achieved and alternative performed
Alternative 2 =•>C(- Aiternative 3
Altemative-5- - Alternative-6-1_
Alternative 1 Alternative-2 - -Alt ve 3
If applicable to alternative performed (Classilonty}indicate''Pfoeess-toe Si cantly Reduee-Pat"ns"
_ Aerobic Digestion _ Air Drying _ Anaerobi-Digestionfmmposttng ' _ Lime Stabilization
If a liable to alternative performed (Class A -or Class 131 CMD1ete the following monitoring data.
Parameter
PP
Allowable Level
Pathogen Density
Numberof
Analysis
Sample
Analytical
Minimum
Geo: Mean-
Maximum -:
Units . - -
in Sludge
Exceedence .
Frequency,
Tye
Technique
2c106 MPN per gram of
Fecal
total solids or W (f CFU
-
Conform
per gram of total solids
1000 MPN per gram of
<1 MPN
<1 MPN
<1 MPN
per -gm DWS
0
1
Com*ite
SM9221 E •
total solid (dry weight)
Salmonella
bacteria (n
3 MPN per 4 grams total
<i MPN
<3 MPN
per4gm DWS
" ' " 0
1
Composite
SM9260D
lieu of fecal
solid (dry weight)
conform
Vector Attraction Reduction (40 CFR 50133) - Please indicate option performed.
Option 1 Option 2. Qption.3-... Qption 4 000n.5
Option 6 X_ Option 7 Option 8 Option 9 Option 10=
No vector attraction reduction options. performed_
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (please check the appropriate statement)
X "I -certify, under penalty of law, that -the. pathogen-reeuirements in-40- FR5(13.32_and_thavecior_attraction
reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have been met"
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the pathogen -requirements in-40-CFR5D3.32andthe-vec t! r. attraction
reduction requirement in 40 CFR 503.33 have not been met." (please note if you check this statement attach
an explanation why you have not met one of b_Qth.of the require Lents.)
"This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with a system designed to ensure
that qualified personnel properly gather and evacuate_the. information used ta determine that.the pathogenand vector
attraction reduction requirements have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for: false certification
including fine and imprisonment."
W. Wayne Cooper/ Pretreatment Coordinator
Preparer Name and itle (type or print)..... . , . _ - -Land.Apptie&oame.-and.Title(iLapplicaht*type-oL^_'nt)
/-a7-
Signature of Preparer Date_
. - . • .
na
Sin_� to of.land-Applier(if.appticabl4."_ Da\

-10/Ala#
i0/Ala# -
. _
': iO/Ala#
a mZ
-30/Aia#
io/Ala#.......:.............
IO/Ala#
wnlualag
`io/Ala#
i0/Na# _
_..
.. _ .
:. i0/Ala#
IaBaIN
wnuapqAloW
iO/Ala#
i0/Na# :
4WAla#
IGrtway�
iO/Ala#
-
' i0/A1a#
i9fNa#
Peal
'ttNilla#
i0/Ntl#
iOtAta#
jaddoo .
i0/Ala#
-
ifliNa#
wnlwo�4�
io/Ala#
10/Na#
iD/Aia#
""""'ppo
i0/AID#
i0/AID#-"
aluas't►
>
. W n and
2ltlSMtl 631/6W
21tlSMd 6�ilb
2itlSMtl 6w6w
_
uo-4R.4ua3uo3
. U04B. Luaouo
uogi-4Ua3UO3
31tla 1N3W"3M-
i0/Ala#-
.i0/Ala# _
_
0"£96
6'91FL
aulZ
iO/AIa#
i0/AIa#
9-"V
0."
wmualaS
i0/Ala#.
IO/Ala# .
. S'ZL£L
0'9L
laA�lN
t3fi7k/J1#
i3n-ivA#..
,i3n- vA#
9"£
""'��l°w
iO/Na# .
t0/Na#
$'Z90L
8"0
>
i0/AIa#
`IO/Ala#
:: -9'8SZ
0'89
P��
iO/Ala#
IO/AIa#
£"f>L�L
L'09
jaddoo
i0/Ata#
i0/Na#
V9Ov
TEE
wnlwo�y�
i0/A1a#
io/Ala# _
9"LLLL
>
L"L
>
wnwPe3
10/Ala#
-
� i0/Ala# �
�
-
L"69Z
L"L
aluasiy
> >
_ _
> >
Div n-nod
6�/6w
21tlSMtl TB)I/BW
IIVSMtl 6)j/6w�ItlSMtl
l
uogE.4ua3uoO
uogE.4uaouoO
uo!lu4ua3uoa
31tla 1N3WItl3MI
1
86/Mt
S��FiS?RiDM
ass-- . NOIIVZ)IrjddV aSanrIs H'IOHM 'IVnNNK

LIHBSTAB.
LIME STABILIZATION RECORDS
■ a a W a W Y W Y W a Y W a Y Y w W W a W W a W W Y W Y W p Q 24HR . TEMP. 5 2C W tl r W Y a■ Y W Y Q W a■ r Y g r q a a Y■■ W ■■■
DATE
TIME
l
TECH
BEGIN TEMP.
I
DATE
TIME
TECH
END TEMP.
LOT #
yzo-sr
3=Y3
S`-
(�'3'
L
o z�
-
3=.28'
7S
.��-9�
3�s
sc
Gs
yz
• -9
79
y-,3-90
3= 3Y
1 Sc
3-
7,57
o
v
Yzs -9a
s•3 9
s�
SS
ya
- Qv
31s-S'
S�
�o
;2J-9�
;�3
w r a a r a aQa r a a a a r a a a a a a a a a 6 a a■aaa- 72 HR. PH >12 aar Yagw Yrr■■Qr■YraaarraaQ■rir■
DATE
TIME
TECH
BEGIN PH
DATE
TIME
TECH
END pH
LOT #
Sao-y8
3=Y3
Sc
%?. 7
vrr
yz3-9v
..3:3S.
Ec
. ,?.7
fry
O
%Gib-
o
V. d
dY�2
• 3-9
3= 38"
S�
%2.
S..�v
y- -9
7,
Sc
/2. -T
d y23
COMMENTS: cf-�o_��- 8/ 8-
r
s.11UIS
�1-�3-9.�-'sL•�j sa ��s
1/ 479p• C-9 G Oi el- i-_40

LIKESTAB
LIME STABILIZATION RECORDS
m a a m m m m ui In w m ai m m n a a w a m ui w m m m ai w 'o iu of m 2 4 H R. TEMP. 5 2101. w m ui ui m m m ui w m m n m m m n m w w ut at m m m It ■�■ ■
aw., 1, wo,
lilt W-0
ma m mIII m ma m al mm ml
DATE 11 TIME
� a a a a m ui m m ai a m ui u� ai m w ai 72 H R. p H > 1 P- m at m m w in w m w w m m w m in it, m w a, ai w w w m IN ui m m III ■■
TECH
BEGIN pH
DATE
TIME
TECH
END pH
LOT #
u�
•i� q
:osVql
o
loqls
Z!>O A •
-
_
m o�77
COMMENTS
'�/ �'�•, 9� ��- S � ,gam ds
�•'s•�� '7� • f °fib ��
(� OL

PH STANDARDIZATION RECORD
MONTH: t1/�jy
COMMENTS:

OFFICERS
Fred H. Niehoff, Jr.
Mayor
T. Lee Osborne
Mayor Pro -Tern
Chris A. Carter
City Manager
Tammie K. Drake
City Clerk
February 17, 1999
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE
"The _City of Four Seasons"
WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT
Ezra Allman, Director
Mr. Roy Davis, Environmental Engneer
DENR/Water Quality Section ��
Asheville Regional Office
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place,
Asheville, NC 28801-2414 "
SUBJECT: Annual` Sludge Report
Dear Roy:. -
COMMISSIONERS
T. Lee Osborne, Jr.
Mary Jo Padgett
Barbara Volk
J. Crit Harley
Please find_eeelosed.the addi6ang.do&unentati-an in re e"ren t-the.1999annual sli> e
report. ,The items enclosed consist:of 1
1. TCLP.laboratory an" —is
2. Calculation :of.plant available nitrogem (PA,
As indicatejin our telephand canve�satlQn, we�lnasiVertentlx faile�Lta havetthe matal
._ s ,N:
tested for'sodium, aluminum; and NO3 NQ2 N
- t ,
i [ i
The enclosed calculation for sludge PAN >isbas_ed ons fht"dry weight" test resiilfs.f�or
TKN N and NIB N (8:1 lbs.-h6h arids0`3-1bs /tonrespectfully.) `tPlease;note that the results for
TKN N. and NH3 N are also repotted on the tit r�siilts Qn an "as:.is" basis 0-9. lbs fton.and- 2
lbs./ton respectfully). Please advise if the-PAN:calculation requires by the annual report sho d
be based- on -the "asis". basis.
_s
Also please. note that: lack o£N0 7NO2 N nitrate/zut lte) test results prevezlts he .
calculated PAN from being most accurate. The enclosed calculation for PAN is based on the
available information
318 Fourth Avenue East P.O. Box 1760 Phone: [phone]
Hendersonville, NC 28792 Hendersonville, NC 28793 Fax: [phone]

We thank you for bringingthis.to our ate .n ion,-nd he_a.dYisesthat plant staffhave been
instructed to ensure compliance with these requirements in future monitoring requirements (see
copy. of memo to WWTP laboratory).
Should you have. additional questions or requests, please contact me -at 69773057.
Sincerely,
W. Wayne Cooper
Pretreatment Coordinator
City of Hendersonville
cc: file
enclosures: PAN calc.; TCLP analysis; WWTP. memo

_Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) Calculation
Sample Date: 4/13/98
1. A TKN N = 8.1 lbs./ton (dry. weight basis)
lbs./ton = mg/kg
0.002
8.1/0.002 = 4050 mg/kg_TKN_.q
B. NH3-N = 0.3 lbs./ton
lbs./ on = n"g
0.002
0.3/.0.002 =150 mg/kg NH3-N
C. NO3 NO2 N = UNKNOWN
2. The Mineralization Rate (MR) -is for.unstabilized s=udary.residuals (4 1(o).
3. PAN for Surface Application formula:
PAN = [(MR) x.(TKN . NH3)I+ 0.5 x.(NH3.)_+.(N.Q3=NO2-N) = mg/kgDry-Wt-
Therefore:
PAN = [(0.40) x.(4050 - .150)] +_0.5.x (150.) + (?)_=.mg/kg Dry7t.
PAN = [(0.40) x (3900)] + 75 + ?
PAN =_ 15.60 + 75 +?.=>1635.mg&g. dry-wt.
4. Total PAN to be land applied (lbs/dry ton)
PAN1bs/dry ton -fPAN mg&g dU wt) x 2000 lbs /ton
1000000
=>1635 mglkg x 2000 lbs./ton
1000000
_ > 3.27 lbs/dry ton. .

' -ice Analytical Services, Inc.
.I-aCe Analytical 54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hendersonville (City of) February 20, 1996
P.O. Box 1760 PACE Project Number: A60130510
Hendersonville, NC 28793
Attn: Mr. Scott Chovan
Client Reference: Sludge Analysis
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
8 RCRA METALS - LEACHATE
Units MDL
93 0175031
01/30/96
01/30/96
Class A
Sludge
Leachate
(1)
Barium, Leachate
mg/L
0.10
1.52
Cadmium, Leachate
mg/L
0.010
ND
Chromium, Leachate
mg/L
0.020
ND
Lead, Leachate
mg/L
0.10
ND
Silver, Leachate
mg/L
0.001
ND
Arsenic, Leachate
mg/L
0.005
ND
Selenium, Leachate
mg/L
0.005.
ND
Mercury, Leachate
mg/L
0.0002
0.0013
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, LEACHATE
Vinyl Chloride
ug/L
5
ND
1,1-Dichloroethylene
ug/L
5
ND
Chloroform
ug/L
5
ND
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
5
ND
2-Butane (MEK)
ug/L
10
ND
Carbon Tetrachloride
ug/L
5
ND
Trichloroethylene
ug/L
5
ND
Benzene
ug/L
5
ND
Tetrachloroethylene
ug/L
5
ND
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
5
ND
SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, LEACHAT
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
10
ND
2-Methylphenol
ug/L
10
ND
3-Methylphenol
ug/L
10
ND
4-Methylphenol
ug/L
10
ND
Nitrobenzene
ug/L
10
ND
Hexachloro-1,3 Butadiene
ug/L
10
ND

' -4ce Analytical Services, Inc.
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Pace Analytical Asheville, NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mr. Scott.Chovan February 20, 1996
Page 2 PACE Project Number: A60130510
Client Reference: Sludge Analysis
PACE Sample Number:
93 0175031
Date Collected:
01/30/96
Date Received:
01/30/96
Client Sample ID:
Class A
Sludge
Parameter
Units
MDL
Leachate
(1)
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS,
LEACHAT
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
10
ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
10
ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ug/L
10
ND
Hexachlorobenzene
ug/L
10
ND
Pentachlorophenol
ug/L
10
ND
Pyridine
ug/L
10
ND
Hexachloroethane
ug/L
10
ND
m & p-Cresol
ug/L
10
30

' ace Analytical Services, Inc.
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Pace Analytical Asheville, NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 3
Client Reference: Sludge Analysis
February 20, 1996
PACE Project Number: A60130510
PACE Sample Number:
93 0175023
Date Collected:
01/30/96
Date Received:
01/30/96
Client Sample ID:
Class A
Parameter
Units
MDL
Sludge
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Aluminum
mg/kg
9.6
14400
Arsenic
mg/kg
0.48
3.90
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.96
ND
Calcium
mg/kg
960
237000
Chromium
mg/kg
1.9
14
Copper
mg/kg
0.96
110
Corrosivity
pH Units
0.1
12
Lead
mg/kg
9.6
71
Magnesium
mg/kg
48
3400
Mercury
mg/kg
0.19
3.48
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.96
3.8
Nickel
mg/kg
4.8
15
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mg/kg
4..8
180
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl
mg/kg
770
7500
Nitrogen, Nitrate plus Nitrite
mg/kg
4.8
13
Nitrogen, Plant Available
mg/kg
1.0
1950
Phosphorus, Total
mg/kg
4.80
96
Potassium
mg/kg
96
1900
Selenium
mg/kg
0.48
1.06
Sodium
mg/kg
48
680
Solids, Percent Total
%
0.01
52
Zinc
mg/kg
0.96
296
Analyses were performed on the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) extract.

EV7
ice Analytical Services, Inc.
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Pace Analytical Asheville, NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Hendersonville (City of) February 20, 1996
P. 0. Box 1760 PACE Project Number: A60130510
Hendersonville, NC 28793
Attn: Mr. Scott Chovan
Client Reference: Hendersonville
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter Units . MDL
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
TCLP PESTICIDES
93 0175031
01/30/96
02/01/96
Class A
Sludge
Leachate DATE ANALYZED
Chlordane
mg/L
0.003
ND
02/14/96
Endrin
mg/L
0.002
ND
02/14/96
Heptachlor
mg/L
0.0008
ND
02/14/96
Heptachlor Epoxide
mg/L
0:0008
ND
02/14/96
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
mg/L
0.04
ND
02/14/96
Methoxychlor
mg/L
1.0
ND
02/14/96
Toxaphene
mg/L
0.05
ND
02/14/96
Date Extracted, Pesticides & PCBs
Date
021096
02/10/96
TCLP HERBICIDES
2,4-D
mg/L
1.0
ND
02/12/96
2,4,5-TP(Silvex)
mg/L
0.10
ND
02/12/96
Date Extracted
Date
021196
02/11/96

EWF'
-ice Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical � 54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mr. Scott Chovan February 20, 1996
Page 4 PACE Project Number: A60130510
Client Reference: Sludge Analysis
These data have been reviewed and are approved for release.
sue. m.m;&
Barbara M. Miller
Supervisor, Inorganic Chemistry
V),& I f O&
Walter L. Miller
General Manager

:ce Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical 54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 5
FOOTNOTES February 20, 1996
for pages 1 through 4 PACE Project Number: A60130510
Client Reference: Sludge Analysis
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL.
(1) All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachate.

rifier, trickling filter, and secondary clarifier network with a separate anaerobic digester
.nd sand sludge drying beds.
Several additions have been made to the plant to increase its nominal design
capacity to 3.2 MGD. Plant capacity expansion has been achieved through the
installation of an oxidation ditch, an additional secondary clarifier, and a sludge belt press
intended to reduce reliance on the sludge drying beds.
i
r The layout of the existing units is shown on Figure 3. The effluent limits
prescribed by NPDES Permit NC0025534 for the treatment plant are presented in
Appendix C.
2.-04.1 Process Units
The influent pumping station has four pumps, with individual pump capacities
ranging from 700 gallons per minute (gpm) to 2,800, gpm. The combined capacity of
these pumps operated in parallel approaches 5.4 MGD. A coarse bar screen prevents
major damage to the pumping, units.
At the treatment plant site wastewater flow passes through six parallel static
screens and dual aerated grit chambers. Downstream from the screening and grit
removal devices, flow discharges to a 65-foot diameter primary clarifier and thence to a
120-foot. diameter trickling filter. Effluent from the trickling filter flows to a three -cell
oxidation ditch and thence to two parallel secondary clarifier, one each 65 feet in diameter
and 90 feet in diameter. Recycle sludge underflow from the .clarifiers is retumed to the
oxidation ditch to sustain the activated sludge process. Overflow from the secondary
clarifiers flows to a chlorine contact basin and thence to Mud Creek.
2.04.2 Residuals Units �"�(1S�i,� 3.2 of G-D
-- The sludge from the primary clarifier is pumped to a 50-foot diameter, 47,124
cubic foot anaerobic digester. The secondary sludge, wasted from the activated sludge
�- process in parallel with the recycle flow from the secondary clarifiers, is pumped directly
- to the one -meter belt press for dewatering. The alkaline stabilized dewatered sludge from
Willis Engineers 6 September 1998

1 t '
the belt press.is applied on farmland in Henderson County or used as cover in the County
landfill.
2.04.3 Deficiencies
The treatment plant has not consistently met the effluent concentrations
prescribed for it by the NPDES Permit. The monthly average limitation for flow of 3.2
= MGD is violated during periods of extended wet weather. Weekly average limitations
established for BOD and suspended solids are likewise exceeded during wet periods. An
- 85 percent removal requirement for BOD and suspended solids is on occasion violated as
a result of higher than allowable effluent concentrations, diluted concentrations of influent,
- or both. Effluent concentrations also exceed prescribed limits for cadmium, cyanide and
-- mercury. Standards for these constituents are in terms of "parts per billion", and no
=— particular individual source of these pollutants has been identified.
r Historical data confirm that when the influent flow to the plant is within the average
daily design flow of 3.2 MGD, virtually no Permit violations occur. However, as
extraneous flow increases in the sewer system as a result of the pervasive 1/1 problem,
the biological treatment processes tend to be upset, the residual sludges tend to overflow
the plant effluent, and the Permit violations occur.
-= Correction of the 1/1 problem will not be sufficient to correct the violations caused
by wet weather flows. Even a modest increase in flow rate is sufficient to exceed the
hydraulic capacity of some of the process units, resulting in carry over of solids. Further
ry
- complicating the carry over problem is the lack of adequate sludge management facilities
both in the treatment process and as sludge is wasted. Because of the hydraulic
limitations of the plant, excess solids have been stored in the relatively shallow secondary
� clarifiers and in the oxidation ditch. in an effort to counter the loss that occurs during high
flow and maintain the biological process. These retained sludges also assist in
,�,.. conditioning the sludge to a higher concentration prior to dewatering on the belt press.
There is no sludge storage available off-line to allow for containment and conditioning of
waste activated sludge.
Willis Engineers 7 September 1998

C,o
initial mechanical equipment cost but require far less tankage and provide greater ease of
operation. These systems are generally competitive in their overall ownership and
operating costs. Given these safety concerns and operational requirements, disinfection
using ultraviolet systems is preferred.
%J 7.04 Sludge Disposal Techniques
A wide variety of options exist for the treatment and ultimate disposal of
wastewater sludge. Each has merits that justify their use in various situations. For areas
such as Henderson County, beneficial reuse of these solids provides a disposal pathway
ti
that can benefit City customers as well as local farmers. Although land application
systems often require extensive treatment, their capital and operating costs are generally
less than destructive treatments, such as incineration.
Henderson County has available adequate agricultural lands to accept solids
generated by Hendersonville and other nearby utilities. Unlike many areas of the
Piedmont and Coastal plain, Henderson County does not have farms offering large
contiguous parcels for land application of residual solids. A majority of the land that can
benefit from these -treatment byproducts is divided into small farms. It is therefore difficult
to permit .sufficient areas to maintain an efficient land application program. The most
attractive alternative for Hendersonville is to provide sufficient sludge treatment to allow
use of these byproducts without - extensive buffer and site specific permitting
requirements. Treatment technologies and their performance are prescribed by State and
Federal regulations and provide several options for treatment techniques.
Farmers in Henderson County have already expressed a strong demand for
alkaline stabilized wastewater sludge in the solid form suitable for application using
conventional farm equipment. These products are currently being manufactured by
Hendersonville utilizing -an outside contractor and by the Metropolitan Sewerage District.
17
7.04.1 Sludge Stabilization��
1.
Biological solids generated by the treatment process will ultimately be processed
Willis Engineers 25 September 1998

Y-
7.-
to a solid form with high alkalinity. This process will reduce both the pathogen content
and vector attraction to meet State and Federal requirements. Although it is generally
desirable to reduce the quantity of solids through some form of digestion, the overall
solids reduction will have little impact on the quantity or quality of the end product
produced. The cost of construction and operation of these digestion processes is greater
than the increased treatment capacity necessary to process them for disposal.
Although the sludge will not be reduced in quantity it can be enhanced and
thickened using chemical and mechanical means to improve the efficiency of the
dewatering devices and provide interim stabilization while they are held for processing.
The most attractive option for accomplishing this is to use a portion of the alkalinity
necessary for sludge treatment and plant operation to elevate the sludge pH while it is
mechanically thickened prior to dewatering.
7.04.2 Sludge DewateringX�S{-�aS
If the sludges are to be processed to a solid form it will be necessary to dewater
them -by some mechanical means. Four methods of sludge dewatering -were evaluated:
drying beds, centrifuges, vacuum filters, and belt presses. While these four options
present similar ownership and operation costs belt. presses offer the most economical
sludge dewatering method. This option also allows the City to reuse the existing press in
an expanded or regional treatment facility.
The present worth analysis of the sludge dewatering methods is presented in
Appendix M.
7.04.3 Sludge Treatment and Disposal
A variety of treatment techniques, some of them proprietary, are available to meet
the State and Federal requirements for land application of Class A sludges. These
techniques employ similar equipment that can be operated with or without licensing
requirements. Given the state of the industry the City's best option is to construct generic
facilities capable of using a variety of treatment techniques in order to avoid changing
proprietary requirements. Solids produced by the facility. will likely be altered periodically
Willis Engineers 26 September 1998

--- to enhance their marketability to local farmers.
7.05 Recommendations
Based on these evaluations it is recommended that the Facility Plan options be
compared based on the following:
1. Wastewater to be disposed of by surface discharge.
2. Influent pumping provided on -site with mechanical treatment to include
screening and aerated grit removal.
3. Biological treatment usingan activated sludge
g process with single stage
nitrification.
4. Effluent polishing using low head filters.
5. Disinfection using ultraviolet treatment.
6. Dewatering using belt presses.
7. Sludge treated as prescribed by State .and Federal requirements to Class A
solid, intended for land application.
Q
Willis Engineers 27 September 1998

V-. 1. 1
11
I�
u
0--
analysis, which considered present worth, environmental impacts, implementation
capabilities, energy utilization, reliability and public acceptability.
It was concluded that Alternative D best met the needs and goals of the
Hendersonville Study Area. This alternative would include upgrading and expanding the
capacity of the existing facilities to 4.8 MGD on an expanded plant site. A site
contiguous with the existing plant but on the north side of Balfour Road has been
acquired by the City for this purpose. An outfall would be constructed from the existing
pumping station to the expanded site. The outfall would consist of approximately 4,900
feet of 42-inch pipe.
Process units located on the expanded site would include influent pumping and
headworks facilities, traditional activated sludge facilities with fine bubble aeration
systems, secondary clarifiers, recycle pumping station, effluent filters, disinfection
facilities. The residuals units would remain on the existing plant site and. include
renovation of the anaerobic digester to a gravity thickener, a new gravity thickener,
stabilization and dewatering facilities and finished sludge holding .facilities. A new office
and laboratory/control building would be constructed on the expanded site.
A preliminary site plan for the proposed Facilities Plan is shown on Figure 6. A
schematic drawing of the process and residuals units for this alternative are shown on
Figure 7. The .Basis of Design is presented in Appendix P. The present worth for these
facilities totals $19,256,000. A tabulation of the costs is presented in Appendix Q.
Sections 7.0 and 8.0 offer a detailed discussion of the alternative analysis used for
selection of the proposed disposal and process techniques as well as the proposed
Facilities Plan.
11.05 Environmental Consequences
In November 1994 a comprehensive environmental survey was conducted by Fish
and Wildlife Associates,. Inc.. The survey was included as a supplement to
"Environmental Assessment for French Broad River Wastewater Treatment Plant, City of
Hendersonville" prepared by McGill Associates, P.A. for the City of Hendersonville. The
Willis Engineers 41 September 1998

201 Facilities Planning Study
Hendersonville Planning Area
B. Residuals Units
�-
Anaerobic Digester (1)
Diameter
Depth
Volume
Belt Press (1)
Size
Capacity
Sludge Drying Beds (14)
a:
Area (combined)
Basis of Design
Existing Facilities
30 feet
24 feet
8,000 cf
1 meter
60 GPM
30,800 sf
;.•? Willis Engineers
a~
:.. 1910.003, September 1998
Appendix A
Page 3 of 3

icilities Planning Study
rsonville Planning Area
Effluent Filtration
Number
Type
Disinfection
siduals Units
Thickeners
Renovated Digestor
Type
Diameter
Depth
New
Type
Diameter
Depth
Stabilization
Dewatenng
Belt Presses
Existing
Size
Capacity
New
Size
Capacity
Finished Sludge Holding
Type
Capacity
Basis of -Design
Alternate C
Two
Traveling Bridge, Automatic
Backwash
Ultraviolet Disinfection
Circular
50 feet
13 feet SWD
Circular
50 feet
13 feet SWD
Lime Slurry Addition
1 meter
60 GPM
2 meter
100 GPM
Covered Storage, Accelerated
Drying by Windrow
90 days (min)
Willis Engineers Appendix N
1910.003, September 1998 Page 2 of 2
a5

Wastewater Trea*-- - ent Plant
Waste Sludge Flow Monitoring
Type
Range
G. Effluent Filtration
Number
Type
Size
Flow Rate
H. Disinfection
Ultraviolet Disinfection
Channels
Number
Dimensions
Length
Width
Depth
UV Equipment
UV Transmission @ 253.7 nm
Number of Lamps per Module
Number of Modules per Bank
Number of Banks per Channel
I. Solids Processing/Alkaline Feed
Sludge Holding Tanks/Thickeners
Type
Number
Diameter
Depth
Storage Volume
Stabilization/Odor Control
Type
Lime Equipment
Bulk Storage
Slaking' Capacity
Slurry Storage
Slurry Mixers
Slurry Pumps
Type
Number
Capacity
Dewatering
Type
Size
Capacity
Stabilization
Type
Basis of Design
Venturi
0-1000 GPM
Two
Automatic Backwash
12.5 Feet by 62 Feet
325 gpm/sf at 12 MGD
Two, (One Future)
42 Feet
47 Inches
106 Inches
65%
Four
Six
Two
Circular Thickeners
Two (one existing)
50 Feet
13 Feet SWD
200,000 Gallons
Lime Slurry Addition
40 Tons
500 Ibs/hr
5000 Gallons
One, 5 HP, Surface Mounted
Induced Flow, Recessed Impeller
Two
0-200 GPM
Belt Press
2 meter
100 GPM, 0.5 -4 % Solids
Pasteurization, Class A by
70 C for 30 min. pH>12 for 22 Hrs. or
52 C for 12 hours. pH>12 for 72 Hrs.
and dry to 50% Solids
Willis Engineers 1910.003
4 01124/PR

I
Wastewater Trea' ---ant Plant
t ?
Alkaline Additive Handling
Bulk Storage
Feed Equipment
Blending Equipment
Reactor
Finished Sludge Holding
Type
Capacity
Basis of Design
40 Tons
Dry Volumetric Feeder
Mixing Hopper
Two 40 CY Concrete Bins
Covered Storage, Accelerated Drying
by Windrow
90 Days (min)
Willis Engineers. 1910.003
5 01 /24/98

OFFICERS'
Fred H. Niehoff, Jr.
Mayor
Barbara Volk
Mayor Pro-Tem
Chris A. Carter
City Manager
Tammie K. Hill
City Clerk
Mr. Jay Sexton
Route #3
Box 113
Hendersonville,
Dear Jay:
COMMISSIONERS
Diane Caldwell
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE Dan McGraw
"The City of Four Seasons" T. Lee Osborne
Barbara Volk
WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT
"at your service"
November 27, 1995
N. C. 2873.9.;:7:,"- .:.<,:.,....:
F,� -
'Re = Biosolids Disposal Program
Enclosed is"' any,;Information.Sheet)'concerning -the `second batch of
biosolids.miaterial that ''you are. -going to apply,to your land. The
North Carolina Department=:of Environment, Health and.Natural
Resources requires -that -this information be provided to each land
owner using -this product`:"
This -material Is a certified Class "A!' product. Upon receipt of
this Information Sheet you may proceed to apply the product
within the -restrictions listed ..on =the Information Sheet. ;`2.25
tons ;:(2.8 cu. yds .) `of this product is "'equivalent - to 1 ton of
agriculture lime.
Should you have,any questions; or need additional information,
please contact me -at 697-3063.
Coordinator
cc: Project File
P. O. Box 1760 Phone [phone]
Hendersonville, NC 28793 318 Fourth Avenue East Facsimile [phone]

INFORMATION SHEET
FOR USERS OF
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE
CLASS "A" RESIDUAL BIOSOLIDS
BATCH # 95-02
Sludge Test # 636
November 27, 1995
This product was prbpared by the City of Hendersonville. If you
have questions regarding the use or content of the product,
please contact:
Mr. Tom Kilpatrick
City of Hendersonville
P.O. Box 1760
145 Fifth Avenue East
Hendersonville, N.C. 28793
[phone]
This product meets EPA's 503 EXCEPTIONAL OUALITY SLUDGE (EQS)
standards. A copy of the laboratory analysis .is attached.
The application of this product is prohibited except in
accordance with the following instructions: _
The product shall not be applied to.property which is
flooded, frozen or snow-covered. The product shall not be applied unless adequate measures
are taken to prevent surface runoff from washing the product
into surface waters.
The product shall not be applied within 10 feet of public or
private well, streams, lakes, rivers, or natural drainage
ways.

qBioCiieck Laboratories
. N C O R P O R A T E D
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHIO ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PARK
1015 Garden Lake Parkway Toledo, Ohio 43606
Phone No 419-385-9585 Fax No 419-385-8572
Laboratory Report
Provided For:
John Schmidt
Pozzolanic Supply Co.
2401 Asbury Road
Knoxville
TN 37932
Phone:[phone]
Fax: [phone]
Plant Name:
Hendersonville WWTP
Hendersonville,. NC 37932
Trace Element
Results, mg/Kg Dry Weight
Arsenic
5.5 mg/Kg
Cadmium
3.0 mg/Kg
Chromium
14.0 mg/Kg
Copper
107.0 mpg
Lead
66.0 mg/Kg
Mercury
1.1 mg/Kg
Molybdenum
<4.5 mg/Kg
Nickel
37.0 mg/Kg
Selenium
<4.5 mg/Kg
Zinc
344.0 mg/Kg
Agricultural Analysis Dry Weight Basis
TKN N
16.1
lbs/ton
NH3-N
0.7
lbs/ton
Phosphorus
11.8
lbs/ton
Potassium
13.6
lbs/ton
Ag-lime Eq (%)
74.8
%
Meets EPA 503
EQS Metals Levels
YES
Sample # 2090
Sludge Test # 636
Sample Identification N-Viro Soil
Date -of Treatment 9/21/95
Date Received October 3 1995
Date Tested October 3 1995
Method
EPA 503 Table 3 Limits
SW-846, 6010
41 mg/Kg
SW-846, 6010
39 mg/Kg
SW-846, 6010
1200 mg/Kg
SW-846, 6010
1500 mg/Kg
SW-846, 6010
300 mg/Kg
SW-846, 7471
17 mg/Kg
SW-846, 6010
18 mg/Kg
SW-846, 6010
420 mg/Kg
•SW-846, 6010
36 mg/Kg
SW-846, 6010
2800 mg/Kg
As is Basis
Method
10.61bs/ton
EPA-600, 351.3
0.51bs/ton
EPA-600, 350.2
7.8 lbs/ton
424 D
8:9 lbs/ton
SW-846, 6010
49.2 %
ASTM C602-69
Note: All Values reported on'a dry weight basis unless specified differently
,1Z
Respectfully submitted Date:
Division Manager, uality Contro d Testing

Ab
A40oCheck Laboratories
N C O R P O R A T E D
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHIO ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY PARK
1015 Garden Lake Parkway Toledo, Ohio 43606
Phone No 419-385-9585 Fax No 419-385-8572
Laboratory
Provided For:
John Schmidt
Pozzolanic Supply Co.
2401 Asbury Road
Knoxville
TN 37932
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Plant Name:
Hendersonville WW
Hendersonville, NC 37932
Sample # 2090
Sludge Test # 636
Sample Identification N-Viro Soil
Date of Treatment 9/21/95
Date Received October 3 1995
Date Tested October 3 1995
Physical Analysis Result Method
pH
12.7
SM 4500H
• Total Solids
65.8
SM 2540 B
% Volatile Solids
7.3
SM 2540 E
Odor * .
1.5
B.CL-V
Compactibility *
Not
BCL-XIV
Granularity *
Excellent
BCL-XlV
Stickiness *
Not
BCL-XV
Overall Rating *
Excellent
KEY BCL Odor Index 0 - 5 : 0=best, 5--worst Stickiness Very,. Moderately, Slightly, Not
Compactability Very, Moderately, Slightly, Not Overall Rating Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent
Granularity Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, Very good,.Excellent -
Microbiological Analysis Result Method EPA 503 Limits (Class A)
Total Bacteria
1.7x10^6 CFU/. 4g DWS
SM 9215A
Fecal :Coliform Results
<1 MPN/ lg DWS
SM9221E
< 1000 MPN/ lg DWS
Fecal Streptococci
1.5 MPN/ 4g DWS
SM 9330A-C
Salmonella Results
<3 MPN/ 4g DWS
SM 9260 D
< 3 MPN/ 4g DWS
Viable Hehninth Ova
<1 eggs/ 4g DWS
Yanko, 1987
< 1 egg/ 4g DWS
Non -viable Helminth Ova
<1 eggs/ 4g DWS
Yanko, 1987.
Enterovirus
<1 pfu/ 4g DWS
ASTM.D 4994-89
< 1 PFU/ 4g DWS
KEY CFU = colony forming units
PFU = plaque forming units
MPN most probable number
Meets EPA 503 EQS Class
A Levels YES
Comments:
Respectfully submitted / CQ�� Date: /
Division Manage 42uality Co 1 and Testing