WQ0011381_Application_19950504

VPj
State of North Carolir1ca
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, -Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 4, 1995
MR TOM KILPATRICK
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE
PO BOX 1760
HENDERSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28739
Subject: Application No. WQ0004319
A Sludge Facility
Sludge -Land Application— ' -wipog
Henderson County /V_ V� �,
Dear MR KILPATRICK:
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on May 2, 1995. This application has been assigned the number listed above.
PLEASE REFER TO -THE ABOVE WATER QUALITY NUMBER WHEN MAKING
INQUIRES ON THIS PROJECT.
Your project has been assigned to Angela Griffin for a detailed engineering review. Should there.be any
questions concerning your project, the reviewer will contact you with an additional information letter.
Be aware that the Division's regional office, copied below, must provide recommendations from the
Regional Supervisor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project, prior to final -action by the
Division.
If you have any questions, please contact Angela Griffin at [phone] extension 554. If the
engineer is unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail and they will respond promptly.
Please reference the above application number when leaving a message. -
lwsl eviftoR,egionalt©fii ewe
----Rust Infrastructure
Sincerely,
e
Carolyn McCaskill
Supervisor, State Engineering Review Group
1)61
Pollution Prevention Pays
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Caroliriab {`' ' - 5 P A 19: 5�q
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
. DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
This application is intended for facilities which are to be regulated under 40 CFR Part 503
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name (please specify the name of the municipality, corporation, individual, etc.);
City of Hendersonville
2. Print owners or signing official's name and title (the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Tom Kilpatrick, Special Project Coordinator, City of Hendersonville
3. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1760
City: Hendersonville State: NC Zip: 28793
Telephone Number: ( 704 ) 697-3063
4. Application Date: 4 / 14 / 9 5
5. Fee Submitted: $ 400.00 [The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H .0205(c)(5).]
6. Specify how these residuals will be distributed: sold or given away irr.bags?� containers; lawn (bulk);
home garden (bulk); X other, Applied to city property by city and available to
public in bulk form.
7. If the alternative for residual disposal consists of "surface disposal" as defined under 40 CFR Part 503, please complete the
application titled "SURFACE DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS. Please identify if there is any storage of residuals in
a surface impoundment or disposal thru landfilling. Explain:
8. Is the residual process facility also the generator? X Yes; No
* 9. Latitude: Longitude:
*Located at existing City of Hendersonville
10. Specify whether the process facility is owned by: 'federal;
11. County where facility is located: Hpndprsnn
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application No. (will be completed by DEM): WQ0004319
Mud Creek
private;
_ of residual process facility
WWTP.
state; X local government;
2. Specify whether project is: X new; renewal"; modification
" For renewals, complete all sections included in the application. Engineering Signature and Seal not required for
renewals.or if there is not any construction involved with the subject project.
3. If this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the existing permit
number
and its issue date
FORM: DRS 02/95 Page 1 of 7

III. FACILITY INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Name of facility where residuals are generated or prepared: _ C i t v o f H e n d e rs o n v i 11
Mud Creek WWTP
2. Facility permit number:_-__Nf'f1f195534 ;facilitypermitholder: _ City of Hendsnnvillp
3. Specify whether facility in Section III.1 is owned by: federal; private; state; X local government;
4. Specify facility design flow: 3 2 MGD; facility average daily flow: 2.8 MGD;
Type of residual storage: _prYina Beds
Volume of residual storage: 3.000 cubic Yard
Length of residuals storage at facility: 180+
g ty� days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units that
are separate from treatment system, i.e. not in clarifiers, aeration basins, etc.);
Estimated volume of residuals: 600 (dry tons/yr.);
5. If the residual process facility is not the same as the generator, please specify delivery frequency and quantity of residual to
be processed:
6. Facility contact (person familiar with residuals preparation): Wayne Cooper
7. Facility contact's telephone number: ( 704 ) 697-2077
8. Location of treatment facility: NC State; Henderson County
9. Mailing address: City of HendersonVi l l e
P.O. Rnx' 17Fn s._01;
10. Specify the source of the residuals: _X treatment of domestic wastewater, treatment of industrial wastewater;
• Muntcipal. gnmip ..
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire process.
11. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program? X Yes; No.
This includes facilities which are classified as a "Class I" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under 40
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as "Class
I" by the appropriate federal or State authority)
IV. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
Pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribution
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sources.
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? Yes; X No.
If Yes, list the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.21-261.24? Yes; X No.
Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and
Corrosivity for each residual.
FORM: DRS 02/95 Page 2 of 7

Note: If the following constituent levels (as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses) are
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the range listed below, the residual is by
definition a Hazardous waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
PPM
ppM
Arsenic
5.0
Barium
100.0
Benzene
0.5
Cadmium
1.0
Carbon tetrachloride
0.5
Chlordane
0.03
Chlorobenzene
100.0
Chloroform
6.0
Chromium
5.0
o-Cresol
200.0
m-Cresol
200.0
p-Cresol
200.0
Cresol
200.0
2,4-D
10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene
0.7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
Fzdrin
0.02
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide)
0.008
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.5
Hexachloroethane
3.0
Lead
5.0
Lindane
0.4
Mercury
0.2
Methoxychlor
10.0
Methyl ethyl ketone
200.0
Nitrobenzene
Pyridine
2.0
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
5.0
Selenium
1.0
Silver
5.0
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
Toxaphene
0.5
Trichloroethylene
0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
Vinyl chloride
0.2
pH (2:1 vo1JwL):
>2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS:OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE,
AS NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR
THAT MATERIAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS
APPLICATION.
2. For each residual, please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough
to completely characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the
facility that will generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters
and any other known and suspected contaminants that are tributary to the system.
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Cadmium
Nickel
Chromium
Selenium
Copper
Zinc
Lead
Aluminum
Mercury
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Calcium
Phosphorus
Magnesium
Potassium
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Sodium
% Total Solids
TKN
pH
Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation)
3. Provide, all applicable pilot studies and any bench scale tests which have been performed on each residual source and the
results, including the approximate fertilizer equivalent.
FORM: DRS 02/95 Pnoa ; n.-7

4. Wastewater residuals can not be sold or given away if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the Ceiling
Concentrations or the Monthly Average Concentrations specified in the table below on a dry weight basis (mg/kg).
Specify the pollutant concentration of the residuals (attach all lab analysis):
Pollutant
Pollutant Ceiling Concentration
Dry Weight Basis (mg/kg)-Dry
Pollutant Concentration
Weight Basis (mg/kg)
Monthly Average Concentrations
Dry Weight Basis m
Arsenic
75
41
Cadmium
85
, 85
39
Chromium
3000
4.0
1200
Copper
4300
68
1500
Lead
840
34
300
Mercury
57
2.0
17
Molybdenum
75
2.4
----
Nickel
420
3.8
420
Selenium
100
36
Zinc
7500
174
2800
V . PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION INFORMATION:
1. In order for the residuals to be Class A, in accordance with the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32(a), either Part a or
Part b od one of the options in Part c must be completed (please submit all lab analysis, test results and calculations):
* a. A Fecal coliform density less than 1000 Most Probable Number per gram of total dry solids, or
*See attached narrative. b. A Salmonella sp. density less than 3 Most Probable Number per 4'gcam�f'fotal dry solids.
2 c. In addition to Part a or Part b being met, one of the following alternatives must also be completed. Please
specify 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a; 5b, 5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g or 6 below being met:
1. time/temperature - an increased residuals temperature should be maintained for a prescribed period of time, in
accordance with the following guidelines. The results (D) shall be the amount of time, in days, that the residuals
shall remain at the given temperature:
Total Solids
Temperature t
Minimum Time
...aw
Equation
Notes
No heating of small
> or = 7%
> or = 500 C
> or = 20 minutes
D=131.700.000
particles by warmed
100.14 t
gases or immiscible
liquid.
> or = 7%
> or = 500 C
> or =15 seconds
D=131,700,000
Small particles heated by
100.14 t
warmed gases or
immiscible liquid.
< 7%
> or = 500 C
> or =15 seconds
D=131,700,000
to
100.14 t
< 30 minutes
< 7%
> or = 500 C
>or = 30 minutes
D = 50,070,000
100.14 t
2. alkaline treatment - the pH of the residuals is raised to greater than 12 for at least 72 hours. During this time, the
temperature of the residuals should be greater than 520 C for at least 12 hours. In addition, after the 72 hour
period,the residuals shall be air dried to greater than 50% total solids.
FORM: DRS 02/95 Page 4 of 7

3. prior testing for Enteric V'rnsNiabl H lmin h Ova - the residuals are analyzed for the presence of enteric viruses
(Plaque -forming units) [pfu] and viable helminth ova. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction
Process and found to have densities of enteric virus <1 pfu/4 grams of total solids and viable helminth ova <1/4g
total solids, the residuals are Class A with respect to enteric virus and viable helminth ova until the next
monitoring episode. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction process and found to have densities
of enteric virus > or = 1 pfu/4 g total solids or viable helminth ova > or = 1/4 g total solids, and tested again after
processing and found to meet the enteric virus and viable helminth ova levels listed under "4" below, then the
processed residuals will be Class A with respect to enteric viruses and viable helminth ova when the operating
parameters for the pathogen reduction process are monitored and shown to be consistent with the values or ranges
of values documented which produces the residuals that meets the virus and helminth ova density requirements.
4. no nrior testing for Enteric VirusNiable He minth Ova -if the residuals are not analyzed before pathogen reduction
processing for enteric viruses and viable helminth ova, the density of enteric viruses must be less than 1 pfu/4 g of
total dry solids and the density of viable helminth ova must be less than 1/4 g of total dry solids, or the residuals
must be treated by a "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" or a "Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" equivalent
process.
5. The "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP) are described as follows:
a. CDMPQ51iU9 - using either the within -vessel or static aerated pile composting methods, the temperature of the
residuals are raised to 550 C or higher for three days. Using the windrow composting method, the residuals are
raised to 550 C or higher for fifteen days. During the high temperature period, there will be a minimum of five
turnings of the windrow.
b. Heat ing - residuals are dried by direct or indirect contact with hot gases to reduce the moisture content of
the residuals to 10% or lower. Either the temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals exceeds 800 C or
the wet bulb temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals, when the residuals leave the dryer, exceeds
800 C.
c. Heat Treatment - liquid residuals are heated to a temperature of 1800. C_or.higher for thirty minutes.
d ThermoAhilic Aerobic Digestion -liquid residuals are agitated wig aueor'b-xygen to maintain aerobic conditions
at the mean cell residence times of ten (10) days at temperatures of 550 C to 600 C.
e. Beta Ray nadia ion - residuals are irradiated with beta rays from an accelerator at dosages of at least 1.0
megarad at room temperature (ca. 200 Q.
f. Gamma Ray Irradiation - residuals are irradiated with gamma rays from certain isotopes such as 60Co and
137Ce, at dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature (ca. 200 Q.
g. Pasttud aW - the temperature of the residuals is maintained at 700 C or higher for at least thirty minutes.
6. The residuals shall be treated in a process that is equivalent to a "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP),
as determined by the permitting authority based on evaluations of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
2. When residuals are to be sold or given away, orie of the following vector attraction reduction requirements (a, b, c, d, e, f,
g, or h) described below must be met.
f • Specify the letter of the vector attraction reduction requirement that has been met (submit.lab results, test results and
calculations). Any variation of the below must be described in full detail and attached.
a. Aerobic or Anaerobic Digestion - The mass of volatile solids are reduced by at least 38%. Volatile solids reduction is
measured between the residuals, prior to stabilization, and the residuals ready for use or disposal. This criterion should
be readily met by properly designed and operated anaerobic digestors, but not as readily met by aerobic digestors.
Treatment facilities with aerobic digestors may need to meet the vector attraction reduction requirement through 19c or
19d.
b. Anaerobic Digestion - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be
demonstrated by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals in a bench scale unit for an additional
40 days at 300 C to 370 C. If, at the end of the 40 days, the volatile solids are reduced,by less than 17%, vector
attraction reduction is achieved.
FORM: DRS 02/95 Page 5 of 7

c.- Aerobic Digestion - If 38% volatile solids reduction cannot be achieved, vector attraction reduction can be demonstrated
by further digesting a portion of the previously digested residuals that have a solids content of 2% or less in a bench
scale unit for an additional 30 days at 200 C. If, at the end of the 30 days, the volatile solids are reduced by less than
15%, vector attraction reduction is achieved.
d Aerobic Digestion - The speck oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) shall be equal to or less than 1.5 milligrams of oxygen
per hour per gram of total dry solids at 200 C.
e. Aerobic Processes - The temperature of the residuals for at least 14 days shall be greater than 400 C. During this time,
the average temperature shall be greater than 450 C.
f. Alkaline Stabilization - The pH of the residuals is raised to 12 or higher by alkali addition and, without the addition of
more alkali, remains at 12 or higher for 2 hours and then at 11.5 or higher for an additional 22 hours.
g. DDtying (stabilized solids,) - The total solids of residuals that do not contain unstabilized solids, and which are generated
in a primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 75%. Blending with other materials is not
Cowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
h. %ng (unstabilized solids) - The total solids of residuals that contains unstabilized solids, and which are generated in a
primary wastewater treatment process, shall be equal to or greater than 90%. Blending with other materials is not
allowed to achieve the total solids percentage.
VI. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Please provide a brief narrative concerning materials handling, including the following:
a: How will the residuals be handled and transported from where the residuals are produced to where they will be treated?
b. Where will the residuals be stored until processed?
c. How will leachate collection be handled?
d. What will be the duration of treatment?
e. Where will the final product be stored?
f. How long will the final product be stored before being distributed?
V..
g. How will the final product be distributed (packaging)?
2. Please attach a marketability statement detailing destinations and approximate amounts of the final product to be
distributed.
3. Please provide either a label which shall be affixed to the bagged processed residual or an information sheet which shall be
provided to the person who receives the processed residual. The label or information sheet shall contain, at a minimum, the
following information:
a. The name and address of the person who prepared the residual that is sold or given away in a bag or other container for
application to the land.
b. A statement that application of the residual to the land is prohibited except in accordance with the instructions on the
label or information sheet.
c. A statement that the residuals shall not be applied to any site that is flooded, frozen or snow-covered.
d A statement that adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any disposed or stored
residuals into any surface waters.
e. Information on all applicable buffers including a 10 foot buffer between application site and any public or private water
supply source (including wells) and any stream, lake, river, or natural drainage way.
FORM: DRS 02/95 Page 6 of 7

Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm: Rust Environment & Infrastru=re
15 Brennan Way
City: _ Greenville State: SC Zip: 29615
Telephone Number: (. 80.1 ) _ 234- 301 Z
Professional Engineer's Certification:
I, P . Bryan Wright , attest that this application for City of Hendersonville -
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowledge
the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of this submittal
package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have
reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's Seal, Signature, and Date:
Applicant's Certification:
Q;.......,,
.QSEALr-�
1995�
�I
I'
I, TOM KILPATRICK , attest that this application for'A
THE CITY OF HENDERSONVILL6
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date 4127195
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: DRS 02/95 Page 7 of 7

Narrative
for
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
Distribution of Residual Solids
II. FACILITY INFORMATION
10. See attached Figure 1. FACILITY DIAGRAM showing WWTP treatment process.
V. PATHOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION REDUCTION
The project involves contracting to have an existing stockpile of sludge treated with the
patented N-Viro process. Therefore no Pathogen or Vector Attraction Reduction data
is available. Because the N-Viro process is a proven technology the City of
Hendersonville request an exemption regarding submittal of Pathogen or Vector
Attraction Reduction data.
The N-Viro process was patented and approved by EPA as a PFRP process and is in fact
the basis of the 40 CFR 503 for alkaline stabilization. Therefore the following
requirements will be met with the N-viro process:
V.1. Pathogen Reduction
a. - Fecal coliform requirement
b. - Salmonella requirements
c. 2. - Alkaline treatment requirements
V. 2. Vector Attraction Reduction
f. Alkaline treatment requirements
VI. GENERAL . INFORMATION
1. The residuals are currently stored in drying beds at the Mud Creek WWTP. The
N-Viro process equipment will be set up adjacent to the beds and the residuals
will be introduced into the process equipment using a front end -loader.
The residuals leachate i collec the drying bed underdrains and flows to the
head of the WWTP. Any runoff. s �g the N-Viro process will flow toa
existing catch basin which also flo ack to the head of the WWTP.
The approximately 2,000 cubic yards of dewatered sludge will be processed in 4
to 8 weeks, depending on weather, after the equipment is set up and operational.
The finished product will be stored in drying beds which have been cleaned
during the process.

The treated residuals will be stored until analytical results show the Pathogen and
Vector Reduction requirements are met. This will take between 30 and 60 days
depending on laboratory turn around time.
The final product will be distributed in one of two ways:
1) The City will apply the final product to City property at agricultural rates
based on growing grass, or
2) the final product will be made available to the public for use on lawns,
shrubs, etc. An information sheet will be provided to anyone receiving
the material.
2. The City of Hendersonville has access to adequate public property to agriculturally land
apply all of the approximately 2,000 tons of final product. In addition, given the lime
value of the final product, public demand may also be significant .
3. See enclosed information sheet.

i
INFORMATION SHEET
FOR USERS OF
CITY OF HENDERSONVII.LE
CLASS "A" RESIDUAL SOLIDS
This product was prepared by the City of Hendersonville. If you have questions regarding the
use or content of the product contact:
Mr. Tom Kilpatrick
City of Hendersonville 2
145 Fifth Avenue East(6�1
J
Hendersonville, N.C. 28792
The application of this product is prohibited except in accordance with the following instructions:
• The product shall not be applied to property which is flooded, frozen or snow-covered.
• The product shall not be applied unless adequate measures are taken to prevent surface
runoff from washing the product into surface waters.
• The product shall not be applied within 10 feet of public or private well, streams,
lakes, rivers, or natural drainage ways.

1
FIGURE 1. FACILITY DIAGRAM ,
FINE
GRIT Q1 BAR
LARIFIER CHAMBER _
SCREENS SCRE::V 1
z
w
_z ITRICKLING SEPTAGE
OXIDATION DITCH
ACTIVATED SLUDGE jO
•FILTER - —
Ix CD
J
ix cn
CLARIFIER
CHLORINE : H
z
z
CONTACT - A OBI
_ cry
2 GESTER — — — —
Sampling Points
a 1. INFLUENT
k 2. EFFLUENT
ii 3. OXIDATION DITCH
4. ANAEROBIC DIGESTER
p 5..SLUDGE TO DISPOSAL
10. SEPTAGE.TANK
T - �
STREAM STORED IN
BELT DRYING
PRESS BEDS

a cec
N c o R P ( R A T E D® REPORT OF LAbdRATORY ANALYSIS
+ THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
January 14, 1994
Mr. Scott Chovan.
Hendersonville (City of)
P.O. Box 1760
Hendersonville, NC 28793
RE: PACE Project No. A31209.530
Client Reference: Sludge - State Permit & 503 Regulations
Dear Mr. Chovan:
Enclosed is the report of laboratory am-Iyses for samples received
December 09 _ 20, 1993.
Footnotes are given at the end of the report.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free
to contact us.
Sincerely,
�•.• . fit/ • b�uaus•�
Kay Parris
Project Manager
Enclosures
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Charlotte; North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, NC 28801
Tampa. Florida
Asheville, North Carolina
TEL [phone]
Iowa City, Iowa
Now York, New York
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri
Denver. Colorado

I N C O R P l) CRAeTEO
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Hendersonville (City of)
P.O. Box 1760
Hendersonville, NC 28793
Attn: .Mr. Scott Chovan
REPORT OF LAbdRATORY ANALYSIS
Client Reference: Sludge = State Permit & 503 Regulations
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Parameter;
INORGANIC,ANALYSIS
8 RCRA METALS - LEACHATE
Barium, Leachate
Cadmium, Leachate
Chromium,;leachate
Lead, Leachate
Silver, Leachate
Arsenic, Leachate
Selenium,iLeachate
Mercury, Leachate
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, LEACHAT
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3-Methylphenoi
Nitrobenzene
Hexachloro-1,3 Butadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
January 14, 1994
PACE Project Number: A31209530
93 0165400
'RF_C;Ej F_D
12/09/93
12/09/93
Sludge
�� fed i 1994
Units
MDL
Leachate
(1)
PCTY;
t
mg/L
_ 0.01
1.1
mg/L ="
0.01
ND
mg/L
0.02
ND
mg/L
0.10
ND
mg/L
0.01
ND
mg/L
0.001
0.006
mg/L
0.001
0.001
mg/L
0.0002
0.0005
ug/L
10
ND
ug/L
10
ND
ug/L
10
NO
ug/L
10
ND
ug/L
10
ND
ug/L
10
NO
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ug/L
10
ND
Hexachlorobe.nzene.
ug/L
10
ND
Pentachlorophenol
ug/L
50
ND
Pyridine
ug/L
50
ND
Hexachloroethane
ug/L
10
NO
m & p-Methylphenol
ug/L
10
NO
RCRA HERBICIDES, LEACHATE
2,4-D
mg/L
1.0
NO
2,4,5-TP
mg/L
0.10
NO
RCRA PESTICIDES, LEACHATE
Chlordane by TCLP
mg/L
0.003
ND
54 Ravenseroft Drive
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville. NC 28801
Tampa, Florida
Asheville, North Carolina
TEU 704-254.7176
Iowa City, Iowa
New York, New York
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania .
Kansas City, Missouri
Deaver, Colorado

PINCORPORATED
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 2
REPORT OF LAbdRATORY ANALYSIS
Client Reference: Sludge - State Permit & 503 Regulations
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter Units MDL
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
RCRA PESTICIDES, LEACHATE
January 14, 1994
PACE Project Number: A31209530
93 0165400
12/09/93
12/09/93
Sludge
Leachate
(1
Endrin by TCLP
mg/L
0.002
NO
Heptachlor by TCLP
mgit
0.0008
NO
Toxaphene by TCLP
mg/L
0.05
NO
Lindane
mg/L
0.04
NO
Methoxychlor
mg/L -
1.0
NO
Heptachlor Epoxide
mg/L
0.0008
NO
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, LEACHATE
Vinyl Chloride
ug/L
20
NO
1,1-Dichloroethylene
ug/L
25
NO
Chloroform
ug/L
25
NO
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
25
NO
2-Butane (MEK)
ug/L
250
NO
Carbon Tetrachloride
ug/L-
25
NO
Trichloroethylene
ug/L
25
NO
Benzene
ug/L
25
NO
Tetrachloroethylene
ug/L
25
NO
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
25
NO
54 fiavenscroft Drive Offices Serving Minneapolis, Minnesota Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, NC 28801 Tempe, Florida Asheville, North Carolina
TEL [phone] Iowa City, Iowa New York, New York
FAX: [phone] San Francisco, Carifomia Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas Cirv_ Mleemvi new.,..

a
I N C O R P O R A T E D
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 3
REPORT OF LAbdRATORY ANALYSIS
Client Reference: Sludge - State Permit & 503 Regulations
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Arsenic
Bacteria; Fecal Colifor.
Cadmium
Calcium
Cation Exchange Capacity
Chloride
Units MDL
January 14, 1994
PACE Project Number: A31209530
93 0165389 93 0165397
12/09/93 12/09/93
12/09/93 12/09/93
Sludge Sludge
Annual Quarterly
mg/kg
0.05 -
0.25
col/g
1000 -
8000 -(2)
mg/kg
0.50 0.85
0.85
mg/kg
5.0 1800
1800
Meq/100"gm
0.1 10.7
-
mg/kg
50 -
91
Chromium
mg/kg
1.0
-
4.0
Copper
mg/kg
0.50
68
68
Corrosivity
pH Units
0.1
6.9
6.9
Lead
mg/kg
5.0
34
34
Magnesium
mg/kg
5.0
480
480
Manganese
mg/kg
0.50
330
-
Mercury
mg%kg
0.10
-
2.0
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.50
-
2.4
Nickel
mg/kg
2.5
3.8
3.8
Nitrogen, Ammonia
mg/kg
8.9
-
4100
Nitrogen, Plant Available
mg/kg
1.0
-
3420
Phosphorus, Total
mg/kg
50
5000
5000
Potassium
mg/kg
5.0
875
875
Selenium
mg/kg
0.05
-
0.20
-Sodium
mg/k;
5.0
56
56
Solids, Percent Total
%
0.01
-
28
Sulfate
mg/kg
50
-
190
Zinc
mg/kg
0.50
174
174
BASE SATURATION (COMPUTED)
% Potassium
%
1.0
27.6
-
% Magnesium
%
1.0
30.5
-
% Calcium
q
1.0
31.4
-
% Hydrogen
%
1.0
10.5
-
STANDARD SOIL FERTILITY TEST
% Humic Matter
%
9.9+
-
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Offices Serving: Mbureapolis, Minnesota
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, NC 28801
Tampa, Florida
Asheville, North Carolina
TEL, 704-254-7176
Iowa City, Iowa
New York, New York
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, Ca6fomia
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri
Denver, Colorado

I N C O R P O R A T E D
THE A55UHANCE OF QUALITY
REPORT OF LAbdRATORY ANALYSIS
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 4
Client -Reference: Sludge - State Permit & 503 Regulations
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter Units MDL
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
STANDARD SOIL FERTILITY TEST
Acidity, Total
NITROGEN, TOTAL
Nitrogen, Kjeldahl
Nitrogen, Nitrate plus Nitrite
Nitrogen, Total
January 14, 1994
PACE Project Number: A31209530
93 0165389 93 0165397
12/09/93 12/09/93
12/09/93 --12/09/93
Sludge Sludge
Annual Quarterly
mg/kg
50 55 -
mg/kg
500 - 8000
mg/kg =
_
5.0 - 20
mg/kg
0.1 - 8020
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
TEL, 704.254-7176
FAX: [phone]
Offices Serving Minneapolis. Minnesota
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
San Francisco, California
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
Asheville, North Carolina
New York New York
Frnubu* Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri
Denver, Colorado

I N C O fl P O R A T E 0
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 5
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Client Reference: Sludge - State Permit & 503 Regulations
January 14, 1994
PACE Project Number: A31209530
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
93 0171656
93 0171664
93 0171672
Date Received:
12/20/93
12/20/93.
12/20/93
12/20/93
12/20/93
12/20/93
Client Sample ID:
Parameter
Sludge
Sludge
Sludge
Units MDL
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Bacteria, Fecal Coliform col/g 1000 3000 (2) 2000 (2).
Bacteria, Fecal Colii-oria col/g -10000 - - 70000 (2)
PACE Sample Number:
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Client Sample ID:
Parameter Units MDL
INORGANIC ANALYSIS
INDIVIDUAL PARAMETERS
Bacteria, Fecal Coliform col/g 100
Bacteria, Fecal Coliform col/g .1000
These data have been reviewed and are approved for release.
Barbara M. Miller
Supervisor, Inorganic Cheldistry
Walter L. Miller
Regional Director
93 0171680 93"0171699 93 0171702
12/20/93 12/20/93 12/20/93
12/20/93 12/20/93 12/20/93
Sludge Sludge Sludge
<100
2000 (2) 3500
Pld�``I k
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville, NC 28801
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
TEL, 704.254.7176
Tampa, Nrida
Iowa City, Iowa
Ashevitle, North Carolina
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
New York, New York
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri
Denier, Colorado

I
+1
I N C O fl P O fl A T E 0
THE ASSURANCE OF QUALITY
Mr. Scott Chovan
Page 6
REPORT OF LAudRATORY ANALYSIS
FOOTNOTES January 14, 1994
for pages 1 through 5 PACE Project Number: A31209530
Client Reference: Sludge - State Permit & 503 Regulations
< Less than reported value.
MDL Method Detection Limit
ND Not detected at or above the MDL.
(1) All analysis performed on Toxic Characteristic Leachate.
(2) Non ideal count.
54 Ravenscroft Drive
Asheville; NC 28801
Offices Serving: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Charlotte, North Carolina An Equal Opportunity Employer
TEL [phone]
Tampa, Florida
Iowa City, Iowa
Asheville, North Carolina
New York, New York
FAX: [phone]
San Francisco, California
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Kansas City, Missouri
Denver, Colorado