090015_Routine Inspection_20220804

' /.
Facility Number
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review ED Structure Evaluation CJ Technical Assistance
Reason for N'isit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Arrival"Time: ` t i;1 Departure Time: 1 County:
ON ner Email:
h
1 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Region:
Facility Contact: k r _ "r .t }; ( y Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
r+
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop, Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
E ; it1
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Laver
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non --Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharge originated at: ( I Structure Application Field 1 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify I)WR )
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'? (I f yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the wafers
of the State other than from a discharge'?
I
Yes
Nei fl N• A n NE
Yes
Yes
No - N• A n NE
No NA 7 NE
[� Yes
Yes
Yes
No I NA 7 NE
No n NA fl NE
No ( NA ❑ NE
Page 1 air 3
5/12/2020 Conntintied

Facility Number: 01
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): .) °�
Structure 2
No
11
31
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑NA ❑NE
[No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ( No E NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA E NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
No
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
rift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C'(1T1 `I �� R 1 r �i e l c[T)Ql\ o\ece--eq
13. Soil Type(s): Q((jum, c, o
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
gYes ❑No ❑NA
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ..qNo ❑ NA
❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes;41No ❑ NA E NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 1p No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. E Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis E Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall E Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Sludge Survey
E Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
!ll��� 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 9
-1c
Date of Inspection: F3, `t -
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
O Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
0 Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
glNo ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
tX No
r_ANo
IV No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations', (use additional pages as necessary
ecommendations o
:hE
arnendment fot flJiUC±
*blitz 3 RErnDve crop off fl-e14
a3 faiR1 to RQ/flcx/'
i7 i(1flr) wqc uianqe to m,iir bit
ttak (c9 not .411e millet, farm
did grow erne the type
9igs5 not eh plaYi
fi�4c� est��1raesn ,igr��te4
cOlkrop
VIQSfie• co in ga, a �i a� II �;�
9u4o-z.� id 21ai
P.41rT;411
5pii ? C/a4irr chit !2I)
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
ante ante
FAQ �031-eirfi
�r�ve 9WtTIv
Phone: " a —3 'P /.5 it
Date: f3' ga'
5/12/2020