20051919 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20140808

FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
GOOSE CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 147, Contract Number 004681)
Construction Completed September 2008
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
r "I.-
AmEMU
l�lll�'ll l
P.vp...
January 2014

FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
GOOSE CREEK
STREAM RESTORATION
DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 147, Contract Number 004681)
Construction Completed September 2008
Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Design Firm:
Biohabitats
8218 Creedmoor Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27613
JkH1 M �emlt
Axiom Environmental, Inc. P1 VUUAM
January 2014

[91 GUINLY&I OJIu/\:7'/ 1�1 7T 1
The Goose Creek stream restoration project originated by the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) was constructed between May 12, 2008 and September 5, 2008. Grading and stream
structure installation began on May 14, 2008 and was completed on August 20, 2008. Planting of the
buffer was completed on February 18, 2009.
The Goose Creek Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located in the City of Durham, North Carolina in a
highly developed watershed (Figure 1, Appendix A). Goose Creek is part of the Neuse River Basin
(Upper Neuse, Subbasin 03- 04 -01) and is located in USGS Cataloging Unit 03020201. This project is
located in the EEP's Ellerbe Creek Local Watershed Plan
(http: / /www.nceep. net / services /lwps/Upper_Neuse /Ellerbe Creek_Local_Watershed_Plan.pdf) area,
which is targeted for mitigation to protect watershed functions, increase aquatic life, decrease destructive
flooding, provide recreational opportunities, and protect the Falls Lake drinking water supply.
The preproject stream was highly modified and artificially confined by concrete along the
southern/upstream channel and banks, and by rock walls in the northern/downstream reach. The project
aimed to eradicate artificial hardening structures, and restore a more natural channel geometry and
riparian buffer. Project restoration efforts provided 1465 linear feet of stream restoration, 1.38 acres of
riparian buffer restoration, and 0.06 acre of riparian buffer enhancement. Tables summarizing project
objectives and activities can be found in Appendix A. This report (compiled based on the EEP's
Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports Version 1.4 dated 11/7/11)
summarizes data for year 5 (2013) monitoring.
The goals of the Goose Creek stream restoration project included the following.
• To improve aquatic habitat by removing the fabriform channel liner on the Eastway Elementary
School reach (upstream/southern reach) and the stone retaining walls on the Longmeadow Park
reach (downstream/northern reach) and reintroduce a more defined and natural riffle /pool channel
geometry.
• To improve water quality by reducing nutrient loading from adjacent developed properties
through restoration of a riparian buffer.
• To improve terrestrial habitat by restoring a riparian buffer.
• To decrease the sediment and nutrient content of stormwater flow originating in the Barnes Street
Redevelopment project site, which flows through the Site and into Goose Creek, through the
means of a re- configured stormwater channel which slows stormwater flow, allowing sediment to
settle and nutrients to be absorbed by planted vegetation.
Goals were accomplished by removing artificial hardening structures; constructing a natural, stable
profile and dimension for the stream channel; and reestablishing a continuous riparian buffer along the
stream banks. Project implementation has greatly increased the prominence of riffles and pools in the
reach and improved aquatic habitat within the Site.
Based on the Goose Creek baseline document (2009), success criteria dictate that after five monitoring
years an average density of 260 stems per acre must be surviving in stream restoration areas (Vegetation
Plot 4) and 320 stems per acre must be surviving in Neuse River Riparian Buffer restoration credit areas
(Vegetation Plots 1, 2, and 3). Based on the number of stems counted, average densities were measured
at 485 planted stems per acre (excluding livestakes) surviving in year 5 (2013). The dominant species
identified at the Site were planted stems of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), tulip tree (Liriodendron
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina page i

tulipifera), and sycamore (Platanus occidentalis). All individual plots met success criteria based on
planted stems alone.
Three large willow oaks (Quercus phellos) (located on the downstream/northem reach) that had
succumbed to the stress of old age and drought were removed by the City of Durham in the winter of
2011 with the approval of EEP. Planting within these areas as well four additional areas on the
upstream/southern reach) were planted with 70 five- gallon sized containerized trees of red oak (Quercus
rubra), sycamore, red chokeberry (Aronia arbutifolia), red maple (Acer rubrum), cherrybark oak
(Quercus pagoda), and Shumard oak (Quercus shumardii), in addition to 25 livestakes of silky dogwood
(Cornus amomum). Trees within these areas are doing well; 2012 planting information is provided in
Appendix F.
Noted vegetation areas of concern within the Site, depicted on the attached Figures 2A -2B (Appendix B),
include the development of invasive species such as Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense) scattered along
the northern/downstream reach between Liberty Street and Holloway Street. Other invasive species
include small patches of Japanese hops (Humulus japonicas) just north of the Liberty Street bridge on the
right bank and adjacent to the left bank of the western tributary to the southern/upstream reach. Mimosa
(Albizia julibrissin), chinaberry (Melia azedarach), and white mulberry (Morus alba), are located in
several locations along the northern (downstream reach). Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and
Japanese privet (Ligustrum japonicum) are located just north of the stormwater wetland and adjacent to
the fence just south of the tributary to the southern/upstream reach coming from the west. Scotch broom
(Cytisus scoparius) is located at the very southeastern corner of the Site; some treatment /control of this
species occurred in the 2011 monitoring year by cutting plants to remove the seed source. In addition,
scattered stems of Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana), white mulberry, wintercreeper (Euonymous
fortunei), air yam (Discorea bulbifera), and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora) are located adjacent to the
southern/upstream reach. Herbaceous species including Nepalese browntop (Microstegium vimineum)
and Asiatic dayflower (Commelina communis) are also located in several areas along the
southern/upstream reach near the stream channel. Invasive species within the Site are not affecting
planted stem survival or growth, and are therefore expected to be shaded out as planted trees mature.
Wisteria (Wisteria frutescens) is located just north of Liberty Street on the right bank adjacent to the
bridge and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) is scattered throughout the Site and occasionally forms thick
stands. Wisteria and giant ragweed are not invasive species but can be problematic due to their growth
habits and potential to shade or, in the case of wisteria, girdle planted trees. These species have been
monitored closely throughout the monitoring period and are not affecting growth of planted stems.
Success criteria for stream restoration reaches dictate that little to no change from the as -built channel
occurred over the five -year monitoring period. Year 5 (2013) monitoring measurements indicate that
there have been minimal changes in cross - sections and profile downstream of Liberty Street as compared
to as -built data. The stream profile upstream of Liberty Street was designed to adjust itself to changes in
watershed flows. A total of 16 bankfull events are documented to have occurred at the Site with three
events in year 1 (2009), three events in year 2 (2010), three events in year 3 (2011), and four events in the
year 4 (2012), and three events to date in year 5 (2013) monitoring period.
Two structures (upstream of Cross - section 5 and downstream of Cross - section 6) that were watched
throughout the five -year monitoring period due to boulders that had fallen in the channel are doing well
and are not exhibiting additional erosion despite extensive flooding during the 2013 monitoring year. The
upper reach of Goose Creek was an unconventional design, which allowed for the evolution of a low flow
channel within the larger bankfull channel. Single wing deflectors were installed to increase channel
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina page ii

sinuosity (restricted due to a narrow beltwidth) within the larger bankfull channel, allowing the thalweg to
migrate within the bankfull channel. Dense, rooted vegetation has established throughout the reach and
adjacent to the structures inhibiting lateral erosion and bed scour. The structures and the entire reach are
stable and functioning as designed, and have remained intact despite flashy flows from the upstream
watershed, which is primarily comprised of impervious surfaces associated with the City of Durham, and
several large rainfall events (Tropical Storm Ida and numerous rain events of greater than 4 inches) that
have occurred throughout the five -year monitoring period.
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for vegetation and stream attributes in the Fifth Monitoring
Year (2013). Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in tables and figures within this report's appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents
available on EEPs website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available
from EEP upon request.
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina page in

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT ............................................... ..............................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. ..............................1
2.1 Vegetation Assessment ........................................................................................ ..............................1
2.2 Stream Assessment ............................................................................................. ............................... 1
3.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ ..............................1
List of Figures
Figure1. Site Location ................................................................................ ............................... Appendix A
Figures 2a -2b. Monitoring Plan View ................................... ............................... .......................Appendix B
List of Tables
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives ................................... ............................... Appendix A
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ........................................ ............................... Appendix A
Table 3. Project Contacts Table .................................................................. ............................... Appendix A
Table 4. Project Attribute Table .................................................................. ............................... Appendix A
Tables 5a -5b. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessments ....... ............................... .......................Appendix B
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment .......................... ............................... .......................Appendix B
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table ............................ .......................Appendix C
Table 8. Vegetation Metadata Table ..................................... ............................... .......................Appendix C
Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species ......... ............................... .......................Appendix C
Table 10. Verification of Bankfull Events ................................................... ............................... Appendix E
Appendices
APPENDIX A. PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1. Site Location
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2a -2b. Monitoring Plan View
Table 5a. North Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Stability Assessment
Table 5b. South Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX C. VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
CVS Summary Data Tables
Table 8. Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
APPENDIX D. STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross - section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Pebble Count Plots
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Table of Contents

Appendices (continued)
APPENDIX E. HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 10. Verification of Bankfull Events
APPENDIX F. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING
APPENDIX G. ADDITIONAL SITE MAPPING
Restoration Plan Figure 5. Soil Types
APPENDIX H. ADDITIONAL SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Preconstruction Site Photographs
Asbuilt Site Photographs
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Table of Contents

2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Following Site construction, four plots (10- meters square) were established and monumented with metal
rebar at all plot corners. Sampling was conducted for year 5 (2013) on September 10, 2013 as outlined in
the CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008)
( http :Hcvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm); results are included in Appendix C. The taxonomic standard for
vegetation used for this document was Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas
(Weakley 2007). The locations of vegetation monitoring plots are depicted on Figures 2A -2B in
Appendix B. Visual assessments were completed on September 10, 2013 for year 5 (2013).
2.2 Stream Assessment
Eight permanent cross - sections were established after construction was completed. Measurements of
each cross - section include points at all breaks in slope including top of bank, bankfull, and thalweg.
Riffle cross - sections are classified using the Applied Fluvial Morphology (Rosgen 1996) stream
classification system. Longitudinal profile measurements of the entire Site restoration reaches include
thalweg and water surface; with each measurement taken at the head of facets (i.e. riffle, run, pool, and
glide) in addition to the maximum pool depth. Visual assessments of in- stream structures were conducted
to determine if failure occurred. Failure of a structure may be indicated by collapse of the structure,
undermining of the structure, abandonment of the channel around the structure, and/or stream flow
beneath the structure. Stream measurements were completed the week of April 8, 2013 (Appendix D).
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.2. (online). Available: http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2007. Redbook, Surface Waters and Wetlands
Standards. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water
Quality. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
Weakley, Alan S. 2007. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (online).
Available: http: / /www. herbarium .unc.edu /WeakleysFIora.pdf [February 1, 2008]. University of
North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Weather Underground. 2012. Station at Raleigh- Durham Airport, North Carolina. (online). Available:
http : / /www.wunderground.com/history /airport/KRDU/ [August 20, 2012]. Weather
Underground.
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina page 1

F.1199"2111 r. .
PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1.
Site Location
Table 1.
Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts Table
Table 4.
Project Attributes Table
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
*Buffer restoration and enhancement is to be used to mitigate for buffer impacts per the Neuse River Buffer Rules
* *Restored length of Longmeadow reach does not include 55 feet of stream between the end of the project and the Holloway Street
culvert that was not restored.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Activity or Report
Pre-
Actual Completion or Delivery
Restoration Plan
July 2005
Planted
Buffer
Buffer
Restoration
Construction
--
September 2008
Restoration
--
September 2008
As- Builts
October 2008
December 2008
Reach
Project
Stationing
Mitigation Plan
Approach
Easement
Restoration
Enhancement
Length
Year 2 (2010) Monitoring
Length ft
January 2011
Level
Acreage
(acres)*
acres *
(ft **
Eastway
514
3 +48 -8 +61
Restoration
P2
0.86
--
-
514
Upstream
Eastway
347
0 +00 -3 +47
Restoration
P2
1.4
0.58
0.06
347
Downstream
Longmeadow
659
0 +55 -6 +59
Restoration
P2
1.69
0.8
--
604
Park Section
TOTALS 71771500
3.95
1.38
0.06
1465
Component Summations
Restoration
Stream (linear feet)
Restoration Buffer (acres)*
Level
Restoration
1465
1.38
Enhancement
--
0.06
1465 linear feet
1.44 acres
TOTALS
1465 SMUs
1.41 BMUs
*Buffer restoration and enhancement is to be used to mitigate for buffer impacts per the Neuse River Buffer Rules
* *Restored length of Longmeadow reach does not include 55 feet of stream between the end of the project and the Holloway Street
culvert that was not restored.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Activity or Report
Data Collection Completion
Actual Completion or Delivery
Restoration Plan
July 2005
October 2005
Final Design- Construction Plans
November 2006
April 2008
Construction
--
September 2008
Permanent Seeding Completed
--
September 2008
As- Builts
October 2008
December 2008
Planting
--
February 2009
Mitigation Plan
March 2009
March 2009
Year 1 (2009) Monitoring
October 2009
November 2009
Year 2 (2010) Monitoring
August 2010
January 2011
Supplemental Planting
March 2011
Year 3 (2011) Monitoring
June 2011
July 2011
Supplemental Planting
March 2012
Year 4 (2012) Monitoring
August 2012
August 2012
Year 5 2013) Monitoring
September 2013
October 2013
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Protect Number 147)
Designer
8918 Creedmoor Road, Suite 200
Biohabitats, Inc
Raleigh, NC 27613
Kevin Nunnery 919 -518 -0311
Construction Contractor
6106 Corporate Park Dr.
Shamrock Environmental, Inc
Browns Summit, NC 27214
Dan Albert 336 - 375 -1989
Survey Contractor
668 Marsh Country Lane
Level Cross Surveying, PLLC
Randleman, NC 23717
Sheri Willard 336- 495 -1713
Planting Contractor
1932 Holt Rd
Southern Garden, Inc
Cary, NC 27519
Todd Laakso 919 - 362 -1050
Seed Mix Suppliers
1218 Management Way, Garner, NC 27529
Green - Resource
Rodney Montgomery 919 - 779 -4727
Planting Stock Suppliers
880 Buteo Ridge Road
Container Stock -Cure Nursery
Pittsboro, NC 27312
Bill Cure 919 -542 -6186
Balled in Burlap
3705 New Bern Ave
Taylor's Nursery
Raleigh, NC 27610
Richard Taylor 919 231 -6161
Year 1 -5 (2009 -13) Monitoring
218 Snow Avenue
Performer
Raleigh, NC 27603
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Grant Lewis (919) 215 -1693
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Project County
Durham
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Triassic Basin
Project River Basin
Neuse
USGS HUC for Project 14 digit)
3020201050010
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
03 -04 -01
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
Ellerbe Creek Local Watershed Plan
WRC Hab Class Warm, Cool, Cold
Warm
% of project easement demarcated
100%
Beaver activity observed?
No
Eastway upstream
Eastway downstream
Longmeadow
Drainage area
350
396
481
Stream order
2
2
2
Restored length (feet)
514
347
604
Perennial or Intermittent
perennial
perennial
perennial
Watershed type (Rural, Urban, etc.)
urban
urban
urban
Watershed LULC Distribution (%
Urban -Low Intensity Developed
44
44
43
Urban-High Intensity Developed
22
22
22
Residential Urban
18
18
19
Forest, Herbaceous, Open Water
16
16
16
Watershed impervious cover %
—55
—55
—54
NCDWQ AU /Index number
27 -5 -1
27 -5 -1
27 -5 -1
NCDWQ classification
WS -IV, NSW
WS -IV, NSW
WS -IV, NSW
303d listed?
no
no
no
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
yes
yes
yes
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
urban stormwater
urban stormwater
urban stormwater
Total acreage of easement
0.9
1.4
1.7
Ros en classification of pre-existing
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ros en classification of As -built
Bc5
BO
BO
Valle type/slope
N/A
N/A
N/A
Valley side slope ranee. . 2 -3.%
10 -15%
10 -15%
10 -15%
Valley toe slope ranee. . 2 -3.%
3 -5%
3 -5%
3 -5%
Dominant soil series /characteristics
Series
Whitestore -Urban
Whitestore -Urban
Whitestore -Urban
Depth
60"
60"
60"
Cla %
5 -70
5 -70
5 -70
Used N/A for items that may not apply. Use " -" for items that are unavailable and "U" for items that are unknown
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

99 _ , 113 t•
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2a -2b. Monitoring Plan View
Table 5a. North Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Stability Assessment
Table 5b. South Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Note: Johnson grass is
scattered along the
northern /downstream reach
between Liberty Street
and Holloway Street;
however, it does not
appear to be affecting
planted tree stems.
Additional species scattered plot 1
throughout this area include
Bradford pear, mimosa,
Japanese privet, china-
berry, and white mulberry.
- 78.88441
= vegetation plot, xs =
n-ML.2� ++ 1J. 17
F. de
7is 0 1
i
Three large willow oaks
removed by City of Durham
in 2012; area was planted
with 165 containerized trees.
Japanese hops are located
on the right bank and
wisteria on the left bank
adjacent to the bridge.
U
+
4
fQW. 0 50 100
Legend
"\-i Conservation Easement
MM- Restored Stream Channel
Vegetation Plots
• Vegetation Plot Origin
Cross - sections
• Removed Oak Trees
C3 Invasive Species /Species of Concern
200 300
Feet
Dw by. FIGURE
Axiom Environmental
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW CLF /KRJ
2ls Snow Avenue
2760 GOOSE CREEK SITE Date: ��
Raleigh, NC 27603 EEP PROJECT NUMBER 147 Oct. 2013
- -- (919) 215 -1693
Durham County, North Carolina Project:
Ax rnri wa nW, Inc. 12- 004.06

w
Japanese hops
�Lib�
Scattered Chinese & Japanese privet,
Bradford pear, white mulberry,
wintercreeper, air yam, and multiflora
rose.
j t
f �
Plot'3
Multiflora rose & x
Chinese privet
Xsect
Comment*
Longitude
Latitude
v 1
- 78.88428807010
35.99419284740
v 1
- 78.88431099220
35.99411022280
v 1
- 78.88441700420
35.99413188950
v 1 origin
- 78.88440030210
35.99422471960
v 2
- 78.88398521060
35.99416646130
v 2
- 78.88395978500
35.99407776030
v 2
- 78.88406798710
35.99405434090
vp2 origin
- 78.88408533090
35.99414585150
v 3
- 78.88370854310
35.99179182840
v 3
- 78.88365999570
35.99179449810
v 3
- 78.88364574290
35.99197147050
vp3 origin
- 78.88369943100
35.99197805180
v 4
- 78.88374436330
35.99120963450
v 4
- 78.88369684360
35.99120309110
v 4
- 78.88367122940
35.99138281330
vp4 origin
- 78.88373014370
35.99138760720
xs1
- 78.88431515510
35.99422927800
xs1
- 78.88412084630
35.99426334970
xs2
- 78.88405842400
35.99364372310
xs2
- 78.88386791880
35.99376040220
xs3
- 78.88358099280
35.99321673000
xs3
- 78.88384776390
35.99324014180
xs4
- 78.88363044960
35.99302764270
xs4
- 78.88384681400
35.99311337920
xs5
- 78.88364554900
35.99188687370
xs5
- 78.88387897610
35.99197005400
xs6
- 78.88390661370
35.99 T-422971 10
xs6
- 78.88369007520
35.99136346110
xs7
- 78.88368865170
35.99067103710
xs7
- 78.88390759170
35.99068068430
xs8
- 78.88390127690
35.99039694400
xs8
- 78.88371291820
35.99040630750
vp = vegetation pros, xs = cross - section
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
(919) 215 -1693
axiom Environmental, Im-
Plot'4
Oft
lAd
1
i
Legend
Conservation Easement
Restored Stream Channel
Xsect 7 R 1
Structures
Vegetation Plots
1'
Scotch broom Vegetation Plot Origin
Cross - sections
Invasive Species /Species of Concern
Xsect DSO 0 50 100 200 300
Get Feet
CO
Dw by.
FIGURE
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW CLF /KRJ
GOOSE CREEK SITE Date:
EEP PROJECT NUMBER 147 Oct. 2013
Durham County, North Carolina Project: 2B
12- 004.06

Table 5a. Eastway (Southern/Upstream) Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment (861 linear feet)
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -built and reference baselines)
(# Stable)
Number
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Total Number
/ feet in
unstable state
% Perform.
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perform.
Mean or
Total
A. Riffles
1. Present?
7
7
N/A
100
100
2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)?
7
7
N/A
100
3. Facet grade appears stable?
7
7
N/A
100
4. Minimal evidence of embedding /fining?
7
7
N/A
100
5. Length appropriate?
7
7
N/A
100
B. Pools
1. Present? (e.g. no severe a radation)
6
6
N/A
100
100
2. Sufficiently deep (Dmax pool:Mean Bkf> 2.2 ?)
6
6
N/A
100
3. Length appropriate?
6
6
N/A
100
C. Thalweg
1. Upstream of meander bend centering?
NA
NA
N/A
N/A
2. Downstream of meander centering?
NA
NA
N/A
D. Meanders
1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion?
NA
NA
N/A
N/A
2. Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation?
NA
NA
N/A
3. Apparent Rc within spec?
NA
NA
N/A
4. Sufficient floodplain access and relief?
NA
NA
N/A
E. Bed General
1.General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
N/A
N/A
0
100
100
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0
100
F. Bank
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
0
100
100
G. Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
13
15
N/A
87
100
2. Height appropriate?
13
15
N/A
87
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
15
15
N/A
100
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
13
15
N/A
87
H. Wads /
1. Free of scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Boulders
2. Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 5b. Long Meadow (Northern/Downstream) Reach Goose Creek Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment (659 linear feet)
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Feature
Category
Metric (per As -built and reference baselines)
(# Stable)
Number
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
per As -built
Total Number
/ feet in
unstable state
% Perform.
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perform.
Mean or
Total
A. Riffles
1. Present?
9
9
N/A
100
100
2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)?
9
9
N/A
100
3. Facet grade appears stable?
9
9
N/A
100
4. Minimal evidence of embedding /fining?
9
9
N/A
100
5. Length appropriate?
9
9
N/A
100
B. Pools
1. Present? (e.g. no severe a radation)
7
7
N/A
100
100
2. Sufficiently deep (Dmax pool:Mean Bkf> 2.2 ?)
7
7
N/A
100
3. Length appropriate?
7
7
N/A
100
C. Thalweg
1. Upstream of meander bend centering?
NA
NA
N/A
N/A
2. Downstream of meander centering?
NA
NA
N/A
D. Meanders
1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion?
NA
NA
N/A
N/A
2. Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar formation?
NA
NA
N/A
3. Apparent Rc within spec?
NA
NA
N/A
4. Sufficient floodplain access and relief?
NA
NA
N/A
E. Bed General
1.General channel bed aggradation areas (bar formation)
N/A
N/A
0
100
100
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of increasing down
cutting or head cutting?
N/A
N/A
0
100
F. Bank
1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
N/A
N/A
0
100
100
G. Vanes
1. Free of back or arm scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Height appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
N/A
N/A
N/A
H. Wads /
1. Free of scour?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Boulders
2. Footing stable?
N/A
N/A
N/A
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project 147)
Planted Acreage 3.8
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
NA
NA
NA
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
NA
NA
NA
0
0.00
0.0%
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Vegetation growth is slow in the southern portion of the Site.
NA
NA
0
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreage` 3.8
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other
elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associated
acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with the
potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2
decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their
coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage,
distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer
will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade
are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a
projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the
conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend
items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.
°% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Johnson grass is scattered along the northern /downstream reach etween Liberty Street and Holloway
Street; however, it does not appear to be affecting planted tree stems. Additional species scattered through
this area include Bradford pear, mimosa, Japanese privet, chinaberry, and white mulberry. These areas ar
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
difficult to quantify and therefore aren't depicted on mapping (Figure 2A) or accounted for in the following
0.01
Light Yellow
7
0.23
6.1%
numbers. Additional areas depicted on mapping and accounted for in the following numbers include severa
small areas containing Chinese & Japanese privet, Bradford pear, white mulbery, wintercreeper, air yam,
multiflora rose, Japanese hops, asiatic day flower, and scotch broom.
5. Easement Encroachment Areas NA NA NA
0
0.00
0.0%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other
elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associated
acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with the
potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2
decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their
coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage,
distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer
will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade
are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a
projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the
conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend
items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.

Goose Creek Restoration Site
Year 5 (2013) Annual Monitoring
Vegetation Plot Photos (taken June 18, 2012)
PD
nD Hr-A Al
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

APPENDIX C
VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
CVS Summary Data Tables
Table 8. Vegetation Metadata Table
Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Proiect Number 147)
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 8. Vegetation Metadata Table
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Report Prepared By
Corri Faquin
Date Prepared
9/10/2013 15:54
database name
Axiom -EEP- 2013- A- v2.3.1.mdb
database location
\ \AE -SBS \Redirected Folders \KJernigan \Desktop
computer name
KEENAN -PC
file size
65798144
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems,
and all natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are
excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
147
project Name
Goose Creek
Description
River Basin
Neuse
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
4
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Project Number 147)
Insert PDF
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross - section Plots and Tables
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Pebble Count Plots
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Goose Creek
XS ID
XS - I
Feature
Riffle
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.0
333.0
6.9
332.9
11.3
332.1
14.4
330.3
16.5
329.5
18.2
328.4
20.0
327.9
22.1
327.6
24.1
326.8
26.8
326.6
28.4
326.8
29.3
326.9
30.5
327.1
34.1
326.6
37.7
326.6
40.2
326.7
42.6
327.4
45.3
328.5
47.4
329.6
50.6
331.4
52.0
331.9
59.0
332.8
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
331.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
120.2
Bankfull Width:
36.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
335.6
Flood Prone Width:
170.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.3
W / D Ratio:
11.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.2
Stream Type I E

River Basin:
Elevation
Neuse
332.30
6.02
331.55
Watershed:
330.16
Goose Creek
329.62
13.94
igan
XS ID
328.52
XS -2
328.16
21.55
328.00
Feature
328.13
Riffle
328.20
29.30
328.11
Date:
328.70
4/30/2013
328.46
36.05
328.39
Field Crew:
329.23
Perkinson, Jern
329.89
44.02
330.51
49.58
331.67
55.64
332.13
62.57
333.01
66.82
333.39
71.32
333.44
Stream Type E/C
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 2
337
336
335
334
333
_
c
.=O 332
331
W
330
329
328
327
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70 80
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.00
332.30
6.02
331.55
11.01
330.16
12.86
329.62
13.94
igan
Station
Elevation
0.00
332.30
6.02
331.55
11.01
330.16
12.86
329.62
13.94
328.72
15.88
328.52
17.71
328.16
21.55
328.00
23.40
328.13
25.89
328.20
29.30
328.11
32.09
328.70
34.07
328.46
36.05
328.39
38.40
329.23
40.57
329.89
44.02
330.51
49.58
331.67
55.64
332.13
62.57
333.01
66.82
333.39
71.32
333.44
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
331.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
109.5
Bankfull Width:
46.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
335.6
Flood Prone Width:
300.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
W / D Ratio:
20.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
----Bankfull
- -- -Flood Prone Area
_ ___ _______________________________ ________
- B As-Built 2008
-6-MY-01 11/2/09
-� MY -02 8/11/10
MY -03 2/9/2011
MY -04 8/14/12
MY -05 4/30/13

River Basin:
Neuse
336
334
^ 332 ml
a) ____ ___ _______________________________
g 330
W 328
326
324
0 10
Stream Type
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 3
20 30 40
Station (feet)
-
___________ ___ •Bankfull
- - -• Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2008
t MY -01 11/2/09
t MY -02 8/11/10
MY -03 3/25/11
MY04 8/14/12
MY -05 4/30/13
50 60 70
XS -3
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Goose Creek
XS ID
XS -3
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
-9.9 3
332.35
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 331.6
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area: 160.5
Bankfull Width: 42.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation: -
Flood Prone Width: -
Max Depth at Bankfull: 6.1
Mean Depth at Banktull: 3.8
W / D Ratio: -
Entrenchment Ratio: -
Bank Height Ratio: 1.0

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Goose Creek
XS ID
XS -4
Featuer
Riffle
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
}
- -
r
Stream Type
C
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 4
336
------------------------°-------------------------------------------
334
---- Bankfull
- - -- Flood Prone Area
332
CO
-� As -Built 2008
--o-MY-01 11/2/09
W
330
t MY -02 8/11/10
MY -03 2/9/11
MY -04 8/14/12
MY -05 4/30/13
328
0 10
20 30 40
50 60 70
Station (feet)
River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Goose Creek
XS ID
XS -4
Featuer
Riffle
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
0.0 3
332.1
3.4 3
331.4
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 332.1
Banull Cross - Sectional Area: 83.5
Bankfull Width: 42.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 335.7
Flood Prone Width: 240.0
Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 2.0
W / D Ratio: 21.2
Entrenchment Ratio: 5.7
Bank Height Ratio: 1.0

River Basin:
Elevation
333.9
332.9
332.6
331.9
332.3
330.7
330.9J�
330.4
329.9
329.1
329.0
328.8
329.7
330.3
332.2
332.2
332.9
333.7
334.6
334
iu
332
c
0
CD
W
330
328
0 10
t._ P
.. •�
-
Stream Type
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 5
20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
T
- - -• Bankfull
- - -• Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2008
t MY -01 11 /2/09
�- MY -02 8/11/10
MY -03 2/9/11
MY -04 8/14/12
MY -05 4130/13
60 70 80
XS -5
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Station
76.5
67.1
54.4
42.9
34.6
33.2
29.6
27.1
25.6
24.6
22.9
21.0
19.2
16.9
14.0
11.2
9.0
5.7
0.0
River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed: _
Goose Creek
XS ID
XS -5
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Banldull Elevation:
333.5
Banldull Cross - Sectional Area:
109.6
Bankfull Width:
66.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.7
Mean Depth at Bankfhll:
1.7
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
BankHeight Ratio:
-

Station E
Elevation
Neuse
Goose Creek
XS -6
Riffle
4/30/2013
Perkinson, Jern
335.9
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Feature
Date:
Field Crew:
Stream Type
C
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS -
6
---- Bankfull
- -- • Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2008
338
t MY -01 11 /2/09
t MY -02 8/11/10
MY -03 2/9/11
336
_
c
334
> MY -04 8/14/12
MY -05 4/30/13
�-
w
332
330
0 10
20 30
40
50 60 70
Station (feet)
Station E
Elevation
0.0 3
335.9
igan
Station E
Elevation
0.0 3
335.9
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfu Elevation: 334.0
Banldull Cross - Sectional Area: 62.0
Bankfull Width: 48.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 337.7
Flood Prone Width: 162.0
Max Depth at Bankfull: 3.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.3
W / D Ratio: 37.3
Entrenchment Ratio: 3.4
Bank Height Ratio: 1.0

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Goose Creek
XS ID
XS -7
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
27.0
332.4
29.6
331.8
31.6
330.8
33.5
330.3
35.7
330.1
37.2
329.9
38.5
330.0
40.0
330.3
40.9
330.9
42.5
332.3
45.2
333.4
48.3
334.1
51.4
334.4
53.6
334.7
57.4
336.1
60.3
336.9
65.1
338.3
t -
,+
,-
,s
Stream Type
Neuse River Basin, Goose Creek, XS - 7
r
338
336
---- Bankfull
---- ----------------------
-----
_
-- -- _ FloodProneArea
°-
-A- As -Built 2008
334
-
a�i
MY -01 11/2/09
W
MY -02 8/11/10
332
MY -03 2/9/11
MY -04 8/14/12
MY -05 4/30/13
330
0 10
20
30 40
50 60 70
Station (feet)
River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Goose Creek
XS ID
XS -7
Feature
Pool
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
-0.3
336.1
7.7
335.2
14.3
334.3
19.0
333.5
23.8
332.7
27.0
332.4
29.6
331.8
31.6
330.8
33.5
330.3
35.7
330.1
37.2
329.9
38.5
330.0
40.0
330.3
40.9
330.9
42.5
332.3
45.2
333.4
48.3
334.1
51.4
334.4
53.6
334.7
57.4
336.1
60.3
336.9
65.1
338.3
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
335.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
106.0
Bankfull Width:
46.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
5.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

Station E
Elevation
Neuse
Goose Ceek
XS -8
Riffle
342
340 --------------------------------------------------------
338
336
0
m
334
W
332
330
0 10
Stream Type
Neuse River Basin, Goose Ceek, XS - 8
20 30
Station (feet)
i
i;
E/C
- -- • Bankfull
- - - • Flood Prone Area
-� As -Built 2008
t MY -01 11 /2/09
MY -02 8/11/10
MY -03 2/9/11
MY -04 8/14/12
MY -05 4/30/13
40 50 60
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Feature
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
-3.3 3
336.7
Date:
4/30/2013
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station E
Elevation
-3.3 3
336.7
SUMMARY DATA
ankfull Elevation: 336.1
anldull Cross - Sectional Area: 72.5
Bankfull Width: 40.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 340.2
Flood Prone Width: 170.0
Max Depth at Bankfull: 4.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull: 1.8
W / D Ratio: 22.3
Entrenchment Ratio: 4.2
Bank Height Ratio: 1.0

Goose Creek Year 5 (2013) Profile- Reach 00 +00 to 10+00
00A0 0 10+00
Profile
=.o,lemi an
2010
2011
2012
2013
Avg. Water Surfare Slope
0.0037
0.0037
0.0037
0.0038
0.0039
Kittle L..gth
35
36
2008
35
2009
Avg. Riffle Slope
2010
0.0075
2011
0.0050
0.0075
2012
40
33
2013
IS
As -built Survey
Year 1 Monitoring
\Survey
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Year
3 Monitoring \Survey
Year
4 Monitoring \Survey
Year 5 Mo dtad g \Survey
;tali..
Bed Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation
Station
Bed Elevadon
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevntion
Stado.
Bed Elevadon
Water Elevndon
5.110.
Bed Elevation
Water Elet
902.6
328.6
0.0
1001.6
326.4
-6.7
331.2
333.0
-7.0
331.3
333.0
1001.2
326.2
329.4
903.9
328.7
9.1
331.1
993.7
326.fi
11.4
331.3
333.0
1.6
331.5
333.0
986.8
328.8
329.4
905.2
328.8
19.6
332.1
982.5
32M
21.4
332.8
333.0
11.8
332.4
333.0
957.2
329.0
329.4
906.4
328.9
38.4
331.8
958.4
329.0
30.2
332.3
332.9
26.2
332.6
333.0
928.3
329.1
329.5
9079
326.8
46.1
332.2
920.3
329.1
37.5
332.2
332.9
31.9
332.3
333.0
862.8
329.0
329.7
909.4
328.8
52.6
331.7
865.1
329.5
51.3
332.6
332.8
49.7
331.7
333.0
855.4
328.4
329.1
911.2
328.9
59.1
332.0
852.5
328.4
58.0
331.4
332.6
56.7
332.7
333.0
845.7
328.2
329.7
913.4
328.8
61.7
331.6
842.6
326.2
71.0
332.0
332.6
66.5
332.4
332.7
811.3
321.1
329.1
914.7
326.9
65.3
332.2
837.0
328.3
81.9
330.7
332.6
80.9
331.5
332.5
800.5
327.5
329.7
916.2
328.7
71.2
331.9
627.8
321.7
98.1
331.2
332.6
98.6
331.6
332.5
793.7
329.2
917.6
328.7
63.0
331.0
608.5
326.9
106.6
331.9
332.7
123.0
331.9
332.5
759.3
329.2
329.7
919.6
328.3
87.9
330.7
799.6
326.7
:16.3
331.6
332.6
134.2
331.6
332.5
753.5
328.4
329.7
921.2
326.3
96.0
331.2
791.1
329.1
133.0
331.0
332.6
139.0
330.6
332.5
745.7
328.3
329.7
922.7
326.2
102.8
331.1
771.0
328.8
15'.2
331.0
332.6
148.9
331.8
332.5
735.3
328.3
329.7
924.4
326.2
112.2
331.4
751.6
328.9
161.6
33:.3
332.6
154.1
33:.3
332.5
722.1
329.1
329.7
926.7
328.2
120.0
33:.4
146.2
328.4
170.4
332.3
332.6
165.8
331.6
332.5
694.1
328.8
329.7
927.8
326.5
129.1
331.1
732.1
328.5
186.7
33:.6
332.2
1'13.0
331.9
332.4
669.8
329.1
329.7
929.2
326.6
136.3
330.9
727.6
329.0
193.4
331.4
332.2
:82.0
33L8
332.3
661.7
328.5
329.7
931.3
328.6
146.6
330.9
718.5
329.1
216.1
331.1
332.2
200.0
331.7
331.9
645.6
327.7
329.7
931.5
328.6
177.2
332.2
711.1
328.7
230.1
331.6
332.2
214.2
331.2
331.9
632.0
329.5
329.7
932.7
326.6
181.8
332.1
703.7
328.7
241.7
331.8
332.1
245.0
331.6
331.9
596:7
329.4
330.0
933.8
326.6
186.9
331.7
695.8
327.5
249.4
331.4
332.0
253.9
330.9
3319
581.6
329.3
330.0
935.1
3266
194.6
331.3
687.5
328.9
256.1
330.6
332.0
266.8
331.1
332.0
574.9
328.4
330.0
936.1
326.7
200.5
331.6
676.9
329.0
263.4
331.1
332.0
274.1
331.6
332.0
565.8
327.5
330.0
937.5
328.6
211.7
331.3
671.4
328.7
273.6
330.8
332.0
284.5
331.8
332.0
516.8
329.9
330.5
938.8
326.9
221.4
331.4
665.3
329.0
282.3
331.4
332.0
293.0
331.1
331.7
SILO
328.3
330.5
940.3
326.8
229.3
331.1
656.7
328.8
286.4
330.9
332.0
310.1
331.3
331.6
497.9
329.1
330.5
941.4
326.8
237.5
331.4
645.4
328.6
294.0
331.5
332.0
324.8
330.5
331.4
489.6
330.2
330.6
Goose Creek Year 5 (2013) Profile- Reach 00 +00 to 10+00
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Avg. Water Surfare Slope
0.0037
0.0037
0.0037
0.0038
0.0039
Kittle L..gth
35
36
37
35
37
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.2290
0.0075
0.0102
0.0050
0.0075
Pool Le.gth
40
33
30
IS
21
Pool Sloe
0.0008
0.0007
0.0008
0.0006
0.0005
Goose Creek Year 5 (2013) Profile- Reach 00 +00 to 10+00
334
333
332
m 331
t
a
`w
330
w
329
G
O
a
� 328
w
327
326
325
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Distance feet
- As- built(2008)Red -+-Year 1(2009) Bed - Year 2 (2010) Bed - Year 3 (2011) Bed -Y-4 (2012) Bed +Year 5(2013) Bed - Year5(2013)Water Surface

1
10,00ro 16+10
Profile
4/30/13
Perldnso4 Jerei ao
2010
2011
2012
2013
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0037
0.0037
0.0037
0.0038
0.0039
t2RRe l,engtb
35
36
2008
35
2009
Avg. Rif . Slope
2010
0.0075
2011
0.0050
0.0075
2012
40
33
2013
15
As -built Survey
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Year
3 Monitoring \Survey
0.0006
Year
4 Monitoring \Survey
Year
5 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevadon
Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elev
998.4
326.6
994.5
326.7
1582.5
325.8
993.9
326.0
329.4
991.8
326.5
329.5
1536.4
326.9
327.4
1000.2
326.7
1036.6
329.2
1562.1
326.2
1020.3
327.7
329.4
1012.4
326.9
329.4
1502.7
3273
327.5
1001.7
326.8
1075.4
328.3
1536.8
327.0
1032.8
329.0
329.4
1033.8
329.1
329.4
1489.6
325.9
327.5
1002.9
326.9
1082.2
327.6
1501.2
327.1
1069.2
328.5
328.9
1075.2
328.4
329.1
1466.5
325.0
327.5
1004.9.
326.8
1088.8
328.4
1484.5
325.8
1078.2
3271
328.8
1081.6
327.8
329.'
1454.7
324.8
327.5
1006.7
326.9
1103.8
326.0
1471.8
325.2
1'68.6
328.1
328.8
1089.3
328.9
329.0
144L2
327.2
327.6
1008.2
326.9
1116.3
325.9
1455.3
325.1
1101.1
325.7
328.8
1Q13.5
328.4
329.0
1422.9
327.5
327.9
1009.8
327.0
1134.0
328.3
1439.1
327.1
1114.4
325.1
328.8
1100.3
326.2
329.0
1387.1
327.5
328.0
1011.6
327.1
1166.1
327.7
1419.5
327.5
1124.5
325.8
328.8
1112.0
326.1
329.1
1374.3
325.69
328.0
1013.9
327.2
1179.8
325.8
1385.7
327.1
1134.6
328.6
328.8
1114.3
325.1
329.0
1353.4
325.5
328.0
1015.3
327.7
1203.7
326.6
1377.3
325.8
1166.8
328.1
328.7
11195
325.4
329.0
1333.6
326.0
328.0
1016.7
3277
1217.4
32].8
1366.6
3216
1183.1
325.4
328.7
1127.8
325.8
329.0
1325.1
327.1
328.0
1018.1
328.1
1231.0
325.7
1348.8
325.7
120].3
326.2
328.7
1137.0
328.4
329.1
1291.9
328.2
328.7
1019.7
328.4
1239.4
326.4
1327.0
326.8
1218.5
327.8
328.7
1160.4
328.0
328.9
1267.4
328.1
328.8
102p.4
328.4
1263.b
328.1
1296.1
328.1
1228.7
325.9
328.7
1171.0
328.0
328.9
1259.3
326.5
328.8
1021.3
328.6
1313.0
32].3
126].0
327.9
1239.7
326.4
328.7
1178:6
325.7
328.9
1244.9
326.3
328.8
1022:3
328.6
1331.0
325.5
1256.5
326.4
1251.69
326.]
328.7
1194.0
325.8
328.8
1230.9
326.1
328.8
1023.2
328.7
1368.8
325.9
1240.1
326.1
1264.0
328.3
328.7
1214.1
326.1
328.9
1225.7
327.9
328.8
1024.3
328.8
1382.4
327.4
1224.2
327.7
129'.3
328.0
328.3
1224.1
328.2
328.9
1216.8
326.1
328.8
1025.6
328.8
1435.6
326.]
1214.6
326.2
1315.6
327.2
327.9
1232.8
325.9
328.9
1194.8
325.4
328.8
1026.7
328.9
1448.5
324.9
1200.1
325.9
1336.1
325.6
327.9
1247.1
326.1
328.9
1182.3
325.6
328.8
1027.9
328.9
1468.4
325.4
1185.8
325.7
1346.6
325.69
327.9
1255.4
326.6
328.9
1173.3
328.2
328.8
1028.7
328.7
1496.8
32].1
1173.6
327.9
1358.8
325.9
327.9
1266.5
328.3
328.9
1140.5
328.6
328.9
1030.0
328.8
1531.7
326.8
1139.8
328.2
1374.9
325.6
327.9
1293.5
328.4
328.9
1126.4
325.5
328.8
1031.0
328.8
1574.0
326.0
1132.5
326.1
1387.6
327.2
327.9
1319.5
327.7
328.0
1105.7
325.7
328.8
1032.2
328.8
1575.2
326.5
1119.]
325.2
1429.4
327.3
327.7
1334,8
325.8
328.1
1095.69
328.8
328.9
1033.4
328.8
1108.0
325.6
1444.3
327.0
327.5
1347.5
325.7
328.0
1088.1
327.6
328.9
Goose Creek Year 5 (2013) Profile- Reach 10+00 to 16 +00
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0037
0.0037
0.0037
0.0038
0.0039
t2RRe l,engtb
35
36
37
35
37
Avg. Rif . Slope
0.2290
0.0075
0.0102
0.0050
0.0075
Pool Length
40
33
30
15
21
Pool Sloe
0.0008
0.W07
0.M08
0.0006
0.0005
Goose Creek Year 5 (2013) Profile- Reach 10+00 to 16 +00
330
329
328
327
A
4j��
326
0
m
i
W
325
324
323
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
Distance feet
- As- built(2008)Bed Year 1 (2009) Bed Year 2 (2010) Bed -/-Year3(2011)Bed - Y r4(2012)Bed +Year 5(2013) Bed -Year 5(2013) Water Surface

bble Count
Percent Riffle:
Percent '..
50 Percent Run:
50 Percent Glide:
=Goose
.• e Creek
1 1 1•
very fine •
fine •
medium .
coarse •
- coarse - 'i
Creek Downstream Reach 201;
1 1
1 1
•• - • •• -
"' ' ■■ 1111111 ■■ 1111111 ■ ■airlll��ri�lll■ ■x111111■ ■1111111
1
1 1
fine _
. grave
medium
coarse
coarse very _
very coarse
`
■■
1111111■
■1!11111
■
■1111111���111111■
■1111111■
■1111111
;,.
, .
■■
1111111
■
■i111111!_!iil��■
■1111111■
■1111111■
■1111111
■
■IIIIIII,J
■Ill��iii
■1111111
■11111111■
■1111111
■
■11
■III
''
'
■
■Ili�lll
■!!1111111
■!!1111111
■1111111■
■1111111
■
■11
■III
'
■
■1111111
■■1111111
■■
1111111■
■1111111■
■1111111■
■1111111
; . ;
■
■11!!�ii
■
■IGillll
■■
1111111■
■1111111■
■1111111■
■1111111
::.
medium • • • =
large
.
■
■1111111��1111111
■■
1111111■
■1111111■
■1111111■
■1111111
''
' '
,
■
■IIIIII�.i�1111111
■■
1111111■
■1111111■
■1111111■
■1111111
small • • • -
small bouldei
medium .. .
large boulder
very large boulde
1
, . ■ ■Iliil 1111 ■1111111 ■!11!!AI ■!l1�l�III■ ■1111111■ ■1111111
1 1 1 1 11 111 [Bills
I / 1•
1 1
-M�,
Size percent less
Percent by . - type

Percent Riffle:
Percent Pool
Percent Run:
Percent Glide
Material
Size Range (mm)
Total #
Goose Creek
silt/clay
0 0.062
25.0
- --
very fine sanc
fine sand
medium sanc
coarse sand
very coarse sanc
0.062 0.13
7.0
Note:
- --
Goose Creek Upstream Reach 201
0.13 0.25
13.0
0.25 0.5
6.0
Pebble Count, Goose Creek
100%
90%
0.5 1
8.0
1 2
6.0
very fine grave
fine grave
fine grave
medium grave
medium grave
coarse grave
coarse grave
very coarse grave
very coarse grave
2 4
4.0
4 6
8.0
6 8
10.0
80%
70%
'/�M
8 11
8.0
11 16
2.0
16 22
0.0
60%
50%
22 32
1.0
32 45
2.0
~
45 64
0.0
iv 40%
ii 30%
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobbl
64 90
0.0
90 128
0.0
128 180
0.0
20%
a 10%
180 256
0.0
small boulder
small bouldei
medium bouldei
large bouldei
very large boulde
256 362
0.0
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm) --a- Cumulative Percent • Percent Item -Riffle � Pool -Run � Glide
362 512
0.0
512 1024
0.0
1024 2048
0.0
2048 4096
0.0
bedrock
0.0
Size percent less than (mm)
Percent by substrate type
True
Weighted Count:
Total Particle Countl
100
D16
D35
D50
D84
D95
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
100
#N /A
0.15
0.4
7
11
25%
1 40%
35%
0%
0%
0%

APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 10. Verification of Bankfull Events
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 10. Verification of Bankfull Events
Goose Creek Restoration Site (EEP Proiect Number 147)
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
Collection
available)
November 11, 2009
November 11, 2009
Visual observation of overbank as the result of Tropical
1-2
Storm Ida
Visual observation of overbank in addition to a total of 0.82
September 29, 2010
June 11, 2009
inches* of rain occurring after numerous rain events, within
the 2 weeks prior, that totaled 2.75 inches *.
Visual observations of wrack lines within the floodplain with
September 29, 2010
September 23, 2009
a total of 1.7 inches* of rain occurring within a 2 -day period
from September 22 -23, 2009.
Visual observations of overbank event including wrack lines
and sediment deposition resulting from a 1.37 inch* rainfall
February 10, 2010
February 5, 2010
event on February 5, 2009 that occurred after numerous
3 -4
rainfall events, within the 3 weeks prior, that totaled 3.94
inches *.
September 29, 2010
May 23, 2010
A total of 4.57 inches* of rain occurring between May 16-
--
23, 2010.
September 29, 2010
September 27, 2010
A total of 2.9 inches* of rain fall between September 26 -27,
--
2010 with more rain expected to follow.
June 23, 2011
May 27, 2011
Visual observations of overbank event including wrack lines
5
resulting from a 1.64 inch* rainfall event on May 27, 2011.
August 20, 2012
July 31, 2011
A total of 3.26 inches* of rain occurring between July 30 -31,
--
2011.
August 20, 2012
August 6, 2011
A total of 4.31 inches* of rain fall between August 6, 2011.
--
August 20, 2012
March 21, 2012
A total of 3.61 inches* of rain occurring between March 16-
26, 2012.
August 20, 2012
July 28, 2012
A total of 3.7 inches* of rain fall between July 20 -28, 2012.
--
September 30, 2013
September 3, 2012
A total of 2.8 inches* of rain fall between September 2 -3,
2012.
September 30, 2013
September 18, 2012
A total of 3.1 inches* of rain fall between September 16 -18,
2012.
September 30, 2013
May 20, 2013
A total of 2.4 inches* of rain fall between May 18 -20, 2013.
6
September 30, 2013
June 7, 2013
A total of 5.1 inches* of rain fall on June 7, 2013.
--
September 30, 2013
August 3, 2013
A total of 3.1 inches* of rain fall on August 2 -3, 2013.
--
* Reported at the Raleigh- Durham Airport (Weather Underground 2013)
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

APPENDIX F
SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Date of Inspection
Date of Report:
Project:
Location:
Inspection of:
By:
INSPECTION REPORT
March 9. 2012
March 9, 2012
Goose Creek — EEP #147
NC
Supplemental Planting (Direct Pay for Services)
Riverworks Inc.
Name & Title of Inspector
COMMENTS:
Perry SuU EEP Project Mir
(Contractor)
At the direction of EEP, River Works Inc. installed 70 containerized trees and 25 live stakes at the Goose
Creek project site in Durham NC on March 9, 2012. The containerized trees were owner - provided plants grown
by NCWRC's plant nursery in Yanceyville NC. WRC delivered all plants on the day of planting. River Works
supplied the live stakes.
River Works installed 70 five -gal containerized trees within targeted areas identified by EEP (see attached
map). Two areas planted on Long Meadow Park were in the vicinity of 2 large dead willow oaks that the City of
Durham had removed the previous September 2011. George Morris (River Works) was instructed to plant the
planting areas with appropriate representation of species, and spaced at least 10 feet from existing trees. The 25
live stakes (silky dogwood) were installed along the Eastway Reach in two small areas of bare banks.
Species
Quantity
Planted
Red Oak (Quercus rubra)
10
Sycamore (Platanus occidentahs)
15
Red Chokeberry (Aronia arbutifolia)
10
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
10
Cherrybark Oak (Quercus pagoda)
15
Shumard Oak (Quercus shumardii)
10
All trees planted met NC EEP size and vigor requirements. A final walk through was conducted by EEP upon
completion on 3/9/2012 and approved.
Supplemental Planting
Goose Creek #147

j
' U)
1
t Supplemental Planting
U March 13, 2012
ti .t
Of
IF
4
J
_ I
it � •� - i YF- �
p �
t ;
L
� 4
Y
� 1
Eva St ,2
°
4WIM.A AN
� � r
.4�4��
NL
x /y� v,
x,
_,
NOTE: LONG MEADOW PARK
Quantities of container plant material installed EEP Stream Restoration
for each area shown for each area. Areas are approximate. REACH Goose Creek - EEP #147
N Durham NC
Legend March 2012
W E
CE_ Goose _FINAL p 50 100 200
supplemental_Planting_2012 Feet S

Supplemental Planting
March 13, 2012
15
t bE} 6 r
_ -`
a
Hopkins St _
4A
Af
W
'k r
eaf TS� ,
.r
r
'♦ M ]`
,
-
4
LA
NOTE:
Quantities of container plant material installed EASTWAY REACH EEP Stream Restoration
for each area shown for each area. Areas are approximate. Moose Creek - EEP #147
N Durham NC
Legend March 2011
W E
CE_ Goose _FINAL 0 50 100 200
supplemental_Planting_2012 Feet S

APPENDIX G
ADDITIONAL SITE MAPPING
Restoration Plan Figure 5. Soil Types
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

} Ilard Ave >'
65 Lowry Ave
ca N
Fern St
65 _ _
d Q
o w ilbert St zl L ' `E
Carlton Ave s c° s E
+';.::... < m Gilbert St o Q
N
2 m o
z Holloway St
. .
.
_
. -
-
- - _
�a I , -
�� 4 ` Eva St
�� 7 LONGMEADOW PARK REACH
2 Libe y St
11) L.
c I
0` X �I
\m�a CO m° Hdpkins St > Qberty St
g �/?7er °e
I Q
etr _ z v
a`6. /ry
EASTW*( ELEMENTARY SCHOOL RAH
`m Southgate St
cn
C.- Ito 2
��ar n 2 ryI;ry S m 1 I�( °
Ot12St to 1 ' Taylor St
E�m S� 4S G /oyry% D z a
.Y,q ' it Cir `° z Q
N e
° pale Oa e St
�y m °
z
e
m -o
E Main St
CT
`�sr �Fmc 65 �� v N cn m
o '
m Q
Cf) m in Hart St N a
FD
of /e D m D m
`D Ashe St `m m
E Umstead St c
Cole
65 65
c x q
� � ve
'la'Ob S t a � tu�a� r) Gi ryW ° ° �� . BOA iry S CO
d o o
t Kate St
co v.
c Masse
Price Av e m� .::`:::: ::::..Fast
u ° � mei : e s t F
6 St "' xAY Q
C y �e `off o)
�Upree S ox q �e ;';'' \�aP a as '.... m
t 5 co
2W Feet
N
Soil Symbol
=cc WSC
Goose Creek Restoration
CrB WSE Durham County, North Carolina
oS Stem MrC WWC Biohabitats Project No. 04802.02
E
arfement I I Figure 5
PROGRAM Ur WWE Coil Types
Biohabitats
� i,o p.arer
September 2005

APPENDIX H
ADDITIONAL SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Preconstruction Site Photographs
Asbuilt Site Photographs
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Preconstruction Site Photographs
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Preconstruction Site Photographs (continued)
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices

Asbuilt Site Photographs
L
Goose Creek (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 5 (2013)
EEP Project Number 147 January 2014
Durham County, North Carolina Appendices