20071394 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20140808

UT BEAR CREEK (Weaver /McLeod) EEP #92347 -- Chatham County
2013 Stream Restoration Monitoring Report -- Year 4 of 5
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCDENR -EEP)
MY -4 Monitoring Data Collected 2013 - -- Project Constructed in 2009
MY -4 Final Report submitted January 30, 2014
NI-
North Carolina Department of
rA j Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
, � n"I 1652 Mail Service Center
I i,� �
'CI II( Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652

UT BEAR CREEK (Weaver /McLeod) EEP #92347 — Chatham County
2013 Stream Restoration Monitoring Report -- Year 4 of 5
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCDENR -EEP)
Monitoring Data Collected in 2013 - -- Project Constructed in 2009
MY -4 Final Report submitted January 30, 2014
Prepared by:
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
RJG &A Environmental Consultants
1221 Corporation Parkway, suite 100
Raleigh NC 27610 - -- 919 - 872 -1174
Gerald Pottern, project manager
gpottern @RJGAcarolina.com
Table of Contents
1.0
Executive Summary ............................................................... ............................... 1
1.1
Goals & Objectives ................................................................... ............................... 1
1.2
Project Setting ........................................................................... ............................... 1
1.3
Vegetation Condition ................................................................ ............................... 1
1.4
Stream Channel Condition ........................................................ ............................... 2
1.5
Stream Hydrology ..................................................................... ............................... 2
1.6
Wetland Hydrology ................................................................... ............................... 3
1.7
Supporting Data Availability .................................................... ............................... 3
2.0
Methodology ............................................................................ ..............................3
2.1
Stream Survey Methods ....................................................... ............................... 3
2.2
Vegetation Sampling Methods ............................................. ............................... 4
2.3
Hydrology Methods ............................................................. ............................... 4
3.0
References ................................................................................ ..............................5
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 MY -4 Final Report, January 2014
2013 Monitoring Report, Year 4 of 5 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1.1 -1.2 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attribute Table
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2.1 -2.3 Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
e -Table
Stream & Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table
e- Photos
Stream & Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Figures 3.1 -3.9
Stream Station Photo Points
Figures 4.1 -4.6
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix C.
Vegetation Plot Monitoring Data
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Success by Asset Type
Table 8
CVS Stem Counts Total and Planted by Plot and Species
e- Tables
Raw CVS vegetation data sheets
Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Figures 5.1 -5.9 Cross sections with Annual Overlays
e- Tables
Raw cross - section survey data spreadsheets
Figures 6.1 -6.5
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
e- Tables
Raw longitudinal profile survey data spreadsheets
Figures 7.1 -7.9
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
e- Tables
Raw pebble count data spreadsheets
Table 9.1 -9.2
Baseline Stream Data & Design Summary Table
Table 10.1
Monitoring Data: Cross - Section Morphology Table
Table 10.2 -10.3
Monitoring Data: Stream Reach Profile Morphology Table
Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankf ill Events
Figure 8 Monthly Rainfall Data for 2013
Figure 9.1 -9.2 Daily Precipitation and Monitoring Well Graphs
e- Tables Raw Data: Daily Precipitation and Monitoring Wells
Table 13 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347 MY -4 Final Report, January 2014
2013 Monitoring Report, Year 4 of 5 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

1.0 Executive Summary
1.1 Goals & Objectives
The goals of the UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 Stream Restoration Project
are to improve water quality, reduce excess sedimentation input from channel banks,
attenuate floodwater flows, and restore aquatic and riparian habitat. To achieve these
goals, the project has the following objectives:
• Reduce nutrient loading from the on -site cattle operation by fencing out cattle and
re- vegetating the riparian buffer;
• Restore stable channel dimension, pattern, and profile so that on -site streams will
transport watershed flows and sediment loads without aggradation or erosion;
• Improve aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed variability, providing shaded
areas within the channel, and introducing woody debris in the form of rootwads,
log vanes, and log sills;
• Enhance wildlife habitat by re- vegetating the riparian buffers with native plants,
helping to create a wildlife corridor through existing agricultural lands.
1.2 Project Setting
The project is located on private farmland in southwestern Chatham County in the Bear
Creek community, on the southeast side of NC -902 across the road from Chatham
Central High School. It is in the Carolina Slate Belt region of the Piedmont province, in
Cape Fear River HUC 03030003 - 070050 (NC -DWQ sub -basin 03- 06 -12). It includes
stream channel and riparian restoration on two parallel tributaries of Bear Creek: the
Northern UT restored channel length is 3,132 feet, and the Southern UT restored channel
length is 1,745 feet. The protected easement along each stream extends from the NC -902
right -of -way downstream (southeastward) to their respective confluences with Bear
Creek. The adjacent land is pasture on both sides of the two restored tributaries. The
project was constructed and planted in 2009 and the first year of post - construction
monitoring (MY -1) was 2010.
1.3 Vegetation Condition
CVS vegetation monitoring plot data were collected in October 2013. Seven of the 12
plots had at least 320 surviving planted trees per acre, and the average density for all
12 plots is 411 trees per acre (Table 7). The five plots that did not meet the 320
trees /acre buffer success threshold (plots 1, 2, 4, 7 and 9) had 243, 162, 243, 283
and 162 surviving planted trees per acre, respectively. However, native volunteer
tree seedlings (mostly green ash, sweetgum, and elm) are abundant in all plots, and
the total density of native trees and shrubs (planted plus volunteers) in plots ranges
from 1,174 to 5,949 per acre. Chinese privet, the only non - native woody plant
recorded in the CVS plots, was present in three plots. It comprised 7 to 8% of total
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347
2013 Monitoring Report, Year 4 of 5
Page l
MY -4 Final Report, January 2014
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

woody stems in plots 2 and 4, and 15% of woody stems in plot 3, all in the upper
portion of the northern tributary where it has apparently spread from the roadside.
Stunted tree growth is evident in several CVS plots and areas outside of the plots,
especially in the upper segments along both tributaries where soil is dense and clayey.
Outside of the CVS plots, more than half of the problem areas mapped as "low planted
stem density" in 2011 were removed from "problem areas" on the CCPV maps in 2012
due to abundant colonization by volunteer native trees that had become tall enough to
detect. In 2013 those areas are continuing to fill in with volunteer native trees. The
currently mapped problem areas with low total woody stem density in Oct 2013 (planted
plus volunteers; five areas along the Northern UT and two along the Southern UT)
remain the same as in April 2013. During Nov 2013 an EEP contractor planted 1500 new
trees (1 and 2 gal containers) of 12 species in areas with low density or poor vigor. The
supplemental planting average density was 1500 trees /11.8 acres = 127 added trees /ac.
Some large trees in the riparian forest near Bear Creek south of the Northern UT and near
both cattle crossings have fallen on the easement fence and broken the wires and
connectors. There are currently no livestock held on the adjacent pastures, and no
livestock damage was observed, but fence repair should be completed prior to releasing
any livestock in the adjacent pasture. Landowner Oscar Guarin reported to RJG &A that
the site is being used to grow hay for sale, and he has no plans to graze livestock on -site.
1.4 Stream Channel Condition
RJG &A staff collected stream bed substrate data and inspected the two channels and their
structures during October 2013. Absolute Land Surveying collected cross - sectional and
longitudinal stream survey data in November and December 2013. Overall the project
appears to have met its morphological goals, and its profile parameters closely mirror the
design criteria. The four segments of stream -bank erosion along the Northern UT noted
in the 2010 to 2012 reports are stabilizing as the density of non -woody and woody plants
on these banks continues to increase. Two of these segments near stations 34 +50 and
37 +00 have mostly weak - rooted annual vegetation and are still identified as problem
areas (total 80 lin.ft), although neither appears to have eroded further during the past two
years. The other two segments near stations 20 +80 and 23 +00 now have dense growths
of Juncus and other sturdy plants that appear adequate to halt further erosion, and are
removed from the "problem area" list and mapping. No new area of erosion was noted in
2013. All rock and log structures appear to be stable and performing as intended. The
Southern UT has no channel instability problem areas.
1.5 Stream Hydrology
A PVC crest gage is installed along the Northern UT near station 32 +50, with the bottom
of the gage (inside of pipe) 1.5 ft below bankfull. The gage was inspected and
maintained in April and October 2013. Cork granules on the rod inside the gage revealed
peak stages of approximately 1.0 ft above bankfull prior to the April 30 inspection, and
approximately 1.6 ft above bankfull prior to the October 17 inspection. Matted grass and
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347
2013 Monitoring Report, Year 4 of 5
Page 2
MY -4 Final Report, January 2014
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

apparently recent wrack lines at or above bankfull were evident during both inspections.
Precipitation records at the Siler City Airport (SILR gage, 10 miles NW of the project
site) and stream stage records at the Tick Creek USGS gage (3.5 miles N of the project
site) during 2013 indicate possible bankf ill flow events on Feb 23, Apr 28 -29, May 20,
Jun 7, and July 1 -3. Hydrologic data from the on -site wells, SILR rain gage, and Tick Cr
stream gage are summarized in Appendix E.
1.6 Wetland Hydrology
The hydrologic success criteria for restored wetlands requires that soils be saturated
within 12 inches of the surface for at least 12.5% of the growing season (27 consecutive
days in Chatham County, April through October). Data downloaded from the two RDS
Ecotone groundwater gages in the wetland along the Northern UT showed the water table
depth within the upper 12 inches at both gages from April 1 through late May, and again
from early June through late August. The longest consecutive saturation periods were 82
days for the eastern (lower) gage and 80 days for the western (upper) gage, clearly
exceeding the wetland hydrologic success criteria. The battery in each gage was replaced
in April 2013. The average monthly precipitation recorded at the SILR rain gage ( Siler
City Airport, ) during April through October was 3.9 inches, and unlike most years there
was no prolonged period more than 2 weeks without at least one 0.25 inch rainfall event.
1.7 Supporting Data Availability
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of such things as beaver activity
or encroachment, and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring
elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative
background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in
the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan
(formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request.
2.0 Methodology
Monitoring and reporting methods follow the current EEP - provided templates and
guidelines (Lee et al 2008; NC -EEP 2012). Photographs were taken with an Olympus
digital camera. A Trimble Geo XT handheld mapping -grade GPS unit was used to
collect cross section endpoints, vegetation plot corners, stream photo points, and problem
area locations. All problem areas identified in the fall 2012 and spring 2013 versions of
the CCPV map were re- evaluated in October 2013.
2.1 Stream Survey Methods
Longitudinal stationing along each UT was assigned in ArcMap using the as -built
centerline data collected in May 2009, beginning with 10 +00 at the upper end of each
restored stream. Nine permanent cross sections (six along the Northern UT and three
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347
2013 Monitoring Report, Year 4 of 5
Page 3
MY -4 Final Report, January 2014
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

along the Southern UT) were selected and staked during April 2010. Geomorphology
data for monitoring year 3 were collected during September to October 2012 using a
South Total Station for the longitudinal profiles and a Nikon automatic level for the cross
sections. Data collection methods employed were a combination of those specified in the
project Mitigation Plan and standard regulatory guidance and procedures documents
including the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines, US Forest Service's Stream
Channel Reference Sites, and Applied River Morphology (USACE, 2003; Harrelson et al.,
1994; Rosgen, 1996). Photographs facing downstream were taken at each cross section.
Stream bed particle distribution was assessed using the Wolman pebble count method.
2.2 Vegetation Sampling Methods
Twelve representative vegetation survey plots (seven along the Northern UT and five
along the Southern UT) were selected and installed in April 2010. The four corners of
each 10 x 10 meter plot are marked with metal conduit pipe, and the side closest to the
stream was designated as the x- axis.. Vegetation data for monitoring year 4 were
collected between October 17 and October 29, 2013. Level 1 (planted woody stems) and
Level 2 (volunteer woody stems) data collection was performed in all plots, following the
most recent CVS -EEP protocol (Lee et al 2008). Each planted woody stem location
within a plot was recorded (x and y coordinates), along with stem height, diameter at
breast height of live stems greater than 137 cm tall, species name, and qualitative vigor
rating. Planted stems were marked with survey flagging to facilitate relocation next year
and to distinguish them from volunteer trees. Planted and volunteer woody species were
identified using Radford et al. (1968) and Weakley (2010). A photo of each vegetation
plot was taken from the 0,0 corner.
2.3 Hydrology Methods
Wetlands: Daily groundwater level data were collected from two Remote Data Systems
automated groundwater monitoring gages installed in the enhanced riparian wetland
adjacent to the Northern UT in April 2010 in accordance with USACE guidance (USACE
2000). These gage data were plotted against precipitation data from the Siler City
Airport ECONet station (SILR), located 10 miles northwest of the monitored wetland.
Wetland gage and precipitation data and graphs are provided in Appendix E of this
monitoring report.
Streams: One PVC crest gage was installed in 2010 at Station 3280 along the Northern
UT to verify the on -site occurrence of bankf ill events. The bottom of the gage is
approximately 0.4 ft above the thalweg and 1.5 ft below bankfull (right bank). The crest
gage was evaluated during the spring and fall data collection visits, and the site was
assessed for evidence of bankfull events. Dates of potential bankfull events were inferred
using precipitation data from the Siler City Airport ECONet station (SILR) and the Tick
Creek stream gage near Mt. Vernon Springs (USGS# 02102800), located 3.5 miles north
of the crest gage. Data are provided in Appendix E.
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347
2013 Monitoring Report, Year 4 of 5
Page 4
MY -4 Final Report, January 2014
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

3.0 References
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. L. Rawlins, and John Potpondy. (1994). Stream Channel
Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. USDA, Forest Service.
General Technical Report RM -245.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. (2008).
CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation version 4.2, October 2008. Retrieved
September 2011, from: http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm
NC -DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program. (2012). NC -EEP Monitoring Report
Template and Guidance version 1.5, June 2012. http: / /portal.ncdenr.org /web /eep /dbb-
resources
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell (1968). Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc. (2010). Baseline Monitoring Document and As-
built Baseline Report UT to Bear Creek( #92347). August 13, 2010.
Rosgen, D. L. (1996) Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, CO.
Rosgen, D.L. (1997). "A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers.
In Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel
Incision, ed. S.S.Y. Wang, E.J. Langendoen and F.B. Shields, Jr. University of
Mississippi Press, Oxford, MS.
USACOE (2003) Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACOE, USEPA, NCWRC,
NCDENR -DWQ
Weakley, Alan (2010). Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding
Areas. http: // www.herbarium.unc.edu /flora.htm.
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347
2013 Monitoring Report, Year 4 of 5
Page 5
MY -4 Final Report, January 2014
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

APPENDIX A.
PROJECT VICINITY MAP and BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1.1 -1.2 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attributes Table

Directions to the Site:
From US -64 just west of Pittsboro, take NC -902 West (southwest) for
15 miles toward Bear Creek. Cross US -421 and then Old US -421 and
a railroad track. Access to the Northern UT is via a gravel road on your
left, 0.3 mile past Old 421, across from Chatham Central High School.
Access to the Southern UT is via another gravel road 0.8 mile farther
west along NC -902, also on your left. The property owner keeps the
gates locked at both access roads.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered
by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefore
access by the general public is not permitted. Access by authorized
personnel of state and federal agencies or their designees /contractors
involved in the development, oversight and stewardship of the
restoration site is permitted within the terms and time frames of their
defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activities
requires prior coordination with EEP.
zlel
- `)c Southern UT
QJ
- 4S
J�
4�
Ra I
x ri 421Y
[ j 5 t
IIN
• r' a%� � l � � J�a i ,( '� r �� .k '��},' X15
.,!ZX M__
ty,J
�I
FL•
Northern UT
4 r f
Bear Creek
}
0
Figure 1.0. General Vicinity Map and Directions. UT to Bear
�. Creek ( #92347). Chatham County, NC.
Project Conservation N
Easement
USGS Streams
ill
r'a = Feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 •
7.5 Minute USGS Topographic Quad: Bear Creek
.um
i
I• I,. I ...5
I
J
1 I
{ r
Y
_
Figure 1.0. General Vicinity Map and Directions. UT to Bear
�. Creek ( #92347). Chatham County, NC.
Project Conservation N
Easement
USGS Streams
ill
r'a = Feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 •
7.5 Minute USGS Topographic Quad: Bear Creek
.um

Table 1.1. Project Restoration Components
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) Stream Restoration - Project #92347
Project
Component
or Reach ID
W w
a a
�° "
Stationing
Comment
Vegetative Plantings to
pasture areas within 50 feet
of creek where density of
existing vegetation is less
4.66
R
--
4.66 ac.
--
1:1
1
4.66
than 100 stems /acre.
Vegetative Plantings to
pasture areas within 50 feet
of creek where density of
Northern UT
existing vegetation is greater
to Bear Creek
than 100 stems /acre, but less
Buffer
0.78
E
-
0.78 ac.
--
2:1
0.5
0.39
than 200 stems /acre
Vegetative Plantings to
pasture areas within 50 feet
of creek where density of
existing vegetation is less
2.32
R
--
2.32 ac.
--
1:1
1
2.32
than 100 stems /acre.
Vegetative Plantings to
pasture areas within 50 feet
of creek where density of
Southern UT
existing vegetation is greater
to Bear Creek
than 100 stems /acre, but less
Buffer
0.42
E
--
0.42 ac.
--
2:1
0.5
0.21
than 200 stems /acre
10+00 -
PI
550 ft.
15 +50
1:1
1
550
15+50-
PH
125 ft.
16 +75
1:1
1
125
16+75 -
PI
225 ft.
19 +00
1:1
1
225
19+50-
PH
350 ft.
23 +00
1:1
1
350
23+00 -
PI
1,675 ft.
39 +75
1:1
1
1,675
Northern UT
Restore channel on new
39 +75-
to Bear Creek
2,832
IR
PII
157 ft.
41 +32
1:1
1
157
location
10 +00-
16+67
17+19 -
PI
1,298 ft.
23 +50
1:1
1 1
1,298
Southern UT
Restore channel on new
23 +50-
to Bear Creek
1,635
R
PH
395 ft.
27 +45
1:1
1
395
location
Riparian
Wetland
along
Supplemental plantings to
Northern UT
0.49
E
--
0.39 ac.
--
2:1
0.5
0.2
existing wetlands

Table 1.2. Component Summations
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) Stream Restoration - Project #92347
Restoration
Level
Stream
(lin.ft)
Riparian
Wetland (acre)
Non -Ripar
(acre)
Upland
(acre)
Buffer
(acre)
BMP
Non -
Riverine Riverine
6.98
0.39
1.2
Restoration
4,775
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
Totals
(Feet /Acres)
4,775
0.39
0
0
8.18
0
MU Totals
4,775
0.2
0
0
7.58
0

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) Stream Restoration - Project #92347
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 4 yrs 7 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 4 yrs 6 Months
Number of Reporting Years': 4
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
U
Jul -07
Final Design — Construction Plans
U
Jan -08
Construction
NA
Apr -09
Containerized, bare root and B &B
plantings for entire project
NA
Apr -09
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0
Monitoring — baseline)
Apr -10
Aug -10
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov -10
Dec -10
Year 2 Monitoring
Aug -Sep 2011
Sep -11
Year 3 Monitoring
Sep -Oct 2012
Dec -12
Year 4 Monitoring
Oct -Dec 2013
Jan -14
Year 4 Supplemental Planting
NA
Nov -13

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
UT of Bear Creek Stream Restoration - Project #92347
Designer
Ko & Associates, P.C.
1011 Schaub Drive, Suite 202
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
R. Kevin Williams, PE, (919) 851 -6066
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanics Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592 -9671
(919) 639 -6132
Survey Contractor
Stewart Proctor
319 Chapanoke Road, Suite 106
Raleigh NC 27603
(919) 779 -1855
Planting Contractor
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28262
(704) 841 -2841
Seeding Contractor
Land Mechanics Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592 -9671
(919) 639 -6132
Seed Mix Sources
Unknown
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arborgen aka South Carolina Super Tree Nursery
Cure Nursery
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Virginia Department of Forestry
Monitoring Performers
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates
1221 Corporation Parkway, Ste. 100
Raleigh NC 27610
Gerald Pottern, (919) 872 -1174

Table 4. Project Attribute Table: UT Bear Creek Weaver- McLeod (NCEEP #92347)
Project County
Chatham
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Carolina Slate Belt
Project River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
03030003 070050
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
03 -06 -12
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
Rocky River Watershed Plan (2005)
WRC Hab Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Warm
% of project easement fenced or
demarcated
100%
Beaver activity observed during design
phase?
No
Restoration Component
Attribute Table
Bear Creek
Northern UT
to Bear Cr
Southern UT
to Bear Cr
Northern UT Wetland
Drainage area
25.0 sq mi
2.36 sq mi
0.34 sq mi
NA
Stream order
4th
2nd
1 st
NA
Restored length (feet)
--
3132
1,745
0.4 acres
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
NA
Watershed type (Rural, Urban, Developing
etc.)
Rural
Rural
Rural
NA
Watershed LULC Distribution (e.g.)
Residential
3%
7%
6%
NA
Commercial
1%
1%
0%
NA
Ag -Row Crop
3%
1%
2%
NA
Ag- Livestock
30%
28%
51%
NA
Forested
52%
54%
35%
NA
Shrub /Scrub /Early Successional
11%
9%
6%
NA
Watershed impervious cover ( %)
2%
3%
2%
NA
NCDWQ AU /Index number
17 -43 -16
17 -43 -16
17 -43 -16
NA
NCDWQ classification
C
C
C
NA
303d listed?
No
No
No
NA
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
No
No
No
NA
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total acreage of easement
15.48
11.75
4.65
NA
Total vegetated acreage within the
easement
12.15
1.58
0.55
NA
Total planted acreage as part of the
restoration
3.23
11.75
4.56
0.4
Rosgen classification of pre- existing
channel
NA
E4 /F4
E4/F4
NA

Bear Creek
Northern UT
to Bear Cr
Southern UT
to Bear Cr
Northern UT Wetland
Rosgen Classification of As -Built
NA
C4 105
C4 /C5
NA
Valley type
VIII
VIII
VIII
NA
Valley slope
0.1%
0.4%
1%
NA
Valley side slope range (e.g. 2 -3. %)
3 -15%
34%
3 -11%
NA
Valley toe slope range (e.g. 2 -3. %)
1 -20%
7 -8%
3 -5%
NA
Cowardin classification
R3UBH
R3UBH
R3UBH
PSS1B
Trout waters designation
NA
NA
NA
NA
Species of concern, endangered etc.?
(Y/N)
No
No
No
No
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
Georgeville
Chewacla
Cid- Lignum
Chewacla
Depth
0 -80
0 -80
0 -80
0 -80
Clay %
5 -40
5 -40
10 -50
5 -40
K
0.17 -0.37
0.24 -0.37
0.24 -.043
0.24 -0.37
T
5
1 5
1 2
1 5
Use N/A for items that may not apply. Use "" for items that are unavailable and "U" for items that are unknown.

Figure 2.1 -2.3
Table 5
Table 6
e -Table
e- Photos
Figure 3.1 -3.9
Figure 4.1 -4.6
APPENDIX B.
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV)
Visual Stream Stability Assessment Table
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream & Vegetation Problem Inventory Table
Stream & Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Stream Station Photo - Points
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

,.4
M
1
�I
� I �
1 �►!I � s
i
h�
% * N1% - !
I
a -
EG'IOCi'P111 � � t
}
P
1M�
x
46
0
-
'4 Figure 2,1, Current Conditions Plan Waw, VT Bear
14 Creek {WeaverJMcLeo�3 # 93947j, Upper HalfcpF
Northern UT, October. 2013- Chatham County
,11
' iPhotopoints
I �--i— Cross - Sections
',legetation monitoring plot
Thelweg MYb (Nov -Dec 2J13)
As -Built Thalweg (May 2009)
Aft In- Stream Structures
Conservation Easement
Top of Bank
i Stream Problem Areas
Bank Erosion
Trees on fence
Vegetation Problem Areas
i " -ow woody stern density
i
Invasive vegetation (Ligustrum)
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
1 inoh = 1 L D N-21
I •I
I I
r}�
I
fV t i
j

I I►
efli
-At
I N%*k A7
ALL
dL
Cl)
6
ti Y'L
31
-^t
Figure 2.2. Current Conditions Plan View, UT Bear
Creek (Weaver/ McLeod 9 92347], Lower Half of
Northern UT, October 2013, Chatham County-
Photopoints Groundwater Gauge
Cross-Sections Flood Crest gauge
ti
IL Vegetation monitoring plot
Tha lweg MY4 {Nov -Der, 20'12
As-Built Tltalweg (May 2009)
A% in-stream structures
Conservation Easement
Top of Bank Restored wetia rid
Stream Problem Areas
Stream bank erosion
Vegetation Problem Areas
Low planted stern density
Invasive Plants (Ligustrum)
. . . Trees down on fence
0 so 100 200 300
Feet
inch = I DD feet

902.-
Ah
r �
:140GR AN
6011—ft
y�
'A {
Y JJ
k �
k�
E
'a
c
N,
6.
-��'
� r
y
If
s
l
_
Figure 2.3. Current Conditions Plan View, UT Bear
Creek (Weaver/McLeod # 92347), Southern UT,
October 2013, Chatham County.
#. Photopoints
-4-1 Cross - Sections
Vegetation monitoring plot
— Thalweg MY4 (Nov-Dec 2013)
= As-Built Thelweg (May 2009)
�,. In- Stream Structures
--�— Conservation Easement
Top of Bank
Vegetation Problem Areas
■■ ...: Low woody stem density
■
Invrasive Plants (Ligustrum
i i e Trees on fend I
0 40 80 160 240 �
Feet
1 inch = 100 feet
�� Ir V_.
r ,
,
2600
I --., �.
I
4i 270
M,
0
' A
L '
A,
6
da
Y
-��'
� r
y
If
s
l
_
Figure 2.3. Current Conditions Plan View, UT Bear
Creek (Weaver/McLeod # 92347), Southern UT,
October 2013, Chatham County.
#. Photopoints
-4-1 Cross - Sections
Vegetation monitoring plot
— Thalweg MY4 (Nov-Dec 2013)
= As-Built Thelweg (May 2009)
�,. In- Stream Structures
--�— Conservation Easement
Top of Bank
Vegetation Problem Areas
■■ ...: Low woody stem density
■
Invrasive Plants (Ligustrum
i i e Trees on fend I
0 40 80 160 240 �
Feet
1 inch = 100 feet
�� Ir V_.
r ,
,
2600
I --., �.
I
4i 270
M,
0
' A
L '
A,
6

UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) — EEP Project #92347 - 2013 (MY -4)
Table 5.1 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Northern UT Assessed Length = 2,975 feet
Number Stable
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Major Channel
Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Cateciory
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
Intended
in As -built
Seciments
Foota a
Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
25
25
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
—
30
31
97%
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
31
31
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
31
31
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
1 31
31
1 100%
1
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion.
2
150
95%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and
0
0
100%
are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
2
150
95%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
22
22
°
100 /o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
10
10
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
arms.
10
10
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15 %. (See guidance exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms)
22
22
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.5 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at low flow.
22
22
100%

UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) — EEP Project #92347 - 2013 (MY -4)
Table 5.2 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Southern UT Assessed Length = 1,700 feet
Number
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Major Channel
Channel
Stable,
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Cate o
Sub -Cate o
Metric
Performing as
in As -built
Se ments
Foota a
Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aegradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
27
27
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
—
48
48
100%
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
48
48
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
48
48
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
48
48
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and are
0
0
100%
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
0
1 0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
32
32
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
28
28
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
arms.
28
28
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15 %. (See guidance exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms)
32
32
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.5 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at low flow.
32
32
100%

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment. UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) EEP# 92347- 2013 (MY -4)
Planted Acreage' 18.2
Easement Acreage 30.35
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
% of Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1 acre
Pattern and
Color
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,
0 .1 acre
orange
8
1'23
6.8%
4, or 5 stem count criteria.
stipules
Total
8
1.23
6.8%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
none
Pattern and
0
0.00
0.0%
Vigor
given the monitoring year.
025 acre
.
Color
0
0.00
°
0.0 /°
Cumulative Total
8
1.23
6.8%
Easement Acreage 30.35
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the
understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table
and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The
list of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short -term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure
for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2 decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity
over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing
the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage,
distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but
potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Iikley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential
impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any
frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk /threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history.
However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for
situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Pattern and
7
0.57
1.9%
Color
0
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Pattern and
0
0.00
0.0%
Color
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the
understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table
and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The
list of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short -term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure
for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2 decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity
over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing
the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage,
distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but
potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Iikley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential
impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any
frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk /threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history.
However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for
situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things

Problem Areas Inventory Tables: UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 - MY4 (2013)
Stream Problem Areas - Northern UT
Problem
North UT Station
Suspected Cause
Photo #
Bank erosion & gully at swale outlet, LB
3435 -3490 LB
Coir and live stakes washed out in 2010 -11;
poor root density on bank.
1,2
Bank erosion, LB
3680 -3705 LB
Coir and live stakes washed out in 2010 -11;
I poor root density on bank.
3,4
Low woody stem density and /or poor
1750 LB, 1900 RB
Trees fallen on fence
11
Stream Problem Areas - Southern UT
Problem South UT Station Suspected Cause Photo #
None on Southern UT
Vegetation & Easement Problem Areas - Northern UT
Problem
North UT Station
Suspected Cause
Photo #
Ligustrum sinense invading upper reach
1000 -1100 RB 1000
Ligustrum abundant in roadside scrub along
along NC -902 (RB +LB)
1170 LB
NC -902
5
Low woody stem density and /or poor
1750 LB, 1900 RB
Trees fallen on fence
11
vigor (RB)
1180 -1310 RB
Soil dense /clayey, poor root growth
6
Low woody stem density and /or poor
vigor (LB)
1350 -1550 LB
Soil dense /clayey, poor root growth
Ligustrum sinense 4 small patches (.02
1450 RB, 1750 RB,
Stump /root sprouts and seedlings from
to .06 acr each) in middle reach
1800 LB, 2300 RB
Ligustrum outside easement fence
Low woody stem density and /or poor
vigor (LB)
1820 -1900 LB
Soil dense /clayey, Fescue dominant
7
Broken fence wires at cattle crossing
1930 LB
Tree fallen on fence
9
Low woody stem density and /or poor
vigor (LB)
1950 -2100 LB
Soil dense /clayey, poor root growth
8
Low woody stem density and /or poor
vigor (RB)
2020 -2150 RB
Soil dense /clayey, poor root growth
Broken fence wires (RB) in forest near
[
Large trees fallen on fence in Bear Creek
Bear Creek confluence
3100 -4000 RB
riparian buffer
Vegetation & Easement Problem Areas - Southern UT
Problem
South UT Station
Suspected Cause
Photo #
Ligustrum sinense invading upper reach
along NC -902 (RB +LB)
1000 -1050 RB -LB
Ligustrum abundant in roadside scrub along
NC -902
Low woody stem density and poor vigor
(LB)
1160 -1340 LB
Soil dense /clayey, Fescue dominant
10
Broken fence wires (RB + LB)
1750 LB, 1900 RB
Trees fallen on fence
11
Low woody stem density, poor vigor (LB)
2300 -2550 LB
Soil dense /clayey, Fescue dominant
12

Stream Problem Area Photos - UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 - MY4 (2013)
1. N- sta- 3450113 Erosion.Oct 2013. Thin veg cover, no woody.
2. N- sta- 3450113 Erosion.Oct 2013. Thin veg cover, no woody.
41-4r-
3. N- sta- 3700113 Erosion.Oct 2013. Thin veg cover, no woody.
4. N- sta- 3700113 Erosion.Apr 2013. Thin veg cover, no woody.
(South Tributary Has No Stream Problem Areas)

Vegetation & Easement Problem Photos - UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 - MY4 (2013)
5. N- sta- 1000113. Apr.2013. Ligustrum invading from roadside
6. N- sta- 1 200.RB. Face Dnstr. Oct.2013. Low woody density
7. N- sta- 19001B. Face Upstr. Apr.2013. Fescue + Low woody
8. N- sta- 1980.LB. Face Dnstr. Oct.2013. Low woody density

Vegetation & Easement Problem Photos - UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 - MY4 (2013)
9. N- sta- 19301B. Oct.2013. Fence collapse at cattle crossing
11. S- sta- 1750.1-13. Apr.2013. Tree fallen on fence
10. S- sta- 12801B. Face Upstr. Oct.2013. Fescue + Low woody
12. S- sta- 2400.1-13. Face Dnstr. Apr.2013. Fescue + Low woody

Figure 3.1 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY4 (2013) - North Trib
Photo -Point 1: Northern UT facing Downstream from NC 902 (Sta. 10 +00)
PhotoPoi nt -1: 3/25/2010
PhotoPoint -1: 04/30/2013
Photo -Point 2: Northern UT facing Downstream (Sta. 13 +60)
y
i
PhotoPoi nt -2: 3/24/2010

Figure 3.2 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY4 (2013) - North Trib
Photo -Point 3: Northern UT facin Upstream from easement fence corner (Sta. 15 +30)
-471 ,
PhotoPoint -3: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoi nt -3: 10/25/2013
Photo -Point 4: Northern UT facing South across stream toward floodplain swale outlet (Sta. 17 +55)
PhotoPoi nt -4: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoint -4: 10/25/2013

Figure 3.3 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY4 (2013) - North Trib
Photo -Point 5: Northern UT facing Downstream at Cattle Crossing (Sta. 19 +30)
r ill
n
w
P 4
xw' r
PhotoPoint -5: 3/24/2010 PhotoPoint -5: 10/25/2013
Photo -Point 6: Northern UT facing Upstream (Sta. 22 +95)
W.4
P hoto Po i nt -6: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoint -6: 10/25/2013

Figure 3.4 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY4 (2013) - North Trib
Photo -Point 7: Northern UT facing Downstream (Sta. 28 +95)
PhotoPoi nt -7: 3/24/2010
Photo -Point 8: Northern UT fe
PhotoPoi nt -7: 10/25/2013
PhotoPoi nt -8: 3/24/2010
Photo Poi nt -8: 10/25/2013

Figure 3.5 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY4 (2013) - North Trib
t
t
Photo -Point 9: Northern UT facinq Upstream (Sta. 38 +50)
Photo Point -9: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoi nt -9: 10/25/2013
just above Bear Creek confluence (Sta. 39 +75)
PhotoPoi nt -10: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoint -10: 9/25/2013

Figure 3.6 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY4 (2013) - South Trib
Downstream from NC 902 (Sta. 10 +00)
'
PhotoPoint -11: 3/25/2010
Photo -Point 12: Southern UT fa(
PhotoPoint -11: 04/30/2013
.
c+ hY
PhotoPoint -12: 3/25/2010
P h oto Po i n t -12: 10/29/2013

Figure 3.7 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY4 (2013) - South Trib
Photo -Point 13: Southern UT f
PhotoPoint -13: 3/25/2010
Photo -Point 14: Southern UT fa
PhotoPoint -13: 04/30/2013
PhotoPoint -14: 3/25/2010
PhotoPoint -14: 10/29/2013

Figure 3.8 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY4 (2013) - South Trib
Photo -Point 15: Southern UT facing Downstream (Sta. 20 +80)
�F
�f+
_
PhotoPoint -15: 3/25/2010 PhotoPoint -15: 04/30/2013
Photo -Point 16: Southern UT
PhotoPoint -16: 3/25/2010 PhotoPoint -16: 10/29/2013

Figure 3.9 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY4 (2013) - South Trib
PhotoPoint -17: 3/25/2010
PhotoPoint -17: 10/25/2013
Photo -Point 18: Southern UT facing Upstream from Bear Creek confluence (Sta. 27 +00)
PhotoPoint -18: 3/25/2010
PhotoPoint -18: 10/25/2013

Figure 4.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY4 (2013) - Project #92347
VegPlot 1 (Norther
OL
VegPlot -1: 4/14/2010
VegPlot 2 (Northern UT Sta. 18 +15)
VegPlot -1: 10/29/2013
VegPlot -2: 4/14/2010
VegPlot -2: 10/29/2013 (10,0 corner)

Figure 4.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY4 (2013) - Project #92347
VegPlot 3 (Northern UT Sta. 24 +35)
r
VegPlot -3: 4/14/2010
VegPlot 4 (Northern UT Sta. 27 +75)
VegPlot -4: 4/14/2010
i
,I
1
VegPlot -3: 10/22/2013
,1
• c
fug '�✓+�,d 'i!k ` �..,�j J�e II '�+ m
k,
VegPlot -4: 10/17/2013

Figure 4.3 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY4 (2013) - Project #92347
VegPlot 5 (Northern UT Sta. 29 +50)
VegPlot -5: 4/14/2010
VegPlot 6 (Northern UT Sta. 31 +10)
VegPlot -5: 10/17/2013
VegPlot -6: 4/14/2010
VegPlot -6: 10/17/2013

Figure 4.4 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY4 (2013) - Project #92347
VegPlot 7 (Northern UT Sta. 33 +75)
VegPlot -7: 4/14/2010
VegPlot 8 (Southern UT Sta. 12 +00 -I WA
.-Ls _
VegPlot -7: 10/17/2013
4
VegPlot -8: 4/15/2010
VegPlot -8: 10/17/2013

Figure 4.5 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY4 (2013) - Project #92347
VegPlot 9 (Southern UT Sta. 14 +45)
v6
�5r
VegPlot -9: 4/15/2010
VegPlot 10 (Southe
VegPlot-9: 10/22/2013
VegPlot-10: 4/15/2010
VegPlot-10: 10/29/2013
•
t
i
VegPlot -9: 4/15/2010
VegPlot 10 (Southe
VegPlot-9: 10/22/2013
VegPlot-10: 4/15/2010
VegPlot-10: 10/29/2013

Figure 4.6 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY4 (2013) - Project #92347
VegPlot 11 (Southern UT Sta. 23 +2
Ar .i ��^1 , 4�:� �iii� ° ;b'�:t� yr, " _ �••!
VegPlot -11: 4/15/2010
VegPlot -12: 4/15/2010
the
F
4
Y '
VegPlot -11: 10/29/2013
Veg Plot -12: 10/22/2013

APPENDIX C.
VEGETATION PLOT MONITORING DATA
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 8 CVS Stem Counts Total and Planted by Plot
e -Table Raw CVS vegetation data sheets

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
UT to Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) # 92347 MY- 4 (Oct 2013)
Plot #
Riparian
Buffer
Stems'
Stream/
Wetland
Stem S 2
Live
Stakes
Invasives
Volunteers3
Tota14
Unknown
Growth
Form
0001
6
6
1
0
56
63
0
0002
4
4
0
4
52
52
0
0003
8
8
0
10
57
55
0
0004
6
6
0
4
44
46
0
0005
n/a
32
0
0
115
147
0
0006
10
10
0
0
42
52
0
0007
7
7
0
0
27
34
0
0008
9
9
0
0
20
29
0
0009
4
4
0
0
50
54
0
0010
8
9
0
0
39
48
0
0011
10
12
0
0
32
44
0
0012
14
15
0
0
60
75
0
Wetland /Stream Vegetation Totals (per acre)
Stream/ Success
Wetland Volunteers Criteria
Plot # SteMS2 3 Tota14 Met?
0001
243
2266
2550
No
0002
162
2104
2104
No
0003
324
2307
2226
Yes
0004
243
1781
1862
No
0005
1295
4654
5949
Yes
0006
405
1700
2104
Yes
0007
283
1093
1376
No, close
0008
364
809
1174
Yes
0009
162
2023
2185
No
0010
364
1578
1942
Yes
0011
486
1295
1781
Yes
0012
607
2428
3035
Yes
Project Avg
411
2003
2357
Yes
Kiparian gutter vegetation I otals
Riparian Success
Buffer Criteria
Plot # Stems' Met?
0001
243
No
0002
162
No
0003
324
Yes, barely
0004
243
No
0005
n/a
0006
405
Yes
0007
283
No
0008
364
Yes
0009
162
No
0010
324
Yes, barely
0011
405
Yes
0012
567
Yes
Project Avg
316
No, close
Stem Class characteristics
1Buffer Stems Native planted hardwood trees. NOT including pines, shrubs, live stakes, vines.
2Stream/ Wetland Native planted hardwood trees + shrubs. NOT including live stakes, vines.
Stems
3Volunteers Native woody trees + shrubs, not planted; not including vines, exotics.
4Total Planted + volunteer native trees, shrubs + live stakes; not including vines, exotics.
Color Code for Density Success Criteria
Exceeds crierion by 10% or more Fails to meet crierion by less than 10%
Exceeds criterion by less than 10% Fails to meet crierion by more than 10%

Table 8. CVS Stem Counts Total & Planted by Plot and Species.
LIT to Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) EEP # 92347 MY- 4 (Oct 2013)
Current Plot Data (MY4 2013)
E92347 -01 -0001 I E92347 -01 -0002 I E92347 -01 -0003 I E92347 -01 -0004 I E92347 -01 -0005 I E92347 -01 -0006 I E92347 -01 -0007
Scientific Name Common Name Soecies Tvoe PnoLS P -all IT PnoLS P -all IT PnoLS P -all IT PnoLS P -all IT PnoLS P -all IT PnoLS P -all IT PnoLS P -all IT
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
71
631
41
41
561
81
81
651
61
61
501
321
321
1471
2
10
52
7
7
34
size (ares)
Aesculus sylvatica
painted buckeye
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
k1295 0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
6
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
4
8
6
6
10
6
6
8
4
10
4
4
7
5
5
8
Stems per ACRE
242.8
283.3
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
2266
323.7
19
2630
242.8
5
2023
2
59491404.71
4
21041
283.31
283.31
1376
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Celtislaevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
11
11
11
Corpus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
27
1
1
37
2
2
42
1
1
37
18
18
50
2
2
33
1
1
10
Gleditsia triacanthos
honeylocust
Tree
2
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
3
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
4
10
4
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
48
41
11
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
6
6
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
11
1
11
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus velutina
black oak
Tree
1
1
1
Rubus argutus
sawtooth blackberry
Shrub
Salix
willow
Shrub, Tree
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
2
7
2
Symphoricarpos orbiculatus
coralberry
Shrub
2
1 51
1
31
4
4
Ulmus
elm
Tree
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
5
3
Ulmus americans
American elm
ITree
21
E]
5
Stem count
61
71
631
41
41
561
81
81
651
61
61
501
321
321
1471
10
10
52
7
7
34
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
k1295 0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
6
6
10
4
4
8
6
6
10
6
6
8
4
10
4
4
7
5
5
8
Stems per ACRE
242.8
283.3
2550
161.9
161.9
2266
323.7
323.7
2630
242.8
242.8
2023
12951
59491404.71
404.71
21041
283.31
283.31
1376
Color Codes for Density Success
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 8, continued. CVS Stem Counts Total & Planted by Plot and Species.
UT to Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) EEP # 92347 MY- 4 (Oct 2013)
Color Codes for Density Success
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Current • Data [MY4 2013)
Annual Means, Total All Plots
E92347-01-0008
0009
E92347-01-0010
00
E92347-01-0012
i
r
i
r r
r i r
,•
Color Codes for Density Success
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Vegetation Monitoring Dat;► (VIVID) Dalaslwet
I'lot 1 92347 -01 -0001
O
VMI) Year f 1 -5): 4 Date:
0.1
-
'Faxcmr)nlic standard:
Taxtm imic Standard IATI.,:
1'1att1 €11ry occidentalis
L.aliltrde or LYI'M -N:
188387 <)
Datu
((oc.deg. or n1)
1..ongill)dc or UTM -I :
67
677625
iJ'f "N
('Oordinale Accuracy (m):
X -Axis bearing I
Plol Dimensions: X:
E 10 Y
10
0.4
Please Jill ill ally missing date► alld Correct ally el- l-ol;S.
1 /
NA D8;3AV
7onU: .nc..-
eM: I. fl5t►1
Date lasl plallIC&
New )Ia €ltl €)g tIt11G itl /yy'?
Chuck box il' plol was Ool
N4)tes: stlmpled, specify reasam below
Plot h 's reverse orierl€ don for X and Y axis (Y is 90 de Aces to the € ighl ul' X
od 2012 Data z 'I'1 [IS WAR'S DATA
c
May) tin€ ; -ce, X Y Ileighl 1)1311 i Ileighl D13I1 Re- Vigor's Danrsgc'k Notes
lI) Species Name char 0.1111 0.1111 ton, I crtl lem" l c111 sprolit
087
Bellila nigr€r
O
R
0.1
0.2
98.f)
r)88
1'1att1 €11ry occidentalis
4
R
6 ,9
soh-
sapl
()-.l c111
1 -2.5
989
OnCIVUS vel€rtilttr
(I,j
R
8,3
0.4
Af rss�,r�
I,.7
1280
Salix aigrrl
{)
R,
9.5...
710
250.[)
Jq
1281
salix nigra
(lt}
1.
0.1
].S
215.0
0.91 it
384
OUP -Te11s nlichauxii
�.
)i
3,0
3.8
91,0
385
OUCIVUS lyr;ta
n
R
4.4
6.4
172.0
0. 9 ...J
rl stops: 7 New Slems, not included Iltst ,year, bol are obviously planted. l l' more Space heeded, use Mark PWS (Planted Woody Stoma) Form:
X 1' 1lcigt €I 1)1311
Species Name Source* {'1€I) (111) I cn1" 1 ens Vigor' Damage Nubs
*Notc.ti by ID: 1987-al 0,0 colucr
1�1G notion of -kill-401 '
Natural Woody Sterns - tallied by species lxnrnlllillg * *:
-lei gI► (21lt- 0f'f(All stems shmicr than €Ilisare ignored. I€ Aocm, explain why to Iho right.): I__) IOCill X,50clll i_ "I 10 em C:1 137cm
> > >
S pecks Name
�-
L�
c
SEEDLINGS
HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— D1311
Timlis --- DIM
5u b-
:
Seed
4
50 CD1-
100 C111137
I()() cIn-
cm
soh-
sapl
()-.l c111
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
_
=1E)
(write D131 f)
(
Jq
8 i
n
h od)
-__
......_
.n�..n
"'Re (tnlr, d Il Cl1 01l 71fI(nl or s131)s,€€llple 2 1 %. *l
*2
r .3
00
6 •4
•o
"5
�✓r
�6
�7
8
�1(1 1'Unll W �, VII'9.1
SOUR C Ii: 11 ,li„ 11sp €n€, 1,- Livestskc 13. 13,1)), 1n�l,burky P Potta,d 1u, l,ubiing R_ =ls€rc Ros3t, M Me�huttc4,Ely, U._ilnl r€nwn §? 1
VICTOR: 4 =exce'llcut, 3 =good, 2 =tan', �DAMAC,L-.: M.- Moval, CUT, MOWIng, 13FAVcr, DF1;R, RODents, INSecs, (,AMF, LIVFStock, Oiher/Unknown
1= 1111likely to survive year, 0--dead, ANIMal, Boman TRAMpled, Si(o Too WFT, Sire'1'oo DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, I IURRicane, DIScased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
`I il:,"Kil IT I'RF.CI51ON drops to 10em if >2.5m and 50cm if Am. Primed in the CM-1, 1ail'h.7 r Y Mal rur. 2. ? .l

Map Or stuns 0,, plot E92347-01-0001 fiverns.. r
mal) size.,
LARGE
f, I
,)AC-
0 �? "
",a I f y
LA.ive slake, 14=13all and b�!rhj -11qllcd,Tu=Tublia , R=barc Rool, M=Mcclvanical ..U=Ustknowll
........... ............ ....1 ............... burlap, — - ---,-.!Y . ............................ . . . ...... ............... ............ .... .....
'V](,,OIZ: 4=exceflem, 3=good, 2=1'aif, --l"'DAMAGE: IUNoval, CUT, MOWing, 13FAVer, DE'E-A, RODcras, INSccls, GAME, 1AWS1'ock, Other /Unknown
I =unlikcly to survive Year, O= dcad, ANIMal, I lumanTRAMpled, Sitc Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DR01jelit, STORM, HURRicane, DISensed, VINE
SiraligillaLioll, UNKNown, specify other.
*1 IFIGI ITPRI.,'CISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cin if >41. Prinfed in file Tool ver..2.2.7

vegelation Monitoring IMltu (YMD) Dittitsitect f'fcilse lilt in tidy ntisslut; tisttu 111111 correct atty errot•4.
Plot E92347-01-0002 Ncv h
VMZ} 7'estr (1-5): ! q Dale: '74/ca i
i
TnNolloolic Slltnd;lyd:
'I'axonontic S€ ildard DATI. -":
L,ilitude or LJTM -N: 1884203 Dallllll; NAD83/W
(dec.dcg. or nl) r:A.1, .._.-_
longittide or UtM ?: 677 197 UTM I e ....
Cborditmte Acwuracy (m)' X Axis lmarill); (dei,): 27,5
D,ft L•rsl I)NMICcl:
New Alwing d;lle m /yy?
Check box if plot was not
Plot IJlrttensiats X: ]U Y ...1 {l „Plot Juts reverse otwnlation for X„and j axis (1 is 90 de� to the right of X
Oct Z(I1'2 )ttt t !'� €
THIS IS YEAR'S DA'D'A
O E
Kill Soarle" X Y Height D1311 I� I
Height 1)1311 lte- Vigor* DAmage'' Notes
ID Species Muse char 0.Lnt 0.Isn ICal* I ern j lent* I cn} sprout
996 Bewla nigrlt
It .9 ,9 Q 1 SS;U
998 I'raxinuspenasylvanica
(iy) R 2.0 4,0 30.0
1001 l7raxilluspenplsylvanica
(]. It {) J K GG.f]
1297 Celtis laevigaw
It 2.5 i),I 6..1) ..
ffJ�4llalr.9�
Species Mime
New Stems, not included last y+'ar, h(tt are obviously planted. If more splice needed, use b1mi < PWS (Plan)cr1 Woolly Stems) Form:
X Y 1lcighl 1)13 E1
Smll•c0 (up) (m) E cm* I cm Vigor'' Danutgc" Notes
Natural Woody . y species "�" `.*
l Stems - tallied � . �Sl1 Ia511n1 fpllgrLt'
�1"ELht 'tit °O f (All SSGnti shOnCl,11181) lhisare igil pred. If >W(111, explain, why to Me light.): 1.3 1042111 1�] 50CM i.i -1 { }l ein ci 137cm
SLwc1C'.S Nit me'
�
S�?T11)r,IN("IS
— HErcrHT CIASSES
SAPIANG's
— D1111
Tlt ii? s - DBI-I
_.._
Sup-
"c.ed
10 c ill-
50 cm
50 cm-
1.00 crn
1€!r) C 1�7-
137 cm
5rsb-
slpl
0-1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
)
(wliw 1)131 1)
.7
W
s Ole,
f
l '1)I Jl t Q rbi
"'licallliltttif eta _pi'1' >Ifkmus sulpsampie ?I #11)%. 11i
2 103
•
•,•4
•• i •
0,0 :6
•• i
7
8
)
I #) Born WS2, vet ').1
SOUR(I .; i i 1 rlitslpl urt, I. ,1,}�� slake, 13 -13all tltd burlap J?„ Pt�tl�d 1 u _ "Cutpllnl; ]Z =b u'e ]Znnt, M _Mich snt�tll)U, _Unl ncpwn — p.3
"Vlwlt: 4= exce-lient, 3 =good, 2 =f air, 1DAMAGE: RE- Noval, CUT, MOWing, 13EAVer, 1)12'113R, RODenls, 1NSecrs, GAME, L.IVES'Fock, 011ie r/Ut1knOWn
I- unlikely to survive year, it =dead, ANIMal, 1lulllan `l- RAMpled, Site'lbo WET, Site "Igo DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, l IURRicane, DISeased, VINI
M= missing, Strangulation, UNKNuwn, specify other.
"1IP.IG fl' PRECISION drops to l0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4n7. Printed in the CM-EI- 'A ry Tuol per, 2..+.1
�` 7

Mal) of' stems on blot E92347 -01 -0002
._ .. X- sixi:s: 275 "
11 Sfell ti:.s
1
LA 80",
N
:. S n I
- -- - ... - -- -- ............ . _
'SOURC:E.;,`l'r— =Transp €ant, I_.= l.ivestake, 13 =13all and burl �, P= polled,._I'u '1'! !Vi R. Ut�c l %�c�t M „Mec.ha ca U Unknown ..... p
....
'VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3= good, 2 =fair, ''DAMAGE: RliMoval, CUT, MOWing, 13LAVe , D1i13R, RODents, INSecis, GAMI3, €_IVFtSlbck, Other' /Unknown
1=unlikely to sulviva year, 0 =dcaJ, ANIMA, Hmnan l'RAMpled, Sile'l'oo WET, Sile`l'oo DRY, 1 FOOD, DROUght, STORM, IIURRicane, DIScased, V1N1;
N9= 1nissing, Strangulnlion, UNKNown, specify other.
"111 1GI l'C PRECISION drops to ]Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printer! in McCM41"hPlwary l'ool ver. 2.2.7
r
__,.
i
i
:. S n I
- -- - ... - -- -- ............ . _
'SOURC:E.;,`l'r— =Transp €ant, I_.= l.ivestake, 13 =13all and burl �, P= polled,._I'u '1'! !Vi R. Ut�c l %�c�t M „Mec.ha ca U Unknown ..... p
....
'VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3= good, 2 =fair, ''DAMAGE: RliMoval, CUT, MOWing, 13LAVe , D1i13R, RODents, INSecis, GAMI3, €_IVFtSlbck, Other' /Unknown
1=unlikely to sulviva year, 0 =dcaJ, ANIMA, Hmnan l'RAMpled, Sile'l'oo WET, Sile`l'oo DRY, 1 FOOD, DROUght, STORM, IIURRicane, DIScased, V1N1;
N9= 1nissing, Strangulnlion, UNKNown, specify other.
"111 1GI l'C PRECISION drops to ]Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printer! in McCM41"hPlwary l'ool ver. 2.2.7
r

Vegetation Monitoring Dala (VMD) Datasbeet
f Plot. E92347-01-0003
_._...........
E r
VNID Year (1 -5): t_ l
[) ;lie:
z
0
"IIIIS YI.ARS 1)AT'A
height 1)1311 Ito- Vigo,, Damage, Naxos
Icm" I Cnl sprout
1007 Fraxinus.permsyfvallica Ti .11 11 27,0
1008 Quercus phellos (c.) H 2.9 1.4 7:3,11
1009 Quercus. michauxii R 5.5 0,2 ] 25.0
1010 13clula nigra H 9.5 (U)
(k) 0 .�
Wit Q1101cu,s:Illiella0xii It bG 2S l();Q
_y..
11112 Nyssa sylvalicll {�s] It 0.4 3.1 fo .()
141:3 Powlluiigsa
1014 Fraxilms peoosylv.anic•a m 8.7 4.2 55,U
1015 I7axinus pennsylvanica 3 12 8.,V 54 SSiO
1016 CCIl s IatVlya3a 1 -1� It 5.2 7.0 30.11
1019 Diospyros virginiami (j� It 9.2 'M 3710
it swul.c: 11 New Steins, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X 1' llcight pfill
Specics Name Source, (Ill) (111) l e[II 1 C111
T;lxonolllic Standard;
E
Taxonomic Standard l)ATF:
I- atitu[Ic ur UTM -N:
1884743
i):uunl; NAD83 /W
€ (dec.deg, UI' 111}
Longitude or UTM -F:
..__ -..--. - -, -.
671040
'u
U'fM zone:
-
nc
i Coordivale Accuracy (111 };
X -Axis bearlllt; (de(;); j 1(11
1 %%SV 1111 ill ally Il1iSSillg (111h alld e0i'1'CCt :Illy ert'Ors.
Co � '1'd ._ ....__.
NOW �I[inlling iialc l i/),y.
�1M ole: ]);lie Kist planted:
r f L
"Check box ii'pklt Watt not
I E
Plot Dimensions; X; I(1 Y lU
' (.) I lot h t5 reverse ofienlalion [03 uld Y axis
Volcs: salllj*d, spec.it'y reosoll below
1S till UG ICUs t0 the 1'191it 01 A
. 0,
11)
Species Name
map
Char
Soura'c X Y
0,1111 0.1111
r)cl )ol� Data
Ileil;hl 1)1311
Icnl "• t cot
z
0
"IIIIS YI.ARS 1)AT'A
height 1)1311 Ito- Vigo,, Damage, Naxos
Icm" I Cnl sprout
1007 Fraxinus.permsyfvallica Ti .11 11 27,0
1008 Quercus phellos (c.) H 2.9 1.4 7:3,11
1009 Quercus. michauxii R 5.5 0,2 ] 25.0
1010 13clula nigra H 9.5 (U)
(k) 0 .�
Wit Q1101cu,s:Illiella0xii It bG 2S l();Q
_y..
11112 Nyssa sylvalicll {�s] It 0.4 3.1 fo .()
141:3 Powlluiigsa
1014 Fraxilms peoosylv.anic•a m 8.7 4.2 55,U
1015 I7axinus pennsylvanica 3 12 8.,V 54 SSiO
1016 CCIl s IatVlya3a 1 -1� It 5.2 7.0 30.11
1019 Diospyros virginiami (j� It 9.2 'M 3710
it swul.c: 11 New Steins, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X 1' llcight pfill
Specics Name Source, (Ill) (111) l e[II 1 C111
MII? qy V
I:::: y g
(a/ .
If more space needed, use blank
Vigor, Darllabe"
El
I
PWS (I'lanted Woolly Stems) form:
Notes
' "NiNcs 11,y 11): 1010- leader died
1015 -top (lied
10 1 6-brokeii
i ll119 -wp died
— - ." .
IZ , , sp€ ull, C I rvc sliikc, R i3111_alld I)urlap,.C'=Poltu[I fu— '1'ublin R bare Root M Mech uueail U =Unknow,q_, ........... . ... l? 5
`SOUR( I! :- 1 r I'rul, — _:-
"VKJOR: 4= excellent, 3= good, 2 =Glir, IDAMA(iE: REM oval, CUT, MOWing, 131HAVer, DE R, RoDenis, INSecls, (;AME, LIVI S'I'ock, OIher /Unknown
1= alnlikcly to survive year, 0 =dead, AN]A4al, Ilunlan `l'ItAMplcd, Sile'I'na WET, 5i[e "t'aa DRY, FLOOD, I)ROUght, STORM, I IURRicane, DISeased, VIN1
M= nlissinsp. Siranglilation, UNKNown, specify other.
11II. -fCITT PRECISION [crops to 10cnl if >-2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the C11SdiliPl1 lm), foul rev 23 1
1S

Plot (Continued):
1+,02347 -0.1 -0003
c:)(t 2(}12 I);,I €,
o
--- •- 14ElCIIT
C I ASSIiN
r1[IS vi::ntt:5 r)nrn
[L) SI1CCIc5
ma€p Somec X Y
Cllul' {Ill) ( €11)
ddh Height }DRII
(11"n) (Cm) (cm)
5(I l,-
9ed
(4(111
(131111)
height
(Cllr
DBI1 1(e- Vigor Dmwige' Notes
(0111) sprow
��Ji!)I41nilllUn �['lE %IYEi
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by specie,( 4u1s1m! Ins * *:
d PL?I t ( '1 (All stenm s11oltcr than Ihisurc igbOled, 1! >10011, exp[ain Why to 111C right,): i;] locm I 1 5 {)Cm [ I I 00 In I 1 137cm
peci45 Name
Q
Sl,EDLINGS
--- •- 14ElCIIT
C I ASSIiN
SAPLINGS
— D1311
'1'jt�
t, s — DBIJ
5(I l,-
9ed
10 cm-
50 C111
50 0111-
1.�)Q Cti]
100C111-
1�7 C111
Sub-
S €p1
�)-� Clll
I -2.5
2.5-
5-
) - -��
=10
(write DIM)
15kle
IOUI
'Re (p!!!C(1 11 0£,011 >1 OCM n1' S(IbS:U11 IC It )%, 6,
i) 7
-78
1 M
X t) 1`01111 W52, VCI 9.I
22 Oct 1J
. ,l
f 1
... ... .. .. m._.... __._
*SOURCE f € 1 r insp[ tot, .-Live Stake, 13=11all and. but]ap, P k'otfcd 1 u 'l'ub3n :1 - -R =bare Roll M Mcchan€cally U Unknown _ .., . p._(>
"Vlt70R: 4-excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGI: Rl Moval, CUT, MOWing, BEsAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, (SAME, 1AVE.STock, O €her /Unknmvn
1= unlikely to survive year, ll =dead, AN[Mai, 1- 11mian l'RAMpled, Site `roo WE ', Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROU61u, STORM, I IURRicane, DISeased, VINI?
M= missing. 1 Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*111:[(;[i'I' PREC[SION drops to I Ocnl if >15m and 50cm if >4n1. Primed in Me CTS -LFll 1r' rtY Tool rep. 2.. ;.1

Map of stems on plot E.92347-01-0003
1,5
Z--
-'$ o ":,"
X-axis- looll Ilvents., 12
URGE
... . . . .. ... . . . .... .................................... ......
"SO L,T( E. Ti-' 'nu s la iL[,- L-- Live sla kc, B= Bal [ and burlap,P= Ilo Hy-j =Unknowji
. ... .. .... 7
,'v Z. 4- excellent, 3=good I)AMAGE: RE'Moval, CUT, MOWing, BEIAWT, DEER, RODems, INSec(s, GAMU', LIVEISTock, Other /Unknown
I =milikely to survive year, (=dead, ANIMM, HU111,M)TRAMpled, Site lbo WFT, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, Dizougia, smim, I 1URRicanc, DIScased, VINE'.
M=inissing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
l;F'X;lFj'llRl4CISION drops lo l0cm if'>2.5m and 50cm if Am, I'Villied it: dw ver. 2L2. 7
v
s
())
07 -
60
go,
3
bt
r', . v
GC;
V IT
... . . . .. ... . . . .... .................................... ......
"SO L,T( E. Ti-' 'nu s la iL[,- L-- Live sla kc, B= Bal [ and burlap,P= Ilo Hy-j =Unknowji
. ... .. .... 7
,'v Z. 4- excellent, 3=good I)AMAGE: RE'Moval, CUT, MOWing, BEIAWT, DEER, RODems, INSec(s, GAMU', LIVEISTock, Other /Unknown
I =milikely to survive year, (=dead, ANIMM, HU111,M)TRAMpled, Site lbo WFT, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, Dizougia, smim, I 1URRicanc, DIScased, VINE'.
M=inissing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
l;F'X;lFj'llRl4CISION drops lo l0cm if'>2.5m and 50cm if Am, I'Villied it: dw ver. 2L2. 7

tl
Ye %etation Mu ►►iloring 1)ati► (VM1)) 1)i ►tastteel
Plot 1±'.02347 -01 -0004 iV'U(',' 1(
VM1) Year (1 -5): 4. ])a €e:
'I'axouonlic Sialldard:
'hil,011013liC Stitrl(itrd DATE:
/ 1
1-,atilude or LJTM -N: 1884972 1)alurrl; NAD83/W I
(dee.dch. m III) ................
I "ongitidle or UCM I : 670908 U'1'M %tine Irlc I
Coflydinalc AcCttracy (nl): X -Axis karinl, (leg): 310,
111 I i
Plot DinlensiollS: X: ]0 Y
Please till in any missing di►ta and correct any errors,
oricntatioll
Oct 2112 Dam 17.
WI) Snurcc* X Y liciglll DIM
Ili Species Name char 0.1111 0.1111 IC111* I cm �
hate last play ed:
New }laminl; dale nllyy'?
(.:heck box if plot w;ts not
Votes: sampled, specify reason bahlw
I- X and Y axis (Y Is 90 dC lws to the Fight of X
TI IIS YfiAWS DATA
I1ciot11 DIM Re- Vigor* Damage" N,jes
Icrn" 1 cm sproul
1025
Fraxinus pelmsylvaluca
[�
c
R
8,5
0.0
168.0
wi
1026
Cc Jtts ►lfcvi
it .:
R
7k.
5€€11-
Ipl
56
�
1-2.5
1027
Quercus 11lichauxii
((1}
R
4.2
2.5
115.0
1)1311?
1028
Nyssa sylvalica
(:
1021)
111nums occidellmli..'
It
9,8
3,6
214.0
1,3 11
1030
1.3utuht nigra
- (
it
7.2
- 5.8
135:0
DDR?
11 saruas: 6 New Sleets, not included last year, but are 0viously plaulted. I1' more space needed, use b1mil, PWS (Planled Woody Sterns) Fornl:
X Y 1lcight 1)131€
Species Name Som -cc.* (tll) (111) I em' I cm Vipm` Dalmtge� Nate,
Stems t'.�1',�lilaail:fllF �S'llf�lllt
Natural Woody Stem - tallied by species �ski I)SI FlU igg*4:
►ei ill (: 111- ()tit'(A11 stems shfllielIhan III isure iguarcik 11' >1Oem, cxptai €, wily to ote,iglit,): € 110cill 11 5Ocill I f 1[I[ CSll t,; 137cill
veies Name
=I-
[�
c
SI?l:l)LINGS
---H nc u, CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DB11
Tm."i.s — DBH
Sub-
wed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 CI11-
100 cm
1100CI11-
137 cm
5€€11-
Ipl
0 -1 cm
�
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(,-rite DBII)
Its Me
LHa
"ItecpliMIifCfa- utr>1tCI1lol'suhsa111p IC? RXM 01
:2
•
03
••
604 "5
0,0 0
6
8
)
to FoimWS2,ver9.1
.. ......... ... ......... ........ _ ........... __. __ .. - - - ........ ......... .........
'SOURCF: ] r.. I ram- Aam, A ivC Slake, 13, =1.3all..aud burkip, P= PoIlcd ] u =Tubiint R =bare Itool, W Mechanically, U =Unkllnlvn _ - - - -- __ p.8
VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair.. [)AMA(,,13: R1 ?Moval, CUT, MOWing, 1313AVer', DE R, RODCnts, INSecls, GAME;, LIV13STock, Olhe.r'IUnk11owu
1= unlikely to survive year, 0= dead, AN1Mal, 1 fumy :n TRAMpled, Sitc Too WF.' ]', Sitc l'oo JURY, FLOOD, DROUgbt, STORM, HURRicane, DISused, VINN.
M= missing. Sn'altgutaflion, UNKNown, specify other.
III1.:XII[ I' PRECISION drops to Meal it' >2.5m and 50cm if Am. Primed in ape (.'t'W"tiP 1,Parp to d lvr. ?.3.r
� 0,

Mal) ol'sterns on plot E92347-01-0004
X- iixiti: 31 #1
11 slems" 6
mall Size:
IARGII
mj)) N
*SOUR(.T; I I't-Trans mijj.A,ivcs(akc, 13A3a11 wid.burlap
jlqttqc!, ' 'u='Fu ling, R=barc Rool, M=Mechanicallv. U�Ujlkllowlt
I' -- - ....... . .. ------------------ ---- ------ ---- ---- - - -- - ----- P, 9
IVIGOR: 4 excellem, 3=good, DAMAGE: RE-Moval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVes-, DU'ER, RODents, INSects, GAMF., LIVE-IS'Foek, Oil lcr/(Jnknowti
I =Lmlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, HumanTRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISOased, VINI:
M=missillg. Strangulation, UNKNowit, specify other.
*11I.-'AGHTPRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and.50cm if >4n). Printed in the CVS-Al- 11 h,'wrl, Y'ool ver. 2.2.7
6 t I

Vegetation Data (VIVID) Datasheet
Plot
VM1) Yea r0 -5): 4_JD;ale:
Taxonomic Standard:
'1,axonamic Slandard [)A'1 "I:i:
Latitude or [J'I'M -N:
(dec.dee. nr m)
Longitude or UTM -l::
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Pleat Dimensions: X:
I
1885064 I Datum:INAI)BSiW
,)7665.1 iJTM 'lone i.114
7 _ ..._._.
1 X -Axis boaring (deg): 29S
:., 0 -b
Please fill ill ally missing data €Illd Correct )Illy errors.
1);lte lust planted:
Now )laming da €c nll,yy?
Check box if' plat wos not
",lllcs: sanlpleo, Spct:lly reason oemw
1 III , : I E [ a
],lot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the light of' X
, E
Dee 2(1]2 Data z!
'I'IIISY)A R'S I)A'1'A
G
Map Source x Y Ftcighl DBit IIcithl DBII 1te' Vigor* Daln,tgr'" Notes
1 D Species Name char 0.1111 O.l Il I I cnl' I cnl -- I ctO l enl sprow
10;37
1039
1031)
1040
1042
1114 3
1044
1045
1040
10118
1049
1050
1051
1052
10,513
I WA
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
MO
1061
1062
1003
1065
1067
1068
Pnaxinus pamsylv:ulica
R
1.9
I.5
130,0
D1311?
�C;epllahiithrls occielcrlt lli5 ,)
R
2
T:OI}l(1
_
._, ._. .
I'rlxlllus IwIllisylvallica
...,....
R
3.2
....
0.4
94,0
hraxinus pennsyivsnica
{
]t
; . 4.6.
0s9
270_;0
1:2
1.,raxinus polmsyNanien
I
5.5
1.0
250,0
1.9
Praxirt,us pcllnsylyanica
w
It
-; 7,9
1 1
240,0
1181-1
Yhnanns occ:idenlaii.s
R
9.5
0,1
500.0
7..0
I.r,Iatl €rls.pe :nlsylv0inice
R
9.8
04
270.,0
1.8 ...]
Flaxinus ImIllsylvarlica
(y)
R
8.2
2.5
220,0
1,6
C,cphillarlthus occideatiks
Ccphaialllhus occidelllalis
(ll�
R
5.1
2,5
80.0
( ]
cephialanillus occidelualis
k
It
CcphMarnlausoccidenlalis
O
R
2.9
3.7
')Cj.(}
h:l
Cephalanillus occidenialis
co
R
' (a,1
.4,,o:
10210
DBIJ? ( f
Cci}IudMlhuS occidculalia
(x)
R
7.8
4.0
136,0
1)1311? 1
l'IatanuS occicle lalis
:It,:
U.
4.2
24010
l.i 1. ]
Finxinusperossylvanica
It
9.0
S.3
280,0
1,71.,._1
C.;ephalaol[ills occitictllttlis
R
S 9
4'.6
125. {}
DRIP
Fraxinus perossylvanica
(1�
R
6.0
5,1
260.0
1.71.]
Raxinus,jlenllsylv2tIflea
It
0 3
5 6
240 0
17axinus pemssylvanica
(�
It
1,9
5.2
139,0
0.4 1_...1
Fraxinos pelrllsylvFailica
AZ
3 1
.:514
786:0
.1,0 �]
Cephalantllus occi(lenlalix
R
8.5
6.2
1 M.0
1x1111? j
Cepinilulttluis ocuidentnlis `
�y)
R
;' 8,0
G:6
1510
0.4.1", ]
Ceplul andius occidel lahs
It
4,2
0.9
115.0
D1311? ]
f't.nxitlus pennsylvaliWa
{ ;)
R
' {}
C G
240.0
] 4 ( ]
t'raxinus pennsylvalaica
(e)
R
1.7
7.5
270.0
1.S f ]
lruxinuspennsylvaiiica)
R
7.2-A5
3209
21( ]
P11tX lluS pennsylvenica
R
9.5
7.3
210.0
1.3 I....]
3 0 0 , ` z
w: #;
zG`i°
Ll
Out o
>C;t) zt
I q? cl.
300 2.17
l3rJ(,. 3
30a..
133) e
El
C¢
3l?o ❑ h
1.
1071 Fraxinus enns Ivaulca R 3 6 844 786:0 0.9
p y (.7 1 .1 HEF� 1072 €�raxinus pelansylvanic'l CIO R 5.4 9.6 174.0 0.7 ❑
.. .. . . _ . . . . . . . .
50LRC E_ : r ranspl m, 1.= l,lvy,stake, 13 13 all d l U Unkowls .._ ..__ . �n p .1 f,
W[GOR: 4= excellcrii, 3- good, 2 =fair, DAMAC1 : Rl3Moval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSect4, € SAME, I.IVI S'['rlck, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, o -dead, ANIMal, FEumlua ` €'RAMpled, Siie'17so WET, Silc Too DRY, 171,.001), DROUglat, STORM, t1URRicanc, D €Seascd, V1N[i
M= nlissillg. Slrangulalion, UNKNown, specify olller.
'I Il.il(i1IT PRECISION drops to IOcnl it >2.5m awl 50cm if >4m. 1'rinrcrd ul nc�Cl!1' E!'.T flan) 7bu! ver, ?.. +.!

Plop (con inued): E92347 -01 -0005 SORT( uoc 2012 tea €a z rl lls Y EA WS DATA
map source X Y ddh Ileit ;ltl DlifI i� (1(111 1Icigill €31311 Re- Vieor'� C)anaagc" Now."
lD S��cc'ics char (na) {m) i (111111) (cm) (Cm) (aam) (cm) (em) sprom
1 073 Benda nigra (ta) R 13 1.7 118m m !)1111?
r1 steins: 32 Now Slems, nol included last year, but a re obvimisfu planlcd, if more space needed, use 11Iank PWS (Planled Woody Stems) Dorm:
X Y Heigftt lll3Ei
Species Name SouiCO (na) (m) I em I can Vigor* Damage* Noles
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species a1 ,n' en >e GY -0 014c -631
LitiM X111- Qft"(Allstems shorterih;ultlrisarcigarored. € €' >1(}un,eXI)461l Why t4)111C ghi.): 1s "):IOC117 W50cin t.] 100c]t a 137cm
S ecies Name
1seed
d
SEEDLINGS
---- H EIGHT
'LASSES
SAPIANC,S
— D1311
`E'Itr
I S — DB11
Snh_
1,110
y
50 cm-
100 c111
1()0 cl�a-
137 c
Sate•
Sapl
0 -'1 cm
1 -2.7
2.5-
5-
=10
(SVrite D1s1ry
a
(
'cJ a g, N �l" P I i 'Levi-
-._-
a
.........
'Reatraiatd it cat -o €l' >1(lcna or subsample? I(i<) %,, wl
:2
♦
• 3
•a
0 ♦4
00
w.5
as
Ci
7 S
)
111 Nunn WS2, vo 9.1
.....: .._. ..
I P = e 13 13 i11.. and_bt�i lap jl =1'nttsd , Tu 1 ubling, R =bl�c Root M =MetI am_c Illy U U11known __.. _....._ - _._ -...
S { }URCI: I t I i ins l int, t ...I nc stale,_,
"VIGOR: d- excellent, 3 -good, 2 =fair, €IAMAGL: RF"Moval, CUT, MOWing, E313AVer, I]I I3R, RODents, INSects, (.€AMIi, 1„IVFShock, Othar/Unknown
1 =unlikely io scirvive year, 0 -dead, ANIMal, Human'IRAMpted, Site Too WN;I', Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROU;_ht, STORM, HURRicane, D[Seased, VINF
M =missing. Surangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT ITFOSION drops to 1 0cm K>2.5m and 50em if >4m. Primed in Me CV' - 1i1iP1 -,jmY )ol ver- 2.3.1
�E.i

Map of stei , j , is op plot E92347-01-0005
:(,Al)],I,Al,, LEATERS represeffl slellIS tll;lt arc different 6-0111 SWIM
�ma•kcd widi lowercase letters (i,e, "A" is different from "a").
295" ft Sle/kIN: 33
nulp SiLf'..
. . .........
4,
(A3
Id
X: 5
Al
...... ... ... ..... ........... ............ ......... . ........ . ...... ... . . .. .... ...... .. ... ....... ...
M'olted,..TU=TUbl ��Unknom,
. ...... ............ . ..... ......................... . .. ....... .... .... . ..... ..
IVKJOIZ: 4=cxcelletil, 3=gok)d, 2=1'hir, 'DAMAGE: RFMoval, afl', MOWing, BEAVer, DFFR, RODents, INSecls, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
I=ujilikely lo survive year, 0 =dead, AN[Mal, I lumanTRAMpled, Site Too WET, Sitel'oo DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DIScased, VIN1.1,
M=missing. � Strangulation, UNKNown, specify olliet'.
"I 1EIGHTPRECISION drops to 10cm if >2,5m and 50cm if >41ll. Primed in Me t.'Wry D,ol ver.

vege(atio►► molliloring Data MID) Dalas►eel
Flo( E92347-01-0006
VNID Year (1-5): i..4 Dzae:
Taxonomic standard:
Taxonomic Stamim-0 DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: ;1$85715 1 Datum: NADS3/W
!,'076777 UM
I-A)llgiltl& 01' U`1'M-F1- I T Lone ne
Com d inatc Accuracy (111): X-Axis bearille, (dei-,): go!
Please fill in ally missing dala and correct ally e►-ors.
Dale last planled:
New ming dale Illlyy?
box ii,plol. was ]lot
Notes: SarIIPIM, Specify ITZIS011 bVIOW
*Notes Ify 11);
..... ........... .......... .. .................. ... . ......... .. . .. . . .
' ,SOURCF:_ €r Iiusplaw, slake, 13=13a It 111d bUrIal), R=bare Rool, M=Mcdianicalty, U=Unkllown 13
"VI( 4 =exec I I lit, 3=goud, 2—fair, 11 )A M A I R FM ova I, L J I M Mine, BFAVer, DEER, RODems, INSecis, GJAME, LIVESTock, 0(hCrAjaknowil
I --unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, fluman'FIZAMped, Silel'oo Wl,T, Siie'fbo DRY, PLOOD, DROUghl, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINIF
M=Irflssing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*1 WIGHT PRECISION drops it) 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if >4jn. Primed in the Tool ver. 2.:3.1
11101 Dilnellioll": X:
Ill Y.
lm 'is reverse orienuitiolt for X and Y axis (Y
is 90 ftrees it) the right of X
1.)
Species Name
Map
Char
x y
0.1111 0.1[11
.............
Oct 06 1
1 1)1311
kill" I cill
. ... .......
z
......... . ... ...... ... ....
Height
I C111
_"- r , , , - - -, r . ,, ,
T I Is YF,ARS DATA
DBI I 1te- Vigor' Dainagel Nolen
1 0111 s I r -m I t
0.4:: ,j
1078 I'llilanus oveklenIalis. 77 0 Ij
1079 Pt IMMS DC6dCllI8IiS R 3A 0.3 105.0 mill?
: .
1080 Diospyros virginiapa 4 ,0 4 '74
1091 I'lalanus occidollialis R 9A 0.4 188.0 0,81".1
1082 0,16.5 Jaevip-lut IJ
1083 Plalanus occidelludis R 5.6 1.5 70,0 -7q
10115 Platallus oucidelitah's R 9 5 .:616 88.0
1096 FNIXillklS I)C1l;lSYIY:LlliC;[ R 7.1 9.2 156.0 0.6
r7777777 71777—
1087 Clutrals veludoa.. It 1 9.., 9;G
1088 Fraxillkvs pV11l1SYk,;u1iCa R 016 916 58,0 LJ AD
1090 Plalavils occidentalis A .3. I .01,0. .:71-0 ..:
New Stems, aol included last year, but W-C ObViOLISly Ifl,111tCd. II' more space neCdCd, USC W011k
X Y HCie-Ill DIM
Species Name Source" ( vigol., Damago"
111) (11)) 1 ern* I cm
El
I
A
F,97
PWS (PIRIllUd Woody 5IC111S) F01-11v
Nows
*Notes Ify 11);
..... ........... .......... .. .................. ... . ......... .. . .. . . .
' ,SOURCF:_ €r Iiusplaw, slake, 13=13a It 111d bUrIal), R=bare Rool, M=Mcdianicalty, U=Unkllown 13
"VI( 4 =exec I I lit, 3=goud, 2—fair, 11 )A M A I R FM ova I, L J I M Mine, BFAVer, DEER, RODems, INSecis, GJAME, LIVESTock, 0(hCrAjaknowil
I --unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, fluman'FIZAMped, Silel'oo Wl,T, Siie'fbo DRY, PLOOD, DROUghl, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINIF
M=Irflssing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*1 WIGHT PRECISION drops it) 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if >4jn. Primed in the Tool ver. 2.:3.1

Plot (carllthmed):
E92347 -01 -0006
Oil 2012 Daw €- I
T[ IIS YF.AR'S DATA
—14 ElGIIT
neap source X Y
(dh Ileighl D1311 I « ddh IIcsghl
1){311 1Zc- Vigor* Damage, Notes
11) specics
chat (€Il) €n)
(n3311) (Col) (Clll) I (Mnl) (CI71)
(C)l1) sprom
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species -4 ml�� �aou)0.1,10
]..dYj1�.1j -) (All . slems .shoilerthat € this are ignmvd. II'> IOc € €l,CXI)I;tisl Why tOOWright,); X 1(CM I:.l5(.1C11) 1i I00cm I_ "1137cin
5 x c is s Name
— t--- -� �
p
SI:I+DLIN(IS
—14 ElGIIT
C LASS EN
SAPLINGS
— D1311
Tit +is —.D 131°1
,
�e�I
10 C111-
50 0111
.50 c m-
100 cm
100 c m-
1.37 cln
_
Sub- i
l
0 -1 cn1
_._._
l -IS
2.5-
-m
5-
10
write 1)1111)
Ul VIAL n 4k.
--
'Re (P€iOwl if Cts -off >1 (kill or subumple? IIXI" /. l
2
i
3
rM
6 64
00
"5
•*
:46
0
::7 1 .18
:1
�I0 puler W'Q, vcr 9.1
_ ,.. .. _.._ ., ..
r I t tl spl € €il_.)...1
)...=Live st ike, l3_ 13111 „and bulamti),, p =l'ptle(€ I tt "1'ubinlg, R =b uy,lZcx }t,, M„ Mcch €nically, U Unknown p. 14
"VIC;OIZ: 4.- ezcelleal, 3 =good, =fair, "DAMAGE; RI Moval, CUT, MOWing, BEAM, DI;hE2, RC }Dents, INSects, GAME, LIVfiS'I'ock, C)Ihcr /Unknmvn
I=UII kely to survive, year, G =dead, ANIMal, 1{unlan TRAMpled, Site'Ton WET, Sile l'oo DRY, FLOOD, DROUgm, s`l'ORM, I IURRicane, DISeased, VINk
M =Inissi€tg. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify Mier.
"11FIGHT NRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and S(lctn if >4m, Prirrred in Me ('VS4- 3i1' A$11r), Tool ver. 2.3.!
,l

Mal) or stems -On plot E92347-01-0006
t'7
X-axis. 901 N ft swig m.. 1)
Inap sbw:
t' z
V
Af
... .. . .......
X;5m
*SOURCE.; l ='Fransplant, [-=.I..ive slake, 13=13all and hurl t'" -.1�=Unkpown
..... . ...................
3=good, 2 flir, DAMAGE: IZEL4oval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODenis, INSecls, GAMU, LIVFSTock, 01her/Unk'nown
I =unlikcJy to survive year, O=dI ANIMal. I I u man TRAM pled, Site'roo SiIcToo DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, ' "IIURRicane, DISeased, VINE.
m=111issing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGlTl'jIlZI.X,'lSlON drops to 10cin if >2.5m and 50cm if Ant. PrbUed in the Entry nmt vei% 2.2.7
0G

VggelalioIi Moniloring Data (VMI)) Dalasheet Please fill in any missing data find Correct any !'1'1'111'5.
Plot E92347 -01- 0007 ROM11 I'
VMD Year (I -5): E Dale;
Taxor10 ill ic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE'
Lalilude or HTM -N:
(dmdeg, or 111)
€,ongilude or U IVI -1 :
Coordinale Accuracy (n1):
Plot D €11Tensions; X:
1885470 1 1)"1111111;
76785
U'1'M %0110: nc
.. ........:.....:................
X -Axis bearing (deg): 2911
1 ...
Y: I.. 10l ( ] i'lot hits reverse urientnlioll for X and Y Axis
Dale last planter!:
New TI nting data r111yy•? tom'
CbOck box if plol was riot
is 90 degrees to Ibe rigll( of X
Oct 2 012 Data HITS YEARS DATA
a
M`111 Source's x Y Height 1)li1 i `6 1leighl €)1311 ire- Vigor. Damage Notes
lD Species Name char 0.7ill 0 -tIll ICU1* 1 cut ICm` I c111 sprout
1094
11Ir1umus occidclllalls
R
0.9
1,0
101.()
1)1311'1I..�
Teti ----- DBH
suer-
wed
C341-,
5f NI
50 cm-
100 cill
100 cm-
137 em
sap-
slpl
1095
13etula li,gra
a
1r
;i A 4
019
deer .
1096
i3etulanigra
R
1.6
4.6
122,0
DBH ?L...I '
1097
Quorcus- phOlos -
li
1..
�.: 9,2
(;9
GD:O
__-
5�
1098
Ouercus phellos
c0
It
3.0
8.4
134.0
DBlI? J
f
,Y
1291
Quereas nuchauxii
R
G G
4 0
103:0
1)!311?
1291)
1'ruxirlus peunsylvanica
a
R
2.7
0.9
62,0
[ j
187
Diospyros virginkma
ttotplile[l if cu tltl >lJkm or subsanlplc? 1(X) %. •I
23:0
(
•'14
x•5
6
8
deed
:10 1 o1m WS2, ver 9.1
li woms:
8 New Slcnls,
not included last
ycttr, but
are obvious €y planted,
€I' more space needed, use blank
PWS
(Planted
Woody Steals) f=orm:
1'
BII
Height €)1311
Name
Species Name
Source*
(In)
(nl)
1 0111 I
Vigo[,
DaHlugC'
Notes
_j Natural Wood � :r 1u1 r1� -„� rt1€' 7 S
N � � ���]<7�� "' ����]l�� �� S� }eC�LS � 'oI :131 Ill! '1'�' dense, U`P�'�t::��
lei =h At Lt -Q IT(A11 .seems shorlCr th.1u Ill isurc ignored. I1 >10cm, cxIA6% why In the right,): U 10cin 50CIT1 I.;' 100c111 c1 1. 37cn1
Species Name
SEED1,INGS
— H GII'(' C LAS SIS
SAPLINGS
— DIM
Teti ----- DBH
suer-
wed
C341-,
5f NI
50 cm-
100 cill
100 cm-
137 em
sap-
slpl
0 -1 ell'
Y
1 -2.5
2,5-
5-
10
(�s -rite. D131q
__-
5�
ttotplile[l if cu tltl >lJkm or subsanlplc? 1(X) %. •I
02
• 3
•'14
x•5
6
8
J
:10 1 o1m WS2, ver 9.1
_.. ,.....- ........''__ani _ _y, _ .._ ki
SOt1.. 1 ; I1 1 r ulsplanl, I�l.rvc stake 13 13 ill Ind lrurinp, I', 1'iiitcd, l u ]'ubinlg, lt_ -b fro Knot M --M.. c h.uucall - -U— Unknown r.. 16.
"VIGOR: 4= excellem, 3-- good, 2 =fair, DAMAGE;: RE;Moval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, D1?P,R, RODents, INSecis, GAME, t,IVFS'I'ock, O1herlUaknown
1= unlikely to survive year, Mead, ANIMal, llunlan'ITRAMI)lcd, Site'1'oo WET, Sitc Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeesed, VINE
M= missing. Strmigulatiolt, UNKNown, specify other,
'I 1 IGH•I' PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5n1 and 50cm if >4n1, Primed in dw (1'1 1•-A'1,41 I, try lnnf ver. 2.3.l

Mal) of stems on plot 11'92347 -01 -0007
Vwds: 290" 11 Stems: S
N
X:
. ............... . .......... .... .. ... .. . ............................................... .. .. .. . .. . .... ...................... . .. ....... ..... ............................................ .. ... .. . .. .
", SOURCE- Ti��Transplanl, stake, 13=11all and burlap, P=11ott", , T - u - I - 'ub, i - i - ig, eql�,mically, U=Unkilown . ...... ..... p.j 7.
........ ................... ..... .. ..
,V[GOR: 4=excolleni, 3=good i r, 'DAMAGE: RFN'oval, CUT, MOWing, 111',"AVef, DEER, RODenis, INSecis, GAME, LIVE'STock, Other/Unknown
I =unlikely to survive year, O=( ANIMal, liumaii'FRAMplcd, Sitc Too WEA', SileToo DRY, 1',LOOD, DROUght, STORM, I JURRicane, DlSeased, VINI.,"
m=11lissing, Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
-1 [] IGHT PRECISION drops to )Ocjn if >2,Sm and 50cm if >4m. Primed In The k.,ow y 7 ewl vep. 2.t,1

Vegoatio►► Mooiloring Dam (VMD) Dala5heet
PkA E92347.01 -0008
VM[D 1'ear(1 -5): �� [)ale: '/
Taxonomic Slandard:
'I'axnnctrnicSlanclard DATE-.
LaIilntle or U`I'M -N: 1882340 Datum: NAI)t33 /W
(dee,deg, or 111) — . ..................... .
I..ungiludear UTM -E: 675887 U'I'M Tulle: ne
Cloordinate Accm,acv (m): 1 ­­1301.
Please fill ill any missing (1411.1 and correct 1my errors.
ParIY: Etnlc: I),Ile last planted:
f Now )Ittttling crate mlyy?
...
(,heck bax if plot was nol
Notes: sampled, specil'y rc.lson below
I'lol Dimensions' Plot has ievclx orientation for X and Y axis (Y is till) cic,gtec5 to the right uf_X.
Solt 2012 I) alt! 11115 Y1AR'S DATA
q
Map Source,' X Y Height DBI1 height DHII tte- Vigor'" Damage" Notes
lD Species Name char 0 -1111 0.1111 ]cn1" 1 ell) Icmn 1 Cfil slrr0ul
1 103 l3eu11a nigra ) R 9.3 0.2 63.0
1104 I3efadn nigra �i7 It' . 9 9... 1110 2h0:f)
1105 13en0a nigra 6,0 K 1,4 9.6 350.0
' ;0 ]107 ?I txtnus iclnis t 4,7 .
388 Diospyrosvirgini;ktm (E,) R 5.5 7,5 95.1)
389 Cch(a hEevigata CO It : 7.0 2;U 187.0
5114 Fl71XiDLIS panrlsylvanica �i� R 9.9 2.5 189.0
,565 Qul ra:tis michauxii �. R 2 8 1, 0 176.0
500 U1111LIS AlUl R 2,0 2,5 151.0
P arcrns: 9 New Slems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y I'Icight D131I
Species Name SUnrCe (111) (111) I Cril ]Col
(._..J
i ]
2.3
:0.5
0,8
O
11.31...}
I €' more space
Vigtlr*
� 2�
-
1i1i;I AIT
CLASSES
c
— ll1311
Tmus — DBH
i
1 C t 1°
}
Q C�17�
{)�} L [1]-
137 cm
Sub-
Sap1
0 -1 CM
)-
,.
5-
=1 f)
(virile DBI I)
i _
r
needed, use blame
DallmgCl
PWS (11,1111ed Woody Slems) TIT), —Ill:
Notes
1' IA111111[lU1t dull4if f
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species .&SIa1Xt1111jt1b1L # *:
ffi i 1I1 - LLIt -off (All sli:nls shover slum Ihls are Ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the rlghl.): C� .1O 0111 1-1 5f C111 I. 11(Cll 37c 111
S x� cie s Na Eve
—Y—
d
SEEDLINGS
1i1i;I AIT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— ll1311
Tmus — DBH
Sub-
1 C t 1°
}
Q C�17�
{)�} L [1]-
137 cm
Sub-
Sap1
0 -1 CM
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
=1 f)
(virile DBI I)
i _
r
" Rewilvd dcd- 111'>1 {knlolsubsunple ?100 %r.. rl
02
,*
rr 3 rr 4
"rr , 1
r 6 �::
r
�rmWS2,ver9.1
.. . ...... . . ................... ... ___- .......... ......._...
SUUEt(, ..................................... ( I I spl ml,,.l,,= ive_st stake, E3_ 13111 utd burhLI) I'= t'mtccl, 1 u I'nhimg it�lrlre Root, M= M,ecllaitically,,,U It 1k11owit.._,_r._�_ _..... _ it =1$, ­t-
"VIGOR:4= excellent, 3= gocxl, 2 -fair, "DAMAGE:: RiiN€oval, CUT, MOWing, 13E?AVer, DEEt, RUi)ents, INSecls, (iAMI.., [.IVt ?S'1'oc4 , O1hcr /Urlk11nwn
I= unlikely to survive yeah, 0= dead, ANIMal, Huntan TRAMpled, Sitc loo WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUghl, STORM, I IURRicane, DISeased, VINE;
M =missing, Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other,
111F.ICiHT PRECISION drops to 10cm il• >2.5n1 and 50cnt if >4m. Prinlerl in (lie CVSJ-•.'1:P li+rr,y wool ref. 2.,1.1

'f 11
Map olstems on plot E92347-01-0008 X-wds'. .. 130. N
null) si::v:
k-u
r:51,,
'SOURCE:' i-Transplaw, [,=I,ive slake, B=lhll and burk ll�lloiwd, Tu--Tublin . lk�barc Rool, M=Meclianically, U=Unknown 19
- ----------------- pp, ....... .... .. .... ........ ...... ....... ...... .. . ... ......... ...... ................. ... .
*VIGOIZ: 4=excellent, 3 -good, 2= fair, "DAMAGE: RU-Noval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVei, DI.-1 R, RODenis, INSecls, GAME, LIVES'Fock, 01her/Unkilowil
I = LlRhkely 10 Survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, human ']'RAM[)tvd,,Sile']'oo WFT, Site "Coo DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicanc, DIScisc(l, VINI:
M-111i""Silig, Strangulation, UNKNown, specify olliel'.
"HHOITPRECISION drops to 10tH; if >2,5m and S0cm il'>4111. Primed In A, Ljuly Mid user. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMI)) Datasheet
Piot 192347 -01 -0009 gvull't
VNIDYeal-0 -5)t i._� ! Date, 9q 1OH-1 { I I
T-I.Nonomic S€ Ildard:
Taxonomic Slandard DAT :
Latitude or UTM -N: 1882512 1)at1.1111: INAD831W
dec.de of FII
L,ullgittldc or U` €'M -I : 6757"19 € 1. TM lone: ,ttc
I.._,_....._.
Coordimnc Accim -acv fII* X-AxiS bear1111? fdct;): 325
-L4 U
Please tlll ill any missing deal and correct any errors.
1111 . 1 \i11L.
-d
DInc hlsl plamed:
New A mling d;ttc. mlyy'?
� -heek box if plot MIS not
Notes: SM111)led, specify retlson Itclow
I'lot Dimensions X...i... 107 Y. 10 j I'lol lull tevc t4c of fc €tt tl €on for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrces tct Ille 1*11t of X
Sep 2012 Dala €1 f I S Y AR'S 1)A T A
0
Map SoIIW X Y height 1)1311 u height 1) 1311 Re- Vigor" DaInage" Now" X. 1 D Species Name char 0,111) 0,1111 1 ern" 1 cm I cnr* 1 col Sprout
7.. 3,9 129
1112 nig a :Q b13II?
{
AIL ii 0
1113 Benda nigra R 5,7 6.1 250:(1 1.3 >of + 2.0
C<i) L:
1 114 I raxirtus:peririsyl rulacn (C) R 4.;0..., K5 95;0
I 1 13 13etula nigla (ll) IZ 2.0 8.5 240,0 ().81 1 ^g[=;1 T9
rr vwms: ,1 New Slems, nol included last year, bul are obviously planted. 11' more .~pace needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Slems) form:
X Y gisl 1)E311
Species Tame Source (m) (nl) 1 ems I em Vipt, Damage* Notes
Natural Woody Steins - tallied by species 2 1I.WhIg
'A t'ie_ _i Ihl Cut-0 ff(AII.~tentsshone €.111ml thisaIC'ignorc 1. If >10em, expInin why to the right.): i:a I em <,5f cI I','.. 10OcIll i�1 137cnt
Smcies Name
M
Sli'.t+.DLINGS — H cirr C1 ASSIS
SAl'1.,IN(.,S
— DIM
Titla�,.s — DB1.1
self-
Seed
I C xr-
�l c A
50 cm-
1.00 cin
1.00 Cm-
11337 cm
s =Ih.
S;tpl
0 -1_ cm
1 -2.5
2,5-
5-
=1f)
(wrilc DIM)
vil fd .S q ky[.i qr_.
- --
�
1pgpg ee��p�yg
— u i�(f r
p 11
n
*Ite Cod red if CIA - off >1(k:ntorsubsamp le. ?I(i0
•
M+•
it
'"0S
rr
vG
•
�7 8
:1
::10 1'onnWS2,%T1 I
,
.. .... . .
"SOUR(i : 1 i 1 r urspl snl, l _ =1 n 4 stale ,,13 E3 st_! Ind bus'lap Y t'txiccl 1 u 'C rsblmg lt. =b ul Rant, M McchTusically, U= Unkoowrt - -__ p. 7( }-
- VIGOR: 4 =eacellenl, 3 =good 2 =1air, -DAMAGE": REMoval, C: U' €', MOWing 131 AVer DHER, RODenis, INSaa1 , GAME, LIViLS'1'ock, Olhcrlllnknown
1= unlikely io survive year, U =dead, ANINU, Human TRAMpled, Site'Foo WL'1", Sile Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUs -lit, STORM, HURRicane, IASeaSed, VINE.
M= ,niesing. I Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
11HG1 IT PRECISION drops It) 10cm if >2,5m and 50cnt 4>4m. Printed in the C1:1'-E1- .Nrury loot ver. ?.3.1
r

Map of stems on plot E92347-01-0009
X-axis: .125
»»~*' 'I
mvvSize:
N
0u� xjm
~ pu
/~wwxw;w^orvwurUIT,o~uu�. |Am/mu/.xmoo�/RAM�uo.u/m^owm�.*��/vo DRY, FLOOD, ox000� STORM, uoxx�i°�oou�v.v/wc
M=mawo� |oonwuxwvo.vwxw"wx specify wher,
'HEIGHT11RUCISION drops mm^mif`z.zm^uu5ccmif`4m, Primed ma, /oul°"zzr
/ c9 \

-4 1 Imo'
VeklChO) MOIllifffikIg D.1111 (VM D) DiAMOIN-1 Please fill ill ally missing datil alld Correct any el-rors,
.. .. . . . . ... .....
Plot E92347-01-0010
V M 1) Yea I- (1 -5): 1 4 Dalc:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATI"':
Latitude or UTM-N:
Longitude or LJTM -1
Coordisiale Accuracy (ill):
],lot Dimensions: X
Date last planted:
Newnflallting date ll)/YY?
Check box if pled was not
Notes: Sall1j)[ed, Specify reason below
1882875 NAD,93/W
.. ... ..... ... .. .....
,)75481 UTM zone: Ilic i
X -Axis betuirtg {[leg} 29t)
Y: I I . ol J Plot has reverse or €c for X and Y axis (Y is 9.0 dqr,cc,S to the right of X
0 cl 2012 D w I o THIS YEAR'S DATA 1.
Mall dial. 'Soul.ee, X Y Height 1) 11 11 eiglit 1)1311 lZU- Vit�01` Notes
ID Species Name 0.1111 0.11111 ]eln* I ell) I c Ill' I cill sprout
1979
1120
1121
1122
1124
1125
1126
3 127
1128
11 Srems:
needed, tise h1mik PWS (Plamed Woody Slems) Form:
Species Name Source* C11,1* I cril Vigor* Dmllagc' Notes
"Notes by 11). fl l2l-icNptolt(
... .. .......... ... . .... . . ...... ..... ....... ..... ... . ... .......... . ........ ......... ...................................................... ........ ...
LA.ive stake, 13=11,01 asid burIal), P=PotLed _T -TL Ming, Ii
U� _R=bare..Ro l,_M=MccIlai caIly,-tJ=LJnknpNvn
.. ....... .... ...... .. ..... 11-1. 111.11- - - I - ­ 1-.. 11.1-1.11 -.-U --- I ...... .. .. ......... .... . 19- -1.1 J— p�
IVK;OR:4mexccllcjil,3=good 2-fair, "DAMAGFI: REMovM, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODeals, INSects, UAM17, LIVFSTock, 01heEMAnowa
I=unfikely it) survive year, 0=(; 11 ANIMM, IlumanTRAMpled, Sitel'on WET, Sitc Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicarle, DIScased, VINE;
M=11lissilig. Strangulation, UNKNoNvu, specify other.
11 IFIGI IT PRECISION drOI)S LO 1 Ocm if >2,5m and 50em jf>4nl. Printer! iu Me I Ool tvr. 2.3.1

Plot (conthmed): E92347-01-0010 Oct 2012 Dam €o TI 11S YLAR;S DATA ��� �,� F I
nlal) .sollrco X Y di €h Ileiglal DR II dclh Ifeigh( DBII 12e- Vigor* Damage, Not"
11) Specics char (m) (111) (111111) (cm) (cn)) (11)111) (enl) (cm) 'Sprain
IhulanlltEon �: c 1 - r
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species .&- aulaamnlln�; r�(`r�3sc' w "'e >��,
lei g) -1 If (AEI s(cins slim lei, (lum Ihisare Igumvd. II >I0cm, cxl) lain why to (ho I igh1.); Cl 1E 4117 1.1 5{ Crll Y,100cm i.1 137cill
Species Name
-
S HA)
1,INGS 11ElC,I IT C LAS SEN
SAPLINGS
— DIM
Tlil��l��ti � min
Ss1I }-
Seed
1
�f
V` C 1
i0 1'
L�f c n
WO cm-
.1.37 cm
Sub -
Stull
0-1 CI11
_
1 -2.5
2.5-
5
—10
(1�-rile D1311j
p €
a
i
'Re(ktiml I(X) r. rl
r %
r
r r
* 04
0 0
* 4
r r
r O
r
1::7
• ;
T
::l! IOiF)W52, 4tl 9.1
'SOURCE; I r I n flisplaal, 1 .€ Ivc stake, 13=13M) and I7urla 11=Polted u-Tubinsg R=b ue Roos M Mech usru llx U_ Unknown p. 2
'VIGOR: 4-excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, ' "DAMAGE.: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BE:AVer, DE,E:sR, RODents, INSecis, (,AME:, LlVI STock, 011)ct- MIAllowll
1 =unlikely to survive year, O =dead, ANIMaI, Ehlman TRAMplcd, Site Ton WEA', Si(e'Foo DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, EIURRicane, DlScased, VIN:.
M= missing. Slrrangulalion, UNKNown, specify other.
''`l IFI(AN E RL CISEON drops to 10c1 t if >151 and 50tH) if Am, Pri+ucdin the Gvs -VET F,1111 Y 7;wl vel. 2.3 .1
i ,�

Map of stems on plot 1192347 -01 -0010 : S6
In (,16d-
.... X -axis: 290"
# swals'. 10
mall Size:
LARGE
N
m
iku
, ml
*SOURCI,: Tr=l)-ansplatit, L=Live stake, 13=13alland burlap, ll�llottqd, Tq�TUOIi1.lg,IW)arc Root, M=Mccll�nicallv. U�Unknown T
.......... . . . .. . .......
*VIGOR; 4=excellent, 3=g ----- - �s --- ------ ----,S .24
I...-I .. . ... .......
ood *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVe,, DE -4FlC( I— INSecls, GAME, LIVF Tock, Odier/Unknown
I =uillikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, I lurrian TRAMpled, Site'roo WET, Site Too DRY, 14.001), DROUghi, STORM, I IURRicane, DIScased, VINE
Wmissisig, Strangulation, UNKNomi, specify other.
* 1-11; 16 HT PRECISION drops to 1 Oem if >2.5m and 50cm i f >4 m. Printed in the CVS-1r,'E'll k'atry mol ver. 2.2.7
10",

veget'llioll Mollitol-ing Data (vMD) Datilsilvel PlellSe 1111 ill 11►y RASSWk� (1411110 and C.011•C.I. Jkl13' en'01"S.
Plot F92347-01-0011
V M 1) yeal. (1 "5), Date;
Taxonomic Standard:
'haxorionlic Standard DXFF':
Lafiludc or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or 111)
Loligiludc or UTM-l"':
Coorditiale Accuracy 011):
Plot Dimensions: X
883130 1),,jitifil: iNAD831W
75287 UTM zojlc: fIlc ,
................
X-Axis bearing Wea): 3151
Dale last phtmed;
NOW 11ailling dale Ill/YY?
MCheck box if plot was uol
Nojcs: Silillifled, Specify reason Iwlow
Y:
Not has i-eyerse orienutt ion for X. and'Y axis (Y is 90 degrecs to the'r ight of X
Sep 2012 Data l TI I I S Y EAR'S 1) ATA
o
Map Soorce, X Y Heigh( D1311 11cipIll DBI I 'Zc- Vigor" Damage* Note,,;
ID Species Name Char 0.1111 0.1 1cm, I cm I cm I I can Sprout
.. ....... ...
11.18 0110-cus It 0,6 0.4 56.0 L]
1139 Be!ola jilgra
1 140 Mims sen-ulata l It 5.6 0.7 35A1
1141 Milano Occitkmulfis ..94
1142 Quercus phellos It 2.5 1.8 32,0
':;:
1143 Alims sormliala 67 0
1144 Quercus phellos . R 9.1 6,5 53.0
1145 Plamnus owiden 6 4 6.Q.
1146 Oulercus phello's It 43 6.3 83.0
:. AA:,::,4
1147 Qual-cus pliellos 9
1315 Quercus michauxii it 1 2.8 88.0
390 Diospyms virgininna :::R:.: 23 :A 4 1210 DRIP
ff %rcins: 12 New Sterns, nol included last year, bul arc obviously planted. If mare space
Species Name Source, x Y I le-iglll DB I 1 11 1 vigor*
(111) (111) 1 cill* I c
70
�j
x
5-7
El
Q-
I
T7
f3
417
wail i
needed, use bhIllk
Daillal,10'
MS (Planted Woody S10111s) Forim
NOLCS
----------------- ---
*Notes by 11): 11 145•top dead
......... ....... . ....................... . ..... .......... ..... .......................... . . .. .. ......... .. ..
slake, 13 13311 wid burkip, 11=11otled .'I , it pica `y, �J=Unkliowrl
.... ........ .
*V[GOk: 4= excci[em, 3=good, 2 =iair, *DAMAGE: IZEMova I , CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DFFR, RODents, INSucts, 6AMF, I.jVI.S'j'ock, ()j1)oijJAnown
I=mflikely to survive year, 0-1 ANIMal, 11LIFTIMITRAMpled, Site Too. W14 "1', Siic Too DRY, FLOOD, DROL)ght, STORM, HURRicane, DIScased, VNI:
M=nliL,Si1q),. I'S"t'raligulaLioll, UNKNown, specify outer.
' HEIGHT' PRIl"CISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if Am. Primed in Me CK 4,1-1'11 A'Wq Tool vej 21.3,1

Plot
1 lot (cmitii>tu ed):
E92347 -01- 001.1 I
Sep 2017 Data
-
a I
a
'I'I IIS Y1 AR'S DATA � �
�� 0 r F, t, ,
SAPLINGS
Inai> source x Y I
ddh 1161,11 DBII
S ddh
I1eighl Dfili 1tc- Vigor" Danrtgv' Noles
��)CCtLS
Chaf (EII� (Itl�
(Inlll� (Cnl� (L' -Ill
(111111)
(em) �C113) sproul
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A ,;;
i'1 t�1 . LI�_Qf��(AII stems shorter 1111111 (11isal'c iguol'ed, If >€0cm, expla n why In [lie right.): L-I a {)CM . � 5OCIII Ill 1[I{ Cltl fa 3�G 131
Species Name
, S
[�f
SE>I
DIANIGS — HEIG<' T C LASSES
SAPLINGS
— D1111
Tiul' s DIM
Sub-
Seed
�
117
50 cm-
100 cm
�1 -00 cln-
137 cm
Ssub.. ..
S1pl
0- 1 cm
�
I -2J
2.5-
5-
=10
(wrilc l)lill}
S1011
*Rv(p6ivd if co-off >I0cm m subsample ? 1(XM •I
M7
•
w 3
••
ll *4
• •
*#.5
••
(i
•
"]
R
7
I f) I om1 WS7, vur'i.l
..... .. _m - -
"SOURC : T- I_ranspl lnl, L_l ivc st 3ke,,13_ 13111 and burlap 11=1, ottul lu .l'uhling,,R =b uc _Root, M Mee h u;scally, li...U»known .--- I>. 26
'VI {;OR:4= excellent, 3 =good, 2-fair, 'DAMAGE,: Rl:Mov,0, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODems, INSecls, GAME, LIVES 'Pock, Other /Unknown
I= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Iluman'1'RAMpled, Site'foo WI T, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, I AURRicane, [)[Sensed, V[Nli
M= nrissing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
11FIOI T PRECISION drops to 10cm if' >2.5m and 50cm if >4n1. Yrilued in the 1a;5'- !'ri!' Ltji .r Tani ver. 2.3 1
�l�l

Map of stems on plot 1,02347-01-0011 ' 0
t 2Y
31.5
II vfems.. 12
orup
N
. .... ........... ... ... .. .. .................... -- ------- --- ------------------ ---- ---- ----- -------- ------- -------- . . . ....... .............. ....... ... . .......... . ....... .......... . . .................. . ......... ... ......... .. .
'1 -7
SOURC stake, 13=13all and buit P'J'= Iq ='j'"blin _R=bare -Root, M=MecItanjcaJ[yj)=Unkj - iown
---- - ----------- 11 .. ............. .... —.9
*VIGOR; 4=cxccIIenI,3=gooc, REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSeds, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
I Wunhkely to survive year, O=dCad, ANIMA, IfurnanTRAMpled, Site Too Wf,T, Sitel'oo DRY, FLOOD, DROUghl, STORM, HURIUcaue, DISeased, VINE
M=Iiiissing. I Strangulation, U N KNown, specify other.
111F,IGHTPRECISION drops to 10cm if >2,5n3 and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the CTS-E1,11 ver 2.27
VI
W V
0
v
V-S
U
ij
ell
. .... ........... ... ... .. .. .................... -- ------- --- ------------------ ---- ---- ----- -------- ------- -------- . . . ....... .............. ....... ... . .......... . ....... .......... . . .................. . ......... ... ......... .. .
'1 -7
SOURC stake, 13=13all and buit P'J'= Iq ='j'"blin _R=bare -Root, M=MecItanjcaJ[yj)=Unkj - iown
---- - ----------- 11 .. ............. .... —.9
*VIGOR; 4=cxccIIenI,3=gooc, REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSeds, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
I Wunhkely to survive year, O=dCad, ANIMA, IfurnanTRAMpled, Site Too Wf,T, Sitel'oo DRY, FLOOD, DROUghl, STORM, HURIUcaue, DISeased, VINE
M=Iiiissing. I Strangulation, U N KNown, specify other.
111F,IGHTPRECISION drops to 10cm if >2,5n3 and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the CTS-E1,11 ver 2.27

WgVI4160111 M011ilfildllg Diffil (VIVID) MWISIlCet
Plot E92347-01-0012
VMDyeal-(11-5): 4 jkdc: 22/0(777/--j
?,,I- F
Taxonomic Stalidard:
TZIN011011lic Standard DATH:
Latitude or UTM-N: 1883250 Datum: NAD837W
(dec'dcg of. 111)
Longitude or UTM-F.-. 675306 UTM Zone: Ile
............
Coordinale Accuracy {ru): X - Axisbcarina(&O: lool
I'lease fill in any missing datt► and correct [l►ly el,rol-s.
-it] Ly.
6. 1
Date hest planted:
Now )Iarlting dale m/yy? E:�l
ffheck box if plot was not
f"'uwll k)umw
I... . . ....... . I —
Plot Dirliensjoils: X: 1Q Y: '(I! Plot has rem'sc of For X_a (I YX
'a is (Y Is 90 dcgrecs.lo I'he'rfight ol'X
"
I Sep 2012 Data Z
2
x Y, H6011 DIM
"a 'S
ll ource,
ID
Specks Name Char 0.1111 0.1111 leaf" I cm
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBII "to- Vigor" Damage' Notes
km* I cin slarout
1148 Bcwht oigra
1149 Aesculils sylyatiolli
1150 PhIMIMS 0CCidC1LUlIiS
9751Frtxin4is ..j7e11111y1va)ticA
1152 OLIUCLIA JACHOS
1153 Diospyros.virginimm
H54 FNIXI[JILIS jWJ1oSYIVaJ11'C,'E
1155 Raxill a le
1310 Ouercils Illichanxii
13.17 raxilius purlosylvallica
13th I litxillus Ile [$If Syl VZ1 11iCa
1319 Fraxilms pelmsylvallica
1320 Fraxillus Ile fill sy I va nico
1321 I,'raxirmsPM1sYI laiLa
419 Quercus phellos
P .sleets: 15 New Slems,
Specio, Nanic
R 03 0.2 213.0
47P
It 14,5 2,1 280.0
It 989 1G2:00:8
It 9.(i 4.8 966)
511 180'0
R 1A) 5.3 18610
A.: '2
..0.6 143:9 ::
R 1.4 2.3 102.0
13
1'() '103.0
:015 19210
It 3.5 3.6 169.0
_. G, 92,0
Iz 8,(9 ml 103.0
not included last year, but are obviously 1*1111 cd.
Source* x Y Might DB I I I] I
(111) (m) I C111* I c
(M) co -v
2,31, 1
1
()'S +
DIM? L 110 0'1
'2
DBIP -5- 1,0
U
0,81 1
DBIJ?
L
Vigor* Damage"
PWS (Planted
Notes
Woody Steins) Form:
..................... ..... .... ..... ................ .............. . . . . ....... . ... ....................................................... . ...... . . .... ..
ISO U 141' ,: 1 =Tra uspian 1, L-Live slake, 13=13111 mid bul-lap, t - -e ' Ito - 0 ' - i - i - c. Ily, U=Unknown ... ...... ..... .. .................. .. . .. p.28
"DAMAGE': REM oval, CUT, MOWing, 131',"AVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Othcr/(Jaknowa
"VIGOR: 4�excellesit, 3=goodf -
I =ujilikely to survive year, 0 =deed, ANIMal, I WHIMITRAMpled, 8iieToo WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, I IURRicanc, DIScased, VINE
M=11-fissing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*1 11-'IG[ITPRE-CISION drops to I 0cm if >2.5311 and 50cm if>4m. Primed in the Ct W,"APF'Pury TOM wo . 2.3, 1
j Z-J

Plot (continued): U,92347- 01-0012 Sip 21)i? I7;Lta o � EAR
map source X V (1(111 height DBII LId1l lieighl DIM Re- Vigor Dam ;lZ;c Nnlcs
11) Species char pu) (m) {Turn) (ern) (cnt) (nlnt) {cnL} (cln) sprout
IaZ I)l alm filln .,, I -o 1
Natural woody Stems - tallied by species X su1hamjliIw* � o5e
77
j (l O r(M ,Icnis shoile.l' 111n11 Hlislam ignored. 11 >1Oc711, Cxplina w11y to €lIC 1'1 11 €.): €:1 1. cm .. cm l.i JoDem c i.37cn1
S x'cies N:t�ne
D
SEEDLINGS
— �1m(,, ti, rC LAS SIC'S
SAPLINGS
Mill
.._._.
-_
TI2�:1 +� — DIM
_ _
Sllt).
wed
j{
50 cm-
100 em
100 cm-
cm
tint)-
s:lpl
0 -1 Cn,
_
i -2.5
2.5-
5-
- 10
F wite 1)M1)
o
g1�37
a
" Mt (PI IIVd iI CL1-011 >I (km 01 5UIKIll)pIC? 11X) 01
02
0
• 3
00
1* 111
••
".5
♦•
Vh 7
•
x
��
�II} Fom, WS', veI 9.1
._ __ - _ -- - - . -- _... I._._._ -- ...-
" SOURC l,: I ). _ t r €nspl ml, f., =E i-- e_St stake, 13 B ill_ and btu'I:a�, f'. -Pnttt 1 1 u= "I'ub{m�, R b lre E2oc M _Mechanic kl�. t Ulik_Ilowrt - -__ p.,29
- -
"VIGOR :4= excclienl, 3 -goal, 2 =fair, "DAMAGI : REMoval, CUT, MOWing, 13EAVer, DFTR, RODents, INSecls, (3AMI',, l- IVES1'oc%, 01helfullknown
I= unlikely to survive year, 0 -dead, AN1Mal, I lrunan TRAMpled, Site'roo WET, Sile'1'oo DRY, FLOOD, DROUehl, STORM, I IURRicane, DISeased, VINIi
W missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify ot7ler,
"I IF,IGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >41i). Printer( in Me CVS -1i1iP 1,.njryp Tiwl «err. 2.3 ,1

Map of stems on plot E92347-01.0012
Fu S ltk4
X-axis. N
li sit"In.s: /5
maj? Size:
1A/4"1
m
X;5111
q
� 14 )
ii
I ( i , 11 "1
------------- I .............. . ....... —1 ........ . .. ... . . .... .... . .. .. . .. .
'SOURCE: ant,- ,,_,, rsu stake, B-Ball -c Root, M=Mechanicall
........ ...... ------- R=baj-- ......... . ... . ...... .............. . . .. ...
'VIGOR: 4= cxcelleat, 3=good 2 -fair *DAMAGE� U',Moval, CUT, MOWhig, BIHAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, (;AMF, LIVFSTock, 01herAJiiknown
I = unlikely to survive year, O =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, SileToo WFT' Sile- Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUghl, STORM, I IURRicane, DIScased, VINE
M= Inissing. � Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*I IF161 ITPRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm i1 >4m. Primed in the 054.7'I'l,"Wry Tool ter. 2.2.7

APPENDIX A
STREAM MORPHOLOGY SURVEY DATA
Figures 5.1 -5.9
e- Tables
Figures 6.1 -6.5
e- Tables
Figures 7.1 -7.9
e- Tables
Table 9
Table 10
Table 11.1 -11.2
Cross sections with Annual Overlays
Raw cross - section survey data spreadsheets
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Raw longitudinal profile survey spreadsheet
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Raw pebble count data spreadsheets
Baseline Stream Data Summary Table
Cross - Section Geomorph Monitoring Data
Stream Reach Geomorph Monitoring Data

Figure 5.1 Cross Section 1 Survey Plot and Photo -- UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- MY -4: Nov 2013
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Reach:
Date:
Field Crew:
Station Rod Ht.
0
0
Cape Fear
UT to Bear Creek
XS 1 riffle
Northern
11/1/2013
C. Eliason
Elevation Notes
100.00 on
99.92 off
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Width (ft)
Flood prone Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Area (ft2)
Width /Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area
.-
.
G r
21.2
100.0
1.2`
2.1
23.4
17.3
5.0
1.0
72.8
Stream Type: C
View of cross - section XS -1 looking downstream
XS1, Riffle, Sta. 16 +15
101
100
3.11
99.33
11.96
99.02
TLB
15.32
97.85
16.81
96.95
19.5
96.99
23.45
96.94
25.38
97.49
29.83
98.85
TRB
37.52
99.09
49.48
98.85
58.651
o
1 99.92
Stream Type: C
View of cross - section XS -1 looking downstream
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
XS1, Riffle, Sta. 16 +15
101
100
99
o
CU
01 98
Baseline (04/20/10)
W
-a- Bankfull (8/15/11)
......... .... ....
MY1 (11/22/10)
97
MY2 (8/15/11)
-- MY3 (9/15/12)
MY4 (11/1/13)
96
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)

Figure 5.2 Cross Section 2 Survey Plot and Photo -- UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- MY -4: Nov 2013
River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
UT to Bear Creek
XS ID
XS 2 (riffle)
Reach:
Northern
Date:
11/1/2013
Field Crew:
C. Eliason
Station
Rod Ht.
Elevation
Notes
0
100.0
100.00
on
0
2.0
99.92
off
5.73
17.3
98.85
4.8
11.981
1.0
98.46
78.3
16.26
98.84
TLB
20.79
97.47
22.5
96.85
25.83
96.70
30.5
97.31
35.26
98.73
45.48
98.81
TRB
45.63
98.77
53.13
1 100.33
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Width (ft)
20.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
Bankfull Area (ft2)
22.5
Width /Depth Ratio
17.3
Entrenchment Ratio
4.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Cross Sectional Area
78.3
Stream Type: C
View of cross - section XS -2 looking downstream

Figure 5.3 Cross Section 3 Survey Plot and Photo -- UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- MY -4: Nov 2013
River Basin:
Cape Fear
SUMMARY DATA
Notes
0
Watershed:
UT to Bear Creek
Bankfull Width ft
20.3
XS ID
XS 3 (pool)
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
99.37
Reach:
Northern
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.2
Date:
11/1/2013
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.7
a..,
Field Crew:
CE
Bankfull Area (ft2)
43.9
f_
95.91
Width /Depth Ratio
9.0e,
".
Station
Rod Ht.
Elevation
Notes
0
100
on
0
99.90
off
7.16
99.37
14.131
99.43
20.92
99.03
TLB
24.79
97.97
25.43
95.91
30.58
95.96
34.43
96.08
37.11
98.57
40.25
99.34
TRB
53.43
99.48
65.31
99.42
78.96
100.72
Entrenchment Ratio 5.1
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
Cross Sectional Area 86.2
Stream Type: E
View of cross - section XS -3 looking downstream

Figure 5.4 Cross Section 4 Survey Plot and Photo -- UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- MY -4: Nov 2013
River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
UT to Bear Creek
XS ID
XS 4 (riffle)
Reach:
Northern
Date:
11/1/2013
Field Crew:
CE
Station
Rod Ht.
Elevation
Notes
0
100
on
0
99.89
off
11.73
99.67
21.811
99.32
23.541
99.53
TLB
26.96
98.32
28.62
97.52
32.72
97.23
37.13
97.18
38.37
98.03
42.93
99.37
TRB
52.35
99.47
61.8
99.38
68.63
100.11
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Width (ft) 20.8
Floodprone Width (ft) 100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 2.4
Bankfull Area (ft2) 27.9
Width /Depth Ratio 13.9
Entrenchment Ratio 4.9
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
Cross Sectional Area 55.8
Stream Type: C
View of cross - section XS -4 looking downstream

Figure 5.5 Cross Section 5 Survey Plot and Photo -- UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- MY -4: Nov 2013
River Basin:
Cape Fear
Watershed:
UT to Bear Creek
XS ID
XS 5 (pool)
Reach:
Northern
Date:
11/1/2013
Field Crew:
CE
Station
Rod Ht.
Elevation
Notes
0
100
on
0
99.98
off
6.98
99.719
19.661
98.66
TLB
22.861
98.023
23.53
96.088
26.55
95.695
31.31
96.23
32.49
98.191
35.74
98.736
TRB
53.291
100.094
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Width (ft) 25.4
Floodprone Width (ft) 220.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 1.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 3.6
Bankfull Area (ft2) 34.6
Width /Depth Ratio 18.9
Entrenchment Ratio 8.7
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
Cross Sectional Area 63.0
Stream Type: C
View of cross - section XS -5 looking downstream

Figure 5.6 Cross Section 6 Survey Plot and Photo -- UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- MY -4: Nov 2013
River Basin: Cape Fear SUMMARY DATA
Watershed: UT to Bear Creek Bankfull Width (ft)
XS ID XS 6 (riffle) Floodprone Width (ft)
Reach: Northern Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Date: 11/1/2013 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Field Crew: CE Bankfull Area (ft2)
Width /Depth Ratio
Station Rod Ht. Elevation Notes Entrenchment Ratio
0 100 on Bank Height Ratio
0 99.87 off Cross Sectional Area
Y'r�1
_ z
_
t •
-
21.3
220.0
1.2
2.0
24.0
17.8
10.3
1.0
38.7
Stream Type: C
View of cross - section XS -6 looking downstream
XS 6, Riffle, Sta. 37 +19
Baseline (04/20/10)
-a-Bankfull (9/21/11)
MY1 (11/22/10)
MY2 (9/21/11)
MY3 (9/16/2012)
MY4 (11/1/13)
30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
13.17
99.64
22.2
99.49
TLB
25.17
98.54
26.39
98.15
29.2
97.66
36.11
97.85
37.851
98.35
38.24
98.53
TRB
43.14
99.82
44.91
99.75
60.46
1 100.49
Stream Type: C
View of cross - section XS -6 looking downstream
XS 6, Riffle, Sta. 37 +19
Baseline (04/20/10)
-a-Bankfull (9/21/11)
MY1 (11/22/10)
MY2 (9/21/11)
MY3 (9/16/2012)
MY4 (11/1/13)
30 40 50 60
Station (feet)

Figure 5.7 Cross Section 7 Survey Plot and Photo -- UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- MY -4: Nov 2013
River Basin: Cape Fear SUMMARY DATA
Watershed: UT to Bear Creek Bankfull Width (ft)
XS ID XS 7 (riffle) Floodprone Width (ft)
Reach: Southern Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Date: 11/1/2013 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Field Crew: CE Bankfull Area (ft2)
Width /Depth Ratio
Station Rod Ht. Elevation Notes Entrenchment Ratio
0 100.00 on Bank Height Ratio
0 99.97 off Cross Sectional Area
t
' ry
+�='
�' Rte: �,� +r+r'�•'+� J$bi"r�w ,' � ,� r
17.4•,
100.0
0.7
1.6
6.9
24.8
9.6
1.0
21.5
Stream Type: C
101
100
m
0
m
99
W
98
View of cross - section XS -7 looking downstream
XS 7, Riffle, Sta. 15 +77
.._ ...... ...........i...............__._ .. .................._..........._ Baseline (04/20/10)
�Bankfull (9/21/11)
MY 1 (11/23/10)
MY2 (9/21/11)
MY3 (9/15/12)
MY4 (11/1/13)
10
20 30
Station (feet)
40
4.96
99.96
11.87
99.53
18.03
99.43
TLB
19.15
99.03
20.08
98.16
21.05
98.17
21.88
98.47
23.13
99.13
26.13
99.78
TRB
33.06
99.68
38.43
99.75
42.54
99.92
45.121
100.39
Stream Type: C
101
100
m
0
m
99
W
98
View of cross - section XS -7 looking downstream
XS 7, Riffle, Sta. 15 +77
.._ ...... ...........i...............__._ .. .................._..........._ Baseline (04/20/10)
�Bankfull (9/21/11)
MY 1 (11/23/10)
MY2 (9/21/11)
MY3 (9/15/12)
MY4 (11/1/13)
10
20 30
Station (feet)
40

Figure 5.8 Cross Section 8 Survey Plot and Photo -- UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- MY -4: Nov 2013
River Basin:
Cape Fear
SUMMARY DATA
p, v
Watershed:
UT to Bear Creek
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.0
0
XS ID
XS 8 (riffle)
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0'
fit. q
Reach:
Southern
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
98.26
Date:
11/1/2013
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1..6
�?
Field Crew:
CE
Bankfull Area (ft2)
9.4
15.13
96.80
Width /Depth Ratio
17.8,'i
"-
Station
Rod Ht.
Elevation
Notes
0
100
on
0
99.92
off
5.29
98.79
9.561
98.26
12.5
98.29
TLB
14.53
97.40
15.13
96.80
16.85
96.61
18.71
96.91
19.36
97.40
21.62
98.02
TRB
27.48
98.11
33.51
98.57
41.48
98.79
Entrenchment Ratio 3.1
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
Cross Sectional Area 43.8
Stream Type: E
View of cross - section XS -8 looking downstream

Figure 5.9 Cross Section 9 Survey Plot and Photo -- UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- MY -4: Nov 2013
River Basin: Cape Fear SUMMARY DATA
Watershed: UT to Bear Creek Bankfull Width (ft)
XS ID XS 9 (pool) Floodprone Width (ft)
Reach: Northern Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Date: 11/1/2013 Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Field Crew: CE ' Bankfull Area (ft2)
Width /Depth Ratio
Station Rod Ht. Elevation Notes Entrenchment Ratio
0 100.00 on Bank Height Ratio
0 99.88 off Cross Sectional Area
22.5
100.0
1.1
3.0
23.0
20.5.rt
4.3
1.0
59.3
Stream Type: B
View of cross - section XS -9 looking downstream
4.97
98.67
10.01
98.30
13.811
97.84
TLB
16.12
96.92
16.8
95.23
20.61
94.79
21.02
95.81
23.8
96.24
24.52
97.11
TRB
26.71
97.55
32.81
97.84
38.79
98.19
48.44
98.41
55.891
98.84
Stream Type: B
View of cross - section XS -9 looking downstream

e- Tables: Cross - Sections Survey Raw Data -- MY4 Nov 2013
Xsec 1 -- Nov
2013
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
POINT ID
NORTHING
EASTING
STATION
OFFSET
NAVD 88
LOCAL
DESCRIPTOR
2046
677376.91
1884098.93
0 +00
0
416.77
100.00
xslb
2047
677375.63
1884095.99
0 +03.11
0
416.10
99.33
xslb
2048
677369.44
1884089.59
0 +11.96
0
415.79
99.02
xslb top bnk
2049
677367.19
1884087.09
0 +15.32
0
414.62
97.85
xslb bnk full
2050
677366.62
1884085.64
0 +16.81
0
413.72
96.95
xslb toe
2051
677365.26
1884083.29
0 +19.50
0
413.76
96.99
xslb thw
2052
677362.26
1884080.62
0 +23.45
0
413.70
96.94
xslb toe
2053
677360.70
1884079.38
0 +25.38
0
414.25
97.49
xslb bnk full
2054
677357.63
1884076.12
0 +29.83
0
415.62
98.85
xslb top bnk
2056
677352.90
1884070.06
0 +37.52
0
415.86
99.09
xslb
2057
677345.99
1884060.29
0 +49.48
0
415.61
98.85
xslb
2058
677341.06
1884052.51
0 +58.65
0
416.68
99.92
xslb
Xsec 2 -- Nov
2013
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
POINT ID
NORTHING
EASTING
STATION
OFFSET
NAVD88
LOCAL
DESCRIPTOR
2333
677133.42
1884498.11
0 +00
0
415.65
100.00
xs2
2334
677129.60
1884493.77
0 +05.73
0
414.50
98.85
xs2
2335
677126.39
1884488.39
0 +11.98
0
414.11
98.46
xs2
2336
677124.13
1884484.76
0 +16.26
0
414.49
98.84
xs2 top bank
2337
677121.99
1884480.75
0 +20.79
0
413.11
97.47
xs2 bank full
2338
677121.16
1884479.24
0 +22.50
0
412.49
96.85
xs2 toe
2339
677119.01
1884476.67
0 +25.83
0
412.34
96.70
xs2 thw
2340
677116.75
1884472.57
0 +30.50
0
412.95
97.31
xs2 bank full
2341
677114.19
1884468.55
0 +35.26
0
414.37
98.73
xs2 top bank
2342
677107.96
1884460.24
0 +45.48
0
414.46
98.81
xs2 top bank
2343
677108.03
1884460.38
0 +45.63
0
414.41
98.77
xs2
2344
677104.15
1884453.77
0 +53.13
0
415.97
100.33
xs2
Xsec 3 -- Nov
2013
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
POINT ID
NORTHING
EASTING
STATION
OFFSET
NAVD 88
LOCAL
DESCRIPTOR
2136
676938.18
1884905.26
0 +00
0
413.54
100.00
xs3
2137
676934.17
1884899.33
0 +07.16
0
412.91
99.37
xs3
2138
676930.33
1884893.51
0 +14.13
0
412.97
99.43
xs3
2139
676926.39
1884887.98
0 +20.92
0
412.57
99.03
xs3 top bnk
2140
676924.14
1884884.82
0 +24.79
0
411.51
97.97
xs3 bnk full
2141
676923.69
1884884.36
0 +25.43
0
409.45
95.91
xs3 toe
249
676920.51
1884880.31
0 +30.58
0
409.50
95.96
XS3 thw
2142
676917.27
1884877.87
0 +34.43
0
409.62
96.08
xs3 toe
2143
676915.68
1884875.73
0 +37.11
0
412.11
98.57
xs3 bnk full
2144
676914.29
1884872.87
0 +40.25
0
412.88
99.34
xs3 top bnk
2145
676906.30
1884862.36
0 +53.43
0
413.02
99.48
xs3
2146
676900.60
1884851.85
0 +65.31
0
412.96
99.42
xs3
2147
676892.54
1884840.83
0 +78.96
0
414.26
100.72
xs3

Xsec 4 -- Nov
2013
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
POINT ID
POINT ID
NORTHING
EASTING
STATION
OFFSET
NAVD 88
LOCAL
DESCRIPTOR
2156
676888.57
1884959.09
0 +00
0
413.29
100.00
xs4
2157
676879.17
1884952.03
0 +11.73
0
412.95
99.67
xs4
2158
676871.27
1884945.76
0 +21.81
0
412.61
99.32
xs4
2159
676870.05
1884944.54
0 +23.54
0
412.82
99.53
xs4 top bank
2160
676867.21
1884942.59
0 +26.96
0
411.60
98.32
xs4 tbank full
2161
676865.74
1884941.76
0 +28.62
0
410.80
97.52
xs4 toe
2162
676862.05
1884939.77
0 +32.72
0
410.51
97.23
xs4 thw
2163
676858.13
1884937.57
0 +37.13
0
410.47
97.18
xs4 toe
2164
676857.40
1884936.53
0 +38.37
0
411.32
98.03
xs4 bank full
2165
676853.73
1884933.80
0 +42.93
0
412.66
99.37
xs4 top bank
2166
676847.46
1884926.63
0 +52.35
0
412.76
99.47
xs4
2167
676840.50
1884920.22
0 +61.80
0
412.67
99.38
xs4
2168
676836.17
1884914.77
0 +68.63
0
413.39
100.11
xs4
Xsec 5 -- Nov 2013
Nov 2013
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
POINT ID
NORTHING
EASTING
STATION
OFFSET
NAVD 88
LOCAL
DESCRIPTOR
2313
676916.88
1885642.09
0 +00
0
410.66
100.00
xs5
2314
676910.11
1885643.96
0 +06.98
0
410.38
99.72
xs5
2315
676897.71
1885646.70
0 +19.66
0
409.32
98.66
xs5 top bank
2316
676894.57
1885647.34
0 +22.86
0
408.68
98.02
xs5 bnk full
2317
676893.91
1885647.45
0 +23.53
0
406.75
96.09
xs5 toe
2236
676890.46
1885644.96
0 +26.55
0
406.36
95.70
thw po mx
2318
676886.41
1885649.83
0 +31.31
0
406.89
96.23
xs5 toe
2319
676885.19
1885649.68
0 +32.49
0
408.85
98.19
xs5 bnk full
2320
676881.99
1885650.21
0 +35.74
0
409.40
98.74
xs5 top bank
2321
676864.27
1885650.52
0 +53.29
0
410.76
100.09
xs5
Xsec 6 --
Nov 2013
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
POINT ID
NORTHING
EASTING
STATION
OFFSET
NAVD 88
LOCAL
DESCRIPTOR
2301
676906.48
1885712.83
0 +00
0
409.57
100.00
xs6
2302
676894.13
1885708.28
0 +13.17
0
409.21
99.64
xs6
2303
676885.64
1885705.19
0 +22.20
0
409.06
99.49
xs6 top bank
2304
676882.99
1885703.81
0 +25.17
0
408.11
98.54
xs6 bnk full
2305
676882.03
1885702.88
0 +26.39
0
407.72
98.15
xs6 toe
2306
676879.24
1885702.30
0 +29.20
0
407.23
97.66
xs6 thw
2307
676873.10
1885699.01
0 +36.11
0
407.42
97.85
xs6 toe
2308
676871.68
1885697.84
0 +37.85
0
407.92
98.35
xs6 bnk full
2309
676866.58
1885696.38
0 +38.24
0
408.10
98.53
xs6 top bank
2310
676871.01
1885698.51
0 +43.14
0
409.38
99.82
xs6 bnk full
2311
676865.05
1885695.42
0 +44.91
0
409.31
99.75
xs6
2312
676849.87
1885691.63
0 +60.46
0
410.06
100.49
xs6

Xsec 7 -- Nov
2013
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
EASTING STATION
POINT ID
NORTHING
EASTING
STATION
OFFSET
NAVD 88
LOCAL
DESCRIPTOR
157
675691.49
1882596.37
0 +00
0
422.61
100.00
xs7 ipf
158
675686.60
1882595.43
0 +04.96
0
422.57
99.96
xs7
159
675679.95
1882593.58
0 +11.87
0
422.14
99.53
xs7
160
675674.09
1882591.63
0 +18.03
0
422.04
99.43
xs7 tob
161
675672.94
1882591.59
0 +19.15
0
421.64
99.03
xs7 bf
162
675672.07
1882591.28
0 +20.08
0
420.77
98.16
xs7 toe
163
675671.20
1882590.79
0 +21.05
0
420.78
98.17
xs7 thw
164
675670.45
1882590.35
0 +21.88
0
421.08
98.47
xs7 toe
165
675669.43
1882589.37
0 +23.13
0
421.74
99.13
xs7 bf
166
675666.52
1882588.65
0 +26.13
0
422.39
99.78
xs7 tob
167
675659.64
1882587.49
0 +33.06
0
422.29
99.68
xs7
168
675654.36
1882586.44
0 +38.43
0
422.36
99.75
xs7
169
675650.42
1882585.28
0 +42.54
0
422.53
99.92
xs7
1061
675648.05
1882584.19
0 +45.12
0
423.00
100.39
xs -7 ipf
Xsec 8 -- Nov 2013
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
POINT ID
NORTHING
EASTING STATION
OFFSET
NAVD 88
LOCAL
DESCRIPTOR
1162
675297.82
1883305.89 0 +00
0
414.16
99.55
xs -8 ipf
1163
675292.76
1883304.27 0 +05.29
0
413.03
98.42
xs -8
1164
675288.47
1883303.46 56
0
412.50
97.89
xs -8
1165
675285.59
1883302.72 0 +12.50
0
412.53
97.92
xs -8 tob
1166
675283.47
1883302.54-14.53
0
411.64
97.03
xs -8 tob /full
1167
675282.84
1883302.49 0 +15.13
0
411.04
96.43
xs -8 toe
1168
675281.25
1883301.83 16.85
0
410.85
96.24
xs -8 flow
1169
675279.46
1883301.28 18.71
0
411.15
96.54
xs -8 toe
1170
675278.92
1883300.91 0 +19.36
0
411.64
97.03
xs -8 tob /full
1171
675276.96
1883299.73 0 +21.62
0
412.26
97.65
xs -8 tob
1172
675271.69
1883297.161+27.48
0
412.35
97.74
xs -8
1173
675266.47
1883294.00 0 +33.51
0
412.81
98.20
xs -8
1174
675259.54
1883289.92 0 +41.48
0
413.03
98.42
xs -8 ipf
Xsec 9 -- Nov 2013
ELEVATION
ELEVATION
POINT ID
NORTHING
EASTING
STATION
OFFSET
NAVD 88
LOCAL
DESCRIPTOR
1184
675240.69
1883362.69
0 +00
0
414.24
100.00
xs -9 pf
1185
675241.07
1883357.70
0 +04.97
0
412.90
98.67
xs -9
1186
675240.56
1883352.67
0 +10.01
0
412.53
98.30
xs -9
1187
675240.23
1883348.88
0 +13.81
0
412.07
97.84
xs -9 tob
1188
675240.26
1883346.58
0 +16.12
0
411.15
96.92
xs -9 tob /full
1189
675240.14
1883345.90
0 +16.80
0
409.47
95.23
xs -9 toe
1190
675237.55
1883342.16
0 +20.61
0
409.02
94.79
xs -9 flow
1191
675238.35
1883338.94
0 +21.02
0
410.05
95.81
xs -9 toe
1192
675238.41
1883338.22
0 +23.80
0
410.48
96.24
xs -9 tob /full
1193
675238.46
1883336.03
0 +24.52
0
411.34
97.11
xs -9 tob
1194
675238.90
1883329.92
0 +26.71
0
411.79
97.55
xs -9
1195
675239.31
1883323.92
0 +32.81
0
412.07
97.84
xs -9
1196
675238.49
1883314.28
0 +38.79
0
412.42
98.19
xs -9
1197
675239.72
1883306.80
0 +48.44
0
412.64
98.41
xs -9
1198
675239.04
1883299.63
0 +55.89
0
413.08
98.84
xs -9 ipf

Figure 6.1 UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Northern UT (Sta. 1000 -2000)
419
Thalweg (As -Built 05/09)
Thalweg (MY1 12/3 & 12/6/10)
418
Thalweg (MY2 8/25/11)
• • m Thalweg (MY3 9/15/12)
• • • • uni Thalweg (MY4 11/1/13)
417
• Water Suface (MY2 8/16- 18/11))
�• • •• ) • Bankfull (MY2 8/16- 18/11))
CU
• • 0 Grade Control Structures
Qj
416
• • c + Rootwads
0
• • Cattle Crossing
• •
�n •
•
W 415 -
" • •
•
414
413
412
411
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
Station (feet)

416
415
414
a�
0 413
c�
_N
W 412
411
410
409
408
Figure 6.2 UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Northern UT (Sta. 2000 -3000)
2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
Station (feet)

Figure 6.3 UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Northern UT (Sta. 3000 -4000)
412
Thalweg (MY3 9/15/12)
•
• •
•
m
— Thalweg (As -Built 05/09)
Thalweg (MY4 11/1/13)
•
•
-
Thalweg (MY1 12/3 & 12/6/10)
• •
• m
•
•
• • •
Overnight rainfall •� �
— Thalweg (MY 2 8/25/11)
�
m
411
o
Grade Control Structures
_ • • • WOO
0
LL ••
Rootwads
_
Q
x
410
0
U
�
cn
(n
C
•
O
N
4J
409
N
• •
-
o
L
O
W
408
Ln
Ln
407
XV VV
406
405
404
3000
3100
3200
3300 3400
3500 3600
3700 3800 3900 4000
Station (feet)
Thalweg (MY3 9/15/12)
•
• •
•
m
Thalweg (MY4 11/1/13)
•
-
• •
• m
•
Water Surface (MY2 8/16- 18/11)
Bankfull (MY2 8/16 - 18/11)
Overnight rainfall •� �
•
�
m
o
Grade Control Structures
1
0
LL ••
Rootwads
_
Q
x
•
0
U
�
cn
(n
C
•
O
4J
N
• •
-
o
L

Figure 6.4 UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Southern UT (Sta. 1000-1900)
427
Thalweg (As -Built 05/09)
•• _
•
Thalweg (MY1 12/10/10)
426
•
• • • • r\
Thalweg (MY2 8/25/11)
• Ln
• • •
Thalweg (MY3 9/15/12)
ra
• • • • • N
Thalweg (MY4 11/1/13)
425
•
Water (MY2 8/25/11)
• • •
• Bankfull (MY1 8/25/11)
�v
• o
o Grade Control Structures
424
U
v
0 Rootwads
• N
—�— Cattle Crossing
V)
•
423
•
•
0
c'a
• •
Q)
422
W
•
•
•
421
•
420
419
AJ�MA
418
417
1000
1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
1700 1800 1900
Station (feet)

Figure 6.5
UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Southern UT (Sta. 1900 -2800)
420
— Thalweg (As -Built 05/09)
•
•
419
•
•
Thalweg (MY1 12/10/10)
• • •
•
Thalweg (MY2 8/25/11)
• • •
418
Thalweg (MY3 9/15/12)
••
�,
0
Ln
Thalweg (MY4 11/1/13)
417
• ~
N
N
• Bankfull (MY2 8/25/11)
0
•
•
N
N
a Grade Control Structures
416
• •
4
Rootwads
+•
•
U
v
---"--Cattle Crossing
4
•
g
c
415
1:W UN
o
• • •
a�
v'
1
414 -
\
cu
• •
U
N
w
O
413
F
•
412
•
•
411
410
409
408
407
1900
2000 2100
2200 2300 2400
2500
2600 2700 2800
Station (feet)

e- Tables: Longitudinal Profile Survey Raw Data -- MY4 Nov 2013
Longitudinal Profile Data - Northern UT -- MY4 (2013)
ID
Northing
Easting Description
Station
Elevation
1
677821.564
1883794.493 HPOOL
1000.02
414.06
2
677810.864
1883800.474 POOLM
1012.25
413.43
3
677802.84
1883806.675
1022.28
415.07
4
677794.596
1883812.338
1032.25
415.35
5
677786.716
1883816.873 TPOOL /HRIF
1041.34
415.35
6
677783.956
1883818.414
1044.51
415.21
7
677773.727
1883822.867 HPOOL /TRIF
1055.32
415.53
8
677773.119
1883823.016
1055.95
415.47
9
677771.464
1883823.793
1057.76
414.02
10
677769.551
1883824.339 POOLM
1059.75
413.66
11
677768.321
1883825.056
1061.14
413.72
12
677760.334
1883827.059
1069.36
413.72
13
677739.547
1883833.212 TPOOL /HRIF
1091.08
415.28
14
677739.28
1883833.874
1091.6
415.12
15
677716.482
1883843.495
1116.33
415.05
16
677690.22
1883855.643 HPOOL /TRIF
1145.09
414.84
17
677688.397
1883856.117
1146.97
414.79
18
677686.845
1883856.047
1148.48
414.42
19
677681.106
1883858.139
1154.51
413.87
20
677681.063
1883858.064 POOLM
1154.53
413.84
21
677680.94
1883857.972
1154.64
413.94
22
677648.304
1883859.391 TPOOL /HRIF
1187.36
415.12
23
677620.97
1883860.623 HPOOL /TRIF
1214.83
415.01
24
677616.907
1883861.914 POOLM
1218.99
413.45
25
677593.575
1883870.096
1245.73
413.7
26
677593.495
1883870.18
1245.85
413.72
27
677579.591
1883887.805 TPOOL /HRIF
1268.05
414.85
28
677566.608
1883910.673
1294.35
414.54
29
677556.744
1883935.964
1321.25
414.46
30
677547.688
1883952.979 HPOOL /TRIF
1340.08
414.69
31
677544.536
1883954.31 POOLM
1343.24
413.84
32
677532.084
1883966.038
1359.63
413.85
33
677504.554
1883970.907 TPOOL /HRIF
1387.54
414.5
34
677464.796
1883971.203
1427.1
414.38
35
677439.944
1883974.515
1451.93
414.2
36
677436.49
1883976.266 HPOOL /TRIF
1455.8
414.1
37
677426.5
1883980.836
1466.78
413.6
38
677415.806
1883992.128 POOLM
1482.17
413.42
39
677405.752
1884012.913 TPOOL /HRIF
1505.06
413.88
40
677400.411
1884032.253
1525.11
413.97
41
677397.106
1884046.427 HPOOL /TRIF
1539.56
413.73
42
677394.873
1884053.838 POOLM
1547.18
413.03
43
677390.663
1884060.832
1555.33
413.21

44
677382.406
1884070.413
1567.95
413.3
45
677367.604
1884080.351
TPOOL /HRIF
1585.78
413.83
46
677365.258
1884083.288
1589.34
413.76
47
677348.264
1884093.202
1608.8
413.75
48
677333.235
1884102.058
HPOOL /TRIF
1626.19
413.18
49
677328.962
1884104.202
POOLM
1630.97
412.98
50
677310.713
1884108.231
TPOOL /HRIF
1649.08
413.6
51
677295.894
1884113.565
1664.63
413.39
52
677285.611
1884112.25
1674.49
413.93
53
677275.621
1884114.316
1684.69
413.46
54
677262.444
1884116.428
1698.03
413.43
55
677255.253
1884118.59
1705.72
413.62
56
677252.142
1884121.171
1709.67
413.02
57
677250.583
1884121.957
HPOOL /TRIF
1711.42
413.39
58
677247.543
1884123.06
1714.62
412.68
59
677242.734
1884125.791
1720.15
412.53
60
677233.462
1884130.16
1730.39
412.13
61
677232.477
1884133.14
POOLM
1734.37
412.05
62
677221.461
1884153.821
TPOOL /HRIF
1757.47
413.23
63
677216.335
1884173.733
1777.7
413.05
64
677214.877
1884178.835
1782.94
412.99
65
677214.743
1884190.049
1794.09
413.13
66
677213.073
1884202.575
HPOOL /TRIF
1806.91
413.2
67
677212.082
1884204.955
1809.54
411.8
68
677211.411
1884207.205
1811.89
411.52
69
677208.866
1884211.565
POOLM
1816.81
411.46
70
677207.206
1884217.105
1822.59
411.77
71
677204.776
1884230.779
1836.08
412.77
72
677184.615
1884264.305
TPOOL /HRIF
1875.17
413.06
73
677172.012
1884282.12
1896.96
412.81
74
677168.269
1884290.205
1905.79
412.75
75
677163.156
1884296.216
1913.6
413
76
677155.91
1884308.607
HPOOL /TRIF
1927.85
412.94
77
677149.11
1884318.369
1939.96
412.37
78
677131.269
1884353.586
POOLM
1979.52
412.21
79
677131.198
1884377.343
TPOOL /HRIF
2002.69
412.69
80
677136.295
1884392.826
2018.95
412.76
81
677145.192
1884409.787
2038
412.73
82
677150.785
1884421.65
HPOOL /TRIF
2051.2
412.44
83
677150.801
1884421.685
2051.16
412.46
84
677153.274
1884430.602
2060.25
411.53
85
677153.234
1884439.409
POOLM
2068.99
411.12
86
677149.396
1884452.634
2081.83
411.52
87
677129.909
1884470.87
TPOOL /HRIF
2108.19
412.46
88
677119.008
1884476.668
2120.25
412.34
89
677112.079
1884481.88
HPOOL /TRIF
2128.9
411.98
90
677092.082
1884499.865
POOLM
2155.9
411.23

91
677086.929
1884510.463
TPOOL /HRIF
2167.42
411.98
92
677083.136
1884515.742
2173.71
411.55
93
677076.195
1884536.576
HPOOL /TRIF
2195.29
411.68
94
677075.001
1884549.939
POOLM
2208.62
410.94
95
677075.978
1884562.879
2220.94
411.17
96
677084.808
1884582.48
2242.35
411.58
97
677090.525
1884599.489
2260.29
411.93
98
677092.46
1884608.128
2269.52
411.5
99
677094.638
1884618.598
2280
411.01
100
677092.835
1884628.462
TPOOL /HRIF
2289.86
411.35
101
677090.652
1884638.009
2298.94
411.13
102
677080.242
1884649.926
2314.76
411.79
103
677064.383
1884663.587
2335.49
411.57
104
677059.908
1884669.844
HPOOL /TRIF
2343.09
411.53
105
677051.134
1884675.034
2352.94
411.21
106
677041.385
1884681.858
2364.64
410.69
107
677038.528
1884686.387
POOLM
2369.88
410.23
108
677028.088
1884702.635
TPOOL /HRIF
2389.06
411.63
109
677024.638
1884722.593
HPOOL /TRIF
2409.07
411.37
110
677021.888
1884740.556
2426.97
410.94
111
677021.797
1884747.495
POOLM
2433.91
410.43
112
677019.685
1884762.103
2448.56
410.73
113
677021.348
1884781.789
2468.23
411.41
114
677022.383
1884782.256
TPOOL /HRIF
2468.66
411.28
115
677021.609
1884805.318
2492.1
411.1
116
677020.413
1884808.448
HPOOL /TRIF
2495.44
411.22
117
677017.335
1884813.367
2501.21
410.39
118
677016.12
1884823.143
POOLM
2510.53
410.04
119
677008.505
1884829.515
2520.46
410.54
120
676995.499
1884838.539
TPOOL /HRIF
2536.12
411.34
121
676972.376
1884850.796
2562.18
411.11
122
676949.215
1884861.01
2587.76
411.01
123
676939.703
1884864.86
2597.85
410.49
124
676934.901
1884869.65
2604.47
410.69
125
676931.291
1884871.999
HPOOL /TRIF
2608.84
410.83
126
676929.186
1884874.145
POOLM
2611.82
409.21
127
676920.506
1884880.308
2622.45
409.5
128
676912.442
1884886.034
2632.32
409.26
129
676907.159
1884890.745
TPOOL /HRIF
2639.4
410.52
130
676895.57
1884898.437
2653.05
410.78
131
676891.014
1884905.913
2661.58
409.77
132
676882.18
1884913.582
2673.24
410.47
133
676862.052
1884939.767
2706.15
410.51
134
676848.061
1884959.043
2729.93
410.55
135
676836.756
1884973.495
2748.2
410.28
136
676829.645
1884978.703
HPOOL /TRIF
2756.55
410.15
137
676826.958
1884980.311
2759.68
409.06

138
676822.362
1884984.525
POOLM
2765.73
408.58
139
676813.118
1884989.864
2776.4
408.8
140
676793.497
1884996.288
TPOOL /HRIF
2796.7
410.35
141
676773.681
1885006.029
2818.71
410.18
142
676750.286
1885011.842
2842.61
410.28
143
676750.211
1885011.837
2842.68
410.28
144
676728.257
1885019.07
HPOOL /TRIF
2865.91
410.55
145
676723.202
1885021.35
2871.45
409.69
146
676711.351
1885027.246
POOLM
2884.69
408.75
147
676706.15
1885032.173
2891.55
409.23
148
676701.068
1885038.813
2893.13
409.31
149
676693.17
1885050.562
2901.06
409.18
150
676682.073
1885080.758
TPOOL /HRIF
2915.03
410.37
151
HPOOL /TRIF
2947.03
410.12
152
676677.281
1885095.088
2961.72
409.14
153
676676.38
1885097.297
POOLM
2963.99
408.72
154
676675.248
1885111.699
TPOOL /HRIF
2978.44
410.09
155
676675.825
1885139.615
3006.2
409.67
156
676676.03
1885151.104
HPOOL /TRIF
3017.67
409.65
157
676676.072
1885162.239
POOLM
3028.8
408.79
158
676668.998
1885184.31
TPOOL /HRIF
3052.14
409.51
159
676658.391
1885203.895
3074.39
409.26
160
676651.703
1885221.117
HPOOL /TRIF
3093.51
409.09
161
676649.53
1885227.657
3100.11
408.34
162
676649.845
1885235.034
POOLM
3107.47
407.68
163
676646.171
1885253.28
3123.77
408.41
164
676654.273
1885269.207
TPOOL /HRIF
3141.56
409.17
165
676676.274
1885289.959
3170.6
409.39
166
676679.458
1885292.776
HPOOL /TRIF
3174.69
409.14
167
676689.28
1885301.111
POOLM
3187.49
408.04
168
676704.9
1885307.739
TPOOL /HRIF
3203.66
408.99
169
676728.048
1885311.181
3226.85
409.01
170
676738.867
1885313.917
HPOOL /TRIF
3238
408.85
171
676753.983
1885317.833
POOLM
3253.61
407.91
172
676771.496
1885323.47
TPOOL /HRIF
3272.11
409.19
173
676787.414
1885332.404
3290.36
408.93
174
676796.738
1885337.93
HPOOL /TRIF
3301.52
408.88
175
676800.423
1885341.54
POOLM
3306.66
407.3
176
676808.317
1885351.381
3319.26
407.88
177
676818.539
1885362.717
TPOOL /HRIF
3334.61
408.83
178
676825.701
1885375.815
3349.56
408.84
179
676833.543
1885392.678
HPOOL /TRIF
3368.15
407.99
180
676834.061
1885398.713
3374.36
407.44
181
676836.023
1885419.854
POOLM
3395.51
407.21
182
676834.079
1885432.953
TPOOL /HRIF
3408.57
408.49
183
676824.985
1885455.495
3432.82
408.46
184
676817.439
1885473.62
3452.44
407.88

185
676812.671
1885483.258
HPOOL /TRIF
3463.19
407.54
186
676810.207
1885489.401
3469.8
407.2
187
676808.096
1885498.835
3479.84
407.4
188
676805.38
1885506.022
3487.11
407.08
189
676804.263
1885511.509
POOLM
3492.63
406.91
190
676806.025
1885524.1
3503.74
407.3
191
676811.394
1885535.014
3515.84
407.23
192
676821.158
1885546.825
TPOOL /HRIF
3531.03
408.15
193
676839.323
1885564.805
3555.98
408.35
194
676851.533
1885575.891
3571.28
407.85
195
676852.608
1885575.931
3573.27
408.07
196
676852.491
1885576.268
HPOOL /TRIF
3573.79
408.02
197
676861.106
1885584.189
3574.03
408.13
198
676864.059
1885587.95
3585.27
407.05
199
676871.912
1885601.623
POOLM
3590.04
406.76
200
676882.479
1885621.222
TPOOL /HRIF
3605.76
408.12
201
676889.988
1885642.679
3627.95
407.99
202
676890.457
1885644.96
HPOOL /TRIF
3650.91
407.95
203
676891.888
1885660.633
3653.21
406.36
204
676889.948
1885678.963
POOLM
3668.94
406.19
205
676879.243
1885702.304
TPOOL /HRIF
3687.18
407.33
206
676875.712
1885707.927
3712.53
407.23
207
676870.065
1885722.482
3719.09
407.15
208
676869.003
1885727.302
HPOOL /TRIF
3734.59
407.41
209
676866.083
1885744.813
POOLM
3739.5
405.41
210
676868.252
1885757.705
3757.22
405.64
211
676874.371
1885778.786
TPOOL /HRIF
3769.65
406.95
212
676873.711
1885802.453
3791.35
406.94
213
676873.401
1885805.722
HPOOL /TRIF
3815.2
406.49
214
676869.962
1885813.559
3815.67
405.51
215
676865.559
1885820.408
3818.41
405.03
216
676852.811
1885842.17
3826.89
405.81
217
677844.716
1883782.081
POOLM
3835.04
403.97
218
TPOOL /HRIF
3860.26
405.26
Longitudinal Profile Data
- Southern UT -- MY4 (2013)
ID
Northing
Easting
Description
Station
Elevation
1
676016.596
1882206.351
1000.32
423.94
2
676005.597
1882229.196
POOLM
1024.57
422.03
3
676003.159
1882235.611
1036.81
422.26
4
676000.714
1882241.98
1042.81
422.85
5
675994.794
1882248.554
1046.22
423.22
6
675985.557
1882259.32
1060.76
424.7
7
675984.486
1882258.968
1061.35
425.09
8
675984.379
1882259.024
TPOOL / HPOOL
1061.47
425.24
9
675982.752
1882260.801
1064.43
424.11

10
675979.286
1882263.514 POOLM
1068.73
423.38
11
675969.425
1882270.132 TPOOL /HRIF
1085.46
424.88
12
675960.222
1882277.278
1097.02
424.08
13
675957.584
1882280.217
1100.69
424.35
14
675954.27
1882285.791
1107.17
424.24
15
675949.543
1882295.551
1117.86
424.47
16
675945.732
1882304.692
1127.95
424.42
17
675943.031
1882308.127
1132.48
424
18
675941.134
1882310.946
1135.86
423.91
19
675936.439
1882315.351
1142.53
424.1
20
675923.063
1882322.936
1158.03
424.22
21
675922.182
1882323.52
1159.12
424.3
22
675918.449
1882325.087 TRIF /HPOOL
1163.16
424
23
675912.446
1882326.877 POOLM
1169.43
423.63
24
675910.91
1882326.211
1170.77
424.05
25
675901.799
1882328.309
1170.17
424.46
26
675900.863
1882328.004
1171.1
424.07
27
675899.054
1882328.402 TPOOL /HRIF
1172.87
424.2
28
675897.842
1882328.518
1174.07
423.93
29
675884.157
1882328.37
1187.75
424.35
30
675880.989
1882328.975
1191.36
424.06
31
675875.345
1882330.573
1197.2
424.14
32
675871.768
1882332.455
1201.26
423.94
33
675866.348
1882337.028
1208.29
423.76
34
675865.541
1882338.298
1209.76
423.93
35
675863.19
1882342.375
1214.37
424.07
36
675859.297
1882351.991
1224.71
424.17
37
675857.221
1882359.601
1232.67
423.95
38
675849.301
1882376.092
1251.04
423.87
39
675845.971
1882380.6
1256.79
423.78
40
675841.314
1882383.188
1262.08
423.97
41
675839.33
1882383.57
1264.06
424.11
42
675835.306
1882385.657
1268.57
424.13
43
675821.602
1882391.651
1283.55
424.01
44
675811.496
1882397.923
1295.52
423.74
45
675807.669
1882401.4
1300.64
423.84
46
675806.666
1882403.876
1303.31
423.84
47
675800.793
1882418.661
1319.49
423.8
48
675796.863
1882431.101
1332.27
423.77
49
675795.852
1882436.367
1337.31
423.66
50
675797.598
1882448.217
1349.04
423.79
51
675797.966
1882449.194
1350.08
423.62
52
675799.426
1882457.057
1358.11
423.85
53
675799.847
1882459.849
1360.92
423.21
54
675801.258
1882466.134
1367.82
423.32
55
675802.261
1882470.651
1372.35
423.39
56
675797.812
1882481.238
1384.36
423.13

57
675796.098
1882485.481
1388.74
423.17
58
675792.374
1882488.173
1393.33
422.9
59
675790.908
1882489.308
TRIF /HPOOL
1395.18
423.78
60
675789.339
1882490.293
POOLM
1397.04
422.38
61
675777.452
1882497.63
1411.1
423.12
62
675776.102
1882499.036
TPOOL /HRIF
1412.94
422.59
63
675775.016
1882499.309
1414.05
422.92
64
675764.741
1882507.216
1427.2
422.25
65
675757.161
1882517.586
1440.55
422.7
66
675755.936
1882519.95
TRIF /HPOOL
1443.34
423.43
67
675756.735
1882523.568
POOLM
1446.8
422.43
68
675754.994
1882528.225
TPOOL /HRIF
1451.67
422.54
69
675754.612
1882529.725
1453.21
422.79
70
675749.53
1882546.059
1470.44
422.37
71
675742.677
1882557.156
1483.47
422.53
72
675736.927
1882559.192
1489.5
422.16
73
675733.196
1882561.208
1493.61
422.32
74
675724.604
1882561.811
1501.74
422.17
75
675720.969
1882561.489
TRIF /HPOOL
1505.63
422.82
76
675718.294
1882561.02
POOLM
1508.36
421.44
77
675706.755
1882558.344
TPOOL /HRIF
1520.06
421.77
78
675704.46
1882557.923
1522.39
421.33
79
675703.102
1882557.803
1523.75
421.59
80
675697.93
1882557.405
1529.18
421.28
81
675697.277
1882557.486
1529.84
421.52
82
675692.591
1882557.413
1534.54
421.65
83
675691.69
1882557.912
1535.48
421.47
84
675691.064
1882557.867
1536.1
421.62
85
675687.299
1882559.751
1541.55
421.5
86
675685.324
1882561.755
1544.28
421.55
87
675684.954
1882562.01
1544.69
421.5
88
675682.944
1882564.51
1547.76
421.59
89
675681.813
1882565.989
1549.57
421.23
90
675678.263
1882570.124
1555.23
421.11
91
675677.828
1882570.214
1555.74
420.95
92
675675.611
1882573.538
1559.7
420.65
93
675675.031
1882575.403
TRIF /HPOOL
1561.72
421.83
94
675674.512
1882577.052
POOLM
1563.45
420.5
95
675674.139
1882578.645
1564.91
420.49
96
675673.415
1882579.909
TPOOL /HPOOL
1566.66
421.5
97
675673.423
1882581.596
POOLM
1568.33
420.36
98
675673.381
1882582.408
1569.13
420.38
99
675668.376
1882599.451
1581.71
420.4
100
675666.04
1882603.198
1588.87
421.23
101
675664.838
1882605.39
TPOOL /HPOOL
1589.75
421.26
102
675664.729
1882606.304
1590.29
420.07
103
675664.496
1882606.797
1590.33
420.05

104
675664.457
1882606.817
1591.4
420.15
105
675663.373
1882607.505
POOLM
1594.5
419.82
106
675661.89
1882610.713
1599.24
420.11
107
675658.129
1882613.555
TPOOL /HRIF
1608.33
420.62
108
675651.46
1882619.74
1618.08
420.09
109
675645.936
1882627.675
1625.96
420.18
110
675644.815
1882635.602
TRIF /HPOOL
1627.38
420.5
111
675645.173
1882637.043
POOLM
1629.78
419.31
112
675645.3
1882638.9
1639.8
419.46
113
675646.457
1882649.033
1648.44
419.62
114
675646.774
1882657.515
1653.18
419.79
115
675645.063
1882661.872
TPOOL /HPOOL
1655.39
420.08
116
675643.905
1882663.919
POOLM
1667.21
419.19
117
675643.022
1882665.522
1679.77
419.42
118
675633.867
1882680.36
1684.09
419.47
119
675631.616
1882684.006
1685.8
419.53
120
675630.671
1882685.436
TPOOL /HRIF
1688.3
419.89
121
675629.045
1882687.375
1695.33
420.05
122
675625.1
1882693.2
1702.36
419.98
123
675621.677
1882699.359
1704.72
419.83
124
675620.043
1882701.124
1707.08
419.51
125
675618.766
1882703.143
1708.93
419.24
126
675618.477
1882704.964
1715.08
419.61
127
675615.192
1882709.621
TRIF /HPOOL
1716.39
419.81
128
675614.515
1882711.069
1717.85
418.58
129
675613.972
1882712.503
POOLM
1724.87
418.47
130
675611.347
1882718.798
1730.21
418.7
131
675609.259
1882723.713
TPOOL /HRIF
1738.68
419.15
132
675608.178
1882732.012
1748.66
419.22
133
675606.007
1882747.018
1752.64
419.34
134
675603.989
1882750.562
1763.57
418.83
135
675597.588
1882759.739
1765.47
418.98
136
675595.758
1882761.178
1768.22
418.78
137
675593.288
1882762.377
1772.11
418.6
138
675589.536
1882764.332
TRIF /HPOOL
1773.17
419.17
139
675588.769
1882764.762
1774.58
418.53
140
675587.654
1882765.285
POOLM
1777.47
417.74
141
675584.906
1882766.864
1791.09
418.61
142
675572.6
1882771.6
TPOOL /HPOOL
1792.14
418.97
143
675571.548
1882771.863
1793.84
418.29
144
675570.03
1882772.625
1806.16
418.12
145
675560.918
1882779.315
POOLM
1810.08
417.91
146
675558.434
1882782.4
1818.09
418.37
147
675554.836
1882788.596
TPOOL /HPOOL
1819.24
418.88
148
675554.593
1882790.062
POOLM
1820.37
417.72
149
675554.424
1882791.182
TPOOL /HRIF
1835.67
418.51
150
675551.595
1882806.17
1845.08
418.37

151
675550.383
1882815.662
1849.34
418
152
675549.013
1882819.699
1853.06
418.02
153
675544.038
1882827.226
1857.42
418.26
154
675541.261
1882830.424
1867.13
418.5
155
675533.31
1882836.408
TRIF /HPOOL
1869.32
418.55
156
675531.585
1882837.636
1870.91
417.98
157
675529.862
1882838.597
POOLM
1877.77
417.84
158
675523.373
1882841.531
TPOOL /HRIF
1887.5
418
159
675514.954
1882845.714
1900.69
417.4
160
675512.215
1882847.354
1902.97
417.84
161
675506.26
1882853.083
TRIF /HPOOL
1904.16
418.1
162
675505.663
1882854.268
1905.64
417.55
163
675504.838
1882855.499
POOLM
1923.62
417.41
164
675496.666
1882871.3
TPOOL /HRIF
1925.17
417.58
165
675495.791
1882872.583
1935.21
417.47
166
675491.442
1882881.651
1935.87
417.54
167
675490.796
1882882.05
1940.06
417.63
168
675488.238
1882885.996
1954.75
417.52
169
675473.639
1882891.566
TRIF /HPOOL
1956.05
417.76
170
675472.339
1882891.655
POOLM
1957.86
416.58
171
675471.026
1882891.208
TPOOL /HRIF
1985.28
416.87
172
675443.572
1882886.827
2006.88
416.84
173
675423.09
1882887.804
2019.78
416.59
174
675412.911
1882894.127
2031.67
416.65
175
675406.4
1882903.285
2071.08
416.11
176
675400.545
1882942.423
2072.89
416.15
177
675398.261
1882946.718
2084.07
416.64
178
675389.126
1882954.252
2108.06
416.57
179
675369.798
1882965.212
2117.19
416.57
180
675367.281
1882973.471
TRIF /HPOOL
2118.92
416.86
181
675366.985
1882975.586
POOLM
2121.74
415.7
182
675366.444
1882977.41
2153.07
415.96
183
675366.423
1883017.61
TPOOL /HPOOL
2163.79
416.38
184
675365.682
1883018.979
2166.89
415.51
185
675364.933
1883020.524
POOLM
2185.78
415.06
186
675353.246
1883041.509
TPOOL /HRIF
2201.01
415.31
187
675352.842
1883057.233
2220.83
415.14
188
675362.506
1883074.601
2231.86
414.97
189
675364.052
1883083.847
2238.46
415.31
190
675361.963
1883089.501
TRIF /HPOOL
2239.7
415.74
191
675361.577
1883090.919
POOLM
2241.44
414.75
192
675360.26
1883092.166
TPOOL /HRIF
2256.18
414.85
193
675353.038
1883104.871
2266.38
415.22
194
675346.027
1883111.987
TRIF /HPOOL
2269.2
415.45
195
675343.226
1883112.239
POOLM
2271.25
414.55
196
675341.22
1883112.692
TPOOL /HRIF
2303.33
414.72
197
675310.778
1883120.327
2315.13
414.37

198
675301.298
1883126.468
TRIF /HPOOL
2315.99
415.01
199
675300.948
1883127.397
2317.28
414.08
200
675300.401
1883128.662
POOLM
2318.44
414.02
201
675300.148
1883130.167
TPOOL /HPOOL
2319.83
414.6
202
675299.426
1883131.289
POOLM
2320.94
413.82
203
675298.029
1883131.767
TPOOL /HRIF
2332.89
414.22
204
675292.887
1883142.78
2336.82
414.06
205
675291.647
1883152.138
2343.5
413.94
206
675294.178
1883158.547
TRIF /HPOOL
2349.78
414.51
207
675294.75
1883160.028
POOLM
2352.48
413.24
208
675295.623
1883161.644
TPOOL /HRIF
2359.95
414.19
209
675311.182
1883184.461
2372.78
413.91
210
675312.679
1883195.278
2382.66
412.95
211
675307.995
1883202.383
2388.45
413.31
212
675294.452
1883216.486
2392.28
412.96
213
675289.158
1883229.992
2397.21
413.58
214
675289.084
1883235.262
2400.85
412.31
215
675294.045
1883248.743
2412.05
413
216
675293.525
1883252.623
2431.5
412.26
217
675293.239
1883253.635
TRIF /HPOOL
2437.53
413.02
218
675293.028
1883255.295
POOLM
2449.21
411.75
219
675290.953
1883264.482
2459.1
412.42
220
675290.421
1883265.726
TPOOL /HPOOL
2460.45
412.47
221
675290.289
1883267.944
2462.17
412.04
222
675288.22
1883282.549
POOLM
2477.32
411.52
223
675287.921
1883283.7
TPOOL /HPOOL
2484.5
411.96
224
675287.089
1883284.963
POOLM
2486.01
411.19
225
675281.184
1883301.612
2498.6
411.37
226
675280.758
1883303.171
TPOOL /HPOOL
2500.17
411.65
227
675280.283
1883304.728
POOLM
2506.79
410.72
228
675272.305
1883318.59
2523.2
410.83
229
675271.002
1883319.773
TPOOL /HPOOL
2525.3
411.29
230
675269.356
1883321.43
2527.63
410.54
231
675256.737
1883336.536
POOLM
2547.28
410.28
232
675254.95
1883338.157
TPOOL /HPOOL
2549.68
411.11
233
675253.289
1883338.929
2551.53
409.92
234
675236.82
1883341.755
POOLM
2564.22
409.57
235
675220.124
1883328.665
2570.44
410.04
236
675219.168
1883328.021
TPOOL /HPOOL
2576.75
410.48
237
675217.661
1883326.935
POOLM
2578.6
409.57
238
675216.664
1883326.174
2579.7
409.78
239
675216.122
1883324.759
TPOOL /HPOOL
2586.37
410.2
240
675215.032
1883323.554
POOLM
2598.29
409.17
241
675194.267
1883307.506
TPOOL /HRIF
2604.01
409.9
242
675193.188
1883306.739
2624.79
409.4
243
675191.465
1883305.626
TRIF /HPOOL
2626.56
410.09
244
675172.794
1883296.23
POOLM
2628.13
408.91

245
675171.726
1883296.225
2649.85
409.72
246
675169.715
1883295.632
TPOOL / HPOOL
2650.56
409.36
247
675154.179
1883290.537
POOLM
2652.78
407.77
248
675133.17
1883293.141
TPOOL /HRIF
2669.5
409
249
675131.091
1883293.947
2690.73
408.19
250
675129.391
1883294.235
TRIF / HPOOL
2692.95
408.6
251
675108.586
1883304.385
POOLM
2694.66
408.08

Figure 7.1 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 1 -- MY4 -2013 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section One - Northern UT
2013
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt/Clay
.062
75
71
71
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
71
Fine Sand
.25
0
71
Medium Sand
0.5
0
71
Coarse Sand
1.0
0
71
Very Course Sand
2
7
7
78
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
5
5
83
Fine Gravel
5.7
2
2
85
Fine Gravel
8
2
2
87
Medium Gravel
13
0
87
Medium Gravel
16
2
2
89
Coarse Gravel
22.6
3
3
91
Coarse Gravel
32
2
2
93
Very Course Gravel
45
0
93
Very Course Gravel
64
0
93
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
2
2
95
Small Cobble
128
2
2
97
Medium Cobble
180
3
3
100
Large Cobble
256
0
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
100
Total
Cross - Section 1
105
r
_
m
m
a
m
E
U
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
80
+, 70
60
m
a 50
_@ 40
U
30
3
a 20
10
I
Cumulative Percent
•O O � ci V S O
O� rS , cr > . .cv O c� �- .- t- v
•S •O • p 0 0 SO OQ
00
Q o 00
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/22/10) MY2 (8/15/11) MY3 (9/15/12) MY4 (10/25/13)
Individual Class Percent
•O •> •� O Q
0, 1 c> > > O •S •O •O
O� O 00
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/22/10) ■ MY 2 (8/15/11) MY 3 (9/15/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13)

Figure 7.2 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 2 -- MY4 -2013 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Two - Northern UT
2013
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
58
49
49
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
49
Fine Sand
.25
0
49
Medium Sand
0.5
0
49
Coarse Sand
1.0
0
49
Very Course Sand
2
6
5
54
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
13
11
65
Fine Gravel
5.7
16
13
78
Fine Gravel
8
2
2
80
Medium Gravel
13
7
6
86
Medium Gravel
16
2
2
87
Coarse Gravel
22.6
3
3
90
Coarse Gravel
32
3
3
92
Very Course Gravel
45
2
2
94
Very Course Gravel
64
1
1
95
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
1
1
96
Small Cobble
128
3
3
98
Medium Cobble
180
2
2
100
Large Cobble
256
0
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
100
Total 119
Cross - Section 2
:; 111111111111111111111111 !�!!:i��������������ll
: 11111111111111�����'��'�� ==11111111111111111111
._--- ____ -- �.�..1111111111111111111111111
• 1111■ �������► ������IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
' 1 , i�v��. �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1��������111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
Individual Class Percent
70
60
c
m
50
m
a
y 40
M
U 30
Z
20
= 10
0
% •cS •c O � b • cP s> 6 Q O c9 O > O 00 S � Q - O Q 0S > O O
00
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ M1 (11/22/10) ■ MY2 (8/15/11) MY3 (9/15/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13)

Figure 7.3 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 3 -- MY4 -2013 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Three - Northern UT
2013
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #1
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
38
29
29
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
29
Fine Sand
.25
0
29
Medium Sand
0.5
10
8
37
Coarse Sand
1.0
27
21
58
Very Course Sand
2
21
16
74
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
21
16
91
Fine Gravel
5.7
4
3
94
Fine Gravel
8
0
94
Medium Gravel
13
0
94
Medium Gravel
16
1
1
95
Coarse Gravel
22.6
3
2
97
Coarse Gravel
32
1
1
98
Very Course Gravel
45
0
98
Very Course Gravel
64
1
1
98
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
2
2
100
Small Cobble
128
0
100
Medium Cobble
180
0
100
Large Cobble
256
0
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
100
Small Boulders
512
I
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
,0
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
100
Total
Cross - Section 3
129
Individual Class Percent
.•
•
I
,0
I
•
•
'
I
,
L
0
Ll Li L, ii
•
-
.•
-
Particle Size Class (mm)

Figure 7.4 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 4 -- MY4 -2013 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Four - Northern UT
2013
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
20
14
14
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
14
Fine Sand
.25
0
14
Medium Sand
0.5
5
3
17
Coarse Sand
1.0
10
7
1 24
Very Course Sand
2
13
9
33
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
20
14
47
Fine Gravel
5.7
20
14
61
Fine Gravel
8
12
8
69
Medium Gravel
13
7
5
74
Medium Gravel
16
4
3
77
Coarse Gravel
22.6
2
1
78
Coarse Gravel
32
2
1
80
Very Course Gravel
45
0
80
Very Course Gravel
64
0
80
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
6
4
84
Small Cobble
128
12
8
92
Medium Cobble
180
3
2
94
Large Cobble
256
2
1
96
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
6
4
100
Small Boulders
512
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
100
Bedrock
JBedrock
40096
1
0
100
Total 144
Cross - Section 4
c
a�
L
m
a
d
:r
co
3
E
3
U
Cumulative Percent
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
3 tp cP 0 -o j i) 111p 17 _c , 61, 1:01
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/22/10) MY2 (8/15/11) MY3 (9/16/12) _MY4 (10/25/13)
Individual Class Percent
40
35
c
m
m
30
a
25
N
t6
U 20
�a
15
2
10
0
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/22/10) ■ MY2 (8/15/11) MY3 (9/16/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13)

Figure 7.5 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 5 -- MY4 -2013 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Five - Northern UT
2013
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
17
12
12
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
12
Fine Sand
.25
0
12
Medium Sand
0.5
0
12
Coarse Sand
1.0
0
12
Very Course Sand
2
17
12
24
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
38
27
51
Fine Gravel
5.7
8
6
57
Fine Gravel
8
11
8
65
Medium Gravel
13
9
6
71
Medium Gravel
16
13
9
80
Coarse Gravel
22.6
10
7
87
Coarse Gravel
32
0
87
Very Course Gravel
45
2
1
89
Very Course Gravel
64
0
89
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
0
89
Small Cobble
128
6
4
93
Medium Cobble
180
4
3
96
Large Cobble
256
0
96
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
6
4
100
Small Boulders
512
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
100
Total
Cross - Section 5
141 141
., 1111111111111111111111111111111 !'_:��:.■ ■■ ■111111
1111111111111111111111 .i■�!!:i��!:il: /111111111111
•, 1111111111111111111 %�i�11�i1111��11111111111111
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�i /!:::ii111_�:i11111111111111111
•, IIIIIIIIIIIII�i�! i1111111��111111111111111111111
,, 111111111111;.I.�. 1111111 .111111111111111111111111
I:iiiiiiii� /,11/ 1111 :11111111111111111111111111
, 11111111111!:.■■■ �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1•••••••• i1�/ 11111111111111111111111111111111111
iiiiiiii■ 111111111111111111111111111111111111111
Individual Class Percent
40
= 35
m
m
30
a.
25
N
R
U 20
R
15
a 10
c
5
0 WX A.aaw Ll U .01
00� �S S •� •O •O •� O c� cS O �O 00 SO O� �� Or' O 00
6,
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/22/10) ■ MY2 (9/21/11) MY3 (9/16/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13)

Figure 7.6 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 6 -- MY4 -2013 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Six - Northern UT
2013
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum
Silt /Clay
Silt/Clay
.062
73
52
52
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
6
4
56
Fine Sand
.25
4
3
59
Medium Sand
0.5
4
3
62
Coarse Sand
1.0
5
4
66
Very Course Sand
2
4
3
69
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
8
6
74
Fine Gravel
5.7
8
6
80
Fine Gravel
8
9
6
86
Medium Gravel
13
6
4
91
Medium Gravel
16
3
2
93
Coarse Gravel
22.6
1
1
94
Coarse Gravel
32
1
1
94
Very Course Gravel
45
2
1
96
Very Course Gravel
64
1
1
96
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
3
2
99
Small Cobble
128
0
99
Medium Cobble
180
1
1
99
Large Cobble
256
1
1
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
100
Bedrock
JBedrock
40096
0
100
Total
Cross - Section 6
140
100
90
80
v 70
L
a 60
m
>_ 50
r
40
E 30
U 20
10
0
70
60
m
`y 50
a
vyi 40
R
U
30
20
10
0
Cumulative Percent
0 •� O c� Q cS N
;PSI 00
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/22/10) MY2 (9/21/11) MY3 (9/16/12) _MY4 (10/25/13)
Individual Class Percent
00� cS �S 'c3` 'O a p —� O �c� �6 �� �i� �5 Q 90 r'�y 'CO �0", �Oc� St>� >0� 0 X00
�z cP 90
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/22/10) ■ MY2 (9/21/11) MY3 (9/16/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13)

Figure 7.7 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 7 -- MY4 -2013 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Seven - Southern UT
2013
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
60
49
49
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
3
2
52
Fine Sand
.25
0
52
Medium Sand
0.5
6
5
57
Coarse Sand
1.0
3
2
59
Very Course Sand
2
0
59
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
0
59
Fine Gravel
5.7
0
59
Fine Gravel
8
3
2
61
Medium Gravel
13
4
3
65
Medium Gravel
16
2
2
66
Coarse Gravel
22.6
10
8
75
Coarse Gravel
32
13
11
85
Very Course Gravel
45
5
4
89
Very Course Gravel
64
7
6
95
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
3
2
98
Small Cobble
128
1
1
98
Medium Cobble
180
0
98
Large Cobble
256
2
2
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
100
Total
Cross - Section 7
122
�, 1111111111111111111 !�i��!:i::�� ■ ■■��IIIIIIIIIII
111111111111111. �iIIII����i111111111111111111111
• IIIIIIIIIII1111�� ►,r����111111111111111111111111
_.. ■�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
, 11�■■/ ii�����:: �11111111111111111111111111111111
1 ��%'►.: ii% IIii�111111111111111111111111111111111111
1-- �IIII/ 111111111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111/ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111�11111111111111111111111111111111111111111
IIII�1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
Individual Class Percent
40
35
d
30
m
y 25
y
U
20
15
> 10
=a
c
5
0
p •� O c� 3?. 0S cP
6� ' cs cS 'cS •O 'O •� > s � O�
sT cP X90
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/23/10) ■ MY2 (9/21/11) MY3 (9/16/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13)

Figure 7.8 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 8 -- MY4 -2013 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Eight- Southern UT
2013
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt/Clay
.062
8
6
6
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
10
8
14
Fine Sand
.25
%�� /�����
_..�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
0
14
Medium Sand
0.5
8
6
20
Coarse Sand
1.0
10
8
28
Very Course Sand
2
0
28
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
16
13
41
Fine Gravel
5.7
13
10
51
Fine Gravel
8
4
3
54
Medium Gravel
13
4
3
57
Medium Gravel
16
4
3
60
Coarse Gravel
22.6
6
5
65
Coarse Gravel
32
7
5
70
Very Course Gravel
45
4
3
73
Very Course Gravel
64
4
3
77
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
4
3
80
Small Cobble
128
5
4
84
Medium Cobble
180
3
2
86
Large Cobble
256
9
7
93
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
8
6
99
Small Boulders
512
1
1
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
100
Total
Cross - Section 8
128
., 1111111111111111111111111111111�:
/■►;��11111111
111111111111111111111111111
. 1111111111111111111111����
!:�!�:::�IIIIIIIIIIII
!:.��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
., 1111111111111111111
%�� /�����
_..�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
11111111111111����1
.�� %i��11111111111111111111111
, 111111_ �_ 1�_-/
����� .���111111111111111111111111111
1■■% �■■ �����_
�I��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
p: 0�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
11�__i �11111111111111111111111111111111111111111
i�1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
I
I
•
I
I
•
I
■IMIluffinPIIIII1
rfrI 1 TI'!'

Figure 7.9 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 9 -- MY4 -2013 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Nine - Southern UT
2013
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
46
40
40
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
40
Fine Sand
.25
0
40
Medium Sand
0.5
0
40
Coarse Sand
1.0
0
40
Very Course Sand
2
0
40
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
18
16
56
Fine Gravel
5.7
13
11
68
Fine Gravel
8
6
5
73
Medium Gravel
13
8
7
80
Medium Gravel
16
5
4
84
Coarse Gravel
22.6
6
5
89
Coarse Gravel
32
5
4
94
Very Course Gravel
45
4
4
97
Very Course Gravel
64
0
97
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
3
3
100
Small Cobble
128
0
100
Medium Cobble
180
0
100
Large Cobble
256
0
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
100
Total 114
Cross - Section 9
100
90
80
v 70
a 60
m
>_ 50
40
E 30
U 20
10
0
90
80
c
70
L
a 60
y
50
U 40
�a
30
20
c
10
0
Cumulative Percent
•O •> •X,:) 0 " cp Q S O > > z 6 9 > - N- u� 0' - c� Q
0� cS S •S •O .O , c� 6 cJ S z O c0 CPO 00 0� c� 0 Q 00
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/23/10) MY2 (8/24/11) MY3 (9/15/12) _MY4 (10/25/13)
Individual Class Percent
0� cS S •S •O •O •� u, 61 ri0 O 00 SO 0� c� O� O 00
v cP c90
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/23/10) ■ MY2 (8/24/11) MY3 (9/15/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13)

e- Table. Raw Pebble Count Survey Data Sheets
Cross Section: 1 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/15/2012 10/25/2013
100 100 100 105

Cross Section: 2 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/15/2012 10/25/2013
100 100 100 119

Cross Section: 3 Feature: Pool
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/16/2012 10/25/2013
100 105 100 129

Cross Section: 4
Year: Baseline MY1
Date: 4/20/2010 11/23/2010
Feature: Riffle
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
9/16/2012 10/25/2013
100 100 100 100 144

Cross Section: 5 Feature: Pool
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/16/2012 10/25/2013
100 100 100 141

Cross Section: 6 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/16/2012 10/25/2013
100 106 101 140

Cross Section: 7 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/16/2012 10/25/2013
111 111 100 122

Cross Section: 8 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/15/2012 10/25/2013
100 101 90 128

Cross Section: 9 Feature: Pool
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/15/2012 10/25/2013
100 100 111 114

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be tilled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project each (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope. 4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
* Mean, not median, provided for design numbers.
Table 9.1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Northern UT (2,975 feet)
Parameter
GaugeZ
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Min
Med*
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
NA
--
15.2
-
-
--
--
-
20.2
--
--
--
-
--
19.0
-
18.3
19.0
18.7
20.3
0.9
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
40.0
-
-
-
-
-
140.0
-
-
-
-
-
100.0
-
100.0
130.0
100.0
220.0
60.0
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
NA
--
1.4
-
-
-
-
-
1.4
--
-
-
-
-
1.4
-
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.5
0.1
4
lBankfull Max Depth (ft)
NA
--
1.7
--
-
--
--
--
1.9
--
--
--
--
--
1.9
--
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.4
0.2
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
NA
--
20.8
-
-
--
--
-
28.2
--
--
-
-
--
25.8
-
23.0
25.7
25.2
29.5
2.9
4
Width /Depth Ratio
NA
--
11.0
-
-
-
-
-
14.5
-
-
-
-
-
14.0
-
13.0
14.1
13.9
15.6
1.1
4
Entrenchment Ratio
NA
--
2.6
-
-
-
-
-
6.9
--
-
-
-
-
5.3
-
4.9
6.9
5.4
11.6
3.2
4
'Bank Height Ratio
NA
I
I
--
1.4
1
--
--
--
--
1.0
--
--
--
--
--
1.0
--
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
-
--
--
-
13.9
33.8
35.7
67.0
12.0
21
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.002
0.008
0.006
0.024
0.006
21
Pool Length (ft)
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
28.7
58.2
58.7
112.8
18.9
23
Pool Max depth (ft)
-
2.0
-
-
-
-
-
2.7
-
-
-
-
-
2.7
-
1.8
2.6
2.6
3.7
0.5
23
Pool Spacing (ft)l
I
I
1
1 25.5
1 --
-
127.0
1
25.0
--
--
104.0
1
1
1 22.8
114.0
1 42.6
131.1
1 103.2
309.1
75.8
22
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
41.0
-
-
116.0
-
-
20.0
--
-
77.0
-
-
38.0
-
114.0
28.9
62.5
61.4
112.3
19.4
20
Radius of Curvature (ft)
21.0
--
--
75.0
-
--
10.2
--
--
13.3
--
--
38.0
--
76.0
31.6
57.5
53.6
98.2
17.5
22
Rc:Bankfull width (ft /ft)
1.4
--
--
4.9
--
--
0.5
--
--
0.7
--
--
2.0
--
4.0
1.6
2.9
2.7
5.0
0.9
22
Meander Wavelength (ft)
125.0
--
--
250.0
--
--
94.0
--
--
100.0
--
-
95.0
--
228.0
166.0
227.1
225.8
310.3
34.6
21
Meander Width Ratiol
I
I
1
1 2.7
1
7.7
1 --
--
1.0
-
--
3.8
1
1 2.0
1 --
1 6.0
1 1.5
3.2
1 3.1
5.7
1 1.0
20
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
0.53
0.22
0.28
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
145
50
80
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /m2
3.8
1.15
1.23
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
NA
Degraded E4 /F4
C4
C4
C4
Mean Bankfull Velocity (fps)
NA
4.8
6.2
3.5
3.0
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
NA
100
173.7
100
77.0
Valley length (ft)
2697
--
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2832
--
3132
2975
Sinuosity (ft)
1.05
1.12
1.13
1.10
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
NA
0.0062
0.0077
0.0028
--
BF slope (ft /ft)
NA
--
-
--
0.003
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
--
--
--
8.19
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
--
--
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
--
--
Biological or Other
--
--
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be tilled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project each (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope. 4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
* Mean, not median, provided for design numbers.

Table 9.2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
UT to Bear Creek (NCEEP# 92347) - Southern UT (1,700 feet)
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med*
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
--
5.0
--
--
--
--
--
20.2
--
--
--
--
--
8.5
--
7.9
10.7
10.7
13.5
NA
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
--
14.3
--
--
-
--
--
140.0
--
--
--
--
--
50.0
--
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
NA
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
1.1
--
-
--
--
--
1.4
-
--
--
--
--
0.7
--
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
NA
2
' Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
-
1.3
--
-
-
--
--
1.9
--
--
--
--
-
1.1
--
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
NA
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
--
5.2
--
--
--
--
--
28.2
-
--
--
--
--
6.0
--
5.3
6.5
6.5
7.8
NA
2
Width /Depth Ratio
-
4.7
--
-
-
--
--
14.5
-
--
--
-
-
12.0
--
12.0
17.7
17.7
23.3
NA
2
Entrenchment Ratiol
2.9
--
--
--
--
--
6.9
-
--
--
--
--
5.9
--
3.7
8.1
8.1
12.6
NA
2
B
'ank Height Ratio
-
1.4
--
-
-
--
--
1.0
--
--
--
-
-
1.0
--
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
NA
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
-
9.0
20.9
17.6
40.2
8.9
13
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
-
--
--
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
0.004
0.021
0.019
0.046
0.011
13
Pool Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7.7
30.9
29.5
53.0
12.8
30
Pool Max depth (ft)
--
1.7
-
-
--
--
-
2.7
-
-
-
-
--
1.4
-
0.5
1.7
1.7
3.0
0.5
30
Pool Spacing (ft)
1
6.8
--
1
21.5
-
-
25.0
1 --
-
104.0
-
-
10.2
1
51.0
15.9
49.1
41.8
169.3
34.3
29
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
25.0
-
-
36.0
-
-
20.0
-
-
77.0
-
--
34.0
--
51.0
16.1
31.1
28.4
96.7
16.0
26
Radius of Curvature (ft)
5.0
--
--
30.0
--
--
10.2
--
--
13.3
--
--
17.0
--
34.0
15.4
24.7
23.8
35.6
5.5
28
Rc:Bankfull width (ft /ft)
1.0
--
--
6.1
--
--
0.5
--
-
0.7
--
--
2.0
--
4.0
1.4
2.3
2.2
3.3
0.5
28
Meander Wavelength (ft)
40.0
--
--
53.0
--
--
94.0
--
--
100.0
--
--
42.5
--
102.0
58.2
99.5
98.9
176.5
22.2
27
Meander Width Ratiol
I
I
1
1 5.0
1
7.3
-
--
1.0
-
-
3.8
--
1 4.0
--
6.0
1.5
2.9
2.6
9.0
1.5
26
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
0.76
0.161
0.39
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
185
36
100
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /m2
4.75
0.94
2.07
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Degraded E4 /F4
C4
C4
C4
Mean Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4.2
6.2
3.9
3.6
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
22
173.7
23.4
23.4
Valley length (ft)
1542
-
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1635
-
1.745
1,700
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.12
1.14
1.10
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.0145
0.0077
0.0041
-
BF slope (ft /ft)
-
-
-
0.01
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
-
--
3.33
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
90
--
Channel Stability or Habitat Metrici
I
--
--
Biological or Otherl
I
--
--
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope. 4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
* Mean, not median, provided for design numbers.

Table 10.1 Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Northern UT 2,975 feet
Cross Section 1 (N: Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (N: Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (N: Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation datum used
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.5
18.4
18.5
20.1
21.2
18.3
18.6
17.9
20.7
20.8
20.0
21.0
19.0
20.1
20.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.2
2.2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.11
2.0
2.1
1.8
2.0
3.9
3.8
3.9
4.0
3.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
26.3
25.8
25.5
23.3
23.4
24.0
23.9
23.3
21.7
22.5
44.2
44.8
42.0
45.9
43.9
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
13.0
13.2
13.4
17.4
17.3
13.9
14.4
13.8
19.8
17.3
9.1
9.9
8.6
8.8
9.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.0
5.0
5.5
5.4
5.6
4.8
4.8
5.0
4.8
5.3
5.0
5.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.01
1.0
1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.01
1.01
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins ft2
75.3
76.9
75.7
71.1
72.8
96.9
96.5
91.4
76.9
78.3
119.5
115.9
105.0
84.2
86.2
d50 (mm)
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.9
3.51
0.051
0.13
1.1
Cross Section 4 (N: Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (N: Pool)
Cross Section 6 (N: Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Bankfull Width (ft)
20.3
19.1
20.9
19.6
20.8
22.9
22.2
24.7
25.3
25.4
18.9
19.1
22.8
20.6
21.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.4
2.31
2.3
2.21
2.41
1 3.8
3.81
3.71
3.7
3.61
1 1.91
1.9
2.1
1.9
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
29.5
28.0
29.6
26.9
27.9
33.3
34.9
35.6
34.0
34.6
23.0
21.4
26.2
22.9
24.0
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
14.0
13.1
14.8
14.3
13.9
15.7
14.1
17.1
18.8
18.9
15.6
17.0
19.9
18.6
17.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.9
5.2
4.8
5.1
4.9
9.6
9.9
8.9
8.7
8.7
11.6
11.6
9.6
10.7
10.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)l
115.9
105.0
84.2
50.4
55.8
6615
59.5
66.6
61.9
63.0
55.9
56.5
51.8
33.2
38.7
d50 (mm)
0.37
0.37
0.05
4.2
7.42
1 6.271
3.95
1
1 0.221
0.061
0.05
0.08
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional /depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum
established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that
states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a
future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary

Table 10.2 Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Southern UT 1,700 feet
Cross Section 7 (S: Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (S: Riffle)
Cross Section 9 (S: Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.7
12.2
11.1
10.4
17.4
13.5
17.0
16.3
8.5
16.0
18.5
21.0
23.6
22.7
22.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
115.9
105.0
84.2
100.0
100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.61
0.61
0.7
1
1 0.6
0.5
0.51
0.8
0.91
1.11
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.4
1..6
2.7
2.91
2.9
3.01
3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
6.1
6.0
6.2
6.2
6.9
7.8
8.2
8.9
7.0
9.4
20.7
22.9
23.2
23.8
23.0
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
31.1
24.9
19.9
17.7
24.8
23.3
35.5
30.2
10.3
17.8
16.6
19.3
24.0
21.8
20.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
7.3
8.2
9.0
9.6
9.6
3.7
2.9
3.1
5.9
3.1
6.1
5.0
3.6
4.2
4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)
23.7
24.2
23.1
13.5
21.5
42.6
44.2
46.4
26.2
43.8
95.8
93.9
97.2
59.3
59.3
d50 (mm)
2.8
1.2
3.1
0.1
4.9
16.7
12.2
5.2
0.05
0.04
0.04
3.2
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional /depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline
datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be
included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be
recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt /Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10.3 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Morphology Data Summary
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Northern UT 2,975 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD4
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD4
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.3
19.0
18.7
20.3
0.9
4
18.4
18.8
18.8
19.1
0.3
4
17.9
20.0
19.7
22.8
2.3
4
19.6
20.3
20.4
20.7
0.5
4
19.6
20.3
20.4
20.7
0.5
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
130
100
220
60
4
100
130
100
220
60
4
100
130
100
220
60
4
100
130
100
220
60
4
100
130
100
220
60
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.5
0.1
4
1.1
1.3
1.3
1.5
0.1
4
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
0.1
4
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.4
0.1
4
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
0.1
4
' Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.4
0.2
4
1.9
1 2.1
2.1
2.3
0.2
4
2.1
1 2.2
2.1
2.3
0.1
4
1.8
2.0
1 2.0
2.2
0.2
4
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.2
0.2
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
23.0
25.7
25.2
29.5
2.9
4
21.4
24.8
24.9
28.0
2.8
4
23.3
26.1
25.9
29.6
2.6
4
21.7
23.7
23.1
26.9
1 2.2
4
1 21.7
1 23.7
23.1
1 26.9
2.2
1 4
Width /Depth Ratio
13.0
14.1
13.9
15.6
1.1
4
13.1
14.4
13.8
17.0
1.8
4
13.4
15.5
14.3
19.9
3.0
4
14.3
17.5
18.0
19.8
2.4
4
14.3
17.5
18.0
19.8
2.4
4
Entrenchment Ratio
4.9
6.9
5.4
11.6
3.2
4
5.2
6.9
5.4
11.6
3.1
4
4.8
6.4
5.5
9.6
2.2
4
4.8
6.4
5.0
10.7
2.9
4
4.8
6.4
5.1
10.7
2.9
4
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
13.9
33.8
35.7
67.0
12.0
21
10
30.3
30.0
54.5
12.1
21
9
31.14
28.5
81.5
14.0
25
20
39.6
34.5
73
1 18.0
22
1 14.01
45.5
42.8
117.2
20.51
31
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.002
0.008
0.006
0.024
0.006
21
0.006
0.013
0.009
0.040
0.006
21
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.01
25
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
22
0.004
0.01
0.01
0.025
0.006
31
Pool Length (ft)
28.7
58.2
58.7
112.8
18.9
23
22
35.1
32.5
80
15.5
31
22
36.37
34.5
80
16.3
31
26
45.1
38
83
22.5
31
22.9
45.3
41.8
94.6
15.0
32
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.8
2.6
2.6
3.7
0.5
23
2.3
3.3
3.3
4.1
0.5
31
1.9
3.1
3.1
3.9
0.5
31
2.15
3.2
3.29
4.05
0.51
29
0.41
1.19
1.29
1.92
0.4
32
Pool Spacing (ft)l
42.6
1 131
1 103
1 309
1 75.8
22
52
1 92.3
85.5
172
1 41.7
30
52
1 91.4
82.8
174
40.7
31
4
1 99.0
87.5
179
47.3
1 28
47.5
91.1
83.8
162.7
30.6
31
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
28.86
62.54
61.35
112.3
19.41
20
Radius of Curvature (ft)
31.6
57.53
53.58
98.16
17.48
22
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Rc:Bankfull width (ft /ft)
1.6
2.9
2.7
4.96
0.88
22
Meander Wavelength (ft)
166
227.1
225.8
310.3
34.59
21
Meander Width Ratiol
1.46
1 316
1 3.1
1 5.67
1 0.98
1 20
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C5
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2975
3041
3036
3064
2960
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.13
1.13
1.14
1.14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.003
BF slope (ft /ft)
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
29
14
56
1
0
21
16
37
9
0
31
16
44
9
0
29.7
11
1 47.7
1 11.5
0
30
11
48
12
0
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
56
9
28
6
1
62.22
9.667
17.3
10.65
0.167
0
62
10
17
11
0
0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
0.022
0.042
1.1383
36.62
96.18
0.025
2.537
5.188
42.24
96.04
0
3
5
42
96
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
3
2
2
1
1
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt /Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 10.4 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Morphology Data Summary
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Southern UT 1,700 feet
Parameter
Baseline MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.5
13.6
13.6
13.7
-
2
12.2
14.6
14.6
17.0
2
11.1
13.7
13.7
16.3
2
4.0
7.2
7.2
10.4
2
8.5
9.5
9.5
10.4
1.3
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
-
2
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
2
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
2
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
2
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
35.4
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
-
2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
2
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
2
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.1
2
' Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.3
1.3
1 1.3
1.4
-
2
1 1.5
1 1.5
1.5
1 1.5
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
2
1.4
1.5
1.5
1 1.5
0.1
1 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
6.1
6.9
6.9
7.8
-
2
6.0
7.1
7.1
8.2
2
6.2
1 7.5
7.5
8.9
2
6.2
6.6
1 6.6
7.0
2
6.2
1 6.6
6.6
7.0
0.6
2
Width /Depth Ratio
23.3
27.2
27.2
31.1
-
2
24.9
30.2
30.2
35.5
2
19.9
25.0
25.0
30.2
2
10.3
14.0
14.0
17.7
2
10.3
14.0
14.0
17.7
5.2
2
Entrenchment Ratio
3.7
5.5
5.5
7.3
-
2
2.9
5.6
5.6
8.2
2
3.1
6.0
6.0
9.0
2
5.9
7.7
7.7
9.6
2
5.9
7.8
7.8
9.6
2.6
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
--
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
9.0
20.9
17.6
40.2
8.9
13
3.5
10.67
10
24
4.4
27
3.5
11.45
9.75
29
1 4.85
28
5
15.87
16
31
6.8771
23
12.71
48.71
30.9
222.3
51.4
19
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.004
0.021
0.019
0.046
0.011
13
0.010
0.033
0.037
0.078
0.014
27
0.002
0.03
0.02
0.13
0.018
28
0.004
0.077
0.022
1.006
0.091
23
0.00
0.08
0.02
1.01
0.09
19
Pool Length (ft)
7.7
30.9
29.5
53.0
12.8
30
7.0
14.7
14.5
25.0
6.9
48
4
14.73
13
34.5
7.3981
49
1 7
19.54
19
40
10.29
39
3.84
20.7
20.0
44.9
9.1
34
Pool Max depth (ft)
0.5
1.7
1.7
3.0
0.5
30
1.4
1.9
1.9
2.9
0.4
47
1.32
2.1
2.07
3.18
0.396
48
0.911
2.191
2.117
4.037
0.536
39
0.1
0.67
0.58
3.21
0.4
33
Pool Spacing (ft)
15.9
1 49.1
1 41.8
1169.31
34.3
1 29
1 9.5
133.71
32
1 112
18.12
1 47
6.5
33.04
29.25
113.5
17.83
48
4
42.95
33
183
27.78
38
2.5
50.6
41.9
1227.6
43.8
33
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 16.1 31.1 28.4 96.7 16.0 26
Radius of Curvature (ft) 15.4 24.7 23.8 35.6 5.5 28
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 1.4 2.3 2.2 3.3 0.5 28
Meander Wavelength (ft) 58.2 99.5 98.9 176.5 22.2 27
Meander Width Ratiol 1.5 1 2.9 1 2.6 1 9.0 1 1.5 1 26
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1700
1741
1737
1724
1694
Sinuosity (ft)
1.10
1.13
1.13
1.12
1.12
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
--
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
BF slope ( ft/ft)
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.009
0.01
RI% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
16
12
55
0
0
17
16
42
6
0
22
17
50
11
0
23
21
49
7
0
23
21
49
7
0
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
40
23
28
8
1
0
48
3
38
11
1
0
45
12
33
9
1
0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 1
0.16
0.3
6.0
30.961
78
1
0.03
1.8
5.1
46.9
79
0.03
1.81
6.3
146.911
79
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
1
0
0
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
--
-
-
Biological or Other
-
-
-
-
-
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3

APPENDIX E.
HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 8 Monthly Rainfall Data at SILR Station
Figure 9.1 -9.2 Daily Precipitation and Monitoring Well Graphs
Table 13.0 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
e- Tables Raw data: Precipitation and Monitoring Wells

Date of Data
Collection
30- Apr -13
30- Apr -13
17- Oct -13
17- Oct -13
17- Oct -13
17- Oct -13
Table 12. Bankfull Verification
UT Bear Creek
SILR Precip or Tick Cr Stream
Gage Date of Occurrence
Feb 22 -23, 2013: 1.0" precip
at SILR rain gage and 3.25'
stage at Tick Creek gage.
Apr 28 -29, 2013: 1.5" precip
at SILR rain gage and 3.33'
stage at Tick Creek gage.
May 20, 2013: 0.9" precip at
SILR rain gage and 3.37' stage
at Tick Creek gage.
Jun 7, 2013: 1.8" precip at
SILR rain gage and 3.72' stage
at Tick Creek gage.
Jun 28 -July 1, 2013: 2.2"
precip (4 days) at SILR gage &
4.23' stage at Tick Cr gage.
July 2 -3, 2013: 1.7" precip at
SILR gage & 4.05' stage at
Tick Cr gage.
- EEP# 92347 - 2013 (MY -4
Evaluation Method
SILR precip data from NC
CRONOS and Tick Cr stage
data from USGS
SILR precip and Tick Cr
stage data; crest gauge
evaluation; and wrack line
observation
SILR precip and Tick Cr
stage data; both water table
gages approx 3.0 in above
ground level
SILR precip and Tick Cr
stage data; both water table
gages 4 to 5 inches above
ground level
SILR precip and Tick Cr
stage data; both water table
gages 6+ inches above
ground level
SILR precip and Tick Cr
stage data; both water table
gages 6+ inches above
around level
Photo #
if available
NA
next page
below
Table 13
NA
IWA
M
NA

Figure 8. Monthly Total Precipitation (2013) and 30 -yr Climate Normal Percentiles.
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347, Chatham County INC -- 2013 (MY4)
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
c
O
3.0
ar
'u .O. 2.0
O1
i
a 1.0
0.0
2013 Monthly Precipitation Totals with 25 and 75 Percentile Climate Normals
(1981 to 2010 period), Siler City Airport, Chatham County NC.
z w a Q z U w U > w
Q L.L Q Q N 0 Z
i Monthly Precip 2013 Month, 2013
25th Percentile Normal
75th Percentile Normal
State Climate Office of North Carolina
NC CRONOS Database
2013
1981 -2010 Climate Normals, inch
Month
Monthly
Total, inch
25
percentile
median 50
percentile
75
percentile
JAN
2.97
2.03
3.80
5.28
FEB
3.10
2.28
3.34
4.74
MAR
2.77
2.78
3.92
6.06
APR
3.75
1.86
3.72
4.66
MAY
2.59
2.34
3.81
4.91
JUN
7.28
1.80
3.72
5.35
JUL
4.84
2.92
3.84
5.48
AUG
3.86
2.47
3.73
5.28
SEP
1.88
1.96
3.74
6.57
OCT
1.66
1.99
3.15
4.73
NOV
2.11
2.02
3.06
4.67
DEC
4.18
2.39
3.21
4.16
Year
40.99
26.84
43.04
61.89
SILR Siler City Airport -- 2013 Monthly Rainfall Totals
Siler City Sta. 317924 -- 30 -yr Climate Normal Percentiles
2013 Monthly Precipitation Totals with 25 and 75 Percentile Climate Normals
(1981 to 2010 period), Siler City Airport, Chatham County NC.
z w a Q z U w U > w
Q L.L Q Q N 0 Z
i Monthly Precip 2013 Month, 2013
25th Percentile Normal
75th Percentile Normal
State Climate Office of North Carolina
NC CRONOS Database

3.5
2.5
1.5
0.5
P
J
N
a+
L
0
Q
L
'a
T
a+
'u
L
v
m
c
0
.w
m
Q
'u
v
L
a
T
O

e- Table: Raw Data: Groundwater Gages in Wetland, SILR Rain Gage, and Tick Cr Stream Gage.
Wetland WT Gage Height: Blue = WT within 12" from surface
Daily Precip at SILR Sta #K5W8: Yellow = 1.5 in or more in 24 hr
Stream Stage at Tick Cr Gage # 02102800: Yellow = 3.2 ft or more
(High Precip /Stage may correlate with bankfull flow at project site)
RDS Water Table Gages in
Daily Precip
Stream Gage
Wetland, North
Trib (in)
(in) at SILR
Height (ft)
09BEA457
138BDBD7
Airport gage
at Tick Creek
Date
(lower, E)
(upper, W)
(10 mi NW)
(3.5 mi N)
1/1/2013
-3.8
-30.0
0.20
2.13
1/2/2013
-2.6
-28.6
0.17
2.27
1/3/2013
1.7
-27.4
0
2.27
1/4/2013
-0.3
-27.2
0
2.18
1/5/2013
-1.4
-27.2
0
2.14
1/6/2013
-3.1
-28.0
0
2.12
1/7/2013
-3.4
-28.1
0
2.10
1/8/2013
-5.0
-28.2
0
2.09
1/9/2013
-6.6
-30.7
0
2.03
1/10/2013
-7.4
-30.4
0
1.99
1/11/2013
-7.7
-30.5
0.22
2.01
1/12/2013
-2.6
-30.6
0
2.02
1/13/2013
-2.5
-30.6
0
2.02
1/14/2013
-4.0
-30.6
0
2.02
1/15/2013
-5.1
-30.5
0.03
2.01
1/16/2013
-6.9
-30.5
0.15
2.02
1/17/2013
-2.4
-0.7
0.36
2.43
1/18/2013
2.4
-4.7
0.99
3.03
1/19/2013
0.9
-5.6
0
2.48
1/20/2013
0.6
-6.7
0
2.35
1/21/2013
0.1
-8.1
0
2.27
1/22/2013
-0.4
-9.9
0
2.21
1/23/2013
-2.3
-10.6
0
2.17
1/24/2013
-2.9
-12.1
0
2.16
1/25/2013
-4.4
-10.7
0
2.14
1/26/2013
-4.0
-6.6
0.29
2.16
1/27/2013
0.5
-6.4
0
2.20
1/28/2013
1.1
-6.3
0
2.18
1/29/2013
0.4
-6.2
0
2.16
1/30/2013
0.7
0.3
0.39
2.15
1/31/2013
0.6
-2.0
0.19
2.51
2/1/2013
0.6
-5.1
0
2.34
2/2/2013
-0.8
-4.7
0
2.24

RIDS Water Table Gages in
Daily Precip
Stream Gage
Wetland, North
Trib (in)
(in) at SILR
Height (ft)
09BEA457
138BDBD7
Airport gage
at Tick Creek
Date
(lower, E)
(upper, W)
(10 mi NW)
(3.5 mi N)
2/3/2013
-0.9
-6.6
0
2.21
2/4/2013
-1.2
-6.8
0
2.18
2/5/2013
-2.2
-8.2
0
2.16
2/6/2013
-2.7
-9.4
0
2.13
2/7/2013
-4.0
1.3
0.35
2.13
2/8/2013
-3.5
0.0
0.27
2.68
2/9/2013
1.3
-1.3
0
2.44
2/10/2013
0.3
0.7
0.03
2.31
2/11/2013
0.1
0.5
0.07
2.28
2/12/2013
2.0
0.1
0
2.28
2/13/2013
1.1
-0.5
0.11
2.24
2/14/2013
1.2
-1.8
0
2.21
2/15/2013
0.0
-1.4
0
2.19
2/16/2013
-0.1
0.2
0.25
2.22
2/17/2013
1.6
-1.1
0.01
2.31
2/18/2013
0.8
-0.8
0
2.23
2/19/2013
0.5
0.5
0.18
2.22
2/20/2013
1.8
-0.3
0
2.28
2/21/2013
0.9
1.2
0
2.23
2/22/2013
1.1
2.1
0.40
2.34
2/23/2013
2.1
2.2
0.60
3.25
2/24/2013
2.5
1.4
0.01
2.82
2/25/2013
2.4
2.0
0
2.51
2/26/2013
2.3
2.1
0.81
3.10
2/27/2013
2.7
1.6
0.01
2.91
2/28/2013
2.7
1.6
0
2.56
3/1/2013
2.5
1.4
0
2.44
3/2/2013
2.8
1.0
0
2.37
3/3/2013
2.1
0.3
0
2.32
3/4/2013
1.9
0.9
0
2.28
3/5/2013
1.9
1.8
0.13
2.26
3/6/2013
3.5
1.2
0.04
2.32
3/7/2013
2.2
1.0
0
2.26
3/8/2013
1.9
1.1
0
2.22
3/9/2013
1.9
0.9
0
2.21
3/10/2013
2.0
0.6
0
2.19
3/11/2013
2.1
2.8
0
2.18
3/12/2013
3.3
2.0
0.55
2.58
3/13/2013
3.3
1.0
0
2.49
3/14/2013
3.1
1.1
0
2.35

RIDS Water Table Gages in
Daily Precip
Stream Gage
Wetland, North
Trib (in)
(in) at SILR
Height (ft)
09BEA457
138BDBD7
Airport gage
at Tick Creek
Date
(lower, E)
(upper, W)
(10 mi NW)
(3.5 mi N)
3/15/2013
2.9
1.2
0
2.28
3/16/2013
3.2
0.9
0
2.26
3/17/2013
3.3
0.1
0
2.23
3/18/2013
3.1
2.3
0.55
2.22
3/19/2013
3.8
1.4
0
2.69
3/20/2013
3.4
1.1
0
2.42
3/21/2013
3.2
0.1
0
2.34
3/22/2013
2.9
0.0
0
2.27
3/23/2013
3.2
1.4
0
2.24
3/24/2013
3.1
1.9
0.78
2.57
3/25/2013
3.6
1.5
0.02
2.76
3/26/2013
3.5
1.0
0
2.47
3/27/2013
3.4
1.1
0
2.37
3/28/2013
3.2
1.1
0
2.32
3/29/2013
3.1
0.9
0
2.28
3/30/2013
3.3
2.4
0
2.26
3/31/2013
3.3
2.2
0.70
2.36
4/1/2013
3.9
1.6
0.03
2.52
4/2/2013
3.3
1.0
0
2.39
4/3/2013
3.3
0.0
0
2.32
4/4/2013
3.1
2.5
0.70
2.43
4/5/2013
3.6
2.1
0.01
3.06
4/6/2013
3.5
1.6
0
2.57
4/7/2013
3.5
1.2
0
2.44
4/8/2013
3.5
0.9
0
2.38
4/9/2013
3.7
0.0
0
2.34
4/10/2013
4.7
-1.4
0
2.30
4/11/2013
5.0
3.2
0
2.28
4/12/2013
5.5
2.2
0.50
2.75
4/13/2013
5.0
1.0
0
2.51
4/14/2013
4.3
-1.0
0
2.37
4/15/2013
5.3
-2.5
0.01
2.31
4/16/2013
5.3
-4.2
0
2.28
4/17/2013
4.3
-5.7
0
2.26
4/18/2013
5.3
-6.6
0
2.25
4/19/2013
4.4
1.6
0.98
2.30
4/20/2013
5.9
-0.9
0
2.56
4/21/2013
3.7
-4.2
0
2.33
4/22/2013
3.4
-5.8
0
2.26
4/23/2013
3.7
-7.5
0
2.23

RIDS Water Table Gages in
Daily Precip
Stream Gage
Wetland, North
Trib (in)
(in) at SILR
Height (ft)
09BEA457
138BDBD7
Airport gage
at Tick Creek
Date
(lower, E)
(upper, W)
(10 mi NW)
(3.5 mi N)
4/24/2013
3.3
-9.7
0
2.22
4/25/2013
3.3
-11.4
0
2.20
4/26/2013
1.4
-11.9
0
2.17
4/27/2013
0.3
-11.3
0
2.15
4/28/2013
-1.2
3.3
1.25
2.19
4/29/2013
5.2
2.3
0.30
3.33
4/30/2013
4.4
1.8
0
2.62
5/1/2013
4.2
1.4
0
2.44
5/2/2013
4.5
1.2
0
2.36
5/3/2013
4.2
-1.2
0
2.31
5/4/2013
4.0
-3.3
0
2.26
5/5/2013
4.0
1.0
0.02
2.23
5/6/2013
4.9
3.1
0.66
2.50
5/7/2013
4.7
2.8
0.01
3.06
5/8/2013
4.6
2.1
0.06
2.54
5/9/2013
5.0
0.4
0.01
2.41
5/10/2013
4.5
-2.5
0
2.32
5/11/2013
5.1
-2.4
0
2.25
5/12/2013
5.2
-7.0
0
2.22
5/13/2013
3.2
-9.6
0
2.19
5/14/2013
2.4
-10.2
0
2.16
5/15/2013
1.7
-11.1
0
2.14
5/16/2013
0.0
-12.9
0
2.12
5/17/2013
-3.0
-14.4
0
2.10
5/18/2013
-7.9
-4.4
0.06
2.13
5/19/2013
3.5
3.7
0.29
2.19
5/20/2013
3.1
2.8
0.62
3.37
5/21/2013
4.0
1.2
0.03
2.86
5/22/2013
3.3
2.5
0
2.48
5/23/2013
4.2
2.4
0.82
2.80
5/24/2013
4.1
-1.8
0.03
2.72
5/25/2013
2.6
-5.9
0
2.42
5/26/2013
1.5
-9.0
0
2.30
5/27/2013
-1.3
-11.1
0
2.24
5/28/2013
-7.3
-13.7
0
2.22
5/29/2013
-11.8
-16.1
0
2.18
5/30/2013
-14.0
-18.3
0
2.15
5/31/2013
-15.8
-19.8
0
2.12
6/1/2013
-17.5
-21.5
0
2.09
6/2/2013
-19.0
-9.8
0.91
2.08

RIDS Water Table Gages in
Daily Precip
Stream Gage
Wetland, North
Trib (in)
(in) at SILR
Height (ft)
09BEA457
138BDBD7
Airport gage
at Tick Creek
Date
(lower, E)
(upper, W)
(10 mi NW)
(3.5 mi N)
6/3/2013
-20.6
-10.3
0.75
2.18
6/4/2013
-21.7
-13.5
0.01
2.21
6/5/2013
-22.5
-11.2
0
2.14
6/6/2013
-23.3
4.2
0.57
2.16
6/7/2013
-23.8
4.2
1.22
3.72
6/8/2013
5.5
4.1
0.12
3.45
6/9/2013
4.7
4.2
0.18
2.64
6/10/2013
4.6
4.4
0.60
2.74
6/11/2013
5.3
4.4
0
2.68
6/12/2013
5.0
4.4
0
2.42
6/13/2013
4.9
4.2
0.05
2.33
6/14/2013
5.1
4.5
0
2.27
6/15/2013
5.0
4.2
0
2.24
6/16/2013
5.1
4.5
0
2.22
6/17/2013
5.3
5.4
0.15
2.22
6/18/2013
5.6
5.3
0.69
2.34
6/19/2013
5.7
5.0
0.01
2.60
6/20/2013
5.6
4.2
0
2.29
6/21/2013
5.1
2.9
0
2.20
6/22/2013
5.0
4.6
0
2.15
6/23/2013
5.0
5.8
0
2.16
6/24/2013
5.5
5.8
0.04
2.15
6/25/2013
5.4
5.7
0
2.13
6/26/2013
5.1
5.7
0.19
2.14
6/27/2013
5.0
5.4
0.01
2.21
6/28/2013
5.4
6.2
1.15
2.20
6/29/2013
6.3
6.3
0.02
3.30
6/30/2013
6.5
6.2
0.61
3.06
7/1/2013
6.4
6.6
0.44
4.23
7/2/2013
6.8
6.4
0.39
3.07
7/3/2013
6.7
6.4
1.35
4.05
7/4/2013
6.6
6.4
0
3.32
7/5/2013
6.5
6.4
0
2.71
7/6/2013
6.9
6.5
0
2.52
7/7/2013
6.6
6.4
0.01
2.42
7/8/2013
7.1
6.4
0.04
2.35
7/9/2013
6.8
6.2
0
2.31
7/10/2013
6.6
6.0
0.30
2.27
7/11/2013
7.1
6.4
0.30
2.29
7/12/2013
7.1
6.2
0.07
2.48

RIDS Water Table Gages in
Daily Precip
Stream Gage
Wetland, North
Trib (in)
(in) at SILR
Height (ft)
09BEA457
138BDBD7
Airport gage
at Tick Creek
Date
(lower, E)
(upper, W)
(10 mi NW)
(3.5 mi N)
7/13/2013
7.2
6.4
0
2.34
7/14/2013
7.2
6.3
0
2.29
7/15/2013
7.0
4.8
0
2.24
7/16/2013
7.2
2.8
0
2.20
7/17/2013
7.7
2.3
0
2.18
7/18/2013
7.4
1.7
0
2.17
7/19/2013
7.5
0.7
0
2.14
7/20/2013
7.6
0.8
0
2.12
7/21/2013
8.0
5.6
0.05
2.11
7/22/2013
8.0
3.5
0.01
2.10
7/23/2013
7.8
1.2
0
2.08
7/24/2013
7.0
5.2
0.75
2.06
7/25/2013
6.9
5.2
0
2.17
7/26/2013
6.3
2.4
0
2.17
7/27/2013
6.3
6.4
0.93
2.12
7/28/2013
6.6
6.4
0.16
2.21
7/29/2013
6.8
5.2
0.01
2.28
7/30/2013
6.1
2.9
0
2.18
7/31/2013
6.5
6.3
0.44
2.12
8/1/2013
6.8
5.9
0.39
2.27
8/2/2013
6.4
3.1
0
2.22
8/3/2013
6.3
0.7
0
2.17
8/4/2013
6.6
-2.3
0
2.13
8/5/2013
6.0
0.5
0
2.05
8/6/2013
6.3
-1.4
0.28
1.97
8/7/2013
6.2
-2.6
0
1.96
8/8/2013
6.6
-4.1
0
1.92
8/9/2013
6.3
-2.4
0
1.89
8/10/2013
6.8
3.4
0.12
1.90
8/11/2013
7.0
-0.9
0
2.02
8/12/2013
6.9
1.0
0
2.00
8/13/2013
6.6
-3.4
0.31
2.13
8/14/2013
6.8
-5.8
0
2.07
8/15/2013
5.3
-6.6
0
1.95
8/16/2013
4.5
-5.9
0
1.90
8/17/2013
4.6
1.0
0.12
1.88
8/18/2013
6.1
-0.8
0.12
1.91
8/19/2013
5.6
1.4
0.19
1.92
8/20/2013
5.8
-1.2
0
1.99
8/21/2013
5.3
-2.0
2.33
2.01

RIDS Water Table Gages in
Daily Precip
Stream Gage
Wetland, North
Trib (in)
(in) at SILR
Height (ft)
09BEA457
138BDBD7
Airport gage
at Tick Creek
Date
(lower, E)
(upper, W)
(10 mi NW)
(3.5 mi N)
8/22/2013
5.1
-4.4
0
2.14
8/23/2013
4.2
-6.9
0
2.08
8/24/2013
3.1
-10.5
0
2.01
8/25/2013
0.3
-12.2
0
1.94
8/26/2013
-2.9
-12.4
0
1.93
8/27/2013
-7.4
-12.8
0
1.90
8/28/2013
-10.7
-11.9
0
1.87
8/29/2013
-12.8
-13.8
0
1.87
8/30/2013
-14.2
-15.7
0
1.88
8/31/2013
-15.9
-16.7
0
1.88
9/1/2013
-17.3
-17.3
0.24
1.89
9/2/2013
-18.8
-16.5
0
1.92
9/3/2013
-20.3
-18.1
0
1.92
9/4/2013
-21.3
-19.2
0
1.91
9/5/2013
-22.5
-20.6
0
1.91
9/6/2013
-23.8
-21.7
0
1.89
9/7/2013
-25.0
-22.0
0
1.89
9/8/2013
-25.8
-23.1
0
1.89
9/9/2013
-26.4
-24.3
0
1.87
9/10/2013
-27.1
-25.3
0
1.85
9/11/2013
-27.5
-26.0
0
1.83
9/12/2013
-27.9
-26.7
0.07
1.79
9/13/2013
-28.4
-28.1
0
1.70
9/14/2013
-28.9
-28.8
0
1.68
9/15/2013
-29.3
-27.8
0
1.68
9/16/2013
-30.1
-28.2
0.01
1.71
9/17/2013
-30.5
-29.2
0
1.71
9/18/2013
-31.0
-29.3
0
1.71
9/19/2013
-31.9
-28.1
0
1.71
9/20/2013
-32.4
-28.0
0.03
1.70
9/21/2013
-32.5
-2.2
0.89
1.72
9/22/2013
-32.5
-14.0
0.64
2.04
9/23/2013
-1.3
-19.1
0
1.80
9/24/2013
-7.8
-20.9
0
1.73
9/25/2013
-12.2
-21.9
0
1.70
9/26/2013
-14.7
-25.2
0
1.65
9/27/2013
-16.8
-27.0
0
1.62
9/28/2013
-18.9
-28.0
0
1.61
9/29/2013
-21.0
-29.4
0
1.60
9/30/2013
-22.6
-29.4
0
1.60

Wetland WT Gage Height: Blue = WT within 12" from surface
Daily Precip at SILR Sta #K5W8: Yellow = 1.5 in or more in 24 hr
Stream Stage at Tick Cr Gage # 02102800: Yellow = 3.2 ft or more
(High Precip /Stage may correlate with bankfull flow at project site)
RIDS Water Table Gages in
Daily Precip
Stream Gage
Wetland, North
Trib (in)
(in) at SILR
Height (ft)
09BEA457
138BDBD7
Airport gage
at Tick Creek
Date
(lower, E)
(upper, W)
(10 mi NW)
(3.5 mi N)
10/1/2013
-24.0
-29.0
0
1.60
10/2/2013
-25.1
-29.0
0
1.61
10/3/2013
-26.1
-29.0
0
1.63
10/4/2013
-27.0
-29.1
0
1.64
10/5/2013
-27.7
-29.2
0
1.64
10/6/2013
-28.2
-29.4
0
1.66
10/7/2013
-28.8
-7.0
1.3
1.93
10/8/2013
3.3
-11.7
0
2.18
10/9/2013
-0.2
-15.2
0
2.04
10/10/2013
-1.3
-15.4
0.26
1.91
10/11/2013
-2.8
-17.4
0
1.87
10/12/2013
-5.1
-18.1
0
1.82
10/13/2013
-8.3
-19.4
0.05
1.77
10/14/2013
-10.6
-20.7
0.04
1.76
10/15/2013
-11.9
-20.3
0
1.76
10/16/2013
-12.9
-21.6
0
1.76
10/17/2013
-14.0
0
1.78
10/18/2013
0
1.91
10/19/2013
0
1.96
10/20/2013
0.01
2.00
10/21/2013
0
2.01
10/22/2013
0
1.93
10/23/2013
0
1.74
10/24/2013
0
1.72
10/25/2013
0
1.71
10/26/2013
0
1.73
10/27/2013
0
1.78
10/28/2013
0
1.85
10/29/2013
0
1.90
10/30/2013
0
1.95
10/31/2013
0
1.98
11/1/2013
0.47
2.04
Wetland WT Gage Height: Blue = WT within 12" from surface
Daily Precip at SILR Sta #K5W8: Yellow = 1.5 in or more in 24 hr
Stream Stage at Tick Cr Gage # 02102800: Yellow = 3.2 ft or more
(High Precip /Stage may correlate with bankfull flow at project site)

Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) EEP# 92347 - 2013 (MY -4)
Gauge
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days during Growing Season
(Percent of 216 -day Growing Season in Chatham County)
Year 1 (2010)
Year 2 (2011)
Year 3 (2012)
Year 4 (2013)
Year 5 (2014)
09BEA457
No /21 days
(9.7 %)
Yes /37 days
(17.1 %)
Yes /28 days
(13.0 %)
Yes /82 days
(38.0 %)
138BDBD7
No /20 days
(9.2 %)
Yes /43 days
(19.9 %)
Yes /30 days
(13.8 %)
Yes /80 days
(37.0 %)
North Trib - Matted vegetation and wrack lines on floodplain, 30 Apr 2013
i
,y I
South Trib - Matted vegetation and wrack lines on floodplain, 30 Apr 2013
R
r1
�
,y I
South Trib - Matted vegetation and wrack lines on floodplain, 30 Apr 2013

UT to Bear Creek (Weaver McLeod) 2013 -02 Final Planting List
EEP #,:92347
Planting Date(s)_ November 13 & 14, 2013
IS ecies
Size
Q
%_
I Acer negundo
'3gal
95
_ 6%
1 Betula nigra
1 gal
249
17%
Ifrax►nus pennsylvanida
Igal
59
4%
Liriodendron tulipifera
1 gal
254
17%
N ssa s lvatica var s lvat►ca
1 gal _
1.48
10%
Platanus occidentahs
1 gal
248
17%
Populus deltoides
1 gal
`74
5%
Quercus michauxii
1 gal
52
3%
Quercus palustris _
1 gal
54_
4%
2 al
63
4%
Quercus phellos
1 gal
90
6%
Ulmus amencana
1 gal
57
4%
Diospyros virginiana
1gal
57
4%
1,500
100%