20081441 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20140808

McKee Creek Stream Restoration
Monitoring Report — Year 2 of 5
Final
Contract # 004391
EEP Project # 92573
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
4Kn
Collected October 2013
Completed 2013
Report December 19, 2013
Revise January 28, 2014
Submitted to:
NCDENR -EEP
1601 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601
os 5te 17
PROGRAM

Prepared By:
WITHERS &I RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
Withers & Ravenel
115 McKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Project Manager: Daniel Wiebke
Email: dwiebke @withersravenel.com

Executive Summary/ Pro aect Abstract
The site is located roughly 10 miles northeast of Charlotte, NC. Figure 1 includes a map and directions to
the site. The restoration was designed by Withers & Ravenel and construction completed by River Works
Inc. in June 2010. This report summarizes the monitoring efforts for Monitoring Year -2 (MY -2) 2013.
McKee Creek was divided into two reaches within the project site; McKee Creek — Reach 1 is upstream
of Peach Orchard Road and McKee Creek — Reach 2 is downstream of the road crossing. The pre - project
stream lengths of McKee Creek — Reach 1 and Reach 2 were 3,733 linear feet (If) and 8471f, respectively.
The pre - project reach length of Clear Creek; was 1,513 If. The total pre - project stream length within the
project limits was 6,093 If
The stream design resulted in 1,641 if of stream restoration on Clear Creek, and 1,096 if of Level I stream
enhancement and 3,240 if of Level 11 stream enhancement on McKee Creek. The total of stream design is
5,9771f.
The project goals and objectives stated in the McKee Creek Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2008) are as
follows:
Project Goals:
• Restore through stream enhancement (Level I and Level II) McKee Creek;
• Restore Clear Creek (Priority I restoration);
• Restore the physical and biological processes of McKee and Clear Creeks;
• Restore riparian vegetation to the maximum extent feasible.
Project Objectives:
• Improve water quality by reducing bank erosion, restricting livestock access to the creeks, and
re- establishing the riparian buffer;
• Stabilize McKee Creek through the use of in- stream structures and pattern re- alignment in
selected areas;
• Restore the dimension, pattern, and profile of Clear Creek;
• Improve the floodplain functionality of Clear Creek by matching floodplain elevation with bank
full stage;
• Improve the wildlife habitat functions of the site through riparian buffer establishment, improved
stream bed form diversity, and improved floodplain functionality to reduce stream incision;
• Protect the site through a permanent conservation easement along the project reaches.
Prior to project completion the streams suffered from excess sedimentation, channel incision, bank
degradation, and limited riparian vegetation. The Lower Yadkin River Basin Local Watershed Plan states
both McKee Creek (from source to Reedy Creek) and Clear Creek (from source to McKee Creek) 303(d)
listed streams; McKee Creek for fecal coliform and sediment and Clear Creek for fecal coliform.
NCDENR indicates the potential sources of impairment for McKee Creek and Clear Creek include
agriculture, land development, and urban runoff/ storm sewers. Additionally McKee Creek has non -
municipal discharges from two minor NPDES permitted discharges from private wastewater treatment
plants located upstream of the project site. It is stated in the LWP that DWQ studies of fecal coliform
bacterial sources for McKee and Clear Creeks indicated that livestock grazing was one of the contributing
factors.
McKee Creek Withers & Ravenel
EEP Project No. 92573 January, 2014
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Monitoring of the project began with a visual site assessment in the spring of 2012 to identify potential
problems. Cross - sections, crest gages, vegetation plots, and photo points were also established at that
time. Base line information is not available since no monitoring was performed from the completion of
construction in June 2010 till the spring 2012.
Project Complications
In addition to the delayed initiation of monitoring, several other factors have been detrimental to the goals
of this mitigation. Approximately a month prior to the initial visual site assessment, a tornado caused
damage in the area off the confluence of Clear Creek and McKee Creek. See Figure 2. The tornado
downed large diameter trees with many spanning McKee and Clear Creek. These downed trees have
been cleared across Clear Creek but remain an obstacle to access on the south bank. Many of the fallen
trees on McKee Creek remain from the edge of the project limits down to Clear Creek.
The downed trees on the south bank of Clear Creek have impeded the monitoring effort. These downed
trees have either attracted beavers or been exacerbated by a beaver population, in the past. This
assessment showed no current evidence of a beaver population, though observations will still be made to
identify them.
Since completion of the stream restoration project a sewer line was constructed along McKee Creek. The
sewer serves a development west of McKee Creek and north of Peach Orchard Road. The sewer parallels
the McKee Creek west bank from Peach Orchard Road to roughly stream station 40 +00 where it traverses
the stream and follows the east bank to a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) upstream of the project
area. This gravity sewer bucks grade to reach the WWTP from Peach Orchard Road. The construction of
the sewer stream crossing required armoring both sides of the stream bank with rip rap for roughly 30
feet. The sewer has an easement along the alignment for access and maintenance that will be cleared. The
easement clearing impact to the riparian buffer is limited to the stream crossing. Additionally it appears
that the majority of survey control set during the stream restoration construction was destroyed by the
sewer line construction. New survey control had to be established along McKee Creek south of Peach
Orchard Road in the fall of 2012.
It was noted in the Spring 2013 Assessment that Vegetation Plot 1 had been mowed over and most, if not
all planted live stems had been cut to the ground. Evident was the regeneration of 6 planted stems in the
plot which identifies a reduction in stems as compared to data collected in the Fall of 2012 (refer to the
Vegetation Results section below for a more detailed description of the effects of this complication).
Vegetation Results
Success of the riparian buffer plantings will be based on plant survival, as per the buffer restoration
guidelines, administered by the NC Division of Water Quality. Four (4) permanent monitoring plots were
established along the restored buffer in spring of 2012. In order to be considered a successful restoration,
the site must contain a minimum of 320 live stems per acre at year 3 and 260 live stems per acre at year 5.
Year 2 shows an average of 515 live planted stems per acre with a minimum count of 242. These
estimates are based on Level 2 of the CVS -EEP monitoring protocol and include only planted woody
stems. The stem count is based on the average stem counts within the vegetation plots. Reference pictures
of each monitoring plot were taken and attached to this report. The fact that all restored vegetation areas
(on average) are performing above the requirement is good however most of the restoration area adjacent
to Plot 1 and the sewer easement being mowed over will definitely limit this section in containing the
minimum number of planted stems per acre after year 3. It should be noted that the combination of 6
(regenerated after mowing) planted live stems and the additional natural woody stems in Vegetation Plot
1 should yield minimum stem counts after year 3, but it is recommended that the mowed area in the
vicinity of Vegetation Plot 1 (that does not have significant seedling regeneration or natural woody stems)
be replanted with appropriate bare root seedlings as described on the original Reach 1 Vegetation Planting
McKee Creek Withers & Ravenel
EEP Project No. 92573 January, 2014
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Plan (Sheet 14) sealed on April 17, 2009 by Withers & Ravenel, Inc. This plan called for bare root
vegetation to be planted at a target density of 680 stems per acre, spaced on an 8' by 8' grid.
Re- vegetation and elimination of invasives along McKee Creek Reach 2 was an important aspect of
project success. The invasive species Rosa multiflora plagued the project site before and during
construction. Construction logs indicate the Rosa multiflora was found to be three times greater than
specified on the original plan and though denied, the contractor requested on -site burning multiple times.
As a result, several rounds of spray treatment were applied followed by bush hogging the invasive
species.
During the Fall 2013 assessment Rosa multiflora was prominent on both sides of the stream adjacent to
Plot 1 and Eleagnus umbellata, Lonicera japonica, Rosa multiflora and Rhus typhina and were prominent
in and around the vicinity of Plot 2. These plants are considered non - native invasive species and should
be removed from the restoration areas to further limit the overtaking the native vegetation. While native
and not necessarily considered invasive by most accounts, there is an also an abundance of Rubus argutus
in and around Plot 2, making it difficult to access and document the plot. Invasives were last treated in
November 2013 and treatment shall be repeated in the Spring of 2014 (early growing season), to allow
more desirable species opportunity to become better established.
Stream Results
A visual qualitative assessment was performed to inspect channel facets, meanders, beds, banks, and
installed structures. This visual assessment was confirmed and enhanced with a quantitative assessment of
a physical stream survey for approximately 1600 feet. In general, Clear Creek appeared to be meeting
expectation. A quick and dense development of vegetation proved to hold the stream together, along with
the exclusion of bank damaging livestock. The vegetation is taking over the banks to a point that the
cross -vane at 12 +50 was not seen until the grass was pulled back and the boulders were found. An area of
concern occurs at the double log sill around cross - section 24 +00. The water surface on either side of the
sill is the same but the sill itself is about 9- inches from being overtopped. This means that there is some
sort of breach around the structure itself. Again a little further downstream at cross - section 24 +50 the log
vane is retaining a majority of the water but leaking seems to be occurring under the log, inferring an
undercut. At the downstream end of the project site the first of the two cross -vanes at station 26 +25 is
beginning to fail. Sediment and vegetation on the right bank is falling into the structure and widening of
the channel along the left bank is causing flows to top the structure on the left side. This widening to the
left bank will most likely continue until the cross -vane is no longer keyed into the bank.
A full restoration was not performed on McKee Creek Reach 1 a majority of this reach was only re-
vegetated. Stream survey of this reach was performed for roughly 105 feet. The re- alignment work that
was done where the sharp bend used to be, is holding well. The J -hook that occupies this same area is
filling in with fines, most likely due to development in the area. There do not seem to be any other outside
factors.
McKee Creek Reach 2 appears to be stable despite the tornado damage. Cattle exclusion has allowed the
banks to re- vegetate and stabilize. Effective floodplain connection remains from downstream of Peach
Orchard Road for approximately 600 feet where the stream enters the tornado impacted area,
approximately 465 feet of this was surveyed. The bank in the area of the most upstream cross -vane is
falling into the stream along with a fallen tree. Both of which are very near the structure and may begin to
fill it in as well. Fines that plagued this section in the previous year due to damming of the stream are not
as severe and seem to be decreasing allowing this reach to return to its original designed condition.
Hydrology Results
During the fall assessment, crest gages were checked for bankfull occurrences. On Reach 2 of McKee
Creek, flattened vegetation, validates the bankfull or greater events at crest gage 1. The reading of crest
McKee Creek Withers & Ravenel
EEP Project No. 92573 January, 2014
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

gage 2 indicates events near bankfull, the presence of vegetation and small trees on the bank and at the
very fringe of the floodplain leaned in the direction of flow are indicators of flow at or just above
bankfull. Whether flow rates greatly exceeded the channel capacity or not is unknown but it demonstrates
that this portion of the stream shows good floodplain connection and energy dissipation. Crest gage 3 had
been toppled over most likely by a combination of inundated soil making it soft and a large storm event.
Visual signs indicate that the water surface overtopped the gage completely.
The rainfall data provided in the appendix as Table 12 was for Cabarrus County per the NC Climate
website through NCSU, during the period between Oct 2012 and Oct 2013 which totaled 48.69 inches.
This is compared to the Harrisburg Town website, which quotes an average annual rainfall of 43.8 inches
"consistent with the average rainfall for Cabarrus County." This means that the site has experienced about
a 5 inch rainfall surplus over the average year.
Wetlands
No formal wetland assessment of this site was preformed. The site does have two small documented
wetlands of 1,050 sf and 3,840 sf, which were discovered after the fall data collection. Both of these
wetlands contain Chewacla type soils, according to the soils maps. In addition, there appears to be a small
wetland just north of Peach Orchard Road approximately 150 ft west of the stream. The soil of this
wetland appears to be moderately wet upon inspection and the surrounding ground and vegetation rather
dry.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
McKee Creek Withers & Ravenel
EEP Project No. 92573 January, 2014
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Methodology
All survey was preformed utilized either total station tradition survey methods or a survey grade
GPS unit to capture points with high horizontal and vertical accuracy. The longitudinal stationing
was formatted as close as possible to the original restoration plan stationing. The particle size
distribution was collected using the standard Wolman pebble count procedure as taught by Dr.
Gregory Jennings, North Carolina State University. The methodology used in this monitoring
assessment followed the prescribed recommendation of the CVS -EEP Vegetation Monitoring
Protocol Level -2.
References
Town of Harrisburg North Carolina, Visitors Page, Geography and Climate
fittp:/ w w�klw. harrisburgnc. orWVisitors /GeographyClimate.aspx
Lower Yadkin LWP— PFR, 2003 and WMP &R — Lower Yadkin LWP, 2004
hgp : / /www.nceep. net /service-,/Iwps /Clarke_Creek/F_R Rocky Yadkin.pdf
Wolman Pebble Count,
http : / /limnotogy.w-ise. edu/courses/Zoo548/ Wof man %20Pebbl�e�' /`2OCount .pdf
Rainfall Data for Cabarrus County,
http://www.nc-climate.nesu.edu/cronos
McKee Creek Withers & Ravenel
EEP Project No. 92573 January, 2014
Monitoring Year 2 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

The subject project site is an environmental
restoration site of the NCDENR Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (EEP) and is encompassed
by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership.
Therefore access by the general public is not permitted.
Access by authorized personnel of state and
federal agencies or their designees /contractors
involved in the development, monitoring and
stewardship of the restoration site is permitted
within the terms and timeframes of their defined,
pre- approved roles. Any intended site visitation
or activity by any person outside of these
previously sanctioned activities /roles requires
prior coordination with EEP
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
McKee Creek Stream Restoration
EEP # 92573
Cabarrus County, NC
December 3, 2012
Take US -64 West from the Raleigh area to 1 -85
( approximateey 85 miles). Take 1 -85 south toward Charlotte
(approximately 48 mlles). Take exit 48 onto 1 -485 toward
Rock Hill (approximately 8 miles) Take exit 39 onto
Harrisburg Road north stay on Robinson Church for
approximately 1 mile and then turn right onto
NCSR 1169 Peach Orchard Road.
Peach Orchard Road intersects the project site.
Miles
0 0.25 0.5
N
WITHERS RAVENEL �',, 4 ►wy, �t4) I
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS I SURVEYORS

_
a)
0
II
a
0
0
a
_
O
d �
O L
O
� II
D
N ED
�Q
II =
a
o ca
_
co Cl)
ca Fn
> Z O
� u 2
m Z U
E o
a� w
U) (D in
J
II U) II
cn > U
J a)
C _j in
(n
II a 'a)
LL N
- 3 3:
U) 11
U -0 U)
a)
= to
O to
C ca �
C7 .
a a c
o Li CD
m U) a)
u �
CU
m ii U
u n
u U) LL
LL U
IL
Q
C
N C_ O
d
ca
L
ca
O
C
lT
X_ -0 O C
p =
E
N
4- _O
.
ca
p
X —
0 UM
O
O
m
v
N
(Q a)C
O
5a)
U ,N C
N
A
cu rr
a)
N cn
(D N =
CD cu
0
H d L U
C
O N
O Cf N
N
N
(D
co
~ � Q
M
C
O
�
eo
CC
o
V
�
c
w �
Ln
6
Lb
(V
r
r
i I-
p
LO
�
C) p p p
p p
o (O
LO
o 7
0
CD
M
p 0)j (D
N
N
p N
LO
+
N
N
N
d
�
d a
4
d
tm O
0
CL m
c
M
°
co
co
Q
0
m
U`
L
m
V
d
d
IL
a
d
Q
O
~
p y
W
W
W
rn J
O:
N
C V
p
It
M
M
M
ao
W d
LL
C
.-
N
U
U
U
a)
V d
cu N
N N
C
L-
�'
U
a m
ai
N
IL
a)
_a)
O
U
U
U
U
_
a)
0
II
a
0
0
a
_
O
d �
O L
O
� II
D
N ED
�Q
II =
a
o ca
_
co Cl)
ca Fn
> Z O
� u 2
m Z U
E o
a� w
U) (D in
J
II U) II
cn > U
J a)
C _j in
(n
II a 'a)
LL N
- 3 3:
U) 11
U -0 U)
a)
= to
O to
C ca �
C7 .
a a c
o Li CD
m U) a)
u �
CU
m ii U
u n
u U) LL
LL U

(1)
m
U
Q
O_
Q
C
O
Z
a
m
U
7 Q
m
C
Co Q
C7
C
.2 M
!d LO
C1_
E �
<
I
C)
�
O
N
Z
_
c
c
0
a
ca�
�,
cu—
a,
E
d
V C)
M C
CL `—�u
Ca
a�
~
CO
0)
O
f`
a)
®
U)
CN
LO
C
N
�
—
_
_O
Q
C
a)
C
a)
C
a)
C
"-
N
�
O
E
E
E
aa)
aa)
_O
N
m
U
U
fa
U
C
y
L
L—
C
C
C
cLi cn
O N
0
C
C
C
of
0
O' J
a'
W
W
W
U(L
2
}
(1)
m
U
Q
O_
Q
C
O
Z

6-
O
�
O a'
G1 >
Eo
0
w
C:)
Q¢m�
m
O
0
>
0
N
?
�z
N
>
° °�
�'
>
M
r
'
N
E
:3
cn
M
—
M
>
c
O
y
N
N
co
co
O
0 E
v
Q
U
a
v
H
0
Q
O
Q
O
M
� ti
r 1l!
ON
r
1w
c •�
o
cn
a
c
' Y
N
m
E
aD
cm
�
4)
cu
,o Y
v
cu
CL
o
,Cj
U)
CD
cm
d
C
i
C
0
is
Co
C
IH
a
O
W
C1
^
LL
M
W
L
cu
�
O
O
V
O
tm
•
cm
�
OO
L
�
C aL
O
}
C
cn
CD
C
•
C
V
Q
O
O
O
cu
N
EC
•
D
I
N
>O
cu
0
C
D Y
O
N
E
L
N
. .�
L
p
m
a)
O
cu
}
.>
}
a)
O
C
0
C
'
CL
CZ3
L
(Q
OL
cu
Q
LC L
U
C)
UU
m
L

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Designer
Withers & Ravenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, NC 27511
Primary voiect design POC
Daniel Wiebke, E.I. 919 469 -3340
Construction Contractor
River Works Inc.
6105 Chapel Hill Road Raleigh, NC 27607
Construction contractor POC
Edward Haynes
Survey Contractor
Turner Land Surveying
Survey contractor POC
Elisabeth Turner
Planting Contractor
River Works Inc.
6105 Chapel Hill Road Raleigh, NC 27607
Planting contractor POC
Edward Haynes
Seeding Contractor
Green Resources
5204 Highgreen Ct Colfax, NC 27235
Contractor point of contact
Rodney Montgomery
Seed Mix Sources
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Not Known
Monitoring Performers
Withers & Ravenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, NC 27511
Stream Monitoring POC
Daniel Wiebke, E.I. 919 535 -5172
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Daniel Wiebke, E.I. (919) 535 -5173
Wetland Monitoring POC

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Project County
Cabarrus
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Southern Outer Piedmont
Project River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
NCDWQ Sub -basin For Project
Clear- 03 -07- 11/03 -08 -34
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
Name the plandocument
WRC Hab Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Cool
% of project easement fenced or demarcated
McKee - 100% Clear -100%
Beaver activity observed during design
phase?
Yes
Restoration
Component Attribute Table
McKee Reach 1
McKee Reach 2
Clear Creek
Drainage area (acres)
Stream order
4131
2
4214
2
635
1
Restored length (feet)
3640
696
1641
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Watershed type (Rural, Urban, Developing
etc.)
Developing
Developing
Rural
Watershed LULC Distribution (e.g.) acres
Single Family
Woods
Commercial
Govt -Inst
Warehouse
Pasture
2150
1154
114
73
76
565
2147
1166
113
73
76
640
106
469
60
Watershed impervious cover ( %)
16
16
4
NCDWQ AU /Index number
NCDWQ classification
C
C
C/C _
303d listed?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
Fecal Coliform,
Sediment
Fecal Coliform,
Sediment
Fecal Coliform
Total acreage of easement
10.63
2.03
4.75
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
2.57
0.11
1.76
Total planted acreage as part of the
restoration
2.57
0.11
1.76
Rosgen classification of pre - existing
E4
E4
E /C5
Rosgen classification of As -bullt
E4
E4
E /C5
Valley type
VIII
VIII
VIII
Valley slope
0.005
0.005
0.014
Valley side slope range (e. . 2 -1%)
1 -2%
1 -2%
1 -2%
Valley toe slope range (e.g. 2 -3. %)
1 -2%
1 -2%
1 -2%
Cowardin classification
PFO1A
PFO1A
PFO1A
Trout waters designation
No
No
No
Species of concern, endangered etc.? (Y /N)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
Chewacla
Chewacla
Chewacla
Depth
6 to 24 inches
6 to 24 inches
6 to 24 inches
Clay%
20.5
20.5
20.5
K
0.275
0.275
0.275
T
4.584
4.584
4.584
Use for items that may not apply. Use " -" for items that are unavailable and "U" for items that are unknown

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Table 5
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID
McKee Creek Reach 1
Assessed Length
3301
Number of Stable
in
Number of Unstable
Amount of Unstable
% Stable Performing as
Number with Stabilizing
Footage with Stabilizing Woody
Adjusted % for Stabilizing
Woody Vegetation
Major Channel
Channel Sub-
Metric
Performing as
As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Woody Vegetation
Vegetation
Category
Category
Intended
Aggradation- Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly
1
10
95%
Vertical Stability
deflect flow latereally (not to include point bars)
Degradation-Evidence of downcuttinq
0
0
ion
100%
Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
0
0
Bed
Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth=
0
0
100%
Meander Pool
1.6
Condition
Length Appropriate( >30% of centerline distance between tail
0
0
100%
of upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle
100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend Run
0
0
100%
Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at dowsntream of meander bend fide
0
0
J
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
Scoured /Eroding
growth and or scour and erasion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extednt that mass wasting
100 /0 °
0
0
100.00%
Bank
Undercut
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,
0
0
a2pear sustainable and are providing habitat
0
100%
0
0
100 00%
Mass Wasting;
Bank slumping. , cavin , or collapse
Totals
0
1{3f}%
0
0
100.06 ° /°
0
Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
0
1
0%
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
0
0
100%
Grade Control
across the sill
Piping
=Structures lacking any substation flow underneath sills or arms
0
0
100%
Engineered
Structures
Bank erosion within the stuctures extednt of influence does
100%
Bank Protection
not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for this table in EEP
0
0
monitoring guidance document
Pool forming structures maintaining -- Max Pool Depth: Mean
100%
Habitat
Bankfull Depth >= 1.6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
1
1
base -flow

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID McKee Creek Reach 2
Assessed Length 723
Major Channel
Category ry
Channel Sub-
Cate o ry
Metric
Number of Stable
Performing as
Intended
Total Number in
As -Built
Number of Unstable
Segments
Amount of Unstable
Footage
%Stable Performing as
Intended
Number with Stabilizing
Woody Vegetation
Footage with Stabilizing Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %for Stabilizing
Woody Vegetation
Vertical Stability
Aggradation- Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow latereally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
Degradation-Evidence of downcuttin
0
0
100%
Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
0
0
100%
Bed
Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth > =
1.6
4
4
100%
Condition
Length Appropriate( >30% of centerline distance between tail
of UPS ream riffle and head of downstream riffle
4
4
100%
Thalweg Position
ThalweS centering at upstream of meander bend Run
4
4
1
100%
Thalweq centering at dowsntream of meadner bend (glide)
4
4
100% El
Scoured/Eroding
g
ank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor
growth and or scour and erosion
1
10
98%
0
0
°
100.00 /°
Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extednt that mass wasting
appears likely Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
Bank
appear sustainable and are providing habitat
Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
1
25
96%
0
0
100.00%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
100%
Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs 5 5
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill
5
5
100%
Engineered
Piping
Structures lacking any substation flow underneath sills or
arms
5
5
100%
Structures
Bank erosion within the stuctures extednt of influence does
Bank Protection
not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for this table in EEP
5
5
100%
monitoring guidance document
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth: Mean
Habitat
Bankfull Depth >= 1.6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
5
5
100%
base -flow

Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Clear Creek
Assessed Length 1566
Major Channel
Channel Sub-
Number of Stable
Total Number in
Number of Unstable
Amount of Unstable
%Stable Performing as
Number with Stabilizing
Footage with Stabilizing Woody
Adjusted %for Stabilizing
Category
Category
Metric
Performing as
As -Built
Sections
Footage
Intended
Woody Vegetation
Vegetation
Woody Vegetation
Intended
Aggradation- Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly
0
0
100%
Vertical Stability
deflect flow latereally (not to include point bars)
De radation- Evidence of downcuttin
0
0
100%
Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
2
2
100%
Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth=
16
16
100%
Bed
Meander Pool
1.6
Length Appropriate( >30% of centerline distance between tail
16
16
100%
Condition
of upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle
Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend Run
16
16
100%
Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at downstream of meadner bend tide
16
16
100%
Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor
0
0
100%
0
0
100.00%
growth and or scour and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extednt that mass wasting
Bank
Undercut
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,
10
10
99%
0
0
99.00%
appear sustainable and are providing habitat
Mass Wastin2
Bank slumping, caving, or colla se 1
30
98%
0
0
100.00%
Totals
0
1 0
100%
0
0
100.00%
Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
13
13
100%
Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
5
7
71%
across the sill
Piping
Structures lacking any substation flow underneath sills or
18
20
90%
Engineered
arms
Bank erosion within the stuctures extednt of influence does
Structures
Bank Protection
not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for this table in EEP
19
20
95%
monitoring uidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth: Mean
Habitat
Bankfull Depth — 1.6 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
5
5
100%
base -flow

-TV T lMdlbl —ILI
!l WARt,
IM -0
X��i
wit t� C
m 13
rc
0
c 41
to
C
co u
�c
40.4 ii�
- art
yf
tN
40
0
2
1

11
• •Mw w•T•j1Y
W
F
w,
W
LL. W
:
9
■
U7
T -
•a

, k:a
0 14
®R
NL 4
F. 4t
do
41
f mL A&
I
■
L7

I
kil
illy
00 �
16
•
to
4LW
16,
16
• 0-jA I
•
•
p
h*A 14- #A jr"
rt
%W17
--Ik —mr —
I
1-4-

IF ilea
a84g
_ 7
•
.1
w�
1
oTr
�sfi �Z.0
J
LL C)
0 z 0
W>
W
0
C) W
LO
/ z
�•i/ 1 z
1 a
J
a
Lf)
N V/ -
lz 1
W W
W
O Z
pZ
i W
c
p
E
a>
cB p
W p N
cn
O N 4- a.+
C c a> p O
c� c o a
c� �.
C U c JI o E i a� o O p 0
o �' 0 s o 0 0 o Q O
= U U X d +r Z (D m C7
l CO >
Q)
L)
r
U
�
L.L.
U
U
U
IF ilea
a84g
_ 7
•
.1
w�
1
oTr
�sfi �Z.0
J
LL C)
0 z 0
W>
W
0
C) W
LO
/ z
�•i/ 1 z
1 a
J
a
Lf)
N V/ -
lz 1
W W
W
O Z
pZ
i W
c
p
E
a>
cB p
W p N
cn
O N 4- a.+
C c a> p O
c� c o a
c� �.
C U c JI o E i a� o O p 0
o �' 0 s o 0 0 o Q O
= U U X d +r Z (D m C7
l CO >

5 '
� F ktA
1�
lam•
E
ilk
IL
cu c
Lli
M . l
i
s �
d
E
ilk
IL
cu c
Lli
M . l
i
s �

ot
Jk
+V
.
•
llt4
440
j P
K
L.
llt4
440
j P
K
L.

■ --
Jl
,
m
�1 o
t r 1
s
lb
A ', -�
�. t
ow
Ar z
,,�"
` • '"�•_. '� ~ • � rte: 'S _
i, R
a
-t
d
r
1

Q) (Y)
ry
7
4 ;
F
44
4,
M4
-�7
oo
A
7�
v a.
............ ................ I .....................
A
4
'oft,
�47
"V
-.1
-
,'
iv lr�� Ailb
V)
10
c
iz
.0
C
W6
77 �IZNWMMM
Ae
4!k
IA
L
40 k.
Ar
40
46
fill.
u
a)
LL 0 C)
C)
LO
LO
04
■ C:)
.1
W L,
z -0 ui
W ui
V-)
w
z
Z
Q
Ul
w wz
LD
w
Z
1
f
le
/ q
E
a)
cn
m
W
0
cn
a)
C: C:
C: uj a- 0
a)
m = 0
c
0
a)
U)
0
vii
C:
0
_0
C) a) 1D .2 co
CD c U)l 0 E
0
U X ok H 2 w
-0
a)
(D
z
-0
0
0
(D
o o
--
0
m (D
Q

g
4
71
-. -v
HMV
7Z-
m It
4M
C�w
_P3
qx
— A-� I I
a)
E
Q)
w
0
M
U)
C: vi 0
ID 0
0
a)
L)
♦W
0
ID
a
C _0
1D o
0 E m
U)
x
zo
U)
-0
0
00
r
0
--
wm
m C7
rY
4w
cn
g
4
71
-. -v
HMV
7Z-
m It
4M
C�w
_P3
qx
— A-� I I
a)
E
Q)
w
0
M
U)
C: vi 0
ID 0
0
a)
L)
♦W
0
ID
a
C _0
1D o
0 E m
U)
x
zo
U)
-0
0
00
r
0
--
wm
m C7
4w
cn

•;' `., ..- � .� � , � v '.tip - � � �- ,�� � ..• �
M h }
1 � � _ ,� r.°M� 7• r�A _ - rw ti�TT•���iii�� I /-'+t` ,+.I'
# '�f IL All
1 Al ' �R"
��11 , L• L
1 � �. �'9f` `'t* .r �1.'SS tip r' � °� , J � r• i.. +' ,1�}` ��
1 3_ * �
,�. �' S 4 . ♦ � J• � .e.`� � T .- � _mil
_ _ ,, f `•
yl
ib
MoLk
Arw
fp 46 l
�w
AOV
2
Y '•
it
AOV
2
4
1
it
r:
J
V
Y
1,yT i
4
1

rr k �
� _ to I�• #.-. S - � 2 ti� '��r: . i Way+ ►.r "' �• �,�-'.
4A
M r .'� LM •
Q v,!
CU N
CD
A
I+
. x 4P AIP +Iii
y�i �I„ ••1��+ 7`
t, +
.............
1
(�
•—
a O
_ "
a
U
I
1
i
N
Vl
W
w
p
C
c
J d N
N
CL
C
m
H U
j
LL
_
--
J
N
W
w
pn,
to
N
Er
Z
M
a
fn
LO
Ll.
rc
LO
�
W
w
W
I�
Z
2
y�i �I„ ••1��+ 7`
t, +
.............
1

Photo 1
Veg Plot 1- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 2
Veg Plot 1- Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
1

Photo 3
Veg Plot 2- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 4
Veg Plot 2- Year 2 (2013)
.r
1/31/2014
2

Photo 5
Veg Plot 3- Year 1 (2012)
M.
Photo 6
Veg Plot 3- Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
3

Photo 7
Veg Plot 4- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 8
Veg Plot 4- Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014

Photo 9 '
Riffle XS 1 - Year 1 (2012)
Photo 10
Riffle XS 1 - Year 2 (2013)
r
1/31/2014
5

Photo 11
Pool XS 1 - Year 1 (2012)
Photo 12
Pool XS 1 - Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
1.1

Photo 13
Riffle XS 2- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 14
Riffle XS 2- Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014

Photo 15
Pool XS 2 - Year 1 (2012)
Photo 16
Pool XS 2 - Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014

Photo 17
Riffle XS 3 - Year 1 (2012)
Photo 18
Riffle XS 3 - Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014

Photo 19
Pool XS 3 - Year 1 (2012) i
7 '
M I� f I f A I . M�•
Photo 20
Pool XS 3 - Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
10

Photo 21
Photo Point 1 -Year 1 (2012)
Photo 22
Photo Point 1 -Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
11

Photo 23
Photo Point 2- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 24
Photo Point 2- Year 2 (2013)
1A
Y.'
1/31/2014
12

Photo 25
Photo Point 3- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 26
Photo Point 3- Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
13

Photo 27
Photo Point 4- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 28
Photo Point 4- Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
14

Photo 29
Photo Point 5- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 30
Photo Point 5- Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
15

Photo 31
Photo Point 6- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 32
Photo Point 6- Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
16

Photo 33
Photo Point 7- Year 1 (2012)
Photo 34
Photo Point 7- Year 2 (2013)
1/31/2014
17

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

C
d
N
d
0
Q
C
M
C
O
V
C
w
r
d
CD
to
d
H
M
ti
M
N
0)
d
.O
a
Y
d
V
d
Y
2
m
O)
Q
V
C
H
IL
V
d
d
o E
G
0
Cc m
d `
0
0
0
oa
0
v
00
o
c C
o
E d
Oa
o
O
0
u
O C
O
` O
9
O
O
O
0 O
m
0 "
O
O
za
O
YU
O
C
C
C
C
dO
a7
C O
a7
C O
a3
O
VCL
O
L) U
� U
B u
l3-
d
Z
c O
m
aL
U)
m
O
Q
L
H
U
LO
N
�
M
V)
0
E
O
C
O
�
ca
0
E
C
U)
N
O
o
d
U
a)
a7
�
N
a)
N
0
o
U
CO
N
C)
T
m
O
m
o
V)
N
O
U
y C
C
>
C
T C
w0
E
0
c
cc
y
E
>
3
D
Q
n
;e
m
a�i
00
0�
a)
E''
o
LM
U
c
a)
0
0',
U
`O
CD
w
o
N
Uw
y
W
c
0
Q
�
Q
L
O
O)
(D
?
T
q
�
c
U
C
O
0
C13
a)
CL
�O
10
2
i

Table 7. Veg Plot Criteria Attainment
McKee Creek Project # 92573
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
1
No
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
Table B. C S Vegetafton Plot Mletadata
£2573
Report Prepared By
Daniel Wiebke
Date Prepared
12/16/2013 11:15
database name
WithersBRavenel- 2013 - A.mdb.mdb
database location
C: \Users \Daniel \Desktop
computer name
DANIEL -PC
file size
72744964
DE=SCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT----- - - - --
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
Metadata
project(s) and project data.
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year.
Proj, planted
This excludes live stakes.
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This
Proj, total stems
includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems.
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead
Plots
stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
Damage
percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY ------- _— _ ---
—_------------------
Project Code
92573
project Name
McKee Creek
McKee Creek Upstream and Downstream of Peach Orchard and Clear
Description
Creek
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
ilength(ft)
- stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
8

ir-
O
M
'LO
F-
(n
N
U')
N
LO
r`
Ln
r-
Lq
(n
r
(n
N
(n
N
Lq
�
(n
N
(n
N
U
N
N
�O
O
•N
p
O
O
O
N
N
N_
N
co
tZ
O
O
0
0
h
p
O
p
O
O
N
0
:';
•O
to
c
(0
d
C
r`
N
L
NU�
O
O
M
LO
O
O
U
OU�
O
O
Cl)
0
0
I-
p
C
l0
0
N
d
«
C
d
L
i
V
(n
M
(n
Ln
LO
U'7
(n
(n
N
p
d
0^
O
p
O
O
N
N
0
0
O��
�
O
O
O
O
N
N
O
O
r`
M
co
y
C
rn
M
rn
t`
R
H
(O
O
O
0
0
It
N
N
O
�
0
0
0
O
�
0
0
!
d
�
R
a
a
Nrn
O
C
tL
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
N
O
0
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
0j
o
0
00
ri
n
o
.'
+
d
O
O
O
O
co
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
fD
3 M
(+f
++
O N
d
i�
a
(n
o
��
0
d Q�
d
O
N
0
0
0
O
0
0
M
co
0
Cl
0
0
0
0
,_
fA
ro
n
N
d d
C
H
O
O
N
N
N
M
O
O
O
in
O
O
N
0
0
0
0
1pll
N
Qd
L
N
N
V
d
r�
°7Oo
aoONOOMOOOO(n0OOOOoO+N
�
t
`
o�v
LO
0 d
�Y
U
C)
C.)
OOM
oONOOOOOOO
o
a
ti
"0
C',
'O
d
O
O
O
O
O'.
co
O
O
O
N
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
N
d
�+
'C
O
R
�
c
of
F-
F�
H�
2
U)
Lo
O
U o
m
m
L
y
E�
3
O
E
C
m
y U a
CO
Z
D
O
°«
L
W
Q
U y
c
C
W
=
E
n
'UU
m
0
�
0
�
E
k
E
O
y
Y
U
c
Y
C
d
0
.20
m
3
ro��
ro
ro
roR
�g
e
m`
ro
'
ro
•�
•�
�,
.0
`
QapV
(�amaO�mi'�co
O
C
Wes'
ad
JJ

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

2
e
2
e
5
a
a
�i
4
} N 5
e�
r � �
e � �
� v ihy
3
B s C
A
9 9 [
e
mg
c
o
_
0
°m
g
g
m
c
n
e.i
n
r
e
�
:ray .o
v°�
n
'H
a
g
:�
d
v
•N
Zvi
C
1f1 Y�
c
N
O N
0
m
q N
N
'a b
N
`G '
•N
'H
S
W W
EgW4r
9 u
o
o �
o
p
m
b N
O
e
o •�
K
M
m Y0
O
r V
W O
o
Z
w
V
L?
$ 6_
S2
Ls
C
W 'S
C
°
o f
_3
o m
AAA9
°
tC
�m 9_
$
m
'n 3
W
a
m c
`o
m
>
t
F
'
u
C
�it
aE
E
2
e
2
e
5
a
a
�i
4
} N 5
e�
r � �
e � �
� v ihy
3
B s C
A
9 9 [

!
!
\
!
�
!
§
fi)
f]\
|)]
;!\
!!!
i!!
|!,
| |]
} \ \/
�| ]
| {!!
�}
!
�
!
!
..
..
.
. .
..
-
—
---
-----
---
-
Ek
■-
�!)
. »,
-
�! !
��—
|
\
,..
.
.
.
.
k£#a
{f£k|
)
�
�
�
\ \/k
{
��.
■�
!
!
\
!
�
!
§
fi)
f]\
|)]
;!\
!!!
i!!
|!,
| |]
} \ \/
�| ]
| {!!

5
a
s
za
s
9
a ®,
ya
8 �
9
y
9
a
� b
L
�!I
O
0
C
c
�
m
c
a m
w
an
V
o
c
@
x
N
G
n
M
.O
N
V7
•M
_
r
'o
O
17.
N
N
r
XX
N
O
Yf
O
C
001
N
m
N
T
�
c
p
N
g
p
N
N
.O
M
III
�
M
M
Ol
f4
IfY
O
C
Ifl
iN
uN'J
c
❑
0
W �
C
N
E
@
x
n
10
p
N
N
.m
N
m
{V
M
O
tai
7 m
H ri
C
{V
N
O n
N
Of
t7
m
N
0
N
0
W
M
E N
''l�lff
T
ik
o.
N m
_C
N
rr
N
O
W Y
m
� U
°
m
w
m �
�
F
U
J
C
�
1Z
J
N
p
m
U
x
�
L
�
�
�
L
�
L
�
3
'E
o n
�+
x
x
r
�
- m
�
x
x •�
-
c
y
3
3
o
a
o
a�
r
:s
a`
`m
myy
m%
c'
y c
m
o
°p
®
7
m
C
,_-
d
°
❑
L
�
_$
N N
J
U)
U
a
10 Ol
U
Lj
_`m
T
Ot
3
O
N
N
N
m
5
C1
n
2
Y„
9
a
a
c
3
E
N
=❑
`°
�?
m
a
LL
N
N,
w
U
O C
N
E
0! m
C
C
N
d
C
m
U
in
E
d
i.
'.t
m
S
N
U
c
N
)
m
m
L
m
m
a
m
3
o
E
m
8
1
..--,-I
r
5
a
s
za
s
9
a ®,
ya
8 �
9
y
9
a
� b

�k
,!
{�
| |k
||
| ||
) �|
|`
I f)
� |!f
|,!!
!.
�� • |!!
`'F
!| ||!
3
.a.f
� |` • �;
«�| ! ;•
§I! f;!§
j\ \
§ ) E
| \
�) \\
.
4
.
{
�§
�§
a
%
■
.I
k
a
:
.
\
a
.£ M
f
k.
\)J
))B
�
a
/
>
E
4
�
/
E
§
■
!'
2
�
k
&�
-f
f
�k
wk
.
�k
,!
{�
| |k
||
| ||
) �|
|`
I f)
� |!f
|,!!
!.
�� • |!!
`'F
!| ||!
3
.a.f
� |` • �;
«�| ! ;•
§I! f;!§
j\ \
§ ) E
| \
�) \\

7}
a
s � s
� � g
g If
16
IL
3 Is
3
$ o�
9
s
C
q
C
.N
E
m
d
c
E
c
9
c
V
u
o
r
�
w
e
Y
A'
m Q
�
Lp
m
m
[L'
v
E
c
0
R
�
N
D
E
c
m
N
d
o
qC
0
o
sa
4
7}
a
s � s
� � g
g If
16
IL
3 Is
3
$ o�
9
s

v C Fn
�8
N C
a
m �
$ W
yO L y
y J U
m m
a m
� rn
mC
'C
= C m
O
L m c =
m O O
_ 3 �U
W O S
m V
m m lC VI
V fi y
a
! L
m a C m
m v E a A
£ a € m m
m
Q y m J N
v
m c E i
E o m o
O C m y
O O J
p N m m
O
3'E mgr_
m y N O
g
0 w $
IL o a
d m C d
E ra
m T
0
� E 10 y
rn
rn m 5 o v
m c c W o
a E y
G .o
C R m
O
� J O
� U d L
y m S
c c�
� j m o
O � L
o g
a
W
0 E
R y g a° T
O y O T d
C
O N O m C
� o
=m
a
°
E
E $ a
L
a y w
c a c o
�mN °i
9 p € W m
3'aocn
Q y 11 L
PL N
Y
>
N
N
m
O
Y
Y
M
�
•
N
0
p
O
O
°
m
n
O
t7
N
m
t0
M
O
M
2
To
to
v
1°O
Q!
r
Z.
10
p
N
�l
N
m
r
(A
C
r
`O
co
p
C
t0
M
N
N
�
O
2
N
0
I°n
0
r
f0
N
r
O
t0'
O
C?
V
N
M
N
m
N
m
y
y
In
to
to
m
+
V
}
E
Y
Y
La
a
N
�o
m
o
C
Y
o.°
°
M
m
''oR
°r
I
m
}
m
m
o
m
r`o,
v
c
C
N
m
M
2
co
N
m
N
vi
�
O)
r
V
N
p
r
0 A
O`
U
r
m
O
m
O
m
m
0
0
O?
CIO
O
O'N
O
O
f�
�
r
p
O
N
LN
N
N
"i
r-
N
N
q
m
m
W it
E
m�
o
m
O
CL
2
OTi Y
O
CL v
m
v
}
o
v
>
15�
Y
C
o
>-
O
O
W
ON
N
N
Y
V
00
0°
N
m
N
m
fD
<
V
o
O
C
N
fA
m
'.l0
N
C
M
N
N
r
�.
O
N
[h
M
m
Q
U
C
Y
R
co
N
°
G
O1
m
f0
I'.
m
01
V7
M
Lo
N
C
O
O
m
1n
r
O
w
f0
N
a0
OD
l0
N
N
r
fG
N
2
lm0
r
r
fV
C7
t0
m
0
m
m
D)
C
m
m
m
m
r
m
y
a
a
xN
E
m���
m
W
m
cry
m
._
is
m
E
:w
m
m
C
au
Y
L
L
L
m
m
m
2
W
Q'
r
m
C
m
L
E
r
J
L.
$
rte-
CL
w
c
m
L
C
Q'
L
m
O
O.
G
m
L
L
C
L
C
E
p
E
m
❑'❑
m
¢
w
a
C
m
L
a
E
3❑❑¢
m
W
a
m
g
c
E
>,
❑
❑.
Q
n
m
a
E
3❑❑
m
m
Q
a
m
m
n
v
t0
r
m
YQm2O�CY
m
c
e
m
❑
2
9
J
YQm2'OCYm
c
m
m
c
m
❑_
E
LLE
2
9
c
'
m
�YEm�.
m
c
c
m
'e�
m❑
DL
t
CY
2
OYemrL
m❑
OL.
L=
CYm
c
P
r
C
j.
m
C
W
6
N
A
m
C
m
'2
mm
fC0
'�-)
C
m
m
.W
m
m
g
J
�C
m
VJ
>�
?_
=
m
p
m
J
y
C
m
m
O
m
p
J
J
2
N
>
9
C
m
m
m
p
J
0
C
lCO
m
m
Y'.
c
m
111
WC
LL
C
m
W
m
W
LL
Y
c
y
W
F
Y
c
y
j
W
{d
!
m
LL
C
m
m
m
y
J
Y
J
!
m
C
m
m
m
y
Q
Y
J
[
C
.O
'.
!
m
c
m
m
m
y
O
Y
J
Y
C
'�"
C
m
m
m
y
O`
Y
,.
C
a
M
m
U
C
m
m
y
C
C
m
m
m
'E
m
U
C
m
m
Y
C
m
m
m
W
O
P
m
U
C
m
m
Y
C
m
m
m
m
U
C
m
m
y
c
m
m
m¢
m
v
—
J
m
m
_
J
m
Q
-
J
m
—
J
m
m
m
t,
m'
m
Ti
U)
N
o
Q
U
�
U
L I
WA
I
I
I
I
I
III
I
I
I
I
I
ILE
v C Fn
�8
N C
a
m �
$ W
yO L y
y J U
m m
a m
� rn
mC
'C
= C m
O
L m c =
m O O
_ 3 �U
W O S
m V
m m lC VI
V fi y
a
! L
m a C m
m v E a A
£ a € m m
m
Q y m J N
v
m c E i
E o m o
O C m y
O O J
p N m m
O
3'E mgr_
m y N O
g
0 w $
IL o a
d m C d
E ra
m T
0
� E 10 y
rn
rn m 5 o v
m c c W o
a E y
G .o
C R m
O
� J O
� U d L
y m S
c c�
� j m o
O � L
o g
a
W
0 E
R y g a° T
O y O T d
C
O N O m C
� o
=m
a
°
E
E $ a
L
a y w
c a c o
�mN °i
9 p € W m
3'aocn
Q y 11 L
PL N

|
!
{ §|
■;#
E[!
!Z$
k�)
!� ■!
!!!¥
`k$\
)f)7
�\)\
;)kf
|(f}
, -�:
Mill
�
...
8111111111
..
1
�11����
�
:
illill
11
IN
\
MEN
ON
$�III
I
����
Below
I.
��.�°
Bill.
@�
11
@
Igloo
�
:
1@@1111
1111
����§
...
@11
.
��NINE
0�
ON
�$
Bill
11
111
.
11111
|
!
{ §|
■;#
E[!
!Z$
k�)
!� ■!
!!!¥
`k$\
)f)7
�\)\
;)kf
|(f}
, -�:

§
!|§
{�{
!]!
I #f
$()
Jq
E
,\k\
i7l2
, ■!e.
;Q!!
!!!f{
�k2
� \kj)
�E2
| \{ \\
11�
11
����i�������
$
11
@
2�
l
�1
111111111111111
�uIll
111/111/
111111111
gill
11111111111���
EN
��
,
mill
111111111111�����
..
..
�
.
.@
�
�
�
a$
�11.
.
.
11
..�������
11111111
.
...
.1��...
�
,Bill
1@1111111111
11111
11
IN
...
��
11
\
Mill
�
III
Bello
'
a:.III
11
1
11,00
Boom
OR
@
I
.
Igloo
11111 11111
Igloo
is
NONNI
Igloo
I�.
11111111
.
.
..
111111111
111$
ME
@�
.
1111111111
1111$
I�
NINE
:
,.
§
!|§
{�{
!]!
I #f
$()
Jq
E
,\k\
i7l2
, ■!e.
;Q!!
!!!f{
�k2
� \kj)
�E2
| \{ \\

Longitudinal Profile Plot
Clear Creek
584
582 - - - - -
I
580
578-
c
-f- Thalweg MY -1
w
576
Thalweg MY -2
574
- - - - - -- -- -
572
- -- - - - - -
570
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000
Station (ft)

Longitudinal Profile Plot
McKee Reach 1
592
590
588
586
584
0
Thalweg MY -1
582
580
578
576
574
2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
Elevation (ft)
-- - - - --
f �
� Thalweg MY -2
�- --
�- ---- -

Longitudinal Profile Plot
McKee Reach 2
578 - -- - - - - - - - - - -
577.5 - - - - - - -
577 - -- - -
576.5 - - - - -
c 576 - - - -- - - -
> 575.5 - - - --
NIX
d -
W
575 - --
574.5 +Thalweg MY -1
574 ! Thalweg MY -2
573.5 -
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Station (ft)

ca
C
o
o
im S m 2
Ln
d3
a,
1 CL R Ir- Jr.-I
a)
(D IN
C)
'�2
:X) C14 :0) :n CO 00
G :�D .00 LO m
a) :No D 0) .�2 r- 1:� 3) o LO to N LI) M N
4U)
'Z 3,0) loqD �rml ;�o r- 00
Lr) LO LO LO n Lf) Lc) LI) LO n
in Lo 'if) 'n 'n ..0
.0
W
3
w
P- D LO -N m M M N N
N :.1 11 Cl rq N N M N
C6
30 0 ,N
-N IN N N C.4 M .1)
.0
O
O
L..j !a
A . . . . . . . . . . . . O IT
In
N
IW
IW

W
,
i
'N
M
01
co
t'D
CO
N
M
IN
�
W'
m
�
M
m
'�
O
M
r
+�
N
JA
+A
I�
I_
N
+T
L'1)
N
W
N
N
'N
,m
•N
.�
IO`^
f`
�
{
+a
f`
r•
O
x'D
^a r
F d
I%7
I.
'tT
I.
ro
m
In
an
�
O
�
In
In
v
d
�
In
E
CO)
a
In
y
O
O
V
o ,n Ir. •a> Ir^ C-, r.
.A 'M �M !A rtp �M n �A O
_
¢[7 106 0
CL
O
Ii
sM
+M
::,Nn
+M
sM
M
sM
1
.p
In
O
n I
an
to
°
+7)
a0
'n -N
�vLOnisDm+N`a
�rN+N+N
EL
OO
N+n
0
m m m °to P, � n n
c
w N 4 +I) N LL N N +[I
(U)14BIGH
N
T,
m
N 'N =
7
o ' E �M Im
uj
C
0
a
C_
O
d
N
IV
o
9
'N
'N
M
01
M
t'D
CO
N
M
IN
�
W'
•O
O
�
M
m
'�
O
M
r
+�
N
JA
+A
I�
I_
N
+T
L'1)
N
W
N
A
m
'N
,m
•N
.�
IO`^
f`
�
W
r.
f`
r•
O
x'D
ID
+D
I.
I%7
I.
'tT
I.
ro
m
In
an
�
rrg
V
�
In
In
'n
In
In
E
In
In
In
_
O
Ii
sM
+M
::,Nn
+M
sM
M
sM
.p
In
O
n I
an
to
a
+7)
a0
'n -N
�vLOnisDm+N`a
�rN+N+N
+D
OO
N+n
c
9
'N
W
M
01
M
t'D
CO
N
M
IN
i
W'
•O
O
�
M
m
O
O
O
M
+�
N
JA
+A
I�
I_
N
+T
L'1)
N
W
N
A
m
'N
,m
•N
.�
�
f`
�
W
r.
f`
r•
O
x'D
ID
+D
I.
I%7
I.
'tT
I.
ro
m
In
an
�
In
�
In
In
'n
In
In
,n
In
In
In
O
Ii
sM
+M
::,Nn
+M
sM
M
sM
.p
In
O
n I
an
to
a
+7)
a0
'n -N
�vLOnisDm+N`a
�rN+N+N
+D
OO
N+n

�
/� v� �
� �
Ac
r
m
�
'�2/
$�
ej
—J!
u
c li
A
3D
0
E
\
� �
2J�}/)�2§2
G
, , , ,©
w w I
m
1? 0 m
8 >�
\9 ƒ}
M M :M Lr) LO -e S.- N
(L .
0 Ae
�\
/k\k\kkk
m L)
IN "r '3'
In
C)
4 ui f- 6
g1l
�
'�2/
$�

O
04
n N. N N o
O
O
CL
:0
c; Iq 'U� -.
m N X)
11 T
E
E
13
m La
ci
(4) 14510H
aTi
OIN m:l
Lf) :
00 S I-- r o :D I ID 3)
19 li P lz� -n
CL
:E
ID 10 1- 11 �M
1-0 1-n I-D Nn Nn
x
X) Wf) L- C) Llr) 1-0
LU
.2
r_
.2
u
0 J,!,
0 13
FA
:In :n :.n 2
41) M M M cn m w 4 m
I D C
It V �; r.0- r"O :4 :Lon No A
-' "i
all
Lis

C-4
U)
p
o v o
■
co
0 cO
0
k \ \�
�,
U$
�.
�ƒ ƒ\�$§
.
\��. . .o
D
Cq
Lrr-
M
C00 D
Q
) D � crO
0o o
rO -
0
UUCI-
� -
O
a)
3a
t�
9
n
$f�=f
}
x
s (�
m
m ;
A a
n D O n
0
D
N
3 o N
0
'N It :0 :0 ci r4 4 c6
t�
f
$f�=f

IL
.§
Ln
9 .
\k
�
§ a
$
> f -
C4
�
2
)
v=
LoR�
f]�
oo �
knj]
:0
~ w ®2'
IL
§■�
�04�\
§
@
2
«(
@ @ a
)�#
�
���
)�
�
�
�c
k
'r
o
N
k / k § § § \ § § \ k §
e o$ § »nU.)qa G~6 %&2U)) /§\k\ w °
5 § I§[ ƒ
\k
7
$
N
k / k § § § \ § § \ k §
e o$ § »nU.)qa G~6 %&2U)) /§\k\ w °
5 § I§[ ƒ
7

Appendix E
Hydrology Data

7
M
T
U
=
m
O
M
T
Q
O
U)
M
T
W
O)
H
d
7
L
Q
N
M
T
�M
M
�N
7
L
N
N
'N
N
!N
d
C
3
T
�N
M
7
i
C9UUU
M
yr
Q
M
T
M t
LO LO LO
T 4.0
Q
L
M
T
03
N
�L
M
L
T
LL
M
M
T
cu
C
cn m
N
T
m
'
N
c
cu
0
N
T
O
N_
Z
`
L
N
N
T
2
—
O
N
T
O 00
T
(D
N
T
O
(ui) uoi
;e ;idioaJd
7
=
m
C7
W
H
d
L
N
�M
�M
M
�N
�
L
N
N
'N
N
!N
d
3
T
�N
M
i
C9UUU